Abstract
As an emerging concept, liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) in biological systems has shed light on the formation mechanisms of membrane-less compartments in cells. The process is driven by multivalent interactions of biomolecules such as proteins and/or nucleic acids, allowing them to form condensed structures. In the inner ear hair cells, LLPS-based biomolecular condensate assembly plays a vital role in the development and maintenance of stereocilia, the mechanosensing organelles located at the apical surface of hair cells. This review aims to summarize recent findings on the molecular basis governing the LLPS of Usher syndrome-related gene-encoding proteins and their binding partners, which may ultimately result in the formation of upper tip-link density and tip complex density in hair cell stereocilia, offering a better understanding of this severe inherited disease that causes deaf-blindness.
Keywords: Liquid-liquid phase separation/Usher Syndrome/Stereocilia
Graphical Abstract
1. Introduction
Cell compartmentalization allows the segregation of distinct components in a confined space; therefore, various biochemical reactions can be spatiotemporally well-controlled. Compartmentalization is usually facilitated by physical separation using lipid membranes. For example, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria are surrounded by lipid membranes. However, many compartments lack membranes, such as centrosomes [1], [2] and stress granules [3] in the cytoplasm and nucleoli [4] and Cajal bodies [5], [6] in the nucleus. In the last decade or two, it has been recognized that many of these membrane-less compartments are formed by a physicochemical process called liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS). Although well-studied in polymer/material science, LLPS has not captured biologists’ attention until recently [7], [8], [9]. LLPS in biological systems refers to the process in which macromolecules, when above threshold concentrations, form a condensed phase autonomously and are separated from the aqueous cellular environment. It is suggested that multivalent interactions, mediated by folded domains or intrinsically disordered regions of proteins, as well as nucleic acids and chromatin, thermodynamically drive LLPS [10], [11], [12], [13]. LLPS-mediated condensate formation has been implicated in a variety of biological processes, including cellular homeostasis [3], [14], [15], transcriptional and translational regulation [16], [17], [18], [19], synaptic transmission in neurons [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], immune signaling [26], [27], [28], [29], and mechanoelectrical transduction (MET) in hair cells [30], [31], [32], which is the focus of this review.
Hearing, or auditory perception, enables us to explore the outer world and communicate with one another. This perception of sound is facilitated by our ears. Our ears can convert mechanical vibrations (i.e., sound waves) into electrical signals (neural signals), which can be interpreted by our brains [33], [34]. Anatomically, the human ear consists of three parts: the outer, middle, and inner ear. While the vestibular system is essential for balance, the cochlea in the inner ear is dedicated to hearing. Within the cochlea, the organ of Corti is where sound is detected and converted [35]. In mammals, the organ of Corti is comprised of ∼15,000–30,000 mechanosensory hair cells, which are positioned on a thin basilar membrane and grouped into two subtypes: three rows of outer hair cells and one row of inner hair cells (Fig. 1A) [36]. On top of each hair cell lies a bundle of hair-like actin-rich structures called stereocilia, arranged in a staircase pattern [37], [38] (Fig. 1B). These stereocilia serve as mechanical sensors, which can undergo sound-induced deflection. Deflection can trigger the opening of the MET channels located at the tip of the stereocilia, leading to the depolarization of the hair cell [39].
Fig. 1.
Schematic of the organ of Corti and hair cell for sound perception. (A) A diagram of the transverse section of the organ of Corti in the mammalian cochlea. (B) A schematic showing a hair cell with stereocilia lying at its apical surface in a staircase pattern. Important compartments including the tip-link, upper tip-link density (UTLD), lower tip-link density, mechanoelectrical transduction (MET) machinery, tip complex, ankle link complex, and ribbon synapse are highlighted. The transient kinocilium is also shown with a dashed contour.
Not surprisingly, developmental defects or damage to this sophisticated structure can lead to hearing loss [40], [41], [42], [43]. According to a World Health Organization (WHO) report in 2021, it is estimated that more than 1.5 billion people experience some degree of hearing loss. Genetic background, health conditions, lifestyles, and environmental factors can contribute to the onset of hearing loss. For newborns with deafness, genetic factors account for over 50%. Hereditary hearing loss can be classified into two main groups, non-syndromic and syndromic hearing loss [44]. Non-syndromic hearing loss can be categorized into three types according to their chromosomal locations and the patterns of inheritance. DFNA represents autosomal dominant deafness; DFNB stands for autosomal recessive deafness; and DFNX denotes X-linked deafness. There are currently 11 known syndromes associated with hearing loss, including Usher syndrome and Alport syndrome. Usher syndrome is one of the best-known forms. Genetic studies have identified several genes (USH genes) linked with this disease [45]. The proteins encoded by these genes and their interacting partners play essential roles in this elaborate sound perception process, especially in terms of stereocilia development, maintenance, and mechanoelectrical transduction of hair cells [46], [47], [48], [49]. This review will summarize some of our recent findings and those of others on complex assembly mediated by USH gene-encoding proteins.
2. Usher syndrome and USH proteins
Usher syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by both deafness and blindness. The frequency has been estimated as roughly 4–17 per 100,000 people. According to the severity of the symptoms, Usher syndrome can be subdivided into type I (USH1), type II (USH2), and type III (USH3). Children with USH1 are severely deaf at birth and have vision problems at a young age. USH2 patients have congenital moderate-to-severe deafness and retinitis pigmentosa in adolescence. USH1 and USH2 account for about 95% of all cases. People with USH3 are not born deaf but often develop hearing loss and/or night blindness in adolescence. The currently known USH genes that might cause this disease include six (USH1B [50], [51], USH1C [52], [53], USH1D [54], [55], [56], USH1F [57], [58], USH1G [59] and USH1J [60]) for USH1, three (USH2A [61], USH2C [62] and USH2D [63]) for USH2, and one (USH3A [64]) for USH3.
Among these proteins, the cadherin proteins CDH23 (Cadherin-23, encoded by USH1D) and PCDH15 (Protocadherin-15, encoded by USH1F) form the tip-link through head-to-head interaction via their extracellular cadherin (EC) repeats and connect the tip of one stereocilium to the adjacent taller one [65], [66] (Fig. 1B). The tip-link has been proposed to convey sound-induced force to the MET channel located at the tip of the shorter stereocilium. At either end of the cytoplasmic side of the tip-link, an electron-dense plaque was observed under the electron microscope, named the upper tip-link density (UTLD) and lower tip-link density (LTLD), respectively [67]. The UTLD contains three USH1 proteins, a molecular motor Myo7a (unconventional myosin VIIa, encoded by USH1B), a PDZ (PSD95/Dlg/ZO1) domain-containing protein Harmonin (encoded by USH1C), and an ankyrin repeats (ANK) and SAM (sterile α motif) domain-containing protein Sans (encoded by USH1G) (Fig. 1B). These interact with one another to form a tripartite complex and finally anchor to the cytoplasmic tail (CT) of CDH23 [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73]. The LTLD is thought to associate with the MET channel and its auxiliary subunits. PCDH15 at the LTLD side binds to the MET machinery components LHFPL5 (lipoma HMGIC fusion partner-like 5, also known as TMHS), TMIE (transmembrane inner ear), and the putative channel TMC1 (Transmembrane channel-like protein 1) [74], [75], [76], [77]. In addition, another USH1 protein CIB2 (calcium and integrin binding family member 2, encoded by USH1J) was reported as an auxiliary subunit that interacted with the cytoplasmic loop of TMC1 (Fig. 1B) [78], [79]. The three USH2 gene-encoding proteins Whirlin (encoded by USH2D), Usherin (encoded by USH2A), and Adgrv1 (adhesion G protein-coupled receptor v1; also called very large G-protein coupled receptor, vlgr1; encoded by USH2C) are better known as components of the ankle link complex (Fig. 1B) [80], [81], [82]. The ankle link is located at the basal region of stereocilia [83]. In mammals, the ankle link transiently appears during developmental stages and disappears prior to the onset of hearing [84]. The adhesion molecule Usherin interacts with Adgrv1 to form the ankle link. Their CTs contain a PBM (PDZ binding motif), which can bind to the PDZ domain-containing protein Whirlin and PDZD7 (PDZ domain-containing protein 7, encoded by PDZD7, a modifier of Usher syndrome) [85], [86]. Clarin-1 (encoded by USH3A) is the only known USH3 protein. It is a tetraspanin-like membrane protein. It has been proposed to function as a key component of hair cell stereocilia and ribbon synapse [87], [88]. In ribbon synapse, it can interact with the presynaptic calcium channel CaV1.3 and the scaffold protein Harmonin (Fig. 1B) [89].
3. Molecular mechanisms governing UTLD formation
Tip-link densities have been noticed for over 30 years [90]. Head movements or sound-induced vibration incessantly generate stretching forces to the stereocilia. The strength of the forces was estimated to be > 100 pN [91], which is strong enough to pull the single-pass transmembrane proteins CDH23 or PCDH15 out of the membrane. Intuitively, the protein-containing dense plagues can serve as the soil to bury the roots (CTs) of the tip-link to sustain such large stretching forces. Recent studies have proposed a possible mechanism for how the densities are formed and how the tip-links are rooted in the densities [30].
As mentioned above, three USH1 proteins, Harmonin, Sans, and Myo7a, build up the central part of the UTLD (Fig. 2A) [72], [73]. Both Harmonin and Sans are scaffold proteins. Harmonin has multiple isoforms and can be grouped into three classes, a, b, and c [53]. Harmonin-b is restrictedly expressed in the cochlea during embryonic and early postnatal stages, whereas the a and c isoforms are widely expressed in several tissues and throughout life. Harmonin-a contains an N-terminal HHD (Harmonin homology domain) domain, three PDZ domains, a putative coiled-coil region (CC1) between the second and third PDZ domains, and a C-terminal PBM; Harmonin-b contains an additional predicted coiled-coil region (CC2) and a proline-serine-threonine-rich (PST) region between the CC1 and the third PDZ domain; and Harmonin-c lacks the third PDZ domain. Sans consists of four N-terminal ankyrin repeats, an unstructured central region (CEN), and a C-terminal SAM domain followed by a PBM. Myo7a contains a motor domain at the head, five IQ motifs and a single α helix (SAH) at the neck, and a pair of MyTH4 (myosin tail homology 4)-FERM (band 4.1, Ezrin, Radixin, Moesin) tandems separated by a SH3 (Src homology 3) domain at the tail. These three proteins interact with each other to form a tripartite complex (Fig. 2B).
Fig. 2.
Molecular basis underlying formation of the upper tip-link density. (A) A schematic of the inner ear hair cell stereocilia showing the tip-link and the electron-dense plaques at both ends. (B) Schematics showing the domain organizations and the interaction network of the core protein components in the upper tip-link density. EC, extracellular cadherin repeat; NBM, N-terminal domain binding motif; PBM, PDZ binding motif; HHD, Harmonin homology domain; PDZ, PSD-95/discs-large/ZO-1; CC, coiled-coil; PST, proline-serine-threonine rich; ANK, ankyrin repeat; CEN, central domain; SAM, sterile α motif; SAH, single α-helix; MyTH4, myosin tail homology 4; FERM, protein 4.1/ezrin/radixin/moesin; SH3, Src homology 3. (C–F) Ribbon diagram representations of the reported overall structures of several binary complexes: Harmonin/Sans (C) (PDB: 3K1R), Myo7a/Sans (D) (PDB: 3PVL), Myo7a/Harmonin (E) (PDB: 5MV9), and Harmonin/CDH23 (F) (PDB: 2KBR and 2KBS).
Detailed biochemical and structural studies have revealed the molecular basis governing tripartite complex formation. Harmonin binds Sans tightly, with a dissociation constant (Kd) of a few nM [71]. The Harmonin HHD and PDZ1 couple together and form a stable integral supramodule. The Sans PBM inserts into the pocket of the Harmonin PDZ1 and the Sans SAM domain extensively contacts the Harmonin PDZ1 to generate such a strong affinity (Fig. 2C). Sans can also interact with Myo7a with a high affinity (Kd of ∼50 nM) [92]. The interaction is mediated by the CEN region of Sans and the N-terminal MyTH4-FERM tandem domain (NMF). The N-terminal half of CEN binds the central inter-lobe interfaces of the cloverleaf-shaped FERM domain and the C-terminal half binds the positively charged surface of the MyTH4 domain (Fig. 2D). These two tight binary interactions are sufficient for tripartite complex formation. Interestingly, later studies showed that Harmonin PDZ3-PBM together could bind the C-terminal MyTH4-FERM tandem domain (CMF), though with relatively low affinity (Fig. 2E) [93], [94].
The multivalent interaction among Harmonin/Sans/Myo7a is reminiscent of postsynaptic density (PSD) assemblies [20], which can drive LLPS. Similarly, both PSD and UTLD are electron-dense structures. Indeed, our previous study demonstrated that these three proteins together were sufficient to form a condensed structure when overexpressed in cells [30]. The condensates are liquid-like, can fuse, and are highly dynamic, which are hallmarks of LLPS. Moreover, the formation of condensates depends on each binary interaction. Usher syndrome-related point mutations that affect the binary interactions can increase the concentration threshold required for LLPS formation and thus weaken the ability to form condensates. Other factors might also contribute to LLPS. The cochlea-specific exon 68 of CDH23 encodes a sequence capable of mediating the dimerization of CDH23 CT and thus can form large protein assemblies with Harmonin [95]. Sans also tends to self-associate via its SAM domain, a domain well-known for its ability to form oligomers. Moreover, F-actin, the major cytoskeleton of stereocilia, provides a series of binding sites for the motor domain of Myo7a. All these factors can further increase the valency and thus promote LLPS.
Anchoring of UTLD to the tip-link depends on the interaction between Harmonin and CDH23, the tip-link component at the UTLD side (Fig. 2B). Each Harmonin molecule contains two binding sites for CDH23 [70]. The Harmonin HHD and the PDZ2 domain recognize an internal sequence and the PBM in CDH23 CT, respectively (Fig. 2F). LLPS clusters Harmonin at high concentrations (estimated as high as a few mM). Although the affinities of both interactions are moderate at the micromolar range, such a high concentration of Harmonin can significantly increase affinity for CDH23, providing anchorage to the tip-link to withstand ceaseless sound wave-induced stretching. Besides, our recent study implied that under such high concentrations, the CC1 of Harmonin tends to form an antiparallel dimer [96]. Dimer formation can create a new surface that is absent in its monomeric form. This newly formed surface could potentially interact with unknown proteins and recruit them to the condensates.
Intriguingly, brush border microvilli, another actin-based protrusion resembling stereocilia, also contain a highly homologous complex (called intermicrovillar adhesion complex, IMAC) consisting of Harmonin, ANKS4B, Myo7b, and the cadherin-related proteins CDHR2/CDHR5 [97], [98]. Similar multivalent interactions among Harmonin/ANKS4B/Myo7b also promote LLPS in vitro and in heterologous cells. Although no electron microscope-based evidence has shown the existence of electron-dense plaques in microvilli, we suggest that Harmonin/ANKS4B/Myo7b might also form tip-link density-like condensates in microvilli for the stable anchorage of the CTs of CDHR2 and CDHR5.
4. Row 1-specific tip complex condensate formation
A distinctive feature of hair cell stereocilia is their staircase-like pattern, which makes the tallest row (row 1) of stereocilia of particular interest. It is widely accepted that the staircase-like pattern of stereocilia is controlled by planar cell polarity mediated by kinocilia, which are specialized microtubule-based cilia found in hair cells [36], [99]. Each hair cell typically contains a single kinocilium. At the early stage of stereocilia development, the kinocilium moves from the center to the edge of the apical surface. Then, the stereocilia closest to the kinocilium elongate first, followed by the second and third rows, forming a staircase pattern. Attachment of the tallest stereocilia to the kinocilium relies on a protein-based link known as the kinociliary link (Fig. 3A). The CD2 isoform of the USH1 protein PCDH15 was reported as one of the components [100]. At the stereocilia side of the kinocilium link, a set of tip-locating proteins can form a complex (hereafter referred to as the tip complex) to determine the row identity and promote elongation of the stereocilia (Fig. 3A) [101], [102], [103]. Recent studies have shed light on the assembling mechanisms of the tip complex [31], [32].
Fig. 3.
Molecular basis underlying row-1-specific tip complex density formation. (A) Schematic of the inner ear hair cell row-1 stereocilia and kinocilium showing the tip complex density. (B) Schematics showing the domain organizations and interaction network of the core protein components in the tip complex density. TPR, tetratricopeptide repeat; GL, GoLoco motif; PR, proline-rich region; PTB, phosphotyrosine-binding domain; WBD, Whirlin binding domain; IDR, intrinsically disordered region. (C–E) Ribbon diagram representations of the solved structures of several binary complexes: Whirlin/Myo15a (C) (PDB: 6KZ1), GPSM2/Whirlin (D) (PDB: 7EP7), and Gαi/GPSM2 (E) (PDB: 4G5Q).
To date, at least five proteins (Whirlin, Myo15a, Eps8, GPSM2, and Gαi) have been identified as core components of the tip complex (Fig. 3B). Whirlin is a USH2 protein and shares similar domain architecture to the USH1 protein Harmonin. It contains an N-terminal HHD domain, two PDZ domains, another HHD domain, a proline-rich (PR) region, and a third PDZ domain. Myo15a (unconventional myosin XVa) is an F-actin-based molecular motor. Analogous to Myo7a, it contains a motor domain, two IQ motifs, and two consecutive MyTH4-FERM tandems separated by a SH3 domain. It also contains a large N-terminal unstructured region proceeding the motor domain and an insertion at the first MyTH4 domain. Eps8 (epidermal growth factor receptor pathway substrate 8) is an F-actin capping protein that controls actin dynamics. It comprises an N-terminal PTB (phosphotyrosine-binding) domain, a middle SH3 domain, and a C-terminal actin-binding SAM domain. These three proteins are thought to be essential for stereocilia elongation. Mice carrying mutations in these genes (whirler, shaker-2, and Eps8-knockout mice) were profoundly deaf and showed shortened stereocilia [63], [102], [103], [104]. The remaining two are polarity-regulating proteins. GPSM2 (G-protein-signaling modulator 2, also called LGN) contains eight tetratricopeptide repeats (TPRs) at its N-terminus, an unstructured linker in the middle, and four GoLoco (GL) motifs at the C-terminus. It is known to regulate spindle orientation during asymmetric cell division [105]. Its GL motifs can bind the GDP-bound form of the α subunit of heterotrimeric G protein and serve as a GDI (guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor) [106]. Mutations of the Gpsm2 gene have been linked to a rare disease called Chudley-McCullough syndrome (CMS) [107], an autosomal recessive genetic disease comprising early-onset sensorineural hearing loss and other structural brain abnormalities. A recent study also reported that GPSM2 colocalized with Whirlin at the tips of row 1 stereocilia [108], [109].
Similar to the UTLD assemblies mentioned above, the tip complex is also formed by multivalent interactions. A well-characterized interaction is that between Whirlin and Myo15a, in which the PDZ3 domain binds the PBM of Myo15a using a typical PDZ-PBM binding mode (Fig. 3C) [31], [110]. The Whirlin HHD1 can bind Eps8. The region of Eps8 responsible for binding (WBD for Whirlin binding domain) is located between its PTB and SH3 domain [31], [102], which contains an α-helical domain as predicted by Alphafold2 [111]. Eps8 can also use its N-terminal PTB domain to interact with the C-terminal MyTH4-FERM of Myo15a. The self-association properties of Whirlin and Eps8 further contribute to the valency. Whirlin can also associate with GPSM2 by binding the inner groove of TPR with a short stretch of sequence in the PR region (Fig. 3D) [32], [108]. GPSM2 can further recruit Gαi. Each GL motif binds Gαi with a typical binding mode (Fig. 3E), generating a 1:4 stoichiometry [112], [113].
As expected, recent studies showed that Whirlin/Eps8/Myo15a together could undergo LLPS [31]. The above-mentioned multivalent interactions are the main driving forces. Whirlin can self-associate with itself and autonomously undergo LLPS under high concentrations, contributing to condensate formation as well. GPSM2 alone can also undergo LLPS, possibly via multivalent electrostatic interactions between the positively charged linker and other negatively charged surfaces [32]. The truncated mutant form of GPSM2 lacking both the linker and GL motifs found in CMS patients fails to form condensates. By binding Whirlin, GPSM2 can significantly promote LLPS of the Whirlin/Myo15a/Eps8 condensates. GPSM2 further recruits Gαi to the condensates and forms the 5 × tip complex density (TCD). With the actin-bundling activity of the C-terminal SAM domain of Eps8, the 5 ×TCD, when compared to the 3 ×TCD, can spark bundling of F-actin much more robustly, providing a possible underlying mechanism for coordinating polarity cues and elongation of the tallest stereocilia [32].
5. Perspective
Over the last decade, LLPS in biological systems has gained significant attention. Our studies, along with others’, have revealed how LLPS contributes to the development and maintenance of hair cell stereocilia, the mechanosensing organelle important for hearing. Our earlier study proposed that the formation of UTLD via LLPS might strengthen anchoring of the tip-link and thus withstand the stretching force [30]. Zhu’s group showed that the building of TCD could enhance the actin-bundling activity and therefore promote the elongation of stereocilia [31], [32]. It is worth noting that LLPS may also play a role in other aspects of the auditory system.
The LTLD is likely formed via LLPS. Similar to the UTLD, the LTLD is the lower anchoring site for the tip-link and undergoes constant stretching. The LTLD might also cluster the MET channels. However, the molecular components of the LTLD are not clearly known. Myo15a and Eps8l2 (a homolog of Eps8), which localize at the tips of stereocilia and are necessary for stereocilia elongation, may be two potential components [101], [114], [115]. The CT of PCDH15 can bind Whirlin [116], but the presence of Whirlin in the LTLD is still under debate [117]. Another actin-bundling protein, Espin-1 or its paralog Espin-like, is likely transported to the tips of stereocilia by class III unconventional myosin Myo3a/Myo3b [118], [119], [120], [121]. Studies have also shown that Espin can interact with Whirlin [122]. It will be interesting to determine whether Espin is a potential component of LTLD. More information is needed to understand how the LTLD is assembled and how it is linked to the MET channels.
Ankle links are transiently formed during the stereociliary development stage. The two PDZ domain-containing proteins, Whirlin and PDZD7, are thought to be cytoplasmic scaffold proteins that anchor the ankle link components Usherin and Adgrv1 [81]. A dense web was observed under an electron microscope, indicating that the ankle link complex can also undergo LLPS [80], [84]. The earlier TCD study showed that Whirlin alone could form condensates in vitro and in cells. How the Whirlin condensates orchestrate the assembly of other ankle link components remains elusive. As the ankle link will disappear upon stereocilia maturation, the ankle link condensates should be dynamically regulated, differing from the UTLD/LTLD condensates.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Jianchao Li: Writing – reviewing and editing.
Conflict of interest
The author declares no competing interest.
Acknowledgments
Research in our lab has been supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31971140, 32271270, and 21907033) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2022ZYGXZR006). We apologize to colleagues whose work could not be cited in this review due to the limited space.
References
- 1.Woodruff J.B., et al. The centrosome is a selective condensate that nucleates microtubules by concentrating tubulin. Cell. 2017;169(6) doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.028. 1066-1077 e10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Raff J.W. Phase separation and the centrosome: a fait accompli? Trends Cell Biol. 2019;29(8):612–622. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2019.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Molliex A., et al. Phase separation by low complexity domains promotes stress granule assembly and drives pathological fibrillization. Cell. 2015;163(1):123–133. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lafontaine D.L.J., et al. The nucleolus as a multiphase liquid condensate. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22(3):165–182. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0272-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dundr M. Nuclear bodies: multifunctional companions of the genome. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2012;24(3):415–422. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2012.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sawyer I.A., Bartek J., Dundr M. Phase separated microenvironments inside the cell nucleus are linked to disease and regulate epigenetic state, transcription and RNA processing. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2019;90:94–103. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hyman A.A., Weber C.A., Julicher F. Liquid-liquid phase separation in biology. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2014;30:39–58. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100913-013325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Banani S.F., et al. Biomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18(5):285–298. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lyon A.S., Peeples W.B., Rosen M.K. A framework for understanding the functions of biomolecular condensates across scales. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22(3):215–235. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-00303-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Li P., et al. Phase transitions in the assembly of multivalent signalling proteins. Nature. 2012;483(7389):336–340. doi: 10.1038/nature10879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bergeron-Sandoval L.P., Safaee N., Michnick S.W. Mechanisms and consequences of macromolecular phase separation. Cell. 2016;165(5):1067–1079. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Choi J.M., Holehouse A.S., Pappu R.V. Physical principles underlying the complex biology of intracellular phase transitions. Annu Rev Biophys. 2020;49:107–133. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-121219-081629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Feng Z., Jia B., Zhang M. Liquid-liquid phase separation in biology: specific stoichiometric molecular interactions vs promiscuous interactions mediated by disordered sequences. Biochemistry. 2021;60(31):2397–2406. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Brangwynne C.P., et al. Germline P granules are liquid droplets that localize by controlled dissolution/condensation. Science. 2009;324(5935):1729–1732. doi: 10.1126/science.1172046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yang P., et al. G3BP1 is a tunable switch that triggers phase separation to assemble stress granules. Cell. 2020;181(2) doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.046. p. 325-345 e28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Boija A., et al. Transcription factors activate genes through the phase-separation capacity of their activation domains. Cell. 2018;175(7) doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.042. p. 1842-1855 e16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cho W.K., et al. Mediator and RNA polymerase II clusters associate in transcription-dependent condensates. Science. 2018;361(6400):412–415. doi: 10.1126/science.aar4199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sabari B.R., et al. Coactivator condensation at super-enhancers links phase separation and gene control. Science. 2018;361(6400) doi: 10.1126/science.aar3958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kim T.H., et al. Phospho-dependent phase separation of FMRP and CAPRIN1 recapitulates regulation of translation and deadenylation. Science. 2019;365(6455):825–829. doi: 10.1126/science.aax4240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zeng M., et al. Phase Transition in Postsynaptic Densities Underlies Formation of Synaptic Complexes and Synaptic Plasticity. Cell. 2016;166(5) doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.008. p. 1163-1175 e12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Milovanovic D., et al. A liquid phase of synapsin and lipid vesicles. Science. 2018;361(6402):604–607. doi: 10.1126/science.aat5671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wu X., et al. RIM and RIM-BP Form Presynaptic Active-Zone-like Condensates via Phase Separation. Mol Cell. 2019;73(5) doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.12.007. p. 971-984 e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chen X., et al. Phase separation at the synapse. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23(3):301–310. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0579-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.McDonald N.A., Fetter R.D., Shen K. Assembly of synaptic active zones requires phase separation of scaffold molecules. Nature. 2020;588(7838):454–458. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2942-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Xing G., et al. Membraneless condensates by Rapsn phase separation as a platform for neuromuscular junction formation. Neuron. 2021;109(12) doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.04.021. p. 1963-1978 e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Su X., et al. Phase separation of signaling molecules promotes T cell receptor signal transduction. Science. 2016;352(6285):595–599. doi: 10.1126/science.aad9964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Du M., Chen Z.J. DNA-induced liquid phase condensation of cGAS activates innate immune signaling. Science. 2018;361(6403):704–709. doi: 10.1126/science.aat1022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Huang W.Y.C., et al. A molecular assembly phase transition and kinetic proofreading modulate Ras activation by SOS. Science. 2019;363(6431):1098–1103. doi: 10.1126/science.aau5721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wong L.E., et al. Tripartite phase separation of two signal effectors with vesicles priming B cell responsiveness. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):848. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14544-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.He Y., Li J., Zhang M. Myosin VII, USH1C, and ANKS4B or USH1G Together Form Condensed Molecular Assembly via Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation. Cell Rep. 2019;29(4) doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.027. p. 974-986 e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lin L., et al. Phase separation-mediated condensation of Whirlin-Myo15-Eps8 stereocilia tip complex. Cell Rep. 2021;34(8) doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shi Y., et al. Promotion of row 1-specific tip complex condensates by Gpsm2-Galphai provides insights into row identity of the tallest stereocilia. Sci Adv. 2022;8(23) doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abn4556. p. eabn4556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hudspeth A.J. How hearing happens. Neuron. 1997;19(5):947–950. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80385-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Xu Z., Ricci A.J., Heller S. Rethinking how hearing happens. Neuron. 2009;62(3):305–307. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.04.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Fettiplace R. Hair cell transduction, tuning, and synaptic transmission in the mammalian cochlea. Compr Physiol. 2017;7(4):1197–1227. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c160049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Schwander M., Kachar B., Muller U. The cell biology of hearing. J Cell Biol. 2010;190(1):9–20. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201001138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tilney L.G., Tilney M.S., Derosier D.J. Actin-Filaments, Stereocilia, and Hair-Cells - How Cells Count and Measure. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1992;8:257–274. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.08.110192.001353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Barr-Gillespie P.G. Assembly of hair bundles, an amazing problem for cell biology. Mol Biol Cell. 2015;26(15):2727–2732. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E14-04-0940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kozlov A.S., Risler T., Hudspeth A.J. Coherent motion of stereocilia assures the concerted gating of hair-cell transduction channels. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10(1):87–92. doi: 10.1038/nn1818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Smith R.J., Bale J.F., Jr., White K.R. Sensorineural hearing loss in children. Lancet. 2005;365(9462):879–890. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71047-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cunningham L.L., Tucci D.L. Hearing loss in adults. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(25):2465–2473. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1616601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Korver A.M., et al. Congenital hearing loss. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2017;3:16094. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lieu J.E.C., et al. Hearing loss in children: a review. JAMA. 2020;324(21):2195–2205. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.17647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Taiber S., et al. The genomics of auditory function and disease. Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet. 2022;23:275–299. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-121321-094136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Delmaghani S., El-Amraoui A. The genetic and phenotypic landscapes of Usher syndrome: from disease mechanisms to a new classification. Hum Genet. 2022;141(3–4):709–735. doi: 10.1007/s00439-022-02448-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.El-Amraoui A., Petit C. Usher I syndrome: unravelling the mechanisms that underlie the cohesion of the growing hair bundle in inner ear sensory cells. J Cell Sci. 2005;118(20):4593–4603. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Petit C., Richardson G.P. Linking genes underlying deafness to hair-bundle development and function. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12(6):703–710. doi: 10.1038/nn.2330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Richardson G.P., de Monvel J.B., Petit C. How the genetics of deafness illuminates auditory physiology. Annu Rev Physiol. 2011;73:311–334. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-012110-142228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mathur P., Yang J. Usher syndrome: hearing loss, retinal degeneration and associated abnormalities. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1852(3):406–420. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.11.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gibson F., et al. A type VII myosin encoded by the mouse deafness gene shaker-1. Nature. 1995;374(6517):62–64. doi: 10.1038/374062a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Weil D., et al. Defective myosin VIIA gene responsible for Usher syndrome type 1B. Nature. 1995;374(6517):60–61. doi: 10.1038/374060a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bitner-Glindzicz M., et al. A recessive contiguous gene deletion causing infantile hyperinsulinism, enteropathy and deafness identifies the Usher type 1C gene. Nat Genet. 2000;26(1):56–60. doi: 10.1038/79178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Verpy E., et al. A defect in harmonin, a PDZ domain-containing protein expressed in the inner ear sensory hair cells, underlies Usher syndrome type 1C. Nat Genet. 2000;26(1):51–55. doi: 10.1038/79171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bolz H., et al. Mutation of CDH23, encoding a new member of the cadherin gene family, causes Usher syndrome type 1D. Nat Genet. 2001;27(1):108–112. doi: 10.1038/83667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bork J.M., et al. Usher syndrome 1D and nonsyndromic autosomal recessive deafness DFNB12 are caused by allelic mutations of the novel cadherin-like gene CDH23. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;68(1):26–37. doi: 10.1086/316954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Di Palma F., et al. Mutations in Cdh23, encoding a new type of cadherin, cause stereocilia disorganization in waltzer, the mouse model for Usher syndrome type 1D. Nat Genet. 2001;27(1):103–107. doi: 10.1038/83660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ahmed Z.M., et al. Mutations of the protocadherin gene PCDH15 cause Usher syndrome type 1F. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;69(1):25–34. doi: 10.1086/321277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Alagramam K.N., et al. Mutations in the novel protocadherin PCDH15 cause Usher syndrome type 1F. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10(16):1709–1718. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.16.1709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Weil D., et al. Usher syndrome type I G (USH1G) is caused by mutations in the gene encoding SANS, a protein that associates with the USH1C protein, harmonin. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12(5):463–471. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddg051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Riazuddin S., et al. Alterations of the CIB2 calcium- and integrin-binding protein cause Usher syndrome type 1J and nonsyndromic deafness DFNB48. Nat Genet. 2012;44(11):1265–1271. doi: 10.1038/ng.2426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Weston M.D., et al. Genomic structure and identification of novel mutations in usherin, the gene responsible for Usher syndrome type IIa. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66(4):1199–1210. doi: 10.1086/302855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Weston M.D., et al. Mutations in the VLGR1 gene implicate G-protein signaling in the pathogenesis of Usher syndrome type II. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74(2):357–366. doi: 10.1086/381685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Mburu P., et al. Defects in whirlin, a PDZ domain molecule involved in stereocilia elongation, cause deafness in the whirler mouse and families with DFNB31. Nat Genet. 2003;34(4):421–428. doi: 10.1038/ng1208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Adato A., et al. USH3A transcripts encode clarin-1, a four-transmembrane-domain protein with a possible role in sensory synapses. Eur J Hum Genet. 2002;10(6):339–350. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Kazmierczak P., et al. Cadherin 23 and protocadherin 15 interact to form tip-link filaments in sensory hair cells. Nature. 2007;449(7158):87–U59. doi: 10.1038/nature06091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Sotomayor M., et al. Structure of a force-conveying cadherin bond essential for inner-ear mechanotransduction. Nature. 2012;492(7427) doi: 10.1038/nature11590. p. 128-+ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kachar B., et al. High-resolution structure of hair-cell tip links. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97(24):13336–13341. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.24.13336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Boeda B., et al. Myosin VIIa, harmonin and cadherin 23, three Usher I gene products that cooperate to shape the sensory hair cell bundle. EMBO J. 2002;21(24):6689–6699. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Siemens J., et al. The Usher syndrome proteins cadherin 23 and harmonin form a complex by means of PDZ-domain interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(23):14946–14951. doi: 10.1073/pnas.232579599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Pan L., et al. Assembling stable hair cell tip link complex via multidentate interactions between harmonin and cadherin 23. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(14):5575–5580. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901819106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Yan J., et al. The structure of the harmonin/sans complex reveals an unexpected interaction mode of the two Usher syndrome proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(9):4040–4045. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911385107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Caberlotto E., et al. Usher type 1G protein sans is a critical component of the tip-link complex, a structure controlling actin polymerization in stereocilia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(14):5825–5830. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017114108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Grati M., Kachar B. Myosin VIIa and sans localization at stereocilia upper tip-link density implicates these Usher syndrome proteins in mechanotransduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(28):11476–11481. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1104161108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Xiong W., et al. TMHS is an integral component of the mechanotransduction machinery of cochlear hair cells. Cell. 2012;151(6):1283–1295. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Maeda R., et al. Tip-link protein protocadherin 15 interacts with transmembrane channel-like proteins TMC1 and TMC2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(35):12907–12912. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402152111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Zhao B., et al. TMIE is an essential component of the mechanotransduction machinery of cochlear hair cells. Neuron. 2014;84(5):954–967. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Ge J., et al. Structure of mouse protocadherin 15 of the stereocilia tip link in complex with LHFPL5. Elife. 2018;7 doi: 10.7554/eLife.38770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Giese A.P.J., et al. CIB2 interacts with TMC1 and TMC2 and is essential for mechanotransduction in auditory hair cells. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):43. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00061-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Liang X., et al. CIB2 and CIB3 are auxiliary subunits of the mechanotransduction channel of hair cells. Neuron. 2021;109(13) doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.05.007. p. 2131-2149 e15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.McGee J., et al. The very large G-protein-coupled receptor VLGR1: a component of the ankle link complex required for the normal development of auditory hair bundles. J Neurosci. 2006;26(24):6543–6553. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0693-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Michalski N., et al. Molecular characterization of the ankle-link complex in cochlear hair cells and its role in the hair bundle functioning. J Neurosci. 2007;27(24):6478–6488. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0342-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Zou J., et al. Individual USH2 proteins make distinct contributions to the ankle link complex during development of the mouse cochlear stereociliary bundle. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(24):6944–6957. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Richardson G.P., Petit C. Hair-bundle links: genetics as the gateway to function. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2019;9(12) doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a033142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Goodyear R.J., et al. Development and properties of stereociliary link types in hair cells of the mouse cochlea. J Comp Neurol. 2005;485(1):75–85. doi: 10.1002/cne.20513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Chen Q., et al. Whirlin and PDZ domain-containing 7 (PDZD7) proteins are both required to form the quaternary protein complex associated with Usher syndrome type 2. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(52):36070–36088. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.610535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Colcombet-Cazenave B., et al. Deciphering the molecular interaction between the adhesion G protein-coupled receptor ADGRV1 and its PDZ-containing regulator PDZD7. Front Mol Biosci. 2022;9 doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.923740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Geng R., et al. The mechanosensory structure of the hair cell requires clarin-1, a protein encoded by Usher syndrome III causative gene. J Neurosci. 2012;32(28):9485–9498. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0311-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Ogun O., Zallocchi M. Clarin-1 acts as a modulator of mechanotransduction activity and presynaptic ribbon assembly. J Cell Biol. 2014;207(3):375–391. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201404016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Dulon D., et al. Clarin-1 gene transfer rescues auditory synaptopathy in model of Usher syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(8):3382–3401. doi: 10.1172/JCI94351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Furness D.N., Hackney C.M. Cross-links between stereocilia in the guinea pig cochlea. Hear Res. 1985;18(2):177–188. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(85)90010-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Jaramillo F., Hudspeth A.J. Displacement-clamp measurement of the forces exerted by gating springs in the hair bundle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90(4):1330–1334. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.4.1330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Wu L., et al. Structure of MyTH4-FERM domains in myosin VIIa tail bound to cargo. Science. 2011;331(6018):757–760. doi: 10.1126/science.1198848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Li J., et al. Structure of Myo7b/USH1C complex suggests a general PDZ domain binding mode by MyTH4-FERM myosins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114(19):E3776–E3785. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702251114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Yu I.M., et al. Myosin 7 and its adaptors link cadherins to actin. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15864. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Wu L., et al. Large protein assemblies formed by multivalent interactions between cadherin23 and harmonin suggest a stable anchorage structure at the tip link of stereocilia. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(40):33460–33471. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.378505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Yan W., Chen G., Li J. Structure of the Harmonin PDZ2 and coiled-coil domains in a complex with CDHR2 tail and its implications. FASEB J. 2022;36(7) doi: 10.1096/fj.202200403RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Crawley S.W., et al. Intestinal brush border assembly driven by protocadherin-based intermicrovillar adhesion. Cell. 2014;157(2):433–446. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Li J., et al. Mechanistic basis of organization of the harmonin/USH1C-mediated brush border microvilli tip-link complex. Dev Cell. 2016;36(2):179–189. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Wang D., Zhou J. The kinocilia of cochlear hair cells: structures, functions, and diseases. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.715037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Webb S.W., et al. Regulation of PCDH15 function in mechanosensory hair cells by alternative splicing of the cytoplasmic domain. Development. 2011;138(8):1607–1617. doi: 10.1242/dev.060061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Belyantseva I.A., et al. Myosin-XVa is required for tip localization of whirlin and differential elongation of hair-cell stereocilia. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7(2):148–156. doi: 10.1038/ncb1219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Manor U., et al. Regulation of stereocilia length by myosin XVa and whirlin depends on the actin-regulatory protein Eps8. Curr Biol. 2011;21(2):167–172. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.12.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Zampini V., et al. Eps8 regulates hair bundle length and functional maturation of mammalian auditory hair cells. PLoS Biol. 2011;9(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Probst F.J., et al. Correction of deafness in shaker-2 mice by an unconventional myosin in a BAC transgene. Science. 1998;280(5368):1444–1447. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5368.1444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Lechler T., Mapelli M. Spindle positioning and its impact on vertebrate tissue architecture and cell fate. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22(10):691–708. doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00384-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Willard F.S., Kimple R.J., Siderovski D.P. Return of the GDI: the GoLoco motif in cell division. Annu Rev Biochem. 2004;73:925–951. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Doherty D., et al. GPSM2 mutations cause the brain malformations and hearing loss in Chudley-McCullough syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;90(6):1088–1093. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Mauriac S.A., et al. Defective Gpsm2/Galphai3 signalling disrupts stereocilia development and growth cone actin dynamics in Chudley-McCullough syndrome. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14907. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Tadenev A.L.D., et al. GPSM2-GNAI specifies the tallest stereocilia and defines hair bundle row identity. Curr Biol. 2019;29(6) doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.051. p. 921-934 e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Zhu Y., et al. Deciphering the unexpected binding capacity of the third PDZ domain of whirlin to various cochlear hair cell partners. J Mol Biol. 2020;432(22):5920–5937. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Jumper J., et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. 2021;596(7873):583–589. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Du Q., Macara I.G. Mammalian Pins is a conformational switch that links NuMA to heterotrimeric G proteins. Cell. 2004;119(4):503–516. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Jia M., et al. Crystal structures of the scaffolding protein LGN reveal the general mechanism by which GoLoco binding motifs inhibit the release of GDP from Galphai. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(44):36766–36776. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.391607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Furness D.N., et al. Progressive hearing loss and gradual deterioration of sensory hair bundles in the ears of mice lacking the actin-binding protein Eps8L2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(34):13898–13903. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1304644110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Dahmani M., et al. EPS8L2 is a new causal gene for childhood onset autosomal recessive progressive hearing loss. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015;10:96. doi: 10.1186/s13023-015-0316-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Michel V., et al. Interaction of protocadherin-15 with the scaffold protein whirlin supports its anchoring of hair-bundle lateral links in cochlear hair cells. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):16430. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73158-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Ebrahim S., et al. Alternative splice forms influence functions of whirlin in mechanosensory hair cell stereocilia. Cell Rep. 2016;15(5):935–943. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.03.081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Salles F.T., et al. Myosin IIIa boosts elongation of stereocilia by transporting espin 1 to the plus ends of actin filaments. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11(4):443–450. doi: 10.1038/ncb1851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Merritt R.C., et al. Myosin IIIB uses an actin-binding motif in its espin-1 cargo to reach the tips of actin protrusions. Curr Biol. 2012;22(4):320–325. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.12.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Ebrahim S., et al. Stereocilia-staircase spacing is influenced by myosin III motors and their cargos espin-1 and espin-like. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10833. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Liu H., et al. Myosin III-mediated cross-linking and stimulation of actin bundling activity of Espin. Elife. 2016;5 doi: 10.7554/eLife.12856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Wang L., et al. Whirlin interacts with espin and modulates its actin-regulatory function: an insight into the mechanism of Usher syndrome type II. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21(3):692–710. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




