Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2023 Mar 6;18(3):e0282569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282569

Diisocyanates influence models of atopic dermatitis through direct activation of TRPA1

Manoj Yadav 1, Prem Prashant Chaudhary 1, Brandon N D’Souza 1, Grace Ratley 1, Jacquelyn Spathies 1, Sundar Ganesan 2, Jordan Zeldin 1, Ian A Myles 1,*
Editor: Shang-Zhong Xu3
PMCID: PMC9987805  PMID: 36877675

Abstract

We recently used EPA databases to identify that isocyanates, most notably toluene diisocyanate (TDI), were the pollutant class with the strongest spatiotemporal and epidemiologic association with atopic dermatitis (AD). Our findings demonstrated that isocyanates like TDI disrupted lipid homeostasis and modeled benefit in commensal bacteria like Roseomonas mucosa through disrupting nitrogen fixation. However, TDI has also been established to activate transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) in mice and thus could directly contribute to AD through induction of itch, rash, and psychological stress. Using cell culture and mouse models, we now demonstrate that TDI induced skin inflammation in mice as well as calcium influx in human neurons; each of these findings were dependent on TRPA1. Furthermore, TRPA1 blockade synergized with R. mucosa treatment in mice to improve TDI-independent models of AD. Finally, we show that the cellular effects of TRPA1 are related to shifting the balance of the tyrosine metabolites epinephrine and dopamine. This work provides added insight into the potential role, and therapeutic potential, or TRPA1 in the pathogenesis of AD.

Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease most often enumerated on the severity of the presenting rash [1]. However, itch is by far the more disruptive symptom to patients and caregivers, in part, through its contribution to the marked psychosocial burdens of AD [2]. Recent work from several groups has elucidated the neuro-endocrine mechanisms of the itch associated with AD [35]. These discoveries include a new appreciation for the role of the transient receptor potential (TRP) family ion channels. Canonic activations of the TRP receptors occurs with temperature changes but they can also be modulated by natural compounds. For example, a recent Nobel prize was awarded to the discovery that capsaicin from peppers generates the sensation of heat through activations of TRP Vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) [6]. Another cutaneous channel in this class, TRP Ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) is typically activated by temperatures below 17°C, but also modulates itch, inflammation, as well as murine models of anxiety and depression [7, 8].

We recently reported that an untargeted comparison of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) pollution databases versus AD rates by US zip codes revealed that isocyanates, such as toluene diisocyanate (TDI), is the pollutant class with the strongest spatiotemporal association with AD [9]. We further demonstrated exposure of health-associated commensal bacteria to TDI shifts the microbial metabolism towards an AD-like phenotype; both TDI and hydrogen isocyanate disrupted lipid homeostasis in and negated the modeled benefit of commensal isolates of Roseomonas mucosa through disrupting nitrogen fixation [9]. However, beyond the impacts on commensal bacteria, the discovery that TRPA1 is directly activated by TDI [1015] suggested that this pollutant may also contribute to AD through directly impact the host.

Herein we demonstrate that, like asthma models [10, 12], TDI-induced dermatitis models are partially TRPA1 dependent. Blockade of TRPA1 synergized with R. mucosa to improve outcomes in both TDI- and MC903-mediated AD mouse models. Using untargeted metabolomics, we identified that the effects of TRPA1 were most strongly associated with changes in tyrosine-related metabolic balance between epinephrine and dopamine. Overall, these data suggest TRPA1 blockade may offer an additional therapeutic target in AD-associated itch.

Materials and methods

Mice

Male and female B6129PF2/J as well as TRPA1 knock out mice aged 6–12 weeks were purchased from Jackson Labs (Bar Harbor, MA). All mice were age and sex matched within each experiment. The MC903 model was performed as previously described [16]. We verified that the effects of interventions were present in both male and female mice but did not compare between sex groups directly. For TDI exposure, TDI (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis MO) was diluted in acetonitrile (Sigma) to a 2% solution; 10 microliters were applied topically to each ear of the mice every other day for three weeks. The ears were collected and analyzed as described for the MC903 model. For experiments using imaging mass spectrometry, mouse tissue was fresh frozen and analyzed on positive ion mode as previously described [17]. By ARRIVE guidelines [18], study design was a comparison between either wild type (WT) or TRPA1-/- mice challenged with TDI, or WT mice in the MC903 model treated with combinations of topical R. mucosa, TRPA1 blockers, or diluent controls. No randomization, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or blinding were used. N values were calculated based on previous results for R. mucosa treatment in mice [16]. Assuming an 8% mean improvement in swelling in the diluent group and a 20% ± 5% in the treatment group would require 4 mice per group based on two independent groups measured by continuous differences. Thus, each experiment used a minimum of 4 per experiment but were combined to assess consistency between experiments. Outcomes measured were ear thickness, which is a sign of swelling which indicates worse outcomes in the models. Statistical comparisons were either Student t test for two-group experiments, or ANOVA for multi-group experiments. Animal work was approved by an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and followed the guidelines and basic principles in the United States Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals by certified staff in an Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC) International accredited facility. Animals were anesthetized using isoflurane and sacrificed using CO2 and cervical dislocation per AAALAC guidelines. All animals were monitored for signs of suffering and, if any had been present, mice would have euthanized to avoid prolonged suffering.

Cell culture scratch assay

HaCaT keratinocytes cultured in KFSM (Gibco, Billings MT) media were seeded at a density of 50,000 cells/well in 8 well chamber labtek culture slides (Lab-Tek II, CC2. ThermoFisher Scientific). Schwann cells were cultures in Schwann cell medium (#1701) (ScienCell research Laboratories) and seeded in an identical manner. After 24 hr of incubation at 37°C and 5% CO2 a pipette tip was used to scratch the cells with two to six experiment groups and one control per trial. After the scratch was created, the media was changed, and cells were incubated for an additional 24hr allowing cell migration and proliferation to close the scratch. Monitoring of the wound closure was performed using the Cytation 5 and their Gen5 software per manufacturer instructions (BioTek, Winooski, VT).

Calcium influx assessment

Schwann cells were seeded in the glass bottom dishes for the Ca2+ imaging experiment. The next day cells were loaded with a calcium sensitive dye (Fluo-4 AM, 2 μM for 30 min; ThermoFisher). After cells were washed with warm PBS and added the warm fresh culture media. The cells were imaged with Leica SP8 confocal microscope. Cells were stimulated with specific agonists or antagonists (TDI used at 7mM, 0.7mM, or 70nM) or diluent control as described during the imaging. Blockade of TRPA1 with HC030031 (Sigma Aldrich Inc) was performed at 10mM 30min before and/or immediately prior to challenge with TDI. The live images were quantified using ImageJ software and graphs were generated with GraphPad Prism software.

Bacterial culture

Isolates of R. mucosa were selected as previously described [16, 19, 20]. Roseomonas was grown in R2A broth (Teknova; Hollister, CA) or on R2A agar (Remel; San Diego, CA) at 32°C. For topical application on mice ears R. mucosa was diluted in the 10% sucrose solution and prepared the working solution at OD 0.4. R. mucosa solution and diluent 10% sucrose solution was applied on both ears as described.

Matric assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) tissue imaging

Fresh frozen tissue collection, matrix spraying, data acquisition and MALDI imaging were performed as described previously [17]. The matrix solution used was 20 mg/mL 5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (#149357-20G Sigma-Aldrich Inc, Missouri, USA) in 100% acetone and 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (#302031 Sigma). The tissue was scanned with both MS and TIMS settings at a resolution of 20 μm. The MS settings were: scan range 20–2500 m/z in positive MS scan mode. The TIMS settings were: 1/K0 0–8 − 1.89 V×s/cm2, ramp time of 200 ms, acquisition time of 20 ms, duty cycle = −10%, and ramp rate of 4.85 Hz. Acquired raw data were initially processed with SCiLS lab 2021a (Bruker Scientific LLC, Billerica, MA, USA) and the file was exported to Metaboscape 2021b (Bruker, USA) for annotations and further downstream analysis.

Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plots and heatmaps

MALDI imaging data was exported from Metaboscape 2021b for further statistical analysis in R. Nonmetric dimensional scaling was carried out in R by using the vegan package. To calculate the statistical difference between the concentration of a metabolite in the groups tested, ANOSIM was employed. For heatmap generation, p-values (FDR) were calculated by t-tests between the two groups, and we plotted a heatmap of the top 100 most significantly different metabolites between the two groups. Heatmap library was used to plot the heatmap. After the peak intensity table was imported, the uploaded data were log-transformed, and normalization was performed by mean subtraction. Other parameters that were set included the use of correlation-based clustering of the columns. To simplify the visualization of the abundances of metabolites across the treatments, the top 100 metabolites ranked by t-test were shown.

Metabolic pathway analysis

Pathway identification was performed using metaboAnalyst (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/) which determines the probability of a pathway being precent based on MS1 features associated with multiple metabolites within the reaction hierarchy of a specific pathway. The output of MetaboAnalyst (functional analysis), index of pathway significance (IPS) values was calculated using the formula: ((Significant hits + 1)2 + (Total − Significant)) / (FET2 * Pathway Metabolites * Expected Hits). This formula consolidates five metrics provided by MetaboAnalyst that, when considered together, quantifies the pathways differences between two samples. A higher IPS value signifies a greater difference between the samples with respect to that pathway, and the use of a single values allows for efficient comparisons between pathways or between samples. The numerator consists of the weighted sum of significant and non-significant metabolites that were found in the samples of interest and divides it by the total number of metabolites in that same pathway. To avoid calculating the same IPS value when the number of significant metabolites is zero and one, respectively, one is added to the number of identified metabolites deemed to be significant. This ratio is then divided by the number of metabolites from that pathway that MetaboAnalyst expected to find in the samples, with a lower value further underscoring the significance of any and all identified metabolites. With FET or p-value being perhaps the metric most indicative of differences between two samples, it is squared and positioned in the denominator to increase the final IPS score exponentially as it approaches or passes statistical significance. By using these IPS values Pathway heatmaps were generated by using pheatmap package in R version 4.1.0. statistical significance was determined based on log10 IPS values.

Statistics

The Student t test was used for two group comparisons whereas multi-group comparisons were performed using ANOVA. The respective figure legends indicate the test used. All statistics were performed using PRISM (GraphPad) as indicated in the respective figure legends.

Study approval

All mouse experiments were approved and monitored by the animal control protocols at the National Institutes of Health.

Results

TDI-induced dermatitis is partially TRPA1 dependent

Prior work has established mouse models of TDI-induced asthma are TRPA1 dependent [10, 12]. However, despite TDI also being an established inducer to AD-models [21], the role of TRPA1 was unclear. We found that TRPA1-/- mice challenged with TDI (Fig 1A) had reduced swelling and reduced vascularization compared to wild type (WT) mice (Fig 1B and 1C); each of these are signs of improved outcomes in the model. Histologic examination confirmed reduced inflammatory infiltrate and epidermal thickening in TRPA1-/- mice (Fig 1D). There were no baseline differences in the WT versus TRPA1-/- mice (S1 Fig), indicating that the TDI-induced dermatitis was TRPA1 dependent. In addition, consistent with direct effects on TRPA1, the dose-dependent TDI induced induction of Ca2+ influx in Schwann cells was inhibited by the TRPA1 blocker HC030031 (Fig 1E and 1F; S1A–S1C Video).

Fig 1. Toluene diisocyanate (TDI) induced dermatitis in mice is dependent on TRPA1.

Fig 1

(A) Overview of model where TDI was applied to B6129PF2/J wild type (WT) or TRPA1 knockout (TRPA1-/-) mouse ears every other day for 3 weeks. (B-D) Resultant thickness for each mouse (B), representative photos (C) and H&E histology (D) are shown. Note that both the B6129PF2/J control and TRPA1-/- mice have natural variation in coloration, thus a representative image from various mice are shown to encompass the range in these strains. (E-F) Schwann cells stimulated with either TDI (at indicated final concentrations) or toluene (arrow indicates when TDI was added). In select conditions pre-incubation with the TRPA1 inhibitor HC030031 either 30 minutes prior (preHC), immediately prior (HC), or both (preHC-HC). Mean calcium flux fluorescent intensity (E) and representative image at peak brightness (F) are shown. Full data set and images can be found in S1 Fig and S1 Video. Data represent three independent experiments and are displayed as mean+SEM (B) or mean (E). *** indicated p < 0.001 as determined by Student T test.

TRPA1 blockade improved TDI-independent models of atopic dermatitis

To assess if TRPA1 may influence skin repair beyond the direct effects of TDI, we also tested TRPA1 modulation in TDI-free murine models of AD. The MC903 model of AD using topically applied calcipotriol hydrate to induce AD-like dermatitis [16]. After the dermatitis was induced, we topically treated mice with either diluent or inhibitors of TRPA1 (cardamonin and its natural source, cardamom seeds) (Fig 2A). Treatment with cardamom seeds, but not purified cardamonin reduced swelling and inflammation in mice (Fig 2B and 2C). However, cardamonin synergized with R. mucosa treatment (Fig 2B and 2C) despite no impact on R. mucosa growth (Fig 2D).

Fig 2. TRPA1 blockade improves non-TDI models of atopic dermatitis.

Fig 2

(A) Overview of MC903 model where topical application occurred daily for 8 days before topical Roseomonas mucosa, cardamonin (Card), or ground cardamom seeds (Spice) were applied for three days. Ears were assessed 3 days after treatment; resultant ear thickness (B) and representative histology (C) are shown (N = 8–19 per group with each dot representing one mouse). (D) R. mucosa was grown in broth with either diluent, cardamonin or ground cardamom seeds (N = 1 isolate in triplicate wells). Resultant impact on optical density is shown. Data represent a combination of (B) or representative of (C-D) two or more independent experiments and are displayed as mean+SEM. ns = not significant, * = p <0.05, ** = p <0.01, *** = p <0.001, **** = p<0.0001 as determined by ANOVA for all displayed items.

TRPA1 modulated tyrosine metabolism

To assess potential mechanisms of TRPA1 on TDI-induced dermatitis, we assess the ear tissue by imaging mass spec on a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization instrument (MALDI) (Fig 3A). Comparing the metabolomic signals from TDI-challenged mouse ears from WT mice and TRPA1-/- revealed general overall similarity (Fig 3B) but also showed several distinguishing metabolites identified by both m/z and collisional cross section (CCS) (Fig 3C). In TRPA1 blockade, similar findings of overall similarity (Fig 4A and 4B) with select differences (Fig 4C) were seen.

Fig 3. TRPA1-/- have differing metabolic response to TDI exposure.

Fig 3

Ears from mice treated with TDI as in Fig 1 were collected and examined by imagine mass spec. (A) Segmentation for representative ear, (B) NMDS similarly plot, and all of the metabolites that were identified by both m/z and collisional cross section (C) are shown. Data represent three independent experiments and calculated as NMDS (B) or ANOVA (C). WT = wild type mice.

Fig 4. TRPA1 blockade alters metabolic response to AD models in mice.

Fig 4

Ears from mice treated with TDI as in Fig 3 were collected and examined by imagine mass spec. (A) Segmentation for representative ear, (B) NMDS similarly plot, and all of the metabolites that were identified by both m/z and collisional cross section (C) are shown. Data represent two independent experiments and calculated using ANOVA. Dil = diluent, Card = cardamonin, Spice = ground cardamom seeds, Rm = Roseomonas mucosa, Rm+C = R. mucosa and Card, Rm + S = R. mucosa and Spice.

TRPA1 effect on wound cultures are modulated by catecholamine signaling

Bundling the identified features from MALDI analysis into pathways using the Metaboanalyst software [22] revealed that tyrosine metabolism was the most upregulated pathway in TRPA1-/- mice (Fig 5A). Tyrosine metabolism was also the most upregulated pathway when comparing the adjunct effects of TRPA1 blockade versus R. mucosa (Fig 5B–5D). The shared impact of tyrosine suggested a possible role for modulation of catecholamines (dopamine, epinephrine, and norepinephrine), given that each is a derivative of tyrosine [23]. We used the in vitro scratch assay model, in which cells are grown to confluence, are physically “scratched”, and then monitored to assess the time it takes to close the resultant cellular gap through a combination of cell proliferation and migration. We have previously shown that this model correlated with our therapeutic outcomes in both clinical trials of AD and the MC903 mouse model [16]. Activation with the TRPA1 agonist cinnamaldehyde [24] reduced modeled healing in both the HaCaT keratinocyte (KC) and Schwann (neuronal) cell lines (Fig 5E and 5F). Blockade of TRPA1 improved healing times in Schwann cells but not in KC (Fig 5E and 5F). In Schwann cells, the effect of cinnamaldehyde were partially reversed by the dopamine D2 receptor blocker haloperidol but was enhanced by co-administration of the anti-adrenergic sotalol (Fig 5G).

Fig 5. Metabolic influence of TRPA1 is concentrated in tyrosine metabolism.

Fig 5

(A-C) Individual pathways as indicated from Metaboanalyst taken from metabolites identified as different between wild type and TRPA1-/- mice in response to TDI (A), R. mucosa treated versus R. mucosa plus Cardamonin (RmC; B), and R. mucosa treated versus R. mucosa plus ground cardamom seeds (RmS; C). (D) Summarizing all pathways impacted by index of pathway significance (IPS) for each condition versus its diluent control. (E, F) Percent of starting wound closure over time for keratinocytes (E) and Schwann neuron cells (F) incubated with diluent, the TRAP1 agonist cinnamaldehyde (Cinn) or TRPA1 blocker HC030031 (N = 1 cells line each in triplicate wells). Significance determined by comparison of area under the curve with 95% confidence intervals by PRISM. (G) Schwann cells in scratch assay with Cinn with or without addition of anti-dopaminergic haloperidol (halo) or anti-adrenergic sotalol (N = 1 cells line each in triplicate wells). Data represent two or more independent experiments and are shown as mean ± SEM. * = p < 0.05 for comparison of area under the curve for wound closure as indicated.

Discussion

The interaction between TDI and TRPA1 presents an intriguing pathology suggesting a role in allergic disease. TDI is a TRPA1 agonist [15] and component of numerous exposures that are known to increase the incidence and severity of AD ranging from fabrics like nylon and polyester to home remodeling chemicals like paint, polyurethane, and memory foam furniture [9]. TDI is a TRPA1-dependent inducer of other atopic models such as contact dermatitis [3], asthma [10, 12], allergic rhinitis [25, 26], and chronic itch [27]. TDI and the related hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) are two of the fewer than ten chemicals used to induce AD in mouse models [21]. Although untested in skin cells, in vitro models using bronchial epithelial cells demonstrated that TDI erodes barrier function through effects on barrier proteins such as occludin [28]. In mice, TRPA1 and TRPV1 are upregulated in the skin after consumption of the AD-associated “Western diet” [29, 30], potentially suggesting the dietary and gut microbiome findings associated with AD [3133] may sensitize patients to the deleterious effects of TDI.

TRPA1 co-activation is required for the activity of one of the central allergic mediators, thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) [34]. In cultures of neurons and mast cells, TRPA1 can create a positive feedback loop with the allergic cytokine IL-13 [35]. Furthermore, in mice, TRPA1 governs models of anxiety and depression [8] which are both strongly associated comorbidities of AD [36]. While uncontrolled itch induces secondary psychiatric stress on its own, these recent elucidations of TRP receptors present the possibility that the association between itch and psychological symptoms could partially reflect the dual consequences of TRPA1 activation.

Our findings beget a working hypothesis in which (di)isocyanate exposure induces dysbiosis [9] through carbamoylation of the amine-groups on the ceramide-sphingolipid family of lipids [37] needed for proper skin barrier function [38]. While altering commensal metabolism, (di)isocyanates may also directly activate TRPA1 to induce itch, rash, Th2 cytokines, and further erode barrier function. A hypothesis which considered TRP receptors as an important activator of AD would be consistent with the description of AD as “the itch that rashes” [39] since peripheral itch from TRPA1 would send afferent signals of itch to the brain, but the resultant inflammatory mediators might not be released until the efferent signals were returned to the skin after the scratching occurred [15].

Our data is also consistent with prior reports linking dopaminergic responses with TRPA1 activity [40, 41]. Glucocorticoids, the most common AD treatment class, has been shown to upregulate dopamine beta-hydroxylase, which converts dopamine to epinephrine and norepinephrine [42]. Our working model suggests that dopamine and epinephrine may have opposing effects on TRPA1 activation and that effects of TRPA1 blockade may be partially reversed by dopamine receptor blockers while being enhanced by anti-adrenergic compounds. While this work furthers the reported link between TRPA1 and catecholamines, uncovering a full understanding of the mechanism linking TRPA1 activation, dopaminergic signaling, and eventual tissue repair will require additional studies.

The literature suggests that each of the chemical compounds which activate TRPA1 (TDI, mustard oil, thiosulfates, tear gas, and cinnamaldehyde) do so through direct alteration of cysteines [15, 43, 44]; cysteine is also a key amino acid regulated in nitrogenase during nitrogen fixation [45]. Therefore, a possible unifying mechanism may entail TDI activating TRPA1 while inactivating commensal nitrogen fixation through impacts on specific cysteine residues of TRPA1 and nitrogenase. However, further work will be needed to validate the mechanism of nitrogen fixation in R. mucosa.

While our study presents population-level associations along with a suggested mechanism, our work is limited in that we do not yet have direct patient-level evaluations. This work’s major limitation is the lack of direct assessment of the differences in TRP expression by age and body site. Alterations in TRPA1 expression between patients with AD and controls, particularly at the young ages which are the critical window for AD risk, would help answer if pollutants create deleterious imprinting onto neuro- and/or immune-development through TRPA1. One study demonstrated a higher TRPA1 expression in the skin of patients with AD, however this was limited to only three adults [35].

Furthering our environmental correlations will also require the development of equipment capable of directly assessing air concentrations of these chemicals as well as directly assessing the surrounding incidence, prevalence, and severity of AD. With both longitudinal symptom and exposure data, the needed odds ratios for exposure and AD risk can be calculated on an individual level, rather than being limited to our current population-level associations.

Our pre-clinical evaluation of TRPA1 blockade is definitionally limited to mice and would require human clinical trials to validate. The promises and limitations of TRPA1 blockade have been well reviewed [46]. In brief, TRPA1-/- mice appear overall normal and, unlike the other TRP receptors, TRPA1 blockade does not harm systemic thermoregulation. TRPA1 blockade does however carry a theoretical risk of loss of the nociception, which could block the needed signals that would otherwise cause people to avoid certain irritants. However overall, this work suggests (di)isocyanates should be further assessed as a potential contributor to AD and presents TRPA1 a potential therapeutic target for this patient population.

Supporting information

S1 Video. TDI directly activates calcium flux from neurons in a TRPA1 dependent manner.

(A) Fluorescence intensity for calcium flux cause by toluene diisocyanate (TDI) added to Schwann neurons at time indicated by arrow. (B) As in A but cells were pre-treated with TRPA1 inhibitor HC030031 (HC) 30 minutes prior to TDI exposure. (C) Similar to A and B, cells were pre-treated with HC 30min prior and then re-exposed to HC immediately prior to TDI challenge. Data represent four independent experiments.

(MOV)

S1 Fig. No baseline differences were present between wild type (WT) and TRPA1-/- mice.

(A) Left ear thickness from 8 mice aged 8 weeks for either WT or TRPA1-/- mice. (B) Representative images from two mice per group showing gross ear anatomy. (C) Representative H&E slides from two mice per group demonstrating baseline histology.

(PDF)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Silverberg JI, Simpson EL, Ardeleanu M, Thaci D, Barbarot S, Bagel J, et al. Dupilumab provides important clinical benefits to patients with atopic dermatitis who do not achieve clear or almost clear skin according to the Investigator’s Global Assessment: a pooled analysis of data from two phase III trials. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181(1):80–7. Epub 2019/02/23. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17791 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Paller A, Jaworski JC, Simpson EL, Boguniewicz M, Russell JJ, Block JK, et al. Major Comorbidities of Atopic Dermatitis: Beyond Allergic Disorders. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018;19(6):821–38. Epub 2018/09/01. doi: 10.1007/s40257-018-0383-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Feng J, Yang P, Mack MR, Dryn D, Luo J, Gong X, et al. Sensory TRP channels contribute differentially to skin inflammation and persistent itch. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):980. Epub 2017/10/31. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01056-8 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sanders KM, Akiyama T. The vicious cycle of itch and anxiety. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;87:17–26. Epub 2018/01/29. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.01.009 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Senra MS, Wollenberg A. Psychodermatological aspects of atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2014;170 Suppl 1:38–43. Epub 2014/06/17. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13084 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Caterina MJ. How do you feel? A warm and touching 2021 Nobel tribute. J Clin Invest. 2021;131(24). Epub 2021/11/19. doi: 10.1172/JCI156587 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lee KI, Lin HC, Lee HT, Tsai FC, Lee TS. Loss of Transient Receptor Potential Ankyrin 1 Channel Deregulates Emotion, Learning and Memory, Cognition, and Social Behavior in Mice. Mol Neurobiol. 2017;54(5):3606–17. Epub 2016/05/20. doi: 10.1007/s12035-016-9908-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.de Moura JC, Noroes MM, Rachetti Vde P, Soares BL, Preti D, Nassini R, et al. The blockade of transient receptor potential ankirin 1 (TRPA1) signalling mediates antidepressant- and anxiolytic-like actions in mice. Br J Pharmacol. 2014;171(18):4289–99. Epub 2014/05/23. doi: 10.1111/bph.12786 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zeldin J, Chaudhary PP, Spathies J, Yadav M, D’Souza BN, Alishahedani ME, et al. Exposure to isocyanates predicts atopic dermatitis prevalence and disrupts therapeutic pathways in commensal bacteria. Science Advances. 2022;In Press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Taylor-Clark TE, Kiros F, Carr MJ, McAlexander MA. Transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 mediates toluene diisocyanate-evoked respiratory irritation. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2009;40(6):756–62. Epub 2008/12/09. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2008-0292OC . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Devos FC, Boonen B, Alpizar YA, Maes T, Hox V, Seys S, et al. Neuro-immune interactions in chemical-induced airway hyperreactivity. Eur Respir J. 2016;48(2):380–92. Epub 2016/04/30. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01778-2015 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yao L, Chen S, Tang H, Huang P, Wei S, Liang Z, et al. Transient Receptor Potential Ion Channels Mediate Adherens Junctions Dysfunction in a Toluene Diisocyanate-Induced Murine Asthma Model. Toxicol Sci. 2019;168(1):160–70. Epub 2018/12/06. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfy285 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kim S, Kim M, Sung JS. Exposure of Toluene Diisocyanate Induces DUSP6 and p53 through Activation of TRPA1 Receptor. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(1). Epub 2022/01/12. doi: 10.3390/ijms23010517 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Noroes MM, Santos LG, Gavioli EC, de Paula Soares Rachetti V, Otuki MF, de Almeida Cabrini D, et al. Role of TRPA1 receptors in skin inflammation induced by volatile chemical irritants in mice. Eur J Pharmacol. 2019;858:172460. Epub 2019/06/23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.172460 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mihara S, Shibamoto T. The role of flavor and fragrance chemicals in TRPA1 (transient receptor potential cation channel, member A1) activity associated with allergies. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2015;11(1):11. Epub 2015/04/22. doi: 10.1186/s13223-015-0074-0 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Myles IA, Castillo CR, Barbian KD, Kanakabandi K, Virtaneva K, Fitzmeyer E, et al. Therapeutic responses to Roseomonas mucosa in atopic dermatitis may involve lipid-mediated TNF-related epithelial repair. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12(560). Epub 2020/09/11. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz8631 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yadav M, Chaudhary PP, D’Souza BN, Spathies J, Myles IA. Impact of Skin Tissue Collection Method on Downstream MALDI-Imaging. Metabolites. 2022;12(6). Epub 2022/06/24. doi: 10.3390/metabo12060497 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Percie du Sert N, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT, Baker M, Browne WJ, et al. Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0. PLoS Biol. 2020;18(7):e3000411. Epub 20200714. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Castillo CR, Alishahedani ME, Gough P, Chaudhary PP, Yadav M, Matriz J, et al. Assessing the effects of common topical exposures on skin bacteria associated with atopic dermatitis. Skin Health Dis. 2021;1(3). Epub 2021/11/02. doi: 10.1002/ski2.41 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Myles IA, Moore IN, Castillo CR, Datta SK. Differing Virulence of Healthy Skin Commensals in Mouse Models of Infection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018;8:451. Epub 2019/02/06. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00451 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Martel BC, Lovato P, Baumer W, Olivry T. Translational Animal Models of Atopic Dermatitis for Preclinical Studies. Yale J Biol Med. 2017;90(3):389–402. Epub 2017/09/29. . [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pang Z, Chong J, Zhou G, de Lima Morais DA, Chang L, Barrette M, et al. MetaboAnalyst 5.0: narrowing the gap between raw spectra and functional insights. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(W1):W388–W96. Epub 2021/05/22. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab382 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Daubner SC, Le T, Wang S. Tyrosine hydroxylase and regulation of dopamine synthesis. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2011;508(1):1–12. Epub 2010/12/24. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2010.12.017 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sodhi RK, Singh R, Bansal Y, Bishnoi M, Parhar I, Kuhad A, et al. Intersections in Neuropsychiatric and Metabolic Disorders: Possible Role of TRPA1 Channels. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021;12:771575. Epub 2021/12/17. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.771575 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fang Z, Yi F, Peng Y, Zhang JJ, Zhang L, Deng Z, et al. Inhibition of TRPA1 reduces airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness in mice with allergic rhinitis. FASEB J. 2021;35(5):e21428. Epub 2021/03/29. doi: 10.1096/fj.201902627R . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Johnson VJ, Yucesoy B, Reynolds JS, Fluharty K, Wang W, Richardson D, et al. Inhalation of toluene diisocyanate vapor induces allergic rhinitis in mice. J Immunol. 2007;179(3):1864–71. Epub 2007/07/21. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.3.1864 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wilson SR, Nelson AM, Batia L, Morita T, Estandian D, Owens DM, et al. The ion channel TRPA1 is required for chronic itch. J Neurosci. 2013;33(22):9283–94. Epub 2013/05/31. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5318-12.2013 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li W, Dong H, Zhao H, Song J, Tang H, Yao L, et al. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 prevents toluene diisocyanate-induced airway epithelial barrier disruption. Int J Mol Med. 2015;36(1):263–70. Epub 2015/05/23. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2015.2214 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jena PK, Sheng L, McNeil K, Chau TQ, Yu S, Kiuru M, et al. Long-term Western diet intake leads to dysregulated bile acid signaling and dermatitis with Th2 and Th17 pathway features in mice. J Dermatol Sci. 2019;95(1):13–20. Epub 2019/06/20. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2019.05.007 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Flohr C, Mann J. New insights into the epidemiology of childhood atopic dermatitis. Allergy. 2014;69(1):3–16. Epub 2014/01/15. doi: 10.1111/all.12270 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fang Z, Li L, Zhang H, Zhao J, Lu W, Chen W. Gut Microbiota, Probiotics, and Their Interactions in Prevention and Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis: A Review. Front Immunol. 2021;12:720393. Epub 2021/08/03. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.720393 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Park DH, Kim JW, Park HJ, Hahm DH. Comparative Analysis of the Microbiome across the Gut-Skin Axis in Atopic Dermatitis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(8). Epub 2021/05/01. doi: 10.3390/ijms22084228 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Trikamjee T, Comberiati P, D’Auria E, Peroni D, Zuccotti GV. Nutritional Factors in the Prevention of Atopic Dermatitis in Children. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:577413. Epub 2021/02/16. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.577413 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wilson SR, The L, Batia LM, Beattie K, Katibah GE, McClain SP, et al. The epithelial cell-derived atopic dermatitis cytokine TSLP activates neurons to induce itch. Cell. 2013;155(2):285–95. Epub 2013/10/08. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.057 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Liu AH, Sun X, Wei XQ, Zhang YZ. Efficacy of multiple low-dose photodynamic TMPYP4 therapy on cervical cancer tumour growth in nude mice. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(9):5371–4. Epub 2013/11/02. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.9.5371 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chatrath S, Lei D, Yousaf M, Chavda R, Gabriel S, Silverberg JI. Longitudinal course and predictors of depressive symptoms in atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;87(3):582–91. Epub 2022/05/14. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.04.061 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Delanghe S, Delanghe JR, Speeckaert R, Van Biesen W, Speeckaert MM. Mechanisms and consequences of carbamoylation. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017;13(9):580–93. Epub 2017/08/02. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2017.103 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.van Smeden J, Bouwstra JA. Stratum Corneum Lipids: Their Role for the Skin Barrier Function in Healthy Subjects and Atopic Dermatitis Patients. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2016;49:8–26. Epub 2016/02/06. doi: 10.1159/000441540 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Boguniewicz M. Atopic dermatitis: beyond the itch that rashes. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2005;25(2):333–51, vii. Epub 2005/05/10. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2005.02.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Landini L, Souza Monteiro de Araujo D, Titiz M, Geppetti P, Nassini R, De Logu F. TRPA1 Role in Inflammatory Disorders: What Is Known So Far? Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(9). Epub 2022/05/15. doi: 10.3390/ijms23094529 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shi L, Lin Y, Jiao Y, Herr SA, Tang J, Rogers E, et al. Acrolein scavenger dimercaprol offers neuroprotection in an animal model of Parkinson’s disease: implication of acrolein and TRPA1. Transl Neurodegener. 2021;10(1):13. Epub 20210428. doi: 10.1186/s40035-021-00239-0 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.McMahon A, Sabban EL. Regulation of expression of dopamine β‐hydroxylase in PC12 cells by glucocorticoids and cyclic AMP analogues. Journal of neurochemistry. 1992;59(6):2040–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Macpherson LJ, Dubin AE, Evans MJ, Marr F, Schultz PG, Cravatt BF, et al. Noxious compounds activate TRPA1 ion channels through covalent modification of cysteines. Nature. 2007;445(7127):541–5. Epub 2007/01/24. doi: 10.1038/nature05544 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Brone B, Peeters PJ, Marrannes R, Mercken M, Nuydens R, Meert T, et al. Tear gasses CN, CR, and CS are potent activators of the human TRPA1 receptor. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2008;231(2):150–6. Epub 2008/05/27. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2008.04.005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dixon R, Kahn D. Genetic regulation of biological nitrogen fixation. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2(8):621–31. Epub 2004/07/21. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro954 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chen J, Hackos DH. TRPA1 as a drug target—promise and challenges. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2015;388(4):451–63. Epub 20150203. doi: 10.1007/s00210-015-1088-3 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Shang-Zhong Xu

19 Dec 2022

PONE-D-22-31629­­Diisocyanates influence models of atopic dermatitis through direct activation of TRPA1PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Myles,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR: The manuscript has been reviewed by one referee. After carefully reading of the whole manuscript and considering the reviewer's comment, we think this story is interesting and therefore invite you to resubmit the manuscript after revision, particularly on the statistics and n numbers for each experiment in the result, which should be detailed in the figure legends. The statistics para in the text should include the detail methods used in the study, not just the software (line 149-line 151). The sample number should be given in figure legends for Figure 3D, Figure 5E-G.  Abbreviations used in figures should also be  indicated in figure legends. In addition, whole manuscript should be carefully proofread.==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 02 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Sam Xu, PhD, MD, 

Hull York Medical School, UK

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. To comply with PLOS ONE submissions requirements, in your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the experiments involving animals and ensure you have included details on (1) methods of sacrifice, (2) methods of anesthesia and/or analgesia, and (3) efforts to alleviate suffering.

3. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. 

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

4. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript: 

"This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. 

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows: 

"The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Additional Editor Comments:

The data is interesting, so we will consider your resubmission after revision. 

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors have identified isocyanates, and in particular, toluene diisocyanate (TDI), as the pollutant class with the strongest association with AD. They could show isocyanates (e.g., TDI) could disrupt lipid homeostasis, and activate TRPA1 in mice which could directly contribute to AD. The authors presented that TDI-induced skin inflammation in mice and calcium flux in human neurons are dependent on TRPA1 and that TRPA1 blockade can exert therapeutic potential in AD.

The authors are encouraged to take the following points into consideration. The abstract can be formulated better, it is hard to understand from sentences what has been modeled and what has been found.

• The statistic section of the manuscript needs substantial revision. It lacks enough information as to what tests were used to measure or compare which elements.

• Did the author find any sex-related differences in the animal study?

• what is the major limitation of this study?

• What are the translational challenges for the application of TRPA1 inhibitors? any expected or potential side effects in humans?

• Please justify the number of animals used, the use of ARRIVE guidelines, and the application of dosages.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Mar 6;18(3):e0282569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282569.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


4 Jan 2023

Reviewer #1: The authors have identified isocyanates, and in particular, toluene diisocyanate (TDI), as the pollutant class with the strongest association with AD. They could show isocyanates (e.g., TDI) could disrupt lipid homeostasis, and activate TRPA1 in mice which could directly contribute to AD. The authors presented that TDI-induced skin inflammation in mice and calcium flux in human neurons are dependent on TRPA1 and that TRPA1 blockade can exert therapeutic potential in AD.

The authors are encouraged to take the following points into consideration. The abstract can be formulated better, it is hard to understand from sentences what has been modeled and what has been found.

We thank the reviewer for their comments and insights. We have made the requested changes as detailed below. The abstract has been amended for clarity.

• The statistic section of the manuscript needs substantial revision. It lacks enough information as to what tests were used to measure or compare which elements.

We placed a small amount more detail in the stats section but focused on detailing the calculation used in the figure legends.

• Did the author find any sex-related differences in the animal study?

We verified that the effects of interventions were found in both male and female mice but did not make direct comparisons between them so cannot comment beyond that. We have added such comment to the text.

• what is the major limitation of this study?

We have amended the discussion section that previously detailed out limitations to indicate the major one is that we simply do not know TRPA1 expression differences between age and body site. If (for example) we knew that TRPA1 expression is greater in children and fades with age, that might elucidate why most patients with AD see their skin symptoms resolve as they age.

• What are the translational challenges for the application of TRPA1 inhibitors? any expected or potential side effects in humans?

We have added a comment and a review citation to TRPA1 blockade’s promise and challenges. In brief, there is only a theoretical risk of loss of nociception (which could cause someone to ignore signals to avoid an irritant.

• Please justify the number of animals used, the use of ARRIVE guidelines, and the application of dosages.

We have added this to the methods section under mice.

Decision Letter 1

Shang-Zhong Xu

1 Feb 2023

PONE-D-22-31629R1­­Diisocyanates influence models of atopic dermatitis through direct activation of TRPA1PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Myles,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR: The manuscript has been reviewed by two referees. There are still many errors and writing issues. The authors should do careful revision and proofreading. Some paragraphs or figures should be reorganized. ---Here are some examples:

Abstract: The abstract is poorly presented. Too long background information (line 13-line 24). The authors should rewrite it with concise background, methodology and results, and conclusions/implications

Line 69, “10mcL per ear was applied to”.  What unit? How to apply?

Line 81, “t” not “T”, also line 165

Line 82, abbr. “IACUC” should give full name. Check whole manuscript for similar the issue.

Line 87, subscript “2” for CO2

Line 95, leave one space between number and unit

Line 102, Should be “Calcium influx …”

Line 112, change the subheading “bacteriology” and give a proper subheading

Line 119, abbr. “MALDI”?

Line 130, Abbr.: NMDS

Results

There are some errors for citing figure numbers (see reviewer comments as well). The result description should be clear and detailed. The paragraph for each result section should be treated in one figure. The figure 5 seems to be for the text under two subheadings, and the "signalling data" section was listed as half figure in figure 5e-g.

The authors should reorganise the data and figure presentation and give proper text description.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 18 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Shang-Zhong Xu, PhD, MD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors have responded to the points raised by the reviewer and accordingly revised the manuscript. Thanks. There is no additional comment.

Reviewer #2: My overall impression is that the authors did not pay much attention to this manuscript. Fig. 2 and 3 are mistakenly cited in the text and data in Fig. 4 and 5 are poorly organized, which all made the manuscript difficult to read and follow.

To improve the scientific quality of this paper, I suggest the authors to provide more results in Fig. 1 as follows, and reorganize the data and description of Fig. 2-5 to make it readable and meaningful.

Fig. 1B-D: Results from WT and TRPA1-/- mice before TDI treatment should be provided. If there is no direct comparison of mouse phenotypes before and after TDI treatment (essentially on the same ears of mice), how could the authors conclude that TDI can induce atopic dermatitis and TRPA1 has a contribution? Even if the TDI-induced model has been established previously, these works should not be neglected as they are important and very easy to do.

Fig. 1E-F: The authors claimed direct activation of TRPA1 by TDI, however the data from Schwann cells are not sufficient to support this conclusion. Patch clamp (ideally) or calcium imaging on TRPA1-overexpreesing and control cells should be performed and a dose-response curve of TDI is essential.

Fig. 1F: What does Pre-Tx mean? It does not seem to be a typo of HC but something else.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Mar 6;18(3):e0282569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282569.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


16 Feb 2023

Reviewer replies

Reviewer #2: My overall impression is that the authors did not pay much attention to this manuscript. Fig. 2 and 3 are mistakenly cited in the text and data in Fig. 4 and 5 are poorly organized, which all made the manuscript difficult to read and follow.

To improve the scientific quality of this paper, I suggest the authors to provide more results in Fig. 1 as follows, and reorganize the data and description of Fig. 2-5 to make it readable and meaningful.

We made the error of mislabeling Fig 2 and 3 (they were switched in the upload). The call outs were correct, but we apologize and understand why this flip was confusing. By placing them in proper order we now have the intended flow of

1 – Establishing TRPA1 mice do not have as severe of AD-like dermatitis after TDI exposure

2 – Blocking TRPA1 improves outcomes in the MC903 model of AD

3 – TRPA1 deletion alters metabolism

4 – TRPA1 blockade alters metabolism

5 – The altered metabolism established in 3 and 4 collate into tyrosine metabolism, which can be further targeted by cell culture model.

Fig. 1B-D: Results from WT and TRPA1-/- mice before TDI treatment should be provided. If there is no direct comparison of mouse phenotypes before and after TDI treatment (essentially on the same ears of mice), how could the authors conclude that TDI can induce atopic dermatitis and TRPA1 has a contribution? Even if the TDI-induced model has been established previously, these works should not be neglected as they are important and very easy to do.

We now present data from WT and TRPA1-/- mice without TDI exposure. As has been established in the prior use of these animals – there are no obvious baseline differences. We understand the request for baseline difference, but seeing none we continue to conclude that this established model is correct and that the TDI exposure’s failure to induce a similar degree of inflammation in the knockout mice supports our conclusion that TDI-induced dermatitis is partially dependent on TRPA1.

Fig. 1E-F: The authors claimed direct activation of TRPA1 by TDI, however the data from Schwann cells are not sufficient to support this conclusion. Patch clamp (ideally) or calcium imaging on TRPA1-overexpreesing and control cells should be performed and a dose-response curve of TDI is essential.

We now present three different doses of TDI to demonstrate the dose response curve requested and thank the reviewer for this recommendation. However, we continue to present data that the calcium influx is dependent on TRPA1. Overexpressing TRPA1 would not impact these conclusions. If overexpression of TRPA1 increased flux, indeed that would support the notion that it was involved – but failure to do so would not comment on TRPA1s role since the rate limiting step of calcium influx may not be the level of receptor expression. Our findings are clear – adding TDI in the presence of a specific TRPA1-blocker negates calcium influx. Given that we now also show that this occurs in a dose dependent manner, we do not feel that the patch clamp or overexpression would change the conclusions presented (save a claim that Ca influx would not carry an obvious change in conductivity).

Fig. 1F: What does Pre-Tx mean? It does not seem to be a typo of HC but something else.

Tx is an established abbreviation for “treatment” for physicians, but this was left in error. We apologize and have fixed the figure, so it is Pre-HC to match the remainder of the figure.

Editor replies:

Abstract: The abstract is poorly presented. Too long background information (line 13-line 24). The authors should rewrite it with concise background, methodology and results, and conclusions/implications

The background portion of the abstract has been amended.

Line 69, “10mcL per ear was applied to”. What unit? How to apply?

We are not sure what is being asked by “what unit” since mcL is a well established unit of volume, but we have spelled out microliter and added “topically” to the description of how this was applied “to the ear”.

Line 81, “t” not “T”, also line 165

This has been changed

Line 82, abbr. “IACUC” should give full name. Check whole manuscript for similar the issue.

This has been added

Line 87, subscript “2” for CO2

This has been changed

Line 95, leave one space between number and unit

This has been changed

Line 102, Should be “Calcium influx …”

This has been changed although technically calcium outflux would also be visible, thus “flux” seemed the most appropriate term.

Line 112, change the subheading “bacteriology” and give a proper subheading

We changed this to “bacterial culture”

Line 119, abbr. “MALDI”?

This has been added

Line 130, Abbr.: NMDS

This has been added

Results

There are some errors for citing figure numbers (see reviewer comments as well). The result description should be clear and detailed. The paragraph for each result section should be treated in one figure. The figure 5 seems to be for the text under two subheadings, and the "signalling data" section was listed as half figure in figure 5e-g.

We made the error of mislabeling Fig 2 and 3 (they were switched in the upload). The call outs are correct, but we apologize and understand why this flip was confusing. We have moved the section on figure 5 to one paragraph. We have left Fig 3 and 4 combined because they are highly related and are only separate because combining them would render the text too small to read.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Reviewer replies v2.docx

Decision Letter 2

Shang-Zhong Xu

21 Feb 2023

­­Diisocyanates influence models of atopic dermatitis through direct activation of TRPA1

PONE-D-22-31629R2

Dear Dr. Myles,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Shang-Zhong Xu, PhD, MD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Shang-Zhong Xu

23 Feb 2023

PONE-D-22-31629R2

­­Diisocyanates influence models of atopic dermatitis through direct activation of TRPA1

Dear Dr. Myles:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Shang-Zhong Xu

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Video. TDI directly activates calcium flux from neurons in a TRPA1 dependent manner.

    (A) Fluorescence intensity for calcium flux cause by toluene diisocyanate (TDI) added to Schwann neurons at time indicated by arrow. (B) As in A but cells were pre-treated with TRPA1 inhibitor HC030031 (HC) 30 minutes prior to TDI exposure. (C) Similar to A and B, cells were pre-treated with HC 30min prior and then re-exposed to HC immediately prior to TDI challenge. Data represent four independent experiments.

    (MOV)

    S1 Fig. No baseline differences were present between wild type (WT) and TRPA1-/- mice.

    (A) Left ear thickness from 8 mice aged 8 weeks for either WT or TRPA1-/- mice. (B) Representative images from two mice per group showing gross ear anatomy. (C) Representative H&E slides from two mice per group demonstrating baseline histology.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reviewer replies v2.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES