Supporting Information for Vrljicak et al., 2016
Files in this Data Supplement:
- Figure S1 - Comparison of integration site identification by TAIL-PCR and Southern analysis. (.pdf, 362 KB)
- Figure S7 - Distribution of repetitive elements across gene regions in the zebrafish genome. (.pdf, 324 KB)
- Figure S2 - Differences in genomic sequencing efficiency for various inserts. (.pdf, 358 KB)
- Figure S3 - Expression patterns of targeted genes. (.pdf, 120 KB)
- Figure S4 - Chromatin marks are correlated with integrations. (.pdf, 152 KB)
- Figure S5 - Ds integrations show varying preferences for different repetitive elements. (.pdf, 160 KB)
- Figure S6 - Genomic feature overlap does not correlate with number of inserts per line. (.pdf, 230 KB)
- Table S1 - Integration sites analyzed (Zv9). (.xlsx, 764 KB)
- Table S2 - Genomic features analyzed. (.xlsx, 10 KB)
- Table S3 - Fold enrichment and p-values for all features analyzed. (.xlsx, 16 KB)
- Table S4 - Gene ontology analysis results for Ensembl genes hit by 1685 Ds selected integrations. (.xlsx, 37 KB)
- Table S5 - Gene ontology analysis results for Ensembl genes hit by 1344 Ds unselected integrations. (.xlsx, 26 KB)
- Table S6 - Gene ontology analysis results for Ensembl genes hit by 379 Tol2 selected integrations. (.xlsx, 17 KB)
- Table S7 - Gene ontology analysis results for Ensembl genes hit 2 or more times by 15223 MMLV integrations. (.xlsx, 92 KB)