Abstract
Background
There are concerns that the evidence from studies showing non-inferiority of oral amoxicillin to benzyl penicillin for severe pneumonia may not be generalizable to high mortality settings.
Methods
An open-label multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial was conducted at six Kenyan hospitals. Eligible children aged 2 – 59 months were randomized to receive amoxicillin or benzyl penicillin and followed up for the primary outcome of treatment failure at 48 hours. A non-inferiority margin of risk difference between amoxicillin and benzyl penicillin groups was pre-specified at 7%.
Results
We recruited 527 children including 302 (57.3%) with co-morbidity. Treatment failure was observed in 20/260 (7.7%)and 21/261 (8.0%) of patients in the amoxicillin and benzyl penicillin arms respectively (risk difference −0.3%, 95% confidence interval (CI) −5.0 to 4.3) in per protocol analyses. These findings were supported by the results of intention to treat analyses. Treatment failure by day 5 post-enrolment was 11.4% and 11.0% and rising to 13.5% and 16.8% by day 14 in the amoxicillin versus benzyl penicillin groups respectively. The most frequent cause of cumulative treatment failure at day 14 was clinical deterioration within 48 hours of enrolment (33/59; 55.9%). Four patients died (overall mortality 0.8%) during the study, three of whom were allocated to the benzyl penicillin group. The presence of wheeze was independently associated with less frequent treatment failure.
Conclusions
Our findings confirm non-inferiority of amoxicillin to benzyl penicillin, provide estimates of risk of treatment failure in Kenya and offer important additional evidence for policy making in sub-Saharan Africa
INTRODUCTION
Almost half of all deaths due to childhood pneumonia occur in sub-Saharan African [1]. World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations for case management of pneumonia in children aged 2 – 59 months have been credited with contributing to substantial reductions in mortality [2]. For over two decades, these guidelines have recommended classification into four classes of severity based on clinical signs at initial presentation with inpatient management reserved for the severe categories (Panel 1) [3].
Recently, however, the WHO undertook a major revision of these guidelines. Children with lower chest wall indrawing are now to be treated with outpatient oral amoxicillin, replacing inpatient benzyl penicillin [4]. Supporting evidence came from large multicenter studies including over 3000 children, predominantly from Asian countries [5, 6]. The WHO panel utilizing the GRADE process [7] reported they were moderately confident in these effect estimates and provided a strong recommendation in favor of this policy shift [8].
The same evidence was reviewed and discussed in Kenya in 2010 as part of a national guideline development exercise. In this context-specific decision-making process the supporting evidence was also graded as of moderate quality with downgrading for indirectness given the small number of African children involved in the trials. A panel of over 70 individuals from clinical, policy and academic backgrounds who participated in this national process had concerns over the generalisability of the results drawn from predominantly Asian study subjects to populations in sub-Saharan Africa in whom mortality may be higher [9]. On this background the Kenyan group declined to adopt outpatient oral amoxicillin to replace injectable benzyl penicillin [10].
Prompted by this uncertainty, we sought to compare the two antibiotics in a population of Kenyan children. Of specific interest, this trial provides the first data on clinical outcomes of children treated for severe pneumonia in an African setting where co-morbid conditions such as malaria, diarrhea and malnutrition are common and was conducted after the introduction of the routine childhood Haemophilus influenzae (Hib) and pneumococcal vaccines in Kenya.
METHODS
Participants
We conducted an open-label, pragmatic, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Children aged 2 – 59 months with severe pneumonia as defined in the 2005 WHO guidelines were recruited from six public hospitals across Kenya. Three of the sites are located in the central region of Kenya at altitudes ranging from 1350m to 1700m above sea level (ASL). The other three hospitals are located in western Kenya around the Lake Victoria basin where malaria is endemic (altitude 1100m – 1300m ASL). All six facilities offer both primary care and referral services with pediatric inpatient departments reporting 2500 to 4500 annual pediatric admissions. Patient screening and enrolment was conducted by trained study clinicians under supervision of the hospital pediatricians who were also the site principal investigators.
Eligibility Criteria
To mimic scenarios encountered in actual practice we enrolled children with common co-morbidities including malaria, diarrhea, wheeze and a single convulsion in the presence of fever. As some form of treatment is common prior to consulting a health professional, children with a recent history of treatment with unknown oral antibiotics or those who had received less than 48 hours of amoxicillin were enrolled. Although enrolling children with co-morbidities or oral pre-treatment would potentially bias the results of the trial towards equivalence we considered the value of gaining data on the population who would actually become the subject of future guidelines of over-riding interest. To minimize this bias we ensured prompt and adequate management of co-morbidities. Children with primary diagnoses that would ordinarily preclude treatment with benzyl penicillin monotherapy were excluded (Supplemental Figure S1).
All children were assessed for the presence of wheeze. Where present, up to three doses of inhaled salbutamol were administered as bronchodilator therapy, each separated by 15 minute intervals at the end of which they were reassessed. Those in whom signs of severe pneumonia subsided exited the study with inhaled bronchodilators and corticosteroids in line with recommended practice [3].
Study Oversight
The KEMRI National Ethical Review Committee (ERC), Kenya National Pharmacy and Poisons Board and University of Oxford Tropical Research Committee approved the trial protocol. Written informed consent was sought from accompanying legal guardians in a locally appropriate language prior to enrolment. All serious adverse events were reported to the KEMRI ERC and the data and safety monitoring board (DSMB). One planned interim analysis was conducted upon recruitment of approximately half of the total sample size. Using the Haybittle-Peto adjustment for multiple testing, recruitment was to be halted if the p-value from a test of difference between the two groups was ≤0.001 [11]. Upon reviewing the report, the DSMB expressed satisfaction with the findings and recommended continuation of recruitment with no amendments to the protocol. Independent monitoring was provided by the Clinical Trials Facility of the KEMRI–Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01399723.
Interventions
Eligible children were randomized to oral amoxicillin at the WHO recommended dose of 40 - 45mg/kg twice daily or intravenous (IV)/ intramuscular (IM) benzyl penicillin at 50,000IU/kg four times daily for a minimum of 48 hours. Additional supportive care, laboratory and radiological investigations were performed as determined by the clinical team managing the ward patients. The clinical team were however trained and advised to strictly adhere to the study protocols and ensure any change of treatment was based on the study definitions of treatment failure (Panel 2).
The study clinician conducted daily clinical reviews in consultation with the hospital pediatrician. Study participants were monitored for signs of clinical deterioration, which if detected resulted in prompt revision of treatment. Follow-up data on inpatient treatment failure and mortality continued until discharge from hospital or day five post-enrolment. At hospital discharge children in both study arms received adequate oral amoxicillin to complete a total of five days of antibiotic treatment. Guardians were counselled on correct administration of and adherence to treatment prior to discharge. Mobile phone contacts collected from the children’s parents or legal guardians were used to facilitate follow up and capture information on any deaths and readmissions both within and outside of the recruiting hospitals through a telephone interview two weeks after enrolment. Caregivers of patients who we knew at discharge were not contactable by telephone were requested to report to the hospital two weeks after enrolment for a direct interview. Participants were compensated for transport costs incurred to and from hospital for this visit.
Study Drugs
Trial lots of amoxicillin and benzyl penicillin were procured directly from the manufacturer with accompanying batch release certificates. Quality of both study treatments was verified at a local WHO accredited laboratory.
Outcomes
The primary outcome was treatment failure determined by the study site clinician in discussion with the site principal investigator at 48 hours (two full days after enrolment). Treatment failure was defined a priori as the development of any one of five pre-specified criteria (see Panel 2). The secondary outcomes were cumulative treatment failure five days after enrolment or upon hospital discharge (whichever occurred sooner) and late treatment failure at day 14, defined as death or prolonged hospitalization, or hospital re-admission, or ongoing treatment with outpatient antibiotics as determined through telephone or direct interview.
Statistical Analysis
Data on baseline characteristics were summarized by study arm. Non-inferiority between amoxicillin and benzyl penicillin was defined a priori as a risk difference of treatment failure and associated upper bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of <7%. This definition is comparable to those of previous studies on childhood pneumonia [5, 6, 12-15]. The initial sample size estimate of 576 children (288 per group) would provide 80% power to detect non-inferiority of amoxicillin against benzyl penicillin within a margin of 7% at a one-sided level of significance of 0.025, assuming a prevalence of treatment failure of 10% at 48 hours derived from a pre-intervention pilot phase of the study. We undertook both intention to treat and per protocol analyses for the primary outcome.
We also explored independent risk factors for treatment failure at 48 hours using a predictive logistic regression model. Age, sex and treatment group were included as a priori covariates. Univariate associations were tested for other potential predictors of treatment failure. An inclusion cut –off of P<0.1 was applied to select covariates for inclusion in the final model. All analyses were conducted using Stata version 12.1 (Stata Corp, Texas, USA).
Randomization
Computer-generated random sequences were created in blocks of randomly varying sizes of six to ten stratified by study site at the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme by an individual independent of the investigators. Treatment allocations were stored in sealed opaque envelopes distributed to the study sites in complete blocks. Envelopes were issued to recruited participants in order of enrolment.
Due to the nature of the intervention, (injectable versus orally administered treatments) blinding was not achieved. However, envelopes containing the assigned treatment were only opened by the recruiting clinician after a potential study patient was determined to have fully satisfied eligibility criteria ensuring allocation concealment. A screening log was maintained to show corresponding accountability for all opened allocation envelopes.
RESULTS
The trial was preceded by a pilot phase during which we recruited 208 children in whom we observed a failure rate of 10.1% (95% CI 6.4 to 15.0) and two deaths. Characteristics of the children recruited in the pilot phase were similar to those in the trial.
During the intervention phase of the study, 527 were recruited from 12th September 2011 to 15th August 2013. A total of 263 children were randomized to receive amoxicillin while 264 received benzyl penicillin. One patient in the benzyl penicillin group was lost to follow up before assessment for the primary outcome at 48 hours (Figure 1). Recruitment was adversely affected by several unpredictable nationwide health worker strikes during the study period. At one hospital recruitment stopped after the site clinician resigned from his position (eight months before the end of the recruitment). Faced with uncertainty regarding the expected end of the trial and a limited budget to prolong recruitment indefinitely, we decided to base the end of the trial on a fixed date rather than achieving the target sample size. No data analysis preceded study termination. Thus, we concluded recruitment with a sample size of 527; 49 patients below the original target.
Protocol violations were observed in five patients. Two patients received under doses of study drug, one patient missed two doses of study drug, treatment for one patient was changed in the absence of any criteria for treatment failure and one patient was enrolled despite having been treated with oral amoxicillin for over 48 hours prior to admission. Data from these patients were excluded from per protocol analyses.
Co-morbidities including malaria (confirmed through microscopy), acute diarrheal illness, wheeze not responsive to initial therapy, anemia and moderate acute malnutrition were present in 302/527 (57.3%) of study patients, rates of co-morbidity consistent with previous reports on similar populations [16, 17]. Baseline characteristics for recruited children were comparable between the treatment groups as displayed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Patient characteristic | Penicillin | Amoxicillin |
---|---|---|
Age in months: median (IQR) | 13 (7, 24) | 14 (7, 25) |
Female gender: proportion (%) | 106/264 (40.2) | 120/263 (45.6) |
History of cough: proportion (%) | 263/264 (99.6) | 262/263 (99.6) |
History of fever: proportion (%) | 240/264 (90.9) | 236/263 (89.7) |
History of diarrhea: proportion (%) | 62/264 (23.5) | 56/263 (21.3) |
Recent antibiotic treatment: proportion (%) | 103/236 (43.6) | 101/238 (42.4) |
Received pneumococcal and Hib vaccines ≥1 dose | 184/245 (75.1) | 183/245 (74.7) |
Temperature (°C): median (IQR) | 37.8 (37.3, 38.5) | 38.1 (37.5, 38.8) |
Oxygen saturation (%): median (IQR) | 94 (92, 96) | 95 (93, 97) |
WHZ less than −2SD below median reference value | 24/264 (9.0) | 15/263 (5.7) |
Any co-morbidity: proportion (%) | 150/264 (56.8) | 152/263 (57.8) |
Wheeze: proportion (%) | 92/264(34.9) | 95/263 (36.1) |
Slide positive malaria: proportion (%) | 22/264 (8.3) | 34/263 (12.9) |
Pallor: proportion (%) | 20/264 (7.6) | 19/263 (7.2) |
Dehydration: proportion (%) | 20/264 (7.5) | 11/263 (4.2) |
Study site | ||
Bungoma DH | 42/264 (15.9) | 41/263 (15.6) |
Embu PGH | 62/264 (23.1) | 60/263 (22.8) |
Kerugoya DH | 60/264 (22.7) | 59/263 (22.4) |
Kisumu DH | 37/264 (14.0) | 36/263 (13.7) |
Mbagathi DH | 39/264(14.8) | 41/263 (15.6) |
New Nyanza PGH | 25/264 (9.5) | 26/263 (9.9) |
Hib - Haemophilus influenzae type b DH – District Hospital PGH – Provincial General HospitalWHZ - Weight-for-height Z score
Out of 11 patients with oxygen saturation recordings of 85% - 90%, treatment failure was observed in one (9.1%). This finding was not statistically different from the risk of treatment failure among children with oxygen saturations ≥90% (P=0.87).
Main Outcomes
The risk of treatment failure was 7.7% in amoxicillin arm and 8.0% in benzyl penicillin arm at 48 hours in per protocol analyses (risk difference −0.3%, 95% CI −5.0 to 4.3) indicating non-inferiority within the pre-specified margin of 7% at 48 hours (Figure 2). Similar results were obtained in intention to treat analyses. The risk difference of treatment failure between the two treatment arms at all follow-up time-points was below 7%: −0.3% at 48hours, 0.4% at day 5, and 3.3% at day 14 (Table 2).
Table 2.
Treatment Group | 48 hr -PP (%) | 48 hr -ITT (%) | Day5 – ITT (%) | Day 14-ITT (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Amoxicillin | 20/260 (7.7) | 20/263 (7.6) | 30/263 (11.4) | 33/244 (13.5) |
Penicillin | 21/261 (8.0) | 21/263 (8.0) | 29/263 (11.0) | 42/250 (16.8) |
Risk Difference (95% CI) | −0.3% (−5.0, 4.3) | −0.4% (−5.0, 4.2) | 0.4% (−5.0, 5.8) | −3.3% (−10.0, 3.0) |
ITT – Intention to treat
PP – Per protocol
Risk Factor Analysis
In univariate analyses, moderate acute malnutrition (weight for height Z score ≥-3 and <-2 SD versus ≥-2) and history of diarrhea were associated with increased odds of treatment failure (Odds ratio (OR) 2.91, 95% CI 1.19 to 7.13; P=0.01 and OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.23 to 4.67; P=0.01 respectively). The presence of wheeze was associated with reduced odds of treatment failure (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.51; P=0.001). Treatment failure was weakly associated with palmar pallor (OR 2.35, 95% CI 0.92 to 6.0; P=0.07) and increasing length of illness in days (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.30; P=0.08). Immunization status (pneumococcal or Hib vaccines), laboratory diagnosis of malaria and recent antibiotic treatment were not associated with treatment failure.
A multivariable predictive model was used to determine independent correlates of treatment failure adjusting for treatment group, age, sex, length of illness, history of diarrhea, temperature, wheeze at the time of recruitment, moderate acute malnutrition and a diagnosis of anemia. In the final model, only presence of wheeze was found to be associated with reduced risk of treatment failure (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.63; P=0.005).
Causes of Treatment Failure
Approximately half (33/59) of the children who progressed, cumulatively, to treatment failure were reported to have deteriorated developing at least one of the signs of very severe pneumonia, 28/33 of these deteriorated within the first 48 hours of admission. In contrast, change of treatment by a clinician in the absence of any of the trial-specified criteria for treatment failure was observed more frequently as a late cause (> 48 hours after admission) of treatment failure. Two patients (one from each study group) withdrew consent during the study (Table 3).
Table 3.
Reason for Treatment Failure | Day Post-enrolment | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Amox | B’ pen | All | |
Signs of very severe pneumonia | 17 | 11 | 4 (1*) | 1 | 0 | 18 | 15 | 33 |
Persisting distress | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Clinician’s decision | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 11 |
Change of diagnosis | 5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
Withdrawal of consent | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| ||||||||
Total | 24 | 17 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 29 | 30 | 59 |
Amox – Amoxicillin
B’pen – Benzyl penicillin
Death following treatment failure
Late Treatment Failure and Mortality
Late treatment failure, assessed 14 days after enrolment, was more frequent, although not statistically significantly, in the benzyl penicillin group (Table 2). However, the proportion of children lost to follow up by day 14 was slightly greater in the amoxicillin group at 7.2% (19/263) versus 4.3% (13/264) (Figure 3).
Four study participants died (0.8%); three in the benzyl penicillin group and one in the amoxicillin group. None of the deaths occurred in the first 48 hours of treatment. One death occurred after hospital discharge, 12 days after recruitment. Cause of death was ascribed to complications of acute diarrhea (n=1), congestive heart failure (n=1), complications of chronic renal failure (n=1) unrecognized at enrolment, and possible intoxication related to ingestion of traditional herbal medicines (n=1). All deaths were reported to the DSMB and the KEMRI ERC who in all instances concluded that none of the deaths was related to study drugs or procedures.
DISCUSSION
The results of this trial are consistent with findings of other large multicenter studies [5, 6, 18] that informed a recent evidence-driven review of the treatment guidelines for severe pneumonia by the WHO, recommending outpatient oral amoxicillin [8]. We have included our new data in a random effects meta-analysis with the two previous comparable trials: the APPIS and NO-SHOTS trials (Supplemental Figure S2). The pooled risk difference for treatment failure comparing amoxicillin versus benzyl penicillin is −0.6% (95% CI −2.4 to 1.2; I2=0%, P=0.77).
The risk of treatment failure in the trial was lower than the estimate obtained from the pilot from which the initial sample size calculation was derived. This implies that the number of patients recruited, although lower than the original target, may have been adequate to achieve the study objectives. The overall risk of treatment failure of almost 10% still however represents a substantial amount of suffering in both treatment groups. Thus there remains need for research to examine complementary interventions to further reduce poor outcomes among children with severe forms of pneumonia such as optimal feeding and fluid regimens.
We excluded children with severe acute malnutrition and alternative or additional severe illnesses according to Kenyan case management guidelines [3] (that are broadly comparable with WHO guidelines [4]). Exploratory analyses for factors associated with treatment failure were thus limited to milder levels of risk. This may explain why factors that have traditionally been associated with poor clinical outcomes were not found to be predictive of treatment failure in our study. Many Kenyan hospitals are unable to perform routine pulse oximetry [19]. In line with the pragmatic design of the study we therefore included children without signs of very severe pneumonia but with a ‘spot’ oxygen saturation on admission examination as low as 85% with no evidence of resultant harm. The presence of wheeze was found to have a protective association with treatment failure – a finding that is consistent with work previously conducted in South Africa to develop a clinical predictive score for mortality in children with lower respiratory tract infections [20].
Randomized controlled trials are frequently criticized for their lack of external validity [21] due to strict eligibility criteria and differences between trial protocols and routine care. To ensure the trial was conducted under conditions representative of typical settings in district level hospitals across Africa with large patient volumes and diverse clinical presentations we adopted a pragmatic design. While one study clinician per site reviewed trial patients, daily further clinical and nursing management was undertaken by hospital staff with access to routinely available resources only and with care supervised by the hospital pediatrician. The ability to provide policy makers data on outcomes of treatment in typical settings where children often have co-morbid conditions as well as information on the comparative effectiveness of treatments was felt critical at the outset given the prior rejection of suggested policy changes despite moderate quality trial data [10]. - The results of this trial therefore provide much-needed evidence for pneumonia guideline-development discussions in Kenya and the sub-Saharan African region. Overall mortality was comparable to that reported in the APPIS trial -a multi-country trial that included children with HIV, in which 0.7% of participants died. Mortality in other cohorts of children with severe pneumonia is low ranging from 0 to 0.2% [5, 18, 22, 23]. Over half of those who failed treatment were observed to have developed signs of very severe pneumonia (6.2% of enrolled children) requiring broad-spectrum parenteral antibiotics and in many cases, oxygen. The challenge of determining the contribution of these more aggressive treatment options to the patients’ ultimate clinical outcome if children are treated from the outset as outpatients, as now recommended by WHO, will warrant consideration as countries develop contextually appropriate policies.
Negative views regarding the efficacy of oral versus injectable medication may have influenced decisions to declare treatment failure among children treated with amoxicillin more readily than in those receiving benzyl penicillin in this open-label study. However, misclassification of this nature is not expected to have had an effect on the results of the study, as it would bias the results in favor of the standard treatment, benzyl penicillin.
CONCLUSION
Oral treatment of severe pneumonia offers several potential benefits including the alternative of outpatient treatment, reduced demand for nursing care, elimination of the risks associated with injectable medications and a potential reduction in the overall cost of treatment. The findings of this study are consistent with those of previous trials suggesting similar outcomes for severe pneumonia treated with benzyl penicillin and oral amoxicillin. The pragmatic nature of the study and associated data on the frequency and nature of treatment failure will provide important new evidence to support discussions on appropriate guidance for Kenya and potentially, other countries with similar patient populations and health systems.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to acknowledge the following individuals, Prof. Steve Graham, Prof. Tabish Hazir and Dr. Jim Todd, who provided important contributions to the study as members of the Data Safety and Monitoring Board or through informal advice on study design and analysis. We also thank Ms. Judy Ng’ang’a and Ms. Bilha Mbayi for their support in coordinating data collection from the study sites. This manuscript is published with the permission of the Director of KEMRI.
FUNDNG
This trial was supported by funding from a Wellcome Trust Strategic Award (#084538) and through a Wellcome Trust Senior Fellowship (#076827) awarded to ME. Additional funds from a Wellcome Trust core grant awarded to the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme (#092654) supported the overall conduct of this work. Wellcome Trust URL: http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/. The Wellcome Trust and other funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Footnotes
COMPETING INTERESTS
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
The authors have no reported conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Walker CL, et al. Global burden of childhood pneumonia and diarrhoea. Lancet. 2013;381(9875):1405–16. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60222-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Niessen LW, et al. Comparative impact assessment of child pneumonia interventions. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87(6):472–80. doi: 10.2471/BLT.08.050872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Government of Kenya . In: Basic Paediatric Protocols. Ministry of Health, editor. Nairobi: 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 4.World Health Organization. Dept. of Child and Adolescent Health and Development . Pocket book of hospital care for children : guidelines for the management of common illnesses with limited resources. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2013. p. xx.p. 378. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hazir T, et al. Ambulatory short-course high-dose oral amoxicillin for treatment of severe pneumonia in children: a randomised equivalency trial. Lancet. 2008;371(9606):49–56. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60071-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Addo-Yobo E, et al. Oral amoxicillin versus injectable penicillin for severe pneumonia in children aged 3 to 59 months: a randomised multicentre equivalency study. Lancet. 2004;364(9440):1141–8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17100-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Guyatt GH, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Bmj. 2008;336(7650):924–6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.World Health Organization . Recommendations for management of common childhood conditions: evidence for technical update of pocket book recommendations: newborn conditions, dysentery, pneumonia, oxygen use and delivery, common causes of fever, severe acute malnutrition and supportive care. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2012. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nair H, et al. Global and regional burden of hospital admissions for severe acute lower respiratory infections in young children in 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2013;381(9875):1380–90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61901-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Agweyu A, Opiyo N, English M. Experience developing national evidence based clinical guidelines for childhood pneumonia in a low-income setting - making the GRADE? BMC Pediatr. 2012;12(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Peto R, et al. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and design. Br J Cancer. 1976;34(6):585–612. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1976.220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Awasthi S, et al. Effectiveness of 3-day amoxycillin vs. 5-day co-trimoxazole in the treatment of non-severe pneumonia in children aged 2-59 months of age: a multi-centric open labeled trial. J Trop Pediatr. 2008;54(6):382–9. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmn050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Clinical efficacy of 3 days versus 5 days of oral amoxicillin for treatment of childhood pneumonia: a multicentre double-blind trial. Lancet. 2002;360(9336):835–41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09994-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Agarwal G, et al. Three day versus five day treatment with amoxicillin for non-severe pneumonia in young children: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Bmj. 2004;328:791–4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38049.490255.DE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.CATCHUP Clinical efficacy of co-trimoxazole versus amoxicillin twice daily for treatment of pneumonia: a randomised controlled clinical trial in Pakistan. Arch Dis Child. 2002;86(2):113–8. doi: 10.1136/adc.86.2.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Berkley JA, et al. Use of clinical syndromes to target antibiotic prescribing in seriously ill children in malaria endemic area: observational study. Bmj. 2005;330(7498):995. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38408.471991.8F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ayieko P, et al. A multifaceted intervention to implement guidelines and improve admission paediatric care in Kenyan district hospitals: a cluster randomised trial. PLoS Med. 2011;8(4):e1001018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Addo-Yobo E, et al. Outpatient treatment of children with severe pneumonia with oral amoxicillin in four countries: the MASS study. Trop Med Int Health. 2011 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02787.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.English M, et al. Adoption of recommended practices and basic technologies in a low-income setting. Arch Dis Child. 2014 doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Reed C, et al. Development of the Respiratory Index of Severity in Children (RISC) score among young children with respiratory infections in South Africa. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(1):e27793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rothwell PM. External validity of randomised controlled trials: “to whom do the results of this trial apply?”. Lancet. 2005;365(9453):82–93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17670-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bari A, et al. Community case management of severe pneumonia with oral amoxicillin in children aged 2-59 months in Haripur district, Pakistan: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9805):1796–803. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61140-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Atkinson M, et al. Comparison of oral amoxicillin and intravenous benzyl penicillin for community acquired pneumonia in children (PIVOT trial): a multicentre pragmatic randomised controlled equivalence trial. Thorax. 2007;62(12):1102–6. doi: 10.1136/thx.2006.074906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.