Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Reprod. 2009 Jan 7;80(5):944–953. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.108.072546

The Unfolded Protein Response Contributes to Preimplantation Mouse Embryo Death in the DDK Syndrome1

Lanping Hao 3, Rita Vassena 3,4, Guangming Wu 3,5, Zhiming Han 3, Yong Cheng 3, Keith E Latham 3,6, Carmen Sapienza 3,7,2
PMCID: PMC2723760  NIHMSID: NIHMS109905  PMID: 19129515

Abstract

DDK syndrome is the polar-lethal embryonic death that occurs at the morula-blastocyst transition when female mice of the DDK strain are mated with males from many other inbred strains (so-called “alien” males). Embryonic death is caused by incompatibility between a DDK oocyte factor and an alien male gene, both of which map to the Om locus on mouse chromosome 11. We have compared global transcription patterns of DDK X DDK embryos (high viability) and DDK X C57BL/6 embryos (low viability) at the morula stage, approximately 24 h before any morphological manifestations of DDK syndrome are observed. Of the transcripts that are differentially more abundant in the DDK X C57BL/6 embryos, we noted that many are the products of genes induced by the “unfolded protein response”. We confirmed that a number of genes in this pathway are up-regulated in the DDK X C57BL/6 embryos by quantitative RT-PCR. Immunostaining of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) marker BIP/GRP78 (immunoglobin-binding protein/glucose-regulated protein of 78 kDa), official symbol HSPA5, heat shock protein 5. revealed an accompanying abnormal HSPA5 accumulation and ER structure in the DDK X C57BL/6 embryos. Immunostaining for HERPUD1 (homocysteine-inducible, endoplasmic reticulum stress-inducible, ubiquitin-like domain member 1) and ATF4 (activating transcription factor 4) also revealed accumulation of these stress-response products. Our results indicate that the unfolded protein response is induced in embryos destined to die from DDK syndrome and that the embryonic death observed is associated with inability to resolve the associated ER stress.

INTRODUCTION

DDK syndrome is the term used to describe the embryonic death that occurs at the morula-blastocyst transition when female mice of the DDK strain are mated with males from many other inbred strains (“alien” males) [13]. The syndrome has attracted attention because of the combination of genetic factors and parental-origin effects that are required for embryonic death to occur. The embryos die because of incompatibility between an ooplasmic factor of DDK maternal origin and a paternal non-DDK (“alien”) gene [46]. Interactions between the ooplasm and the paternal pronucleus affect trophoblast function and blastocyst formation [4, 6] but the nature of the maternal/paternal factor interaction is unknown.

Several morphological and physiological abnormalities have been characterized in the dying embryos, including reduced gap junctional communication [7, 8], low intracellular pH [7, 8] and a tendency for compacted morula to “decompact” [3]. However, none of these morphological or physiological features suggests an obvious pathway by which lethality is induced.

The fact that the lethal phenotype is not fully penetrant, varies with a characteristic frequency (depending on the DDK and alien strain combination [3]) and requires both genetic (i.e., both DDK and “alien” strain-specific factors) and epigenetic (DDK maternal and alien strain paternal) factors suggests that the phenotype is caused by abnormal regulation of otherwise normal genes. In this context, DDK syndrome is an unusual form of “synthetic lethal” [9]; in the context of each inbred strain, the lethal genes/gene products do not cause lethality. Synthetic lethality is explained most frequently as the result of individual gene defects in two parallel redundant pathways (disrupting both) or two defects in genes in a single pathway which are cumulative in their effect, resulting in disruption of the single essential pathway (e.g., [10], for additional discussion). The DDK syndrome requirement for an epigenetic component (parental origin of the Om genes) suggests that the lethal phenotype, in this case, results from the abnormal regulation and interaction of genetically “different” but otherwise “normal” gene products.

Both the maternal and paternal genes responsible for DDK syndrome have been mapped to a 700 kb interval on chromosome 11 [11]. The compatible/incompatible paternal phenotype is in complete linkage disequilibrium with two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the second intron of LOC435271 [11], a member of the schlafen gene family. Schlafen gene family members affect differentiation in the hematopoeitic lineage, in vivo [12]. Schlafen family members also lead to G1 cell cycle arrest through repression of cyclin D1, in vitro [13], although there are conflicting reports on this point [14]. The paternal gene in the death of DDK syndrome embryos is a member of a gene family about which little is known (the family was first described by Schwartz et al. [12] and only 13 studies have been published on schlafen family members[1123]. There is conflicting evidence over whether the expression of particular members results in cell cycle arrest or cell death, hence it remains unclear what specific pathway links the schlafen gene family to the lethal phenotype. To discover what specific processes and pathways are altered in embryos destined to die from the DDK syndrome, we compared global transcription patterns of DDK X DDK embryos (fully viable embryos, hereafter denoted “KK”) and DDK X C57BL/6 embryos (90–95% of these embryos die, hereafter denoted “KB”). We compared the transcriptomes of morphologically normal KB embryos and healthy KK embryos at the morula stage, approximately 24 hours before the appearance of any morphological manifestations of “DDK syndrome” using the mouse Affymetrix MOE430 v2.0 gene chip. We found a group of genes with higher transcript levels in the KB embryos, several of which are involved in the unfolded protein response (UPR) pathway. We confirmed independently that several genes in this pathway are upregulated in the KB embryos by real-time PCR. Immunostaining of the endoplasmic reticulum marker HSPA5, heat shock protein A5 (also known as BIP/GRP78) confirmed abnormal accumulation and structure of the ER in the lethal embryos. Positive immunostaining for HERPUD1, (homocysteine-inducible, endoplasmic reticulum stress-inducible, ubiquitin-like domain member 1) and ATF4 (activating transcription factor 4) further demonstrated accumulation of these stress-response products. Pathway analysis of genes upregulated in KB embryos indicates that LOC435271 may transmit cell death signals through the UPR pathway and result in “DDK syndrome” embryonic death.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mouse crosses and collection of mouse embryos

The DDK inbred strain was a gift of Charles Babinet (Institute Pasteur, Paris) and has been maintained in a specific pathogen-free facility at Temple University Medical School since 1997. C57/BL6 mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Mice carrying the “40E” recombinant Chromosome 11 were kindly provided by Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena (Carolina Center for Genome Sciences). All studies adhered to procedures consistent with the National Research Council Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

All mice are maintained in a constant environment with a 12hr/12hr light/dark cycle. Morula stage embryos were collected from 3–10 month old females following mating within its natural estrous cycle without hormone induction. Two types of embryos were collected: the “KK” group (DDK female mated with DDK male) and the “KB” group (DDK female mated with C57/BL6 male). For immunofluorescent staining, 40E mice were used instead of DDK inbred mice. The 40E mice are homozygous for DDK alleles at the Om locus and were used instead of the DDK inbred strain because of greater availability. The reproductive performance of 40E animals, with respect to DDK syndrome, is identical to the DDK inbred strain [11, 24]. Mice were checked for copulation plugs each morning, and the embryos were flushed from the reproductive tract on the morning of day 4 (day of copulation plug denoted as day 1) using M2 medium (Sigma, St.Louis).

RNA extraction, labeling, and hybridization

For each KK and KB group, three pools of 30 embryos were collected and transferred to 20 µl of extraction buffer (Picopure kit, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). The tube was incubated at 42° C for 30 min and then stored at −70 °C. RNA extraction was performed with the Picopure RNA extraction kit according to manufacturer instructions for small sample preparation. For each sample, the mRNA population was reverse transcribed. The cDNA was employed for a first round of in vitro transcription, followed by random priming and a second round of reverse transcription and in vitro transcription to achieve a linear amplification (Affymetrix Small Sample Technical Bulletin, www.affymetrix.com) with the following minor modifications: the initial volume for mRNA annealing was raised to five µl, and the conditions for reverse transcription were 30 min at 42° C followed by 30 min at 45° C to increase the reaction efficiency in GC rich regions of mRNA. The final yield of biotinylated cRNA was 30–80 µg. 20µg of cRNA per replicate were fragmented and 10µg hybridized to Affymetrix MOE 430 2.0 Gene Chips, then washed and stained on fluidic stations, and scanned according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Microarray data analysis

Microarray Analysis Suite 5.0 (MAS, Affymetrix) was used to quantify microarray signals with default analysis parameters and global scaling to target a mean equal to 150 signal units. The MAS metric output was loaded into GeneSpring v7 (Silicon Genetics) with per chip normalization to the 50th percentile and per gene normalization to the median. To minimize false positive signals, only genes called “Present” in at least two out of three replicates in one embryo kind/condition were used for further analysis with all statistical packages. The K-means hierarchical clustering (HCL) of GeneSpring v7 was used divide the data into groups based on their expression patterns and to produce groups with a high degree of similarity within groups and low degree of similarity between groups. It is important to note that, although the Affymetrix MOE430 2.0 array interrogates one gene with every probe set, 14.7% of the genes present on the array are represented by more than one probe set. All analyses described were performed using the Affymetrix probe set lists.

The filtered MAS metrics output was loaded into TIGR-MEV v3.0.3 [25]. The Statistical Analysis of Microarray (SAM) algorithm[26] was applied to identify genes with significant differences among KB and KK embryos at the 5% false discovery rate (FDR).

Fold-changes of expression differences KB and KK embryos were calculated following SAM analysis. The resulting lists of differentially expressed genes (Supplemental Table 1 and all Supplemental Tables are available online at www.biolreprod.org) were imported into Expression Analysis Systematic Explorer (EASE, version 2.0) to analyze gene ontology for over-representation [27]. EASE is an algorithm designed to analyze a list of candidate genes against a set population (in our case the list of genes detected on the Gene Chip) and to report a score that is the expression of the likelihood of over-representation in the Gene Ontology (GO) annotation categories for biological process, molecular function, or cellular component. The EASE score was calculated for likelihood of over-representation of annotation classes, and only GO biological processes with an EASE score less than 5% are shown. It is important to note that a significant EASE score does not relate to an increased fold-change or overall expression significance, but merely a higher than expected number of transcripts falling into a GO annotation category. The filtered list of transcripts over-expressed in KB embryos was further imported into Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA, www.ingenuity.com) in order to detect networks detailing physical association or functional interaction among transcripts falling into different GO annotation categories.

Quantitative mRNA expression analysis

For each KK and KB group, three pools of seven morulae were collected. RNA was extracted using Picopure RNA extraction kit. Reverse transcription and total cDNA amplification by PCR were performed as previously described [2830]. The 3’ termini of the entire mRNA population are amplified quantitatively without altering relative sequence abundance. The RT-PCR method yields highly representative cDNA libraries [28, 3133]. The amplified cDNA was then analyzed by real-time PCR using LightCycler DNA Master SYBR Green I (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN), following the manufacturer protocol. cDNA was diluted 1:8 , and 1µl of the diluted cDNA was used in each 20 µl PCR reaction using primers shown in Table 3. The cytochrome c oxidase subunit VII (Cox7c) mRNA was assayed as an internal control to aid quantitation. This mRNA is induced and expressed at a high constitutive level from the8-cell stage onward [34] and is therefore ideal as an internal standard for embryos collected after the 8-cell stage. All Cox7c probes present on the array detect similar amounts of Cox7c mRNA in both groups of embryos (see Supplemental Table 3). The differences in mRNA expression between the KB and KK groups were calculated using 2−ΔΔCT method [35].

Table 3.

Primers for real time PCR

Gene
name
Forward Primer (5’–3’) Reverse primer (5’–3’) Product
length
Atf4 CTCGGCCCAAACCTTATG CTTCTATCAGGTCTTTCAGATACT 249
C80913 CCTTTATCAGTGGCATTGGG CAA CAT CAC AGCTGGTACG 202
Chek1 GTGAATAGAGTGCTGCTATGTG ATGAATTTGATCCATCCTGTCC 193
Coil GGAGGCATCCTTGTTGTATT GCAGTTTATATTCAGCCTTTAGC 208
Dap TTACCAGGCTGTGTCGCTA TTATGGCTTTAAGGTCCCTTCCTA 225
Exosc9 GGAAGAGGAGGAAGGTGG CTTCTGGTTTGCACTGGTC 193
Herpud1 ACTGTAAGCAGAAGGCCC ACATGTCTAGCAATTCACTGAT 222
Psmd6 TAAGAGAAATGAGAATCCATGCG GTTCTTGCTATCAGGTCTGTTG 203
Rps9 CGCCAACGTCACATTAGG CCTCATCATCACCAGCTC 184
Usp39 GAATTACAAGACCTCCAGGTG GTCAGTCTGTGTTCAGCG 202
Xbp1 CATAGGCCTGTCTCTTTCGTTA AAACTGTCAAATGACCCTCC 224

Immunofluorescent staining

Embryos at the morula stage were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 30 min, washed 3 times in PBS and permeabilized with PBS/0.05% Triton X-100 for 30 min, followed by incubation in PBS/2%BSA for 30 min. To detect HERPUD1 or ATF4 and HSPA5 simultaneously, 0.2 µg/ml anti-HERPUD1 rabbit antibody (Protein Tech Group, Chicago, IL) or 2.5µg/ml anti-ATF4 rabbit antibody (Lifespan Biosciences, Seattle, WA), and 10µg/ml anti-KDEL mouse monoclonal antibody (Stressgen, Ann Abor, MI) were added to embryos for overnight incubation at 4 °C. After washing 3 times in 0.01% Triton X -100 and 0.1% Tween-20 in PBS, embryos were incubated for 1 h with both Red-X-goat anti rabbit IgG (H+L), 20µg /ml (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and FITC anti mouse IgG(H+L), F(ab’)2 fragment, 10 µg/ml (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD). After two washes in 0.01% Triton X -100 and 0.1% Tween-20 in PBS and one wash with PBS, embryos were placed on slides with citifluor (AF1, Citifluor Products, Canterbury, UK), covered with a coverslip and sealed with nail polish. Fluorescence was visualized on a inverted Olympus microscope (Olympus America Inc.) equipped with fluorview confocal laser scanning software (Olympus). The 488-nm (Argon) and 568-nm (Krypton) wavelengths of the laser were used for the excitation of flurorescein (FITC) and propidium iodide (PI) fluorescence respectively. ImageJ software (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/download.html) was used to quantify total embryo fluorescence.

RESULTS

Microarray analysis

We compared mRNA expression profiles of KK morula stage embryos with KB morula stage embryos. This developmental stage was selected because both groups of embryos appear morphologically normal at this stage but greater than 90% of the KB embryos die within the next 24 hours [2] (see also Fig. 1). We reasoned that only one or two cell divisions take place between the time at which the embryos appear morphologically normal and the time at which they are grossly abnormal/dying, so that any cell death pathway is likely to be induced around the time at which we collected embryo samples. We used three replicates of each group with 30 embryos per replicate. RNA was extracted from each embryo pool and cRNA was amplified and hybridized as described (See methods) to the Affymetrix MOE 430 v.2 chip, which contains 49,000 different probes corresponding to approximately 35,000 different transcripts.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

“DDK Syndrome”- Preimplantation embryos from DDK females X C57BL/6 males. Left group of embryos appear morphologically normal at the morula stage. Right grouping shows same embryos degenerating after one additional day of culture. Arrow in right grouping denotes one morphologically normal blastocyst.

Amongst the six arrays, percent present call ranged from 36.87 to 40.20, corresponding to 45101 probe sets, which is well within the acceptable range [36, 37], and an overall presence call of 36.5% (1.9×104 of 5.2×104 probe sets). The other quality control parameters for all the samples were: scale factor 1.139 to 1.68 (accepted range: 0.5 to 5.0), and background 37.04 to 46.29 (accepted range: 20 to 100). Tabular data for all samples are available at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository (www.ncbi.nlm.gih.gov/geo).

Hierarchical clustering of the replicates (Fig. 2) indicated that the KK replicates cluster together and their transcriptional profile is distinct from the KB group of replicates, which also clustered together.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Hierarchichal clustering analysis of sample replicates based on transcript levels in each of three replicates of thirty embryos each from the cross DDK X DDK (KK1, KK2, KK3 on left half of figure) and from the cross DDK X C57BL/6 (KB1, KB2, KB3 on right half of figure).

Comparison of the total transcript profiles using SAM (Statistical Analysis of Microarray) at a 5% false discovery rate (FDR) indicated that transcripts corresponding to 83 of the probes were present at significantly higher level in KB embryos than KK embryos, while five transcripts were present at lower levels in KB embryos (Supplemental Table 1).

mRNA Expression analysis

To confirm differential transcript levels between the two types of embryo, we isolated RNA and quantitatively amplified the mRNA using a well established protocol developed originally by Brady and Iscove (1993) [28], which amplifies the cDNA population whilst preserving the individual sequence representation. The amplified cDNA was then analyzed by real-time PCR in order to compare expression of specific mRNAs. Of the eleven genes tested for increased levels of mRNA in KB embryos nine also appeared to be present at higher levels by real-time PCR (Fig. 3). These data thus confirm differential expression for the majority of genes assayed.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Comparison between relative expression on microarray analysis (black bars) and observed relative expression by real time PCR (white bars) for eleven genes estimated to be upregulated in KB embryos compared with KK embryos by transcriptional profiling (using Affymetrix MOE430 v.2,)

Although our results with KB morula stage embryos should not be expected to be directly comparable with the transcriptional profiles of “wild-type” embryos of other inbred strain combinations, we note that ten of the eleven genes examined by real-time PCR also appear over-expressed in KB morulae as compared with (CF1XB6D2F1) 8 cell embryos [38]. This does not appear to be the result of hybridization differences due to probe/target SNPs or comparisons between embryos of slightly different stages. KK morulae showed very close to equal expression with (CF1XB6D2F1) 8 cell embryos at six of the eleven loci and slightly lower expression at the other five (data not shown).

Biological Functions of Differentially Expressed mRNAs

The first ten genes whose transcripts were identified as differentially abundant in KB embryos are ranked in Table 1 (see also Supplemental Table 1 for a complete listing of all 83 probes with a significant P-value.). In ranking the genes, multiple probes corresponding to the same gene have not been included, nor have probes corresponding only to unannotated or poorly annotated genes (i.e.,Riken cDNAs) because we are attempting to identify the pathway leading to the death of these embryos. We noted that three of the first four genes in Table 1 are involved in the “unfolded protein response” (UPR). The UPR is an intracellular signaling pathway that transmits information about protein folding status in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the cytoplasm and the nucleus [39]. The UPR includes transcriptional induction of a number of UPR genes, translational attenuation of global protein synthesis and ER-associated degradation (ERAD) [40]. The UPR leads to apoptosis if the protein folding defect is not corrected [41].

Table 1.

Top 10 genes upregulated in DDK X C57BL/6 embryos and other upregulated genes

X-fold overexpressed in
DDK X C57BL/6
Gene
identity
Function
39.05 Herpud1 Stress, unfolded protein
25.04 Aldh18a1 Proline biosynthesis
15.22 Usp39 mRNA processing
ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process
10.88 Ddit Transcription, ER overload
response/apoptosis
9.91 Lyz1 Carbohydrate metab., cytolysis, defense resp.
to bacteria
8.47 Scd3 Stearoyl coA desaturase, iron binding
8.46 Tm6sf1 Transmembrane 6 superfamily 1
7.5 Pycr1 Proline biosynthesis
7.27 Mtmr7 Protein amino acid phosphorylation
7.22 B3galt6 Glycosaminoglycan biosyn, protein amino
acid phosphorylation
7.14 Rps9 RNA binding
structural constituent of ribosome
4.44 Psmd6 Protein binding
3.72 Dap Apoptosis, induction of apoptosis by
extracellular signals
3.21 C80913 Unfolded protein binding
3.09 Xbp1 DNA binding, transcription factor activity,
protein binding, sequence-specific DNA
binding,
protein dimerization activity
3.04 Atf4 DNA binding, transcription factor activity,
protein binding, sequence-specific DNA
binding, protein dimerization activity
2.64 Chek1 protein binding
ATP binding
kinase activity
transferase activity
2.27 Coil protein binding
disulfide oxidoreductase activity
2.03 Exosc9 RNA binding
nuclease activity
exonuclease activity
protein binding
hydrolase activity

We also analyzed the list of genes that were differentially more abundant in KB embryos using the Expression Analysis Systematic Explorer (EASE, version 2.0) to analyze the gene ontology for overrepresentation [27]. The EASE score was calculated for likelihood of over-representation of annotation classes, and only biological processes with an EASE score less than 5% are shown (Table 2). Among the transcripts over-represented in KB morulae, EASE analysis identified 2 Gene Ontology (GO) categories with a Bonferroni-corrected EASE score <0.05 (Table 2). Of note, these two GO categories point to abnormal metabolism of organic and carboxylic acids, which may help to explain the observed abnormality in intracellular pH [7, 8]. In addition, GO categories with significant uncorrected EASE scores include those involving amino acid biosynthesis, amino acid metabolism and tRNA metabolism. These pathways are also expected to be disrupted if the UPR is induced, leading to disruption of protein synthesis.

Table 2.

EASE analysis for genes upregulated in KB morulae compared with KK

GO molecular function EASE score Bonferroni No. of
genes
ORGANIC ACID METABOLISM 7.24E-05 4.77E-02 10
CARBOXYLIC ACID METABOLISM 7.24E-05 4.77E-02 10
CATALYTIC ACTIVITY 1.57E-04 3.83E-01 32
CELLULAR BIOSYNTHESIS 5.81E-04 4.23E-01 14
BIOSYNTHESIS 6.42E-04 1.00E+00 15
TRANSFERASE ACTIVITY 5.41E-03 1.00E+00 15
OXIDOREDUCTASE ACTIVITY 7.97E-03 1.00E+00 8
CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGICAL PROCESS 1.35E-02 1.00E+00 46
AMINO ACID METABOLISM 1.42E-02 1.00E+00 5
ORGANELLE MEMBRANE 1.46E-02 1.00E+00 8
CELLULAR METABOLISM 1.62E-02 1.00E+00 37
TRANSFERASE ACTIVITY, 1.78E-02 1.00E+00 10
TRANSFERRING PHOSPHORUS-
CONTAINING GROUPS
TRNA METABOLISM 1.90E-02 1.00E+00 4
PHOSPHORYLATION 2.04E-02 1.00E+00 8
AMINO ACID BIOSYNTHESIS 2.12E-02 1.00E+00 3
MALATE METABOLISM 2.18E-02 1.00E+00 2
AMINO ACID AND DERIVATIVE 2.49E-02 1.00E+00 5
METABOLISM
MALATE DEHYDROGENASE ACTIVITY 2.51E-02 1.00E+00 2
GENERATION OF PRECURSOR 2.79E-02 1.00E+00 7
METABOLITES AND ENERGY
NITROGEN COMPOUND BIOSYNTHESIS 3.42E-02 1.00E+00 3
AMINE BIOSYNTHESIS 3.42E-02 1.00E+00 3
AMINE METABOLISM 4.09E-02 1.00E+00 5
CELL 4.32E-02 1.00E+00 46
MITOCHONDRION 4.91E-02 1.00E+00 9
OXIDATIVE PHOSPHORYLATION 4.94E-02 1.00E+00 3
NITROGEN COMPOUND METABOLISM 4.99E-02 1.00E+00 5

The five transcripts found to be present at lower level in KB embryos than KK embryos do not have any GO categories in common and we were unable to confirm that Catalase (Supplemental Table 2), stress 70 protein chaperone or RNA binding motif protein 39 (not shown in Supplemental Table 2 but for which lower transcript levels were observed on the array) were present at lower levels in KB embryos. We did not pursue these genes further.

We also used Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) to discover networks of genes that were expressed at higher level in KB embryos and that may interact in the UPR pathway (Fig. 4). Of note, with respect to the map location of the genes responsible for DDK syndrome, one of the schlafen gene family members (Slfn1) (see Discussion) is found in the network, even though it is not found to be differentially abundant between the two classes of embryos.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

HERPUD1 Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Pathway illustrates interactions between indicated proteins. The shaded symbols indicate proteins encoded by transcripts that are more abundant in KB embryos. Unshaded symbols were not identified as differentially expressed but were integrated into the computationally generated networks on the basis of evidence stored in the IPA knowledge memory indicating a relevance to this network. The symbol shapes denote enzymes (diamond), kinases (triangle), transcription factors (ellipse), growth factors (square), ion channels (rectangle), transporters (trapezoid) and “other” (circle).

Examination of ER and ER stress response by immunofluorescence

If KB embryos are dying as a result of inducing the UPR, one might expect abnormal amount or structure of the ER in embryos from the lethal cross. We have examined KK and KB embryos by immunofluorescence, using anti-KDEL antibodies specific to the endoplasmic reticulum marker HSPA5. We also performed immunofluorescence with antibodies against HERPUD1 and ATF4, both of which are involved in the UPR and show increased mRNA level in the KB embryos. Although the morphological differences between the two genotypic classes of embryos are not striking at this stage (both classes of embryos appear similar to the KB embryos in the left panel of Fig. 1; i.e., “normal” morulae), 90–95% of the KB embryos die within 24 hours (right panel of Fig. 1).

Upon immunostaining for HSPA5, the ER in KB embryos appears more prominent and less regular in shape and perinuclear location than the ER of KK embryos (Fig. 5, Fig. 6). Although HERPUD1 does not co-localize with the ER in either class of embryo (nor in control embryos of other genotypes, data not shown), there appears to be more HERPUD1 in KB embryos (compare merge images; KK total fluorescence = 114 units by ImageJ software (see Materials and Methods), KB total fluorescence = 141 units) and ATF4 also appears more intense in KB embryos (compare merge images; KK total fluorescence = 90 units, KB total fluorescence = 124 units).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Confocal images of immunofluorescence of KK and KB morula stage embryos. Anti-KDEL recognizes HSPA5 (detected in green), which is an integral component of endoplasmic reticulum and HERPUD1 is linked to ER stress. Ninety-five percent of KB embryos die within twenty-four hours of the morula stage. Arrowheads in KB embryos denote areas in which ER appears to be more prominent than in KK embryos or a substantial ER structure does not appear to be surrounding a cell nucleus (arrowhead in KB merge image). Red fluorescence (HERPUD1) also appears more intense in KB embryo (compare merge images and see text).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Confocal images of immunofluorescence of KK and KB morula stage embryos. Anti-KDEL recognizes HSPA5 (detected in green) which is an integral component of endoplasmic reticulum and ATF4 is linked to ER stress. Arrowheads in KB embryos denote areas in which ER appears to be more prominent than in KK embryos or a substantial ER structure does not appear to be surrounding a cell nucleus (arrowhead). Red fluorescence (ATF4) also appears more intense in KB embryos (compare merge images and see text).

Transient “Rescue” of DDK Syndrome Embryos Reduces Abnormal ER Characteristics

Previous studies [7, 8] have shown that DDK syndrome embryos have a comparatively low intracellular pH of approximately 6.65 (as compared to a pH of approximately 7.15 for control embryos). Artificially increasing intracellular pH by incubating the 4–16 cell embryos in the weak base, methylamine increases the rate of blastocyst formation dramatically [7]. If ER stress is associated with DDK syndrome embryo death, one might expect that treatments that increase embryo survival would also reduce abnormal ER accumulation and localization. We divided a group of KB embryos into two groups and treated one group with 10 µM methylamine for six hours at the 8-cell stage. At the end of the treatment period, each group of embryos was fixed and the ER amount and localization was examined by immunofluorescence using the same ATF4 and KDEL antibodies used in Fig. 6. The merged images are shown in Fig. 7 and indicate that untreated embryos (first column), as a group, have more abnormal localization of KDEL immunofluorescence than the treated embryos. We also quantified the KDEL fluorescence of each embryo (Fig. 8) using ImageJ software (see Materials and Methods). The mean fluorescence of the treated group is significantly lower than the mean fluorescence of the untreated group (237.05 mean arbitrary fluorescence units versus 304.35 mean arbitrary fluorescence units; P<0.01). These results indicate that methylamine treatment of KB embryos decreases both amount and abnormal localization of ER.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Merged confocal images of immunofluorescent staining. Anti-KDEL (recognizes HSPA5) detected in green, ATF4 detected in red. Left column, KB morulae without methylamine treatment, right column, KB morulae with methylamine treatment.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Confocal images of embryos in Fig. 7 showing only anti-KDEL staining (recognizes HSPA5, detected in green). Left column, KB morulae without methylamine treatment, right column, KB morulae with methylamine treatment. Bar height in graph at base shows mean fluorescence of each group, with standard deviation (P<0.01).

DISCUSSION

We have examined the global transcription profile of preimplantation embryos that are destined to die as a result of “DDK syndrome” in order to identify the biochemical pathway that leads to embryonic death. Our analysis indicates that multiple genes in the UPR are up-regulated prior to the appearance of the morphological abnormalities that are characteristic of DDK syndrome embryos. The so-called “ER stress” resulting from the accumulation of improperly folded proteins is known to lead to apoptotic cell death, if uncorrected, in multiple systems [40, 41].

Embryos that die from “DDK syndrome” have morphological characteristics of apoptotic death, such as cell blebbing (right panel of Fig. 1). The morula stage embryos we have examined by transcriptional profiling appear morphologically normal and healthy (left panel of Fig. 1) and we find little evidence of upregulation of several genes central to apoptotic pathways at this time (Supplemental Table 3). However, Dap mRNA levels are approximately 3.5-fold higher in KB embryos than in KK embryos. Gozuacik et al. [42] have reported that DAP kinase is a key mediator of ER stress-induced caspase activation. We did not observe increased mRNA in KB embryos over KK embryos for any of caspases 3, 7, 8, 9 on the microarray (Supplemental Table 3). We did detect low levels of the pro-apoptotic caspases 3 and 7 in both groups of embryos, however, normal 8 cell and blastocyst stage embryos also express low-to-moderate levels of these mRNAs in an apparent stage-specific manner [43]. It is possible that caspase activity is not regulated at the level of transcription in preimplantation embryos, as mRNA levels of caspases 3 and 7 could not be used as a reliable indicator of apoptosis in bovine blastocysts [44]. Overall, the ER accumulation and abnormal localization seen in DDK syndrome embryos (Fig. 5, 6) supports the transcriptional profile of DDK syndrome embryos, indicating embryonic death is associated with a failure to resolve ER stress.

Artificially increasing the intracellular pH of 8 cell DDK syndrome embryos by incubation in the weak base, methylamine, resulted in a significant decrease in amount and abnormal localization of ER in treated embryos (Fig. 6). Methylamine treatment is reported to increase intracellular pH by approximately 0.5 units and dramatically improves embryo development to the blastocyst stage [7]. The cause of the 0.5 unit difference in pH between DDK syndrome and control embryos is unknown but it is noteworthy that the two GO gene categories that remain significantly different between the two types of embryos after correction for multiple testing are the “organic acid metabolism” and the “carboxylic acid metabolism” categories (Table 2). In addition, many of the individual genes that appear upregulated in KB embryos are involved in the synthesis, transport and modification of amino acids (Table 1; see also Supplemental Table 1). Any large-scale disruption in amino acid metabolism is likely to affect cellular pH and many cellular processes, including observed defects in gap-junctional communication [7, 8], as well as protein folding. It is unclear whether KB embryos might suffer from a general disruption in protein folding or whether a specific improperly folded protein accumulates and leads to the response.

The association between death of DDK syndrome embryos and induction of the UPR may result from the UPR being a default pathway that is implemented as a result of a primary defect in amino acid metabolism or, alternatively, the ER stress is caused by a primary defect in protein folding and the resulting effects on protein synthesis may lead to disruption of amino acid metabolism. The fact that DDK syndrome is initiated at the one cell stage [6] makes it difficult to conclude that the primary genetic or epigenetic defects affect the UPR, directly. However, the identity of the paternal gene [11] as part of a gene family whose members have biochemical functions that could play such a role (see below) is suggestive. In any case, the dramatic increase in blastocyst formation after incubation in methylamine [7] or forskolin [8] and the fact that 5–10% of KB embryos appear as morphologically normal blastocysts (and are capable of becoming viable and fertile adults [3]) suggests that one or both of the DDK ooplasmic factor and the factor provided by the alien paternal gene are not present or required after preimplantation development.

The lethally interacting paternal gene, LOC435271 [11], is a member of the schlafen gene family, of which at least two members (Slfn1 and Slfn2) cause cell cycle arrest [12, 13]. Although LOC435271 is not present as a probe on the array, it is expressed during preimplantation development (data not shown), as is Slfn1 (data not shown). The identification of LOC435271 as the lethally-interacting “alien” paternal gene in the DDK syndrome suggests that expression of this member of the schlafen family leads to cell death even though the nature of the connection between LOC435271 and the UPR pathway is unknown. In this regard, another schlafen family member, Slfn1, is linked to several UPR genes that are upregulated in KB embryos (Table 1) by Ingenuity pathway analysis (e.g., Herpud1, Ddit3, Xbp1Fig. 3).

LOC435271 has a divergent “AAA domain”, as do all of the schlafen family members. Classical AAA domain-containing proteins bind and hydrolyze GTP and ATP and perform diverse cellular functions that require energy, including protein folding and degradation (reviewed in Erzberger and Berger 2006[45]). How the expression of alien alleles of LOC435271 from the paternal genome might lead to induction of the unfolded protein response and embryonic death only in conjunction with DDK ooplasm suggests that a protein-protein interaction may be disrupted. Because models for AAA domain-containing protein function are based on associations of protein oligomers [45], it is not unreasonable to speculate that the protein encoded by the DDK allele at this locus is incompatible with the “alien” version of this protein in oligomeric complexes. Under this model, the reason that (alien female X DDK male) embryos are viable and (DDK female X alien male) embryos are not is that the former may express only one allele (or no alleles) at this locus, while the latter are predicted to express both alleles during early embryogenesis. We note that this “dominant - negative” mode of action speculation is a mirror image hypothesis of our original genetic model for DDK syndrome [46], in which we proposed that a gene expressed from only the maternal allele in alien strains became expressed from only the paternal allele in DDK, resulting in the expression of neither allele in (DDK female X alien male) embryos. The inactivation of an oligomeric complex by incompatible subunits is a biochemically distinct, but formally similar, mechanism. This scenario is capable of explaining the epigenetic requirements of DDK syndrome. However, the genetic composition of extant inbred strains, with respect to whether they carry DDK female-compatible or DDK female-incompatible alleles at the paternal gene, suggests that maternal and paternal components of DDK syndrome are encoded by different genes [11]. However, we note that the published observations require only that the incompatible maternal and paternal factors be different mutations [11] and does not exclude the possibility that they are different mutations within the same gene. The predictions of this model are being tested.

Footnotes

1

Supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD41440 and RR18907 to K.E.L. and HD34508 to C.S.)

REFERENCES

  • 1.Tomita T. One-side cross sterility between inbred strains of mice. Jpn. J. Genet. 1960;35:291. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wakasugi N. Studies on fertility of DDK mice: reciprocal crosses between DDK and C57BL/6J strains and experimental transplantation of the ovary. J Reprod Fertil. 1973;33:283–291. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0330283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wakasugi N. A genetically determined incompatibility system between spermatozoa and eggs leading to embryonic death in mice. J Reprod Fertil. 1974;41:85–96. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0410085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Babinet C, Richoux V, Guenet JL, Renard JP. The DDK inbred strain as a model for the study of interactions between parental genomes and egg cytoplasm in mouse preimplantation development. Dev Suppl. 1990:81–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mann JR. DDK egg-foreign sperm incompatibility in mice is not between the pronuclei. J Reprod Fertil. 1986;76:779–781. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0760779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Renard JP, Babinet C. Identification of a paternal developmental effect on the cytoplasm of one-cell-stage mouse embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;83:6883–6886. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.18.6883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Buehr M, Lee S, McLaren A, Warner A. Reduced gap junctional communication is associated with the lethal condition characteristic of DDK mouse eggs fertilized by foreign sperm. Development. 1987;101:449–459. doi: 10.1242/dev.101.3.449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Leclerc C, Becker D, Buehr M, Warner A. Low intracellular pH is involved in the early embryonic death of DDK mouse eggs fertilized by alien sperm. Dev Dyn. 1994;200:257–267. doi: 10.1002/aja.1002000307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dobzhansky T. Genetics of Natural Populations. Xiii. Recombination and Variability in Populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1946;31:269–290. doi: 10.1093/genetics/31.3.269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tucker CL, Fields S. Lethal combinations. Nat Genet. 2003;35:204–205. doi: 10.1038/ng1103-204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bell TA, de la Casa-Esperon E, Doherty HE, Ideraabdullah F, Kim K, Wang Y, Lange LA, Wilhemsen K, Lange EM, Sapienza C, de Villena FP. The paternal gene of the DDK syndrome maps to the Schlafen gene cluster on mouse chromosome 11. Genetics. 2006;172:411–423. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.047118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schwarz DA, Katayama CD, Hedrick SM. Schlafen, a new family of growth regulatory genes that affect thymocyte development. Immunity. 1998;9:657–668. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80663-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Brady G, Boggan L, Bowie A, O'Neill LA. Schlafen-1 causes a cell cycle arrest by inhibiting induction of cyclin D1. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:30723–30734. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500435200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhao L, Neumann B, Murphy K, Silke J, Gonda TJ. Lack of reproducible growth inhibition by Schlafen1 and Schlafen2 in vitro. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2008 doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2008.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Afonso CL, Tulman ER, Lu Z, Zsak L, Sandybaev NT, Kerembekova UZ, Zaitsev VL, Kutish GF, Rock DL. The genome of camelpox virus. Virology. 2002;295:1–9. doi: 10.1006/viro.2001.1343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cohen-Tannoudji M, Vandormael-Pournin S, Le Bras S, Coumailleau F, Babinet C, Baldacci P. A 2-Mb YAC/BAC-based physical map of the ovum mutant (Om) locus region on mouse chromosome 11. Genomics. 2000;68:273–282. doi: 10.1006/geno.2000.6297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fujikado N, Saijo S, Iwakura Y. Identification of arthritis-related gene clusters by microarray analysis of two independent mouse models for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8:R100. doi: 10.1186/ar1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Geserick P, Kaiser F, Klemm U, Kaufmann SH, Zerrahn J. Modulation of T cell development and activation by novel members of the Schlafen (slfn) gene family harbouring an RNA helicase-like motif. Int Immunol. 2004;16:1535–1548. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxh155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gubser C, Goodbody R, Ecker A, Brady G, O'Neill LA, Jacobs N, Smith GL. Camelpox virus encodes a schlafen-like protein that affects orthopoxvirus virulence. J Gen Virol. 2007;88:1667–1676. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.82748-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lund S, Christensen KV, Hedtjarn M, Mortensen AL, Hagberg H, Falsig J, Hasseldam H, Schrattenholz A, Porzgen P, Leist M. The dynamics of the LPS triggered inflammatory response of murine microglia under different culture and in vivo conditions. J Neuroimmunol. 2006;180:71–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2006.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Neumann B, Zhao L, Murphy K, Gonda TJ. Subcellular localization of the Schlafen protein family. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;370:62–66. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.03.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sohn WJ, Kim D, Lee KW, Kim MS, Kwon S, Lee Y, Kim DS, Kwon HJ. Novel transcriptional regulation of the schlafen-2 gene in macrophages in response to TLR-triggered stimulation. Mol Immunol. 2007;44:3273–3282. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2007.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang Y, Yang Z, Cao Y, Zhang S, Li H, Huang Y, Ding YQ, Liu X. The Hsp40 family chaperone protein DnaJB6 enhances Schlafen1 nuclear localization which is critical for promotion of cell-cycle arrest in T-cells. Biochem J. 2008;413:239–250. doi: 10.1042/BJ20071510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pardo-Manuel De Villena F, de La Casa-Esperon E, Williams JW, Malette JM, Rosa M, Sapienza C. Heritability of the maternal meiotic drive system linked to Om and high-resolution mapping of the Responder locus in mouse. Genetics. 2000;155:283–289. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.1.283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Saeed AI, Sharov V, White J, Li J, Liang W, Bhagabati N, Braisted J, Klapa M, Currier T, Thiagarajan M, Sturn A, Snuffin M, Rezantsev A, Popov D, Ryltsov A, Kostukovich E, Borisovsky I, Liu Z, Vinsavich A, Trush V, Quackenbush J. TM4: a free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis. Biotechniques. 2003;34:374–378. doi: 10.2144/03342mt01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:5116–5121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.091062498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hosack DA, Dennis G, Jr, Sherman BT, Lane HC, Lempicki RA. Identifying biological themes within lists of genes with EASE. Genome Biol. 2003;4:R70. doi: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-10-r70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Brady G, Iscove NN. Construction of cDNA libraries from single cells. Methods Enzymol. 1993;225:611–623. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(93)25039-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Latham KE, De la Casa E, Schultz RM. Analysis of mRNA expression during preimplantation development. Methods Mol Biol. 2000;136:315–331. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-065-9:315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rambhatla L, Patel B, Dhanasekaran N, Latham KE. Analysis of G protein alpha subunit mRNA abundance in preimplantation mouse embryos using a rapid, quantitative RT-PCR approach. Mol Reprod Dev. 1995;41:314–324. doi: 10.1002/mrd.1080410306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Brady G, Billia F, Knox J, Hoang T, Kirsch IR, Voura EB, Hawley RG, Cumming R, Buchwald M, Siminovitch K. Analysis of gene expression in a complex differentiation hierarchy by global amplification of cDNA from single cells. Curr Biol. 1995;5:909–922. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(95)00181-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cano-Gauci DF, Lualdi JC, Ouellette AJ, Brady G, Iscove NN, Buick RN. In vitro cDNA amplification from individual intestinal crypts: a novel approach to the study of differential gene expression along the crypt-villus axis. Exp Cell Res. 1993;208:344–349. doi: 10.1006/excr.1993.1255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Iscove NN, Barbara M, Gu M, Gibson M, Modi C, Winegarden N. Representation is faithfully preserved in global cDNA amplified exponentially from sub-picogram quantities of mRNA. Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20:940–943. doi: 10.1038/nbt729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mann M, Latham KE, Varmuza S. Identification of genes showing altered expression in preimplantation and early postimplantation parthenogenetic embryos. Dev Genet. 1995;17:223–232. doi: 10.1002/dvg.1020170307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pan H, O'Brien MJ, Wigglesworth K, Eppig JJ, Schultz RM. Transcript profiling during mouse oocyte development and the effect of gonadotropin priming and development in vitro. Dev Biol. 2005;286:493–506. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zeng F, Baldwin DA, Schultz RM. Transcript profiling during preimplantation mouse development. Dev Biol. 2004;272:483–496. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zheng P, Patel B, McMenamin M, Reddy SE, Paprocki AM, Schramm RD, Latham KE. The primate embryo gene expression resource: a novel resource to facilitate rapid analysis of gene expression patterns in non-human primate oocytes and preimplantation stage embryos. Biol Reprod. 2004;70:1411–1418. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.023788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bernales S, Papa FR, Walter P. Intracellular signaling by the unfolded protein response. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2006;22:487–508. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.122303.120200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Travers KJ, Patil CK, Wodicka L, Lockhart DJ, Weissman JS, Walter P. Functional and genomic analyses reveal an essential coordination between the unfolded protein response and ER-associated degradation. Cell. 2000;101:249–258. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80835-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Liu CY, Kaufman RJ. The unfolded protein response. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:1861–1862. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gozuacik D, Bialik S, Raveh T, Mitou G, Shohat G, Sabanay H, Mizushima N, Yoshimori T, Kimchi A. DAP-kinase is a mediator of endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced caspase activation and autophagic cell death. Cell Death Differ. 2008;15:1875–1886. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2008.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Exley GE, Tang C, McElhinny AS, Warner CM. Expression of caspase and BCL-2 apoptotic family members in mouse preimplantation embryos. Biol Reprod. 1999;61:231–239. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod61.1.231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Vandaele L, Goossens K, Peelman L, Van Soom A. mRNA expression of Bcl-2, Bax, caspase-3 and -7 cannot be used as a marker for apoptosis in bovine blastocysts. Anim Reprod Sci. 2008;106:168–173. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Erzberger JP, Berger JM. Evolutionary relationships and structural mechanisms of AAA+ proteins. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2006;35:93–114. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.35.040405.101933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sapienza C, Paquette J, Pannunzio P, Albrechtson S, Morgan K. The polar-lethal Ovum mutant gene maps to the distal portion of mouse chromosome 11. Genetics. 1992;132:241–246. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.1.241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES