Abstract
Proton uptake accompanies the reduction of all known substrates by nitrogenase. As one consequence, higher pH should limit the availability of protons as a substrate essential for turnover, thereby increasing the proportion of more highly reduced forms of the enzyme for further study. The utility of the high pH approach would appear problematic in view of the observation reported by Pham and Burgess (Biochemistry 32, 13725 (1993)) that the MoFe-protein undergoes irreversible protein denaturation above pH 8.65. In contrast, we found by both enzyme activity and crystallographic analyses that MoFe-protein is stable when incubated at pH 9.5. We did observe, however, that at higher pHs and under turnover conditions, the MoFe-protein is slowly inactivated. While normal, albeit low, substrate reduction occurs under these conditions, the MoFe-protein undergoes a complex transformation; initially the enzyme is reversibly inhibited for substrate reduction at pH 9.5 yet in a second, slower process the MoFe-protein becomes irreversibly inactivated as measured by substrate reduction activity at the optimal pH of 7.8. The final inactivated MoFe-protein has an increased hydrodynamic radius compared to native MoFe-protein yet it has a full complement of iron and molybdenum. Significantly, the modified MoFe-protein retains the ability to specifically interact with its nitrogenase partner, the Fe-protein, as judged by the support of ATP hydrolysis and by tight complex formation with Fe-protein in the presence of ATP and aluminum fluoride. The turnover-dependent inactivation coupled to conformational change suggests a mechanism based transformation that may provide a new probe of the nitrogenase catalysis.
Keywords: nitrogenase, mechanism based inhibition, iron-sulfur protein, nucleotide-dependent electron transfer, metalloprotein crystallography
Introduction
Substrate reduction by the molybdenum dependent nitrogenase involves two protein components, the molybdenum iron (MoFe-) protein, containing the active site for substrate reduction, and the iron (Fe-) protein, serving as the unique ATP dependent reductant for the MoFe-protein (1–3). A striking feature of the nitrogenase catalyzed reaction is that the electron flux through the system is independent of the substrate that is being reduced (1); under a given set of conditions, the number of electrons transferred to substrate per active site per unit time is the same for the reduction of dinitrogen to ammonia (the physiological reaction), the reduction of acetylene to ethylene (commonly used to assay nitrogenase activity), or the reduction of protons to dihydrogen, which occurs in the absence (or sufficiently low concentrations) of other reducible substrates. An important characteristic of the nitrogenase reaction is that substrates can only bind to forms of the MoFe-protein reduced by two or three electrons relative to the "asisolated" form, which can only be efficiently generated in the presence of reduced Fe-protein and ATP (4, 5). Efforts to generate significant populations of more highly reduced forms of the MoFe-protein for biophysical or structural characterizations are confounded by the ubiquitous presence of protons which are reduced to dihydrogen with the concomitant return to the initial stages of the catalytic cycle.
While protons cannot be eliminated from the aqueous solution environment, their concentration can be reduced by working at higher pHs. The pH dependence of nitrogenase activity may be described as a bell shape curve (6–10), with optimal activity occurring around pH 7–8 and decreasing at both lower and higher pHs (half maximal pHs of ~6.5 and 8.5, respectively). While it is not surprising that nitrogenase activity decreases at high pH, Pham and Burgess (8) reported that the MoFe-protein is "irreversibly damaged by pre-incubation above pH 8.65" in a 3 minute incubation, through a process suggested to arise from "a critical group on the MoFe protein with a pK in that range whose deprotonation leads either to cluster destruction or to an irreversible change in the structure of some critical part of the protein." Indeed, the idea that the MoFe-protein denatures at pHs outside the optimal range has been reflected in the subsequent design of pH-dependent experiments of nitrogenase activities (see (11)). However, while attempting to trap substrates and inhibitors of nitrogenase for crystallization studies, we observed a distinct type of high pH inactivation of the MoFe-protein that was not simple denaturation. As we report here, inactivation of the MoFe-protein at higher pH is not due to protein instability but is rather the consequence of a complex, mechanism-based reaction with the potential to provide insight to the mechanism(s) of nitrogenase.
Materials and Methods
Preparation of nitrogenase proteins
The MoFe-protein and Fe-protein from Azotobacter vinelandii (designated Av1 and Av2, respectively) were isolated under anaerobic conditions as previously described (12). The specific activities for acetylene reduction were ~2200 nmol ethylene min−1 mg−1 for Av1 and ~1800 nmol ethylene min−1 mg−1 for Av2. Unless otherwise noted, all operations were conducted anaerobically by appropriate manipulations using a Schlenk line connected to oxygen-scrubbed argon or in an anaerobic chamber.
The component ratio (CR) of Fe-protein to MoFe-protein is defined as moles of Av2 per mole of Av1 active site (with two active sites per Av1 tetramer). The CR may be calculated from the concentrations of Av1 and Av2 through the relationship CR = 1.82(cAv2/cAv1), where cAv1 and cAv2 are the protein concentrations in the final reaction mixture, given in mg mL−1, based on 233 kD and 64 kD for the molecular weights of Av1 and Av2, respectively. Protein concentration was determined by absorbance at 410 nm using extinction coefficients of 76 mM−1 cm−1 and 9.4 mM−1 cm−1 for Av1 and Av2, respectively.
Tri-buffer systems
Since the kinetics of substrate reduction by nitrogenase are sensitive to both pH (6–10) and ionic strength (13, 14), it is critical to use solution conditions where the two parameters may be varied independently. For the pH range of 7.8 to 10 utilized in this study, a tri-buffer system developed by Ellis and Morrison (15) was employed, composed of three components: 100 mM N-(2-acetamido)-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid (ACES), 50 mM tris(hydroxymethyl) aminomethane (Tris) and 50 mM ethanolamine, with pKas of 6.67, 8.0 and 9.5 at 30 °C, respectively. Over the pH range from 8 to 10, the ionic strength of this buffer ranges from 0.096 M to 0.100 M. We note that this is a different buffer system from that employed in the Pham and Burgess study (75 mM [bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino] tris(hydroxymethyl)methane (Bis-Tris), 38 mM N-(2-hydroxyethy1) piperazine-N'-propanesulfonic acid (HEPPS), 38 mM 2-(cyclohexylamino) ethanesulfonic acid (CHES) (8)), that exhibits a calculated ionic strength variation over the same pH range from 0.023 M to 0.070 M.
Nitrogenase activity assays
The activity of the nitrogenase proteins was determined by acetylene reduction to ethylene as expressed in the head space gas equilibrated with the reaction solution. The assay contained: 20 mM sodium dithionite (the source of reducing equivalents and also to maintain anaerobic conditions) and an ATP regeneration system (5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM ATP, 20 mM creatine phosphate and 23 units mL−1 creatine phosphokinase) (12). For the standard assay, the reaction mixture was buffered with 50 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.8, while for reactions above pH 8, the tri-buffer system described above was utilized. The pH of tri-buffer with ATP and creatine phosphate was adjusted by adding 6 M NaOH to a value higher than the target pH, so that the final pH was 9.5 (or other target pH) after processing, in order, addition of the kinase and MgCl2, multiple cycles of degassing, addition of dithionite, and finally introduction of the component proteins. Because these common buffers are strongly temperature dependent, the final pH was verified by measurement at 30 °C for a test vial with all components. No inhibitory effects on acetylene reduction by nitrogenase were observed for the tri-buffer when compared to the standard assay. For the kinetic studies, the reduction of acetylene was initiated by the addition to the reaction assay of premixed Av1 and Av2 to achieve the desired concentrations and component ratio. The volume of added Av1 and Av2 mixture was kept constant by addition of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.75, 200 mM NaCl and 5 mM sodium dithionite, so that the final ionic strength was independent of the CR. The anaerobic assay reactions were at 30 °C and for 10 min. in 8.9 mL serum vials with 1.0 mL assay solution and an argon atmosphere containing 1.0 mL of acetylene gas. The reaction was terminated by the addition of 0.25 mL 1 M citric acid and ethylene in the gas phase was quantified by gas chromatography.
In addition to the standard assay described above, two types of activity measurements were used: the "head space" and the "specific activity" assays. In the head space assay, the activity was monitored by the rate of appearance of ethylene in the gas phase of the reaction vial while allowing the reaction to continue. Ethylene and acetylene were quantified by gas chromatography of gas aliquots (50 μL) removed from the headspace at the designed time points.
The specific activity of Av1 in the reaction vial was monitored by removing liquid samples from the assay mixture at specified time points, for immediate transfer into a pH 7.8 standard assay solution containing excess additional Av2 (CR ~60). The transfer time was less than 10 sec. and the transfer initiated the standard 10 min. pH 7.8 assay. The program SigmaPlot version 11.0 (Systate Software, Inc) was used for curve-fitting and display of the experimental data.
Analytical column chromatography
The proteins in a reaction mixture were analyzed by size exclusion chromatography on a 1 cm × 30 cm column of Superdex S-200, run under anaerobic conditions. The elution profile was monitored by the absorbance at either 390 or 410 nm, as indicated.
ATP hydrolysis as measured by creatine
Since one mole of creatine is produced by the creatine kinase catalyzed phosphorylation of one mole of ADP by creatine phosphate, the amount of ATP hydrolyzed was established by measuring the change in creatine concentration in the reaction mixture (16, 17). These reactions were identical to the acetylene reduction assay, except the reaction was quenched by 0.25 mL of 0.5 M Na2EDTA, pH 8.0.
Av1-Av2-ADP-AlF4− complex formation
The ADP-AlF4− stabilized Av1-Av2 complex was prepared following the protocols of Renner and Howard (17). Inactive Av1 at a final concentration of 0.066 mg mL−1 and Av2 at CR ~4 were incubated in 100 mM MOPS, 50 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.3 with 10 mM sodium dithionite, 4 mM NaF and 0.2 mM AlCl3. For the reaction in the presence of ATP, 1 mM ATP, 8 mM MgCl2 plus the creatine kinase based ATP regenerating system were added. For reactions with ADP, 1 mM ADP and 8 mM MgCl2 were added, without an ATP regenerating system. The reactions were allowed to proceed for 30 minutes at 30 °C and the products analyzed by analytical column chromatography.
Metal analysis
The molybdenum and iron contents of Av1 were determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) using a Hewlett-Packard 4500 ICP-MS system. Iron and molybdenum standards (Ultra Scientific Analytical solutions for ICP-MS) at concentration ranges comparable to and overlapping the protein values were analyzed in tandem with the protein samples. Proteins and standards were prepared in ultra pure H2O containing 1% nitric acid (ICP-MS grade, Fluka) with appropriate reagent and buffer blanks. Protein concentration was determined by absorbance at 410 nm prior to 1 to 400 dilution in the nitric acid to give 35–50 μg mL−1 for aspiration by the ICP-MS instrument. The concentration of the Fe and Mo were determined using 56Fe and 96Mo isotopes and normalized for the Av1 concentration. The values were verified using the other natural abundance isotopes for both elements.
Crystal structure determination for native Av1 at pH 9.5
Av1 was crystallized at 22 °C in an anaerobic chamber using the sitting drop method with mixed drops containing 2 µL of 42 mg mL−1 of Av1 solution and 4 µL of precipitant. The precipitant contained 150 mM ACES, 75 mM Tris and 75 mM ethanolamine, pH 9.79, 17%-18% PEG 3350, 0.8 M NaCl, 1 mM sodium dithionite. Upon addition of protein, the final pH of the mixed drop was 9.5. For cryoprotection, crystals of native Av1 grown at pH 9.5 were successively transferred into the reservoir solution with increasing concentrations of 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol (MPD) up to 20%. Diffraction data were collected on beamline 12–2 at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource (SSRL), processed with XDS (18), and scaled with SCALA (19). The structure was solved by molecular replacement with the program MOLREP (20), using as a search model the Av1 structure determined at 1.16 Å resolution (PDB code: 1M1N). The refinement was performed with REFMAC (21) and PHENIX (22), while the graphics program COOT (23) was used for displaying maps and rebuilding the model. Data and refinement statistics are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Data collection and refinement statistics crystal parameters | |
space group P21 | |
a (Å) | 76.53 |
b (Å) | 127.92 |
c (Å) | 107.08 |
β(°) | 108.9 |
Data processing statistics | |
resolution range (Å) | 39.3 – 2.0 (2.11 Å – 2.00 Å) |
no. of total observations | 356,532 (52,041) |
no. of unique observations | 124,962 (18,522) |
completeness (%) | 95.3 (96.8) |
multiplicity | 2.9 (2.8) |
Rmerge (%)a | 10.7 (0.733) |
Mean (I)/σ(I) | 8.3 (1.7) |
Refinement statistics | |
resolution range (Å) | 36.7 – 2.0 (2.023 Å – 2.00 Å) |
Rwork | 0.156 (0.255) |
Rfree | 0.204 (0.300) |
rms of bond lengths (Å) | 0.012 |
rms of bond angles (°) | 1.69 |
Ramachandran plot (favored, allowed, outliers, %) | 96.5, 3.3, 0.2 |
Rmerge (I) = Σhkl((Σi|Ihkl,i - <Ihkl>|)/ΣiIhkl,i), where Ihkl is the intensity of an individual measurement of the reflection with indices hkl and 〈Ihkl〉 is the mean intensity of that reflection.
Residue 440 of the α-chain was corrected to Gln rather than the Glu reported in all previous structures to reflect the correct A. vinelandii nifD gene sequence (24); this discrepancy was highlighted by a recent analysis of 95 MoFe-protein sequences demonstrating that all but two had Gln and Asn at this position, with no examples of Glu (25).
Results
Time course of acetylene reduction at high pH
The initial test of nitrogenase activity well above its pH optimum was at pH 9.5 using the head space measure of ethylene formation with time as shown in Fig. 1A. The rate curve indicated a progressive loss of product formation with complete cessation well before depletion of any component of the assay. Supplementing the reaction mixture at longer times with fresh aliquots of dithionite, Av2, or components of the ATP regenerating system did not result in further substrate reduction which confirmed that the loss of acetylene reduction activity was not due to depletion of any of these components. Together these studies implicated progressive inhibition of the Av1 which can be described by a first order process characteristic of slow inhibitors (26) such as the aluminum fluoride inhibition of nitrogenase activity (17):
(Eq. 1) |
where v0, ki and P(t) are the initial rate of product formation (the enzyme catalytic activity expressed in nmoles min−1), the observed first order inactivation rate constant (min−1) of Av1, and the time dependent amount of ethylene in the head space (nmoles), respectively. v0 /ki is the total amount of product produced at the limit t = ∞. The solid lines in Fig. 1 represent the nonlinear curve fitting of the data points based on Eq. 1. For this type of inhibition, the cessation of product formation at long time points (the plateau in Fig. 1) implies a quasi-irreversible state of inhibition of the enzyme, at least under the pH 9.5 conditions of the assay (17, 26). For a slowly reversible reaction, a flat line plateau would not be observed and the kinetic expression would have additional elements to include the slower back reaction (26).
The generality of the progressive inhibition as a consequence of pH was demonstrated by a series of experiments using the head space assay in the upper range of pH 8.8 to 9.8 that has been previously reported for various nitrogenase studies (6–10). The data were fit using Eq.1 shown as the solid lines in Fig. 1B, with the calculated ki and v0 in Fig. 1C. In keeping with the accepted nitrogenase pH activity dependence, the initial velocity, v0, decreases with increased pH. More significantly, the observed inactivation rate, ki increases with increased pH suggesting that a deprotonated state of the enzyme is a precursor for the inhibition. This clearly separates the two phenomena: the enzymatic activity follows a pH dependent decline while the inhibition process increases with higher pH.
Turnover conditions are required for high pH inactivation of Av1
Inhibition of the enzymatic activity as a consequence of Av1 inactivation was established by the specific activity assay which determines the amount of active Av1 at saturating Av2 in the pH 7.8 assay. Following initiation of the reaction at pH 9.5, aliquots of the reaction mixture were sampled at designated time points and the Av1 specific activity was determined. As shown in Fig. 2, Av1 from the pH 9.5 incubation was progressively inactivated as indicated by the loss of specific activity measured at pH 7.8. The time dependent loss of Av1 specific activity at pH 9.5 required turnover of the complete system which was established by a series of changes in the pH 9.5 reaction conditions. If Av2 or the ATP regenerating system was omitted, or if AMP-PNP, a nonhydrolyzable ATP analog was used, no acetylene reduction was detected at pH 9.5 (as expected) and through the first 2 hrs incubation at pH 9.5, there was only ~10% decrease in Av1 specific activity as determined at pH 7.8, at time in which there was ~90% inactivation under the full turnover conditions. Most importantly, incubation of Av1 or Av2 alone at pH 9.5 showed only minimal activity loss even after four hours. Although acetylene reduction was the most convenient substrate to monitor enzyme activity, the inactivation proceeded equally well when dinitrogen replaced the acetylene or when there was no added substrate beyond the protons in the solution (see Fig S1 in the Supplementary Information). Furthermore, the inhibitor of all substrates except protons, carbon monoxide, did not block the inactivation of Av1.
Component ratio and protein concentration effects on pH 9.5 reaction
Central to the understanding of the complex kinetic properties of the two protein component system of nitrogenase is that the activity is dependent on total protein concentration and component ratio as important factors controlling the electron flux during turnover (27, 28). As one example, for a fixed concentration of MoFe-protein, the initial velocity for acetylene reduction increases with increasing CR until a plateau level of activity is obtained, indicative of saturation kinetics; the specific activity of the MoFe-protein is determined from the plateau level of activity when titrated with Fe-protein at pH 7.8. The same general behavior was also observed when titrating a fixed amount of Av1 with different CRs of Av2 at pH 9.5, although the amounts of product formed per time are much lower than at pH 7.8 (Fig. 3). By fitting the headspace data (Fig. 3A) to equation (1), the initial velocity v0 can be determined as a function of CR and is presented in the form of an Av1 titration curve. As shown in Fig. 3B, the initial velocity exhibits a strong CR dependence similar in form to that observed at pH 7.8 suggesting the initial rate correctly reflects the nitrogenase reaction and its pH dependence. At the saturation of Av1 by Av2, the specific activity of Av1 at pH 9.5 was estimated as 100 nmol min−1 mg−1, or ~5% of the value at pH 7.8. As also observed at the optimal pH (29–31), the Av1 titration curve at pH 9.5 is not fully hyperbolic and has a “lag” at low concentrations of Av2 (CR < ~1). This is consistent with a similar process of interactions between the MoFe-protein and Fe-protein that is observed at the optimal pH and is maintained at the higher pH. One measure of the association of Av2 and Av1 is the CR at half saturation which at pH 9.5 is ca. 4 and similar to that at pH 7.8 (an absolute comparison is obviated by the necessary protein concentration differences with approximately two orders of magnitude difference in vo). An additional test that the enzymatic substrate reduction at pH 9.5 reflects a similar turnover mechanism as at pH 7.8 is the protein concentration dependence of the reaction rate. As shown in Fig 3C, over an eight fold protein concentration range and constant CR, v0 increased ca six fold, comparable to that observed at pH 7.8 (32–34).
In contrast to the clear similarity of pattern in turnover parameters at pH 9.5 and at the optimum pH, the inactivation rate constant, ki, showed a fully different pattern with these variables (Figs. 3B and 3C). Namely, ki is substantially independent of CR and protein concentration and was calculated to be ~ 0.07 min−1 (corresponding to a half-life ~10 minutes). The small variance of ca. 20% for ki is in contrast to an order of magnitude or more changes in vo values for the same CR. The implication is that whatever mechanism of inactivation is occurring, it is a first order process independent of the overall nitrogenase turnover rate as measured by product formed.
Component ratio effects on specific activity
In contrast to the apparent first order inhibition kinetics observed for the head space assay at pH 9.5, the inactivation kinetics monitored by the specific activity measured at pH 7.8 cannot be modeled by a single kinetic phase. As shown in Fig. 4, the kinetics of inactivation measured by specific activity are quite sensitive to the CR used in the pH 9.5 reaction, e.g., for CR = 0.15, ~3 hours incubation is required to lose 50% of the specific activity, while for CRs > 1, the corresponding time is ~30 minutes. Most importantly, the loss of specific activity is significantly slower than the inhibition observed at pH 9.5 based on the direct measure of product in the head space. As seen by comparing Figs. 3 and 4, for all CR at 60 min., acetylene reduction at pH 9.5 has stopped while the specific activity ranges from 25% to 75%. This strongly implies that the inhibited state at pH 9.5 is partially reversible at pH 7.8. The time of incubation at pH 7.8 before initiating the specific activity assay showed no effect on the measured value, which suggests the reversible step must be fast compared to the minimal time for sampling of the pH 9.5 reaction into the pH 7.8 assay.
ATP hydrolysis during turnover
The kinetic properties of the reaction at pH 9.5 versus the loss in specific activity measured at pH 7.8 suggested that some level of interactions between Av1 and Av2 proceeds after cessation of observed product formation in the headspace gas. ATP hydrolysis only occurs in the complex between Av1 and Av2 although it is independent of the oxidation state of the two proteins (7, 35, 36). Indeed, while Av2 can bind MgATP, a conformational change stabilized by complex formation with Av1 is required for the hydrolysis (17, 37). The number of ATP equivalents turned over by the enzyme can be conveniently measured by following the formation of creatine in the ATP regenerating system (16, 17). The results for the correlation of ATP equivalents used and product formation at pH 9.5 are plotted in Fig. 5A for CR = 0.3 and 1.0. The clear result is that ATP hydrolysis initially tracks the substrate reduction, yet continues long after product formation has terminated. Even for those low component ratios, e.g., CR = 0.3, where the ethylene production is below the threshold of the detection at pH 9.5, the ATP hydrolysis readily occurs long into the time course for inactivation and provides evidence that the Av2 is still active. Indeed, the ability of the various forms of Av1 generated during turnover at pH 9.5 to support ATP hydrolysis is unmistakably shown in Fig 5B for the changes in specific activity over the time course of inactivation. For CR = 1.0 where at 240 min the Av1 is nearly fully inactivated, ATP hydrolysis is still supported at ca. 40% the rate of native Av1 at saturation with Av2. The initial time points show an ATP/ethylene ratio of ca 5, in keeping with the accepted value of 4–5 with dithionite as the terminal reducing agent, but the ratio rapidly increases to >50 for the later time points as the Av1 is inactivated. These high ratios represent the small fraction of active enzyme plus the increasing amount of inactive enzyme which is still capable of supporting substantial ATP hydrolysis.
Characterization of native Av1 incubated at pH 9.5
The activity studies clearly indicated that Av1 was not denatured with loss of activity at pH 9.5. To directly assess structural consequences of incubation of Av1 at pH 9.5 (in the absence of turnover) and to provide a control structure for future work at higher pHs, the crystal structure at pH 9.5 was determined. Single crystals were obtained and reached their maximum size in 3 days. X-ray diffraction data was collected to 2.0 Å resolution, and the resulting structure of native Av1 at pH 9.5 was found to adopt the same overall conformation as that crystallized at pH 8.0 (38, 39) (Fig. 6). The root mean square deviation in positions of main chain atoms between the pH 9.5 structure and that refined at 1 Å resolution (PDB 3U7Q (39)) was 0.3 Å, with little differences observed in the metalloclusters (Figure 6). Some repositioning of side chains was indicated that may reflect deprotonation at high pH, including the C1 carboxyl group of the FeMo-cofactor homocitrate. This carboxyl group interacts with Glnα191 and intriguingly, diastereomers of fluorohomocitrate substituted at the methylene group of this arm of homocitrate support significantly different nitrogen reduction activities (40); a previous analysis of the diastereomer results in terms of the Av1 structure suggested a possible role for the C1 arm of homocitrate in proton transfer reactions (41).
Characterization of modified (inactive) Av1
To characterize the inactive protein, Av1 was isolated from the pH 9.5 reaction after four hours incubation (specific activity less than 10%) using size exclusion chromatography column at pH 7.3. Intriguingly, as shown in Fig. 7A, the peak position of inactive Av1 shifted to an earlier elution time, relative to the position observed for native Av1 or for Av1 incubated at pH 9.5 in the absence of turnover components. The shift in elution position indicates that the hydrodynamic radius of inactive Av1 has increased relative to native Av1. The observed shift in hydrodynamic radius was a consequence of the pH 9.5 turnover as shown in Fig 7A; incubation of Av1 alone or in combination with Av2 without ATP did not cause a shift in the elution position. Indeed, the complete recovery of both Av1 and Av2 (as measured by the absorbance at 410 nm) from 4 hr incubation at pH 9.5, either alone or under turnover conditions, further substantiates the stability of the proteins at pH as high as 9.5. This form of Av1, here after referred to as Av1-mod, is stable to multiple cycles of rechromatography at pH 7.3–8.0 in 100–200 mM NaCl.
The absorption at 410 nm arises from the metalloclusters and the integrated peak areas for Av1 were similar for all samples, irrespective of pH and precise conditions of the turnover (the same total amounts of Av1 were initially used in the compared chromatographs). This observation implies that the metalloclusters in Av1-mod are not significantly changed through either loss of iron, rearrangement of clusters, or other changes in the metal environment. This latter conclusion was substantiated by the results of Fe and Mo analysis of native and Av1-mod as given in Table 2. Within the experimental uncertainty in the analysis, there are two important findings: incubation of native Av1 at pH 9.5 does not lead to metal loss as might be expected for a denatured protein; and, likewise, inactivation of Av1 is not due to general denaturation with the loss of either iron or molybdenum.
Table 2.
sample | Fe | Mo | ratio (Fe:Mo) |
---|---|---|---|
Av1-native, 1 | 29.7 ± 0.5 | 1.99 ± 0.03 | 14.9 ± 0.5 |
Av1-native, 2 | 29.7 ± 0.5 | 1.98 ± 0.03 | 15.0 ± 0.5 |
Av1-mod, 1 | 29.1 ± 0.5 | 1.99 ± 0.03 | 14.6 ± 0.5 |
Av1-mod, 2 | 29.0 ± 0.5 | 1.99 ± 0.04 | 14.6 ± 0.5 |
Av1-mod was generated at pH 9.5 by incubation of Av1 and Av2 (CR = 4.0) under turnover conditions at 30 °C for 4 hours. The protein was isolated by size exclusion chromatography at pH 9.5 using the same tri-buffer as for the inactivation. The control sample of Av1 alone was isolated by chromatography at pH 7.5. Full duplicate reactions and isolations were prepared for both proteins. Metal content was determined by ICP-MS performed in triplicate for each sample. The standard deviation for 56Fe was ± 0.56% and for 96Mo was ± 0.22% while for the protein concentration varied from ±1.5% to ±1.8%. The results are normalized to the protein concentration for each individual sample and given with standard deviation based upon the individual sample multiple determinations.
The results of monitoring ATP hydrolysis during the two assay procedures (see section above) clearly demonstrated that the inactive Av1 retained the ability to interact with Av2 in a way that induces the Av2 conformation necessary for the nucleotide hydrolysis. To further evaluate the integrity of Av1-mod with respect to binding of Av2-ATP, the established ability of Av1 and Av2 to form a complex stabilized by ADP-AlF4− was investigated (17, 42). For native Av1 and Av2, the complex can be formed by reaction of either MgADP or MgATP as the nucleotide component with AlF4− (17). The reaction with MgATP is faster than with MgADP but leads to the same final complex (17, 43, 44). As shown in Fig 7B, Av1-mod forms a faster migrating species when it is incubated with Av2, ATP, and AlF4−. Based upon this earlier elution time compared to Av1-mod, a stable complex is inferred. This peak contained Av2 (by SDS-PAGE) and is estimated to be a 2:1 complex, (assuming the tetramer of Av1-mod). Under similar conditions, MgADP also induced a stable complex which was intermediate in elution time between Av1-mod and the putative 2:1 complex of Av1-mod:2Av2[ADP-AlF4−]4. However, in contrast to the similar study with the native Av1, formation of the complex with MgADP appears to give only a 1:1 Av2:Av1 complex (based upon elution position). The assumption for the native proteins is that AlF4− stabilizes a hypothetical transition state in electron transfer between Av2 and Av1 and that ATP hydrolysis leads to this state; by microscopic reversibility, ADP obtains the same state. For the Av1-mod, the path by microscopic reversibility for ADP appears to be much slower and only partial conversion to the complex is observed even after 30 min reaction.
Discussion
Protons have multiple roles in the catalytic mechanism of enzymes as reflected in variation of activity with pH. Among these roles for nitrogenase are: proper protonation state of catalytic residues; ionic state of residues in the nucleotide binding site; ionic states of residues involved in binding Fe-protein to MoFe-protein; and, most importantly, protons as co-substrate for all known nitrogenase reactions, including the direct reduction to dihydrogen. The latter reaction poses a particular challenge for mechanistic studies of nitrogenase since the ubiquitous presence of protons in aqueous solutions necessarily precludes the preparation of more reduced states of the MoFe-protein. Although protons cannot be completely removed from nitrogenase containing solutions, the use of higher pH conditions can significantly reduce their concentration. However, the conclusion of Pham and Burgess that Av1 is irreversibly inactivated by protein denaturation at higher pHs (8), would preclude this potentially promising approach.
We have re-investigated the effect of increased pH on Av1 with significantly different results and conclusions. First among our results is the finding that Av1 is neither denatured nor inactivated when incubated alone at pHs as high as 9.5. Av1 exhibited only minimal change in specific activity after incubation for several hours at pH 9.5 and 30 °C and could be crystallized at pH 9.5 with no important changes in the structure even after the several days needed to form the crystals.
As Pham and Burgess (8) found, we did observe a pH dependent inactivation of Av1, but in contrast to their conclusions, we found that the inactivation is a consequence of catalytic turnover resulting in a modified but structurally intact protein; inactivation of Av1 requires both Av2 and ATP hydrolysis. At pH 9.5, the model condition studied here, the enzyme activity, while turning over, decreased with time with a pattern similar to “slow inhibitors” such that both the initial rate, vo, and the inhibition rate constant, ki, could be determined by following the product in the gas phase of the reaction. Evaluation of the changes in vo with protein concentration and component ratio indicated this rate was measuring the true enzyme reaction and was consistent with a decrease in catalytic activity expected over a measured pH range. Hence, we find that some forms of activity can be reliably studied at higher pH when limited to appropriately determined initial rates, a condition generally applicable to all steady state enzyme kinetics.
While the inhibition at pH 9.5 requires enzyme turnover and, hence, is related to turnover, the inactivation was distinctly different from the enzyme activity. The inhibition rate increased as the enzyme turnover decreased, that is, inhibition rate increases with increased pH as the activity decreased. The following characteristics summarize the observations with some of the implications.
The inactivation reaction, being turnover dependent, suggests a process involving states of the MoFe-protein that are distinct from the as-isolated form—mostly likely a different redox state. Because the inactivation is independent of which added substrate is present, one of the first enzymatically reduced states of the MoFe-protein may be sufficient to lead to inactivation.
The inactivation process at pH 9.5 appears first order when monitored by the decrease in rate of ethylene formation with time at pH 9.5 in the head-space assay.
The rate of inactivation, ki, (Eqn. 1) appears to be independent of the component ratio, protein concentration and the amount of product produced (at least for CR > ~1). This indicates that the probability of inactivation is distinct from the probability of product formation.
Although there is insufficient data to assign reliable apparent pKa for the groups associated with the vo and the ki, the results in Fig. 1C clearly show them to be different, hence derived from different functional groups.
The decrease in specific activity upon turnover at pH 9.5 as measured at pH 7.8 follows a more complex kinetic pattern involving multiple phases and requiring significantly longer times (hours) for completion than for the pH 9.5 inhibition.
The observed difference in the two inactivation/inhibition rates suggests that the inhibited state of Av1 at pH 9.5 is different from, although likely on the path to, the ultimately inactive Av1-mod. The first state must be somewhat reversible for activity to be seen at pH 7.8. For any CR used in Fig. 3 at pH 9.5 and at 60 min., product formation has ceased while at the same time point and at pH 7.8, the specific activity retains 25–75% of the initial value, depending on the CR at pH 9.5. The final state, however, is irreversibly inactive in substrate reduction.
Turnover at pH 9.5 continues past the cessation of product formation as determined by continued ATP hydrolysis. For the fully inactive Av1-mod, the associated ATP hydrolysis is ca 40% of the native protein with saturating Av2.
The Av1-mod has an expanded conformation (increased hydrodynamic radius) that maintains structural integrity. The new conformation is stable over time, retains the metal content to within the limits set by the analytical methods, and has the ability to associate with Av2. The latter is demonstrated by supporting ATP hydrolysis and the formation of a tight complex mediated by nucleotide-AlF4−. Together these observations suggest a mechanism based reaction with multiple forms of Av1 that can interconvert during the turnover at pH 9.5, some of which lead to inactivation. Although a comprehensive model that describes the kinetic behavior of this system under all these conditions would be desirable, we have demurred in such a construction because there are an enormous number of potential pH-dependent ionic states relating the multiple components. To assign pKas, activity levels, inhibition rates, and association constants for the two components and for the nucleotides would be outside the number of parameters that we have collected. Indeed, although the pH 9.5 inhibition rate is first order and follows “slow inhibitor” rate law, we have not found a simple, rational kinetic measure of the specific activity decrease that would follow from the pH 9.5 inhibition rate.
Most importantly, our work identifies some of the conditions promoting a mechanism based inactivation of the MoFe-protein. This should provide both a new direction for probing the catalytic mechanism(s) and the conditions to evaluate studies at pHs > 8.5, e.g., the reported changes in electron allocation with pH or the trapping of intermediates (8, 10, 45). While the focus of this paper has been on the inactivation reaction at pH 9.5, the process carries to lower pHs; it is only that the inhibition at the higher pH is sufficiently fast to facilitate kinetic characterization. One may anticipate that the phenomenon of inactivation would also take place at more physiologically relevant pHs, albeit with a slower rate. For example, the inactivation process may be particularly sensitive to amino acid residues in the cofactor environment such that differences in apparent substrate reduction rates for mutant nitrogenase with amino acid substitutions may be a consequence of changes in inactivation rates even when studied at the native protein pH optimum. Just as the generation of highly oxidizing species in photosystem II during water oxidation leads to protein inactivation with subsequent adaptations for protein turnover (46), the generation of highly reducing species in nitrogenase during substrate reduction is also associated with protein inactivation which may require protein turnover adaptations in vivo.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
FUNDING
This work was supported by NIH grant GM045162.
The assistance of Dr. Jens Kaiser and Dr. Nathan Dalleska is appreciated. We acknowledge the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, the Beckman Institute, and the Sanofi–Aventis Bioengineering Research Program at Caltech for their generous support of the Molecular Observatory at Caltech. This project benefited from the use of instrumentation made available by the Caltech Environmental Analysis Center. Portions of this research were carried out at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource (SSRL), a Directorate of SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory and an Office of Science User Facility operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science by Stanford University. The SSRL Structural Molecular Biology Program is supported by the DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research, and by the National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research Resources, Biomedical Technology Program (P41RR001209), and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences.
ABBREVIATIONS
- Av1 and Av2
the MoFe-protein and Fe-protein from Azotobacter vinelandii
- Av1-mod
a stable form of the inactive MoFe-protein isolable after incubation under turnover conditions at pH 9.5
- ACES
N-(2-acetamido)-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid
- Bis-Tris
[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino] tris(hydroxymethyl) methane
- CHES
2-(cyclohexylamino) ethanesulfonic acid
- CR
component ratio or molar ratio of active sites in Fe-protein and MoFe-protein
- HEPPS
N-(2-hydroxyethy1) piperazine-N'-propanesulfonic acid
- ICP-MS
inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
- MPD
2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol
- Tris
tris(hydroxymethyl) aminomethane
Footnotes
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
Coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank of the Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics as entry 4ND8.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION AVAILABLE
Figure S1. Inactivation rates for Av1 with different substrates and inhibitors at pH 9.5. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
REFERENCES
- 1.Burgess BK, Lowe DJ. Mechanism of molybdenum nitrogenase. Chem. Rev. 1996;96:2983–3011. doi: 10.1021/cr950055x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Howard JB, Rees DC. How many metals does it take to fix N2? A mechanistic overview of biological nitrogen fixation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:17088–17093. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603978103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Seefeldt LC, Hoffman BM, Dean DR. Mechanism of Mo-nitrogenase. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 2009;78:701–722. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.070907.103812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Thorneley RNF, Lowe DJ. Kinetics and mechanism of the nitrogenase enzyme system. In: Spiro TG, editor. Molybdenum Enzymes. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1985. pp. 221–284. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Thorneley RNF, Lowe DJ. Nitrogenase: substrate binding and activation. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 1996;1:576–580. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hadfield KL, Bulen WA. Adenosine triphosphate requirement of nitrogenase from Azotobacter vinelandii. Biochemistry. 1969;8:5103–5108. doi: 10.1021/bi00840a064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Imam S, Eady RR. Nitrogenase of Klebsiella pneumoniae: reductant-independent ATP hydrolysis and the effect of pH on the efficiency of coupling of ATP hydrolysis to substrate reduction. FEBS Lett. 1980;110:35–38. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(80)80016-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pham DN, Burgess BK. Nitrogenase reactivity: Effects of pH on substrate reduction and CO inhibition. Biochemistry. 1993;32:13725–13731. doi: 10.1021/bi00212a043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schneider K, Müller A, Krahn E, Hagen WR, Wassink H, Knüttel K-H. The molybdenum nitrogenase from wild-type Xanthobacter autotrophicus exhibits properties reminiscent of alternative nitrogenases. Eur. J. Biochem. 1995;230:666–675. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.0666h.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Igarashi RY, Laryukhin M, Dos Santos PC, Lee HI, Dean DR, Seefeldt LC, Hoffman BM. Trapping H- bound to the nitrogenase FeMo-Cofactor active site during H2 evolution: Characterization by ENDOR spectroscopy. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:6231–6241. doi: 10.1021/ja043596p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Han JH, Newton WE. Differentiation of acetylene-reduction sites by stereoselective proton addition during Azotobacter vinelandii nitrogenase-catalyzed C2D2 reduction. Biochemistry. 2004;43:2947–2956. doi: 10.1021/bi035247y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wolle D, Kim C, Dean D, Howard JB. Ionic interactions in the nitrogenase complex. Properties of Fe-protein containing substitutions for Arg-100. J. Biol. Chem. 1992;267:3667–3673. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Burns A, Watt GD, Wang ZC. Salt inhibition of nitrogenase catalysis and salt effects on the separate protein components. Biochemistry. 1985;24:3932–3936. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Deits TL, Howard JB. Effect of salts on Azotobacter vinelandii nitrogenase activities. J. Biol. Chem. 1990;265:3859–3867. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ellis KJ, Morrison JF. Buffers of constant ionic strength for studying pH-dependent processes. Meth. Enzymol. 1982;87:405–426. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(82)87025-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ennor AH. Determination and preparation of N-phosphates of biological origin. Meth. Enzymol. 1957;3:850–861. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Renner KA, Howard JB. Aluminum fluoride inhibition of nitrogenase: Stabilization of a nucleotide•Fe-protein•MoFe-protein complex. Biochemistry. 1996;35:5353–5358. doi: 10.1021/bi960441o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kabsch W. XDS. Acta Crystallogr. 2010;D66:125–132. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909047337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Evans P. Scaling and assessment of data quality. Acta Crystallogr. 2006;D62:72–82. doi: 10.1107/S0907444905036693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Vagin A, Teplyakov A. MOLREP: an automated program for molecular replacement. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1997;30:1022–1025. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Murshudov GN, Vagin AA, Dodson EJ. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. 1997;D53:240–255. doi: 10.1107/S0907444996012255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Adams PD, Afonine PV, Bunkoczi G, Chen VB, Davis IW, Echols N, Headd JJ, Hung LW, Kapral GJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, McCoy AJ, Moriarty NW, Oeffner R, Read RJ, Richardson DC, Richardson JS, Terwilliger TC, Zwart PH. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. 2010;D66:213–221. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909052925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. 2010;D66:486–501. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910007493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Brigle KE, Newton WE, Dean DR. Complete nucleotide sequence of the Azotobacter vinelandii nitrogenase structural gene cluster. Gene. 1985;37:37–44. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(85)90255-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Howard JB, Kechris KJ, Rees DC, Glazer AN. Multiple amino acid sequence alignment nitrogenase component 1: insights into phylogenetics and structurefunction relationships. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e72751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Morrison JF, Walsh CT. The behavior and significance of slow-binding enzyme inhibitors. Adv. Enzymol. Rel. Areas Mol. Biol. 1988;61:201–301. doi: 10.1002/9780470123072.ch5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hageman RV, Burris RH. Kinetic studies on electron transfer and interaction between nitrogenase components from Azotobacter vinelandii. Biochem. 1978;17:4117–4124. doi: 10.1021/bi00613a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wherland S, Burgess BK, Stiefel EI, Newton WE. Nitrogenase reactivity: Effects of component ratio on electron flow and distribution during nitrogen fixation. Biochemistry. 1981;20:5132–5140. doi: 10.1021/bi00521a006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bergersen FJ, Turner GL. Kinetic studies of nitrogenase from soya-bean root-nodule bacteroids. Biochem. J. 1973;131:61–75. doi: 10.1042/bj1310061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Orme-Johnson WH, Davis LC, Henzl MT, Averill BA, Orme-Johnson NR, Munck E, Zimmerman R. Components and pathways in biological nitrogen fixation. In: Newton WE, Postgate JR, Rodriguez-Barrueco C, editors. Recent Developments in Nitrogen Fixation. London: Academic Press; 1977. pp. 131–178. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Johnson JL, Nyborg AC, Wilson PE, Tolley AM, Nordmeyer FR, Watt GD. Analysis of steady state Fe and MoFe protein interactions during nitrogenase catalysis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2000;1543:24–35. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4838(00)00195-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Silverstein R, Bulen WA. Kinetic studies of the nitrogenase-catalyzed hydrogen evolution and nitrogen reduction reactions. Biochemistry. 1970;9:3809–3815. doi: 10.1021/bi00821a021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Thorneley R, Lowe DJ. Nitrogenase of Klebsiella pneumonia: Kinetics of the dissociation of oxidized iron protein from molybdenum-iron protein: Identification of the rate-limiting step for substrate reduction. Biochem. J. 1983;215:393–403. doi: 10.1042/bj2150393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Johnson JL, Nyborg AC, Wilson PE, Tolley AM, Nordmeyer FR, Watt GD. Mechanistic interpretation of the dilution effect for Azotobacter vinelandii and Clostridium pasteurianum nitrogenase catalysis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2000;1543:36–46. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4838(00)00196-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bui PT, Mortenson LE. The hydrolysis of adenosine triphosphate by purified components of nitrogenase. Biochemistry. 1969;8:2462–2465. doi: 10.1021/bi00834a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ljones T, Burris RH. ATP hydrolysis and electron transfer in the nitrogenase reaction with different combinations of the iron protein and the molybdenumiron protein. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1972;275:93–101. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(72)90027-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wolle D, Dean DR, Howard JB. Nucleotide-iron-sulfur cluster signal transduction in the nitrogenase iron-protein: The role of Asp125. Science. 1992;258:992–995. doi: 10.1126/science.1359643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Einsle O, Tezcan FA, Andrade SLA, Schmid B, Yoshida M, Howard JB, Rees DC. Nitrogenase MoFe-protein at 1.16Å resolution: A central ligand in the FeMo-cofactor. Science. 2002;297:1696–1700. doi: 10.1126/science.1073877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Spatzal T, Aksoyoglu M, Zhang L, Andrade SLA, Schleicher E, Weber S, Rees DC, Einsle O. Evidence for interstitial carbon in nitrogenase FeMo cofactor. Science. 2011;334:940. doi: 10.1126/science.1214025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Madden MS, Kindon ND, Ludden PW, Shah VK. Diastereomer-dependent substrate reduction properties of a dinitrogenase containing 1-fluorohomocitrate in the iron-molybdenum cofactor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1990;87:6517–6521. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.17.6517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Howard JB, Rees DC. Nitrogenase: A nucleotide-dependent molecular switch. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1994;63:235–264. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.63.070194.001315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Duyvis MG, Wassink H, Haaker H. Formation and characterization of a transition state complex of Azotobacter vinelandii nitrogenase. FEBS Lett. 1996;380:233–236. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00019-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Schindelin H, Kisker C, Schlessman JL, Howard JB, Rees DC. Structure of ADP-AlF4− stabilized nitrogenase complex and its implications for signal transduction. Nature. 1997;387:370–376. doi: 10.1038/387370a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Schmid B, Einsle O, Chiu H-J, Willing A, Yoshida M, Rees DC, Howard JB. Biochemical and structural characterization of the crosslinked complex of nitrogenase: comparison to the ADP-AlF4− stabilized structure. Biochemistry. 2002;41:15557–15565. doi: 10.1021/bi026642b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hageman RV, Burris RH. Electron allocation to alternative substrates of Azotobacter nitrogenase is controlled by the electron flux through dinitrogenase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1980;591:63–75. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(80)90220-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Adir N, Zer H, Shochat S, Ohad I. Photoinhibition - a historical perspective. Photosyn. Res. 2003;76:343–370. doi: 10.1023/A:1024969518145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.