Abstract
The contractile and enzymatic activities of myosin VI are regulated by calcium binding to associated calmodulin light chains. We have used transient phosphorescence anisotropy (TPA) to monitor the microsecond rotational dynamics of erythrosin iodoacetamide-labeled actin with strongly-bound myosin VI (MVI) and to evaluate the effect of MVI-bound calmodulin (CaM) light chain on actin filament dynamics. MVI binding lowers the amplitude but accelerates actin filament microsecond dynamics in a Ca2+ - and CaM-dependent manner, as indicated from an increase in the final anisotropy and a decrease in the correlation time of TPA decays. MVI with bound apo-CaM or Ca2+ - CaM weakly affects actin filament microsecond dynamics, relative to other myosins (e.g. muscle myosin II and myosin Va). CaM dissociation from bound MVI damps filament rotational dynamics (i.e. increases the torsional rigidity), such that the perturbation is comparable to that induced by other characterized myosins. Analysis of individual actin filament shape fluctuations imaged by fluorescence microscopy reveals a correlated effect on filament bending mechanics. These data support a model in which Ca2+ - dependent CaM binding to the IQ domain of MVI is linked to an allosteric reorganization of the actin-binding site(s), which alters the structural dynamics and the mechanical rigidity of actin filaments. Such modulation of filament dynamics may contribute to the Ca2+ – and CaM–dependent regulation of myosin VI motility and ATP utilization.
Introduction
Interaction of actin and myosin is required for force generation and contractility in muscle and non-muscle cells. A large body of studies on the molecular mechanism of motility approaches the problem by focusing primarily on one of the two crucial issues of this mechanism: the structure of the actomyosin interface and nucleotide-induced structural changes at the light chain-binding domain of myosin. However, since biochemical studies indicate functional interdependence (i.e. coupling) of the actin and light chain binding domains of several myosins, the two issues are linked and these interrelations must be elucidated for a complete molecular understanding of myosin-based motility.
The essential light chain isoform bound to skeletal muscle myosin strongly influences actin-activated ATPase1, in vitro motility sliding velocity of actin filaments2, and the ability of the S1 motor domain to accelerate actin polymerization3. Actin-activated ATPase of smooth muscle myosin is regulated by phosphorylation-induced structural transitions in the N-terminal region of bound light chains4. The activity of molluscan striated muscle myosin is regulated by Ca2+ binding to the regulatory light chain5.
Light chain-regulation of actin-myosin interactions requires long-range allosteric communication between the actin- and light chain- binding regions of myosin. Crystal structures of muscle and non-muscle myosins indicate that small movements within the myosin motor domain can be transmitted through the converter domain to the light chain binding region6; 7. Functional interdependence between the motor properties of myosin and the light chain-binding domain is particularly clear in myosin VI (herein referred to as MVI) - the only known myosin family member that moves toward the pointed end of actin filaments rather than the barbed end7. MVI achieves reverse directionality by rotating its lever arm in the direction opposite to that of other myosins. Such rotation is probably enabled by the presence of an unique insert between the converter and the calmodulin (CaM) light chain binding (IQ) domain, which influences coupling between the light chain binding domain orientation and the nucleotide and actin binding sites7; 8.
The insert and IQ domains of MVI each bind a single CaM molecule. It has been suggested that the insert-bound CaM principally plays a structural role and the IQ-bound CaM may be involved in Ca2+ -regulation MVI function9, namely slowing actin motility, actin-activated ATPase, and ADP release10; 11. Early studies using gel densitometry showed that binding of CaM to MVI HMM dimers is not affected by Ca2+ up to ~100 µM10. Mass spectrometry confirms that CaM binding to the insert and to the IQ region is Ca2+ –independent and that CaM binds with a higher affinity (Kd ~ 30 nM) to the insert domain9. Furthermore, structural analysis by cryo-electron microscopy shows that Ca2+ weakens CaM binding to the IQ domain, but not to the insert12. Since CaM binds the insert region of MVI independent of calcium with a high affinity9, while Ca2+ weakens the affinity of CaM for the IQ domain of MVI12, it is possible that CaM binding and/or a CaM-linked conformation of the IQ domain modulates actin filament stiffening.
There is increasing evidence that actin filaments adopt multiple conformational states and that the equilibria among these states are modulated by interaction with regulatory proteins, including myosin contractile proteins13; 14. Numerous studies have shown that changes in the structural state(s) of actin modulate filament sliding and actomyosin ATPase15; 16, and that the effect of myosin on actin structure depends on the structural states of myosin17; 18; 19. The impact of Ca2+-CaM regulation on the interaction between MVI and actin in terms of actin structural properties is less clear.
We initiated this study to determine whether Ca2+-CaM regulation of MVI involves allosteric modulation of the actin-binding regions that modulates the structural state fluctuations of actin. We measured the actin filament microsecond dynamics using transient phosphorescence anisotropy (TPA) and the actin filament flexural rigidity from images of thermally-driven filament shape conformations acquired using fluorescence microscopy. Previously, we demonstrated that the structural dynamics of actin is an important determinant of functional properties of the actomyosin complex17; 18; 20. The present results with MVI reveal that the actomyosin interface and resulting changes in filament dynamics can be allosterically regulated by ligand-linked changes in the light chain-binding domain of myosin.
Results & Discussion
A. Effects of MVI on actin TPA decays
MVI binding affects the TPA decays of actin filaments in a Ca2+ - and CaM-dependent manner (Fig. 1). In the presence of free calcium (200 µM) and no added CaM, MVI substantially increases the final anisotropy, corresponding to a reduction in the amplitude of filament microsecond rotational dynamics (i.e. torsional stiffening; Fig. 1, red), as observed with other myosin isoforms19. However, the effects of bound MVI are substantially diminished in the absence of calcium (i.e. with bound apo-CaM; Fig. 1, blue) or upon addition of 30 µM Ca2+-CaM (Fig. 1, green). Equilibrium binding assays confirm MVI binds actin stoichiometrically under these conditions (Fig. 2), indicating that the observed effects reflect Ca2+ and CaM-dependent structural changes in actomyosin VI. Calcium and/or CaM alone have negligible effects on the TPA decays of bare actin (data not shown).
Figure 1. Effects of Ca2+ and CaM on the TPA decays of actomyosin VI.
Conditions: 200 µM Ca2+ (red); 200 µM Ca2+ and 30 µM CaM (green); 1 mM EGTA (blue). Bare actin (grey) is shown for comparison. Smooth lines represent fits to the sum of two exponential terms (Eq. 1). Both panels show the same data over different time scales.
Figure 2. Equilibrium binding of myosin VI and actin filaments.
Binding of myosin VI to actin in the presence (blue) and absence (red) of 200 µM Ca2+ measured from pyrene actin fluorescence quenching. The solid line is the best fit to a quadratic binding expression using the binding affinities36 and total reactant concentrations37; 38, yielding binding stoichiometries of 0.98±0.07 and 0.98±0.04 in the presence and absence of Ca2+, respectively.
B. Ca2+ and CaM-dependence of MVI effects on actin torsional dynamics
We evaluated the CaM-dependence of actin TPA decays, specifically the final anisotropy and the average correlation time (Eq. 1, Eq. 2, Fig. 3), with sub-stoichiometric MVI (myosin VI binding density = 0.25) to determine if torsional stiffening of actin filaments by MVI is regulated by CaM. The final anisotropy and the average correlation time of actin depend hyperbolically (Eq. 3) on the [CaM] when Ca2+ is saturating (9; 11) (Fig. 3), yielding an apparent binding affinity (Kd) of 0.6 µM (final anisotropy) - 1.5 µM (average correlation time) for Ca2+ -CaM binding to the IQ domain of MVI. Ca2+ -[CaM]-dependent changes in the individual component anisotropy amplitudes (r1 and r2) and correlation times (ϕ1 and ϕ2) yield essentially identical results as the final anisotropy and average correlation time (Fig. 4; Kd = 0.5 – 1.2 µM). Thus, Ca2+ -CaM similarly affects both slow (r1, ϕ1) and fast (r2, ϕ2) components of the anisotropy decays. We conclude, in agreement with cryo electron microscopy studies12, that Ca2+ lowers the CaM binding affinity of MVI and exogenous CaM is needed to saturate the IQ domain of MVI; binding to the insert IQ peptide is much tighter (Kd ~ 30 nM) and independent of calcium9.
Figure 3. Effects of exogenous CaM on TPA decays of actomyosin VI.
Conditions: 200 µM Ca2+ or 1 mM EGTA. The myosin binding density is 0.25. The solid lines through the data represent the best fits to rectangular hyperbolae (Eq. 3). Uncertainty bars represent one standard deviation from the mean.
Figure 4. Effects of CaM on the individual TPA decay component correlation times and anisotropy amplitudes.
Conditions: 200 µM Ca2+. The myosin binding density is 0.25. The solid lines through the data represent the best fits to rectangular hyperbolae (Eq. 3). Uncertainty bars represent one standard deviation from the mean.
Inclusion of exogenous CaM in the absence of calcium (1 mM EGTA present) has no detectable effect on the TPA decays (Fig. 3). The simplest explanation of this result is that MVI is saturated with CaM from the initial purification and this endogenous CaM binds MVI with high affinity (Kd <130 nM) in the absence of Ca2+. Thus, three distinct states that differentially affect actin rotational dynamics exist and their distribution is dictated by the CaM and Ca2+ concentrations.
C. Allostery of MVI effects on actin torsional dynamics in the presence and absence of calcium and CaM
Experiments thus far (Fig. 1 to Fig. 4) evaluate the effects of CaM at a single bound MVI concentration. We have previously shown that the perturbation of actin filament microsecond torsional dynamics by various myosin isoforms displays non-nearest neighbor (i.e. long-range) cooperative interactions, such that an individual bound myosin influences the dynamics of ~10 unoccupied filament subunits19. To determine whether and how the extent of filament saturation with MVI affects the regulatory effects of CaM, actin was titrated with MVI in the presence of calcium without and with CaM added at saturating (30 µM) concentration as well as in the absence of calcium, and the MVI-induced changes in the final anisotropy and average correlation time were fitted to a one-dimensional lattice model (Eq. 4, Fig. 5). In the presence of Ca2+ but absence of CaM, the increase in final anisotropy is highly cooperative and a single bound MIV affects the dynamics of 8.5±2.7 filament subunits, similar to that observed for myosin Va19. A comparable cooperative unit (N = 8.2±3.7) is observed in the reduction of the average correlation time.
Figure 5. Effects of myosin VI on the final anisotropy and average correlation time 〈 ϕ 〉 of actin filaments.
Conditions: 200 µM Ca2+ (red); 200 µM Ca2+ and 30 µM CaM (green); 1 mM EGTA (blue). Myosin binding densities were calculated from the equilibrium binding affinities and total concentrations. Molar ratios ranged from 0 to 1.2 myosin per actin. The solid lines represent the best fit of the data to the expression for binding to a linear one-dimensional lattice with cooperative non-nearest neighbor interactions (Eq. 4). Uncertainty bars represent one standard deviation from the mean.
Either addition of CaM in the presence of calcium (Ca2+ -CaM) or removal of calcium by EGTA (apo-CaM), two conditions favoring CaM-bound at the MVI IQ domain, has substantial effects on actin dynamics. Cooperative changes in final anisotropy for Ca2+ -CaM and apo-CaM are less pronounced (N = 4.6±0.1 and N = 6.1±1, respectively), with a modest reduction in the magnitude of change in final anisotropy. The effects on the correlation time are non-cooperative (Fig. 5). These data indicate that three MVI states with distinct actin filament interactions and cooperativity (Table 1) exist in a reversible Ca2+ – and CaM– linked equilibrium (Table 1). MVI with bound apo-CaM or Ca2+ - CaM weakly affects actin filament microsecond torsional dynamics compared to other myosins (e.g. muscle myosin II and myosin Va19). CaM dissociation from bound MVI stiffens filaments (Fig. 6), to an extent comparable to other myosins19. Ca2+ – and CaM–dependent modulation of acto-MIV filament dynamics may contribute to regulation of myosin VI motility and ATP utilization10; 11.
Table 1.
Summary of actomyosin VI filament interactions and dynamics.
Conditions | CaM occupancy | Actin Cooperativity | Final anisotropy | Rotational dynamics |
---|---|---|---|---|
High Ca2+, Low CaM | IQ domain: unoccupied Insert: bound CaM | Induces cooperative (N ~8 subunits) actin structural changes | High | Cooperative acceleration |
Ca2+-free (EGTA) | IQ domain: bound apo-CaM Insert: bound CaM | Weakly/Non- cooperative | Intermediate | Non-cooperative acceleration |
High Ca2+, High CaM | IQ domain: bound Ca2+-CaM Insert: bound CaM | Weakly/Non- cooperative | Intermediate | Weak acceleration |
Figure 6. Bending flexibility of actin filaments modulated by myosin VI.
The best fits of the average angular correlation of actin filaments to the 2D persistence length function (Eq. 7): bare (black) and fully myosin VI-decorated with 200 uM Ca2+ (red), 200 µM Ca2+ and 30 µM CaM (green) or 1 mM EGTA (blue) yield persistence lengths of 8.2±0.2, 21.4±0.7 and 12.8±0.2 µm, respectively.
D. Bending persistence length of actomyosin VI filaments modulated by Ca2+ and CaM
We determined the actin and filament bending persistence length, Lp, by fitting the 2D average cosine correlation function, 〈C(s)〉, to the average cosine of correlated tangential angles (θ) along segment lengths of actin filaments21; 22. MVI increases the actin filament Lp from 8.8 ± 0.8 µm to 15 ± 1 µm (in the presence of 1 mM EGTA; Fig. 6). Adding 200 µM Ca2+ to actomyosin VI dissociates myosin-bound CaM and stiffens filaments, as indicated by a higher Lp of 23 ± 2 µm (Fig. 6). When additional CaM is supplemented to favor Ca2+ -CaM binding, actomyosin VI filaments have an Lp of 14 ± 1 µm (in the presence of 200 µM Ca2+ and 30 µM CaM; Fig. 6), which is comparable to actomyosin MVI in the presence of 1mM EGTA. These measurements indicate that myosin VI-, Ca2+ - and CaM-dependent changes in actin filament flexural rigidity correlate with effects in torsional dynamics assayed by TPA.
E. Origin of CaM-dependent actomyosin VI filament dynamics
CaM-regulated dynamics of actomyosin VI (Fig. 3; Fig. 5) does not result from CaM binding to actin (e.g. bound CaM interaction with actin’s C-terminus, as observed for the essential light chain of muscle S123) since the light chain binding domain of actin-bound MVI points away from the actin filament, while that of muscle myosin II and MV tilt towards the filament7; 8. It is more likely that CaM-regulated dynamics of MVI-bound actin occurs via allosteric structural changes at the actin binding regions of MVI that originate from the light chain binding IQ domain. Reorganization of the actomyosin interface presumably compromises the energy and/or interface area between filament subunits, which influences the filament compliance24.
We observe a remarkable agreement between MVI-induced changes in the microsecond torsional rigidity and the millisecond flexural rigidity of actin filaments (Fig. 7). Correlated, but opposite, changes in the twisting and bending motions of actin filaments are induced by cofilin - bound cofilin lowers the torsional25 and flexural rigidity of actin filaments22. These observations are consistent with a coupling between actin filament twisting and bending motions26. The non-nearest neighbor effects in filament dynamics and elasticity could influence the stepping behavior of dimeric myosin VI and interaction with filament regulatory proteins. Actin subdomains 1 and 2 are regions likely to be affected by MVI binding as it results in reorganization of the actomyosin interface27. We expect MVI – induced changes in subdomain 1 to be subtle since the phosphorescence lifetime of ErIA-actin (156.8±5.4 µs) – a sensitive indicator of accessibility of the probe environment - is not significantly affected by MVI either in the absence of Ca2+/CaM (148.4±3.6 µs) or the presence of 30 µM CaM (137.1 µs). Alteration of the DNase loop within actin subdomain 2, has been implicated in determination of actin mechanical properties28, as well as the dynamics and distribution of structural states within actin filaments, particularly upon interaction with a variety of actin-binding proteins29; 13; 25; 30; 22; 31. The increased flexibility and dynamics of cofilin-decorated actin filaments were interpreted in terms of possible disruption of stabilizing intersubunit contacts, particularly contacts involving subdomain 2 induced by rearrangement of the DNase loop22; 31. It is possible that MVI stiffens actin filaments by stabilizing the same DNase loop-mediated intersubunit contacts that modulate the dynamics and rigidity of actin filaments. MVI could potentially favor formation of a subset of the various actin filament subunit solution conformations13; 14. Differences in the TPA of MVI as compared to other myosins (e.g. final anisotropy, correlation time, cooperativity19) may reflect different distributions of the various filament thermal conformers that are populated with bound myosin.
Figure 7. CaM-dependent microsecond dynamics and millisecond flexural rigidity of actomyosin VI filaments.
The amplitude of the microsecond dynamics calculated from the average anisotropy, r, from 400 to 500 µs (blue) and bending Lp from fits of the average angular correlation (red) of actin filaments upon the addition of saturating concentrations of myosin VI alone and with 200 uM Ca2+ and/or 30 µM CaM. Error bars indicate the SEM.
F. Implications for biological functions of MVI
The effects of Ca2+ -CaM on the dynamics of actomyosin VI could potentially have functional implications. MVI stiffens actin filaments and possibly more resistant to fragmentation, similar to bound MV19, dystrophin and utrophin32. MVI is present in many non-muscle cells, and Ca2+ associated modulation of actomyosin VI stiffness may be one of the structural determinants of the mechanical properties of actin bundles such as in hair cells in the inner ear33. Studies on the dynamics of hair bundles indicate that the bundle stiffness increases with Ca2+ concentration, interpreted as Ca2+ - modulation of actin filament stiffness34. A significant increase in the hair bundle stiffness is observed at ~200 µM Ca2+ (Ref.34), which agrees with the increased actin filament stiffness upon the addition of MVI and 200 µM Ca2+ observed here. Thus, Ca2+ regulation of CaM binding to the IQ domain of MVI (i.e. by Ca2+ fluxes in the inner ear) likely enhance the “grip” of MVI on actin filaments and the mechanical stiffness of actin-based cytoskeletal structures.
Material and Methods
Protein preparations
Actin was prepared from rabbit skeletal muscle and labeled with erythrosin iodoacetamide (ErIA, AnaSpec)17 pyrene-iodoacetamide (Invitrogen) at Cys 374 or Alexa 488 succinimidyl ester (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) and gel-filtered22; 30. A labeling efficiency with ErIA of 0.83±0.13 (mean±SD, n=11) was determined from the absorbance at 538 nm using extinction coefficient 8300035 and ~0.8 for Alexa 488. Freshly prepared ErIA labeled actin was immediately stabilized against label-induced destabilization by adding a molar equivalent of phalloidin. Actin-bound Ca2+ was exchanged for Mg2+ with 200 µM EGTA and 80 µM MgCl2 immediately before polymerization. Single-headed porcine myosin VI (T406A mutant; truncated at Gly840) with bound CaM light chain36; 37; 38 was purified from Sf9 cells by Flag affinity chromatography. Purity was >98% for all preparations. CaM was purified from E. coli using calcium-dependent hydrophobic interaction chromatography on phenyl sepharose 4B39.
TPA experiments
Phalloidin-stabilized ErIA-F-actin was diluted in KMg50 buffer (50 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 10 mM imidazole pH 7.0 with 0.2 mM CaCl2 or 1 mM EGTA) to 0.5 µM, and 0.05 – 0.6 µM MVI was added to form the actomyosin VI complexes, as indicated in the text. To remove residual ATP and ADP from actin, all samples prior to measurement were incubated for 20 min with 0.5 units/ml apyrase. To prolong the excited-state lifetime and prevent photo-bleaching of the dye, oxygen was removed from the sample by 5 min incubation with glucose oxidase (55 µg/ml), catalase (36 µg/ml), and glucose (45 µg/ml)17.
TPA data analysis: model-independent fit to the sum of exponentials
Time-resolved phosphorescence anisotropy was measured at 25°C as described previously19, by recording 30 cycles of 1000 laser pulses (500 in each orientation of the polarizer). The initial anisotropy r0, rotational correlation times ϕ1 and ϕ2 and corresponding amplitudes r1 and r2 were determined by fitting the anisotropy to the sum of two exponential terms and a constant r∞ as described previously20:
Eq. 1 |
The time course of TPA decay was fitted in the 10 – 500 µs time range. The fit quality indicated residuals < 2% of the signal. Extending the fit to the full scale of decay (1 ms) increased the residuals due to lower signal to noise ratio at long times, but yielded r∞ values within 5% of the calculated average r(t) in the 400–500 µs time range, since the decays are nearly completed within this time scale. The calculated average value of r(t) in the 400 – 500 µs time range has been shown previously to provide the most sensitive and precise measurement of actin’s microsecond rotational dynamics20 and therefore was defined as the final anisotropy, determining the amplitude of microsecond time scale motions in actin. The component lifetimes and amplitudes of the two exponential fit were used to calculate a single weighted average correlation time (〈ϕ〉):
Eq. 2 |
The apparent affinity Kd of CaM to MVI was determined by fitting the effects of CaM on the final anisotropy and average correlation time (y) to a rectangular hyperbola with offset using Origin.8 program:
Eq. 3 |
where y0 = y in the absence of CaM.
The effects of bound MVI on the observed final anisotropy (robs) of actin was analyzed in terms of the linear one-dimensional lattice model with non-nearest neighbor interactions20; 40, in which binding to an individual actin filament subunit allosterically affects the dynamics of a filament segment containing N protomers according to:
Eq. 4 |
where yactin and ymax are the limiting values of final anisotropy and average correlation time <ϕ> at 0 and infinite concentrations of MVI, respectively, and ν is the MVI binding density (i.e. bound [MVI]/[actin]). The unconstrained parameters in the least-squares fit were ymax and N.
The phosphorescence intensity (unpolarized) was calculated as I(t) = (Iv(t)+2*GIh(t))/3, and fitted to
Eq. 5 |
The amplitudes (ai) and the triplet excited-state lifetimes (τi) were used to calculate a single weighted average lifetime, 〈τ〉:
Eq. 6 |
Equilibrium binding measurements
Myosin VI binding to actin filaments was measured from the [myosin] dependence of pyrene actin fluorescence quenching37. MVI was mixed with 500 nM phalloidin-stabilized pyrene actin and equilibrated at 25 °C (±0.1 °C) for 40–60 min in the presence of the indicated [CaM] and [Ca2+]. Steady-state fluorescence intensities were measured using a Photon Technologies International (New Brunswick, NJ) Alphascan fluorescence spectrometer.
Determination of filament flexural rigidity
Cation exchanged Alexa 488-labeled actin was polymerized in KMg50 buffer and equilibrated with and without saturating concentrations of myosin VI. Samples were diluted with KMg50 buffer supplemented with 15 mM dextrose, 100 mM DTT, 0.1 mg mL−1 glucose oxidase, and 20 µg mL−1 catalase and either 200 uM Ca2+, 200 µM Ca2+ and 30 µM CaM or 1 mM EGTA to a final actin concentration of 50 nM. Analysis of filaments undergoing thermal fluctuations and those adsorbed to poly-L-lysine-treated slides yielded comparable results21. Images of individual filaments were acquired using a Nikon Eclipse TE300 microscope equipped with a Coolsnap HQ cooled CCD camera (Roper Scientific, Tucson, AZ) and µManager, processed using imageJ (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) and analyzed with code written in Matlab (The Mathworks, Natick, MA) as described22. The bending persistence length (Lp) was determined by fitting the average of >100 angular (θ) cosine correlation measurements (C(s)) of a segment length, s, corrected for measurement variance, to the following two-dimensional correlation function:
Eq. 7 |
Statistical analysis of data
Each result is reported as mean ± SEM, unless indicated otherwise.
Acknowledgement
Phosphorescence experiments were carried out in the Biophysical Spectroscopy Facility, University of Minnesota. The authors thank Octavian Cornea for assistance with preparation of the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health to D.D.T. (AR32961, AG26160) and to E.M.D.L.C. (GM071688, GM071688-S1, GM097348). E.M.D.L.C. is an American Heart Association Established Investigator (0940075N), an NSFCAREER Award recipient (MCB-0546353) and Hellman Family Fellow. B.R.M. was supported by American Heart Association predoctoral award 09PRE2230014. H.F.C. is supported by NIH predoctoral fellowship F31 DC009143 and in part by grants from the American Heart Association (0655849T) and Yale Institute for Nanoscience and Quantum Engineering to E.M.D.L.C.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Wagner PD, Slater CS, Pope B, Weeds AG. Studies on the actin activation of myosin subfragment-1 isoezymes and the role of myosin light chains. Eur J Biochem. 1979;99:385–394. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1979.tb13267.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lowey S, Waller GS, Trybus KM. Function of skeletal muscle myosin heavy and light chain isoforms by an in vitro motility assay. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:20414–20418. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chaussepied P, Kasprzak AA. Isolation and characterization of the G-actin-myosin head complex. Nature. 1989;342:950–953. doi: 10.1038/342950a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kast D, Espinoza-Fonseca LM, Yi C, Thomas DD. Phosphorylation-induced structural changes in smooth muscle myosin regulatory light chain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:8207–8212. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001941107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tan JL, Ravid S, Spudich JA. Control of nonmuscle myosins by phosphorylation. Annu Rev Biochem. 1992;61:721–759. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.003445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sweeney HL, Houdusse A. The motor mechanism of myosin V: insights for muscle contraction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004;359:1829–1841. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Menetrey J, Bahloul A, Wells AL, Yengo CM, Morris CA, Sweeney HL, Houdusse A. The structure of the myosin VI motor reveals the mechanism of directionality reversal. Nature. 2005;435:779–785. doi: 10.1038/nature03592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wells AL, Lin AW, Chen LQ, Safer D, Cain SM, Hasson T, Carragher BO, Milligan RA, Sweeney HL. Myosin VI is an actin-based motor that moves backwards. Nature. 1999;401:505–508. doi: 10.1038/46835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bahloul A, Chevreux G, Wells AL, Martin D, Nolt J, Yang Z, Chen LQ, Potier N, Van Dorsselaer A, Rosenfeld S, Houdusse A, Sweeney HL. The unique insert in myosin VI is a structural calcium-calmodulin binding site. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:4787–4792. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0306892101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yoshimura M, Homma K, Saito J, Inoue A, Ikebe R, Ikebe M. Dual regulation of mammalian myosin VI motor function. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:39600–39607. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M105080200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Morris CA, Wells AL, Yang Z, Chen LQ, Baldacchino CV, Sweeney HL. Calcium functionally uncouples the heads of myosin VI. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:23324–23330. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M208957200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Song CF, Sader K, White H, Kendrick-Jones J, Trinick J. Nucleotide-dependent shape changes in the reverse direction motor, myosin VI. Biophys J. 2010;99:3336–3344. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Galkin VE, Orlova A, Schroder GF, Egelman EH. Structural polymorphism in F-actin. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17:1318–1323. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kozuka J, Yokota H, Arai Y, Ishii Y, Yanagida T. Dynamic polymorphism of single actin molecules in the actin filament. Nat Chem Biol. 2006;2:83–86. doi: 10.1038/nchembio763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Prochniewicz E, Yanagida T. Inhibition of sliding movement of F-actin by crosslinking emphasizes the role of actin structure in the mechanism of motility. J Mol Biol. 1990;216:761–772. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90397-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kim E, Bobkova E, Miller CJ, Orlova A, Hegyi G, Egelman EH, Muhlrad A, Reisler E. Intrastrand cross-linked actin between Gln-41 and Cys-374. III. Inhibition of motion and force generation with myosin. Biochemistry. 1998;37:17801–17809. doi: 10.1021/bi981286b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Prochniewicz E, Walseth TF, Thomas DD. Structural dynamics of actin during active interaction with myosin: different effects of weakly and strongly bound myosin heads. Biochemistry. 2004;43:10642–10652. doi: 10.1021/bi049914e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Prochniewicz E, Spakowicz D, Thomas DD. Changes in actin structural transitions associated with oxidative inhibition of muscle contraction. Biochemistry. 2008;47:11811–11817. doi: 10.1021/bi801080x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Prochniewicz E, Chin HF, Henn A, Hannemann DE, Olivares AO, Thomas DD, De La Cruz EM. Myosin isoform determines the conformational dynamics and cooperativity of actin filaments in the strongly bound actomyosin complex. J Mol Biol. 2010;396:501–509. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.11.063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Prochniewicz E, Thomas DD. Perturbations of functional interactions with myosin induce long-range allosteric and cooperative structural changes in actin. Biochemistry. 1997;36:12845–12853. doi: 10.1021/bi971201r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.McCullough BR, Grintsevich EE, Chen CK, Kang H, Hutchison AL, Henn A, Cao W, Suarez C, Martiel JL, Blanchoin L, Reisler E, De La Cruz EM. Cofilin-linked changes in actin filament flexibility promote severing. Biophys J. 2011;101:151–159. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.05.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.McCullough BR, Blanchoin L, Martiel JL, De la Cruz EM. Cofilin increases the bending flexibility of actin filaments: implications for severing and cell mechanics. J Mol Biol. 2008;381:550–558. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.05.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Milligan RA, Whittaker M, Safer D. Molecular structure of F-actin and location of surface binding sites. Nature. 1990;348:217–221. doi: 10.1038/348217a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.De La Cruz EM, Roland J, McCullough BR, Blanchoin L, Martiel JL. Origin of twist-bend coupling in actin filaments. Biophys J. 2010;99:1852–1860. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Prochniewicz E, Janson N, Thomas DD, De la Cruz EM. Cofilin increases the torsional flexibility and dynamics of actin filaments. J Mol Biol. 2005;353:990–1000. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.09.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.De La Cruz EM, Roland J, McCullough BR, Blanchoin L, Martiel JL. Origin of twist-bend coupling in actin filaments. Biophys J. 99:1852–1860. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Volkmann N, Ouyang G, Trybus KM, DeRosier DJ, Lowey S, Hanein D. Myosin isoforms show unique conformations in the actin-bound state. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:3227–3232. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0536510100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Orlova A, Egelman EH. A conformational change in the actin subunit can change the flexibility of the actin filament. J Mol Biol. 1993;232:334–341. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Oztug Durer ZA, Diraviyam K, Sept D, Kudryashov DS, Reisler E. F-actin structure destabilization and DNase I binding loop: fluctuations mutational cross-linking and electron microscopy analysis of loop states and effects on F-actin. J Mol Biol. 2010;395:544–557. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.De La Cruz EM. Cofilin binding to muscle and non-muscle actin filaments: isoform-dependent cooperative interactions. J Mol Biol. 2005;346:557–564. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.11.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pfaendtner J, De La Cruz EM, Voth GA. Actin filament remodeling by actin depolymerization factor/cofilin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:7299–7304. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911675107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Prochniewicz E, Henderson D, Ervasti JM, Thomas DD. Dystrophin and utrophin have distinct effects on the structural dynamics of actin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:7822–7827. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812007106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Roux I, Hosie S, Johnson SL, Bahloul A, Cayet N, Nouaille S, Kros CJ, Petit C, Safieddine S. Myosin VI is required for the proper maturation and function of inner hair cell ribbon synapses. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:4615–4628. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pae SS, Saunders JC. Intra- and extracellular calcium modulates stereocilia stiffness on chick cochlear hair cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:1153–1157. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.3.1153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Prochniewicz E, Zhang Q, Howard EC, Thomas DD. Microsecond rotational dynamics of actin: spectroscopic detection and theoretical simulation. J Mol Biol. 1996;255:446–457. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.De La Cruz EM, Ostap EM, Sweeney HL. Kinetic mechanism and regulation of myosin VI. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:32373–32381. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M104136200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Robblee JP, Olivares AO, de la Cruz EM. Mechanism of nucleotide binding to actomyosin VI: evidence for allosteric head-head communication. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:38608–38617. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M403504200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Robblee JP, Cao W, Henn A, Hannemann DE, De La Cruz EM. Thermodynamics of nucleotide binding to actomyosin V and VI: a positive heat capacity change accompanies strong ADP binding. Biochemistry. 2005;44:10238–10249. doi: 10.1021/bi050232g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gopalakrishna R, Anderson WB. Ca2+-induced hydrophobic site on calmodulin: application for purification of calmodulin by phenyl-Sepharose affinity chromatography. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1982;104:830–836. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(82)90712-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.McGhee JD, von Hippel PH. Theoretical aspects of DNA-protein interactions: co-operative and non-co-operative binding of large ligands to a one-dimensional homogeneous lattice. J Mol Biol. 1974;86:469–489. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90031-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]