Abstract
Background: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a severe gastrointestinal disease that occurs predominantly in premature infants and is characterized by the inflammation and necrosis of the intestine, showing high morbidity and mortality rates. Despite decades of research efforts, a specific treatment is currently lacking, and preventive strategies are the mainstays of care. This review aims to help understand the complex interplay between gut microbiota and their metabolites in NEC pathogenesis. In particular, we focused on how these factors can influence gut health, immune responses, and intestinal barrier integrity. Discussion: Current research has increasingly focused on the role of the gut microbiota and their metabolites in NEC pathogenesis, thanks to their involvement in modulating gut health, immune responses, and intestinal barrier integrity. Conclusions: A deeper understanding of the interplay between gut microbiota and their metabolites is essential for developing personalized strategies to prevent NEC. By targeting these microbial interactions, new therapeutic approaches may emerge that offer improved outcomes for preterm infants at a high risk of NEC.
Keywords: necrotizing enterocolitis, preterm infants, gut microbiota, gut microbiota-derived metabolites
1. Introduction
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is an intestinal disease that principally affects preterm infants, with a prevalence of approximately 10% among neonates with a birth weight under 1500 g [1]. It is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates, as well as long-term sequelae [2]. Despite advances in neonatal care, the pathogenesis of NEC remains incompletely understood. Various risk factors seem to be involved in its development (prematurity, formula feeding, bacterial colonization, and inflammatory responses) [1]. Recently, there has been an increased interest in better understanding the role of gut-derived metabolites in the pathogenesis of NEC. These metabolites are produced through microbial fermentation and host metabolic processes and are crucial in maintaining intestinal homeostasis and immune functions [3].
This narrative review aims to offer an overview on the physiological functions of some of the principal gut microbiota-derived metabolites and their role in NEC pathogenesis, highlighting the need for a better understanding of the gut microbiota and their metabolic involvement in the pathogenesis of NEC in order to identify new potential therapeutic strategies for preventing or treating NEC.
2. Pathogenesis of NEC
The pathogenesis of NEC is multifactorial, involving interactions among several factors, spanning the prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal periods. Prematurity and its associated complications play the most crucial role, but feeding practices and management in the neonatal period can dramatically heighten the NEC risk [1,3]. Several risk factors and the inflammatory response must be considered to understand the pathogenesis of NEC (Table 1).
Table 1.
Principal NEC risk factors.
Prenatal Risk Factors | Perinatal Risk Factors | Neonatal Risk Factors |
---|---|---|
Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) [4] Chorioamnionitis [5] Placental abruption [6] Preeclampsia [7] Maternal hypertension [8] Gestational diabetes [9] Fetal intestinal hypoxia and hypoperfusion [10] Maternal drugs exposure [11] Abnormal antenatal umbilical artery flow [12] |
Cesarean section delivery [13] Low APGAR score [14] |
Prematurity [15] Low birth weight [16] Formula feeding [17] Congenital heart diseases [18] Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) [19] Blood transfusion (transfusion-associated NEC) [20,21] Sepsis [22] Antibiotic therapy [23] H2 blocker therapy [24] Prolonged use of umbilical catheters [25] Abnormal gut colonization [26] Neonatal hypoxia or respiratory distress [27,28] |
2.1. Risk Factors
Prematurity represents the most significant risk factor for NEC. Preterm infants (<37 weeks of gestation) are particularly exposed, with the highest susceptibility observed in those <32 weeks due to the immaturity of the gastrointestinal system. Preterm infants exhibit reduced gut motility, with an immature intestinal barrier and an immature immune response, contributing to a high susceptibility to NEC. This physiological immaturity creates a permissive milieu for bacterial translocation across the intestinal wall, inciting inflammation and culminating in intestinal necrosis [1,3].
In addition, the feeding method plays a critical role in the risk of NEC. Formula-fed infants have a higher incidence of NEC than breastfed infants. This difference may be due to the absence of human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) and other bioactive compounds that are naturally present in breast milk [29,30,31,32]. The lack of these protective elements in formula milk may be associated with an altered gut microbiota composition that predisposes the infant to NEC. In addition, the osmolality and volume of formula milk may contribute to intestinal mucosal injury [33].
Intestinal ischemia is another crucial contributor to NEC pathogenesis. The immature cardiovascular system of preterm infants predisposes them to a decreased blood flow to the gut, resulting in tissue hypoxia, cellular injury, and necrosis. This ischemia allows for bacterial invasion and inflammation [1]. Sepsis or patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) may trigger these ischemic episodes [34,35,36]. In addition, a hypoxic bowel may disrupt the gut microbiota and promote dysbiosis, which exacerbates inflammation and perpetuates the cycle of intestinal injury that is associated with NEC [37].
The role of the gut microbiota in NEC is well established, with dysbiosis being a central factor in the development of the disease [38,39]. It is widely accepted that preterm infants harbor a markedly different gut microbiota compared to their full-term counterparts, and those who develop NEC may exhibit reduced microbial diversity and an overabundance of Proteobacteria, particularly Enterobacteriaceae [40,41,42,43,44]. This imbalance allows harmful bacteria to exploit the immature immune system and facilitates bacterial translocation across the compromised intestinal barrier, driving the inflammatory cascade characteristic of NEC [45]. Furthermore, the absence of beneficial commensal bacteria, such as Bifidobacteria, further undermines the gut’s ability to regulate inflammation and maintain barrier function [46].
The gut microbiota of preterm infants are shaped during a critical developmental window by exposure to prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal environmental insults [47].
Genetic factors also play a significant role in NEC susceptibility. Several genetic polymorphisms, particularly those involved in immune regulation and inflammation, have been linked to an increased risk of NEC [48]. Mainly, polymorphisms in the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) gene, which plays a critical role in recognizing bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), have been associated with a higher NEC risk [49]. In preterm infants, heightened TLR4 expression can lead to excessive inflammation and tissue damage [50,51]. Additionally, polymorphisms of genes encoding tight junction proteins have been found to elevate the NEC risk [52]. These genetic factors likely interact with environmental influences, such as feeding practices and microbiota composition, modulating the overall risk of developing NEC [53].
The interplay of prematurity, feeding practices, ischemia, microbiota composition, and genetic susceptibility highlights the complexity of NEC pathogenesis. This emphasizes the necessity of a comprehensive comprehension of these risk factors to inform preventive and therapeutic approaches.
2.2. Inflammatory Response
Preterm neonates exhibit an immature immune system, resulting in altered cytokine production and the impaired function of innate immune cells such as macrophages and neutrophils. This dysregulation can amplify the inflammatory response to gut bacteria, thereby contributing to tissue damage and the onset of NEC [54].
Extensive research has shown that the activation of TLR4 is a crucial factor in developing NEC [3,50]. Notably, the overexpression of TLR4 in the intestinal epithelium of preterm infants plays a critical role in initiating and expanding the inflammatory response [1]. Upon stimulation by LPS, TLR4 initiates a signaling cascade, producing pro-inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukins 6 and 8 (IL-6, IL-8). This process contributes to the breakdown of the intestinal barrier, heightened gut permeability, bacterial translocation, and the subsequent exacerbation of systemic inflammation [50,54,55,56].
3. Gut Microbiota and Gut Microbiota-Derived Metabolites
The human gut microbiota are a complex and dynamic community of microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract, contributing to various aspects of their host’s health, including digestion, immune function, and metabolism [57].
The gut microbiota play a crucial role in human health by producing a variety of bioactive metabolites that significantly impact several physiological and pathological pathways in the host [58].
As reported by Yang et al., gut microbiota-derived metabolites are well recognized as being involved in regulating immune responses and in the pathogenesis of chronic immune-related diseases [59,60].
Emerging evidence suggests that modulating these microbiota-derived metabolites can offer therapeutic benefits for several diseases, including metabolic, inflammatory, and gastrointestinal disorders, cardiovascular diseases, neurological conditions, and cancer [61,62].
Gut microbiota-derived metabolites are small molecules produced by gut microbiota or derived from the diet via microbial fermentation and host metabolism. These metabolites are essential for various physiological functions, including energy homeostasis, the modulation of the immune system, and intestinal barrier integrity [63].
These metabolites fall into three broad groups, depending on their origin and synthesis: (1) metabolites produced by the intestinal microbiota from diet components, (2) host-produced metabolites modified by the intestinal microbiota, and (3) metabolites synthesized de novo by the intestinal microbiota (Table 2).
Table 2.
Classification of gut microbiota-derived metabolites according to their production.
Group | Metabolite | Origin |
---|---|---|
Metabolites produced by the intestinal microbiota from diet components | Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) | Produced by the fermentation of dietary fiber by gut bacteria, particularly Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes species |
Microbial-derived tryptophan metabolites | Metabolized from tryptophan by gut bacteria into compounds such as indoles, kynurenine, and serotonin | |
Host-produced metabolites modified by the intestinal microbiota | Secondary bile acids | Synthesized from cholesterol in the liver and metabolized by gut bacteria into secondary bile acids |
Metabolites synthesized de novo by the intestinal microbiota | Polyamines (putrescine, spermine, and sperimidine) | Synthesized by gut bacteria de novo without direct dietary input |
3.1. Metabolites Produced by Gut Bacteria from Dietary Components
Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), specifically acetate, propionate, and butyrate, are generated through the fermentation of dietary fiber by distinct gut bacterial groups, such as Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes [64,65]. These compounds play pivotal roles in gut health, including increasing mucin production, providing an energy source for colonocytes, fortifying tight junctions, and regulating immune responses through the modulation of regulatory T cell activity [66]. In particular, butyrate, extensively studied and recognized as a beneficial gut metabolite, has demonstrated the ability to enhance intestinal barrier function by promoting tight junction protein and mucin expression, consequently reducing epithelial permeability [65,67,68,69]. Dysregulated SCFA production has been linked to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), colorectal cancer, and metabolic syndrome [70,71].
Tryptophan (Trp), an essential amino acid, undergoes metabolism by gut bacteria, yielding bioactive compounds such as indoles, kynurenine, and serotonin. These metabolites are pivotal in various physiological processes, encompassing immune function, intestinal homeostasis, and neurobehavioral regulation [68]. Notably, microbial-derived tryptophan metabolites, such as indole and indole-3-propionate, have been shown to support gut barrier integrity and modulate inflammation by increasing the expression of tight junction proteins and stimulating the production of antimicrobial peptides against pathogenic bacteria through the aryl hydrocarbon receptor’s (AhR) activation [68,72,73].
Due to the crucial role played by Trp in several pathophysiological processes, including neuronal function, metabolism, inflammatory responses, oxidative stress, immune responses, and intestinal homeostasis, Trp metabolism disorders have been linked to several diseases related to the digestive, nervous, respiratory, blood, and other systems [74].
3.2. Metabolites Produced by the Host and Modified by Gut Bacteria
Bile acids (BAs) are synthesized from cholesterol in the liver and metabolized by gut bacteria into secondary bile acids. These metabolites play an essential role in regulating the composition and function of bile acids within the gastrointestinal tract [75]. Their functions include emulsifying and aiding in the absorption of dietary fats and exhibiting antimicrobial properties to help maintain balanced gut microbiota [76]. In addition, bile acids exert their biological effects through the activation of various receptors, such as the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and the G protein-coupled bile acid receptor 1 (TGR5), thereby playing a pivotal role in preserving intestinal barrier integrity and modulating inflammatory responses [77]. Alterations in bile acid metabolism have been implicated in a spectrum of gastrointestinal disorders, including non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), obesity, and NEC [78,79].
3.3. Metabolites Synthesized De Novo by Gut Bacteria
Polyamines are small, positively charged polycationic molecules in all living organisms, including mammals, plants, and bacteria. The primary polyamines in mammalian cells are putrescine, spermidine, and spermine [80]. Despite their presence in millimolar concentrations, these compounds are known to play essential roles in various critical biological functions, including the synthesis, functioning, and stability of nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) and cell signaling [81,82,83,84,85]. Disruptions in polyamine levels have been associated with increased intestinal permeability, leading to barrier failure and bacterial translocation, potentially contributing to NEC [68,85].
3.4. Gut Microbiota-Derived Metabolites in the Regulation of Immune Response
Accumulating evidence suggests that the gut microbiota are deeply involved in shaping the immune response, in part through the production of their metabolites [59,60]. Gut microbiota and their metabolites are essential regulators of immune function; collectively, they promote a balance between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory responses [86] (Figure 1). In particular, as reported by Kim et al., SCFAs play multiple regulatory roles in the immune system as they can influence the gene expression of genes involved in epithelial barrier and defense functions [60]. SCFAs can promote the differentiation of regulatory T cells (Tregs), which is crucial for immune tolerance and the prevention of excessive immune responses [87]. Park and colleagues also reported that SCFAs can influence effector T cell responses by promoting their Th1 differentiation through the target of the therapamycin-ribosomal S6 kinase (mTOR-S6K) pathway [87]. Although Park et al. have reported that SCFAs can induce Th17 differentiation, butyrate has been reported to inhibit Th17 cell differentiation, thereby preventing pro-inflammatory responses [87], highlighting that the effects of SCFAs are context-dependent [59]. SCFAs have also been reported to regulate the innate immune response by regulating immune cells such as macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells (DCs) [59,60]. Tryptophan-derived metabolites are also capable of modulating T cell responses [88]; in particular, they have been reported to promote Treg differentiation and Th17 suppression through AhR activation, thereby promoting immune tolerance and helping to maintain a balanced immune response [59,60]. Polyamines can also exert regulatory functions on immune cells; in particular, they have anti-inflammatory effects by suppressing inflammatory T cells and producing cytokines and nitric oxide (NO) [60]. Secondary bile acids also play critical anti-inflammatory roles; in particular, they promote Treg differentiation and suppress Th17 differentiation, thereby reducing the pro-inflammatory response [59]. Secondary bile acids may partially regulate the immune response through their receptors, such as TGR5, and two nuclear receptors, FXR and pregnane X receptor (PXR) [88].
Figure 1.
Crosstalk between the gut microbiota, gut microbiota-derived metabolites, intestine, and immune system. Gut microbiota and their metabolites are deeply involved in shaping immune system responses, generally promoting immune tolerance and suppressing pro-inflammatory responses. AhR: aryl hydrocarbon receptor; FXR: farnesoid X receptor; PXR: pregnane X receptor; SCFAs: short-chain fatty acids; TGR5: G protein-coupled bile acid receptor 1; Th1: T helper 1 cells; Th17: T helper 17 cells. Created with Biorender.
4. Role of Gut Microbiota and Gut Microbiota-Derived Metabolites in NEC Pathogenesis
Because of their well established role in shaping the immune response, the gut microbiota, particularly their composition, have been strongly correlated with the development of NEC [47]. As reported by Mueller et al., the development of neonatal microbiota is profoundly influenced by several factors, including maternal factors, the mode of delivery, antibiotic use, and feeding [47,89]. In particular, Kaplina and colleagues focused on the multifactorial origin of NEC. They highlighted the role of maternal and neonatal microbiota in its pathogenesis, emphasizing that the first days of life are critical for the proper development and modulation of the gut microbiota, as also reported by Tarracchini et al. and Catassi and colleagues [27,90,91]. In healthy-term infants, the microbiota are established stepwise, starting with facultative anaerobes (Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus, and Streptococcus). Thanks to the adequate oxygenation of their gut, preterm infants are exposed to a completely different environment after birth [27]. Thus, their microbiota develop in a completely different manner, and are characterized by lower microbial diversity, with lower levels of Bifidobacteria and Bacteroidetes and a higher presence of Proteobacteria and other pathogens, leading to their increased susceptibility to NEC [27,92,93]. In addition, preterm infants have an immature gastrointestinal tract, which, together with dysbiosis, may contribute to immature barrier function and an inadequate immune response, thus increasing the risk of NEC [3,47]. In this context, the role of the gut microbiota is paramount, as they have three essential functions: metabolism, immune system training and development, and protection against disease [3,47]. Emerging evidence suggests that gut microbiota-derived metabolites, including SCFAs, tryptophan derivatives, and BAs, play a critical role in the pathogenesis of NEC by influencing intestinal barrier function, immune responses, and microbial composition. SCFAs, particularly butyrate, are essential for maintaining intestinal barrier integrity by promoting tight junction proteins, such as occludin and claudins, and mucus production, while modulating inflammation [94,95]. In NEC, reduced butyrate levels, likely due to altered gut microbiota composition and decreased fiber fermentation, affect gut barrier function, increasing permeability and consequent bacterial translocation and inflammation [96,97,98]. Several studies have reported that SCFAs show anti-inflammatory properties, inhibiting the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-6, while stimulating the release of anti-inflammatory cytokines like IL-10 [65,99]. The imbalance of SCFAs in NEC may exacerbate the inflammatory response, contributing to tissue injury and necrosis [71,100].
Tryptophan-derived metabolites, such as indole and indole-3-propionate, also help maintain intestinal barrier integrity and regulate immune responses [101,102,103]. Tarracchini et al. reported alterations in Trp metabolism in NEC [90]. In particular, they found overexpression of critical enzymes, such as tryptophanase and indole pyruvate decarboxylase, which are involved in the indole and indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis. Although these metabolites play a critical role in regulating intestinal immunity by activating the AhR, their effects are limited by the reduced availability of tryptophan due to the extensive gastrointestinal damage that is typical of NEC patients [90,104]. In NEC, the altered gut microbiota disrupt the production of these beneficial metabolites, leading to decreased barrier function, increased intestinal permeability, and increased inflammation [59,102,105,106,107,108]. In addition, the accumulation of toxic metabolites, such as quinolinic acid, disrupts AhR signaling, further compromising gut integrity [73,109,110].
Metabolism is another critical factor in NEC pathogenesis, as evidenced by clinical and omics data showing elevated total BA levels in NEC patients [79,111,112,113,114]. Elevated BA levels, especially in preterm and formula-fed infants, lead to toxic accumulation in the intestine and liver [115]. As reported by Yang et al., NEC-related dysbiosis impairs bile acid metabolism because the reduced levels of beneficial bacteria (Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus) interfere with the conversion of primary bile acids to secondary bile acids, leading to an abnormal, toxic accumulation of primary bile acids [79]. The resulting inefficient bile acid clearance exacerbates intestinal injury through FXR and TGR5 receptors. It also upregulates the ileal apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT), thereby triggering an inflammatory response with the release of IL6 and TNFalpha, thus exacerbating intestinal inflammation and injury, with elevated BA levels correlating with the severity of NEC [79,114,116,117].
5. Therapeutic Interventions Targeting Gut-Derived Metabolites
Given the critical role of gut-derived metabolites in NEC pathogenesis, therapeutic strategies aimed at modulating these metabolites hold promise for preventing or treating NEC. Modulating the gut microbiota and their metabolic products might restore gut homeostasis, reduce inflammation, and enhance barrier function, ultimately lowering the incidence and severity of NEC in preterm [118].
Potential interventions include dietary modifications, probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics, and pharmacological agents [118,119,120,121].
5.1. Modulation of Diet
Dietary interventions that modulate gut microbiota-derived metabolites have gained significant attention as non-pharmacological approaches to managing various diseases, including NEC.
Breast milk or supplementation with specific nutrients can influence gut-derived metabolite production. Breast milk is the optimal source of infant nutrition and harbors many bioactive components that confer protection against NEC, including HMOs, immunoglobulins, and growth factors [122]. Breast milk supports a healthy gut microbiota composition, enhances mucosal immunity, and reduces inflammation [29].
In cases where breastfeeding is not feasible, the formula composition can be modified to incorporate prebiotics and probiotics. Furthermore, supplementing the formula with bovine colostrum has demonstrated potential for reducing the incidence of NEC [123]. Enriched formulas are specifically designed to emulate the protective properties of breast milk by promoting the growth of beneficial microbiota and reinforcing the integrity of the gut barrier [45,124]. Diets rich in fibers, polyphenols, and omega-3 fatty acids have been shown to sustain the production of beneficial metabolites like SCFAs and, at the same time, to reduce that of harmful metabolites [125].
5.2. Probiotics, Prebiotics and Postbiotics
Prebiotic, probiotic, and postbiotic supplementation of the gut microbiota has emerged as a potential strategy for preventing and treating NEC.
Prebiotics are defined as non-digestible food ingredients that selectively stimulate the growth and the activity of the beneficial bacteria in the gut [126]. Prebiotics facilitate the proliferation of beneficial bacteria, thereby augmenting the production of SCFAs, consequently fortifying the intestinal barrier and modulating the immune response [127,128,129]. Moreover, they can be easily administered through the diet, making them a convenient option for integration into infants’ nutrition [128]. On the other hand, it has been reported that their efficacy can vary according to the infants’ gut microbiota composition. The excessive or inappropriate use of prebiotics might cause an imbalance in gut microbiota, potentially exacerbating dysbiosis instead of preventing it. Even though prebiotics represent a promising approach, more extensive clinical trials are needed to establish their effectiveness in preventing NEC in preterm infants, since their efficacy in reducing NEC incidence has been controversial, with some studies reporting no effects [130,131,132].
Probiotics are live microorganisms that modulate the gut microbiota and their metabolic output, thus conferring health benefits [133]. The administration of probiotics has shown promise in reducing the incidence and severity of NEC [134,135]. It has been reported that probiotics can improve gut barrier function, modulate immune responses, and inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria by competing with pathogenic bacteria for adhesion sites on the intestinal mucosa, producing antimicrobial substances, and stimulating the production of SCFAs or inducing changes in gut microbiota composition by increasing SCFA-producing bacteria, ultimately improving mucosal integrity and reducing inflammation thanks to their action as epigenetic modifiers, as reported by Alsharairi et al. and Cifuentes et al. [45,65,99,136,137,138,139].
Since probiotics are live microorganisms, their administration to preterm infants raises safety concerns. Reports indicate the potential for probiotics to induce sepsis, as they can facilitate bacterial translocation across the intestinal barrier [140]. Moreover, the effects of probiotics are strain-specific, and not all probiotic strains may be effective against NEC, and some of them may even pose risks if not adequately selected [141,142].
Postbiotics are defined as any factor resulting from the metabolic activity of a probiotic or any released molecule that is capable of conferring beneficial effects to the host, directly or indirectly. Research has demonstrated their ability to enhance host antimicrobial activity, improve gut barrier function, and strengthen intestinal immunity [143,144,145,146,147,148]. The distinguishing feature of postbiotics compared to probiotics lies in their safety profile, as they do not contain any living or dead bacteria or fragments. Consequently, their functional properties and low toxicity render postbiotics an appealing novel approach for re-establishing host-microbe homeostasis without the potential for harmful bacterial translocation, particularly in vulnerable populations such as high-risk preterm infants [120,121,149]. Moreover, they can be used in a broader range of clinical settings, including in severely ill or immunocompromised infants where probiotics administration may not be indicated [150]. On the other hand, research into postbiotics is currently at an early stage, with limited clinical evidence available to substantiate their efficacy in preventing or treating NEC. Further investigation is necessary to grasp their impact comprehensively and to standardize postbiotic formulations, given that their composition is contingent upon the specific bacterial strains and their metabolic activity [151].
5.3. Pharmacological Agents
Pharmacological agents targeting specific metabolic pathways involved in NEC pathogenesis are being explored. For instance, butyrate supplements or analogs have been shown to enhance gut barrier function and reduce inflammation [69,152]. BA sequestrants or FXR agonists may help regulate bile acid metabolism and improve gut barrier integrity [153].
The potential therapeutic application of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) involves transferring fecal matter from a healthy donor to a recipient and has been investigated as a viable treatment for NEC. FMT endeavors to reinstate a balanced gut microbial community, thereby fostering the generation of advantageous metabolites, including SCFAs and tryptophan derivatives. Initial investigations have indicated promising outcomes, characterized by diminished inflammation and enhanced gut barrier function after FMT administration in animal models of NEC [154].
6. Challenges and Future Directions
NEC is the most common and lethal acute gastrointestinal emergency in preterm infants. Due to its complex and multifactorial pathogenesis, its diagnosis is difficult, especially in the early stages [104] There is an urgent medical need for an earlier diagnosis. Identifying early and noninvasive biomarkers could allow for the timely prediction and the effective differentiation of NEC from other intestinal pathologies, leading to immediate intervention in the hope of better outcomes. In this context, metabolomics is increasingly interesting [104,155].
Moreover, the need for a better understanding of the gut microbiota and their metabolic involvement in the pathogenesis of NEC in preterm infants has led to more review articles on this topic to better dissect every aspect of this intricate crosstalk. In this context, exploring the potential of targeting gut microbiota-derived metabolites to prevent and treat NEC reveals a promising yet challenging path forward.
One of the primary challenges lies in the imperative for increased standardization in research methodologies. The extensive range of study designs, encompassing sample collection methods, population demographic characteristics, and analytical techniques, frequently results in inconsistent findings. This variance impedes our ability to establish conclusive determinations and underscores the critical necessity for uniform protocols [156,157]. Establishing consistent criteria for diagnosing NEC, uniform sample collection processes, and harmonized analytical techniques would enhance the result comparability across studies and foster more robust and dependable conclusions [158].
Furthermore, most existing studies are cross-sectional, offering only a momentary snapshot. NEC is a dynamic ailment, and cross-sectional studies providing only fixed snapshots can result in inadequacy for elucidating its progression and causality [159]. Longitudinal studies, which evaluate the relationship between the risk factors and the disease’s development and the outcomes of treatments over different lengths of time, are mandatory in NEC research for tracking alterations in gut microbiota and metabolite levels over time [160,161]. Such studies could aid in identifying critical intervention windows and early biomarkers for NEC, which are pivotal in developing predictive tools, enabling prompt diagnoses and personalized interventions [104,162]. Nevertheless, longitudinal studies, although more informative on disease progression and casualty, have limitations and criticisms, such as high costs, requiring a long time to be set up, and potential incomplete and interrupted follow-up over time [160].
A critical obstacle lies in translating research discoveries into clinical applications. Although initial inquiries into interventions such as probiotics and SCFAs have displayed potential, comprehensive, randomized controlled trials are indispensable to substantiate their efficacy and safety in preterm infants. Numerous barriers frequently impede translation, notably the inadequacy of the requisite skills to evaluate, interpret, and implement the research findings [163,164]. Overcoming these barriers will require a coordinated effort among researchers, clinicians, and regulatory bodies to facilitate the transition from theoretical research to practical application [163].
Lastly, considering the inherent variability in microbial composition and the dynamic nature of metabolite production, personalized therapeutic approaches represent the future of NEC treatment. Customizing interventions based on an individual’s gut microbiota and metabolomic profile can enhance treatment efficacy while reducing the risk of adverse effects [104,155,165].
7. Conclusions
Therapeutic interventions targeting gut microbiota-derived metabolites are promising for treating and preventing NEC. These interventions can restore homeostasis and improve health outcomes by modulating the production of critical gut-derived metabolites. Although significant progress has been made, further research is needed to fully realize the potential of these therapies and develop more precise and effective treatments.
Acknowledgments
Special thanks to Stefano Gatti, the director of the Center for Preclinical Investigation of the Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico.
Abbreviations
AhR: aryl hydrocarbon receptor; ASBT: apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter; BA: bile acid; DNA: deoxyribonucleic acid; FXR: farnesoid X receptor; HMOs: human milk oligosaccharides; IBD: inflammatory bowel disease; IL-6: interleukin-6; IL-8: interleukin-8; IL-10: interleukin-10; LPS: lipopolysaccharide; mTOR-S6K: target of rapamycin-ribosomal S6 kinase; NAFLD: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; NEC: necrotizing enterocolitis; PDA: patent ductus arteriosus; PXR: pregnane X receptor; RNA: ribonucleic acid; SCFAs: short-chain fatty acids; TGR5: G protein-coupled bile acid receptor 1; Th1: T helper 1 cells; Th17: T helper 17 cells; TLR-4: Toll-like receptor 4; TNFα: tumor necrosis factor-alpha; Tregs: regulatory T cells; Trp: tryptophan.
Author Contributions
L.P. and G.C. contributed to the study’s conception and design. L.P., A.T., F.A., M.T., G.R., I.A., L.R., C.V.B., M.F., F.G. and G.C. contributed to the study’s methodology, investigation, and data curation. L.P., A.T., F.A. and G.C. wrote the initial draft preparation of the manuscript. L.P., A.T., F.A., M.T., G.R., I.A., L.R., C.V.B., M.F., F.G. and G.C. wrote, reviewed, and edited the manuscript. L.P., A.T. and G.C. contributed to the figures’ design. G.C. contributed to the supervision and the project administration of the study. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
Francesca Algieri is an employee of Postbiotica s.r.l. The paper reflects the view of the scientist, and not the company. The remaining authors declare that research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be constructed as a potential conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This study was partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Corrente) and the grant Ricerca Finalizzata Giovani Ricercatori, which was awarded to GR (grant number GR-2021-12375473).
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Neu J., Walker W.A. Necrotizing enterocolitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011;364:255–264. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1005408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Adams-Chapman I. Necrotizing Enterocolitis and Neurodevelopmental Outcome. Clin. Perinatol. 2018;45:453–466. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2018.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Niño D.F., Sodhi C.P., Hackam D.J. Necrotizing enterocolitis: New insights into pathogenesis and mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016;13:590–600. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hackett G.A., Campbell S., Gamsu H., Cohen-Overbeek T., Pearce J.M. Doppler studies in the growth retarded fetus and prediction of neonatal necrotising enterocolitis, haemorrhage, and neonatal morbidity. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.) 1987;294:13–16. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6563.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Farghaly M.A.A., Alzayyat S., Kassim D., Taha S.A., Aly H., Mohamed M.A. Maternal chorioamnionitis and the risk for necrotizing enterocolitis in the United States: A national cohort study. Early Hum. Dev. 2024;197:106108. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2024.106108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Abuelazm S., Iben S., Farghaly M., Mohamed M.A., Aly H. Placental abruption and the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates with birth weight ≥ 1500 grams; US national database study. Pediatr. Res. 2024 doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03510-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Perger L., Mukhopadhyay D., Komidar L., Wiggins-Dohlvik K., Uddin M.N., Beeram M. Maternal pre-eclampsia as a risk factor for necrotizing enterocolitis. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29:2098–2103. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1076386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhang B., Chen X., Yang C., Shi H., Xiu W. Effects of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy on the complications in very low birth weight neonates. Hypertens. Pregnancy. 2024;43:2314576. doi: 10.1080/10641955.2024.2314576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Su Y., Xu R.H., Guo L.Y., Chen X.Q., Han W.X., Ma J.J., Liang J.J., Hao L., Ren C.J. Risk factors for necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates: A meta-analysis. Front. Pediatr. 2022;10:1079894. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1079894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Martini S., Annunziata M., Della Gatta A.N., Aceti A., Brunetti M., Pilu G., Simonazzi G., Corvaglia L. Association between Abnormal Antenatal Doppler Characteristics and Gastrointestinal Outcomes in Preterm Infants. Nutrients. 2022;14:5121. doi: 10.3390/nu14235121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Andrews L., Davies T.H., Haas J., Loudin S., Heyward A., Werthammer J. Necrotizing enterocolitis and its association with the neonatal abstinence syndrome. J. Neonatal Perinat. Med. 2020;13:81–85. doi: 10.3233/NPM-180154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Duci M., Frigo A.C., Visentin S., Verlato G., Gamba P., Fascetti-Leon F. Maternal and placental risk factors associated with the development of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and its severity. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2019;54:2099–2102. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Torrazza R.M., Neu J. The altered gut microbiome and necrotizing enterocolitis. Clin. Perinatol. 2013;40:93–108. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2012.12.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kordasz M., Racine M., Szavay P., Lehner M., Krebs T., Luckert C., Hau E.M., Berger S., Kessler U. Risk factors for mortality in preterm infants with necrotizing enterocolitis: A retrospective multicenter analysis. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2022;181:933–939. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04266-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.David P., Claud E.C. Necrotizing Enterocolitis and the Preterm Infant Microbiome. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2024;1449:29–41. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-58572-2_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ree I.M., Smits-Wintjens V.E., Rijntjes-Jacobs E.G., Pelsma I.C., Steggerda S.J., Walther F.J., Lopriore E. Necrotizing enterocolitis in small-for-gestational-age neonates: A matched case-control study. Neonatology. 2014;105:74–78. doi: 10.1159/000356033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Moreira-Monteagudo M., Leirós-Rodríguez R., Marqués-Sánchez P. Effects of Formula Milk Feeding in Premature Infants: A Systematic Review. Children. 2022;9:150. doi: 10.3390/children9020150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Burge K.Y., Gunasekaran A., Makoni M.M., Mir A.M., Burkhart H.M., Chaaban H. Clinical Characteristics and Potential Pathogenesis of Cardiac Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Neonates with Congenital Heart Disease: A Narrative Review. J. Clin. Med. 2022;11:3987. doi: 10.3390/jcm11143987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hamrick S.E.G., Sallmon H., Rose A.T., Porras D., Shelton E.L., Reese J., Hansmann G. Patent Ductus Arteriosus of the Preterm Infant. Pediatrics. 2020;146:e20201209. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-1209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Maheshwari A., Patel R.M., Christensen R.D. Anemia, red blood cell transfusions, and necrotizing enterocolitis. Semin. Pediatr. Surg. 2018;27:47–51. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2017.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Stritzke A.I., Smyth J., Synnes A., Lee S.K., Shah P.S. Transfusion-associated necrotising enterocolitis in neonates. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013;98:F10–F14. doi: 10.1136/fetalneonatal-2011-301282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lambert D.K., Christensen R.D., Henry E., Besner G.E., Baer V.L., Wiedmeier S.E., Stoddard R.A., Miner C.A., Burnett J. Necrotizing enterocolitis in term neonates: Data from a multihospital health-care system. J. Perinatol. 2007;27:437–443. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Klerk D.H., van Avezaath L.K., Loeffen E.A.H., Hulscher J.B.F., Kooi E.M.W. Fetal-neonatal exposure to antibiotics and NEC development: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Pediatr. 2022;10:1102884. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1102884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pulsifer-Anderson E., Guillet R. National Institues of Health recommends the routine use of H2 blockers in preterm infants be carefully evaluated. Neonatal Netw. 2006;25:223–224. doi: 10.1891/0730-0832.25.3.223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lalitha R., Hicks M., Qureshi M., Kumaran K. Umbilical arterial catheter duration as risk factor for Bell’s Stage III necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm neonates. JPGN Rep. 2024;5:256–264. doi: 10.1002/jpr3.12081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Masi A.C., Beck L.C., Perry J.D., Granger C.L., Hiorns A., Young G.R., Bode L., Embleton N.D., Berrington J.E., Stewart C.J. Human milk microbiota, oligosaccharide profiles, and infant gut microbiome in preterm infants diagnosed with necrotizing enterocolitis. Cell Rep. Med. 2024;5:101708. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kaplina A., Kononova S., Zaikova E., Pervunina T., Petrova N., Sitkin S. Necrotizing Enterocolitis: The Role of Hypoxia, Gut Microbiome, and Microbial Metabolites. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:2471. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Berger D.S., Garg B., Penfield C.A., Caughey A.B. Respiratory distress syndrome is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in late preterm births. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. MFM. 2024;6:101374. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bode L. Human milk oligosaccharides: Every baby needs a sugar mama. Glycobiology. 2012;22:1147–1162. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cws074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fu C., Sun W., Wang X., Zhu X. Human breast milk: A promising treatment for necrotizing enterocolitis. Early Hum. Dev. 2023;184:105833. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2023.105833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Martin R., Makino H., Cetinyurek Yavuz A., Ben-Amor K., Roelofs M., Ishikawa E., Kubota H., Swinkels S., Sakai T., Oishi K., et al. Early-Life Events, Including Mode of Delivery and Type of Feeding, Siblings and Gender, Shape the Developing Gut Microbiota. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0158498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rose A.T., Patel R.M. A critical analysis of risk factors for necrotizing enterocolitis. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;23:374–379. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2018.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sullivan S., Schanler R.J., Kim J.H., Patel A.L., Trawöger R., Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U., Chan G.M., Blanco C.L., Abrams S., Cotten C.M., et al. An exclusively human milk-based diet is associated with a lower rate of necrotizing enterocolitis than a diet of human milk and bovine milk-based products. J. Pediatr. 2010;156:562–567.e561. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.10.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nowicki P.T., Nankervis C.A. The role of the circulation in the pathogenesis of necrotizing enterocolitis. Clin. Perinatol. 1994;21:219–234. doi: 10.1016/S0095-5108(18)30342-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nowicki P.T., Nankervis C.A., Miller C.E. Effects of ischemia and reperfusion on intrinsic vascular regulation in the postnatal intestinal circulation. Pediatr. Res. 1993;33:400–404. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199304000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nankervis C.A., Giannone P.J., Reber K.M. The neonatal intestinal vasculature: Contributing factors to necrotizing enterocolitis. Semin. Perinatol. 2008;32:83–91. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2008.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Deng F., Lin Z.B., Sun Q.S., Min Y., Zhang Y., Chen Y., Chen W.T., Hu J.J., Liu K.X. The role of intestinal microbiota and its metabolites in intestinal and extraintestinal organ injury induced by intestinal ischemia reperfusion injury. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2022;18:3981–3992. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.71491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Claud E.C., Keegan K.P., Brulc J.M., Lu L., Bartels D., Glass E., Chang E.B., Meyer F., Antonopoulos D.A. Bacterial community structure and functional contributions to emergence of health or necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants. Microbiome. 2013;1:20. doi: 10.1186/2049-2618-1-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Stanikova A., Jouza M., Bohosova J., Slaby O., Jabandziev P. Role of the microbiome in pathophysiology of necrotising enterocolitis in preterm neonates. BMJ Paediatr. Open. 2023;7:e002172. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Pammi M., Cope J., Tarr P.I., Warner B.B., Morrow A.L., Mai V., Gregory K.E., Kroll J.S., McMurtry V., Ferris M.J., et al. Intestinal dysbiosis in preterm infants preceding necrotizing enterocolitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microbiome. 2017;5:31. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0248-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Morrow A.L., Lagomarcino A.J., Schibler K.R., Taft D.H., Yu Z., Wang B., Altaye M., Wagner M., Gevers D., Ward D.V., et al. Early microbial and metabolomic signatures predict later onset of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants. Microbiome. 2013;1:13. doi: 10.1186/2049-2618-1-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Neu J., Pammi M. Pathogenesis of NEC: Impact of an altered intestinal microbiome. Semin. Perinatol. 2017;41:29–35. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2016.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Neu J., Pammi M. Necrotizing enterocolitis: The intestinal microbiome, metabolome and inflammatory mediators. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;23:400–405. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2018.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Warner B.B., Deych E., Zhou Y., Hall-Moore C., Weinstock G.M., Sodergren E., Shaikh N., Hoffmann J.A., Linneman L.A., Hamvas A., et al. Gut bacteria dysbiosis and necrotising enterocolitis in very low birthweight infants: A prospective case-control study. Lancet. 2016;387:1928–1936. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00081-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Underwood M.A., Gaerlan S., De Leoz M.L., Dimapasoc L., Kalanetra K.M., Lemay D.G., German J.B., Mills D.A., Lebrilla C.B. Human milk oligosaccharides in premature infants: Absorption, excretion, and influence on the intestinal microbiota. Pediatr. Res. 2015;78:670–677. doi: 10.1038/pr.2015.162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Warner B.B., Tarr P.I. Necrotizing enterocolitis and preterm infant gut bacteria. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;21:394–399. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2016.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Aziz M., Prince J.M., Wang P. Gut microbiome and necrotizing enterocolitis: Understanding the connection to find a cure. Cell Host Microbe. 2022;30:612–616. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2022.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Cuna A., George L., Sampath V. Genetic predisposition to necrotizing enterocolitis in premature infants: Current knowledge, challenges, and future directions. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;23:387–393. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2018.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Taft D.H., Kottyan L., Lagomarcino A.J., Schibler K.R., Yu Z., Gevers D., Ward D.V., Huttenhower C., Newburg D.S., Morrow A.L. A pilot study of TLR4 polymorphism in relation to intestinal dysbiosis and risk of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants. FASEB J. 2013;27:866.10. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.27.1_supplement.866.10. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hackam D.J., Sodhi C.P. Toll-Like Receptor-Mediated Intestinal Inflammatory Imbalance in the Pathogenesis of Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018;6:229–238.e221. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2018.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hackam D.J., Afrazi A., Good M., Sodhi C.P. Innate immune signaling in the pathogenesis of necrotizing enterocolitis. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2013;2013:475415. doi: 10.1155/2013/475415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Moore S.A., Nighot P., Reyes C., Rawat M., McKee J., Lemon D., Hanson J., Ma T.Y. Intestinal barrier dysfunction in human necrotizing enterocolitis. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2016;51:1907–1913. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Good M., Sodhi C.P., Hackam D.J. Evidence-based feeding strategies before and after the development of necrotizing enterocolitis. Expert. Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2014;10:875–884. doi: 10.1586/1744666X.2014.913481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Jilling T., Simon D., Lu J., Meng F.J., Li D., Schy R., Thomson R.B., Soliman A., Arditi M., Caplan M.S. The roles of bacteria and TLR4 in rat and murine models of necrotizing enterocolitis. J. Immunol. 2006;177:3273–3282. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.5.3273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Leaphart C.L., Cavallo J., Gribar S.C., Cetin S., Li J., Branca M.F., Dubowski T.D., Sodhi C.P., Hackam D.J. A critical role for TLR4 in the pathogenesis of necrotizing enterocolitis by modulating intestinal injury and repair. J. Immunol. 2007;179:4808–4820. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.7.4808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Frost B.L., Modi B.P., Jaksic T., Caplan M.S. New Medical and Surgical Insights Into Neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis: A Review. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171:83–88. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.2708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Thursby E., Juge N. Introduction to the human gut microbiota. Biochem. J. 2017;474:1823–1836. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20160510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Donaldson G.P., Lee S.M., Mazmanian S.K. Gut biogeography of the bacterial microbiota. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016;14:20–32. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Yang W., Cong Y. Gut microbiota-derived metabolites in the regulation of host immune responses and immune-related inflammatory diseases. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2021;18:866–877. doi: 10.1038/s41423-021-00661-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kim C.H. Immune regulation by microbiome metabolites. Immunology. 2018;154:220–229. doi: 10.1111/imm.12930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Shapiro H., Thaiss C.A., Levy M., Elinav E. The cross talk between microbiota and the immune system: Metabolites take center stage. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2014;30:54–62. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2014.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Rooks M.G., Garrett W.S. Gut microbiota, metabolites and host immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016;16:341–352. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Adak A., Khan M.R. An insight into gut microbiota and its functionalities. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2019;76:473–493. doi: 10.1007/s00018-018-2943-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Mann E.R., Lam Y.K., Uhlig H.H. Short-chain fatty acids: Linking diet, the microbiome and immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2024;24:577–595. doi: 10.1038/s41577-024-01014-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Cifuentes M.P., Chapman J.A., Stewart C.J. Gut microbiome derived short chain fatty acids: Promising strategies in necrotising enterocolitis. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2024;6:100219. doi: 10.1016/j.crmicr.2024.100219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Furusawa Y., Obata Y., Fukuda S., Endo T.A., Nakato G., Takahashi D., Nakanishi Y., Uetake C., Kato K., Kato T., et al. Commensal microbe-derived butyrate induces the differentiation of colonic regulatory T cells. Nature. 2013;504:446–450. doi: 10.1038/nature12721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Louis P., Flint H.J. Diversity, metabolism and microbial ecology of butyrate-producing bacteria from the human large intestine. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2009;294:1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01514.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Rahman S., O’Connor A.L., Becker S.L., Patel R.K., Martindale R.G., Tsikitis V.L. Gut microbial metabolites and its impact on human health. Ann. Gastroenterol. 2023;36:360–368. doi: 10.20524/aog.2023.0809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Peng L., Li Z.R., Green R.S., Holzman I.R., Lin J. Butyrate enhances the intestinal barrier by facilitating tight junction assembly via activation of AMP-activated protein kinase in Caco-2 cell monolayers. J. Nutr. 2009;139:1619–1625. doi: 10.3945/jn.109.104638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Shin Y., Han S., Kwon J., Ju S., Choi T.G., Kang I., Kim S.S. Roles of Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Nutrients. 2023;15:4466. doi: 10.3390/nu15204466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Parada Venegas D., De la Fuente M.K., Landskron G., González M.J., Quera R., Dijkstra G., Harmsen H.J.M., Faber K.N., Hermoso M.A. Short Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs)-Mediated Gut Epithelial and Immune Regulation and Its Relevance for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:277. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Yang S., Yu M. Role of Goblet Cells in Intestinal Barrier and Mucosal Immunity. J. Inflamm. Res. 2021;14:3171–3183. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S318327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Roager H.M., Licht T.R. Microbial tryptophan catabolites in health and disease. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:3294. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05470-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Xue C., Li G., Zheng Q., Gu X., Shi Q., Su Y., Chu Q., Yuan X., Bao Z., Lu J., et al. Tryptophan metabolism in health and disease. Cell Metab. 2023;35:1304–1326. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2023.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Ridlon J.M., Kang D.J., Hylemon P.B. Bile salt biotransformations by human intestinal bacteria. J. Lipid Res. 2006;47:241–259. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R500013-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Islam K.B., Fukiya S., Hagio M., Fujii N., Ishizuka S., Ooka T., Ogura Y., Hayashi T., Yokota A. Bile acid is a host factor that regulates the composition of the cecal microbiota in rats. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:1773–1781. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.07.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Inagaki T., Moschetta A., Lee Y.K., Peng L., Zhao G., Downes M., Yu R.T., Shelton J.M., Richardson J.A., Repa J.J., et al. Regulation of antibacterial defense in the small intestine by the nuclear bile acid receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:3920–3925. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509592103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Fleishman J.S., Kumar S. Bile acid metabolism and signaling in health and disease: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2024;9:97. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01811-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Yang J., Chen X., Liu T., Shi Y. Potential role of bile acids in the pathogenesis of necrotizing enterocolitis. Life Sci. 2024;336:122279. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2023.122279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Thomas T., Thomas T.J. Polyamines in cell growth and cell death: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic applications. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. CMLS. 2001;58:244–258. doi: 10.1007/PL00000852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Waligora-Dupriet A.J., Dugay A., Auzeil N., Nicolis I., Rabot S., Huerre M.R., Butel M.J. Short-chain fatty acids and polyamines in the pathogenesis of necrotizing enterocolitis: Kinetics aspects in gnotobiotic quails. Anaerobe. 2009;15:138–144. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2009.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Gerner E.W., Meyskens F.L. Polyamines and cancer: Old molecules, new understanding. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2004;4:781–792. doi: 10.1038/nrc1454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Pegg A.E. Mammalian polyamine metabolism and function. IUBMB Life. 2009;61:880–894. doi: 10.1002/iub.230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Xuan M., Gu X., Li J., Huang D., Xue C., He Y. Polyamines: Their significance for maintaining health and contributing to diseases. Cell Commun. Signal. 2023;21:348. doi: 10.1186/s12964-023-01373-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Sagar N.A., Tarafdar S., Agarwal S., Tarafdar A., Sharma S. Polyamines: Functions, Metabolism, and Role in Human Disease Management. Med. Sci. 2021;9:44. doi: 10.3390/medsci9020044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Hou K., Wu Z.-X., Chen X.-Y., Wang J.-Q., Zhang D., Xiao C., Zhu D., Koya J.B., Wei L., Li J., et al. Microbiota in health and diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022;7:135. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-00974-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Park J., Kim M., Kang S.G., Jannasch A.H., Cooper B., Patterson J., Kim C.H. Short-chain fatty acids induce both effector and regulatory T cells by suppression of histone deacetylases and regulation of the mTOR-S6K pathway. Mucosal Immunol. 2015;8:80–93. doi: 10.1038/mi.2014.44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Wheeler M.A., Rothhammer V., Quintana F.J. Control of immune-mediated pathology via the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292:12383–12389. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R116.767723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Mueller N.T., Bakacs E., Combellick J., Grigoryan Z., Dominguez-Bello M.G. The infant microbiome development: Mom matters. Trends Mol. Med. 2015;21:109–117. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Tarracchini C., Milani C., Longhi G., Fontana F., Mancabelli L., Pintus R., Lugli G.A., Alessandri G., Anzalone R., Viappiani A., et al. Unraveling the Microbiome of Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Insights in Novel Microbial and Metabolomic Biomarkers. Microbiol. Spectr. 2021;9:e0117621. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.01176-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Catassi G., Mateo S.G., Occhionero A.S., Esposito C., Giorgio V., Aloi M., Gasbarrini A., Cammarota G., Ianiro G. The importance of gut microbiome in the perinatal period. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2024 doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05795-x. online ahead of print . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Arboleya S., Rios-Covian D., Maillard F., Langella P., Gueimonde M., Martín R. Preterm Delivery: Microbial Dysbiosis, Gut Inflammation and Hyperpermeability. Front. Microbiol. 2021;12:806338. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.806338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Catassi G., Aloi M., Giorgio V., Gasbarrini A., Cammarota G., Ianiro G. The Role of Diet and Nutritional Interventions for the Infant Gut Microbiome. Nutrients. 2024;16:400. doi: 10.3390/nu16030400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Liang L., Liu L., Zhou W., Yang C., Mai G., Li H., Chen Y. Gut microbiota-derived butyrate regulates gut mucus barrier repair by activating the macrophage/WNT/ERK signaling pathway. Clin. Sci. 2022;136:291–307. doi: 10.1042/CS20210778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Gustafsson J.K., Johansson M.E.V. The role of goblet cells and mucus in intestinal homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022;19:785–803. doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00675-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Yu W., Venkatraman A., Menden H.L., Martinez M., Umar S., Sampath V. Short-chain fatty acids ameliorate necrotizing enterocolitis-like intestinal injury through enhancing Notch1-mediated single immunoglobulin interleukin-1-related receptor, toll-interacting protein, and A20 induction. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2023;324:G24–G37. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00057.2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Liu X.C., Du T.T., Gao X., Zhao W.J., Wang Z.L., He Y., Bao L., Li L.Q. Gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acids may be new biomarkers for predicting neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: A pilot study. Front. Microbiol. 2022;13:969656. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.969656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Xiong J., Liao X.S., Yin T., Liu X.C., Bao L., Li L.Q. Alterations of the gut microbiota and short chain fatty acids in necrotizing enterocolitis and food protein-induced allergic protocolitis infants: A prospective cohort study. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2022;12:1030588. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1030588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Alsharairi N.A. Therapeutic Potential of Gut Microbiota and Its Metabolite Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Life. 2023;13:561. doi: 10.3390/life13020561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Xiong R.G., Zhou D.D., Wu S.X., Huang S.Y., Saimaiti A., Yang Z.J., Shang A., Zhao C.N., Gan R.Y., Li H.B. Health Benefits and Side Effects of Short-Chain Fatty Acids. Foods. 2022;11:2863. doi: 10.3390/foods11182863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Wang G., Fan Y., Zhang G., Cai S., Ma Y., Yang L., Wang Y., Yu H., Qiao S., Zeng X. Microbiota-derived indoles alleviate intestinal inflammation and modulate microbiome by microbial cross-feeding. Microbiome. 2024;12:59. doi: 10.1186/s40168-024-01750-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Li X., Zhang B., Hu Y., Zhao Y. New Insights Into Gut-Bacteria-Derived Indole and Its Derivatives in Intestinal and Liver Diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 2021;12:769501. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.769501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Arifuzzaman M., Collins N., Guo C.-J., Artis D. Nutritional regulation of microbiota-derived metabolites: Implications for immunity and inflammation. Immunity. 2024;57:14–27. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2023.12.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Bosco A., Piu C., Picciau M.E., Pintus R., Fanos V., Dessì A. Metabolomics in NEC: An Updated Review. Metabolites. 2023;14:14. doi: 10.3390/metabo14010014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Healy D.B., Ryan C.A., Ross R.P., Stanton C., Dempsey E.M. Clinical implications of preterm infant gut microbiome development. Nat. Microbiol. 2022;7:22–33. doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-01025-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Lai M.-Y., Chang Y.-H., Lee C.-C., Group N.M.O.S. The impact of gut microbiota on morbidities in preterm infants. Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 2024;40:780–788. doi: 10.1002/kjm2.12878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Su X., Gao Y., Yang R. Gut Microbiota-Derived Tryptophan Metabolites Maintain Gut and Systemic Homeostasis. Cells. 2022;11:2296. doi: 10.3390/cells11152296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Chelakkot C., Ghim J., Ryu S.H. Mechanisms regulating intestinal barrier integrity and its pathological implications. Exp. Mol. Med. 2018;50:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s12276-018-0126-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Gupta S.K., Vyavahare S., Duchesne Blanes I.L., Berger F., Isales C., Fulzele S. Microbiota-derived tryptophan metabolism: Impacts on health, aging, and disease. Exp. Gerontol. 2023;183:112319. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2023.112319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Scott S.A., Fu J., Chang P.V. Microbial tryptophan metabolites regulate gut barrier function via the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:19376–19387. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2000047117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Halpern M.D., Holubec H., Dominguez J.A., Meza Y.G., Williams C.S., Ruth M.C., McCuskey R.S., Dvorak B. Hepatic inflammatory mediators contribute to intestinal damage in necrotizing enterocolitis. Am. J. Physiol.-Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2003;284:G695–G702. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00353.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Halpern M.D., Dvorak B. Does Abnormal Bile Acid Metabolism Contribute to NEC? Semin. Perinatol. 2008;32:114–121. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2008.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Knapp S., Kehring A., Stepp J., Calton C.M., Gephart S.M., Bandlamuri S., Boyle K.E., Dietz G.I., Johnson H., Romo R.E., et al. Elevated Coefficient of Variation in Total Fecal Bile Acids Precedes Diagnosis of Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:249. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57178-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Feng Z., Jia C., Lin X., Hao H., Li S., Li F., Cui Q., Chen Y., Wu F., Xiao X. The inhibition of enterocyte proliferation by lithocholic acid exacerbates necrotizing enterocolitis through downregulating the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway. Cell Prolif. 2022;55:e13228. doi: 10.1111/cpr.13228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Hu H., Shao W., Liu Q., Liu N., Wang Q., Xu J., Zhang X., Weng Z., Lu Q., Jiao L., et al. Gut microbiota promotes cholesterol gallstone formation by modulating bile acid composition and biliary cholesterol secretion. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:252. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27758-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Halpern M.D., Weitkamp J.H., Mount Patrick S.K., Dobrenen H.J., Khailova L., Correa H., Dvorak B. Apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter upregulation is associated with necrotizing enterocolitis. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2010;299:G623–G631. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00242.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Halpern M.D., Holubec H., Saunders T.A., Dvorak K., Clark J.A., Doelle S.M., Ballatori N., Dvorak B. Bile acids induce ileal damage during experimental necrotizing enterocolitis. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:359–372. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.10.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Beharry K.D., Latkowska M., Valencia A.M., Allana A., Soto J., Cai C.L., Golombek S., Hand I., Aranda J.V. Factors Influencing Neonatal Gut Microbiome and Health with a Focus on Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Microorganisms. 2023;11:2528. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11102528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Patel R.M., Denning P.W. Therapeutic use of prebiotics, probiotics, and postbiotics to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis: What is the current evidence? Clin. Perinatol. 2013;40:11–25. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2012.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Mosca F., Gianni M.L., Rescigno M. Can Postbiotics Represent a New Strategy for NEC? Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019;1125:37–45. doi: 10.1007/5584_2018_314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Giannì M.L., Morniroli D., Mosca F., Rescigno M. Can Postbiotics Represent a New Strategy for NEC? Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2024;1449:43–57. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-58572-2_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Victora C.G., Bahl R., Barros A.J., França G.V., Horton S., Krasevec J., Murch S., Sankar M.J., Walker N., Rollins N.C. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016;387:475–490. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Bakshi S., Paswan V.K., Yadav S.P., Bhinchhar B.K., Kharkwal S., Rose H., Kanetkar P., Kumar V., Al-Zamani Z.A.S., Bunkar D.S. A comprehensive review on infant formula: Nutritional and functional constituents, recent trends in processing and its impact on infants’ gut microbiota. Front. Nutr. 2023;10:1194679. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1194679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Bansal T., Alaniz R.C., Wood T.K., Jayaraman A. The bacterial signal indole increases epithelial-cell tight-junction resistance and attenuates indicators of inflammation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:228–233. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906112107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Aziz T., Hussain N., Hameed Z., Lin L. Elucidating the role of diet in maintaining gut health to reduce the risk of obesity, cardiovascular and other age-related inflammatory diseases: Recent challenges and future recommendations. Gut Microbes. 2024;16:2297864. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2023.2297864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Davani-Davari D., Negahdaripour M., Karimzadeh I., Seifan M., Mohkam M., Masoumi S.J., Berenjian A., Ghasemi Y. Prebiotics: Definition, Types, Sources, Mechanisms, and Clinical Applications. Foods. 2019;8:92. doi: 10.3390/foods8030092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Patel R.M., Underwood M.A. Probiotics and necrotizing enterocolitis. Semin. Pediatr. Surg. 2018;27:39–46. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2017.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Ji J., Jin W., Liu S.J., Jiao Z., Li X. Probiotics, prebiotics, and postbiotics in health and disease. MedComm (2020) 2023;4:e420. doi: 10.1002/mco2.420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Chandrasekaran P., Weiskirchen S., Weiskirchen R. Effects of Probiotics on Gut Microbiota: An Overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024;25:6022. doi: 10.3390/ijms25116022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Kho Z.Y., Lal S.K. The Human Gut Microbiome—A Potential Controller of Wellness and Disease. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:1835. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Saeed N.K., Al-Beltagi M., Bediwy A.S., El-Sawaf Y., Toema O. Gut microbiota in various childhood disorders: Implication and indications. World J. Gastroenterol. 2022;28:1875–1901. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i18.1875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Johnson-Henry K.C., Abrahamsson T.R., Wu R.Y., Sherman P.M. Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Synbiotics for the Prevention of Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Adv. Nutr. 2016;7:928–937. doi: 10.3945/an.116.012237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Hill C., Guarner F., Reid G., Gibson G.R., Merenstein D.J., Pot B., Morelli L., Canani R.B., Flint H.J., Salminen S., et al. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014;11:506–514. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Underwood M.A. Impact of probiotics on necrotizing enterocolitis. Semin. Perinatol. 2017;41:41–51. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2016.09.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Seghesio E., De Geyter C., Vandenplas Y. Probiotics in the Prevention and Treatment of Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Nutr. 2021;24:245–255. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2021.24.3.245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.AlFaleh K., Anabrees J. Probiotics for prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005496.pub4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Houghteling P.D., Walker W.A. Why is initial bacterial colonization of the intestine important to infants’ and children’s health? J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2015;60:294–307. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Wang X., Zhang P., Zhang X. Probiotics Regulate Gut Microbiota: An Effective Method to Improve Immunity. Molecules. 2021;26:6076. doi: 10.3390/molecules26196076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Virk M.S., Virk M.A., He Y., Tufail T., Gul M., Qayum A., Rehman A., Rashid A., Ekumah J.-N., Han X., et al. The Anti-Inflammatory and Curative Exponent of Probiotics: A Comprehensive and Authentic Ingredient for the Sustained Functioning of Major Human Organs. Nutrients. 2024;16:546. doi: 10.3390/nu16040546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Underwood M.A., Umberger E., Patel R.M. Safety and efficacy of probiotic administration to preterm infants: Ten common questions. Pediatr. Res. 2020;88:48–55. doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-1080-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Sajankila N., Wala S.J., Ragan M.V., Volpe S.G., Dumbauld Z., Purayil N., Mihi B., Besner G.E. Current and future methods of probiotic therapy for necrotizing enterocolitis. Front. Pediatr. 2023;11:1120459. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1120459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Kothari D., Patel S., Kim S.-K. Probiotic supplements might not be universally-effective and safe: A review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019;111:537–547. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.12.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Tsilingiri K., Barbosa T., Penna G., Caprioli F., Sonzogni A., Viale G., Rescigno M. Probiotic and postbiotic activity in health and disease: Comparison on a novel polarised ex-vivo organ culture model. Gut. 2012;61:1007. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Tsilingiri K., Rescigno M. Postbiotics: What else? Benef. Microbes. 2013;4:101–107. doi: 10.3920/BM2012.0046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Salminen S., Collado M.C., Endo A., Hill C., Lebeer S., Quigley E.M.M., Sanders M.E., Shamir R., Swann J.R., Szajewska H., et al. The International Scientific Association of Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of postbiotics. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021;18:649–667. doi: 10.1038/s41575-021-00440-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Wegh C.A.M., Geerlings S.Y., Knol J., Roeselers G., Belzer C. Postbiotics and Their Potential Applications in Early Life Nutrition and Beyond. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:4673. doi: 10.3390/ijms20194673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Collado M.C., Vinderola G., Salminen S. Postbiotics: Facts and open questions. A position paper on the need for a consensus definition. Benef. Microbes. 2019;10:711–719. doi: 10.3920/BM2019.0015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Aguilar-Toalá J.E., Arioli S., Behare P., Belzer C., Berni Canani R., Chatel J.-M., D’Auria E., de Freitas M.Q., Elinav E., Esmerino E.A., et al. Postbiotics—When simplification fails to clarify. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021;18:825–826. doi: 10.1038/s41575-021-00521-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Algieri F., Tanaskovic N., Rincon C.C., Notario E., Braga D., Pesole G., Rusconi R., Penna G., Rescigno M. Lactobacillus paracasei CNCM I-5220-derived postbiotic protects from the leaky-gut. Front. Microbiol. 2023;14:1157164. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1157164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Morniroli D., Vizzari G., Consales A., Mosca F., Giannì M.L. Postbiotic Supplementation for Children and Newborn’s Health. Nutrients. 2021;13:781. doi: 10.3390/nu13030781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Mosca A., Abreu Y.A.A.T., Gwee K.A., Ianiro G., Tack J., Nguyen T.V.H., Hill C. The clinical evidence for postbiotics as microbial therapeutics. Gut Microbes. 2022;14:2117508. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2117508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Scheppach W. Effects of short chain fatty acids on gut morphology and function. Gut. 1994;35:S35–S38. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.1_Suppl.S35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Pols T.W., Noriega L.G., Nomura M., Auwerx J., Schoonjans K. The bile acid membrane receptor TGR5 as an emerging target in metabolism and inflammation. J. Hepatol. 2011;54:1263–1272. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Wu H., Guo K., Zhuo Z., Zeng R., Luo Y., Yang Q., Li J., Jiang R., Huang Z., Sha W., et al. Current therapy option for necrotizing enterocolitis: Practicalities and challenge. Front. Pediatr. 2022;10:954735. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.954735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Daliri E.B., Wei S., Oh D.H., Lee B.H. The human microbiome and metabolomics: Current concepts and applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017;57:3565–3576. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2016.1220913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Khan A.M. Guidelines for standardizing and increasing the transparency in the reporting of biomedical research. J. Thorac. Dis. 2017;9:2697–2702. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.07.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Institute of Medicine . Sharing Clinical Research Data: Workshop Summary. National Academies Press (US); Washington, DC, USA: 2013. The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Patel R.M., Ferguson J., McElroy S.J., Khashu M., Caplan M.S. Defining necrotizing enterocolitis: Current difficulties and future opportunities. Pediatr. Res. 2020;88:10–15. doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-1074-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Wang X., Cheng Z. Cross-Sectional Studies: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Recommendations. Chest. 2020;158:S65–S71. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Caruana E.J., Roman M., Hernández-Sánchez J., Solli P. Longitudinal studies. J. Thorac. Dis. 2015;7:E537–E540. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.10.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Neumann C.J., Mahnert A., Kumpitsch C., Kiu R., Dalby M.J., Kujawska M., Madl T., Kurath-Koller S., Urlesberger B., Resch B., et al. Clinical NEC prevention practices drive different microbiome profiles and functional responses in the preterm intestine. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:1349. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36825-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Agakidou E., Agakidis C., Gika H., Sarafidis K. Emerging Biomarkers for Prediction and Early Diagnosis of Necrotizing Enterocolitis in the Era of Metabolomics and Proteomics. Front. Pediatr. 2020;8:602255. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.602255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Abu-Odah H., Said N.B., Nair S.C., Allsop M.J., Currow D.C., Salah M.S., Hamad B.A., Elessi K., Alkhatib A., ElMokhallalati Y., et al. Identifying barriers and facilitators of translating research evidence into clinical practice: A systematic review of reviews. Health Soc. Care Community. 2022;30:e3265–e3276. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Bahadori M., Raadabadi M., Ravangard R., Mahaki B. The barriers to the application of the research findings from the nurses’ perspective: A case study in a teaching hospital. J. Educ. Health Promot. 2016;5:14. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.184553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Schupack D.A., Mars R.A.T., Voelker D.H., Abeykoon J.P., Kashyap P.C. The promise of the gut microbiome as part of individualized treatment strategies. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022;19:7–25. doi: 10.1038/s41575-021-00499-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.