Skip to main content
Immunology logoLink to Immunology
. 1979 Dec;38(4):741–748.

Binding of bursal, thymic and splenic lymphocytes to macrophages

R L Duncan Jr, W P McArthur
PMCID: PMC1457875  PMID: 93085

Abstract

This study was carried out to examine the potential for chicken lymphocytes from the bursa of Fabricius, the thymus and the spleen to interact physically with glass-adherent peripheral blood monocytes (macrophages). Lymphocytes from all three sources were bound by macrophages. Under optimal conditions, over 90% of the macrophages had lymphocytes bound. Splenic lymphocytes from either bursectomized or normal chickens were capable of being bound by macrophages. The degree of macrophage—lymphocyte interaction varied with the duration of incubation and with the concentration of lymphocytes in culture. The number of lymphocytes bound to macrophages was reduced when binding was allowed to take place at 4°, or if macrophage monolayers were pre-treated with iodoacetate. Incubation of the macrophage cultures with cytochalasin B or pre-treatment of the macrophage monolayers with trypsin also reduced lymphocyte binding. Chicken immunoglobulin, fresh chicken serum, or antigen—antibody complexes had no apparent affect on macrophage—lymphocyte interaction. These data indicated the following: (1) the majority of macrophages derived from peripheral blood monocytes have a receptor for lymphocytes; (2) functionally immature thymic and bursal lymphocytes as well as splenic lymphocytes can be bound by macrophages; and (3) macrophage—lymphocyte interaction in the chicken has similar properties to that seen in mammals.

Full text

PDF
741

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beller D. I., Farr A. G., Unanue E. R. Regulation of lymphocyte proliferation and differentiation by macrophages. Fed Proc. 1978 Jan;37(1):91–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen C., Hirsch J. G. The effects of mercaptoethanol and of peritoneal macrophages on the antibody-forming capacity of nonadherent mouse spleen cells in vitro. J Exp Med. 1972 Sep 1;136(3):604–617. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.3.604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cline M. J., Swett V. C. The interaction of human monocytes and lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1968 Dec 1;128(6):1309–1325. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.6.1309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Duncan R. L., Jr, McArthur W. P. Partial characterization and the distribution of chicken mononuclear cells bearing the Fc receptor. J Immunol. 1978 Mar;120(3):1014–1020. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hersh E. M., Harris J. E. Macrophage-lymphocyte interaction in the antigen-induced blastogenic response of human peripheral blood leukocytes. J Immunol. 1968 Jun;100(6):1184–1194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Katz D. H., Unanue E. R. Critical role of determinant presentation in the induction of specific responses in immunocompetent lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1973 Apr 1;137(4):967–990. doi: 10.1084/jem.137.4.967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lipsky P. E., Rosenthal A. S. Macrophage-lymphocyte interaction. I. Characteristics of the antigen-independent-binding of guinea pig thymocytes and lymphocytes to syngeneic macrophages. J Exp Med. 1973 Oct 1;138(4):900–924. doi: 10.1084/jem.138.4.900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lipsky P. E., Rosenthal A. S. Macrophage-lymphocyte interaction: antigen-independent binding of guinea pig lymph node lymphocytes by macrophages. J Immunol. 1975 Aug;115(2):440–445. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mosier D. E. Cell interactions in the primary immune response in vitro: a requirement for specific cell clusters. J Exp Med. 1969 Feb 1;129(2):351–362. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.2.351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mosier D. E., Pierce C. W. Functional maturation of thymic lymphocyte populations in vitro. J Exp Med. 1972 Dec 1;136(6):1484–1500. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.6.1484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nguyen B. T., Stadtsbaeder S. Spontaneous interaction in vitro between lymphocytes and syngeneic peritoneal macrophages of mice. Infect Immun. 1976 Mar;13(3):884–889. doi: 10.1128/iai.13.3.884-889.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pierce C. W., Benacerraf B. Immune response in vitro: independence of "activated" lymphoid cells. Science. 1969 Nov 21;166(3908):1002–1004. doi: 10.1126/science.166.3908.1002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Seeger R. C., Oppenheim J. J. Synergistic interaction of macrophages and lymphocytes in antigen-induced transformation of lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1970 Jul 1;132(1):44–65. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.1.44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shortman K., Diener E., Russell P., Armstrong W. D. The role of nonlymphoid accessory cells in the immune response to different antigens. J Exp Med. 1970 Mar 1;131(3):461–482. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.3.461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Toivanen P., Toivanen A., Taamminen P. Bursal and postbursal cells in chicken. Occurrence of postbursal cells in bone marrow, thymus and spleen. Eur J Immunol. 1974 Jun;4(6):405–410. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830040604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Waldron J. A., Jr, Horn R. G., Rosenthal A. S. Antigen-induced proliferation of guinea pig lymphocytes in vitro: obligatory role of macrophages in the recognition of antigen by immune T-lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1973 Jul;111(1):58–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Weber W. T. Avian B lymphocyte subpopulations: origins and functional capacities. Transplant Rev. 1975;24:113–158. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1975.tb00167.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Weber W. T. In vitro studies on chicken B cell populations. I. The effect of soluble and insoluble phytomitogens and anti-immunoglobulin serum on bursal lymphocytes. J Reticuloendothel Soc. 1973 Dec;14(6):538–549. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES