Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 18.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Cycle. 2007 May 25;6(15):1896–1902. doi: 10.4161/cc.6.15.4510

Activation of the Budding Yeast Securin Pds1 but Not Rad53 Correlates with Double-Strand Break-Associated G2/M Cell Cycle Arrest in a mec1 Hypomorphic Mutant

Mingzeng Sun 1, Michael Fasullo 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC10195031  NIHMSID: NIHMS1875695  PMID: 17671432

Abstract

Budding yeast Mec1, encoded by the yeast ATR/ATM homolog, negatively regulates cell cycle progression by activating Rad53 (Chk2) and Chk1, two parallel downstream checkpoint pathways. Chk1 phosphorylates Pds1 (securin), which prevents Pds1 degradation. We determined whether activation of both downstream pathways is required to establish G2 arrest in response to double-strand breaks (DSBs). In a hypomorphic mec1 mutant, Rad53 activation was not required to establish G2 arrest triggered by a single HO endonuclease-generated DSB. However, Pds1 phosphorylation did correlate with G2 arrest and mec121 pds1 cells did not arrest in G2 after exposure to ionizing radiation. The G2 checkpoint genes, CHK1 and PDS1, did confer radiation resistance in mec121, indicating that CHK1-mediated pathway is functional in the mec1 hypomorph. Thus, phosphorylation of Pds1 but not Rad53 correlates with G2 arrest in response to DSBs in the mec1 hypomorphic mutant.

Keywords: Saccharomyces cerevisiae, G2 checkpoint, MEC1, RAD53, PDS1

INTRODUCTION

Eukaryotic cells activate checkpoint pathways to arrest cell cycle progression in response to DNA damage. Cell cycle arrest allows time for DNA repair to occur before DNA replication or before sister chromatid separation. Defective checkpoint pathways enhance genome instability, such as chromosomal rearrangements, which are associated with cancer in higher eukaryotes.1,2

Observations that the G2 checkpoint suppresses chromosomal rearrangements underscore the importance of understanding the contribution of individual pathways in triggering G2 arrest.3,4 In Saccharomyces cerevisiae (budding yeast), DNA damage initiates checkpoint pathways that block entry into anaphase by preventing the degradation of cohesins and sister chromatid separation. Sister chromatid cohesion is achieved by stabilizing Pds1 (securin), which is normally degraded by the anaphase promoting complex (APC).5 Chk1-mediated phosphorylation of Pds1 prevents Pds1 degradation by APCCdc20;6,7 which is important in the DNA damage-mediated checkpoint.8,9 Alternatively, Rad53 (Chk2) inhibits Cdc20-Pds1 interaction7 and phosphorylates Dun1, which in turn, inhibits mitotic exit by activating the Bfa1-Bub2 complex.10 However, rad53 and pds1 mutants exhibit a partial defect in DNA damage-induced G2 arrest;11 whereas, the rad53 pds1 double11 and rad9 mutants12 are completely deficient in DNA damage-induced G2 arrest. These observations suggest that there is some redundancy in the Rad53 and Pds1-mediated G2 checkpoint pathways.

MEC1, the yeast homolog of human ATR (ATM and RAD3-related)/ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia, mutated), is required for all DNA damage-associated checkpoint pathways.13,14 mec1 null mutants are completely deficient in DNA damage-associated G2 arrest, since Mec1 is required to activate both Rad53 and Chk1 downstream pathways through the recruitment of Rad9 to sites of DNA damage.1517 Both Mec1-dependent pathways are required for establishing and maintaining G2/M arrest following the accumulation of single-stranded DNA at the telomeres.11 Mec1 also mediates mitotic exit by stabilizing Pds1 via phosphorylation of the mitotic inducer Cdc20.18 Thus, Mec1 is central to the DNA damage checkpoint in budding yeast and controls multiple effector pathways.

Considering that G2 arrest can be initiated after exposure to diverse DNA damaging agents, including UV, ionizing radiation,12,19 and cross-linking agents,20 it is unclear whether both Rad53 and Chk1-mediated pathways contribute equally in establishing and maintaining G2 arrest initiated by diverse DNA lesions. mec1 hypomorphic mutants, such as mec121,21 that exhibit separation of function phenotypes are particularly valuable in determining the contribution of downstream checkpoint pathways in establishing G2 arrest after exposure to specific DNA damaging agents. mec121 results from a G to A substitution (G882S) at position 2644 outside of the kinase domain.22 mec1-21 retains essential function, is less sensitive to the replication inhibitor hydroxyurea (HU) and DNA damaging agents UV and methane methylsulfonate (MMS), compared with mec1 null mutant, but is defective in S phase checkpoint function and Rad53 signaling.6,2123 We used mec121 to determine how G2 arrest is signaled following exposure to ionizing radiation. Considering that a single DSB is sufficient to trigger G2 arrest,24 we also determined whether a directed HO endouclease-generated DSB could trigger G2 arrest and downstream checkpoint activation in mec121. We found that G2/M arrest is triggered in mec121 cells after exposure to DSBs generated by ionizing radiation or a single HO-induced DSB, and that this correlated with phosphorylation of Pds1 but not of Rad53.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Yeast strains, plasmids and media.

The genotypes of yeast strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. The original mec121 strain (Y620)21 was backcrossed ten times into S288c strain background. Mutants containing chk1::KanMX, pds1::KanMX and sml1::URA3 mec1::KanMX were generated by one-step gene disruption25 using PCR amplified gene fragments and selecting for KanR26 or Ura+. Additional mutants were made by standard genetic crosses and tetrad dissections (Table 1). The primers used for amplifying these gene fragments are listed in the “Yeast Deletion Database” (www-deletion.stanford.edu). Plasmid pOC52 (HA-PDS1) was provided by Y. Sanchez. YP (yeast extract, peptone), YPD (YP, dextrose), SC (synthetic complete, dextrose), SC-LEU (SC lacking leucine), SC-TRP (SC lacking tryptophan), and SC-URA (SC lacking uracil), are describedby Burke et al.27 YPL medium contains YP with 2% lactate (pH 5.8); YPGal medium contains YP medium with 2% ultra-pure galactose. YPD(Kan) is YPD supplemented with 200 μg/ml of kanamycin sulfate.

Table 1.

Yeast strains

Strain Genotypea Source (Synonym)
YB163 MATa-inc ura3-52 his3-Δ200 ade2-101
lys-801 trp1-Δ1
gal3 trp1::[his3-Δ3′::HOcs, his3-Δ5′]
This laboratory
YB147 MATa rad9::URA3 This laboratory
YB312 MATα mec1-21 This laboratory
YB331 MATa-inc mec1-21 rad9::URA3 This laboratory
YB335 MATa-inc chk1::KanMX chk1::KanMX disruption in YB163
YB337 MATα mec1-21 chk1::KanMX From cross of YB312 with YB335
YB338 MATa-inc sml1::URA3 sml1::URA3 disruption in YB163
YB339 MATa-inc sml1::URA3 mec1-Δ::KanMX mec1::KanMX disruption in YB338
YB368 MATa-inc leu2-Δ1 mec1-21 This laboratory
YB383 MATα mec1-21 pds1::KanMX pds1::KanMX disruption in YB312
a

All strains listed below YB163 have the same genotype as YB163 unless indicated. Mating type is added for clarity.

Exposing cells to ionizing radiation.

To measure cell cycle progression or checkpoint activation following radiation exposure, cells were grown to the appropriate cell density, washed and resuspended in sterile H2O. Cells were exposed to X rays using a Faxitron X-ray irradiator (Wheeling, IL) at a dose rate of 120 rads/min.

To measure radiation sensitivities, cells were grown to log phase in YPD medium at 30°C or at 25°C. Cells were then plated onto YPD plates after appropriate dilution, and exposed to γ rays using a Nordion 1.8 kCi 137Cs at 6.8 krad/h. Results obtained using the Nordion irradiator were more consistent for longer radiation exposures, compared to the X-ray irradiator. Colonies were counted after incubation for four to six days at appropriate temperature (30°C or 25°C). We used at least three independent cultures for each strain.

Flow cytometry.

Flow cytometry analysis was carried out as previously described by Gasch et al.28 Briefly, 0.3 ml of freshly growing cells was added directly to 0.9 ml of ethanol and allowed to fix at 4°C overnight. Cells were rehydrated in PBS for at least 1 h, washed once and resuspended in 100 μl of FACS buffer (0.2 M Tris pH 7.5, 20 mM EDTA), and incubated with 1 mg/ml RNase A at 37°C for 4 h. Cells were then washed in PBS, treated with 5 μg/ml propidium iodide in a final volume of 0.5 ml of PBS, and analyzed for fluorescence content with the use of a BD LSR II Flow cytometer.

Targeting HO endonuclease-generated DSBs to the TRP1 locus.

HO endonuclease generates DSBs at the MAT locus. We inserted the 117 bp MATa fragment containing the HO endonuclease recognition sequence (HOcs) within a his3 fragment.3 This fragment, his33’::HOcs was then inserted at the trp1 locus on chromosome IV in a MATa-inc strain, so that only the trp1 locus is digested by HO endonuclease (Fig. 1). The strain construction used in this study was previously used to measure recombination stimulated by HO endonuclease-generated DSBs.3 pGHOT-GAL3 containing the HO gene under GAL control,3 was introduced into MEC1, mec121 and mec1 null strains by selecting for Trp+ transformants. Stationary phase cells in SC-TRP were diluted 1:10 in YPLactate and cultures were grown to midlog phase (107 cells/ml). The cells were then synchronized in G1 with α-factor (10 μg/ml). Cells were washed in sterile H2O, and incubated in YPGal or YPGlu (YPD) for 3 h to either repress or induce the expression of HO endonuclease, respectively. HO endonuclease digestion at this site generates chromosomal IV fragments,29 and in this particular strain, DSB repair occurs by homologous recombination with a juxtaposed his3 fragment, his35’.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The location of the 117 bp HO cut site (HOcs) at trp1 on chromosome IV. The oval represents the centromere and the single line represents duplex DNA. For simplicity, the left arm of chromosome IV is not shown. The HOcs is located within one his3 fragment, his3-Δ3’, which is juxtaposed to the his3 fragment, his3-Δ5’. The his3-Δ3’ lacks the 3’ sequences (arrow head), while the his3-Δ5’ lacks to promoter sequences (feathers). Both his3 fragments are located with the amino acid reading frames oriented to the centromere. The his3 fragments share a total of 450 bp sequence homology. The boundaries of the HOcs are represented by two parallel vertical lines within his3-Δ3’ Digestion at the HOcs triggers G2 arrest and homologous recombination between the two his3 fragments.

DAPI staining.

Cell cultures from above were then harvested and fixed with 75% ethanol. The fixed cells were rehydrated with PBS for 30 minutes, stained with 1μg/ml DAPI for 10 seconds, washed with distilled water five times. Then samples were processed for microscope examination. Images of G2 arrested nuclei were captured using a Zeiss Axioskop 40 microscope.

Western blots.

Protein extracts from yeast cells were prepared as previously described by Foiani et al.,30 separated either on 10% acrylamide/0.066% bis-acrylamide gels for Pds1 detection, or on 10% acrylamide/0.266% bis-acrylamide gels for Rad53 detection, and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Rad53 and HA-Pds1p were detected by Western blotting using goat anti-Rad53 (yC-19, Santa Cruz) and mouse anti-HA (16B12, Covance, Madison, WI) antibodies respectively. The secondary antibodies used were anti-goat IgG-HRP and anti-mouse IgG-HRP (Santa Cruz).

RESULTS

Because MEC1 is required for G2 arrest after exposure to DNA damaging agents, mec1 hypomorphic mutants, such as mec1-21, that are partially defective in signaling pathways may elucidate which genes are required for cell cycle arrest following exposure to radiation. We first determined whether resistance to ionizing radiation in mec1-21 correlated with G2 checkpoint function. Considering that ionizing radiation causes both single and DSBs, we also determined whether a single HO-induced DSB would trigger G2 arrest in mec1-21 (Fig. 1). Finally, we determined whether Rad53 or Pds1 activation correlated with G2 arrest following ionizing radiation exposure or induction of HO-endonuclease.

G2 checkpoint genes confer radiation resistance in mec1-21.

We measured the γ-ray sensitivity of mec1-21 and mec1 null cells. We found that mec1 null cells are significantly more sensitive than mec1-21 cells to ionizing radiation, especially after exposure to higher radiation doses (Fig. 2A). For example, mec1 null cells were over 10-fold (1.3%/14.3% survival) more sensitive than mec1-21 after exposure to 18 krads. Thus, mec1-21 cells retain DNA repair function(s) lacking in mec1 null cells.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Ionizing irradiation sensitivity of mec1 and G2 checkpoint mutants. (A) Radiation sensitivity of cells incubated at 30°C. (B) Radiation sensitivity of cells incubated at 25°C. Viability (percent survival) is plotted against radiation dose; 1 krad = 10 Gy. Genotypes are indicated adjacent to the appropriate survival curve. Wild-type (YB163, diamond), mec1 null (YB339, solid triangle), mec1-21 (YB368, square), rad9 (YB147, cross), mec1-21chk1 (YB337, open triangle), mec1-21rad9 (YB331, open diamond), and mec1-21pds1 (YB383, circle). Symbols may obscure standard deviations.

We then asked whether radiation resistance in mec1-21 was conferred by the G2 checkpoint genes, RAD9, CHK1 and PDS1. We disrupted RAD9, PDS1 and CHK1 in mec1-21 and measured the radiation sensitivity in the single and double mutants. Although the chk1 mutant is as resistant as wild type cells to ionizing radiation, there is a synergistic increase in the radiation sensitivity of mec1-21 chk1 compared to the single mutants, and the sensitivity of mec1-21 chk1 is similar to that mec1-Δ (Fig. 2A). However, compared to rad9, there is only an additive increase in the radiation sensitivity of mec1-21rad9. These data indicate that the DNA repair deficiencies in mec1-21 and chk1 reside in different pathways, while DNA repair deficiencies in the mec1-21 and rad9 reside in over-lapping pathways.

Chk1 regulates the metaphase-to-anaphase transition in response to DNA damage by preventing Pds1 degradation. We measured radiation sensitivity in mec1-21pds1 double mutant and the corresponding single mutants (Fig. 2B). Because pds1 cells are temperature sensitive, all cells were irradiated and incubated at 25°C. After log phase cells were exposed to ionizing radiation, mec1-21pds1 double mutant displayed an increase in sensitivity compared to the single mutants. The percent survival of mec1-21 pds1 and mec1-21 chk1 after radiation exposure and incubation at 25°C were similar (data not shown). These data suggest that some DNA repair functions of PDS1 and CHK1 still function in mec1-21. Because PDS1 and CHK1 function in DNA damage-induced G2 arrest, we then determined whether G2 arrest can be triggered in mec1-21.

Radiation-induced G2 arrest in mec1-21 requires PDS1.

We investigated whether ionizing radiation exposure triggered PDS1-dependent G2 arrest in mec1-21. Wild type, mec1-21, and mec1-21 pds1 log phase cells were exposed to 3 krads ionizing radiation, and then returned to rich (YPD) medium, and incubated at 25°C. Cell-cycle progression was determined by FACS analysis (Fig. 3). We expected that if radiation triggered G2 arrest, the 2N peak, indicative of G2 cells, would increase while the 1N peak, indicative of G1 cells, would decrease. We observed an increase in the G2 peak and a decrease in the G1 peak for both mec1-21 and wild-type cells 90–120 minutes after radiation exposure (Fig. 3A and B), while we observed no increase in the G2 peak for mec1-21 pds1 cells (Fig. 3C). Thus, exposure to ionizing radiation triggers PDS1-dependent G2 arrest in mec1-21.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Cell cycle progression in mec1 mutants after exposure to ionizing radiation. Logarithmically growing cells were exposed to 3 krads X-ray, and returned to growth media (YPD). FACS analysis was performed on cells collected at each indicated time point after radiation exposure. The genotypes are listed above the panels. (A) FACS profiles for wild-type cells (YB163); (B) mec1-21 cells (YB368); (C) mec1-21pds1 cells (YB383).

A targeted DSB causes G2 arrest in mec1-21.

Since one DSB is sufficient to trigger G2 arrest in wild type cells,24 we determined whether a single DSB would trigger G2 arrest in mec1-21. We used strains containing a single HO cut site at the trp1 locus; this cut site is present within a his3 fragment, his33’ (Fig. 1). We introduced a galactose-inducible HO gene, present on pGHOT-GAL3, into wild type, mec1-21 and mec1 null cells. Mid-log phase mec1-21, mec1 and MEC1 cells were synchronized in G1 with α-factor and HO endonuclease was induced for 3 h by addition of galactose. We visualized G2-arrested cells by DAPI staining. As shown in Figure 4, both wild type (Fig. 4A) and mec1-21 (Fig. 4B) cells exhibit a dumb-bell morphology with the nucleus at the neck of the bud, which is a typical G2 arrest phenotype in budding yeast. In contrast, we observed diffuse DAPI staining in mec1 null cells (Fig. 4C), suggestive of nuclear fragmentation, as described for a mec1-ts mutant growing at non-permissive temperature.31 These data indicate that DNA damage-induced G2 cell-cycle arrest occurs in mec1-21 cells after generation of a single HO-induced DSB.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

DAPI staining of wild-type, mec1-21, and mec1-Δ cells 3 h after HO endonuclease induction. HO endonuclease was induced in α-factor arrested G1 cells. Cells were then incubated for 3 h in growth medium (YPGal) and their nuclei morphology was determined by DAPI staining. The cells were photographed by fluorescence microscopy. (A) MEC1 (YB163); (B) mec1-21 (YB368); (C) mec1-Δ (YB339).

Pds1 but not Rad53 is activated in mec1-21 after exposure to HO-induced DSBs.

DNA damage-associated G2 arrest involves MEC1-dependent activation of Pds1 and Rad53.69,11 Considering that DSBs trigger G2 arrest in mec1-21, we determined by western blots whether Rad53 and Pds1 were activated in wild-type and mec1-21 cells after radiation exposure or after HO induction. Pds1 phosphorylation was previously observed after exposure to 4 and 8 krads radiation.8 Thirty minutes after 6 krads radiation exposure, we found that both Rad53 and Pds1 were activated in wild-type cells (Fig. 5A and B), and we measured the ratio of activated protein to non-activated protein by scanning densitometry. The ratio of P-Rad53 to Rad53 was 0.67 and 0.38 for wild-type and mec1-21 cells after X-ray exposure, respectively. We then determined whether Pds1 was phosphorylated after X-ray exposure, using a HA-tagged Pds1 protein expressed on pOC52. Pds1-HA appeared as a doublet, with a minor (phosphorylated) form migrating slower than the major form. After 6 krads X-ray exposure, Pds1 activation resulted in a shift from the major to the minor form. For wild type after X-ray exposure, the ratio of P-Pds1 to Pds1 was 5.4, while for mec1-21, the ratio of P-Pds1 to Pds1 was 2.1. No activation of either Rad53 or Pds1 was observed in mec1-Δ cells (data not shown).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Phosphorylation of Pds1 and Rad53 in wild-type and mec1-21 cells after exposure to either 6 krads ionizing radiation or an HO endonuclease-induced DSB. HO endonuclease was induced or repressed after the addition of galactose (Gal) or glucose (Glu), respectively. HA-Pds1 and Rad53 were detected by Western blots using anti-HA and anti-Rad53 antibody, respectively. Arrows point to the position of phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated forms of Rad53 and Pds1. (A) Rad53 phosphorylation after exposure to ionizing radiation; (B) Pds1-HA phosphorylation after exposure to ionizing irradiation; (C) Rad53 phosphorylation after induction of HO endonuclease; (D) Pds1-HA phosphorylation after induction of HO endonuclease; (E) Densitometry scan of lane 2, 3 (MEC1) and 5, 6 (mec1-21) of (D). The solid and dashed lines are of Pds1-HA from galactose and glucose treated respectively. Scans were performed from bottom to top

Considering that HO-induced DSBs triggered G2 arrest in mec1-21, we determined whether Rad53 and Pds1 activation also occurred in mec1-21 cells following HO endonuclease induction. We extracted protein from wild-type and mec1-21 cells, containing pGHOT-GAL3 and pOC52, grown in YPL, YPD, and YPGal media. As also observed by Nakada et al.,32 Rad53 phosphorylation occurred in wild-type cells after HO induction in YPGal; however, we did not observe Rad53 phosphorylation in mec1-21 cells after HO induction (Fig. 5C). When cells were grown in YPL or YPD media (Fig. 5D), we observed the Pds1-HA doublet in both wild type and mec1-21 cells (Fig. 5D, lanes 1, 2, 4 and 5). After HO endonuclease, induction we observed a shift from the major form of Pds1-HA to the minor (phosphorylated) form in both wild- type and mec1-21 cells (Fig. 5D lane 3, 6 and E). Previous observations have indicated that there are also mobility changes in the non-phosphorylated form of Pds1-HA after exposure to DNA damage.8 After HO endonuclease induction, there was a slight shift in the mobility of the non-phosphorylated form of Pds1-HA, as indicated by a shift in the peak dimensions on the scanning densitometer (Fig. 5E, lanes 3 and 6). Our results suggest that mec1-21 cells retain a Pds1 signaling pathway that triggers G2 arrest. Thus, Pds1 and not Rad53 activation correlated with G2 arrest triggered by a single DSB in the mec1-21 hypomorph.

DISCUSSION

MEC1, the yeast ATR/ATM homolog, is required for G2 arrest in response to DNA damage and activates two parallel pathways, Chk1/Pds1 and Rad53 (Chk2).6 G2 arrest is then achieved by blocking the degradation of cohesins through the maintenance of Pds1 (securin), which is normally ubiquitinated by the anaphase promoting complex APCCdc20 and targeted for degradation.5 RAD53 and CHK1 are required to maintain and establish G2 arrest in cdc13 mutants,11 which accumulate single-stranded DNA at the telomeres.33 However, it is unknown whether activation of both Chk1/Pds1 and Rad53 are required to establish G2 arrest in response to DSBs. Here, we used log phase mec1-21 cells, which are deficient in the S phase checkpoint,21 to determine which checkpoint genes are signaled to establish G2 arrest and ionizing radiation resistance. Our major conclusion is that Pds1 phosphorylation correlates with G2 arrest initiated by DSBs, while Rad53 phosphorylation is dispensable.

These studies indicate that mec1-21 is a hypomorphic mutant that separates the cell cycle arrest from Rad53 signaling function that is signaled by DSBs. Previous studies indicated that rad53 mutants were only partially defective in establishing and maintaining G2 arrest.11 Since RAD53 is essential due to its regulation of dNTP,3435 Rad53 essential function must be maintained in mec1-21. We cannot exclude that a non-phosphorylated Rad53 may still function in establishing G2 arrest in mec1-21. Further experiments are necessary to determine whether G2 arrest can be established in a mec1-21 rad53 double mutant in response to double-strand breaks.

These data may seem to be incongruent with previous observations that mec1-21 is deficient in maintaining G2 arrest in nocodazole arrested cells exposed to UV.36 However, these previous experiments addressed the maintenance but not the establishment of G2 arrest, and are consistent with observations that Clb2 levels are decreased in mec1-21.18 We used log phase cells and α-factor arrested cells that could enter S phase after exposure to DSBs. Further experiments are necessary to determine whether the G2 arrest phenotype can be maintained for extended periods of time following ionizing radiation exposure in mec1-21 rad52 cells. Thus, the previous experiments are different from those discussed in this study.

The PDS1-dependent G2 arrest phenotype in mec1-21 complements observations that the mec1-21 chk1 mutant is synergistically more sensitive to radiation, compared to mec1-21 and chk1. These data thus support the idea that when Rad53 signaling is functional, Chk1 is dispensable for radiation repair, while when Rad53 signaling is deficient, as in mec1-21, Chk1 is required for radiation repair. Thus, rad9 mutations, which confer G2 checkpoint and Chk1 and Rad53 signaling deficiencies,16,17 do not confer a synergistic increase in radiation sensitivity in mec1-21 cells.

Although RAD53 signaling may be dispensable for repair of DSBs, these observations do not imply that all RAD53 functions are dispensable for recombinational repair between sister chromatids. Indeed, we previously observed that rad53 mutants were deficient for all types of DNA damage-associated SCE except UV-associated SCE.37 RAD53 is required for the phosphorylation of RAD55 after exposure to DNA damage.38 Thus, we speculate that some RAD53 DNA repair function is maintained in mec1-21. Exactly which DNA repair function(s) confers radiation resistance in mec1-21 is currently being investigated.

Other pathways for G2 arrest have been observed in mec1 null mutants. For example, Clerici et al.39 observed a Tel1/MRX-dependent G2 checkpoint which depends on completion of replication of the DNA lesion, an active Clb-CDK complex, and PDS1. They propose that TEL1 may be directly involved in Pds1 phosphorylation, and that Mad2 (spindle checkpoint) may contribute to checkpoint arrest. Thus, it will be important to determine the role of TEL1 and MAD2 in checkpoint signaling in mec1-21 after exposure to ionizing radiation. Further studies would be necessary to determine the kinase activity and substrate specificity of the mutant Mec1 protein.

In summary, we have shown that establishment of G2 arrest does not require Rad53 activation in a mec1 hypomorphic mutant. These results underscore previous studies that multiple pathways can establish G2 arrest in yeast, and may further elucidate the many pathways involved in G2 arrest in higher eukaryotes.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was previously supported by grant from the National Cancer Institute, CA70105. We are grateful to Y. Sanchez for pOC52 (HA-PDS1) plasmid and T. Petes for yeast strains. We thank C.-U. Lim for performing FACS analysis and C. Cera for carefully reading the manuscript.

ABBREVIATIONS

ATM

Ataxia telangiectasia mutated

ATR

ATM and rad3 related

HU

hydroxyurea

MMS

methyl methanesulfonate

DSB

double-strand break

HO

mating-type switching endonuclease

SCE

sister chromatid exchange

DAPI

4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole

References

  • 1.Hartwell LH, Kastan MB. Cell cycle control and cancer. Science 1994; 266:1821–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gollin SM. Mechanisms leading to nonrandom, nonhomologous chromosomal translocations in leukemia Semin. Cancer Biol 2007; 17:74–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fasullo M, Bennett P, AhChing P, Koudelik J. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9 checkpoint reduces the DNA damage-associated stimulation of directed reciprocal translocations. Mol Cell Biol 1998; 18:1190–1200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Filatov L, Golubovskaya V, Hurt JC, Byrd LL, Phillips JM, Kaufmann WK. Chromosomal instability is correlated with telomere erosion and inactivation of G2 checkpoint function in human fibroblasts expressing human papillomavirus type 16 E6 oncoprotein. Oncogene 1998; 16:1825–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cohen-Fix O, Peters JM, Kirschner MW, Koshland D. Anaphase initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the APC-dependent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p. Genes Dev 1996; 10:3081–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sanchez Y, Bachant J, Wang H, Hu F, Liu D, Tetzlaff M, Elledge SJ. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science 1999; 286:1166–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Agarwal R, Tang Z, Yu H, Cohen-Fix O. Two distinct pathways for inhibiting pds1 ubiquitination in response to DNA damage. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:45027–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cohen-Fix O, Koshland D. The anaphase inhibitor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pds1p is a target of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94:14361–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang H, Liu D, Wang Y, Qin J, Elledge SJ. Pds1 phosphorylation in response to DNA damage is essential for its DNA damage checkpoint function. Genes Dev 2001; 15:1361–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hu F, Wang Y, Liu D, Li Y, Qin J, Elledge SJ. Regulation of the Bub2/Bfa1 GAP complex by Cdc5 and cell cycle checkpoints. Cell 2001; 107:655–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gardner R, Putnam CW, Weinert T. RAD53, DUN1 and PDS1 define two parallel G2/M checkpoint pathways in budding yeast. EMBO J 1999; 18:3173–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Weinert TA, Hartwell LH. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 1988; 241:317–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Murakami H, Nurse P. DNA replication and damage checkpoints and meiotic cell cycle controls in the fission and budding yeasts. Biochem J 2000; 349:1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Brush GS, Morrow DM, Hieter P, Kelly TJ. The ATM homologue MEC1 is required for phosphorylation of replication protein A in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93:15075–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Naiki T, Wakayama T, Nakada D, Matsumoto K, Sugimoto K. Association of Rad9 with double-strand breaks through a Mec1-dependent mechanism. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:3277–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Blankley RT, Lydall DA. Domain of Rad9 specifically required for activation of Chk1 in budding yeast. J Cell Sci 2004; 117:601–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sweeney FD, Yang F, Chi A, Shabanowitz J, Hunt DF, Durocher D. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad9 acts as a Mec1 adaptor to allow Rad53 activation. Curr Biol 2005; 15:1364–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Searle JS, Schollaert KL, Wilkins BJ, Sanchez Y. The DNA damage checkpoint and PKA pathways converge on APC substrates and Cdc20 to regulate mitotic progression. Nat Cell Biol 2004; 6:138–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Weinert TA, Hartwell LH. Characterization of RAD9 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and evidence that its function acts posttranslationally in cell cycle arrest after DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol 1990; 10:6554–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Grossmann KF, Brown JC, Moses RE. Cisplatin DNA cross-links do not inhibit S-phase and cause only a G2/M arrest in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res 1999; 434:29–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Desany BA, Alcasabas AA, Bachant JB, Elledge SJ. Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes Dev 1998; 12:2956–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mallory JC, Petes TD. Protein kinase activity of Tel1p and Mec1p, two Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins related to the human ATM protein kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97:13749–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sanchez Y, Desany BA, Jones WJ, Liu Q, Wang B, Elledge SJ. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science 1996; 271:357–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bennett CB, Lewis AL, Baldwin KK, Resnick MA. Lethality induced by a single site-specific double-strand break in a dispensable yeast plasmid. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1993; 90:5613–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rothstein RJ. One-step gene disruption in yeast. Methods Enzymol 1983; 101:202–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Goldstein AL, McCusker JH. Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1999; 15:1541–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Burke D, Dawson D, Stearns T. Methods in yeast genetics. In: Burke D, Dawson D, Stearns T, eds. A Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Course Manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Press, 2000:171–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gasch AP, Huang M, Metzner S, Botstein D, Elledge SJ, Brown PO. Genomic Expression responses to DNA-damaging agents and the regulatory role of the yeast ATR homolog Mec1p. Mol Biol Cell 2001; 12:2987–3003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fasullo M, Bennett T, Dave P. Expression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MATa and MAT alpha enhances the HO endonuclease-stimulation of chromosomal rearrangements directed by his3 recombinational substrates. Mutat Res 1999; 26:433:33–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Foiani M, Marini F, Gamba D, Lucchini G, Plevani P. The B subunit of the DNA polymerase α-primase complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae executes an essential function at the initial stage of DNA replication. Mol Cell Biol 1994; 14:923–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cha RS, Kleckner N. ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones. Science 2002; 297:602–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nakada D, Hirano Y, Sugimoto K. Requirement of the Mre11 complex and exonuclease 1 for activation of the Mec1 signaling pathway. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:10016–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Garvik B, Carson M, Hartwell L. Single-stranded DNA arising at telomeres in cdc13 mutants may constitute a specific signal for the RAD9 checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol 1995; 15:6128–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zheng P, Fay DS, Burton J, Xiao H, Pinkham JL, Stern DF. SPK1 is an essential S-phase-specific gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that encodes a nuclear serine/threonine/tyrosine kinase. Mol Cell Biol 1993; 13:5829–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhao X, Muller EG, Rothstein R. A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Mol Cell 1998; 2:329–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Scott KL, Plon SE. Loss of Sin3/Rpd3 histone deacetylase restores the DNA damage response in checkpoint-deficient strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23:4522–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fasullo M, Dong Z, Sun M, Zeng L. Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD53 (CHK2) but not CHK1 is required for double-strand break-initiated SCE and DNA damage-associated SCE after exposure to X rays and chemical agents. DNA Repair (Amst) 2005; 4:1240–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bashkirov VI, King JS, Bashkirova EV, Schmuckli-Maurer J, Heyer WD. DNA repair protein Rad55 is a terminal substrate of the DNA damage checkpoints. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:4393–404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Clerici M, Baldo V, Mantiero D, Lottersberger F, Lucchini G, Longhese MP. Related Articles, Links A Tel1/MRX-dependent checkpoint inhibits the metaphase-to-anaphase transition after UV irradiation in the absence of Mec1. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:10126–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES