Skip to main content
Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences logoLink to Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences
. 2023 May 18;14:e15. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2023.15

A Bibliometric Study on the Top 101 Most-Cited Articles of Dental Journals of the Middle East/North Africa Countries From 2011 to 2021

Leyla Roghanizadeh 1, Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban 2, Jila Azizzadeh 3, Saeed Asgary 3,*
PMCID: PMC10423963  PMID: 37583497

Abstract

Introduction: This retrospective descriptive study evaluated the Scopus-indexed dental journals and their most-cited documents affiliated with the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries from 2011 to 2021.

Methods: Dental journals affiliated with MENA countries, their bibliometric indicators (SJR, CiteScore, SNIP, and H-index), and the 101 most cited articles of the considered journals were extracted and studied through descriptive statistics. In addition, the "citation per year" of each top 101 articles was calculated. Spearman’s rho test was used for pairwise comparisons of the correlation coefficient values between each two of the considered bibliometric indicators.

Results: The number of citations of the 101 most-cited papers ranged from 35 to 203. The mean (SD) citations of studied articles were 61.33 (37.58) and the median was 46. Furthermore, CiteScore had the highest significant correlation with SJR (r=0.828, P˂0.001). Moreover, the citation per year of the top 101 documents had no significant relationship with any of the journals’ bibliometric indicators.

Conclusion: Because journal performance and citation rate are multi-dimensional concepts, a single metric cannot express them thoroughly despite correlations between indices. "European Journal of Dentistry" from Turkey, "Saudi Dental Journal" from Saudi Arabia, and "Iranian Endodontic Journal" and "Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences" both from Iran had the highest ranks in the SCImago portal and the highest scores in bibliometric indices amongst the MENA dental journals

Keywords: Bibliometrics, Citations, CiteScore, Dental journals, Medical journalism, Middle East

Introduction

Scientometric and bibliometric studies explore various kinds of scientific activities and investigate the trend and spread of different areas of research publications by the application of statistical methods.1,2 Academic journals have important roles in building a collective knowledge base and validating the quality of research.3 Assessments of such journals will help visualize changes in scientific publications and evaluate the research output of affiliated countries.4

Bibliometric analyses in dental disciplines and evaluation of dental journals were not common in the past.5 Bibliometric analysis can aim to study changes in research trends and contemporary advances in the dentistry field, the most common study designs, the centers of excellence, and the scientific impacts of different articles in dental sciences.6 Through such studies, a significant rise in terms of the number of journals, scientific articles, acquired citations, and also an upward trend in bibliometric indicators have been observed.5 Last decade, several bibliometric studies were conducted in different areas of dentistry, such as endodontics,1 periodontics,7 oral and maxillofacial surgery,8 and orthodontics.9 Moreover, some bibliometric studies have evaluated dental journals in recent years.10-12

Scopus database, as one of the largest citation databases of peer-reviewed literature, covers a larger area of science than “Web of Science Group/Clarivate Analytics”. It provides intelligent tools for tracking and analyzing global research production and citation analysis.13,14 Based on the information from the Scopus database, “The SCImago Journal & Country Rank” ranks journals of different subject areas published from different regions/countries in the world. Its indicators can be used to evaluate countries in various scientific domains.15

In the recent decade, the established Scopus-associated citation-based qualitative indicators including SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), CiteScore, and source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) have frequently been used to evaluate journal quality information.16 SJR can be obtained by considering the average number of received citations in the selected year by the documents published in the journal in the previous three years and weighing the affiliated journals (according to their citation rates together with a negative effect of self-citations) from which the citations are taken.15,17 CiteScore calculates the average number of citations received in a calendar year by all documents published in that journal in the previous three years.17 SNIP of a journal is a ratio that indicates the average number of citations per paper published in a journal and divides it by relative database citation potential in the journal’s subject field.3 H-index which is created by Hirsch18 expresses “the journal’s number of articles (H) that have received at least H citations”.18 In addition, “Cites per document” has also indicated the average citations per document for 1 to 4 years.19

The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) consist of countries with different levels of economic growth, health status, and scientific activities.20 Although there has been underinvestment in public health and medical education and research in some MENA countries,21 growth has picked up across the region and is projected to strengthen through the next few years.20 Yet achieving improvement in those fields will require the collaboration of health policymakers and healthcare professionals.22 Recently, a special emphasis on strengthening regional oral health research has been recommended.23

As far as we have reviewed the literature, no study has been conducted on dental journals from the MENA countries. Thus, the aim of the present study was a bibliometric evaluation of the Scopus-indexed dental journals published from/affiliated with the MENA countries. We focused on the evaluation of the 101 most cited articles of the abovementioned journals from 2011 to 2021 and their Scopus-associated bibliographic indicators.

Methods

Our study was a retrospective descriptive investigation that focused on the 2011 to 2021-time duration.

Search Strategy and Data Extraction

Initially, the names of the MENA countries were extracted by searching the World Atlas portal, and they were listed.24 To search the academic dental journals of those countries, we used the SCImago website (www.scimagojr.com). “Journal Ranks Explorer”, “Dentistry” and “All subject categories” were selected as the “Subject areas”. In the “Regions/countries” box, “Middle East” was selected. Moreover, “Journals” was our considered “Publication Type”. The journals’ list and their rankings based on the SJR index were retrieved by LR.

In order not to have selection bias, another review of dental journals published by MENA countries and indexed in the Scopus database was conducted. In the “Sources” selection option of the Scopus portal, “Dentistry” was selected as the “Subject area”. After obtaining the names of all Scopus-indexed journals in the field of dentistry, the name of each aforementioned journal was entered in the search box of “SCImago Journal & Country rank” to find whether the affiliated country was amongst the focused countries. Furthermore, if the name of a MENA country was a component of the name of a Scopus-indexed dental journal, the journal was considered for further investigation in this study, even if the affiliated country was not geographically located in the MENA region.

The retrieved names of the journals were searched in the Scopus portal to extract their CiteScore, SNIP, and Scopus coverage years (available at the homepage of the Scopus database, and directly at http://info.scopus.com/journalmetrics/ for all Scopus-indexed journals). Then, SCImago Journal Rankings (https://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php) were further investigated to find out the SJR and H-Index of the journals. One author (LR) undertook the search in the specified databases. Then, another author (JA) rechecked the indices and searched articles. If there was any problem in the search process, SA was asked and his opinion was applied.

Inclusion Criteria

The top 101 documents with the highest number of citations published in the reviewed journals were extracted from the Scopus database (in January 2022) and included in the study. The subject/subfield of dentistry and the study type/design of each article were determined. In addition, the names of the first author, corresponding author, and their affiliated institutes/countries were obtained.

In this study, “cites per document” was calculated in the title of “citation per year” as the average citation of an article over each year for the 101 most cited articles. The citation number of each of those top articles was divided by the number of years passed from its publication year to the year 2021.

Statistical Analysis

The data were entered into Excel 2013 software (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, WA, USA). SPSS software (SPSS version 26.0; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for data analysis. The 101 most cited articles from reviewed journals were studied through descriptive statistics. The frequencies of different subjects/subfields of dentistry and study designs in the aforementioned articles were extracted. Also, the frequencies of the names of the first/corresponding authors and their affiliated institutes/countries were obtained.

For statistical analysis, first, the distribution of the obtained variables was assessed with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. As it revealed that selected variables had a non-normal distribution, the correlation between each two of four established bibliometric indices (SJR, CiteScore, SNIP, and H-index) was measured with Spearman’s rho test for all combinations of the bivariate pair, having pairwise comparisons of the correlation coefficients values.17 Similarly, Spearman’s rho test analyzed the relationship between “citations per year” of each of the 101 most cited articles of investigated journals and each of those four established bibliometric indices.

Results

Of the total 12 Scopus-indexed dental journals affiliated with the MENA countries, Turkey with 5 journals published the highest number of dental journals. Iran with 3 and Saudi Arabia with 2 journals were in the 2nd and 3rd ranks. One of Saudi’s journals has been published in a country outside the region.

Table 1 summarizes the investigated journals and their rankings based on the SJR index that was obtained from the SCImago portal. Amongst the abovementioned journals, “European Journal of Dentistry” from Turkey ranked first, “Saudi Dental Journal” from Saudi Arabia, “Iranian Endodontic Journal” and “Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences” both from Iran were next in line.

Table 1. Dentistry Journals From the Middle East in SCImago Ranking Database, Journal Publisher’s Country, and Their Bibliometric Indices .

Journal Title Subject Area and Category Country Publisher SJR 2020 H-Index CiteScore 2020 SNIP 2020 Scopus Coverage Years
European Journal of Dentistry Dentistry
Dentistry (miscellaneous)
Turkey Georg Thieme Verlag 0.625 31 3.5 2.067 2009, 2011-2021
Saudi Dental Journal Dentistry
Dentistry (miscellaneous)
Saudi Arabia King Saud University/ Elsevier 0.527 24 3.8 2.048 2009-2021
Iranian Endodontic Journal Dentistry
Dentistry (miscellaneous)
Iran Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 0.513 22 3.0 0.815 2010-2021
Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences Dentistry
Dentistry (miscellaneous)
Medicine
Dermatology
Nephrology
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Surgery
Urology
Iran Laser Application in Medical Sciences Research Center 0.443 21 2.5 1.262 2010-2021
Open Dentistry Journal Dentistry
Dentistry (miscellaneous)
United Arab Emirates Bentham Science Publishers 0.428 25 2.3 1.033 2011-2021
Dental Research Journal Dentistry
Dentistry (miscellaneous)
Iran Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 0.334 17 1.8 0.911 2009-2021
European Endodontic Journal Dentistry
Dentistry (miscellaneous)
Turkey Kare Publishing 0.302 6 0.8 0.524 2016-2021
Saudi Endodontic Journal Dentistry
Dentistry (miscellaneous)
Saudi Arabia Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 0.272 8 1.2 0.877 2015-2021
Journal of International Dental and Medical Research Dentistry
Dentistry (miscellaneous)
Turkey Ektodermal Displazi Grubu 0.259 13 1.3 0.759 2009-2021
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics Dentistry
Orthodontics
Turkey Aves 0.241 4 0.7 0.851 2018-2021
Case Reports in Dentistry Dentistry
Dentistry (miscellaneous)
Egypt Hindawi 0.221 11 1.0 0.561 2013-2021
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal Dentistry
Dentistry (miscellaneous)
Turkey Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry 0.221 5 1.0 0.722 2010-2021

The reason for considering the top 101 most-cited articles instead of 100 was because articles #100 and #101 both had 35 citations, and article #101 was the last article to have 35 citations. The number of citations to article #102 was 34 times.

In the review of the 101 most-cited articles published in the above journals from 2011 to 2021 (Table 2), the number of citations received by those documents ranged from 35 to 203. In addition, the mean (SD) citations of 101 top articles were 61.33 (37.58) and the median of citations was 46. “European Journal of Dentistry” (30.7%), “Saudi Dental Journal” (17.8%), and “Open Dentistry Journal” (17.8%) presented the majority of top papers. Moreover, considering citation density, one review article25 published in “Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences” had the highest citation number of 203. That review was about low-level laser therapy. The second rank belonged to another review26 with 197 citations that highlighted the essential points of oral squamous cell carcinoma. In the third rank, with a citation density of 191, was a systematic review of the storage medium for an avulsed tooth.27 In addition, the highest number of “citations per year” belongs to three articles published in “Open Dentistry Journal”,28 “Cumhuriyet Dental Journal”,27 and “Saudi Dental Journal”,29 respectively (with 130, 95.5, and 88 citations per year, respectively).

Table 2. List of the Top 101 Most-Cited Articles, Their Authors, Year of Publishing and the Affiliated Journals (2011-2021) .

Rank Document title Authors Year Source Cited by
1 Biological effects of low level laser therapy Farivar et al25 2014 Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences 203
2 Current aspects on oral squamous cell carcinoma Markopoulos26 2012 Open Dentistry Journal 197
3 Natural product as the storage medium for an avulsed tooth - A systematic review Rajakeerth and Nivedhitha27 2019 Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 191
4 Mechanisms of guided bone regeneration: A review Liu and Kerns30 2014 Open Dentistry Journal 171
5 Comparative evaluation of salivary malondialdehyde levels as a marker of lipid peroxidation in early childhood caries Subramanyam et al31 2018 European Journal of Dentistry 157
6 Evaluation of knowledge among general dentists in treatment of traumatic injuries in primary teeth: A cross-sectional questionnaire study Ravikumar et al32 2017 European Journal of Dentistry 144
7 Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial Govindaraju et al33 2017 European Journal of Dentistry 140
8 Orthodontic extrusion of Ellis Class VIII fracture of maxillary lateral incisor – The sling shot method Felicita34 2018 Saudi Dental Journal 137
9 Different treatment modalities followed by dental practitioners for ellis class 2 fracture – a questionnaire-based survey Jose et al28 2020 Open Dentistry Journal 130
10 Shape optimal and clean more Teja and Ramesh 35 2019 Saudi Endodontic Journal 122
11 Orthodontic management of a dilacerated central incisor and partially impacted canine with unilateral extraction – A case report Felicita 36 2017 Saudi Dental Journal 104
12 Tooth-bleaching procedures and their controversial effects: A literature review Alqahtani 37 2014 Saudi Dental Journal 99
13 Failure of endodontic treatment: The usual suspects Tabassum and Khan 38 2016 European Journal of Dentistry 98
14 A review on miswak (Salvadora persica) and its effect on various aspects of oral health Halawany 39 2012 Saudi Dental Journal 97
15 A systematic review of population-based dental caries studies among children in Saudi Arabia Al Agili 40 2013 Saudi Dental Journal 94
16 Guidelines for dental care provision during the COVID-19 pandemic Alharbi et al29 2020 Saudi Dental Journal 88
17 Comparison of the Efficacy of Three Different Bone Regeneration Materials: An Animal Study Anbu et al41 2019 European Journal of Dentistry 86
18 Prevalence of early childhood caries and associated risk factors in preschool children of urban Bangalore, India: A cross-sectional study Prakash et al42 2012 European Journal of Dentistry 85
19 A brief historical perspective on dental implants, their surface coatings and treatments Abraham 43 2014 Open Dentistry Journal 83
20 Antimicrobial efficacy of five essential oils against oral pathogens: An in vitro study Thosar et al44 2013 European Journal of Dentistry 75
21 The effect of surface roughness on ceramics used in dentistry: A review of literature Rashid 45 2014 European Journal of Dentistry 74
22 The need for virtual reality simulators in dental education: A review Roy et al46 2017 Saudi Dental Journal 72
23 Three-dimensional imaging techniques: A literature review Karatas and Toy 47 2014 European Journal of Dentistry 70
24 Congenitally missing teeth (hypodontia): A review of the literature concerning the etiology, prevalence, risk factors, patterns and treatment Rakhshan 48 2015 Dental Research Journal 67
25 Concentrated growth factors as an ingenious biomaterial in regeneration of bony defects after periapical surgery: A report of two cases Malli Sureshbabu et al49 2019 Case Reports in Dentistry 66
26 Academic distress, perceived stress and coping strategies among dental students in Saudi Arabia Al-Sowygh 50 2013 Saudi Dental Journal 64
27 Evaluation of surface roughness and hardness of different glass ionomer cements Bala et al51 2012 European Journal of Dentistry 64
28 Clinical approach of high technology techniques for control and elimination of endodontic microbiota Chiniforush et al52 2015 Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences 63
29 A review of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture techniques for removable denture fabrication Bilgin et al53 2016 European Journal of Dentistry 62
30 Management of peri-implantitis Prathapachandran and Suresh 54 2012 Dental Research Journal 62
31 Clinical performance of a new biomimetic double network material Dirxen et al55 2013 Open Dentistry Journal 62
32 The zirconia ceramic: Strengths and weaknesses Daou 56 2014 Open Dentistry Journal 59
33 Effect of low level laser therapy on proliferation and differentiation of the cells contributing in bone regeneration Amid et al57 2014 Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences 57
34 Nanotechnology and dentistry Ozak and Ozkan 58 2013 European Journal of Dentistry 56
35 Alveolar antral artery isolation during sinus lift procedure with the double window technique Maridati et al59 2014 Open Dentistry Journal 55
36 A review of early displaced maxillary canines: Etiology, diagnosis and interceptive treatment Litsas and Acar 60 2011 Open Dentistry Journal 54
37 Fem and von mises analysis of OSSTEM® dental implant structural components: Evaluation of different direction dynamic loads Cervino et al61 2018 Open Dentistry Journal 51
38 The antimicrobial activity of azadirachta indica, mimusops elengi, tinospora cardifolia, ocimum sanctum and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate on common endodontic pathogens: An in vitro study Mistry et al62 2014 European Journal of Dentistry 51
39 Dental evidence in forensic identification – an overview, methodology and present status Krishan et al63 2015 Open Dentistry Journal 50
40 The prevalence of dental anxiety and fear in patients referred to Isfahan Dental School, Iran Saatchi et al64 2015 Dental Research Journal 50
41 Evaluation of the marginal fit of full ceramic crowns by the microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) technique Demir et al65 2014 European Journal of Dentistry 50
42 Survival rate of different fixed posterior space maintainers used in Paediatric Dentistry – A systematic review Ramakrishnan et al66 2019 Saudi Dental Journal 49
43 Adverse effects of orthodontic treatment: A clinical perspective Talic 67 2011 Saudi Dental Journal 49
44 Allergic effects of the residual monomer used in denture base acrylic resins Rashid et al68 2015 European Journal of Dentistry 47
45 Effect of incorporation of silane in the bonding agent on the repair potential of machinable esthetic blocks Zaghloul et al69 2014 European Journal of Dentistry 47
46 Evaluation of root anatomy of permanent mandibular premolars and molars in a Korean population with cone-beam computed tomography Park et al70 2013 European Journal of Dentistry 47
47 Evaluation of degree of conversion and hardness of dental composites photoactivated with different light guide tips Galvão et al71 2013 European Journal of Dentistry 47
48 Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy: An effective alternative approach to control bacterial infections Mahmoudi et al72 2018 Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences 46
49 Factors affecting polymerization of resin-based composites: A literature review AlShaafi 73 2017 Saudi Dental Journal 46
50 Alveolar ridge augmentation with titanium mesh. A retrospective clinical study Poli et al74 2014 Open Dentistry Journal 46
51 Atomic force microscopy of bacteria from periodontal subgingival biofilm: Preliminary study results Germano et al75 2013 European Journal of Dentistry 46
52 Propolis: Chemical composition and its applications in endodontics Ahangari et al76 2018 Iranian Endodontic Journal 45
53 A review on vital pulp therapy in primary teeth Parisay et al77 2015 Iranian Endodontic Journal 45
54 Children's perception of their dentists Alsarheed 78 2011 European Journal of Dentistry 45
55 Apical surgery: A review of current techniques and outcome von Arx 79 2011 Saudi Dental Journal 45
56 A review on prevention and treatment of post-orthodontic white spot lesions - evidence-based methods and emerging technologies Bergstrand and Twetman 80 2011 Open Dentistry Journal 45
57 How effective the problem-based learning (PBL) in dental education. A critical review Alrahlah 81 2016 Saudi Dental Journal 44
58 Mechanisms of laser-tissue interaction: II. tissue thermal properties Ansari et al82 2013 Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences 44
59 Can antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) enhance the endodontic treatment? Chiniforush et al83 2016 Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences 43
60 Evaluation of root morphology and root canal configuration of premolars in the Turkish individuals using cone beam computed tomography Bulut et al84 2015 European Journal of Dentistry 43
61 Prevalence and severity of temporomandibular disorders among university students in Riyadh Habib et al85 2015 Saudi Dental Journal 43
62 New approaches in vital pulp therapy in permanent teeth Ghoddusi et al86 2014 Iranian Endodontic Journal 43
63 Quantitative and qualitative analysis of microorganisms in root-filled teeth with persistent infection: Monitoring of the endodontic retreatment Endo et al87 2013 European Journal of Dentistry 43
64 Protein-signaled guided bone regeneration using titanium mesh and Rh-BMP2 in oral surgery: A case report involving left mandibular reconstruction after tumor resection Cicciù et al88 2012 Open Dentistry Journal 42
65 Histomorphometric evaluation of anorganic bovine bone coverage to reduce autogenous grafts resorption: Preliminary results Maiorana et al89 2011 Open Dentistry Journal 42
66 Safety and effectiveness of low-level laser therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis Rayegani et al90 2017 Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences 41
67 Morse taper dental implants and platform switching: The new paradigm in oral implantology Macedo et al91 2016 European Journal of Dentistry 41
68 A review of antibacterial agents in endodontic treatment Rahimi et al92 2014 Iranian Endodontic Journal 41
69 Microleakage at enamel and dentin margins with a bulk fills flowable resin Scotti et al93 2014 European Journal of Dentistry 41
70 Diode laser application in soft tissue oral surgery Azma and Safavi94 2013 Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences 41
71 Surgical options in oroantral fistula treatment Borgonovo et al95 2012 Open Dentistry Journal 41
72 Dental patients' awareness and knowledge in using dental implants as an option in replacing missing teeth: A survey in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Al-Johany et al96 2010 Saudi Dental Journal 41
73 Implantology and periodontal disease: The panacea to problem solving? Matarese et al97 2017 Open Dentistry Journal 40
74 Outcomes of vital pulp therapy in permanent teeth with different medicaments based on review of the literature Akhlaghi and Khademi 98 2015 Dental Research Journal 40
75 Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in endodontics Mohammadi et al99 2013 European Journal of Dentistry 40
76 Survey of perceived stress-inducing problems among dental students, Saudi Arabia Al-Saleh et al100 2010 Saudi Dental Journal 40
77 The antimicrobial sensitivity of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sangius to colloidal solutions of different nanoparticles applied as mouthwashes Ahrari et al101 2015 Dental Research Journal 39
78 Antimicrobial efficacy of mineral trioxide aggregate with and without silver nanoparticles Samiei et al102 2013 Iranian Endodontic Journal 39
79 The effect of luting agents and ceramic thickness on the color variation of different ceramics against a chromatic background de Azevedo Cubas et al103 2011 European Journal of Dentistry 39
80 Periodontal health status in patients treated with the Invisalign® system and fixed orthodontic appliances: A 3 months clinical and microbiological evaluation Levrini et al104 2015 European Journal of Dentistry 38
81 The applications of cone-beam computed tomography in endodontics: A review of literature Kiarudi et al105 2015 Iranian Endodontic Journal 38
82 Comparison of two routes of administration of dexamethasone to reduce the postoperative sequelae after third molar surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis Troiano et al106 2018 Open Dentistry Journal 37
83 IL6 and IL10 are genetic susceptibility factors of periodontal disease Scapoli et al107 2012 Dental Research Journal 37
84 A cone-beam computed tomography study of the root canal morphology of anterior teeth in a Turkish population Altunsoy et al108 2014 European Journal of Dentistry 36
85 Salivary alpha-amylase activity and salivary flow rate in young adults Arhakis et al109 2013 Open Dentistry Journal 36
86 Effectiveness of lasers in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity Asnaashari and Moeini 110 2013 Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences 36
87 The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of novel resin composites Erdemir et al111 2012 European Journal of Dentistry 36
88 Comparison of the cleaning capacity of Mtwo and ProTaper rotary systems and manual instruments in primary teeth Azar et al112 2012 Dental Research Journal 36
89 Microleakage comparison of four dental materials as intra-orifice barriers in endodontically treated teeth Yavari et al113 2012 Iranian Endodontic Journal 36
90 Strategies used to inhibit postoperative swelling following removal of impacted lower third molar Sortino and Cicciù 114 2011 Dental Research Journal 36
91 Self-reported dental health attitudes and behaviour of dental students in Turkey Yildiz and Dogan 115 2011 European Journal of Dentistry 36
92 Effectiveness of chitosan tooth paste from white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) to reduce number of Streptococcus mutans in the case of early childhood caries Achmad and Ramadhany 116 2017 Journal of International Dental and Medical Research 35
93 Patient-centered evaluation of microsurgical management of gingival recession using coronally advanced flap with platelet-rich fibrin or amnion membrane: A comparative analysis Agarwal et al117 2016 European Journal of Dentistry 35
94 Photodynamic therapy - A non-Invasive treatment modality for precancerous lesions Maloth et al118 2016 Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences 35
95 An in vitro comparison of antimicrobial effects of curcumin-based photodynamic therapy and chlorhexidine, on Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans Najafi et al119 2016 Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences 35
96 Knowledge, attitudes, and experience of dentists living in Saudi Arabia toward child abuse and neglect Al-Dabaan et al120 2014 Saudi Dental Journal 35
97 Prevalence of dental caries among 12-14 year old children in Qatar Al-Darwish et al121 2014 Saudi Dental Journal 35
98 Comparison of phenotype and differentiation marker gene expression profiles in human dental pulp and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells Ponnaiyan and Jegadeesan 122 2014 European Journal of Dentistry 35
99 Treatment outcomes of primary molars direct pulp capping after 20 months: A randomized controlled trial Fallahinejad Ghajari et al123 2013 Iranian Endodontic Journal 35
100 A cephalometric comparative study of class II correction with Sabbagh universal spring (SUS2) and forsus FRD appliances Oztoprak et al124 2012 European Journal of Dentistry 35
101 Correlation between metabolic syndrome, periodontitis and reactive oxygen species production. A pilot study Patini et al125 2017 Open Dentistry Journal 35

Furthermore, the most studied subjects/subfields of dentistry were endodontics (24.8%), pediatric dentistry (9.9%), and oral/dentofacial surgery (7.9%). Review articles (39.6%), original in vitro studies (17.8%), and original questionnaire studies (8.9 %) were the most common study designs.

As shown in Table 3, according to the affiliation of corresponding authors, the countries affiliated with the highest number of most-cited articles were Iran (24.7%), India (18.8%), Italy (13.8%), and Saudi Arabia (12.8%). Table 4 shows the academic institutions which had the most contributions to the publication of highly cited articles as the affiliation of corresponding authors, with at least 2% contribution. The “College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia” (10.9%) and “Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, India” (10.9%) were the institutions with the highest number of top documents. Table 5 shows the names of the most productive corresponding and first authors in the publication of highly cited articles in the considered journal, with at least a 2% total contribution. Cicciu, M. (7.9%) from Italy, and Azar M.R. (3.0%) and Bahador, A. (3.0%) both from Iran were the corresponding authors with the highest number of articles in the top 101. In addition, the first authors with the highest number of publications (all of whom contributed equally to 2%) were Felicita, A.S. from India, Rashid, H. from Pakistan, and Chiniforush, N. from Iran.

Table 3. List of the Countries Contributing Over the Years Considered, in the Publication of Most-Cited Documents in the Dental Journals From the Middle East Countries, Frequency, and Percent of Their Papers .

Rank of Country Country Name Frequency Percent
1 Iran 25 24.7
2 India 19 18.8
3 Italy 14 13.8
4 Saudi Arabia 13 12.8
5 Turkey 9 8.9
6 Brazil 4 4.0
7 Greece 3 3.0
8 Pakistan 3 3.0
9 United States 2 2.0
10 Australia 1 1.0
11 Denmark 1 1.0
12 Egypt 1 1.0
13 Germany 1 1.0
14 Indonesia 1 1.0
15 Lebanon 1 1.0
16 Qatar 1 1.0
17 South Korea 1 1.0
18 Switzerland 1 1.0
Total 101 100

Table 4. Most Productive Academic Institutions in the Publication of Highly Cited Documents in Dental Journals From the Middle East Countries, With at Least 2% Contribution .

Rank of Institution Institution Name, Affiliated City, and Country Frequency Percent
1 King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 11 10.9
1 Saveetha University, Chennai, India 11 10.9
2 University of Messina, Messina, Italy 7 6.9
3 Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 6 5.9
4 Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 3 3.0
5 Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran 2 2.0
5 Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran 2 2.0
5 Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan 2 2.0

Table 5. Most Productive Authors in the Publication of Highly Cited Documents in Dental Journals From the Middle East Countries, With at Least 2% Contribution .

Rank of Author Author Name Author Role, Frequency Institution Name, Affiliated City, and Country Total Frequency Total Percentage of Contribution
1 Cicciu, M.59,61,74,75,88,89,106,114 Corresponding author, 7 papers; corresponding author and first author, 1 paper University of Messina, Messina, Italy 8 7.9
2 Azar, M.R.68,112,126 Corresponding author, 2 papers; corresponding author and first author, 1 paper Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran 3 3.0
2 Bahador, A.52,83,119 Corresponding author, 3 papers Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 3 3.0
3 Felicita, A.34,36 Corresponding author and first author, 2 papers Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, Italy 2 2.0
3 Rashid, H.45,68 Corresponding author and first author, 2 papers Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan 2 2.0
3 Forghani, M.77,86 Corresponding author, 2 papers Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran 2 2.0
3 Chiniforush, N.52,83 First author, 2 papers Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran 2 2.0

In the review of the corresponding authors and the first authors, both were from the same institution in 89 articles (88%). The only two cases of international collaboration were first between “Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark” and “Stockholm, Sweden”, and second between “Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis/SC, Brazil” and “Universidade Fernando Pessoa, Porto, Portugal”, respectively. Moreover, the collaboration between different universities in a country was observed in 10 papers.

“Saudi Dental Journal”, “European Journal of Dentistry”, “Iranian Endodontic Journal”, and “Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences” achieved the highest CiteScore and SJR amongst the considered journals, respectively. Moreover, the highest values in SNIP belong to “European Journal of Dentistry”, “Saudi Dental Journal”, and “Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences”, respectively. Furthermore, “European Journal of Dentistry”, “Open Dentistry Journal”, and “Saudi Dental Journal” gained the highest “H-index”. The mean (SD) of the H-index of the reviewed journals was 15.58 (9.01). In addition, “Saudi Dental Journal”, “Dental Research Journal”, and “Journal of International Dental and Medical Research” had the longest continuous indexing time in Scopus from 2009 to 2021.

In analyzing the correlation between different bibliometric indices, the distribution of the variables was not normal. Through Spearman’s rho test, correlations between variables were obtained. CiteScore had statistical correlations with SJR (r = 0.828, P˂0.001), with SNIP (r = 0.732, P˂0.001), and with H-index (r = 0.472, P˂0.001). Thus, CiteScore and SJR had the highest correlations. Another index that we calculated was the citation per year for each of the 101 top articles of MENA dental journals. The citation per year of a paper did not have any statistical relationship with journals’ established bibliometric indices including SJR, CiteScore, SNIP, and H-index.

Discussion

Dental journals, which demonstrate the status and progress of the academic environments, are invaluable in evaluating the researcher’s and countries’ research performance in the dentistry field10. Amongst considered journals, “European Journal of Dentistry” from Turkey, “Saudi Dental Journal” from Saudi Arabia, and “Iranian Endodontic Journal” and “Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences” both from Iran had the highest rankings in “SCImago Database”, respectively.

To evaluate the considered journals, several indices have been studied. Any single metric of journal bibliometric analysis is not perfect. A scholarly communication system is a complex approach, and journal performance and citation measures are multi-dimensional concepts that are not possible to be expressed in a single indicator.3 Despite decades of research on bibliometric indicators, there is still a deep gap among funders, policymakers, publishers, and researchers to reach a common understanding of journal-based metrics (such as CiteScore) and altmetric-based metrics (such as the H-index) to have a balanced evaluation of research output.127

According to the SCImago portal, and based on SJR, among dental journals affiliated with the Middle East countries, “European Journal of Dentistry” published in Turkey ranked first. This journal also had the highest majority of top papers and the highest SNIP and H-index amongst the reviewed journals. Furthermore, Turkey had the highest number of scientific documents in the “Dentistry” field in the region.

Amongst the studied journals affiliated with MENA countries, in the SCImago ranking, “Saudi Dental Journal” was in the second rank. Furthermore, this journal achieved the highest CiteScore. In addition, the second rank in SNIP and in having the majority of top papers belonged to this journal. Simultaneously and with the same rank, the “College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia” and “Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, India” had the highest number of top documents. Furthermore, published documents on health sciences by researchers in Saudi Arabia had significant growth in the last decade.128

Based on SJR and CiteScore, two journals from Iran, “Iranian Endodontic Journal” and “Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences”, stood at the third and fourth ranks amongst the reviewed journals. Moreover, the highest number of most-cited articles were affiliated with Iran, and according to the SCImago portal, Iran had the second-highest number of published scientific documents in the field of “Dentistry”. Another investigation declared that there was a progressive trend in the number of dentistry articles originating from Iran in the PubMed database.129 Also, a previous comparison between Iran and other regional countries had shown a noticeable rise in the number of papers from different Iranian universities in the special field of endodontics in PubMed-indexed journals.130 In addition, citations to articles written by Iranian authors in international endodontic textbooks have increased during the recent decade.131

In the present study, CiteScore, SJR, SNIP, and H-index showed significant correlations. The highest correlation value was found between CiteScore and SJR. Similar to the results we obtained, a bibliometric analysis indicated that IF, SNIP, CiteScore, and SJR were all significantly correlated.132 In addition, another study on the impact of open-access journals pointed out a significant correlation among CiteScore, H-index, and SJR.133 Although contrary to the results of our study, the highest correlation value was between CiteScore and the H-index.133 Moreover, the analysis of the pairwise comparison of bibliometric indicators suggested no interchangeability between them.17

Another index that we calculated was the citation per year for each of the 101 top articles in MENA dental journals. The citation per year of the 101 top documents had no significant relationship with any of the other studied indices. Thus, in the evaluated journals, the citation density of each article depended more on the characteristics of the article itself than on the characteristics of the journal. However, our findings were contrary to the results of a study in the field of medicine which indicated that citation rates of the studied articles had a significantly positive relationship with the journals’ SJR and SNIP.134 Therefore, it is recommended that scientific periodical publishing of each subject area be evaluated through various bibliometric indices which demonstrate different aspects of their characteristics.

One of our main limitations was that most dental journals published in MENA countries are not indexed or have been just recently indexed in “Clarivate/Web of Science Group”; therefore, they could not be evaluated according to their impact factors (IF). Instead of IF, we evaluated several other indicators, including CiteScore which has the most similarity to journal IF. However, IF computes the metric applying the two previous years as a basis for the citation count, but CiteScore uses a three-year period.135

As the results of this study indicated, in dental journals of the MENA region, the number of citations to an article was more dependent on the quality of the article itself than the indices of the journal in which it was published. Furthermore, different bibliometric indices evaluated the number of citations in different conditions. Therefore, researchers can be recommended not to pay attention to just one or two indices of a journal to publish their article and to consider a set of bibliometric indicators and all the features and specifications of a scientific journal. Moreover, it is recommended that the dental journals of the Middle East/North Africa be reviewed in the next 5 years. Until then, journals included in the “Emerging Sources Citation Index” from this region will probably be indexed in the “Clarivate/Web of Science Master Journal List” and their IF can be reviewed.

Conclusion

Reviewing the scientific journals and the citation density of their documents needs a multifaceted approach to have a more comprehensive evaluation of the journal rankings. Among the reviewed bibliometric indices, CiteScore and SJR had the highest correlation. No significant correlation was observed between citations per year of the top 101 documents and any of the journals’ bibliometric indicators.

Furthermore, “European Journal of Dentistry” from Turkey, “Saudi Dental Journal” from Saudi Arabia, and “Iranian Endodontic Journal” and “Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences” both from Iran have achieved the highest values in various bibliometric indicators and the highest places in “SCImago Journal Rankings”, respectively.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences for their financial support.

Competing Interests

The authors had no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Please cite this article as follows: Roghanizadeh L, Akbarzadeh Baghban A, Azizzadeh J, Asgary S. A bibliometric study on the top 101 most-cited articles of dental journals of the Middle East/North Africa countries from 2011 to 2021. J Lasers Med Sci. 2023;14:e15. doi:10.34172/jlms.2023.15.

References

  • 1.Shamszadeh S, Asgary S, Nosrat A. Regenerative endodontics: a scientometric and bibliometric analysis. J Endod. 2019;45(3):272–80. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Abedi AR, Razzaghi M, Montazeri S, Allameh F. The trends of urolithiasis therapeutic interventions over the last 20 years: a bibliographic study. J Lasers Med Sci. 2021;12:e14. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2021.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Moed HF. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. J Informetr. 2010;4(3):265–77. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Asadi H, Mostafavi E. The productivity and characteristics of Iranian Biomedical Journal: a scientometric analysis. Iran Biomed J. 2018;22(6):362–6. doi: 10.29252/.22.6.362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jayaratne YS, Zwahlen RA. The evolution of dental journals from 2003 to 2012: a bibliometric analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ahmad P, Alam MK, Jakubovics NS, Schwendicke F, Asif JA. 100 years of the Journal of Dental Research: a bibliometric analysis. J Dent Res. 2019;98(13):1425–36. doi: 10.1177/0022034519880544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ahmad P, Arshad AI, Della Bella E, Khurshid Z, Stoddart M. Systemic manifestations of the periodontal disease: a bibliometric review. Molecules. 2020;25(19):4508. doi: 10.3390/molecules25194508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Alkhutari AS, Al-Moraissi EA, Galvão EL, Christidis N, Falci SGM. Top 100 cited systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the major journals of oral and maxillofacial surgery: a bibliometric analysis. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;26(3):343–56. doi: 10.1007/s10006-021-00981-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tarazona B, Lucas-Dominguez R, Paredes-Gallardo V, Alonso-Arroyo A, Vidal-Infer A. The 100 most-cited articles in orthodontics: a bibliometric study. Angle Orthod. 2018;88(6):785–96. doi: 10.2319/012418-65.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mishra L, Pattnaik P, Kumar M, Aggarwal S, Misra SR. A bibliometric analysis of two PubMed-indexed high-impact factor endodontic journals: a comparison of India with other countries. Indian J Dent. 2016;7(3):121–5. doi: 10.4103/0975-962x.189342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ahmad P, Vincent Abbott P, Khursheed Alam M, Ahmed Asif J. A bibliometric analysis of the top 50 most cited articles published in the Dental Traumatology. Dent Traumatol. 2020;36(2):89–99. doi: 10.1111/edt.12534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ahmad P, Asif JA, Alam MK, Slots J. A bibliometric analysis of Periodontology 2000. Periodontol 2000. 2020;82(1):286–97. doi: 10.1111/prd.12328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008;22(2):338–42. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Saad RK, Al Nsour M, Khader Y, Al Gunaid M. Public health surveillance systems in the Eastern Mediterranean region: bibliometric analysis of scientific literature. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021;7(11):e32639. doi: 10.2196/32639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. SCImago — SCImago Journal & Country Rank. Scopus® database (Elsevier B.V.). 2018. Available from: http://www.scimagojr.com.
  • 16.Serati Shirazi M, Valinejadi A. Investigating of association between altmetrics activity indicators and citation quality indicators in Iranian medical journals. Int J Prev Med. 2021;12:156. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_59_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Villaseñor-Almaraz M, Islas-Serrano J, Murata C, Roldan-Valadez E. Impact factor correlations with SCImago journal rank, source normalized impact per paper, Eigenfactor score, and the CiteScore in radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging journals. Radiol Med. 2019;124(6):495–504. doi: 10.1007/s11547-019-00996-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(46):16569–72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mingers J, Leydesdorff L. A review of theory and practice in scientometrics. Eur J Oper Res. 2015;246(1):1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Arezki R, Mottaghi L, Barone A, Fan RY, Kiendrebeogo Y, Lederman D. Middle East and North Africa Economic Monitor, Spring 2018: Economic Transformation. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2018.
  • 21. Middle East and North Africa Overview [Internet]. The World Bank. 2021. Available from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/region/mena/overview.
  • 22.Katoue MG, Cerda AA, García LY, Jakovljevic M. Healthcare system development in the Middle East and North Africa region: challenges, endeavors and prospective opportunities. Front Public Health. 2022;10:1045739. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1045739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Elamin A, Garemo M, Mulder A. Determinants of dental caries in children in the Middle East and North Africa region: a systematic review based on literature published from 2000 to 2019. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01482-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. How Many Countries Are There in the Middle East? [Internet]. Reunion Technology Inc. 2022. Available from: https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/which-are-the-middle-eastern-countries.html.
  • 25.Farivar S, Malekshahabi T, Shiari R. Biological effects of low level laser therapy. J Lasers Med Sci. 2014;5(2):58–62. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Markopoulos AK. Current aspects on oral squamous cell carcinoma. Open Dent J. 2012;6:126–30. doi: 10.2174/1874210601206010126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rajakeerthi R, Nivedhitha MS. Natural product as the storage medium for an avulsed tooth–a systematic review. Cumhur Dent J. 2019;22(2):249–56. doi: 10.7126/cumudj.525182. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jose J, Ajitha P, Subbaiyan H. Different treatment modalities followed by dental practitioners for Ellis Class 2 fracture–a questionnaire-based survey. Open Dent J. 2020;14(1):59–65. doi: 10.2174/1874210602014010059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Alharbi A, Alharbi S, Alqaidi S. Guidelines for dental care provision during the COVID-19 pandemic. Saudi Dent J. 2020;32(4):181–6. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu J, Kerns DG. Mechanisms of guided bone regeneration: a review. Open Dent J. 2014;8:56–65. doi: 10.2174/1874210601408010056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Subramanyam D, Gurunathan D, Gaayathri R, Vishnu Priya V. Comparative evaluation of salivary malondialdehyde levels as a marker of lipid peroxidation in early childhood caries. Eur J Dent. 2018;12(1):67–70. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_266_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ravikumar D, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EMG. Evaluation of knowledge among general dentists in treatment of traumatic injuries in primary teeth: a cross-sectional questionnaire study. Eur J Dent. 2017;11(2):232–7. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_357_16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Govindaraju L, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EMG. Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Eur J Dent. 2017;11(3):376–9. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_345_16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Felicita AS. Orthodontic extrusion of Ellis Class VIII fracture of maxillary lateral incisor - the sling shot method. Saudi Dent J. 2018;30(3):265–9. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2018.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Teja KV, Ramesh S. Shape optimal and clean more. Saudi Endod J. 2019;9(3):235–6. doi: 10.4103/sej.sej_72_19. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Felicita AS. Orthodontic management of a dilacerated central incisor and partially impacted canine with unilateral extraction - a case report. Saudi Dent J. 2017;29(4):185–93. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2017.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Alqahtani MQ. Tooth-bleaching procedures and their controversial effects: a literature review. Saudi Dent J. 2014;26(2):33–46. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tabassum S, Khan FR. Failure of endodontic treatment: the usual suspects. Eur J Dent. 2016;10(1):144–7. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.175682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Halawany HS. A review on miswak (Salvadora persica) and its effect on various aspects of oral health. Saudi Dent J. 2012;24(2):63–9. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2011.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Al Agili DE. A systematic review of population-based dental caries studies among children in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dent J. 2013;25(1):3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2012.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Anbu RT, Suresh V, Gounder R, Kannan A. Comparison of the efficacy of three different bone regeneration materials: an animal study. Eur J Dent. 2019;13(1):22–8. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Prakash P, Subramaniam P, Durgesh BH, Konde S. Prevalence of early childhood caries and associated risk factors in preschool children of urban Bangalore, India: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Dent. 2012;6(2):141–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Abraham CM. A brief historical perspective on dental implants, their surface coatings and treatments. Open Dent J. 2014;8:50–5. doi: 10.2174/1874210601408010050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Thosar N, Basak S, Bahadure RN, Rajurkar M. Antimicrobial efficacy of five essential oils against oral pathogens: an in vitro study. Eur J Dent. 2013;7(Suppl 1):S071–S7. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.119078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rashid H. The effect of surface roughness on ceramics used in dentistry: a review of literature. Eur J Dent. 2014;8(4):571–9. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.143646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Roy E, Bakr MM, George R. The need for virtual reality simulators in dental education: a review. Saudi Dent J. 2017;29(2):41–7. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2017.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Karatas OH, Toy E. Three-dimensional imaging techniques: a literature review. Eur J Dent. 2014;8(1):132–40. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.126269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Rakhshan V. Congenitally missing teeth (hypodontia): a review of the literature concerning the etiology, prevalence, risk factors, patterns and treatment. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2015;12(1):1–13. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.150286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Malli Sureshbabu N, Selvarasu K, V JK, Nandakumar M, Selvam D. Concentrated growth factors as an ingenious biomaterial in regeneration of bony defects after periapical surgery: a report of two cases. Case Rep Dent. 2019;2019:7046203. doi: 10.1155/2019/7046203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Al-Sowygh ZH. Academic distress, perceived stress and coping strategies among dental students in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dent J. 2013;25(3):97–105. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2013.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bala O, Arisu HD, Yikilgan I, Arslan S, Gullu A. Evaluation of surface roughness and hardness of different glass ionomer cements. Eur J Dent. 2012;6(1):79–86. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chiniforush N, Pourhajibagher M, Shahabi S, Bahador A. Clinical approach of high technology techniques for control and elimination of endodontic microbiota. J Lasers Med Sci. 2015;6(4):139–50. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2015.09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Bilgin MS, Baytaroğlu EN, Erdem A, Dilber E. A review of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture techniques for removable denture fabrication. Eur J Dent. 2016;10(2):286–91. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.178304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Prathapachandran J, Suresh N. Management of peri-implantitis. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012;9(5):516–21. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.104867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Dirxen C, Blunck U, Preissner S. Clinical performance of a new biomimetic double network material. Open Dent J. 2013;7:118–22. doi: 10.2174/1874210620130904003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Daou EE. The zirconia ceramic: strengths and weaknesses. Open Dent J. 2014;8:33–42. doi: 10.2174/1874210601408010033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Amid R, Kadkhodazadeh M, Ahsaie MG, Hakakzadeh A. Effect of low level laser therapy on proliferation and differentiation of the cells contributing in bone regeneration. J Lasers Med Sci. 2014;5(4):163–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ozak ST, Ozkan P. Nanotechnology and dentistry. Eur J Dent. 2013;7(1):145–51. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Maridati P, Stoffella E, Speroni S, Cicciu M, Maiorana C. Alveolar antral artery isolation during sinus lift procedure with the double window technique. Open Dent J. 2014;8:95–103. doi: 10.2174/1874210601408010095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Litsas G, Acar A. A review of early displaced maxillary canines: etiology, diagnosis and interceptive treatment. Open Dent J. 2011;5:39–47. doi: 10.2174/1874210601105010039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Cervino G, Romeo U, Lauritano F, Bramanti E, Fiorillo L, D’Amico C, et al. Fem and von mises analysis of OSSTEM® dental implant structural components: evaluation of different direction dynamic loads. Open Dent J. 2018;12:219–29. doi: 10.2174/1874210601812010219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Mistry KS, Sanghvi Z, Parmar G, Shah S. The antimicrobial activity of Azadirachta indica, Mimusopselengi, Tinosporacardifolia, Ocimum sanctum and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate on common endodontic pathogens: An in vitro study. Eur J Dent. 2014;8(2):172–7. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.130591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Krishan K, Kanchan T, Garg AK. Dental evidence in forensic identification - an overview, methodology and present status. Open Dent J. 2015;9:250–6. doi: 10.2174/1874210601509010250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Saatchi M, Abtahi M, Mohammadi G, Mirdamadi M, Binandeh ES. The prevalence of dental anxiety and fear in patients referred to Isfahan Dental School, Iran. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2015;12(3):248–53. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Demir N, Ozturk AN, Malkoc MA. Evaluation of the marginal fit of full ceramic crowns by the microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) technique. Eur J Dent. 2014;8(4):437–44. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.143612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ramakrishnan M, Dhanalakshmi R, Subramanian EMG. Survival rate of different fixed posterior space maintainers used in Paediatric Dentistry - a systematic review. Saudi Dent J. 2019;31(2):165–72. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.02.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Talic NF. Adverse effects of orthodontic treatment: a clinical perspective. Saudi Dent J. 2011;23(2):55–9. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2011.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Rashid H, Sheikh Z, Vohra F. Allergic effects of the residual monomer used in denture base acrylic resins. Eur J Dent. 2015;9(4):614–9. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.172621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Zaghloul H, Elkassas DW, Haridy MF. Effect of incorporation of silane in the bonding agent on the repair potential of machinable esthetic blocks. Eur J Dent. 2014;8(1):44–52. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.126240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Park JB, Kim N, Park S, Kim Y, Ko Y. Evaluation of root anatomy of permanent mandibular premolars and molars in a Korean population with cone-beam computed tomography. Eur J Dent. 2013;7(1):94–101. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Galvão MR, Caldas SG, Bagnato VS, de Souza Rastelli AN, de Andrade MF. Evaluation of degree of conversion and hardness of dental composites photo-activated with different light guide tips. Eur J Dent. 2013;7(1):86–93. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Mahmoudi H, Bahador A, Pourhajibagher M, Alikhani MY. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy: an effective alternative approach to control bacterial infections. J Lasers Med Sci. 2018;9(3):154–60. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2018.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.AlShaafi MM. Factors affecting polymerization of resin-based composites: a literature review. Saudi Dent J. 2017;29(2):48–58. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2017.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Poli PP, Beretta M, Cicciù M, Maiorana C. Alveolar ridge augmentation with titanium mesh. A retrospective clinical study. Open Dent J. 2014;8:148–58. doi: 10.2174/1874210601408010148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Germano F, Bramanti E, Arcuri C, Cecchetti F, Cicciù M. Atomic force microscopy of bacteria from periodontal subgingival biofilm: preliminary study results. Eur J Dent. 2013;7(2):152–8. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.110155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Ahangari Z, Naseri M, Vatandoost F. Propolis: chemical composition and its applications in endodontics. Iran Endod J. 2018;13(3):285–92. doi: 10.22037/iej.v13i3.20994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Parisay I, Ghoddusi J, Forghani M. A review on vital pulp therapy in primary teeth. Iran Endod J. 2015;10(1):6–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Alsarheed M. Children’s perception of their dentists. Eur J Dent. 2011;5(2):186–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.von Arx T. Apical surgery: a review of current techniques and outcome. Saudi Dent J. 2011;23(1):9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2010.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Bergstrand F, Twetman S. A review on prevention and treatment of post-orthodontic white spot lesions - evidence-based methods and emerging technologies. Open Dent J. 2011;5:158–62. doi: 10.2174/1874210601105010158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Alrahlah A. How effective the problem-based learning (PBL) in dental education. A critical review. Saudi Dent J. 2016;28(4):155–61. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2016.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Ansari MA, Erfanzadeh M, Mohajerani E. Mechanisms of laser-tissue interaction: II. Tissue thermal properties. J Lasers Med Sci. 2013;4(3):99–106. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Chiniforush N, Pourhajibagher M, Shahabi S, Kosarieh E, Bahador A. Can antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) enhance the endodontic treatment? J Lasers Med Sci. 2016;7(2):76–85. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2016.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Bulut DG, Kose E, Ozcan G, Sekerci AE, Canger EM, Sisman Y. Evaluation of root morphology and root canal configuration of premolars in the Turkish individuals using cone beam computed tomography. Eur J Dent. 2015;9(4):551–7. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.172624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Habib SR, Al Rifaiy MQ, Awan KH, Alsaif A, Alshalan A, Altokais Y. Prevalence and severity of temporomandibular disorders among university students in Riyadh. Saudi Dent J. 2015;27(3):125–30. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Ghoddusi J, Forghani M, Parisay I. New approaches in vital pulp therapy in permanent teeth. Iran Endod J. 2014;9(1):15–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Endo MS, Ferraz CCR, Zaia AA, Almeida JFA, Gomes B. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of microorganisms in root-filled teeth with persistent infection: monitoring of the endodontic retreatment. Eur J Dent. 2013;7(3):302–9. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.115414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Cicciù M, Herford AS, Stoffella E, Cervino G, Cicciù D. Protein-signaled guided bone regeneration using titanium mesh and Rh-BMP2 in oral surgery: a case report involving left mandibular reconstruction after tumor resection. Open Dent J. 2012;6:51–5. doi: 10.2174/1874210601206010051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Maiorana C, Beretta M, Battista Grossi G, Santoro F, Scott Herford A, Nagursky H, et al. Histomorphometric evaluation of anorganic bovine bone coverage to reduce autogenous grafts resorption: preliminary results. Open Dent J. 2011;5:71–8. doi: 10.2174/1874210601105010071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Rayegani SM, Raeissadat SA, Heidari S, Moradi-Joo M. Safety and effectiveness of low-level laser therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Lasers Med Sci. 2017;8(Suppl 1):S12–S9. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2017.s3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Macedo JP, Pereira J, Vahey BR, Henriques B, Benfatti CAM, Magini RS, et al. Morse taper dental implants and platform switching: the new paradigm in oral implantology. Eur J Dent. 2016;10(1):148–54. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.175677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Rahimi S, Janani M, Lotfi M, Shahi S, Aghbali A, Vahid Pakdel SM, et al. A review of antibacterial agents in endodontic treatment. Iran Endod J. 2014;9(3):161–8. doi: 10.22037/iej.v9i3.5086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Scotti N, Comba A, Gambino A, Paolino DS, Alovisi M, Pasqualini D, et al. Microleakage at enamel and dentin margins with a bulk fills flowable resin. Eur J Dent. 2014;8(1):1–8. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.126230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Azma E, Safavi N. Diode laser application in soft tissue oral surgery. J Lasers Med Sci. 2013;4(4):206–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Borgonovo AE, Berardinelli FV, Favale M, Maiorana C. Surgical options in oroantral fistula treatment. Open Dent J. 2012;6:94–8. doi: 10.2174/1874210601206010094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Al-Johany S, Al Zoman HA, Al Juhaini M, Al Refeai M. Dental patients’ awareness and knowledge in using dental implants as an option in replacing missing teeth: a survey in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dent J. 2010;22(4):183–8. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2010.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Matarese G, Ramaglia L, Fiorillo L, Cervino G, Lauritano F, Isola G. Implantology and periodontal disease: the panacea to problem solving? Open Dent J. 2017;11:460–5. doi: 10.2174/1874210601711010460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Akhlaghi N, Khademi A. Outcomes of vital pulp therapy in permanent teeth with different medicaments based on review of the literature. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2015;12(5):406–17. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.166187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Mohammadi Z, Shalavi S, Jafarzadeh H. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in endodontics. Eur J Dent. 2013;7(Suppl 1):S135–S42. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.119091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Al-Saleh SA, Al-Madi EM, Al-Angari NS, Al-Shehri HA, Shukri MM. Survey of perceived stress-inducing problems among dental students, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dent J. 2010;22(2):83–8. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2010.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Ahrari F, Eslami N, Rajabi O, Ghazvini K, Barati S. The antimicrobial sensitivity of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sangius to colloidal solutions of different nanoparticles applied as mouthwashes. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2015;12(1):44–9. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.150330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Samiei M, Aghazadeh M, Lotfi M, Shakoei S, Aghazadeh Z, Vahid Pakdel SM. Antimicrobial efficacy of mineral trioxide aggregate with and without silver nanoparticles. Iran Endod J. 2013;8(4):166–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.de Azevedo Cubas GB, Camacho GB, Demarco FF, Pereira-Cenci T. The effect of luting agents and ceramic thickness on the color variation of different ceramics against a chromatic background. Eur J Dent. 2011;5(3):245–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Levrini L, Mangano A, Montanari P, Margherini S, Caprioglio A, Abbate GM. Periodontal health status in patients treated with the Invisalign® system and fixed orthodontic appliances: a 3 months clinical and microbiological evaluation. Eur J Dent. 2015;9(3):404–10. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.163218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Kiarudi AH, Eghbal MJ, Safi Y, Aghdasi MM, Fazlyab M. The applications of cone-beam computed tomography in endodontics: a review of literature. Iran Endod J. 2015;10(1):16–25. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Troiano G, Laino L, Cicciù M, Cervino G, Fiorillo L, D’Amico C, et al. Comparison of two routes of administration of dexamethasone to reduce the postoperative sequelae after third molar surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Dent J. 2018;12:181–8. doi: 10.2174/1874210601812010181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Scapoli L, Girardi A, Palmieri A, Carinci F, Testori T, Zuffetti F, et al. IL6 and IL10 are genetic susceptibility factors of periodontal disease. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012;9(Suppl 2):S197–201. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.109754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Altunsoy M, Ok E, Nur BG, Aglarci OS, Gungor E, Colak M. A cone-beam computed tomography study of the root canal morphology of anterior teeth in a Turkish population. Eur J Dent. 2014;8(3):302–6. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.137630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Arhakis A, Karagiannis V, Kalfas S. Salivary alpha-amylase activity and salivary flow rate in young adults. Open Dent J. 2013;7:7–15. doi: 10.2174/1874210601307010007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Asnaashari M, Moeini M. Effectiveness of lasers in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity. J Lasers Med Sci. 2013;4(1):1–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Erdemir U, Sancakli HS, Yildiz E. The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of novel resin composites. Eur J Dent. 2012;6(2):198–205. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Azar MR, Safi L, Nikaein A. Comparison of the cleaning capacity of Mtwo and ProTaper rotary systems and manual instruments in primary teeth. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012;9(2):146–51. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.95227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Yavari HR, Samiei M, Shahi S, Aghazadeh M, Jafari F, Abdolrahimi M, et al. Microleakage comparison of four dental materials as intra-orifice barriers in endodontically treated teeth. Iran Endod J. 2012;7(1):25–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Sortino F, Cicciù M. Strategies used to inhibit postoperative swelling following removal of impacted lower third molar. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2011;8(4):162–71. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.86031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Yildiz S, Dogan B. Self reported dental health attitudes and behaviour of dental students in Turkey. Eur J Dent. 2011;5(3):253–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Achmad H, Ramadhany YF. Effectiveness of chitosan tooth paste from white shrimp (Litopenaeusvannamei) to reduce number of Streptococcus mutans in the case of early childhood caries. J Int Dent Med Res. 2017;10(2):358–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Agarwal SK, Jhingran R, Bains VK, Srivastava R, Madan R, Rizvi I. Patient-centered evaluation of microsurgical management of gingival recession using coronally advanced flap with platelet-rich fibrin or amnion membrane: a comparative analysis. Eur J Dent. 2016;10(1):121–33. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.175686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Maloth KN, Velpula N, Kodangal S, Sangmesh M, Vellamchetla K, Ugrappa S, et al. Photodynamic therapy - a non-invasive treatment modality for precancerous lesions. J Lasers Med Sci. 2016;7(1):30–6. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2016.07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Najafi S, Khayamzadeh M, Paknejad M, Poursepanj G, Kharazi Fard MJ, Bahador A. An in vitro comparison of antimicrobial effects of curcumin-based photodynamic therapy and chlorhexidine, on Aggregatibacteractinomycetemcomitans. J Lasers Med Sci. 2016;7(1):21–5. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2016.05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Al-Dabaan R, Newton JT, Asimakopoulou K. Knowledge, attitudes, and experience of dentists living in Saudi Arabia toward child abuse and neglect. Saudi Dent J. 2014;26(3):79–87. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Al-Darwish M, El Ansari W, Bener A. Prevalence of dental caries among 12-14 year old children in Qatar. Saudi Dent J. 2014;26(3):115–25. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Ponnaiyan D, Jegadeesan V. Comparison of phenotype and differentiation marker gene expression profiles in human dental pulp and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Eur J Dent. 2014;8(3):307–13. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.137631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Fallahinejad Ghajari M, Asgharian Jeddi T, Iri S, Asgary S. Treatment outcomes of primary molars direct pulp capping after 20 months: a randomized controlled trial. Iran Endod J. 2013;8(4):149–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Oztoprak MO, Nalbantgil D, Uyanlar A, Arun T. A cephalometric comparative study of class II correction with Sabbagh Universal Spring (SUS2) and Forsus FRD appliances. Eur J Dent. 2012;6(3):302–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Patini R, Gallenzi P, Spagnuolo G, Cordaro M, Cantiani M, Amalfitano A, et al. Correlation between metabolic syndrome, periodontitis and reactive oxygen species production. A pilot study. Open Dent J. 2017;11:621–7. doi: 10.2174/1874210601711010621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Milani AS, Shakouie S, Borna Z, Sighari Deljavan A, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Pournaghi Azar F. Evaluating the effect of resection on the sealing ability of MTA and CEM cement. Iran Endod J. 2012;7(3):134–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Teixeira da Silva JA. CiteScore: advances, evolution, applications, and limitations. Publ Res Q. 2020;36(3):459–68. doi: 10.1007/s12109-020-09736-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Ul Haq I, Ur Rehman S, Al-Kadri HM, Farooq RK. Research productivity in the health sciences in Saudi Arabia: 2008-2017. Ann Saudi Med. 2020;40(2):147–54. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2020.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Asgary S, Sabbagh S, Sarraf Shirazi A, Ahmadyar M, Shahravan A, Ahmad Akhoundi MS. PubMed-indexed dental publications from Iran: a scientometric study. J Dent (Tehran) 2016;13(3):157–67. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Eghbal MJ, Davari Ardakani N, Asgary S. A scientometric study of PubMed-indexed endodontic articles: a comparison between Iran and other regional countries. Iran Endod J. 2012;7(2):56–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Kakooei S, Mostafavi M, Parirokh M, Asgary S. Indexing of Iranian publications in well-known endodontic textbooks: a scientometric analysis. Iran Endod J. 2016;11(3):157–63. doi: 10.7508/iej.2016.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Brown T, Gutman SA. Impact factor, Eigenfactor, article influence, Scopus SNIP, and SCImage journal rank of occupational therapy journals. Scand J Occup Ther. 2019;26(7):475–83. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2018.1473489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Wei M. Research on impact evaluation of open access journals. Scientometrics. 2020;122(2):1027–49. doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03306-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Yaminfirooz M, Ardali FR. Identifying the factors affecting papers’ citability in the field of medicine: an evidence-based approach using 200 highly and lowly-cited papers. Acta Inform Med. 2018;26(1):10–4. doi: 10.5455/aim.2018.26.10-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Fernandez-Llimos F. Differences and similarities between journal impact factor and CiteScore. Pharm Pract (Granada) 2018;16(2):1282. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2018.02.1282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES