Abstract
The outer membrane (OM) of Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli is an asymmetric bilayer with the glycolipid lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the outer leaflet and glycerophospholipids in the inner. Nearly all integral OM proteins (OMPs) have a characteristic β-barrel fold and are assembled in the OM by the BAM complex, which contains one essential β-barrel protein (BamA), one essential lipoprotein (BamD), and three non-essential lipoproteins (BamBCE). A gain-of-function mutation in bamA enables survival in the absence of BamD, showing that the essential function of this protein is regulatory. Here, we demonstrate that the global reduction in OMPs caused by BamD loss weakens the OM, altering cell shape and causing OM rupture in spent medium. To fill the void created by OMP loss, phospholipids (PLs) flip into the outer leaflet. Under these conditions, mechanisms that remove PLs from the outer leaflet create tension between the OM leaflets, which contributes to membrane rupture. Rupture is prevented by suppressor mutations that release the tension by halting PL removal from the outer leaflet. However, these suppressors do not restore OM stiffness or normal cell shape, revealing a possible connection between OM stiffness and cell shape.
Subject terms: Bacteriology, Bacterial genetics, Membrane structure and assembly, Cellular microbiology
The outer membrane (OM) of Gram-negative bacteria is an asymmetric bilayer, with phospholipids in the inner leaflet. Here the authors show that a reduction in OM proteins and the subsequent mislocalization of phospholipids weaken the OM and alter growth rate and cell shape, emphasizing the role of OM proteins in OM stiffness and cell shape.
Introduction
Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli are protected from the environment by their cell envelope, which is made unique by the outer membrane (OM). The OM, an asymmetric bilayer with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the outer leaflet and glycerophospholipids (PLs) in the inner leaflet, functions as a selective permeability barrier, allowing passage of small hydrophilic compounds while excluding large and hydrophobic molecules1. An ordered network of outer membrane proteins (OMPs) with patches of LPS stabilized by electrostatic LPS-LPS and LPS-OMP interactions contribute to the mechanical strength of the cell2–4. Perturbation to this essential barrier can result in cell death.
The integrity of the OM relies on proper localization of its multiple components. LPS is transported by the Lpt machinery, which is composed of seven proteins that form a trans-envelope bridge5. Asymmetry is then established by multiple mechanisms. First, the Mla system shuttles mislocalized PLs back to the inner membrane (IM)6. Second, the outer membrane phospholipase PldA breaks down mislocalized PLs and acts as a sensor of OM asymmetry7,8. While LPS transport and maintenance of OM asymmetry are well understood, PL transport to the OM remains poorly characterized. However, recent work indicates that PLs are transported from the IM to the inner leaflet of the OM by protein bridges using redundant AsmA-like proteins such as YhdP, TamB, and YdbH9–12.
OMPs are typically β-barrel proteins that span the OM and are assembled by the β-barrel assembly machine (BAM) complex. The E. coli BAM complex is heteropentomeric, containing two essential proteins, BamA and BamD, and three non-essential proteins, BamB, BamC, and BamE. BamA, itself a β-barrel protein, catalyzes the folding of OMPs, while the lipoprotein BamD plays a regulatory and substrate quality control role in OMP assembly13,14. Previous work identified an allele of bamA, bamAE470K, that is viable in the absence of bamD14. Deletion of bamD in the bamAE470K background results in increased OM permeability14, but the structural changes underlying this phenotype are not well understood.
In this work, we investigate the consequences of bamD deletion on the structural integrity of the OM and on cell shape. bamD deletion resulted in a highly inefficient BAM complex, leading to decreased OMP levels and mislocalization of PLs to the outer leaflet of the OM14. We show that these structural changes alter growth rate and cell shape and cause a striking cell death phenotype, precipitated by rupture of the OM in spent medium or under oscillatory hyperosmotic shocks. Suppressor analysis suggested that mechanisms that remove PLs from the OM outer leaflet under protein-depleted conditions create interleaflet tension that destabilizes the OM. Relieving this tension through suppressor mutations rescued cell death, but altered cell shape and OM mechanical stiffness remained compromised, emphasizing the central role of OM proteins and OM stiffness in cellular morphogenesis and integrity.
Results
Deletion of bamD decreases fitness in stationary phase and causes OM permeability defects
A previous study showed that bamAE470K cells can tolerate deletion of bamD14. Given the otherwise essential role of bamD, we sought to further characterize the effects of bamD deletion on cellular physiology. As observed previously, overnight cultures of a bamAE470K ∆bamD strain (hereafter, ∆bamD) exhibited lower optical density (OD) than the parent bamAE470K strain14, and ∆bamD cultures exhibited lower maximum growth rate and pronounced lysis during stationary phase compared with the parent (Fig. 1a). To further interrogate the stationary phase lysis of ∆bamD cultures, we resuspended log-phase cells in LB supernatant collected by filtering the cells from an overnight wild-type culture (“spent medium”), which lacks the nutrients needed to support growth and rapidly transitions cells into stationary phase. This spent medium assay was used previously to probe membrane integrity in cells with the mlaA* allele15, which disrupts OM lipid homeostasis. ΔbamD and MC4100 mlaA* cells exhibited nearly identical lysis dynamics upon transitioning to spent medium, while the OD of the parent remained high (Fig. 1b). Since spent LB lacks the Mg2+ necessary to stabilize LPS-LPS interactions, we reasoned that the weakened OM of the ΔbamD mutant was not able to withstand the additional stress. Indeed, when we supplemented spent LB with Mg2+, lysis was abolished (Fig. S1).
ΔbamD colonies were very mucoid, suggesting that the Rcs stress response is activated due to perturbations to the OM. To probe the integrity of the OM, we plated parent and ΔbamD cells on LB and LB supplemented with bacitracin, a large hydrophilic peptide antibiotic that is typically excluded from E. coli cells16, or SDS-EDTA. ΔbamD cells were unable to grow in the presence of bacitracin or SDS-EDTA (Fig. 1c). To further test OM permeability, we quantified uptake of fluorescent 1-N-phenyl-naphthylamine (NPN)17. After 20 min, wild-type MC4100 and bamAE470K cells displayed much lower uptake than ΔbamD cells (Fig. 1d), indicating that bamD deletion generally increased OM permeability. Together, these results indicate that bamD deletion dramatically alters the OM.
bamD deletion reduces growth rate and disrupts cell shape
We noted that deletion of bamD decreased the maximal growth rate in exponential phase (Fig. 1a), and sought to characterize the effect of bamD deletion on cell shape and single-cell growth dynamics. Using time-lapse imaging, we tracked single cells from log-phase cultures on an LB agarose pad and quantified single-cell growth rates (Fig. 2a, b). ∆bamD cells exhibited disrupted shapes, usually featuring more nonuniform cell width along the cell body and greater elongation compared with the parent (Fig. 2a, Movie S1, S2), indicating disrupted shape regulation. The average instantaneous growth rate of ∆bamD cells was significantly lower than that of wild-type cells even when controlling for similar cell shape (Fig. 2b), consistent with population growth measurements (Fig. 1a). Moreover, instantaneous growth rate decreased as the cell-width coefficient of variation increased (Fig. 2b), suggesting that deletion of bamD causes a metabolic burden linked to envelope disruption. Some cells eventually lysed (Fig. 2a, arrows), signifying weakening of the cell envelope. Additionally, we quantified the morphology of two other BAM complex mutants: bamA101, a transposon insertion in the bamA promoter that decreases BamA levels by >90%, and deletion of bamB, which encodes a nonessential BAM complex lipoprotein. We selected ∆bamB because this mutant has greater permeability defects than ∆bamC or ∆bamE mutants18–20. The bamA101 and ∆bamB mutants showed disrupted regulation of cell width compared to bamAE470K (Fig. S2a). Thus, disrupting the BAM complex has global effects on cell morphology and growth.
The OM ruptures prior to the IM in ∆bamD cells when transitioned to spent medium
Based on the similarity of lysis dynamics upon starvation in mlaA* cells and ∆bamD cells (Fig. 1b), we hypothesized based on our previous findings15 that bamD deletion leads to loss of outer membrane material via vesiculation. To test this hypothesis, we collected outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) from exponentially growing cells (Methods). While we were able to easily harvest OMVs from mlaA* cells, preparations from parent or ΔbamD cells displayed no detectable OM proteins (Fig. 2c). Instead, in ΔbamD cells we detected the cytoplasmic protein GroEL, suggesting leakiness due to cell rupture during the centrifugation used for OMV harvest.
To identify the mechanism by which ΔbamD cells lyse in spent medium, we used a microfluidic flow cell to rapidly transition log-phase cells to spent medium (Methods). Motivated by our previous study in which we showed that the IM ruptures before the OM in mlaA* cells11, we utilized a ∆bamD strain that constitutively expresses cytoplasmic GFP and periplasmic mCherry (Table S1). Time-lapse imaging revealed that periplasmic mCherry fluorescence was always lost prior to (Fig. 2d) or coincident with the loss of cytoplasmic GFP (Fig. 2e), indicating that the OM ruptured before the IM. Together, these data indicate that a severely destabilized OM is the direct cause of ∆bamD cell lysis in stationary phase.
OM composition is altered by bamD deletion
To further interrogate the lysis phenotype, we collected cell lysate from cells grown at 37 °C in log phase (Methods) and measured the abundance of OM components such as the major OM porins (Fig. 3a, lane 1 and 2; Fig. 3b, lane 1 and 2) and LPS (Fig. 3b, lane 1 and 2). Deletion of bamD dramatically decreased levels of OM porins, including the essential BamA and LptD. By contrast, LPS levels were relatively unaffected by bamD deletion even though LptD levels were decreased (Fig. 3b, lane 1 and 2). Taken together, these results indicate that the OM of ΔbamD cells is highly lacking in proteins, and that lysis is not due to membrane loss but instead due to altered OM composition.
Mutants that increase PL levels in the OM outer leaflet suppress lysis due to bamD deletion
Efforts to isolate spontaneous suppressors of ∆bamD lysis were unsuccessful, hence we attempted to identify rescue conditions for growth and decreased lysis through strategic genetic manipulation of the OM. In previous work, we identified the OM outer leaflet phospholipase PldA as a potent suppressor of mlaA* lysis15. Deletion of pldA from ΔbamD cells slowed down lysis kinetics in both stationary phase and the spent medium assay, and moderately improved the initial growth dynamics (Fig. 3c). We reasoned that since ∆bamD cells are lacking in many proteins that typically make up a large fraction of the OM, deletion of pldA allowed the cells to retain more PLs to fill the voids. Thus, by analogy with Acinetobacter baumannii mutants that lack LPS, we reasoned that other mutations that allow PLs to accumulate in the OM outer leaflet might also act as suppressors of ΔbamD lysis21,22. As shown in previous studies, inhibiting the Mla transport system and deleting pldA increases PL levels in the OM outer leaflet by ~25-fold and drastically changes OM physiology2,6. We found that deletion of mlaA from ΔbamD cells was not sufficient to rescue lysis (Fig. 3c). Nonetheless, lysis was virtually abolished in ΔbamD ΔpldA ΔmlaA cells in both stationary phase and spent medium (Fig. 3c). Single-cell lysis dynamics of the suppressors ΔbamD ΔpldA, ΔbamD ΔmlaA, and ΔbamD ΔpldA ΔmlaA upon exposure to spent medium (Fig. 3d) closely mimicked population-level measurements (Fig. 3c).
The lpxC101 allele decreases lipid A biosynthesis23,24 and frees up precursors for PL synthesis, leading to increased levels of PLs in the outer leaflet of the OM25. Introduction of lpxC101 to ∆bamD cells improved growth dynamics and ameliorated lysis similar to the deletion of mlaA (Fig. S3a). Moreover, the combination of lpxC101 with ΔbamD ΔpldA restored growth dynamics and final yield to approximately that of the bamAE470K parent and lysis in stationary phase and the spent medium assay was completely abolished (Fig. S3a, b). ΔbamD lpxC101 ΔmlaA cells still showed lysis in spend medium, suggesting that PldA activity is detrimental in the ΔbamD background (Fig. S3c).
To investigate the basis for rescue, we first tested whether the Bam complex was functioning more efficiently in the suppressor backgrounds. The ΔbamD ΔmlaA ΔpldA and ΔbamD lpxC101 ΔpldA suppressors of lysis did not restore OMP levels to that of wild type, nor did any of the other single mutants (Fig. 3b). Moreover, levels of oxidized or reduced LptD showed a similar pattern in all mutants, and LPS levels were only reduced in strains with the lpxC101 allele (Fig. 3b). As noted above, the ∆bamD colonies are mucoid, indicating production of the colanic acid capsule. Since E. coli K-12 strains lack an O-antigen, the O-antigen ligase attaches colanic acid to LPS, producing a larger, modified form of LPS. This modification did not affect the lysis phenotype, as disruption of the upstream Rcs pathway did not reduce the degree of lysis (Fig. S4).
The ΔbamD ΔmlaA ΔpldA and ΔbamD lpxC101 ΔpldA suppressor mutants had a similar increase in permeability in our NPN assay relative to the parent (Fig. 3e). Collectively, these data suggest that prevention of lysis depends on PL levels in the OM outer leaflet, and not restoration of protein networks or LPS modification.
Populating the OM outer leaflet with PLs does not restore cell shape or viability under large osmotic shocks
One of the essential functions of the bacterial OM is to provide mechanical integrity for withstanding forces from inside and outside of the cell3,26. The stiffness of the OM is largely determined by molecular interactions among outer membrane components including proteins and LPS molecules and between the OM and the cell wall2–4. Based on the altered OM composition of the ΔbamD strain and its suppressors (Fig. 3a, b), we hypothesized that a reduction in OM protein levels or increased PLs would affect the stiffness of the OM. To quantify sensitivity to mechanical perturbations, we performed oscillatory hyperosmotic shock assays in a microfluidic flow cell (Methods)3,27. ΔbamD cells exhibited a drastic reduction in viability compared to the parent strain (Fig. 4a, Movie S3). While ΔbamD ∆mlaA ΔpldA cells did not exhibit lysis in spent medium (Fig. 3c, d), they were still more sensitive to large osmotic shocks than the parent strain (Fig. 4a).
Previously, we quantified the stiffness of the OM in various Gram-negative bacteria using a plasmolysis/lysis assay in which cells were exposed first to a large hyperosmotic shock to remove turgor pressure and then a detergent or EDTA to lyse the cells (Methods)3. Consistent with our previous findings, cell length of the parent strain decreased by ~12% upon plasmolysis and then by a further ~11% upon lysis (Fig. 4b), indicating that compression of the stiff outer membrane was holding the cell wall in an extended state during plasmolysis. By contrast, ΔbamD and ΔbamD ΔpldA ΔmlaA cells shrank by ~30% upon plasmolysis and exhibited very little further contraction upon lysis (Fig. 4b), suggesting that the OM in these strains is much weaker than the parent strain. Interestingly, the stiffness of the OM in the bamA101 and ΔbamB mutants was similar to that of bamAE470K cells, as indicated by the comparable cell length contraction upon plasmolysis and subsequent cell lysis (Fig. S2b).
Similar to a spring, contraction upon plasmolysis is determined by a combination of the stiffness and rest length (amount of material) of the OM. We previously showed in wild-type cells that the OM rest length is similar to the length of the turgid cell3, indicating that there is little stress in the OM during steady-state growth. Mimicking these findings, we found that OM rest length in bamAE470K, ∆bamD, and ∆bamD ∆pldA ∆mlaA cells was similar to the length of the turgid cell and significantly larger than the plasmolyzed length, which is ~75% of the turgid cell length (Fig. 4c, Methods). In other words, even though the OM of ∆bamD cells lacks OMPs, the amount of material in the OM is not substantially lower than in wild-type cells.
By assuming that the OM rest length is equivalent to the turgid length, we estimated the mean OM stiffness (Methods) to be ~90% and ~75% lower in ∆bamD and ∆bamD ∆pldA ∆mlaA cells, respectively, compared with bamAE470K cells. Moreover, exponentially growing ∆bamD ΔpldA, ∆bamD ∆mlaA, and ∆bamD ∆mlaA ΔpldA cells all exhibited disrupted cell shapes (Fig. 4d), similar to ∆bamD cells (Fig. 2a). Taken together, we infer that reduction in the levels of OM proteins mechanically destabilized the OM, and increasing the levels of PLs by deleting pldA and mlaA does not restore mechanical integrity.
Discussion
Our results demonstrate that a global decrease in OMP levels resulting from lack of BamD in the BAM complex compromises cell viability and shape. The destabilized OM ruptures during stationary phase due to increased tension and has significantly decreased stiffness with which to withstand mechanical stress.
As observed previously with A. baumannii21,22, to populate voids in the OM caused by the lack of OM components in E. coli ∆bamD cells, PLs flip from the inner leaflet of the OM to the outer leaflet. In the case of A. baumannii, the OM component lacking was LPS, while E. coli ∆bamD it was OMPs. In both organisms, PldA and Mla pathway activityes are detrimental, and both activities must be removed to relieve the defects. It is likely that the OMP defect is more severe than the LPS defect. A. baumannii strains lacking LPS exhibit growth defects22, while in E. coli ∆bamD, the OMP defects both slow growth and cause cell lysis in spent media.
In vitro studies with purified PldA suggest that the enzyme binds diacyl compounds three to five times better than monoacyl compounds, demonstrating a preference for PLs28. Thus, in an envelope that has an abundance of PLs, the majority of PldA activity may be generating lyso-phospholipids rather than fully breaking down the PLs. In turn, lyso-phospholipids have been implicated in changes to local membrane properties and in modification of embedded protein function29,30. We suggest that the decreased production of these lyso-phospholipids explains why removing PldA has a greater effect on cellular viability of the ∆bamD mutant than does removal of the Mla transport system.
Gram-negative bacteria possess several mechanisms for maintaining lipid asymmetry in the OM and as such, there is likely no mechanism for flipping PLs from the inner leaflet to the outer leaflet; such an activity would be counterproductive. In strains where PLs are needed in the outer leaflet to fill the void created by the absence of one of the major OM components, uncatalyzed PL flipping happens slowly and the resulting imbalance in material content creates tension between the membrane leaflets (Fig. 5). To make matters worse, PLs are further limited in the outer leaflet via rapid degradation by PldA and the activity of the Mla transport system (Fig. 5). We hypothesize that by populating the outer leaflet with PLs, interleaflet membrane tension is decreased, growth defects are ameliorated, and OMP-depleted E. coli cells can survive in nutrient- and cation-depleted spent LB (Fig. 5). Interestingly, while the growth defects and lysis can be suppressed in the ∆pldA ∆mlaA double mutant, the suppressor mutations do not restore mechanical integrity, the OM permeability barrier, or cell shape (Fig. 5).
Together, our data combined with the previous studies of LPS- or lipooligosaccharide (LOS)-deficient A. baumannii suggest that the intact, ordered OMP network stabilized by LPS-LPS and LPS-protein interactions2–4 are required to form a stiff OM. Our previous study implicated both LPS and OMPs as partial contributors to OM stiffness3. The reduction of OMP levels in ∆bamD cells destroys the ordered OMP network and LPS presumably forms disconnected islands, leading to almost complete loss of OM stiffness. Proposed mechanisms of cell shape determination in bacteria tend to focus on the peptidoglycan cell wall due to its solid-like structure and ability to maintain its shape in the absence of other components31. However, our suppressor mutants imply the existence of a connection between OM stiffness and cell shape regulation, with a stiff OM mechanically restraining cell width fluctuations during growth and preventing the development of irregular cell shapes. PBP1A glycosyltransferase activity is lethal for LOS-deficient A. baumannii strains, suggesting that it is PBP1A activity that is affected by OM stiffness, leading to the observed irregular cell shapes in ∆bamD cells32. The ability to perturb specific components of the complex OM composition, in this case OMPs through bamD deletion, thus provides insight into a distinct physiological state in which new mechanisms of cell envelope regulation can be revealed.
Methods
Bacterial strains and growth conditions
Strains, plasmids, and oligonucleotides are listed in Table S1. Strains were grown in lysogeny broth (LB) supplemented with 25 mg/L kanamycin, 25 mg/L ampicillin, or 25 mg/L tetracycline when appropriate. Strains were maintained at 30 °C to decrease the frequency of lysis, while experimental data were acquired at 37 °C. bamAE470K was generated at the native bamA locus through recombineering using Collinsella stercoris phage RecT (CspRecT) as described previously33. All other chromosomal mutations were constructed using generalized transduction34. Deletions originated from the Keio collection35. Kanamycin resistance cassettes were excised using the FLP recombinase as described previously36.
Growth curves
Overnight cultures were diluted 1:100 in fresh LB and grown at 30 °C for 2 h. Optical density was measured, and cells were diluted to OD600 = 0.05 in 500 mL of LB in a 24-well plate (CytoOne, USA Scientific, Cat. #CC7682-7524). The plate was covered with a Breathe-Easy gas-permeable membrane (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat. #Z380059) and grown overnight in a Synergy H1 microplate reader (BioTek) at 37 °C with continuous orbital shaking at 559 cpm frequency. OD600 was measured every 15 min for 18 h.
Lysis curves
To make spent media, the wild-type MC4100 strain was grown in LB medium overnight, followed by centrifugation and filtration through a 0.2-µm filter to create cell-free spent medium. Early exponential phase cells (OD600 = 0.6–0.8) were concentrated to OD600 = 1 via centrifugation. Supernatant was discarded and the cell pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of spent medium, transferred to a 24-well plate (CytoOne, USA Scientific, Cat. #CC7682-7524), and covered with a Breathe-Easy gas-permeable membrane (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat. #Z380059). Lysis was monitored by decrease in optical density in a Synergy H1 microplate reader (BioTek) at 37 °C with continuous orbital shaking at 559 cpm frequency. OD600 was measured every 15 min for 18 h.
Efficiency of plating assay
Exponential phase cultures were normalized to OD600 = 1 and serially diluted 10-fold in LB medium in a 96-well plate. Cells were spotted using a 96-well replica plater onto the indicated media and incubated at 37 °C overnight.
1-N-phenylnapthylamine (NPN) uptake assay
The NPN assay was performed as described previously17. Overnight cultures were diluted and grown to OD600 = 0.6-0.8, and then normalized to OD600 = 0.5. Cells were washed and resuspended in 5 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.2). Two hundred microliters of cells were aliquoted into a clear-bottom black-well plate (Corning Incorporated, Cat. #3603). NPN was added at a final concentration of 10 μM. The plate was sealed with a Breathe-Easy gas-permeable membrane (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat. #Z380059) and incubated in a Synergy H1 microplate reader (BioTek). Fluorescence (excitation 350 nm, emission 420 nm) was measured after 20 min of incubation.
Immunoblot analyses
Exponentially growing cells were normalized to OD600 = 1 and harvested by centrifugation. Cell pellets were resuspended in lysis buffer (25 mM Tris [pH 6.8], 1% SDS) and boiled for 5 min, followed by centrifugation. Supernatant was collected and protein concentration was measured using the Pierce BCA protein assay kit (ThermoFisher, Cat. #23225). Ten micrograms of protein were diluted in 4X Laemelli sample buffer (Bio-Rad, Cat. #1610747) supplemented with β-mercaptoethanol (except LptD-oxidized samples, for which β-mercaptoethanol was left out), and boiled for 10 min. Samples were loaded on an 8% (LptD samples) or 10% (all others) SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and electrophoresed. Proteins were transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane using the Trans-Blot Turbo Transfer system (BioRad, Cat. #1704150) and membranes were blocked for 1 h in 5% milk at room temperature. Immunoblotting was performed using polyclonal antisera against BamA (1:25,000 dilution), OmpF/C/A (1:25,000 dilution), LamB/MBP (1:12,500 dilution), or monoclonal antibody recognizing GroEL (1:50,000, Sigma-Aldrich, Cat. #G6532) or FLAG (1:5000 dilution, Sigma-Aldrich, Cat. #F3165), followed by secondary antibodies goat anti-rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase (1:10,000 dilution, Sigma-Aldrich, Cat. #12-348) or goat anti-mouse IgG horseradish peroxidase (1:10,000 dilution, BioRad, Cat. #1706516).
LPS analysis
LPS levels were analyzed as previously described8. Cells were grown to exponential phase and an OD600 = 1 culture was obtained by centrifugation. The cell pellet was washed with PBS and resuspended in 100 μL of 1X NuPAGE LDS sample buffer (ThermoFisher, Cat. #NP0007) supplemented with 4% β-mercaptoethanol. Samples were boiled for 10 min and 2 μL of 20 mg/ml proteinase K (New England Biolabs, Cat. #P8107S) were added. Samples were incubated at 55 °C for 16 h, followed by inactivation by boiling for 5 min. Lysates were loaded onto a 4–12% NuPAGE Bis-Tris gradient gel (ThermoFisher, Cat. #NP0322BOX) and resolved by SDS-PAGE. Gels were stained with Pro-Q Emerald 300 Lipopolysaccharide Gel Stain kit (ThermoFisher, Cat. #P20495) using manufacturer’s instructions. LPS bands were visualized by UV transillumination.
Fractionation of OM vesicles (OMVs)
OMVs were collected as described previously8. Briefly, overnight cultures were diluted 1:100 into fresh LB and grown to OD600 = 0.6-0.8. To collect whole-cell lysate controls, an OD600 = 1 culture was obtained by centrifugation, resuspended in 50 µL of 2X Laemmli buffer (BioRad, Cat. #1610747) with 10% β-mercaptoethanol (MilliporeSigma, Cat. #M3148), and boiled for 10 min. To collect OMVs, an OD600 = 3 culture was obtained by centrifugation. Supernatants were collected and adjusted to equal volume with fresh LB. Supernatants were filtered through a 0.2-μm filter (MilliporeSigma, Cat. #SLGPR33RB) and then through an Amicon Ultra-15 centrifugal filter with 100 kDa molecular weight cutoff (MilliporeSigma, Cat. #UFC9100) to isolate and concentrate OMVs. Centrifuged samples were adjusted to equal volume and resuspended in 2X Laemmli buffer (BioRad, Cat. #1610747) supplemented with 10% β-mercaptoethanol (MilliporeSigma, Cat. #M3148). Samples were boiled for 10 min, loaded on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and processed as described above by immunoblot analysis.
Single-cell imaging
Overnight cultures were diluted 1:200 (or 1:100 for ΔbamD cultures due to their low cell density) and grown at 37 °C, followed by two 1:10 dilutions (at OD600 around 0.1) to generate steady-state log-phase cells. Cells were imaged on a Nikon Eclipse Ti-E inverted fluorescence microscope with a 100X (NA 1.40) oil-immersion objective (Nikon Instruments). Images were collected on a Zyla 5.5 sCMOS camera (Andor Technology) using µManager v. 1.437. Cells were maintained at 37 °C during imaging with an active-control environmental chamber (HaisonTech).
For single-cell imaging on agarose pads, 1 µL of cells was spotted onto a pad of 1% agarose in fresh LB. For microfluidic flow-cell experiments, including the spent medium assays, the oscillatory osmotic shock assays, and the plasmolysis/lysis assays, cells were loaded into CellASIC ONIX microfluidic flow cells (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat. #B04A-03-5PK) and medium was exchanged using the CellASIC ONIX2 microfluidic platform (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat. #CAX2-S0000).
Imaging in microfluidic flow cells
ONIX B04A plates were loaded with medium and pre-warmed to 37 °C. Exponentially growing cells were incubated at 37 °C in fresh LB without shaking for 60 min before transitioning into experimental conditions and imaging. For spent medium assays, cells were perfused with spent LB subsequent to fresh LB. For oscillatory osmotic shock assays, cells were subjected to alternating hyperosmotic shocks of 400 mM sorbitol (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat. #S1876, dissolved in LB) and recovery without sorbitol, with a period of 2 min (1 min shock and 1 min recovery). For plasmolysis/lysis assays to measure OM stiffness, cells were subjected first to hyperosmotic shock with 1 M sorbitol in LB and then treated with 5% N-lauroylsarcosine sodium salt (MP biomedicals, Cat. #190289) to remove the OM. Cells were stained with 300 µM 3-[[(7-Hydroxy-2-oxo-2H-1-benzopyran-3-yl)carbonyl]amino]-D-alanine hydrocholoride (HADA, MedChemExpress, Cat. #HY-131045/CS-0124027) and perfused with 0.85X PBS prior to the osmotic shock.
Spheroplast induction
Cells from a log-phase culture were loaded into an ONIX B04A plate and perfused with fresh LB and 2 µg/mL FM 4-64 (Invitrogen, Cat. #T13320) for 1 h, followed by 1 M sorbitol in LB for 10 min to induce plasmolysis. Plasmolyzed cells were treated with 1 mg/mL lysozyme (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat. #L6876) and 1 M sorbitol in LB to digest the cell wall, creating spheroplasts within 15 min of lysozyme treatment. Spheroplast cell contours were measured immediately after the loss of rod shape to minimize the impact of subsequent growth.
Image analysis
Time-lapse images were first segmented with the software DeepCell38, and the resulting segmented images were analyzed using Morphometrics39 to obtain single-cell lineages and cell contours at sub-pixel resolution. Cell width and length were calculated using the MicrobeTracker meshing algorithm40. For plasmolysis/lysis assays, image segmentation and cell length measurements were performed using Morphometrics.
Single-cell growth rate and morphology analysis
The instantaneous growth rate of individual cells was computed using cell contour and cell lineage data obtained using Morphometrics. The two-dimensional projected cell area A was used as a proxy for cell biomass. At each time point, instantaneous growth rate was calculated from a local linear fit of ln(A). We determined the longitudinal axis of each cell contour and measured local cell width at equally spaced locations along the longitudinal axis. The coefficient of variation (CV) of cell width was defined for each cell as the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean of local width measurements along the rod-shaped cell body (measurements at the poles were excluded based on the curved geometry).
Calculation of OM rest length and estimation of OM stiffness
To calculate OM rest length, we used Morphometrics to measure HADA-labeled cell-envelope contours before and after plasmolysis and FM 4-64-labled OM contours of wall-less spheroplasts induced by lysozyme as described above. For each cell, we calculated the surface area of the turgid cell, Aturgid, from its contour by assuming rotational symmetry around its long axis. After digestion of the cell wall by lysozyme, the OM adopted an amorphous shape, while remaining trapped in the flow cell with height assumed to be equal to the cell width before plasmolysis, w. We calculated the surface area of the OM, AOM, using its two-dimensional area, a, and contour length, s, via the relation AOM = 2a + ws. Finally, to calculate the rest length of the OM, lOM, defined as the length of the OM if it were reshaped into a rod cell shape of width w, we used the equation lOM = lturgid + (AOM−Aturgid)/(πw). Here, we approximated a rod-shaped cell as a cylinder capped by two hemispheres. Thus, the difference between the length of a turgid cell and the OM rest length is proportional to the difference between the corresponding surface areas by a factor of 1/(πw), the reciprocal of the cross-sectional perimeter.
OM stiffness was estimated using a plasmolysis-lysis assay3 performed in a CellASIC ONIX microfluidic flow cell (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat. #B04A-03-5PK). Cell length was measured in the turgid state (l1), under plasmolysis (l2), and after lysis (l3). Length contractions between these states were calculated as ε12 = (l1−l2)/l2, ε23 = (l2−l3)/l3, and ε13 = (l1−l3)/l3. The OM stiffness kOM relative to that of the cell wall kCW was estimated using the average value of the length contractions as kOM = kCW <ε23>/[<ε12> (1 + <ε23>)], as in ref. 3.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Source data
Acknowledgements
We thank members of the Huang and Silhavy labs for helpful discussions. This work was funded by National Science Foundation grants EF-2125383 (to K.C.H.) and IOS-2032985 (to K.C.H.) and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Awards 5R35GM118024 (to T.J.S.) and F32GM139232 (to I.V.M.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. K.C.H. is a Chan Zuckerberg Biohub Investigator.
Author contributions
I.V.M., J.S., K.C.H., and T.J.S. designed the research; I.V.M. and J.S. performed the research; I.V.M., J.S., K.C.H., and T.J.S. analyzed data; and I.V.M., J.S., K.C.H., and T.J.S. wrote the paper.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Data availability
All data used for generating figures in this study are available at the Stanford Digital Repository: https://purl.stanford.edu/gp172gf6221. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
All code used for generating figures in this study are available at the Stanford Digital Repository: https://purl.stanford.edu/gp172gf6221.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Irina V. Mikheyeva, Jiawei Sun.
Contributor Information
Kerwyn Casey Huang, Email: kchuang@stanford.edu.
Thomas J. Silhavy, Email: tsilhavy@princeton.edu
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-023-40396-6.
References
- 1.Silhavy TJ, Kahne D, Walker S. The bacterial cell envelope. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 2010;2:a000414. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a000414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Benn G, et al. Phase separation in the outer membrane of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2021;118:e2112237118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2112237118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rojas ER, et al. The outer membrane is an essential load-bearing element in Gram-negative bacteria. Nature. 2018;559:617–621. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0344-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Webby MN, et al. Lipids mediate supramolecular outer membrane protein assembly in bacteria. Sci. Adv. 2022;8:eadc9566. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adc9566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Okuda S, Sherman DJ, Silhavy TJ, Ruiz N, Kahne D. Lipopolysaccharide transport and assembly at the outer membrane: the PEZ model. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016;14:337–349. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Malinverni JC, Silhavy TJ. An ABC transport system that maintains lipid asymmetry in the Gram-negative outer membrane. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:8009–8014. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903229106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Snijder HJ, et al. Structural evidence for dimerization-regulated activation of an integral membrane phospholipase. Nature. 1999;401:717–721. doi: 10.1038/401717a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.May KL, Silhavy TJ. The Escherichia coli phospholipase PldA regulates outer membrane homeostasis via lipid signaling. mBio. 2018;9:e00379–18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00379-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ruiz N, Davis RM, Kumar S. YhdP, TamB, and YdbH are redundant but essential for growth and lipid homeostasis of the Gram-negative outer membrane. mBio. 2021;12:e0271421. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02714-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wilson A, Ruiz N. Transport of lipopolysaccharides and phospholipids to the outer membrane. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2021;60:51–57. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2021.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Grimm J, et al. The inner membrane protein YhdP modulates the rate of anterograde phospholipid flow in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:26907–26914. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2015556117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yeow J, Chng S-S. Of zones, bridges and chaperones–phospholipid transport in bacterial outer membrane assembly and homeostasis. Microbiology. 2022;168:001177. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.001177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tomasek D, Kahne D. The assembly of beta-barrel outer membrane proteins. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2021;60:16–23. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2021.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hart EM, Gupta M, Wuhr M, Silhavy TJ. The gain-of-function allele bamA(E470K) bypasses the essential requirement for BamD in beta-barrel outer membrane protein assembly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:18737–18743. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007696117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sutterlin HA, et al. Disruption of lipid homeostasis in the Gram-negative cell envelope activates a novel cell death pathway. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:E1565–E1574. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1601375113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Vaara M. Antibiotic-supersusceptible mutants of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1993;37:2255–2260. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.11.2255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hancock RE, Farmer SW, Li ZS, Poole K. Interaction of aminoglycosides with the outer membranes and purified lipopolysaccharide and OmpF porin of Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1991;35:1309–1314. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.7.1309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Aoki SK, et al. Contact-dependent growth inhibition requires the essential outer membrane protein BamA (YaeT) as the receptor and the inner membrane transport protein AcrB. Mol. Microbiol. 2008;70:323–340. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06404.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rigel NW, Schwalm J, Ricci DP, Silhavy TJ. BamE modulates the Escherichia coli beta-barrel assembly machine component BamA. J. Bacteriol. 2012;194:1002–1008. doi: 10.1128/JB.06426-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sklar JG, et al. Lipoprotein SmpA is a component of the YaeT complex that assembles outer membrane proteins in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:6400–6405. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701579104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Powers MJ, Trent MS. Phospholipid retention in the absence of asymmetry strengthens the outer membrane permeability barrier to last-resort antibiotics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:E8518–E8527. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806714115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nagy E, Losick R, Kahne D. Robust suppression of lipopolysaccharide deficiency in Acinetobacter baumannii by growth in minimal medium. J. Bacteriol. 2019;201:e00420–00419. doi: 10.1128/JB.00420-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Beall B, Lutkenhaus J. Sequence analysis, transcriptional organization, and insertional mutagenesis of the envA gene of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1987;169:5408–5415. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.12.5408-5415.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Normark S, Boman HG, Matsson E. Mutant of Escherichia coli with anomalous cell division and ability to decrease episomally and chromosomally mediated resistance to ampicillin and several other antibiotics. J. Bacteriol. 1969;97:1334–1342. doi: 10.1128/jb.97.3.1334-1342.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nilsson I, et al. Metabolic phospholipid labeling of intact bacteria enables a fluorescence assay that detects compromised outer membranes. J. Lipid Res. 2020;61:870–883. doi: 10.1194/jlr.RA120000654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sun J, Rutherford ST, Silhavy TJ, Huang KC. Physical properties of the bacterial outer membrane. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2022;20:236–248. doi: 10.1038/s41579-021-00638-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rojas E, Theriot JA, Huang KC. Response of Escherichia coli growth rate to osmotic shock. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:7807–7812. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402591111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Horrevoets AJ, Hackeng TM, Verheij HM, Dijkman R, De Haas GH. Kinetic characterization of Escherichia coli outer membrane phospholipase A using mixed detergent-lipid micelles. Biochemistry. 1989;28:1139–1147. doi: 10.1021/bi00429a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fuller N, Rand RP. The influence of lysolipids on the spontaneous curvature and bending elasticity of phospholipid membranes. Biophys. J. 2001;81:243–254. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75695-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Vasquez V, Sotomayor M, Cordero-Morales J, Schulten K, Perozo E. A structural mechanism for MscS gating in lipid bilayers. Science. 2008;321:1210–1214. doi: 10.1126/science.1159674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Holtje JV. Growth of the stress-bearing and shape-maintaining murein sacculus of Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1998;62:181–203. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.62.1.181-203.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Boll JM, et al. A penicillin-binding protein inhibits selection of colistin-resistant, lipooligosaccharide-deficient Acinetobacter baumannii. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:E6228–E6237. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611594113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wannier TM, et al. Improved bacterial recombineering by parallelized protein discovery. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:13689–13698. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001588117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Silhavy, T. J., Berman, M. L. & Enquist, L. W. Experiments with Gene Fusions (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1984).
- 35.Baba T, et al. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2006;2:2006–0008. doi: 10.1038/msb4100050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:6640–6645. doi: 10.1073/pnas.120163297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Edelstein A, Amodaj N, Hoover K, Vale R, Stuurman N. Computer control of microscopes using µManager. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 2010;92:14–20. doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb1420s92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Van Valen DA, et al. Deep learning automates the quantitative analysis of individual cells in live-cell imaging experiments. PLoS Comp. Biol. 2016;12:e1005177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ursell T, et al. Rapid, precise quantification of bacterial cellular dimensions across a genomic-scale knockout library. BMC Biol. 2017;15:17. doi: 10.1186/s12915-017-0348-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sliusarenko O, Heinritz J, Emonet T, Jacobs-Wagner C. High-throughput, subpixel precision analysis of bacterial morphogenesis and intracellular spatio-temporal dynamics. Mol. Microbiol. 2011;80:612–627. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07579.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data used for generating figures in this study are available at the Stanford Digital Repository: https://purl.stanford.edu/gp172gf6221. Source data are provided with this paper.
All code used for generating figures in this study are available at the Stanford Digital Repository: https://purl.stanford.edu/gp172gf6221.