Skip to main content
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 1980 Sep;34(3):217–222. doi: 10.1136/jech.34.3.217

Dose-response in case-control studies.

G Berry
PMCID: PMC1052081  PMID: 7441145

Abstract

The evidence provided by a case-control study on the association between a disease and some factor is strengthened if the extent of exposure to the factor is categorised into several groups or measured on a continuous scale. Then dose-response relationships can be estimated. The methods available are illustrated by application to data on lung cancer and chrysotile asbestos exposure from Quebec in which there were three matched controls for each case. Regression-type models were fitted assuming that the relative risk of lung cancer was linearly related to an exposure measure; a covariate, smoking, was also included in the analysis. The data were first analysed ignoring the matching and secondly taking account of the matching. The methodology for the latter analysis has only recently been developed; formerly, matched studies were of necessity analysed as unmatched. Although, in this particular example, the unmatched and matched analyses gave similar results, this is not always the case and it is argued that, now that the methodology is available, matched case-control studies should be analysed taking proper account of the matching.

Full text

PDF
220

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Breslow N. E., Day N. E., Halvorsen K. T., Prentice R. L., Sabai C. Estimation of multiple relative risk functions in matched case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1978 Oct;108(4):299–307. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. HILL A. B. THE ENVIRONMENT AND DISEASE: ASSOCIATION OR CAUSATION? Proc R Soc Med. 1965 May;58:295–300. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. McDonald J. C., Liddell F. D., Gibbs G. W., Eyssen G. E., McDonald A. D. Dust exposure and mortality in chrysotile mining, 1910-75. Br J Ind Med. 1980 Feb;37(1):11–24. doi: 10.1136/oem.37.1.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Saracci R. Asbestos and lung cancer: an analysis of the epidemiological evidence on the asbestos-smoking interaction. Int J Cancer. 1977 Sep 15;20(3):323–331. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910200302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Seigel D. G., Greenhouse S. W. Validity in estimating relative risk in case-control studies. J Chronic Dis. 1973 Apr;26(4):219–225. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(73)90102-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES