Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2023 Oct 31;32(8):1096–1123. doi: 10.1007/s10646-023-02706-y

Mercury in Neotropical birds: a synthesis and prospectus on 13 years of exposure data

Christopher J Sayers II 1,2,3,, David C Evers 2, Viviana Ruiz-Gutierrez 4, Evan Adams 2, Claudia M Vega 3,5, Jessica N Pisconte 3, Vania Tejeda 3, Kevin Regan 2, Oksana P Lane 2, Abidas A Ash 6, Reynold Cal 7, Stevan Reneau 7, Wilber Martínez 7, Gilroy Welch 7, Kayla Hartwell 7, Mario Teul 7, David Tzul 7, Wayne J Arendt 8, Marvin A Tórrez 9, Mrinalini Watsa 10,11, Gideon Erkenswick 11, Caroline E Moore 10, Jacqueline Gerson 12, Victor Sánchez 13, Raúl Pérez Purizaca 14, Helen Yurek 2, Mark E H Burton 2, Peggy L Shrum 15, Sebastian Tabares-Segovia 16, Korik Vargas 2, Finola F Fogarty 17,18, Mathieu R Charette 18, Ari E Martínez 19, Emily S Bernhardt 20, Robert J Taylor 21, Timothy H Tear 2, Luis E Fernandez 3,5,22
PMCID: PMC10622370  PMID: 37907784

Abstract

Environmental mercury (Hg) contamination of the global tropics outpaces our understanding of its consequences for biodiversity. Knowledge gaps of pollution exposure could obscure conservation threats in the Neotropics: a region that supports over half of the world’s species, but faces ongoing land-use change and Hg emission via artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM). Due to their global distribution and sensitivity to pollution, birds provide a valuable opportunity as bioindicators to assess how accelerating Hg emissions impact an ecosystem’s ability to support biodiversity, and ultimately, global health. We present the largest database on Neotropical bird Hg concentrations (n = 2316) and establish exposure baselines for 322 bird species spanning nine countries across Central America, South America, and the West Indies. Patterns of avian Hg exposure in the Neotropics broadly align with those in temperate regions: consistent bioaccumulation across functional groups and high spatiotemporal variation. Bird species occupying higher trophic positions and aquatic habitats exhibited elevated Hg concentrations that have been previously associated with reductions in reproductive success. Notably, bird Hg concentrations were over four times higher at sites impacted by ASGM activities and differed by season for certain trophic niches. We developed this synthesis via a collaborative research network, the Tropical Research for Avian Conservation and Ecotoxicology (TRACE) Initiative, which exemplifies inclusive, equitable, and international data-sharing. While our findings signal an urgent need to assess sampling biases, mechanisms, and consequences of Hg exposure to tropical avian communities, the TRACE Initiative provides a meaningful framework to achieve such goals. Ultimately, our collective efforts support and inform local, scientific, and government entities, including Parties of the United Nations Minamata Convention on Mercury, as we continue working together to understand how Hg pollution impacts biodiversity conservation, ecosystem function, and public health in the tropics.

Keywords: Mercury, Birds, Neotropics, Artisanal and small-scale gold mining, Bioaccumulation

Highlights

  • We summarized the largest database on Neotropical bird Hg concentrations to identify major patterns of pollution exposure to terrestrial biodiversity in the tropics.

  • We detected the highest Hg concentrations in carnivorous bird species, aquatic habitats, and gold mining sites.

  • We showcase among the highest published Hg concentrations for songbirds (Passeriformes) in the world.

  • Madre de Dios, Peru, central Belize, and Ayapel, Colombia are biological Hg hotspots, but widespread sampling is necessary throughout the Neotropics.

  • Inclusive collaboration will excel the field of tropical ecotoxicology by improving the efficiency and comparability of future monitoring efforts.

Introduction

Environmental pollutants, including pesticides, microplastics, nutrients, and heavy metals, present profound threats to global biodiversity and health—creating a suite of unresolved challenges for health professionals, conservation biologists, landscape managers, and policy-makers (Mueller et al. 2022). Mercury (Hg) is one example of a persistent pollutant that adversely impacts environmental, animal, and public health on a global scale. Though Hg exists naturally in the environment, anthropogenic emissions from activities including resource extraction, fossil fuel combustion, metal and cement production, and waste incineration amplify environmental Hg loads (UNEP 2019). These activities can emit or release Hg directly into soils, waterways, or the atmosphere, where Hg can be mobilized around the globe and impact ecosystems far from original sources. At the local scale, microbes can convert inorganic Hg into organic methylmercury (MeHg), which is a more bioavailable form that readily biomagnifies in aquatic and terrestrial food webs (Evers et al. 2005; Cristol et al. 2008; Ackerman et al. 2016a) and can bioaccumulate to detrimental concentrations in longer-lived organisms (Evers et al. 2008; Hill et al. 2008; Scheuhammer et al. 2008; Rutkiewicz et al. 2011). For example, MeHg exposure in mammals, birds, and fish can cause behavioral, immunological, neurological, physiological, and reproductive impairment (Depew et al. 2012; Dietz et al. 2013; Scheuhammer et al. 2015; Ackerman et al. 2016a; Whitney and Cristol 2017; Evers 2018).

The World Health Organization’s “One Health” concept—an interdisciplinary approach to improve public health by mitigating threats to humans, animals, and the environment—requires robust data on global Hg emission, deposition, and exposure (WHO 2022). However, other international efforts seeking to mitigate health threats by curtailing anthropogenic Hg emissions typically have environmental data that better reflect nations in temperate, developed regions. The United Nations Minamata Convention on Mercury follows this pattern for North America (Seewagen 2010; Ackerman et al. 2016a; Cristol and Evers 2020) and Europe (Sun et al. 2019; Dietz et al. 2021), and lacks information on exposure throughout tropical regions of Africa, Asia, and Latin America (UNEP 2019). This sampling bias could undermine the goals of UN agencies, as the tropics play a crucial role in climate regulation (Sullivan et al. 2020), contribute to advances in modern medicine and biochemistry (Skirycz et al. 2016), support more than 75% of all species (Barlow et al. 2018), and will support more than half of the world’s human population by mid-century (Edelman et al. 2014). Therefore, investing in the understanding and preservation of tropical system health should be a global priority.

Human and wildlife Hg exposure in the tropics remains poorly quantified and potentially difficult to interpret due to the physical, chemical, and biological differences between Holarctic and Pantropical realms (Burger 1997; Lacher and Goldstein 1997). Many tropical regions feature three of the largest natural and anthropogenic sources of environmental Hg: geogenic (e.g., volcanism), artisanal & small-scale gold mining (ASGM), and biomass burning (Nriagu and Becker 2003; Saginor et al. 2013; Shi et al. 2019; UNEP 2019). Thus, the combination of these emissions and re-emissions has the potential to obscure source attribution and mitigation priorities to reduce organismal exposure. Relative to Holarctic forests, which have comparatively lower total leaf area, intact tropical wet forests have exceptional capacity to scavenge particulate and gaseous elemental Hg out of the atmosphere and direct it to forest floors via throughfall and litterfall (Gerson et al. 2022). Concurrently, the elevated precipitation, seasonal river fluctuations, and high wetland prevalence in tropical systems may enhance methylation rates (Burger 1997; Lacher and Goldstein 1997), as reflected by elevated “ecosystem sensitivity” for MeHg throughout the Pantropical realm (Evers and Sunderland 2019). However, some tropical regions may have enhanced demethylation rates (Shanley et al. 2020). From a community perspective, the high species richness and narrow niche breadth create more complex food webs, which are expected to increase the biomagnification potential of tropical systems (Burger 1997; Lacher and Goldstein 1997). Due to these collective factors, the ecotoxicological methods and analyses that have been developed and refined in the Holarctic realm might lack applicability in the tropics (Lacher and Goldstein 1997)—thereby limiting our capacity to assess the drivers, distribution, and impacts of Hg at these latitudes. These fundamental gaps in understanding have been repeatedly identified in past decades (Burger 1997; Lacher and Goldstein 1997; Seewagen 2010) and are particularly concerning given accelerating anthropogenic Hg emissions in many equatorial developing countries (UNEP 2019).

Artisanal and small-scale gold mining is the largest polluting sector of environmental Hg in the world, and accounts for almost 38% of global anthropogenic Hg emissions (UNEP 2019). As a major source of income for local and national economies (Wilson et al. 2015; Schwartz et al. 2021), ASGM has expanded with increasing gold demand, price, and road connectivity (Swenson et al. 2011; Alvarez-Berríos and Aide 2015; Caballero-Espejo et al. 2018), leading to further encroachment into intact tropical forests. Following forest removal, miners use high-pressure hydraulic jets to dislodge alluvial gold deposits in riparian sediments, and then add liquid elemental Hg to amalgamate gold particles (Damonte et al. 2013). Up to 60% of Hg inputs are discarded in sediments or washed downstream via mining tailings (Maurice-Bourgoin et al. 1999, 2000), while the remainder is released into the atmosphere following amalgam burning or re-emission (AMAP/UNEP 2019). Concurrently, ASGM’s alterations to hydrological landscapes drastically amplify MeHg production (Gerson et al. 2020). The Neotropics, collectively Central America, South America, and the West Indies, produce 42% of global ASGM Hg emissions (UNEP 2019) while also supporting around 60% of all terrestrial biodiversity (UNEP-WCMC 2016) and 8.2% of the world’s human population (World Bank 2022). This problematic overlap presents a potential conservation threat that deserves urgent attention.

Due to their global ubiquity, reliable association to specific habitats, and relative ease of detection, capture, tracking, and identification compared to other taxa, birds stand apart as the most well-studied and cost-effective taxonomic group for monitoring terrestrial biodiversity health and ecosystem function in the tropics (Bierregaard and Lovejoy 1989; Furness and Greenwood 1993; Remsen 1994; Stotz et al. 1996; Gardner et al. 2008; Lees et al. 2014). These collective factors position birds as ideal bioindicators for both local and regional ecotoxicological monitoring efforts (Furness and Greenwood 1993; Evers et al. 2008; Ackerman et al. 2016a; Egwumah et al. 2017; Sayers et al. 2021), and appropriate foci for monitoring global threats to One Health. The diversity of trophic niche and habitat specialization within the avian clade also allows species to be strategically sampled to understand exposure pathways and biogeochemical dynamics for different spatial and temporal scales (Furness and Greenwood 1993; Evers et al. 2008; Ackerman et al. 2016a; Cristol and Evers 2020). As environmental toxicant emissions continue to increase worldwide across almost all polluting industries (UNEP 2019), the associated exposure impacts could contribute to resident and migratory bird declines throughout the Americas (Robinson 1999, 2001; Sigel et al. 2006; Latta et al. 2011; Blake and Loiselle 2015, Boyle and Sigel 2015; Stanton et al. 2018; Rosenberg et al. 2019; Stouffer et al. 2020; Sherry 2021; Pollock et al. 2022). However, as only about 5% of bird species are represented in published literature on avian Hg exposure in the Neotropics (n = 171; Table S1), we currently have limited capacity to assess toxicological risk throughout the most species-rich region on Earth.

This synthesis builds from decades of research on the importance of Hg monitoring throughout the Global North, which has identified persistent gaps in our understanding of how Hg impacts biodiversity throughout the Global South (Burger 1997; Lacher and Goldstein 1997; Seewagen 2010; Elliott et al. 2015; Jackson et al. 2015; Ackerman et al. 2016a; Canham et al. 2020; Cristol and Evers 2020). Here, we present and summarize the largest database on Hg exposure to Neotropical birds. Our primary goals are (1) to begin quantifying the prevalence, variation, and distribution of Hg across the Neotropics by establishing exposure baselines for representative avian taxonomy and functional traits, and (2) to develop a series of recommendations, methodologies, and research priorities for avian Hg monitoring. In undertaking these goals, we hope to support future monitoring efforts in maximizing efficiency and comparability with existing research and augment our collective understanding of how Hg impacts biodiversity conservation, ecosystem function, and ultimately, public health.

Methods

Sample collection

We obtained samples of Neotropical resident and migratory bird Hg concentrations from published and unpublished datasets provided by the Biodiversity Research Institute, USA; Foundation for Wildlife Conservation, Belize; USDA Forest Service, Puerto Rico; Centro de Innovación Científica Amazónica, Peru; World Wildlife Fund, Peru; Universidad Centroamericana, Nicaragua; San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, USA; Field Projects International, USA; Clemson University, USA; Belize Foundation for Research & Environmental Education, Belize; Toucan Ridge Ecology & Education Society, Belize; Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia; and University of California, Santa Cruz, USA. Organizations are listed in descending order of samples contributed.

To collect these samples, we conducted ground-level mist-net or Bal-Chatri trap surveys at 41 sampling sites in nine countries across Central America, South America, and the West Indies during wet and dry seasons from 2007 to 2023. We selected study locations in a variety of habitats ranging from flooded tropical evergreen forest, to arid lowland scrub, to elfin forest. A total of five sampling sites in Ayapel, Colombia and Madre de Dios, Peru were located within a 7 km radius of artisanal gold mines that were either active at the time of sampling or had last been active in the preceding 5 years. Following thorough in-person exploration and inspection of present satellite imagery, we propose that ASGM emissions had a negligible direct influence on avian Hg exposure at all remaining sites, which were located upstream and at least 25 km from the closest mine. Site-specific capture and habitat information are featured in Table S2.

Whenever possible, we fitted all taxa, excluding hummingbirds (Trochilidae), with a uniquely-numbered aluminum leg band from the US Fish and Wildlife Service, CORBIDI (Center for Ornithology and Biodiversity, Lima, Peru), or the National Band & Tag Company (Newport, Kentucky, USA) to prevent resampling. In unique circumstances when we did not possess the proper leg bands, we assigned captured individuals and corresponding samples a unique identification number and clipped interior tail feathers to prevent short-term recapture. We then identified individuals to an appropriate species, sex, age, and molt cycle using a local bird field guide (Schulenberg et al. 2010; Garrigues and Dean 2014; Fagan and Komar 2016; Quiñones 2018) and either a calendar-based, or preferably, Wolfe-Ryder-Pyle (WRP) cycle-based age-classification system (Wolfe et al. 2010; Johnson et al. 2011; Tórrez and Arendt 2012, 2017; Pyle et al. 2016) described for Neotropical bird families in Johnson and Wolfe (2017). Depending on the priorities of each research effort, we measured and assessed birds for feather molt and wear, skull ossification, fat stores, muscle mass, wing chord, tarsometatarsus length, bill dimensions, tail length, body mass, and reproductive stage via cloacal protuberance and brood patch.

We followed tissue collection, preparation, and storage methods provided by the Biodiversity Research Institute (Evers et al. 2021). Whenever possible, we collected 30–60 µL of blood from the cutaneous ulnar vein using 75 µL heparinized capillary tubes, sealed tubes at both ends using Critocaps™ or Critoseal™, placed tubes into a plastic vacutainer, and stored samples in a cooler with ice packs. We transferred blood samples into a freezer within 8 h of collection, where they were stored below −4 ºC until laboratory analysis. For feather sampling, we collected the two outermost tail feathers, six “body” feathers (flank, breast, or back feathers, depending on project objectives) and stored feathers at ambient temperatures in paper coin envelopes or plastic Ziploc™ bags.

Laboratory analysis

We analyzed avian tissue samples for total Hg (THg) at the Biodiversity Research Institute Toxicology Lab (Portland, Maine, USA; 81% of the cumulative samples), Laboratorio de Mercurio y Química Ambiental of Centro de Innovación Científica Amazónica (Puerto Maldonado, Madre de Dios, Peru; 15%), and Texas A&M University Trace Element Research Laboratory (College Station, Texas, USA; 4%) using a thermal decomposition and atomic absorption spectrophotometry technique with either a Milestone DMA-80 or Nippon MA-3000 direct Hg analyzer. Based on previous studies, we assumed that nearly all THg (>95%) in whole blood (Rimmer et al. 2005; Edmonds et al. 2010) and feathers (Thompson and Furness 1989) were in the MeHg form. Therefore, all tissue concentrations should approximate MeHg contamination of Neotropical avifauna. We followed United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) SW-846 Method 7473, “Mercury in solids and solutions by thermal decomposition, amalgamation, and atomic absorption spectrophotometry” (USEPA 1998). To ensure consistent precision and accuracy, we used quality control methods, including certified reference materials DORM-3, DORM-4, DOLT-4, DOLT-5, ERM-CE464, CRM-13, and NIST2710, which had recovery averages above 95% for both blood and feather tissues. We supplied an artificial concentration of 0.001 µg/g THg to any sample that registered below the analyzer’s lower detection limit (0.05 ng, 0.001 µg/g THg) rather than excluding data from statistical analyses (Shoari and Dubé 2018).

Assigning functional traits

To explain variation in THg concentrations across bird individuals, we obtained information on species’ functional traits, which can be powerful tools to understand species’ extinction risks (Purvis et al. 2000), responses to land-use change (Hamer et al. 2015; Socolar and Wilcove 2019), as well as Hg bioaccumulation (Jackson et al. 2015; Ackerman et al. 2016a). We assigned species to an appropriate taxonomy, trophic niche, primary habitat association, and migratory status in R (v. 4.2.0; R Core Team 2022; R package “tidyverse”; Wickham et al. 2019). We standardized taxonomy based on the eBird/Clements Checklist of Birds of the World: v2022 (Clements et al. 2022). We assigned species to a trophic niche following Pigot et al. (2020), which was expanded from the EltonTraits 1.0 database (Wilman et al. 2014). We also assigned species to a primary habitat association and migratory status following Parker et al. (1996), which was adopted in Socolar and Wilcove (2019) to incorporate updated taxonomy. For modeling simplicity and ease of interpretation, we lumped habitat classifications into six representative categories for the Neotropical realm (see Statistical analysis). We refer to a “resident” as any species that occurs in the Neotropics throughout the full annual cycle and makes no seasonal migratory movements, a “partial migrant” as any species that breeds partly or fully within the Neotropical realm and changes their distribution in the nonbreeding season, and a “full migrant” as any species that occurs regularly in the Neotropics, but only as a nonbreeder (Parker et al. 1996; Stotz et al. 1996). Habitat classifications for migrant species represent primary nonbreeding habitat associations. Comprehensive habitat and migratory status descriptions are available in Stotz et al. (1996). In cases of taxonomic changes when there was no accompanying entry in Parker et al. (1996) or Pigot et al. (2020), we created a new entry in the databases using life history information present in Birds of the World (BOW 2022). If life history information was unclear or absent in Birds of the World, we deferred to the life history information present for the outdated species in Parker et al. (1996) and Pigot et al. (2020). We provide the updated Parker et al. (1996) and Pigot et al. (2020) databases for species included in this synthesis at https://github.com/csayers2/Neotropical-Bird-Hg-Synthesis. We summarize functional traits for all avian taxa sampled in this study in Table S3.

Data transformation and filtering

For ease of interpretation, we pooled flank, breast, and back feather samples together as “body” feathers in subsequent models, summaries, and visualizations. Low et al. (2020) documented low THg variation among these feather tracks in North American resident and Neotropical migrant songbirds. However, researchers have not yet tested the assumption that body feather samples represent similar signals of MeHg body burden in Neotropical resident species. We lack the ability to attempt this comparison here because we did not sample sufficient individuals for multiple body feather categories.

In comparison to whole blood, which represents days to weeks of dietary Hg exposure, feathers from migratory species can represent Hg exposure from the capture location, previous migratory stopover sites, or their original breeding or wintering location before beginning migration depending on the sampling date and species’ molting patterns (see section Tissue selection). To increase our confidence that bird Hg concentrations represented dietary exposure at each sampling location, we excluded feather samples from migratory taxa in all models, summaries, and visualizations. Likewise, we excluded feather samples from all taxa in models and visualizations examining within-year temporal trends (see sections Statistical analysis, Tissue selection).

Statistical analysis

Building from decades of research that have established the ecology of avian Hg exposure and bioaccumulation within the Holarctic realm, we constructed two candidate sets of linear mixed-effects models fit with maximum likelihood estimations to identify biotic and abiotic factors that best explained variation in Neotropical bird THg concentrations (R package “glmmTMB”; Brooks et al. 2017). We performed a natural-log transformation on THg concentrations so that the response variable approximated a Gaussian distribution. For the global functional trait model, we included tissue type (three types: whole blood, body feather, tail feather), trophic niche (seven niches: terrestrial vertivore, aquatic predator, invertivore, omnivore, nectarivore, frugivore, granivore), primary habitat association (six habitats: aquatic, lowland evergreen forest, lowland deciduous forest, montane evergreen forest, secondary forest, grassland/scrub), migratory status (three statuses: resident, partial migrant, full migrant), and ASGM presence at each sampling location within a 7 km radius (two levels: present or absent) as fixed effects, and included a nested sampling site/station term (41 sites, 57 sampling stations), a nested family/species/individual term (51 families, 322 species, 1856 individuals), and year (13 years represented from 2007 to 2023) as random effect intercepts. For the global temporal model of avian blood THg concentrations, we included a season (two seasons: wet and dry) by trophic niche interaction term as a fixed effect and kept the same random effects structure as the functional trait model. We performed model selection on all reduced model combinations for both the functional trait and temporal models based on second-order Akaike’s Information Criterion for small-sample sizes (AICC; Burnham and Anderson 2002; R package “MuMIn”; Bartoń 2022). Using the models of best fit, we then performed an analysis of variance based on type II Wald chi-square tests (R package “car”; Fox and Weisberg 2019) and conducted Tukey pairwise comparisons to assess the relative importance of modeled factors (R package “emmeans”; Lenth 2022). We present all model-generated results as back-transformed predicted means and 95% confidence intervals from the model of best fit (R package “ggeffects”; Lüdecke 2018).

Results and discussion

We present a collective database containing 2,316 THg samples collected from 17 orders, 51 families, and 322 bird species from 41 sites in nine countries across Central America, South America, and the West Indies from 2007–2023. Whole blood (n = 963) was the most well-represented sampling tissue, followed by tail feathers (n = 690) and body feathers (n = 663). Samples were distributed across Belize (n = 946; 5 sites), Peru (n = 676; 6 sites), Nicaragua (n = 261; 12 sites), Costa Rica (n = 136; 6 sites), Dominican Republic (n = 134; 4 sites), Colombia (n = 63; 1 site), Puerto Rico (n = 59; 1 site), Mexico (n = 24; 5 sites), and Panama (n = 17; 1 site). The seven most well-sampled bird families were Parulidae (New World warblers; n = 299), Thraupidae (tanagers; n = 240), Tyrannidae (tyrant flycatchers; n = 222), Furnariidae (ovenbirds; n = 216), Pipridae (manakins; n = 206), Thamnophilidae (antbirds; n = 154), and Troglodytidae (wrens; n = 107).

Following natural log-transformation of the response variable and visual inspection of plotted residuals, we detected a lack of residual normality via skewness in quantile-quantile plots for both global models (Zuur et al. 2009). Evidence of a poor distributional assumption signals that our models may conservatively overestimate the variance around predicted means. These modeling shortcomings could arise from haphazard sampling or high variance in Hg exposure among sites. Therefore, we advocate that future biomonitoring efforts pursue standardized and thorough sampling designs to better model avian Hg exposure (see Spatial variation, Temporal variation). Despite these shortcomings, other evidence suggests that our models remain statistically robust. Our top-performing functional trait and temporal model accounted for ≥92% of variation in the data, ≥68% of total model weight, and were statistically distinguishable (∆AICC > 2) from all other models within their respective candidate sets (Table S4). Therefore, we chose to forgo model averaging and base inferences and predictions off the models of best fit. Tables S45 summarize linear mixed-effects model selection and analysis of variance results, and Tables S8, S68, and Figs. S16 summarize arithmetic mean THg concentrations by country, site, trophic niche, primary habitat association, and taxonomy.

Trophic niche, habitat association, and taxonomy

Neotropical bird THg concentrations differed among trophic niches (χ2 = 85.59, p < 0.001; Figs. 1, S1; Tables S5, S6), primary habitat associations (χ2 = 14.47, p = 0.013; Figs. 2, S2; Tables S5, S7), and taxonomy (χ2 = 639.34, p < 0.001; Figs. 3, S35; Tables S5, S8). Terrestrial vertivores, aquatic predators, and invertivores exhibited the highest predicted and mean THg concentrations, while omnivores, frugivores, and granivores exhibited the lowest (Figs. 1, S1; Table S6). Taxonomic groups that occupy carnivorous trophic levels, especially families Parulidae (New World warblers), Furnariidae (ovenbirds), Thamnophilidae (antbirds), Troglodytidae (wrens), and Alcedinidae (kingfishers), also ranked highest in predicted and mean THg concentrations (Figs. 3, S4; Table S8). Species that prefer aquatic habitats exhibited the highest predicted and mean THg concentrations and were significantly higher than those that prefer secondary and montane evergreen forests (Figs. 2, S2; Tables S5, S7). In terms of data variability, coefficients of THg variation (CVs) were high (≥50%) in blood and feather samples for most trophic niches, primary habitat associations, orders, families, and species (Tables S68).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Total mercury (THg) concentrations (µg/g) overlaid with back-transformed predicted means ± 95% confidence intervals among Neotropical bird trophic niches and artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) presence. Bird THg concentrations were nearly four times higher at ASGM sites on average (p < 0.001). Non-overlapping letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) among groups based on Tukey pairwise comparisons across tissue types

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Total mercury (THg) concentrations (µg/g) overlaid with back-transformed predicted means ± 95% confidence intervals among Neotropical bird primary habitat associations and artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) presence. Bird THg concentrations were nearly four times higher at ASGM sites on average (p < 0.001). Non-overlapping letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) among groups based on Tukey pairwise comparisons across tissue types

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Total mercury (THg) concentrations (µg/g) overlaid with back-transformed predicted means ± 95% confidence intervals among Neotropical bird families and artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) presence. Bird THg concentrations were nearly four times higher at ASGM sites on average (p < 0.001). Families with fewer than 25 samples are excluded

These results are consistent with avian Hg dynamics and regional syntheses within the Holarctic realm (Evers et al. 2005; Evers et al. 2011; Mallory and Braune 2012; Jackson et al. 2015, 2016; Ackerman et al. 2016a). Birds feeding at higher trophic levels and in aquatic habitats typically bioaccumulate higher THg concentrations due to MeHg biomagnification up food webs (Evers et al. 2005; Jackson et al. 2015; Ackerman et al. 2016a) and because of biogeochemical conditions that facilitate microbial methylation in aquatic environments (Ullrich et al. 2001). The high variation present within these data is also not surprising given the high spatial heterogeneity of avian Hg exposure (Evers et al. 2005; Lane et al. 2011, 2020; Ackerman et al. 2016a; Tsui et al. 2018; Brasso et al. 2020; Sayers et al. 2021), and similarly high coefficients of Hg variation when sampling over large geographic areas (Ackerman et al. 2016a; Dzielski et al. 2019).

Trophic niche pairwise comparisons indicated that invertivores, aquatic predators, and terrestrial vertivores were not significantly different in predicted THg (Fig. 1; Table S5). Avian invertivores often bioaccumulate Hg concentrations that match or exceed those in taxa occupying higher trophic positions, especially avian piscivores (Evers et al. 2005; Cristol et al. 2008; Jackson et al. 2015; Ackerman et al. 2016a; Abeysinghe et al. 2017; Adams et al. 2020). This is one of the first studies based in the Neotropical realm to support this relationship and identify a variety of invertivorous taxa that experience Hg exposure comparable to taxa that predate fish and other vertebrates. We showcase repeated instances of species in Parulidae (New World warblers), Furnariidae (ovenbirds), Thamnophilidae (antbirds), Formicariidae (antthrushes), and Troglodytidae (wrens) that exceeded terrestrial vertivores in Falconidae (falcons and caracaras), Accipitridae (hawks, eagles, and kites), and Strigidae (owls), as well as aquatic predators in Alcedinidae (kingfishers), Ardeidae (herons), and Sulidae (boobies and gannets), in predicted and mean THg concentrations (Fig. S5; Table S8). These observations may be attributable to a rich diet of arachnids for some species, in which the predatory behavior and elevated biomagnification potential of spiders can increase avian Hg bioaccumulation (Cristol et al. 2008; Chumchal et al. 2022). Our findings have potentially large implications for the Pantropical realm considering that invertivores constitute more than 60% of all tropical bird species (Sherry 2021). However, we must also acknowledge that aquatic predators including Chloroceryle americana (green kingfisher; 35.75 ± 27.92 µg/g fw body feather), Chloroceryle amazona (Amazon kingfisher; 23.90 ± 5.85 µg/g fw body feather), and Chloroceryle aenea (American pygmy kingfisher; 10.31 ± 7.73 µg/g fw tail feather; 0.54 ± 0.40 µg/g ww whole blood) exhibited the highest mean THg concentrations across all tissue types due to a combination of high trophic position and ASGM emissions (see Artisanal and Small-scale Gold Mining (ASGM); Fig. S5; Table S8).

Notably, nectarivores were not statistically different from all higher trophic niches in predicted THg, in which Trochilidae (hummingbirds) ranked seventh highest among families with 25 or more samples (Figs. 1, 3; Table S5). This is likely a biased signal because all hummingbird samples were collected from ASGM sites in Madre de Dios, Peru. However, this comparison does illuminate the high bioaccumulation potential of hummingbirds and how invertivorous diets (e.g., predating spider webs) may influence their Hg exposure (Remsen et al. 1986; Stiles 1995; Guevara and Stiles 2005; Hardesty 2008; Mikoni et al. 2017).

Overall, our findings showcase consistent patterns in avian Hg exposure between Holarctic and Neotropical realms. Further, they assert that Neotropical invertivores regularly match or even exceed THg concentrations in taxa occupying higher trophic positions and identify regions and taxonomic groups that deserve additional focus (see Spatial variation, Sentinel species selection).

Spatial variation

Neotropical bird THg concentrations also differed among sampling sites (χ2 = 321.52, p < 0.001; Figs. S6, 7; Tables S2, S5), which aligns well with previous predictions about the high spatial heterogeneity of the Neotropics (Burger 1997; Lacher and Goldstein 1997), as well as with site-specific Hg variation across the Holarctic realm (Evers et al. 2005; Lane et al. 2011, 2020; Ackerman et al. 2016a; Sayers et al. 2021). When comparing among the most well-sampled sites (n ≥ 25), central Belize, Ayapel, Colombia, and Madre de Dios, Peru exhibited consistently high predicted and mean THg concentrations—signaling that these regions are biological Hg hotspots (Figs. S67; Table S2). While there is still much to investigate here, bird communities in Belize may have elevated THg concentrations because of gaseous elemental Hg emissions from local landfill incineration, coal combustion in central Mexico (UNEP 2019), or industrial and artisanal gold mining in the Chiquibul/Maya Mountains (Cornec 2010; Briggs et al. 2013; Manzanero 2014; Rath 2016). In addition, there is an abundance of Hg methylating habitats at some Belize sampling sites, including seasonal wetlands, that may convert inorganic emissions to a more bioavailable form. We principally attribute elevated bird THg concentrations in Ayapel, Colombia, and Madre de Dios, Peru to ASGM activities. All three of our sampling stations in Ayapel feature freshwater wetlands directly downstream from active gold mining operations. This situation creates theoretically ideal conditions for high MeHg production: elevated volumes of aqueous inorganic Hg that interact with organic sediment via periodic inundation. Madre de Dios is now recognized as a global hotspot for ASGM, where this often-illicit industry consumes up to 10,000 ha of primary rainforest and releases up to 185 Mg of inorganic Hg into local waterways per year (Andina 2015; Asner and Tupayachi 2017; Collyns 2019; Caballero-Espejo et al. 2018). Although the Peruvian government augmented their enforcement of illegal gold mining in certain areas of Madre de Dios in 2019–2020 (e.g., Operación Mercurio 2019; Leas 2019), ASGM continues unrestrained in other parts of the region. Further, legacy Hg released from over five decades of ASGM activity in Madre de Dios persists in aquatic and terrestrial systems (Diringer et al. 2015).

Artisanal and Small-scale Gold Mining (ASGM)

Perhaps the most important finding of this study is that bird THg concentrations were over four times higher at sites within 7 km of artisanal gold mining activities than at other sites across the Neotropics (χ2 = 20.54, p < 0.001; Figs. 13; Tables S2, S5). These ASGM-impacted sites not only featured among the highest Hg concentrations ever published for songbirds (Passeriformes; Abeysinghe et al. 2017; Evers et al. 2023) but also kingfisher samples that set a new record for the highest mean feather Hg concentration ever reported for a bird species in South America (Chloroceryle americana: 35.75 ± 27.92 µg/g fw body feather; Balza et al. 2021).

These results represent a wake-up call for tropical bird conservation, and signal an urgent need to assess the community-level consequences of this industry by further clarifying the scale and endpoints of impact, as well as the biomagnification mechanisms at play. Our model estimates should neutralize much of the doubt surrounding the role of ASGM in contributing to elevated Hg exposure for tropical biodiversity. As many tropical regions are geochemically active and face a surge of biomass burning via agricultural expansion, there has been perpetual uncertainty and scrutiny about whether natural Hg emissions and re-emissions are responsible for high organismal exposure. While we cannot adequately determine source attribution without the use of stable Hg isotopes, an evolving methodology for birds (Kumar et al. 2018; Tsui et al. 2018; Li et al. 2022), we assert that it is negligent to disregard ASGM as one of the principal drivers of Hg exposure in the Neotropics given that (1) global anthropogenic emissions vastly exceed natural ones, and (2) ASGM contributes the majority of Hg emissions across all anthropogenic sectors (UNEP 2019). Regardless of the theoretical presence of naturally-sourced Hg at ASGM sites, our model estimates demonstrate a clear additive effect of ASGM emissions compared to background concentrations.

Temporal variation

Neotropical bird THg concentrations tended to be higher in dry seasons for many trophic niches, but there was not a significant seasonal difference at the community level in our top-performing model (χ2 = 3.65, p = 0.056; Table S5). Including a season by trophic niche interaction term vastly improved model fit, indicating that certain trophic niches experienced significant differences in exposure between dry and wet seasons (χ2 = 41.19, p < 0.001; Fig. S8; Table S5). Hg concentrations also differed among years (χ2 = 103.67, p < 0.001; Table S5), but due to our inconsistent sampling across locations throughout the full annual cycle, we are unable to determine the directionality of these trends. Intra- and inter-annual temporal patterns are likely to be most biologically meaningful for taxonomic groups occupying higher trophic niches and populations occupying Hg hotspots.

Intra-annual mechanisms, such as seasonal re-emission and methylation rates or even dietary shifts throughout the annual cycle, could contribute to seasonal differences in avian Hg exposure. Tropical precipitation rates change dramatically throughout the annual cycle, leading to distinct dry and wet seasons, often with accompanying pulses in biomass burning and flooding, respectively. These intra-annual changes likely contribute to strong seasonal atmospheric Hg trends in tropical South America, though further research is valuable (Koenig et al. 2021; Gerson et al. 2022). Due to the substantial sequestration of gaseous elemental Hg by forests, leaf litter, and soil organic matter (Obrist 2007; Jiskra et al. 2015, 2018; Obrist et al. 2018; Gerson et al. 2022), during months of relatively little precipitation, biomass burning events can re-emit large quantities of Hg to the atmosphere (Webster et al. 2016; Fraser et al. 2018; Shi et al. 2019; Koenig et al. 2021). Changing sediment moisture conditions, such as those following rainfall and flooding events, produce conditions that amplify MeHg production and bioavailability (Snodgrass et al. 2000; Hall et al. 2008). Therefore, we expect avian Hg exposure acquired through food web biomagnification to track well with seasonal atmospheric trends—peaking during the dry-wet seasonal transition following biomass burnings in the dry season (Shi et al. 2019; Koenig et al. 2021) and the release of MeHg into aquatic systems during inundation (Devito and Hill 1999; Snodgrass et al. 2000; Eimers et al. 2003; Hall et al. 2008). Concurrently, many species within omnivorous, frugivorous, and granivorous trophic niches shift to a more invertivorous diet during the breeding cycle to match the protein needs of their offspring (Moermond and Denslow 1985). Therefore, due to elevated Hg biomagnification in carnivorous food webs, we should expect bird Hg concentrations to increase during breeding seasons, which vary by taxonomy and geography.

These proximate, intra-annual mechanisms operate amidst ultimate, inter-annual mechanisms pertaining to emission, methylation, land-use, and climate changes. Anthropogenic Hg emissions have steadily increased throughout the Neotropical realm since at least 1980 (UNEP 2013, 2019; Streets et al. 2017). These trends are largely a result of ASGM emissions, which have almost doubled at 5-year increments since 2005 in South America (UNEP 2013, 2019). Artisanal and industrial Hg emissions may be compounded by (1) the increased methylation capacity of ASGM landscapes (Gerson et al. 2020), and (2) increasing biomass burning re-emissions via agricultural expansion and evapotranspiration feedback loops (Nature 2019; Escobar 2020). ASGM activities convert forests to aquatic habitats, especially ponds, which can dramatically increase MeHg production (Gerson et al. 2020). Cattle ranching and soybean production, which regularly utilize slash-and-burn land clearing methods, are the principal drivers of deforestation and biomass burning in the Neotropics (Sampaio et al. 2007; Nature 2019; Lapola et al. 2023). Specifically in Amazonia, there is now mounting evidence that forest cover loss reduces evapotranspiration and precipitation recycling, leads to an altered hydrological cycle with an extended dry season, increases the frequency and intensity of biomass burnings and subsequent re-emissions of gaseous elemental Hg, and further reduces forest cover (Sampaio et al. 2007; Gloor et al. 2015; Lovejoy and Nobre 2018; Peña-Claros and Nobre 2023)—a positive feedback loop known as savannification. Anecdotally, the management actions necessary to bring the Amazon back from this tipping point (Lovejoy and Nobre 2018; Peña-Claros and Nobre 2023), such as implementing sustainable agriculture practices to curb deforestation and increase soil carbon stocks (Loker 1994; zu Ermgassen et al. 2018; Ogle et al. 2019), and mending fragmented habitats through ecosystem restoration (Aide et al. 2000; Strassburg et al. 2020), all have the potential to greatly decrease Hg re-emissions, while protecting the health and longevity of humans and biodiversity—a win-win-win situation.

Migratory strategy

Migratory status as a fixed effect was excluded from the top-performing model during model selection and Neotropical bird Hg concentrations did not differ among migratory statuses in the global model (χ2 = 1.77, p = 0.412; Table S2). However, Hg biomonitoring efforts should continue to sample Neotropical migrants in parallel with resident species since there are several toxic mechanisms that could influence their migratory success (Seewagen 2020).

New World warblers and tyrant flycatchers are among the highest-ranking Neotropical families in predicted and mean THg concentrations and have declined over 25% and 20% in North America, respectively (Rosenberg et al. 2019). As these species must overcome immense physical challenges to complete a successful migration, this life history stage is commonly associated with high mortality (Sillett and Holmes 2002; Paxton et al. 2017; Rushing et al. 2017). Hg exposure throughout the full annual cycle (Evers 2018; Cristol and Evers 2020) is widely expected to introduce additional complications for navigation, flight endurance, stopover refueling, cell oxidation, and predator avoidance along the migratory route (Ma et al. 2018a, b; Adams et al. 2020; Seewagen 2020), which could contribute to seasonal carry-over effects and regional population declines (Ma et al. 2018a).

Methylmercury has the potential to influence migratory success via acute and chronic mechanisms of toxicity. Ma et al. (2018b) showed that Setophaga coronata (yellow-rumped warblers) rapidly accumulated dietary MeHg into the bloodstream and incurred more frequent strikes and decreased flight endurance during wind tunnel experiments as a consequence of acute neurotoxicity. One chronic toxicity mechanism that can impact migratory success is fluctuating asymmetry, in which feather growth departs from bilateral symmetry on the wings and tail. In Sterna forsteri (Forster’s terns) and Gavia immer (common loons), fluctuating asymmetry was positively correlated with blood and feather Hg concentrations (Evers et al. 2008; Herring et al. 2017) and has been shown to reduce take off speed, aerial maneuverability, and flight performance in Sturnus vulgaris (European starlings; Swaddle et al. 1996). Birds accommodating for imperfections in drag, wing shape, and weight distribution due to clipped or naturally molting feathers, generate less mechanical power, have slower flight speeds, and exert more energy during flight (Thomas 1993; Chai 1997; Chai and Dudley 1999; Hambly et al. 2004). This increased energy expenditure has profound implications for migratory success. Over long distances, and especially trans-oceanic flights, Hg-driven asymmetry could therefore result in shorter flight durations, lengthened stopover time, delayed arrival to favored breeding territories (Seewagen 2020), reduced predator avoidance abilities (Lind et al. 2010), or even distance misjudgments, starvation, and fatigue.

Considering these potential mechanisms, Ma et al. (2018a) introduced and supported a fundamental hypothesis in which long-distance Neotropical migrant songbirds departing from the breeding grounds during autumn migration with high Hg exposure are less likely to return in the following spring. As a result, scientists would observe a higher frequency of migrants with lower Hg concentrations during spring migration—with the main implication being that, due to a Hg-driven reduction in migration success, there are fewer breeding migrants as time progresses. However, this hypothesis ignores Hg exposure present on the nonbreeding grounds. Framing Hg-migration dynamics only in terms of breeding ground exposure is problematic because it removes any culpability that migrant wintering grounds can contribute to reductions in spring migration success, and reduces the impetus for ecotoxicological biomonitoring in tropical regions. Using the Ma et al. (2018a) hypothesis, we would also predict that Neotropical migrants sampled on the wintering grounds with the highest Hg concentrations would be the least likely to complete a successful spring migration. And if this prediction is valid, we would also observe a higher frequency of migrants with lower Hg concentrations during spring in North America. To elucidate the effects of Hg on Neotropical migrants and the role that Hg may have in regional migratory bird declines (Rosenberg et al. 2019), ecotoxicologists should implement strategic tissue sampling of this clade during all life stages (Jackson et al. 2015).

Risk assessment

Using established effect concentrations featured in Jackson et al. (2011), 9.5% (221/2316) of individuals across 26% (85/322) of species and 45% (23/51) of families within our sampled community may experience a 10% or greater reduction in reproductive success. At the species level, we estimate that a total of five terrestrial vertivore, three aquatic predators, 19 invertivores, and four omnivore species with more than five samples in a given tissue category fall above this risk threshold (Fig. 4). Most at-risk species were among the highest-ranking families in predicted and mean THg concentrations: Alcedinidae (kingfishers), Thamnophilidae (antbirds), Furnariidae (ovenbirds), Parulidae (New World warblers), and Troglodytidae (wrens; Figs. 3, S4). In addition, most at-risk individuals were sampled from Hg hotspots that we identified: central Belize, Ayapel, Colombia, and Madre de Dios, Peru.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Proportion of Neotropical bird species sampled for (a) whole blood, (b) body feathers, and (c) tail feathers that may be subject to reductions in reproductive success via MeHg exposure, as defined by Jackson et al. (2011). Species with fewer than five samples are excluded. Whole blood risk categories are: < 0.7 µg/g ww (gray, ≤10% decline in reproductive success), ≥0.7 µg/g ww (yellow, ≥10%), ≥1.2 µg/g ww (orange, ≥20%), ≥1.7 µg/g ww (red, ≥30%), and ≥2.2 µg/g ww (black, ≥40%). Body feather risk categories are: < 2.4 µg/g ww (gray, ≤10%), ≥2.4 µg/g ww (yellow, ≥10%), ≥3.4 µg/g ww (orange, ≥20%), ≥4.5 µg/g ww (red, ≥30%), and ≥5.3 µg/g ww (black, ≥40%). Tail feather risk categories are: <3 µg/g ww (gray, ≤10%), ≥3 µg/g ww (yellow, ≥10%), ≥4.7 µg/g ww (orange, ≥20%), ≥6.4 µg/g ww (red, ≥30%), and ≥7.7 µg/g ww (black, ≥40%)

Because we collected over 95% of bird tissue samples via ground-level mist-net surveys, our results and subsequent risk assessments are applicable to strata generalists and understory species. This is particularly valuable considering the declines of understory invertivores within protected Neotropical forest tracts (Robinson 1999, 2001; Sigel et al. 2006; Latta et al. 2011; Blake and Loiselle 2015; Boyle and Sigel 2015; Stouffer et al. 2020; Sherry 2021; Pollock et al. 2022). Several species with mean THg concentrations that exceeded sublethal effect thresholds, including Formicarius analis (black-faced antthrush), Willisornis poecilinotus (common scale-backed antbird), Dendrocincla fuliginosa (plain-brown woodcreeper), Dendrocincla homochroa (ruddy woodcreeper), and Myrmotherula axillaris (white-flanked antwren), also suffered significant abundance declines in recent studies on Neotropical avifaunal collapse (Stouffer et al. 2020; Pollock et al. 2022; Table S8). Given these risk estimates and overall elevated concentrations for these taxa, we posit that ASGM and other Hg-polluting industries throughout Latin America may play a role in shaping the understory invertivore community. However, we acknowledge that toxicity reference values developed for Holarctic species may be limiting when assessing risk for Neotropical resident avifauna (Canham et al. 2020).

Selecting Hg effect thresholds that can be applied to the 322 bird species included in this synthesis is a difficult task. While toxicity reference values have been defined for a variety of endpoints, relatively few bird species have been studied, and none exist for tropical biomes (Fuchsman et al. 2017; Cristol and Evers 2020). Researchers have often relied on extrapolation across species, families, or even orders of similar diet or body size when reference values have not been defined for a species of interest (Warner et al. 2010; Lane et al. 2011, 2020; Winder 2012; Sayers et al. 2021). Because species vary widely in their respective sensitivities to Hg (Fuchsman et al. 2017; Cristol and Evers 2020), extrapolation has the potential to be inaccurate (USEPA 2007), and to ignore interspecific differences in size, trophic position, and evolved Hg tolerance (Thompson and Furness 1989; Eagles-Smith et al. 2009; Fuchsman et al. 2017).

Neotropical species may have higher or lower tolerance to Hg exposure than Holarctic species due to a variety of environmental and evolutionary factors. As the Neotropics are a geochemically-active region, resident bird communities could exhibit elevated tolerance to MeHg bioaccumulation via generations of natural exposure from volcanism and leaching of volcanic rock (Nriagu and Becker 2003; Saginor et al. 2013). Neotropical birds tend to have longer molt cycles than Holarctic species (Moreno-Palacios et al. 2018), which provides more time to depurate Hg into developing feathers and reduce their body burden. Neotropical birds also tend to be larger, longer-lived, and have lower metabolic rates than Holarctic species; which, in addition to differentiated cellular properties, appears to increase their resistance to oxidative stress (Jimenez et al. 2014). Therefore, Neotropical bird species may be able to tolerate higher concentrations of Hg (Canham et al. 2020). On the contrary, the slower “pace of life” and metabolism of Neotropical species (Wikelski et al. 2003; Jimenez et al. 2014) could reduce their capacity to eliminate Hg through excretion, depuration, or demethylation. Neotropical species tend to have longer breeding periods with smaller clutch sizes, sometimes lasting all year, have a lower annual reproductive output, and exist at lower densities than Holarctic species (Jetz et al. 2008; Jimenez et al. 2014; but see Arendt 2004, 2006). Therefore, Hg exposure may have a disproportionately negative impact on Neotropical bird population growth, stability, and recovery (Burger 1997). Despite these broad-scale differences between Neotropical and Holarctic taxa, it is important to attempt to provide context for our results. Therefore, as we lack any evidence of how Hg may influence Neotropical bird species, we cautiously extrapolate from frequently-cited toxicity reference values for songbirds in North America.

Jackson et al. (2011) monitored Thryothorus ludovicianus (Carolina wrens), a non-migratory invertivorous songbird, breeding along two contaminated rivers in Virginia, USA, to develop effect concentrations based on percent reductions in nesting success. Females with blood, body feather, and tail feather THg concentrations of 0.7, 2.4, and 3.0 µg/g, respectively, were projected to experience a 10% reduction in nesting success. These toxicity reference values have since been routinely used to provide context for a variety of invertivorous passerine species (Winder 2012; Evers 2018; Lane et al. 2020; Sayers et al. 2021). While non-passerine species, including members of Alcedinidae (kingfishers), Falconidae (falcons), Strigidae (owls), and Momotidae (motmots), tend to be larger and consume higher trophic level prey items than invertivorous songbirds, McNab (1988) notes that vertebrate-eating birds weighing less than a kilogram, including small raptors (Order Accipitriformes and Falconiformes), seabirds (Order Procellariiformes), and members of family Alcedinidae (kingfishers), have high basal metabolic rates similar to invertivorous passerines. Because avian Hg exposure and toxicokinetics are related to body mass, birds of similar size and metabolic rate should have similar sensitivities to Hg (Fuchsman et al. 2017). Therefore, we have increased confidence in applying toxicity reference values from Jackson et al. (2011) to non-passerine species present in our database.

Research priorities & recommendations for future biomonitoring

A plethora of additional research is necessary to address important and persistent gaps in our understanding of Hg exposure to Neotropical birds. We assert that the most immediate priority for the field of Neotropical ecotoxicology is to clarify how Hg exposure and risk changes over time and space, which not only requires interdisciplinary expertize and coordination, but also systematic sampling of sites, habitats, taxonomy, and tissues.

A critical, albeit challenging, task to overcome the present limitations of interpreting Hg exposure to Neotropical birds is to develop effect concentrations for reproductive endpoints using field-based approaches. These toxicity thresholds should reflect the most abundant and widespread sentinel species to broaden their taxonomic and geographic applicability (see Sentinel species selection; Table S9). Metrics of reproductive success (e.g., nesting attempts, clutch size, nestling survival, proportion of chicks fledged) are the most useful interpretive endpoints for ecological Hg effects because they can be relatively easy to measure in cavity-nesting species and have direct population-level consequences (Brasso and Cristol 2008; Evers et al. 2008; Jackson et al. 2011). In controlled laboratory-based, or ex situ, studies that rely on the dosing of captive individuals, reproductive success is easily isolated and quantifiable without the influence of stochastic environmental stressors, including food abundance, weather, predation, or human interference. However, the lack of stochasticity creates a potentially large limitation in applying ex situ adverse-effect thresholds to in situ free-living populations, which must compensate for Hg contamination in the face of environmental stress. Therefore, laboratory-based studies should supplement empirical field-based studies to characterize the role of environmental stochasticity, define toxicokinetic relationships, and better explain in situ responses. By integrating these efforts, we can begin to provide more-accurate estimations of Hg risk in past, present, and future avian populations.

A robust way to examine temporal patterns in avian Hg exposure is through the simultaneous monitoring and comparison of contemporary and historical bird communities. To better understand proximate, intra-annual mechanisms, we recommend the consistent collection of avian blood samples—a tissue representative of recent dietary Hg exposure (see Tissue selection)—across sites throughout the full annual cycle. To define ultimate, inter-annual mechanisms, however, museum collections provide enormous power to understand past, present, and future Hg emissions scenarios for biodiversity (Vo et al. 2011; Evers et al. 2014; Perkins et al. 2020). By leveraging the chemical stability of MeHg in feathers (Applequist et al. 1984) and evolving methods to quantify stable Hg isotope ratios (Kumar et al. 2018; Tsui et al. 2018; Li et al. 2022), we can analyze preserved bird specimens in natural history museums to understand how emission sources, biogeochemical cycling, and biological risk of Hg pollution have changed over time.

Ecotoxicologists should continue to monitor the Hg hotspots we identify here, as they provide the opportunity to: (1) further understand inherent differences between Holarctic and tropical Hg dynamics, (2) inform government agencies about the ecological impacts of gold mining activities, (3) refine the selection of sentinel species for Neotropical habitats and regions, (4) examine temporal changes in Hg emission and methylation rates, and (5) serve as reference sites for future comparisons. In particular, weighing the rapid expansion of ASGM in Neotropical lowland ecosystems with the global significance and general lack of Hg exposure data for these regions, the Amazon River Basin should be one of the top sampling priorities for Neotropical ecotoxicologists throughout the next decade (Canham et al. 2020). Coupled with immense inorganic Hg emissions at small-scale operations, mining can contribute 9–70% of local annual deforestation in Amazonia (Sonter et al. 2017; Caballero-Espejo et al. 2018). As such, there are not only ecotoxicological concerns but also significant fragmentation, biogeography, carbon sequestration, climate change, and savannification implications associated with ASGM—placing further strain on conservation efforts in the face of mining pressure (Sonter et al. 2018). Given its staggering biodiversity, relatively small size, high density of ASGM activity, and robust network of biological stations and ecolodges, we propose Madre de Dios, Peru as a meaningful starting point for long-term Hg biomonitoring efforts in Amazonia.

We must also stress, however, that the Neotropics are in great need of widespread Hg sampling beyond these hotspots, and that reducing the spatial coverage of biomonitoring efforts would be counterproductive to articulating Hg exposure and risk on a multi-continental scale. Historical and present sampling efforts have largely been confined to accessible locations with adequate infrastructure, often near tourist destinations within politically-stable countries. As such, we still consider the Neotropical realm to be poorly assessed in terms of avian Hg exposure. We urge researchers to consider venturing outside of our established sampling sites (Fig. 5; Table S2), and highlight that inclusive collaboration provides a viable solution to mitigate current geographic sampling biases (see The Tropical Research for Avian Conservation & Ecotoxicology (TRACE) Initiative).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Total mercury (THg) concentrations (µg/g) and sample sizes of birds sampled for (a, b) whole blood, (c, d) body feathers, and (e, f) tail feathers across Central America, South America, and the West Indies from 2007–2023. Point size and color are arranged in order of increasing THg concentration and hexagonal grid cells are colored in terms of increasing sample size

Finally, following the recommendations of Jackson et al. (2015), conservation ornithologists should consider incorporating Hg exposure metrics into mark-recapture and full-annual-cycle population models to isolate the impacts of pollution from a plethora of other stressors, including land-use and climate changes. Such models would be most appropriate for resident and migratory species that have the highest biomagnification potential, the highest probability to interact with ASGM-polluted landscapes, or the highest conservation concern (see Sentinel species selection).

Tissue selection

Neotropical bird THg concentrations differed among tissue types across individuals (χ2 = 3358.75, p < 0.001; Table S5), which highlights the importance of selecting sampling tissues appropriately when organizing Hg biomonitoring efforts. Funding and logistical constraints can often influence tissue selection decisions, since there are different equipment, analysis, or storage requirements. While both internal and external tissues are appropriate for monitoring MeHg exposure in birds (Ackerman et al. 2016a; Fuchsman et al. 2017; Evers 2018), we present economical, nonlethal, and minimally-invasive options suitable for conservation research: blood and feather collection from mature birds. Non-viable eggs are another popular, non-invasive sampling option, and are particularly useful for estimating a laying female’s MeHg exposure during egg development (Ackerman et al. 2016b; Espín et al. 2016). However, in tropical moist forest habitats where nests are difficult to find and access, eggs may not be appropriate for rapid assessments. Tissue selection should ultimately be informed by the desired research endpoint, as different tissues represent different temporal or geographic scales of MeHg exposure. To help guide tissue sampling selections for avian Hg assessments, we provide a procedural and inferential flowchart in Table S9.

Whole blood is perhaps the most favorable and commonly sampled tissue for Hg biomonitoring, and is the most reliable proxy for determining MeHg body burden in birds (Ackerman et al. 2016a, b; Low et al. 2020). Whole blood Hg concentrations are strongly correlated with those in other internal tissues, such as eggs (Ackerman et al. 2016b), as well as in tissues that can only be assessed through euthanasia, such as muscle and liver (Eagles-Smith et al. 2008; Ackerman et al. 2016b). This strong correlation facilitates both the confident conversion of Hg concentrations and the comparison of toxicity reference values among tissue types when necessary (Ackerman et al. 2016a). Whole blood samples represent short-term dietary MeHg exposure from days to weeks (Evers 2018); which, for taxa not in active migration, also reliably represents site-specific MeHg exposure. Therefore, whole blood can be considered a spatiotemporal “snapshot” of MeHg exposure, and is the ideal sampling matrix when seeking to quantify the spatial distribution of MeHg sources across a landscape or region (Evers et al. 2005; Sayers et al. 2021).

Whole blood sampling is complicated by bulky, expensive equipment and challenging storage requirements relative to other nonlethal sampling options, including feathers. Accepted whole blood sampling procedures require the use of coolers, ice packs, and plastic vacutainers to temporarily insulate and protect blood-collection receptacles, especially glass microhematrocirit capillary tubes. These materials can be cumbersome in the field and require careful handling to avoid breakage. Blood-collection receptacles also need to be sealed and stored below freezing with minimal freeze-thaw cycles to prevent changes in Hg concentrations due to contamination, moisture loss, and interconversions of Hg species (Horvat and Byrne 1992; Varian-Ramos et al. 2011; Sommer et al. 2016; Evers et al. 2021). At remote tropical field sites, resources to transport and store samples may be difficult to organize or access, which precludes the use of whole blood as a sampling tissue. However, the collection of dried blood spots on filter paper cards may present a convenient alternative in remote tropical environments since samples do not need to be refrigerated (Chaudhuri et al. 2009; Basu et al. 2017; Perkins and Basu 2018; Nyanza et al. 2019; Santa-Rios et al. 2021)—all while representing the same spatiotemporal scale of MeHg exposure.

Feathers are another preferred tissue for avian Hg monitoring efforts in both temperate (Cristol et al. 2008; Evers et al. 2008; Jackson et al. 2011; Lane et al. 2020) and tropical biomes (Burger and Gochfeld 1991; Anbazhagan et al. 2021; Parolini et al. 2021) due to their unique spatiotemporal Hg signal and convenient sampling, transportation, and storage requirements (Furness et al. 1986; Burger 1993; Bortolotti 2010; Espín et al. 2016). During molting periods, when feathers are connected to the bloodstream, birds can mitigate their body burden by depurating toxicants from internal tissues into growing feathers (Furness et al. 1986; Braune and Gaskin 1987; Burger 1993; Markowski et al. 2013). Following feather maturation, the MeHg bound to feather keratin structures is chemically stable and becomes isolated from the rest of the body (Applequist et al. 1984). The amount of Hg detected in a single feather thus represents a bird’s dietary MeHg exposure and endogenous accumulation throughout the time of feather growth (Burger et al. 1992; Evers et al. 2005; Markowski et al. 2013; but see Furness et al. 1986).

Depending on a species’ molt strategy and movement behavior during molt, feather Hg concentrations can represent a much wider spatiotemporal scale of MeHg exposure than whole blood (Evers 2018). This may complement certain research goals and even allow for ex situ Hg monitoring, but is a strong disadvantage when trying to pinpoint MeHg sources in a landscape. Feather sampling is also complicated by high Hg variation among feathers within or between tracts from the same individual (Bond and Diamond 2008; Carravieri et al. 2014; Ackerman et al. 2019; Peterson et al. 2019; Low et al. 2020) and poor prediction of Hg concentrations in internal tissues, especially for migratory species (Eagles-Smith et al. 2008; Ackerman et al. 2019; Low et al. 2020). As such, blood sampling may be the only approach for gathering a precise spatiotemporal estimate of MeHg exposure for birds that make large seasonal movements (Bildstein 2004; Hobson et al. 2003; Hsiung et al. 2018). In contrast, feather sampling can be more appropriate for species with limited movements, where feather molt occurs near the sampling location (Ackerman et al. 2012). Additional exceptions exist for species with well-documented molt cycles and individuals with accompanying telemetry or isotope data, where we can accurately estimate the geographic origin of Hg detected in a feather (Fort et al. 2014; Ma et al. 2021). Because many Neotropical resident species maintain small territories (generally < 64 ha, Terborgh et al. 1990; Jirinec et al. 2018), feathers from nonmigratory taxa may closely resemble the geographic MeHg signal of blood, while integrating MeHg exposure over a longer time period. Considering these dynamics, researchers should obtain a robust understanding of the molt and movement ecology of their focal species before selecting appropriate sampling tissues.

External contamination is yet another necessary variable to consider when analyzing feathers for Hg. As a general rule, MeHg constitutes approximately 95% of the total Hg detected in biological tissues, including blood (Rimmer et al. 2005), eggs (Ackerman et al. 2013), and feathers (Thompson and Furness 1989). Analyzing tissue samples for total Hg (THg), a much cheaper alternative to MeHg, allows researchers to substantially reduce laboratory costs. However, in unique circumstances, such as museum specimens preserved with mercuric chloride (HgCl2) (Goldberg 1996) or feathers sampled near ASGM zones with high inorganic Hg emissions and re-emissions, researchers should analyze feathers for MeHg. This practice avoids the potential bias from exogenous contamination from the adsorption of inorganic Hg on the feather surface (Vo et al. 2011; Markowski et al. 2013; Evers et al. 2014; Dzielski et al. 2019; Perkins et al. 2020). Nevertheless, the convenience of feather sampling outweighs some of the shortcomings.

Logistical advantages of sampling feathers include that they can be plucked without causing permanent damage, sampled repeatedly in the same individual to illustrate temporal bioaccumulation trends, have a much lower risk of disease transmission than blood, are resistant to environmental degradation, and are accessible via natural history collections (Evers et al. 2008; Bortolotti 2010; Espín et al. 2016; Dzielski et al. 2019; Perkins et al. 2020). As with dried blood spots, the chemical stability of MeHg within keratin-based tissues precludes the need to store and transport feather samples below freezing (Applequist et al. 1984; Espín et al. 2016; Evers et al. 2021), which profoundly simplifies field planning in remote tropical locations. In addition, feather sampling circumvents the logistical complications surrounding the transmission of Exotic Newcastle Disease and the H5N1 subtype of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza when importing and exporting samples internationally (Paul 2005), since MeHg in fully-grown feathers remains stable when exposed to extreme treatments (Applequist et al. 1984; Goede and de Bruin 1984).

Once familiarizing themselves with the life history of their focal species, researchers interested in sampling feathers for Hg analysis should consider tail and flank feathers as useful standards. The sampling of two symmetrical outer tail feathers (rectrices, typically R6) is less invasive compared to flight feathers of the wing (remiges)—which have greater implications for flight efficiency, predator avoidance, and migratory success (Swaddle et al. 1996; Lind et al. 2010; McDonald and Griffith 2011)—allows for consistent comparisons among individuals (Varela et al. 2016), and also allows for the measurement of Hg-related fluctuating asymmetry (Espín et al. 2016). Additionally, many species have well-documented and predictable tail feather molt cycles, which reduces the temporal uncertainty of Hg exposure (Bortolotti 2010). Flank feathers can be easily plucked and analyzed whole, are typically larger and provide more mass than adjacent breast or belly feathers—which is useful for the minimum mass requirement in direct Hg analysis—and tend to have lower Hg variation relative to other feather tracts (Furness et al. 1986; Low et al. 2020). Since museum curators aim to minimize destructive sampling, flank feathers offer a unique opportunity to conduct retrospective analyses using preserved specimens in natural history collections (Applequist et al. 1984; Vo et al. 2011; Evers et al. 2014; Dzielski et al. 2019; Perkins et al. 2020). In Neotropical migratory songbirds, while flight feathers may only be molted once a year during the postbreeding phase prior to autumn migration, body feathers can be molted twice a year, and represent two distinct spatiotemporal periods of MeHg exposure (Pyle 1997; Rohwer et al. 2005). These combined traits make flank feathers one of the most favorable sampling matrices for avian Hg monitoring (Furness et al. 1986). Despite the inherent complications and advanced considerations necessary when sampling feathers, their ease of collection and storage, especially in regions with limited-resources, and the chemical stability of MeHg within keratin-based complexes, make feathers a desirable tissue choice for some Hg monitoring situations.

Sentinel species selection

Sentinel species provide a convenient and efficient proxy for quantifying contaminant risk at various temporal and spatial scales. Distilling the writing of Beeby (2001) and Jackson et al. (2015), in general, sentinel species should be abundant and widespread to facilitate extensive sampling and geographic comparisons, live long enough and occupy a home range that matches the spatiotemporal scale in question, and have a relatively well-documented life history that can provide context for how contaminants affect their behavior, physiology, and reproduction. More simply, an effective sentinel species is one that best complements the research question or system of interest. With over 3500 bird species native to the Neotropics, the selection of sentinel species is much more challenging than for studies based in temperate biomes. Due to the high diversity and low density of Neotropical species, broader taxonomic or functional groups may even be more useful sentinels than individual species (Lacher and Goldstein 1997). Because our cumulative sampling efforts are not exhaustive, and the vast majority of Neotropical species remain unsampled (i.e., this synthesis provides THg exposure profiles for only about 9% of Neotropical species), we cannot produce a definitive list of all relevant and thus, irrelevant species. Here, we present a conservative list of species that have good potential to act as sentinels for various Neotropical habitats and regions given our current understanding (Table S10).

Piscivorous birds have particular advantages as sentinel species. Both small and large piscivores, including species in Alcedinidae (kingfishers) and Ardeidae (herons), respectively, are at a high risk of Hg exposure due to their high trophic position and association with aquatic environments. Alcedinidae and Ardeidae feather THg concentrations have exceeded 6 µg/g fw in previous studies (Herring et al. 2009; Zamani-Ahmadmahmoodi et al. 2009), and ascend to 72 µg/g fw in this study (Table S8)—highlighting their bioaccumulation potential. Due to the global distribution of these families, ecotoxicologists have the opportunity to compare Hg concentrations in Neotropical species of Alcedinidae and Ardeidae to those observed in species elsewhere around the world. Concurrent logistical advantages include that species in Alcedinidae can be captured using passive ground-level mist-net arrays and, due to their aggressive territoriality, can also be lured with auditory playback tools. Additionally, species in Ardeidae nest in large colonies—meaning that samples can be collected more efficiently once a nesting site is identified. Due to their relative trophic position, habitat occupancy, logistical advantages, and previous Hg research focused on these families, members of Alcedinidae and Ardeidae, such as Chloroceryle amazona (Amazon kingfisher), Chloroceryle americana (green kingfisher), Chloroceryle aenea (American pygmy-kingfisher), and Ardea alba (great egret), are well-suited as sentinel piscivores for Neotropical aquatic habitats.

Due to their high bioaccumulation potential and convenience of sampling, invertivorous songbirds are ideal avian sentinels to assess Hg contamination across terrestrial habitats (Jackson et al. 2015; Cristol and Evers 2020)—especially in unison with established mist-netting surveys. Two avian invertivore clades of particular interest to Neotropical regions are ant-following birds and Neotropical migrants, both of which exhibit elevated THg concentrations relative to other invertivores (Figs. 3, S4; Table S7).

An estimated 465 Neotropical bird species engage in obligate, facultative, or opportunistic ant-following behavior—one of the most conspicuous and captivating foraging spectacles native to wet forest biomes of Central and South America—by targeting invertebrate or vertebrate prey items that attempt to escape foraging army ant swarms (Oniki and Willis 1972; Stotz et al. 1996; Roberts et al. 2000; Wrege et al. 2005; Tórrez et al. 2009). New World army ants, particularly Eciton burchellii and Labidus praedator, are obligate nomadic group predators that roam the forest floor in large raids while searching for their preferred prey items: mainly pupae of other ant species (Willis and Oniki 1978; Powell 2011). Army ants will also consume virtually any organism that they can immobilize, including frogs, lizards, snakes, spiders, and nestling birds (Breed and Moore 2016). Several bird families that regularly attend swarms, such as Thamnophilidae (antbirds), Furnariidae (ovenbirds), Momotidae (motmots), Tyrannidae (tyrant flycatchers), Cuculidae (cuckoos), Troglodytidae (wrens), and Parulidae (New World warblers), are among the highest-ranking families in predicted and mean THg concentrations (Figs. 3, S4). While ant-following species are not thought to target the ants themselves when foraging, individuals may consume ants infrequently as bycatch (Willis and Oniki 1978). Thus, ant-followers may experience elevated Hg exposure due to both increased access to higher trophic level prey items, such as spiders and lizards, or the accidental consumption of predatory ants. Given their invertivorous trophic niche and widespread distribution throughout Latin America, within the ant-following clade, several species that standout as potential sentinels include Formicarius analis (black-faced antthrush), Taraba major (great antshrike), Sittasomus griseicapillus (olivaceous woodcreeper), and Eucometis penicillata (gray-headed tanager). These species all present ideal opportunities for continental-scale comparative analyses throughout the Neotropical realm.

Ant-following birds present a model system with unique conservation significance for Neotropical wet forests (Martínez et al. 2021). Further, ant-following food web dynamics have yet to be described by the ecotoxicological community. Given the placement of army ants as keystone species (Martínez et al. 2021), the presence and impacts of Hg in the ant-following system should be further scrutinized. In sampling ant-following taxa, which are among the most frequently-captured individuals in passive ground-level mist-net surveys, we can (1) better understand how Hg migrates and biomagnifies through Neotropical terrestrial systems, (2) quantify the toxicological impacts of ASGM on declining biota, and (3) articulate the presence and influence of Hg throughout the full annual-cycle for resident and migratory species.

Birds of prey are perhaps the most charismatic taxonomic group worth considering as avian Hg sentinels. Because raptors occupy apex trophic positions of tropical terrestrial food webs, they provide a unique biomagnification profile relative to avian piscivores and invertivores. Raptors often bioaccumulate elevated Hg concentrations in both temperate and tropical biomes (DeSorbo et al. 2018; Bourbour et al. 2016; Keyel et al. 2020), and have repeatedly served as focal organisms for Hg assessments in Latin America (Shrum 2009; Elliott et al. 2015; Canham et al. 2020; Balza et al. 2021). Following the relationships illustrated for temperate raptors (Bourbour et al. 2016; Keyel et al. 2020), larger Neotropical raptors in Accipitridae (hawks, eagles, and kites) that hunt primarily granivorous or frugivorous prey groups such as rodents, primates, and sloths, would not be expected to bioaccumulate elevated Hg concentrations due to the low trophic positions of their preferred prey items. However, members of Falconidae (falcons and caracaras) that scavenge marine carrion (Balza et al. 2021), or hunt birds, bats, lizards, or insects are more likely to experience increased biomagnification. For example, the opportunistic ant-following, and primarily bird- and insect-eating, Micrastur ruficollis and Micrastur gilvicollis (barred and lined forest-falcons; Oniki and Willis 1972) exhibited the highest feather THg concentrations among raptor species sampled in Madre de Dios, Peru (Shrum 2009; Figs. 4, S5). While raptors are generally sparsely-populated, difficult to capture, and maintain much larger home ranges than songbirds, baited traps can be an effective way of assessing apex biomagnification and intra-taxonomic variation within this clade across large spatial scales of interest (Bloom et al. 2007; Shrum 2009).

Deriving Hg effect concentrations in wild bird populations is most feasible for species that can be efficiently accessed and sampled relative to more cryptic nesters. These can include cavity-nesting species that utilize man-made nest boxes (Brasso and Cristol 2008; Jackson et al. 2011), colonial-nesting species (King et al. 1991; Henny et al. 2002; Hill et al. 2008), or species that are easily observed and tracked over time (Evers et al. 2008). Therefore, obligate or opportunistic cavity-nesting piscivores and invertivores, including members of Alcedinidae (kingfishers), Momotidae (motmots), Hirundinidae (swallows), Furnariidae (ovenbirds), and Troglodytidae (wrens)—as well as colonial-nesting piscivores, including members of Ardeidae (herons)—could make ideal candidate species for monitoring Hg impacts to avian health in the Neotropics.

The Tropical Research for Avian Conservation & Ecotoxicology (TRACE) Initiative

Mercury biomonitoring efforts over the past century have pursued divergent sampling strategies and focal species (including this study), while neglecting the most biologically-rich regions on the planet. These decisions have limited our ability to make meaningful comparisons across respective datasets and biological realms. Therefore, the field of ecotoxicology stands to benefit greatly from a coordinated effort that aims to resolve current uncertainties by overcoming previous methodological inconsistencies. We offer potential solutions in the form of (1) a consolidated bird sampling protocol for Hg analysis (Evers et al. 2021), and (2) an international, collaborative data-sharing platform known as the Tropical Research for Avian Conservation and Ecotoxicology (TRACE) Initiative (https://www.briwildlife.org/TRACE). TRACE builds upon the international collaborations responsible for generating the data we showcase in this manuscript, and offers a framework for a variety of researchers and stakeholders to interact (e.g., local, state, and federal governmental agencies, nongovernmental conservation organizations, academic institutions, natural history museums, trace element laboratories, and local communities). Our bird Hg sampling protocol provides a meaningful complement to this platform and a set of instructions to standardize focal species and sampling tissue selection, as well as data management practices, among adjacent ecotoxicological research efforts (Evers et al. 2021). By synchronizing these efforts, we can effectively maximize the comparability of data across time and space, and minimize the redundant use of resources to achieve intended research goals.

Notably, TRACE also provides an opportunity to dismantle systemic barriers and colonialist precedents within the field of Neotropical ornithology (van Deelen 2022; Ruelas Inzunza et al. 2023; Soares et al. 2023). Fundamental to the TRACE Initiative is to distance ourselves from “parachute science,” where researchers from the Global North exploit local knowledge in the Global South to collect data, and return to Western societies to disseminate their findings via inaccessible communication outlets (e.g., for-profit journals)—all without involving local stakeholders in the scientific process (Asase et al. 2022). Therefore, through an equitable exchange of expertise, funding, resources, data, and authorship among collaborators, TRACE can: (1) generate crucial research capacity and leadership opportunities in tropical nations, which are disproportionately impacted by environmental crises, and (2) produce standardized information on the prevalence, distribution, toxicokinetics, and biogeochemistry of Hg—using birds as a convenient, ecologically-important, and charismatic proxy. Ultimately, we aim to broadly disseminate this standardized information to empower local communities and inform national and international policies, including those coordinated by Parties of the United Nations Minamata Convention on Mercury.

Conclusion

This synthesis provides unprecedented baseline knowledge of Neotropical bird Hg exposure and is a valuable first step in improving our understanding of how Hg could potentially impact avian health and productivity throughout Central America, South America, and the West Indies. Given the limited spatial density and extent of these data, we cannot expect our findings to be representative of the entire Neotropical realm. However, we highlight that Hg exposure to avian communities extends well beyond pollution hotspots and illustrate the general ubiquity of this heavy metal across Neotropical regions. Due to the previously mounting uncertainty surrounding avian Hg exposure in the Neotropics, recent, and otherwise comprehensive, publications on Neotropical bird declines have not acknowledged Hg as a potential stressor (Robinson 1999, 2001; Sigel et al. 2006; Latta et al. 2011; Blake and Loiselle 2015; Boyle and Sigel 2015; Powell et al. 2015; Stouffer et al. 2020; Sherry 2021; Pollock et al. 2022). We believe that our findings merit the consideration of Hg emission, deposition, methylation, and biomagnification when setting priorities for tropical avian conservation and management, and more broadly, defining global biodiversity targets (Mueller et al. 2022; Sigmund et al. 2022).

With the exception of Barbados, Belize, French Guiana, Guatemala, Grenada, Haiti, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, and Trinidad and Tobago, all Neotropical nations have acceded or ratified both the UN Convention on Biological Diversity and the Minamata Convention on Mercury (CBD Secretariat 2021; MCM 2021). As such, there is overwhelming support to understand how Hg impacts public health, ecosystem function, and biodiversity conservation. While international agreements provide the framework and capacity to implement solutions, birds—as indicators of ecosystem health—offer the ideal sampling foci to generate crucial information on this accelerating issue across the Pantropical realm.

Appendix 1. Supplementary materials

Supplementary materials include figures displaying mean THg concentrations among avian trophic niches, primary habitat associations, orders, families, species, and sampling sites (Figs. S1–6); predicted THg concentrations among sites (Fig. S7); and predicted seasonal THg concentrations among trophic niches (Fig. S8); tables displaying publications that report Hg exposure to birds in the Neotropics (Table S1); mean THg concentrations among countries, sites, trophic niches, primary habitat associations, and taxonomy (Tables S2, S6–8); taxonomic, foraging guild, primary habitat, and migratory classifications assigned to sampled bird species (Table S3); model selection and analysis of variance results (Tables S4–5); an inferential flowchart for tissue selection (Table S9); and potential avian sentinel species (Table S10).

Supplementary information

10646_2023_2706_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.7MB, pdf)

SupplementaryMaterials_NeotropicalBirdHgSynthesis

Acknowledgements

We would first like to thank Jacob Socolar for publishing an open-access version of the Parker et al. (1996) dataset, Marshall Illiff and Jacob Socolar for providing taxonomic resources and expertise, and Eliot Miller for offering assistance in determining trophic niche information. We thank William Hopping, Jay McGowan, Eliot Miller, and Camila Gomez Montes for their advice in selecting appropriate sentinel species; Sarah Dzielski, William Hopping, Robert Wiebe, and Samantha Hagler for providing relevant literature; Benjamin Tonelli for assistance generating hexagonal grids; and Madeline Reed for offering constructive feedback on the manuscript. We especially thank Gaetan Dupont for providing the inspiration for the TRACE acronym. Lastly, we thank three anonymous reviewers, the Associate Editor, and Editor-in-Chief for granting us the opportunity to improve this manuscript via their constructive feedback.

Author contributions

CRediT author statement: Conceptualization: CJS, DCE, VR, OPL, THT; Validation: CJS; Formal analysis: CJS, VR, EA; Investigation: CJS, DCE, EA, CMV, JNP, VT, KR, OPL, AAA, RC, SR, WM, GW, KH, MT, DT, WJA, MAT, MW, GE, CEM, JG, VS, RPP, HY, MEHB, PLS, STS, KV, FFF, MRC, AEM, RJT; Resources: CJS, DCE, CMV, JNP, KR, OPL, AAA, WM, KH, WJA, MAT, MW, GE, CEM, JG, PLS, FFF, AEM; Data curation: CJS, CMV, JNP, KR, OPL, RC, SR, WM, GW, WJA, MAT, MW, GE, CEM, JG, VS, RPP, HY, MEHB, PLS, STS, KV, FFF, AEM, RJT; Writing—original draft: CJS; Writing—review & editing: CJS, DCE, VR, EA, CMV, KR, THT, WJA, CEM, JG, AEM, ESB, LEF; Visualization: CJS; Supervision: DCE, VR, EA, AEM, ESB, THT, LEF; Project administration: CJS, DCE, VR, CMV, JNP, VT, OPL, AAA, KH, WJA, MW, GE, CEM, JG, KV, MRC, AEM, ESB, LEF; Funding acquisition: DCE, VR, KH, WJA, MW, GE, CEM, JG, PLS, MRC, AEM, ESB, LEF.

Funding

This work was supported by the Kristen Rupert & John Foote Undergraduate Research Grant and Experiential Learning Grant at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Jonathan Frazen Fellowship at Los Amigos Bird Observatory—Amazon Conservation; Tambopata Reserve Society (TReeS) Scholarship; USGS Water, Energy, and Biogeochemical Budgets (WEBB) program; USGS Toxic Substances Hydrology Program; NSF award #DEB-1457805; NSF Luquillo Critical Zone Observatory award #EAR-1331841; USDA Forest Service International Institute of Tropical Forestry International Cooperation Unit and Wildlife Ecology Program; Santo Domingo Urban Long-term Research Area (ULTRA) Program; Instituto Tecnológico de Santo Domingo; USAID/Dominican Republic PAPA No. AEG-T-00-07-00003-00; USAID/Nicaragua PASA No. 524-P-00-00-07-00007-00; and International Bird of Prey Trust.

Data availability

All data and software curated for this research are archived and available at https://github.com/csayers2/Neotropical-Bird-Hg-Synthesis.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethics

Sampling was conducted with annual authorization from the Belize Forest Department (FD/WL/1/21 [19]), Peruvian Ministry of the Environment (SERFOR) (117-20[06–12]-056), as well as Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUC) of Clemson University, California State University, Long Beach (2019-032-FLD), University of Missouri, St. Louis (#1208181-4), and Washington University in St. Louis (#21-0084).

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10646-023-02706-y.

References

  1. Abeysinghe KS, Qiu G, Goodale E, et al. Mercury flow through an Asian rice-based food web. Environ Pollut. 2017;229:219–228. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.05.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ackerman JT, Overton CT, Casazza ML, et al. Does mercury contamination reduce body condition of endangered California clapper rails? Environ Pollut. 2012;162:439–448. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ackerman JT, Herzog MP, Schwarzbach SE. Methylmercury is the predominant form of mercury in bird eggs: a synthesis. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47:2052–2060. doi: 10.1021/es304385y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ackerman JT, Eagles-Smith CA, Herzog MP, et al. Avian mercury exposure and toxicological risk across western North America: a synthesis. Sci Total Environ. 2016;568:749–769. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ackerman JT, Hartman CA, Herzog MP. Mercury contamination in resident and migrant songbirds and potential effects on body condition. Environ Pollut. 2019;246:797–810. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ackerman JT, Eagles-Smith CA, Herzog MP, Hartman CA. Maternal transfer of contaminants in birds: mercury and selenium concentrations in parents and their eggs. Environ Pollut. 2016;210:145–154. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Adams EM, Sauer AK, Lane O, et al. The effects of climate, habitat, and trophic position on methylmercury bioavailability for breeding New York songbirds. Ecotoxicology. 2020;29:1843–1861. doi: 10.1007/s10646-019-02151-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Aide TM, Zimmerman JK, Pascarella JB, et al. Forest regeneration in a chronosequence of tropical abandoned pastures: implications for restoration ecology. Restor Ecol. 2000;8:328–338. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-100X.2000.80048.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Alvarez-Berríos NL, Aide TM. Corrigendum: global demand for gold is another threat for tropical forests (2014 Environ. Res. Lett. 10 014006) Environ Res Lett. 2015;10:029501. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/2/029501. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. AMAP/UNEP (Arctic Monitoring & Assessment Programme, UN Environment Programme) (2019) Technical background report for the Global Mercury Assessment 2018 technical report electronic annex. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, Oslo/UN Environment Programme, Chemicals and Health Branch, Geneva. viii + 426 pp including E-Annexes. https://www.amap.no/documents/download/3411/inline
  11. Anbazhagan V, Partheeban EC, Arumugam G, et al. (2021) Avian feathers as a biomonitoring tool to assess heavy metal pollution in a wildlife and bird sanctuary from a tropical coastal ecosystem. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 10.1007/s11356-021-13371-1 [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Andina (2015) Madre de Dios: 40 toneladas de mercurio por la minería afectan ríos. Andina. https://andina.pe/agencia/noticia-madre-dios-40-toneladas-mercurio-por-mineria-afectan-rios-548367.aspx. Accessed 9 Apr 2021
  13. Applequist H, Asbirk S, Drabæk I (1984) Mercury monitoring: mercury stability in bird feathers. Mar Pollut Bull 15:22–24. 10.1016/0025-326X(84)90419-3
  14. Arendt WJ. Open- and cavity-nesting traits merge in the evolution of an avian supertramp, the Pearly-eyed Thrasher (Margarops fuscatus) Ornitol Neotrop. 2004;15:455–465. [Google Scholar]
  15. Arendt WJ (2006) Adaptations of an avian supertramp: distribution, ecology, and life history of the pearly-eyed thrasher (Margarops fuscatus). General Technical Report ITF-GTR-27. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, International Institute of Tropical Forestry, San Juan, Puerto Rico. p 404. https://www.fs.fed.us/global/iitf/pubs/iitf-gtr27a.pdfhttps://www.fs.fed.us/global/iitf/pubs/iitf-gtr27b.pdf
  16. Asase A, Mzumara-Gawa TI, Owino JO, et al. Replacing “parachute science” with “global science” in ecology and conservation biology. Conserv Sci Pract. 2022;4:e517. doi: 10.1111/csp2.517. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Asner GP, Tupayachi R. Accelerated losses of protected forests from gold mining in the Peruvian Amazon. Environ Res Lett. 2017;12:094004. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa7dab. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Balza U, Brasso R, Lois NA, et al. The highest mercury concentrations ever reported in a South American bird, the Striated Caracara (Phalcoboenus australis). Polar Biol. 2021;44:2189–2193. doi: 10.1007/s00300-021-02938-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Barlow J, França F, Gardner TA, et al. The future of hyperdiverse tropical ecosystems. Nature. 2018;559:517–526. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0301-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Bartoń K (2022) MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 1.46.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn
  21. Basu N, Eng JWL, Perkins M, et al. Development and application of a novel method to characterize methylmercury exposure in newborns using dried blood spots. Environ Res. 2017;159:276–282. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Beeby A. What do sentinels stand for? Environ Pollut. 2001;112:285–298. doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(00)00038-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Bierregaard RO, Jr, Lovejoy TΕ. Effects of forest fragmentation on Amazonian understory bird communities. Acta Amaz. 1989;19:215–241. doi: 10.1590/1809-43921989191241. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Bildstein KL. Raptor migration in the Neotropics: patterns, processes, and consequences. Ornitol Neotrop. 2004;15:83–99. [Google Scholar]
  25. Blake JG, Loiselle BA. Enigmatic declines in bird numbers in lowland forest of eastern Ecuador may be a consequence of climate change. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1177. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Bloom PH, Clark WS, Kidd JW (2007) Capture techniques. In: Bird DM, Bildstein KL (eds) Raptor research and management techniques. Hancock House Publishers, Surrey, British Columbia, pp 193–219
  27. Bond AL, Diamond AW. High within-individual variation in total mercury concentration in seabird feathers. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2008;27:2375–2377. doi: 10.1897/08-163.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Bortolotti GR. Flaws and pitfalls in the chemical analysis of feathers: bad news-good news for avian chemoecology and toxicology. Ecol Appl. 2010;20:1766–1774. doi: 10.1890/09-1473.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Bourbour RP, Martinico BL, Ackerman JT et al. (2016) Feather mercury concentrations in North American raptors sampled at migration monitoring stations. Ecotoxicology 28:379–391. 10.1007/s10646-019-02016-2 [DOI] [PubMed]
  30. BOW (Birds of the World) (2022) https://birdsoftheworld.org/. Accessed 31 Oct 2022
  31. Boyle WA, Sigel BJ. Ongoing changes in the avifauna of La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica: twenty-three years of Christmas Bird Counts. Biol Conserv. 2015;188:11–21. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Brasso R, Rittenhouse KA, Winder VL. Do songbirds in wetlands show higher mercury bioaccumulation relative to conspecifics in non-wetland habitats? Ecotoxicology. 2020;29:1183–1194. doi: 10.1007/s10646-020-02160-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Brasso RL, Cristol DA. Effects of mercury exposure on the reproductive success of tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) Ecotoxicology. 2008;17:133–141. doi: 10.1007/s10646-007-0163-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Braune BM, Gaskin DE. A mercury budget for the Bonaparte’s gull during autumn moult. Ornis Scand. 1987;18:244–250. doi: 10.2307/3676891. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Breed MD, Moore J (2016) Comparative social behavior. In: Breed MD, Moore J (eds) Animal Behavior, Second Edition. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 459–497
  36. Briggs VS, Mazzotti FJ, Harvey RG, et al. Conceptual ecological model of the Chiquibul/Maya Mountain Massif, Belize. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2013;19:317–340. doi: 10.1080/10807039.2012.685809. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Brooks ME, Kristensen K, van Benthem KJ, et al. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J. 2017;9(2):378–400. doi: 10.32614/RJ-2017-066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Burger J. Metals in avian feathers: bioindicators of environmental pollution. Rev Environ Toxicol. 1993;5:203–311. [Google Scholar]
  39. Burger J. Ecological effects and biomonitoring for mercury in tropical ecosystems. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1997;97:265–272. doi: 10.1023/A:1018363108495. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Burger J, Gochfeld M. Lead, mercury, and cadmium in feathers of tropical terns in Puerto Rico and Australia. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1991;21:311–315. doi: 10.1007/BF01055351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Burger J, Parsons K, Benson T, et al. Heavy metal and selenium levels in young cattle egrets from nesting colonies in the northeastern United States, Puerto Rico, and Egypt. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1992;23:435–439. doi: 10.1007/BF00203806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York. 10.1007/b97636
  43. Caballero-Espejo J, Messinger M, Román-Dañobeytia F, et al. Deforestation and forest degradation due to gold mining in the Peruvian Amazon: a 34-year perspective. Remote Sens. 2018;10:1–17. doi: 10.3390/rs10121903. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Canham R, González-Prieto AM, Elliott JE. Mercury exposure and toxicological consequences in fish and fish-eating wildlife from anthropogenic activity in Latin America. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2020;0:1–14. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Carravieri A, Bustamante P, Churlaud C, et al. Moulting patterns drive within-individual variations of stable isotopes and mercury in seabird body feathers: implications for monitoring of the marine environment. Mar Biol. 2014;161:963–968. doi: 10.1007/s00227-014-2394-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Chai P. Hummingbird hovering energetics during moult of the primary feathers. J Exp Biol. 1997;200:1527–1536. doi: 10.1242/jeb.200.10.1527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Chai P, Dudley R. Maximum flight performance of hummingbirds: Capacities, constraints, and trade-offs. Am Nat. 1999;153:398–411. doi: 10.1086/303179. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Chaudhuri SN, Butala SJM, Ball RW, et al. Pilot study for utilization of dried blood spots for screening of lead, mercury and cadmium in newborns. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2009;19:298–316. doi: 10.1038/jes.2008.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Chumchal MM, Beaubien GB, Drenner RW et al. (2022) Use of Riparian Spiders as Sentinels of Persistent and Bioavailable Chemical Contaminants in Aquatic Ecosystems: A Review. Environ Toxicol Chem 41:499–514. 10.1002/etc.5267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  50. Clements JF, Schulenberg TS, Iliff MJ, Fredericks TA, Gerbracht JA, Lepage D, Billerman SM, Sullivan BL, Wood CL (2022) The eBird/Clements Checklist of Birds of the World: v2022. The Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca. https://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/download/
  51. Collyns D (2019) Inside La Pampa: the illegal mining city Peru is trying to wipe out. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2019/mar/25/la-pampa-the-illegal-mining-city-peru-wants-wiped-out
  52. Convention on Biological Diversity Secretariat (2021) List of Profiles. https://www.cbd.int/information/parties.shtml. Accessed 1 Nov 2021
  53. Cornec JH (2010) Gold potential of the Maya Mountains: Belize’s best kept secret? https://ambergriscaye.com/art/pdfs/Gold_Potential_of_the_Maya_Mountains-2010.pdf. Accessed 26 Sept 2021
  54. Cristol DA, Evers DC. The impact of mercury on North American songbirds: effects, trends, and predictive factors. Ecotoxicology. 2020;29:1107–1116. doi: 10.1007/s10646-020-02280-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Cristol DA, Brasso RL, Condon AM, et al. The movement of aquatic mercury through terrestrial food webs. Science. 2008;320:335. doi: 10.1126/science.1154082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Damonte G, de Mesquita M, Pachas V, et al. (2013) Small-scale gold mining and social and environmental conflict in the Peruvian Amazon. In: Cremers L, Kolen J, de Theije M (eds) Small-scale gold mining in the Amazon. CEDLA, Amsterdam, pp 68–84
  57. Depew DC, Basu N, Burgess NM, et al. Toxicity of dietary methylmercury to fish: derivation of ecologically meaningful threshold concentrations. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2012;31:1536–1547. doi: 10.1002/etc.1859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. DeSorbo CR, Burgess NM, Todd CS et al. (2018) Mercury concentrations in bald eagles across an impacted watershed in Maine, USA. Sci Total Environ 627:1515–1527. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.023 [DOI] [PubMed]
  59. Devito KJ, Hill AR. Sulphate mobilization and pore water chemistry in relation to groundwater hydrology and summer drought in two conifer swamps on the Canadian shield. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1999;113:97–114. doi: 10.1023/A:1005081505086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Dietz R, Sonne C, Basu N, et al. What are the toxicological effects of mercury in Arctic biota? Sci Total Environ. 2013;443:775–790. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Dietz R, Fort J, Sonne C, et al. A risk assessment of the effects of mercury on Baltic Sea, Greater North Sea, and North Atlantic wildlife, fish and bivalves. Environ Int. 2021;146:106178. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Diringer SE, Feingold BJ, Ortiz EJ, et al. River transport of mercury from artisanal and small-scale gold mining and risks for dietary mercury exposure in Madre de Dios, Peru. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2015;17:478–487. doi: 10.1039/c4em00567h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Dzielski SA, Razavi NR, Twining CW, et al. (2019) Reconstructing avian mercury concentrations through time using museum specimens from New York State. Ecotoxicology. 10.1007/s10646-019-02123-0 [DOI] [PubMed]
  64. Eagles-Smith CA, Ackerman JT, Adelsbach TL, et al. Mercury correlations among six tissues for four waterbird species breeding in San Francisco Bay, California, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2008;27:2136–2153. doi: 10.1897/08-038.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Eagles-Smith CA, Ackerman JT, Yee J, Adelsbach TL. Mercury demethylation in waterbird livers: dose-response thresholds and differences among species. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2009;28:568–577. doi: 10.1897/08-245.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Edelman A, Gedling A, Konovalov E, et al. (2014) State of the Tropics: 2014 Report. James Cook University, Cairns
  67. Edmonds ST, Evers DC, Cristol DA, et al. Geographic and seasonal variation in mercury exposure of the declining Rusty Blackbird. Condor. 2010;112:789–799. doi: 10.1525/cond.2010.100145. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Egwumah F, Egwumah P, Edet D. Paramount roles of wild birds as bioindicators of contamination. Int J Avian Wildl Biol. 2017;2:194–199. doi: 10.15406/ijawb.2017.02.00041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Eimers MC, Dillon PJ, Schiff SL, Jeffries DS. The effects of drying and re-wetting and increased temperature on sulfate release from upland and wetland material. Soil Biol Biochem. 2003;35:1663–1673. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.08.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Elliott JE, Kirk DA, Elliott KH, et al. Mercury in forage fish from Mexico and Central America: implications for fish-eating birds. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2015;69:375–389. doi: 10.1007/s00244-015-0188-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Escobar H. Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon is still rising sharply. Science. 2020;369:613. doi: 10.1126/science.369.6504.613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Espín S, García-Fernández AJ, Herzke D et al. (2016) Tracking pan-continental trends in environmental contamination using sentinel raptors—what types of samples should we use? Ecotoxicology 25:777–801. 10.1007/s10646-016-1636-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  73. Evers DC, Burgess NM, Champoux L, et al. Patterns and interpretation of mercury exposure in freshwater avian communities in northeastern North America. Ecotoxicology. 2005;14:193–221. doi: 10.1007/s10646-004-6269-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Evers DC, Williams KA, Meyer MW, et al. Spatial gradients of methylmercury for breeding common loons in the Laurentian Great Lakes region. Ecotoxicology. 2011;20:1609–1625. doi: 10.1007/s10646-011-0753-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Evers DC, Schmutz JA, Basu N, et al. Historic and contemporary mercury exposure and potential risk to yellow-billed loons (Gavia adamsii) breeding in Alaska and Canada. Waterbirds. 2014;37:147–159. doi: 10.1675/063.037.sp117. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Evers DC (2018) The effects of methylmercury on wildlife: a comprehensive review and approach for interpretation. In: Dellasala DA, Goldstein MI (eds) Encyclopedia of the anthropocene, vol. 5. Elsevier, New York, pp 181–194
  77. Evers DC, Ackerman JT, Akerblom S, et al. (2023) Global mercury concentrations in biota: Their use as a basis for a global biomonitoring framework. Ecotoxicology THIS ISSUE [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  78. Evers DC, Savoy LJ, DeSorbo CR et al. (2008) Adverse effects from environmental mercury loads on breeding common loons. Ecotoxicology 17:69–81. 10.1007/s10646-007-0168-7 [DOI] [PubMed]
  79. Evers DC, Savoy LJ, DeSorbo CR, Regan K, Persico C, Sayers CJ II (2021) Bird field sampling methods: collection of tissues for mercury analysis. Report BRI 2021-03, Biodiversity Research Institute, Portland, Maine. https://briwildlife.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Bird-Field-Sampling-Methods.pdf
  80. Evers DC, Sunderland E (2019) Technical Information Report on Mercury Monitoring in Biota: Proposed components towards a strategic long-term plan for monitoring mercury in fish and wildlife globally. UN Environment Programme, Chemicals Branch, Geneva
  81. Fagan J, Komar O (2016) Peterson Field Guide to Birds of Northern Central America. Mariner Books, Boston
  82. Fort J, Robertson GJ, Grémillet D, et al. Spatial ecotoxicology: migratory arctic seabirds are exposed to mercury contamination while overwintering in the northwest Atlantic. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48:11560–11567. doi: 10.1021/es504045g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Fox J, Weisberg S (2019) An R companion to applied regression. Third Edition. Sage, Thousand Oaks. https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion/
  84. Fraser A, Dastoor A, Ryjkov A. How important is biomass burning in Canada to mercury contamination? Atmos Chem Phys. 2018;18:7263–7286. doi: 10.5194/acp-18-7263-2018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  85. Fuchsman PC, Brown LE, Henning MH, et al. Toxicity reference values for methylmercury effects on avian reproduction: critical review and analysis. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2017;36:294–319. doi: 10.1002/etc.3606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Furness RW, Muirhead SJ, Woodburn M. Using bird feathers to measure mercury in the environment: relationships between mercury content and moult. Mar Pollut Bull. 1986;17:27–30. doi: 10.1016/0025-326X(86)90801-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  87. Furness RW, Greenwood JD (1993) Birds as monitors of environmental change. Springer, Dordrecht. 10.1007/978-94-015-1322-7
  88. Gardner TA, Barlow J, Araujo IS, et al. The cost-effectiveness of biodiversity surveys in tropical forests. Ecol Lett. 2008;11:139–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01133.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Garrigues R, Dean R (2014) The birds of Costa Rica: a field guide, 2nd edn. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
  90. Gerson JR, Topp SN, Vega CM, et al. Artificial lake expansion amplifies mercury pollution from gold mining. Sci Adv. 2020;6:1–8. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd4953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Gerson JR, Szponar N, Zambrano AA, et al. Amazon forests capture high levels of atmospheric mercury pollution from artisanal gold mining. Nat Commun. 2022;13:559. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-27997-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Gloor M, Barichivich J, Ziv G, et al. Recent Amazon climate as background for possible ongoing and future changes of Amazon humid forests. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 2015;29:1384–1399. doi: 10.1002/2014GB005080. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  93. Goede AA, de Bruin M (1984) The use of bird feather parts as a monitor for metal pollution. Environ Pollut Ser B, Chem Phys 8:281–298. 10.1016/0143-148X(84)90028-4
  94. Goldberg L (1996) A history of pest control measures in the anthropology collections, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution. J Am Inst Conserv 35:23–43
  95. Guevara AR, Stiles FG (2005) Relaciones entre morfología y forrajeo de artrópodos en colibríes de bosque altoandino. Undergraduate thesis, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá
  96. Hall BD, Aiken GR, Krabbenhoft DP, et al. (2008) Wetlands as principal zones of methylmercury production in southern Louisiana and the Gulf of Mexico region. Environ Pollut. 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.12.017 [DOI] [PubMed]
  97. Hambly C, Harper EJ, Speakman JR. The energetic cost of variations in wing span and wing asymmetry in the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata. J Exp Biol. 2004;207:3977–3984. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Hamer KC, Newton RJ, Edwards FA, et al. Impacts of selective logging on insectivorous birds in Borneo: the importance of trophic position, body size and foraging height. Biol Conserv. 2015;188:82–88. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  99. Hardesty JL (2008) Seasonality in equatorial cloud forest birds. Dissertation, Duke University, Durham
  100. Henny CJ, Hill EF, Hoffman DJ, et al. Nineteenth century mercury: hazard to wading birds and cormorants of the Carson River, Nevada. Ecotoxicology. 2002;11:213–231. doi: 10.1023/A:1016327602656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Herring G, Eagles-Smith CA, Ackerman JT (2017) Mercury exposure may influence fluctuating asymmetry in waterbirds. Environ Toxicol Chem 36:1599–1605. 10.1002/etc.3688 [DOI] [PubMed]
  102. Herring G, Gawlik DE, Rumbold DG (2009) Feather mercury concentrations and physiological condition of great egret and white ibis nestlings in the Florida Everglades. Sci Total Environ 407:2641–2649. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.12.043 [DOI] [PubMed]
  103. Hill EF, Henny CJ, Grove RA. Mercury and drought along the lower Carson River, Nevada: II. Snowy egret and black-crowned night-heron reproduction on Lahontan Reservoir, 1997–2006. Ecotoxicology. 2008;17:117–131. doi: 10.1007/s10646-007-0180-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Hobson KA, Wassenaar LI, Milá B, et al. Stable isotopes as indicators of altitudinal distributions and movements in an Ecuadorean hummingbird community. Oecologia. 2003;136:302–308. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1271-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Horvat M, Byrne AR. Preliminary study of the effects of some physical parameters on the stability of methylmercury in biological samples. Analyst. 1992;117:665–668. doi: 10.1039/an9921700665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Hsiung AC, Boyle WA, Cooper RJ, Chandler RB. Altitudinal migration: ecological drivers, knowledge gaps, and conservation implications. Biol Rev. 2018;93:2049–2070. doi: 10.1111/brv.12435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Inzunza ER, Cockle KL, Núñez Montellano MG, et al. How to include and recognize the work of ornithologists based in the Neotropics: Fourteen actions for Ornithological Applications, Ornithology, and other global-scope journals. Ornithol Appl. 2023;125:duac047. doi: 10.1093/ornithapp/duac047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  108. Jackson A, Evers DC, Eagles-Smith CA, et al. Mercury risk to avian piscivores across western United States and Canada. Sci Total Environ. 2016;568:685–696. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Jackson AK, Evers DC, Etterson MA, et al. Mercury exposure affects the reproductive success of a free-living terrestrial songbird, the Carolina wren (Thryothorus ludovicianus) Auk. 2011;128:759–769. doi: 10.1525/auk.2011.11106. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  110. Jackson AK, Evers DC, Adams EM, et al. Songbirds as sentinels of mercury in terrestrial habitats of eastern North America. Ecotoxicology. 2015;24:453–467. doi: 10.1007/s10646-014-1394-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Jetz W, Sekercioglu CH, Böhning-Gaese K. The worldwide variation in avian clutch size across species and space. PLoS Biol. 2008;6:e303. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Jimenez AG, Cooper-Mullin C, Calhoon EA, Williams JB. Physiological underpinnings associated with differences in pace of life and metabolic rate in north temperate and Neotropical birds. J Comp Physiol B Biochem Syst Environ Physiol. 2014;184:545–561. doi: 10.1007/s00360-014-0825-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Jirinec V, Elizondo EC, Rutt CL, Stouffer PC. Space use, diurnal movement, and roosting of a variegated ant-pitta (Grallaria varia) in central Amazonia. Ornitol Neotrop. 2018;29:13–20. doi: 10.58843/ornneo.v29i1.325. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  114. Jiskra M, Wiederhold JG, Skyllberg U, et al. Mercury deposition and re-emission pathways in boreal forest soils investigated with Hg isotope signatures. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49:7188–7196. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Jiskra M, Sonke JE, Obrist D, et al. A vegetation control on seasonal variations in global atmospheric mercury concentrations. Nat Geosci. 2018;11:244–250. doi: 10.1038/s41561-018-0078-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  116. Johnson EI, Wolfe JD, Brandt Ryder T, Pyle P. Modifications to a molt-based ageing system proposed by Wolfe et al (2010) J F Ornithol. 2011;82:422–424. doi: 10.1111/j.1557-9263.2011.00345.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  117. Johnson EI, Wolfe JD (2017) Molt in neotropical birds: life history and aging criteria, first edition. CRC Press, New York. 10.4324/9781315119755
  118. Keyel ER, Etterson MA, Niemi GJ, et al. Feather mercury increases with feeding at higher trophic levels in two species of migrant raptors, Merlin (Falco columbarius) and Sharp-shinned Hawk (Accipiter striatus) Condor. 2020;122:1–17. doi: 10.1093/condor/duz069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. King KA, Custer TW, Quinn JS. Effects of mercury, selenium, and organochlorine contaminants on reproduction of Forster’s terns and black skimmers nesting in a contaminated Texas bay. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1991;20:32–40. doi: 10.1007/BF01065325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Koenig AM, Magand O, Laj P, et al. Seasonal patterns of atmospheric mercury in tropical South America as inferred by a continuous total gaseous mercury record at Chacaltaya station (5240 m) in Bolivia. Atmos Chem Phys. 2021;21:3447–3472. doi: 10.5194/acp-21-3447-2021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  121. Kumar A, Divoll TJ, Ganguli PM, et al. Presence of artisanal gold mining predicts mercury bioaccumulation in five genera of bats (Chiroptera) Environ Pollut. 2018;236:862–870. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Lacher TE, Goldstein MI. Tropical ecotoxicology: status and needs. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1997;16:100–111. doi: 10.1897/1551-5028(1997)016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  123. Lane O, Adams EM, Pau N, et al. Long-term monitoring of mercury in adult saltmarsh sparrows breeding Maine, Massachusetts and New York, USA 2000–2017. Ecotoxicology. 2020;29:1148–1160. doi: 10.1007/s10646-020-02180-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Lane OP, O’Brien KM, Evers DC, et al. Mercury in breeding saltmarsh sparrows (Ammodramus caudacutus caudacutus) Ecotoxicology. 2011;20:1984–1991. doi: 10.1007/s10646-011-0740-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Lapola DM, Pinho P, Barlow J et al. (2023) The drivers and impacts of Amazon forest degradation. Science 379:eabp8622. 10.1126/science.abp8622 [DOI] [PubMed]
  126. Latta SC, Tinoco BA, Astudillo PX, Graham CH. Patterns and magnitude of temporal change in avian communities in the Ecuadorian Andes. Condor. 2011;113:24–40. doi: 10.1525/cond.2011.090252. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  127. Leas S (2019) Operación Mercurio 2019. Public Policy Peru. https://umdpolicyperu2016.wordpress.com/2019/04/03/operacion-mercurio-2019/. Accessed 24 January 2022
  128. Lees AC, Naka LN, Aleixo A, et al. Conducting rigorous avian inventories: Amazonian case studies and a roadmap for improvement. Rev Bras Ornitol. 2014;22:107–120. doi: 10.1007/bf03544240. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  129. Lenth R (2022) emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.8.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
  130. Li M, Kwon SY, Poulin BA, et al. Internal dynamics and metabolism of mercury in biota: a review of insights from mercury stable isotopes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022;56:9182–9195. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c08631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Lind J, Jakobsson S, Kullberg C (2010) Impaired predator evasion in the life history of birds: behavioral and physiological adaptation to reduced flight ability. In: Thompson CF (ed) Current ornithology, vol 17. Springer, New York, pp 1–30
  132. Loker WM. Where’s the beef?: incorporating cattle into sustainable agroforestry systems in the Amazon Basin. Agrofor Syst. 1994;25:227–241. doi: 10.1007/BF00707462. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  133. Lovejoy TE, Nobre C. Amazon tipping point. Sci Adv. 2018;4:eaat2340. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat2340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Low KE, Ramsden DK, Jackson AK, et al. Songbird feathers as indicators of mercury exposure: high variability and low predictive power suggest limitations. Ecotoxicology. 2020;29:1281–1292. doi: 10.1007/s10646-019-02052-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Lüdecke D. ggeffects: tidy data frames of marginal effects from regression models. J Open Sour Softw. 2018;3(26):772. doi: 10.21105/joss.00772. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  136. Ma Y, Hobson KA, Kardynal KJ, et al. Inferring spatial patterns of mercury exposure in migratory boreal songbirds: combining feather mercury and stable isotope (δ2H) measurements. Sci Total Environ. 2021;762:143109. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Ma Y, Perez CR, Branfireun BA, Guglielmo CG. Dietary exposure to methylmercury affects flight endurance in a migratory songbird. Environ Pollut. 2018;234:894–901. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Ma Y, Branfireun BA, Hobson KA, Guglielmo CG (2018a) Evidence of negative seasonal carry-over effects of breeding ground mercury exposure on survival of migratory songbirds. J Avian Biol e01656. 10.1111/jav.01656
  139. Mallory ML, Braune BM. Tracking contaminants in seabirds of Arctic Canada: temporal and spatial insights. Mar Pollut Bull. 2012;64:1475–1484. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Manzanero R (2014) Illegal Gold Panning on the Highlands of the Chiquibul/Maya Mountains. Friends for Conservation and Development, pp 1–4
  141. Markowski M, Kaliński A, Skwarska J, et al. Avian feathers as bioindicators of the exposure to heavy metal contamination of food. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2013;91:302–305. doi: 10.1007/s00128-013-1065-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Martínez AE, Pollock HS, Rodrigues PF, Touchton JM. Army-ant following in Neotropical birds: a review and prospectus. Ornithology. 2021;138:1–16. doi: 10.1093/ornithology/ukaa078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  143. Maurice-Bourgoin L, Quiroga I, Guyot JL, Malm O. Mercury pollution in the Upper Beni River. Ambio. 1999;28:302–306. [Google Scholar]
  144. Maurice-Bourgoin L, Quiroga I, Chincheros J, Courau P. Mercury distribution in waters and fishes of the upper Madeira rivers and mercury exposure in riparian Amazonian populations. Sci Total Environ. 2000;260:73–86. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00542-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. McDonald PG, Griffith SC. To pluck or not to pluck: the hidden ethical and scientific costs of relying on feathers as a primary source of DNA. J Avian Biol. 2011;42:197–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-048X.2011.05365.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  146. McNab BK. Food habits and the basal rate of metabolism in birds. Oecologia. 1988;77:343–349. doi: 10.1007/BF00378040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Mikoni NA, Poppenga R, Ackerman JT, et al. Trace element contamination in feather and tissue samples from Anna’s hummingbirds. Ecol Indic. 2017;80:96–105. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  148. Minamata Convention on Mercury (MCM) (2021) Party Profiles. https://www.mercuryconvention.org/en/parties/profiles. Accessed 1 Nov 2021
  149. Moermond TC, Denslow JS. Neotropical Avian Frugivores: patterns of behavior, morphology, and nutrition, with consequences for fruit selection. Ornithol Monogr. 1985;36:865–897. doi: 10.2307/40168322. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  150. Moreno-Palacios M, Losada-Prado S, Echeverry-Gálvis MÁ. Duration and intensity of primary molt in two neotropical grasslands Passerines. Caldasia. 2018;40:27–40. doi: 10.15446/caldasia.v40n1.68817. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  151. Mueller LK, Ågerstrand M, Backhaus T, et al. Policy options to account for multiple chemical pollutants threatening biodiversity. Environ Sci Adv. 2022;2:151–161. doi: 10.1039/d2va00257d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  152. Nature Take action to stop Amazon fires. Nature. 2019;573:163. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-02615-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Nriagu J, Becker C. Volcanic emissions of mercury to the atmosphere: global and regional inventories. Sci Total Environ. 2003;304:3–12. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00552-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Nyanza EC, Dewey D, Bernier F, et al. Validation of dried blood spots for maternal biomonitoring of nonessential elements in an artisanal and small-scale gold mining area of Tanzania. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2019;38:1285–1293. doi: 10.1002/etc.4420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Obrist D. Atmospheric mercury pollution due to losses of terrestrial carbon pools. Biogeochemistry. 2007;85:119–123. doi: 10.1007/s10533-007-9108-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  156. Obrist D, Kirk JL, Zhang L, et al. A review of global environmental mercury processes in response to human and natural perturbations: changes of emissions, climate, and land use. Ambio. 2018;47:116–140. doi: 10.1007/s13280-017-1004-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Ogle SM, Alsaker C, Baldock J, et al. Climate and soil characteristics determine where no-till management can store Carbon in soils and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47861-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Oniki Y, Willis EO (1972) Studies of Ant-Following Birds North of the Eastern Amazon. Acta Amaz 2:127–151. 10.1590/1809-43921972022127
  159. Parker III TA, Stotz DF, Fitzpatrick JW (1996) Ecological and distributional databases for Neotropical birds. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. ISBN: 9780226646763
  160. Parolini M, Sturini M, Maraschi F, et al. Trace elements fingerprint of feathers differs between breeding and non-breeding areas in an Afro-Palearctic migratory bird, the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica) Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28:15828–15837. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11597-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Paul E (2005) A guide to the permits and procedures for importing bird products into the United States for scientific research and display. Ornithol. Counc. 1–97
  162. Paxton EH, Durst SL, Sogge MK, et al. Survivorship across the annual cycle of a migratory passerine, the willow flycatcher. J Avian Biol. 2017;48:1126–1131. doi: 10.1111/jav.01371. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  163. Peña-Claros M, Nobre C (2023) A regional approach to save the Amazon. Science 381:1261. 10.1126/science.adk8794 [DOI] [PubMed]
  164. Perkins M, Basu N. Dried blood spots for estimating mercury exposure in birds. Environ Pollut. 2018;236:236–246. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Perkins M, Lane OP, Evers DC, et al. Historical patterns in mercury exposure for North American songbirds. Ecotoxicology. 2020;29:1161–1173. doi: 10.1007/s10646-019-02054-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Peterson SH, Ackerman JT, Toney M, Herzog MP. Mercury concentrations vary within and among individual bird feathers: a critical evaluation and guidelines for feather use in mercury monitoring programs. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2019;38:1164–1187. doi: 10.1002/etc.4430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Pigot AL, Sheard C, Miller ET, et al. Macroevolutionary convergence connects morphological form to ecological function in birds. Nat Ecol Evol. 2020;4:230–239. doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-1070-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Pollock HS, Toms JD, Tarwater CE, et al. Long-term monitoring reveals widespread and severe declines of understory birds in a protected Neotropical forest. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2022;119:e2108731119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2108731119/-/DCSupplemental.Published. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Powell LL, Cordeiro NJ, Stratford JA. Ecology and conservation of avian insectivores of the rainforest understory: a pantropical perspective. Biol Conserv. 2015;188:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  170. Powell S. How much do army ants eat? On the prey intake of a Neotropical top-predator. Insectes Sociaux. 2011;58:317–324. doi: 10.1007/s00040-011-0152-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  171. Purvis A, Gittleman JL, Cowlishaw G, Mace GM. Predicting extinction risk in declining species. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2000;267:1947–1952. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Pyle P, Tranquillo K, Kayano K, Arcilla N. Molt patterns, age criteria, and molt-breeding dynamics in American Samoan land birds. Wilson J Ornithol. 2016;128:56–59. doi: 10.1676/wils-128-01-56-69.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  173. Pyle P (1997) Identification guide to North American birds. Slate Creek Press, Bolinas
  174. Quiñones, FA (2018). Birds of Colombia. Panamericana Formas e Impresos S.A., Bogota, Colombia
  175. R Core Team (2022). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/
  176. Rath T (2016) In Belize, All That Is Gold Does not Glitter: The looting, desecration and annexation of the Chiquibul Forest in Belize, Central America. Maptia. https://maptia.com/tonyrath/stories/in-belize-all-that-is-gold-does-not-glitter. Accessed 26 Sept 2021
  177. Remsen JV., Jr Use and misuse of bird lists in community ecology and conservation. Auk. 1994;111:225–227. doi: 10.2307/4088531. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  178. Remsen JV, Jr, Stiles FG, Scott P. Frequency of arthropods in stomachs of Tropical hummingbirds. Auk. 1986;103:436–441. doi: 10.1093/auk/103.2.436. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  179. Rimmer CC, Mcfarland KP, Evers DC, et al. Mercury concentrations in Bicknell’s thrush and other insectivorous passerines in montane forests of Northeastern North America. Ecotoxicology. 2005;14:223–240. doi: 10.1007/s10646-004-6270-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Roberts DL, Cooper RJ, Petit LJ. Flock characteristics of ant-following birds in premontane moist forest and coffee agroecosystems. Ecol Appl. 2000;10:1414–1425. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1414:FCOAFB]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  181. Robinson WD. Long-term changes in the avifauna of Barro Colorado Island, Panama, a tropical forest isolate. Conserv Biol. 1999;13:85–97. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97492.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  182. Robinson WD. Changes in abundance of birds in a Neotropical forest fragment over 25 years: a review. Anim Biodivers Conserv. 2001;24:51–65. [Google Scholar]
  183. Rohwer S, Butler L, Froehlich D (2005) Ecology and demography of east-west differences in molt scheduling of Neotropical migrant passerines. In: Greenburg R, Marra P (eds) Birds of two worlds: the ecology and evolution of migration. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 87–105
  184. Rosenberg KV, Dokter AM, Blancher PJ, et al. Decline of the North American avifauna. Science. 2019;366:120–124. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw1313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Rushing CS, Hostetler JA, Sillett TS, et al. Spatial and temporal drivers of avian population dynamics across the annual cycle. Ecology. 2017;98:2837–2850. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Rutkiewicz J, Nam DH, Cooley T, et al. Mercury exposure and neurochemical impacts in bald eagles across several Great Lakes states. Ecotoxicology. 2011;20:1669–1676. doi: 10.1007/s10646-011-0730-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Saginor I, Gazel E, Condie C, et al. Evolution of geochemical variations along the Central American volcanic front. Geochemistry. Geophys Geosyst. 2013;14:4504–4522. doi: 10.1002/ggge.20259. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  188. Sampaio G, Nobre C, Costa MH, et al. Regional climate change over eastern Amazonia caused by pasture and soybean cropland expansion. Geophys Res Lett. 2007;34:1–7. doi: 10.1029/2007GL030612. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  189. Santa-Rios A, Barst BD, Tejeda-Benitez L, et al. Dried blood spots to characterize mercury speciation and exposure in a Colombian artisanal and small-scale gold mining community. Chemosphere. 2021;266:129001. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Sayers CJ, II, Roeder MR, Forrette LM, et al. Geographic variation of mercury in breeding tidal marsh sparrows of the northeastern United States. Ecotoxicology. 2021;30:1929–1940. doi: 10.1007/s10646-021-02461-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Scheuhammer A, Braune B, Chan HM, et al. Recent progress on our understanding of the biological effects of mercury in fish and wildlife in the Canadian Arctic. Sci Total Environ. 2015;509–510:91–103. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. Scheuhammer AM, Basu N, Burgess NM, et al. Relationships among mercury, selenium, and neurochemical parameters in common loons (Gavia immer) and bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) Ecotoxicology. 2008;17:93–101. doi: 10.1007/s10646-007-0170-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Schulenberg TS, Stotz DF, Lane DF, O’Neill JP, Parker TA III (2010) Birds of Peru, revised and updated edition. Princeton University Press, Princeton
  194. Schwartz FW, Lee S, Darrah TH. A review of the scope of artisanal and small-scale mining worldwide, poverty, and the associated health impacts. GeoHealth. 2021;5:e2020GH00032. doi: 10.1029/2020GH000325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  195. Seewagen CL. Threats of environmental mercury to birds: knowledge gaps and priorities for future research. Bird Conserv Int. 2010;20:112–123. doi: 10.1017/S095927090999030X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  196. Seewagen CL. The threat of global mercury pollution to bird migration: potential mechanisms and current evidence. Ecotoxicology. 2020;29:1254–1267. doi: 10.1007/s10646-018-1971-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. Shanley JB, Marvin-DiPasquale M, Lane O, et al. Resolving a paradox—high mercury deposition, but low bioaccumulation in northeastern Puerto Rico. Ecotoxicology. 2020;29:1207–1220. doi: 10.1007/s10646-019-02108-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  198. Sherry TW. Sensitivity of tropical insectivorous birds to the anthropocene: a review of multiple mechanisms and conservation implications. Front Ecol Evol. 2021;9:1–20. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.662873. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  199. Shi Y, Zhao A, Matsunaga T, et al. High-resolution inventory of mercury emissions from biomass burning in tropical continents during 2001–2017. Sci Total Environ. 2019;653:638–648. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  200. Shoari N, Dubé JS. Toward improved analysis of concentration data: embracing nondetects. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2018;37:643–656. doi: 10.1002/etc.4046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  201. Shrum PL (2009) Analysis of mercury and lead in birds of prey from gold mining areas of the Peruvian Amazon. Thesis, Clemson University, Clemson
  202. Sierra-Marquez L, Peñuela-Gomez S, Franco-Espinosa L et al. (2018) Mercury levels in birds and small rodents from Las Orquideas National Natural Park, Colombia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:35055–35063. 10.1007/s11356-018-3359-2 [DOI] [PubMed]
  203. Sigel BJ, Sherry TW, Young BE. Avian community response to lowland tropical rainforest isolation: 40 years of change at La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica. Conserv Biol. 2006;20:111–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00293.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Sigmund G, Ågerstrand M, Brodin T et al. (2022) Broaden chemicals scope in biodiversity targets. Science 376:1280. 10.1126/science.add3070 [DOI] [PubMed]
  205. Sillett ST, Holmes RT. Variation in survivorship of a migratory songbird throughout its annual cycle. J Anim Ecol. 2002;71:296–308. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00599.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  206. Skirycz A, Kierszniowska S, Méret M, et al. Medicinal bioprospecting of the Amazon rainforest: a modern Eldorado? Trends Biotechnol. 2016;34:781–790. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  207. Snodgrass JW, Jagoe CH, Bryan AL, Jr, Brant HA, Burger J. Effects of trophic status and wetland morphology, hydroperiod, and water chemistry on mercury concentrations in fish. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2000;57:171–180. doi: 10.1139/f99-199. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  208. Soares L, Cockle KL, Ruelas Inzunza E, et al. Neotropical ornithology: Reckoning with historical assumptions, removing systemic barriers, and reimagining the future. Ornithol Appl. 2023;125:duac046. doi: 10.1093/ornithapp/duac046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  209. Socolar JB, Wilcove DS. Forest-type specialization strongly predicts avian responses to tropical agriculture. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2019;286:20191724. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  210. Sommer YL, Ward CD, Pan Y, et al. Long-term stability of inorganic, methyl and ethyl mercury in whole blood: effects of storage temperature and time. J Anal Toxicol. 2016;40:222–228. doi: 10.1093/jat/bkw007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  211. Sonter LJ, Herrera D, Barrett DJ, et al. Mining drives extensive deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1013. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00557-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  212. Sonter LJ, Ali SH, Watson JEM. Mining and biodiversity: key issues and research needs in conservation science. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2018;285:20181926. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.1926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  213. Stanton RL, Morrissey CA, Clark RG. Analysis of trends and agricultural drivers of farmland bird declines in North America: a review. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2018;254:244–254. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.11.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  214. Stiles FG. Behavioral, ecological and morphological correlates of foraging for arthropods by the hummingbirds of a tropical wet forest. Condor. 1995;97:853–878. doi: 10.2307/1369527. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  215. Stotz DF, Fitzpatrick JW, Parker III TA, Moskovits DK (1996) Neotropical birds: ecology and conservation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
  216. Stouffer PC, Jirinec V, Rutt CL, et al. Long-term change in the avifauna of undisturbed Amazonian rainforest: ground-foraging birds disappear and the baseline shifts. Ecol Lett. 2020;24(2):186–195. doi: 10.1111/ele.13628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  217. Strassburg BBN, Iribarrem A, Beyer HL, et al. Global priority areas for ecosystem restoration. Nature. 2020;586:724–729. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2784-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  218. Streets DG, Horowitz HM, Jacob DJ, et al. Total mercury released to the environment by human activities. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51:5969–5977. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b00451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  219. Sullivan MJP, Lewis SL, Affum-Baffoe K, et al. Long-term thermal sensitivity of earth’s tropical forests. Science. 2020;368:869–874. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw7578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  220. Sun J, Bustnes JO, Helander B, et al. Temporal trends of mercury differ across three northern white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) subpopulations. Sci Total Environ. 2019;687:77–86. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  221. Swaddle JP, Witter MS, Cuthill IC, et al. Plumage condition affects flight performance in common starlings: implications for developmental homeostasis, abrasion and moult. J. Avian Biol. 1996;27:103–111. doi: 10.2307/3677139. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  222. Swenson JJ, Carter CE, Domec J-C, Delgado CI. Gold mining in the Peruvian Amazon: global prices, deforestation, and mercury imports. PLoS One. 2011;6:e18875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  223. Terborgh J, Robinson SK, Parker TA, III, et al. Structure and organization of an Amazonian forest bird community. Ecol Monogr. 1990;60:213–238. doi: 10.2307/1943045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  224. Thomas ALR. The aerodynamic costs of asymmetry in the wings and tail of birds: asymmetric birds can’t fly round tight corners. Proc R Soc London B. 1993;254:181–189. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0144. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  225. Thompson DR, Furness RW. Comparison of the levels of total and organic mercury in seabird feathers. Mar Pollut Bull. 1989;20:577–579. doi: 10.1016/0025-326X(89)90361-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  226. Tórrez M, Arendt WJ. Claves y pautas gráficas en la determinación de edad en dos especies del género Thryothorus (Troglodytidae) en el Pacifico de Nicaragua. Ornitol Neotrop. 2012;23:23–32. [Google Scholar]
  227. Tórrez MA, Arendt W, Salmeron P. Aves hormigueras en bosque seco del Pacífico de Nicaragua: Uso de hábitat y comportamiento parasítico. Zeledonia. 2009;13:1–9. [Google Scholar]
  228. Tórrez MA, Arendt WJ (2017) La muda en especies de aves selectas de Nicaragua. UCA Publicaciones, Managua. https://data.fs.usda.gov/research/pubs/iitf/bw_iitf_2017_torrez_arendt001.pdf
  229. Tsui MTK, Adams EM, Jackson AK, et al. Understanding sources of methylmercury in songbirds with stable mercury isotopes: challenges and future directions. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2018;37:166–174. doi: 10.1002/etc.3941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  230. Ullrich SM, Tanton TW, Abdrashitova SA. Mercury in the aquatic environment: a review of factors affecting methylation. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2001;31:241–293. doi: 10.1080/20016491089226. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  231. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2013) Global Mercury Assessment 2013: sources, emissions, releases and environ(mental transport. UN Environment Programme, Chemicals Branch, Geneva
  232. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2019) Global Mercury Assessment 2018. UN Environment Programme, Chemicals and Health Branch, Geneva
  233. UNEP-WCMC (United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre) (2016) The state of biodiversity in Latin America and the Caribbean: a mid-term review of progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, Cambridge
  234. US EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (1998) Method 7473 (SW-846): mercury in solids and solutions by thermal decomposition, amalgamation, and atomic absorption spectrophotometry, revision 0. Washington, DC. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-07/documents/epa-7473.pdf. Accessed 3 Jan 2022
  235. US EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2007) Framework for metals risk assessment. EPA 120/R-07/001. Office of the Science Advisor Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, DC. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2013-09/documents/metals-risk-assessment-final.pdf. Accessed 3 Jan 2022
  236. van Deelen G (2022) Systemic Barriers Hinder Bird Research, Say 124 Latin American Ornithologists. Audubon. https://www.audubon.org/news/systemic-barriers-hinder-bird-research-say-124-latin-american-ornithologists
  237. Varela Z, García-Seoane R, Fernández JA, et al. Study of temporal trends in mercury concentrations in the primary flight feathers of Strix aluco. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2016;130:199–206. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  238. Varian-Ramos CW, Condon AM, Hallinger KK, et al. Stability of mercury concentrations in frozen avian blood samples. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2011;86:159–162. doi: 10.1007/s00128-010-0164-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  239. Vo ATE, Bank MS, Shine JP, Edwards SV. Temporal increase in organic mercury in an endangered pelagic seabird assessed by century-old museum specimens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:7466–7471. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1013865108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  240. Warner SE, Shriver WG, Pepper MA, Taylor RJ. Mercury concentrations in tidal marsh sparrows and their use as bioindicators in Delaware Bay, USA. Env Monit Assess. 2010;171:671–679. doi: 10.1007/s10661-010-1312-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  241. Webster JP, Kane TJ, Obrist D, et al. Estimating mercury emissions resulting from wildfire in forests of the Western United States. Sci Total Environ. 2016;568:578–586. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  242. Whitney MC, Cristol DA. Impacts of sublethal mercury exposure on birds: a detailed review. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2017;244:113–163. doi: 10.1007/398_2017_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  243. WHO (World Health Organization) (2022) A health perspective on the role of the environment in One Health. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen. https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/WHO-EURO-2022-5290-45054-64214
  244. Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, et al. Welcome to the tidyverse. J Open Sour Softw. 2019;4:1686. doi: 10.21105/joss.01686. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  245. Wikelski M, Spinney L, Schelsky W, et al. Slow pace of life in tropical sedentary birds: a common-garden experiment on four stonechat populations from different latitudes. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2003;270:2383–2388. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  246. Willis EO, Oniki Y. Birds and Army Ants. Annu Rev Ecol, Evol Syst. 1978;9:243–263. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.09.110178.001331. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  247. Wilman H, Belmaker J, Simpson J, et al. EltonTraits 1.0: species-level foraging attributes of the world’s birds and mammals. Ecology. 2014;95:2027. doi: 10.1890/13-1917.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  248. Wilson ML, Renne E, Roncoli C, et al. Integrated assessment of artisanal and small-scale gold mining in Ghana — part 3: social sciences and economics. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:8133–8156. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120708133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  249. Winder VL. Characterization of mercury and its risk in Nelson’s, saltmarsh, and seaside sparrows. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  250. Wolfe JD, Ryder TB, Pyle P. Using molt cycles to categorize the age of tropical birds: an integrative new system. J F Ornithol. 2010;81:186–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1557-9263.2010.00276.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  251. World Bank (2022) “World Bank Open Data”. The World Bank Group. https://data.worldbank.org/. Accessed 5 Aug 2023
  252. Wrege PH, Wikelski M, Mandel JT, et al. Antbirds parasitize foraging army ants. Ecology. 2005;86:555–559. doi: 10.1890/04-1133. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  253. Zamani-Ahmadmahmoodi R, Esmaili-Sari A, Ghasempouri SM, Savabieasfahani M (2009) Mercury levels in selected tissues of three kingfisher species; Ceryle rudis, Alcedo atthis, and Halcyon smyrnensi, from Shadegan Marshes of Iran. Ecotoxicology 18:319–324. 10.1007/s10646-008-0284-z [DOI] [PubMed]
  254. zu Ermgassen EKHJ, de Alcântara MP, Balmford A, et al. Results from on-the-ground efforts to promote sustainable cattle ranching in the Brazilian Amazon. Sustainability. 2018;10:1301. doi: 10.3390/su10041301. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  255. Zuur A, Ieno EN, Walker N, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York. 10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

10646_2023_2706_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.7MB, pdf)

SupplementaryMaterials_NeotropicalBirdHgSynthesis

Data Availability Statement

All data and software curated for this research are archived and available at https://github.com/csayers2/Neotropical-Bird-Hg-Synthesis.


Articles from Ecotoxicology (London, England) are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES