Skip to main content
IUCrData logoLink to IUCrData
. 2023 Jul 14;8(Pt 7):x230610. doi: 10.1107/S2414314623006107

Bis(tetra­butyl­ammonium) tetra­chlorido­manganate(II) di­chloro­methane disolvate

Michael T Hay a,*, Hemant P Yennawar b
Editor: M Weilc
PMCID: PMC10626607  PMID: 37937132

The ionic title compound consists of a 2:1 ratio of the tetra­butyl­ammonium cation (1+) and the tetra­chlorido­manganate(II) anion (2–). The structure reported contains two di­chloro­methane solvent mol­ecules co-crystallized per anion.

Keywords: crystal structure, organic–inorganic salt, manganese(II) complex, tetra­butyl­ammonium salt, solvate

Abstract

The title compound, (C16H36N)2[MnCl4]·2CH2Cl2, is an ionic organic–inorganic hybride compound consisting of a tetra­butyl­ammonium cation and a tetra­chlorido­manganate(II) anion in a 2:1 stoichiometric ratio. The cation contains a central nitro­gen atom bonded to four n-butyl groups in a tetra­hedral arrangement, while the anion contains a central MnII atom tetra­hedrally coordinated by four chlorido ligands. It co-crystallized with two equivalents of di­chloro­methane solvent, CH2Cl2, to give the following empirical formula: [(C4H9)4N]2[MnCl4]·(CH2Cl2)2. The crystal structure is mainly stabilized by Coulombic inter­actions. graphic file with name x-08-x230610-scheme1-3D1.jpg

Structure description

During our efforts to prepare novel manganese-containing coordination complexes, we synthesized the previously reported non-solvated compound bis­(tetra­butyl­ammonium) tetra­chlorido­manganate(II). In conducting our experiments, we inadvertently obtained the disolvated title compound and determined its crystal structure. After reviewing the literature, we realised that no crystallographic data had yet been reported on either the non-solvated or solvated forms of this substance. The only crystallographic data related to this system was the powder X-ray diffraction data for the non-solvated form at 900 K after it had already undergone thermal decomposition (Styczeń et al., 2009). Herein we present the results of the single-crystal structure analysis of the title compound.

The structural formula shows a ratio of 2:1 for the tetra­butyl­ammonium cation and the tetra­chlorido­manganate(II) anion, combined with two solvent mol­ecules of di­chloro­methane (Fig. 1). The above three mol­ecular entities have inter­nal symmetries allowing them to occupy different special positions in the lattice with point group symmetries Inline graphic .. (multiplicity 4, Wyckoff letter a) for the anion, and .2. (8 d) both for the cation and the solvent mol­ecule. The root-mean-square deviations from ideal Td symmetry for the anion, S 4 symmetry for the cation and C 2v symmetry for the solvent mol­ecule amount to 0.0123, 0.0501 and 0 Å, respectively, as calculated with PLATON (Spek, 2020), based on the SYMMOL program by Pilati & Forni (1998, 2000). The tetra­butyl­ammonium cation, (C4H9)4N+, consists of a central nitro­gen atom tetra­hedrally surrounded by ordered butyl groups, with N—C bond lengths ranging from 1.505 (12) Å to 1.511 (11) Å and C—N—C bond angles in the range of 105.8 (5)–111.7 (11)°. The complex anion MnCl4 2– is consistent with the structure previously published for the tetra­methyl­ammonium salt (Rodríguez-Lazcano et al., 2009) – the central MnII atom is bound with four chloride ligands tetra­hedrally arranged. The Cl—Mn—Cl bond angles are 108.80 (12)-109.81 (12)°. The Mn—Cl bond lengths are all 2.364 (2) Å.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Mol­ecular structures of the entities present in the title compound, with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level.

The crystal structure (Fig. 2) is stabilized primarily by Coulombic forces in the absence of classical hydrogen-bonding inter­actions.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Packing diagram of the crystal structure, which is stabilized primarily by Coulombic forces.

Synthesis and crystallization

A similar protocol was followed as previously reported in the literature (Styczeń et al., 2009). Pink MnCl4·4H2O (5.05 mmol, 1.00 g) was dissolved in warm absolute ethanol (10–15 ml). Separately, two equivalents of white (C4H9)4NCl·H2O (10.1 mmol, 2.81 g) were also dissolved in warm absolute ethanol (10–15 ml). The two ethanol solutions were then mixed, and the solution turned a light-green color. The ethanol was removed under reduced pressure with heating to produce a pale-green solid. The solid was recrystallized from di­chloro­methane/ether to give pale-green crystals. After drying the crystals under reduced pressure at 311 K, they were massed (3.07 g, 89.2% yield). They were analyzed by IR and elemental analysis. IR (cm−1): 2962m, 2943m, 2875m, 1484s, 1468m, 1378m, 1151w, 1025w, 881m, 749m, 732m. Analysis calculated for (C16H36N)2MnCl4: C, 56.38; H, 10.65, N, 4.11. Found: C, 56.47; H, 11.47, N, 4.04. X-ray quality crystals were obtained from a mixture of di­chloro­methane/ether during a reaction involving the non-solvated form of the title compound as the starting material.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details for the reported structure is summarized in Table 1. The crystal diffracted poorly at high resolution. The average intensity drops below the 3σ level at 0.9933 Å. Consequently, the reliability factors are comparatively high. As a result of the special symmetry of the di­chloro­methane solvent mol­ecule, the two H atoms (H9A and H9B) were refined with half-occupancy.

Table 1. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula (C16H36N)2[MnCl4]·2CH2Cl2
M r 851.50
Crystal system, space group Tetragonal, I Inline graphic 2d
Temperature (K) 173
a, c (Å) 14.0775 (3), 24.3492 (8)
V3) 4825.4 (3)
Z 4
Radiation type Cu Kα
μ (mm−1) 6.46
Crystal size (mm) 0.38 × 0.28 × 0.13
 
Data collection
Diffractometer ROD, Synergy Custom system, HyPix-Arc 150
Absorption correction Analytical (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku OD, 2021)
T min, T max 0.060, 0.359
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 9265, 2334, 1567
R int 0.038
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.624
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.075, 0.222, 1.06
No. of reflections 2334
No. of parameters 108
No. of restraints 47
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.35, −0.32
Absolute structure Flack x determined using 458 quotients [(I +)-(I -)]/[(I +)+(I -)] (Parsons et al., 2013)
Absolute structure parameter −0.018 (8)

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku OD, 2021), OLEX2.solve (Bourhis et al., 2015), SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015), and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2414314623006107/wm4191sup1.cif

x-08-x230610-sup1.cif (137.2KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2414314623006107/wm4191Isup2.hkl

x-08-x230610-Isup2.hkl (128.6KB, hkl)

CCDC reference: 2280618

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

Authors contributions are as follows. Conceptualization, MTH; validation, MTH and HPY; formal analysis, HPY; investigation, MTH (synthesis and characterization) and HPY (XRD); resources, MTH and HPY; writing (original draft), MTH and HPY; writing (review and editing of the manuscript), MTH and HPY; visualization, MTH and HPY; funding acquisition, MTH and HPY.

full crystallographic data

Crystal data

(C16H36N)2[MnCl4]·2CH2Cl2 Dx = 1.172 Mg m3
Mr = 851.50 Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54184 Å
Tetragonal, I42d Cell parameters from 3369 reflections
a = 14.0775 (3) Å θ = 3.6–60.8°
c = 24.3492 (8) Å µ = 6.46 mm1
V = 4825.4 (3) Å3 T = 173 K
Z = 4 Plate, clear yellow
F(000) = 1820 0.38 × 0.28 × 0.13 mm

Data collection

ROD, Synergy Custom system, HyPix-Arc 150 diffractometer 2334 independent reflections
Radiation source: Rotating-anode X-ray tube, Rigaku (Cu) X-ray Source 1567 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Mirror monochromator Rint = 0.038
Detector resolution: 10.0000 pixels mm-1 θmax = 74.1°, θmin = 3.6°
ω scans h = −17→16
Absorption correction: analytical (CrysAlisPro; Rigaku OD, 2021) k = −16→17
Tmin = 0.060, Tmax = 0.359 l = −27→29
9265 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Hydrogen site location: mixed
Least-squares matrix: full H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.075 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1133P)2 + 4.1001P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.222 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.06 Δρmax = 0.35 e Å3
2334 reflections Δρmin = −0.32 e Å3
108 parameters Absolute structure: Flack x determined using 458 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013)
47 restraints Absolute structure parameter: −0.018 (8)
Primary atom site location: iterative

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Mn1 0.500000 0.000000 0.750000 0.0722 (7)
Cl1 0.37996 (17) −0.06513 (19) 0.69347 (9) 0.0925 (8)
Cl2 0.2523 (6) 0.1511 (5) 0.4325 (2) 0.248 (4)
C9 0.250000 0.2191 (18) 0.375000 0.152 (9)
H9 0.204 (11) 0.254 (12) 0.382 (8) 0.182*
N1 0.3681 (8) 0.250000 0.625000 0.090 (3)
C1 0.4291 (7) 0.2541 (7) 0.6760 (3) 0.094 (3)
H1A 0.466853 0.194827 0.677948 0.112*
H1B 0.386692 0.255178 0.708408 0.112*
C2 0.4966 (8) 0.3374 (6) 0.6802 (3) 0.100 (3)
H2A 0.540087 0.337104 0.648222 0.120*
H2B 0.459916 0.397367 0.679322 0.120*
C3 0.5535 (9) 0.3328 (8) 0.7322 (5) 0.125 (4)
H3A 0.587481 0.271263 0.733181 0.150*
H3B 0.509107 0.334000 0.763696 0.150*
C4 0.6252 (10) 0.4116 (9) 0.7396 (6) 0.142 (5)
H4A 0.664940 0.416247 0.706657 0.213*
H4B 0.665249 0.397709 0.771501 0.213*
H4C 0.591855 0.471854 0.745395 0.213*
C5 0.3081 (8) 0.1621 (7) 0.6308 (4) 0.101 (3)
H5A 0.270075 0.167990 0.664871 0.121*
H5B 0.350980 0.106950 0.635531 0.121*
C6 0.2413 (9) 0.1411 (9) 0.5839 (5) 0.127 (4)
H6A 0.278449 0.128709 0.550114 0.152*
H6B 0.200173 0.196905 0.577132 0.152*
C7 0.1799 (11) 0.0552 (10) 0.5969 (6) 0.155 (5)
H7A 0.221001 0.001495 0.608109 0.186*
H7B 0.137194 0.070402 0.627982 0.186*
C8 0.1215 (16) 0.026 (2) 0.5479 (8) 0.260 (13)
H8A 0.162622 0.022088 0.515483 0.390*
H8B 0.071993 0.074082 0.541378 0.390*
H8C 0.091990 −0.035380 0.554830 0.390*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Mn1 0.0805 (10) 0.0805 (10) 0.0555 (13) 0.000 0.000 0.000
Cl1 0.0873 (14) 0.1130 (18) 0.0771 (12) 0.0069 (13) −0.0096 (11) −0.0207 (12)
Cl2 0.359 (8) 0.258 (7) 0.127 (3) −0.111 (7) −0.053 (5) 0.044 (4)
C9 0.17 (2) 0.137 (19) 0.145 (18) 0.000 0.050 (17) 0.000
N1 0.115 (8) 0.085 (7) 0.070 (6) 0.000 0.000 0.020 (5)
C1 0.122 (7) 0.096 (6) 0.063 (5) −0.006 (6) 0.003 (5) 0.014 (4)
C2 0.130 (7) 0.093 (6) 0.077 (5) 0.000 (7) 0.003 (6) 0.009 (5)
C3 0.152 (10) 0.106 (8) 0.117 (9) −0.022 (8) −0.028 (8) 0.008 (6)
C4 0.146 (10) 0.140 (11) 0.139 (11) −0.018 (9) −0.018 (9) 0.005 (9)
C5 0.117 (8) 0.098 (7) 0.088 (6) −0.007 (6) 0.000 (6) 0.008 (5)
C6 0.141 (10) 0.131 (10) 0.109 (8) −0.030 (9) −0.017 (8) 0.008 (7)
C7 0.166 (13) 0.163 (12) 0.136 (11) −0.029 (11) −0.028 (10) −0.005 (10)
C8 0.22 (2) 0.32 (3) 0.24 (2) −0.11 (2) −0.07 (2) 0.06 (2)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Mn1—Cl1i 2.364 (2) C3—H3B 0.9900
Mn1—Cl1ii 2.364 (2) C3—C4 1.510 (10)
Mn1—Cl1iii 2.364 (2) C4—H4A 0.9800
Mn1—Cl1 2.364 (2) C4—H4B 0.9800
Cl2—C9 1.695 (15) C4—H4C 0.9800
C9—H9 0.83 (15) C5—H5A 0.9900
C9—H9iv 0.83 (15) C5—H5B 0.9900
N1—C1v 1.511 (11) C5—C6 1.510 (10)
N1—C1 1.511 (11) C6—H6A 0.9900
N1—C5 1.505 (12) C6—H6B 0.9900
N1—C5v 1.505 (12) C6—C7 1.519 (11)
C1—H1A 0.9900 C7—H7A 0.9900
C1—H1B 0.9900 C7—H7B 0.9900
C1—C2 1.513 (9) C7—C8 1.505 (11)
C2—H2A 0.9900 C8—H8A 0.9800
C2—H2B 0.9900 C8—H8B 0.9800
C2—C3 1.500 (9) C8—H8C 0.9800
C3—H3A 0.9900
Cl1i—Mn1—Cl1ii 109.81 (6) H3A—C3—H3B 107.5
Cl1ii—Mn1—Cl1 108.80 (12) C4—C3—H3A 108.5
Cl1i—Mn1—Cl1iii 108.80 (12) C4—C3—H3B 108.5
Cl1iii—Mn1—Cl1 109.81 (6) C3—C4—H4A 109.5
Cl1i—Mn1—Cl1 109.81 (6) C3—C4—H4B 109.5
Cl1ii—Mn1—Cl1iii 109.81 (6) C3—C4—H4C 109.5
Cl2—C9—Cl2iv 111.3 (14) H4A—C4—H4B 109.5
Cl2iv—C9—H9 120 (10) H4A—C4—H4C 109.5
Cl2—C9—H9 100 (10) H4B—C4—H4C 109.5
Cl2iv—C9—H9iv 100 (10) N1—C5—H5A 108.3
Cl2—C9—H9iv 120 (10) N1—C5—H5B 108.3
H9—C9—H9iv 107 (10) N1—C5—C6 116.1 (8)
C1—N1—C1v 110.7 (10) H5A—C5—H5B 107.4
C5v—N1—C1v 105.8 (5) C6—C5—H5A 108.3
C5—N1—C1 105.8 (5) C6—C5—H5B 108.3
C5—N1—C1v 111.4 (6) C5—C6—H6A 109.5
C5v—N1—C1 111.4 (6) C5—C6—H6B 109.5
C5—N1—C5v 111.7 (11) C5—C6—C7 110.6 (9)
N1—C1—H1A 108.2 H6A—C6—H6B 108.1
N1—C1—H1B 108.2 C7—C6—H6A 109.5
N1—C1—C2 116.2 (7) C7—C6—H6B 109.5
H1A—C1—H1B 107.4 C6—C7—H7A 109.4
C2—C1—H1A 108.2 C6—C7—H7B 109.4
C2—C1—H1B 108.2 H7A—C7—H7B 108.0
C1—C2—H2A 109.4 C8—C7—C6 111.0 (12)
C1—C2—H2B 109.4 C8—C7—H7A 109.4
H2A—C2—H2B 108.0 C8—C7—H7B 109.4
C3—C2—C1 111.0 (7) C7—C8—H8A 109.5
C3—C2—H2A 109.4 C7—C8—H8B 109.5
C3—C2—H2B 109.4 C7—C8—H8C 109.5
C2—C3—H3A 108.5 H8A—C8—H8B 109.5
C2—C3—H3B 108.5 H8A—C8—H8C 109.5
C2—C3—C4 115.2 (9) H8B—C8—H8C 109.5
N1—C1—C2—C3 −179.5 (10) C1—C2—C3—C4 178.4 (11)
N1—C5—C6—C7 −175.7 (11) C5v—N1—C1—C2 −58.2 (12)
C1v—N1—C1—C2 59.3 (7) C5—N1—C1—C2 −179.8 (9)
C1v—N1—C5—C6 −58.6 (12) C5v—N1—C5—C6 59.6 (8)
C1—N1—C5—C6 −179.0 (10) C5—C6—C7—C8 −173.2 (16)

Symmetry codes: (i) y+1/2, −x+1/2, −z+3/2; (ii) −x+1, −y, z; (iii) −y+1/2, x−1/2, −z+3/2; (iv) −x+1/2, y, −z+3/4; (v) x, −y+1/2, −z+5/4.

Funding Statement

NIH funding for the X-ray instrumentation – award Nos. 1S10OD028589–01 and 1S10RR023439–01 to Dr Neela Yennawar – is acknowledged.

References

  1. Bourhis, L. J., Dolomanov, O. V., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2015). Acta Cryst. A71, 59–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  2. Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.
  3. Parsons, S., Flack, H. D. & Wagner, T. (2013). Acta Cryst. B69, 249–259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  4. Pilati, T. & Forni, A. (1998). J. Appl. Cryst. 31, 503–504.
  5. Pilati, T. & Forni, A. (2000). J. Appl. Cryst. 33, 417.
  6. Rigaku OD (2021). CrysAlis PRO. Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, Yarnton, England.
  7. Rodríguez-Lazcano, Y., Nataf, L. & Rodríguez, F. (2009). J. Lumin. 129, 2000–2003.
  8. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
  9. Spek, A. L. (2020). Acta Cryst. E76, 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  10. Styczeń, E., Wyrzykowski, D., Gazda, M. & Warnke, Z. (2009). Thermochim. Acta, 481, 46–51.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2414314623006107/wm4191sup1.cif

x-08-x230610-sup1.cif (137.2KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2414314623006107/wm4191Isup2.hkl

x-08-x230610-Isup2.hkl (128.6KB, hkl)

CCDC reference: 2280618

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from IUCrData are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES