Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2024 Apr 2;12:RP89136. doi: 10.7554/eLife.89136

Lactate transporter MCT1 in hepatic stellate cells promotes fibrotic collagen expression in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

Kyounghee Min 1, Batuhan Yenilmez 1, Mark Kelly 1, Dimas Echeverria 2, Michael Elleby 1, Lawrence M Lifshitz 1, Naideline Raymond 1, Emmanouela Tsagkaraki 1, Shauna M Harney 1, Chloe DiMarzio 1, Hui Wang 1, Nicholas McHugh 2, Brianna Bramato 2, Brett Morrison 3, Jeffery D Rothstein 3, Anastasia Khvorova 2, Michael P Czech 1,
Editors: David E James4, David E James5
PMCID: PMC10987092  PMID: 38564479

Abstract

Circulating lactate is a fuel source for liver metabolism but may exacerbate metabolic diseases such as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Indeed, haploinsufficiency of lactate transporter monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1) in mice reportedly promotes resistance to hepatic steatosis and inflammation. Here, we used adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors to deliver thyroxin binding globulin (TBG)-Cre or lecithin-retinol acyltransferase (Lrat)-Cre to MCT1fl/fl mice on a choline-deficient, high-fat NASH diet to deplete hepatocyte or stellate cell MCT1, respectively. Stellate cell MCT1KO (AAV-Lrat-Cre) attenuated liver type 1 collagen protein expression and caused a downward trend in trichrome staining. MCT1 depletion in cultured human LX2 stellate cells also diminished collagen 1 protein expression. Tetra-ethylenglycol-cholesterol (Chol)-conjugated siRNAs, which enter all hepatic cell types, and hepatocyte-selective tri-N-acetyl galactosamine (GN)-conjugated siRNAs were then used to evaluate MCT1 function in a genetically obese NASH mouse model. MCT1 silencing by Chol-siRNA decreased liver collagen 1 levels, while hepatocyte-selective MCT1 depletion by AAV-TBG-Cre or by GN-siRNA unexpectedly increased collagen 1 and total fibrosis without effect on triglyceride accumulation. These findings demonstrate that stellate cell lactate transporter MCT1 significantly contributes to liver fibrosis through increased collagen 1 protein expression in vitro and in vivo, while hepatocyte MCT1 appears not to be an attractive therapeutic target for NASH.

Research organism: Human, Mouse

Introduction

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease, afflicting over a quarter of the world’s population. It describes a spectrum of liver diseases ranging from simple steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (Younossi et al., 2016; Estes et al., 2018). Steatosis is considered relatively benign as lifestyle modifications can reverse fatty liver to a healthy condition. On the other hand, NASH is characterized by severe steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis. Severe fibrotic stages of NASH can develop into permanent liver damage, and the disease can progress to cirrhosis and hepatoma. Currently, NASH is a leading cause for liver transplantation, and there is no FDA-approved therapeutic for NASH (Estes et al., 2018; Alexander et al., 2019; Diehl and Day, 2017; Friedman et al., 2018). Since NASH is closely associated with the hallmarks of type 2 diabetes and obesity, including chronic overnutrition, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia, it is likely that substrate overload to the liver contributes to its cause (Friedman et al., 2018). Accordingly, NAFLD and NASH patients display hyperactive liver tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle flux due to an overabundance of upstream metabolites (García-Ruiz and Fernández-Checa, 2018; Sunny et al., 2017). These findings suggest that lowering substrate influx to the liver is a promising strategy to prevent and possibly alleviate steatosis and NASH.

Human subjects with type 2 diabetes and obesity reportedly have increased plasma lactate levels (Lovejoy et al., 1992; Crawford et al., 2010; Juraschek et al., 2013a; Juraschek et al., 2013b; DiGirolamo et al., 1992; Sabater et al., 2014; Jansson et al., 1994). Lactate is produced and released into the circulation when cellular glycolytic flux surpasses mitochondrial oxidative capacity. Once considered to be simply a metabolic waste product, lactate is now recognized as a primary fuel for the TCA cycle in liver and thus an essential energy source (Hui et al., 2017; Rabinowitz and Enerbäck, 2020). Additionally, it is a critical regulator that contributes to whole-body energy homeostasis (Brooks, 2020; Li et al., 2022). Under physiological conditions, cellular lactate levels are tightly controlled by monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs). MCTs are members of the solute carrier 16A (SLC16A) family, which are proton-coupled transmembrane protein transporters. Among 14 MCT isoforms, only MCTs 1–4 have been shown to transport monocarboxylate molecules such as lactate, pyruvate, short-chain fatty acids, and ketone bodies (Felmlee et al., 2020). Notably, MCT1 is denoted as a primary lactate transporter as it is the most widely distributed MCT isoform in various metabolic tissues and has a high affinity for lactate, maintaining basal cellular homeostasis according to transmembrane lactate gradients (Li et al., 2022; Halestrap, 2013). Reportedly, MCT1 haploinsufficiency in mice reduces MCT1 protein levels to nearly half in major metabolic tissues such as liver, brain, and white adipose tissues, and these mice are resistant to diet-induced obesity and liver steatosis and inflammation (Lengacher et al., 2013; Carneiro et al., 2017; Hadjihambi et al., 2023). The role of MCT1 in hypothalamus and adipose tissues in these phenotypes was ruled out, as selective MCT1 depletion in those tissues either increased food intake and body weight (Elizondo-Vega et al., 2016) or enhanced systemic inflammation and insulin resistance (Lin et al., 2022). Thus, the question of which tissue or tissues are responsible for the phenotype of whole-body MCT1 haploinsufficiency is not solved.

The above considerations suggest the possibility that MCT1KO in one or more liver cell types may explain the effects of MCT1 haploinsufficiency in mice. Since hepatocytes account for the majority of liver cells and have high rates of lipogenesis and triglyceride (TG) accumulation, lactate levels governed by hepatocyte MCT1 could be involved in regulating steatosis. On the other hand, while hepatic stellate cells account for only 5–10% of the hepatic cell population, they are the major cell type contributing to hepatic fibrogenesis (Wake, 1971; Mederacke et al., 2013). Fate tracing studies have revealed that 82–96% of myofibroblasts are derived from hepatic stellate cells, which are liver-specific pericytes (Mederacke et al., 2013). During NASH progression, multiple liver injury signals stimulate the transition of vitamin A-storing quiescent hepatic stellate cells into fibrogenic, proliferative myofibroblasts that produce and secrete collagen fibers (Trautwein et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2015; Puche et al., 2013; Tsuchida and Friedman, 2017). As a result, healthy hepatic parenchyma is replaced with a collagen-rich extracellular matrix, turning the liver into a hardened and scarred tissue (Mehal et al., 2011). In general, major organ fibrosis is directly correlated with morbidity and mortality, contributing up to 45% of deaths in developed countries (Wynn, 2008). Thus, targeting activated hepatic stellate cells has become a major strategy in NASH therapeutics development (Friedman et al., 2018; Tsuchida and Friedman, 2017). However, the role of MCT1 in hepatic stellate cells activation or fibrogenesis has not been investigated.

The aim of the present studies was to investigate the role of hepatic lactate transport via MCT1 in lipid metabolism and fibrogenesis in NASH, and to determine its potential suitability as a therapeutic target. Two key unanswered questions were of particular interest: (1) is it hepatocyte-specific MCT1 depletion that protects mice with MCT1 haploinsufficiency from liver lactate overload and NAFLD and (2) does liver stellate cell MCT1 promote hepatic fibrogenesis that occurs in NASH? We tested the possible enhancement of lipogenesis and fat accumulation via MCT1 function specifically in hepatocytes using adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated thyroxin binding globulin (TBG)-Cre MCT1KO in MCT1fl/fl mice, and in other experiments by silencing hepatocyte MCT1 with tri-N-acetyl galactosamine (GN)-conjugated siRNA. These experiments showed that hepatocyte MCT1 loss decreased expression of enzymes in the de novo lipogenesis (DNL) pathway, but did not diminish overall steatosis. Surprisingly, hepatocyte MCT1KO increased liver fibrosis in two mouse models of NASH. In contrast, hepatic stellate cell-selective MCT1KO, achieved by injection of AAV9-lecithin-retinol acyltransferase (Lrat)-Cre into MCT1fl/fl mice, did attenuate collagen production and fibrosis. Our findings underscore the critical importance of implementing cell type-specific targeting strategies to diminish NASH fibrogenesis.

Results

MCT1 depletion prevents TGF-β1-stimulated type 1 collagen production in cultured human LX2 stellate cells

As fate tracing studies have revealed that 82–96% of myofibroblasts are derived from hepatic stellate cells (Mederacke et al., 2013), we employed a simple in vitro system utilizing LX2 human hepatic stellate cells to investigate effects of MCT1 silencing on expression of type 1 collagen, a major component of fibrosis. Cells were transfected with Lipofectamine and native MCT1-targeting siRNA (MCT1-siRNA), which diminished SLC16A1/MCT1 mRNA expression by about 80% (Figure 1A), or nontargeted control (NTC-siRNA), and then treated with transforming growth factor 1β (TGF-β1) (10 µg/ml) for 48 hr. As expected, TGF-β1 stimulated expression of ACTA2 and collagen 1 isoform, COL1A1, by several folds (Figure 1B and C). SLC16A1/MCT1 silencing significantly inhibited TGF-β1-stimulated ACTA2 mRNA expression as well as collagen 1 protein production (Figure 1B and C), indicating cell-autonomous functions of MCT1 in hepatic stellate cells.

Figure 1. MCT1 depletion attenuates transforming growth factor 1β (TGF-β1)-stimulated collagen 1 production in human LX2 stellate cells.

Figure 1.

Cells were transfected with either NTC-siRNA or MCT1-siRNA for 6 hr. Then, cells were maintained in serum-starved media with or without 10 ng/ml of recombinant human TGF-β1 for 48 hr and harvested. (A) SLC16A1/MCT1 mRNA expression levels. (B) Collagen 1 protein levels. Quantification was added below. (C) Representative fibrogenic marker genes, ACTA2, and COL1A1 expression levels were monitored (mean ± SD, t-test, one-way ANOVA, *: p<0.05, **: p<0.01, ***: p<0.001, ****: p<0.0001).

Figure 1—source data 1. MCT1 depletion attenuates transforming growth factor 1β (TGF-β1)-stimulated collagen 1 production in human LX2 stellate cells.

Identification of a potent, chemically modified siRNA candidate targeting MCT1

Given the therapeutic potential of SLC16A1/MCT1 silencing in preventing fibrogenesis (Figure 1), we aimed to develop MCT1-siRNA compounds, chemically modified for stability, potency, and delivery in vivo for use in this research and potentially for therapeutic advancement. Asymmetrical siRNA compounds used here are composed of 15 double-strand nucleotides with a short overhanging single-strand that promotes cellular uptake (Behlke, 2006; Khvorova and Watts, 2017). To enhance the stability of the constructs, the 2’-OH of each ribose was modified to either 2’-O-methyl or 2’-fluoro. In addition, phosphorothioate linkage backbone modifications were applied to avoid exonuclease degradation. Tetra-ethylenglycol-cholesterol (Chol) was conjugated to the 3’ end-sense strand to enhance stability and cellular uptake of candidate compounds. Each Chol-conjugated, fully chemically modified MCT1-siRNA (Chol-MCT1-siRNA) candidate construct’s sequence and targeting region on the Slc16a1/Mct1 transcript is described in Table 1 and Figure 2A.

Table 1. Sequences of chemically modified siRNA candidates targeting MCT1 used in in vitro screening.

siRNAs utilized in in vitro screening were a double-strand oligonucleotide comprised of 15 sense and 20 antisense nucleotides. The sequences of each candidate’s antisense and sense strands were listed (P: 5’-phosphate, #: phosphorothioate, m: 2’-O-methyl, f: 2’-fluoro, Chol: tetra-ethylenglycol-cholesterol conjugate).

Antisense strands:
Oligo ID Chemically modified RNA sequence
MCT1-507 P(mU)#(fG)#(mU)(fU)(mA)(fC)(mA)(fG)(mA)(fA)(mA)(fG)(mA)#(fA)#(mG)#(fC)#(mU)#(fG)#(mC)#(fG)
MCT1-1976 P(mU)#(fA)#(mA)(fA)(mC)(fU)(mU)(fA)(mA)(fG)(mG)(fC)(mA)#(fC)#(mA)#(fU)#(mA)#(fU)#(mU)#(fA)
MCT1-2013 P(mU)#(fU)#(mU)(fA)(mA)(fA)(mA)(fG)(mU)(fU)(mA)(fA)(mG)#(fG)#(mC)#(fU)#(mC)#(fU)#(mC)#(fU)
MCT1-2042 P(mU)#(fU)#(mU)(fA)(mA)(fA)(mA)(fC)(mA)(fA)(mA)(fU)(mG)#(fA)#(mA)#(fU)#(mU)#(fC)#(mA)#(fG)
MCT1-2060 P(mU)#(fU)#(mU)(fC)(mC)(fU)(mU)(fU)(mU)(fA)(mA)(fA)(mA)#(fU)#(mG)#(fA)#(mC)#(fA)#(mU)#(fU)
MCT1-2120 P(mU)#(fU)#(mU)(fA)(mC)(fA)(mA)(fA)(mC)(fA)(mA)(fC)(mA)#(fA)#(mC)#(fA)#(mA)#(fA)#(mA)#(fC)
MCT1-3067 P(mU)#(fU)#(mU)(fU)(mC)(fU)(mG)(fC)(mC)(fU)(mC)(fU)(mA)#(fU)#(mU)#(fC)#(mA)#(fG)#(mA)#(fA)
MCT1-3160 P(mU)#(fU)#(mC)(fU)(mU)(fA)(mC)(fA)(mC)(fA)(mA)(fG)(mG)#(fU)#(mU)#(fU)#(mU)#(fA)#(mA)#(fA)
MCT1-3290 P(mU)#(fA)#(mU)(fA)(mU)(fU)(mA)(fG)(mA)(fA)(mA)(fG)(mG)#(fU)#(mU)#(fA)#(mA)#(fA)#(mA)#(fU)
MCT1-4340 P(mU)#(fU)#(mG)(fA)(mA)(fU)(mU)(fU)(mG)(fU)(mA)(fU)(mG)#(fA)#(mG)#(fA)#(mA)#(fU)#(mA)#(fA)
Sense strands:
Oligo ID Chemically modified RNA sequence
Chol-MCT1-507 (fC)#(mU)#(fU)(mC)(fU)(mU)(fU)(mC)(fU)(mG)(fU)(mA)(fA)#(mC)#(fA)-Chol
Chol-MCT1-1976 (fU)#(mG)#(fU)(mG)(fC)(mC)(fU)(mU)(fA)(mA)(fG)(mU)(fU)#(mU)#(fA)-Chol
Chol-MCT1-2013 (fG)#(mC)#(fC)(mU)(fU)(mA)(fA)(mC)(fU)(mU)(fU)(mU)(fA)#(mA)#(fA)-Chol
Chol-MCT1-2042 (fU)#(mU)#(fC)(mA)(fU)(mU)(fU)(mG)(fU)(mU)(fU)(mU)(fA)#(mA)#(fA)-Chol
Chol-MCT1-2060 (fC)#(mA)#(fU)(mU)(fU)(mU)(fA)(mA)(fA)(mA)(fG)(mG)(fA)#(mA)#(fA)-Chol
Chol-MCT1-2120 (fG)#(mU)#(fU)(mG)(fU)(mU)(fG)(mU)(fU)(mU)(fG)(mU)(fA)#(mA)#(fA)-Chol
Chol-MCT1-3067 (fA)#(mA)#(fU)(mA)(fG)(mA)(fG)(mG)(fC)(mA)(fG)(mA)(fA)#(mA)#(fA)-Chol
Chol-MCT1-3160 (fA)#(mA)#(fC)(mC)(fU)(mU)(fG)(mU)(fG)(mU)(fA)(mA)(fG)#(mA)#(fA)-Chol
Chol-MCT1-3290 (fA)#(mA)#(fC)(mC)(fU)(mU)(fU)(mC)(fU)(mA)(fA)(mU)(fA)#(mU)#(fA)-Chol
Chol-MCT1-4340 (fC)#(mU)#(fC)(mA)(fU)(mA)(fC)(mA)(fA)(mA)(fU)(mU)(fC)#(mA)#(fA)-Chol

Figure 2. Screening of chemically modified Chol-MCT1-siRNA in vitro.

Figure 2.

(A) Targeted regions of multiple Chol-MCT1-siRNA candidates on Slc16a1/Mct1 transcript. (B) Silencing efficacy of each Chol-MCT1-siRNA candidate (1.5 µM) on Slc16a1/Mct1 mRNA expression levels was monitored 72 hr after the treatment in mouse hepatocyte cell lines, FL83B in vitro. Chol-NTC-siRNA was used as a control (mean ± SD). (C) Dose-response potency test was performed to identify the most potent Chol-MCT1-siRNA compound. IC50 values were determined using six serially diluted concentrations of each compound starting from 1.5 µM (mean ± SD). IC50 values and knockdown % of the two most potent compounds were shown in the table below. (D) 72 hr after the treatment of Chol-MCT1-2060 compounds (1.5 µM), MCT1 protein expression levels were visually monitored by immunofluorescence (scale bar: 10 µm). (E) 72 hr after the treatment of either Chol-MCT1-2060 or Chol-MCT1-3160 compounds (1.5 µM), their silencing efficacy on MCT1 protein expression levels was examined by western blotting.

Figure 2—source data 1. Screening of chemically modified Chol-MCT1-siRNA in vitro.

We performed in vitro screening to select the most potent Chol-MCT1-siRNA compounds that were initially synthesized (Figure 2A and B). Each Chol-MCT1-siRNA compound candidate was treated into mouse hepatocyte FL83B cells. As opposed to native siRNA, our Chol-MCT1-siRNA does not require transfection reagents as it is fully chemically modified. The silencing effect on Slc16a1/Mct1 mRNA was monitored after 72 hr (Figure 2B). Several compounds elicited a silencing effect greater than 80% compared to the Chol-NTC-siRNA. The two most potent Chol-MCT1-siRNA, Chol-MCT1-2060 (IC50: 59.6 nM, KD%: 87.2) and Chol-MCT1-3160 (IC50: 32.4 nM, KD%: 87.7) (Figure 2C), were evaluated for their inhibitory effect on MCT1 protein levels (Figure 2D and E). Based on its IC50 value and silencing potency, Chol-MCT1-3160 construct was chosen for further studies in vivo (Table 2).

Table 2. Sequences of the selected final chemically modified siRNA candidates targeting MCT1 used for in vivo studies.

MCT1-3160 was selected for the final construct for in vivo studies. MCT1-siRNAs utilized in in vivo study was a double-strand oligonucleotide comprised of 18 sense and 20 antisense nucleotides. To sense strands, either Chol- or GN- was attached (VP: 5′-(E)-vinyl phosphonate, #: phosphorothioate, m: 2′-O-methyl, f: 2′-fluoro, Chol: tetra-ethylenglycol-cholesterol conjugate, GN: tri-N-acetyl-galactosamine).

Antisense strands:
Oligo ID Chemically modified RNA sequence
MCT1-3160 VP(mU)#(fU)#(mC)(mU)(mU)(fA)(mC)(mA)(mC)(mA)(mA)(mG)(mG)#(fU)#(mU)#(fU)#(mU)#(mA)#(mA)#(fA)
Sense strands:
Oligo ID Chemically modified RNA sequence
Chol-MCT1-3160 (mU)#(mA)#(mA)(mA)(mA)(mC)(mC)(fU)(fU)(fG)(mU)(fG)(mU)(mA)(mA)(mG)#(mA)#(mA)-Chol
GN-MCT-3160 (mU)#(mA)#(mA)(mA)(mA)(mC)(mC)(fU)(fU)(fG)(mU)(fG)(mU)(mA)(mA)(mG)#(mA)#(mA)-GN

Distinct cellular biodistribution of Chol- vs GN-conjugated siRNAs

For in vivo studies, further chemical modifications were applied (Figure 3A). MCT1-siRNAs utilized in in vivo studies are double-strand oligonucleotides comprised of 18 sense and 20 antisense nucleotides. At the 5’-end of the antisense strand, a 5’-(E)-vinyl-phosphonate modification was added to prevent phosphatase-induced degradation, enhancing in vivo stability and promoting its accumulation in target cells. Either a hydrophobic Chol or a hepatocyte-targeting GN was attached to the 3’-end of sense strands of MCT1-siRNAs to direct different hepatic cellular biodistribution.

Figure 3. Biodistribution of Chol- and GN-MCT1-siRNA in the liver.

Male C57BL/6 wild-type mice (16–18 weeks, n=4) were subcutaneously injected with 10 mg/kg of each siRNA, twice within 15 days, while fed a chow diet. Mice were sacrificed on day 15. (A) Chemical structure of the fully chemically modified siRNA that was used for further in vivo studies: Chol-MCT1-siRNA and GN-MCT1-siRNA. (B, E) Primary hepatocytes, (C, F) stellate cells, and (D, G) Kupffer cells were isolated from each mouse using different gravity centrifugations and gradient solutions after the liver perfusion. Slc16a1/Mct1 mRNA expression levels in each cell-type fraction were measured (mean ± SD, t-test, *: p<0.05, **: p<0.01).

Figure 3—source data 1. Biodistribution of Chol- and GN-MCT1-siRNA in the liver.

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Biodistribution of GN-MCT1-siRNA and Chol-MCT1-siRNA.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

Male C57BL/6 wild-type mice (16–18 weeks, n=4) were subcutaneously injected with 10 mg/kg of siRNAs twice within 15 days. Livers were perfused through inferior vena cava and multiple liver cells were isolated using different gravity centrifugations and gradient solutions. (A, D) Purity of isolated hepatocytes, (B, E) hepatic stellate cells, (C, F) and Kupffer cells was validated with representative marker genes, Alb, Des, and Clec4f expression, respectively (mean ± SD, one-way ANOVA, *: p<0.05, **: p<0.01, ***: p<0.001, ****: p<0.0001). (G, H) MCT1 protein expression levels in multiple fat tissues (inguinal white adipose tissue [iWAT], gonadal white adipose tissue [gWAT], and brown adipose tissue [BAT]) were monitored by immunohistochemistry. % MCT1 positive areas were quantified. (I, J) MCT1 protein expression levels in multiple tissues (heart, lung, kidney, spleen, and intestine) were monitored by immunohistochemistry. % MCT1 positive areas were quantified.
Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Biodistribution of GN-MCT1-siRNA and Chol-MCT1-siRNA.

To validate the biodistribution of siRNAs with these two conjugates, 10 mg/kg of each siRNA was subcutaneously injected into 16- to 18-week-old male C57BL/6 wild-type mice twice within a 15-day period. On day 15, mice were sacrificed and the livers were perfused to isolate multiple hepatic cell types, including hepatocytes, stellate cells, and Kupffer cells. Isolation of each hepatic cell type was validated for enrichment (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A–F). As expected, GN-conjugated, fully chemically modified MCT1-siRNA (GN-MCT1-siRNA) silenced Slc16a1/Mct1 mRNA only in the hepatocyte fraction (Figure 3B–D), as GN binds to the asialoglycoprotein receptor primarily expressed in hepatocytes. On the other hand, Chol-MCT1-siRNA silenced Slc16a1/Mct1 mRNA levels in all hepatic cell types (Figure 3E–G), as its cellular uptake is highly dependent on the non-specific, hydrophobic interaction between cholesterol and plasma membranes. Notably, the hepatic stellate cell fraction distinguishes GN-MCT1-siRNA from Chol-MCT1-siRNA in biodistribution, as only the latter silences Slc16a1/Mct1 in stellate cells (Figure 3C vs F). We also confirmed that both GN-MCT1-siRNA and Chol-MCT1-siRNA do not affect MCT1 levels in other major metabolic tissues (Figure 3—figure supplement 1G–J).

Subcutaneous injection of Chol-MCT1-siRNA or GN-MCT1-siRNA silences hepatic MCT1 in a genetically obese NASH mouse model

We next investigated the effect of Chol-MCT1-siRNA on reversing severe steatosis in the genetically obese ob/ob mouse on a NASH-inducing Gubra Amylin NASH (GAN) diet (Yenilmez et al., 2022). These mice normally develop severe steatosis from an early age but hardly develop fibrosis until fed the GAN diet. Each siRNA (10 mg/kg) was subcutaneously injected once every 10 days and mice were fed a GAN diet for 3 weeks before sacrifice (Figure 4A). Hepatic MCT1 protein levels were visually monitored by MCT1-positive staining immunohistochemistry (Figure 4B and C), showing more than 70% MCT1 protein depletion (Chol-MCT1-siRNA: 77.99% and GN-MCT1-siRNA: 71.35% silencing). Similar silencing was observed when Slc16a1/Mct1 mRNA levels were measured by real-time quantitative PCR (rt-qPCR) (Figure 4D). The silencing was Slc16a1/Mct1 selective, not depleting other isoforms such as Slc16a7/Mct2 and Slc16a3/Mct4 (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A and B). Importantly, there was no surge in plasma lactate level (Figure 4E), addressing the concern of potential lactic acidosis after MCT1 depletion in the liver, the major lactate-consuming tissue. We also monitored food intake and body weight over time (Figure 4—figure supplement 1C and D), as there was a report of decreased food anticipation activity upon hepatic MCT1 deletion followed by reduced plasma β-hydroxybutyrate levels (Martini et al., 2021). Intriguingly, the GN-MCT1-siRNA administration led to a decrease in both food intake and body weight, while the Chol-MCT1-siRNA did not. Neither Chol-MCT1-siRNA administration nor hepatocyte-specific MCT1KO improved glucose tolerance on the genetically obese NASH mouse model or a 12-week HFD-induced NAFLD model, respectively (Figure 4—figure supplement 1E and F).

Figure 4. Hepatic MCT1 depletion did not resolve steatosis in a genetically obese nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) mouse model.

(A) Male ob/ob mice (10 weeks, n=6) were subcutaneously injected with 10 mg/kg of siRNA once every 10 days. Mice were fed a Gubra Amylin NASH (GAN) diet for 3 weeks and sacrificed. (B) Livers were stained with MCT1 antibody and the representative images of each group are shown (scale bar: 50 µm). (C) % of MCT1 positive area shown in immunohistochemistry images were quantified. (D) Hepatic Slc16a1/Mct1 mRNA level was measured by real-time quantitative PCR (rt-qPCR) upon each siRNA administration. (E) Plasma lactate levels were monitored. (F) Mean size of lipid droplets was quantified from H&E images (mean, sem). (G) Mean number of lipid droplets was quantified from H&E images (mean, sem). (H) Liver triglyceride (TG) levels were examined in each group (mean ± SD or otherwise noted, t-test, *: p<0.05, ***: p<0.001, ****: p<0.0001).

Figure 4—source code 1. Hepatic MCT1 depletion did not resolve steatosis in a genetically obese nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) mouse model.
Figure 4—source data 1. Hepatic MCT1 depletion did not resolve steatosis in a genetically obese nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) mouse model.

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. GN-MCT1-siRNA induced a complementary effect on monocarboxylate transporter (MCT) isoform expression and decreased food intake and body weight.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

Male ob/ob mice (10 weeks, n=6) were subcutaneously injected with 10 mg/kg of siRNA once every 10 days. Mice were fed a Gubra Amylin NASH (GAN) diet for 3 weeks. (A, B) The complementary effect of Slc16a1/Mct1 depletion on Slc16a7/Mct2 and Slc16a3/Mct4 mRNA expressions was examined. (C) Accumulative food intake and (D) body weight were monitored during the study. (E) GTT was performed after 16 hr of fasting in third week of the GAN diet. (F) Male MCT1fl/fl mice (n=6) were intravenously injected with 1×1011 gc of either AAV-TBG-Cre or AAV-Lrat-Cre. Mice were fed a high-fat diet for 12 weeks. Then, GTT was performed after 16 hr of fasting (mean ± SD, t-test, *: p<0.05, **: p<0.01).
Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 1. GN-MCT1-siRNA induced a complementary effect on monocarboxylate transporter (MCT) isoform expression and decreased food intake and body weight.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2. Both Chol-MCT1-siRNA and GN-MCT1-siRNA significantly decreased hepatic DNL gene expression.

Figure 4—figure supplement 2.

Male ob/ob mice (10weeks, n=6) were subcutaneously injected with 10mg/kg of siRNA once every 10days. Mice were fed a Gubra Amylin NASH (GAN) diet for 3weeks and sacrificed. Representative DNL gene expression levels were measured in (A, B) mRNA and (C, D) protein upon Chol-siRNA or GN-siRNA administration, respectively. Protein expression levels were quantified. (E, F) Phosphorylated AMPK (pAMPK) and AMPK protein levels and their expression ratio were quantified (mean ± SD, t-test, *: p<0.05, **: p<0.01, ***: p<0.001, ****: p<0.0001).
Figure 4—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Both Chol-MCT1-siRNA and GN-MCT1-siRNA significantly decreased hepatic DNL gene expression.

Hepatic MCT1 depletion downregulates lipogenic genes but not steatosis in the ob/ob NASH diet mouse model

In order to fully analyze steatosis in NASH, lipid droplet morphology and total hepatic TG were assessed (Figure 4F–H). The results showed that neither GN-MCT1-siRNA nor Chol-MCT1-siRNA decreased total hepatic TG levels (Figure 4H), although quantitative analysis of H&E images showed a small decrease in mean lipid droplet size and increased number of lipid droplets upon MCT1 silencing (Figure 4F and G). These data suggest the possibility that hepatic MCT1 depletion either (1) inhibits formation or fusion of lipid droplets, or (2) enhances lipolysis to diminish lipid droplet size.

To investigate the underlying mechanism by which lipid droplet morphological dynamics change, we monitored the effect of hepatic MCT1 depletion on DNL-related gene expression. Both GN-MCT1-siRNA and Chol-MCT1-siRNA strongly decreased the mRNA and protein levels related to representative DNL genes (Figure 4—figure supplement 2A–D). Intriguingly, both modes of hepatic MCT1 depletion also inhibited expression of the upstream regulatory transcription factors SREBP1 and ChREBP. Because phosphorylated AMPK (pAMPK), an active form of AMPK, is known to inhibit SREBP nuclear translocation (Li et al., 2011) as well as the DNA binding activity of ChREBP (Kawaguchi et al., 2002), we evaluated pAMPK levels. As a result, there was a significant increase in pAMPK levels and pAMPK/AMPK ratio in both GN-MCT1-siRNA and Chol-MCT1-siRNA injected groups (Figure 4—figure supplement 2E and F).

Opposite effects of Chol-MCT1-siRNA versus GN-MCT1-siRNA on fibrotic collagen expression

We next monitored fibrosis, a tissue damaging phenotype that is associated with NASH. Consistent with the results in LX2 stellate cells (Figure 1), Chol-MCT1-siRNA administration to ob/ob mice on GAN diet significantly reduced liver collagen 1 protein levels (Figure 5A and B). This result could be attributable to the fact that subcutaneous injection of the Chol-MCT1-siRNA compound is able to silence genes in hepatic stellate cells, the predominant cell type that produces collagens. Interestingly, decreases in mRNA encoding collagen 1 isoforms were not detected by rt-qPCR analysis (Figure 5C), indicating possible effects at the level of translation or protein turnover. Surprisingly, an opposite phenotype on collagen 1 protein expression was observed in response to administration of GN-MCT1-siRNA compared to Chol-MCT1-siRNA (Figure 5D and E). Hepatocyte-specific GN-MCT1-siRNA actually enhanced the expression of type 1 collagen protein in these experiments (Figure 5D and E), and this effect was also apparent at the mRNA expression level (Figure 5F). Overall fibrosis as detected by Sirius Red was also analyzed in these experiments, as this staining detects all types of collagen fibers that are involved in hepatic fibrosis, such as III, IV, V, and VI. In line with collagen 1 mRNA and protein levels, GN-MCT1-siRNA significantly enhanced Sirius Red positive areas in the images, as shown in Figure 5G and H. Despite its inhibitory effect on collagen 1 production levels, Chol-MCT1-siRNA did not reduce Sirius Red positive areas.

Figure 5. Opposite effects of Chol-MCT1-siRNA versus GN-MCT1-siRNA on fibrotic type 1 collagen expression.

Male ob/ob mice (10weeks, n=6) were subcutaneously injected with 10mg/kg of siRNA once every 10days. Mice were fed a Gubra Amylin NASH (GAN) diet for 3weeks and sacrificed. Representative fibrogenic gene expression levels were measured for (A, B) mRNA and (C, D) protein. (E, F) Protein expression levels were quantified. (G) Livers were stained with Sirius Red and the representative images of each group are shown (scale bar: 200 µm). (H) % of Sirius Red positive areas were quantified (mean ± SD, t-test, *: p<0.05, **: p<0.01, ***: p<0.001).

Figure 5—source code 1. Opposite effects of Chol-MCT1-siRNA versus GN-MCT1-siRNA on fibrotic type 1 collagen expression.
Figure 5—source data 1. Opposite effects of Chol-MCT1-siRNA versus GN-MCT1-siRNA on fibrotic type 1 collagen expression.

Figure 5.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1. A comparable level of M1/M2 macrophage polarization upon Chol-MCT1-siRNA and GN-MCT1-siRNA administration.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

Male ob/ob mice (10weeks, n=6) were subcutaneously injected with 10mg/kg of siRNA once every 10days. Mice were fed a Gubra Amylin NASH (GAN) diet for 3weeks and sacrificed. Representative pro-inflammatory M1 markers and pro-fibrogenic M2 macrophage gene expression levels were measured in (A, B) upon Chol-siRNA or GN-siRNA administration, respectively (mean ± SD, t-test, *: p<0.05, **: p<0.01, ***: p<0.001, ****: p<0.0001).
Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1. A comparable level of M1/M2 macrophage polarization upon Chol-MCT1-siRNA and GN-MCT1-siRNA administration.
Figure 5—figure supplement 2. Intravenous injection of AAV9-Lrat-Cre in MCT1fl/fl mice specifically targets hepatic stellate cells.

Figure 5—figure supplement 2.

(A) Male mice (9–10 weeks, n=4) were intravenously injected with 1×1011 gc of either AAV9-Lrat-null or AAV9-Lrat-Cre. Mice were fed a chow diet for 3 weeks and sacrificed. Isolation of either (B) primary hepatocytes or (C) stellate cells was validated with each cell type’s representative marker, albumin and desmin, respectively. Slc16a1/Mct1 mRNA expression levels in (D) hepatocyte or (E) stellate cell fractions were examined (mean ± SD, t-test, *: p<0.05, ****: p<0.0001). (F) MCT1 protein expression levels in multiple fat tissues (inguinal white adipose tissue [iWAT], gonadal white adipose tissue [gWAT], and brown adipose tissue [BAT]) were monitored by immunohistochemistry. % MCT1 positive areas were quantified. (G) MCT1 protein expression levels in multiple tissues (heart, lung, kidney, spleen, and intestine) were monitored by immunohistochemistry. % MCT1 positive areas were quantified.
Figure 5—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Intravenous injection of AAV9-Lrat-Cre in MCT1fl/fl mice specifically targets hepatic stellate cells.

A comparable level of M1/M2 macrophage polarization upon GN-MCT1-siRNA and Chol-MCT1-siRNA administration

Given the distinct hepatic cellular distribution of Chol-MCT1-siRNA and GN-MCT1-siRNA (Figure 3—figure supplement 1), the opposite fibrogenic phenotype observed may be attributed to MCT1’s role in non-hepatocyte cell types such as the inflammatory Kupffer cells and the fibrogenic hepatic stellate cells. To determine which hepatic cell type derived the opposite fibrotic phenotypes of MCT1, we first hypothesized that GN-MCT1-siRNA activates M2 pro-fibrogenic macrophage more than Chol-MCT1-siRNA does. Since Zhang et al. have demonstrated that histone lactylation via lactyl-CoA intermediate drives the shift of M1 macrophages into pro-fibrogenic M2-like macrophage polarization upon bacterial exposure, the epigenetic contribution of lactate via lactylation has started to be appreciated (Zhang et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2022; Gaffney et al., 2020). Similarly, Cui et al. have shown that histone lactylation promotes macrophage profibrotic activity via p300 in lung myofibroblasts (Cui et al., 2021). Interestingly, another report claims targeting MCT1-mediated lactate flux attenuates pulmonary fibrosis by preventing macrophage profibrotic polarization (He et al., 2023). These findings suggest the possibility that reduced histone lactylation in macrophages, indirectly affected by MCT1 depletion in the stellate cells, prevents fibrogenesis and inhibits pro-fibrogenic M2 macrophage polarization. Thus, representative M1 pro-inflammatory macrophage and M2 pro-fibrogenic macrophage markers were monitored in our experiments. However, GN-MCT1-siRNA treatment caused comparable M1/M2 macrophage activation levels to Chol-MCT1-siRNA treatment (Figure 5—figure supplement 1A and B). These data suggest that the opposite fibrotic phenotypes caused by the different siRNA constructs are not due to M1/M2 macrophage polarization.

MCT1KO by AAV-Lrat-Cre and AAV-TBG-Cre constructs confirm cell-type specificity of MCT1KO effects

The results presented above suggested that Chol-MCT1-siRNA downregulates type 1 collagen protein by depleting MCT1 in hepatic stellate cells, which hepatocyte-specific GN-MCT1-siRNA cannot target. To test this hypothesis, we developed and validated AAV9-Lrat-Cre constructs to generate hepatic stellate cell-specific MCT1 knockout mice. Male MCT1fl/fl mice (Jha et al., 2020) were intravenously injected with AAV9-Lrat-Cre (1×1011 gc) and sacrificed 3 weeks later (Figure 5—figure supplement 2A). Isolation of hepatocytes and hepatic stellate cells was validated with their representative marker genes encoding albumin and desmin, respectively (Figure 5—figure supplement 2B and C). Successful depletion of hepatic stellate cell-selective Slc16a1Mct1 mRNA was confirmed in the MCT1fl/fl mice injected with the AAV9-Lrat-Cre construct. Slc16a1/Mct1 mRNA levels in the hepatocytes, which account for up to 70% of total liver cell types, were intact (Figure 5—figure supplement 2D and E). No change in MCT1 protein level was observed in other metabolic tissues (Figure 5—figure supplement 2F and G).

Hepatocyte-specific MCT1KO accelerated fibrosis, while hepatic stellate cell-specific MCT1KO decreased it in the CDHFD-induced NASH mouse model

We employed the choline-deficient, high-fat diet (CDHFD)-induced NASH mouse model to test these AAV constructs on steatosis and fibrosis. CDHFD induces severe steatosis due to inhibited VLDL secretion and β-oxidation and thereby exacerbates NASH fibrosis in a relatively short time (Raubenheimer et al., 2006; Matsumoto et al., 2013). MCT1fl/fl mice were intravenously injected with 2×1011 gc of AAV8-TBG-Cre or AAV9-Lrat-Cre or both (Figure 6A). A week after the injections, mice were fed with a CDHFD for 8 weeks to induce NASH. Depletion of hepatic Slc16a1/Mct1 mRNA in each group was confirmed (Figure 6B). There was no food intake or body weight difference between the groups (Figure 6C and D). Similar to the results we obtained by MCT1 silencing with siRNAs (Figure 4), MCT1 deletion in either hepatocytes or in hepatic stellate cells did not resolve steatosis (Figure 6E and F).

Figure 6. MCT1 depletion did not resolve steatosis in the choline-deficient, high-fat diet (CDHFD)-induced nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) model.

Figure 6.

(A) Male MCT1fl/fl mice (8 weeks, n=10) were intravenously injected with 2×1011 gc of AAV-TBG-Cre or AAV-Lrat-Cre or both. The same amount of AAV-TBG-null or AAV-Lrat-null was used as a control. A week after the injection, mice were fed a CDHFD for 8 weeks and sacrificed. (B) Slc16a1/Mct1 mRNA expression levels in whole livers were examined. (C) Food intake and (D) body weights were monitored. (E) CDHFD-induced steatosis was monitored by H&E (scale bar: 200 µm). (F) % of lipid droplet areas was quantified (mean ± SD, one-way ANOVA, *: p<0.05, **: p<0.01, ***: p<0.001, ****: p<0.0001).

Figure 6—source code 1. MCT1 depletion did not resolve steatosis in the choline-deficient, high-fat diet (CDHFD)-induced nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) model.
Figure 6—source data 1. MCT1 depletion did not resolve steatosis in the choline-deficient, high-fat diet (CDHFD)-induced nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) model.

Also consistent with the results obtained by hepatocyte selective MCT1 silencing with GN-MCT1-siRNA (Figure 5), hepatocyte-specific knockout of MCT1 (Hep KO) enhanced the collagen 1 level compared to the control group (Figure 7A). In contrast, hepatic stellate cell-specific MCT1 knockout (HSC KO) prevented CDHFD-induced collagen 1 protein levels (Figure 7B). MCT1KO in combined hepatocytes and hepatic stellate cells blunted the effect shown in each single KO (Figure 7C). Overall liver fibrosis detected by trichrome staining again confirmed the acceleration of fibrosis in the Hep KO group and a downward trend in the HSC KO group (Figure 7D and E). Dual MCT1KO in hepatocytes plus hepatic stellate cells showed no change in overall fibrosis, similar to the Chol-MCT1-siRNA results (Figure 5G and H). Additionally, liver stiffness was monitored via ultrasound-based shear wave elastography (SWE) in a noninvasive diagnostic mode for liver disease (Morin et al., 2021; Czernuszewicz et al., 2022). After 8 weeks of CDHFD, all groups had the same level of increased liver stiffness above what the control mice showed at 4 weeks, however, Hep KO mice exhibited elevated liver stiffness over all other groups at 4 weeks of the diet (Figure 7F and G). There was no change in plasma alanine transaminase (ALT) levels among the groups (Figure 7H).

Figure 7. Hepatocyte-specific MCT1KO accelerated fibrosis, while hepatic stellate cell-specific MCT1KO decreased it.

Figure 7.

Male MCT1fl/fl mice (6 weeks, n=10) were intravenously injected with 2×1011 gc of AAV-TBG-Cre or AAV-Lrat-Cre or both. The same amount of AAV-TBG-null or AAV-Lrat-null was used as a control. A week after the injection, mice were fed a choline-deficient, high-fat diet (CDHFD) for 8 weeks and sacrificed. (A) Collagen 1 protein levels were compared between the control and the hepatocyte MCT1KO groups. (B) Collagen 1 protein levels were compared between the control and the hepatic stellate cell MCT1KO groups. (C) Collagen 1 protein levels were compared between the control group and MCT1KO in both hepatocyte and hepatic stellate cell groups. (D) Livers were stained with trichrome and the representative images of each group were shown (scale bar: 100 µm). (E) Trichrome staining images were quantified. (F) Liver stiffness was monitored 4 weeks after CDHFD feeding via shear wave elastography (SWE). (G) Liver stiffness was monitored 8 weeks after CDHFD feeding via SWE. (H) Alanine transaminase (ALT) levels were measured in every CDHFD-fed group (mean ± SD, t-test, one-way ANOVA, *: p<0.05, **: p<0.01, ***: p<0.001, ****: p<0.0001).

Figure 7—source code 1. Hepatocyte-specific MCT1KO accelerated fibrosis, while hepatic stellate cell-specific MCT1KO decreased it.
Figure 7—source data 1. Hepatocyte-specific MCT1KO accelerated fibrosis, while hepatic stellate cell-specific MCT1KO decreased it.

Lactate enhances the TGF-β1-stimulatory effect in the presence of pyruvate

To understand the underlying pathway explaining the opposite effects of GN-MCT1-siRNA and Chol-MCT1-siRNA on fibrotic collagen expression, we hypothesize that the lactate transporter MCT1 in hepatic stellate cells promotes the expression of fibrotic collagens by regulating lactate flux. Furthermore, we propose that in the case of MCT1 depletion in hepatocytes, lactate present in the hepatic blood flow that has not been taken up by hepatocytes is redirected to other hepatic cell types, including hepatic stellate cells. To test this hypothesis, we examined whether lactate itself acts as a fibrogenic inducer in cultured LX2 cells treated with increasing doses of sodium lactate (NaLac: 0, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40 mM) for 48 hr and then harvested. However, no increase in collagen mRNA or protein levels upon lactate treatment was observed (Figure 8A and B), suggesting that lactate itself may not be a fibrogenic inducer. We then investigated whether lactate assists in collagen production in the presence of other potent fibrogenic inducers, such as TGF-β1. LX2 cells were treated with three different conditions for 48 hr: (1) TGF-β1 only, (2) TGF-β1 with sodium pyruvate (NaPyr: 1 mM), and (3) TGF-β1 with the combination of sodium pyruvate (1 mM) and sodium lactate (10 mM) matched to the physiological lactate:pyruvate (L:P) ratio. Interestingly, the combination treatment of sodium pyruvate (1 mM) and sodium lactate (10 mM) significantly enhanced both mRNA and protein expressions of collagen 1 (Figure 8C–E). As the cells were grown in the high glucose (25 mM) DMEM condition, we further tested if MCT1 depletion can inhibit both endogenous and exogenous lactate-mediated collagen 1 production. MCT1 depletion in LX2 cells prevented TGF-β1-stimulated collagen 1 production in both conditions where lactate was solely generated by endogenous glycolysis (Figure 8F) and where exogenous lactate was supplied (Figure 8G). Taken together, these findings suggest that although lactate itself is not a fibrogenic inducer, it can assist in TGF-β1-induced collagen production via MCT1.

Figure 8. Lactate enhances the transforming growth factor 1β (TGF-β1)-stimulatory effect in the presence of pyruvate in human LX2 stellate cells.

Cells were treated with increasing doses of sodium lactate (0, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40 mM) for 48 hr. Dose-response effect of sodium lactate on (A) COL1A1 mRNA and (B) collagen 1 protein levels were monitored. Lactate effect on TGF-β1-stimulated collagen production was also examined. LX2 cells were treated with three conditions with or without TGF-β1 (10 ng/ml) treatment for 48 hr: (1) control (DMEM/high glucose media only), (2) sodium pyruvate (1 mM), and (3) the combination of sodium pyruvate (1 mM) and sodium lactate (10 mM). (C) Collagen 1 protein levels. (D) Quantification of collagen 1 protein levels. (E) COL1A1 mRNA expression levels. To test if MCT1 depletion can inhibit both endogenous and exogenous lactate-mediated collagen 1 production, cells were transfected with either NTC-siRNA or MCT1-siRNA for 6 hr. Then, cells were maintained in serum-starved media with or without 10 ng/ml of recombinant human TGF-β1 for 48 hr and harvested. (F) Collagen 1 protein levels upon sodium pyruvate-deprived condition. (G) Collagen 1 protein levels upon sodium pyruvate (1 mM) and sodium lactate (10 mM) condition (mean ± SD, one-way ANOVA, *: p<0.05, **: p<0.01, ***: p<0.001, ****: p<0.0001).

Figure 8—source data 1. Lactate enhances the transforming growth factor 1β (TGF-β1)-stimulatory effect in the presence of pyruvate in human LX2 stellate cells.

Figure 8.

Figure 8—figure supplement 1. MCT1 promotes SMAD3 phosphorylation/activation in human LX2 stellate cells.

Figure 8—figure supplement 1.

Cells were transfected with either NTC-siRNA or MCT1-siRNA for 6 hr. Then, cells were maintained in serum-starved media with or without 10 ng/ml of recombinant human transforming growth factor 1β (TGF-β1) for 48 hr and harvested. (A, B) SMAD3 and phosphorylated SMAD3 (pSMAD3) protein levels and their expression ratio were quantified. (C) With either NTC-siRNA or MCT1-siRNA pretreatment for 6 hr, different concentrations of TGF-β1 (0, 1, 2.5, 5 ng/ml) were treated to the cells for 48 hr. Collagen 1, SMAD3, and pSMAD3 protein levels were monitored. (D) Quantification of collagen 1 protein levels. (E) Quantification of pSMAD and SMAD3 ratio (mean ± SD, t-test, *: p<0.05, **: p<0.01).
Figure 8—figure supplement 1—source data 1. MCT1 promotes SMAD3 phosphorylation/activation in human LX2 stellate cells.
Figure 8—figure supplement 2. MCT1 silencing enhanced fibrogenic gene expression levels in human hematoma cell lines, HepG2.

Figure 8—figure supplement 2.

Cells were transfected with either NTC-siRNA or MCT1-siRNA for 6 hr. 48 hr later, cells were harvested, and media were collected. LX2 cells were provided with the conditioned media (40% conditioned media+60% fresh media) and harvested in 48 hr. (A) SLC16A1/MCT1 mRNA expression levels were measured in HepG2 cells upon MCT1-siRNA treatment. (B) Fibrogenic gene expression levels were measured in HepG2 cells upon MCT1-siRNA treatment. (C) Fibrogenic gene expression levels were measured in LX2 cells upon conditioned media treatment (mean ± SD, t-test, *: p<0.05, **: p<0.01).
Figure 8—figure supplement 2—source data 1. MCT1 silencing enhanced fibrogenic gene expression levels in human hematoma cell lines, HepG2.
Figure 8—figure supplement 3. Graphical abstract.

Figure 8—figure supplement 3.

Hepatocyte MCT1KO enhances fibrosis, while stellate cell MCT1KO decreases it.
© 2024, BioRender Inc
This figure was created with BioRender.com, and published under a CC-BY-NC-ND license with permission.

MCT1 promotes SMAD3 phosphorylation/activation in LX2 cells

We also examined the phosphorylation of SMAD3 which is the canonical pathway of TGF-β1-induced collagen production (Breitkopf et al., 2006; Friedman, 2008,Tsuchida and Friedman, 2017). As a result, we observed that MCT1-siRNA significantly decreased the phosphorylated SMAD3 (pSMAD3) protein level and the pSMAD3/SMAD3 ratio in the absence of TGF-β1 treatment (Figure 8—figure supplement 1A and B), implying the potential regulatory effect of MCT1 on the TGF-β1-SMAD3 axis. Interestingly, however, in the presence of TGF-β1 pretreatment, the contribution of pSMAD on MCT1’s inhibitory effect on collagen 1 production was limited. While MCT1 depletion inhibited collagen production, the significant decrease of pSMAD3/SMAD ratio was only shown upon low concentrations of TGF-β1 (0, 1, 2.5 ng/ml) pretreatment (Figure 8—figure supplement 1C–E). This data suggests that both SMAD3-dependent and independent MCT1 regulation may be relevant to the TGF-β1-induced collagen production in which MAPK, NF-kB, and PI3K are potential mediators in SMAD3-independent TGF-β1 pathways (Derynck and Zhang, 2003; Xu et al., 2016). However, the mechanism of these pathways and biological consequences are still not fully understood.

MCT1 depletion enhanced fibrogenic gene expression levels in human hepatoma HepG2 cells

The direct effect of MCT1 depletion in HepG2 hepatocytes was also investigated by transfection with either NTC-siRNA or MCT1-siRNA (Figure 8—figure supplement 2A and B). MCT1-siRNA treatment depleted SLC16A1/MCT1 mRNA levels (Figure 8—figure supplement 2A) and significantly enhanced fibrogenic gene markers ACTA2 and COL1A1 (Figure 8—figure supplement 2B). However, HepG2-derived conditioned media-treated LX2 cells did not change the expression of fibrogenic genes (Figure 8—figure supplement 2C). These data are consistent with the idea that enhanced fibrogenesis due to GN-MCT1-siRNA treatment of mice may be a direct effect of hepatocyte MCT1 depletion. However, hepatic stellate cells are thought to be the primary producers of collagen, contributing 10–20 times more collagen than hepatocytes or endothelial cells, respectively, in rodent systems (Friedman et al., 1985). Thus, this issue will require additional work to fully understand the basis for the effect of GN-MCT1-siRNA treatment.

Discussion

The major finding of this study is that MCT1 function in hepatic stellate cells promotes collagen 1 expression, as MCT1 depletion in this cell type, either in vitro in cell culture (Figure 1B) or in vivo in mice (Figure 7B), attenuates fibrotic collagen 1 protein production. We also provided evidence that lactate may enhance TGF-β1-induced collagen production via MCT1 in studies in cultured LX2 cells. The finding in mice was made by generating novel AAV9-Lrat-Cre constructs that can be injected into MCT1fl/fl mice to elicit stellate cell-selective MCT1 depletion, as verified by isolation and Slc16a1/Mct1 mRNA analysis in liver cell types (Figure 5—figure supplement 2). Previous use of Lrat-Cre for germline transmission had validated constitutive gene KO selectively in hepatic stellate cells in mice (Mederacke et al., 2013), while our AAV-Lrat-Cre construct allows inducible gene KO, eliminating time-demanding mouse crossing and breeding. Surprisingly, MCT1KO in hepatocytes, both in vivo (Figure 7A) and in vitro (Figure 8—figure supplement 2B), evoked the opposite effect: a robust upregulation of collagen 1 expression and fibrosis. This may be an effect of increased local lactate to enhance stellate cell collagen production, but may also be in part a cell-autonomous effect in hepatocytes, as we observed increased collagen 1 expression in Hep2G cells upon silencing SLC16A1/MCT1 (Figure 8—figure supplement 2). The hepatocyte-selective MCT1KO caused increased total fibrosis, evidenced by trichrome staining of liver (Figure 7D and E), while the stellate cell MCT1KO was associated with a trend toward diminished trichrome staining that did not reach statistical significance (Figure 7D and E). Nonetheless, taken together, our data suggest that lactate flux via MCT1 in hepatic stellate cells strongly promotes collagen 1 translation or inhibits protein turnover rates (Figure 8—figure supplement 3).

Interestingly, the inhibitory effect of stellate cell MCT1KO was observed only at the collagen 1 protein level, while the hepatocyte MCT1KO affected both collagen mRNA and protein. The exact mechanism needs to be further investigated, but one possibility is that increased import of lactate into hepatic stellate cells serves as a precursor for glycine, proline, and hydroxyproline synthesis, as suggested in other systems such as cancer or pulmonary fibrosis (Pérez-Escuredo et al., 2016; Hamanaka et al., 2019). This could potentially explain why MCT1 depletion in stellate cells has a greater translational effect on collagen expression rather than transcriptional regulation.

Strong support for the above conclusions was obtained in an alternative experimental model of NASH—genetically obese ob/ob mice on a GAN diet (Yenilmez et al., 2022). In these experiments we employed chemically stabilized siRNA, taking advantage of RNA modifications 2-fluoro, 2-O-methyl ribose, and phosphorothioate backbone replacement to block siRNA degradation and immune responses as well as enhance in vivo delivery effectiveness and silencing longevity (Behlke, 2006; Khvorova and Watts, 2017). Conjugation of such siRNA compounds with GN promotes binding to the asialoglycoprotein receptor that is primarily expressed in hepatocytes at high levels, and we confirmed hepatocyte-selective gene silencing with such constructs (Figure 3B–D). Moreover, injection of GN-MCT1-siRNA did not affect MCT1 expression in other major tissues including inguinal white adipose tissue, gonadal white adipose tissue, brown adipose tissue, intestine, heart, lung, kidney, and spleen (Figure 3—figure supplement 1G and H). Hepatocyte-selective MCT1 silencing strongly upregulated collagen 1 in livers of ob/ob mice on a GAN diet (Figure 5D–F), as did hepatocyte-selective MCT1KO in the CDHFD mouse model (Figure 7A). In contrast, Chol-conjugated, chemically modified siRNA targeting MCT1 silenced the gene in all three liver cell types tested, including hepatic stellate cells (Figure 3E–G), and did attenuate liver collagen 1 expression (Figure 5A and B). This result is consistent with the idea that depleting MCT1 in stellate cells decreases collagen 1 production, as shown by MCT1KO in stellate cells (Figure 7B). The data in Figure 3 and Figure 3—figure supplement 1 also show the effectiveness of RNA interference (RNAi) in interrogating cell-specific processes in liver, and highlight the multiple advantages over traditional small molecule inhibitors in developing therapeutics (Bumcrot et al., 2006; Aagaard and Rossi, 2007). To date, five RNAi-based therapeutic agents have received FDA approvals targeting multiple disease areas, and a great many clinical trials of oligonucleotide therapeutics are in progress (Padda et al., 2023; Traber and Yu, 2023; Zhu et al., 2022; Mullard, 2022).

Analysis of gene expression profiles also showed that hepatic MCT1 positively regulates the levels of SREBP1 and ChREBP, major transcription factors regulating liver lipid metabolism, as well as their target DNL genes. These effects were apparently not sufficient to reverse severe steatosis in the genetically obese NASH mouse model (Figure 4), although a slight decrease in mean lipid droplet size was observed. The remaining steatosis may be attributed to the continuous supply of fatty acids from adipose tissue lipolysis, which accounts for up to 65% of hepatic fat accumulation as opposed to only 25% coming from hepatic DNL (Donnelly et al., 2005). While recognizing that the decreased expression of DNL genes does not necessarily indicate an inhibited fatty acid synthesis rate, we also cannot rule out the possibility of compensatory effects from other MCT isoforms that are expressed. However, since MCT1 haploinsufficiency showed greatly reduced HFD-induced hepatic steatosis, the discrepancies with our data may be due to other tissues being involved or the different mouse models used. Overall, it is clear from our studies that steatosis is not much affected by hepatic MCT1 depletion in two models of NASH in mice. A possible future strategy for NASH therapeutics may be to combine the depletion of MCT1 in stellate cells to decrease fibrosis with a potent anti-steatosis target such as DGAT2 (Yenilmez et al., 2022; Calle et al., 2021; Loomba et al., 2020) which we and others have shown is effective in reducing steatosis when depleted. Although there are still remaining challenges in developing a successful hepatic stellate cell-selective delivery system (Poelstra, 2020), ongoing studies are identifying promising candidates such as M6P-polyethylene glycol (Zhu and Mahato, 2010), IGF2R-specific peptide coupled nanocomplex (Zhao et al., 2018), and others (Chen et al., 2019).

To understand the underlying mechanism by which hepatic MCT1 depletion drives the downregulation of DNL genes expression, we investigated AMPK activation, as pAMPK has a negative regulatory effect on SREBP1 and ChREBP activation (Li et al., 2011; Kawaguchi et al., 2002). Indeed, hepatic MCT1 silencing enhanced AMPK phosphorylation, consistent with the previous MCT1 haploinsufficient mice study (Carneiro et al., 2017). These data are also in line with another study in which MCT1 inhibition reduced ATP production and activated AMPK, thus deactivating SREBP1c and lowering levels of its target SCD1 (Zhao et al., 2020). It remains to be examined whether other mechanisms are also at play that connect MCT1 function in liver to DNL gene regulation.

In summary, the data presented here highlight hepatic stellate cell MCT1 as a potential therapeutic target to prevent NASH fibrogenesis related to collagen 1 production. Its utility as a therapeutic target is complicated by our finding that MCT1 depletion in hepatocytes actually increases fibrosis. This work highlights the importance of contemplating cell-type specificity when developing therapeutic strategies, especially in systems of complex cellular landscapes such as NASH.

Materials and methods

Oligonucleotide synthesis

The 15–20 or 18–20 sequence oligonucleotides were synthesized by phosphoramidite solid-phase synthesis on a Dr Oligo 48 (Biolytic, Fremont, CA, USA), or MerMade12 (Biosearch Technologies, Novato, CA, USA) using 2ʹ-F and 2ʹ-O-Me phosphoramidites with standard protecting groups (Chemgenes, Wilmington, MA, USA). For the 5’-VP coupling, 5'-(E)-vinyl tetraphosphonate (pivaloyloxymethyl) 2'-O-methyl-uridine 3'-CE phosphoramidite was used (Hongene Biotech, Union City, CA, USA). Phosphoramidites were prepared at 0.1 M in anhydrous acetonitrile (ACN), except for 2'-O-methyl-uridine phosphoramidite dissolved in anhydrous ACN containing 15% dimethylformamide. 5-(Benzylthio)1H-tetrazole (BTT) was used as the activator at 0.25 M, coupling time for all phosphoramidites was 4 min. Detritylations were performed using 3% trichloroacetic acid in dichloromethane. Capping reagents used were CAP A (20% n-methylimidazole in ACN) and CAP B (20% acetic anhydride and 30% 2,6-lutidine in ACN). Phosphite oxidation to convert to phosphate or phosphorothioate was performed with 0.05 M iodine in pyridine-H2O (9:1, vol/vol) or 0.1 M solution of 3-[(dimethylaminomethylene)amino]-3H-1,2,4-dithiazole-5-thione (DDTT) in pyridine, respectively. All synthesis reagents were purchased from ChemGenes. Unconjugated oligonucleotides were synthesized on 500 Å long-chain alkyl amine (LCAA) controlled pore glass (CPG) functionalized with Unylinker terminus (ChemGenes). Chol-conjugated oligonucleotides were synthesized on a 500 Å LCAA-CPG support, functionalized with a tetra-ethylenglycol cholesterol moiety bound through a succinate linker (ChemGenes). GN-conjugated oligonucleotides were grown on a 500 Å LCAA-CPG functionalized with an aminopropanediol-based trivalent GalNAc cluster (Hongene).

Deprotection and purification of oligonucleotides for screening of sequences

Prior to the deprotection, synthesis columns containing oligonucleotides were treated with 10% diethylamine (DEA) in ACN to deprotect cyanoethyl groups. Synthesis columns containing the oligonucleotides covalently attached to the solid supports were cleaved and deprotected for 1 hr at room temperature with anhydrous mono-methylamine gas (Airgas). Columns with deprotected oligonucleotides were washed with 1 ml of 0.1 M sodium acetate in 85% ethanol aqueous solution, followed by rinse with an 85% ethanol aqueous solution. The excess ethanol was dried from the column on a vacuum manifold. Finally, the oligonucleotides were eluted off the columns with MilliQ water.

Deprotection and purification of oligonucleotides for in vivo experiments

Chol- or GN-conjugated oligonucleotides were cleaved and deprotected with 28–30% ammonium hydroxide and 40% aqueous methylamine in a 1:1 ratio for 2 hr at room temperature. VP-containing oligonucleotides were cleaved and deprotected as described previously. Briefly, CPG with VP-oligonucleotides was treated with a solution of 3% DEA in 28–30% ammonium hydroxide for 20 hr at 35°C. The cleaved oligonucleotide solutions were filtered to remove CPG and dried under a vacuum. The pellets were resuspended in 5% ACN in water and purified on an Agilent 1290 Infinity II HPLC system. VP and GN-conjugated oligonucleotides were purified using a custom 20×150 mm2 column packed with Source 15Q anion exchange resin (Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA). Run conditions were the following. Eluent A: 20 mM sodium acetate in 10% ACN in water. Eluent B: 1 M sodium bromide in 10% ACN in water. Linear gradient 10–35% B 20 min at 40°C. Chol-conjugated oligonucleotides were purified using 21.2×150 mm2 PRP-C18 column (Hamilton Co, Reno, NV, USA). Run conditions were the following: Eluent A, 50 mM sodium acetate in 5% ACN in water; Eluent B: 100% ACN. Linear gradient, 40–60% B 20 min at 60°C. Flow used was 40 ml/min for both systems. Peaks were monitored at 260 nm. Fractions collected were analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Pure fractions were combined and dried under a vacuum and resuspended in 5% ACN. Oligonucleotides were desalted by size exclusion on a 50×250 mm2 custom column packed with Sephadex G-25 media (Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA), and lyophilized. Reagents for deprotection and purification were purchased from Fisher Scientific, Sigma-Aldrich, and Oakwood Chemicals.

LC-MS analysis of oligonucleotides

The identity of oligonucleotides is verified by LC-MS analysis on an Agilent 6530 accurate mass Q-TOF using the following conditions: buffer A: 100 mM 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP) (Oakwood Chemicals) and 9 mM triethylamine (TEA) (Fisher Scientific) in LC-MS grade water (Fisher Scientific); buffer B:100 mM HFIP and 9 mM TEA in LC-MS grade methanol (Fisher Scientific); column, Agilent AdvanceBio oligonucleotides C18; linear gradient 0–35% B 5 min was used for unconjugated and GN-conjugated oligonucleotides; linear gradient 50–100% B 5 min was used for cholesterol-conjugated oligonucleotides; temperature, 60°C; flow rate, 0.85 ml/min. LC peaks are monitored at 260 nm. MS parameters: source, electrospray ionization; ion polarity, negative mode; range, 100–3,200 m/z; scan rate, 2 spectra/s; capillary voltage, 4000; fragmentor, 200 V; gas temperature, 325°C.

LX2 human hepatic stellate cell studies

Human hepatic stellate cell line, LX2, was freshly purchased from the Millipore Sigma (cat SCC064) and the cell line authentication test conducted by ATCC demonstrated a match percentage exceeding the 80% threshold. LX2 cells were cultured in DMEM/high glucose media (Gibco, cat 11995065 and Fisher, cat 11965092) with 10% FBS. To test the preventative effect of MCT1 depletion in TGF-β1-stimulated hepatic stellate cell conditions, LX2 cells were plated in 6-well plates (300k cells/well) or 12-well plates (150k cells/well) in DMEM/high glucose media with 2% FBS. To test the lactate effect on collagen production, cells were treated with sodium lactate (Sigma-Aldrich, cat L7022) for 48 hr and harvested. To test the MCT1 effect on TGF-β1-stimulated collagen production, cells were first transfected with either NTC-siRNA or MCT1-siRNA (IDT, cat 308915476) using Lipofectamine RNAi Max (Thermo Fisher, cat 13778075) for 6 hr in less serum optiMEM media (Thermo Fisher, cat 31985062). Then, cells were maintained in serum-starved media with or without 10 ng/ml of recombinant human TGF-β1 (R&D Systems, cat 240-B/CF) for 48 hr and harvested. As a housekeeping gene, β-actin (ACTB) was used.

Human HepG2 hepatoma cell studies

Human hepatoma cell line, HepG2, was freshly purchased from ATCC (cat HB-8065) and the cell line authentication test conducted by ATCC confirmed a match percentage exceeding the 80% threshold. Cells were cultured in RPMI media (Gibco, cat 11875-093) with 10% FBS. To test the effect of MCT1 depletion, cells were plated in 6 well plates (300k cells/well) or 12-well plates (150k cells/well). The next day, cells were transfected with either NTC-siRNA or MCT1-siRNA using Lipofectamine RNAi Max (Thermo Fisher, cat 13778075) for 6 hr in less serum optiMEM media (Thermo Fisher, cat 31985062). After 48 hr, HepG2 cells were harvested. The media were saved to further test for secreted factors that may affect hepatic stellate cell activation. LX2 cells were incubated with the conditioned media (40% conditioned media+60% fresh media), and cells were harvested after 48 hr.

In vitro screening of chemically modified siRNAs

Mouse hepatocyte cell line, FL83B, was freshly purchased from ATCC (cat CRL-2390) and the cell line authentication test conducted by ATCC confirmed a match percentage exceeding the 80% threshold. FL83B cells were plated in 12-well plates (150k cells/well) in F-12K medium with 3% FBS. Then, 1.5 µM of each Chol-MCT1-siRNA candidate compound was added and Chol-NTC-siRNA was used as a control. Then, 72 hr after the treatment, cells were harvested, and the Mct1 mRNA silencing potency was monitored. To further evaluate the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values, the dose-dependent silencing effect of the compounds was calculated upon six different concentrations (1.5, 0.75, 0.38, 0.19, 0.05, and 0 µM). As a housekeeping gene, β-2-microglobulin (B2m) was used.

Generation and validation of hepatic stellate cell-specific AAV9-Lrat-Cre

Lrat-Cre-mediated KO mice have been widely utilized in the field to delete genes in hepatic stellate cells (Mederacke et al., 2013). We newly synthesized AAV9-Lrat-Cre to establish an inducible hepatic stellate cell KO system in collaboration with Vector Biolabs. Proximal mouse Lrat promoter region from –1166 bp, including the putative transcriptional start site, to +262 bp downstream sequence was chosen (Prukova et al., 2015). A 1428b Lrat promoter was synthesized and cloned into Vector Biolabs’ AAV-CMV-Cre vector to replace CMV promoter with Lrat promoter. The AAV-Lrat-Cre was then packaged into AAV9 virus. As a control, AAV-Lrat-null constructs were used.

Animal studies

All animal procedures were performed in accordance with animal care ethics approval and guidelines of University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC, protocol number A-1600-19). All wild-type C57BL6/J male mice and genetically obese ob/ob male mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratory. MCT1fl/fl mice were generated in the Rothstein lab (Jha et al., 2020). Mice were group-housed on a 12 hr light/dark cycle and had ad libitum access to water and food. For each experiment, mice are randomly assigned to control and experimental groups to ensure unbiased results. For obese NASH model studies, 10-week-old genetically obese ob/ob male mice (n=6) were subcutaneously injected with 10 mg/kg of siRNAs accordingly (Chol-NTC-siRNA, Chol-MCT1-siRNA, GN-NTC-siRNA, and GN-MCT1-siRNA), every 10–12 days. Mice were fed the GAN diet (Research Diets, cat D09100310) for 3 weeks. Food intake and body weight were monitored. Mice were sacrificed with CO2, and double-killed with cervical dislocation. For CDAHFD-induced NASH model studies, 8-week-old male MCT1fl/fl mice (n=10) were intravenously injected with 2×1011 gc of AAV-TBG-Cre or AAV-Lrat-Cre or both. As a control, the same amount of AAV-TBG-null or AAV-Lrat-null control was used. A week after the injection, mice were fed a CDHFD (Research Diets, cat A06071302i) for 8 weeks and sacrificed.

Primary mouse cell isolation

Male C57BL/6 wild-type mice 16- to 18-week-old (n=4) were subcutaneously injected with 10 mg/kg of siRNAs accordingly (Chol-NTC-siRNA, Chol-MCT1-siRNA, GN-NTC-siRNA, and GN-MCT1-siRNA), twice within 15 days. Mice were put on a chow diet (LabDiet, cat 5P76) and sacrificed on day 15. Primary hepatocytes, hepatic stellate cells, and Kupffer cells were isolated from the livers using the modified perfusion method described previously (Mederacke et al., 2015; Aparicio-Vergara et al., 2017). Briefly, livers were digested in situ with 14 mg pronase (Sigma-Aldrich, cat P5147) and 3.7 U collagenase D (Roche, cat 11 088 882 001) via inferior vena cava. Digested livers were isolated and minced with 0.5 mg/ml pronase, 0.088 U/ml collagenase, and 0.02 mg/ml DNase I (Roche, cat 10 104 159 001). After centrifuging cells for 3 min at 50×g at 4°C, primary hepatocytes were obtained in the pellet. The remaining supernatant was collected and centrifuged for 10 min at 580×g at 4°C and the pellet was saved for further hepatic stellate cell separation using Nycodenz (Accurate Chemical, cat 1002424) gradient solution. Lastly, Kupffer cells were isolated from the remaining cells using a Percoll (Sigma, cat P1644) gradient solution. Separation of hepatocytes, hepatic stellate cells, and Kupffer cells was validated using representative mRNA markers of each cell type such as Alb, Des, and Clec4f, respectively, by rt-qPCR.

Serum analysis

Retro-orbital bleeding was performed prior to sacrificing mice. Blood was collected in heparinized capillary tubes and centrifuged 10 min at 7000 rpm at 4°C. Supernatant plasma was saved for further serum analysis. Plasma lactate level was measured using a specific apparatus, Lactate Plus meter (Nova Biomedical, cat 62624). ALT level was determined using ALT Colorimetric Activity Assay Kit (Cayman, cat 700260). Absorbances were detected using a Tecan safire2 microplate reader.

Glucose tolerance test

GTT was performed after 16 hr of fasting. Basal glucose level was measured using a glucometer (CONTOUR NEXT ONE glucose meter), then mice were intraperitoneally injected with 1 g/kg body weight D-glucose dissolved in sterile saline. Blood glucose was measured with a single drop of tail blood at 15, 30, 45, 90, and 120 min after the glucose injection.

Shear wave elastography

Mouse liver stiffness was monitored by Vega robotic ultrasound imager, SonoEQ 1.14.0 (SonoVol), as described in a previous study (Morin et al., 2021). Before SWE measurement, mice had their abdomen hair shaved and the residual hair was removed using chemical depilation cream (Nair). After being anesthetized with isoflurane, mice were located in prone position on the fluid chamber through an acoustically transmissive membrane with ultrasound transducer imaging from below. During the imaging, wide-field B-mode was captured, a 3D volume was reconstructed, liver was visualized, and fiducial markers in 3D space indicating the position of the desired SWE capture were placed. Liver stiffness was monitored by Young’s modulus.

RNA isolation and rt-qPCR

Frozen mouse livers samples (25 mg) or in vitro cell samples were homogenized in Trizol (Ambion) using QIAGEN TissueLyser II. Chloroform was added and centrifuged for 15 min at maximum speed at 4°C. The supernatant was collected and 100% isopropanol was added. After another 10 min centrifugation at maximum speed at 4°C, the pellet was saved and washed with 70% ethanol with 5 min centrifugation at maximum speed at 4°C. The pellet was dried briefly and resuspended with ultrapure distilled water (Invitrogen). cDNA was synthesized using 1 µg of total RNA using iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad) on Bio-Rad T100 thermocycler. rt-qPCR was performed using iQ SybrGreen Supermix on CFX96 1000 thermocycler (Bio-Rad) and analyzed as described (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001). Primer sequences used for rt-qPCR were listed in Table 3.

Table 3. List of primers used for real-time quantitative PCR (rt-qPCR).

Mouse primers:
Gene Forward Reverse
Slc16a1/Mct1 TGTTAGTCGGAGCCTTCATTTC CACTGGTCGTTGCACTGAATA
Slc16a1Mct1 (Exon 2,3 overlapping) TGCAACGACCAGTGAAGTATC GCTGCCGTATTTATTCACCAAG
Slc16a7/Mct2 CCATCAGTAGTGTGTTGGTGAA TCTATCACGCTGTTGCTGTAAG
Slc16a3/Mct4 AGTGCCATTGGTCTCGTG CATACTTGTAAACTTTGGTTGCATC
Srebf1 GGAGCCATGGATTGCACATT GGCCCGGGAAGTCACTGT
Mlxipl TCTGCAGATCGCGTGGAG CTTGTCCCGGCATAGCAAC
Fasn GGAGGTGGTGATAGCCGGTAT TGGGTAATCCATAGAGCCCAG
Scd1 CCGGAGACCCCTTAGATCGA TAGCCTGTAAAAGATTTCTGCAAACC
Acly TGGTGGAATGCTGGACAA GCCCTCATAGACACCATCTG
Tgfb1 CTCCCGTGGCTTCTAGTGC GCCTTAGTTTGGACAGGATCTG
Ihh CTCTTGCCTACAAGCAGTTCA CCGTGTTCTCCTCGTCCTT
Acta2 ATGCTCCCAGGGCTGTTTTCC GTGGTGCCAGATCTTTTCCATGTCG
Gli2 CAACGCCTACTCTCCCAGAC GAGCCTTGATGTACTGTACCAC
Gli3 CACAGCTCTACGGCGACTG CTGCATAGTGATTGCGTTTCTTC
Col1a1 GCTCCTCTTAGGGGCCACT CCACGTCTCACCATTGGGG
Col1a2 GTAACTTCGTGCCTAGCAACA CCTTTGTCAGAATACTGAGCAGC
Col3a1 CTGTAACATGGAAACTGGGGAAA CCATAGCTGAACTGAAAACCACC
Timp1 CTCAAAGACCTATAGTGCTGGC CAAAGTGACGGCTCTGGTAG
Alb TGCTTTTTCCAGGGGTGTGTT TTACTTCCTGCACTAATTTGGCA
Des CTAAAGGATGAGATGGCCCG GAAGGTCTGGATAGGAAGGTTG
Clec4f GAGGCCGAGCTGAACAGAG TGTGAAGCCACCACAAAAAGAG
B2m CATGGCTCGCTCGGTGAC CAGTTCAGTATGTTCGGCTTCC
F4/80 CTTTGGCTATGGGCTTCCAGTC GCAAGGAGGACAGAGTTTATCGTG
Ccl2 AGGTCCCTGTCATGCTTCTG AAGGCATCACAGTCCGAGTC
Il1b TTTGACAGTGATGAGAATGACC CTCTTGTTGATGTGCTGCTG
Tlr4 ATGGCATGGCTTACACCACC GAGGCCAATTTTGTCTCCACA
Ccr2 ATCCACGGCATACTATCAACATC CAAGGCTCACCATCATCGTAG
Ccl20 GCCTCTCGTACATACAGACGC CCAGTTCTGCTTTGGATCAGC
Cd163 ATGGGTGGACACAGAATGGTT CAGGAGCGTTAGTGACAGCAG
Arg1 CTCCAAGCCAAAGTCCTTAGAG AGGAGCTGTCATTAGGGACATC
Ccl22 AGGTCCCTATGGTGCCAATGT CGGCAGGATTTTGAGGTCCA
Cd206 CTCTGTTCAGCTATTGGACGC TGGCACTCCCAAACATAATTTGA
Human primers:
Gene Forward Reverse
SLC16A1/MCT1 TGGAAGACACCCTAAACAAGAG AAAGCCTCTGTGGGTGAATAG
ACTA2 AGCGTGGCTATTCCTTCGT CTCATTTTCAAAGTCCAGAGCTACA
TGFB1 CAACGAAATCTATGACAAGTTCAAGCAG CTTCTCGGAGCTCTGATGTG
COL1A1 ACGTCCTGGTGAAGTTGGTC ACCAGGGAAGCCTCTCTCTC
TIMP1 AATTCCGACCTCGTCATCAGG ATCCCCTAAGGCTTGGAACC
ACTB GATGAGATTGGCATGGCTTT GAGAAGTGGGGTGGCTT

Immunoblotting

Frozen mouse liver samples (50 mg) or in vitro cell samples were homogenized in a sucrose lysis buffer (250 mM sucrose, 50 mM Tris-Cl pH 7.4) with 1:100 phosphatase and protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich) using QIAGEN TissueLyser II. Protein concentration was determined by BCA assay. Immunoblotting loading samples were prepared after adjusting the protein concentration using 5× SDS (Sigma-Aldrich) and denatured by boiling. Proteins were separated in 4–15% sodium dodecyl sulfate/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gel (Bio-Rad) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked with Tris-buffered saline with Tween (TBST) with 5% skim milk or 5% bovine serum albumin. Membranes were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C, washed in TBST for 30 min, then incubated with secondary antibodies for an hour at room temperature, and washed for 30 min in TBST. Antibodies used in the studies were listed in Table 4. ECL (Perkin Elmer) was added to the membranes and the protein signals were visualized with ChemiDox XRS+image-forming system.

Table 4. List of antibodies used in this study.

Reagent Source Identifier
Anti-MCT1 Proteintech Cat # 20139-1-AP
Anti-FASN Cell Signaling Cat # 3180s
Anti-ACLY Cell Signaling Cat # 4332
Anti-SCD1 Cell Signaling Cat # 2794s
Anti-ChREBP Novus Bio Cat # NB400-135
Anti-SREBP1 Millipore Cat # MABS1987
Anti-GAPDH-HRP Cell Signaling Cat # 8884s
Anti-H3 Cell Signaling Cat # 4499s
Anti-Tubulin Sigma-Aldrich Cat # T5168
Anti-pAMPK (T172) Cell Signaling Cat # 2535s
Anti-AMPKα Cell Signaling Cat # 2793s
Anti-αSMA Cell Signaling Cat # 19,245s
Anti-Collagen 1 Southern Biotech Cat # 1310–01
Anti-HSP90-HRP Cell Signaling Cat # 79,631s
Anti-SMAD3 Cell Signaling Cat # 9523S
Anti-pSMAD3 Abcam Cat # AB52903
Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG-HRP Invitrogen Cat # 65-6120
Goat Anti-Mouse IgG-HRP Invitrogen Cat # 65-6520
Goat Anti-Mouse IgG-HRP Thermo Fisher Cat # G21040
Mouse Anti-Goat IgG-HRP Santa Cruz Cat # sc-2354
Goat-anti-Rabbit-488 Thermo Fisher Cat # A11008
ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant Thermo Fisher Cat # P36931

Immunofluorescence

FL83B cells were seeded in coverslips placed in 12-well plates (150k cells/well). Then, 1.5 µM of either Chol-NTC-siRNA or Chol-MCT1-siRNA at final concentration was added for 72 hr. To stain mitochondrial membranes, cells were incubated with Mitotracker at 37°C (Thermo Fisher, cat M7512) for 45 min in serum-free media. Then, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 30 min. Fixed cells were blocked by fresh permeabilization buffer (0.5% Triton, 1% FBS in PBS) at room temperature for 30 min and incubated with 1:100 Anti-MCT1 (Proteintech, cat 20139-1-AP) overnight at 4°C. As a secondary antibody, 1:1000 goat-anti-Rabbit-488 was used, while cells were protected from light. Coverslips were mounted on ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant with DAPI (Invitrogen, cat P35934). Images were acquired using an Olympus IX81 microscope (Central Valley, PA, USA) with dual Andor Zyla sCMOS 4.2 cameras (Belfast, UK). Images were quantified using ImageJ software.

Histological analysis

For the immunohistochemistry, half of the biggest lobe of each mouse liver was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. Sectioned slides were stained where indicated with H&E, Trichrome, Sirius Red, and anti-MCT1 (Proteintech, cat 20139-1-AP) at the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School Morphology Core. The whole stained slides were scanned with ZEISS Axio Scan Z1. Images were analyzed by ZEN 3.0 and ImageJ software.

H&E lipid droplet analysis

To quantify the mean size and the mean number of lipid droplets, H&E images further underwent thorough image analysis. The 2D RGB images (8 bits per channel) were read into the Fiji version (Schindelin et al., 2012) based on ImageJ2 (Rueden et al., 2017). An ImageJ macro language program was then written to analyze each image. First, the Labkit plugin (Arzt et al., 2022) was used to classify pixels as either lipid or background. The classifier used was trained on a few short line segments drawn in either lipid or background regions. The binary objects created then had their holes filled and were culled using ‘Analyze Particles’ to eliminate objects larger than 10,000 pixels (typically veins). Then the ‘watershed’ algorithm was used to separate touching lipid droplets, and ‘Analyze Particles’ was used again, this time to keep objects with a circularity of 0.5–1 and a size of 40–5000 pixels. Pixel size was converted to µm using a 0.47 µm/pixel width conversion ratio (so a 0.22 µm2/pixel conversion factor).

Trichrome and Sirius Red image analysis for fibrosis

To quantify the % of fibrotic regions, 2D RGB images (8 bits per channel) of Sirius Red and Trichrome (without the hematoxylin stain) were read into the Fiji version (Schindelin et al., 2012) based on ImageJ2 (Rueden et al., 2017). ‘Analyze Particles’ was used to threshold the Sirius Red images (×20 magnification) in the green channel, keeping pixels with an intensity <100 and object size >100 pixels as fibrotic regions. Pixels in the Trichrome images (×2.5 magnification) in the red channel with intensity <60 and object size >0.0005 pixels were considered as fibrotic regions.

Quantification and statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were calculated using GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad software). A two-sided unpaired Student’s t-test was used for the analysis of the statistical significance between the two groups. For more than three groups, one-way ANOVA was used for the analysis of statistical significance. Data were presented as mean ± SD or otherwise noted. Differences were considered significant when p<0.05 (*: p<0.05, **: p<0.005, and ***: p<0.0005). Data were excluded only when a technical error occurred in sample preparation or after identifying outliers through analysis in GraphPad Prism 9. Sample sizes were decided based on previous publications or power analysis. Statistical significance was pursued through the utilization of a minimum of three technical replicates and three biological replicates, with each graph incorporating the representation of individual data points.

Acknowledgements

We thank all members of Michael Czech’s Lab and Dr. Zinger Yang Loureiro for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. We thank the UMASS Morphology Core for assistance in immunohistochemistry analysis. The graphical abstract was created with BioRender.com. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants DK116056, DK103047, and DK030898 to MPC.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Michael P Czech, Email: michael.czech@umassmed.edu.

David E James, University of Sydney, Australia.

David E James, University of Sydney, Australia.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • National Institutes of Health DK116056 to Kyounghee Min, Batuhan Yenilmez, Mark Kelly, Michael Elleby, Lawrence M Lifshitz, Naideline Raymond, Emmanouela Tsagkaraki, Shauna M Harney, Chloe DiMarzio, Hui Wang, Michael P Czech.

  • National Institutes of Health DK103047 to Kyounghee Min, Batuhan Yenilmez, Mark Kelly, Michael Elleby, Lawrence M Lifshitz, Naideline Raymond, Emmanouela Tsagkaraki, Shauna M Harney, Chloe DiMarzio, Hui Wang, Michael P Czech.

  • National Institutes of Health DK030898 to Kyounghee Min, Batuhan Yenilmez, Mark Kelly, Michael Elleby, Lawrence M Lifshitz, Naideline Raymond, Emmanouela Tsagkaraki, Shauna M Harney, Chloe DiMarzio, Hui Wang, Michael P Czech.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

Reviewing editor, eLife.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Resources, Formal analysis, Investigation.

Resources, Investigation, Methodology.

Resources, Software, Validation.

Formal analysis.

Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Validation, Visualization.

Resources, Formal analysis.

Formal analysis, Investigation.

Formal analysis.

Formal analysis, Investigation.

Formal analysis, Investigation.

Resources, Validation.

Resources, Validation.

Resources.

Resources.

Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation.

Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.

Ethics

All animal procedures were performed in accordance with animal care ethics approval and guidelines of University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC, protocol number A-1600-19).

Additional files

MDAR checklist

Data availability

All data quantified during this study are included in the manuscript and the Materials and methods.

References

  1. Aagaard L, Rossi JJ. RNAi therapeutics: principles, prospects and challenges. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2007;59:75–86. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2007.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander M, Loomis AK, van der Lei J, Duarte-Salles T, Prieto-Alhambra D, Ansell D, Pasqua A, Lapi F, Rijnbeek P, Mosseveld M, Waterworth DM, Kendrick S, Sattar N, Alazawi W. Risks and clinical predictors of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma diagnoses in adults with diagnosed NAFLD: real-world study of 18 million patients in four european cohorts. BMC Medicine. 2019;17:95. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1321-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aparicio-Vergara M, Tencerova M, Morgantini C, Barreby E, Aouadi M. Isolation of kupffer cells and hepatocytes from a single mouse liver. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2017;1639:161–171. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7163-3_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arzt M, Deschamps J, Schmied C, Pietzsch T, Schmidt D, Tomancak P, Haase R, Jug F. LABKIT: labeling and segmentation toolkit for big imagE DATA. Frontiers in Computer Science. 2022;4:777728. doi: 10.3389/fcomp.2022.777728. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Behlke MA. Progress towards in vivo use of siRNAs. Molecular Therapy. 2006;13:644–670. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2006.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Breitkopf K, Godoy P, Ciuclan L, Singer MV, Dooley S. TGF-beta/Smad signaling in the injured liver. Zeitschrift Fur Gastroenterologie. 2006;44:57–66. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-858989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brooks GA. Lactate as a fulcrum of metabolism. Redox Biology. 2020;35:101454. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bumcrot D, Manoharan M, Koteliansky V, Sah DWY. RNAi therapeutics: a potential new class of pharmaceutical drugs. Nature Chemical Biology. 2006;2:711–719. doi: 10.1038/nchembio839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Calle RA, Amin NB, Carvajal-Gonzalez S, Ross TT, Bergman A, Aggarwal S, Crowley C, Rinaldi A, Mancuso J, Aggarwal N, Somayaji V, Inglot M, Tuthill TA, Kou K, Boucher M, Tesz G, Dullea R, Bence KK, Kim AM, Pfefferkorn JA, Esler WP. ACC inhibitor alone or co-administered with a DGAT2 inhibitor in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: two parallel, placebo-controlled, randomized phase 2a trials. Nature Medicine. 2021;27:1836–1848. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01489-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Carneiro L, Asrih M, Repond C, Sempoux C, Stehle JC, Leloup C, Jornayvaz FR, Pellerin L. AMPK activation caused by reduced liver lactate metabolism protects against hepatic steatosis in MCT1 haploinsufficient mice. Molecular Metabolism. 2017;6:1625–1633. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2017.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen Z, Jain A, Liu H, Zhao Z, Cheng K. Targeted drug delivery to hepatic stellate cells for the treatment of liver fibrosis. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 2019;370:695–702. doi: 10.1124/jpet.118.256156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Crawford SO, Hoogeveen RC, Brancati FL, Astor BC, Ballantyne CM, Schmidt MI, Young JH. Association of blood lactate with type 2 diabetes: the atherosclerosis risk in communities carotid mri study. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2010;39:1647–1655. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyq126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cui H, Xie N, Banerjee S, Ge J, Jiang D, Dey T, Matthews QL, Liu RM, Liu G. Lung myofibroblasts promote macrophage profibrotic activity through lactate-induced histone lactylation. American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. 2021;64:115–125. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2020-0360OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Czernuszewicz TJ, Aji AM, Moore CJ, Montgomery SA, Velasco B, Torres G, Anand KS, Johnson KA, Deal AM, Zukić D, McCormick M, Schnabl B, Gallippi CM, Dayton PA, Gessner RC. Development of a robotic shear wave elastography system for noninvasive staging of liver disease in murine models. Hepatology Communications. 2022;6:1827–1839. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Derynck R, Zhang YE. Smad-dependent and Smad-independent pathways in TGF-beta family signalling. Nature. 2003;425:577–584. doi: 10.1038/nature02006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Diehl AM, Day C. Cause, pathogenesis, and treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;377:2063–2072. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1503519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. DiGirolamo M, Newby FD, Lovejoy J. Lactate production in adipose tissue: a regulated function with extra-adipose implications. FASEB Journal. 1992;6:2405–2412. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.6.7.1563593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Donnelly KL, Smith CI, Schwarzenberg SJ, Jessurun J, Boldt MD, Parks EJ. Sources of fatty acids stored in liver and secreted via lipoproteins in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2005;115:1343–1351. doi: 10.1172/JCI23621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Elizondo-Vega R, Cortés-Campos C, Barahona MJ, Carril C, Ordenes P, Salgado M, Oyarce K, García-Robles M. Inhibition of hypothalamic MCT1 expression increases food intake and alters orexigenic and anorexigenic neuropeptide expression. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:33606. doi: 10.1038/srep33606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Estes C, Razavi H, Loomba R, Younossi Z, Sanyal AJ. Modeling the epidemic of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease demonstrates an exponential increase in burden of disease. Hepatology. 2018;67:123–133. doi: 10.1002/hep.29466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Felmlee MA, Jones RS, Rodriguez-Cruz V, Follman KE, Morris ME. Monocarboxylate transporters (slc16): function, regulation, and role in health and disease. Pharmacological Reviews. 2020;72:466–485. doi: 10.1124/pr.119.018762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Friedman SL, Roll FJ, Boyles J, Bissell DM. Hepatic lipocytes: the principal collagen-producing cells of normal rat liver. PNAS. 1985;82:8681–8685. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.24.8681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Friedman SL. Hepatic stellate cells: protean, multifunctional, and enigmatic cells of the liver. Physiological Reviews. 2008;88:125–172. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00013.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Friedman SL, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Rinella M, Sanyal AJ. Mechanisms of NAFLD development and therapeutic strategies. Nature Medicine. 2018;24:908–922. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0104-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gaffney DO, Jennings EQ, Anderson CC, Marentette JO, Shi T, Schou Oxvig AM, Streeter MD, Johannsen M, Spiegel DA, Chapman E, Roede JR, Galligan JJ. Non-enzymatic lysine lactoylation of glycolytic enzymes. Cell Chemical Biology. 2020;27:206–213. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2019.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. García-Ruiz C, Fernández-Checa JC. Mitochondrial oxidative stress and antioxidants balance in fatty liver disease. Hepatology Communications. 2018;2:1425–1439. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hadjihambi A, Konstantinou C, Klohs J, Monsorno K, Le Guennec A, Donnelly C, Cox IJ, Kusumbe A, Hosford PS, Soffientini U, Lecca S, Mameli M, Jalan R, Paolicelli RC, Pellerin L. Partial MCT1 invalidation protects against diet-induced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and the associated brain dysfunction. Journal of Hepatology. 2023;78:180–190. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Halestrap AP. Monocarboxylic acid transport. Comprehensive Physiology. 2013;3:1611–1643. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c130008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hamanaka RB, O’Leary EM, Witt LJ, Tian Y, Gökalp GA, Meliton AY, Dulin NO, Mutlu GM. Glutamine metabolism is required for collagen protein synthesis in lung fibroblasts. American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. 2019;61:597–606. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2019-0008OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. He C, Larson-Casey JL, Carter AB. Targeting MCT1-mediated Intercellular Lactate Shuttling Attenuates Pulmonary Fibrosis. American Thoracic Society 2023 International Conference, May 19-24, 2023 - Washington, DC; 2023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hui S, Ghergurovich JM, Morscher RJ, Jang C, Teng X, Lu W, Esparza LA, Reya T, Yanxiang Guo J, White E, Rabinowitz JD. Glucose feeds the TCA cycle via circulating lactate. Nature. 2017;551:115–118. doi: 10.1038/nature24057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jansson PA, Larsson A, Smith U, Lönnroth P. Lactate release from the subcutaneous tissue in lean and obese men. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1994;93:240–246. doi: 10.1172/JCI116951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jha MK, Lee Y, Russell KA, Yang F, Dastgheyb RM, Deme P, Ament XH, Chen W, Liu Y, Guan Y, Polydefkis MJ, Hoke A, Haughey NJ, Rothstein JD, Morrison BM. Monocarboxylate transporter 1 in Schwann cells contributes to maintenance of sensory nerve myelination during aging. Glia. 2020;68:161–177. doi: 10.1002/glia.23710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Juraschek SP, Selvin E, Miller ER, Brancati FL, Young JH. Plasma lactate and diabetes risk in 8045 participants of the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Annals of Epidemiology. 2013a;23:791–796. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Juraschek SP, Shantha GPS, Chu AY, Miller ER, Guallar E, Hoogeveen RC, Ballantyne CM, Brancati FL, Schmidt MI, Pankow JS, Young JH. Lactate and risk of incident diabetes in a case-cohort of the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. PLOS ONE. 2013b;8:e55113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kawaguchi T, Osatomi K, Yamashita H, Kabashima T, Uyeda K. Mechanism for fatty acid “sparing” effect on glucose-induced transcription: regulation of carbohydrate-responsive element-binding protein by AMP-activated protein kinase. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2002;277:3829–3835. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M107895200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Khvorova A, Watts JK. The chemical evolution of oligonucleotide therapies of clinical utility. Nature Biotechnology. 2017;35:238–248. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lee YA, Wallace MC, Friedman SL. Pathobiology of liver fibrosis: a translational success story. Gut. 2015;64:830–841. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-306842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lengacher S, Nehiri-Sitayeb T, Steiner N, Carneiro L, Favrod C, Preitner F, Thorens B, Stehle JC, Dix L, Pralong F, Magistretti PJ, Pellerin L. Resistance to diet-induced obesity and associated metabolic perturbations in haploinsufficient monocarboxylate transporter 1 mice. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e82505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Li Y, Xu S, Mihaylova MM, Zheng B, Hou X, Jiang B, Park O, Luo Z, Lefai E, Shyy JYJ, Gao B, Wierzbicki M, Verbeuren TJ, Shaw RJ, Cohen RA, Zang M. AMPK phosphorylates and inhibits SREBP activity to attenuate hepatic steatosis and atherosclerosis in diet-induced insulin-resistant mice. Cell Metabolism. 2011;13:376–388. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Li X, Yang Y, Zhang B, Lin X, Fu X, An Y, Zou Y, Wang JX, Wang Z, Yu T. Correction: lactate metabolism in human health and disease. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2022;7:372. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01206-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lin Y, Bai M, Wang S, Chen L, Li Z, Li C, Cao P, Chen Y. Lactate is a key mediator that links obesity to insulin resistance via modulating cytokine production from adipose tissue. Diabetes. 2022;71:637–652. doi: 10.2337/db21-0535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Liu X, Zhang Y, Li W, Zhou X. Lactylation, an emerging hallmark of metabolic reprogramming: current progress and open challenges. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2022;10:972020. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.972020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Loomba R, Morgan E, Watts L, Xia S, Hannan LA, Geary RS, Baker BF, Bhanot S. Novel antisense inhibition of diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 2 for treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. The Lancet. Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2020;5:829–838. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30186-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lovejoy J, Newby FD, Gebhart SS, DiGirolamo M. Insulin resistance in obesity is associated with elevated basal lactate levels and diminished lactate appearance following intravenous glucose and insulin. Metabolism. 1992;41:22–27. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(92)90185-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Martini T, Ripperger JA, Chavan R, Stumpe M, Netzahualcoyotzi C, Pellerin L, Albrecht U. The hepatic monocarboxylate transporter 1 (mct1) contributes to the regulation of food anticipation in mice. Frontiers in Physiology. 2021;12:665476. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.665476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Matsumoto M, Hada N, Sakamaki Y, Uno A, Shiga T, Tanaka C, Ito T, Katsume A, Sudoh M. An improved mouse model that rapidly develops fibrosis in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. International Journal of Experimental Pathology. 2013;94:93–103. doi: 10.1111/iep.12008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Mederacke I, Hsu CC, Troeger JS, Huebener P, Mu X, Dapito DH, Pradere JP, Schwabe RF. Fate tracing reveals hepatic stellate cells as dominant contributors to liver fibrosis independent of its aetiology. Nature Communications. 2013;4:2823. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Mederacke I, Dapito DH, Affò S, Uchinami H, Schwabe RF. High-yield and high-purity isolation of hepatic stellate cells from normal and fibrotic mouse livers. Nature Protocols. 2015;10:305–315. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Mehal WZ, Iredale J, Friedman SL. Scraping fibrosis: expressway to the core of fibrosis. Nature Medicine. 2011;17:552–553. doi: 10.1038/nm0511-552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Morin J, Swanson TA, Rinaldi A, Boucher M, Ross T, Hirenallur-Shanthappa D. Application of ultrasound and shear wave elastography imaging in a rat model of nafld/nash. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2021;01:62403. doi: 10.3791/62403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Mullard A. FDA approves fifth RNAi drug - alnylam’s next-gen hATTR treatment. Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery. 2022;21:548–549. doi: 10.1038/d41573-022-00118-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Padda IS, Mahtani AU, Parmar M. Sandhiya RSodium-Glucose Transport Protein 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors. StatPearls; 2023. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Pérez-Escuredo J, Dadhich RK, Dhup S, Cacace A, Van Hée VF, De Saedeleer CJ, Sboarina M, Rodriguez F, Fontenille MJ, Brisson L, Porporato PE, Sonveaux P. Lactate promotes glutamine uptake and metabolism in oxidative cancer cells. Cell Cycle. 2016;15:72–83. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2015.1120930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Poelstra K. Innovative nanotechnological formulations to reach the hepatic stellate cell. Current Tissue Microenvironment Reports. 2020;1:13–22. doi: 10.1007/s43152-020-00004-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Prukova D, Ileninova Z, Antosova B, Kasparek P, Gregor M, Sedlacek R. Transgenic reporter mice with promoter region of murine LRAT specifically marks lens and meiosis spermatocytes. Physiological Research. 2015;64:247–254. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.932733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Puche JE, Saiman Y, Friedman SL. Hepatic stellate cells and liver fibrosis. Comprehensive Physiology. 2013;3:1473–1492. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c120035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Rabinowitz JD, Enerbäck S. Lactate: the ugly duckling of energy metabolism. Nature Metabolism. 2020;2:566–571. doi: 10.1038/s42255-020-0243-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Raubenheimer PJ, Nyirenda MJ, Walker BR. A choline-deficient diet exacerbates fatty liver but attenuates insulin resistance and glucose intolerance in mice fed a high-fat diet. Diabetes. 2006;55:2015–2020. doi: 10.2337/db06-0097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Rueden CT, Schindelin J, Hiner MC, DeZonia BE, Walter AE, Arena ET, Eliceiri KW. ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2017;18:529. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Sabater D, Arriarán S, del Romero MM, Agnelli S, Remesar X, Fernández-López JA, Alemany M. Cultured 3T3L1 adipocytes dispose of excess medium glucose as lactate under abundant oxygen availability. Scientific Reports. 2014;4:3663. doi: 10.1038/srep03663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez JY, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Sunny NE, Bril F, Cusi K. Mitochondrial adaptation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Novel mechanisms and treatment strategies. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2017;28:250–260. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2016.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Traber GM, Yu AM. RNAi-based therapeutics and novel RNA bioengineering technologies. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 2023;384:133–154. doi: 10.1124/jpet.122.001234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Trautwein C, Friedman SL, Schuppan D, Pinzani M. Hepatic fibrosis: concept to treatment. Journal of Hepatology. 2015;62:S15–S24. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.02.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Tsuchida T, Friedman SL. Mechanisms of hepatic stellate cell activation. Nature Reviews. Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2017;14:397–411. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Wake K. “Sternzellen” in the liver: perisinusoidal cells with special reference to storage of vitamin A. The American Journal of Anatomy. 1971;132:429–462. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001320404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Wynn TA. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis. The Journal of Pathology. 2008;214:199–210. doi: 10.1002/path.2277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Xu F, Liu C, Zhou D, Zhang L. Tgf-β/smad pathway and its regulation in hepatic fibrosis. The Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry. 2016;64:157–167. doi: 10.1369/0022155415627681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Yenilmez B, Wetoska N, Kelly M, Echeverria D, Min K, Lifshitz L, Alterman JF, Hassler MR, Hildebrand S, DiMarzio C, McHugh N, Vangjeli L, Sousa J, Pan M, Han X, Brehm MA, Khvorova A, Czech MP. An RNAi therapeutic targeting hepatic DGAT2 in a genetically obese mouse model of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Molecular Therapy. 2022;30:1329–1342. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64:73–84. doi: 10.1002/hep.28431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Zhang D, Tang Z, Huang H, Zhou G, Cui C, Weng Y, Liu W, Kim S, Lee S, Perez-Neut M, Ding J, Czyz D, Hu R, Ye Z, He M, Zheng YG, Shuman HA, Dai L, Ren B, Roeder RG, Becker L, Zhao Y. Metabolic regulation of gene expression by histone lactylation. Nature. 2019;574:575–580. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1678-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhao Z, Li Y, Jain A, Chen Z, Liu H, Jin W, Cheng K. Development of a peptide-modified siRNA nanocomplex for hepatic stellate cells. Nanomedicine. 2018;14:51–61. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2017.08.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhao Y, Li M, Yao X, Fei Y, Lin Z, Li Z, Cai K, Zhao Y, Luo Z. Hcar1/mct1 regulates tumor ferroptosis through the lactate-mediated ampk-scd1 activity and its therapeutic implications. Cell Reports. 2020;33:108487. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Zhu L, Mahato RI. Targeted delivery of siRNA to hepatocytes and hepatic stellate cells by bioconjugation. Bioconjugate Chemistry. 2010;21:2119–2127. doi: 10.1021/bc100346n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Zhu Y, Zhu L, Wang X, Jin H. RNA-based therapeutics: an overview and prospectus. Cell Death & Disease. 2022;13:644. doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-05075-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

eLife assessment

David E James 1

This convincing manuscript represents a valuable advance in understanding the role of MCT1 – a transporter for lactate and other organic anions – in hepatocytes and hepatic stellate cells in the liver. The authors also generate exciting new tools to investigate hepatic stellate cell biology, and these may have much broader applications, but future studies are required to validate these new tools.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Anonymous

The authors put forth the hypothesis that hepatocyte and/or non-parenchymal liver MCT1 may be responsible for physiologic effects (lower body weight gain and less hepatic steatosis) in MCT1 global heterozygote mice. They generate multiple tools to test this hypothesis, which they combine with mouse diets that induce fatty liver, steatohepatitis and fibrosis. Novel findings include that deletion of hepatocyte MCT1 does not change liver lipid content, but increases liver fibrosis. Deletion of hepatic stellate cell (HSC) MCT1 does not substantially affect any liver parameter, but concomitant HSC MCT1 deletion does reverse fibrosis seen with hepatocyte MCT1 knockout or knockdown. In both models, plasma lactate levels do not change, suggesting that liver MCT1 does not substantially affect systemic lactate. In general, the data match conclusions of the manuscript, and the studies are well-conducted and well-described. Further work would be necessary to dissect mechanism of fibrosis with hepatocyte MCT1, and whether this is due to changes in local lactate (as speculated by the authors) or another MCT1 substrate. This would be important to understand this novel potential cross-talk between hepatocytes and HSCs.

A parallel and perhaps more important advance is the generation of new methodology to target HSC in mice, using modified siRNA and by transduction of AAV9-Lrat-Cre. Both methods would reduce the need to cross floxed mice with the Lrat-Cre allele, saving time and resources. These tools were validated to an extent by the authors, but not sufficiently to ensure that there is no cross-reactivity with other liver cell types. For example, AAV9-Lrat-Cre-transduced MCT1 floxed mice show compelling HSC but not hepatocyte Mct1 knockdown, but other liver cell types should be assessed to ensure specificity. This is particularly important as overall liver Mct1 decreased by ~30% in AAV9-Lrat-Cre-transduced mice, which may exceed HSC content of these mice, especially when considering a 60-70% knockdown efficiency. This same issue also affects Chol-MCT1-siRNA, which the authors demonstrate to affect hepatocytes and HSC, but likely affects other cell types not tested. As this is a new and potentially valuable tool, it would be important to assess Mct1 expression across more non-parenchymal cells (i.e. endothelial, cholangiocytes, immune cells) to determine penetration and efficacy.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Anonymous

In this study, the authors seek to answer two main questions: (1) Whether interfering with lactate availability in hepatocytes through depletion of hepatocyte specific MCT-1 depletion would reduce steatosis, and (2) Whether MCT-1 in stellate cells promote fibrogenesis. While the first question is based on the observation that haploinsufficiency of MCT-1 makes mice resistant to steatosis, the rationale behind how MCT-1 could impact fibrogenesis in stellate cells is not clear. A more detailed discussion regarding how lactate availability would regulate two different processes in two different cell types would be helpful. The authors employ several mouse models and in vitro systems to show that MCT1 inhibition in hepatic stellate cells reduces the expression of COL-1.

The authors have sufficiently addressed prior comments and added new experiments to provide details on possible mechanisms.

Reviewer #3 (Public Review):

Anonymous

We commend the authors on addressing our points and do believe that the manuscript is much improved. Even with the added in vitro data (Figure 8, Supplementary Figure 6), however, a clear mechanistic explanation for how MCT1 is modulating/inhibiting fibrosis in hepatic stellate cells is lacking and this represents a key area for future exploration. The authors provide interesting follow up experiments that suggest lactate can potentiate TGF-β1 signaling, a phenomenon that has previously been described in pulmonary fibrosis. Additionally, MCT1 depletion decreased the pSMAD3/SMAD ratio, but this was overcome with higher doses of TGB- β1 ligand. It remains unclear how intracellular versus extracellular lactate is signaling to exert the observed effects, and how the altered metabolism/metabolic flux in NAFLD is contributing to organ level metabolic dysregulation. These will be keys questions to answer going forward potentially using the novel in vivo models that the authors have contributed here.

A major finding of this work is that loss of monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1), specifically in stellate cells, can decrease fibrosis in the liver. However, the underlying mechanism whereby MCT1 influences stellate cells is not addressed. It is unclear if upstream/downstream metabolic flux within different cell types leads to fibrotic outcomes. Ultimately, the paper opens more questions than it answers: why does decreasing MCT1 expression in hepatocytes exacerbate disease, while silencing MCT1 in fibroblasts seems to alleviate collagen deposition? Mechanistic studies in isolated hepatocytes and stellate cells could enhance the work further to show the disparate pathways that mediate these opposing effects. The work highlights the complexity of cellular behavior and metabolism within a disease environment but does little to mechanistically explain it.

eLife. 2024 Apr 2;12:RP89136. doi: 10.7554/eLife.89136.3.sa4

Author Response

Kyounghee Min 1, Batuhan Yenilmez 2, Mark Kelly 3, Dimas Echeverria 4, Michael Elleby 5, Lawrence M Lifshitz 6, Naideline Raymond 7, Emmanouela Tsagkaraki 8, Shauna M Harney 9, Chloe DiMarzio 10, Hui Wang 11, Nicholas McHugh 12, Brianna Bramato 13, Brett Morrison 14, Jeffery D Rothstein 15, Anastasia Khvorova 16, Michael Czech 17

The following is the authors’ response to the original reviews.

eLife assessment

This important study extends insights on NAFLD and NASH regarding the role of plasma lactate levels using mice haplo-insufficient for the gene encoding lactate transporter MCT-1. While the evidence is largely convincing and the work significantly advances our understanding of the roles of distinct hepatic cell types in steatosis, a number of issues require attention and would best be solved by further experimentation.

RESPONSE: We agree with this assessment by eLife, and appreciate the reviewers’ view that the study is important and extends insights into liver disease.

Public Reviews:

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The authors put forth the hypothesis that hepatocyte and/or non-parenchymal liver MCT1 may be responsible for physiologic effects (lower body weight gain and less hepatic steatosis) in MCT1 global heterozygote mice. They generate multiple tools to test this hypothesis, which they combine with mouse diets that induce fatty liver, steatohepatitis and fibrosis. Novel findings include that deletion of hepatocyte MCT1 does not change liver lipid content, but increases liver fibrosis. Deletion of hepatic stellate cell (HSC) MCT1 does not substantially affect any liver parameter, but concomitant HSC MCT1 deletion does reverse fibrosis seen with hepatocyte MCT1 knockout or knockdown. In both models, plasma lactate levels do not change, suggesting that liver MCT1 does not substantially affect systemic lactate. In general, the data match the conclusions of the manuscript, and the studies are well-conducted and well-described. Further work would be necessary to dissect mechanism of fibrosis with hepatocyte MCT1, and whether this is due to changes in local lactate (as speculated by the authors) or another MCT1 substrate. This would be important to understand this novel potential cross-talk between hepatocytes and HSCs.

A parallel and perhaps more important advance is the generation of new methodology to target HSC in mice, using modified siRNA and by transduction of AAV9-Lrat-Cre. Both methods would reduce the need to cross floxed mice with the Lrat-Cre allele, saving time and resources. These tools were validated to an extent by the authors, but not sufficiently to ensure that there is no cross-reactivity with other liver cell types. For example, AAV9-LratCre-transduced MCT1 floxed mice show compelling HSC but not hepatocyte Mct1 knockdown, but other liver cell types should be assessed to ensure specificity. This is particularly important as overall liver Mct1 decreased by ~30% in AAV9-Lrat-Cre-transduced mice, which may exceed HSC content of these mice, especially when considering a 60-70% knockdown efficiency. This same issue also affects Chol-MCT1-siRNA, which the authors demonstrate to affect hepatocytes and HSC, but likely affects other cell types not tested. As this is a new and potentially valuable tool, it would be important to assess Mct1 expression across more non-parenchymal cells (i.e. endothelial, cholangiocytes, immune cells) to determine penetration and efficacy.

RESPONSE: We appreciate the reviewer’s view that the new methods we describe represent an important advance. To ensure the specificity of our novel AAV-Lrat-Cre construct, it would be fair to test its distribution among all possible hepatic cell types, including endothelial cells, cholangiocytes, and other immune cells, as suggested. Our efforts in this study were primarily focused on the major cell types thought to contribute to NASH, namely hepatocytes, Kupffer cells, and in particular hepatic stellate cells. The reasons for this focus were:

1. Our primary goal was to investigate the role of MCT1 in hepatic fibrogenesis. According to Manderacke et al. (2013, Nature Comm), hepatic stellate cells account for the dominant proportion (82-96%) of myofibroblast progenitors, which produce collagen fibers. While there may be interesting roles of MCT1 in those other cell types, to elucidate MCT1's role in fibrogenesis, focusing on the dominant fibrogenic cell type, hepatic stellate cells, was the most appropriate approach for this goal.

2. Considering the proportion of each hepatic cell type in the liver, hepatocytes constitute the majority (60-70%), followed by endothelial cells (15%), immune cells (10%), and stellate cells (5%), among others.

3. The AAV-Cre system is highly specific to its promoter, in this case, Lrat, which has been well established in multiple previous studies to exhibit high specificity for hepatic stellate cells in the liver.We will certainly conduct more comprehensive biodistribution studies in the future, as we believe that our AAV-Lrat-Cre system could be a valuable tool in this field.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In this study, the authors seek to answer two main questions: (1) Whether interfering with lactate availability in hepatocytes through depletion of hepatocyte specific MCT-1 depletion would reduce steatosis, and (2) Whether MCT-1 in stellate cells promote fibrogenesis. While the first question is based on the observation that haploinsufficiency of MCT-1 makes mice resistant to steatosis, the rationale behind how MCT-1 could impact fibrogenesis in stellate cells is not clear. A more detailed discussion regarding how lactate availability would regulate two different processes in two different cell types would be helpful. The authors employ several mouse models and in vitro systems to show that MCT1 inhibition in hepatic stellate cells reduces the expression of COL-1. The significance of the findings is moderately impacted due to the following considerations:

RESPONSE: We have included additional in vitro data in order to provide a more comprehensive discussion of MCT1's potential role in regulating collagen production. Please refer to the new Figure 8, Supplementary Figure 6, and the results section (Potential Mechanism). Also note that our original hypothesis was that depleting MCT1 specifically in hepatocytes would protect mice with MCT1 haploinsufficiency from liver lactate overload and NAFLD. Furthermore, we postulated that this protection might prevent NASH progression since lipotoxicity-driven hepatocyte damage is a central factor in NASH pathogenesis. However, our findings did not support this hypothesis.We found only one brief article (2015, Z Gastroenterol et al., "Functional effects of monocarboxylate transporter 1 expression in activated hepatic stellate cells") that discussed the potential role of MCT1 depletion in hepatic stellate cells in regulating collagen production or fibrosis, as mentioned in their abstract. Unfortunately, the DOI for this article is not functional, and the data cannot be located. Moreover, when we attempted to replicate their results, we were unable to do so, leading us to report our own findings in the current paper.

a. Fibrosis in human NAFLD is a significant problem as a predictor of liver related mortality and is associated with type 1 and type 3 collagen. However, the reduction in COL1 in stellate cells did not amount to a reduction in liver fibrosis even in cell specific KO (in Fig 7E, there is no indication of whether Sirius red staining was different between HSC KO and control mice- the authors mention a downward trend in the text). The authors postulate that type 1 COL may not be the more predominant form of fibrosis in the model. This does not seem likely, since the same ob/ob mouse model was used to determine that fibrosis was enhanced with hepatocyte specific MCT-1 KO and decreased with Chol MCT-1KO. Measurements of different types of collagens in their model and the effect of MCT-1 on different types could be more informative. In particular, although collagens are the structural building blocks for hepatic fibrosis, fibrosis can also be controlled by matrix remodeling factors such as Timp1, Serpine 1, PAI-1 and Lox.

RESPONSE: We monitored the expression levels of matrix remodeling factors, such as Timp1 (Figure 5C, 5F). There was no change in expression upon Chol-MCT1-siRNA treatment, while a significant increase was observed upon GN-MCT1-siRNA treatment. This trend was similar to collagen expression in both cases. Regarding the different types of collagen, instead of measuring each individual type of collagen, we conducted Sirius red and trichrome staining, which enabled us to detect multiple types of collagen simultaneously (Figure 5G, Figure 7D).

b. The authors use multiple animal models including cell specific KO to conclude that stellate cell MCT-1 inhibition decreases COL-1. However, the mechanisms behind this reduced expression of COL-1 are not discussed or explored, making it descriptive.

RESPONSE: We agree that the mechanisms involved are not fully defined but have added new data (Figure 8, Supplement Figure 6) and text to discuss possibilities.

c. Different types of diets are used in this study which could impact lactate availability. Choline deficiency diets are reported to cause weight loss, and importantly have none of the metabolic features of human NASH. Therefore, their utility is doubtful, especially for this study which proposes to investigate if metabolic dysregulation and substrate availability could be a tool for therapy.

RESPONSE: Unfortunately, none of the rodent models used to study NASH completely replicate the condition in human patients, each having its own set of advantages and drawbacks. In line with the concern raised by reviewer #2, there has been a shift away from the use of severely detrimental methionine and choline-deficient diets in contemporary NASH research. Instead, diets that combine methionine and other amino acids with cholinedeficient diets, in conjunction with high-fat diets, have become more popular. The diet we employed in our study consists of high-fat diet combined with choline-deficient diets. We believe that our findings, which are consistent and established across two distinct NASH pathogenesis models and genetic backgrounds, lend additional robustness to our results.

d. Hepatocyte specific MCT-1 KO mice seem to have increased COL-1 production, despite no noticeable difference in hepatocyte steatosis. The reasons for this are not discussed. Fibrosis in NASH is thought to be from stellate cell activation secondary to signals from hepatocellular damage. There is no evidence that there was a difference in either of these parameters in the mouse models used.

RESPONSE: While lipotoxicity-driven liver damage remains a central aspect of NASH pathogenesis, the traditional two-hit theory has become less tractable, giving way to the multi-hit theory in the NASH field. The current debate revolves around whether steatosis is a decisive factor and requirement for NASH fibrogenesis. Our previous publication (Yenilmez et al., 2022, Mol Ther) demonstrated that nearly complete resolution of steatosis did not prevent other NASH features like inflammation and fibrosis, indicating the existence of multiple factors beyond steatosis in NASH pathogenesis. We believe that steatosis and fibrosis influence each other but can also develop independently.

e. The authors report that serum lactate levels did not rise after MCT-1 silencing, but the reasons behind this are unclear. There is insufficient data about lactate production and utilization in this model, which would be useful to interpret data regarding steatosis and fibrosis development. For example, does the MCT-1 KO prevent hepatocyte and stellate cell net import or export of lactate? What is the downstream metabolic consequence in terms of pyruvate, acetylCoA and the NAD/NADH levels. Does the KO have downstream effects on mitochondrial TCA cycling?

RESPONSE: Due to both biological and technical challenges (which are described in the new draft), conducting a comprehensive metabolomics study comparing hepatocyte MCT1 KO to hepatic stellate cell MCT1 KO was not feasible. It is important to note that MCT1 can also transport other substrates that are often overlooked, including pyruvate, short-chain fatty acids, and ketone bodies. Also, in addition to MCT1, there are at least two other functional isoforms of MCT: MCT2 and MCT4. Regrettably, due to these biological and technical complications, conducting a comprehensive metabolomic analysis is extremely complicated and difficult to interpret. Nevertheless, some insights are gained from a study involving MCT1 chaperone protein Basigin/CD147 knockout (KO) mice in a high-fat diet- induced hepatic steatosis model. Basigin acts as an auxiliary protein for MCT1, and its absence leads to improper localization and stabilization of MCT1, effectively simulating a state of MCT1 deficiency. In this context, hepatic lactate levels were reduced by half, and other metabolites such as pyruvate, citrate, α-ketoglutarate, fumarate, and malate were significantly decreased. While we must exercise caution when extrapolating these findings to our MCT1 study, they suggest that multiple metabolites, particularly pyruvate, may play a crucial role in the context of MCT1 deficiency.

f. MCT-1 protein expression is measured only in the in vitro assay. Similar quantitation through western blot is not shown in the animal models.

RESPONSE: We monitored MCT1 protein expression with either Western blot (Fig 2D, 2E (in vitro)) or immune-histology (Fig 4B, 4C (in vivo, ob/ob + GAN diet NASH model), Sup Fig 5F, 5G (in vivo, MCT1 f/f + CDHFD model)).

Reviewer #3 (Public Review):

A major finding of this work is that loss of monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1), specifically in stellate cells, can decrease fibrosis in the liver. However, the underlying mechanism whereby MCT1 influences stellate cells is not addressed. It is unclear if upstream/downstream metabolic flux within different cell types leads to fibrotic outcomes. Ultimately, the paper opens more questions than it answers: why does decreasing MCT1 expression in hepatocytes exacerbate disease, while silencing MCT1 in fibroblasts seems to alleviate collagen deposition? Mechanistic studies in isolated hepatocytes and stellate cells could enhance the work further to show the disparate pathways that mediate these opposing effects. The work highlights the complexity of cellular behavior and metabolism within a disease environment but does little to mechanistically explain it.

RESPONSE: Described above to Reviewer #2

The observations presented are compelling and rigorous, but their impact is limited by the nearly complete lack of mechanistic insight presented in the manuscript. As also mentioned elsewhere, it is important to know whether lactate import or export (or the transport of another molecule-like ketone bodies, for example) is the decisive role of MCT1 for this phenotype. Beyond that, it would be interesting, albeit more difficult, to determine how that metabolic change leads to these fibrotic effects.

RESPONSE: Described above to Reviewer #2

Kuppfer cells are initially analyzed and targeted. These cells may play a major role in fibrotic response. It will be interesting to determine the effects of lactate metabolism in other cells within the microenvironment, like Kuppfer cells, to gain a complete understanding of how metabolism is altered during fibrotic change.

RESPONSE: To address the potential involvement of inflammatory cells, we added new data to the manuscript (Supplement Figure 4). Given the distinct hepatic cellular distribution of Chol-MCT1-siRNA and GN-MCT1-siRNA, the opposite fibrogenic phenotype observed may be attributed to MCT1’s role in non-hepatocyte cell types such as the inflammatory Kupffer cells and the fibrogenic hepatic stellate cells. To determine which hepatic cell type drives the opposite fibrotic phenotypes, we first hypothesized that GN-MCT1-siRNA activates M2 pro-fibrogenic macrophages more than Chol-MCT1-siRNA does. The representative M1/ M2 macrophage polarization gene markers were monitored in Kupffer cells. However, GN-MCT1-siRNA treatment caused comparable M1/M2 macrophage activation levels to Chol-MCT1-siRNA treatment (Supplement Figure 4A, 4B). These data suggest that the opposite fibrotic phenotypes caused by the different siRNA constructs are not due to M1/M2 macrophage polarization.

The timing of MCT1 depletion raises concern, as this is a largely prophylactic experiment, and it remains unclear if altering MCT1 would aid in the regression of established fibrosis. Given the proposal for translation to clinical practice, this will be an important question to answer.

RESPONSE: Agree these are important experiments for future evaluation.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations For The Authors):

As above, in general, the conclusions match the data presented. The one exception is the authors discussion point that these data show the importance of lactate flux in fibrosis. As MCT1 has other substrates, it does not seem this is definitively due to lactate flux. It would be helpful to have additional experiments to clarify mechanism by which loss of hepatocyte MCT1 leads to increased fibrosis, while loss of HSC MCT1 reverses this finding. This may aid in concluding that altered fibrosis is in fact due to lactate flux in these cell types.

RESPONSE: Described above to Reviewer #2

In addition, it is unclear why the authors switched NASH models for the two tools generated (GAN diet for siRNA, CDHFD for AAV). Similarly, methodology to assess fibrosis switched between these two experiments - i.e. Sirius Red staining for siRNA-treated GAN diet-fed mice vs. Trichrome staining for AAV-transduced CDHFD-fed mice. These changes make it difficult to perform cross-comparisons of the data, to explain (for example), why GN-siRNA to Mct1 reduced body weight but AAV8-TBG-Cre did not. Similarly, GN-siRNA increased liver Col1a1 protein but AAV8-TBG-Cre did not. These differences could be explained by model system, or tool efficacy/off-target effects.

RESPONSE: We agree that different model systems can explain difference in results, but there is also an advantage of using different models and various methodologies as preclinical tests of consistency of data on NASH under different conditions. There are no perfect mouse models for human NASH.

  • Phenotyping is also incomplete for the latter experiment, in particular amount of liver lipid content –

RESPONSE: We estimated lipid content by H&E (Fig 6E, F). In some experiments, we focused mostly on COL1 protein expression, as this rather than mRNA is the functional aspect of fibrosis.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations For The Authors):

This study could benefit from standardization of the types of diet used across all animal models and a more comprehensive focus on the metabolic/substrate availability and utilization aspects of NAFLD and NASH affected in the mouse models with MCT-1 dependent lactate transport deficiency. Since hepatic fibrogenesis in NASH is impacted by signals following hepatocyte damage, the extent of cell death in these models could also be better characterized.

RESPONSE: Our ALT data provides indirect insight into hepatocyte damage. Our histology images did not reveal significant changes in cell morphology or integrity and there were no notable changes in caspase protein levels.

Other comments:

In Fig 4G, there is an increase in the number of lipid droplets with Chol- MCT-1 siRNA compared to GN-MCT1-sirRNA, suggesting that the stellate cell component might be responsible for this finding. The possible reasons for this are not discussed.

RESPONSE: The effects in Fig 4G were exceedingly small and there is no difference in total TG in these experiments, so it is hard to interpret these data and provide logical explanations.

In Fig 5A. A western Blot for aSMA and COL 1 is shown but the sample labeling is unclear i.e, do the lanes belong to different mice of the same condition? HFD mice vs Ctr mice?

RESPONSE: Both groups of ob/ob mice were fed a GAN diet. The graph in Fig 5 is a direct comparison between NTC-siRNA and MCT1-siRNA. To enhance clarity, this is indicated in the figure legends, and the data in Fig 5 is a continuation of the data presented in Fig 4

In Fig 5E, COL1 densitometry data should also be provided for non-silenced mice on HFD and Chow diet for appropriate comparison

RES\PONSE: Both groups of ob/ob mice were fed a GAN diet. The graph in Fig 5represents a comparison between NTC-siRNA and MCT1-siRNA. It's important to note that, typically, ob/ob mice fed either a chow diet or a high-fat diet do not exhibit fibrogenic phenotypes within this time frame (3 weeks of dietary intervention).

There are many mis-statements throughout the text.Page 6 - "MCT1 silencing significantly inhibited Tgf1β-stimulated ACTA2 mRNA expression as well as collagen 1 protein production" but it is not stated that CO1A1 mRNA is unchanged in Fig 1C.

RESPONSE: We observed no change in CO1A1 mRNA levels (Fig 1C), so we focused on collagen 1 protein production (Fig 1B) on page 6. Given the consistent trend observed in Chol-MCT1-siRNA (Fig 5C), we proposed the possibility of MCT1's influence on collagen translation or protein turnover on page 11.

Page 7- ".......our Chol-MCT1-siRNA does not require transfection reagents as it is fully chemically modified". What does fully chemically modified mean and why does this mean in terms of transfection efficiency.

RESPONSE: One of the primary challenges in utilizing RNAi as a therapeutic approach has been the effective in vivo delivery strategy, particularly concerning stability and longevity against systemic nucleases. Recent developments in siRNA duplex chemical modification strategies, such as 2-Fluoro and 2-O-Methyl ribose substitutions, as well as phosphorothioate backbone replacements, have addressed these challenges Please see Figure 3. In our current study, we employed 'chemically fully modified' siRNA, featuring several key modifications: (1) every single ribose is chemically modified to 2-F or 2-OMeribose, (2) phosphorothioate backbone replacement, (3) 5'-end of the antisense strand modification to (E)-Vinyl-phosphonate, and (4) 3'-end of the sense strand linkers such as Cholesterol or Tri-N-Acetyl-galactosamine. These chemical enhancements significantly improve transfection efficiency, longevity, and selectivity, setting it apart from traditional siRNA lacking such chemical modifications. A prior study from the Khvorova lab has demonstrated substantial efficiency differences between partially and fully modified siRNA in vivo.

Page 7- the results present for Fig 2 ignores Fig, 2C, if this is important it needs to be described if not, please delete.

RESPONSE: The dose-response potency results, crucial for identifying the most potent Chol-MCT1-siRNA compound, are depicted in Figure 2C. The wording "(Figure 2C)" has been inserted in the sentence as follows. “The silencing effect on Mct1 mRNA was monitored after 72 hours (Figure 2B). Several compounds elicited a silencing effect greater than 80% compared to the NTC-siRNA. The two most potent Chol-MCT1-siRNA, Chol-MCT1-2060 (IC50: 59.6nM, KD%: 87.2), and Chol-MCT1-3160 (IC50: 32.4nM, KD%: 87.7)(Figure 2C) were evaluated for their inhibitory effect on MCT1 protein levels (Figure 2D, 2E). Based on its IC50 value and silencing potency, Chol-MCT1-3160 construct was chosen for further studies in vivo (Table 2).”

Supplement Fig 1A-F should be analyzed by multiple comparisons not by paired t-tests.

RESPONSE: We performed t-tests for every comparison between two groups. However, for Sup Fig 1A-F, which involved a comparison among three different groups, we applied oneway ANOVA.

The x-axis in supplement Fig 2A and B are not labeled, and I assume are in weeks. The Fig 2B x-axis numbers also mis-labeled and should also be 0-3 and not 10-13.

RESPONSE: The x-axis is now appropriately labeled.

Page 10 - the description of supplement Fig 4A is not accurate. Srebf1 mRNA is unchanged by the GN-MCT1-siRNA treatment and Mlxipl mRNA is unchanged by Chol-MCT1-siRNA treatment. Is this total Mlxipl mRNA or can you distinguish between the alpha and beta variants.

RESPONSE: We adhered to NCBI nomenclature, where 'SREBP1' and 'ChREBP' represent proteins, not mRNA. The Mlxipl mRNA we tested pertains to total Mlxipl mRNA. Original draft shown below.

“To investigate the underlying mechanism by which lipid droplet morphological dynamics change, we monitored the effect of hepatic MCT1 depletion on DNL-related gene expression. Both GN-MCT1-siRNA and Chol-MCT1-siRNA strongly decreased the mRNA and protein levels related to representative DNL genes (Supplement Figure 4A-4D). Intriguingly, both modes of hepatic MCT1 depletion also inhibited expression of the upstream regulatory transcription factors SREBP1 and ChREBP.”

There are no molecular weight markers in supplement Fig 4C and D. Is the Srebp1c blot for the nuclear or precursor form?

RESPONSE: The Srebp1c blot presented represents the precursor form. I have edited the figure legend accordingly. It's worth noting that the cleaved form of Srebp1c either exhibited significantly lower expression compared to its precursor form or displayed comparable expression between the control group and the MCT1 depletion group.

Changes in mRNA and protein do not always reflect changes in activity (allosteric regulation). If you want to draw any conclusions about de novo lipogenesis you need to directly measure fatty acid synthesis rates from a carbohydrate precursor.

RESPONSE: We completely agree. Therefore, in the current study, we emphasized two key points: (1) hepatic MCT1 depletion affects the expression levels of representative DNL genes, and (2) however, this regulation was insufficient to resolve the steatosis phenotypes in our NASH model. We have added the text “while recognizing that the decreased expression of DNL genes does not necessarily indicate inhibited fatty acid synthesis rate” on page 15.

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations For The Authors):

Figure 1 - Are there changes to fibroblast phenotype with TGF-beta stimulation and are these changes reversed with MCT1 siRNA-mediated silencing, or is this purely an expression phenomenon?

RESPONSE: This study was designed to assess the preventative effect of MCT1 silencing on Tgf1β-induced fibrosis, rather than a reversal study. As detailed in the methods section, LX2 cells were initially cultured in DMEM/high glucose media with 2% FBS. The following day, we transfected the cells with either NTC-siRNA or MCT1-siRNA (IDT, cat 308915476) using Lipofectamine RNAi Max (ThermoFisher, cat 13778075) for 6 hours in serum-reduced Opti-MEM media (ThermoFisher, cat 31985062). Subsequently, the cells were maintained in serum-starved media, with or without 10ng/ml of recombinant human Tgf1β (R&D Systems, cat 240-B/CF), for 48 hours before harvesting.

Is lactate import/export itself responsible for this phenotype? It is presumed that MCT1 depletion alters import/export of lactate and subsequently modulates this phenotype, but this is never shown experimentally. Does lactate accumulate in these cells or in the medium in culture? The foundation of the paper rests on this hypothesis, so we believe that this is critical to establish. This is particularly relevant as MCT1 has been proposed to function primarily as a lactate importer, so the availability of medium lactate could be easily modulated to determine whether that mimics MCT1 loss.

RESPONSE: To address the underlying mechanism of MCT1/Lactate in stellate cells, we added a new figure to the manuscript (Figure 8). We had previously conducted an experiment to determine whether MCT1 depletion in LX2 cells in vitro influences extracellular lactate concentrations in DMEM/high glucose (25mM glucose) media supplemented with 1mM sodium pyruvate but without sodium lactate. Interestingly, we found no significant difference in extracellular glucose and lactate concentrations, which remained at 25mM and 5mM, respectively. These concentrations were comparable between groups, regardless of MCT1 loss. Additionally, we investigated the effects of MCT1 silencing in the presence of potent fibrogenic inducer TGF-β1. Intriguingly, MCT1 depletion effectively prevented TGF-β1-induced collagen production, irrespective of lactate (+/- pyruvate) supply in the media. LX2 cells with MCT1 depletion exhibited reduced collagen 1 production when lactate was solely generated by endogenous glycolysis (Figure 8F) and when exogenous lactate was supplied (Figure 8G).

Figure 2 - It is compelling that the Chol-MCT1-siRNA compounds are effective at targeting MCT1. However, is it clear how specific the siRNA target is? Are other MCT genes affected as well (if the siRNAs target areas of homology, for example)? Given that this siRNA strategy is used going forward and proposed as a therapeutic, it would be important to discuss and perhaps characterize off-target effects. A simple BLAST search for homology for the chosen siRNAs could help answer this question.

RESPONSE:

1. We designed the siRNA to specifically avoid any potential off-target effects on MCT1's 14 isoforms, and this approach aligns with the results obtained from the NCBI-BLAST analysis.

2. While there are 14 isoforms of MCTs, only the first four are functional. To assess the off-target effect of Chol-MCT1-siRNA on MCT2 and MCT4 (MCT3 was excluded due to its limited expression in retinal pigment epithelium), we conducted in vivo experiments in ob/ob mice, which demonstrated a highly selective MCT1 silencing effect. We have also included MCT1, MCT2, and MCT4 rt-qPCR data in the manuscript (Supplement Figure 2A, 2B).

3. We plan to further optimize and validate the human MCT1-targeting siRNA sequence for use in humanized mouse studies. It's important to note that the MCT1-siRNA used in this study was designed for mice.

Supplemental Figure 1 - brain would be one other highly metabolic tissue wherein it would be important to show lack of activity/accumulation.

RESPONSE: Undoubtedly, the brain is one of the most metabolically active tissues, playing a pivotal role in regulating signaling pathways and metabolism in other tissues. However, it poses a significant challenge in terms of targeting due to the presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Overcoming BBB penetration remains one of the foremost challenges in the field of therapeutic siRNA delivery. For many therapeutic oligonucleotides, including Cholesterol-conjugated siRNAs, systemic administration alone is normally insufficient to achieve BBB penetration. Direct local injection or transient disruption of the BBB is normally required.

Figure 4 - The image shown for chol-MCT1-siRNA seems to show variation in lipid droplet size. Is this just this single image? The authors quantify smaller lipid droplets in this group, so the image may not be representative as there are many large droplets. Ultimately, additional mechanisms as to how alterations in lactate metabolism could mediate this phenotype are missing. This hypothesis also rests upon the assumption that MCT1 is modulating lactate, which is not shown experimentally, as discussed above.

RESPONSE: We changed the representative images (Fig 4B). We agree this aspect of the study is not resolved, and we have related text in the manuscript on this point: “neither GNMCT1-siRNA nor Chol-MCT1-siRNA decreased total hepatic TG levels (Figure 4H), although quantitative analysis of H&E images showed a small decrease in mean lipid droplet size and increased number of lipid droplets upon MCT1 silencing (Figure 4F, 4G). These data suggest the possibility that hepatic MCT1 depletion either (1) inhibits formation or fusion of lipid droplets, or (2) enhances lipolysis to diminish lipid droplet size.”

Figure 5 provides evidence that Chol-MCT1-siRNA expression decreases fibrosis but this is attributed to the effects on stellate cells. While GN-MCT1-siRNA and subsequent MCT1 silencing in hepatocytes has an opposite effect. The cell population that is not discussed, however, is the Kupffer cell. Could MCT1 silencing in this cell population be mediating part of the phenotype observed? How does MCT1 silencing affect Kupffer cell phenotype and activity?

This extends into Figure 6 where Kupffer cells are not given consideration in targeted experiments.

RESPONSE: Described above to Reviewer #3

Figure 6 and 7 use a different model to show that stellate cell depletion of MCT1, specifically, decreases collagen 1 protein levels in NASH, which reinforces the authors claims. Given the cell specificity of this experiment, it is more compelling data. It would be nice to show that Kupffer cell depletion of MCT1 does not have any affect or perhaps show that it does.

RESPONSE: We agree, but Kupffer selective depletion is not possible to do with this siRNA technology. Please see the response above as our most recent attempt to address this question.

Figure 7 shows that even with decreased collagen deposition, there is no effect on liver stiffness or chronic liver injury as measure by ALT. This may suggest that the decreased level of fibrosis is either not significant to overall clinical outcome or that there are other fibroinflammatory mechanisms compensating for lack of COL1 deposition. Is there increased reticulin fibrosis when MCT1 is knocked down? This could be assessed with IHC or monitoring type 3 collogen (COL3A1).

RESPONSE: Reticulin fibrosis results from the excessive deposition of reticular fibers, primarily composed of type 3 collagen. However, based on our observation of trichrome staining in whole liver histology data (Fig 7D-E), which exhibited nearly identical trends to collagen type 1 expression (Fig 7A-C), it seems unlikely that type 3 collagen compensated for the decrease in type 1 collagen protein expression upon hepatic stellate cell MCT1 KO. We plan to perform detailed analysis of a more comprehensive list of ECM proteins including type 3 collagen in our humanized mouse model with engrafted human liver cells in future experiments.

Additional considerations:

It may be useful to know if inhibition of fibrosis affects survival/progression in these NASH models over a longer timeframe, although this may understandably be beyond the scope of the current work.The timing of MCT1 depletion is prophylactic and given the proposal to translate this research, it would be important to determine whether MCT1 inhibition reversed fibrosis, and if so, by what metabolic mechanism?

RESPONSE: We have observed that extending the duration of the NASH model increases the likelihood of hepatocarcinoma development. Exploring the aim to include survival and disease progression as well as reversal of fibrosis would be important in future experiments.

Summary of new Figures and Figures modified:

  • Fig 1B: added "and" (significance) between the first and the third group, and the second and the last group.

  • Fig 4B: replaced images with more representative ones as the mean lipid size was questioned by the reviewer.

  • Fig 7D: made the images bigger (original images cropped and enlarged → 5X)

  • Fig 8: newly created to explain the underlying pathway of lactate, and MCT1 regulating collagen production. Please find the results sections.

  • Sup fig 2A, B: newly added to show our compounds’ selective silencing effect. - Sup Fig 2C-D: Added missing x-axis (moved from previous Figure 2A, 2B) - Sup Fig 2E-F: moved from sup Fig 3 not to have too many sup figures.

  • Sup Fig 3C-D: showed both precursor and cleaved form of SREBP1 bands as requested (moved from previous sup Figure 4)

  • Sup Fig 4: newly created, as questioned many times for the effect on Kupffer cells or other inflammatory cells.

  • Sup Fig 6: newly created to explain the potential underlying mechanism of MCT1 depletion on collagen production.

  • Sup Fig 7: moved from previous sup Fig 6.

  • Sup Fig 8: moved from previous sup Fig 7.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 1—source data 1. MCT1 depletion attenuates transforming growth factor 1β (TGF-β1)-stimulated collagen 1 production in human LX2 stellate cells.
    Figure 2—source data 1. Screening of chemically modified Chol-MCT1-siRNA in vitro.
    Figure 3—source data 1. Biodistribution of Chol- and GN-MCT1-siRNA in the liver.
    Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Biodistribution of GN-MCT1-siRNA and Chol-MCT1-siRNA.
    Figure 4—source code 1. Hepatic MCT1 depletion did not resolve steatosis in a genetically obese nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) mouse model.
    Figure 4—source data 1. Hepatic MCT1 depletion did not resolve steatosis in a genetically obese nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) mouse model.
    Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 1. GN-MCT1-siRNA induced a complementary effect on monocarboxylate transporter (MCT) isoform expression and decreased food intake and body weight.
    Figure 4—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Both Chol-MCT1-siRNA and GN-MCT1-siRNA significantly decreased hepatic DNL gene expression.
    Figure 5—source code 1. Opposite effects of Chol-MCT1-siRNA versus GN-MCT1-siRNA on fibrotic type 1 collagen expression.
    Figure 5—source data 1. Opposite effects of Chol-MCT1-siRNA versus GN-MCT1-siRNA on fibrotic type 1 collagen expression.
    Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1. A comparable level of M1/M2 macrophage polarization upon Chol-MCT1-siRNA and GN-MCT1-siRNA administration.
    Figure 5—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Intravenous injection of AAV9-Lrat-Cre in MCT1fl/fl mice specifically targets hepatic stellate cells.
    Figure 6—source code 1. MCT1 depletion did not resolve steatosis in the choline-deficient, high-fat diet (CDHFD)-induced nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) model.
    Figure 6—source data 1. MCT1 depletion did not resolve steatosis in the choline-deficient, high-fat diet (CDHFD)-induced nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) model.
    Figure 7—source code 1. Hepatocyte-specific MCT1KO accelerated fibrosis, while hepatic stellate cell-specific MCT1KO decreased it.
    Figure 7—source data 1. Hepatocyte-specific MCT1KO accelerated fibrosis, while hepatic stellate cell-specific MCT1KO decreased it.
    Figure 8—source data 1. Lactate enhances the transforming growth factor 1β (TGF-β1)-stimulatory effect in the presence of pyruvate in human LX2 stellate cells.
    Figure 8—figure supplement 1—source data 1. MCT1 promotes SMAD3 phosphorylation/activation in human LX2 stellate cells.
    Figure 8—figure supplement 2—source data 1. MCT1 silencing enhanced fibrogenic gene expression levels in human hematoma cell lines, HepG2.
    MDAR checklist

    Data Availability Statement

    All data quantified during this study are included in the manuscript and the Materials and methods.


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES