Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Ecol. 2022 Mar 14;32(10):2565–2581. doi: 10.1111/mec.16411

Bacterial-Fungal Interactions and Their Impact on Microbial Pathogenesis

Jessie MacAlpine 1, Nicole Robbins 1, Leah E Cowen 1,*
PMCID: PMC11032213  NIHMSID: NIHMS1981698  PMID: 35231147

Abstract

Microbial communities of the human microbiota exhibit diverse effects on human health and disease. Microbial homeostasis is important for normal physiological functions and changes to the microbiota are associated with many human diseases including diabetes, cancer, and colitis. In addition, there are also many microorganisms that are either commensal or acquired from environmental reservoirs that can cause diverse pathologies. Importantly, the balance between health and disease is intricately connected to how members of the microbiota interact and affect one another’s growth and pathogenicity. However, the mechanisms that govern these interactions are only beginning to be understood. In this review, we outline bacterial-fungal interactions in the human body, including examining the mechanisms by which bacteria govern fungal growth and virulence, as well as how fungi regulate bacterial pathogenesis. We summarize advances in the understanding of chemical, physical, and protein-based interactions, and their role in exacerbating or impeding human disease. We focus on the three fungal species responsible for the majority of systemic fungal infections in humans: Candida albicans, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Aspergillus fumigatus. We conclude by summarizing recent work in mining microbes for novel antimicrobials and antivirulence factors, highlighting the potential of the human microbiota as a rich resource for small molecule discovery.

Introduction

Microbial communities are ubiquitous throughout nature, occupying diverse ecosystems and exhibiting a range of interactions within and between species, from symbiosis to competition and predation1. One ecological niche of particular interest is the human body, as diverse collections of bacteria, fungi, archaea, and viruses living on and within this mammalian host interact to govern diverse aspects of human health25. Specifically, these communities of microbes play pivotal roles in maintaining normal physiological functions, as dysbiosis of the microbiota is associated with many diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease6, irritable bowel syndrome7, diabetes8, obesity9, and cancer10,11, as well as allergies12,13. Such commensal organisms can be acquired through birth, food consumption, and exposure to diverse environments, and thus can have a profound impact on human development and health throughout an individual’s lifetime14,15. Importantly, members of the microbiota interact with each other as well as with the host to influence diverse phenotypic traits. Yet, despite the importance of these communications, our understanding of how these players interact remains in its infancy.

In addition to those members of the microbiota that play important roles in maintaining human health, there are also many microorganisms capable of causing diverse pathologies. While traditionally human microbiome studies have focused on bacterial species, advancements in sequencing technology have facilitated the identification and characterization of other members of these microbial communities in the human gut3,16,17, and other anatomical sites1820. Among these commensal organisms are opportunistic fungal pathogens. These eukaryotic pathogens are reported to infect over 1 billion people annually, leading to approximately 1.5 million deaths worldwide21,22. Most fungal pathogens of humans take advantage of local or systemic suppression of the immune system to cause diverse maladies, including but not limited to: superficial skin, hair, and nail infections; chronic fungal lung infections; and systemic infections with mortality rates as high as 90%23. The three main opportunistic invaders capable of causing systemic disease in humans include species of Candida, Cryptococcus, and Aspergillus. Humans are exposed to some of these organisms through an environmental reservoir, including Aspergillus fumigatus and Cryptococcus neoformans24. Other fungal infections are caused by constituents of the human microbiota, including Candida albicans, which colonizes the gastrointestinal tract, urogenital tract, and skin24. Not surprisingly, bacterial pathogens capable of residing within a human host are also responsible for significant morbidity and mortality in humans, including but not limited to Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the lungs25, Staphylococcus aureus in the nasopharyngeal cavity26, and Clostridioides difficile in the gut27. While recent work has begun to elucidate the role of bacterial-fungal interactions in opportunistic infections25,28,29, the mechanisms by which these interactions contribute to pathogenesis remain largely unknown. Several recent publications have also reviewed bacterial-fungal interactions in the context of the human host3,3038.

The scope of this review will focus on bacterial-fungal interactions and their role in microbial pathogenesis in the context of human health and disease (Figure 1). In recent years, bacterial-fungal interactions have been reviewed. We provide an overview of current work evaluating bacterial-fungal interactions in the human body, including examining the mechanisms by which bacteria govern fungal growth and virulence, as well as how fungi regulate bacterial pathogenesis. We summarize advances in understanding chemical, physical, and protein-based interactions, and their role in exacerbating or impeding human disease. We conclude by exploring the potential of bacterial-fungal interactions as a rich source for antimicrobial discovery and the identification of anti-virulence strategies to thwart infectious disease.

Figure 1: Bacterial-fungal interactions in the human body.

Figure 1:

While this is not a comprehensive list of organisms found in the human microbiota, it highlights the key bacterial-fungal interactions summarized in this review, sorted by anatomical site. Figure made with biorender.com.

Modulation of fungal proliferation and virulence by bacteria

Fungal pathogens of humans employ a range of adaptive mechanisms and virulence factors to facilitate growth and survival during infection of the host (Figure 2A). These include secretion of proteases and toxins, as well as switching between diverse morphological states that assist with adhesion, penetration of host tissue, and evasion of the host immune system3942. By affecting the virulence of fungal pathogens, commensal and pathogenic bacteria can modulate the ability of fungi to thrive and cause disease in the host, as well as influence the host-response to the fungus.

Figure 2: Microbial traits modulated by inter-kingdom interactions.

Figure 2:

A/ Bacteria influence the ability of C. albicans, C. neoformans, and A. fumigatus to proliferate and modulate antifungal susceptibility, with certain inter-kingdom interactions enhancing these phenotypic traits and others impeding proliferation or compound susceptibility. This is examined in vitro by culturing fungi on solid (shown) or liquid medium in the presence or absence of bacteria or bacterial supernatants. It is also examined using mouse models, where the microbiota has been altered. Finally, the impact of bacteria on antifungal susceptibility can be assessed using a variety of approaches, including disc diffusion assays where the ability of bacterial supernatants to increase the efficacy (zone of inhibition) of antifungals can be assessed. Bacteria also modulate diverse virulence traits including C. albicans hyphal formation, A. fumigatus germination, and C. neoformans capsule formation, melanization, and titan cell induction. Finally, bacteria can modulate biofilm formation in C. albicans and A. fumigatus. Displayed are the developmental stages of C. albicans biofilm formation, including adhesion to a solid surface, induction of hyphal morphogenesis, and maturation and dispersal where an extracellular matrix is produced and yeast cells are released. B/ Fungi can influence the ability of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus to proliferate and can modulate antibacterial susceptibility through increasing the expression of efflux pumps in S. aureus. This has been determined through both in vitro co-culture assays on solid or liquid medium (shown) and through in vivo co-culture models of infection. Fungi can also modulate diverse bacterial virulence traits including inhibition of iron acquisition and quorum sensing in P. aeruginosa, as well as alpha toxin production in S. aureus. Finally, fungi can inhibit mono and polymicrobial biofilm formation in both P. aeruginosa and enhance biofilm formation in S. aureus. Figure made with biorender.com.

Candida albicans

C. albicans is a natural member of the human mucosal microbiota and is a commensal in approximately 50% of healthy adults43. As an opportunistic pathogen, C. albicans is responsible for mucosal infections such as oral and vaginal candidiasis, as well as life-threatening systemic disease in immunocompromised individuals23,44,45. In its host niche, C. albicans interacts with bacterial commensals, which influence diverse fungal phenotypic traits25. Many bacterial species inhibit C. albicans growth, while others secrete factors that inhibit fungal virulence traits, including filamentation and biofilm formation (Figure 2A)34,46. In contrast, some bacteria promote fungal growth or enhance C. albicans virulence attributes. Naturally, a thorough understanding of the factors and conditions that govern C. albicans commensalism and pathogenesis is critical to understand how this organism can cause disease.

Proliferation

The ability of C. albicans to proliferate in the host relies on the fungus’ ability to adapt to various environmental perturbations including exposure to elevated temperatures, alternative carbon sources, reactive oxygen species, cell wall stressors, and diverse pH ranges47. These responses can all be influenced through interactions with commensal and pathogenic bacteria. In the oral and vaginal microenvironments, C. albicans interacts with Lactobacillus spp., which secrete lactic acid and other weak organic acids that inhibit C. albicans proliferation48,49. Additionally, Lactobacillus spp. secrete cyclic dipeptides that inhibit the growth of the fungus50. This particular inter-kingdom interaction appears to be important in maintaining a healthy physiological state as individuals with reduced colonization by key Lactobacillus spp. are at increased risk for vulvovaginal candidiasis51,52. Beyond Lactobacillus spp., other commensal bacteria found in the oral mucosa inhibit C. albicans growth in co-culture assays, including Actinomyces israelii and P. aeruginosa, as well as high concentrations of Prevotella nigrescens and Porphyromonas gingivalis53. In the gut, C. albicans interacts with bacteria and other members of the microbiota that also influence its ability to proliferate. Recent work explored interactions between C. albicans and the gut commensal Escherichia coli (strain MG1655) in vitro. E. coli was found to secrete a soluble factor that directly kills the fungus in a magnesium-dependent manner54, as depletion of magnesium in a C. albicans-E. coli co-culture rescued growth of the fungus54. Notably, the authors indicate that the magnesium levels present in serum of healthy humans are well above the depleted levels used in the study. Therefore, for the inter-kingdom interaction to be physiologically relevant in vivo it would need to occur in microenvironments with depleted magnesium, which may occur at the sites of infection.

Morphogenesis

C. albicans undergoes a transition from yeast to filamentous morphologies in response to a variety of host-relevant cues including exposure to serum, nutrient limitation, neutral pH, and elevated temperature55. This transition is important for virulence as C. albicans mutants locked in either morphological state are largely avirulent in mouse models of infection56,57. The current paradigm is that the filamentous, hyphal morphology is important for tissue invasion and adherence, whereas the yeast morphotype is imperative for dissemination. The filamentous form is also associated with additional virulence factors, including secretion of the cytolytic peptide candidalysin, as well as proteases41,58. Importantly, previous work demonstrated an inverse relationship between filamentous growth and commensalism, as mutations in key regulators of the yeast-to-filament transition lead to enhanced fitness in the mouse gut58. Finally, in addition to filamentous states and the standard ‘white’ round-to-oval yeast morphology, C. albicans can also transition into several elongated yeast-like cell types (opaque, grey, and GUT) that exhibit distinct in vitro properties and interactions with the host56. Thus, modulating the diverse morphological states adopted by C. albicans can have a profound consequence on its ability to cause disease.

Commensal and pathogenic bacteria play key roles in regulating the C. albicans yeast-to-hyphal transition, with both inhibitors and enhancers of filamentation identified. One key bacterial-fungal interaction occurs between P. aeruginosa and C. albicans in the human lung (Figure 3A). Previous work found that P. aeruginosa can physically adhere to C. albicans filaments in response to the quorum sensing molecule N-(3-Oxododecanoyl)-L-homoserine lactone, leading to fungal cell death59,60. Notably, production of this quorum sensing molecule increases resistance of C. albicans to the most widely deployed antifungal, fluconazole, by upregulating efflux pump expression and activating stress response pathways61. The secretion of additional compounds with antifungal activity by P. aeruginosa is also well characterized, including the production of phenazines, which inhibit C. albicans growth at high concentrations62, and inhibit hyphal morphogenesis at sub-inhibitory concentrations63. Phenazine production is at the core of the chemical interaction between C. albicans and P. aeruginosa and elicits a myriad of effects on the host. During growth, C. albicans secretes ethanol as a by-product of fermentation, which enhances the production of phenazine compounds, such as pyocyanin, by P. aeruginosa63. Increased phenazine production further increases fungal ethanol secretion in a positive feedback loop by compromising mitochondrial function64. To add further complexity to this interaction, the production of phenazines and ethanol affect the host response to both pathogens, as ethanol reduces the ability of macrophages to clear P. aeruginosa65, while phenazines cause direct damage to epithelial tissues66. Finally, the host detects phenazines through the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), upregulating antimicrobial defences and proinflammatory cytokines, which lead to the degradation of virulence factors and eventual clearing of the microorganisms67. Interactions between P. aeruginosa and C. albicans are also important upon phagocytosis by host immune cells. Co-infection of macrophages with P. aeruginosa and C. albicans decreases fungal survival, reduces fungal escape from macrophages, and reduces C. albicans filamentation in response to host cells relative to macrophage infection with C. albicans alone68. This is dependent on the presence of phenazines, as P. aeruginosa strains defective in compound production are unable to enhance fungal killing by macrophages.

Figure 3: Interactions between bacteria and C. albicans modulate virulence of the fungus.

Figure 3:

A/ Interactions between C. albicans and P. aeruginosa on the lung epithelium. P. aeruginosa secretes phenazines such as pyocyanin that inhibit C. albicans growth and biofilm formation, as well as the yeast-to-hyphal transition at concentrations below those inhibiting growth. Through a positive feedback loop, the production of ethanol by C. albicans stimulates phenazine production in P. aeruginosa, and phenazines then further increase ethanol production in the fungus through compromising mitochondrial function. P. aeruginosa quorum sensing (QS) molecules, including N-3-oxo-dodecanoyl-L-homoserine lactone, also inhibit the C. albicans yeast-to-hyphal transition. This QS molecule also upregulates efflux pumps in C. albicans leading to increased resistance to the antifungal, fluconazole. Finally, P. aeruginosa can adhere to C. albicans hyphae and directly kill them through the secretion of phenazines. B/ Interactions between C. albicans and Lactobacillus spp. on the vaginal epithelium. Lactobacillus spp. secrete small molecules including hydrogen peroxide, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), and weak organic acids (WOAs) such as lactic acid that affect fungal growth. Lactobacillus spp. also secrete 1-acetyl-beta-carboline that inhibits the yeast-to-filament transition, as well as chitinase, which breaks down the fungal cell wall. Finally, Lactobacillus spp. directly compete with C. albicans for adhesion sites on the vaginal epithelium. Figure made with biorender.com.

Over time, C. albicans and P. aeruginosa have evolved to adapt to the negative pressures each pathogen exerts on one another. For example, clinical isolates of C. albicans from the lungs of cystic fibrosis patients have been identified that are resistant to the filament-repressive effects of P. aeruginosa69. Genome sequencing of the C. albicans clinical isolates revealed that most of the constitutively filamentous strains harbored mutations in the transcriptional repressor gene NRG1; such mutations were necessary and sufficient for the filamentous phenotype. Six independent nrg1 mutations arose in Candida isolates from different cystic fibrosis patients69, providing a poignant example of parallel evolution in the context of the human host.

In the oral cavity, C. albicans interacts with the oral commensal and opportunistic pathogen, Streptococcus mutans. This microbe along with other Streptococcus spp. secrete trans-2-decenoic acid, a small molecule that inhibits C. albicans hyphal morphogenesis without affecting fungal growth70. S. mutans also secretes mutanobactin A, another small molecule that blocks C. albicans hyphal morphogenesis71.

Another mucosal site frequently colonized by C. albicans is the human vagina18,72. Within this environment, C. albicans is the leading cause of vaginal candidiasis73 and interacts with commensal bacteria on the vaginal mucosa, including Lactobacillus spp. (Figure 3B).74,75. The ability of Lactobacillus spp. to affect C. albicans morphogenesis is dependent on white-opaque cell type switching. The white cell morphology has been best studied for its interaction with Lactobacillus spp. Cellular proteins secreted by this genus include major secreted protein 1 (Msp1), which is readily produced by Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and acts as a chitinase to break down the fungal cell wall, blocking filamentous growth in white cells76. In addition to chitinase, other factors resistant to protease and heat treatment within Lactobacillus-conditioned medium inhibit C. albicans hyphal morphogenesis in white cells7779, although the molecular entity responsible for this effect remained elusive for some time. Fortunately, recent work identified a component of the Lactobacillus secretome, 1-acetyl-beta-carboline, that inhibits C. albicans hyphal morphogenesis and biofilm formation via inhibition of the DYRK1-family kinase, Yak180. However, the same conditions that block filamentation in white cells do not block morphogenesis in opaque cells, highlighting the broad phenotypic plasticity C. albicans displays in response to both its environment and inter-kingdom interactions81.

Streptococcus agalactiae is another bacterium found in the vaginal microenvironment that is commonly isolated from individuals with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis82. Similar to Lactobacillus, S. agalactiae-conditioned medium inhibits C. albicans hyphal morphogenesis. However, co-inoculation of mice with C. albicans and S. agalactiae increased fungal burden in a mouse model of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis due to a decreased Th17 immune response 82, highlighting the complex connections between the fungus, bacterium, and host in governing pathogenesis.

C. albicans also resides in the human gut83 where it interacts with commensal and pathogenic bacteria, including E. coli, Salmonella enterica, and Enterococcus faecalis. Previous work found that secretory products found during culture of E. coli biofilms were able to inhibit C. albicans hyphal morphogenesis and the expression of key hyphal-associated genes84. Additionally, S. enterica serovar Typhimurium was able to inhibit C. albicans filamentation in a Caenorhabditis elegans model of infection and directly kill C. albicans hyphae through a mechanism that relied on the inositol phosphatase, sopB85. Interestingly, C. albicans-conditioned medium increased the expression of sopB and other genes important for S. enterica-mediated hyphal-killing85, highlighting a compensatory mechanism adopted by the bacterium to regulate fungal virulence. Finally, the interaction between E. faecalis and C. albicans has been well studied, where early work found that co-infection with both organisms resulted in attenuated virulence in a C. elegans model86. E. faecalis secretes EntV, a bacteriocin with antifungal and anti-filamentation activity, which protects C. elegans from infection with C. albicans87. Recent work found that post-translational modifications are important for the regulation of EntV, including identifying the requirement for gelatinase activity to cleave EntV into its active form88. Many other bacteria have also been reported to produce soluble factors that govern C. albicans morphogenesis, including the opportunistic pathogens C. difficile and Burkholderia cenocepacia, which secrete para-Cresol89, and cis-2-dodecnoic acid (BDSF)90, respectively.

More broadly in the gut, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are metabolites produced in the colon by bacterial fermentation of dietary fibers, and these lipids play a key role in maintaining a healthy microbiota. SCFAs inhibit growth, filamentation, and biofilm formation of C. albicans in vitro91. Consequently, antibacterial-treated mice susceptible to C. albicans gut infection exhibit significantly reduced levels of SCFAs in the cecum and higher fungal loads in the feces91, providing in vivo evidence that SCFAs are important in controlling C. albicans overgrowth. Additionally, recent work assessed the role of C. albicans in governing pathogenicity in a chemical-induced colitis mouse model, and observed that vaccination with the Candida NDV-3A vaccine protected mice from fungal-induced damage during colitis92. In the future, it will be interesting to see if these protective effects are also observed in a bacterial-induced colitis model.

In contrast to the examples highlighted above, commensal bacteria are also implicated in enabling C. albicans morphogenesis in the mammalian gut93. Serial passage of C. albicans through the gastrointestinal tracts of antibiotic-treated mice led to the rapid generation of low-virulence strains unable to form hyphae due to mutations in a gene encoding a transcription factor that positively regulates filamentation, FLO893. These evolved lineages stimulated proinflammatory cytokines and conferred transient cross-protection against several other gut inhabitants. However, if an intact microbiota was present, only the virulent hyphal form persisted, suggesting that bacterial commensals play a critical role in promoting the filamentous or virulent form. The reason for this contradiction remains unclear but may be due to the commensal status of organisms as opposed to inter-kingdom interactions in disease contexts.

Biofilm Formation

Another important C. albicans virulence trait is its ability to form intrinsically drug-resistant biofilms, or surface-associated communities, which colonize medical devices such as catheters in healthcare settings94. While the yeast-to-filament transition is intricately linked to the ability of C. albicans to form these structures, there are numerous other facets that contribute to their formation. C. albicans is frequently isolated in polymicrobial biofilms that are also comprised of Streptococcus spp., P. aeruginosa, and S. aureus9597. These primarily occur on healthcare devices such as catheters and pacemakers, as well as in the oral cavity, where co-colonization with bacteria is associated with dental cavities, periodontitis, and denture stomatitis98. In the mouth, C. albicans adheres to oral Streptococcus spp., providing additional surface for fungal colonization99. Streptococcus gordonii, a common commensal of the oral mucosa, exerts physical force and produces chemical signals that lead to enhanced fungal morphogenesis and biofilm formation in C. albicans100. Additional work found that the competence regulation system ComDE in S. gordonii is important in the early stages of dual-species biofilms, but inhibits C. albicans biofilm formation in later stages101. Streptococcus oralis colonization of the oral mucosa also leads to increased biofilm formation, enhanced dissemination of C. albicans in mice, and increased expression of proinflammatory cytokines that result in enhanced tissue inflammation and immunopathogenesis102. Other bacterial members of the oral microbiota also enhance C. albicans virulence in early stages of biofilm formation, including Streptococcus sanguinis, Actinomyces odontolyticus, and Actinomyces viscosus103.

In contrast, the opportunistic pathogen and oral commensal Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans secretes the quorum sensing molecule autoinducer-2 that inhibits C. albicans biofilm formation by blocking filamentation104. As well, P. aeruginosa secretes factors that inhibit C. albicans biofilm formation, although through a mechanism that is independent of morphogenesis105. Using a strain of P. aeruginosa that does not secrete homoserine lactone, it was discovered that the bacterial supernatant could inhibit biofilm formation in the constitutively filamentous tup1 deletion strain of C. albicans, implying an effect beyond inhibition of hyphal morphogenesis105.

Cryptococcus neoformans

While studies examining fungal–bacterial interaction have mainly been performed with C. albicans, the impact of bacteria on C. neoformans growth and virulence has also been investigated. C. neoformans is an opportunistic human fungal pathogen and causative agent of cryptococcosis106. While immunocompromised individuals are most vulnerable to cryptococcal infections, there are also reports of C. neoformans causing systemic infections in immunocompetent hosts107,108. An estimated 223,100 cases of cryptococcal meningitis occur globally each year, leading to 181,100 deaths109. These staggeringly high mortality rates are due to numerous factors including a limited antifungal arsenal, the frequent development of antifungal resistance, and the fact that these infections predominantly occur in resource-poor settings where proper medical care is inadequate. As a human fungal pathogen, C. neoformans relies on several unique virulence traits to survive in a human host including the ability to proliferate at mammalian body temperature, as well as the capacity to form a polysaccharide capsule, produce melanin, and form the atypical titan cell morphology (Figure 2)110. Titan cells are cryptococcal cells with enormous dimensions and clinical relevance due in part to being refractory to phagocytosis by human immune cells111.

Proliferation

Given the diverse environmental niches that C. neoformans is capable of inhabiting, there are many reports of diverse bacterial species exerting anti-cryptococcal activity31. C. neoformans is commonly isolated from pigeon guano suggesting that its gastrointestinal tract is at least temporarily colonized with this fungus, despite this species being recalcitrant to cryptococcal infection112. Early work that co-incubated C. neoformans with seven species of bacteria found within the pigeon microbiota observed a complete inhibition of C. neoformans growth, speculating that a specialized avian microbiota may at least partially protect birds from infections by C. neoformans113. Follow-up investigations found that the growth-inhibitory activity was mainly exerted by only two bacterial species, P. aeruginosa and Bacillus subtilis114. P. aeruginosa can inhibit C. neoformans growth through both a contact-dependent mechanism as well as contact-independent mechanisms that include the secretion of pyocyanin and other phenazine derivatives115. S. aureus is also reported to kill C. neoformans through a mechanism that involves attachment to the capsule116 as the anti-proliferative effects are specific to C. neoformans and not to other fungal pathogens that do not produce the polysaccharide layer. While these examples all highlight inter-kingdom interactions that impair C. neoformans growth, the soil bacterium Acinetobacter baumanii was observed to increase C. neoformans survival in biofilms and stimulate the formation of capsule117. The exact molecular mechanism of this interaction remains to be determined; however, physical contact was not required, at least for the biofilm-inducing activity, suggesting that A. baumanii likely secretes specific factors that affect the fungus either at the cell surface or inside the cell. Overall, the impact of these inter-kingdom interactions on C. neoformans proliferation is highly complex and dependent on the organism involved.

Virulence

C. neoformans melanization is an important virulence trait to help protect the fungus from oxidative damage, antifungal assault, and high temperature, while also functioning to modulate host immune responses118. To better understand how bacteria regulate C. neoformans melanin production, a screen was performed using 40 microorganisms found in environmental niches occupied by the fungus119. This work identified several species of the Bacillus genus that were able to inhibit melanization without affecting growth. Bacillus safensis was further investigated and found to inhibit other virulence traits including capsule production and biofilm formation, in part via the action of chitinase activity119. There are also examples of bacteria enhancing C. neoformans virulence. The opportunistic bacterial pathogen Klebsiella aerogenes promotes melanization of C. neoformans cells during co-cultivation through the bacterial production of dopamine, a precursor for cryptococcal melanin biosynthesis120. Finally, it was recently shown that the mouse microbiota has the capacity to induce titan cell formation by C. neoformans121. The in vivo significance of the microbiota in promoting titan cell formation was established by observing that mice pre-treated with antibiotics prior to infection with C. neoformans had significantly less fungal cells with the titan morphology compared to antibiotic-free mice121. Further analysis of the titan cell-inducing mechanisms revealed that bacteria such as E. coli, and Streptococcus pneumoniae trigger cryptococcal titanization via shedding of peptidoglycan, a component of the bacterial cell wall121.

Aspergillus fumigatus

Aspergillus fumigatus is a saprotrophic fungus ubiquitous in the environment and a leading cause of invasive aspergillosis122. A. fumigatus is a significant cause of invasive infections in individuals with impaired immune function, including those with neutropenia, solid organ transplant recipients, and patients on immunosuppressive therapies, such as high-dose corticosteroids. It is estimated that more than 200,000 cases of invasive aspergillosis occur each year, with staggering mortality rates of up to 50% with treatment and 100% if left undiagnosed24. A. fumigatus relies on several virulence traits during infection of a human host, including the production of gliotoxin and germination of conidia into hyphae123.

One of the most consequential bacterial-fungal interactions occurs between A. fumigatus and P. aeruginosa, which can be deadly in individuals with chronic lung conditions, such as cystic fibrosis97,124. It is well established that P. aeruginosa secretes antifungal compounds with activity against A. fumigatus, including pyocyanin and other phenazines125,126. Expanding beyond these well-characterized secreted compounds, Sass et al. evaluated 24 P. aeruginosa mutants with deletions in genes important for virulence127. The authors found that the P. aeruginosa siderophore pyoverdine was effective at inhibiting A. fumigatus biofilm formation. By capturing extracellular iron, the authors predicted that pyoverdine limits A. fumigatus growth and biofilm formation by creating a nutrient-limited environment127. Pyoverdine was later found to work synergistically with the Pseudomonas quinolone signal (PQS) quorum sensing molecule that is also responsible for iron chelation and inhibition of biofilm formation under low iron conditions128. Paradoxically, under high iron conditions, PQS enhances A. fumigatus biofilm formation and this process is dependent on the A. fumigatus iron siderophore, ferricrocin128. Finally, P. aeruginosa produces volatiles that stimulate A. fumigatus to invade the lung parenchyma when the two organisms are physically separated129. However, as soon as the organisms come into direct contact, their relationship becomes antagonistic as they compete for nutrients, including iron129. This highlights the complex inter-kingdom interactions displayed between these two opportunistic pathogens that have a profound impact on the human host, as well as the key role of iron in modulating this dynamic relationship.

In other mucosal sites of the human body, an important fungal-bacterial interaction occurs between A. fumigatus and S. aureus. During polymicrobial biofilm formation, S. aureus inhibits A. fumigatus conidiation, filamentation, and biofilm maturation130. Another study found that E. coli DH5α secretes a 60 kDa protein with activity against A fumigatus. This activity was then linked to a siderophore-based inhibition of fungal growth via limitation of iron acquisition131.

Overall, these studies demonstrate that different bacteria have disparate effects on C. albicans, C. neoformans, and A. fumigatus either promoting or preventing growth, and either enhancing or blocking the production of virulence factors. As further studies continue to explore the inter-kingdom interactions that occur in the human host, more mechanistic insights will be gleaned as to how fungal pathogenesis is impacted by other inhabitants of the human microbiota.

Modulation of bacterial proliferation and virulence by fungi

Similar to fungi, bacteria employ a range of virulence traits to facilitate infection in the host, including the use of secretion systems for the release of toxins and other effectors132,133. Some fungi exhibit broad effects on the virulence of multiple bacterial pathogens. For example, C. albicans biofilms create a hypoxic microenvironment that facilitates the growth of anaerobic bacteria including Clostridium perfringens and Bacteroides fragilis134. Here, we summarize current research efforts to evaluate the effect of fungi on bacterial growth and virulence in the context of the human host.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

P. aeruginosa is a leading cause of hospital-acquired infections, including pneumonia and urinary and wound infections135, and is frequently detected in the lungs of cystic fibrosis patients97. In fact, over 75 % of CF patients over 18 years of age are chronically colonized with P. aeruginosa, which often persists throughout the life of the patient. Previous work found that C. albicans impacts P. aeruginosa virulence, biofilm formation, and secretion of antifungal compounds. Specifically, C. albicans produces the quorum sensing molecule farnesol, which inhibits transcription from the pqsA–E operon, blocks production of the quinolone signal PQS, and ultimately inhibits the expression of phenazine biosynthetic genes136. However, in P. aeruginosa–C. albicans biofilms, where P. aeruginosa and PQS concentrations are high, the presence of the fungus leads to increased production of phenazines through an uncharacterized pathway, suggesting that the effects of C. albicans on P. aeruginosa are complex62,137. Interestingly, C. albicans can also impact P. aeruginosa virulence by inhibiting iron acquisition. C. albicans-secreted proteins inhibit the expression of P. aeruginosa genes important for iron acquisition and virulence, including pyochelin and pyoverdine138. Oral administration of C. albicans secreted proteins was sufficient to protect mice from P. aeruginosa infection and oral iron supplementation rescued bacterial virulence in the presence of C. albicans. P. aeruginosa and A. fumigatus are also frequent co-colonizers in the lungs of cystic fibrosis patients97 and gliotoxin produced by A. fumigatus inhibits P. aeruginosa growth and biofilm formation139. Other work found that A. fumigatus secretes isocyanides that bind copper and exhibit broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, including activity against P. aeruginosa140.

Staphylococcus aureus

S. aureus and C. albicans are frequently co-isolated in biofilm-associated diseases such as keratitis and urinary tract and wound infections141. S. aureus adheres to C. albicans hyphae through the adhesins FnpB, SasF, and Atl to facilitate tissue penetration and seed dissemination of the bacteria142. In a mouse model of oral candidiasis, co-infection of C. albicans and S. aureus results in the establishment of systemic infection as opposed to symptoms of oral candidiasis with the fungus alone or no symptoms with the bacteria alone142. A mouse model of intra-abdominal infection also found that coinfection with C. albicans and S. aureus results in synergistic lethality143,144. Interestingly, this synergism is not dependent on the ability of C. albicans to undergo hyphal morphogenesis and non-albicans species of Candida also enhance infection145,146. Additionally, recent work established that during polymicrobial growth of C. albicans and S. aureus, the fungus elevates extracellular pH to enhance the production of alpha toxin, the major cytotoxic agent released by the bacterium147. As well, when exposed to the C. albicans quorum sensing molecule farnesol, S. aureus exhibits enhanced tolerance to antimicrobial agents due to increased expression of drug efflux pumps148.

Other Examples

S. mutans and C. albicans are frequently co-isolated in plaques and biofilms in the oral mucosa, contributing to caries and other tooth decay and damage, particularly in children. While high levels of farnesol can inhibit S. mutans growth, lower concentrations that are found in S. mutans-C. albicans conditioned medium actually increase growth and enhance biofilm formation in S. mutans149. Farnesol also increases the expression of glucosyltransferases in S. mutans that contribute to the robust exopolysaccharides found in the extracellular matrix of biofilms149. Thus, there is a dynamic relationship between farnesol production and S. mutans growth and virulence.

To investigate the mechanisms underlying the high rate of mucosal and systemic candidiasis in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy150, Bertolini et al. developed a chemotherapy-immunosuppressed mouse model of oral and gut mucosal breach by C. albicans151. The authors showed that infection with C. albicans led to changes in the oral mucosa that contributed to disease151. These changes in the microbial community led to an increase in prevalence of Enterococcus spp., which reduced the integrity of the epithelial barrier and promoted invasion of C. albicans and immunopathology associated with candidiasis.

In contrast to most of the mechanistic studies published over the past decade, recent work established that positive interactions between microbes were much more common than previously predicted. This was determined by using a high-throughput co-culture platform that examined over 180,000 different interactions between 20 soil-dwelling bacteria in 40 different environment conditions152. It would be interesting to use a similar platform in the future to examine bacterial-fungal interactions in a high-throughput manner to systemically evaluate both positive and negative effects on proliferation and virulence.

Targeting Virulence as an Antimicrobial Strategy

Microbe-derived biomolecules, including natural products, are a rich source of antimicrobial compounds153,154. About 70% of antibacterial agents used in the clinic are of natural product origin, and 97% of these compounds originate from either fungi or bacteria155,156. However, a vast majority of these antimicrobials target essential gene products or processes required for pathogen viability. A relatively underexplored area of study is the therapeutic potential of anti-virulence compounds to thwart infectious disease157,158. A challenge of canonical antimicrobial agents is their relatively non-selective inhibition of microbial growth. This leads to negative effects on commensal microbes in the human body and contributes to antimicrobial resistance159161. One of the exciting possibilities of anti-virulence strategies to combat disease is the ability to specifically prevent organisms from causing infections, as opposed to directly killing microbes. This reduces selective pressure on the organism to evolve resistance as cells are still able to grow and survive, without employing virulence factors that damage the host162. Inhibiting virulence factors also extends potential drug targets beyond those involved in essential processes in pathogens. This is especially important in fungi, as these eukaryotic pathogens share many essential processes with their human hosts. However, there are limitations to anti-virulence strategies, as elimination of the pathogen is necessary in the case of many infections. Anti-virulence strategies alone could be employed for common opportunistic infections such as oral and vaginal candidiasis. However, for bloodstream infections or complicated disease, combination therapy could be employed that uses both an antimicrobial and anti-virulence-based strategy163.

While this review has described several secreted compounds produced by members of the human microbiota that modulate key virulence attributes, thus far, the only FDA-approved anti-virulence therapeutic to date has used antibodies to bind and neutralize toxins in bacterial pathogens. The first study to demonstrate efficacy of an anti-virulence strategy against a pathogen involved treatment of infant botulism with antibodies purified from adult donors that neutralize the botulism toxin164. Building on the success of this approach, a separate study successfully employed an anti-virulence treatment in stage three clinical trials to combat recurrent C. difficile infection165. The authors administered two monoclonal antibodies, actoxumab and bezlotoxumab, that bind and neutralize the C. difficile toxins A and B, respectively. Treatment with both antibodies was associated with a significant reduction in recurrent C. difficile infection in at-risk patients165. Additionally, another monoclonal antibody, raxibacumab, binds and neutralizes a component of the anthrax toxin and confers improved survival and clinical outcomes following anthrax exposure in rabbits and monkeys166. Probiotic bacteria have been extensively investigated for their ability to treat infections that lead to microbial dysbiosis, including diarrheal disease and vaginal candidiasis167,168. However, only one fungal species is established as a treatment for bacterial infection, including diarrhea caused by C. difficile in adults and children. Previous work found that Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 secretes a 54-kDa protease which digests the C. difficile toxin A169. Oral administration of the probiotic fungus has no effect on the microbiota of healthy humans, but it can rescue eubiosis of the intestinal microbiota following diarrheal disease170 and infection with Helicobacter pylori171. These examples highlight the potential of targeting virulence factors to combat C. difficile infections, including the potential application of microbiota-derived factors.

A relatively unexplored and exciting area of current focus is the potential of small molecules to target virulence traits of human fungal pathogens. Several small molecule inhibitors of C. albicans hyphal morphogenesis have been described (Figure 4)60,77,172174. This includes small molecules secreted by bacteria, such as 1-acetyl-beta-carboline secreted by Lactobacillus spp.80 and the C. albicans quorum sensing molecule, farnesol175. Other work has screened collections of small molecules for activity against C. albicans hyphal morphogenesis. Specifically, a collection of 30,000 small molecules was assessed for their ability to inhibit adhesion of C. albicans to polystyrene plates, identifying a single molecule, filastatin, that inhibits C. albicans adhesion, hyphal morphogenesis, biofilm formation, and fungal virulence in a nematode model of infection172. Analogous screens also identified biaryl amide compounds that inhibit C. albicans hyphal morphogenesis and prevent virulence in oral and invasive murine models of candidiasis176, as well as diazaspiro-decane analogs as inhibitors of C. albicans biofilm formation, hyphal morphogenesis, and virulence in both an oral and invasive model of mouse candidiasis173. Additionally, a screen of 678 compounds pre-selected based on bioactivity against Saccharomyces cerevisiae identified Tri-Chloro-Salicyanilide (TCSA) as a top compound that blocks C. albicans hyphal morphogenesis and biofilm formation. Through transcriptional profiling, this activity was linked to fungal mitochondrial protein import177. However, none of these compounds have advanced to a clinical trial. The only anti-virulence strategy to combat fungal infection that is under clinical development is the NDV-3A C. albicans vaccine178. It was developed using the Als3 adhesin protein that is critical for C. albicans adherence, invasion, and virulence in the host179. The vaccine has demonstrated efficacy against both systemic and oral candidiasis in murine models180182, as well as recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis in women in a double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial178. Thus, although targeting virulence traits represents a promising therapeutic strategy to mitigate infectious diseases, future study is necessary to develop microbiome-derived compounds with efficacy against fungal pathogens.

Figure 4: Bacteria secrete diverse compounds that inhibit the C. albicans yeast-to-hyphal transition.

Figure 4:

The small molecules secreted by bacterial species highlight a diverse collection of chemical scaffolds capable of inhibiting hyphal morphogenesis in C. albicans. Figure made with biorender.com.

Bacteria and fungi alike have been mined for the secretion of antimicrobial compounds, including many front-line anti-infective agents used clinically183,184. However, the current mining of antimicrobials is neither systematic nor comprehensive, and the re-discovery of antimicrobial agents is a significant hurdle that is yet to be overcome185. Current work is trying to establish efficient pipelines coupled with modern ‘omics’ technology to facilitate natural product discovery in diverse microbial backgrounds. Such advancements could be applied to those organisms living in the environment as well as those found within a human host. Bioinformatics now facilitates the discovery of silenced or cryptic biosynthetic clusters responsible for natural product production in both fungi and bacteria186188. This includes recent work that developed a pipeline for identifying natural products from anaerobic fungi using genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, highlighting the untapped potential of anaerobic gut fungi as producers of natural products189. Whole-genome sequencing to identify unexplored biosynthetic gene clusters has also led to the identification of a known antibacterial complestatin and a new antibacterial corbomycin, that bind to bacterial peptidoglycan and inhibit autolysin activity to prevent essential bacterial cell wall remodelling190. Both compounds were effective in a murine model of skin infection and decreased methicillin-resistant S. aureus burden190. Finally, leveraging the microbiomes of marine animals and cutting-edge metabolomics and genomic tools, a novel antifungal turbinmicin was discovered that displays potent in vitro and in vivo activity against multidrug-resistant fungal pathogens through a fungal-specific mode of action, targeting Sec14 of the vesicular trafficking pathway191. Continued advances in antimicrobial discovery will help scientists and clinicians realize the potential of anti-virulence strategies to thwart infectious disease.

Conclusion

Dissecting the mechanisms underlying inter-kingdom interactions is important for furthering our understanding of human health and disease. The literature outlined in this review demonstrates that microbial interactions, including both antagonistic and synergistic interactions, have important implications for opportunistic infections and beyond. We highlight the extensive literature that describes the effects of bacteria on fungal growth and virulence in the mammalian host, as well as the effect of fungi on bacterial proliferation and virulence. By focusing on opportunistic fungal and bacterial pathogens that colonize the human body, we highlight key microbial interactions that contribute to the onset and severity of diverse infections. Studies highlighted in this review that investigate the synergistic interactions between bacteria and fungi identify their important implications for polymicrobial infections and disease susceptibility. Additionally, work describing antagonistic interactions between bacteria and fungi demonstrate their potential for the identification of novel antimicrobial compounds and strategies to thwart infectious disease. These novel antimicrobial compounds offer a promising reservoir of untapped chemical diversity that remains largely unexplored. Beyond the medical applications of inter-kingdom interactions, characterizing these communications is important for our understanding of the development and maintenance of the human microbiota. Similar to studying other ecological environments, examining the microbial composition of healthy and disease states can further our understanding of these complex communities.

With the rising threat of antimicrobial resistance, the need for novel antibacterial and antifungal agents is reaching a critical point. Improved strategies for mining bacteria and fungi for natural products now enable researchers to revisit ecological bacterial-fungal interactions as a source of novel antimicrobials. Given that many microbes are opportunistic pathogens that rely on virulence traits to cause disease in a human host, small molecules that inhibit microbial virulence represent an exciting area of antimicrobial discovery. With antibody and vaccine-based anti-virulence strategies beginning to gain approval for clinical use, further research is required to expand the available repertoire of microbial virulence inhibitors.

Acknowledgements

We thank all members of the Cowen lab for helpful discussions. J.M. is supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research Canada Graduate Scholarship-Doctoral (FDN-457296). L.E.C. is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Foundation Grant (FDN-154288), a National Institutes of Health NIAID R01 (1R01AI127375), and the W. Garfield Weston Foundation Microbiome Initiative Proof of Principle Grant (189663) and Translational Research Grant (301617). L.E.C. is a Canada Research Chair (Tier 1) in Microbial Genomics & Infectious Disease and co-Director of the CIFAR Fungal Kingdom: Threats & Opportunities program.

Footnotes

Declaration of Interests

L.E.C. is a co-founder and shareholder in Bright Angel Therapeutics, a platform company for development of novel antifungal therapeutics.

Data Accessibility Statement

Data archiving is not applicable.

Data Archiving

Data archiving is not applicable.

References

  • 1.Coyte KZ, Schluter J & Foster KR The ecology of the microbiome: Networks, competition, and stability. Science 350, 663–666 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Limon JJ, Skalski JH & Underhill DM Commensal fungi in health and disease. Cell Host Microbe 22, 156–165 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kapitan M, Niemiec MJ, Steimle A, Frick JS & Jacobsen ID Fungi as part of the microbiota and interactions with intestinal bacteria. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol 422, 265–301 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.d’Enfert C et al. The impact of the fungus-host-microbiota interplay upon Candida albicans infections: Current knowledge and new perspectives. FEMS Microbiol. Rev 45, fuaa060 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Santus W, Devlin JR & Behnsen J Crossing kingdoms: How the mycobiota and fungal-bacterial interactions impact host health and disease. Infect. Immun 89, e00648–20 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Caruso R, Lo BC & Núñez G Host–microbiota interactions in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol 20, 411–426 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jeffery IB, O’Herlihy EO, Shanahan F & O’Toole PW Microbiome alterations in IBS. Gut 69, 2263–2264 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tig H & Moschen AR Microbiota and diabetes: An evolving relationship. Gut 63, 1513–1521 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Turnbaugh PJ et al. A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature 457, 480–484 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schwabe RF & Jobin C The microbiome and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 13, 800–812 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Helmink BA, Khan MAW, Hermann A, Gopalakrishnan V & Wargo JA The microbiome, cancer, and cancer therapy. Nat. Med 25, 377–388 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Belkaid Y & Hand TW Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation. Cell 157, 121–141 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liu HY et al. The interactions of airway bacterial and fungal communities in clinically stable asthma. Front. Microbiol 11, 1647 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vangay P et al. US immigration Westernizes the human gut microbiome. Cell 175, 962–972 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ferretti P et al. Mother-to-infant microbial transmission from different body sites shapes the developing infant gut microbiome. Cell Host & Microbe 24, 133–145 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Li J et al. Fungi in gastrointestinal tracts of human and mice: From community to functions. Microb Ecol 75, 821–829 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Paterson MJ, Oh S & Underhill DM Host-microbe interactions: commensal fungi in the gut. Curr. Opin. Microbiol 40, 131–137 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bradford LL & Ravel J The vaginal mycobiome: A contemporary perspective on fungi in women’s health and diseases. Virulence 8, 342–351 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Xu H & Dongari-Bagtzoglou A Shaping the oral mycobiota: Interactions of opportunistic fungi with oral bacteria and the host. Curr. Opin. Microbiol 26, 65–70 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kalia N, Singh J & Kaur M Microbiota in vaginal health and pathogenesis of recurrent vulvovaginal infections: A critical review. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 19, 5 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Brown GD et al. Hidden killers: Human fungal infections. Sci. Transl. Med 4, 165rv13 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fisher MC, Hawkins NJ, Sanglard D & Gurr SJ Worldwide emergence of resistance to antifungal drugs challenges human health and food security. Science 360, 739–742 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fisher MC et al. Threats posed by the fungal kingdom to humans, wildlife, and agriculture. mBio 11, e00449–20 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.d’Enfert C Hidden killers: Persistence of opportunistic fungal pathogens in the human host. Curr. Opin. Microbiol 12, 358–364 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Peleg AY, Hogan DA & Mylonakis E Medically important bacterial-fungal interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 8, 340–349 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Foster TJ, Geoghegan JA, Ganesh VK & Höök M Adhesion, invasion and evasion: The many functions of the surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 12, 49–62 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dicks LMT, Mikkelsen LS, Brandsborg E & Marcotte H Clostridium difficile, the difficult “Kloster” fuelled by antibiotics. Curr. Microbiol 76, 774–782 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mould DL & Hogan DA Intraspecies heterogeneity in microbial interactions. Curr. Opin. Microbiol 62, 14–20 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kruger W, Vielreicher S, Kapitan M, Jacobsen ID & Niemiec MJ Fungal-bacterial interactions in health and disease. Pathogens 8, 70 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang F et al. Interactions between invasive fungi and symbiotic bacteria. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol 36, 137 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mayer FL & Kronstad JW The spectrum of interactions between Cryptococcus neoformans and bacteria. J. Fungi (Basel) 5, 31 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kumari A & Singh R Medically important interactions of staphylococci with pathogenic fungi. Future Microbiol 14, 1159–1170 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Briard B, Mislin GLA, Latgé JPJP & Beauvais A Interactions between Aspergillus fumigatus and pulmonary bacteria: Current state of the field, new data, and future perspective. J. Fungi (Basel) 5, 48 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nogueira F, Sharghi S, Kuchler K & Lion T Pathogenetic impact of bacterial-fungal interactions. Microorganisms 7, 459 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Santus W, Devlin JR & Behnsen J Crossing kingdoms: How the mycobiota and fungal-bacterial interactions impact host health and disease. Infect. Immun 89, e00648–20 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Steffan BN, Venkatesh N & Keller NP Let’s get physical: Bacterial-fungal interactions and their consequences in agriculture and health. J. Fungi (Basel) 6, 243 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Montelongo-Jauregui D & Lopez-Ribot JL Candida interactions with the oral bacterial microbiota. J. Fungi (Basel) 4, 122 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Negrini T. de C., Koo H & Arthur RA Candida-bacterial biofilms and host-microbe interactions in oral diseases. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol 1197, 119–141 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Netea MG, Joosten LAB, van der Meer JWM, Kullberg B-J & van de Veerdonk FL Immune defence against Candida fungal infections. Nat. Rev. Immunol 15, 630–642 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Alves R et al. Adapting to survive: How Candida overcomes host-imposed constraints during human colonization. PLOS Pathog 16, e1008478 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Moyes DL et al. Candidalysin is a fungal peptide toxin critical for mucosal infection. Nature 532, 64–68 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Santos CMA et al. Selection of Lactobacillus strains as potential probiotics for vaginitis treatment. Microbiology 162, 1195–1207 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Romo JA & Kumamoto CA On commensalism of Candida. J. Fungi 6, 16 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Cassone A Vulvovaginal Candida albicans infections: Pathogenesis, immunity and vaccine prospects. BJOG 122, 785–794 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Calderone RA & Fonzi WA Virulence factors of Candida albicans. Trends Microbiol 9, 327–35 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Forster TM et al. Enemies and brothers in arms: Candida albicans and gram-positive bacteria. Cell. Microbiol 18, 1709–1715 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Brown AJP et al. Stress adaptation in a pathogenic fungus. J. Exp. Biol 217, 144–155 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lourenco A, Pedro NA, Salazar SB & Mira NP Effect of acetic acid and lactic acid at low pH in growth and azole resistance of Candida albicans and Candida glabrata. Front. Microbiol 9, 3265 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ballou ER et al. Lactate signalling regulates fungal β-glucan masking and immune evasion. Nat. Microbiol 2, 16238 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kwak M-K et al. Cyclic dipeptides from lactic acid bacteria inhibit the proliferation of pathogenic fungi. J. Microbiol 52, 64–70 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Seelig MS Mechanisms by which antibiotics increase the incidence and severity of candidiasis and alter the immunological defenses. Bacteriol. Rev 30, 442–59 (1966). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Osset J, García E, Bartolomé RM & Andreu A Role of Lactobacillus as protector against vaginal candidiasis. Med. Clin. (Barc) 117, 285–288 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Thein ZM, Samaranayake YH & Samaranayake LP. Effect of oral bacteria on growth and survival of Candida albicans biofilms. Arch. Oral Biol 51, 672–680 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Cabral DJ, Penumutchu S, Norris C, Morones-Ramirez JR. & Belenky P Microbial competition between Escherichia coli and Candida albicans reveals a soluble fungicidal factor. Microb. Cell 5, 249–255 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Shapiro RS, Robbins N & Cowen LE Regulatory circuitry governing fungal development, drug resistance, and disease. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev 75, 213–267 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Noble SM, Gianetti BA & Witchley JN Candida albicans cell-type switching and functional plasticity in the mammalian host. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 15, 96–108 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Noble SM, French S, Kohn LA, Chen V & Johnson AD Systematic screens of a Candida albicans homozygous deletion library decouple morphogenetic switching and pathogenicity. Nat. Genet 42, 590–598 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Witchley JN et al. Candida albicans morphogenesis programs control the balance between gut commensalism and invasive infection. Cell Host Microbe 25, 432–443 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hogan DA & Kolter R. Pseudomonas-Candida interactions: An ecological role for virulence factors. Science 296, 2229–2232 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hogan DA, Vik Å & Kolter R A Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing molecule influences Candida albicans morphology. Mol. Microbiol 54, 1212–1223 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Bandara HMHN et al. Fluconazole resistance in Candida albicans is induced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing. Sci. Reports 10, 1–17 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gibson J, Sood A & Hogan DA Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Candida albicans interactions: Localization and fungal toxicity of a phenazine derivative. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 75, 504–513 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Morales DK. et al. Control of Candida albicans metabolism and biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa phenazines. mBio 4, e00526–12 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lindsay AK et al. Analysis of Candida albicans mutants defective in the Cdk8 module of mediator reveal links between metabolism and biofilm formation. PLOS Genet 10, e1004567 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Greenberg SS et al. Ethanol inhibits lung clearance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by a neutrophil and nitric oxide-dependent mechanism, in vivo. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res 23, 735–744 (1999). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Rada B & Leto TL. Pyocyanin effects on respiratory epithelium: Relevance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa airway infections. Trends Microbiol 21, 73–81 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Moura-Alves P et al. AhR sensing of bacterial pigments regulates antibacterial defence. Nature 512, 387–392 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Salvatori O et al. Bacteria modify Candida albicans hypha formation, microcolony properties, and survival within macrophages. mSphere 5, e00689–20 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kim SH et al. Global analysis of the fungal microbiome in cystic fibrosis patients reveals loss of function of the transcriptional repressor Nrg1 as a mechanism of pathogen adaptation. PLoS Pathog 11, e1005308 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Vílchez R et al. Streptococcus mutans inhibits Candida albicans hyphal formation by the fatty acid signaling molecule trans-2-decenoic acid (SDSF). ChemBioChem 11, 1552–1562 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Joyner PM et al. Mutanobactin A from the human oral pathogen Streptococcus mutans is a cross-kingdom regulator of the yeast-mycelium transition. Org. Biomol. Chem 8, 5486–5489 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Barousse MM, Van Der Pol BJ, Fortenberry D, Orr D & Fidel PL Vaginal yeast colonisation, prevalence of vaginitis, and associated local immunity in adolescents. Sex Transm Infect 80, 48–53 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Foxman B, Barlow R, D’Arcy H, Gillespie B & Sobel JD Candida vaginitis: Self-reported incidence and associated costs. Sex. Transm. Dis 27, 230–5 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Vrbanac A et al. The murine vaginal microbiota and its perturbation by the human pathogen group B Streptococcus. BMC Microbiol 18, 197 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Pendharkar S, Brandsborg E, Hammarström L, Marcotte H & Larsson P-G Vaginal colonisation by probiotic lactobacilli and clinical outcome in women conventionally treated for bacterial vaginosis and yeast infection. BMC Infect. Dis 15, 255 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Allonsius CN et al. Inhibition of Candida albicans morphogenesis by chitinase from Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Sci. Rep 9, 2900 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Wang S et al. Antimicrobial compounds produced by vaginal Lactobacillus crispatus are able to strongly inhibit Candida albicans growth, hyphal formation and regulate virulence-related gene expressions. Front. Microbiol 8, 564 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kaewsrichan J, Peeyananjarassri K & Kongprasertkit J Selection and identification of anaerobic lactobacilli producing inhibitory compounds against vaginal pathogens. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol 48, 75–83 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Jang SJ, Lee K, Kwon B, You HJ & Ko G Vaginal lactobacilli inhibit growth and hyphae formation of Candida albicans. Sci. Rep 9, 8121 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.MacAlpine J et al. A small molecule produced by Lactobacillus species blocks Candida albicans filamentation by inhibiting a DYRK1-family kinase. Nat. Commun 12, 1–16 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Liang W et al. Lactic acid bacteria differentially regulate filamentation in two heritable cell types of the human fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Mol. Microbiol 102, 506–519 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Yu X-Y,. et al. Streptococcus agalactiae inhibits Candida albicans hyphal development and diminishes host vaginal mucosal TH17 response. Front. Microbiol 9, 198 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kumamoto CA, Gresnigt MS & Hube B The gut, the bad and the harmless: Candida albicans as a commensal and opportunistic pathogen in the intestine. Curr. Opin. Microbiol 56, 7–15 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Bandara HMHN, Cheung BPK, Watt RM, Jin LJ & Samaranayake LP Secretory products of Escherichia coli biofilm modulate Candida biofilm formation and hyphal development. J. Investig. Clin. Dent 4, 186–199 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kim Y & Mylonakis E Killing of Candida albicans filaments by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium is mediated by sopB effectors, parts of a type III secretion system. Eukaryot. Cell 10, 782–790 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Cruz MR, Graham CE, Gagliano BC, Lorenz MC & Garsin DA Enterococcus faecalis inhibits hyphal morphogenesis and virulence of Candida albicans. Infect. Immun 81, 189–200 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Graham CE, Cruz MR, Garsin DA & Lorenz MC Enterococcus faecalis bacteriocin EntV inhibits hyphal morphogenesis, biofilm formation, and virulence of Candida albicans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 114, 4507–4512 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Brown AO et al. Antifungal activity of the Enterococcus faecalis peptide EntV requires protease cleavage and disulfide bond formation. mBio 10, e01334–19 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.van Leeuwen PT et al. Interspecies interactions between Clostridium difficile and Candida albicans. mSphere 1, e00187–16 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Boon C et al. A novel DSF-like signal from Burkholderia cenocepacia interferes with Candida albicans morphological transition. ISME J 2, 27–36 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Guinan J, Wang S, Hazbun TR, Yadav H & Thangamani S Antibiotic-induced decreases in the levels of microbial-derived short-chain fatty acids correlate with increased gastrointestinal colonization of Candida albicans. Sci. Rep 9, 8872 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Ost KS et al. Adaptive immunity induces mutualism between commensal eukaryotes. Nature 596, 114–118 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Tso GHW et al. Experimental evolution of a fungal pathogen into a gut symbiont. Science 362, 589–595 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Andes D et al. Development and characterization of an in vivo central venous catheter Candida albicans biofilm model. Infect. Immun 72, 6023–6031 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Lohse MB, Gulati M, Johnson AD & Nobile CJ Development and regulation of single- and multi-species Candida albicans biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 16, 19–31 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Dhamgaye S, Qu Y & Peleg AY Polymicrobial infections involving clinically relevant Gram-negative bacteria and fungi. Cell. Microbiol 18, 1716–1722 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Wittaker Leclair L & Hogan DA Mixed bacterial-fungal infections in the CF respiratory tract. Med. Mycol 48, 125–132 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.O’Donnell LE et al. Polymicrobial Candida biofilms: friends and foe in the oral cavity. FEMS Yeast Res 15, fov077 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Jenkinson HF, Lala HC & Shepherd MG Coaggregation of Streptococcus sanguis and other streptococci with Candida albicans. Infect. Immun 58, 1429–1436 (1990). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Bamford CV et al. Streptococcus gordonii modulates Candida albicans biofilm formation through intergeneric communication. Infect. Immun 77, 3696–3704 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Jack AA et al. Streptococcus gordonii comCDE (competence) operon modulates biofilm formation with Candida albicans. Microbiology 161, 411–421 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Xu H et al. Streptococcal co-infection augments Candida pathogenicity by amplifying the mucosal inflammatory response. Cell. Microbiol 16, 214–231 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Morse DJ et al. Modulation of Candida albicans virulence in in vitro biofilms by oral bacteria. Lett. Appl. Microbiol 68, 337–343 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Bachtiar EW et al. AI-2 of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans inhibits Candida albicans biofilm formation. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol 4, 1–8 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Holcombe LJ et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa secreted factors impair biofilm development in Candida albicans. Microbiology 156, 1476–1485 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.May RC, Stone NRH, Wiesner DL, Bicanic T & Nielsen K Cryptococcus: from environmental saprophyte to global pathogen. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 14, 106–117 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Perfect JR et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america. Clin. Infect. Dis 50, 291–322 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Kwon-Chung KJ et al. Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii, the etiologic agents of cryptococcosis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med 4, a019760 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Rajasingham R et al. Global burden of disease of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: An updated analysis. Lancet. Infect. Dis 17, 873–881 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.de Sousa HR, de Frazao S, de Oliveira GP Jr., Albuquerque P & Nicola AM Cryptococcal virulence in humans: Learning from translational studies with clinical isolates. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol 11, 657502 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Iyer KR, Revie NM, Fu C, Robbins N & Cowen LE Treatment strategies for cryptococcal infection: Challenges, advances and future outlook. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 19, 454–466 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Khan ZU, Pal M, Randhawa HS & Sandhu RS Carriage of Cryptococcus neoformans in the crops of pigeons. J. Med. Microbiol 11, 215–218 (1978). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Abou-Gabal M & Atia M Study of the role of pigeons in the dissemination of Cryptococcus neoformans in nature. Sabouraudia 16, 63–68 (1978). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Ruiz A, Neilson JB & Bulmer GS Control of Cryptococcus neoformans in nature by biotic factors. Sabouraudia 20, 21–29 (1982). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Rella A et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa inhibits the growth of Cryptococcus species. Mycopathol 173, 451–461 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Saito F & Ikeda R Killing of Cryptococcus neoformans by Staphylococcus aureus: The role of cryptococcal capsular polysaccharide in the fungal-bacteria interaction. Med. Mycol 43, 603–612 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Abdulkareem AF, Lee HH, Ahmadi M & Martinez LR Fungal serotype-specific differences in bacterial-yeast interactions. Virulence 6, 652–657 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Camacho E et al. The structural unit of melanin in the cell wall of the fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Biol. Chem 294, 10471–10489 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Mayer FL & Kronstad JW Disarming fungal pathogens: Bacillus safensis inhibits virulence factor production and biofilm formation by Cryptococcus neoformans and Candida albicans. MBio 8, e01537–17 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Frases S, Chaskes S, Dadachova E & Casadevall A Induction by Klebsiella aerogenes of a melanin-like pigment in Cryptococcus neoformans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 72, 1542–1550 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Dambuza IM et al. The Cryptococcus neoformans Titan cell is an inducible and regulated morphotype underlying pathogenesis. PLoS Pathog 14, e1006978 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.van de Veerdonk FL, Gresnigt MS, Romani L, Netea MG & Latge J -P. Aspergillus fumigatus morphology and dynamic host interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 15, 661–674 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Askew DS Aspergillus fumigatus: Virulence genes in a street-smart mold. Curr. Opin. Microbiol 11, 331–337 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Sass G et al. Aspergillus-Pseudomonas interaction, relevant to competition in airways. Med. Mycol 57, S228–S232 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Mangan A Interactions between some aural Aspergillus species and bacteria. J. Gen. Microbiol 58, 261–266 (1969). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Kerr JR et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa pyocyanin and 1-hydroxyphenazine inhibit fungal growth. J. Clin. Pathol 52, 385–387 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Sass G et al. Studies of Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants indicate pyoverdine as the central factor in inhibition of Aspergillus fumigatus biofilm. J. Bacteriol 200, e00345–17 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Nazik H et al. Novel intermicrobial molecular interaction: Pseudomonas aeruginosa Quinolone Signal (PQS) modulates Aspergillus fumigatus response to iron. Microbiology 166, 44–55 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Briard B, Heddergott C & Latge J-P Volatile compounds emitted by Pseudomonas aeruginosa stimulate growth of the fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. mBio 7, e00219 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Granillo AR et al. Antibiosis interaction of Staphylococccus aureus on Aspergillus fumigatus assessed in vitro by mixed biofilm formation. BMC Microbiol 15, 33 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Balhara M, Ruhil S, Kumar M, Dhankhar S & Chhillar AK An anti-Aspergillus protein from Escherichia coli DH5α: Putative inhibitor of siderophore biosynthesis in Aspergillus fumigatus. Mycoses 57, 153–162 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Costa TRD et al. Secretion systems in Gram-negative bacteria: Structural and mechanistic insights. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 13, 343–359 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Deng W et al. Dissecting virulence: Systematic and functional analyses of a pathogenicity island. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 101, 3597–602 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Fox EP et al. Anaerobic bacteria grow within Candida albicans biofilms and induce biofilm formation in suspension cultures. Curr. Biol 24, 2411–2416 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Berube BJ, Rangel SM & Hauser AR Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Breaking down barriers. Curr. Genet 62, 109–113 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Cugini C et al. Farnesol, a common sesquiterpene, inhibits PQS production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Microbiol 65, 896–906 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Cugini C, Morales DK & Hogan DA Candida albicans-produced farnesol stimulates Pseudomonas quinolone signal production in LasR-defective Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Microbiology 156, 3096–3107 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Lopez-Medina E et al. Candida albicans inhibits Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence through suppression of pyochelin and pyoverdine biosynthesis. PLoS Pathog 11, e1005129 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Reece E, Doyle S, Greally P, Renwick J & McClean S Aspergillus fumigatus inhibits Pseudomonas aeruginosa in co-culture: Implications of a mutually antagonistic relationship on virulence and inflammation in the CF airway. Front. Microbiol 9, 1205 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Raffa N et al. Dual-purpose isocyanides produced by Aspergillus fumigatus contribute to cellular copper sufficiency and exhibit antimicrobial activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 118, e2015224118 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Klotz SA, Chasin BS, Powell B, Gaur NK & Lipke PN Polymicrobial bloodstream infections involving Candida species: Analysis of patients and review of the literature. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis 59, 401–406 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Schlecht LM et al. Systemic Staphylococcus aureus infection mediated by Candida albicans hyphal invasion of mucosal tissue. Microbiolgy 161, 168–181 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Todd OA et al. Candida albicans augments Staphylococcus aureus virulence by engaging the Staphylococcal agr Quorum Sensing System. mBio 10, e00910–19 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Carlson E Synergistic effect of Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus on mouse mortality. Infect. Immun 38, 921–924 (1982). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Nash EE, Peters BM, Palmer GE, Fidel PL & Noverr MC Morphogenesis is not required for Candida albicans-Staphylococcus aureus intra-abdominal infection-mediated dissemination and lethal sepsis. Infect. Immun 82, 3426–3435 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Nash EE, Peters BM, Fidel PL & Noverr MC Morphology-independent virulence of Candida species during polymicrobial intra-abdominal infections with Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun 84, 90–98 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Todd OA, Noverr MC & Peters BM Candida albicans impacts Staphylococcus aureus alpha-toxin production via extracellular alkalinization. mSphere 4, e00780–19 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Kong EF, Tsui C, Kucharikova S, Van Dijck P & Jabra-Rizk MA Modulation of Staphylococcus aureus response to antimicrobials by the Candida albicans quorum sensing molecule farnesol. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 61, e01573–17 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Kim D et al. Candida albicans stimulates Streptococcus mutans microcolony development via cross-kingdom biofilm-derived metabolites. Sci. Rep 7, 41332 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Lalla RV et al. A systematic review of oral fungal infections in patients receiving cancer therapy. Support. Care Cancer 18, 985–992 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Bertolini M et al. Candida albicans induces mucosal bacterial dysbiosis that promotes invasive infection. PLoS Pathog 15, e1007717 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Kehe J et al. Positive interactions are common among culturable bacteria. Sci. Adv 7, 7159 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Potterat O & Hamburger M Concepts and technologies for tracking bioactive compounds in natural product extracts: Generation of libraries, and hyphenation of analytical processes with bioassays. Nat. Prod. Rep 30, 546–564 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Moloney MG Natural products as a source for novel antibiotics. Trends Pharmacol. Sci 37, 689–701 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Clardy J, Fischbach MA & Currie CR The natural history of antibiotics. Curr. Biol 19, R437–41 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Patridge E, Gareiss P, Kinch MS & Hoyer D An analysis of FDA-approved drugs: natural products and their derivatives. Drug Discov. Today 21, 204–207 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Clatworthy AE, Pierson E & Hung DT Targeting virulence: A new paradigm for antimicrobial therapy. Nat. Chem. Biol 3, 541–548 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Vu K, Garcia JA & Gelli A Cryptococcal meningitis and anti-virulence therapeutic strategies. Front. Microbiol 10, 353 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Willing BP, Russell SL & Finlay BB Shifting the balance: Antibiotic effects on host–microbiota mutualism. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 9, 233–243 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Bottery MJ, Pitchford JW & Friman V-P Ecology and evolution of antimicrobial resistance in bacterial communities. ISME J 15, 939–948 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Martens E & Demain AL The antibiotic resistance crisis, with a focus on the United States. J. Antibiot 70, 520–526 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Dickey SW, Cheung GYC & Otto M Different drugs for bad bugs: Antivirulence strategies in the age of antibiotic resistance. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov 16, 457–471 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Cui J, Ren B, Tong Y, Dai H & Zhang L Synergistic combinations of antifungals and anti-virulence agents to fight against Candida albicans. Virulence 6, 362–371 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Arnon SS, Schechter R, Maslanka SE, Jewell NP & Hatheway CL Human botulism immune globulin for the treatment of infant botulism. N. Engl. J. Med 354, 462–471 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Wilcox MH et al. Bezlotoxumab for prevention of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. N. Engl. J. Med 376, 422–423 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Migone TS. et al. Raxibacumab for the treatment of inhalational anthrax. N. Engl. J. Med 361, 135–144 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Shenoy A & Gottlieb A Probiotics for oral and vulvovaginal candidiasis: A review. Dermatol. Ther 32, e12970 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Guarino A, Guandalini S & Vecchio AL Probiotics for prevention and treatment of diarrhea. J. Clin. Gastroenterol 49, 37–45 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Castagliuolo I, LaMont JT, Nikulasson ST & Pothoulakis C Saccharomyces boulardii protease inhibits Clostridium difficile toxin A effects in the rat ileum. Infect. Immun 64, 5225–5232 (1996). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.More MI & Swidsinski A Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 supports regeneration of the intestinal microbiota after diarrheic dysbiosis - a review. Clin. Exp. Gastroenterol 8, 237–255 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Szajewska H, Horvath A & Kolodziej M Systematic review with meta-analysis: Saccharomyces boulardii supplementation and eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther 41, 1237–1245 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Fazly A et al. Chemical screening identifies filastatin, a small molecule inhibitor of Candida albicans adhesion, morphogenesis, and pathogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 110, 13594–13599 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Pierce CG et al. A novel small molecule inhibitor of Candida albicans biofilm formation, filamentation and virulence with low potential for the development of resistance. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 1, 1–8 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Ramage G, Saville SP, Wickes BL & López-Ribot JL Inhibition of Candida albicans biofilm formation by farnesol, a quorum-sensing molecule. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 68, 5459–5463 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Padder SA, Prasad R & Shah AH Quorum sensing: A less known mode of communication among fungi. Microbiol. Res 210, 51–58 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Romo JA et al. Development of anti-virulence approaches for candidiasis via a novel series of small-molecule inhibitors of Candida albicans filamentation. mBio 8, e01991–17 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Garcia C et al. A phenotypic small-molecule screen identifies halogenated salicylanilides as inhibitors of fungal morphogenesis, biofilm formation and host cell invasion. Sci. Reports 8, 1–15 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Edwards JE Jr. et al. A fungal immunotherapeutic vaccine (NDV-3A) for treatment of recurrent ulvovaginal candidiasis-A phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin. Infect. Dis 66, 1928–1936 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Phan QT et al. Als3 is a Candida albicans invasin that binds to cadherins and induces endocytosis by host cells. PLoS Biol 5, e64 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Spellberg B, Ibrahim AS, Edwards JE & Filler SG Mice with disseminated candidiasis die of progressive sepsis. J. Infect. Dis 192, 336–343 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Ibrahim AS et al. NDV-3 protects mice from vulvovaginal candidiasis through T- and B-cell immune response. Vaccine 31, 5549–5556 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Ibrahim AS, Spellberg BJ, Avanesian V, Fu Y & Edwards JE Jr. The anti-Candida vaccine based on the recombinant N-terminal domain of Als1p is broadly active against disseminated candidiasis. Infect. Immun 74, 3039–3041 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Molloy EM & Hertweck C Antimicrobial discovery inspired by ecological interactions. Curr. Opin. Microbiol 39, 121–127 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Adnani N, Rajski SR & Bugni TS Symbiosis-inspired approaches to antibiotic discovery. Nat. Prod. Rep 34, 784–814 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Roemer T et al. Confronting the challenges of natural product-based antifungal discovery. Chem. Biol 18, 148–164 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Culp EJ et al. Hidden antibiotics in actinomycetes can be identified by inactivation of gene clusters for common antibiotics. Nat. Biotechnol 37, 1149–1154 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Blin K et al. antiSMASH 4.0—improvements in chemistry prediction and gene cluster boundary identification. Nucleic Acids Res 45, 36–41 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Li YF et al. Comprehensive curation and analysis of fungal biosynthetic gene clusters of published natural products. Fungal Genet. Biol 89, 18–28 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Swift CL et al. Anaerobic gut fungi are an untapped reservoir of natural products. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 118, e2019855118 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Culp EJ et al. Evolution-guided discovery of antibiotics that inhibit peptidoglycan remodelling. Nature 578, 582–587 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Zhang F et al. A marine microbiome antifungal targets urgent-threat drug-resistant fungi. Science 370, 974–978 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES