Abstract
Regular exercise promotes whole-body health and prevents disease, but the underlying molecular mechanisms are incompletely understood1–3. Here, the Molecular Transducers of Physical Activity Consortium4 profiled the temporal transcriptome, proteome, metabolome, lipidome, phosphoproteome, acetylproteome, ubiquitylproteome, epigenome and immunome in whole blood, plasma and 18 solid tissues in male and female Rattus norvegicus over eight weeks of endurance exercise training. The resulting data compendium encompasses 9,466 assays across 19 tissues, 25 molecular platforms and 4 training time points. Thousands of shared and tissue-specific molecular alterations were identified, with sex differences found in multiple tissues. Temporal multi-omic and multi-tissue analyses revealed expansive biological insights into the adaptive responses to endurance training, including widespread regulation of immune, metabolic, stress response and mitochondrial pathways. Many changes were relevant to human health, including non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, inflammatory bowel disease, cardiovascular health and tissue injury and recovery. The data and analyses presented in this study will serve as valuable resources for understanding and exploring the multi-tissue molecular effects of endurance training and are provided in a public repository (https://motrpac-data.org/).
Subject terms: Transcriptomics, Proteomics, Epigenetics, Metabolomics
Temporal multi-omic analysis of tissues from rats undergoing up to eight weeks of endurance exercise training reveals widespread shared, tissue-specific and sex-specific changes, including immune, metabolic, stress response and mitochondrial pathways.
Main
Regular exercise provides wide-ranging health benefits, including reduced risks of all-cause mortality1,5, cardiometabolic and neurological diseases, cancer and other pathologies2,6,7. Exercise affects nearly all organ systems in either improving health or reducing disease risk2,3,6,7, with beneficial effects resulting from cellular and molecular adaptations within and across many tissues and organ systems3. Various ‘omic’ platforms (‘omes’) including transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics and metabolomics, have been used to study these events. However, work to date typically covers one or two omes at a single time point, is biased towards one sex, and often focuses on a single tissue, most often skeletal muscle, heart or blood8–12, with few studies considering other tissues13. Accordingly, a comprehensive, organism-wide, multi-omic map of the effects of exercise is needed to understand the molecular underpinnings of exercise training-induced adaptations. To address this need, the Molecular Transducers of Physical Activity Consortium (MoTrPAC) was established with the goal of building a molecular map of the exercise response across a broad range of tissues in animal models and in skeletal muscle, adipose and blood in humans4. Here we present the first whole-organism molecular map of the temporal effects of endurance exercise training in male and female rats and provide multiple insights enabled by this MoTrPAC multi-omic data resource.
Multi-omic analysis of exercise training
Six-month-old male and female Fischer 344 rats were subjected to progressive treadmill endurance exercise training (hereafter referred to as endurance training) for 1, 2, 4 or 8 weeks, with tissues collected 48 h after the last exercise bout (Fig. 1a). Sex-matched sedentary, untrained rats were used as controls. Training resulted in robust phenotypic changes (Extended Data Fig. 1a–d), including increased aerobic capacity (VO2 max) by 18% and 16% at 8 weeks in males and females, respectively (Extended Data Fig. 1a). The percentage of body fat decreased by 5% in males at 8 weeks (Extended Data Fig. 1b), without a significant change in lean mass (Extended Data Fig. 1c). In females, the body fat percentage did not change after 4 or 8 weeks of training, whereas it increased by 4% in sedentary controls (Extended Data Fig. 1b). Body weight of females increased in all intervention groups, with no change for males (Extended Data Fig. 1d).
Whole blood, plasma and 18 solid tissues were analysed using genomics, proteomics, metabolomics and protein immunoassay technologies, with most assays performed in a subset of these tissues (Fig. 1b and Extended Data Fig. 1e,f). Specific details for each omic analysis are provided in Extended Data Fig. 2, Methods, Supplementary Discussion and Supplementary Table 1. Molecular assays were prioritized on the basis of available tissue quantity and biological relevance, with the gastrocnemius, heart, liver and white adipose tissue having the most diverse set of molecular assays performed, followed by the kidney, lung, brown adipose tissue and hippocampus (Extended Data Fig. 1e). Altogether, datasets were generated from 9,466 assays across 211 combinations of tissues and molecular platforms, resulting in 681,256 non-epigenetic and 14,334,496 epigenetic (reduced-representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) and assay for transposase-accessible chromatin using sequencing (ATAC-seq)) measurements, corresponding to 213,689 and 2,799,307 unique non-epigenetic and epigenetic features, respectively.
Differential analysis was used to characterize the molecular responses to endurance training (Methods). We computed the overall significance of the training response for each feature, denoted as the training P value, where 35,439 features at 5% false discovery rate (FDR) comprise the training-regulated differential features (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Table 2). Timewise summary statistics quantify the exercise training effects for each sex and time point. Training-regulated molecules were observed in the vast majority of tissues for all omes, including a relatively large proportion of transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics and immunoassay features (Fig. 1c). The observed timewise effects were modest: 56% of the per-feature maximum fold changes were between 0.67 and 1.5. Permutation testing showed that permuting the group or sex labels resulted in a significant reduction in the number of selected analytes in most tissues (Extended Data Fig. 3a–d and Supplementary Discussion). For transcriptomics, the hypothalamus, cortex, testes and vena cava had the smallest proportion of training-regulated genes, whereas the blood, brown and white adipose tissues, adrenal gland and colon showed more extensive effects (Fig. 1c). For proteomics, the gastrocnemius, heart and liver showed substantial differential regulation in both protein abundance and post-translational modifications (PTMs), with more restricted results in white adipose tissue, lung and kidney protein abundance. For metabolomics, a large proportion of differential metabolites were consistently observed across all tissues, although the absolute numbers were related to the number of metabolomic platforms used (Extended Data Fig. 1e). The vast number of differential features over the training time course across tissues and omes highlights the multi-faceted, organism-wide nature of molecular adaptations to endurance training.
Multi-tissue response to training
To identify tissue-specific and multi-tissue training-responsive gene expression, we considered the six tissues with the deepest molecular profiling: gastrocnemius, heart, liver, white adipose tissue, lung and kidney. In sum, 11,407 differential features from these datasets were mapped to their cognate gene, for a total of 7,115 unique genes across the tissues (Fig. 2a, Extended Data Fig. 4a and Supplementary Table 3). Most of the genes with at least one training-responsive feature were tissue-specific (67%), with the greatest number appearing in white adipose tissue (Fig. 2a). We identified pathways enriched by these tissue-specific training-responsive genes (Extended Data Fig. 4b) and tabulated a subset of highly specific genes to gain insight into tissue-specific training adaptation (Supplementary Table 4). Focusing on sexually conserved responses revealed tissue-dependent adaptations. These included changes related to immune cell recruitment and tissue remodelling in the lung, cofactor and cholesterol biosynthesis in the liver, ion flux in the heart, and metabolic processes and striated muscle contraction in the gastrocnemius (Supplementary Discussion). A detailed analysis of white adipose tissue adaptations to exercise training is provided elsewhere14. We also observed ‘ome’-specific responses, with unique transcript and protein responses at the gene and pathway levels (Extended Data Fig. 4c,d, Supplementary Discussion and Supplementary Tables 5 and 6).
2,359 genes had differential features in at least two tissues (Fig. 2a). Lung and white adipose tissue had the largest set of uniquely shared genes (n = 249), with predominantly immune-related pathway enrichments (Fig. 2b); expression patterns suggested decreased inflammation in the lung and increased immune cell recruitment in white adipose tissue (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). Heart and gastrocnemius had the second-largest group of uniquely shared genes, with enrichment of mitochondrial metabolism pathways including the mitochondria fusion genes Opa1 and Mfn1 (Supplementary Table 3).
Twenty-two genes were training-regulated in all six tissues, with particular enrichment in heat shock response pathways (Fig. 2c). Exercise induces the expression of heat shock proteins (HSPs) in various rodent and human tissues15. A focused analysis of our transcriptomics and proteomics data revealed HSPs as prominent outliers (Extended Data Fig. 5a and Supplementary Discussion). Specifically, there was a marked, proteomics-driven up-regulation in the abundance of HSPs, including the major HSPs HSPA1B and HSP90AA1 (Extended Data Fig. 5b,c). Another ubiquitous endurance training response involved regulation of the kininogenases KNG1 and KNG2 (Supplementary Table 3). These enzymes are part of the kallikrein–kininogen system and have been implicated in the hypotensive and insulin-sensitizing effects of exercise16,17.
Transcription factors and phosphosignalling
We used proteomics and transcriptomics data to infer changes in transcription factor and phosphosignalling activities in response to endurance training through transcription factor and PTM enrichment analyses (Methods). We compared the most significantly enriched transcription factors across tissues (Fig. 3a, Extended Data Fig. 6a and Supplementary Table 7). In the blood, we observed enrichment of the haematopoietic-associated transcription factors GABPA, ETS1, KLF3 and ZNF143; haematopoietic progenitors are proposed to be transducers of the health benefits of exercise18. In the heart and skeletal muscle, we observed a cluster of enriched Mef2 family transcription factor motifs (Fig. 3a). MEF2C is a muscle-associated transcription factor involved in skeletal, cardiac and smooth muscle cell differentiation and has been implicated in vascular development, formation of the cardiac loop and neuron differentiation19.
Phosphorylation signatures of key kinases were altered across many tissues (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Table 8). This included AKT1 across heart, kidney and lung, mTOR across heart, kidney and white adipose tissue, and MAPK across heart and kidney. The liver showed an increase in the phosphosignature related to regulators of hepatic regeneration, including EGFR1, IGF and HGF (Extended Data Fig. 6b, Supplementary Discussion). Increased phosphorylation of STAT3 and PXN, HGF targets involved in cell proliferation, suggest a mechanism for liver regeneration in response to exercise (Extended Data Fig. 6c). In the heart, kinases showed bidirectional changes in their predicted basal activity in response to endurance training (Extended Data Fig. 6d and Supplementary Discussion). Several AGC protein kinases showed a decrease in predicted activity, including AKT1, whereas tyrosine kinases, including SRC and mTOR, were predicted to have increased activity. The known SRC target phosphorylation sites GJA1 pY265 and CDH2 pY820 showed significantly increased phosphorylation in response to training (Extended Data Fig. 6e). Notably, phosphorylation of GJA1 Y265 has previously been shown to disrupt gap junctions, key transducers of cardiac electrical conductivity20. This suggests that SRC signalling may regulate extracellular structural remodelling of the heart to promote physiologically beneficial adaptations. In agreement with this hypothesis, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of extracellular matrix proteins revealed a negative enrichment in response to endurance training, showing decreased abundance of proteins such as basement membrane proteins (Extended Data Fig. 6f–h and Supplementary Table 9).
Molecular hubs of exercise adaptation
To compare the dynamic multi-omic responses to endurance training across tissues, we clustered the 34,244 differential features with complete timewise summary statistics using an empirical Bayes graphical clustering approach (Methods). By integrating these results onto a graph, we summarize the dynamics of the molecular training response and identify groups of features with similar responses (Extended Data Fig. 7 and Supplementary Table 10). We performed pathway enrichment analysis for many graphically defined clusters to characterize putative underlying biology (Supplementary Table 11).
We examined biological processes associated with training using the pathway enrichment results for up-regulated features at 8 weeks of training (Extended Data Fig. 8, Supplementary Table 12 and Supplementary Discussion). Compared with other tissues, the liver showed substantial regulation of chromatin accessibility, including in the nuclear receptor signalling and cellular senescence pathways. In the gastrocnemius, terms related to peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) signalling and lipid synthesis and degradation were enriched at the protein level, driven by proteins including the lipid droplet features PLIN2, PLIN4 and PLIN5. At the metabolomic level, terms related to ether lipid and glycerophospholipid metabolism were enriched. Together, these enrichments highlight the well-known ability of endurance training to modulate skeletal muscle lipid composition, storage, synthesis and metabolism. The blood displayed pathway enrichments related to translation and organelle biogenesis and maintenance. Paired with the transcription factor analysis (Fig. 3a), this suggests increased haematopoietic cellular mobilization in the blood. Less studied tissues in the context of exercise training, including the adrenal gland, spleen, cortex, hippocampus and colon, also showed regulation of diverse pathways (Supplementary Discussion).
To identify the main temporal or sex-associated responses in each tissue, we summarized the graphical cluster sizes by tissue and time (Extended Data Fig. 7a). We observed that the small intestine and plasma had more changes at weeks 1 and 2 of training. Conversely, many up-regulated features in brown adipose tissue and down-regulated features in white adipose tissue were observed only at week 8. The largest proportion of opposite effects between males and females was observed at week 1 in the adrenal gland. Other tissues, including the blood, heart, lung, kidney and skeletal muscle (gastrocnemius and vastus lateralis), had relatively consistent numbers of up-regulated and down-regulated features.
We next focused on characterizing shared molecular responses in the three striated muscles (gastrocnemius, vastus lateralis and heart). The three largest graphical clustering paths of differential features in each muscle tissue converged to a sex-consistent response by week 8 (Fig. 4a). Because of the large number of muscle features that were up-regulated in both sexes at week 8, we further examined the corresponding multi-omic set of analytes (Fig. 4b). Pathway enrichment analysis of the genes associated with these differential features demonstrated a sex- and muscle-consistent endurance training response that reflected up-regulation of mitochondrial metabolism, biogenesis and translation, and cellular response to heat stress (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Table 11).
We used a network connectivity analysis to study up-regulated features in the gastrocnemius at week 8 (Extended Data Fig. 9a,b, Methods and Supplementary Discussion). Mapping features to genes revealed overlaps between transcriptomic, chromatin accessibility, and proteomic assays, but no overlaps with methylation. Three molecular interaction networks were compared (Methods), and BioGRID21 was used for further clustering analysis, which identified three clusters (Extended Data Fig. 9c and Supplementary Table 13). The largest cluster was significantly enriched for multiple muscle adaptation processes (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Table 14). This analysis illustrates the direct linkage among pathways and putative central regulators, emphasizing the importance of multi-omic data in identifying interconnected networks and understanding skeletal muscle remodelling.
Connection to human diseases and traits
To systematically evaluate the translational value of our data, we integrated our results with extant exercise studies and disease ontology (DO) annotations (Methods). First, we compared our vastus lateralis transcriptomics results to a meta-analysis of long-term training gene-expression changes in human skeletal muscle tissue8, demonstrating a significant and direction-consistent overlap (Extended Data Fig. 9d–g and Supplementary Discussion). We also identified a significant overlap between differential transcripts in the gastrocnemius of female rats trained for 8 weeks and differentially expressed genes identified in the soleus in a study of sedentary and exercise-trained female rats selectively bred for high or low exercise capacity22 (Extended Data Fig. 9h). Similarly, adaptations from high-intensity interval training in humans23 significantly overlapped with the proteomics response in rats (Extended Data Fig. 9i), particularly for female rats trained for 8 weeks (Extended Data Fig. 9j). Finally, we performed DO enrichment analysis using the DOSE R package24 (Supplementary Table 15 and Methods). Down-regulated genes from white adipose tissue, kidney and liver were enriched for several disease terms, suggesting a link between the exercise response and type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, obesity and kidney disease (5% FDR; Extended Data Fig. 9k and Supplementary Discussion), which are all epidemiologically related co-occurring diseases25. Overall, these results support a high concordance of our data from rats with human studies and their relevance to human disease.
Sex-specific responses to exercise
Many tissues showed sex differences in their training responses (Extended Data Fig. 10), with 58% of the 8-week training-regulated features demonstrating sex-differentiated responses. Opposite responses between the sexes were observed in adrenal gland transcripts, lung phosphosites and chromatin accessibility features, white adipose tissue transcripts and liver acetylsites. In addition, proinflammatory cytokines exhibited sex-associated changes across tissues (Extended Data Fig. 11a,b and Supplementary Table 16). Most female-specific cytokines were differentially regulated between weeks 1 and 2 of training, whereas most male-specific cytokines were differentially regulated between weeks 4 and 8 (Extended Data Fig. 11c).
We observed extensive transcriptional remodelling of the adrenal gland, with more than 4,000 differential genes. Notably, the largest graphical path of training-regulated features was negatively correlated between males and females, with sustained down-regulation in females and transient up-regulation at 1 week in males (Extended Data Fig. 11d). The genes in this path were also associated with steroid hormone synthesis pathways and metabolism, particularly those pertaining to mitochondrial function (Supplementary Table 11). Further, transcription factor motif enrichment analysis of the transcripts in this path showed enrichment of 14 transcription factors (5% FDR; Supplementary Table 17), including the metabolism-regulating factors PPARγ, PPARα and oestrogen-related receptor gamma (ERRγ). The gene-expression levels of several significantly enriched transcription factors themselves followed the same trajectory as this path (Extended Data Fig. 11e).
In the rat lung, we observed decreased phosphosignalling activity with training primarily in males (Fig. 3b). Among these, the PRKACA phosphorylation signature showed the largest sex difference at 1 and 2 weeks (Extended Data Fig. 11f–h and Supplementary Table 8). PRKACA is a kinase that is involved in signalling within multiple cellular pathways. However, four PRKACA substrates followed this pattern and were associated with cellular structures (such as cytoskeleton and cell–cell junctions): DSP, MYLK, STMN1 and SYNE1 (Extended Data Fig. 11i). The phosphorylation of these proteins suggests a sex-dependent role of PRKACA in mediating changes in lung structure or mechanical function with training. This is supported as DSP and MYLK have essential roles in alveolar and epithelial cell remodelling in the lung26,27.
Immune pathway enrichment analysis of training-regulated transcripts at 8 weeks showed limited enrichment in muscle (heart, gastrocnemius and vastus lateralis) and brain (cortex, hippocampus, hypothalamus), down-regulation in the lung and small intestine, and strong up-regulation in brown and white adipose tissue in males only (Fig. 5a, Extended Data Fig. 12a and Supplementary Table 11). Many of the same immune pathways (Supplementary Table 18) and immune-related transcription factors (Supplementary Table 19) were enriched in both adipose tissues in males. Furthermore, correlation between the transcript expression profiles of male-specific up-regulated features in the adipose tissues and immune cell markers from external cell-typing assays revealed a strong positive correlation for many immune cell types, including B, T and natural killer cells, and low correlation with platelets, erythrocytes and lymphatic tissue (Fig. 5b,c, Methods and Supplementary Table 20). These patterns suggest recruitment of peripheral immune cells or proliferation of tissue-resident immune cells as opposed to non-biological variation in blood or lymph content. Correlations at the protein level were not as marked (Extended Data Fig. 12b,c). Complementary analyses using CIBERTSORTx produced similar results (Extended Data Fig. 12d,e). In summary, our data suggest an important role of immune cell activity in the adaptation of male adipose tissue to endurance training.
The small intestine was among the tissues with the highest enrichment in immune-related pathways (Extended Data Fig. 12a), with down-regulation of transcripts at 8 weeks, and a more robust response in females (Fig. 5b). This transcript set was significantly enriched with pathways related to gut inflammation (Supplementary Table 11). We observed positive associations between these transcripts and markers of several immune cell types, including B, T, natural killer and dendritic cells, suggesting decreased abundance (Fig. 5c and Supplementary Discussion). Endurance training also decreased the expression of transcripts with genetic risk loci for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including major histocompatability complex class II28, a finding that also emerged through the DO enrichment analysis (Supplementary Table 15). Endurance training is suggested to reduce systemic inflammation, in part by increasing gut microbial diversity and gut barrier integrity29. In accordance, we observed decreases in Cxcr3 and Il1a with training (Extended Data Fig. 12f), both of which are implicated in the pathogenesis of IBD30,31. Together, these data suggest that endurance training improves gut homeostasis, potentially conferring systemic anti-inflammatory effects.
Multi-tissue changes in mitochondria and lipids
We summarized the organism-wide metabolic changes for metabolomic datasets using RefMet metabolite classes (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Table 21) and for non-metabolomics datasets using metabolic subcategories of KEGG pathways (10% FDR; Extended Data Fig. 13a and Supplementary Table 11). The liver showed the greatest number of significantly enriched metabolite classes, followed by the heart, lung and hippocampus (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Discussion). Inspection of individual metabolites and acylcarnitine groups revealed changes associated with functional alterations in response to training (Extended Data Fig. 13b–d and Supplementary Discussion). Of particular interest, trimethylamine-N-oxide has been associated with cardiovascular disease32. We observed up-regulation of 1-methylhistidine, a marker of muscle protein turnover, in the kidney at 1, 2 and 4 weeks, which may indicate muscle breakdown and clearance through the kidney during early training time points. Cortisol levels were increased as expected from the physiological stress of training, and we observed a substantial increase in the kidney, again probably owing to renal clearance33. The liver showed up-regulation of 1-methylnicotinamide, which may have a role in inflammation34, at 8 weeks.
The heart showed enrichment of various carbohydrate metabolism subcategories across many omes (Extended Data Fig. 13a), and remarkably, all enzymes within the glycolysis–gluconeogenesis pathway showed a consistent increase in abundance, except for GPI, FBP2 and DLAT (Extended Data Fig. 13e). Oxidative phosphorylation was enriched in most tissues and is consistent with the joint analyses of the muscle tissues (Fig. 4c), suggesting potential changes in mitochondria biogenesis. We estimated proportional mitochondrial changes to endurance training using mitochondrial RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) reads (Extended Data Fig. 14a–c) and changes of mitochondrial functions through GSEA using gene expression, protein abundance and protein PTMs (Fig. 6b, Extended Data Fig. 14d and Supplementary Tables 22–25). Increased mitochondrial biogenesis was observed in skeletal muscle, heart and liver across these analyses. Moreover, sex-specific mitochondrial changes were observed in the adrenal gland, as described above, and in the colon, lung and kidney. These results highlight a highly adaptive and pervasive mitochondrial response to endurance training; a more in-depth analysis of this response is provided elsewhere35.
In the liver, we observed substantial regulation of metabolic pathways across the proteome, acetylome and lipidome (Fig. 6a,b and Extended Data Fig. 13a). For example, there was significant enrichment in 12 metabolite classes belonging to ‘lipids and lipid-related compounds’ (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Table 26). We therefore focused on the large group of features that increased in abundance over time for both sexes (Fig. 6c). Most of these liver features corresponded to protein abundance and protein acetylation changes in the mitochondrial, amino acid and lipid metabolic pathways (Fig. 6d and Supplementary Table 27). We also observed an increase in phosphatidylcholines and a concomitant decrease in triacylglycerols (Fig. 6e). Finally, there was increased abundance and acetylation of proteins from the peroxisome, an organelle with key functions in lipid metabolism (Extended Data Fig. 14e). To our knowledge, these extensive changes in protein acetylation in response to endurance training have not been described previously. Together, these molecular adaptations may constitute part of the mechanisms underlying exercise-mediated improvements in liver health, particularly protection against excessive intrahepatic lipid storage and steatosis36.
Discussion
Mapping the molecular exercise responses across a whole organism is critical for understanding the beneficial effects of exercise. Previous studies are limited to a few tissues, a narrow temporal range, or a single sex. Substantially expanding on the current work in the field, we used 25 distinct molecular platforms in as many as 19 tissues to study the temporal changes to endurance exercise training in male and female rats. Accordingly, we identified thousands of training-induced changes within and across tissues, including temporal and sex-biased responses, in mRNA transcripts, proteins, post-translational modifications and metabolites. Each omic dataset provides unique insights into exercise adaptation, where a holistic understanding requires multi-omic analysis. This work illustrates how mining our data resource can both recapitulate expected mechanisms and provide novel biological insights.
This work can be leveraged to deepen our understanding of exercise-related improvement of health and disease management. The global heat shock response to exercise may confer cytoprotective effects, including in pathologies related to tissue damage and injury recovery37. Increased acetylation of liver mitochondrial enzymes and regulation of lipid metabolism may link exercise to protection against non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and steatohepatitis36. Similarly, exercise-mediated modulation of cytokines, receptors and transcripts linked to intestinal inflammation or IBD may be associated with improved gut health. These examples highlight unique training responses illuminated by a multi-omics approach that can be leveraged for future hypothesis-driven research on how exercise improves whole-body and tissue-specific health.
We note limitations in our experimental design, datasets and analyses (Supplementary Discussion). In short, samples were collected 48 h after the last exercise bout to capture sustained alterations, thereby excluding acute responses. Our assays were performed on bulk tissue and do not cover single-cell platforms. Our resource has limited omic characterization for certain tissues, and additional platforms with emerging biological relevance were not utilized, including microbiome profiling. Moreover, our results are hypothesis-generating and require biological validation; supporting this, we have established a publicly accessible tissue bank from this study.
This MoTrPAC resource provides future opportunities to enhance and refine the molecular map of the endurance training response. We expect that this dataset will remain an ongoing platform to translate tissue- and sex-specific molecular changes in rats to humans. MoTrPAC has made extensive efforts to facilitate access, exploration and interpretation of this resource. We developed the MoTrPAC Data Hub to easily explore and download data (https://motrpac-data.org/), software packages to provide reproducible source code and facilitate data retrieval and analysis in R (MotrpacRatTraining6mo and MotrpacRatTraining6moData38,39), and visualization tools for data exploration (https://data-viz.motrpac-data.org). Altogether, this multi-omic resource serves as a broadly useful reference for studying the milieu of molecular changes in endurance training adaptation and provides new opportunities to understand the effects of exercise on health and disease.
Methods
All methods are included in the Supplementary Information.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Online content
Any methods, additional references, Nature Portfolio reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at 10.1038/s41586-023-06877-w.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
Funding: The MoTrPAC Study is supported by NIH grants U24OD026629 (Bioinformatics Center), U24DK112349, U24DK112342, U24DK112340, U24DK112341, U24DK112326, U24DK112331, U24DK112348 (Chemical Analysis Sites), U01AR071133, U01AR071130, U01AR071124, U01AR071128, U01AR071150, U01AR071160, U01AR071158 (Clinical Centers), U24AR071113 (Consortium Coordinating Center), U01AG055133, U01AG055137 and U01AG055135 (PASS/Animal Sites). This work was also supported by other funding sources: NHGRI Institutional Training Grant in Genome Science 5T32HG000044 (N.R.G.), National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Grant No. NSF 1445197 (N.R.G.), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institute of Health F32 postdoctoral fellowship award F32HL154711 (P.M.J.B.), the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (M.E.L.), National Science Foundation Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) CHE-1726528 (F.M.F.), National Institute on Aging P30AG044271 and P30AG003319 (N.M.), and NORC at the University of Chicago grant no. P30DK07247 (E.R.). Parts of this work were performed in the Environmental Molecular Science Laboratory, a US Department of Energy national scientific user facility at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Richland, WA. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NIH or the US Department of Health and Human Services. Some figures were created using Biorender.com. Fig. 1b was modified with permission from ref. 46.
Extended data figures and tables
Author contributions
All authors reviewed and revised the manuscript. Detailed author contributions are provided in the Supplementary Information.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature thanks Atul Deshmukh, Jorge Ruas and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer review reports are available.
Data availability
MoTrPAC data are publicly available via http://motrpac-data.org/data-access. Data access inquiries should be sent to motrpac-helpdesk@lists.stanford.edu. Additional resources can be found at http://motrpac.org and https://motrpac-data.org/. Interactive data visualizations are provided through a website (https://data-viz.motrpac-data.org) and HTML reports summarizing the multi-omic graphical analysis results in each tissue40. Processed data and analysis results are additionally available in the MotrpacRatTraining6moData R package39 (https://github.com/MoTrPAC/MotrpacRatTraining6moData). Raw and processed data for were deposited in the appropriate public repositories as follows. RNA-seq, ATAC-seq and RRBS data were deposited at the Sequence Read Archive under accession PRJNA908279 and at the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession GSE242358; multiplexed immunoassays were deposited at IMMPORT under accession SDY2193; metabolomics data were deposited at Metabolomics Workbench under project ID PR001020; and proteomics data were deposited at MassIVE under accessions MSV000092911, MSV000092922, MSV000092923, MSV000092924, MSV000092925 and MSV000092931. We used the following external datasets: release 96 of the Ensembl R. norvegicus (rn6) genome (https://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/release-96/fasta/rattus_norvegicus/dna/) and gene annotation (https://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/release-96/gtf/rattus_norvegicus/Rattus_norvegicus.Rnor_6.0.96.gtf.gz); RefSeq protein database (https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/R_norvegicus/, downloaded 11/2018); the NCBI gene2refseq mapping files (https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/DATA/gene2refseq.gz, accessed 18 December 2020); RGD rat gene annotation (https://download.rgd.mcw.edu/data_release/RAT/GENES_RAT.txt, accessed 12 November 2021); BioGRID v4.2.193 (https://downloads.thebiogrid.org/File/BioGRID/Release-Archive/BIOGRID-4.2.193/BIOGRID-ORGANISM-4.2.193.tab3.zip); STRING v11.5 (https://stringdb-downloads.org/download/protein.physical.links.v11.5/10116.protein.physical.links.v11.5.txt.gz); GENCODE release 39 metadata and annotation files (https://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/gencode/Gencode_human/release_39/, accessed 20 January 2022); MatrisomeDB (10.1093/nar/gkac1009); MitoPathways database available through MitoCarta (https://personal.broadinstitute.org/scalvo/MitoCarta3.0/); PTMSigDB v1.9.0 PTM set database (10.1074/mcp.TIR118.000943); UniProt human proteome FASTA for canonical protein sequences (UniProtKB query “reviewed:true AND proteome:up000005640”, download date 3 March 2021); the CIBERSORT LM22 leukocyte gene signature matrix (10.1007/978-1-4939-7493-1_12); published results from Amar et al.8, Bye et al.22 and Hostrup et al.23; and GTEx v8 gene-expression data (dbGaP Accession phs000424.v8.p2). Details are provided in the Supplementary Information, Methods.
Code availability
Code for reproducing the main analyses is provided in the MotrpacRatTraining6mo R package38 (https://motrpac.github.io/MotrpacRatTraining6mo/). MoTrPAC data processing pipelines for RNA-seq, ATAC-seq, RRBS and proteomics are available in the following Github repositories: https://github.com/MoTrPAC/motrpac-rna-seq-pipeline41, https://github.com/MoTrPAC/motrpac-atac-seq-pipeline42, https://github.com/MoTrPAC/motrpac-rrbs-pipeline43 and https://github.com/MoTrPAC/motrpac-proteomics-pipeline44. Normalization and quality control scripts are available at https://github.com/MoTrPAC/MotrpacRatTraining6moQCRep45.
Competing interests
S.C.B. has equity in Emmyon, Inc. G.R.C. sits on data and safety monitoring boards for AI Therapeutics, AMO Pharma, Astra-Zeneca, Avexis Pharmaceuticals, Biolinerx, Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics, Bristol Meyers Squibb/Celgene, CSL Behring, Galmed Pharmaceuticals, Green Valley Pharma, Horizon Pharmaceuticals, Immunic, Mapi Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Holdings, Opko Biologics, Prothena Biosciences, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi-Aventis, Reata Pharmaceuticals, NHLBI (protocol review committee), University of Texas Southwestern, University of Pennsylvania, Visioneering Technologies, Inc.; serves on consulting or advisory boards for Alexion, Antisense Therapeutics, Biogen, Clinical Trial Solutions LLC, Genzyme, Genentech, GW Pharmaceuticals, Immunic, Klein-Buendel Incorporated, Merck/Serono, Novartis, Osmotica Pharmaceuticals, Perception Neurosciences, Protalix Biotherapeutics, Recursion/Cerexis Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron, Roche, SAB Biotherapeutics; and is the president of Pythagoras Inc., a private consulting company. S.A.C. is a member of the scientific advisory boards of Kymera, PrognomiQ, PTM BioLabs, and Seer. M.P.S. is a cofounder and scientific advisor to Personalis, Qbio, January AI, Filtricine, SensOmics, Protos, Fodsel, Rthm, Marble and scientific advisor to Genapsys, Swaz, Jupiter. S.B.M. is a consultant for BioMarin, MyOme and Tenaya Therapeutics. D.A. is currently employed at Insitro, South San Francisco, CA. N.R.G. is currently employed at 23andMe, Sunnyvale, CA. P.M.J.B. is currently employed at Pfizer, Cambridge, MA. Insitro, 23andMe and Pfizer had no involvement in the work presented here.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: David Amar, Nicole R. Gay, Pierre M. Jean-Beltran
These authors jointly supervised this work: Sue C. Bodine, Steven A. Carr, Karyn A. Esser, Stephen B. Montgomery, Simon Schenk, Michael P. Snyder, Matthew T. Wheeler
A list of authors and their affiliations appears at the end of the paper
Contributor Information
MoTrPAC Study Group:
Lead Analysts:
David Amar, Nicole R. Gay, and Pierre M. Jean-Beltran
MoTrPAC Study Group:
Karen P. Dalton, Trevor Hastie, Steven G. Hershman, Mihir Samdarshi, Christopher Teng, Rob Tibshirani, Elaine Cornell, Nicole Gagne, Sandy May, Brian Bouverat, Christiaan Leeuwenburgh, Ching-ju Lu, Marco Pahor, Fang-Chi Hsu, Scott Rushing, Michael P. Walkup, Barbara Nicklas, W. Jack Rejeski, John P. Williams, Ashley Xia, Brent G. Albertson, Elisabeth R. Barton, Frank W. Booth, Tiziana Caputo, Michael Cicha, Luis Gustavo Oliveira De Sousa, Roger Farrar, Andrea L. Hevener, Michael F. Hirshman, Bailey E. Jackson, Benjamin G. Ke, Kyle S. Kramer, Sarah J. Lessard, Nathan S. Makarewicz, Andrea G. Marshall, Pasquale Nigro, Scott Powers, Krithika Ramachandran, R. Scott Rector, Collyn Z-T. Richards, John Thyfault, Zhen Yan, Chongzhi Zang, Mary Anne S. Amper, Ali Tugrul Balci, Clarisa Chavez, Maria Chikina, Roxanne Chiu, Marina A. Gritsenko, Kristy Guevara, Joshua R. Hansen, Krista M. Hennig, Chia-Jui Hung, Chelsea Hutchinson-Bunch, Christopher A. Jin, Xueyun Liu, Kristal M. Maner-Smith, D. R. Mani, Nada Marjanovic, Matthew E. Monroe, Ronald J. Moore, Samuel G. Moore, Charles C. Mundorff, Daniel Nachun, Michael D. Nestor, German Nudelman, Cadence Pearce, Vladislav A. Petyuk, Hanna Pincas, Irene Ramos, Alexander (Sasha) Raskind, Stas Rirak, Jeremy M. Robbins, Aliza B. Rubenstein, Frederique Ruf-Zamojski, Tyler J. Sagendorf, Nitish Seenarine, Tanu Soni, Karan Uppal, Sindhu Vangeti, Mital Vasoya, Alexandria Vornholt, Xuechen Yu, Elena Zaslavsky, Navid Zebarjadi, Marcas Bamman, Bryan C. Bergman, Daniel H. Bessesen, Thomas W. Buford, Toby L. Chambers, Paul M. Coen, Dan Cooper, Fadia Haddad, Kishore Gadde, Bret H. Goodpaster, Melissa Harris, Kim M. Huffman, Catherine M. Jankowski, Neil M. Johannsen, Wendy M. Kohrt, Bridget Lester, Edward L. Melanson, Kerrie L. Moreau, Nicolas Musi, Robert L. Newton, Jr, Shlomit Radom-Aizik, Megan E. Ramaker, Tuomo Rankinen, Blake B. Rasmussen, Eric Ravussin, Irene E. Schauer, Robert S. Schwartz, Lauren M. Sparks, Anna Thalacker-Mercer, Scott Trappe, Todd A. Trappe, and Elena Volpi
Extended data
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41586-023-06877-w.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41586-023-06877-w.
References
- 1.Blair SN, et al. Physical fitness and all-cause mortality. A prospective study of healthy men and women. JAMA. 1989;262:2395–2401. doi: 10.1001/jama.1989.03430170057028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Booth FW, Roberts CK, Laye MJ. Lack of exercise is a major cause of chronic diseases. Compr. Physiol. 2012;2:1143–1211. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c110025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Neufer PD, et al. Understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms of physical activity-induced health benefits. Cell Metab. 2015;22:4–11. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sanford JA, et al. Molecular Transducers of Physical Activity Consortium (MoTrPAC): mapping the dynamic responses to exercise. Cell. 2020;181:1464–1474. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nocon M, et al. Association of physical activity with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Prev. Rehabil. 2008;15:239–246. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3282f55e09. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Moore SC, et al. Association of leisure-time physical activity with risk of 26 types of cancer in 1.44 million adults. JAMA. Intern. Med. 2016;176:816–825. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pedersen BK, Saltin B. Exercise as medicine — evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports. 2015;25:1–72. doi: 10.1111/sms.12581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Amar D, et al. Time trajectories in the transcriptomic response to exercise - a meta-analysis. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:3471. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23579-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gibb AA, et al. Exercise-induced changes in glucose metabolism promote physiological cardiac growth. Circulation. 2017;136:2144–2157. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lindholm ME, et al. An integrative analysis reveals coordinated reprogramming of the epigenome and the transcriptome in human skeletal muscle after training. Epigenetics. 2014;9:1557–1569. doi: 10.4161/15592294.2014.982445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Overmyer KA, et al. Maximal oxidative capacity during exercise is associated with skeletal muscle fuel selection and dynamic changes in mitochondrial protein acetylation. Cell Metab. 2015;21:468–478. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pillon NJ, et al. Transcriptomic profiling of skeletal muscle adaptations to exercise and inactivity. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:470. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13869-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sato S, et al. Atlas of exercise metabolism reveals time-dependent signatures of metabolic homeostasis. Cell Metab. 2022;34:329–345.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Many, G. M. Sexual dimorphism and the multi-omic response to exercise training in rat subcutaneous white adipose tissue. Nat. Metab.10.1038/s42255-023-00959-9 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 15.Henstridge DC, Febbraio MA, Hargreaves M. Heat shock proteins and exercise adaptations. Our knowledge thus far and the road still ahead. J. Appl. Physiol. 2016;120:683–691. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00811.2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dumke CL, Kim J, Arias EB, Cartee GD. Role of kallikrein–kininogen system in insulin-stimulated glucose transport after muscle contractions. J. Appl. Physiol. 2002;92:657–664. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00854.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vettor R, et al. Effect of exercise on plasma kallikrein and muscular phospholipase A2 activity in rats. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 1986;45:65–70. doi: 10.1016/0303-7207(86)90083-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.De Lisio M, Parise G. Exercise and hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells: protection, quantity, and function. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 2013;41:116–122. doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e3182877deb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cho E-G, et al. MEF2C enhances dopaminergic neuron differentiation of human embryonic stem cells in a parkinsonian rat model. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e24027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lin R, Warn-Cramer BJ, Kurata WE, Lau AF. v-Src phosphorylation of connexin 43 on Tyr247 and Tyr265 disrupts gap junctional communication. J. Cell Biol. 2001;154:815–827. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200102027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Oughtred R, et al. The BioGRID database: a comprehensive biomedical resource of curated protein, genetic, and chemical interactions. Protein Sci. 2021;30:187–200. doi: 10.1002/pro.3978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bye A, et al. Gene expression profiling of skeletal muscle in exercise-trained and sedentary rats with inborn high and low VO. Physiol. Genomics. 2008;35:213–221. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.90282.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hostrup M, et al. High-intensity interval training remodels the proteome and acetylome of human skeletal muscle. eLife. 2022;11:e69802. doi: 10.7554/eLife.69802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yu G, Wang L-G, Yan G-R, He Q-Y. DOSE: an R/Bioconductor package for disease ontology semantic and enrichment analysis. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:608–609. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Aguilar D. Heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease: a clinical conundrum. Circ. Heart Fail. 2016;9:e003316. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.003316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.van Moorsel CHM. Desmoplakin: an important player in aging lung disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020;202:1201–1202. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202006-2457ED. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang T, et al. Myosin light chain kinase (MYLK) coding polymorphisms modulate human lung endothelial cell barrier responses via altered tyrosine phosphorylation, spatial localization, and lamellipodial protrusions. Pulm. Circ. 2018;8:2045894018764171. doi: 10.1177/2045894018764171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jostins L, et al. Host–microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature. 2012;491:119–124. doi: 10.1038/nature11582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Clarke SF, et al. Exercise and associated dietary extremes impact on gut microbial diversity. Gut. 2014;63:1913–1920. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lammers KM, et al. Gliadin induces an increase in intestinal permeability and zonulin release by binding to the chemokine receptor CXCR3. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:194–204.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.03.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Scarpa M, et al. The epithelial danger signal IL-1α is a potent activator of fibroblasts and reactivator of intestinal inflammation. Am. J. Pathol. 2015;185:1624–1637. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.02.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang Z, et al. Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease. Nature. 2011;472:57–63. doi: 10.1038/nature09922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Daly W, Seegers C, Timmerman S, Hackney AC. Peak cortisol response to exhausting exercise: effect of blood sampling schedule. Med. Sportiva. 2004;8:17–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhang W, et al. Nicotinamide N-methyltransferase ameliorates renal fibrosis by its metabolite 1-methylnicotinamide inhibiting the TGF-β1/Smad3 pathway. FASEB J. 2022;36:e22084. doi: 10.1096/fj.202100913RRR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Amar, D. et al. The mitochondrial multi-omic response to exercise training across tissues. Prepint at BioRxiv10.1101/2023.01.13.523698 (2023).
- 36.Thyfault JP, Rector RS. Exercise combats hepatic steatosis: potential mechanisms and clinical implications. Diabetes. 2020;69:517–524. doi: 10.2337/dbi18-0043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dornbos D, et al. Preischemic exercise reduces brain damage by ameliorating metabolic disorder in ischemia/reperfusion injury. J. Neurosci. Res. 2013;91:818–827. doi: 10.1002/jnr.23203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gay, N. R., Amar, D., Beltran, P. M. J. & MoTrPAC Study Group. MotrpacRatTraining6mo: Analysis of the MoTrPAC endurance exercise training study in 6-month-old. R package version 1.6.3 https://motrpac.github.io/MotrpacRatTraining6mo/ (2023).
- 39.Gay, N. R. & MoTrPAC Study Group. MotrpacRatTraining6moData: Data for analysis of the MoTrPAC endurance exercise training study in 6-month-old rats. R package version 1.9.0 https://motrpac.github.io/MotrpacRatTraining6moData/ (2023).
- 40.Gay, N. R., Amar, D. & MoTrPAC Study Group. Visualization of graphical analysis results: Temporal dynamics of the multi-omic response to endurance exercise training across tissues. Zenodo10.5281/zenodo.7703294 (2023).
- 41.Raja, A. et al. MoTrPAC/motrpac-rna-seq-pipeline. GitHubhttps://github.com/MoTrPAC/motrpac-rna-seq-pipeline (2023).
- 42.Gay, N. R., Raja, A. & MoTrPAC Study Group. MoTrPAC/motrpac-atac-seq-pipeline. GitHubhttps://github.com/MoTrPAC/motrpac-atac-seq-pipeline (2023).
- 43.Akre, S., Raja, A., Samdarshi, M. & MoTrPAC Study Group. MoTrPAC/motrpac-rrbs-pipeline. GitHubhttps://github.com/MoTrPAC/motrpac-rrbs-pipeline (2023).
- 44.Jimenez-Morales, D., Samdarshi, M., Hershman, S. & MoTrPAC Study Group. MoTrPAC/motrpac-proteomics-pipeline. GitHubhttps://github.com/MoTrPAC/motrpac-proteomics-pipeline (2023).
- 45.Amar, D., Samdarshi, M., Raja, A. & Gay, N. R. MoTrPAC/MotrpacRatTraining6moQCRep. GitHubhttps://github.com/MoTrPAC/MotrpacRatTraining6moQCRep (2023).
- 46.McCarron A, et al. Phenotypic characterization and comparison of cystic fibrosis rat models generated using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing. Am. J. Pathol. 2020;190:977–993. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2020.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
MoTrPAC data are publicly available via http://motrpac-data.org/data-access. Data access inquiries should be sent to motrpac-helpdesk@lists.stanford.edu. Additional resources can be found at http://motrpac.org and https://motrpac-data.org/. Interactive data visualizations are provided through a website (https://data-viz.motrpac-data.org) and HTML reports summarizing the multi-omic graphical analysis results in each tissue40. Processed data and analysis results are additionally available in the MotrpacRatTraining6moData R package39 (https://github.com/MoTrPAC/MotrpacRatTraining6moData). Raw and processed data for were deposited in the appropriate public repositories as follows. RNA-seq, ATAC-seq and RRBS data were deposited at the Sequence Read Archive under accession PRJNA908279 and at the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession GSE242358; multiplexed immunoassays were deposited at IMMPORT under accession SDY2193; metabolomics data were deposited at Metabolomics Workbench under project ID PR001020; and proteomics data were deposited at MassIVE under accessions MSV000092911, MSV000092922, MSV000092923, MSV000092924, MSV000092925 and MSV000092931. We used the following external datasets: release 96 of the Ensembl R. norvegicus (rn6) genome (https://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/release-96/fasta/rattus_norvegicus/dna/) and gene annotation (https://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/release-96/gtf/rattus_norvegicus/Rattus_norvegicus.Rnor_6.0.96.gtf.gz); RefSeq protein database (https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/R_norvegicus/, downloaded 11/2018); the NCBI gene2refseq mapping files (https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/DATA/gene2refseq.gz, accessed 18 December 2020); RGD rat gene annotation (https://download.rgd.mcw.edu/data_release/RAT/GENES_RAT.txt, accessed 12 November 2021); BioGRID v4.2.193 (https://downloads.thebiogrid.org/File/BioGRID/Release-Archive/BIOGRID-4.2.193/BIOGRID-ORGANISM-4.2.193.tab3.zip); STRING v11.5 (https://stringdb-downloads.org/download/protein.physical.links.v11.5/10116.protein.physical.links.v11.5.txt.gz); GENCODE release 39 metadata and annotation files (https://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/gencode/Gencode_human/release_39/, accessed 20 January 2022); MatrisomeDB (10.1093/nar/gkac1009); MitoPathways database available through MitoCarta (https://personal.broadinstitute.org/scalvo/MitoCarta3.0/); PTMSigDB v1.9.0 PTM set database (10.1074/mcp.TIR118.000943); UniProt human proteome FASTA for canonical protein sequences (UniProtKB query “reviewed:true AND proteome:up000005640”, download date 3 March 2021); the CIBERSORT LM22 leukocyte gene signature matrix (10.1007/978-1-4939-7493-1_12); published results from Amar et al.8, Bye et al.22 and Hostrup et al.23; and GTEx v8 gene-expression data (dbGaP Accession phs000424.v8.p2). Details are provided in the Supplementary Information, Methods.
Code for reproducing the main analyses is provided in the MotrpacRatTraining6mo R package38 (https://motrpac.github.io/MotrpacRatTraining6mo/). MoTrPAC data processing pipelines for RNA-seq, ATAC-seq, RRBS and proteomics are available in the following Github repositories: https://github.com/MoTrPAC/motrpac-rna-seq-pipeline41, https://github.com/MoTrPAC/motrpac-atac-seq-pipeline42, https://github.com/MoTrPAC/motrpac-rrbs-pipeline43 and https://github.com/MoTrPAC/motrpac-proteomics-pipeline44. Normalization and quality control scripts are available at https://github.com/MoTrPAC/MotrpacRatTraining6moQCRep45.