Skip to main content
Cells logoLink to Cells
. 2024 Jun 27;13(13):1115. doi: 10.3390/cells13131115

Thymosin β4 and β10 Expression in Human Organs during Development: A Review

Gavino Faa 1,2, Irene Messana 3, Pierpaolo Coni 1, Monica Piras 1, Giuseppina Pichiri 1, Marco Piludu 4, Federica Iavarone 5,6, Claudia Desiderio 3, Giovanni Vento 7,8, Chiara Tirone 7, Barbara Manconi 9, Alessandra Olianas 9, Cristina Contini 1, Tiziana Cabras 9, Massimo Castagnola 10,*
Editor: John Tower
PMCID: PMC11240739  PMID: 38994967

Abstract

This review summarizes the results of a series of studies performed by our group with the aim to define the expression levels of thymosin β4 and thymosin β10 over time, starting from fetal development to different ages after birth, in different human organs and tissues. The first section describes the proteomics investigations performed on whole saliva from preterm newborns and gingival crevicular fluid, which revealed to us the importance of these acidic peptides and their multiple functions. These findings inspired us to start an in-depth investigation mainly based on immunochemistry to establish the distribution of thymosin β4 and thymosin β10 in different organs from adults and fetuses at different ages (after autopsy), and therefore to obtain suggestions on the functions of β-thymosins in health and disease. The functions of β-thymosins emerging from these studies, for instance, those performed during carcinogenesis, add significant details that could help to resolve the nowadays so-called “β-thymosin enigma”, i.e., the potential molecular role played by these two pleiotropic peptides during human development.

Keywords: human, development, thymosin β4, thymosin β10, mass spectrometry, preterm newborns, immunostaining

1. “The Incipit of Our β-Thymosin Adventure”

In the early 2000s, our research group carried out the first analysis of the acidic soluble fraction of adult human saliva. At that time, the analytical strategy was mainly based on reversed-phase high-performance-liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) separation and spectrophotometric diode array detection (DAD) methods [1]. Therefore, the identification and characterization of proteins and peptides belonging to the main families of human salivary proteins could only take profit from two pieces of information: (a) the different detection wavelengths, which accounted for the presence or absence of aromatic amino acid residues (mainly tyrosine and tryptophan) in the structure; and (b) the different polarity of proteins and peptides that affected the retention time in the C18 or C8 reversed-phase columns. For instance, the absence of aromatic amino acid residues in the structure of salivary basic proline-rich proteins (b-PRPs) caused their lack of absorbance at 276 nm, with their elution peaks only detectable at the secondary wavelength of 214 nm. On the contrary, the presence of three tyrosine residues in the statherin sequence allowed us to easily recognize its peak inside the complex and crowded HPLC profile due to its specific absorbance at 276 nm (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Typical HPLC profile of the acidic soluble fraction of human whole saliva from human adults. The UV profiles revealed by diode-array detection at 214 (upper lane) and 276 nm (bottom lane) suggests the hypothetical identity of several salivary peptides and proteins based on their polarity and differential UV absorbance [1]. The attributions were confirmed by ESI ion trap and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (see Figure 2). (NL: normalization level).

The easy and painless collection of the samples encouraged us to continue investigating human saliva with the ambitious aim of characterizing its proteome. However, the need to exploit a detection method capable of providing useful information for the unambiguous characterization of the multiple salivary components was immediately clear. The newly available ion-trap (IT) mass spectrometers (MSs) coupled with HPLC via electrospray ionization (ESI) sources were helpful for our purposes; so, we initially utilized a low-resolution IT-MS (Deca-XP, Thermofisher, Waltham, MA, USA), which allowed us to characterize many components of the human adult salivary proteome [2,3,4,5,6] (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Typical HPLC-TIC (total ion current) profile of the acidic soluble fraction of human whole saliva from human adults obtained by revealing, with IT-MS, the ions generated from eluting analytes at the electrospray (ESI) source. The TIC profile contained ESI spectra useful to determine the M (average) of the most abundant components of the main families of human salivary proteins [7].

Unlike the proteomic studies carried out by other groups, our analytical strategy did not involve a proteolytic treatment of the samples. Instead, our goal was to characterize intact small proteins and peptides soluble in the supernatant of acidic solutions obtained by diluting (1:1 v/v) whole salivary samples either with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA 0.2%) or formic acid (FA 0.2%). This pipeline was lately defined top-down proteomics [7,8], and it is still utilized by us and other groups. Since one of the most intriguing issues of the proteomic analysis of a bodily fluid, such as saliva, is the comprehension of the contribution of the different sources to the whole, around the year 2004, we collected and analyzed the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF). GCF is a physiological fluid arising from the gingival plexus of blood vessels in the gingival corium, subjacent to the epithelium lining the dental–gingival space. It contains a diverse population of cells, including bacteria from the adjacent plaque mass, transmigrating leucocytes, and desquamated epithelial cells, which are passively washed out into the oral cavity [9]. The HPLC analysis of GCF coupled with DAD and ESI ion trap MS detection led us to recognize different peptides and proteins soluble in acidic solution [10]. Besides high quantities of human serum albumin, a-defensins 1–4, and minor amounts of cystatin A, P-B peptide, and statherin, two peptides with the average masses (Mav) of 4964.0 ± 0.6 Da and 4936.4 ± 0.6 Da were detected. At that time, we were unable to characterize their amino acid sequence due to the low resolution of the MS/MS fragmentation spectra. A few months later, we hypothesized that the two peptides detected in GCF were thymosin beta 4 (Tβ4, Mav theor 4963.5 Da, Swiss-Prot code P62328) and thymosin beta 10 (Tβ10, Mav theor 4936.5 Da, Swiss-Prot code P63313), because of the information published in the papers of Prof. Allan L. Goldstein [11,12], Emeritus at the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of George Washington University (Washington, DC, USA) and discoverer of thymosins, a family of at least 40 mostly small acidic polypeptides, with molecular weights ranging from 1000 to 15,000 Da. During that period, our research group, aided by the availability of the new-generation Orbitrap analyzers, started a study devoted to the characterization of the proteome of whole saliva collected from preterm newborns in comparison with the salivary proteome of infants of different ages and adults [13]. Among the striking differences with respect to adults, the analysis of the preterm newborns’ salivary proteome evidenced considerably high levels of Tβ4 and Tβ10 and allowed the unambiguous determination of their amino acid sequences with an N-terminal acetylation by high-resolution MS/MS fragmentation (Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5) [12].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Panel (A): High-resolution (Orbitrap) HPLC-ESI-MS profile of the acidic soluble fraction of whole saliva from preterm newborns (233 days of post-conceptional age (PCA)). The elution range (18–20 min) where Tβ4 and Tβ10 elute is evidenced by the colored box. Panel (B): XIC (eXtracted Ion Current) peaks were revealed by selecting four multicharged ions from [M + 8H+]8+ to [M + 5H+]5+ of Tβ4 (upper lane) and Tβ10 (bottom lane). The ESI spectrum and the corresponding deconvolution of Tβ4 are shown in Panels (C,D), respectively. The ESI spectrum and the corresponding deconvolution of Tβ10 are shown in Panels (E,F), respectively. Deconvolutions allowed us to determine the experimental M (monoisotopic) of Tβ4 (Panel (D), theor. 4960.486) and Tβ10 (Panel (F), theor. 4933.523).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

MS/MS characterization of the sequence of Tβ4. High-resolution MS/MS of the [M + 7H+]7+ ion at 709.94 m/z of Tβ4 (Panel (A)) and the corresponding deconvoluted spectrum (Panel (B)). Matching fragments’ grid (Panel (C)), showing theoretical and experimental B and Y fragment ions (blu lines) obtained by ProSight Lite (version 1.4), assuming the N-term acetylation of Tβ4 (red box) as reported in the graphical fragment map (Panel (D)).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

MS/MS characterization of the sequence of Tβ10. High-resolution MS/MS of the [M + 7H+]7+ ion at 706.08 m/z of Tβ10 (Panel (A)) and the corresponding deconvoluted spectrum (Panel (B)). Matching fragments’ grid (Panel (C)), showing theoretical and experimental B and Y fragment ions (Blu lines) obtained by ProSightLite (Version 1.4), assuming the N-term acetylation of Tβ10 (red box), as reported in the graphical fragment map (Panel (D)).

The mean concentration of Tβ4 (measured by HPLC-ESI-MS using β-thymosin standards as references) in the saliva of preterm newborns at approximately 200 days of post-conceptional age (PCA) was about 2.0 nanomol/mL, 20 times higher than the mean concentration measured in adults [13]. Indeed, Tβ4 was firstly identified in human adult saliva using an enzymatic immunoassay, always by the group of Prof. Goldstein [14,15], at a concentration ranging from about 0.2 up to 2 µg/mL (approximately from 0.04 to 0.40 nanomol/mL). In the selected glandular saliva, the concentrations of Tβ4 and Tβ10 had to be lower than the detection limit of our analytical technique. However, they were undetectable; so, we assumed that the main contribution of Tβ4 and Tβ10 to human saliva derived from GCF [16]. In the saliva of preterm newborns, the concentration of Tβ10 (≈0.5 nanomol/L) was roughly in a constant ratio of ≈1:4 with respect to Tβ4 [13].

2. Structural Characteristics of Human Thymosin Beta 4 and Thymosin Beta 10

As shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5, Tβ4 is a small and very polar peptide of 43 amino acids, 21 of which are ionogenic, i.e., 3 Asp, 8 Glu, 9 Lys, and the C-terminal Ser, while the N-terminus is acetylated. The prevalence of acidic versus basic residues generates a pI close to five and a net charge close to −3 at physiological pH (Figure 6) [17].

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Charge of β-thymosins as a function of pH (blue line, Tβ4; dashed red line, Tβ10). The curves were obtained as reported in [17]. The two lines resulted from the summation of the molar fractions of the 22 charged species multiplied for their charge (from +9 to −12, reported with different colors only for Tβ4). For simplicity, the molar fractions of the 21 charged species of Tβ10 (from +9 to −11) are not shown.

10 has one aspartic acid residue less than Tβ4; thus, its charge at physiological pH is about −2. These features result in highly reactive and flexible structures, typical of disordered proteins. Indeed, β-thymosins are included in the family of intrinsically disordered proteins, defined as unstructured proteins in their free conformation but able to adopt a well-defined three-dimensional structure when interacting with binding partners. Moreover, both Tβ4 and Tβ10 undergo disorder-to-order transitions in carrying out their biological functions [18].

A common structural attribute of β-thymosins is the presence of one or more βT repeats, an approximate 43 amino acid signature motif first defined for the prototypical Tβ4. Tβ4 was discovered in the 1970s during the purification of polar peptides from the thymus tissue, hence the name [11]. Thereafter, various investigations showed that Tβ4 binds and sequesters monomeric G-actin, the major component of the cytoskeleton in eukaryotic cells [19]. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structural studies on isolated Tβ4 began and subsequently on the Tβ4-actin complex [20,21]. X-ray crystallography studies were only possible when procedures to stabilize the intrinsically disordered Tβ4 in its complex with actin were developed [22,23]. These structural data, together with the discovery of homologs through protein and nucleotide sequencing, allowed a precise definition of the βT repeat characteristics: a consensus LKKT motif at the center of the sequence, flanked by two somewhat conserved segments that weakly form amphipathic α-helices in isolation, stabilizing when bound to actin. Because the LKKT motifs, N-terminal α-helices, and actin-binding properties were detected in the Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP) homology domain 2 (WH2)-containing proteins, βTs and WH2s domains are often grouped in the same functional superfamily [24,25].

βT repeats appear within proteins either singly or as multiple repeats. Tβ4 and the close homologs, such as Tβ10, contain one βT repeat, while other members contain from 2 to 27 such repeats [26]. One widely investigated multi-βT repeat protein is the three βT repeat Drosophila ciboulot, which was the first protein having an actin-bound βT repeat structure investigated by X-ray crystallography [27]. Single- and multi-repeat βTs have differences in their actin-binding functionality: all the studied single-repeat βTs act like Tβ4 in inhibiting their bound actin from forming or joining a filament [28].

Around the year 2007, the antibodies for the immunohistochemical analyses of both β-thymosins were commercially available; so, we decided to investigate by immunohistochemistry the expression and distribution of Tβ4 and Tβ10 in various tissues of fetuses, infants, children, and adults at autopsy. As a positive control tissue, we used a biopsy of skeletal muscle, in which the antibody against Tβ4 immunostained many muscle cells. The results of our studies are reviewed in the following sections.

3. Salivary Glands

As a starting point, we analyzed the expression of both Tβ4 and Tβ10 in the parotid, submandibular, and minor salivary glands localized at the base of the tongue in human fetuses and preterm newborns, ranging in PCA from 12 to 31 weeks and in a 1.5-year-old child [13]. In this study, a high expression of Tβ4 was observed in major and minor developing salivary glands at all gestational ages, with peculiar features regarding the expression of the peptide at different stages of development. At 12 and 13 weeks of intrauterine life, Tβ4 was mainly expressed as granular deposits inside the cytoplasm of tubular cells and inside the lumen of salivary gland tubules (Figure 7A).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Immunostaining for Tβ4 in salivary glands. (A) Immunostaining for Tβ4 in fetal minor salivary glands shows granular reactivity for the peptide in tubular cells and in the surrounding myxoid stroma (Magnification ×100). (B) Granular immunoreactivity for Tβ4 in the cytoplasm of developing tubular cells in submandibular fetal glands. The peptide is also expressed in the lumen (arrowhead) of developing glands. (Magnification ×250). (C) Fetal parotid gland showing immunostaining for Tβ4 in tubular cells undergoing branching morphogenesis. (Magnification ×250).

4-reactive granules were also detected in the cytoplasm of acinar cells of the developing acinar structures (Figure 7B,C).

At this PCA, Tβ4 was also highly expressed in the stroma surrounding the developing epithelial structures, inside the cytoplasm of activated fibroblast precursors embedded in the mesenchyme of the fetal glands. Marked differences were observed at 31 weeks of gestation. Contrasting with the granular expression in tubular and acinar cells observed at the previous ages, immunoreactivity for Tβ4 appeared to be widespread to the whole cytoplasm of acinar and tubular cells, suggesting the binding of Tβ4 to the actin of the cytoskeleton. Few small Tβ4-reactive granules were restricted to the lumen of tubular structures. A decrease in Tβ4 expression was noticed, at this gestational age, in the fibroblasts of the glandular mesenchyme. Changes were also observed in the salivary glands at 1.5 years of postnatal age, in which immunoreactivity for Tβ4 was characterized by a mild and diffuse immunostaining in the cytoplasm of tubular cells. A mild granular staining was observed in the cytoplasm of some acinar cells. No reactivity was found in the salivary gland stroma at this age. Moreover, in the salivary glands of the adult subjects utilized as a control group, a mild diffuse Tβ4 expression was restricted to the cytoplasm of tubular cells, in the absence of any significant reactivity in acinar cells and in the surrounding stroma. These data, taken together, clearly indicate that the expression of Tβ4 in the human salivary glands is dynamic, changing significantly during the different stages of prenatal and postnatal development. The predominant granular pattern found in the early stages of development indicates a prevalent localization of the peptide inside cytoplasmic vesicles, suggesting a secretory pathway that was confirmed by the finding of Tβ4 granules in the lumen of salivary gland tubules. This finding was in line with the presence of very high levels of Tβ4 secreted into the saliva of preterm newborns as compared to adults [13]. In the 1.5-year-old child, the prevalent granular pattern of Tβ4 immunostaining appeared progressively substituted by a diffuse reactivity in the cytoplasm of tubular cells, with small, rare granules in acinar cells. This result suggests a switch in Tβ4 function, changing from a secretory immunophenotype to a structural phenotype, in which Tβ4 may be associated with other cytoplasmic components, including actin of the cytoskeleton. In adults, a weak diffuse immunoreactivity for Tβ4 restricted to tubular cells was detected.

Another interesting finding, which arose from our immunohistochemical studies, was concerned with the Tβ4 expression in the stroma of the salivary glands, with large granular deposits localized in the cytoplasm of fibroblast precursors, embedded in the glandular microenvironment (GME), surrounding the developing tubular and acinar structures in the early stages of development. This result may suggest a major role for the salivary gland-associated fibroblasts in the branching morphogenesis of human salivary glands and in acinar differentiation. In recent years, the role of fibroblasts during embryonal development has been underlined by multiple studies, revealing their abilities in the production of complex extracellular matrix, in providing niches and positional information for stem/progenitor cells and in driving morphogenesis [29,30]. The evidence of Tβ4 production by the fibroblasts of the fetal salivary glands reinforces the hypothesis of a key role of fibroblasts in human development, suggesting that the Tβ4 produced and secreted by these cells might influence the branching morphogenesis of the epithelial structures and the development of salivary glands. Accepting the hypothesis that Tβ4 might play a major role during development as confirmed by our findings, and previously reported by the decreased Tβ4 levels in the saliva after birth, in childhood, and in adulthood [13], a secretion switch should be expected after birth.

A peculiar pattern of expression (different from the pattern described for Tβ4) was found for Tβ10 in developing salivary glands [31]. Immunoreactivity for Tβ10 was analyzed in the major and minor salivary glands in two human fetuses and four preterm newborns, ranging from 13 up to 33 weeks of PCA. Tβ10 immunoreactivity was detected in all the examined salivary glands. Moreover, the parotid glands showed the highest Tβ10 reactivity, characterized by granular staining in the cytoplasm of tubular cells undergoing branching morphogenesis (Figure 8A).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Immunostaining for Tβ10 in salivary glands. (A) Tβ10 expression in the developing fetal parotid gland is characterized by a granular immunostaining in the cytoplasm of immature tubular cells undergoing branching morphogenesis. A mild reactivity is also observed in the myxoid stroma. (magnification ×100). (B) Immunoreactivity for Tβ10 in the developing salivary glands is mainly localized in the cytoplasm and in the lumen of tubular cells. A mild reactivity is detected in the surrounding stroma. (magnification ×100). (C) A large tubular structure of a fetal salivary gland shows abundant granular deposits of Tβ10 inside the lumen. The peptide is also expressed, at low levels, in the cytoplasm of tubular cells. (magnification ×250). (D) Immunoreactivity for Tβ10 in minor salivary glands in Sjögren syndrome is characterized by a granular cytoplasmic pattern mainly localized in serous cells. A mild diffuse cytoplasmic reactivity is also found in the cytoplasm of mucous cells (magnification ×100). (E) In serous–mucous acinar structures, immunoreactivity for Tβ10 is predominantly found in serous cells with scattered small Tβ10 granules in mucous cells and in the peri-glandular stroma. (magnification ×400). (F) Tβ10 is detected in the lumen of salivary gland tubular structures. The peptide is also found in the cytoplasm of some mucous cells. (magnification ×400).

In the developing glands, immunoreactivity for Tβ10 was also observed in the surrounding myxoid stroma (Figure 8B).

Lower levels of immunoreactivity for Tβ10 were observed in minor salivary glands. Marked changes were observed in Tβ10 expression and localization during embryogenesis. Tβ10 was mainly localized extracellularly in the cytoplasm of fibroblast-like cells embedded in the stroma surrounding the epithelial structures, in the youngest human fetuses (13 weeks of PCA), in the cytoplasm of immature duct cells at 20 weeks, and in acinar cells and in the duct lumen at 33 weeks of PCA (Figure 8C).

The strong expression of Tβ10 in the human salivary glands during the initial phases of the development suggested a major role for the peptide in the organogenesis of salivary glands. The preferential localization of the peptide in the salivary gland-associated fibroblasts laid stress on the role of this cell type during organogenesis and, particularly, in the branching morphogenesis of salivary glands, paralleling the role previously hypothesized for Tβ4.

Marked differences regarding the role and the expression of Tβ4 and Tβ10 have been found even in the pathology of salivary glands, in patients affected by Sjӧgren syndrome [32]. At immunohistochemistry, in patients with primary Sjӧgren syndrome, minor salivary glands showed a peculiar pattern characterized by immunoreactivity for Tβ10 in acinar cells in the absence of any immunostaining for Tβ4. Immunostaining for Tβ10 was mainly detected in serous cells, with a granular pattern diffuse to the entire cytoplasm (Figure 8D).

A mild diffuse reactivity for the peptide was observed in the cytoplasm of ductal cells. In glands with a mixed serous–mucous component, immunoreactivity for Tβ10 allowed the identification of serous cells (Figure 8E).

A mild granular reactivity was detected in the peri-glandular stroma. Tβ10 was also found in the lumen of salivary gland ducts, as well in the cytoplasm of some mucous cells (Figure 8F).

All these results suggested a different role for Tβ4 and Tβ10 in patients with primary Sïogren syndrome. The immunohistochemical findings correlated with differences in beta thymosin expression in saliva of the two peptides: Tβ10 was detectable in 66.7% of patients with primary Sjӧgren syndrome, while Tβ4 sulfoxide was detectable only in 44.4% of patients.

4. Gut, Liver, and Pancreas

The finding of high levels of Tβ4 in the saliva, the body fluid that is continuously ingested, induced us to analyze the expression of the peptide in the human gut during development and in adulthood. To this aim, the expression of Tβ4 was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in autoptic samples from two fetuses of 20 and 21 weeks of PCA and two 65- and 74-year-old adults. Marked differences were observed between the adult subjects and the fetuses. In the fetal esophagus, a thin layer expressing Tβ4 was detected on the surface of the epithelium, whereas the adult esophagus showed a mild reactivity for the peptide in the cytoplasm of the epithelial cells of the superficial layers. In the fetal stomach, Tβ4-immunoreactive granules were observed in many columnar cells, suggesting their ability to secrete the peptide during gestation. On the contrary, in the adult stomach, the gastric mucosa appeared covered by a superficial Tβ4-reactive thin layer. A mild reactivity for Tβ4 was also found in the chief and oxyntic cells in the gastric glands. In the fetal ileum, Tβ4-reactive granules were observed in the mucous cells of the intestinal villi and in the mucus occupying the intestinal lumen. In the adult ileum, two patterns of Tβ4 reactivity were identified: diffuse and homogeneous in the cytoplasm of enterocytes covering the villi and granular in the cytoplasm mucous cells of the villi. These findings suggested the existence of striking differences regarding the function of Tβ4 in different cell types: a secretory (granular expression) phenotype in mucous cells and a structural (homogeneous immunostaining) phenotype, putatively reflecting the adhesion of Tβ4 to actin of the cytoskeleton in the enterocytes [33]. Fetal and adult Tβ4 patterns were more similar in the mucosa of colon and rectum. In fetal colonic mucosa, coarse granules were found in superficial epithelial cells, whereas, in adult colon mucosa, a diffuse reactivity, with coarse perinuclear granules, suggesting a localization of the peptide in the trans-Golgi network, was detected in superficial and crypt epithelial cells.

Striking differences regarding Tβ4 expression were found between the fetal and the adult livers. In the fetal liver, Tβ4 was not expressed in the hepatocytes, in bile duct cells, or in the developing ductal plate. A strong Tβ4 immunostaining was restricted to undifferentiated stem/progenitor cells localized in the immature portal tracts. In the adult liver, the expression pattern changed completely, with a strong granular immunoreactivity in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes and in Kupffer cells in the absence of any significant reactivity in bile duct cells [34]. Intriguing data were reported in a study on Tβ4 and Tβ10 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Tβ4 immunostaining was found at low levels in 30% of cases, being negative in the vast majority of HCCs. On the contrary, Tβ10 reactivity was detected in 97% of HCCs [35]. The higher incidence of Tβ10 was paralleled by its strong expression in tumor cells involved in stromal invasion, suggesting a major role for Tβ10 in liver carcinogenesis and in HCC progression. Our results were confirmed later by other groups, which underlined the utility in clinical practice of immunostaining for Tβ10 expression as a predictor of poor prognosis in HCC [36].

Nevertheless, the findings regarding Tβ4 expression in the liver deserve some consideration. Whereas our preliminary data were in favor of a prevalent Tβ4 expression in human organs and tissues during fetal life, followed by a decrease after birth, the liver pattern forced us to modify this hypothesis. In liver cells, Tβ4 expression was characterized by low Tβ4 levels during gestation, high levels in the postnatal life and in adulthood, and low expression levels in cancer. This means that the dynamics of Tβ4 expression in different cell types are more complex than previously thought, and caution should be taken in the evaluation of the function of this peptide in every cell and tissue. One hypothesis is confirmed by our findings regarding Tβ4 expression in liver cells: a similarity regarding the Tβ4 expression pattern between fetuses and cancer originating from the same cell type, which puts Tβ4 at a crossroads between development and cancer [37]. Regarding the hepatic expression pattern, the low levels in the fetal liver were paralleled by low levels in HCC.

In the fetal developing pancreas, immunostaining for Tβ10 was mainly found in the endocrine pancreas, inside the developing Langerhans islet cells. Tβ10 was localized in the cytoplasm of a subset of endocrine cells, showing a diffuse homogeneous cytoplasmic reactivity (Figure 9).

Figure 9.

Figure 9

In the fetal pancreas, Tβ10 is mainly expressed in the endocrine cells of the developing Langerhans islets, showing a strong homogeneous cytoplasmic immunostaining. A mild granular reactivity for Tβ10 is also observed in the developing tubular structures of the cells of the exocrine pancreas and in the stroma of the pancreas microenvironment. (magnification ×100).

In addition, a mild granular immunoreactivity for Tβ10 was detected in the developing exocrine pancreas, inside the cytoplasm of tubular cells undergoing branching morphogenesis (Figure 9). Tβ10 was also expressed in the adult pancreas. Scattered Tβ10 positive granular deposits were also observed in the myxoid stroma of the fetal pancreas [38].

Taken together, these findings indicated the existence of a cell-specific and a differentiation stage-specific regulation of the expression pattern of Tβ4 and Tβ10 in the gut and in the annexed glands during development and in adulthood. The marked changes observed regarding the immunohistochemical patterns observed in different tracts of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, as well in the liver and pancreas, probably reflected the different roles played by this peptide during the organogenesis and the changing functions of Tβ4 in childhood and in adult life. The granular immunoreactivity indicated the localization of the peptide in the cytoplasmic vesicles, suggesting a secretory phenotype. The larger Tβ4-reactive granular deposits in the perinuclear site might indicate a localization of the peptide in the trans-Golgi apparatus, showing the localization of the peptide in the secretory pathway. The homogenous diffuse cytoplasmic staining could indicate the association of Tβ4 with the actin of the cytoskeleton, suggesting a structural actin-monomer sequestering function assumed by Tβ4 in cells. New intriguing findings regarded the strong expression of the hepatocytes in the adult liver, which contrasted with the absence of reactivity for Tβ4 in the fetal hepatocytes. These findings confirmed the existence of organ-specific patterns regarding the different functions of Tβ4 in the development of different human organs and tissues. High levels in the saliva from preterm newborns and in the salivary glands probably reflected a major role for the peptide in their development and contrasted with the low levels of expression in the developing liver, probably suggesting a minor role for Tβ4 in hepatic development. On the other hand, the diffuse granular reactivity in adult hepatocytes suggested a major role for the liver in the production and secretion of Tβ4 in adult life. The high levels of Tβ4 detected in the fetal GI tract stress the key role played by Tβ4 in the organogenesis of the human GI tract. The heterogeneity of Tβ4 immunoreactivity in the different regions of the GI tract, ranging from the absence in the esophageal mucosa to the high and diffuse expression in the colon mucosa, associated with the marked differences between prenatal and adult life, should be considered when evaluating the role of Tβ4 in human development and physiology.

5. Genitourinary Tract

The first studies on the expression of Tβ4 in the fetal and adult genitourinary tract, including kidneys, bladder, uterus, ovaries, testicles, and prostate, revealed the expression of the peptide in cells of different origin, such as surface epithelial cells, gland cells, and interstitial cells in all the organs analyzed, with marked differences, in some cases, between fetal and adult organs. The initial analyses of Tβ4 in fetal kidneys evidenced a similar pattern of expression between fetal and adult organs, characterized by a weak and homogeneous cytoplasmic immunostaining for Tβ4 in the primary and secondary ducts. A weak immunostaining for Tβ4 was detected in S-shaped and Comma-shaped bodies in the cortex of the developing kidney in the absence of any significant reactivity in glomeruli (Figure 10).

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Fetal kidney, cortical zone: a mild diffuse immunostaining for Tβ4 is observed in Comma-shaped and S-shaped bodies (arrows). No reactivity for the peptide is found in the collecting tubules and in glomeruli. (magnification ×50).

In the fetal bladder, the transitional epithelium showed a homogeneous weak reactivity for Tβ4; a similar diffuse expression of Tβ4 was also found in the underlying stromal cells. Conversely, in the adult bladder, immunostaining in the transitional epithelium was granular, often characterized by coarse perinuclear deposits suggesting a localization of the peptide in the trans-Golgi apparatus. A focal reactivity for the peptide was also found in stromal cells. Marked differences were found in the endometrium between fetuses and adult women. No reactivity for Tβ4 was found in the fetal developing endometrial glands, whereas focal immunostaining for the peptide was observed in scattered stromal cells. In the adult endometrium, granular cytoplasmic immunoreactivity was detected in the endometrial glands, in absence of any reactivity in stromal cells. No immunostaining for Tβ4 was revealed in the fetal prostate, both in the glands and in stromal cells, contrasting with a diffuse reactivity for Tβ4 restricted to the stroma of adult subjects. In the fetal testicle, no expression of Tβ4 was found in the immature spermatic ducts, whereas some mild expression of the peptide was found in scattered interstitial cells. The pattern of Tβ4 expression changed in the adult testicle, with a granular expression of Tβ4 in the interstitial cells associated with a weak immunostaining in the cells of the spermatic ducts. A similar pattern was found in fetal and adult ovaries. The peptide was mainly expressed in the cytoplasm of oocytes, appearing as a fine granular reactivity in fetal organs and as a homogeneous weak reactivity in adult organs. A diffuse immunoreactivity for Tβ4 was also observed in stromal cells, both in fetal and adult ovaries, confirming the key role of the stromal component in the development of fetal organs [39].

This study demonstrated that Tβ4 plays a major role during human development, even in the genitourinary tract, being expressed in all organs analyzed, and confirmed that Tβ4 expression may change significantly during postnatal and adult life. Moreover, these findings demonstrated that Tβ4 expression is specific for each different organ, and it appears to be restricted to certain structures or to specific cell types. Furthermore, the type of reactivity may change significantly with age within the same cell, being granular in fetal oocytes and homogeneous in adult oocytes. These changes related to the Tβ4 pattern of expression might indicate a different role of the peptide at different ages: secretory, concentrated in cytoplasmic vesicles in the fetal age, and structural, homogeneously associated with the cytoskeleton components in adult life. The evidence of relevant Tβ4 expression in multiple adult organs, including kidneys, clearly indicates that the functions of Tβ4 are not restricted to the prenatal life and to human development and might be important even in adult life. Regarding the different cell types expressing Tβ4, the finding of immunostaining for Tβ4 in the stromal cells of multiple organs, including ovaries and testicles, indicated that Tβ4 functions are not restricted to epithelial cells, but may include stromal cells and fibroblasts as previously found in the development of salivary glands [13]. Finally, the high expression of Tβ4 in fetal oocytes and in adult oocytes suggested a role for this peptide both in germ cell development and in its maintenance in adult women.

6. Thymosin β4 and Thymosin β10 in Human Nephrogenesis

The preliminary findings on Tβ4 expression in the fetal kidney induced us to better analyze Tβ4 and Tβ10 expressions in a larger series of fetuses and newborns, ranging from 17 up to 38 weeks of gestation, to highlight their role in the different phases of the intrauterine life. These further investigations allowed us to reach a better picture of Tβ4 expression in the various components of the developing human kidney and in the multiple cell types involved in nephrogenesis [40]. The analysis of all fetal kidney samples immunostained for Tβ4 first confirmed that Tβ4 is scarcely expressed in the stem/progenitor cells of the subcapsular nephrogenic zone and in the epithelial components of the cortex, including glomeruli, proximal, distal, and collecting tubules (Figure 10). A focal cytoplasmic reactivity was detected, only in few cases, in distal tubules and in the medullary zone, restricted to the Henle loops (Figure 11A).

Figure 11.

Figure 11

4 and Tβ10 in human nephrogenesis. (A) Fetal kidney medullary zone: immunoreactivity for Tβ4 is shown in the cytoplasm of tubular cells. (magnification ×100) (B) PK1 renal cell line. Scattered cultured renal cells immunostained for Tβ4 show a vesicular cytoplasmic staining, which appears stronger in mitotic cells (arrows) (magnification ×630). (C) 293T cell line. Embryonic renal progenitor cells show a peculiar expression pattern for Tβ4. The peptide is mainly expressed in thin cytoplasmic processes, suggesting a role for Tβ4 in intercellular communications. (magnification ×630). (D) Immunostaining for Tβ10 in the fetal kidney is mainly restricted to the proximal and distal tubules. No reactivity for the peptide is observed, in this picture, in the glomerular cells. (magnification ×100).

The highest levels of immunoreactivity for Tβ4 were found in the stromal cells localized in the renal capsule and in the hilum surrounding the ureter and the branches of the renal artery. A strong reactivity for the peptide was also found in the smooth muscle cells of the arterial wall and in the perineural cells encircling nerves. Tβ4-reactive fibroblast-like cells were also found encircling the Bowman capsule and distal tubules in the absence of any staining in stromal cells surrounding proximal tubules [41]. When immunoreactivity for Tβ4 was analyzed in renal cells in culture, the peptide was expressed in the cytoplasm, showing a vesicular pattern of immunostaining. Cells in mitosis were characterized by a strong expression of Tβ4 compared to adjacent cells (Figure 11B).

A different pattern of expression was observed in the 293T cell line, adenovirus-immortalized human embryonic cells, in which Tβ4 was mainly expressed in cytoplasmic projections, a pattern suggestive of a role of Tβ4 in intercellular communications (Figure 11C).

A diverse pattern of expression was observed regarding Tβ10 in the developing human kidney of human fetuses and preterm infants, ranging from 25 up to 36 weeks of gestation [42]. Tβ10 was highly expressed in the proximal and distal tubules, whose cells were characterized by a strong homogeneous cytoplasmic reactivity for the peptide (Figure 11D).

No immunostaining was found in the collecting ducts and in the glomeruli. Focal immunostaining for Tβ10 was detected inside rare glomeruli in some fetuses with gestational age lower than 29 weeks of gestation. Unlike Tβ4, Tβ10 was also detected in the nephrogenic zone located in the subcapsular region occupied by the nephrogenic mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells. In this area, Tβ10 showed granular immunoreactivity, mainly identified in the cytoplasm of the Comma-shaped and S-shaped bodies. Interestingly, Tβ10 expression disappeared in the S-shaped bodies with the appearance of the primitive vascular tuft followed by the generation of the glomerular body. In the adult kidney, immunostaining for Tβ10 was restricted to the proximal and distal tubules in the absence of any expression inside glomeruli.

These findings first confirmed the selective localization of beta-thymosins in developing organs, including the fetal kidney, and evidenced once more of their different expression in the fetal and adult kidneys. Striking differences should also be underlined between Tβ4 and Tβ10 expression. The most intriguing finding regarding Tβ10 expression was represented by its reactivity in the nephrogenic zone, participating in the early phases of nephrogenesis and disappearing at the early insurgence of the glomerular tuft. This finding contrasted with the absence of any significant reactivity for Tβ4 in the mesenchymal progenitors, highlighting the hypothesis of different functions of the two β-thymosins during development. Another difference regarding immunostaining for Tβ4 and Tβ10 was the restriction of the reactivity for the former in the cytoplasm, whereas Tβ10 was also localized inside the nuclei of tubular cells.

7. Thymosin β4 Expression in Mast Cells of Fetal Tissues and in the Tumor Microenvironment

To test immunoreactivity for Tβ4 in the different subtypes of mast cells, the expression of the peptide was analyzed in multiple fetal tissues, in colon biopsies containing mucosal mast cells, in skin biopsies with dermal-serosal mast cells, and in biopsies from salivary gland tumors and breast cancer containing tumor-infiltrating mast cells [43]. In the fetal tissues and in the colon mucosa samples, a strong cytoplasmic immunoreactivity for Tβ4 was observed in mast cells, paralleling the reactivity for tryptase, in the absence of any reactivity for chymase. In skin samples with dermal-serosal mast cells, Tβ4 immunostaining paralleled reactivity of skin-associated mast cells for both chymase and tryptase. A different pattern of expression was found in peri- and intra-tumoral mast cells. In the salivary gland tumors, Tβ4 was expressed only in a subset of mast cells, which were immunoreactive for both chymase and tryptase. In breast cancer, most tumor-infiltrating mast cells were reactive for Tβ4 and tryptase, whereas immunostaining for chymase was observed in a minority of mast cells. The same pattern of expression was noticed in mast cells surrounding fibrocystic changes in the mammary glands, suggesting that the immunohistochemical pattern observed in breast cancer should not be restricted to cancer, but might reflect the pattern of breast-associated mast cells. All these data extended the knowledge regarding the immunophenotype of mast cells and introduced Tβ4 as a new useful marker for the identification of both serosal and mucosal mast cells in normal tissues and in cancer. Even more relevant are the findings regarding the Tβ4 expression in intra-tumoral and peri-tumoral mast cells, that might contribute to explain their function in cancer progression. Previous studies have demonstrated the association between high levels of Tβ4 and the ability of cancer cells to acquire a motile phenotype, stimulating their directional migration towards lymphatic vessels and capillaries, ending with locoregional and/or distant metastases [44,45,46,47]. In some studies, the expression of Tβ4 was not restricted to cancer cells, being observed even in other cell types of the tumor microenvironment (TME) [48]. Moreover, Tβ4 was reported to enhance endothelial cell differentiation and angiogenesis, facilitating cancer progression. Our findings on the strong expression of Tβ4 in intra-tumoral and peri-tumoral mast cells reinforced the hypothesis that Tβ4 should be considered as a new molecular target for antitumor strategies [49]. In addition, since mast cells are one of the multiple constituents of the tumor microenvironment, their ability to produce high levels of Tβ4 may suggest the need for developing new anti-cancer strategies focused on the cells of the tumor microenvironment, including mast cells.

8. Thymosin β4 Cytoplasmic/Nuclear Translocation as a New Marker of Cellular Stress

In immunohistochemical studies carried out in fetal and adult tissue samples, Tβ4 was always localized in the cytoplasm of cells expressing the peptide, suggesting a prevalent role played by Tβ4 in the different cytoplasm compartments, including vesicles (fine granules reactivity), the trans-Golgi network (dots-like deposits in the perinuclear areas), and cytoskeleton-associated actin (homogeneous staining diffused to the entire cytoplasm). Further studies on Tβ4 expression in cell culture in different environmental conditions forced us to modify our hypothesis on the restriction of Tβ4 expression to the cytoplasm. The first experiment was carried out in HepG2 cells, a line of human hepatocellular carcinoma. In tumor cells growing in normal conditions with fetal bovine serum, in the first 72 h, Tβ4 expression was restricted to the cytoplasm, showing a homogeneous reactivity suggestive of the localization of the peptide in the cytoskeleton. At 84 h, the diffused Tβ4 cytoplasmic immunostaining shifted to a focal perinuclear reactivity, followed by the appearance of a nuclear immunostaining. In absence of serum, under starvation, nuclear reactivity increased, paralleled by a progressive decrease in cytoplasmic immunostaining. These findings revealed a previously unknown dynamic expression of Tβ4, able to translocate from vesicles to the Golgi apparatus and into the nucleus, according to different environmental conditions [49]. The punctuated pattern of associated nuclear Tβ4 immunostaining suggested that the peptide might be localized in the nuclear pores (Figure 12), where it could regulate pore permeability.

Figure 12.

Figure 12

In culture cells under starvation, the appearance of a punctuated pattern of expression in the nuclei is suggestive of the translocation of Tβ4 into the nucleus. This pattern of immunoreactivity suggests a preferential localization of the peptide in the nuclear pores. (magnification ×630).

The normal immunocytochemical pattern was restored when culture cells submitted to starvation for 84 h received a new complete medium for 48 h. This finding evidenced the ability of Tβ4 to re-translocate from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, re-acquiring its fundamental function in physiological conditions, mainly related to its actin monomer-sequestering properties with a relevant role in the organization of the cytoskeleton [50]. The translocation of Tβ4 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus was confirmed in Caco2 cells, a colon adenocarcinoma cell line [51]. When cells were exposed to multiple stress conditions, including serum starvation and butyrate and DMSO administration, Tβ4 translocated from the cytoplasmic domains towards the nucleus. According to these findings, the cytoplasmic/nuclear translocation of Tβ4 should be considered a general defensive response against adverse environmental events and indicated Tβ4 as an efficient biomarker of early cellular stress [51]. In a more recent experiment on the effects of cellular stress conditions on beta thymosins, cell starvation was found to increase the uptake of extracellular Tβ4, increasing the internalization of extracellular Ca2+/Tβ4 complexes [52]. Given the role of Tβ4 and calcium in cell proliferation and migration, the high intracellular concentrations of both Tβ4 and calcium ions following starvation might represent the initial signal for the acquisition of a motile phenotype by cancer cells, allowing their detachment from the tumor mass and invasion, ending with the insurgence of the metastatic process.

An immunoelectron microscopic study carried out on HepG2 cells, with the aim of better understanding the intracellular localization of Tβ4 in physiological conditions and after starvation, allowed to obtain a better knowledge of the intracellular trafficking of this peptide [53]. In tumor cells growing in a complete medium, Tβ4 reactivity was mainly observed in the cytoplasm associated with the endoplasmic reticulum, with a high concentration of gold particles in the perinuclear compartment, often associated with the nuclear membrane. A minor component of Tβ4-bound gold particles was also detected inside the nuclear envelope, associated to the nucleolus. Following serum starvation, immunostaining for Tβ4 was observed both in the cytoplasm and in the nucleoplasm, whereas only few gold particles decorated the nucleolus. These findings from high-resolution electron microscopy allowed the obtaining of better knowledge regarding the dynamics of intracellular Tβ4 trafficking according to different environmental conditions. First, Tβ4 was localized in the nucleus even in physiological conditions, being associated with the nucleolus. The low levels of this nucleolar component did not allow its identification in previous immunohistochemical studies. Moreover, new intranuclear trafficking was revealed by the electron immunogold technique: from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm following serum starvation. Tβ4 presence in the nucleolus could reflect the interaction of Tβ4 with nucleolar components. According to this hypothesis, Tβ4 could contribute, together with other nucleolar acting-binding proteins, to modulating the transcription activity of RNA polymerases.

9. Prenatal Thymosin β4 Administration Improves Fetal Development

The hypothesis that Tβ4 could play a key role in the physiological development of human embryos and fetuses originated from the experimental data emerging from the multiple studies of our group. The initial finding of high concentrations of Tβ4 in the saliva of preterm infants was followed by the report of a high expression of the peptide in multiple fetal organs, including salivary glands, gut and annexed glands, kidneys, and the urogenital tract, as described in previous sections of this review. All these observations forced us to better investigate the linkage between Tβ4 and human development. Preterm delivery is generally considered one of the most important factors influencing organ development. Preterm labor and low birth weight are associated with the interruption of the development of multiple organs, with a block, after birth, of the genesis of new cardiomyocytes, neurons of the cerebral cortex, and many other cell types, including glomeruli [40]. This block is at the origin of the fetal programing theory, also known as the Barker hypothesis [54]. According to this theory, adverse events occurring during fetal life may influence our susceptibility to develop chronic and acute diseases later in life, in childhood or in adulthood. Infants with a low nephron number are susceptible to renal insufficiency [55]. Newborns with a deficient development of the cardiovascular system should be more susceptible to severe heart attack and/or to severe forms of atherosclerosis [56]; a low number of cortical neurons and glial cells might predispose to the insurgence of neuropsychiatric disorders, including Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease [57,58,59]. According to the Barker hypothesis, preterm delivery represents an important challenge for the medical community. A question has surfaced in the literature in recent years: how can organ development and nephrogenesis be improved in infants at high risk of undergoing preterm delivery [60,61]? A second question is: is it possible to promote organ development after birth in preterm newborns to transform susceptible infants into individuals resistant to multiple diseases later in life [62]? The hypothesis of “physiological regenerative medicine” [63] has its origin in and its basis on the abundance of stem cells in all the organs of newborns and, particularly, in the organs and tissues of preterm neonates [31]. Stem/progenitor cells represent an optimal target for starting regenerative medicine in the perinatal period [64,65]. Tβ4 appeared from our perspective a good candidate for this project, given its multiple physiological roles in actin polymerization, angiogenesis, cell survival, cell migration, and fetal development [66]. Our study was aimed at evaluating the ability of Tβ4 to function as a fetal growth promoter when administered to pregnant animals during gestation [67]. To this end, pregnant mice were treated with an intraperitoneal injection of Tβ4 on days E14 and E17 of gestation. Maternal Tβ4 treatment was associated with a fetal higher cranio-caudal length and with a more accelerated development of lungs, kidneys, heart, and cerebral cortex. Our preliminary data indicated that Tβ4 may act as a powerful fetal growth promoter in fetuses when administered to mothers in the prenatal period, transforming the dream of “physiological regenerative medicine” into a possible program to be tested in a large cohort of experimental animals in order to confirm our intriguing preliminary results [68]. However, given that Tβ4 is a natural compound, and not a drug, these preliminary data might represent the basis for starting proper clinical trials aimed at introducing the use of Tβ4 in clinical practice. The trials might start in pregnant women with a programed preterm delivery and should be focused on this goal: to transform a newborn susceptible of developing chronic diseases later in life into a resistant subject, thanks to the accelerated development of multiple organs operated by the maternal administration of Tβ4.

10. Concluding Remarks

Several years ago, at an international meeting on β- and α-thymosins organized in Washington by Prof. Goldstein, one of the speakers, Hui Qiao Sun, entitled his presentation “the β-thymosin enigma” [69]. During the presentation, the speaker explained the reasons behind this title, originating from the complex pleiotropic effects of β-thymosins in cells, due to the direct and indirect effects of the cytoskeleton on the modulation of multiple signaling pathways, impacting a variety of cell functions. Over the years, this enigma has not been solved, and the number of functions played by β-thymosins in physiological and pathological conditions has increased, including the influence on angiogenesis, tissue repair, corneal wound healing, collagen deposition, cell survival, stem cell migration, and nephrogenesis [41]. Moreover, they act as anti-apoptotic agents; β-thymosins are involved in fetal development, in wound healing, and in cancer onset and progression. Very recently, Tβ4 has been reported to play a key role in the differentiation of thymocytes by influencing cytoskeletal rearrangement and mitochondrial transfer in thymic epithelial cells [70], effects that reinforce the hypothesis of a Tβ4 impact on the aggregation of F-actin.

The complexity of immunohistochemical data regarding the expression of Tβ4 and Tβ10 in different tissues and cell types, often characterized by an uneven and patchy distribution, did not allow a quantitative evaluation of the levels of expression of β-thymosins in different organs and tissues. Further studies based on the application of artificial intelligence, and in particular the use of deep learning models applied to whole-slide images, will probably allow a quantitative determination of the concentrations of these peptides.

In this review, which covers the works of our group for more than 20 years, we described the pleiotropic functions of Tβ4 and Tβ10 in multiple cell functions during development and in carcinogenesis. New functions of β-thymosins emerge from this review. The expression of β-thymosins in the mesenchymal cells of the tumor microenvironment enlarges the spectrum of key functions played by these peptides during carcinogenesis, functions that are not restricted to tumor cells, including the tumor microenvironment and cancer-associated fibroblasts. Given the role of Tβ4 and Tβ10 in cancer progression, the Tβ4- and Tβ10-producing stromal cells of the tumor microenvironment appear an ideal target of future anti-cancer therapies aimed at halting the ability of tumor cells to migrate and create distant metastases through the blocking/inhibition of Tβ4 biological action. Therefore, we believe that the results reported in this review contribute to elucidating β-thymosins’ functions in health and disease and offer new clues to solve the “β-thymosin enigma”.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing original draft, G.F., M.C., and I.M.; methodology and investigation: P.C., M.P. (Monica Piras), G.P., M.P. (Marco Piludu), F.I., C.D., G.V., C.T., B.M., A.O., C.C. and T.C.; software, M.C., B.M., C.C., A.O. and T.C.; visualization, P.C., M.P. (Monica Piras), G.P., M.P. (Marco Piludu), G.V., C.T., B.M., A.O., C.C. and T.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Castagnola M., Congiu D., Denotti G., Di Nunzio A., Fadda M.B., Melis S., Messana I., Misiti F., Murtas R., Olianas A., et al. Determination of the human salivary peptides histatins 1, 3, 5 and statherin by high-performance liquid chromatography and by diode-array detection. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl. 2001;751:153–160. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)00466-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lupi A., Messana I., Denotti G., Schininà M.E., Gambarini G., Fadda M.B., Vitali A., Cabras T., Piras V., Patamia M., et al. Identification of the human salivary cystatin complex by the coupling of high-performance liquid chromatography and ion-trap mass spectrometry. Proteomics. 2003;3:461–467. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200390060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Messana I., Loffredo F., Inzitari R., Cabras T., Giardina B., Onnis G., Piludu M., Castagnola M. The coupling of RP-HPLC and ESI-MS in the study of small peptides and proteins secreted in vitro by human salivary glands that are soluble in acidic solution. Eur. J. Morphol. 2003;41:103–106. doi: 10.1080/09243860412331282228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Messana I., Cabras T., Inzitari R., Lupi A., Zuppi C., Olmi C., Fadda M.B., Cordaro M., Giardina B., Castagnola M. Characterization of the human salivary basic proline-rich protein complex by a proteomic approach. J. Proteome Res. 2004;3:792–800. doi: 10.1021/pr049953c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Inzitari R., Cabras T., Rossetti D.V., Fanali C., Vitali A., Pellegrini M., Paludetti G., Manni A., Giardina B., Messana I., et al. Detection in human saliva of different statherin and P-B fragments and derivatives. Proteomics. 2006;6:6370–6379. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200600395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Inzitari R., Cabras T., Onnis G., Olmi C., Mastinu A., Sanna M.T., Pellegrini M., Castagnola M., Messana I. Different isoforms and post-translational modifications of human salivary acidic proline-rich proteins. Proteomics. 2005;5:805–815. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200401156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Messana I., Inzitari R., Fanali C., Cabras T., Castagnola M. Facts and artifacts in proteomics of body fluids. What proteomics of saliva is telling us? J. Sep. Sci. 2008;31:1948–1963. doi: 10.1002/jssc.200800100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Messana I., Cabras T., Iavarone F., Vincenzoni F., Urbani A., Castagnola M. Unraveling the different proteomic platforms. J. Sep. Sci. 2013;36:128–139. doi: 10.1002/jssc.201200830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Delima A.J., Van Dyke T.E. Origin, and function of the cellular components in gingival crevice fluid. Periodontology 2000. 2003;31:55–77. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0757.2003.03105.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pisano E., Cabras T., Montaldo C., Piras V., Inzitari R., Olmi C., Castagnola M., Messana I. Peptides of human gingival crevicular fluid determined by HPLC-ESI-MS. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2005;113:462–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00246.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Goldstein A.L. History of the discovery of the thymosins. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2007;1112:1–13. doi: 10.1196/annals.1415.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Castagnola M., Inzitari R., Fanali C., Iavarone F., Vitali A., Desiderio C., Vento G., Tirone C., Romagnoli C., Cabras T., et al. The surprising composition of the salivary proteome of preterm human newborn. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2011;10:M110.003467. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M110.003467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nemolato S., Messana I., Cabras T., Manconi B., Inzitari R., Fanali C., Vento G., Tirone C., Romagnoli C., Riva A., et al. Thymosin β4 and β10 levels in pre-term newborn oral cavity and foetal salivary glands evidence a switch of secretion during foetal development. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e5109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Badamchian M., Damavandy A.A., Damavandy H., Wadhwa S.D., Katz B., Goldstein A.L. Identification and quantification of thymosin beta-4 in human saliva and tears. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2007;1112:458–465. doi: 10.1196/annals.1415.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Low T.L., Goldstein A.L. Thymosins: Structure, function and therapeutic applications. Thymus. 1984;6:27–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Inzitari R., Cabras T., Pisano E., Fanali C., Manconi B., Scarano E., Fiorita A., Paludetti G., Manni A., Nemolato S., et al. HPLC-ESI-MS analysis of oral human fluids reveals that gingival crevicular fluid is the main source of thymosins beta-4 and beta-10. J. Sep. Sci. 2009;32:57–63. doi: 10.1002/jssc.200800496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hearn M.T.W., Keah H.H., Boysen R.I., Messana I., Misiti F., Rossetti D.V., Giardina B., Castagnola M. Determination of biophysical parameters of polypeptide retro-inverso isomers and their analogues by capillary electrophoresis. Anal. Chem. 2000;72:1964–1972. doi: 10.1021/ac990369a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xue B., Robinson R.C. Actin-Induced Structure in the Beta-Thymosin Family of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins. Vitam. Horm. 2016;102:55–71. doi: 10.1016/bs.vh.2016.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Safer D., Elzinga M., Nachmias V.T. Thymosin beta 4 and Fx, an actin-sequestering peptide, are indistinguishable. J. Biol. Chem. 1991;266:4029–4032. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(20)64278-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Czisch M., Schleicher M., Hörger S., Voelter W., Holak T.A. Conformation of thymosin beta 4 in water determined by NMR spectroscopy. Eur. J. Biochem. 1993;218:335–344. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18382.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Domanski M., Hertzog M., Coutant J., Gutsche-Perelroizen I., Bontems F., Carlier M.F., Guittet E., van Heijenoort C. Coupling of folding and binding of thymosin beta4 upon interaction with monomeric actin monitored by nuclear magnetic resonance. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:23637–23645. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311413200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Aguda A.H., Xue B., Irobi E., Préat T., Robinson R.C. The structural basis of actin interaction with multiple WH2/beta-thymosin motif-containing proteins. Structure. 2006;14:469–476. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2005.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Xue B., Leyrat C., Grimes J.M., Robinson R.C. Structural basis of thymosin-β4/profilin exchange leading to actin filament polymerization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:E4596–E4605. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1412271111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hannappel E., Huff T. The thymosins. Prothymosin alpha, parathymosin, and beta-thymosins: Structure and function. Vitam. Horm. 2003;66:257–296. doi: 10.1016/s0083-6729(03)01007-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ying Y., Lin C., Tao N., Hoffman R.D., Shi D., Chen Z., Gao J. Thymosin β4 and Actin: Binding Modes, Biological Functions and Clinical Applications. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2023;24:78–88. doi: 10.2174/1389203724666221201093500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Paunola E., Mattila P.K., Lappalainen P. WH2 domain: A small, versatile adapter for actin monomers. FEBS Lett. 2002;513:92–97. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)03242-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hertzog M., van Heijenoort C., Didry D., Gaudier M., Coutant J., Gigant B., Didelot G., Préat T., Knossow M., Guittet E., et al. The beta-thymosin/WH2 domain; structural basis for the switch from inhibition to promotion of actin assembly. Cell. 2004;117:611–623. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00403-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Eadie J.S., Kim S.W., Allen P.G., Hutchinson L.M., Kantor J.D., Zetter B.R. C-terminal variations in beta-thymosin family members specify functional differences in actin-binding properties. J. Cell. Biochem. 2000;77:277–287. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(20000501)77:2<277::AID-JCB10>3.0.CO;2-Q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Plikus M.V., Wang X., Sinha S., Forte E., Thompson S.M., Herzog E.L., Driskell R.R., Rosenthal N., Biernaskie J., Horsley V. Fibroblasts: Origins, definitions, and functions in health and disease. Cell. 2021;184:3852–3872. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.06.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Thompson S.M., Phan Q.M., Winuthayanon S., Driskell I.M., Driskell R.R. Parallel Single-Cell Multiomics Analysis of Neonatal Skin Reveals the Transitional Fibroblast States that Restrict Differentiation into Distinct Fates. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2022;142:1812–1823.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2021.11.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fanni D., Gerosa C., Nemolato S., Locci A., Marinelli V., Cabras T., Messana I., Fanos V., Castagnola M., Faa G. Thymosin beta 10 expression in developing human salivary glands. Early Hum. Dev. 2011;87:779–783. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bosello S., Peluso G., Iavarone F., Tolusso B., Messana I., Faa G., Castagnola M., Ferraccioli G. Thymosin β4 and β10 in Sjögren’s syndrome: Saliva proteomics and minor salivary glands expression. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2016;18:229. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1134-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Goldstein A.L., Hannappel E., Kleinman H.K. Thymosin Beta4: Actin-sequestering protein moonlights to repair injured tissues. Trends Mol. Med. 2005;11:421–429. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2005.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nemolato S., Van Eyken P., Cabras T., Cau F., Fanari M.U., Locci A., Fanni D., Gerosa C., Messana I., Castagnola M., et al. Expression pattern of thymosin beta 4 in the adult human liver. Eur. J. Histochem. 2011;55:e25. doi: 10.4081/ejh.2011.e25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Theunissen W., Fanni D., Nemolato S., Di Felice E., Cabras T., Gerosa C., van Eyken P., Messana I., Castagnola M., Faa G. Thymosin beta 4 and thymosin beta 10 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2014;58:2242. doi: 10.4081/ejh.2014.2242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang H., Jiang S., Zhang Y., Pan K., Xia J., Chen M. High expression of thymosin beta 10 predicts poor prognosis for hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2014;12:226. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Faa G., Nemolato S., Cabras T., Fanni D., Fanari M., Locci A., Fanos V., Messana I., Castagnola M. Thymosin Beta 4 expression reveals intriguing similarities between fetal and cancer cells. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2012;1269:53–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06679.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nemolato S., Cabras T., Cau F., Fanari M.U., Fanni D., Manconi B., Messana I., Castagnola M., Faa G. Different thymosin Beta 4 immunoreactivity in foetal and adult gastrointestinal tract. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e9111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Nemolato S., Cabras T., Fanari M.U., Cau F., Fanni D., Gerosa C., Manconi B., Messana I., Castagnola M., Faa G. Immunoreactivity of thymosin beta 4 in human foetal and adult genitourinary tract. Eur. J. Histochem. 2010;54:193–196.e43. doi: 10.4081/ejh.2010.e43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Faa G., Gerosa C., Fanni D., Monga G., Zaffanello M., van Eyken P., Fanos V. Morphogenesis and molecular mechanisms involved in human kidney development. J. Cell. Physiol. 2012;227:1257–1268. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nemolato S., Cabras T., Messana I., Gerosa C., Faa G., Castagnola M. Do Beta-thymosins play a role in human nephrogenesis? In: Faa G., Fanos V., editors. Kidney Development in Renal Pathology, Current Clinical Pathology. Springer Science; New York, NY, USA: 2014. pp. 81–93. Series Editor: Antonio Giordano. Chapter 8. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gerosa C., Fanni D., Nemolato S., Locci A., Marinelli V., Cabras T., Messana I., Castagnola M., Monga G., Fanos V., et al. Thymosin beta-10 expression in developing human kidney. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23((Suppl. S3)):125–128. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2010.510645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nemolato S., Cabras T., Fanari M.U., Cau F., Fraschini M., Manconi B., Messana I., Castagnola M., Faa G. Thymosin beta 4 expression in normal skin, colon mucosa and tumor infiltrating mast cells. Eur. J. Histochem. 2010;54:14–17.e3. doi: 10.4081/ejh.2010.e3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kobayashi T., Okada F., Fuji N., Tomita N., Ito S., Tazawa H., Aoyama T., Choi S.K., Shibata T., Fujita H., et al. Thymosin beta4 regulates motility and metastasis of malignant mouse fibrosarcoma cells. Am. J. Pathol. 2002;160:869–882. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64910-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cha H.J., Jeong K.J., Kleinman H.K. Role of thymosin beta4 in tumor metastasis and angiogenesis. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2003;95:1674–1680. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djg100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wang W.S., Chen P.M., Hsiao H.I., Ju S.Y. Overexpression of the thymosin beta4 gene is associated with malignant progression of SW480 cancer cells. Oncogene. 2003;22:3297–3306. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wang W.S., Chen P.M., Hsiao H.L., Wang H.S., Liang W.Y., Su Y. Overexpression of the thymosin beta-4 gene is associated with increased invasion of SW480 colon carcinoma cells and the distant metastasis of human colorectal carcinoma. Oncogene. 2004;23:6666–6671. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Larsson L.I., Holck S. Occurrence of thymosin beta4 in human breast cancer cells and in other cell types of the tumor microenvironment. Hum. Pathol. 2007;38:114–119. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.06.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Goldstein A.L. Thymosin beta4: A new molecular target for antitumor strategies. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2003;95:1646–1647. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djg126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pichiri G., Coni P., Nemolato S., Cabras T., Fanari M.U., Sanna A., Di Felice E., Messana I., Castagnola M., Faa G. Cellular trafficking of thymosin Beta-4 in HEPG2 cells following serum starvation. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e67999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Coni P., Piras M., Mateddu A., Piludu M., Orrù G., Scano A., Cabras T., Piras V., Lachowicz J.I., Jaremko M., et al. Thymosin beta4 cytoplasmic/nuclear translocation as a new marker of cellular stress. A CaCO2 case study. RSC Adv. 2020;10:12680–12688. doi: 10.1039/C9RA10365A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Piludu M., Pichiri G., Coni P., Piras M., Congiu T., Faa G., Lachowicz J.I. Cell starvation increases uptake of extracellular thymosin beta-4 and its complexes with calcium. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2023;116:109743. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.109743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Piludu M., Piras M., Pichiri G., Coni P., Orrù G., Cabras T., Messana I., Faa G., Castagnola M. Thymosin beta 4 may translocate from cytoplasm into the nucleus in HepG2 cells following serum starvation. An ultrastructural study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0119642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Barker D.J.P., Eriksson J.G., Forsén T., Osmond C. Fetal origins of adult disease: Strength of effects and biological basis. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2002;31:1235–1239. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.6.1235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Manfellotto D., Cortinovis M., Perico N., Remuzzi G. Low birth weight, nephron number and chronic kidney disease. Ital. J. Med. 2022;16:15–23. doi: 10.4081/itjm.2022.1538. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Gerosa C., Faa G., Fanni D., Cerrone G., Suri J.S., Barcellona D., Coni P., Congiu T., Lai M.L., Piras M., et al. Fetal programming of atherosclerosis: May the Barker hypothesis explain the susceptibility of a subset of patients to develop stroke or cardiac infarct? Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2021;25:6633–6641. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202111_27107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Piras M., Fanos V., Ravarino A., Marcialis M.A., Vinci L., Pintus M.C., Faa G. Fetal programming of Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases: The role of epigenetic factors. J. Pediatr. Neonat. Individual Med. 2014;3:e030270. doi: 10.7363/030270. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Faa G., Manchia M., Pintus R., Gerosa C., Marcialis M.A., Fanos V. Fetal programming of neuropsychiatric disorders. Birth Defects Res. Part C Embryo Today Rev. 2016;108:207–223. doi: 10.1002/bdrc.21139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Fanni D., Gerosa C., Rais M., Ravarino A., van Eyken P., Fanos V., Faa G. The role of neuropathological markers on the interpretation of neuropsychiatric disorders: Focus on fetal and perinatal programming. Neurosci. Lett. 2018;669:75–82. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.10.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Fanos V., Castagnola M., Faa G. Prolonging nephrogenesis in preterm infants. A new approach for prevention of kidney disease in adulthood? Iran J. Kidney Dis. 2015;9:180–185. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Fanos V., Gerosa C., Loddo C., Faa G. State of the art on kidney development: How nephron endowment at birth can shape our susceptibility to renal dysfunction later in life. Am. J. Perinatol. 2019;36:S33–S36. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1691798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Faa G., Fanni D., Gerosa C., Gibo Y., Fanos V. Kidney development and susceptibility to develop kidney disease in adulthood. Japan J. Med. 2018;1:217–221. doi: 10.31488/jjm.1000119. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Faa G., Sanna A., Gerosa C., Fanni D., Puddu M., Ottonello G., van Eyken P., Fanos V. Renal physiological regenerative medicine to prevent chronic renal failure: Should we start at birth? Clin. Chim. Acta. 2015;444:156–162. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2015.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Faa G., Fanos V., Giordano A. Stem cells: Present and future. J. Pediatr. Neonatal Individ. Med. 2016;5:e050234. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Fanni D., Gerosa C., Loddo C., Castagnola M., Fanos V., Zaffanello M., Faa G. Stem/progenitor cells in fetuses and newborns: Overview of immunohistochemical markers. Cell Regen. 2021;10:22. doi: 10.1186/s13619-021-00084-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Marks E.D., Kumar A. Thymosin beta4: Roles in development, repair, and engineering of the cardiovascular system. Vitam. Horm. 2016;102:227–249. doi: 10.1016/bs.vh.2016.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Faa G., Piras M., Mancuso L., Coni P., Pichiri G., Orrù G., Fanni D., Gerosa C., Cao G., Taibi R., et al. Thymosin beta-4 prenatal administration improves fetal development and halts side effects due to preterm delivery. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2021;25:431–437. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202101_24411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Fanni D., Gerosa C., Nemolato S., Mocci C., Pichiri G., Coni P., Faa G., Fanos V. “Physiological” renal regenerating medicine in VLBW preterm infants: Could a dream come true? J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25((Suppl. S3)):41–48. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.712339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Sun H.Q., Yin H.L. The beta-thymosin enigma. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2007;1112:45–55. doi: 10.1196/annals.1415.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ying Y., Tao N., Zhang F., Wen X., Zhou M., Gao J. Thymosin β4 Regulates the Differentiation of Thymocytes by Controlling the Cytoskeletal Rearrangement and Mitochondrial Transfer of Thymus Epithelial Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024;25:1088. doi: 10.3390/ijms25021088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cells are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES