Skip to main content
Cells logoLink to Cells
. 2024 Jul 31;13(15):1294. doi: 10.3390/cells13151294

Effects of Angiogenic Factors on the Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition and Their Impact on the Onset and Progression of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Overview

Silvia Pomella 1, Ombretta Melaiu 1, Maria Dri 2, Mirko Martelli 1, Marco Gargari 1, Giovanni Barillari 1,*
Editors: Jozsef Dudas, Nicoletta Gagliano
PMCID: PMC11311310  PMID: 39120324

Abstract

High levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-2 and angiopoietin (ANG)-2 are found in tissues from oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs). As might be expected, VEGF, FGF-2, and ANG-2 overexpression parallels the development of new blood and lymphatic vessels that nourish the growing OPMDs or OSCCs and provide the latter with metastatic routes. Notably, VEGF, FGF-2, and ANG-2 are also linked to the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a trans-differentiation process that respectively promotes or exasperates the invasiveness of normal and neoplastic oral epithelial cells. Here, we have summarized published work regarding the impact that the interplay among VEGF, FGF-2, ANG-2, vessel generation, and EMT has on oral carcinogenesis. Results from the reviewed studies indicate that VEGF, FGF-2, and ANG-2 spark either protein kinase B (AKT) or mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), two signaling pathways that can promote both EMT and new vessels’ formation in OPMDs and OSCCs. Since EMT and vessel generation are key to the onset and progression of OSCC, as well as to its radio- and chemo-resistance, these data encourage including AKT or MAPK inhibitors and/or antiangiogenic drugs in the treatment of this malignancy.

Keywords: VEGF, FGF-2, ANG-2, AKT, MAPK, EMT, OPMD, OSCC, angiogenesis, metastasis

1. Introduction

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is an aggressive tumor that, together with other head and neck neoplasms, ranks sixth among the most common human malignancies worldwide, representing over 90% of those arising in the oral cavity (oral SCC, OSCC) [1].

In most cases, the onset of an OSCC is preceded by that of dysplastic–hyperplastic lesions, termed oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) [1]. Among them, non-homogeneous leukoplakia, erythroplakia, proliferative verrucous leukoplakia, and submucous fibrosis have a high risk of transforming into OSCC [2].

The development of an OPMD and its eventual evolution into an OSCC, as well as OSCC’s clinical progression, are preceded and accompanied by the chronic inflammation of oral mucosa that results from prolonged exposure to mechanical traumas (e.g., broken or badly positioned teeth), chemical substances (e.g., tobacco and/or ethyl alcohol), or infectious agents (e.g., bacteria causing periodontitis) [1,3,4]. Such a persistent inflammation leads to the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of oral epithelial cells [5,6,7].

EMT is a cellular trans-differentiation process impelling epithelial cells to gradually lose their static phenotype (that is firmly attached to sister cells and to the basement membrane and oriented in an apical-basal polarity), and to acquire the invasive and migratory capabilities that are peculiar to mesenchymal cells [8,9,10,11,12].

When it is transient and reversible, EMT plays an important role in tissue damage repair [11]. On the other hand, long-lasting, intense EMT is associated with inflammatory, degenerative, or neoplastic diseases [6,8,9,10,12,13,14].

Epithelial cells that undergo EMT lose epithelial (E)-cadherin, a receptor that mediates homotypic adhesion between epithelial cells, and replace it with de novo synthesizing neuronal (N)-cadherin, an intercellular adhesion molecule expressed by mesenchymal cells: because of the E-cadherin loss, the adhesiveness between epithelial cells decreases [6,7,8,9,10]. Such a change in the expression of cadherins, which is known as the “cadherin switch”, characterizes OSCC tissues; its intensity is directly proportional to the ability of the tumor to metastasize and/or relapse after surgical removal [6].

Moreover, during the EMT process, the expression of vimentin (a component of mesenchymal cell cytoskeleton) is induced, which contributes to conferring mobility to the otherwise static epithelial cells [6,7,8,9,10].

Another feature of the EMT phenotype is the synthesis of the matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) and/or the urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA): these enzymes effectively degrade the molecular constituents of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and basement membranes, hence endowing the transdifferentiated epithelial cells with invasive capabilities [3,6,7,8,9,10,15,16].

In addition to EMT, the development and progression of OSCC are also accompanied by the neoformation of blood and lymphatic vessels [17,18,19,20]. As with many other tumor types, in OSCC the new blood vessels are formed mainly through angiogenesis [21], a multistep process in which endothelial cells lining the endoluminal face of the capillaries and venules degrade the vascular basement membrane and migrate into the perivascular space to form solid cords: the latter will then cavitate to allow the blood to flow into them [22]. The formation of new lymphatic vessels (lymphangiogenesis) occurs in ways that are like those of angiogenesis [22].

Angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis are promoted by a variety of molecules which, taken together, are named angiogenic factors [22]. Among them, those belonging to the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family are particularly effective [23]. Specifically, VEGF-A is believed to be the most important mediator of angiogenesis, while VEGF-C is mainly involved in lymphangiogenesis [23,24]. Another family of cytokines that can promote all the events underlying angiogenesis is that of the fibroblast growth factors (FGFs): amidst them, FGF-2, also termed basic FGF, takes on particular importance in tumor angiogenesis [25]. Another effective angiogenic factor is angiopoietin-2 (ANG-2), which starts angiogenesis by destabilizing the pre-existing vessels [26,27].

As seen for EMT, angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis are also pivotal to OSCC progression and metastasis. Through angiogenesis, in fact, the proliferating OPMDs or OSCCs are equipped with new vessels that add to the original ones to satisfy, at least in part, the increased need for oxygen and nutrients [24,28,29]. Consistently, the number of blood vessels is greater in a growing OPMD compared to healthy oral mucosa, and it further increases in an enlarging OSCC [30]. On its part, lymphangiogenesis provides OSCC cells with additional routes to metastasize [24,29]. In accordance, the intensity of lymphangiogenesis is a reliable indicator of metastasis risk and poor prognosis for OSCC patients [31]. Importantly, in OSCC tissues, tumor cells that have undergone EMT localize in the areas of lymphangiogenesis, from where they will metastasize [32].

Of utmost interest, EMT, angiogenesis, and lymphangiogenesis are simultaneously triggered during oral carcinogenesis [17,21,30,32,33,34,35,36]. In fact, in OPMDs and OSCCs, the number of newly formed vessels rises in parallel with the increase in the expression of EMT markers [30].

Based on these data, here, we have summarized and discussed the results from studies concerning the role that the angiogenic VEGF, FGF-2, and ANG-2 have in the EMT underlying the development, progression, and metastasizing of OSCC. Data were searched for in the PubMed Central electronic database of the National Library of Medicine (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America). The search was carried out from June 2023 to July 2024. There was no time restriction on the studies included, and the final data consisted of studies published from 1996 to 2024. In total, 161 articles were selected for full-text screening, and 135 of them were included in the final study. The other articles discussed and cited in this review served to complete the description of the topics considered herein.

2. Molecular Mechanisms Underlying EMT

During chronic oral mucositis of mechanical, chemical, or microbial origin, leukocytes and macrophages are recruited in the damaged mucosa, where they produce cytokines such as interleukin-1, -6, and -8, tumor necrosis factors, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1, and epidermal growth factor (EGF) [3] (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Molecular mechanisms leading to EMT in oral mucosa. Arrows symbolize directions of connections. Abbreviations: AKT, protein kinase B; E-cadherin, epithelial-cadherin; EGF, epidermal growth factor; EMT, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition; GLUT, glucose transporter protein; HIF, hypoxia-inducible factor; IC, inflammatory cytokines; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MMPs, matrix metalloproteinases; N-cadherin, neuronal-cadherin; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa B; OPMDs, oral potentially malignant disorders; OSCC, oral squamous cell carcinoma; SNAI, zinc finger snail homolog; TGF, transforming growth factor; TWIST, basic helix–loop–helix twist homolog; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; ZEB, zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox. Created with BioRender.com.

As for other inflamed epithelia, also in oral mucosa, the above-mentioned inflammatory mediators or growth factors turn on transcription factors such as the zinc finger snail homolog (SNAI), the basic helix–loop–helix twist homolog (TWIST), and the zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox (ZEB) in epithelial cells, which then acquire the EMT phenotype [3,37,38,39] (Figure 1). Specifically, SNAI, TWIST, or ZEB induces the expression of mesenchymal N-cadherin or vimentin and represses the synthesis of E-cadherin and other epithelial molecules [3,37,38,39]. At the same time, SNAI, TWIST, and ZEB promote MMPs expression [3,37,38,39]. In this context, one should consider that the EMT process is slow and reversible [40]: this explains why cells with epithelial or mesenchymal characteristics are concomitantly present in a chronically inflamed oral mucosa together with cells that show intermediate phenotypes between the decidedly epithelial and the predominantly mesenchymal one [41].

In addition to inducing EMT, inflammatory cytokines stimulate the growth of the trans-differentiated oral epithelial cells both directly and by amplifying the effects of growth factors [4].

While it is commonly believed that the EMT phenotype is more related to cell migration than to cell proliferation [8], it has recently been shown that EMT boosts the proliferation of epithelial cells cultured in 3D [42]. Another study indicates that, upon their exposure to TGF, epithelial cells undergo EMT and, at the same time, display increased viability and an increased growth rate [43]. Moreover, the inhibition of EMT in lung carcinoma cells is followed by a decrease in both their proliferation and invasiveness [44].

Overall, these events explain why dysplastic/hyperplastic OPMDs often originate from a persistent inflammation of the oral cavity [3,4,45].

In this context, environmental or infectious mutagens can promote the malignant transformation of the trans-differentiated and/or proliferating oral epithelial cells, leading to the onset of an OSCC: thus, EMT is related to the OPMD transformation into OSCC [4,45,46] (Figure 1).

As for the normal epithelial cells that line an inflamed oral cavity, and as for the dysplastic cells constituting OPMDs, the transformed OSSC cells will also be exposed for a prolonged time to cytokines and growth factors produced by infiltrating leukocytes and macrophages, by fibroblasts, and by the activated oral epithelial cells themselves: consequently, also OSCC cells undergo EMT; this exacerbates their invasive capabilities [3,4]. Similar to what happens with normal epithelial cells lining a chronically inflamed oral mucosa, OSCC cells can also display a variety of phenotypes ranging from fully epithelial to markedly mesenchymal ones [47,48]. Actually, in OSCC tissues, most OSCC cells display an intermediate phenotype since they express both epithelial and mesenchymal markers [47].

In a wide variety of epithelial cells, those lining the oral cavity included, the activation of EMT-inducing transcription factors is triggered by two intracellular signaling pathways, namely the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT) and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) [49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57].

Notably, both of these signaling pathways are activated by the same cytokines or growth factors that are released from the inflammatory cells infiltrating oral squamous preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions [3]. Consistently, both PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK result in being overactivated in OPMDs, and even more so in OSCCs, reaching levels of intensity that are directly correlated with the severity of the disease [58,59]. In particular, the greatness of AKT activation increases as OPMD progresses to OSCC, and when OSCC becomes invasive [60]. Notably, the abnormal activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway that is detected in almost all OSCCs results from the overactivation of EGF signaling or the mutation/amplification of one or more of the genes coding for the molecules involved in AKT phosphorylation [58]. Analogously to PI3K/AKT, an increased activation of ERK has been observed in non-invasive OSCC as compared to non-neoplastic oral mucosa, and in invasive OSCC as compared to non-invasive OSCC [61].

In brief terms, inflammatory cytokines or growth factors expressed in OPMDs and OSCCs turn on PI3K in epithelial cells by promoting the conversion of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate to phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate: the latter (with the cooperation of 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1) phosphorylates AKT, activating it [49]. In turn, phosphorylated AKT (pAKT) turns on TWIST and, at the same time, induces the expression of SNAI both directly and indirectly, i.e., by increasing the activity of the nuclear factor–kappa B (NF-κB) transcription factor [49]. For its part, TWIST enhances the pro-EMT effects of AKT by promoting its phosphorylation [49]. Moreover, pAKT phosphorylates glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK-3) β, leading to its degradation and thus preventing it from deactivating SNAI [49]. A further consequence of GSK-3β degradation is the increase in the intracellular content of β-catenin, a component of cadherin-based adherents junctions, and the key effector of Wingless-related integration site (Wnt) signaling in the nucleus [49]. Under physiological conditions, β-catenin binds to the E-cadherin intracellular domain, remaining in the cytoplasm; the E-cadherin down-regulation occurring in EMT causes the nuclear translocation of β-catenin, whose transcriptional activity is then increased upon its phosphorylation via pAKT [49].

Concerning the MAPK/ERK pathway, its triggering leads to ZEB, TWIST, and SNAI expression, and it both stabilizes and phosphorylates the TWIST1 protein in epithelial cells, those lining the oral cavity included [49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57]. Moreover, MAPK phosphorylation switches on β-catenin signaling and, at the same time, favors NF-κB translocation into the nucleus [62,63,64]. Thus, following PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK activation, the nuclear levels and/or the transcriptional activity of TWIST, SNAI, NF-κB, and β-catenin increase, thus inducing EMT and promoting MMPs expression in epithelial cells, those of the oral cavity included, whether they are normal or transformed [3,65,66,67] (Figure 1). With specific regard to the oral cavity, in OPMDs, the EMT contributes to the dysplasia that characterizes these lesions [7,37,39]; in contrast, in OSCCs, the EMT is not only linked to dysplasia but also facilitates the spreading of cancerous cells first locally and then at distant sites [6].

Because of the inherent subversion of the mechanisms that control cell proliferation and the concurrent presence of growth factors in the tumor microenvironment, OSCC cells proliferate, aggrandizing the OSCC mass [3] (Figure 1).

As the tumor is enlarged, local blood vessels cannot satisfy its augmented request for oxygen and nutrients [68]. Wherefore, the tumor undergoes hypoxia, and hypoxia-inducible transcription factors (HIF)-1 and -2 are activated to stimulate angiogenesis [68] (Figure 1). Specifically, HIF-1 promotes the expression of VEGF, together with its type-2 receptor (VEGFR-2) [69,70]. An additional HIF-1 target that is transcribed in OSCC hypoxic areas is glucose transporter protein 1 (GLUT-1), a member of a family of proteins that mediate glucose’s entry into the cells [71]. Therefore, in hypoxic OSCCs, the activation of HIF-1 leads to the simultaneous expression of VEGF and GLUT-1: the former increases the number of intra-tumoral vessels, while the latter improves glucose uptake by the proliferating endothelial and OSCC cells [71]. In this regard, it must be highlighted that the energy that is required for cancer cell migration, invasion, and metastasis is predominantly provided by glycolysis [72,73]. Thus, any increase in GLUT expression would also facilitate OPMD progression to invasive OSCC, as well as the spreading of OSCC cells throughout the human body.

At variance with the vegf gene, those coding for FGF-2 or ANG-2 are not transcriptional targets of HIF-1 [69,74].

Concerning HIF-2, it cooperates with prostaglandin E-2 and prostacyclin-2 at stimulating endothelial cells to produce ANG-2 and invade the vascular basement membrane, thereby starting angiogenesis [74,75,76]. Because of the concurrent activation of HIF-1 and HIF-2, ANG-2 and GLUT-1 are co-expressed in colorectal cancer cells cultured under hypoxic conditions [77]. To date, it is not known whether the same phenomenon also occurs in OSCC cells.

Notably, HIF-1 can also activate the expression of the EMT transcription factors TWIST, SNAI, and ZEB [78] (Figure 1). Thus, hypoxia simultaneously promotes the trans-differentiation of epithelial cells and the angiogenesis that supports the proliferation of the trans-differentiated epithelial cells [78,79] (Figure 1).

In the oral cavity, the concurrent occurrence of these HIF-1-induced events has been shown to favor not only OSCC progression [78] but also OPMD’s evolution to OSCC [30] (Figure 1).

Of note, a reduction in HIF-1 activity is followed by the simultaneous downregulation of VEGF, SNAI, and TWIST, thus inhibiting angiogenesis and, at the same time, reverting the EMT phenotype of carcinoma cells [79]. The return of carcinoma cells to a more epithelial phenotype is termed the “mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition” (MET) [12].

In many human carcinomas, a continuous switch from EMT to MET, and vice versa, is observed [12]. Such cellular plasticity has been noted in OSCC tissues as well, and it is thought to be an adaptive response of the cancer cells to the varying tumor microenvironment [80].

It is generally believed that the EMT phenotype helps carcinoma cells invade the peritumor area, penetrate the stroma, reach and enter blood or lymphatic vessels, and survive while circulating in blood or lymph [12]. In contrast, MET occurs at the metastatic site, where it aids the metastasized cells in adapting to the novel microenvironment that they find in the colonized tissue [12]. In this context, however, it must be highlighted that, when carcinoma cells undergo MET, their invasiveness is reduced [12,44,81].

3. The Angiogenic VEGF, ANG-2, and FGF-2 Are Overexpressed in OPMDs and OSCCs, Where They Trigger the Molecular Pathways Leading to EMT

Previous work has reported that VEGF-A and VEGF-C expression is higher in OPMDs and OSCCs than in healthy oral mucosa [19]. Interestingly, VEGF levels increase when OPMDs evolve into OSCCs, and they rise further as OSCCs progress, positively correlating not only with the number of tumor vessels but also with the degree of cancer cell invasiveness [19,28,82]. Consistently, VEGF-A and VEGF-C expression levels in OSCC tissues are significantly associated with higher tumor stages, invasion grades, recurrence, and lymph node metastasis and, thereby, with the poor 5-year survival rate of OSCC patients [24,82].

In OSCC, VEGF is produced primarily by the carcinoma cells themselves, especially when they are subjected to hypoxia [69,70,83]. Nonetheless, it is conceivable that VEGF is also synthesized by the leukocytes that infiltrate the inflamed oral mucosa where OPMDs or OSCCs originate [3]. Indeed, T lymphocytes, neutrophils, basophils, and monocytes are all capable of producing VEGF [84,85,86]. Moreover, VEGF could also be spawned by the macrophages and keratinocytes that are activated during the inflammatory processes preceding OPMDs’ development or accompanying OPMDs’ evolution into OSCCs [3,87,88].

Like VEGF-A and -C, ANG-2 is also overexpressed in OSCCs as compared to non-cancerous peri-tumor tissue and healthy oral mucosa [28,34]. As expected, ANG-2 levels increase in OSCCs in parallel with the number of newly formed vessels [28,34]. Accordingly, ANG-2 overexpression positively correlates with the viability of OSCC cells and with the volume of the OSCC mass, while it is negatively associated with OSCC patients’ overall survival [28,34]. It is currently unknown whether OSCC cells synthesize ANG-2 as breast carcinoma cells do [88]. In this regard, one should consider that endothelial cells synthesize and release ANG-2 [89,90]. Given that, ANG-2 could be produced by the endothelial cells that line the vessels nourishing the growing OSCC.

Regarding FGF-2, its expression is induced during oral wound repair, in which FGF-2 plays a preponderant role [31,91]. Interestingly, FGF-2 and its receptors are overexpressed in OPMDs, especially in those that are at high risk of malignant transformation [29,92]. FGF-2 levels are further augmented in OSCCs [31], where the cytokine is synthesized by the tumor cells [93] and, possibly, by T cells, monocytes, macrophages, and/or inflamed keratinocytes [93,94,95,96]. Notably, FGF-2 directly sparks the survival and proliferation of OSCC cells; these pro-tumor effects add to FGF-2 angiogenic activity [97]. In contrast, either VEGF or ANG-2 promotes OSCC growth only indirectly, i.e., by stimulating angiogenesis [34,98,99].

Taken together, these findings point to VEGF, FGF-2, and ANG-2 as reliable prognostic markers for OSCC patients [19,24,28,29,31,34,82,92].

Additional data strongly support a role for VEGF, FGF-2, and ANG-2 in the EMT that characterizes OPMDs and OSCCs.

Concerning a possible role for VEGF in EMT induction, one should consider that the binding of VEGF-A to VEGFR-2 sparks a variety of intracellular signaling pathways, among which PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK are included [100] (Table 1).

Table 1.

VEGF-A, ANG-2, or FGF-2 exerts EMT-associated, pro-tumor activities.

DIRECT EFFECT VEGF-A ANG-2 FGF-2
Triggering of AKT or MAPK Yes [100] Yes [101,102,103] Yes [104,105,106,107]
Activation of TWIST, SNAI, or ZEB Yes [108] Not known Yes [91,109,110]
Downregulation of E-cadherin expression Yes [19,108,111] Yes [34] Yes [112]
Induction of N-cadherin expression Yes [108] Not known Yes [113]
Induction of vimentin expression Yes [108] Yes [44] Yes [114]
Induction of fibronectin expression No [36,115] Not known Yes [113,116]
Upregulation of MMP-1 Yes [117] Yes [118] Yes [119]
Upregulation of MT1-MMP, MMP-2, and MMP-9 Yes [120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128] Yes [129] Yes [128,130,131,132]
Downregulation of TIMP-1 Yes [133] Yes [133] Yes [134]
Protection from anoikis Yes [135,136] Not known Yes [137]
Promotion of CSCs appearance and viability Yes [138,139] Not known Yes [138,139,140]

As we mentioned before, the activation of PI3K/AKT and/or MAPK/ERK stimulates EMT [49,54,55,56,57,67]; notably, the triggering of these same signaling pathways also induces new vessel formation [100,141,142]. In this regard, a positive correlation between VEGF expression and both new vessel formation and the acquisition of the invasive EMT phenotype by oral epithelial cells has been observed in OPMDs and OSCCs [19,111].

Analogous findings have been described for other types of carcinomas where VEGF levels parallel those of SNAI, TWIST, vimentin, MMP-9, and N-cadherin and are inversely correlated with E-cadherin expression [143,144]. A similar, although less intense, phenomenon has been observed in normal epithelia in the context of inflammatory/reparative processes [145].

However, studies that have aimed to dissect VEGF’s role in EMT have produced contrasting data. Specifically, the results from several articles indicate that, rather than directly stimulating EMT, VEGF is produced by cells that have undergone EMT [18,19,36,146,147,148,149,150,151]. This finding agrees with the fact that the triggering of MAPK/ERK or PI3K/AKT leads to VEGF expression [146,147,152]. Consistently, MAPK/ERK or PI3K/AKT inhibitors can reduce VEGF expression [148,150,151,153,154]. Nevertheless, the exposure of pancreas carcinoma cells to VEGF-A is followed by the nuclear translocation of beta-catenin and an increase in SNAI and TWIST expression: this, in turn, causes pancreas carcinoma cells to acquire EMT features such as a reduction in E-cadherin levels and the concomitant induction of N-cadherin and vimentin expression [108] (Table 1). Further work is, then, needed to fully clarify whether VEGF can directly trigger EMT in normal, dysplastic, and/or neoplastic oral epithelial cells.

Regarding ANG-2, it activates ERK and AKT in carcinoma but not in normal cells [101,102,155] (Table 1). Indeed, OSCC cells that overexpress ANG-2 display reduced E-cadherin and increased vimentin levels, as well as augmented migratory/invasive capabilities [34]. Likewise, ANG-2 overexpression parallels the EMT of breast carcinoma cells in vitro, in animal models, and in oncologic patients, where it reflects the degree of differentiation, lymph node invasion, and metastasis of the tumor [101]. Analogous data have been reported for lung carcinoma cells, where silencing the ang-2 gene lowers the expression of TWIST and SNAI, thereby promoting the MET of these cancer cells [44].

Similarly to what occurs for VEGF, the expression of ANG-2 is upregulated by MAPK/ERK agonists [152] and downregulated via MAPK/ERK antagonists [153,156]. Differently from VEGF, however, the activation of PI3K/AKT downregulates ANG-2 [26], although PI3K/AKT inhibitors repress ANG-2 expression [156]. Additional investigations are required to shed light on this discrepancy.

At variance with VEGF and ANG-2, the role of FGF-2 in EMT, and the mechanisms for it, is clear and well established (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

FGF-2 promotes EMT in oral mucosa. Arrows symbolize directions of connections. Abbreviations: AKT, protein kinase B; CSCs, cancer stem cells; EMT, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; GLUT, glucose transporter protein; HIF, hypoxia-inducible factor; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MMPs, matrix metalloproteinases; OSCC, oral squamous cell carcinoma; SNAI, zinc finger snail homolog; TWIST, basic helix–loop–helix twist homolog; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; ZEB, zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox. Created with BioRender.com.

In fact, during the repair of an injured epithelium, FGF-2 already directly activates SNAI, promotes the nuclear translocation of β-catenin, lowers the levels of E-cadherin, and induces the expression of vimentin in keratinocytes, endowing them with the motility they need to close the edges of the wound [91] (Table 1). However, to fully carry out its pro-EMT action in the non-neoplastic mucosa, FGF-2 requires the help of TGFβ1 [91]. Instead, FGF-2 alone promotes EMT in OSCC cells [112] (Figure 2). Specifically, the elevated levels of FGF-2 detected in OSCCs are associated with the induction of EMT in OSCC cells [112]. This is probably because FGF-2 is overexpressed, together with its receptors in OSCCs [31,157]. In this context, it is noteworthy that the expression of FGF-2 and its co-receptors is upregulated during inflammation [158,159]. Analogously to OSCC, a direct pro-EMT effect of FGF-2 has also been observed in ovarian and liver carcinomas [109,110].

Noticeably, FGF-2 triggers either PI3K/AKT or MAPK/ERK in a wide variety of normal, as well as tumor, cells [104,105,106,107] (Table 1; Figure 2). Due to its ability to activate the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, FGF-2 increases SNAI and ZEB expression and stabilizes TWIST by compromising its binding to GSK-3β [109,114] (Table 1; Figure 2). For its part, the activation of MAPK/ERK promoted by FGF-2 upregulates the expression of ZEB [110] (Figure 2). In this regard, one should consider that FGF-2 can directly induce the expression of vimentin and N-cadherin, while repressing that of E-cadherin [113,114] (Table 1). In agreement with these findings, FGF-2 antagonists block EMT and induce MET [160].

Interestingly, as previously mentioned for VEGF, the interactions between FGF-2 and MAPK/ERK or PI3K/AKT are also both-sided. Specifically, the activation of MAPK/ERK or PI3K/AKT is followed by FGF-2 upregulation [161,162] (Figure 2), while ERK or AKT inhibitors reduce FGF-2 expression [154,163].

Notably, at the same time at which they downregulate the angiogenic factors, the inhibitors of PI3K/AKT or MAPK/ERK signaling induce MET, decrease the expression of MMPs, and upregulate MMPs antagonists, such as the tissue inhibitor of MMPs (TIMP)-1 [150].

Regarding the hypoxia that occurs in proliferating OSCCs, one should consider that HIF-1 and VEGF can reciprocally upregulate their expression [69,74,164].

Like VEGF, FGF-2 upregulates HIF-1 expression in carcinoma cells (Figure 2), thereby potentiating HIF-1 activity and keeping it even when oxygen levels in tumor tissue are normal [165]. This effect follows the phosphorylation of AKT triggered by FGF-2 and leads to VEGF synthesis in carcinoma cells [165] (Figure 2). In addition to VEGF, FGF-2 also upregulates ANG-2 [95]: it is very likely that these activities contribute to the EMT-promoting effect of FGF-2.

In agreement with their capability of upregulating HIF-1, both VEGF and FGF-2 increase GLUT-1 expression in endothelial cells [166,167,168] (Table 1; Figure 2): as for FGF-2, it is likely that this can guarantee the optimal use of glucose via the nascent tumor vessels even in conditions of normoxia.

Moreover, given the importance of glycolysis in cancer cell locomotion [72,73], VEGF and FGF-2’s capability of upregulating GLUT-1 could facilitate OSCC metastasis.

Differently from VEGF and FGF-2, ANG-2 decreases both the expression and the DNA-binding activity of HIF-1, hence downregulating VEGF expression [169]. At present, it is not known whether ANG-2 affects GLUT-1 expression.

Taken together, the findings discussed in this section indicate that angiogenesis and EMT occurring in OSCC have strong interconnections, most of which synergize in promoting OSCC progression.

4. The Pro-EMT Effects of Angiogenic Factors Have a Role in OSCC Metastasizing

A few types of human cells possess motile capabilities that allow them to take part in physiological, tightly regulated reactive/reparative processes [170,171,172]. In contrast, abnormal and deregulated cell migration characterizes a variety of diseases, neoplasms included [170,171,172]. In particular, the migration through the stroma that carcinoma cells carry out after they have invaded the basement membrane is a fundamental step of the metastatic process [170].

The formation of metastases involves at first the detachment of cancerous cells from the primary tumor [173]. In OSCCs, this event is facilitated first by the decrease in E-cadherin levels on the surface of the carcinoma cells that have undergone EMT [6]. Indeed, the loss of E-cadherin loosens the adhesions among OSCC cells [6]. Another important mediator of tumor cell detachment is MMP-1, which degrades the ECM molecules that hold together the cells constituting the neoplastic mass [174]. Notably, in OSCC tissues, MMP-1 is overexpressed [175], while E-cadherin is downregulated [6].

Once detached from the primary tumor, carcinoma cells move through the peritumoral ECM via two substantially different modes, that is as single cells or as cellular aggregates [170].

When migrating as single cells, carcinoma cells generally adopt the so-termed mesenchymal mode of migration [170]. The latter strictly relies on the EMT phenotype and implies that cells rearrange their cytoskeletons via the polymerization of actin filaments and their crosslink with myosin that, in turn, strengthens the actin filaments and renders them contractile [170,171,172]. Specifically, actin polymerization drives the formation of a protrusion at the leading edge of migrating carcinoma cells [170,176,177]. Such a protrusion, which is a specialized podosome for which the newly synthesized vimentin contributes in providing a scaffold [176,177,178], is termed invadopodium because it is through it that cancer cells invade the stroma [170,176,177]. While the invadopodium firmly attaches to the ECM, the back edge of the migrating cell retracts due to myosin contraction and detaches from the ECM: this causes the cell to move forward, being attracted by growth factors and/or ECM molecules [170,171,172].

In sum, cells move via their adhesive interactions with the ECM [170,171,172]. The latter are mostly mediated by the integrins, a family of transmembrane receptors [170]. Notably, in migrating carcinoma cells, the integrins cluster on the invadopodium immediately after the latter adheres to the ECM [170,171,172]. The extracellular domain of the integrins binds to the ECM [171,172], whereas their intracellular domain interacts with the actin cytoskeleton and GTPases such as Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 [171,172,179]. At the leading edge of a migrating carcinoma cell, mechanical signals resulting from invadopodium’s adhesion to the ECM activate Rac and Cdc42, which, in turn, promote actin polymerization; at the cellular rear, the same ECM signals trigger Rho that stimulates myosin contractility [171,172].

Thanks to the joint activity of the integrins, the actin/myosin complexes, and the GTPases, carcinoma cells deform their cytoskeleton so to enhance their migratory capabilities as much as possible: then, the single carcinoma cells invade the peritumoral ECM via the proteolytic activity of MMPs and/or uPA [3,10,15,16,173].

Amidst MMPs, the MMP-2, MMP-9, and membrane type (MT) 1-MMP are expressed in OSCC at levels that positively correlate with the size, histologic grade, or stage of progression of OSCC and are predictive of OSCC metastasizing [3]. While MMPs are overexpressed, their antagonists TIMPs are downregulated in OSCCs as compared to the healthy oral mucosa [180]: definitely, these two concurrent phenomena strongly increase the activity of MMPs in the tumor tissue.

Analogously to the MMPs, uPA and its receptor (uPAR) are also expressed in OSCCs at levels that positively correlate with the invasive and metastatic capabilities of these tumors [15].

Notably, the ECM-degrading MT1-MMP or uPA and the ECM-binding integrin receptors are positioned in proximity on the invadopodium of OSCC cells: this drives ECM degradation toward the direction that the cancer cells are heading [3]. Noteworthy, the invadopodium is found not only on the surface of OSCC cells but also on that of the keratinocytes constituting OPMDs at high risk for malignant transformation [181].

Due to the activity of MMPs and/or uPA, carcinoma cells create real tunnels in the ECM [170]. Migrating single carcinoma cells that have undergone EMT can pass through those tunnels according to the so-called amoeboid migration: the latter, typical of leukocytes, is very fast and almost independent of cellular adhesions [170]. Therefore, individually migrating carcinoma cells can change their migration mode from mesenchymal to amoeboid, depending on the state of ECM integrity [170].

In addition, the paths generated by MMPs and/or uPA allow the migration of carcinoma cells grouped in sheets or filaments that would otherwise be stopped due to the physical barrier constituted by an intact ECM [170].

In the collectively migrating cancer cells, a front is distinguished that consists of cells with an EMT phenotype that tow cells with a fairly epithelial phenotype, which are connected to each other via epithelial intercellular adhesion molecules such as E-cadherin [170]. Interestingly, invadopodia are located on the ventral surface of collectively invading cancer cells, and they release a large number of MMPs to favor collective invasion [178].

It must be highlighted that carcinomas metastasize via collective migration more than via single-cell migration and that carcinoma cells with an epithelial phenotype are very viable and aggressive, although they are less mobile than those that have undergone EMT [81,170].

Concerning OSCCs, results from ex vivo and in vitro studies indicate that both single-cell and collective migration occurs in this tumor and that the mode of migration is strongly influenced by the EMT phenotype of the cancer cells [47,81,182]. Specifically, vimentin-positive OSCC cells with low levels of E-cadherin are very invasive and adopt the single-cell migration mode; in contrast, vimentin-negative OSCC cells expressing high levels of E-cadherin are minimally invasive and migrate collectively [47,81,182].

Regarding a possible direct effect of angiogenic factors on the locomotion of normal and/or transformed oral epithelial cells, VEGF stimulates the migration of OSCC cells but not of normal oral keratinocytes [183], while FGF-2 appears to be involved in the motility of both normal and neoplastic oral epithelial cells [140,184]. As for ANG-2, we have found no information on whether it has a direct chemotactic effect on OSCC cells or oral keratinocytes. Nonetheless, given EMT’s role in carcinoma cell migration, and considering the links that VEGF, FGF-2, and ANG-2 have with EMT, all three angiogenic factors could likely contribute to OSCC metastasizing. This hypothesis is supported by the finding that VEGF, FGF-2, or ANG-2 expression markedly increases in OSCCs immediately before and during the metastatic process [19,31,34,82].

In this context, one should consider that VEGF, FGF-2, or ANG-2 are all capable of inducing or upregulating MMP-1 expression [117,118,119], as well as repressing E-cadherin [19,34,111,112] (Table 1; Figure 2). Thus, angiogenic factors may favor the detachment of OSCC cells from the primary tumor by both reducing E-cadherin levels and upregulating MMP-1.

Still in this regard, previous work has reported that VEGF and FGF-2, but not ANG-2, trigger Rho GTPases to promote cellular migration [185,186]. Consistently, VEGF activates actin filament polymerization, vimentin expression, and invadopodium formation at the migrating front of cancer cells in the same way in which it promotes the budding of a podosome from the surface of endothelial cells during angiogenesis [108,187,188,189,190]. Analogous findings have been described for neuronal cells upon their exposure to FGF-2 [191]. ANG-2 could also play a role in this important step of the metastatic process, given that the production and release of ANG2 are followed by the formation of podosomes in endothelial cells [192]. In addition, VEGF or ANG-2 upregulates (while FGF-2 inhibits) myosin expression in stem cells [193,194,195]. Moreover, VEGF and ANG-2 are, respectively, involved in the cellular locomotion mediated by beta 1 and beta 3 integrins [196,197], which are the same clustering on the invadopodium [170].

Further investigations are needed to clarify whether VEGF, FGF-2, and/or ANG-2 promote all these events in OSCC cells.

For now, it is well established that VEGF, FGF-2, and ANG-2 upregulate MT1-MMP, MMP-2, and MMP-9 expression (Table 1; Figure 2): consistently, a positive correlation has been observed between the levels of these angiogenic factors and those of MT1-MMP, MMP-2 or MMP-9 in tumor tissues [120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132]. In addition, VEGF, FGF-2, and ANG-2 are known to reduce TIMP-1 levels in vitro and in vivo [133,134] (Table 1; Figure 2).

Notably, VEGF levels mirror those of uPA in neoplasms [198], especially where NF-κB is overactivated [199]. Regarding FGF-2, it can directly upregulate uPA expression [200], while ANG-2 levels positively correlate with those of uPA and uPAR in tumor specimens, as well as during wound healing [201,202].

Additional work must be performed to assess whether VEGF, FGF-2, and ANG-2 diminish the levels of TIMPs and increase those of uPA/uPAR in dysplastic or neoplastic oral epithelial cells.

While OSCC cells degrade the peritumoral ECM and move through it, the ECM changes in its components. Specifically, laminin (LN)-5 is deposited on the basement membrane [203], and the content of tenascin (TN), fibronectin (FN), and WNT1-inducible signaling pathway protein-1 (WISP-1) in the ECM increases [17,36,203,204]. In this context, LN-5, TN, and FN are synthesized by OSCC cells and/or OSCC-associated fibroblasts with the cooperation of inflammatory cells [203,204,205,206]. As for WISP-1, it must be highlighted that it is produced upon the activation of the Wnt-1/beta-catenin pathway [207], which is constitutively triggered in progressing OSCC [3,67]. Interestingly, WISP-1 activates AKT and SNAIL, thereby stimulating the EMT of oral keratinocytes [17]. In addition, WISP-1 promotes both lymphangiogenesis and the migration of OSCC cells, thereby favoring OSCC metastasizing [17]. For its part, LN-5 promotes the locomotion of OSCC cells toward the basement membrane [203], while TN provides OSCC cells that have acquired the motile EMT phenotype with a solid support that facilitates their migration [204]. As for FN, it is present mostly at the invasive front of OSCCs, where it increases the speed of carcinoma single-cell migration [81]. Moreover, FN binding to its main receptor, which is the α₅β₁ integrin, triggers the expression of the anti-apoptotic BCL-2 protein by carcinoma cells, thereby favoring their survival [208].

Among all the cytokines present in the OSCC microenvironment, TGFβ1 is particularly effective in inducing the changes in the peritumoral ECM that accompany the metastasis process [3,209].

Concerning the possibility that angiogenic factors could contribute to the changes in ECM composition observed in OSCC tissues, it is noteworthy that FGF-2 upregulates both FN and α₅β₁ [114,116] (Table 1). In contrast, VEGF does not induce FN expression (Table 1); it is, rather, FN, as well as WISP-1, that promotes VEGF synthesis by OSCC cells [36,115].

Regarding ANG-2, its overexpression in human gliomas parallels an increase in LN-5, and this correlates with the upregulation of MT1-MMP and MMP-2, as well as the invasion of glioma cells [210]. It is currently unknown whether these events also occur in OSCC.

The fact that VEGF, FGF-2, and/or ANG-2 induce the EMT phenotype leads us to imagine them as involved mainly in single-OSCC cell migration. This hypothesis is supported by the links existing between VEGF or FGF-2 and the Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP), a component of the Hippo pathway that is inactivated during the collective migration of OSCC cells [211]. In particular, FGF-2 activates YAP [212], which, in turn, inhibits VEGF expression [213].

However, one should consider that EMT cells are present at the front of migrating carcinoma cell aggregates [170]. In this regard, it must be highlighted that hypoxia promotes the expression of VEGF, together with that of discoidin domain receptor-1, a membrane receptor that orchestrates the collective migration of carcinoma cells and that is highly expressed in OSCCs [214,215,216]. Furthermore, VEGF can bind the alpha v integrins [217], which mediate the aggregation and collective migration of OSCC cells [214]. Future studies could dissect the role that angiogenic factors play in each of the migration modes of OSCC cells.

After invading the stroma, OSCC cells move toward the blood or lymphatic vessels, adhere to their wall, penetrate it due to the proteolytic activity of uPA and the MMPs, and eventually disseminate throughout the organism via the blood or lymph [155]. There, carcinoma cells circulate individually or in aggregates: the latter are more aggressive than single cells, and their presence in the blood or lymph is associated with the patient’s poor prognosis [170]. In this context, the alpha v integrins are believed to play a role in the intra-vascular spreading of OSCC cell aggregates [214]: this leads us to hypothesize that VEGF’s capability of binding the alpha v integrins may impact on this mode of metastasis [217].

However, neither blood nor lymph provides OSCC cells with the survival signal resulting from AKT and/or ERK activation that follows cellular adhesion to a solid ECM [218]. The lack of this signal makes circulating OSCC cells undergo “anoikis”, a peculiar type of apoptosis that can jeopardize cancer metastasizing [173,218].

When thinking about a way in which angiogenic factors could help OSCC cells overcome anoikis, one should consider that VEGF levels are high in the serum of OSCC patients [219,220] and that OSCC cells express VEGFR-2 [221]. Indeed, VEGF binding to VEGFR-2 activates AKT-mediated cell survival signals [221]: this would increase the viability of circulating OSCC cells, protecting them from anoikis, as has been reported for other carcinoma cell types [135,136] (Table 1). Therefore, VEGF could facilitate OSCC metastasizing both by increasing the viability of circulating cancer cells and by promoting the formation of new vessels that function as metastasis routes.

As for ANG-2, it is present in the serum of OPMD patients [222]. Given its capability of triggering survival signals in transformed cells [119], ANG-2 would also be of importance for OSCC metastasizing. However, we have found no information on whether ANG-2 is present in the serum of OSCC patients.

FGF-2 has been reported to counter the anoikis of human stem cells because of its ability to ignite either AKT or ERK [137] (Table 1). However, FGF-2 levels increase in the saliva, but not in the serum, of OSCC patients, as compared to healthy individuals [223]. This finding is consistent with the fact that, after its production by tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating leukocytes, the majority of FGF-2 remains within OSCC [93,224], probably because of its high affinity for the heparan sulfate proteoglycans of the cell surface and ECM [225]. Therefore, FGF-2 is likely to be less involved than VEGF in protecting circulating OSCC cells from anoikis.

5. Angiogenic Factors Could Favor the Establishment of Metastases at Ectopic Sites

At the end of the metastatic process, OSCC cells arrive in body areas that may be close to, or distant from, the primary tumor: there, the OSCC cells exit the vessel due to uPA and MMPs actions, adhere to local ECM, and then proliferate to give rise to secondary tumors [173]. However, for the metastasis to successfully settle in the new site, OSCC cells must defeat the attack of resident immune cells.

In this context, VEGF exerts multiple activities that help metastatic tumor cells to survive the antitumor immune responses. Specifically, VEGF impairs the maturation of T cells and dendritic cells and stimulates tumor-associated macrophages to release immunosuppressive cytokines [226]. Moreover, when combined with ANG-2, VEGF lowers NK cell activity [227]. For its part, FGF-2 could contribute to these immunosuppressive effects because of its capability to promote VEGF expression [228] (Figure 2). Altogether, these activities are likely to take place in OSCCs, where VEGF, FGF-2, and ANG-2 are concomitantly overexpressed.

The final step of the metastatic process implies that cancer cells adapt to the new environment they have arrived in, which is often very different from the one where they originated [173,229].

In this regard, the persistence of intense pro-EMT stimuli over time causes carcinoma cells to lose most of their epithelial markers and to express in their place stem cell markers, which add to the EMT ones [112]. In view of their poor differentiation, such cells are named cancer stem cells (CSCs) [229]. In other instances, normal stem cells are recruited from the bone marrow into the stroma of tumors [230], where they may eventually undergo malignant transformation, hence becoming CSCs [231]. The bone marrow-derived stem cells that infiltrate tumors produce ANG-2 [230] which, in turn, promotes angiogenesis, EMT, and tumor cell invasion and growth [26,27,34,44,232]. Notably, angiogenic factors are important to the generation and maintenance of CSCs. Specifically, due to its capability of directly inducing EMT, FGF-2 increases the number of CSCs in a population of SCC cells and, together with VEGF, strengthens their viability and self-renewal [138,139] (Table 1; Figure 2).

Like normal stem cells, CSCs have a highly plastic phenotype, which allows them to adapt even to environments that would otherwise be “hostile” [173,229]. In addition to being very mobile and invasive, CSCs have an almost infinite capacity for self-renewal [229]. Moreover, they are very viable, making them extremely resistant to anoikis [229]. Taken together, these features render CSCs particularly capable of metastasizing.

OSCC is populated by CSCs that display EMT features (such as upregulated TWIST1, newly synthesized N-cadherin, and downregulated E-cadherin), together with stem cell markers (e.g., OCT4 and SOX2) and cell surface molecules (e.g., CD44 and CD133) that are also expressed by CSCs from other types of carcinomas [233]. The CSCs of OSCCs synthesize VEGF, FGF-2, and ANG-2 [233]. FGF-2 has an undebatable role in maintaining the stemness, self-renewal capacity, and tumorigenicity of CSCs in OSCC [140] (Figure 2). Given that, and in view of what happens in other carcinomas, VEGF and ANG-2 could also positively act on OSCC-resident CSCs to promote OSCC progression.

Consistent with CSCs’ capability of surviving apoptosis, self-renewing, invading, and migrating, the presence of CSCs in an OSCC correlates with the likelihood that the tumor will recur after surgical removal and metastasize [234]. Moreover, the great viability of CSCs makes them resistant to anti-tumor radiotherapy and chemotherapy [235]. In this regard, one should also consider that EMT transcriptional activators such as TWIST, SNAI, and ZEB induce the expression of anti-apoptosis molecules, as well as genes involved in the multidrug resistance of tumor cells [49].

For all these reasons, CSCs are one of the major obstacles to the successful treatment of tumors, OSCC included [49,234,235]. Thus, because of their positive interconnections with the EMT process, FGF-2, VEGF, and/or ANG-2 could compromise the efficacy of conventional anti-OSCC therapies.

6. Conclusions and Future Directions

Analogously to what happens for other tumor types, the early detection of OSCC and the timeliness of the start of therapy favor the patient’s survival [236]. OSCC treatment involves the surgical excision of the tumor and, possibly, radiotherapy and/or the administration of combined chemotherapeutics, such as cisplatin, fluorouracil, and antibodies directed against EGF receptors or the programmed death 1 immune checkpoint (PD-1) protein [1,58]. However, in patients with OSCC in an advanced stage of progression, surgery is very mutilating and often incapable of preventing tumor recurrence or metastasis [1]. Furthermore, most of the late-stage OSCC patients develop drug- or radio-resistance over time [1,237]. As a result, nowadays, the five-year survival of patients with advanced OSCC has remained the same as it was sixty years ago, i.e., it does not exceed fifty percent [238]. Therefore, the identification and exploitation of novel anti-OSCC therapeutic tools, hopefully more effective than the current ones, are urgent.

In this context, curative approaches countering the two major cornerstones upon which the clinical progression of OSCC is based, namely the EMT of carcinoma cells and the neoformation of tumor-associated lymphatic and blood vessels [6,7,31], should be designed and evaluated.

Prompted by this need, here, we have discussed published findings indicating that VEGF, FGF-2, and ANG-2 are upregulated in OPMD and OSCC, where they activate the PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK pathways that, in turn, lead to EMT and concomitant vessels generation.

Given that PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK are dysregulated in a large variety of human tumors, several inhibitors of these pathways have been formulated to date, some synthetic and some from natural sources [239,240].

As for OSCC, results from experimental work indicate that ERK, p38MAPK, or PI3K/AKT inhibitors are all capable of reducing or halting the growth and migration of OSCC cells [241,242,243,244]. Moreover, these inhibitors enhance the sensitivity of OSCC cells to anticancer drugs [242,245,246].

However, it must be highlighted that resistance often develops against MAPK inhibitors, thus limiting their therapeutic efficacy [240]. Regarding this last aspect, PI3K/AKT inhibitors have proven to sensitize OSCC cells to anticancer chemotherapeutics even when these tumor cells display activated MAPKs [246].

This gives hope that PI3K/AKT inhibitors can be used in the therapy of OSCC, especially considering the importance that this signaling pathway plays in the development and progression of OSCC [58]. Certainly, however, PI3K/AKT inhibitors cannot be administered as a monotherapy, given that the intrinsic characteristics of OSCC and those of its microenvironment cause the continuous reactivation of AKT [58].

In this regard, the results of many studies support the administration of PI3K/AKT inhibitors (e.g., flavanones) in combination with conventional cytostatic/cytotoxic chemotherapeutics for the treatment of OSCC patients [58,239].

In view of the findings summarized in the present review, which point to angiogenic factors as targets for innovative therapies directed against OSCC, OSCC patients could take PI3K/AKT inhibitors also in combination with anti-angiogenic drugs [120,247]. In this regard, a phase I clinical trial carried out on twenty patients with locally advanced resectable OSCC treated with three cycles of APATINIB (a VEGFR2 inhibitor) combined with CAMRELIZUMAB (an anti-PD-1 antibody) has given promising results [248]. Specifically, all patients tolerated this treatment well, and 40% of them showed a minimal percentage of residual viable OSCC cells. Furthermore, two years after starting treatment, 95% of responder patients were still alive [248]. These clinical findings are consistent with the results of previous work highlighting the efficacy of VEGF antagonists in preclinical models of OSCC [249,250].

Alternatively, or additionally, multidrug combinatorial therapies could also include the use of steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs that have been shown to counter AKT [204] and promote MET [79,251].

Since the MET phenotype generally results in a decrease in the invasive capabilities of carcinoma cells [49,252], it would be a great success to find a therapy reverting the EMT of the highly metastatic OSCC cells to a more static phenotype. Indeed, EMT not only facilitates cancer cell invasion and dissemination throughout the body but also augments cancer cells’ resistance to chemotherapy or radiotherapy [49,253,254]. Therefore, it is believed that converting the OSCC cell phenotype to a more epithelial-like one would not only reduce OSCC invasiveness and metastasizing but also render OSCC cells more sensitive to anticancer therapies [252]. This would be particularly beneficial, given that OSCC patients frequently develop radio- and/or chemo-resistance [1,237].

Finally, considering the easy accessibility of the oral cavity, anti-EMT and anti-angiogenic drugs may find a topical application that could possibly reduce their side effects.

Author Contributions

S.P. and G.B. searched for (and analyzed) the articles discussed herein and wrote the manuscript; O.M., M.D., M.M. and M.G. completed some paragraphs. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

Supported by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR), University Scientific Research Projects (RSA) 2021, grant. no. E83C22002040005. S.P. was funded by a grant from MUR, Research and Innovation Projects (PON).

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Tan Y., Wang Z., Xu M., Li B., Huang Z., Qin S., Nice E.C., Tang J., Huang C. Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas: State of the Field and Emerging Directions. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2023;15:44. doi: 10.1038/s41368-023-00249-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Warnakulasuriya S., Kujan O., Aguirre-Urizar J.M., Bagan J.V., González-Moles M.Á., Kerr A.R., Lodi G., Mello F.W., Monteiro L., Ogden G.R., et al. Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders: A Consensus Report from an International Seminar on Nomenclature and Classification, Convened by the WHO Collaborating Centre for Oral Cancer. Oral Dis. 2021;27:1862–1880. doi: 10.1111/odi.13704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barillari G., Melaiu O., Gargari M., Pomella S., Bei R., Campanella V. The Multiple Roles of CD147 in the Development and Progression of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:8336. doi: 10.3390/ijms23158336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ciani L., Libonati A., Dri M., Pomella S., Campanella V., Barillari G. About a Possible Impact of Endodontic Infections by Fusobacterium Nucleatum or Porphyromonas Gingivalis on Oral Carcinogenesis: A Literature Overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024;25:5083. doi: 10.3390/ijms25105083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Niklander S.E. Inflammatory Mediators in Oral Cancer: Pathogenic Mechanisms and Diagnostic Potential. Front. Oral Health. 2021;2:642238. doi: 10.3389/froh.2021.642238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hakim S.G., Taubitz C., Hoppe S., Steller D., Rades D., Ribbat-Idel J., Alsharif U., Falougy M. Prognostic Impact of the Loss of E-Cadherin and de Novo Expression of N-Cadherin at the Invasive Front of Primary and Recurrent Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Front. Oncol. 2023;13:1151879. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1151879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Meng Z., Yang T., Liu D. Type-2 Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Oral Mucosal Nonneoplastic Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2022;13:1020768. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1020768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lamouille S., Xu J., Derynck R. Molecular Mechanisms of Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014;15:178–196. doi: 10.1038/nrm3758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Haensel D., Dai X. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal Transition in Cutaneous Wound Healing: Where We Are and Where We Are Heading. Dev. Dyn. 2018;247:473–480. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.24561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhang J., Hu Z., Horta C.A., Yang J. Regulation of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition by Tumor Microenvironmental Signals and Its Implication in Cancer Therapeutics. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2023;88:46–66. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jonckheere S., Adams J., De Groote D., Campbell K., Berx G., Goossens S. Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) as a Therapeutic Target. Cells Tissues Organs. 2022;211:157–182. doi: 10.1159/000512218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bakir B., Chiarella A.M., Pitarresi J.R., Rustgi A.K. EMT, MET, Plasticity, and Tumor Metastasis. Trends Cell Biol. 2020;30:764–776. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2020.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Velotti F., Barchetta I., Cimini F.A., Cavallo M.G. Granzyme B in Inflammatory Diseases: Apoptosis, Inflammation, Extracellular Matrix Remodeling, Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition and Fibrosis. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:587581. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.587581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yao P.-L., Parmar V.M., Choudhary M., Malek G. NURR1 Expression Regulates Retinal Pigment Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition and Age-Related Macular Degeneration Phenotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2022;119:e2202256119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2202256119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yoshizawa K. Expression of Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator/Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor and Maspin in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Association with Mode of Invasion and Clinicopathological Factors. Oncol. Rep. 2011;26:1555–1560. doi: 10.3892/or.2011.1419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gupta R., Chetty C., Bhoopathi P., Lakka S., Mohanam S., Rao J.S., Dinh D.H. Downregulation of UPA/UPAR Inhibits Intermittent Hypoxia-Induced Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) in DAOY and D283 Medulloblastoma Cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2011;38:733–744. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2010.883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chang A.-C., Lien M.-Y., Tsai M.-H., Hua C.-H., Tang C.-H. WISP-1 Promotes Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells via the MiR-153-3p/Snail Axis. Cancers. 2019;11:1903. doi: 10.3390/cancers11121903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang S., Zhou X., Wang B., Zhang K., Liu S., Yue K., Zhang L., Wang X. Loss of VHL Expression Contributes to Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2014;50:809–817. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hung P.-S., Tu H.-F., Kao S.-Y., Yang C.-C., Liu C.-J., Huang T.-Y., Chang K.-W., Lin S.-C. MiR-31 Is Upregulated in Oral Premalignant Epithelium and Contributes to the Immortalization of Normal Oral Keratinocytes. Carcinogenesis. 2014;35:1162–1171. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgu024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Agnihotri N.S., Astekar M. The Role of Novel Prognostic Markers PROX1 and FOXC2 in Carcinogenesis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J. Exp. Ther. Oncol. 2018;12:171–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yao Z., An W., Tuerdi M., Zhao J. Identification of Novel Prognostic Indicators for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Based on Proteomics and Metabolomics. Transl. Oncol. 2023;33:101672. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dudley A.C., Griffioen A.W. Pathological Angiogenesis: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies. Angiogenesis. 2023;26:313–347. doi: 10.1007/s10456-023-09876-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mabeta P., Steenkamp V. The VEGF/VEGFR Axis Revisited: Implications for Cancer Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:15585. doi: 10.3390/ijms232415585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yanase M., Kato K., Yoshizawa K., Noguchi N., Kitahara H., Nakamura H. Prognostic Value of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors A and C in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2014;43:514–520. doi: 10.1111/jop.12167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sun Q., Wang Y., Ji H., Sun X., Xie S., Chen L., Li S., Zeng W., Chen R., Tang Q., et al. Lenvatinib for Effectively Treating Antiangiogenic Drug-Resistant Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13:724. doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-05171-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tsigkos S., Zhou Z., Kotanidou A., Fulton D., Zakynthinos S., Roussos C., Papapetropoulos A. Regulation of Ang2 Release by PTEN/PI3-kinase/Akt in Lung Microvascular Endothelial Cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 2006;207:506–511. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Khan K.A., Wu F.T., Cruz-Munoz W., Kerbel R.S. Ang2 Inhibitors and Tie2 Activators: Potential Therapeutics in Perioperative Treatment of Early Stage Cancer. EMBO Mol. Med. 2021;13:e08253. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201708253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li C., Sun C., Fan J., Geng N., Li C., Liao J., Mi K., Zhu G., Ma H., Song Y., et al. Angiopoietin-2 Expression Is Correlated with Angiogenesis and Overall Survival in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Med. Oncol. 2013;30:571. doi: 10.1007/s12032-013-0571-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nayak S., Goel M.M., Makker A., Bhatia V., Chandra S., Kumar S., Agarwal S.P. Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF-2) and Its Receptors FGFR-2 and FGFR-3 May Be Putative Biomarkers of Malignant Transformation of Potentially Malignant Oral Lesions into Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0138801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gupta S., Shetty D., Gulati N., Juneja S., Jain A. Potentiated Action on the Progression of OSMF by Hypoxia Mediated Signaling Pathway by the Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition and Angiogenic Apparatus. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2023;19:S389–S396. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_502_21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mariz B.A.L.A., Soares C.D., Morais T.M.L., Fonseca F.P., de Carvalho M.G.F., Jorge J. Expression of FGF-2/FGFR-1 in Normal Mucosa, Salivary Gland, Preneoplastic, and Neoplastic Lesions of the Oral Cavity. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2018;47:816–822. doi: 10.1111/jop.12773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lonardi S., Missale F., Calza S., Bugatti M., Vescovi R., Debora B., Uppaluri R., Egloff A.M., Mattavelli D., Lombardi D., et al. Tumor-associated Neutrophils (TANs) in Human Carcinoma-draining Lymph Nodes: A Novel TAN Compartment. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 2021;10:e1252. doi: 10.1002/cti2.1252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Irani S., Dehghan A. The Expression and Functional Significance of Vascular Endothelial-Cadherin, CD44, and Vimentin in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2018;8:110. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_408_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li C., Li Q., Cai Y., He Y., Lan X., Wang W., Liu J., Wang S., Zhu G., Fan J., et al. Overexpression of Angiopoietin 2 Promotes the Formation of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Increasing Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition-Induced Angiogenesis. Cancer Gene Ther. 2016;23:295–302. doi: 10.1038/cgt.2016.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Li X., Wang C., Zhang H., Li Y., Hou D., Liu D., Xu R., Cheng J., Liu L., Fu Y., et al. CircFNDC3B Accelerates Vasculature Formation and Metastasis in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2023;83:1459–1475. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-22-2585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Morita Y., Hata K., Nakanishi M., Omata T., Morita N., Yura Y., Nishimura R., Yoneda T. Cellular Fibronectin 1 Promotes VEGF-C Expression, Lymphangiogenesis and Lymph Node Metastasis Associated with Human Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Clin. Exp. Metastasis. 2015;32:739–753. doi: 10.1007/s10585-015-9741-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Panda A., Mishra P., Mohanty A., Sundaragiri K.S., Singh A., Jha K. Is Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition a New Roadway in the Pathogenesis of Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Comprehensive Review. Cureus. 2022;14:e29636. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wilkins-Port C.E., Higgins P.J. Regulation of Extracellular Matrix Remodeling Following Transforming Growth Factor-Beta1/Epidermal Growth Factor-Stimulated Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Human Premalignant Keratinocytes. Cells. Tissues. Organs. 2007;185:116–122. doi: 10.1159/000101312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shetty S.S., Sharma M., Fonseca F.P., Jayaram P., Tanwar A.S., Kabekkodu S.P., Kapaettu S., Radhakrishnan R. Signaling Pathways Promoting Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition in Oral Submucous Fibrosis and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 2020;56:97–108. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2020.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Xu Q., Deng F., Qin Y., Zhao Z., Wu Z., Xing Z., Ji A., Wang Q.J. Long Non-Coding RNA Regulation of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Cancer Metastasis. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7:e2254. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lee J., Roberts J.S., Atanasova K.R., Chowdhury N., Han K., Yilmaz Ö. Human Primary Epithelial Cells Acquire an Epithelial-Mesenchymal-Transition Phenotype during Long-Term Infection by the Oral Opportunistic Pathogen, Porphyromonas Gingivalis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017;7:493. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hosseini K., Trus P., Frenzel A., Werner C., Fischer-Friedrich E. Skin Epithelial Cells Change Their Mechanics and Proliferation upon Snail-Mediated EMT Signalling. Soft Matter. 2022;18:2585–2596. doi: 10.1039/D2SM00159D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhang Z., Zhu H., Liu Y., Quan F., Zhang X., Yu L. LncRNA HOTAIR Mediates TGF-Β2-Induced Cell Growth and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Human Lens Epithelial Cells. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2018;50:1028–1037. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmy101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dong Z., Chen J., Yang X., Zheng W., Wang L., Fang M., Wu M., Yao M., Yao D. Ang-2 Promotes Lung Cancer Metastasis by Increasing Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. Oncotarget. 2018;9:12705–12717. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Warnakulasuriya S. Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders: A Comprehensive Review on Clinical Aspects and Management. Oral Oncol. 2020;102:104550. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.González-Arriagada W.A., Canedo-Marroquin G., Adorno-Farías D., Fernández-Ramires R. New Insights into the Role of the Oral Leukoplakia Microenvironment in Malignant Transformation. Front. Oral Health. 2024;5:1363052. doi: 10.3389/froh.2024.1363052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Etemad-Moghadam S., Alaeddini M. Invasion Phenotypes of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. AIMM. 2015;23:e12–e16. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kurkalang S., Roy S., Acharya A., Mazumder P., Mazumder S., Patra S., Ghosh S., Sarkar S., Kundu S., Biswas N.K., et al. Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis of Gingivo-Buccal Oral Cancer Reveals Two Dominant Cellular Programs. Cancer Sci. 2023;114:4732–4746. doi: 10.1111/cas.15979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Xu W., Yang Z., Lu N. A New Role for the PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathway in the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. Cell Adh. Migr. 2015;9:317–324. doi: 10.1080/19336918.2015.1016686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lee C.-H., Chang J.S.-M., Syu S.-H., Wong T.-S., Chan J.Y.-W., Tang Y.-C., Yang Z.-P., Yang W.-C., Chen C.-T., Lu S.-C., et al. IL-1β Promotes Malignant Transformation and Tumor Aggressiveness in Oral Cancer. J. Cell. Physiol. 2015;230:875–884. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Davies M., Robinson M., Smith E., Huntley S., Prime S., Paterson I. Induction of an Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition in Human Immortal and Malignant Keratinocytes by TGF-Beta1 Involves MAPK, Smad and AP-1 Signalling Pathways. J. Cell. Biochem. 2005;95:918–931. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Liu W., Yao Y., Shi L., Tang G., Wu L. A Novel LncRNA LOLA1 May Predict Malignant Progression and Promote Migration, Invasion, and EMT of Oral Leukoplakia via the AKT/GSK-3β Pathway. J. Cell. Biochem. 2021;122:1302–1312. doi: 10.1002/jcb.29951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Xie C., Li Z., Hua Y., Sun S., Zhong L., Chen Q., Feng H., Ji N., Li T., Zhou X., et al. Identification of a BRAF/PA28γ/MEK1 Signaling Axis and Its Role in Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Oral Submucous Fibrosis. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13:701. doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-05152-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Jiang W., Zhang C., Zhang X., Sun L., Li J., Zuo J. CircRNA HIPK3 Promotes the Progression of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma through Upregulation of the NUPR1/PI3K/AKT Pathway by Sponging MiR-637. Ann. Transl. Med. 2021;9:860. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-1908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Elsum I.A., Martin C., Humbert P.O. Scribble Regulates an EMT–Polarity Pathway through Modulation of MAPK-ERK Signaling to Mediate Junction Formation. J. Cell Sci. 2013;126:3990–3999. doi: 10.1242/jcs.129387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.HAN Y., LUO Y., WANG Y., CHEN Y., LI M., JIANG Y. Hepatocyte Growth Factor Increases the Invasive Potential of PC-3 Human Prostate Cancer Cells via an ERK/MAPK and Zeb-1 Signaling Pathway. Oncol. Lett. 2016;11:753–759. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.3943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Fan J., Fan Y., Wang X., Niu L., Duan L., Yang J., Li L., Gao Y., Wu X., Luo C. PLCε Regulates Prostate Cancer Mitochondrial Oxidative Metabolism and Migration via Upregulation of Twist1. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019;38:337. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1323-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Marquard F.E., Jücker M. PI3K/AKT/MTOR Signaling as a Molecular Target in Head and Neck Cancer. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2020;172:113729. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2019.113729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Mishima K., Yamada E., Masui K., Shimokawara T., Takayama K., Sugimura M., Ichijima K. Overexpression of the ERK/MAP Kinases in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Mod. Pathol. 1998;11:886–891. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Massarelli E., Liu D.D., Lee J.J., El-Naggar A.K., Lo Muzio L., Staibano S., De Placido S., Myers J.N., Papadimitrakopoulou V.A. Akt Activation Correlates with Adverse Outcome in Tongue Cancer. Cancer. 2005;104:2430–2436. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Pramanik K.K., Mishra R. ERK-Mediated Upregulation of Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Promotes the Invasiveness in Human Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) Exp. Cell Res. 2022;411:112984. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2021.112984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Shen T., Yang T., Yao M., Zheng Z., He M., Shao M., Li J., Fang C. BTC as a Novel Biomarker Contributing to EMT via the PI3K-AKT Pathway in OSCC. Front. Genet. 2022;13:875617. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.875617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wang R., Lu X., Yu R. LncRNA MALAT1 Promotes EMT Process and Cisplatin Resistance of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma via PI3K/AKT/m-TOR Signal Pathway. Onco. Targets. Ther. 2020;13:4049–4061. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S251518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Cheng S.-C., Huang W.-C., Pang J.-H.S., Wu Y.-H., Cheng C.-Y. Quercetin Inhibits the Production of IL-1β-Induced Inflammatory Cytokines and Chemokines in ARPE-19 Cells via the MAPK and NF-ΚB Signaling Pathways. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:2957. doi: 10.3390/ijms20122957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hsu P.-Y., Chen J.-L., Kuo S.-L., Wang W.-L., Jan F.-W., Yang S.-H., Yang C.-Y. San-Zhong-Kui-Jian-Tang Exerts Antitumor Effects Associated With Decreased Cell Proliferation and Metastasis by Targeting ERK and the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Pathway in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2022;21:15347354221134920. doi: 10.1177/15347354221134921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ohnishi Y., Sakamoto T., Zhengguang L., Yasui H., Hamada H., Kubo H., Nakajima M. Curcumin Inhibits Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Oral Cancer Cells via c-Met Blockade. Oncol. Lett. 2020;19:4177–4182. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ha G.-H., Park J.-S., Breuer E.-K.Y. TACC3 Promotes Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) through the Activation of PI3K/Akt and ERK Signaling Pathways. Cancer Lett. 2013;332:63–73. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Albadari N., Deng S., Li W. The Transcriptional Factors HIF-1 and HIF-2 and Their Novel Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2019;14:667–682. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2019.1613370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Qiu Y.-Y., Hu S.-J., Bao Y.-J., Liang B., Yan C.-N., Shi X.-J., Yu H., Zou Y., Tang L.-R., Tang Q.-F., et al. Anti-Angiogenic and Anti-Proliferative Effects of Inhibition of HIF-1α by p-HIF-1α RNAi in Colorectal Cancer. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015;8:7913–7920. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Zhang W., Sun L., Gao H., Wang S. Mechanism of the HIF-1α/VEGF/VEGFR-2 Pathway in the Proliferation and Apoptosis of Human Haemangioma Endothelial Cells. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2023;104:258–268. doi: 10.1111/iep.12485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Eckert A.W., Kappler M., Schubert J., Taubert H. Correlation of Expression of Hypoxia-Related Proteins with Prognosis in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2012;16:189–196. doi: 10.1007/s10006-012-0335-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Arseneault R., Chien A., Newington J.T., Rappon T., Harris R., Cumming R.C. Attenuation of LDHA Expression in Cancer Cells Leads to Redox-Dependent Alterations in Cytoskeletal Structure and Cell Migration. Cancer Lett. 2013;338:255–266. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.03.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Mustafa E.H., Mahmoud H.T., Al-Hudhud M.Y., Abdalla M.Y., Ahmad I.M., Yasin S.R., Elkarmi A.Z., Tahtamouni L.H. 2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Synergizes with Doxorubicin or L-Buthionine Sulfoximine to Reduce Adhesion and Migration of Breast Cancer Cells. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2015;16:3213–3222. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.8.3213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Pichiule P., Chavez J.C., LaManna J.C. Hypoxic Regulation of Angiopoietin-2 Expression in Endothelial Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:12171–12180. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M305146200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Nagao K., Oka K. HIF-2 Directly Activates CD82 Gene Expression in Endothelial Cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011;407:260–265. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Qin Y., Zhang J., Babapoor-Farrokhran S., Applewhite B., Deshpande M., Megarity H., Flores-Bellver M., Aparicio-Domingo S., Ma T., Rui Y., et al. PAI-1 Is a Vascular Cell–Specific HIF-2–Dependent Angiogenic Factor That Promotes Retinal Neovascularization in Diabetic Patients. Sci. Adv. 2022;8:eabm1896. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abm1896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Gu J., Yamamoto H., Ogawa M., Ngan C.Y., Danno K., Hemmi H., Kyo N., Takemasa I., Ikeda M., Sekimoto M., et al. Hypoxia-Induced up-Regulation of Angiopoietin-2 in Colorectal Cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2006;15:779–783. doi: 10.3892/or.15.4.779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Joseph J.P., Harishankar M.K., Pillai A.A., Devi A. Hypoxia Induced EMT: A Review on the Mechanism of Tumor Progression and Metastasis in OSCC. Oral Oncol. 2018;80:23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Kim J.H. Dexamethasone Inhibits Hypoxia-Induced Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Colon Cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015;21:9887. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i34.9887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Biddle A., Gammon L., Liang X., Costea D.E., Mackenzie I.C. Phenotypic Plasticity Determines Cancer Stem Cell Therapeutic Resistance in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. eBioMedicine. 2016;4:138–145. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Ramos G.d.O., Bernardi L., Lauxen I., Sant’Ana Filho M., Horwitz A.R., Lamers M.L. Fibronectin Modulates Cell Adhesion and Signaling to Promote Single Cell Migration of Highly Invasive Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0151338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Naruse T., Kawasaki G., Yanamoto S., Mizuno A., Umeda M. Immunohistochemical Study of VEGF Expression in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas: Correlation with the MTOR-HIF-1α Pathway. Anticancer Res. 2011;31:4429–4437. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Subarnbhesaj A., Miyauchi M., Chanbora C., Mikuriya A., Nguyen P.T., Furusho H., Ayuningtyas N.F., Fujita M., Toratani S., Takechi M., et al. Roles of VEGF-Flt-1 Signaling in Malignant Behaviors of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0187092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Freeman M.R., Schneck F.X., Gagnon M.L., Corless C., Soker S., Niknejad K., Peoples G.E., Klagsbrun M. Peripheral Blood T Lymphocytes and Lymphocytes Infiltrating Human Cancers Express Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor: A Potential Role for T Cells in Angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 1995;55:4140–4145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Marone G., Borriello F., Varricchi G., Genovese A., Granata F. Basophils: Historical Reflections and Perspectives. Hist. Allergy. 2014;100:172–192. doi: 10.1159/000358734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Kasama T., Miwa Y., Isozaki T., Odai T., Adachi M., Kunkel S. Neutrophil-Derived Cytokines: Potential Therapeutic Targets in Inflammation. Curr. Drug Target-Inflamm. Allergy. 2005;4:273–279. doi: 10.2174/1568010054022114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Butoi E., Gan A.M., Tucureanu M.M., Stan D., Macarie R.D., Constantinescu C., Calin M., Simionescu M., Manduteanu I. Cross-Talk between Macrophages and Smooth Muscle Cells Impairs Collagen and Metalloprotease Synthesis and Promotes Angiogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Mol. Cell Res. 2016;1863:1568–1578. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2016.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Yahya S.M.M., Abdelhamid A.O., Abd-Elhalim M.M., Elsayed G.H., Eskander E.F. The Effect of Newly Synthesized Progesterone Derivatives on Apoptotic and Angiogenic Pathway in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells. Steroids. 2017;126:15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2017.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Collazos-Alemán J.D., Gnecco-González S., Jaramillo-Zarama B., Jiménez-Mora M.A., Mendivil C.O. The Role of Angiopoietins in Neovascular Diabetes-Related Retinal Diseases. Diabetes Ther. 2022;13:1811–1821. doi: 10.1007/s13300-022-01326-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Jonke E., Gemperli A.C., Zhang T., Özdemir B., Dard M., Rausch-Fan X., Andrukhov O. Effect of Tyrosine-Rich Amelogenin Peptide on Behavior and Differentiation of Endothelial Cells. Clin. Oral Investig. 2016;20:2275–2284. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1726-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Koike Y., Yozaki M., Utani A., Murota H. Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 Accelerates the Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition in Keratinocytes during Wound Healing Process. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:18545. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75584-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Mariz B.A.L.A., Sales de Sá R., Araújo A.L.D., Fernandes C.I.R., Mariano F.V., Santos-Silva A.R., Lopes M.A., Vargas P.A., de Almeida O.P., Kowalski L.P., et al. FGFR1 Is an Important Prognostic Factor in Oral Leukoplakia and Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2023;52:119–126. doi: 10.1111/jop.13398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Partridge M., Kiguwa S., Luqmani Y., Langdon J.D. Expression of BFGF, KGF and FGF Receptors on Normal Oral Mucosa and SCC. Eur. J. Cancer Part B Oral Oncol. 1996;32:76–82. doi: 10.1016/0964-1955(95)00056-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Blotnick S., Peoples G.E., Freeman M.R., Eberlein T.J., Klagsbrun M. T Lymphocytes Synthesize and Export Heparin-Binding Epidermal Growth Factor-like Growth Factor and Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor, Mitogens for Vascular Cells and Fibroblasts: Differential Production and Release by CD4+ and CD8+ T Cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1994;91:2890–2894. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.8.2890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Fujii T., Kuwano H. Regulation of the Expression Balance of Angiopoietin-1 and Angiopoietin-2 by Shh and FGF-2. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol.-Anim. 2010;46:487–491. doi: 10.1007/s11626-009-9270-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Murata M., Hara K., Saku T. Dynamic Distribution of Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor during Epulis Formation: An Immunohistochemical Study in an Enhanced Healing Process of the Gingiva. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 1997;26:224–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1997.tb01228.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Chen F., Qi S., Zhang X., Wu J., Yang X., Wang R. MiR-23a-3p Suppresses Cell Proliferation in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas by Targeting FGF2 and Correlates with a Better Prognosis. Pathol.-Res. Pract. 2019;215:660–667. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2018.12.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Dickens S., Vermeulen P., Hendrickx B., Van den Berge S., Vranckx J.J. Regulable Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor 165 Overexpression by Ex Vivo Expanded Keratinocyte Cultures Promotes Matrix Formation, Angiogenesis, and Healing in Porcine Full-Thickness Wounds. Tissue Eng. Part A. 2008;14:19–27. doi: 10.1089/ten.a.2007.0060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Larcher F., Franco M., Bolontrade M., Rodriguez-Puebla M., Casanova L., Navarro M., Yancopoulos G., Jorcano J.L., Conti C.J. Modulation of the Angiogenesis Response through Ha- Ras Control, Placenta Growth Factor, and Angiopoietin Expression in Mouse Skin Carcinogenesis. Mol. Carcinog. 2003;37:83–90. doi: 10.1002/mc.10126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Claesson-Welsh L., Welsh M. VEGFA and Tumour Angiogenesis. J. Intern. Med. 2013;273:114–127. doi: 10.1111/joim.12019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Imanishi Y., Hu B., Jarzynka M.J., Guo P., Elishaev E., Bar-Joseph I., Cheng S.-Y. Angiopoietin-2 Stimulates Breast Cancer Metastasis through the A5β1 Integrin-Mediated Pathway. Cancer Res. 2007;67:4254–4263. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Li T., Liu Z., Jiang K., Ruan Q. Angiopoietin2 Enhances Doxorubin Resistance in HepG2 Cells by Upregulating Survivin and Ref-1 via MSK1 Activation. Cancer Lett. 2013;337:276–284. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.04.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Harfouche R., Hussain S.N.A. Signaling and Regulation of Endothelial Cell Survival by Angiopoietin-2. Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol. 2006;291:H1635–H1645. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01318.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Wang Y., Pan X.-F., Liu G.-D., Liu Z.-H., Zhang C., Chen T., Wang Y.-H. FGF-2 Suppresses Neuronal Autophagy by Regulating the PI3K/Akt Pathway in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Brain Res. Bull. 2021;173:132–140. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2021.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Kim B.S., Park J.-Y., Kang H.-J., Kim H.-J., Lee J. Fucoidan/FGF-2 Induces Angiogenesis through JNK- and P38-Mediated Activation of AKT/MMP-2 Signalling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014;450:1333–1338. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.06.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Takai S., Tokuda H., Hanai Y., Kozawa O. Activation of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt Limits FGF-2-Induced VEGF Release in Osteoblasts. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2007;267:46–54. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2006.12.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Tay K.-C., Tan L.T.-H., Chan C.K., Hong S.L., Chan K.-G., Yap W.H., Pusparajah P., Lee L.-H., Goh B.-H. Formononetin: A Review of Its Anticancer Potentials and Mechanisms. Front. Pharmacol. 2019;10:820. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Yang A.D., Camp E.R., Fan F., Shen L., Gray M.J., Liu W., Somcio R., Bauer T.W., Wu Y., Hicklin D.J., et al. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1 Activation Mediates Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition in Human Pancreatic Carcinoma Cells. Cancer Res. 2006;66:46–51. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Chengye W., Yu T., Ping S., Deguang S., Keyun W., Yan W., Rixin Z., Rui L., Zhenming G., Mingliang Y., et al. Metformin Reverses BFGF-Induced Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in HCC Cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8:104247–104257. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Lau M.-T., So W.-K., Leung P.C.K. Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 Induces E-Cadherin Down-Regulation via PI3K/Akt/MTOR and MAPK/ERK Signaling in Ovarian Cancer Cells. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e59083. doi: 10.1371/annotation/ee15c511-4f60-4415-a0f4-c99dcf1bb2e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Sharada P., Swaminathan U., Nagamalini B., Kumar K., Ashwini B., Lavanya V. Coalition of E-Cadherin and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression in Predicting Malignant Transformation in Common Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders. J. Oral Maxillofac. Pathol. 2018;22:40. doi: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_13_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Essid N., Chambard J.C., Elgaaïed A.B. Induction of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) and Gli1 Expression in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) Spheroid Cultures. Bosn. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2018;18:336–346. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2018.3243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Debiais F., Lemonnier J., Hay E., Delannoy P., Caverzasio J., Marie P.J. Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 (FGF-2) Increases N-Cadherin Expression through Protein Kinase C and Src-Kinase Pathways in Human Calvaria Osteoblasts. J. Cell. Biochem. 2001;81:68–81. doi: 10.1002/1097-4644(20010401)81:1<68::AID-JCB1024>3.0.CO;2-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Lee J.G., Jung E., Heur M. Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 Induces Proliferation and Fibrosis via SNAI1-Mediated Activation of CDK2 and ZEB1 in Corneal Endothelium. J. Biol. Chem. 2018;293:3758–3769. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA117.000295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Chuang J.-Y., Chen P.-C., Tsao C.-W., Chang A.-C., Lein M.-Y., Lin C.-C., Wang S.-W., Lin C.-W., Tang C.-H. WISP-1, a Novel Angiogenic Regulator of the CCN Family, Promotes Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Angiogenesis through VEGF-A Expression. Oncotarget. 2015;6:4239–4252. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Tang C.-H., Yang R.-S., Huang T.-H., Liu S.-H., Fu W.-M. Enhancement of Fibronectin Fibrillogenesis and Bone Formation by Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor via Protein Kinase C-Dependent Pathway in Rat Osteoblasts. Mol. Pharmacol. 2004;66:440–449. doi: 10.1124/mol.66.3.. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Wang H., Keiser J.A. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Upregulates the Expression of Matrix Metalloproteinases in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells. Circ. Res. 1998;83:832–840. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.83.8.832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Etoh T., Inoue H., Tanaka S., Barnard G.F., Kitano S., Mori M. Angiopoietin-2 Is Related to Tumor Angiogenesis in Gastric Carcinoma: Possible in Vivo Regulation via Induction of Proteases. Cancer Res. 2001;61:2145–2153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Aho S., Rouda S., Kennedy S.H., Qin H., Tan E.M.L. Regulation of Human Interstitial Collagenase (Matrix Metalloproteinase-1) Promoter Activity by Fibroblast Growth Factor. Eur. J. Biochem. 1997;247:503–510. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.00503.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Belotti D., Calcagno C., Garofalo A., Caronia D., Riccardi E., Giavazzi R., Taraboletti G. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Stimulates Organ-Specific Host Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Expression and Ovarian Cancer Invasion. Mol. Cancer Res. 2008;6:525–534. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-07-0366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Deng S., Zhou J., Peng H., Fang H., Liu F., Weng J. Local Intra-articular Injection of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Accelerates Articular Cartilage Degeneration in Rat Osteoarthritis Model. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018;17:6311–6318. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.8652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Dias S., Hattori K., Zhu Z., Heissig B., Choy M., Lane W., Wu Y., Chadburn A., Hyjek E., Gill M., et al. Autocrine Stimulation of VEGFR-2 Activates Human Leukemic Cell Growth and Migration. J. Clin. Investig. 2000;106:511–521. doi: 10.1172/JCI8978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Korompelis P., Piperi C., Adamopoulos C., Dalagiorgou G., Korkolopoulou P., Sepsa A., Antsaklis A., Papavassiliou A.G. Expression of Vascular Endothelial Factor-A, Gelatinases (MMP-2, MMP-9) and TIMP-1 in Uterine Leiomyomas. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2015;53:1415–1424. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-0798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Munaut C., Noël A., Hougrand O., Foidart J., Boniver J., Deprez M. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression Correlates with Matrix Metalloproteinases MT1-MMP, MMP-2 and MMP-9 in Human Glioblastomas. Int. J. Cancer. 2003;106:848–855. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Noda K., Ishida S., Shinoda H., Koto T., Aoki T., Tsubota K., Oguchi Y., Okada Y., Ikeda E. Hypoxia Induces the Expression of Membrane-Type 1 Matrix Metalloproteinase in Retinal Glial Cells. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005;46:3817. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-1528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Shan B., Li W., Yang S.-Y., Li Z.-R. Estrogen Up-Regulates MMP2/9 Expression in Endometrial Epithelial Cell via VEGF-ERK1/2 Pathway. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2013;6:826–830. doi: 10.1016/S1995-7645(13)60146-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Yao G., He P., Chen L., Hu X., Gu F., Ye C. MT1-MMP in Breast Cancer: Induction of VEGF-C Correlates with Metastasis and Poor Prognosis. Cancer Cell Int. 2013;13:98. doi: 10.1186/1475-2867-13-98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Kim M.H. Flavonoids Inhibit VEGF/BFGF-induced Angiogenesis in Vitro by Inhibiting the Matrix-degrading Proteases. J. Cell. Biochem. 2003;89:529–538. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Das A., Fanslow W., Cerretti D., Warren E., Talarico N., McGuire P. Angiopoietin/Tek Interactions Regulate MMP-9 Expression and Retinal Neovascularization. Lab. Investig. 2003;83:1637–1645. doi: 10.1097/01.LAB.0000097189.79233.D8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Li L., Ma Q., Mou J., Wang M., Ye J., Sun G. Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Gel Preparation Induces Angiogenesis during Wound Healing. Int. J. Artif. Organs. 2023;46:171–181. doi: 10.1177/03913988221145525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Toschi E., Barillari G., Sgadari C., Bacigalupo I., Cereseto A., Carlei D., Palladino C., Zietz C., Leone P., Stürzl M., et al. Activation of Matrix-Metalloproteinase-2 and Membrane-Type-1-Matrix-Metalloproteinase in Endothelial Cells and Induction of Vascular Permeability In Vivo by Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 Tat Protein and Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2001;12:2934–2946. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.10.2934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Zhang Y., Wang R., Zhang H., Liu L., An J., Hao J., Ma J. Plumbagin Inhibits Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion of Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells Induced by FGF-2. Tissue Cell. 2021;72:101547. doi: 10.1016/j.tice.2021.101547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Law A.Y.S., Wong C.K.C. Stanniocalcin-1 and -2 Promote Angiogenic Sprouting in HUVECs via VEGF/VEGFR2 and Angiopoietin Signaling Pathways. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2013;374:73–81. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2013.04.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Shi H.-X., Lin C., Lin B.-B., Wang Z.-G., Zhang H.-Y., Wu F.-Z., Cheng Y., Xiang L.-J., Guo D.-J., Luo X., et al. The Anti-Scar Effects of Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor on the Wound Repair In Vitro and In Vivo. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e59966. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Sher I., Adham S.A., Petrik J., Coomber B.L. Autocrine VEGF-A/KDR Loop Protects Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma Cells from Anoikis. Int. J. Cancer. 2009;124:553–561. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Campos M.S., Neiva K.G., Meyers K.A., Krishnamurthy S., Nör J.E. Endothelial Derived Factors Inhibit Anoikis of Head and Neck Cancer Stem Cells. Oral Oncol. 2012;48:26–32. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Wang X., Lin G., Martins-Taylor K., Zeng H., Xu R.-H. Inhibition of Caspase-Mediated Anoikis Is Critical for Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor-Sustained Culture of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:34054–34064. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.052290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Maehara O., Suda G., Natsuizaka M., Ohnishi S., Komatsu Y., Sato F., Nakai M., Sho T., Morikawa K., Ogawa K., et al. Fibroblast Growth Factor-2–Mediated FGFR/Erk Signaling Supports Maintenance of Cancer Stem-like Cells in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2017;38:1073–1083. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgx095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Mercurio A.M. VEGF/Neuropilin Signaling in Cancer Stem Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:490. doi: 10.3390/ijms20030490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Martin C.E., Nguyen A., Kang M.K., Kim R.H., Park N.-H., Shin K.-H. DYRK1A Is Required for Maintenance of Cancer Stemness, Contributing to Tumorigenic Potential in Oral/Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Exp. Cell Res. 2021;405:112656. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2021.112656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Basini G., Santini S.E., Bussolati S., Grasselli F. Sanguinarine Inhibits VEGF-Induced Akt Phosphorylation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2007;1095:371–376. doi: 10.1196/annals.1397.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Ruan G.-X., Kazlauskas A. Axl Is Essential for VEGF-A-Dependent Activation of PI3K/Akt. EMBO J. 2012;31:1692–1703. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Zhong L., Pan Y., Shen J. FBXW7 Inhibits Invasion, Migration and Angiogenesis in Ovarian Cancer Cells by Suppressing VEGF Expression through Inactivation of Β-catenin Signaling. Exp. Ther. Med. 2021;21:514. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.9945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Gao H., Lan X., Li S., Xue Y. Relationships of MMP-9, E-Cadherin, and VEGF Expression with Clinicopathological Features and Response to Chemosensitivity in Gastric Cancer. Tumor Biol. 2017;39:101042831769836. doi: 10.1177/1010428317698368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Llorián-Salvador M., Byrne E.M., Szczepan M., Little K., Chen M., Xu H. Complement Activation Contributes to Subretinal Fibrosis through the Induction of Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) in Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells. J. Neuroinflamm. 2022;19:182. doi: 10.1186/s12974-022-02546-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Wang H., Ran H., Yin Y., Xu X., Jiang B., Yu S., Chen Y., Ren H., Feng S., Zhang J., et al. Catalpol Improves Impaired Neurovascular Unit in Ischemic Stroke Rats via Enhancing VEGF-PI3K/AKT and VEGF-MEK1/2/ERK1/2 Signaling. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2022;43:1670–1685. doi: 10.1038/s41401-021-00803-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Sun Z., Luo Q., Ye D., Chen W., Chen F. Role of Toll-like Receptor 4 on the Immune Escape of Human Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Resistance of Cisplatin-Induced Apoptosis. Mol. Cancer. 2012;11:33. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-11-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Aggarwal S., John S., Sapra L., Sharma S.C., Das S.N. Targeted Disruption of PI3K/Akt/MTOR Signaling Pathway, via PI3K Inhibitors, Promotes Growth Inhibitory Effects in Oral Cancer Cells. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2019;83:451–461. doi: 10.1007/s00280-018-3746-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Song Y., Zeng S., Zheng G., Chen D., Li P., Yang M., Luo K., Yin J., Gu Y., Zhang Z., et al. FOXO3a-Driven MiRNA Signatures Suppresses VEGF-A/NRP1 Signaling and Breast Cancer Metastasis. Oncogene. 2021;40:777–790. doi: 10.1038/s41388-020-01562-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Sławińska-Brych A., Mizerska-Kowalska M., Król S.K., Stepulak A., Zdzisińska B. Xanthohumol Impairs the PMA-Driven Invasive Behaviour of Lung Cancer Cell Line A549 and Exerts Anti-EMT Action. Cells. 2021;10:1484. doi: 10.3390/cells10061484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Shin J.-M., Jeong Y.-J., Cho H.-J., Park K.-K., Chung I.-K., Lee I.-K., Kwak J.-Y., Chang H.-W., Kim C.-H., Moon S.-K., et al. Melittin Suppresses HIF-1α/VEGF Expression through Inhibition of ERK and MTOR/P70S6K Pathway in Human Cervical Carcinoma Cells. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e69380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Maduabuchi W.O., Tansi F.L., Heller R., Hilger I. Hyperthermia Influences the Secretion Signature of Tumor Cells and Affects Endothelial Cell Sprouting. Biomedicines. 2023;11:2256. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11082256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Kong X., Zhang Y., Liu C., Guo W., Li X., Su X., Wan H., Sun Y., Lin N. Anti-Angiogenic Effect of Triptolide in Rheumatoid Arthritis by Targeting Angiogenic Cascade. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e77513. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Harada K., Supriatno, Kawashima Y., Yoshida H., Sato M. S-1 Inhibits Tumorigenicity and Angiogenesis of Human Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells by Suppressing Expression of Phosphorylated Akt, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Fibroblast Growth Factor-2. Int. J. Oncol. 2007;30:365–374. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Kanda S., Miyata Y., Mochizuki Y., Matsuyama T., Kanetake H. Angiopoietin 1 Is Mitogenic for Cultured Endothelial Cells. Cancer Res. 2005;65:6820–6827. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.WANG F., DONG X., XIU P., ZHONG J., WEI H., XU Z., LI T., LIU F., SUN X., LI J. T7 Peptide Inhibits Angiogenesis via Downregulation of Angiopoietin-2 and Autophagy. Oncol. Rep. 2015;33:675–684. doi: 10.3892/or.2014.3653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Gu Z., Zhou R., Hong D., Han Y., Wang L., Li J., Zhang Z., Shi C. Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors 1 and 4 Combined with Lymph Node Metastasis Predicts Poor Prognosis in Oral Cancer. Oral Dis. 2024;30:1004–1017. doi: 10.1111/odi.14542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Lee H.T., Lee J.G., Na M., Kay E.P. FGF-2 Induced by Interleukin-1β through the Action of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Mediates Endothelial Mesenchymal Transformation in Corneal Endothelial Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:32325–32332. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M405208200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Regeenes R., Silva P.N., Chang H.H., Arany E.J., Shukalyuk A.I., Audet J., Kilkenny D.M., Rocheleau J.V. Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 5 (FGFR5) Is a Co-Receptor for FGFR1 That Is up-Regulated in Beta-Cells by Cytokine-Induced Inflammation. J. Biol. Chem. 2018;293:17218–17228. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.003036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Li S., Huang Q., Mao J., LI Q. FGF Signaling Mediates Definitive Endoderm Formation by Regulating Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition and Cell Proliferation. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2020;64:471–477. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.190372ql. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Li A., Guo H., Luo X., Sheng J., Yang S., Yin Y., Zhou J., Zhou J., Li A., Guo H., et al. Apomorphine-induced Activation of Dopamine Receptors Modulates FGF-2 Expression in Astrocytic Cultures and Promotes Survival of Dopaminergic Neurons. FASEB J. 2006;20:1263–1265. doi: 10.1096/fj.05-5510fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Pezzatini S., Morbidelli L., Solito R., Paccagnini E., Boanini E., Bigi A., Ziche M. Nanostructured HA Crystals Up-Regulate FGF-2 Expression and Activity in Microvascular Endothelium Promoting Angiogenesis. Bone. 2007;41:523–534. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Kanaya S., Xiao B., Sakisaka Y., Suto M., Maruyama K., Saito M., Nemoto E. Extracellular Calcium Increases Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 Gene Expression via Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2 and Protein Kinase A Signaling in Mouse Dental Papilla Cells. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2018;26:e20170231. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Choi Y.K. A Positive Circuit of VEGF Increases Glut-1 Expression by Increasing HIF-1α Gene Expression in Human Retinal Endothelial Cells. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2017;40:1433–1442. doi: 10.1007/s12272-017-0971-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Shi Y., Wang Y., Bingle L., Gong L., Heng W., Li Y., Fang W. In Vitro Study of HIF-1 Activation and VEGF Release by BFGF in the T47D Breast Cancer Cell Line under Normoxic Conditions: Involvement of PI-3K/Akt and MEK1/ERK Pathways. J. Pathol. 2005;205:530–536. doi: 10.1002/path.1734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Witmer A.N., van Blijswijk B.C., van Noorden C.J.F., Vrensen G.F.J.M., Schlingemann R.O. In Vivo Angiogenic Phenotype of Endothelial Cells and Pericytes Induced by Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2004;52:39–52. doi: 10.1177/002215540405200105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Zhao F., Deng J., Yu X., Li D., Shi H., Zhao Y. Protective Effects of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Cultured Brain Endothelial Cells against Hypoglycemia. Metab. Brain Dis. 2015;30:999–1007. doi: 10.1007/s11011-015-9659-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Marzano M., Chen X., Russell T.A., Medina A., Wang Z., Hua T., Zeng C., Wang X., Sang Q.-X., Tang H., et al. Studying the Inflammatory Responses to Amyloid Beta Oligomers in Brain-Specific Pericyte and Endothelial Co-Culture From Human Stem Cells. Front. Chem. Eng. 2022;4:927188. doi: 10.3389/fceng.2022.927188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Lee O.-H., Xu J., Fueyo J., Alonso M.M., Liu D., Martin V., Jiang H., Piao Y., Liu T.J., Gomez-Manzano C. Angiopoietin-2 Decreases Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression by Modulating HIF-1α Levels in Gliomas. Oncogene. 2008;27:1310–1314. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Friedl P. Prespecification and Plasticity: Shifting Mechanisms of Cell Migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2004;16:14–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2003.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Mak M., Spill F., Kamm R.D., Zaman M.H. Single-Cell Migration in Complex Microenvironments: Mechanics and Signaling Dynamics. J. Biomech. Eng. 2016;138:021004. doi: 10.1115/1.4032188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Lintz M., Muñoz A., Reinhart-King C.A. The Mechanics of Single Cell and Collective Migration of Tumor Cells. J. Biomech. Eng. 2017;139:0210051–0210059. doi: 10.1115/1.4035121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Barillari G. The Impact of Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 on the Sequential Steps of the Metastatic Process. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:4526. doi: 10.3390/ijms21124526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Arakaki P.A., Marques M.R., Santos M.C.L.G. MMP-1 Polymorphism and Its Relationship to Pathological Processes. J. Biosci. 2009;34:313–320. doi: 10.1007/s12038-009-0035-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Cai M., Zheng Z., Bai Z., Ouyang K., Wu Q., Xu S., Huang L., Jiang Y., Wang L., Gao J., et al. Overexpression of Angiogenic Factors and Matrix Metalloproteinases in the Saliva of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients: Potential Non-Invasive Diagnostic and Therapeutic Biomarkers. BMC Cancer. 2022;22:530. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09630-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Schoumacher M., Goldman R.D., Louvard D., Vignjevic D.M. Actin, Microtubules, and Vimentin Intermediate Filaments Cooperate for Elongation of Invadopodia. J. Cell Biol. 2010;189:541–556. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200909113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Sutoh Yoneyama M., Hatakeyama S., Habuchi T., Inoue T., Nakamura T., Funyu T., Wiche G., Ohyama C., Tsuboi S. Vimentin Intermediate Filament and Plectin Provide a Scaffold for Invadopodia, Facilitating Cancer Cell Invasion and Extravasation for Metastasis. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2014;93:157–169. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2014.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Linder S., Wiesner C., Himmel M. Degrading Devices: Invadosomes in Proteolytic Cell Invasion. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011;27:185–211. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Huveneers S., Danen E.H.J. Adhesion Signaling—Crosstalk between Integrins, Src and Rho. J. Cell Sci. 2009;122:1059–1069. doi: 10.1242/jcs.039446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Radulescu R., Totan A., Imre M., Miricescu D., Didilescu A., Greabu M. Mediators of Extracellular Matrix Degradation and Inflammation: A New Team of Possible Biomarkers for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Stage. Exp. Ther. Med. 2021;22:877. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Ali A., Soares A.B., Eymael D., Magalhaes M. Expression of Invadopodia Markers Can Identify Oral Lesions with a High Risk of Malignant Transformation. J. Pathol. Clin. Res. 2021;7:61–74. doi: 10.1002/cjp2.182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Vipparthi K., Patel A.K., Ghosh S., Das S., Das C., Das K., Sarkar A., Thatikonda V., Pal B., Remani A.S.K.N., et al. Two Novel Cell Culture Models of Buccal Mucosal Oral Cancer from Patients with No Risk-Habits of Tobacco Smoking or Chewing. Oral Oncol. 2021;113:105131. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.105131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Islam M.R., Jones S.J., Macluskey M., Ellis I.R. Is There a PAkt between VEGF and Oral Cancer Cell Migration? Cell. Signal. 2014;26:1294–1302. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2014.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Qu Y., Cao C., Wu Q., Huang A., Song Y., Li H., Zuo Y., Chu C., Li J., Man Y. The Dual Delivery of KGF and BFGF by Collagen Membrane to Promote Skin Wound Healing. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2018;12:1508–1518. doi: 10.1002/term.2691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Soga N., Namba N., McAllister S., Cornelius L., Teitelbaum S.L., Dowdy S.F., Kawamura J., Hruska K.A. Rho Family GTPases Regulate VEGF-Stimulated Endothelial Cell Motility. Exp. Cell Res. 2001;269:73–87. doi: 10.1006/excr.2001.5295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.van der Heijden M., van Nieuw Amerongen G.P., van Bezu J., Paul M.A., Groeneveld A.B.J., van Hinsbergh V.W.M. Opposing Effects of the Angiopoietins on the Thrombin-Induced Permeability of Human Pulmonary Microvascular Endothelial Cells. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e23448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Daubon T., Spuul P., Alonso F., Fremaux I., Génot E. VEGF-A Stimulates Podosome-Mediated Collagen-IV Proteolysis in Microvascular Endothelial Cells. J. Cell Sci. 2016;129:2586–2598. doi: 10.1242/jcs.186585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Dong Y., Alonso F., Jahjah T., Fremaux I., Génot E. Cell Migration in Three Dimensions. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2023. Angiogenesis Invasion Assay to Study Endothelial Cell Invasion and Sprouting Behavior; pp. 345–364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Hamad H.A., Enezei H.H., Alrawas A., Zakuan N.M., Abdullah N.A., Cheah Y.K., Hashim N.F.M. Identification of Potential Chemical Substrates as Fuel for Hypoxic Tumors That May Be Linked to Invadopodium Formation in Hypoxia-Induced MDA-MB-231 Breast-Cancer Cell Line. Molecules. 2020;25:3876. doi: 10.3390/molecules25173876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Ma L.-L., Guo L.-L., Luo Y., Liu G.-L., Lei Y., Jing F.-Y., Zhang Y.-L., Tong G.-H., Jing Z.-L., Shen L., et al. Cdc42 Subcellular Relocation in Response to VEGF/NRP1 Engagement Is Associated with the Poor Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:171. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2370-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Dent E.W., Barnes A.M., Tang F., Kalil K. Netrin-1 and Semaphorin 3A Promote or Inhibit Cortical Axon Branching, Respectively, by Reorganization of the Cytoskeleton. J. Neurosci. 2004;24:3002–3012. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4963-03.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Yoodee S., Peerapen P., Plumworasawat S., Thongboonkerd V. ARID1A Knockdown in Human Endothelial Cells Directly Induces Angiogenesis by Regulating Angiopoietin-2 Secretion and Endothelial Cell Activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021;180:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.02.218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Song Y.-H., Gehmert S., Sadat S., Pinkernell K., Bai X., Matthias N., Alt E. VEGF Is Critical for Spontaneous Differentiation of Stem Cells into Cardiomyocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007;354:999–1003. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.01.095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Song K., Wang Z., Li W., Zhang C., Lim M., Liu T. In Vitro Culture, Determination, and Directed Differentiation of Adult Adipose-Derived Stem Cells towards Cardiomyocyte-like Cells Induced by Angiotensin II. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2013;170:459–470. doi: 10.1007/s12010-013-0210-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Pasumarthi K.B., Doble B.W., Kardami E., Cattini P.A. Over-Expression of CUG- or AUG-Initiated Forms of Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor in Cardiac Myocytes Results in Similar Effects on Mitosis and Protein Synthesis but Distinct Nuclear Morphologies. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 1994;26:1045–1060. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.1994.1125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Le Boeuf F., Houle F., Sussman M., Huot J. Phosphorylation of Focal Adhesion Kinase (FAK) on Ser732 Is Induced by Rho-Dependent Kinase and Is Essential for Proline-Rich Tyrosine Kinase-2-Mediated Phosphorylation of FAK on Tyr407 in Response to Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2006;17:3508–3520. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e05-12-1158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Dong X.F., Zhong J.T., Liu T.Q., Chen Y.Y., Tang Y.T., Yang J.R. Angiopoietin-2 Regulates Vessels Encapsulated by Tumor Clusters Positive Hepatocellular Carcinoma Nest-Type Metastasis via Integrin A5β1. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021;101:654–660. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200605-01780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Weiss T.W., Simak R., Kaun C., Rega G., Pflüger H., Maurer G., Huber K., Wojta J. Oncostatin M and IL-6 Induce u-PA and VEGF in Prostate Cancer Cells and Correlate in Vivo. Anticancer Res. 2011;31:3273–3278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Suh J., Rabson A.B. NF-κB Activation in Human Prostate Cancer: Important Mediator or Epiphenomenon? J. Cell. Biochem. 2004;91:100–117. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Ziche M., Parenti A., Ledda F., Dell’Era P., Granger H.J., Maggi C.A., Presta M. Nitric Oxide Promotes Proliferation and Plasminogen Activator Production by Coronary Venular Endothelium Through Endogenous BFGF. Circ. Res. 1997;80:845–852. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.80.6.845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Matte I., Lane D., Laplante C., Rancourt C., Piché A. Profiling of Cytokines in Human Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Ascites. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2012;2:566–580. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Arndt S., Unger P., Berneburg M., Bosserhoff A.-K., Karrer S. Cold Atmospheric Plasma (CAP) Activates Angiogenesis-Related Molecules in Skin Keratinocytes, Fibroblasts and Endothelial Cells and Improves Wound Angiogenesis in an Autocrine and Paracrine Mode. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2018;89:181–190. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2017.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Kosmehl H., Berndt A., Strassburger S., Borsi L., Rousselle P., Mandel U., Hyckel P., Zardi L., Katenkamp D. Distribution of Laminin and Fibronectin Isoforms in Oral Mucosa and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Br. J. Cancer. 1999;81:1071–1079. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Berndt A., Richter P., Kosmehl H., Franz M. Tenascin-C and Carcinoma Cell Invasion in Oral and Urinary Bladder Cancer. Cell Adh. Migr. 2015;9:105–111. doi: 10.1080/19336918.2015.1005463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Dang D., Atakilit A., Ramos D.M. EMMPRIN Modulates Migration and Deposition of TN-C in Oral Squamous Carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2008;28:2049–2054. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Huang S., Zhang Q.-Y., He A.-E., Li H.-B., Zhang Z.-X. Sex Determining Region Y-Box 9 Induced Microtubule Formation and Epithelial⁃mesenchymal Transition in Human Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma CAL27 Cells. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021;39:74–80. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2021.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Xu L., Corcoran R.B., Welsh J.W., Pennica D., Levine A.J. WISP-1 Is a Wnt-1- and Beta-Catenin-Responsive Oncogene. Genes Dev. 2000;14:585–595. doi: 10.1101/gad.14.5.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Núñez M.A.G., de Matos F.R., Freitas R.d.A., Galvão H.C. Immunohistochemical Study of Integrin A5β1, Fibronectin, and Bcl-2 in Normal Oral Mucosa, Inflammatory Fibroepithelial Hyperplasia, Oral Epithelial Dysplasia, and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. 2013;21:354–361. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0b013e318266c39d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.El-Baz L.M.F., Shoukry N.M., Hafez H.S., Guzy R.D., Salem M.L. Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 Augments Transforming Growth Factor Beta 1 Induced Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Lung Cell Culture Model. Iran. J. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020;19:348. doi: 10.18502/ijaai.v19i4.4110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Guo P., Imanishi Y., Cackowski F.C., Jarzynka M.J., Tao H.-Q., Nishikawa R., Hirose T., Hu B., Cheng S.-Y. Up-Regulation of Angiopoietin-2, Matrix Metalloprotease-2, Membrane Type 1 Metalloprotease, and Laminin 5 γ 2 Correlates with the Invasiveness of Human Glioma. Am. J. Pathol. 2005;166:877–890. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62308-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Ahmad U.S., Parkinson E.K., Wan H. Desmoglein-3 Induces YAP Phosphorylation and Inactivation during Collective Migration of Oral Carcinoma Cells. Mol. Oncol. 2022;16:1625–1649. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.13177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Cheng F., Wang J., Wang R., Pan R., Cui Z., Wang L., Wang L., Yang X. FGF2 Promotes the Proliferation of Injured Granulosa Cells in Premature Ovarian Failure via Hippo-YAP Signaling Pathway. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2024;589:112248. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2024.112248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Fan X., Shan X., Jiang S., Wang S., Zhang F., Tian Q., Chen D., Ma J., Xue F., Mao S., et al. YAP Promotes Endothelial Barrier Repair by Repressing STAT3/VEGF Signaling. Life Sci. 2020;256:117884. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Tuguzbaeva G., Yue E., Chen X., He L., Li X., Ju J., Qin Y., Pavlov V., Lu Y., Jia W., et al. PEP06 Polypeptide 30 Is a Novel Cluster-Dissociating Agent Inhibiting α v Integrin/FAK/Src Signaling in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells. Acta Pharm. Sin. B. 2019;9:1163–1173. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2019.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Kirwan R.P., Felice L., Clark A.F., O’Brien C.J., Leonard M.O. Hypoxia Regulated Gene Transcription in Human Optic Nerve Lamina Cribrosa Cells in Culture. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53:2243–2255. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-6729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Chen Y.-L., Tsai W.-H., Ko Y.-C., Lai T.-Y., Cheng A.-J., Shiah S.-G., Hsiao J.-R., Chang J.-Y., Lin S.-F. Discoidin Domain Receptor-1 (DDR1) Is Involved in Angiolymphatic Invasion in Oral Cancer. Cancers. 2020;12:841. doi: 10.3390/cancers12040841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Hutchings H., Ortega N., Plouët J. Extracellular Matrix-Bound Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Promotes Endothelial Cell Adhesion, Migration, and Survival through Integrin Ligation. FASEB J. 2003;17:1520–1522. doi: 10.1096/fj.02-0691fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Kamarajan P., Alhazzazi T.Y., Danciu T., D’silva N.J., Verdin E., Kapila Y.L. Receptor-interacting Protein (RIP) and Sirtuin-3 (SIRT3) Are on Opposite Sides of Anoikis and Tumorigenesis. Cancer. 2012;118:5800–5810. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Aggarwal S., Devaraja K., Sharma S.C., Das S.N. Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) in Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Its Clinical Significance. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2014;436:35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.04.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Shang Z.-J., Li J.-R., Li Z.-B. Circulating Levels of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2002;31:495–498. doi: 10.1054/ijom.2002.0284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Sun Q., Zhang T., Xiao Q., Mei B., Zhang X. Procyanidin B2 Inhibits Angiogenesis and Cell Growth in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells through the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)/VEGF Receptor 2 (VEGFR2) Pathway. Bioengineered. 2022;13:6500–6508. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2033013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Bessar H., Hammad N.M., Ismail T., Teama M.A., Youssef A. Serum Angiopoietin-2 Level as a Novel Potential Biomarker in Oral Lichen Planus. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2021;20:2940–2944. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Vucicević Boras V., Cikes N., Lukać J., Virag M., Cekić-Arambasin A. Salivary and Serum Interleukin 6 and Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Levels in Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Minerva Stomatol. 2005;54:569–573. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Hase T., Kawashiri S., Tanaka A., Nozaki S., Noguchi N., Kato K., Nakaya H., Nakagawa K. Correlation of Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Expression with the Invasion and the Prognosis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2006;35:136–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2006.00397.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Forsten-Williams K., Chua C.C., Nugent M.A. The Kinetics of FGF-2 Binding to Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycans and MAP Kinase Signaling. J. Theor. Biol. 2005;233:483–499. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Melaiu O., Vanni G., Portarena I., Pistolese C.A., Anemona L., Pomella S., Bei R., Buonomo O.C., Roselli M., Mauriello A., et al. The Combination of Immune Checkpoint Blockade with Tumor Vessel Normalization as a Promising Therapeutic Strategy for Breast Cancer: An Overview of Preclinical and Clinical Studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:3226. doi: 10.3390/ijms24043226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Huang Q., Ding J., Gong M., Wei M., Zhao Q., Yang J. Effect of MiR-30e Regulating NK Cell Activities on Immune Tolerance of Maternal-Fetal Interface by Targeting PRF1. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019;109:1478–1487. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.09.172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Yamauchi J., Takai S., Matsushima-Nishiwaki R., Adachi S., Minamitani C., Natsume H., Mizutani J., Otsuka T., Takeda J., Harada A., et al. Tacrolimus but Not Cyclosporine A Enhances FGF-2-Induced VEGF Release in Osteoblasts. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2009;23:267–272. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Liang L., Kaufmann A.M. The Significance of Cancer Stem Cells and Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition in Metastasis and Anti-Cancer Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:2555. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.De Luca A., Gallo M., Aldinucci D., Ribatti D., Lamura L., D’Alessio A., De Filippi R., Pinto A., Normanno N. Role of the EGFR Ligand/Receptor System in the Secretion of Angiogenic Factors in Mesenchymal Stem Cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 2011;226:2131–2138. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Reya T., Morrison S.J., Clarke M.F., Weissman I.L. Stem Cells, Cancer, and Cancer Stem Cells. Nature. 2001;414:105–111. doi: 10.1038/35102167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Karabid N.M., Wiedemann T., Gulde S., Mohr H., Segaran R.C., Geppert J., Rohm M., Vitale G., Gaudenzi G., Dicitore A., et al. Angpt2/Tie2 Autostimulatory Loop Controls Tumorigenesis. EMBO Mol. Med. 2022;14:e14364. doi: 10.15252/emmm.202114364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Patil S. CD44 Sorted Cells Have an Augmented Potential for Proliferation, Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition, Stemness, and a Predominantly Inflammatory Cytokine and Angiogenic Secretome. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2021;43:423–433. doi: 10.3390/cimb43010034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Patel S.S., Shah K.A., Shah M.J., Kothari K.C., Rawal R.M. Cancer Stem Cells and Stemness Markers in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2014;15:8549–8556. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.20.8549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Joshi J., Patel H., Bhavnagari H., Tarapara B., Pandit A., Shah F. Eliminating Cancer Stem-Like Cells in Oral Cancer by Targeting Elementary Signaling Pathways. Crit. Rev. Oncog. 2022;27:65–82. doi: 10.1615/CritRevOncog.2022047207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Magnes T., Wagner S., Kiem D., Weiss L., Rinnerthaler G., Greil R., Melchardt T. Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:4981. doi: 10.3390/ijms22094981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Jiang C., Liu F., Xiao S., He L., Wu W., Zhao Q. MiR-29a-3p Enhances the Radiosensitivity of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells by Inhibiting ADAM12. Eur. J. Histochem. 2021;65:3295. doi: 10.4081/ejh.2021.3295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Ma H., Shujaat S., Bila M., Nanhekhan L., Vranckx J., Politis C., Jacobs R. Survival Analysis of Segmental Mandibulectomy with Immediate Vascularized Fibula Flap Reconstruction in Stage IV Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients. J. Stomatol. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2022;123:44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2020.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Ghareghomi S., Atabaki V., Abdollahzadeh N., Ahmadian S., Hafez Ghoran S. Bioactive PI3-Kinase/Akt/MTOR Inhibitors in Targeted Lung Cancer Therapy. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2021;13:24. doi: 10.34172/apb.2023.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Fu L., Chen S., He G., Chen Y., Liu B. Targeting Extracellular Signal-Regulated Protein Kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) in Cancer: An Update on Pharmacological Small-Molecule Inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2022;65:13561–13573. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Brusevold I.J., Aasrum M., Bryne M., Christoffersen T. Migration Induced by Epidermal and Hepatocyte Growth Factors in Oral Squamous Carcinoma Cells In Vitro: Role of MEK/ERK, P38 and PI-3 Kinase/Akt. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2012;41:547–558. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2012.01139.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Kashyap T., Pramanik K.K., Nath N., Mishra P., Singh A.K., Nagini S., Rana A., Mishra R. Crosstalk between Raf-MEK-ERK and PI3K-Akt-GSK3β Signaling Networks Promotes Chemoresistance, Invasion/Migration and Stemness via Expression of CD44 Variants (v4 and v6) in Oral Cancer. Oral Oncol. 2018;86:234–243. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Kumar V.B., Hsieh M.-J., Mahalakshmi B., Chuang Y.-C., Lin C.-C., Lo Y.-S., Ho H.-Y., Lin J.-T. 7-Epitaxol Induces Apoptosis and Autophagy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma through Inhibition of the ERK Pathway. Cells. 2021;10:2633. doi: 10.3390/cells10102633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Ito K., Ota A., Ono T., Nakaoka T., Wahiduzzaman M., Karnan S., Konishi H., Furuhashi A., Hayashi T., Yamada Y., et al. Inhibition of Nox1 Induces Apoptosis by Attenuating the AKT Signaling Pathway in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Lines. Oncol. Rep. 2016;36:2991–2998. doi: 10.3892/or.2016.5068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Pai S., Yadav V.K., Kuo K.-T., Pikatan N.W., Lin C.-S., Chien M.-H., Lee W.-H., Hsiao M., Chiu S.-C., Yeh C.-T., et al. PDK1 Inhibitor BX795 Improves Cisplatin and Radio-Efficacy in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Downregulating the PDK1/CD47/Akt-Mediated Glycolysis Signaling Pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:11492. doi: 10.3390/ijms222111492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Smolensky D., Rathore K., Bourn J., Cekanova M. Inhibition of the PI3K/AKT Pathway Sensitizes Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells to Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy In Vitro. J. Cell. Biochem. 2017;118:2615–2624. doi: 10.1002/jcb.25747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Türkeli A., Yilmaz Ö., Karaman M., Kanik E., Firinci F., İnan S., Yüksel H. Anti-VEGF Treatment Suppresses Remodeling Factors and Restores Epithelial Barrier Function through the E-cadherin/Β-catenin Signaling Axis in Experimental Asthma Models. Exp. Ther. Med. 2021;22:689. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248.Ju W., Xia R., Zhu D., Dou S., Zhu G., Dong M., Wang L., Sun Q., Zhao T., Zhou Z., et al. A Pilot Study of Neoadjuvant Combination of Anti-PD-1 Camrelizumab and VEGFR2 Inhibitor Apatinib for Locally Advanced Resectable Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:5378. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33080-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Ganjibakhsh M., Monshizadeh R., Nasimian A., Aminishakib P., Farzaneh P., Tavakoli Shiraji S., Gharajei A., Rahrotaban S., Baghaei F., Gohari N.S. Anti-Angiogenic Efficacy of Aflibercept and Bevacizumab in Primary Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2018;47:575–582. doi: 10.1111/jop.12717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Yoshida H., Yoshimura H., Matsuda S., Ryoke T., Kiyoshima T., Kobayashi M., Sano K. Effects of Peritumoral Bevacizumab Injection against Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a Nude Mouse Xenograft Model: A Preliminary Study. Oncol. Lett. 2018;15:8627–8634. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.8399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Zhou Y., Ran J., Tang C., Wu J., Honghua L., Xingwen L., Chen N., Qiao L. Effect of Celecoxib on E-Cadherin, VEGF, Microvessel Density and Apoptosis in Gastric Cancer. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2007;6:269–275. doi: 10.4161/cbt.6.2.3629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Yang X., Sun T., Zhao Y., Liu S., Liang X. 4sc-202 and Ink-128 Cooperate to Reverse the Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition in OSCC. Oral Dis. 2022;28:2139–2148. doi: 10.1111/odi.13860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.Ashrafizadeh M., Mirzaei S., Hashemi F., Zarrabi A., Zabolian A., Saleki H., Sharifzadeh S.O., Soleymani L., Daneshi S., Hushmandi K., et al. New Insight towards Development of Paclitaxel and Docetaxel Resistance in Cancer Cells: EMT as a Novel Molecular Mechanism and Therapeutic Possibilities. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021;141:111824. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Liu Y.-P., Zheng C.-C., Huang Y.-N., He M.-L., Xu W.W., Li B. Molecular Mechanisms of Chemo- and Radiotherapy Resistance and the Potential Implications for Cancer Treatment. MedComm. 2021;2:315–340. doi: 10.1002/mco2.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cells are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES