Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1997 May 15;16(10):2907–2916. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.10.2907

The transcription activation domains of Fos and Jun induce DNA bending through electrostatic interactions.

T K Kerppola 1, T Curran 1
PMCID: PMC1169898  PMID: 9184234

Abstract

Transcription factor-induced DNA bending is essential for the assembly of active transcription complexes at many promoters. However, most eukaryotic transcription regulatory proteins have modular DNA-binding and activation domains, which appeared to exclude DNA bending as a mechanism of transcription activation by these proteins. We show that the transcription activation domains of Fos and Jun induce DNA bending. In chimeric proteins, the transcription activation domains induce DNA bending independent of the DNA-binding domains. DNA bending by the chimeric proteins is directed diametrically away from the transcription activation domains. Therefore, the opposite directions of DNA bending by Fos and Jun are caused, in part, by the opposite locations of the transcription activation domains relative to the DNA-binding domains in these proteins. DNA bending is reduced in the presence of multivalent cations, indicating that electrostatic interactions contribute to DNA bending by Fos and Jun. Consequently, regions outside the minimal DNA-binding domain can influence DNA structure, and may thereby contribute to the architectural reorganization of the promoter region required for gene activation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (522.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abate C., Luk D., Curran T. Transcriptional regulation by Fos and Jun in vitro: interaction among multiple activator and regulatory domains. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Jul;11(7):3624–3632. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.7.3624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ansari A. Z., Bradner J. E., O'Halloran T. V. DNA-bend modulation in a repressor-to-activator switching mechanism. Nature. 1995 Mar 23;374(6520):371–375. doi: 10.1038/374370a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Becker J. C., Nikroo A., Brabletz T., Reisfeld R. A. DNA loops induced by cooperative binding of transcriptional activator proteins and preinitiation complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Oct 10;92(21):9727–9731. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.21.9727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brennan R. G., Roderick S. L., Takeda Y., Matthews B. W. Protein-DNA conformational changes in the crystal structure of a lambda Cro-operator complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Oct;87(20):8165–8169. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.20.8165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Crothers D. M., Drak J. Global features of DNA structure by comparative gel electrophoresis. Methods Enzymol. 1992;212:46–71. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(92)12005-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Crothers D. M., Haran T. E., Nadeau J. G. Intrinsically bent DNA. J Biol Chem. 1990 May 5;265(13):7093–7096. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DiGabriele A. D., Sanderson M. R., Steitz T. A. Crystal lattice packing is important in determining the bend of a DNA dodecamer containing an adenine tract. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Mar;86(6):1816–1820. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.6.1816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gao J., Mammen M., Whitesides G. M. Evaluating electrostatic contributions to binding with the use of protein charge ladders. Science. 1996 Apr 26;272(5261):535–537. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5261.535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Giese K., Kingsley C., Kirshner J. R., Grosschedl R. Assembly and function of a TCR alpha enhancer complex is dependent on LEF-1-induced DNA bending and multiple protein-protein interactions. Genes Dev. 1995 Apr 15;9(8):995–1008. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.8.995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Grigoriadis A. E., Wang Z. Q., Cecchini M. G., Hofstetter W., Felix R., Fleisch H. A., Wagner E. F. c-Fos: a key regulator of osteoclast-macrophage lineage determination and bone remodeling. Science. 1994 Oct 21;266(5184):443–448. doi: 10.1126/science.7939685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hoover T. R., Santero E., Porter S., Kustu S. The integration host factor stimulates interaction of RNA polymerase with NIFA, the transcriptional activator for nitrogen fixation operons. Cell. 1990 Oct 5;63(1):11–22. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90284-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ito K., Asano M., Hughes P., Kohzaki H., Masutani C., Hanaoka F., Kerppola T., Curran T., Murakami Y., Ito Y. c-Jun stimulates origin-dependent DNA unwinding by polyomavirus large Tantigen. EMBO J. 1996 Oct 15;15(20):5636–5646. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kahn J. D., Crothers D. M. Protein-induced bending and DNA cyclization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jul 15;89(14):6343–6347. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.14.6343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kerppola T. K., Curran T. DNA bending by Fos and Jun: the flexible hinge model. Science. 1991 Nov 22;254(5035):1210–1214. doi: 10.1126/science.1957173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kerppola T. K., Curran T. Fos-Jun heterodimers and Jun homodimers bend DNA in opposite orientations: implications for transcription factor cooperativity. Cell. 1991 Jul 26;66(2):317–326. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90621-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Leonard D. A., Rajaram N., Kerppola T. K. Structural basis of DNA bending and oriented heterodimer binding by the basic leucine zipper domains of Fos and Jun. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 May 13;94(10):4913–4918. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.10.4913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lobell R. B., Schleif R. F. DNA looping and unlooping by AraC protein. Science. 1990 Oct 26;250(4980):528–532. doi: 10.1126/science.2237403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Love J. J., Li X., Case D. A., Giese K., Grosschedl R., Wright P. E. Structural basis for DNA bending by the architectural transcription factor LEF-1. Nature. 1995 Aug 31;376(6543):791–795. doi: 10.1038/376791a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mandal N., Su W., Haber R., Adhya S., Echols H. DNA looping in cellular repression of transcription of the galactose operon. Genes Dev. 1990 Mar;4(3):410–418. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.3.410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Manning G. S. The molecular theory of polyelectrolyte solutions with applications to the electrostatic properties of polynucleotides. Q Rev Biophys. 1978 May;11(2):179–246. doi: 10.1017/s0033583500002031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Martin M. L., Lieberman P. M., Curran T. Fos-Jun dimerization promotes interaction of the basic region with TFIIE-34 and TFIIF. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 May;16(5):2110–2118. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.5.2110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Metz R., Bannister A. J., Sutherland J. A., Hagemeier C., O'Rourke E. C., Cook A., Bravo R., Kouzarides T. c-Fos-induced activation of a TATA-box-containing promoter involves direct contact with TATA-box-binding protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Sep;14(9):6021–6029. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.9.6021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Natesan S., Gilman M. Z. DNA bending and orientation-dependent function of YY1 in the c-fos promoter. Genes Dev. 1993 Dec;7(12B):2497–2509. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.12b.2497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. O'Neil K. T., Hoess R. H., DeGrado W. F. Design of DNA-binding peptides based on the leucine zipper motif. Science. 1990 Aug 17;249(4970):774–778. doi: 10.1126/science.2389143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. O'Shea E. K., Klemm J. D., Kim P. S., Alber T. X-ray structure of the GCN4 leucine zipper, a two-stranded, parallel coiled coil. Science. 1991 Oct 25;254(5031):539–544. doi: 10.1126/science.1948029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Oakley M. G., Dervan P. B. Structural motif of the GCN4 DNA binding domain characterized by affinity cleaving. Science. 1990 May 18;248(4957):847–850. doi: 10.1126/science.2111578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pil P. M., Chow C. S., Lippard S. J. High-mobility-group 1 protein mediates DNA bending as determined by ring closures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Oct 15;90(20):9465–9469. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.20.9465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pérez-Martín J., Espinosa M. Protein-induced bending as a transcriptional switch. Science. 1993 May 7;260(5109):805–807. doi: 10.1126/science.8387228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Robertson L. M., Kerppola T. K., Vendrell M., Luk D., Smeyne R. J., Bocchiaro C., Morgan J. I., Curran T. Regulation of c-fos expression in transgenic mice requires multiple interdependent transcription control elements. Neuron. 1995 Feb;14(2):241–252. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90282-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Talanian R. V., McKnight C. J., Kim P. S. Sequence-specific DNA binding by a short peptide dimer. Science. 1990 Aug 17;249(4970):769–771. doi: 10.1126/science.2389142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zacharias M., Luty B. A., Davis M. E., McCammon J. A. Poisson-Boltzmann analysis of the lambda repressor-operator interaction. Biophys J. 1992 Nov;63(5):1280–1285. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81723-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES