Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1987 Oct;117(2):319–329. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.2.319

Dominance, Pleiotropy and Metabolic Structure

Peter D Keightley 1, Henrik Kacser 1
PMCID: PMC1203207  PMID: 3666444

Abstract

It is a common observation that most mutants have similar dominance relations for all the characters they are known to affect. As a model of pleiotropic effects we investigate a branched pathway where the two outputs represent two characters whose variation is affected by changes in any of the genetically specified enzymes in the system. We consider the effects on the phenotype (fluxes or intermediate metabolites) of substitutions at one locus represented by enzyme activities of the two homozygotes (mutant and wild type) and that of the heterozygote. Dominance indices for the characters pleiotropically connected by the metabolic system are calculated. We show that if enzymes behave `linearly,' (first order), that is if saturation and feedback inhibition or other nonlinearities are absent, all fluxes and pools have identical dominance relations. The presence of such nonlinearity, however, leads to differences in dominance between different characters and we define the conditions where such differences can be important.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bulfield G., Kacser H. Histidinaemia in mouse and man. Arch Dis Child. 1974 Jul;49(7):545–552. doi: 10.1136/adc.49.7.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burns J. A., Kacser H. Allosteric repression: an analysis. J Theor Biol. 1977 Sep 21;68(2):199–213. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(77)90159-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CLELAND W. W. The kinetics of enzyme-catalyzed reactions with two or more substrates or products. I. Nomenclature and rate equations. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1963 Jan 8;67:104–137. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(63)91800-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cornish-Bowden A. Dominance is not inevitable. J Theor Biol. 1987 Apr 7;125(3):333–338. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(87)80065-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dean A. M., Dykhuizen D. E., Hartl D. L. Fitness as a function of beta-galactosidase activity in Escherichia coli. Genet Res. 1986 Aug;48(1):1–8. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300024587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fell D. A., Sauro H. M. Metabolic control and its analysis. Additional relationships between elasticities and control coefficients. Eur J Biochem. 1985 May 2;148(3):555–561. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1985.tb08876.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Flint H. J., Porteous D. J., Kacser H. Control of the flux in the arginine pathway of Neurospora crassa. The flux from citrulline to arginine. Biochem J. 1980 Jul 15;190(1):1–15. doi: 10.1042/bj1900001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hofmeyr J. H., Kacser H., van der Merwe K. J. Metabolic control analysis of moiety-conserved cycles. Eur J Biochem. 1986 Mar 17;155(3):631–641. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1986.tb09534.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. KNOX W. E., MESSINGER E. C. The detection in the heterozygote of the metabolic effect of the recessive gene for phenylketonuria. Am J Hum Genet. 1958 Mar;10(1):53–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kacser H., Burns J. A. The control of flux. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1973;27:65–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kacser H., Burns J. A. The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics. 1981 Mar-Apr;97(3-4):639–666. doi: 10.1093/genetics/97.3-4.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kacser H. Dominance not inevitable but very likely. J Theor Biol. 1987 Jun 21;126(4):505–506. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(87)80155-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kacser H. The control of enzyme systems in vivo: elasticity analysis of the steady state. Biochem Soc Trans. 1983 Jan;11(1):35–40. doi: 10.1042/bst0110035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. LaPorte D. C., Walsh K., Koshland D. E., Jr The branch point effect. Ultrasensitivity and subsensitivity to metabolic control. J Biol Chem. 1984 Nov 25;259(22):14068–14075. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Middleton R. J., Kacser H. Enzyme variation, metabolic flux and fitness: alcohol dehydrogenase in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1983 Nov;105(3):633–650. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.3.633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES