Abstract
Few coastal ecosystems remain untouched by direct human activities, and none are unimpacted by anthropogenic climate change. These drivers interact with and exacerbate each other in complex ways, yielding a mosaic of ecological consequences that range from adaptive responses, such as geographic range shifts and changes in phenology, to severe impacts, such as mass mortalities, ecological regime shifts and loss of biodiversity. Identifying the role of climate change in these phenomena requires corroborating evidence from multiple lines of evidence, including laboratory experiments, field observations, numerical models and palaeorecords. Yet few studies can confidently quantify the magnitude of the effect attributable solely to climate change, because climate change seldom acts alone in coastal ecosystems. Projections of future risk are further complicated by scenario uncertainty – that is, our lack of knowledge about the degree to which humanity will mitigate greenhouse-gas emissions, or will make changes to the other ways we impact coastal ecosystems. Irrespective, ocean warming would be impossible to reverse before the end of the century, and sea levels are likely to continue to rise for centuries and remain elevated for millennia. Therefore, future risks to coastal ecosystems from climate change are projected to mirror the impacts already observed, with severity escalating with cumulative emissions. Promising avenues for progress beyond such qualitative assessments include collaborative modelling initiatives, such as model intercomparison projects, and the use of a broader range of knowledge systems. But we can reduce risks to coastal ecosystems by rapidly reducing emissions of greenhouse gases, by restoring damaged habitats, by regulating non-climate stressors using climate-smart conservation actions, and by implementing inclusive coastal-zone management approaches, especially those involving nature-based solutions.
Keywords: global warming, ocean acidification, ocean deoxygenation, sea-level rise, detection and attribution
Impact statement
Human society deeply values coasts and the ecosystem services they provide. But navigating the challenge of coastal management over the coming decades to sustain these connections depends on an ability to identify and quantify the ecological consequences of climate change. Aiding in this task has been a sequence of Assessment Reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the most recent of which is its Sixth Assessment Report. Both this IPCC Report and associated studies emphasise that human-caused climate change has driven our oceans into states unprecedented over millennia, and that these changes have led to fundamental ecological impacts across all coastal ecosystems. These impacts exacerbate and are exacerbated by other human-caused impacts in the coastal zone. Projections of future risk mirror the impacts already observed, but they escalate with cumulative greenhouse-gas emissions. Although these conclusions are supported by multiple lines of evidence, progress beyond qualitative assessments is hampered by our inability to confidently disentangle the effects of interacting drivers of change. Difficulties in this regard escalate as the number of drivers considered increases. Promising avenues for progress include emerging collaborative initiatives, such as model intercomparison projects, and the more inclusive use of multiple knowledge systems. In the interim, however, reducing risks over the remainder of this century depends on rapidly reducing emissions, restoring damaged habitats, designing and deploying climate-smart conservation actions that alleviate non-climate stressors, and carefully managing existing and future coastal development, with an emphasis on nature-based solutions.
Introduction
The world’s coasts hold special places in human history and culture: settlements and cities have sprung up close to the sea because of the rich resources the ocean and coastal ecosystems provide, the transport and trade they facilitate, and the sense of place they instil (Neumann et al., 2015; Cooley et al., 2022). As a direct result, these coastal ecosystems face multiple escalating threats from humanity, most of which exacerbate or are exacerbated by climate change. Navigating the challenge of coastal management over the coming decades therefore relies heavily on being able to identify and quantify the ecological consequences of climate change. Aiding in this task has been a sequence of Assessment Reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the most recent of which is its Sixth Assessment Report (IPCC, 2021, 2022). Here, we explore the main findings of that work, providing illustrative examples of climate-driven impacts and risks, identifying key challenges to progress, and briefly discussing promising avenues that might lead to the development of more robust, quantitative projections of future risk to coastal ecosystems due to climate change.
Human-induced climate change has vastly altered the environmental conditions within which coastal ecosystems operate
Anthropogenic climate change has driven the physical and chemical conditions of coastal ecosystems (Table 1) to states that are unprecedented over millennia (Cooley et al., 2022). Approximately 93% of the excess incoming solar energy trapped by greenhouse gases is absorbed by the ocean. This has added 350 ZJ (1 ZJ = 1021 J) to the heat content of the oceans between 1958 and 2019, with an annual acceleration over the past decade. (Cheng et al., 2022). This has driven the heat content of the upper ocean to reach record levels in 2022, exceeding the previous record (2021) by approximately 10 ZJ (Cheng et al., 2023). Associated warming has been almost ubiquitous along coastlines (Lima and Wethey, 2012) and within estuaries (Scanes et al., 2020). The exception has been upwelling cells, where the increased prevalence of upwelling-favourable winds has resulted in local cooling, especially at higher latitudes (Bograd et al., 2023). Superimposed on this long-term trend of warming has been a rapid surge in the localised occurrence of anomalously warm waters that persists for days to many months, known as marine heatwaves (MHWs) (Hobday et al., 2016; Laufkötter et al., 2020; Sen Gupta et al., 2020). The frequency of MHWs has at least doubled since the 1980s, and MHW intensity has increased rapidly with ocean warming, as has the proportion of time the global ocean is subject to MHW conditions (IPCC, 2021).
Table 1.
Estimates of magnitudes of observed and projected changes in climate-induced drivers pertinent to coastal ecosystems, as assessed by the IPCC. These estimates are global averages and it should be noted that in each case, considerable spatial variability is anticipated, especially in coastal areas. Unless otherwise stated, ranges in brackets represent 90% confidence intervals.
| Climate impact-driver | Observed change | Projected change |
|---|---|---|
| Ocean warming | Considering the decade 2011–2020, the global ocean surface waters have warmed on average by 0.88°C (0.68–1.01°C) compared with the period 1850–1900, with 0.60°C (0.44–0.74°C) of this warming having occurred since 1980 (Fox-Kemper et al., 2021). | Relative to the 20-year period ending in 2014, global ocean surface temperatures in the last two decades of the century are projected to have warmed by 0.86°C (0.43–1.47°C) under SSP1‑2.6, 1.51°C (1.02–2.19°C) under SSP2‑4.5, 2.19°C (1.56–3.30°C) under SSP3‑7.0, and 2.89°C (2.01–4.07°C) under SSP5‑8.5 (Fox-Kemper et al., 2021). |
| Marine heatwaves | Over the course of the 20th century, marine heatwaves became more frequent and intense, with a rapid escalation in the 21st century: since the 1980s, the frequency of marine heatwaves has doubled, and their intensity and duration have rapidly increased (Fox-Kemper et al., 2021). | Relative to the 20-year period ending in 2014, marine heatwaves are projected to be four times more frequent in the last two decades of the century under SSP1‑2.6, and eight times more likely under SSP5‑8.5 (Fox-Kemper et al., 2021). |
| Stratification and deoxygenation | Stratification of the upper 200 m of the ocean water column has increased by approximately 5% since the 1970s (Arias et al., 2021). Over the same period, the subsurface ocean (100–600 m depth) lost 2% of its total dissolved oxygen, resulting in the identification of >700 hypoxic (<2 mg O2 L−1) coastal regions (Canadell et al., 2021). | Over the course of the 21st century, the ocean water column will continue to stratify, and subsurface waters are projected to transition to historically unprecedented conditions, with dissolved oxygen in the last two decades of the century declining by between 6.4 ± 2.9 mmol m−3 (under SSP1-2.6) and 13.3 ± 5.3 mmol m−3 (under SSP5-8.5), relative to the period 1870–1899 (Canadell et al., 2021). |
| Acidification | The pH of surface waters in the open ocean has declined by 0.012–0.104 pH units since the 1970s, and acidification of deeper waters has become ubiquitous since the 1980s (Gulev et al., 2021). | Relative to the period 1870–1899, ocean surface pH in the last two decades of the 21st century is projected to have declined by 0.16–0.44 pH units under SSP1-2.6 and SSP5-8.5, respectively (Canadell et al., 2021). |
| Sea-level rise | Over the period 1901–2018, global mean sea level rose by 201.9 mm (150.3–253.5 mm), with 44.3 mm (38.6–50.0 mm) of this rise since 2006 at a rate of 3.7 mm yr−1 (3.2–4.2 mm yr−1) (Fox-Kemper et al., 2021; Gulev et al., 2021). High-tide flooding events that occurred five times per year during the period 1960–1980 occurred, on average, more than eight times per year during the period 1995–2014 (Fox-Kemper et al., 2021). | Ignoring high-impact–low-likelihood outcomes, such as Antarctic marine ice-cliff instability, global mean sea levels (relative to those for the period 1995–2014) are projected to rise by between 190 mm (66% confidence: 160–250 mm) and 230 mm (200–290 mm) by 2050 under SSP1-2.6 and SSP5-8.5, respectively. Corresponding projections for 2100 are 440 mm (320–620 mm) and 770 mm (630–1010 mm), respectively. Associated rates of sea-level rise are 4.8 mm yr−1 (3.5–6.8 mm yr−1) to 7.2 mm yr−1 (5.6–9.7 mm yr−1) over the 20-year period centred on 2050 under SSP1-2.6 and SSP5-8.5, respectively. Corresponding projections for the 20-year period centred on 2090 are 5.2 mm yr−1 (3.2–8.0 mm yr−1) and 12.1 mm yr−1 (8.6–17.6 mm yr−1), respectively (Fox-Kemper et al., 2021). These projections mean that historically extreme sea levels (i.e., 1-in-100-year events for the period 1995–2014) might occur annually (or more frequently) across 19–31% of locations by 2050, rising to 60–82% of locations by 2100 under SSP1-2.6 and SSP5-8.5, respectively (Fox-Kemper et al., 2021). |
As the oceans have warmed, the solubility of gases has decreased, resulting in a strong trend in declining dissolved oxygen content – a process known as ocean deoxygenation (Canadell et al., 2021). Ocean stratification is enhanced by warming, reducing mixing (ventilation), altering nutrient redistribution, and exacerbating deoxygenation, especially in subsurface waters. Oxygen minimum zones (OMZs) – areas of low oxygen concentration in the upper ocean that are especially apparent in tropical regions – have been expanding at least since 1960 (Zhou et al., 2022). An exception to warming-driven deoxygenation is found where intensifying upwelling brings cold, low-oxygen water to the surface (Canadell et al., 2021; Bograd et al., 2023). A further direct impact of warming is melting ice, both at sea and grounded on land. The latter – together with the thermal expansion of seawater – has contributed to accelerating rates of sea-level rise, now averaging >3 mm per year, faster than any time in at least the last 3,000 years (Fox-Kemper et al., 2021; Le Cozannet et al., 2022).
Increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations have resulted in decreasing pH of ocean waters – known as ocean acidification – so that surface-water pH is now unusually low in the context of the past 2 million years (Arias et al., 2021). Finally, changes in precipitation, stratification and ice-melt have enhanced contrasts in salinity between relatively salty and relatively fresh parts of the ocean (Cheng et al., 2020).
Ocean conditions are projected to continue diverging from their pre-industrial state, with the magnitude of change depending on cumulative emissions
Most of the observed changes in ocean conditions due to anthropogenic climate change (Table 1) are irreversible on centennial to millennial scales, given present mitigation tools (IPCC, 2021). Warming of the upper ocean by 2100 is projected to range 2–8 times that experienced over the period 1971–2015, resulting in more frequent and intense MHWs, greater deoxygenation, increased stratification, faster ice-melt and accelerating sea-level rise. Ocean acidification is expected to intensify and salinity contrasts to be enhanced (Arias et al., 2021).
Confirming that climate change has caused ecological responses
While change in Earth’s climate system has been unambiguously attributed to anthropogenic greenhouse-gas emissions (IPCC, 2021), distinguishing the role of anthropogenic climate change in altering ecological systems from the roles of other potential drivers has proven more problematic and contentious (Brander et al., 2011; Pielke, 2011; Stocker et al., 2011). Such attribution has been especially difficult in coastal systems, where human impact is ubiquitous (Williams et al., 2022; Allan et al., 2023) and drivers of change compete with each other amidst naturally variable conditions, confounding unambiguous interpretations (Cooley et al., 2022; Friess et al., 2022). In such systems, attribution instead usually comprises a sequence of steps (Figure 1), often involving multiple lines of evidence (Parmesan et al., 2013; Hansen et al., 2016; Phillips, 2023).
Figure 1.
Steps involved in detecting and attributing an impact of climate change on an organism or ecological system. Note that the final step of attribution is seldom straightforward, instead often involving inference on the basis of multiple lines of evidence.
The first step involves identifying a hazard. This could be a change in a climate variable that is known to be affected by anthropogenic greenhouse-gas emissions (i.e., a climate-induced driver), but it could equally be a phenomenon caused by a change in climate, including a management action taken to mitigate an existing climate-change impact (e.g., the construction of a seawall, Simpson et al., 2021). The second requirement is to demonstrate that the organism or system is vulnerable to that hazard – that is, that there is a plausible and demonstrable mechanism for the putative effect. Third, the organism or system must experience – be exposed to – the hazard. Fourth, an exposed organism or system must demonstrate the anticipated change – a process known as “detection” of a climate impact. Ideally, detection is accompanied by an analysis that separates the putative climate response from responses to other non-climate drivers experienced by the organism or system (Hansen et al., 2016) – this constitutes formal “attribution” of a climate impact (Figure 1). Gonzalez et al. (2023) provide a more detailed discussion of detection and attribution and propose a quantitative framework for these processes as they apply to changes in biodiversity and other impacts to ecosystems (Parmesan et al., 2013; Ara Begum et al., 2022).
Climate-induced drivers have greatly impacted life in the ocean and along its coasts
Ocean warming
Temperature is a central driver of metabolic processes and therefore a key driver of ecological responses (Pörtner, 2021). Because the specific heat of seawater is around four times that of air, the oceans have warmed only half as much as the atmosphere as a result of anthropogenic climate change, despite absorbing more than nine times the thermal energy (Fox-Kemper et al., 2021). But this property of seawater also means that ocean temperatures are generally less variable in space and time than those on land, resulting in marine organisms having narrower thermal tolerance ranges (Pinsky et al., 2019; Pörtner, 2021), and a greater predisposition towards occupying the full extent of these ranges than that of their terrestrial counterparts (Sunday et al., 2012). This renders marine biodiversity more vulnerable to warming than its terrestrial counterparts, causing a wide range of impacts. Among the more common consequences of the long-term trend in warming for coastal biodiversity are range shifts and tropicalisation, and changes in phenology.
Range shifts, tropicalisation and depth shifts
Warming of the ocean surface since the 1950s has shifted marine taxa and communities poleward at an average (± 90% confidence interval) of 59.2 ± 15.5 km per decade (Lenoir et al., 2020; Fredston et al., 2021). Susceptibility to range shifts varies strongly by functional group, with short-lived, fast-growing planktonic organisms shifting their ranges much faster than longer-lived and sessile species, or species with fixed breeding sites (Poloczanska et al., 2013; Pinsky et al., 2020). Although range edges of coastal species in tropical to temperate waters generally maintain the species’ thermal niches as the climate warms (Lenoir et al., 2020; Fredston et al., 2021), this tendency is both stronger and more common at the leading (cool) range edge than at the trailing (warm) range edge (Poloczanska et al., 2013; Fredston-Hermann et al., 2020; Pinsky et al., 2020). Pinsky et al. (2020) provide a detailed discussion of potential explanations for this phenomenon, including physiology, behaviour, evolution, dispersal and species interactions, but answers are elusive, and this question remains a topic of active research (e.g., Usui et al., 2023).
Nevertheless, arguably the most ubiquitous consequence of differential range shifts at leading and trailing range edges is the arrival of warm-affinity species in communities previously dominated by – and still occupied by – species of cooler provenance (Vergés et al., 2014; Chaudhary et al., 2021; Favoretto et al., 2022; Fujiwara et al., 2022). This process, known in low- to mid-latitudes as tropicalisation, in combination with the closely related process of deborealisation – the loss of cool-associated species from high-latitude places – results in the continual reassembly of biotic communities in coastal waters (McLean et al., 2021). When tropicalisation involves the arrival of herbivores, seagrasses and macroalgal habitat can be rapidly transformed (Vergés et al., 2016, 2022; Schuster et al., 2022; Santana-Garcon et al., 2023), reshaping entire ecosystems and their functioning (Peleg et al., 2020). But other arriving taxa can have equally profound impacts (de et al., 2022). Despite evidence that “healthy” ecosystems with relatively intact biodiversity can resist climate change of the magnitude already witnessed (Bates et al., 2014; Frid et al., 2023; Ziegler et al., 2023), the inevitability of range shifts identifies the network effects of tropicalisation and deborealisation as an urgent research priority.
Although range shifts are the most commonly studied ecological response to warming, some coastal species might respond to warming surface waters by seeking refuge at depth (Giraldo-Ospina et al., 2020). Evidence of such depth shifts, however, remains somewhat contradictory (Chaikin and Belmaker, 2023; Rubenstein et al., 2023).
Marine heatwaves (MHWs)
MHWs can expose marine life to conditions beyond those projected for the end of this century for periods ranging from days to months (Sen Gupta et al., 2020; Koehlinger et al., 2023). It is therefore unsurprising that MHWs impact all levels of marine life, from the ecophysiology of individual organisms to the structure of marine communities (Smith et al., 2023). Although some effects can be beneficial, especially at high latitudes – for example, increased productivity or reproductive success in populations close to their leading range edge (Smith et al., 2019; Favoretto et al., 2022; Magel et al., 2022) – many effects are detrimental. MHWs can reduce breeding success (Hays et al., 2021; Rogers et al., 2021), cause trailing-edge extirpations and consequent regime shifts (Arafeh-Dalmau et al., 2019; Wernberg, 2021; Félix-Loaiza et al., 2022), facilitate geographic shifts at leading range edges (Smith et al., 2019; Favoretto et al., 2022; Coulson et al., 2023) and benefit non-native invasive species (Arafeh-Dalmau et al., 2019), drive mass mortalities in natural (Piatt et al., 2020) and aquaculture (Smith et al., 2021) settings, exacerbate infectious disease epidemics (Harvell et al., 2019; Claar and Wood, 2020; Genin et al., 2020), and impact habitat-forming taxa, including seagrasses (Strydom et al., 2020), kelps (Arafeh-Dalmau et al., 2019; Wernberg, 2021) and corals (Goreau and Hayes, 2021; Speare et al., 2022; van Woesik et al., 2022). However, the magnitude of effects varies by taxon, location, ecosystem type and health, and even genotype, as well as the intensity, duration, abruptness of onset and return interval of the MHW event (Smith et al., 2019; Fox et al., 2021; Suryan et al., 2021; Magel et al., 2022; Shlesinger and van Woesik, 2023; Ziegler et al., 2023).
Phenology
Another conspicuous impact of ocean warming is the earlier attainment of typical spring temperatures and later attainment of autumn temperatures, which are both important in setting the timing of key seasonal events, such as breeding and migration. Although the timing of such seasonal events is not regulated by temperature signals alone (Ducklow et al., 2022; Whelan et al., 2022), a meta-analysis of phenological studies indicates that ocean warming has driven spring events 4.3 ± 1.8 days to 7.5 ± 1.5 days earlier per decade among planktonic organisms and 3.0 ± 2.1 days earlier per decade for fish (Cooley et al., 2022). Although there is more and stronger evidence for climate-driven phenological shifts among small, short-lived taxa (Cooley et al., 2022), recent evidence confirms such responses among large, long-lived taxa, including whales (Ganley et al., 2022; Pendleton et al., 2022; Shuert et al., 2022) and sharks (Hammerschlag et al., 2022). Moreover, since both range shifts and phenological shifts are responses to warming, it is unsurprising that taxa with high geographic fidelity (e.g., those with specific spawning or nesting requirements) might demonstrate stronger phenological responses than those that more readily shift ranges (Chust et al., 2023).
Deoxygenation
Progressive loss of oxygen – deoxygenation – has been observed in the ocean interior since the mid-twentieth century (Canadell et al., 2021). Normally, oxygen enters the upper ocean from the atmosphere and from photosynthesis by aquatic vegetation (including phytoplankton), then vertical mixing moves oxygen into the deep ocean, where it is respired by heterotrophic marine organisms. About 15% of the observed deoxygenation is attributed to warming-induced decreases in oxygen solubility, and the rest is attributed to increased stratification (Canadell et al., 2021).
Deoxygenation is transforming marine communities by increasing individual species’ migration, replacement and loss (Cooley et al., 2022) by, for example, altering the dynamics of aquatic infectious diseases (Burge and Hershberger, 2020; Byers, 2021) and threatening tropical shallow-water coral reefs with lethal and sublethal effects (Hughes et al., 2020; Pezner et al., 2023). In mid-waters, deoxygenation is thought to compress habitat for pelagic oceanic fish species and temporarily increase catchability (Breitburg et al., 2018).
Acidification
The decrease in surface ocean pH observed over the past 40 years due to the uptake of anthropogenically released atmospheric CO2 has altered the water chemistry surrounding upper-ocean ecosystems more than in the past 26,000 or more years (Arias et al., 2021). Ocean acidification can have a variety of effects on biological processes: higher aquatic dissolved CO2 concentrations tend to increase photosynthesis of some primary producers, while higher H+ ion concentrations (i.e., greater acidity or lower pH) tend to challenge calcification – the biological creation of calcium carbonate shells and skeletons – for several animals or planktonic species, especially juveniles (Doney et al., 2020). Loss of juvenile Pacific oysters in aquaculture facilities (Barton et al., 2015) and increased bioerosion and dissolution of tropical corals in nature have been attributed to ocean acidification, but the complexity and variety of the effects of acidification on marine species, along with species’ exposure to multiple simultaneous drivers, makes attributing many individual and most ecosystem-scale outcomes to ocean acidification extremely challenging (Doo et al., 2020).
Sea-level rise
Thermal expansion of the ocean and, more recently, freshwater input from the loss of ice mass from terrestrial glaciers are driving up the global mean sea level (Fox-Kemper et al., 2021). Because coastlines can be subsiding (e.g., due to freshwater extraction) or experiencing isostatic rebound from the last glaciation (Durand et al., 2022), this sea-level rise is experienced as the change in the mean sea level relative to the land – relative sea-level rise. Almost all intertidal and shallow subtidal coastal ecosystems are sensitive to relative sea-level rise (Cooley et al., 2022). Observed impacts include flooding at high-tide extremes (Lawrence et al., 2022); salinisation of coastal soils, wetlands and the upper reaches of estuaries, with associated ecosystem transitions (Peteet et al., 2018; Andres et al., 2019; Kirwan and Gedan, 2019; Grieger et al., 2020; Eswar et al., 2021); increased erosion (e.g., Peteet et al., 2018); and coastal storm and flood damage (e.g., Strauss et al., 2021). Counterintuitively, relative sea-level rise can also result in accretion of intertidal sediments in areas where wetland vegetation can generate or trap sediments at rates exceeding those of relative sea-level rise (e.g., Marx et al., 2020; Saintilan et al., 2020).
Despite these observations, the impacts of relative sea-level rise are compounded with and confounded by other anthropogenic stressors at the coast, as well as the widespread deployment of countermeasures, including beach nourishment and other forms of coastal restoration and protection (Cooley et al., 2022). Global analyses of relatively coarse-scale imagery suggest the net effects of these processes have resulted in the loss of 15% of tidal flats since 1984 (Mentaschi et al., 2018; Murray et al., 2022), but with a corresponding number of the world’s beaches accreting (28%) as eroding (24%) (Luijendijk et al., 2018).
Ice loss
The effects of ice loss on coastal ecosystems are so far most keenly felt in the Arctic (Meredith et al., 2019; Cooley et al., 2022). Here, the formation, melting and persistence of sea ice drives seasonal patterns of coastal productivity, breeding and feeding opportunities, and connectivity (Le Moullec and Bender, 2022). Sea ice can be disruptive, through processes like benthic scouring, but can also be protective, through processes like buffering of coastal erosion (Lebrun et al., 2022). Irrespective, loss of ice in Arctic coastal systems can have cascading impacts (Meredith et al., 2019; Cooley et al., 2022), including the poleward movement of primary productivity driven by spring melt, with concomitant impacts for benthic and pelagic communities and the predators that feed on these (Brandt et al., 2023), including iconic species such as polar bears and walruses (Lebrun et al., 2022; Alabia et al., 2023; Kellner et al., 2023). Changes in ice phenology also impact phenology and breeding success among seabirds (Cusset et al., 2019; Descamps et al., 2019; Golubova, 2021). Despite these examples of impact, there is considerable variation among taxa and locations (Gutowsky et al., 2022; Grémillet and Descamps, 2023). Trends in ice loss and their attribution to climate change are both more uncertain in the Antarctic (Fox-Kemper et al., 2021; Cooley et al., 2022).
Other climate-induced drivers
Coastal ecosystems and their resident organisms are variously sensitive to a range of climate-induced drivers beyond those discussed above (Cooley et al., 2022). Included amongst these are drivers, such as changes in ocean salinity and stratification, that are not yet expected to elicit ecological responses large enough to be detectable as climate-change impacts. Also included are changes in wave height and power (Young and Ribal, 2019; Odériz et al., 2021) and ocean circulation (e.g., Hu et al., 2020), which are yet to be confidently detected and attributed (Fox-Kemper et al., 2021; Gulev et al., 2021), and atmospheric phenomena that are difficult to predict, let alone project, such as tropical cyclones and storms. The latter can impact coastal systems such as vegetated wetlands and exposed sandy beaches, but with effects that are case-specific, and sometimes counter-intuitive. For example, the precipitation, wind and wave action associated with storms can rearrange coastal sediments, causing erosion in some places and accretion elsewhere (Xie et al., 2017; Armitage et al., 2020; Mo et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020). In other cases, impacts can be indirect: heavy precipitation associated with storms can increase estuarine nutrient loads via runoff from adjacent land, causing or exacerbating eutrophication and stimulating HABs (Phlips et al., 2020; Dai et al., 2023), sometimes causing large-scale marine mammal, bird, and fish kills (Adams et al., 2019). Similarly, strong winds from tropical storms and cyclones can be beneficial for mangroves (Castañeda-Moya et al., 2020; Feher et al., 2020), or cause ephemeral damage (Armitage et al., 2020; Branoff, 2020), but they can also initiate regime shifts involving peat collapse and transition to mudflats (Chambers et al., 2019; Osland et al., 2020).
Compound events
Although discussion so far has focused on the direct impacts caused by individual climate-induced drivers, in real-world situations, none of these operate in isolation. Instead, they combine and interact in various ways. This complicates the task of attributing observed ecological responses to any single driver (Parmesan et al., 2013). For example, because ocean acidification and deoxygenation both depend on the solubility of gases in seawater – which is temperature dependent – these climate-induced drivers operate in concert with ocean warming to change the physiological suitability of coastal waters for marine fish and invertebrates.
Because temperature fundamentally affects the metabolism, motility, feeding efficiency and breeding success of marine organisms (Grady et al., 2019), ocean warming can also modify ecological interactions. Among the many examples of this phenomenon, one is of increasing concern: the host–pathogen interactions that drive outbreaks of infectious diseases in a range of coastal and marine taxa (Harvell et al., 2002; Randall and van Woesik, 2015; Cohen et al., 2018; Harvell et al., 2019). Since metabolic activity in ectothermic fish is temperature-dependent, warming temperatures, in concert with parasite exposure, are likely to facilitate the proliferation of disease-causing organisms and affect the health of fish hosts (Scharsack et al., 2021). In some cases, parasites grow faster and produce more viable eggs and offspring, which can lead to a rise in infection pressure, increased virulence, pathogenicity or expanded ranges for the parasite (Harvell et al., 2002; Arriaza et al., 2010; Cohen et al., 2018; Scharsack et al., 2021), and reduced fitness and/or mortality for the host. This can indirectly lead to trophic cascades in the warming habitat through changes to predation rates, thereby affecting ecosystem functioning (Harvell et al., 2019; Scharsack et al., 2021).
Such compounded combinations of hazards in marine systems result in rates of extirpation twice as high as those experienced by terrestrial taxa (Pinsky et al., 2019). On a global scale, the progressive loss of tropical biodiversity Chaudhary et al. (2021) provides stark evidence of these aggregate impacts of changes in the physical and chemical state of the ocean, in line with data from experiments and the palaeorecord (Reddin et al., 2020; Penn and Deutsch, 2022).
The effects of climate change worsen and are worsened by the impacts on marine life of non-climate anthropogenic drivers
Not only do climate-induced drivers interact with each other, but their effects also modify and are modified by the effects of non-climate anthropogenic drivers (Sage, 2020; Gissi et al., 2021; Cooley et al., 2022). This is particularly true – but under-recognised – in coastal ecosystems, few of which remain untouched by human activities (Williams et al., 2022; Allan et al., 2023), rendering them especially vulnerable to the coupled climate and biodiversity crises (Pörtner et al., 2023).
The escalation of interactive effects of climate-induced drivers and other anthropogenic stressors is ubiquitous in coastal ecosystems (Halpern et al., 2019; He and Silliman, 2019; Gissi et al., 2021). Although examples abound (Table 2), we will restrict our brief discussion here to impacts on tropical coral reefs as a case study.
Table 2.
Examples of interactions among climate-induced drivers and other anthropogenic stressors in coastal ecosystems.
| Non-climate driver | Interacting climate-induced drivers | Mechanism of impact | Ecosystems impacted | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Runoff of fertilizers or organic matter | Warming, acidification, deoxygenation, sea-level rise | Nutrients released into the water column stimulate a pulse of primary production. When nutrients are depleted, secondary production consumes oxygen, leading to hypoxic or even anoxic, acidic conditions. | Estuaries, lagoons, deltas, shallow nearshore waters, including seagrass beds | Nelson and Zavaleta (2012); Brauko et al. (2020); DeCarlo et al. (2020); Wooldridge (2020); Dai et al. (2023) |
| Disturbance of organic-rich sediment | Warming, acidification, deoxygenation | Estuaries, lagoons, deltas, shallow nearshore waters, including seagrass beds | Simone et al. (2021); Zhu et al. (2021); Smeaton and Austin (2022) | |
| Coastal infrastructure | Sea-level rise | The mass of infrastructure and the abstraction of groundwater can lead to subsidence of coastal land, aggravating the effects of sea-level rise. | Shorelines of estuaries, lagoons, deltas | Rossi and Toran (2019); Befus et al. (2020); Bosserelle et al. (2022) |
| Infrastructure sets a hard limit to inland migration of coastal habitats in response to rising sea levels. This phenomenon is known as coastal squeeze. | Mangroves, saltmarshes, sandy beaches | Borchert et al. (2018); Lithgow et al. (2019) | ||
| Resource use | Warming | Fishing can impose additional sources of mortality on fish populations and benthic habitats, including seagrass beds. This can alter community structure and exacerbate the effects of ocean warming. | Estuaries, lagoons, nearshore waters | Brander (2007); Grech et al. (2012); Townhill et al. (2019) |
| Warming, acidification, deoxygenation | By disturbing organic-rich sediment, some fishing methods, like bottom trawling, can exacerbate deoxygenation and acidification. | Estuaries, lagoons, deltas, shallow nearshore waters | De Leo et al. (2017); Bradshaw et al. (2021); Corell et al. (2023) | |
| Sea-level rise | Harvesting of trees for building material and fuel can make mangroves more susceptible to habitat transitions driven by sea-level rise. | Mangroves | Ward et al. (2016) | |
| Impoundment of rivers | Sea-level rise | Reduction of freshwater input can accelerate upstream penetration of saline waters. | Estuaries | Herbert et al. (2015); Bricheno et al. (2021); Costa et al. (2023); Khondoker et al. (2023) |
| Reduced supplies of terrigenous sediments can exacerbate coastal erosion. | Sandy beaches | Tuck et al. (2021); Gao et al. (2023) |
Corals are important habitat-forming species in tropical waters that support exceptionally high biodiversity (Fisher et al., 2015; Hughes et al., 2017) and provide extensive ecosystem services (Eddy et al., 2021). Yet many coral taxa are sensitive to climate change, especially through ocean warming and acidification, as well as to other anthropogenic stressors, such as nutrient and sediment loading (Hughes et al., 2017; Ellis et al., 2019; Cornwall et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2021; Cooley et al., 2022). Importantly, both vulnerability to and recovery from the impacts of climate change are affected by local anthropogenic stressors (França et al., 2020; Cramer et al., 2021; Donovan et al., 2021). This is a double-edged sword: where reefs are exposed to both climate change and other human impacts, consequences can be severe; but this also means that well-designed climate-smart conservation interventions in these places, which both alleviate non-climate human impacts and deploy complementary strategies, should reduce vulnerability to climate change (Mellin et al., 2019; França et al., 2020; Dutra et al., 2021; Kuempel et al., 2022), at least in the short to medium term. Many other coastal ecosystems are less well-studied but would benefit equally from climate-smart conservation planning approaches (Brown et al., 2022; Doxa et al., 2022; Buenafe et al., 2023).
Projecting future risks of climate change in coastal ecosystems
Given the difficulties in detecting and attributing climate-change impacts in coastal ecosystems, it should be no surprise that projecting future risks comes with even greater uncertainties. In some instances, projected risks of climate change are inferred from magnitudes of projected change in climate-driven hazards (Table 1, Figure 2), combined with the same established (or inferred) sensitivities to these drivers as are used in attributing observed impacts (Figure 1). In such cases, only the direction of change can be projected with any confidence (e.g., Hughes et al., 2020; Friess et al., 2022). In other cases, statistical models – including, but not limited to species distribution models – are used to map ecological responses against climate-driven hazards, and then this model is used to project the magnitude of future change in that response variable (e.g., Moltó et al., 2021; Van der Stocken et al., 2022; Chaudhary et al., 2023). More sophisticated, still, are ecosystem models that couple multiple environmental drivers to multiple interacting ecological response variables; these models are then used to extrapolate those interacting relationships forward under projected future climates (e.g., Moullec et al., 2019; Tittensor et al., 2021). All of these methods assume that the underlying models are transferable in time (and sometimes space), despite known problems with this assumption (Yates et al., 2018; Neupane et al., 2022; Rousseau and Betts, 2022). But as with the detection of climate impacts, confidence in their attribution – and therefore their utility as predictors of future responses – increases in the presence of multiple lines of evidence.
Figure 2.

Projected changes in climate-induced drivers across coastal systems relative to the recent past (1985–2014), after Cooley et al. (2022). Climate-induced drivers are arranged by row, while coastal systems are arranged by column. All measures are for the ocean surface, except changes in oxygen concentrations, which are subsurface (100–600 m) in upwelling and polar systems. Projections are derived from an ensemble of CMIP6 models interpolated to a 1° x 1° grid. Error bars represent 90% confidence.
An alternative approach that does not rely on projecting established relationships forward in time, involves using palaeodata to estimate the magnitude of ecological responses to past climate states analogous to projected future climates (Fordham et al., 2020). Examples of such palaeodata for coastal ecosystems include reef and sediment cores (Jones et al., 2019; Cohen et al., 2020; Cramer et al., 2021; Hesterberg et al., 2022; Bograd et al., 2023). The advantages of palaeo-analogues of future climate are that they potentially account for natural adaptation in the taxa or systems impacted, and that human impacts are effectively eliminated (Kiessling et al., 2023). But questions about the transferability of estimates remain.
Beyond the approaches used to project future risks of climate change, it is important, also, to ensure that the future being assessed is plausible. Recent reviews (Burgess et al., 2023; Schoeman et al., 2023) provide detailed analysis of the use of future scenarios (described in Table 3), as used in climate-change ecology. Results reveal that the practice of focusing exclusively on RCP8.5/SSP5-8.5 – often designated a “high-emissions scenario” – is common. But even when complemented by RCP2.6/SSP1-2.6 – commonly designated a “low-emissions scenario” – the use of this extreme scenario is problematic for projections out to 2100: while SSP1-2.6 is still attainable over this timeframe, SSP5-8.5 is highly unlikely (Hausfather and Peters, 2020), despite being potentially useful over the near- to mid-term (Schwalm et al., 2020). Instead, SSP2-4.5 (Table 3) is believed to be the most plausible of the common long-term scenarios, arguably along with SSP1-2.6, and while SSP3-7.0 is a better “business-as-usual” scenario than SSP5-8.5, especially in the long term, it is also reasonably implausible in some regards (Burgess et al., 2023). It is important to note, however, that the plausibility of future emissions scenarios depends heavily on whether countries’ ambitions to reduce such emissions will be matched with strong action (Rogelj et al., 2023). Irrespective, since much of the literature on projected impacts in the coastal zone by 2100 relies on RCP8.5/SSP5-8.5, significant caution is warranted when interpreting these projections.
Table 3.
Policy context of common future climate scenarios (Meinshausen et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2021). Scenarios are named by Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSPs) and radiative forcing level in 2100, approximating Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs; W m−2).
| Scenario | Policy relevance, including global warming levels (GWL) relative to the pre-industrial and corresponding 90% confidence intervals, as assessed by the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (IPCC, 2021) |
|---|---|
| SSP1-1.9 | A 1.5°C world: an equitable world with sustainable development achieves net zero greenhouse-gas emissions by mid-century and maintains net negative emissions for several decades thereafter. This stabilises global temperatures at 1.4°C (1.0–1.8°C) GWL. Minimal overshoot beyond 1.5 °C is in line with the stretch goal of the Paris Agreement. |
| SSP1-2.6 | A 2°C world: an equitable world with sustainable development achieves net zero emissions around 2075 and maintains net negative emissions for several decades thereafter. Temperatures remain below the target set by the Paris Agreement, being restricted to 1.8 °C (1.3–2.4°C) GWL. |
| SSP2-4.5 | Approximates current climate policies: a world implementing current climate policies and following current trends of slow reduction in consumption and energy use, sees emissions rising until around 2050, before declining to net zero by 2100. Temperatures exceed the Paris Agreement, reaching 2.7°C (2.1–3.5°C) by 2100 and stabilising thereafter. Current nationally determined contributions (NDCs) for 2030 achieve a slightly lower GWL of 2.4°C (1.8–3.4°C) (Hausfather and Moore, 2022). |
| SSP3-7.0 | Approximates a scenario under which no new climate policy is implemented: a world retreating from globalisation to focus on domestic issues deprioritises the environment, resulting in slow economic growth and a doubling of emissions by 2100. Warming reaches 3.6°C (2.8–4.6°C) GWL by 2100 and continues thereafter. |
| SSP5-8.5 | An extreme counterfactual: a world focusing on capitalism, open markets and consumption results in rapid economic growth. Emissions double by 2050 and triple by the end of the century. Warming reaches 4.4°C (3.3–5.7°C) by 2100 and continues thereafter. |
Projected future ocean conditions increase risks to ocean and coastal systems, including elevated risk of regional extirpations and global extinctions
A clear message from the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report cycle, including its Special Reports, is that risks from climate change escalate with the magnitude and duration of warming caused by greenhouse-gas emissions (Magnan et al., 2021; IPCC, 2023): every increment beyond 1.5°C of warming matters. Nowhere on Earth is this message more pertinent than along the world’s coasts, where warming is faster than for the global ocean as a whole (Figure 2; Lima and Wethey, 2012; Varela et al., 2023). The thermal inertia of the ocean, together with the acknowledgement that sea levels will continue to rise for centuries and remain elevated for millennia (Fox-Kemper et al., 2021), means that there are few easy ways to reduce risks of climate change to coastal ecosystems over the remainder of this century. But rapidly reducing emissions, alleviating non-climate anthropogenic stressors, and attempting to restore damaged habitats will provide more operating room for the full adaptation toolkit. This includes revising institutions related to ocean and coastal activities and users, developing new technologies and innovative built infrastructure, and employing marine and coastal nature-based solutions while also carefully managing existing and future coastal development (Duarte et al., 2020; Frazão Santos et al., 2020; Cooley et al., 2022; Shin et al., 2022; van Woesik et al., 2022; Pörtner et al., 2023; Rossbach et al., 2023).
Given this reality, together with the assessment that anthropogenic climate change has already exposed coastal ecosystems to conditions unprecedented over millennia, it can be projected with some confidence that the impacts already caused by climate change will become worse and more extensive (Cooley et al., 2022). Here, we present a selection of the most robust projections of future risk, focusing on habitat-forming species due to their importance in ecological structure and functioning.
Projected climate risks for habitat-forming coastal taxa
Evidence from the palaeorecord and from species-environment relationships suggests that ocean warming and acidification will result in declining coral reef extent and species richness (Pandolfi et al., 2011; Pandolfi and Kiessling, 2014; Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2018a; Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2019; van der Zande et al., 2020; Chaudhary et al., 2023). Recent assessments that exclude consideration of natural adaptive capacity project declines in reef extent by >70% at 1.5°C of warming, and by >99% at 2°C (Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2018b; Kalmus et al., 2022). Considering return times of severe bleaching-level heat events provides an even more pessimistic outlook (Kalmus et al., 2022). However, on the basis of results from a coral-symbiont eco-evolutionary model, Logan et al. (2021) concluded that natural adaptation – including evolution and other processes – could allow 70–80% of coral to survive the century with ~2°C of warming, but with warming beyond 3.5°C by 2100, <10% of coral cover would remain. The relatively high levels of trait heritability among corals (Bairos-Novak et al., 2021) further emphasise the potential for future adaptation. However, limits remain, and resilience is spatially variable, even when accounting for adaptive capacity (Cornwall et al., 2023).
Kelps and seagrasses are also at risk from future warming (Cooley et al., 2022). For both taxa, warming trends commonly underlie projections of extirpations at warm range edges, with poleward range extensions at cool range edges (Wilson and Lotze, 2019; Assis et al., 2022; Davis et al., 2022; Pecquet et al., 2022; Daru and Rock, 2023). However, there are exceptions to this pattern (e.g., Goldsmit et al., 2021), especially for invasive seagrasses (Wesselmann et al., 2021). Some species might even find refuge from warming at depth and boost their overall biomass due to increasing productivity in the cooler parts of their ranges (Davis et al., 2022). The potential effects of projected changes in marine heatwaves remain qualitative (e.g., Starko et al., 2022), although progress is being made towards more quantitative projections (e.g., Pruckner et al., 2022; Li and Donner, 2023).
Other climate-sensitive coastal taxa that contribute to habitat structure include mangroves and saltmarshes. But even for the well-studied mangrove forests, quantitative projections are challenged by difficulties in disentangling the impacts of recent climate change from those of other non-climate anthropogenic stressors, and by the mix of positive (e.g., through enhanced productivity due to CO2 enrichment and warming) and negative (e.g., due to sea-level rise and drought) effects of projected climate change (Friess et al., 2022). Further complications are introduced by uncertainties surrounding future trajectories of socioeconomic development in the coastal zone, which can have effects on projected gains or losses of coastal wetland habitat that at least equal those of climate change (Ouyang et al., 2022; Liang et al., 2023). Central to the future of these systems is the availability of accommodation space, which regulates their ability to accrete sediment and move inland in response to sea-level rise (Krauss, 2021; Rogers, 2021). In this sense, coastal development that restricts accommodation space and traps wetlands in a coastal squeeze is arguably the largest threat to their resilience (Cooley et al., 2022). Irrespective, analysis of reconstructed palaeorecords suggests projected rates of sea-level rise (Table 1) will overwhelm the ability of mangroves to keep pace with rising water levels by mid-century, even with ambitious mitigation of greenhouse-gas emissions, and that saltmarshes face the same fate by the end of the century (Horton et al., 2018; Saintilan et al., 2020; Törnqvist et al., 2020). Although the vulnerability of coastal wetlands decreases with increasing sediment availability, greater elevation on the shore, and increasing tidal range (Schuerch et al., 2018; Saintilan et al., 2020; Friess et al., 2022), efforts at restoration and protection appear to be the key to the future resilience of these systems. Quantitative projections remain contentious for other coastal systems, such as sandy beaches (e.g., Cooper et al., 2020; Vousdoukas et al., 2020a; Vousdoukas et al., 2020b).
Broader projections of climate risks for marine taxa and regions
When considering quantitative projections of processes such as range shifts (e.g., García Molinos et al., 2016; Gokturk et al., 2022) and phenology (e.g., Asch et al., 2019; Gokturk et al., 2022; Yamaguchi et al., 2022), analyses are often either taxon-specific or global, and not focused specifically on coastal ecosystems. The same is true for quantitative projections of future risk. Yet results are instructive for coastal ecosystems. For example, Trisos et al. (2020) project not only that temperatures across entire species’ ranges will transition to levels unprecedented in those species’ recent (1850–2005) experience, but that this will occur abruptly, especially for marine species such as seagrasses, corals, cephalopods, marine reptiles and marine mammals. This phenomenon is projected to manifest in tropical oceans before 2030 under the highest emissions scenarios and escalate with duration and the magnitude of emissions. Pigot et al. (2023) confirm this trend towards abrupt thermal exposure across species’ ranges. Further evidence comes from a recent analysis of future climate risk across ~25,000 marine species (Boyce et al., 2022), which found that by the end of the century, risk was substantially reduced for ~1.8°C relative to ~4.4°C of global warming, with 1.3% vs 2.7% of assessed species being at critical risk and 54% vs 84% at high risk, respectively. Since many of the taxa in these analyses occur primarily in coastal waters, these generic risks may be assumed to hold there, too.
Moving beyond projections of climate risk for individual taxa becomes more difficult, but climate analogues can help. For example, on the basis of data from the palaeorecord, Reddin et al. (2022) project that if warming levels approach those anticipated under the highest emissions scenarios (Table 3), taxa with thermal optima beyond ~21°C will experience elevated risk of extinction, as will those with thermal optima below ~11°C. This pattern is mirrored by projections from an ecophysiological model validated on spatial patterns of extinction from the fossil record, which projects extirpations at the tropics and extinctions at the poles, but with substantial reductions in risk from immediate and strong mitigation (Penn and Deutsch, 2022). Again, however, these are generic projections, and coastal taxa must be assumed to comply with reported patterns.
The emergence of ecosystem and global models for projecting of climate risks in the ocean
The growing need for policy advice in the face of these projected climate-change risks has challenged the scientific community to develop models that go beyond exploring risks to biodiversity, such as those discussed above, to instead assess risks to ecosystem functioning and service provision (Weiskopf et al., 2022). This requires modellers to build from familiar outputs of Earth System models (ESMs), such as changes in temperature, pH and salinity, and, more recently, nutrient availability, phytoplankton and even zooplankton biomass (Canadell et al., 2021), to project changes in primary and secondary production.
One response has been the development of the Fisheries and Marine Ecosystem Model Intercomparison Project (FishMIP), which specifies sets of common ESM forcings and model outputs for a diverse suite of marine fisheries and ecosystem models (Tittensor et al., 2018). The advantage of the “modelling intercomparison” approach is that it yields comparable projections from each model, allowing assessment of the range of plausible outcomes, given our current understanding and computing capacity (Heymans et al., 2020). This is important because marine ecosystem models still largely lack formal approaches to validation, calibration, and quantification of uncertainty (Steenbeek et al., 2021).
In terms of uncertainty, scenario uncertainty can be assessed by comparing model outputs generated under different future scenarios, such as those in Table 3. But parametric uncertainty – the uncertainty around the parameters within individual models – is far more difficult to address for models with any level of complexity, given current computational capacity (Steenbeek et al., 2021). Finally, intercomparison can help to quantify structural – inter-model – uncertainty, but attempts to do so reveal that the projected responses to two of the most fundamental inputs to the models – magnitude of warming and productivity of lower trophic levels – are inconsistent in both direction and magnitude amongst models (Heneghan et al., 2021). This disparity emphasises that understanding of how ecosystem-level effects emerge from individual-level processes remains incomplete. Despite limitations in individual ecosystem models, ensembles of models – such as those in FishMIP – provide projections of global decline in total biomass of marine animals that worsen with increasing emissions (Tittensor et al., 2021), with reasonable agreement in the direction of change in coastal systems, but little agreement on the magnitude of change (Cooley et al., 2022).
A view of the way ahead
Despite the recent advances in our understanding of the impacts of anthropogenic climate change on coastal ecosystems described in Cooley et al. (2022) and updated above, projections of future climate risk have not progressed much beyond the notion that risks escalate with cumulative emissions (i.e., with warming). Part of the problem is that our detailed understanding of processes at the single-organism level seldom adequately addresses interactions among multiple drivers, so does not scale intuitively to predict integrated responses at the levels of populations or ecosystems (Boyd et al., 2018; Collins et al., 2022). Theoretical progress is being made in this regard (Orr et al., 2020; Pirotta et al., 2022), but proposed solutions are not yet commonly implemented. This problem is exacerbated for coastal ecosystems by the interactions among numerous climate-induced and non-climate anthropogenic drivers (Table 2; Gissi et al., 2021). Not only do these interactions complicate the parameterisation of models, but they also complicate the scenario space that must be explored: what humans do in the coastal zone can often have a larger ecological effect than that of climate change. For example, under ambitious mitigation, conservation and coastal-zone planning can ameliorate climate impacts on coastal ecosystems, but climate-uninformed coastal development can condemn those same ecosystems (Cooley et al., 2022). The utility of advice to policymakers therefore requires more purposeful selection and articulation of scenarios to be considered – simply making projections for SSP1-2.6 and SSP5-8.5 cannot remain the norm. In this context, one solution might be to consider warming levels (e.g., 1.5°C, 2°C and 3°C relative to pre-industrial), each in combination with alternative coastal development scenarios. This is impractical with current CMIP6 model outputs because each scenario subsumes a shared socioeconomic pathway (Table 3), but the increasingly prominent use of climate-model emulators (Nicholls et al., 2020; IPCC, 2021) might provide a solution.
There are several other areas where progress is urgently needed. But one requires particular attention because we have not addressed it elsewhere in this review: the need to expand the knowledge systems on which our assessments depend by ensuring that Indigenous Knowledge and perspectives are more adequately represented in our assessments (Fischer et al., 2022; Schipper et al., 2022). Silent cores of sediment and coral have taught us so much about the past and the future; how much more could we learn from the rich oral histories held by Indigenous Peoples around the world?
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the contributions of Laurent Bopp, Philip Boyd, Simon Donner, Shin-Ichi Ito, Wolfgang Kiessling, Paulina Martinetto, Elena Ojea, Marie-Fanny Racault, Björn Rost, Mette Skern-Mauritzen, Dawit Yemane Ghebrehiwet, Lisa Levin and Karim Hilmi, who were Lead Authors or Review Editors on Chapter 3 of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report: Oceans and Coastal Ecosystems and Their Services. Without their work, neither that assessment nor this paper could have been completed. We also acknowledge the many Contributing Authors and Expert Reviewers for the IPCC Chapter, especially Olivier Torres, who provided the data for Figure 2.
Open peer review
To view the open peer review materials for this article, please visit http://doi.org/10.1017/cft.2023.27.
Author contribution
All authors contributed to all aspects of the development of this manuscript.
Financial support
D.S.S. was funded by Australian Research Council Discovery Project DP230102359. J.A.B. was funded by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship and a Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation ResearchPlus Scholarship.
Competing interest
The authors declare no competing interests exist.
References
- Adams DH, Tremain DM, Paperno R and Sonne C (2019) Florida lagoon at risk of ecosystem collapse. Science 365, 991–992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alabia ID, García Molinos J, Hirata T, Mueter FJ and David CL (2023) Pan-Arctic marine biodiversity and species co-occurrence patterns under recent climate. Scientific Reports 13, 4076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Allan H, Levin N and Kark S (2023) Quantifying and mapping the human footprint across Earth’s coastal areas. Ocean and Coastal Management 236, 106476. [Google Scholar]
- Andres K, Savarese M, Bovard B and Parsons M (2019) Coastal wetland geomorphic and vegetative change: Effects of sea-level rise and water management on brackish marshes. Estuaries and Coasts 42, 1308–1327. [Google Scholar]
- Ara Begum R, Lempert R, Ali E, Benjaminsen TA, Bernauer T, Cramer W, Cui X, Mach K, Nagy G, Stenseth NC, Sukumar R and Wester P (2022). Point of Departure and Key Concepts. In Pörtner H-O, Roberts DC, Tignor M, Poloczanska ES, Mintenbeck K, Alegría A, Craig M, Langsdorf S, Löschke S, Möller V, Okem A and Rama B (eds.), Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 121–196. [Google Scholar]
- Arafeh-Dalmau N, Montaño-Moctezuma G, Martínez JA, Beas-Luna R, Schoeman DS and Torres-Moye G (2019) Extreme marine heatwaves alter kelp forest community near its equatorward distribution limit. Frontiers in Marine Science 6, 499. [Google Scholar]
- Arias PA, Bellouin N, Coppola E, Jones RG, Krinner G, Marotzke J, Naik V, Palmer MD, Plattner G-K, Rogelj J, Rojas M, Sillmann J, Storelvmo T, Thorne PW, Trewin B, Achuta Rao K, Adhikary B, Allan RP, Armour K, Bala G, Barimalala R, Berger S, Canadell JG, Cassou C, Cherchi A, Collins W, Collins WD, Connors SL, Corti S, Cruz F, Dentener FJ, Dereczynski C, Di Luca A, Diongue Niang A, Doblas-Reyes FJ, Dosio A, Douville H, Engelbrecht F, Eyring V, Fischer E, Forster P, Fox-Kemper B, Fuglestvedt JS, Fyfe JC, Gillett NP, Goldfarb L, Gorodetskaya I, Gutierrez JM, Hamdi R, Hawkins E, Hewitt HT, Hope P, Islam AS, Jones C, Kaufman DS, Kopp RE, Kosaka Y, Kossin J, Krakovska S, Lee J-Y, Li J, Mauritsen T, Maycock TK, Meinshausen M, Min S-K, Monteiro PMS, Ngo-Duc TOtto F, Pinto I, Pirani A, Raghavan K, Ranasinghe R, Ruane AC, Ruiz L, Sallée J-B, Samset BH, Sathyendranath S, Seneviratne SI, Sörensson AA, Szopa S, Takayabu I, Tréguier A-M, van den Hurk B, Vautard R, von Schuckmann K, Zaehle S, Zhang X and Zickfeld K (2021). Technical Summary. In Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C, Berger S, Caud N, Chen Y, Goldfarb L, Gomis MI, Huang M, Leitzell K, Lonnoy E, JBR Matthews, Maycock TK, Waterfield T, Yelekçl O, Yu R and Zhou B (eds.), Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33−144. [Google Scholar]
- Armitage AR, Weaver CA, Kominoski JS and Pennings SC (2020) Resistance to hurricane effects varies among wetland vegetation types in the marsh–mangrove ecotone. Estuaries and Coasts 43, 960–970. [Google Scholar]
- Arriaza, BT, Reinhard KJ, Araújo AG, Orellana NC and Standen VG (2010) Possible influence of the ENSO phenomenon on the pathoecology of diphyllobothriasis and anisakiasis in ancient Chinchorro populations. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 105, 66–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Asch RG, Stock CA and Sarmiento JL (2019) Climate change impacts on mismatches between phytoplankton blooms and fish spawning phenology. Global Change Biology 25, 2544–2559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Assis J, Serrão EA, Duarte CM, Fragkopoulou E and Krause-Jensen D (2022) Major Expansion of Marine Forests in a Warmer Arctic. Frontiers in Marine Science 9, 850368. [Google Scholar]
- Bairos-Novak KR, Hoogenboom MO, van Oppen MJH and Connolly SR (2021) Coral adaptation to climate change: Meta-analysis reveals high heritability across multiple traits. Global Change Biology 27, 5694–5710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barton A, Waldbusser GG, Feely RA, Weisberg SB, Newton J, Hales B, Cudd S, Benoit Eudeline B, Langdon CJ, Jefferds I, King T, Suhrbier A and McLaughlin K (2015) Impacts of coastal acidification on the Pacific Northwest shellfish industry and adaptation strategies implemented in response. Oceanography 28, 146–159. [Google Scholar]
- Bates AE, Barrett NS, Stuart-Smith RD, Holbrook NJ, Thompson PA and Edgar GJ (2014) Resilience and signatures of tropicalization in protected reef fish communities. Nature Climate Change 4, 62–67. [Google Scholar]
- Befus KM, Barnard PL, Hoover DJ, Finzi Hart JA and Voss CI (2020) Increasing threat of coastal groundwater hazards from sea-level rise in California. Nature Climate Change 10, 946–952. [Google Scholar]
- Bograd SJ, Jacox MG, Hazen EL, Lovecchio E, Montes I, Pozo Buil M, Shannon LJ, Sydeman WJ and Rykaczewski RR (2023) Climate change impacts on eastern boundary upwelling systems. Annual Review of Marine Science 15, 303–328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Borchert SM, Osland MJ, Enwright NM and Griffith KT (2018) Coastal wetland adaptation to sea level rise: Quantifying potential for landward migration and coastal squeeze. Journal of Applied Ecology 55, 2876–2887. [Google Scholar]
- Bosserelle AL, Morgan LK and Hughes MW (2022) Groundwater rise and associated flooding in coastal settlements due to sea-level rise: A review of processes and methods. Earth’s Future 10, e2021EF002580. [Google Scholar]
- Boyce DG, Tittensor DP, Garilao C, Henson S, Kaschner K, Kesner-Reyes K, Pigot A, RodolfoReyes RB, Gabriel Reygondeau G, Schleit KE, Shackell NL, Sorongon-Yap P and Worm B (2022) A climate risk index for marine life. Nature Climate Change 12, 854–862. [Google Scholar]
- Boyd PW, Collins S, Dupont S, Fabricius K, Gattuso J-P, Havenhand J, Hutchins DA, Riebesell U, Rintoul MS, Vichi M, Biswas H, Ciotti A, Gao K, Gehlen M, Hurd CL, Kurihara H, McGraw CM, Navarro JM, Nilsson GE, Passow U and Pörtner H-O (2018) Experimental strategies to assess the biological ramifications of multiple drivers of global ocean change – A review. Global Change Biology 24, 2239–2261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bradshaw C, Jakobsson M, Brüchert V, Bonaglia S, Mörth C-M, Muchowski J, Stranne C and Sköld M (2021) Physical disturbance by bottom trawling suspends particulate matter and alters biogeochemical processes on and near the seafloor. Frontiers in Marine Science 8, 683331. [Google Scholar]
- Brander K, Bruno J, Hobday A and Schoeman D (2011) The value of attribution. Nature Climate Change 1, 70–71. [Google Scholar]
- Brander KM (2007) Global fish production and climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 19709–19714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brandt S, Wassmann P and Piepenburg D (2023) Revisiting the footprints of climate change in Arctic marine food webs: An assessment of knowledge gained since 2010. Frontiers in Marine Science 10, 1096222. [Google Scholar]
- Branoff BL (2020) Mangrove disturbance and response following the 2017 hurricane season in Puerto Rico. Estuaries and Coasts 43, 1248–1262. [Google Scholar]
- Brauko KM, Cabral A, Costa NV, Hayden J, Dias CEP, Leite ES, Leite ES, Westphal RD, Mueller CM, Hall-Spencer JM, Rodrigues RR, Rörig LR, Pagliosa PR, Fonseca AL, Alarcon OE and Horta PA (2020) Marine heatwaves, sewage and eutrophication combine to trigger deoxygenation and biodiversity loss: A SW Atlantic case study. Frontiers in Marine Science 7, 590258. [Google Scholar]
- Breitburg D, Levin LA, Oschlies A, Grégoire M, Chavez FP, Conley DJ, … Zhang J (2018) Declining oxygen in the global ocean and coastal waters. Science 359, eaam7240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bricheno LM, Wolf J and Sun Y (2021) Saline intrusion in the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna megadelta. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 252, 107246. [Google Scholar]
- Brown MB, Morrison JC, Schulz TT, Cross MS, Püschel-Hoeneisen N, Suresh V and Eguren A (2022) Using the conservation standards framework to address the effects of climate change on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Climate 10, 13. [Google Scholar]
- Buenafe KCV, Dunn DC, Everett JD, Brito-Morales I, Schoeman DS, Hanson JO, Alvise Dabalà A, Neubert S, Cannicci S, Kaschner K and Richardson AJ (2023) A metric-based framework for climate-smart conservation planning. Ecological Applications 33, e2852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burge CA and Hershberger PK (2020) Climate change can drive marine diseases. In Behringer DC, Silliman BR and Lafferty KD (eds). Marine Disease Ecology. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 83–94. [Google Scholar]
- Burgess MG, Becker SL, Langendorf RE, Fredston A and Brooks CM (2023) Climate change scenarios in fisheries and aquatic conservation research. ICES Journal of Marine Science 80, 1163–1178. [Google Scholar]
- Byers JE (2021) Marine parasites and disease in the era of global climate change. Annual Review of Marine Science 13, 397–420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Canadell JG, Monteiro PMS, Costa MH, Cotrim da Cunha L, Cox PM, Eliseev AV, Henson S, Ishii M, Jaccard S, Koven C, Lohila A, Patra PK, Piao S, Rogelj J, Syampungani S, Zaehle S and Zickfeld K (2021) Global carbon and other biogeochemical cycles and feedbacks. In Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C, Berger S, Caud N, Chen Y, Goldfarb L, Gomis MI, Huang M, Leitzell K, Lonnoy E, JBR Matthews, Maycock TK, Waterfield T, Yelekçl O, Yu R and Zhou B (eds.). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 673–816. [Google Scholar]
- Castañeda-Moya E, Rivera-Monroy VH, Chambers RM, Zhao X, Lamb-Wotton L, Gorsky A, Gaiser EE, Troxlera TG, Kominoski JS and Hiatt M (2020) Hurricanes fertilize mangrove forests in the Gulf of Mexico (Florida Everglades, USA). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117, 4831–4841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chaikin S and Belmaker J (2023) Fish depth redistributions do not allow maintenance of abundance in a region of rapid change. Oikos, e09650. [Google Scholar]
- Chambers LG, Steinmuller HE and Breithaupt JL (2019) Toward a mechanistic understanding of “peat collapse” and its potential contribution to coastal wetland loss. Ecology 100, e02720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chaudhary C, Alfaro-Lucas JM, Simões MVP, Brandt A and Saeedi H (2023) Potential geographic shifts in the coral reef ecosystem under climate change. Progress in Oceanography 213, 103001. [Google Scholar]
- Chaudhary C, Richardson AJ, Schoeman DS and Costello MJ (2021) Global warming is causing a more pronounced dip in marine species richness around the equator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118, e2015094118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen D, Rojas M, Samset BH, Cobb K, Diongue Niang A, Edwards P, Emori S, Faria SH, Hawkins E, Hope P, Huybrechts P, Meinshausen M, Mustafa SK, Plattner G-K and Tréguier A-M (2021) Framing, Context, and Methods. In Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C, Berger S, Caud N, Chen Y, Goldfarb L, Gomis MI, Huang M, Leitzell K, Lonnoy E, Matthews JBR, Maycock TK, Waterfield T, Yelekçl O, Yu R and Zhou B (eds.), Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 147−286. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng L, Abraham J, Trenberth KE, Fasullo J, Boyer T, Mann ME, Zhu J, Wang F, Locarnini R, Li Y, Zhang B, Yu F, Wan L, Chen X, Feng L, Song X, Liu Y, Reseghetti F, Simoncelli S, Gouretski V, Chen G, Mishonov A, Reagan J and Li G (2023) Another year of record heat for the oceans. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 40, 963–974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng L, Trenberth KE, Gruber N, Abraham JP, Fasullo JT, Li G, Mann ME, Zhao X and Zhu J (2020) Improved estimates of changes in upper ocean salinity and the hydrological cycle. Journal of Climate 33, 10357–10381. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng L, von Schuckmann K, Abraham JP, Trenberth KE, Mann ME, Zanna L, England MH, Zika JD, Fasullo JT, Yu Y, Pan Y, Zhu J, Newsom ER, Bronselaer B and Lin X (2022) Past and future ocean warming. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment 3, 776–794. [Google Scholar]
- Chust G, Taboada FG, Alvarez P and Ibaibarriaga L (2023) Species acclimatization pathways: Latitudinal shifts and timing adjustments to track ocean warming. Ecological Indicators 146, 109752. [Google Scholar]
- Claar DC and Wood CL (2020) Pulse heat stress and parasitism in a warming world. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 35, 704–715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cohen MCL, Figueiredo BL, Oliveira NN, Fontes NA, França MC, Pessenda LCR, de Souza AV, Macario K, Giannini PCF, Bendassolli JA and Lima P (2020) Impacts of Holocene and modern sea-level changes on estuarine mangroves from northeastern Brazil. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 45, 375–392. [Google Scholar]
- Cohen RE, James CC, Lee A, Martinelli MM, Muraoka WT, Ortega M, Sadowski R, Starkey L, Szesciorka AR, Timko SE, Weiss EL and Franks PJS (2018) Marine host-pathogen dynamics: Influences of global climate change. Oceanography 31, 182–193. [Google Scholar]
- Collins S, Whittaker H and Thomas MK (2022) The need for unrealistic experiments in global change biology. Current Opinion in Microbiology 68, 102151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cooley S, Schoeman D, Bopp L, Boyd P, Donner S, Ghebrehiwet DY, Ito S-i, Kiessling W, Martinetto P, Ojea E, Racault M-F, Rost B and Skern-Mauritzen M (2022) Oceans and Coastal Ecosystems and Their Services. In Pörtner H-O, Roberts DC, Tignor M, Poloczanska ES, Mintenbeck K, Alegría A, Craig M, Langsdorf S, Löschke S, Möller V, Okem A and Rama B (eds.), Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 379–550. [Google Scholar]
- Cooper JAG, Masselink G, Coco G, Short AD, Castelle B, Rogers K, Anthony E, Green AN, Kelley JT, Pilkey OH and Jackson DWT (2020) Sandy beaches can survive sea-level rise. Nature Climate Change 10, 993–995. [Google Scholar]
- Corell H, Bradshaw C and Sköld M (2023) Sediment suspended by bottom trawling can reduce reproductive success in a broadcast spawning fish. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 282, 108232. [Google Scholar]
- Cornwall CE, Comeau S, Donner SD, Perry C, Dunne J, Hooidonk R, Ryan JS and Logan CA (2023) Coral adaptive capacity insufficient to halt global transition of coral reefs into net erosion under climate change. Global Change Biology 29, 3010–3018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cornwall CE, Comeau S, Kornder NA, Perry CT, van Hooidonk R, DeCarlo TM, Pratchett MS, Anderson KD, Browne N, Carpenter R, Diaz-Pulido G, D’Olivo JP, Doo SS, Figueiredo J, Fortunato SAV, Kennedy E, Lantz CA, McCulloch MT, González-Rivero M, Schoepf V, Smithers SG and Lowe RJ (2021) Global declines in coral reef calcium carbonate production under ocean acidification and warming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118, e2015265118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Costa Y, Martins I, de Carvalho GC and Barros F (2023) Trends of sea-level rise effects on estuaries and estimates of future saline intrusion. Ocean and Coastal Management 236, 106490. [Google Scholar]
- Coulson PG, Leary T, Chandrapavan A, Wakefield CB and Newman SJ (2023) Going with the flow: The case of three tropical reef fish transported to cool temperate waters following an extreme marine heatwave. Regional Studies in Marine Science 61, 102856. [Google Scholar]
- Cramer KL, Donovan MK, Jackson JBC, Greenstein BJ, Korpanty CA, Cook GM and Pandolfi JM (2021) The transformation of Caribbean coral communities since humans. Ecology and Evolution 11, 10098–10118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cusset F, Fort J, Mallory M, Braune B, Massicotte P and Massé G (2019) Arctic seabirds and shrinking sea ice: Egg analyses reveal the importance of ice-derived resources. Scientific Reports 9, 15405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dai M, Zhao Y, Chai F, Chen M, Chen N, Chen Y, Cheng D, Gan J, Guan D, Hong Y, Huang J, Lee Y, Leung KMY, Lim PE, Lin S, Lin X, Liu X, Liu Z, Luo Y-W, Meng F, Sangmanee C, Shen Y, Uthaipan K, Talaat WIAW, Wan XS, Wang C, Wang D, Wang G, Wang S, Wang Y, Wang Y, Wang Z, Wang Z, Xu Y, Yang J-YT, Yang Y, Yasuhara M, Yu D, Yu J, Yu L, Zhang Z, Zhang Z (2023). Persistent eutrophication and hypoxia in the coastal ocean. Cambridge Prisms: Coastal Futures 1, E19. [Google Scholar]
- Daru BH and Rock BM (2023) Reorganization of seagrass communities in a changing climate. Nature Plants 9, 1034–1043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis TR, Champion C and Coleman MA (2022) Ecological interactions mediate projected loss of kelp biomass under climate change. Diversity and Distributions 28, 306–317. [Google Scholar]
- de Vargas Ribeiro F, Pessarrodona A, Tucket C, Mulders Y, Pereira RC and Wernberg T (2022) Shield wall: Kelps are the last stand against corals in tropicalized reefs. Functional Ecology 36, 2445–2455. [Google Scholar]
- De Leo FC, Gauthier M, Nephin J, Mihály S and Juniper SK (2017) Bottom trawling and oxygen minimum zone influences on continental slope benthic community structure off Vancouver Island (NE Pacific). Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 137, 404–419. [Google Scholar]
- DeCarlo TM, Gajdzik L, Ellis J, Coker DJ, Roberts MB, Hammerman NM, Pandolfi JM, Monroe AA and Berumen ML (2020) Nutrient-supplying ocean currents modulate coral bleaching susceptibility. Science Advances 6, eabc5493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Descamps S, Ramírez F, Benjaminsen S, Anker-Nilssen T, Barrett RT, Burr Z, Christensen-Dalsgaard S, Erikstad KE, Irons DB, Lorentsen S-H, Mallory ML, Robertson GJ, Reiertsen TK, Strøm H, Varpe Ø and Lavergne S (2019) Diverging phenological responses of Arctic seabirds to an earlier spring. Global Change Biology 25, 4081–4091 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doney SC, Busch DS, Cooley SR and Kroeker KJ (2020) The impacts of ocean acidification on marine ecosystems and reliant human communities. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 45, 83–112. [Google Scholar]
- Donovan MK, Burkepile DE, Kratochwill C, Shlesinger T, Sully S, Oliver TA, Hodgson G, Freiwald J and van Woesik R (2021) Local conditions magnify coral loss after marine heatwaves. Science 372, 977–980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doo SS, Kealoha A, Andersson A, Cohen AL, Hicks TL, Johnson ZI, Long MH, McElhany P, Mollica N, Shamberger KEF, Silbiger NJ, Takeshita Y and Busch DS (2020) The challenges of detecting and attributing ocean acidification impacts on marine ecosystems. ICES Journal of Marine Science 77, 2411–2422. [Google Scholar]
- Doxa A, Almpanidou V, Katsanevakis S, Queirós AM, Kaschner K, Garilao C, Reyes K and Mazaris AD (2022) 4D marine conservation networks: Combining 3D prioritization of present and future biodiversity with climatic refugia. Global Change Biology 28, 4577–4588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duarte CM, Agusti S, Barbier E, Britten GL, Castilla JC, Gattuso J-P, … Worm B (2020) Rebuilding marine life. Nature 580, 39–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ducklow H, Cimino M, Dunton KH, Fraser WR, Hopcroft RR, Ji R, Miller AJ, Ohman MD and Sosik HM (2022) Marine pelagic ecosystem responses to climate variability and change. BioScience 72, 827–850. [Google Scholar]
- Durand G, van den Broeke MR, Le Cozannet G, Edwards TL, Holland PR, Jourdain NC, Marzeion B, Mottram R, Nicholls RJ, Pattyn F, Paul F, Slangen ABA, Winkelmann R, Burgard C, van Calcar CJ, Barré J-B, Bataille A and Chapuis A (2022) Sea-level rise: From global perspectives to local services. Frontiers in Marine Science 8, 709595. [Google Scholar]
- Dutra LXC, Haywood MDE, Singh S, Ferreira M, Johnson JE, Veitayaki J, Kininmonth S, Morris CW and Piovano S (2021) Synergies between local and climate-driven impacts on coral reefs in the Tropical Pacific: A review of issues and adaptation opportunities. Marine Pollution Bulletin 164, 111922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eddy TD, Lam VWY, Reygondeau G, Cisneros-Montemayor AM, Greer K, Palomares MLD, Bruno JF, Ota Y and Cheung WWL (2021) Global decline in capacity of coral reefs to provide ecosystem services. One Earth 4, 1278–1285. [Google Scholar]
- Ellis JI, Jamil T, Anlauf H, Coker DJ, Curdia J, Hewitt J, Jones BH, Krokos G, Kürten B, Hariprasad D, Roth F, Carvalho S and Hoteit I (2019) Multiple stressor effects on coral reef ecosystems. Global Change Biology 25, 4131–4146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eswar D, Karuppusamy R and Chellamuthu S (2021) Drivers of soil salinity and their correlation with climate change. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 50, 310–318. [Google Scholar]
- Favoretto F, Sánchez C and Aburto-Oropeza O (2022) Warming and marine heatwaves tropicalize rocky reefs communities in the Gulf of California. Progress in Oceanography 206, 102838. [Google Scholar]
- Feher LC, Osland MJ, Anderson GH, Vervaeke WC, Krauss KW, Whelan KRT, Balentine KM, Tiling-Range G, Smith TJ and Cahoon DR (2020) The long-term effects of hurricanes Wilma and Irma on soil elevation change in everglades mangrove forests. Ecosystems 23, 917–931. [Google Scholar]
- Félix-Loaiza AC, Rodríguez-Bravo LM, Beas-Luna R, Lorda J, de La Cruz-González E and Malpica-Cruz L (2022) Marine heatwaves facilitate invasive algae takeover as foundational kelp. Botanica Marina 65, 315–319. [Google Scholar]
- Fischer M, Maxwell K, Nuunoq, Pedersen H, Greeno D, Jingwas N, Blair JG, Hugu S, Mustonen T, Murtomäki E and Mustonen K (2022) Empowering her guardians to nurture our Ocean’s future. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 32, 271–296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fisher R, O’Leary RA, Low-Choy S, Mengersen K, Knowlton N, Brainard RE and Caley MJ (2015) Species richness on coral reefs and the pursuit of convergent global estimates. Current Biology 25, 500–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fordham DA, Jackson ST, Brown SC, Huntley B, Brook BW, Dahl-Jensen D, Gilbert MTP, Otto-Bliesner BL, Svensson A, Theodoridis S, Wilmshurst JM, Buettel JC, Canteri E, McDowell M, Orlando L, Pilowsky J, Rahbek C and Nogues-Bravo D (2020) Using paleo-archives to safeguard biodiversity under climate change. Science 369, eabc5654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fox MD, Cohen AL, Rotjan RD, Mangubhai S, Sandin SA, Smith JE, Thorrold SR, Dissly L, Mollica NR and Obura D (2021) Increasing coral reef resilience through successive marine heatwaves. Geophysical Research Letters 48, e2021GL094128. [Google Scholar]
- Fox-Kemper B, Hewitt HT, Xiao C, Aðalgeirsdóttir G, Drijfhout SS, Edwards TL, Golledge NR, Hemer M, Kopp RE, Krinner G, Mix A, Notz D, Nowicki S, Nurhati IS, Ruiz L, Sallée J-B, ABA Slangen and Yu Y (2021) Ocean, Cryosphere and Sea Level Change. In Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C, Berger S, Caud N, Chen Y, Goldfarb L, Gomis MI, Huang M, Leitzell K, Lonnoy E, JBR Matthews, Maycock TK, Waterfield T, Yelekçl O, Yu R and Zhou B (eds.). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1211–1362. [Google Scholar]
- França FM, Benkwitt CE, Peralta G, Robinson JPW, Graham NAJ, Tylianakis JM, Berenguer E, Lees AC, Ferreira J, Louzada J and Barlow J (2020). Climatic and local stressor interactions threaten tropical forests and coral reefs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 375, 20190116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fredston A, Pinsky M, Selden RL, Szuwalski C, Thorson JT, Gaines SD and Halpern BS (2021) Range edges of North American marine species are tracking temperature over decades. Global Change Biology 27, 3145–3156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fredston-Hermann A, Selden R, Pinsky M, Gaines SD and Halpern BS (2020) Cold range edges of marine fishes track climate change better than warm edges. Global Change Biology 26, 2908–2922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frid O, Malamud S, Franco AD, Guidetti P, Azzurro E, Claudet J, Micheli F, Yahel R, Sala E and Belmaker J (2023) Marine protected areas’ positive effect on fish biomass persists across the steep climatic gradient of the Mediterranean Sea. Journal of Applied Ecology 60, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Friess DA, Adame MF, Adams JB and Lovelock CE (2022) Mangrove forests under climate change in a 2°C world. WIREs Climate Change 13, e792. [Google Scholar]
- Fujiwara M, Simpson A, Torres-Ceron M and Martinez-Andrade F (2022) Life-history traits and temporal patterns in the incidence of coastal fishes experiencing tropicalization. Ecosphere 13, e4188. [Google Scholar]
- Ganley LC, Byrnes J, Pendleton DE, Mayo CA, Friedland KD, Redfern JV, Turner JT and Brault S (2022) Effects of changing temperature phenology on the abundance of a critically endangered baleen whale. Global Ecology and Conservation 38, e02193. [Google Scholar]
- Gao W, Du J, Gao S, Xu Y, Li B, Wei X, Zhang Z, Liu J and Li P (2023) Shoreline change due to global climate change and human activity at the Shandong Peninsula from 2007 to 2020. Frontiers in Marine Science 9, 1123067. [Google Scholar]
- Genin A, Levy L, Sharon G, Raitsos DE and Diamant A (2020) Rapid onsets of warming events trigger mass mortality of coral reef fish. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117, 25378–25385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giraldo-Ospina A, Kendrick GA and Hovey RK (2020) Depth moderates loss of marine foundation species after an extreme marine heatwave: Could deep temperate reefs act as a refuge? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 287, 20200709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gissi E, Manea E, Mazaris AD, Fraschetti S, Almpanidou V, Bevilacqua S, Coll M, Guarnieri G, Lloret-Lloret E, Pascual M, Petza D, Rilov G, Schonwald M, Stelzenmüller V and Katsanevakis S (2021) A review of the combined effects of climate change and other local human stressors on the marine environment. Science of the Total Environment 755, 142564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gokturk EN, Bartlett BS, Erisman B, Heyman W and Asch RG (2022) Loss of suitable ocean habitat and phenological shifts among grouper and snapper spawning aggregations in the Greater Caribbean under climate change. Marine Ecology Progress Series 699, 91–115. [Google Scholar]
- Goldsmit J, Schlegel RW, Filbee-Dexter K, MacGregor KA, Johnson LE, Mundy CJ, Savoie AM, McKindsey CW, Howland KL and Archambault P (2021) Kelp in the Eastern Canadian Arctic: Current and Future predictions of habitat suitability and cover. Frontiers in Marine Science 8, 742209. [Google Scholar]
- Golubova EY (2021) Breeding Biology of the crested auklet (Aethia cristatella, Alcidae, Charadriiformes) in the northern part of the Sea of Okhotsk. Biology Bulletin 48, 1541–1562. [Google Scholar]
- Gonzalez A, Chase JM and O’Connor MI (2023) A framework for the detection and attribution of biodiversity change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 378, 20220182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goreau TJF and Hayes RL (2021) Global warming triggers coral reef bleaching tipping point. Ambio 50, 1137–1140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grady JM, Maitner BS, Winter AS, Kaschner K, Tittensor DP, Record S, Smith FA, Wilson AM, Dell AI, Zarnetske PL, Wearing HJ, Alfaro B and Brown JH (2019) Metabolic asymmetry and the global diversity of marine predators. Science 363, eaat4220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grech A, Chartrand-Miller K, Erftemeijer P, Fonseca M, McKenzie L, Rasheed M, Taylor H and Coles R (2012) A comparison of threats, vulnerabilities and management approaches in global seagrass bioregions. Environmental Research Letters 7, 024006. [Google Scholar]
- Grémillet D and Descamps S (2023) Ecological impacts of climate change on Arctic marine megafauna. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 38, 773–783. 10.1016/j.tree.2023.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grieger R, Capon SJ, Hadwen WL and Mackey B (2020) Between a bog and a hard place: A global review of climate change effects on coastal freshwater wetlands. Climatic Change 163, 161–179. [Google Scholar]
- Gulev SK, Thorne PW, Ahn J, Dentener FJ, Domingues CM, Gerland S, Gong D, Kaufman DS, Nnamchi HC, Quaas J, Rivera JA, Sathyendranath S, Smith SL, Trewin B, von Schuckmann K and Vose RS (2021) Changing State of the Climate System. In Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C, Berger S, Caud N, Chen Y, Goldfarb L, Gomis MI, Huang M, Leitzell K, Lonnoy E, Matthews JBR, Maycock TK, Waterfield T, Yelekçl O, Yu R and Zhou B (eds.), Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 287–422. [Google Scholar]
- Gutowsky SE, Baak JE, Gaston AJ and Mallory ML (2022) Sea ice extent and phenology influence breeding of high-Arctic seabirds: 4 decades of monitoring in Nunavut, Canada. Oecologia 198, 393–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Halpern BS, Frazier M, Afflerbach J, Lowndes JS, Micheli F, O’Hara C, Scarborough C and Selkoe KA (2019) Recent pace of change in human impact on the world’s ocean. Scientific Reports 9, 11609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hammerschlag N, McDonnell LH, Rider MJ, Street GM, Hazen EL, Natanson LJ, McCandless CT, Boudreau MR, Gallagher AJ, Pinsky ML and Kirtman B (2022) Ocean warming alters the distributional range, migratory timing, and spatial protections of an apex predator, the tiger shark (Galeocerdo cuvier). Global Change Biology 28, 1990–2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hansen G, Stone D, Auffhammer M, Huggel C and Cramer W (2016) Linking local impacts to changes in climate: A guide to attribution. Regional Environmental Change 16, 527–541. [Google Scholar]
- Harvell CD, Mitchell CE, Ward JR, Altizer S, Dobson AP, Ostfeld RS and Samuel MD (2002) Climate warming and disease risks for terrestrial and marine biota. Science 296, 2158–2162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harvell CD, Montecino-Latorre D, Caldwell JM, Burt JM, Bosley K, Keller A, Heron SF, Salomon AK, Lee L, Pontier O, Pattengill-Semmens C and Gaydos JK (2019) Disease epidemic and a marine heat wave are associated with the continental-scale collapse of a pivotal predator (Pycnopodia helianthoides). Science Advances 5, eaau7042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hausfather Z and Moore FC (2022) Net-zero commitments could limit warming to below 2 °C. Nature 604, 247–248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hausfather Z and Peters GP (2020) Emissions – the ‘business as usual’ story is misleading. Nature 577, 618–620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hays GC, Chivers WJ, Laloë J-O, Sheppard C and Esteban N (2021) Impact of marine heatwaves for sea turtle nest temperatures. Biology Letters 17, 20210038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He Q and Silliman BR (2019) Climate change, human impacts, and coastal ecosystems in the Anthropocene. Current Biology 29, R1021–R1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heneghan RF, Galbraith E, Blanchard JL, Harrison C, Barrier N, Bulman C, Cheung W, Coll M, Eddy TD, Erauskin-Extramiana M, Everett JD, Fernandes-Salvador JA, Gascuel D, Guiet J, Maury O, Palacios-Abrantes J, Petrik CM, du Pontavice H, Richardson AJ, Steenbeek J, Tai TC, Volkholz J, Woodworth-Jefcoats PA and Tittensor DP (2021) Disentangling diverse responses to climate change among global marine ecosystem models. Progress in Oceanography 198, 102659. [Google Scholar]
- Herbert ER, Boon P, Burgin AJ, Neubauer SC, Franklin RB, Ardón M, Hopfensperger KN, Lamers LPM and Gell P (2015) A global perspective on wetland salinization: Ecological consequences of a growing threat to freshwater wetlands. Ecosphere 6, art206. [Google Scholar]
- Hesterberg SG, Jackson K and Bell SS (2022) Climate drives coupled regime shifts across subtropical estuarine ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119, e2121654119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heymans JJ, Bundy A, Christensen V, Coll M, de Mutsert K, Fulton EA, Piroddi C, Shin Y-J, Steenbeek J and Travers-Trolet M (2020) The ocean decade: A true ecosystem modeling challenge. Frontiers in Marine Science 7, 554573. [Google Scholar]
- Hobday AJ, Alexander LV, Perkins SE, Smale DA, Straub SC, Oliver ECJ, Benthuysen JA, Burrows MT, Donat MG, Feng M, Holbrook NJ, Moore PJ, Scannell HA, Gupta AS and Wernberg T (2016) A hierarchical approach to defining marine heatwaves. Progress in Oceanography 141, 227–238. [Google Scholar]
- Hoegh-Guldberg O, Jacob D, Taylor M, Bindi M, Brown S, Camilloni I, Diedhiou A, Djalante R, Ebi KL, Engelbrecht F, Guiot J, Hijioka Y, Mehrotra S, Payne A, Seneviratne SI, Thomas A, Warren R and Zhou G (2018a) Impacts of 1.5˚C global warming on natural and human systems. In Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner H-O, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, Péan C, Pidcock R, Connors S, Matthews JBR, Chen Y, Zhou X, Gomis MI, Lonnoy E, Maycock T, Tignor M and Waterfield T (eds.), Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. IPCC. [Google Scholar]
- Hoegh-Guldberg O, Kennedy EV, Beyer HL, McClennen C and Possingham HP (2018b) Securing a long-term future for coral reefs. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 33, 936–944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoegh-Guldberg O, Pendleton L and Kaup A (2019) People and the changing nature of coral reefs. Regional Studies in Marine Science 30, 100699. [Google Scholar]
- Horton BP, Shennan I, Bradley SL, Cahill N, Kirwan M, Kopp RE and Shaw TA (2018) Predicting marsh vulnerability to sea-level rise using Holocene relative sea-level data. Nature Communications 9, 2687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu S, Sprintall J, Guan C, McPhaden MJ, Wang F, Hu D and Cai W (2020) Deep-reaching acceleration of global mean ocean circulation over the past two decades. Science Advances 6, eaax7727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hughes DJ, Alderdice R, Cooney C, Kühl M, Pernice M, Voolstra CR and Suggett DJ (2020) Coral reef survival under accelerating ocean deoxygenation. Nature Climate Change 10, 296–307. [Google Scholar]
- Hughes TP, Barnes ML, Bellwood DR, Cinner JE, Cumming GS, Jackson JBC, Kleypas J, Leemput IA van de, Lough JM, Morrison TH, Palumbi SR, van Nes EH and Scheffer M (2017) Coral reefs in the Anthropocene. Nature 546, 82–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- IPCC (2021) Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. In Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C, Berger S, Caud N, Chen Y, Goldfarb L, Gomis MI, Huang M, Leitzell K, Lonnoy E, Matthews JBR, Maycock TK, Waterfield T, Yelekçl O, Yu R and Zhou B (eds.), Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- IPCC (2022) Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In Pörtner H-O, Roberts DC, Tignor M, Poloczanska ES, Mintenbeck K, Alegría A, Craig M, Langsdorf S, Löschke S, Möller V, Okem A and Rama B (eds.), Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- IPCC (2023) Summary for Policymakers . In Lee H and Romero J (eds.), Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC, pp. 1–34. [Google Scholar]
- Jones MC, Wingard GL, Stackhouse B, Keller K, Willard D, Marot M, Landacre B and Bernhardt CE (2019) Rapid inundation of Southern Florida coastline despite low relative sea-level rise rates during the late-Holocene. Nature Communications 10, 3231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kalmus P, Ekanayaka A, Kang E, Baird M and Gierach M (2022) Past the Precipice? Projected Coral habitability under global heating. Earth’s Future 10, e2021EF002608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kellner A, Atwood TC, Douglas DC, Breck SW and Wittemyer G (2023) High winds and melting sea ice trigger landward movement in a polar bear population of concern. Ecosphere 14, e4420. [Google Scholar]
- Khondoker M, Mandal S, Gurav R and Hwang S (2023). Freshwater shortage, salinity increase, and global food production: A need for sustainable irrigation water desalination–a scoping review. Earth 4, 223–240. [Google Scholar]
- Kiessling W, Smith JA and Raja NB (2023) Improving the relevance of paleontology to climate change policy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 120, e2201926119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirwan ML and Gedan KB (2019) Sea-level driven land conversion and the formation of ghost forests. Nature Climate Change 9, 450–457. [Google Scholar]
- Koehlinger JA, Newton J, Mickett J, Thompson L and Klinger T (2023) Large and transient positive temperature anomalies in Washington’s coastal nearshore waters during the 2013–2015 northeast Pacific marine heatwave. PLoS One 18, e0280646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krauss KW (2021) Use of ‘accommodation space’ in tidal wetlands. A commentary on Kerrylee Rogers’ “Accommodation space as a framework for assessing the response of mangroves to relative sea-level rise”. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 42, 184–189. [Google Scholar]
- Kuempel CD, Tulloch VJD, Giffin AL, Simmons BA, Hagger V, Phua C and Hoegh-Guldberg O (2022) Identifying management opportunities to combat climate, land, and marine threats across less climate exposed coral reefs. Conservation Biology 36, e13856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laufkötter C, Zscheischler J and Frölicher TL (2020) High-impact marine heatwaves attributable to human-induced global warming. Science 369, 1621–1625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lawrence J, Mackey B, Chiew F, Costello MJ, Hennessy K, Lansbury N, Lansbury N, Nidumolu UB, Pecl G, Rickards L, Tapper N, Woodward A and Wreford A (2022) Australasia. In Pörtner H-O, Roberts DC, Tignor M, Poloczanska ES, Mintenbeck K, Alegría A, Craig M, Langsdorf S, Löschke S, Möller V, Okem A and Rama B (eds.). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1581–1688. [Google Scholar]
- Le Cozannet G, Lawrence J, Schoeman DS, Adelekan I, Cooley SR, Glavovic B, Haasnoot M, Harris R, Kiessling W, Kopp RE, Mukherji A, Nunn P, Piepenburg D, Schmidt D, Simmons CT, Singh C, Slangen A and Supratid S (2022) Cross-chapter box SLR. In Pörtner H-O, Roberts DC, Tignor M, Poloczanska ES, Mintenbeck K, Alegría A, Craig M, Langsdorf S, Löschke S, Möller V, Okem A and Rama B (eds.), Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 477–480. [Google Scholar]
- Le Moullec M and Bender ML (2022) Impacts of global warming on arctic biota. In Finger M and Rekvig G (eds.), Global Arctic: An Introduction to the Multifaceted Dynamics of the Arctic. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 211–228. [Google Scholar]
- Lebrun A, Comeau S, Gazeau F and Gattuso J-P (2022) Impact of climate change on Arctic macroalgal communities. Global and Planetary Change 219, 103980. [Google Scholar]
- Lenoir J, Bertrand R, Comte L, Bourgeaud L, Hattab T, Murienne J and Grenouillet G (2020) Species better track climate warming in the oceans than on land. Nature Ecology and Evolution 4, 1044–1059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li X and Donner S (2023) Assessing Future projections of warm-season marine heatwave characteristics with three CMIP6 models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 128, e2022JC019253. [Google Scholar]
- Liang S, Hu W, Liu J, Su S, Chen G, Chen S, Xie B, Du J, Liu W and Chen B (2023) Mapping mangrove sustainability in the face of sea level rise and land use: A case study on Leizhou Peninsula, China. Journal of Environmental Management 325, 116554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lima FP and Wethey DS (2012) Three decades of high-resolution coastal sea surface temperatures reveal more than warming. Nature Communications 3, 704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lithgow D, Martínez ML, Gallego-Fernández JB, Silva R and Ramírez-Vargas DL (2019) Exploring the co-occurrence between coastal squeeze and coastal tourism in a changing climate and its consequences. Tourism Management 74, 43–54. [Google Scholar]
- Logan CA, Dunne JP, Ryan JS, Baskett ML and Donner SD (2021) Quantifying global potential for coral evolutionary response to climate change. Nature Climate Change 11, 537–542. [Google Scholar]
- Luijendijk A, Hagenaars G, Ranasinghe R, Baart F, Donchyts G and Aarninkhof S (2018) The State of the World’s Beaches. Scientific Reports 8, 6641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Magel CL, Chan F, Hessing-Lewis M and Hacker SD (2022). Differential responses of eelgrass and macroalgae in Pacific Northwest estuaries following an unprecedented NE Pacific Ocean marine heatwave. Frontiers in Marine Science 9, 838967. [Google Scholar]
- Magnan AK, Pörtner H-O, Duvat VKE, Garschagen M, Guinder VA, Zommers Z, Hoegh-Guldberg O and Gattuso J-P (2021) Estimating the global risk of anthropogenic climate change. Nature Climate Change 11, 879–885. [Google Scholar]
- Marx, SK, Knight JM, Dwyer PG, Child DP, Hotchkis MAC and Zawadzki A (2020) Examining the response of an eastern Australian mangrove forest to changes in hydro-period over the last century. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 241, 106813. [Google Scholar]
- McLean M, Mouillot D, Maureaud AA, Hattab T, MacNeil MA, Goberville E, Lindegren M, Engelhard G, Pinsky M and Auber A (2021) Disentangling tropicalization and deborealization in marine ecosystems under climate change. Current Biology 31, 4817–4823, e4815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meinshausen M, Nicholls ZRJ, Lewis J, Gidden MJ, Vogel E, Freund M, Beyerle U, Gessner C, Nauels A, Bauer N, Canadell JG, Daniel JS, John A, Krummel PB, Luderer G, Meinshausen N, Montzka SA, Rayner PJ, Reimann S, Smith SJ, van den Berg M, Velders GJM, Vollmer MK and Wang RHJ (2020) The shared socio-economic pathway (SSP) greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions to 2500. Geoscientific Model Development 13, 3571–3605. [Google Scholar]
- Mellin C, Matthews S, Anthony KRN, Brown SC, Caley MJ, Johns KA, Osborne K, Puotinen M, Thompson A, Wolff NH, Fordham DA and MacNeil MA (2019) Spatial resilience of the Great Barrier Reef under cumulative disturbance impacts. Global Change Biology 25, 2431–2445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mentaschi L, Vousdoukas MI, Pekel J-F, Voukouvalas E and Feyen L (2018) Global long-term observations of coastal erosion and accretion. Scientific Reports 8, 12876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meredith M, Sommerkorn M, Cassotta S, Derksen C, Ekaykin A, Hollowed A, Kofinas G, Mackintosh A, Melbourne-Thomas J, MMC Muelbert, Ottersen G, Pritchard H and EAG Schuur (2019). Polar regions. In Pörtner H-O, Roberts DC, Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Tignor M, Poloczanska E, Mintenbeck K, Alegría A, Nicolai M, Okem A, Petzold J, Rama B and Weyer NM (eds.), IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 203–320. [Google Scholar]
- Mo Y, Kearney MS and Turner RE (2020) The resilience of coastal marshes to hurricanes: The potential impact of excess nutrients. Environment International 138, 105409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Molinos JG, Halpern BS, Schoeman DS, Brown CJ, Kiessling W, Moore PJ, Pandolfi JM, Poloczanska ES, Richardson AJ and Burrows MT (2016) Climate velocity and the future global redistribution of marine biodiversity. Nature Climate Change 6, 83–88. [Google Scholar]
- Moltó V, Palmer M, Ospina-Álvarez A, Pérez-Mayol S, Benseddik AB, Gatt M, Morales-Nin B, Alemany F and Catalán IA (2021) Projected effects of ocean warming on an iconic pelagic fish and its fishery. Scientific Reports 11, 8803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moullec F, Barrier N, Drira S, Guilhaumon F, Marsaleix P, Somot S, Ulses C, Velez L and Shin Y-J (2019) An end-to-end model reveals losers and winners in a warming Mediterranean Sea. Frontiers in Marine Science 6, 345. [Google Scholar]
- Murray NJ, Worthington TA, Bunting P, Duce S, Hagger V, Lovelock CE, Lucas R, Saunders MI, Sheaves M, Spalding M, Waltham NJ and Lyons MB (2022) High-resolution mapping of losses and gains of Earth’s tidal wetlands. Science 376, 744–749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nelson JL and Zavaleta ES (2012) Salt Marsh as a coastal filter for the oceans: Changes in Function with experimental increases in nitrogen loading and sea-level rise. PLoS ONE 7, e38558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neumann B, Vafeidis AT, Zimmermann J and Nicholls RJ (2015) Future coastal population growth and exposure to sea-level rise and coastal flooding - a global assessment. PLoS ONE 10, e0118571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neupane N, Zipkin EF, Saunders SP and Ries L (2022) Grappling with uncertainty in ecological projections: A case study using the migratory monarch butterfly. Ecosphere 13, e03874. [Google Scholar]
- Nicholls ZRJ, Meinshausen M, Lewis J, Gieseke R, Dommenget D, Dorheim K, Fan C-S, Fuglestvedt JS, Gasser T, Golüke U, Goodwin P, Hartin C, Hope AP, Kriegler E, Leach NJ, Marchegiani D, McBride LA, Quilcaille Y, Rogelj J, Salawitch RJ, Samset BH, Sandstad M, Shiklomanov AN, Skeie RB, Smith CJ, Smith S, Tanaka K, Tsutsui J and Xie Z (2020) Reduced complexity model intercomparison project phase 1: Introduction and evaluation of global-mean temperature response. Geoscientific Model Development 13, 5175–5190. [Google Scholar]
- Odériz I, Silva R, Mortlock TR, Mori N, Shimura T, Webb A, Padilla-Hernández R and Villers S (2021) Natural variability and warming signals in global ocean wave climates. Geophysical Research Letters 48, e2021GL093622. [Google Scholar]
- Orr JA, Vinebrooke RD, Jackson MC, Kroeker KJ, Kordas RL, Mantyka-Pringle C, den Brink PJV, Laender FD, Stoks R, Holmstrup M, Matthaei CD, Monk WA, Penk MR, Leuzinger S, Schäfer RB and Piggott JJ (2020) Towards a unified study of multiple stressors: Divisions and common goals across research disciplines. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 287, 20200421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osland MJ, Feher LC, Anderson GH, Vervaeke WC, Krauss KW, Whelan KRT, Balentine KM, Tiling-Range G, Smith TJ and Cahoon DR (2020) A tropical cyclone-induced ecological regime shift: Mangrove forest conversion to mudflat in Everglades National Park (Florida, USA). Wetlands 40, 1445–1458. [Google Scholar]
- Ouyang X, Connolly RM and Lee SY (2022) Revised global estimates of resilience to sea level rise for tidal marshes. Environmental Challenges 9, 100593. [Google Scholar]
- Pandolfi JM, Connolly SR, Marshall DJ and Cohen AL (2011) Projecting coral reef futures under global warming and ocean acidification. Science 333, 418–422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pandolfi JM and Kiessling W (2014) Gaining insights from past reefs to inform understanding of coral reef response to global climate change. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 7, 52–58. [Google Scholar]
- Parmesan C, Burrows MT, Duarte CM, Poloczanska ES, Richardson AJ, Schoeman DS and Singer MC (2013) Beyond climate change attribution in conservation and ecological research. Ecology Letters 16, 58–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pecquet J, Mouchet M, Campagne S, Raybaud V, Baulaz Y, Gevaert F and Lasram BRF (2022) Combining ecological niche models and ecosystem services indicators to assess impacts of climate change on kelp: Application to French coasts. Ecosystems and People 18, 358–377. [Google Scholar]
- Peleg O, Guy-Haim T, Yeruham E, Silverman J and Rilov G (2020) Tropicalization may invert trophic state and carbon budget of shallow temperate rocky reefs. Journal of Ecology 108, 844–854. [Google Scholar]
- Pendleton DE, Tingley MW, Ganley LC, Friedland KD, Mayo C, Brown MW, McKenna BE, Jordaan A and Staudinger MD (2022) Decadal-scale phenology and seasonal climate drivers of migratory baleen whales in a rapidly warming marine ecosystem. Global Change Biology 28, 4989–5005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Penn JL and Deutsch C (2022) Avoiding ocean mass extinction from climate warming. Science 376, 524–526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peteet DM, Nichols J, Kenna T, Chang C, Browne J, Reza M, Kovari S, Liberman L and Stern-Protz S (2018) Sediment starvation destroys New York City marshes’ resistance to sea level rise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115, 10281–10286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pezner AK, Courtney TA, Barkley HC, Chou W-C, Chu H-C, Clements SM, Cyronak T, DeGrandpre MD, Kekuewa SAH, Kline DI, Liang Y-B, Martz TR, Mitarai S, Page HN, Rintoul MS, Smith JE, Soong K, Takeshita Y, Tresguerres M, Wei Y, Yates KK and Andersson AJ (2023) Increasing hypoxia on global coral reefs under ocean warming. Nature Climate Change 13, 403–409. [Google Scholar]
- Phillips JD (2023) Landscape change and climate attribution, with a case study of estuarine marshes. Geomorphology 430, 108666. [Google Scholar]
- Phlips EJ, Badylak S, Nelson NG and Havens KE (2020) Hurricanes, El Niño and harmful algal blooms in two sub-tropical Florida estuaries: Direct and indirect impacts. Scientific Reports 10, 1910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Piatt JF, Parrish JK, Renner HM, Schoen SK, Jones TT, Arimitsu ML, Kuletz KJ, Bodenstein B, García-Reyes M, Duerr RS, Corcoran RM, Kaler RSA, McChesney GJ, Golightly RT, Coletti HA, Suryan RM, Burgess HK, Lindsey J, Lindquist K, Warzybok PM, Jahncke J, Roletto J and Sydeman WJ (2020) Extreme mortality and reproductive failure of common murres resulting from the northeast Pacific marine heatwave of 2014–2016. PLoS ONE 15, e0226087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pielke R (2011) Challenging convention. Nature Climate Change 1, 70. [Google Scholar]
- Pigot AL, Merow C, Wilson A and Trisos CH (2023) Abrupt expansion of climate change risks for species globally. Nature Ecology & Evolution 7, 1060–1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pinsky ML, Eikeset AM, McCauley DJ, Payne JL and Sunday JM (2019) Greater vulnerability to warming of marine versus terrestrial ectotherms. Nature 569, 108–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pinsky ML, Selden RL and Kitchel ZJ (2020) Climate-driven shifts in marine species ranges: Scaling from organisms to communities. Annual Review of Marine Science 12, 153–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pirotta E, Thomas L, Costa DP, Hall AJ, Harris CM, Harwood J, Kraus SD, Miller PJO, Moore MJ, Photopoulou T, Rolland RM, Schwacke L, Simmons SE, Southall BL and Tyack PL (2022) Understanding the combined effects of multiple stressors: A new perspective on a longstanding challenge. Science of the Total Environment 821, 153322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poloczanska ES, Brown CJ, Sydeman WJ, Kiessling W, Schoeman DS, Moore PJ, Brander K, Bruno JF, Buckley LB, Burrows MT, Duarte CM, Halpern BS, Holding J, Kappel CV, O’Connor MI, Pandolfi JM, Parmesan C, Schwing F, Thompson SA and Richardson AJ (2013) Global imprint of climate change on marine life. Nature Climate Change 3, 919–925. [Google Scholar]
- Pörtner H-O (2021) Climate impacts on organisms, ecosystems and human societies: Integrating OCLTT into a wider context. Journal of Experimental Biology 224, jeb238360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pörtner H-O, Scholes RJ, Arneth A, Barnes DKA, Burrows MT, Diamond SE, Duarte CM, Kiessling W, Leadley P, Managi S, McElwee P, Midgley G, Ngo HT, Obura D, Pascual U, Sankaran M, Shin YJ and Val AL (2023) Overcoming the coupled climate and biodiversity crises and their societal impacts. Science 380, eabl4881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pruckner S, Bedford J, Murphy L, Turner JA and Mills J (2022) Adapting to heatwave-induced seagrass loss: Prioritizing management areas through environmental sensitivity mapping. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 272, 107857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Randall CJ and van Woesik R (2015) Contemporary white-band disease in Caribbean corals driven by climate change. Nature Climate Change 5, 375–379. [Google Scholar]
- Reddin CJ, Aberhan M, Raja NB and Kocsis ÁT (2022) Global warming generates predictable extinctions of warm- and cold-water marine benthic invertebrates via thermal habitat loss. Global Change Biology 28, 5793–5807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reddin CJ, Nätscher PS, Kocsis ÁT, H-O Pörtner and Kiessling W (2020) Marine clade sensitivities to climate change conform across timescales. Nature Climate Change 10, 249–253. [Google Scholar]
- Rogelj J, Fransen T, Den Elzen MGJ, Lamboll RD, Schumer C, Kuramochi T, Hans F, Mooldijk S and Portugal-Pereira J (2023) Credibility gap in net-zero climate targets leaves world at high risk. Science 380, 1014–1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rogers K (2021) Accommodation space as a framework for assessing the response of mangroves to relative sea-level rise. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 42, 163–183. [Google Scholar]
- Rogers LA, Wilson MT, Duffy-Anderson JT, Kimmel DG and Lamb JF (2021) Pollock and “the Blob”: Impacts of a marine heatwave on walleye pollock early life stages. Fisheries Oceanography 30, 142–158. [Google Scholar]
- Rossbach S, Steckbauer A, Klein SG, Arossa S, Geraldi NR, Lim KK, Martin C, Rossbach FI, Shellard MJ, Valluzzi L and Duarte CM (2023) A tide of change: What we can learn from stories of marine conservation success. One Earth 6, 505–518. [Google Scholar]
- Rossi RJ and Toran L (2019) Exploring the potential for groundwater inundation in coastal US cities due to interactions between sewer infrastructure and global change. Environmental Earth Sciences 78, 258. [Google Scholar]
- Rousseau JS and Betts MG (2022) Factors influencing transferability in species distribution models. Ecography 2022, e06060. [Google Scholar]
- Rubenstein MA, Weiskopf SR, Bertrand R, Carter SL, Comte L, Eaton MJ, Johnson CG, Lenoir J, Lynch AJ, Miller BW, Morelli TL, Rodriguez MA, Terando A and Thompson LM (2023) Climate change and the global redistribution of biodiversity: Substantial variation in empirical support for expected range shifts. Environmental Evidence 12, 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sage RF (2020) Global change biology: A primer. Global Change Biology 26, 3–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saintilan N, Khan NS, Ashe E, Kelleway JJ, Rogers K, Woodroffe CD and Horton BP (2020) Thresholds of mangrove survival under rapid sea level rise. Science 368, 1118–1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santana-Garcon J, Bennett S, Marbà N, Vergés A, Arthur R and Alcoverro T (2023) Tropicalization shifts herbivore pressure from seagrass to rocky reef communities. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 290, 20221744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santos CF, Agardy T, Andrade F, Calado H, Crowder LB, Ehler CN, García-Morales S, Gissi E, Halpern BS, Orbach MK, H-O Pörtner and Rosa R (2020) Integrating climate change in ocean planning. Nature Sustainability 3, 505–516. [Google Scholar]
- Scanes E, Scanes PR and Ross PM (2020) Climate change rapidly warms and acidifies Australian estuaries. Nature Communications 11, 1803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scharsack JP, Wieczorek B, Schmidt-Drewello A, Büscher J, Franke F, Moore A, Antoine Branca A, Witten A, Stoll M, Bornberg-Bauer E, Wicke S and Kurtz J (2021) Climate change facilitates a parasite’s host exploitation via temperature-mediated immunometabolic processes. Global Change Biology 27, 94–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schipper ELF, Revi A, Preston BL, Carr ER, Eriksen SH, Fernandez-Carril LR, Glavovic BC, Hilmi NJM, Ley D, Mukerji R, Muylaert de Araujo MS, Perez R, Rose SK and Singh PK (2022). Climate resilient development pathways. In Pörtner H-O, Roberts DC, Tignor M, Poloczanska ES, Mintenbeck K, Alegría A, Craig M, Langsdorf S, Löschke S, Möller V, Okem A and Rama B (eds.), Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 2655–2807. [Google Scholar]
- Schoeman DS, Gupta AS, Harrison CS, Everett JD, Brito-Morales I, Hannah L, Bopp L, Roehrdanz PR and Richardson AJ (2023) Demystifying global climate models for use in the life sciences. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 38, 843–858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schuerch M, Spencer T, Temmerman S, Kirwan ML, Wolff C, Lincke D, McOwen CJ, Pickering MD, Reef R, Vafeidis AT, Hinkel J, Nicholls RJ and Brown S (2018) Future response of global coastal wetlands to sea-level rise. Nature 561, 231–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schuster JM, Stuart-Smith RD, Edgar GJ and Bates AE (2022) Tropicalization of temperate reef fish communities facilitated by urchin grazing and diversity of thermal affinities. Global Ecology and Biogeography 31, 995–1005. [Google Scholar]
- Schwalm CR, Glendon S and Duffy PB (2020) RCP8.5 tracks cumulative CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 19656–19657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sen Gupta A, Thomsen M, Benthuysen JA, Hobday AJ, Oliver E, Alexander LV, Burrows MT, Donat MG, Feng M, Holbrook NJ, Perkins‐Kirkpatrick S, Moore PJ, Rodrigues RR, Scannell HA, Taschetto AS, Ummenhofer CC, Wernberg T and Smale DA (2020) Drivers and impacts of the most extreme marine heatwave events. Scientific Reports 10, 19359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shin Y, Midgley GF, Archer ERM, Arneth A, Barnes DKA, Chan L, Hashimoto S, Hoegh‐Guldberg O, Insarov G, Leadley P, Levin LA, Ngo HT, Pandit R, Pires APF, Pörtner H, Rogers AD, Scholes RJ, Settele J and Smith P (2022) Actions to halt biodiversity loss generally benefit the climate. Global Change Biology 28, 2846–2874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shlesinger T and van Woesik R (2023) Oceanic differences in coral-bleaching responses to marine heatwaves. Science of the Total Environment 871, 162113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shuert CR, Marcoux M, Hussey NE, Heide-Jørgensen MP, Dietz R and Auger-Méthé M (2022) Decadal migration phenology of a long-lived Arctic icon keeps pace with climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119, e2121092119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simone MN, Schulz KG, Oakes JM and Eyre BD (2021) Warming and ocean acidification may decrease estuarine dissolved organic carbon export to the ocean. Biogeosciences 18, 1823–1838. [Google Scholar]
- Simpson NP, Mach KJ, Constable A, Hess J, Hogarth R, Howden M, Lawrence J, Lempert RJ, Muccione V, Mackey B, New MG, O’Neill B, Otto F, Pörtner H-O, Reisinger A, Roberts D, Schmidt DN, Seneviratne S, Strongin S, van Aalst M, Totin E and Trisos CH (2021) A framework for complex climate change risk assessment. One Earth 4, 489–501. [Google Scholar]
- Smeaton C and Austin WEN (2022) Quality Not quantity: Prioritizing the management of sedimentary organic matter across continental shelf seas. Geophysical Research Letters 49, e2021GL097481. [Google Scholar]
- Smith KA, Dowling CE and Brown J (2019). Simmered then boiled: Multi-decadal poleward shift in distribution by a temperate fish accelerates during marine heatwave. Frontiers in Marine Science 6, 407. [Google Scholar]
- Smith KE, Burrows MT, Hobday AJ, Gupta AS, Moore PJ, Thomsen M, Wernberg T and Smale DA (2021) Socioeconomic impacts of marine heatwaves: Global issues and opportunities. Science 374, eabj3593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith KE, Burrows MT, Hobday AJ, King NG, Moore PJ, Gupta AS, Thomsen MS, Wernberg T and Smale DA (2023) Biological impacts of marine heatwaves. Annual Review of Marine Science 15, 119–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Speare KE, Adam TC, Winslow EM, Lenihan HS and Burkepile DE (2022) Size-dependent mortality of corals during marine heatwave erodes recovery capacity of a coral reef. Global Change Biology 28, 1342–1358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Starko S, Neufeld CJ, Gendall L, Timmer B, Campbell L, Yakimishyn J, Druehl L and Baum JK (2022) Microclimate predicts kelp forest extinction in the face of direct and indirect marine heatwave effects. Ecological Applications 32, e2673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steenbeek J, Buszowski J, Chagaris D, Christensen V, Coll M, Fulton EA, Katsanevakis S, Lewis KA, Mazaris AD, Macias D, de Mutsert K, Oldford G, Pennino MG, Piroddi C, Romagnoni G, Serpetti N, Shin Y-J, Spence MA and Stelzenmüller V (2021) Making spatial-temporal marine ecosystem modelling better – A perspective. Environmental Modelling and Software 145, 105209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stocker TF, Dahe Q, Plattner G-K, Midgley P and Tignor M (2011) Tried and tested. Nature Climate Change 1, 71. [Google Scholar]
- Strauss BH, Orton PM, Bittermann K, Buchanan MK, Gilford DM, Kopp RE, Kulp S, Massey C, de Moel H and Vinogradov S (2021) Economic damages from Hurricane Sandy attributable to sea level rise caused by anthropogenic climate change. Nature Communications 12, 2720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strydom S, Murray K, Wilson S, Huntley B, Rule M, Heithaus M, Bessey C, Kendrick GA, Burkholder D, Holmes T, Fraser MW and Zdunic K (2020). Too hot to handle: Unprecedented seagrass death driven by marine heatwave in a World Heritage Area. Global Change Biology 26, 3525–3538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sunday JM, Bates AE and Dulvy NK (2012) Thermal tolerance and the global redistribution of animals. Nature Climate Change 2, 686–690. [Google Scholar]
- Suryan RM, Arimitsu ML, Coletti HA, Hopcroft RR, Lindeberg MR, Barbeaux SJ, Batten SD, Burt WJ, Bishop MA, Bodkin JL, Brenner R, Campbell RW, Cushing DA, Danielson SL, Dorn MW, Drummond B, Esler D, Gelatt T, Hanselman DH, Hatch SA, Haught S, Holderied K, Iken K, Irons DB, Kettle AB, Kimmel DG, Konar B, Kuletz KJ, Laurel BJ, Maniscalco JM, Matkin C, McKinstry CAE, Monson DH, Moran JR, Olsen D, Palsson WA, Pegau WS, Piatt JF, Rogers LA, Rojek NA, Schaefer A, Spies IB, Straley JM, Strom SL, Sweeney KL, Szymkowiak M, Weitzman BP, Yasumiishi EM and Zador SG (2021) Ecosystem response persists after a prolonged marine heatwave. Scientific Reports 11, 6235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tittensor DP, Eddy TD, Lotze HK, Galbraith ED, Cheung W, Barange M, Blanchard JL, Bopp L, Bryndum-Buchholz A, Büchner M, Bulman C, Carozza DA, Christensen V, Coll M, Dunne JP, Fernandes JA, Fulton EA, Hobday AJ, Huber V, Jennings S, Jones M, Lehodey P, Link JS, Mackinson S, Maury O, Niiranen S, Oliveros-Ramos R, Roy T, Schewe J, Shin Y-J, Silva T, Stock CA, Steenbeek J, Underwood PJ, Volkholz J, Watson JR and Walker ND (2018) A protocol for the intercomparison of marine fishery and ecosystem models: Fish-MIP v1.0. Geoscientific Model Development 11, 1421–1442. [Google Scholar]
- Tittensor DP, Novaglio C, Harrison CS, Heneghan RF, Barrier N, Bianchi D, Bopp L, Bryndum-Buchholz A, Britten GL, Büchner M, Cheung WWL, Christensen V, Coll M, Dunne JP, Eddy TD, Everett JD, Fernandes-Salvador JA, Fulton EA, Galbraith ED, Gascuel D, Guiet J, John JG, Link JS, Lotze HK, Maury O, Ortega-Cisneros K, Palacios-Abrantes J, Petrik CM, du Pontavice H, Rault J, Richardson AJ, Shannon L, Shin Y-J, Steenbeek J, Stock CA and Blanchard JL (2021) Next-generation ensemble projections reveal higher climate risks for marine ecosystems. Nature Climate Change 11, 973–981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Törnqvist TE, Jankowski KL, Li Y-X and González JL (2020) Tipping points of Mississippi Delta marshes due to accelerated sea-level rise. Science Advances 6, eaaz5512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Townhill BL, Radford Z, Pecl G, van Putten I, Pinnegar JK and Hyder K (2019) Marine recreational fishing and the implications of climate change. Fish and Fisheries 20, 977–992. [Google Scholar]
- Trisos CH, Merow C and Pigot AL (2020) The projected timing of abrupt ecological disruption from climate change. Nature 580, 496–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tuck ME, Ford MR, Kench PS and Masselink G (2021) Sediment supply dampens the erosive effects of sea-level rise on reef islands. Scientific Reports 11, 5523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Usui T, Lerner D, Eckert I, Angert AL, Garroway CJ, Hargreaves A, Lancaster LT, Lessard J-P, Riva F, Schmidt C, van der Burg K and Marshall KE (2023) The evolution of plasticity at geographic range edges. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 38, 831–842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van der Stocken T, Vanschoenwinkel B, Carroll D, Cavanaugh KC and Koedam N (2022) Mangrove dispersal disrupted by projected changes in global seawater density. Nature Climate Change 12, 685–691. [Google Scholar]
- van der Zande RM, Achlatis M, Bender-Champ D, Kubicek A, Dove S and Hoegh-Guldberg O (2020) Paradise lost: End-of-century warming and acidification under business-as-usual emissions have severe consequences for symbiotic corals. Global Change Biology 26, 2203–2219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Varela R, de Castro M, Dias JM and Gómez-Gesteira M (2023) Coastal warming under climate change: Global, faster and heterogeneous. Science of the Total Environment 886, 164029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vergés A, Doropoulos C, Malcolm HA, Skye M, Garcia-Pizá M, Marzinelli EM, Campbell AH, Ballesteros E, Hoey AS, Vila-Concejo A, Y-M Bozec and Steinberg PD (2016) Long-term empirical evidence of ocean warming leading to tropicalization of fish communities, increased herbivory, and loss of kelp. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113, 13791–13796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vergés A, Lanham BS, Kono M, Okumura S and Nakamura Y (2022) Differences in fish herbivory among tropical and temperate seaweeds and annual patterns in kelp consumption influence the tropicalisation of temperate reefs. Scientific Reports 12, 21202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vergés A, Steinberg PD, Hay ME, Poore AGB, Campbell AH, Ballesteros E, Heck KL, Booth DJ, Coleman MA, Feary DA, Figueira W, Langlois T, Marzinelli EM, Mizerek T, Mumby PJ, Nakamura Y, Roughan M, Sebille E van, Gupta AS, Smale DA, Tomas F, Wernberg T and Wilson SK (2014) The tropicalization of temperate marine ecosystems: Climate-mediated changes in herbivory and community phase shifts. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281, 20140846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vousdoukas MI, Ranasinghe R, Mentaschi L, Plomaritis TA, Athanasiou P, Luijendijk A and Feyen L (2020a) Reply to: Sandy beaches can survive sea-level rise. Nature Climate Change 10, 996–997. [Google Scholar]
- Vousdoukas MI, Ranasinghe R, Mentaschi L, Plomaritis TA, Athanasiou P, Luijendijk A and Feyen L (2020b) Sandy coastlines under threat of erosion. Nature Climate Change 10, 260–263. [Google Scholar]
- Wang J, Dai Z, Mei X and Fagherazzi S (2020) Tropical Cyclones significantly alleviate mega-deltaic erosion induced by high riverine flow. Geophysical Research Letters 47, e2020GL089065. [Google Scholar]
- Ward RD, Friess DA, Day RH and MacKenzie RA (2016) Impacts of climate change on mangrove ecosystems: A region by region overview. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability 2, e01211. [Google Scholar]
- Weiskopf SR, Myers BJE, Arce-Plata MI, Blanchard JL, Ferrier S, Fulton EA, Harfoot M, Isbell F, Johnson JA, Mori AS, Weng E, HarmáČková ZV, Londoño-Murcia MC, Miller BW, Pereira LM and Rosa IMD (2022) A conceptual framework to integrate biodiversity, ecosystem function, and ecosystem service models. BioScience 72, 1062–1073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wernberg T (2021) Marine heatwave drives collapse of kelp forests in Western Australia. In Canadell JG and Jackson RB (ed.), Ecosystem Collapse and Climate Change. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 325–343. [Google Scholar]
- Wesselmann M, Chefaoui RM, Marbà N, Serrao EA and Duarte CM (2021) Warming threatens to propel the expansion of the exotic seagrass Halophila stipulacea. Frontiers in Marine Science 8, 759676. [Google Scholar]
- Whelan S, Hatch SA, Gaston AJ, Gilchrist HG and Elliott KH (2022) Opposite, but insufficient, phenological responses to climate in two circumpolar seabirds: Relative roles of phenotypic plasticity and selection. Functional Ecology 36, 1782–1795. [Google Scholar]
- Williams BA, Watson JEM, Beyer HL, Klein CJ, Montgomery J, Runting RK, Roberson LA, Halpern BS, Grantham HS, Kuempel CD, Frazier M, Venter O and Wenger A (2022) Global rarity of intact coastal regions. Conservation Biology 36, e13874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson KL and Lotze HK (2019) Climate change projections reveal range shifts of eelgrass Zostera marina in the Northwest Atlantic. Marine Ecology Progress Series 620, 47–62. [Google Scholar]
- Woesik R, Shlesinger T, Grottoli AG, Toonen RJ, Thurber RV, Warner ME, Hulver AM, Chapron L, McLachlan RH, Albright R, Crandall E, DeCarlo TM, Donovan MK, Eirin‐Lopez J, Harrison HB, Heron SF, Huang D, Humanes A, Krueger T, Madin JS, Manzello D, McManus LC, Matz M, Muller EM, Rodriguez‐Lanetty M, Vega‐Rodriguez M, Voolstra CR and Zaneveld J (2022) Coral-bleaching responses to climate change across biological scales. Global Change Biology 28, 4229–4250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wooldridge SA (2020) Excess seawater nutrients, enlarged algal symbiont densities and bleaching sensitive reef locations: 1. Identifying thresholds of concern for the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Marine Pollution Bulletin 152, 107667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xie W, He Q, Zhang K, Guo L, Wang X, Shen J and Cui Z (2017) Application of terrestrial laser scanner on tidal flat morphology at a typhoon event timescale. Geomorphology 292, 47–58. [Google Scholar]
- Yamaguchi R, Rodgers KB, Timmermann A, Stein K, Schlunegger S, Bianchi D, Dunne JP and Slater RD (2022) Trophic level decoupling drives future changes in phytoplankton bloom phenology. Nature Climate Change 12, 469–476. [Google Scholar]
- Yates KL, Bouchet PJ, Caley MJ, Mengersen K, Randin CF, Parnell S, Fielding AH, Bamford AJ, Ban S, Barbosa AM, Dormann CF, Elith J, Embling CB, Ervin GN, Fisher R, Gould S, Graf RF, Gregr EJ, Halpin PN, Heikkinen RK, Heinänen S, Jones AR, Krishnakumar PK, Lauria V, Lozano-Montes H, Mannocci L, Mellin C, Mesgaran MB, Moreno-Amat E, Mormede S, Novaczek E, Oppel S, Crespo GO, Peterson AT, Rapacciuolo G, Roberts JJ, Ross RE, Scales KL, Schoeman D, Snelgrove P, Sundblad G, Thuiller W, Torres LG, Verbruggen H, Wang L, Wenger S, Whittingham MJ, Zharikov Y, Zurell D and Sequeira AMM (2018) Outstanding Challenges in the transferability of ecological models. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 33, 790–802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Young IR and Ribal A (2019) Multiplatform evaluation of global trends in wind speed and wave height. Science 364, 548–552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao H, Yuan M, Strokal M, Wu HC, Liu X, Murk A, Kroeze C and Osinga R (2021) Impacts of nitrogen pollution on corals in the context of global climate change and potential strategies to conserve coral reefs. Science of the Total Environment 774, 145017. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou Y, Gong H and Zhou F (2022) Responses of horizontally expanding oceanic oxygen minimum zones to climate change based on observations. Geophysical Research Letters 49, e2022GL097724. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu Z, Bouma TJ, Zhu Q, Cai Y and Yang Z (2021) Effects of Waves and sediment disturbance on seed bank persistence at tidal flats. Frontiers in Marine Science 8, 728065. [Google Scholar]
- Ziegler SL, Johnson JM, Brooks RO, Johnston EM, Mohay JL, Ruttenberg BI, Starr RM, Waltz GT, Wendt DE and Hamilton SL (2023) Marine protected areas, marine heatwaves, and the resilience of nearshore fish communities. Scientific Reports 13, 1405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

