Abstract
Background:
Environmental exposures and social determinants likely influence specific childhood asthma phenotypes.
Objective:
We hypothesized that the Child Opportunity Index (COI) at birth, measuring multiple neighborhood opportunities, influences incidence rates (IRs) for asthma with recurrent exacerbations (ARE).
Methods:
We tested for COI associations with ARE incidence rates in 15,877 children born between 1990–2018 in the Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program. Parent-reported race and ethnicity and other demographics were assessed as effect modifiers.
Results:
The IR of ARE for children born in very low COI neighborhoods was higher (IR=10.98; 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) 9.71, 12.25) than for other COI categories. Rates for Non-Hispanic Black children (NHB) were significantly higher than Non-Hispanic White (NHW) children in every COI category. The ARE IRs for children born in very low COI neighborhoods were several-fold higher for NHB and Hispanic Black (HB) children (IR=15.30; 95% CI 13.10, 17.49; IR=18.48; 95% CI 8.80, 28.15 respectively) when compared to White children. Adjusting for individual-level characteristics, children born in very low COI neighborhoods demonstrated an ARE incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 1.26 (95% CI 0.99,1.59) with a higher incidence of cases among children ages 2–4 years and with a parental history of asthma.
Conclusions:
Rates of ARE were higher among children born in under-resourced communities and this relationship is strongest for young minoritized children with a parental history of asthma. Higher rates for NHB even in the highest COI categories suggest that risk associated with race persists regardless of social disadvantage.
Keywords: Asthma, Recurrent asthma exacerbations, Child Opportunity Index, Incidence rates, Environmental and social determinants of asthma
Capsule Summary:
Rates of childhood asthma with recurrent exacerbations were higher among children born in under-resourced communities. This relationship is strongest for young minoritized children. Higher rates for NHB children were observed across all categories of childhood opportunity.
Graphical Abstract

Introduction:
Childhood asthma with recurrent exacerbations (ARE) is a distinct asthma phenotype that is associated with substantial child morbidity, health care costs, and burdens for the patient and family, including in comparison to more controlled asthma.1–7 The U.S. Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program, a nationwide consortium of pediatric cohorts whose participants are geographically and demographically diverse, was designed to help address causes of childhood asthma and other important health outcomes. In a recent analysis of ECHO data from over three decades of surveillance we reported that the incidence of childhood ARE varied over time, and was higher in one decade (2000–2009) compared to other decades (1990–1999, 2010–2017).8 These findings suggest that dynamic environmental exposures, social determinants, or both may contribute to the etiology of ARE.
Research from ECHO and the Children’s Respiratory and Environmental Workgroup (CREW), a group of asthma-focused cohorts funded under ECHO, have identified environmental exposures and neighborhood-level social determinants of health that were associated with the development of childhood wheeze and asthma.9 These associations were observed for exposures and social determinants linking census data to birth address using the census year nearest to the birth year, suggesting that prenatal exposures may influence subsequent asthma-related outcomes.9 One neighborhood measure, the Child Opportunity Index (COI), combines weighted information from 29 indicators of neighborhood conditions that correlate with greater upward economic mobility and better health and development of children in long-term studies.10–12 Sub-scores in three domains (education, health and environment, social and economic) are grouped into a final overall opportunity score at the census tract level.11,12 The higher the COI score, the greater the number of positive features in a neighborhood that are believed to contribute to better economic mobility and healthier child development, including access to quality educational resources, healthy food and green space, lower air pollution, and better employment opportunities. A lower overall COI score has been associated cross-sectionally with higher rates of asthma-related emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations for young children.13 Further, pooled data from 46 ECHO cohorts around the U.S. has demonstrated that high or very high compared to low COI levels measured at birth were associated with reduced incidence of childhood asthma even after adjusting for individual sociodemographic characteristics, parental history of asthma and other covariates.11 These findings suggest that prenatal and childhood measures of neighborhood characteristics contribute to childhood asthma risk. However, the impact of prenatal neighborhood conditions as measured by the COI on the development of the more burdensome childhood ARE phenotype remains an important public health concern and a substantial research gap.
Based on these previous findings, we hypothesized that lower COI assessed at the birth census tract influences the incidence rates for childhood ARE. We additionally hypothesized that individually reported race and ethnicity would modify this association between COI and ARE. Further understanding of the prenatal and early childhood determinants of this complex childhood disorder at both the individual and neighborhood level could help refine strategies to prevent childhood ARE.
Methods:
1. Study population and ARE outcome:
Children were enrolled from existing cohorts participating in the U.S. ECHO consortium and meeting the following a priori defined additional eligibility criteria, as described previously8,14: a) born 1990–2018, b) were followed up from 2 years to at least 5 years and up to 19 years of age, and c) had geocoded residential addresses at birth linked to the COI (described below). Procedures for consent, enrollment, and data harmonization have been described.15 Data were gathered from children starting at 2 years of age (i.e. time zero) who were followed until at least age 5 years and up to age 20 years; through the date of last visit, date of loss to follow-up, or the end of the study follow up period, whenever was earliest. The analysis data set included data collected through March 1st, 2023. The institutional review boards for each cohort site and the ECHO Data Analysis Center (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health) approved all activities associated with this study and informed consent and assent was obtained.
ARE was determined based on at least two reports of systemic corticosteroid use at any time during the entire follow-up period with each considered an exacerbation event if separated by a minimum of 30 days. ARE was defined at the time of the second exacerbation event.16 Diagnosis of asthma for this study required that a child diagnosed before 5 years of age also have a reported diagnosis of asthma during a follow-up visit at age 5 years or older to avoid disease misclassification.17 The date of asthma diagnosis could be at any time, irrespective of the ascertained date of ARE. Asthma diagnoses between ages of 2 and 5 years were classified at the reported age but only if they were later confirmed at or beyond age 5 years (i.e. repeated diagnosis, or evidence of asthma-related provider visit, medication visit, or hospitalization). All reports of systemic corticosteroid use starting at age 2 years were considered as asthma exacerbations ascertained as described previously.8 In 49 cases (2.6%) a reported use of corticosteroid was therefore combined with the previous occurrence. There were 16 children treated with corticosteroids at least twice before age 2 years who did not have evidence of an asthma diagnosis during follow-up and were not considered to be cases.
2. Neighborhood socioeconomic and opportunity measures at birth:
The ECHO Data Analysis Center linked COI to participant birth addresses using ArcGIS geospatial software (Esri, Redlands, CA). The COI was built in a supervised fashion with weights based and derived from long-term studies of children, including those that move over time, and established factors of early life that account for healthier outcomes. The COI includes metrics such as poverty and unemployment rates, access to green space, and number of high-quality early childhood education centers from all public sources such as the Census Bureau, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the Environmental Protection Agency, combined into one overall and three domain sub-scores (education, health and environment, social and economic). For each census tract, a nationally standardized z-score for each neighborhood indicator was calculated and subsequently domain-specific and overall COI scores for a total of 72,195 census tracts across all U.S. states and the District of Columbia were derived. The scores were ranked and normed nationally such that higher scores reflected more favorable neighborhood environments relative to other neighborhoods across the US. Each participant’s primary residential address at birth (1994, earliest birth year recorded–2018) was geocoded as determined from monthly residential timelines constructed based on all available addresses and residential history information in ECHO. Census tract at birth was then linked spatially to the geocoded address using the nearest in time decennial US census tract boundaries. Participants only with high quality geocodes (i.e., either a point or specific street address) were included. The version of COI (2010, 2015) closest to the birth year was then linked to the residential census tract. For ECHO participants who could not share address information, this workflow was conducted in an identical but decentralized manner by cohort investigators, and COI estimates at birth stripped of identifiable information were then integrated into the ECHO Data Analysis Center dataset. Consistent with prior ECHO studies,10,11,18 categories of COI used in these analyses were grouped census tracts based on nationally normed quintiles of the COI score as follows: very low (≤20th percentile), low (20th–<40th percentile), moderate (40th–<60th percentile), high (60th–<80th percentile) and very high (≥80th percentile). For the current analyses the high and very high categories were combined.
In addition, several sociodemographic and economic indicators were linked with the birth address census tract, following a similar approach to the COI (that involves combining centralized and decentralized workflows). This was achieved by utilizing data that were temporally adjusted to account for census boundary changes over time, adjusted for inflation, and standardized nationally using z-scores. These data were sourced from the 1990, 2000, and 2010 census as well as the 2019 American Community Survey (ACS) data and were compiled by ECHO investigators. These variables include the percentages of individuals living below the federal poverty line, unemployed, female-headed households, and the representation of specific racial or ethnic backgrounds (also in percent of total population).9,19
3. Covariates and statistical analyses:
Individual-level reported (by parent) race and ethnicity were categorized as Non-Hispanic White (NHW), Hispanic White (HW), Non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Hispanic Black (HB) and Other race and ethnicity (including as Non-Hispanic Other; Hispanic Other; and Other or Unknown). Self-reported race and ethnicity were viewed as societal constructs, rather than deterministic biological causes of disease risk.20 Individual-level measures of maternal education (highest attained from categories of bachelor’s degree, some college, high school degree or less than high school degree), decade of birth (1990–1999, 2000–2009, 2010–2018), child age and sex (assigned at birth), parent-reported child race and ethnicity, census region of recruitment site, and parental history of asthma (from either or both biological parents) were included. Geographic region was categorized into four regions (West, Northeast, Midwest, South) as defined by the U.S. Census.21
Prior to analysis, data from all participants were pooled and inspected for distributions, outliers and missingness. To address missingness (up to 30%) of individual-level data, we implemented RELATE R package to find clusters of cohorts that were common based on variables included in the analysis.22 Multiple imputation with chained equations (MICE) within the clusters of cohorts was used to create 30 datasets after which Rubin’s combination rules were applied to obtain estimates from the multiply imputed data. Distributions of neighborhood-level variables by ARE status obtained using two-sample t-tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum for normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively, were compared. Poisson regression models with a fixed effect were used to adjust for cohort groups (i.e. study design and implementation characteristics) and a cluster term was used for county (i.e. geography/region-based characteristics). Unadjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) by individual-level characteristics, followed by adjusted IRRs where we extended models to include the above-mentioned individual-level covariates of interest, were estimated. Where model convergence was not achieved (small cells), clustered sandwich estimators rather than use of a fixed effect to adjust for clustering on groups of cohorts with common characteristics were employed, and the number of imputed datasets to compute estimates was reduced to the maximum possible for achieving standard error calculation. Differences in the association between COI and ARE incidence by race and ethnicity were explored by conducting stratified analyses. The significance of interaction terms to explore potential effect modification by birth decade, age at follow-up, parental history of asthma, sex, census region at birth, and maternal education at childbirth was assessed. Model goodness-of-fit was evaluated by likelihood ratio tests comparing nested (outcome model with all covariates) and extended models (outcome model with all covariates and interaction term). The fitted model estimated (i.e. predicted) number of ARE cases per 1000 child-years by each potential modifier was calculated. Finally, as a sensitivity analysis to further assess cohort heterogeneity, we conducted a meta-analysis estimating IRRs comparing incidence of ARE among moderate, low, and very low COI versus high/very high (reference) groups for each RELATE subgroup, as described.23,24
All models were performed using Stata version 17 (StataCorp, College Station, TX).
Results:
Of the 63,799 children in ECHO, 25,699 met study eligibility criteria. Of this number, 15,877 were involved in cohorts that collected data on asthma diagnoses and corticosteroid use and composed the analytic cohort. These children were from 60 geographically diverse ECHO cohorts within the U.S. including Puerto Rico and provided 119,068 person-years of follow-up for these analyses (Figure 1). Supplemental Table 1 compares the study-eligible ECHO children with those included in the analytic cohort and suggests that the latter differs by being recruited during earlier decades and included more Non-Hispanic White children. The maternal educational level remained similar while the analytical cohort had more participants with a parental history of asthma, probably because cohorts that collected asthma diagnosis data were more likely to collect such information. Measures of heterogeneity (I2: 0%, Cochran’s Q: p=0.92) indicated an insignificant amount of heterogeneity across RELATE subgroups of cohorts sharing common characteristics. Of the study population of 15,877, 692 children (4.4%) had ≥2 exacerbations and met the definition of ARE. Overall, the incidence rate of ARE was 6.46 per 1,000 person years (95% CI: 5.98, 6.94; n=15,877; 119,068 person-years of follow-up, 692 cases; Supplemental Table 2). Recent decades of birth, younger child age, NHB race and HB race, Northeast, Midwest and South census region compared to West, male sex and parental history of asthma was associated with a higher IR of ARE. A lower level of maternal education attained also was associated with a higher IR of ARE.
Figure 1:

Distribution of the study population. All study-eligible ECHO children (n=25,699) were defined as baseline eligible if born after 1990, contacted between age 2–19 years of age and had a birth census tract coded.
Table 1 shows significant differences in z-scores measured from census tract-derived neighborhood-level sociodemographic and economic characteristics between cases of ARE and those that did not develop ARE (the comparison group). At the neighborhood level, ARE cases were associated with residence in areas with higher percentages of the population below the poverty level, with a female head of household, with higher unemployment, lacking a high school diploma, and with a higher population density. The overall COI and domain specific scores, median household income, and distributions of White, Asian and Hispanic individuals were lower (all p <0.01), and the distribution of Black individuals was higher (both p<0.01) for ARE cases compared to the comparison group.
Table 1.
Distribution of census tract level neighborhood characteristics by ARE status based on z scores
| Census-based neighborhood-level characteristics (z scores) | All children N=15,877 |
Comparison group N=15,185 |
ARE case N=692 |
p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| % Below poverty level | −0.39 (−0.75, 0.39) | −0.40 (−0.75, 0.36) | 0.03 (−0.61, 1.05) | <0.01 |
| Median household income | −0.01 (−0.58, 0.65) | 0.01 (−0.56, 0.66) | −0.41 (−0.91, 0.28) | <0.01 |
| % Female head of household | −0.25 (−0.67, 0.48) | −0.26 (−0.68, 0.44) | 0.25 (−0.44, 2.18) | <0.01 |
| % Unemployed | −0.33 (−0.72, 0.34) | −0.34 (−0.73, 0.31) | 0.04 (−0.61, 1.02) | <0.01 |
| % Without HS diploma | −0.39 (−0.84, 0.41) | −0.40 (−0.84, 0.38) | 0.03 (−0.70, 0.81) | <0.01 |
| Population density, people per square km | −0.17 (−0.38, 0.15) | −0.17 (−0.38, 0.14) | −0.12 (−0.33, 0.38) | <0.01 |
| % White participant | 0.17 (−0.94, 0.76) | 0.18 (−0.88, 0.76) | −0.34 (−2.12, 0.64) | <0.01 |
| % Black participant | −0.44 (−0.56, 0.16) | −0.45 (−0.57, 0.11) | 0.01 (−0.51, 2.17) | <0.01 |
| % Asian participant | −0.26 (−0.42, 0.19) | −0.26 (−0.42, 0.21) | −0.34 (−0.45, −0.11) | <0.01 |
| % Other participant | −0.30 (−0.55, 0.33) | −0.30 (−0.55, 0.33) | −0.38 (−0.56, 0.18) | <0.01 |
| % Hispanic participant | −0.43 (−0.59, 0.11) | −0.43 (−0.59, 0.12) | −0.48 (−0.59, −0.09) | <0.01 |
| % White, non-Hispanic participant | −0.40 (−0.51, 0.06) | −0.39 (−0.50, 0.05) | −0.44 (−0.52, −0.22) | <0.01 |
| % Black race, non-Hispanic participant | −0.22 (−0.25, 0.08) | −0.23 (−0.25, 0.08) | −0.18 (−0.24, 0.04) | <0.01 |
| Overall COI z score | 0.01 (−0.02, 0.03) | 0.01 (−0.02, 0.03) | −0.01 (−0.05, 0.02) | <0.01 |
| Education COI domain, mean (SD) | −0.00 (0.06) | 0.00 (0.06) | −0.02 (0.06) | <0.01 |
| Health and environment COI domain, mean (SD) | 0.01 (0.05) | 0.01 (0.05) | −0.01 (0.06) | <0.01 |
| Social and economic COI domain, mean (SD) | 0.05 (−0.12, 0.17) | 0.05 (−0.12, 0.17) | −0.06 (−0.33, 0.12) | <0.01 |
Point estimates represent median Z score (IQR) unless specified otherwise. Negative sign indicates median is below the normalized mean.
Other race and ethnicity was defined as Non-Hispanic Other; Hispanic Other; Other or unknown race or ethnicity.
All census-based neighborhood-level characteristics are based on n=15,427 children (n=450; 2.8%) missing data) except for all COI z-scores (n=0 missing data).
Abbreviations: ARE: Asthma with recurrent exacerbations; COI: Child opportunity index; HS: High school; SD: Standard deviation.
Figure 2 and Supplemental Table 3 display IRs for the COI categories stratified by individually-reported child race and ethnicity. The IR of ARE for children residing at birth in a very low overall COI neighborhood was significantly higher than for children born in neighborhoods from all the other categories at 10.98 per 1000 person years (95% CI: 9.71, 12.25). The IRs of ARE for NHB children were 1.76 (moderate COI) to almost 4 (very low COI score category) times higher when compared to NHW children. Within the very low COI category, the IR of ARE was higher among HB children compared to HW children and among NHB compared to NHW. Otherwise, the IRs were not statistically different between the HB and NHB children or between HW children and NHW White children, although the numbers of HB and HW children with ARE were small (<15 in each COI category).
Figure 2:
Overall COI category-specific measures of incidence rates (IRs) of ARE by individual-level race and ethnicity. 95% CI are shown.
We next examined COI associations with ARE for each of the 3 COI domains and found greatest differences across the four categories for the education domain. The IR of ARE for children in the very low category (10.41 per 1000 person years; 95% CI: 8.97, 11.84) was nominally higher than the other groups (Supplemental Table 4). Otherwise, similar findings were observed for the social and economic domain, and the health and environment domain-specific COI categories (Supplemental Tables 5, 6).
Table 2 presents COI category-specific and individual-level characteristic-specific incidence unadjusted and adjusted rate ratios (IRRs) of ARE. Unadjusted analyses showed higher IRRs of ARE among children from very low and low COI neighborhoods, as well as an effect of several individual level characteristics. However, adjustment for individual characteristics diminished the association of ARE with a very low and low overall COI (Table 2). Even when removing the adjustment for individual level maternal education, the IRR was attenuated but remained significant (1.32 (95% CI: 1.05,1.65, p=0.02)). Birth during more recent decades (2000–2009, 2010–2018) remained significantly associated with a higher IRR (adjusted IRR=2.45; 95% CI:1.61, 3.73; adjusted IRR=2.39; 95% CI: 1.47, 3.86, respectively). Adjusted analyses for both the 5–9 and 2–4 year old age groups increased the IRRs to IRR= 25.08; 95% CI: 19.58, 32.12 in the latter group. Individually reported HB and NHB race and ethnicity also retained their associations with a higher IRR for ARE, although adjustment diminished the effect (adjusted IRR=1.93; 95% CI: 1.13, 3.27 and IR=1.97; 95% CI: 1.58, 2.46) respectively. Northeast, South and Midwest census region at birth retained significance when compared to the West region, as did child sex and parental history of asthma, with minimal impact on the IRR upon adjustment for the other characteristics. When examining the adjusted IRRs of ARE for the education domain of COI and individual level demographic characteristics, the 2000–2009 and 2010–2018 decade of birth, NHB, HB, Other race and ethnicity, Northeast, Midwest, South census region, male sex and parental history of asthma similarly retained statistical significance (Table 3). The very low category of COI was associated with a diminished adjusted IRR for ARE that retained statistical significance (IRR=1.29; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.63). Similar trends for the social and economic domain and the health and environment domain of the COI are shown in Supplemental Tables 7, 8.
Table 2.
Overall COI category-specific and individual-level characteristic-specific incidence unadjusted and adjusted* rate ratios (IRRs) of ARE by multivariate regression model
| Unadjusted IRR (95% CI) | P value | Adjusted IRR (95% CI) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall COI categories | ||||
| High/very high | Reference | Reference | ||
| Moderate | 1.13 (0.89,1.45) | 0.32 | 1.05 (0.81,1.35) | 0.72 |
| Low | 1.35 (1.06, 1.72) | 0.01 | 1.04 (0.81,1.34) | 0.76 |
| Very low | 2.14 (1.78, 2.58) | <0.01 | 1.26 (0.99,1.59) | 0.06 |
| Individual level characteristics | ||||
| Maternal education | ||||
| ≥Bachelor’s** | Reference | Reference | ||
| Some college | 1.76 (1.42, 2.19) | <0.01 | 1.26 (1.00,1.57) | 0.04 |
| HS degree | 1.71 (1.25, 2.32) | <0.01 | 1.13 (0.82,1.55) | 0.45 |
| <HS | 1.64 (1.10, 2.42) | 0.01 | 1.14 (0.76,1.73) | 0.52 |
| Decade born | ||||
| 1990–1999 | Reference | Reference | ||
| 2000–2009 | 2.23 (1.54, 3.22) | <0.01 | 2.45 (1.61,3.73) | <0.01 |
| 2010–2018 | 4.15 (2.64, 6.54) | <0.01 | 2.39 (1.47, 3.86) | <0.01 |
| Child age (years) | ||||
| 10–18 | Reference | Reference | ||
| 5–9 | 2.85 (2.23, 3.66) | <0.01 | 5.19 (4.00, 6.74) | <0.01 |
| 2–4 | 12.51 (9.88,15.8) | <0.01 | 25.08 (19.58, 32.12) | <0.01 |
| Child race, ethnicity | ||||
| Non-Hispanic White | Reference | Reference | ||
| Non-Hispanic Black | 2.67 (2.23, 3.21) | <0.01 | 1.97 (1.58, 2.46) | <0.01 |
| Hispanic White | 1.01 (0.72,1.43) | 0.94 | 1.15 (0.78, 1.61) | 0.45 |
| Hispanic Black | 3.09 (1.86, 5.12) | <0.01 | 1.93 (1.13, 3.27) | 0.02 |
| Other | 1.47 (1.19, 1.83) | <0.01 | 1.37 (1.08,1.73) | <0.01 |
| Census region | ||||
| West | Reference | Reference | ||
| Northeast | 4.68 (3.36, 6.52) | <0.01 | 4.32 (3.07, 6.08) | <0.01 |
| Midwest | 3.66 (2.53, 5.29) | <0.01 | 3.86 (2.64, 5.64) | <0.01 |
| South | 5.18 (3.39, 7.91) | <0.01 | 4.05 (2.59, 6.34) | <0.01 |
| Child sex | ||||
| Female | Reference | Reference | ||
| Male | 1.41 (1.21,1.64) | <0.01 | 1.36 (1.17, 1.59) | <0.01 |
| Parental history of asthma | ||||
| None | Reference | Reference | ||
| Either or both | 2.80 (2.37, 3.32) | <0.01 | 2.52 (2.13, 2.99) | <0.01 |
Adjusted IRR estimates were derived from models adjusting for all variables in the table.
≥Bachelor’s refers to bachelors, master’s, some professional, or doctorate degree. Other refers to Non-Hispanic Other; Hispanic Other; Other or unknown.
Abbreviations: ARE: Asthma with recurrent exacerbations; CI: Confidence interval; COI: Child opportunity index; HS: high school; IRRs: incidence rate ratios. Model controls for the clustering effect of cohorts by using a fixed effect representing groups of cohorts found to have common characteristics using the RELATE package in R.
Table 3.
Education COI domain and individual-level characteristic-specific incidence unadjusted and adjusted* rate ratios (IRRs) of ARE by multivariate regression model
| Unadjusted IRR (95% CI) | P value | Adjusted IRR (95% CI) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education COI domain categories | ||||
| High/very high | Reference | Reference | ||
| Moderate | 1.13 (0.90, 1.42) | 0.31 | 1.05 (0.83, 1.32) | 0.72 |
| Low | 1.68 (1.36, 2.08) | <0.01 | 1.25 (1.00, 1.58) | 0.05 |
| Very low | 2.02 (1.65, 2.47) | <0.01 | 1.29 (1.02, 1.63) | 0.03 |
| Individual level characteristics | ||||
| Maternal education | ||||
| ≥Bachelor’s** | Reference | Reference | ||
| Some college | 1.76 (1.42, 2.19) | <0.01 | 1.25 (1.01, 1.57) | 0.05 |
| HS degree | 1.71 (1.25, 2.32) | <0.01 | 1.13 (0.83, 1.55) | 0.44 |
| <HS | 1.64 (1.10, 2.42) | 0.03 | 1.15 (0.76, 1.72) | 0.51 |
| Decade born | ||||
| 1990–1999 | Reference | Reference | ||
| 2000–2009 | 2.23 (1.54, 3.22) | <0.01 | 2.45 (1.61, 3.74) | <0.01 |
| 2010–2018 | 4.15 (2.64, 6.54) | <0.01 | 2.38 (1.47, 3.86) | <0.01 |
| Child age (years) | ||||
| 10–18 | Reference | Reference | ||
| 5–9 | 2.85 (2.23, 3.66) | <0.01 | 5.21 (4.01,6.76) | <0.01 |
| 2–4 | 12.51 (9.88, 15.83) | <0.01 | 25.17 (19.64, 32.25) | <0.01 |
| Child race, ethnicity | ||||
| Non-Hispanic White | Reference | Reference | ||
| Non-Hispanic Black | 2.67 (2.22, 3.21) | <0.01 | 1.99 (1.61,2.46) | <0.01 |
| Hispanic White | 1.01 (0.72, 1.43) | 0.94 | 1.15 (0.81, 1.65) | 0.43 |
| Hispanic Black | 3.09 (1.86, 5.12) | <0.01 | 1.95 (1.15, 3.30) | 0.01 |
| Other | 1.47 (1.19, 1.83) | <0.01 | 1.36 (1.08, 1.72) | <0.01 |
| Census region | ||||
| West | Reference | Reference | ||
| Northeast | 4.68 (3.36, 6.52) | <0.01 | 4.40 (3.13, 6.19) | <0.01 |
| Midwest | 3.66 (2.53, 5.29) | <0.01 | 3.87 (2.65, 5.66) | <0.01 |
| South | 5.18 (3.39, 7.91) | <0.01 | 4.05 (2.59, 6.34) | <0.01 |
| Child sex | ||||
| Female | Reference | Reference | ||
| Male | 1.41 (1.21, 1.64) | <0.01 | 1.36 (1.17, 1.59) | <0.01 |
| Parental history of asthma | ||||
| None | Reference | Reference | ||
| Either or both | 2.80 (2.37, 3.32) | <0.01 | 2.52 (2.12, 2.99) | <0.01 |
Adjusted IRR estimates were derived from models adjusting for all variables in the table.
≥Bachelor’s refers to bachelors, master’s, some professional, or doctorate degree. Other refers to Non-Hispanic Other; Hispanic Other; Other or unknown.
Abbreviations: ARE: Asthma with recurrent exacerbations; CI: Confidence interval; COI: Child opportunity index; HS: high school; IRRs: incidence rate ratios. Model controls for the clustering effect of cohorts by using a fixed effect representing groups of cohorts found to have common characteristics using the RELATE package in R.
Figures 3 and 4 and Supplemental Figure 1 display the predicted number (i.e. fitted model estimated) of ARE cases per 1000 child-years by COI level, stratified by potential effect modifiers. The number of ARE cases per 1000 person-years was higher among children born during the 2000–2009 with a very low COI (IR2000–2009= 53.2 per 1000 person-years, (95% CI: 44.27, 70.29) versus IR1990–1999= 9.65 (95% CI: 4.40, 21.40). The same trend by birth decade was observed to a lesser extent among those with a low COI (Figure 3). The number of ARE cases per 1000 person-years was highest among very young children ages 2–4 years in each COI category compared to their older counterparts of 5–9 years and 10–19 year of age (Figure 4a). The number of ARE cases per 1000 person-years was higher among children with parental history of asthma in compared to children whose parents have no history of asthma, especially among those in the very low COI category (Figure 4b). The differences after adjusting for male sex and maternal education below a bachelor’s degree across the COI categories were relatively smaller (Supplemental Figure 1).
Figure 3:
Predicted number of ARE cases per 1000 child-years by COI category, stratified by birth decade. Fully adjusted data through 2018 are shown. 95% CI are shown.
Figure 4:
Predicted number of ARE cases per 1000 child-years by COI category, stratified by A. Age groups and B. Parental history of asthma. Fully adjusted data are shown. 95% CI are shown.
Discussion:
ARE captures asthma complications that may or may not present to an ED but still cause substantial healthcare burdens for individuals in the U.S. with an overall rate of 6.46 per 100 person years among children aged 5–19 years participating in the nationwide ECHO program. Recent research from the ECHO program showed time-dependent differences in the IR of ARE during childhood that cannot be explained by genetic factors,8 and suggest changing environments including physical exposures and social determinants. Utilizing the large sample size of the ECHO program and detailed residential histories, we evaluated whether the COI overall score, believed to capture systemic structural factors and latent causes at the area or neighborhood level that drive child’s opportunity,11,12 measured near child birth address was associated independently with the IR for the phenotype of ARE during subsequent childhood. We also adjusted for key individual-level characteristics. We further examined effect modification by individually-reported race and ethnicity, young age and other key demographic characteristics. We found that overall, the IRs of ARE for children born in a neighborhood with a very low COI category was significantly higher than the IRs of ARE for the other (high/very high, moderate, low) COI categories. In addition, the IRs of ARE for the overall COI as well as for the three domains (social and economic, education, health and environment domains) were several-fold higher among children who were parent-reported Black children when compared to White children. Adjustment for individual-level characteristics attenuated the significant association of birth in a very low COI neighborhood and higher incidence rate ratio of AR, more clearly evident when examining the overall and educational COI.
The association of neighborhood-level opportunity based on the overall COI score and each of its three domains with ARE is consistent with previous literature suggesting that neighborhood disadvantage in the prenatal period remains an important determinant of asthma and ED or hospital visits for asthma.9,11,25,26 Cross-sectional studies have reported associations between lower COI and more frequent pediatric ED and hospital visits for asthma.13,27 Our data from a diverse U.S. population showed that children born in a neighborhood with a very low COI category, in either the total scores or individuals domains, had the highest incidence of ARE, even after adjustment for individual characteristics.
The stronger associations of individually-reported Black race with ARE across all categories of COI may relate to neighborhood stressors or lack of access to resources that are greater for Black children, even after considering neighborhood factors.28,29 Independent of the affluence level of the neighborhood, ARE may be more frequent for more marginalized families who have relatively reduced access to optimal health care in ways that are not measured with our research surveys, including those related to social stressors, discrimination or structural racism.6,30 Previous studies have found that communities of color are more likely to live in areas of historical redlining and higher levels of air pollution.31–33 Disparities within neighborhoods in ARE for Black children compared to non-Hispanic White children are not likely to be a function of biologic differences in heritable vulnerability.34
ARE cases were more common among younger children, children with a parental history of asthma, children born 2000–2009, boys, and among children of mothers with a lower education level. These factors are similar to those associated with childhood asthma, irrespective of exacerbation history.17,35 Indeed, previous findings on incidence rates for ARE in the ECHO population also suggested the rates were highest in the youngest children aged 2–4 years, among Black children, and among those with a parental history of asthma.8 Poor airway function in infancy has been shown to be associated with lower lung function and exacerbations in adolescence and adulthood,36,37 further supporting the importance of physiological characteristics detected at young ages to longer term airway health. In the present analyses, the increase in ARE cases for young age was particularly notable in the very low COI category, as was an increase associated with parental asthma history. Higher risk associated with parental history of disease and younger age at onset likely suggest an interaction of early environmental exposures with genetic susceptibility.38
Similar to our previous report,8 we observed a higher incidence of ARE among children born 2000–2009 compared to the previous decade. We also observed a trend for higher rates for the 2010–2018 birth decade compared to 1990–1999 with the adjustments made here. Notably we report the novel result that among children with a very low COI, those born during the 2000–2009 birth decade experienced the highest rates of ARE (Figure 3). This new finding varies from our previous observations on asthma incidence that was more notable beginning 1990–1999, especially among African American/Caribbean children with a parental history of asthma.35 Altogether these new results suggest that rates of ARE, unlike the rates of child asthma that may be declining,39 are persisting and related to low levels of neighborhood opportunity (lower opportunity for economic mobility and employment, reduced access to quality educational resources, healthy food and green space, and air pollution or other elements of structural racism). The small influence of individually-reported maternal education (IR=1.32) suggests that this particular indicator of an important family resource explains some but not all of the child’s access and opportunity at the neighborhood level on ARE risk. Thus, neighborhood level interventions are still an important target for specific intervention beyond individual level factors.
While the impact of the prenatal compared to childhood time window of exposure was not directly studied here, the findings analyzing the COI measured at birth suggest that pregnancy could be a critical time for intervention. The impact of the physical environmental and social determinants may begin prior to birth but persist during early childhood and over a more prolonged course to induce oxidative or other toxic injury to the airway or allergic sensitization.40 Notably, early childhood adversity including socioeconomic disadvantage has been associated with higher levels of proinflammatory biomarkers in children.41
We acknowledge several study limitations. First, individual cohorts were harmonized to comprise the overall ECHO population and were not randomly selected from defined populations. Therefore, ECHO is not representative of the general national population or any other population.42 Participants included in this analysis also differ slightly compared to the study eligible ECHO population by time/decade of enrollment and race. These differences in composition including missing data could potentially introduce bias and limit generalizability. However, because differences in maternal education were not apparent and because we carefully considered variables (SES) that are thought to have the most impact on research participant invitation and acceptance, we speculate that the impact of differences between our analytic population and the general ECHO and US populations on our study inferences is likely modest. Neighborhood measures of exposure at the census tract level are defined by administrative boundaries and do not necessarily mirror what individuals consider their actual neighborhood in terms of where they spend time and interact with others. As such, they may not fully capture exposures in relevant areas where pregnant women spend most of their time. Second, data used for the neighborhood census-cased social determinants (1990, 2000, 2010) and for the COI (2010, 2015) measures were not exactly the birth year but based on closet year. Given the wide range of variability in birth dates for all the ECHO cohorts integrated into this analysis, and the challenges with harmonizing exposure data across these, some cohorts’ neighborhood measures may be less certain than others (especially in earlier birth years and with the COI). Elements of the actual neighborhood (including access to education, and healthcare and social resources, physical buildings, discrimination, stress, air pollution levels) during pregnancy may have variably changed. Unmeasured confounding from other environmental exposures (e.g. respiratory syncytial virus, and human rhinovirus, allergens, ambient air quality) and social stressors (e.g. discrimination) may not have been captured by these measures and could influence the incidence of ARE. ECHO recruitment sites that differed across decades also could have affected the distribution of urbanicity and other potential unmeasured confounders. However, we examined neighborhood effects while adjusting for individual factors raising our confidence that we distinguished effects at the neighborhood level. We did not adjust for other individual factors beyond parental history of asthma such as gestational age and maternal smoking as our focus was on basic demographic factors. We chose individual indicators that best mirrored the contextual indicators included in the COI. Finally, many of the comparisons between HB and other race and ethnic subgroups were hindered by limited power (i.e. small sample size).
Our results indicate that ARE may be more likely to develop among children living in marginalized under-resourced communities. Potential explanations may include diminished access to health care that can predispose to co-morbidities and inadequate medical prescriptions or counseling. Other environmental instabilities such as substandard housing conditions, greater pollution, higher stress, crowding and less green space within the neighborhood43,44 can increase the likelihood of asthma exacerbations. This study adds to the mounting evidence that improving disadvantaged neighborhoods has a myriad of benefits for children, providing evidence for policy makers of the potential for improving asthma control and decreasing asthma morbidity. Future studies may assess the utility of incorporating the CO as a clinical prediction tool for children with asthma.
Supplementary Material
Key Messages:
The incidence rate of asthma with recurrent exacerbations for children born in very low Child Opportunity Index (COI) neighborhoods was significantly higher than rates for the other COI categories.
The incidence rate of asthma with recurrent exacerbations for children born in very low COI neighborhoods were several-fold higher for parent-reported Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic Black children when compared to White children.
Rates for Non-Hispanic Black children were significantly higher than Non-Hispanic White children in every COI category.
Following adjustment for individual-level characteristics, children born in a very low COI neighborhood demonstrated an ARE incidence rate ratio of 1.26 (95% CI 0.99,1.59, p= 0.06) with a higher incidence of cases among children ages 2–4 years and with a parental history of asthma.
ECHO Collaborators Acknowledgements:
The authors wish to thank our ECHO colleagues; the medical, nursing, and program staff; and the children and families participating in the ECHO cohorts.
Funding:
Research reported in this publication was supported by the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, under Award Numbers U2COD023375 (Coordinating Center), U24OD023382 (Data Analysis Center), U24OD023319 with co-funding from the Office of Behavioral and Social Science Research (Measurement Core), U24OD035523 (Lab Core), ES0266542 (HHEAR), U24ES026539 (HHEAR Barbara O’Brien), U2CES026533 (HHEAR Lisa Peterson), U2CES026542 (HHEAR Patrick Parsons, Kannan Kurunthacalam), U2CES030859 (HHEAR Manish Arora), U2CES030857 (HHEAR Timothy R. Fennell, Susan J. Sumner, Xiuxia Du), U2CES026555 (HHEAR Susan L. Teitelbaum), U2CES026561 (HHEAR Robert O. Wright), U2CES030851 (HHEAR Heather M. Stapleton, P. Lee Ferguson), UG3/UH3OD023251 (Akram Alshawabkeh), UH3OD023320 and UG3OD035546 (Judy Aschner), UH3OD023332 (Clancy Blair, Leonardo Trasande), UG3/UH3OD023253 (Carlos Camargo), UG3/UH3OD023248 and UG3OD035526 (Dana Dabelea), UG3/UH3OD023313 (Daphne Koinis Mitchell), UH3OD023328 (Cristiane Duarte), UH3OD023318 (Anne Dunlop), UG3/UH3OD023279 (Amy Elliott), UG3/UH3OD023289 (Assiamira Ferrara), UG3/UH3OD023282 (James Gern), UH3OD023287 (Carrie Breton), UG3/UH3OD023365 (Irva Hertz-Picciotto), UG3/UH3OD023244 (Alison Hipwell), UG3/UH3OD023275 (Margaret Karagas), UH3OD023271 and UG3OD035528 (Catherine Karr), UH3OD023347 (Barry Lester), UG3/UH3OD023389 (Leslie Leve), UG3/UH3OD023344 (Debra MacKenzie), UH3OD023268 (Scott Weiss), UG3/UH3OD023288 (Cynthia McEvoy), UG3/UH3OD023342 (Kristen Lyall), UG3/UH3OD023349 (Thomas O’Connor), UH3OD023286 and UG3OD035533 (Emily Oken), UG3/UH3OD023348 (Mike O’Shea), UG3/UH3OD023285 (Jean Kerver), UG3/UH3OD023290 (Julie Herbstman), UG3/UH3OD023272 (Susan Schantz), UG3/UH3OD023249 (Joseph Stanford), UG3/UH3OD023305 (Leonardo Trasande), UG3/UH3OD023337 (Rosalind Wright), UG3OD035508 (Sheela Sathyanarayana), UG3OD035509 (Anne Marie Singh), UG3OD035513 and UG3OD035532 (Annemarie Stroustrup), UG3OD035516 and UG3OD035517 (Tina Hartert), UG3OD035518 (Jennifer Straughen), UG3OD035519 (Qi Zhao), UG3OD035521 (Katherine Rivera-Spoljaric), UG3OD035527 (Emily S Barrett), UG3OD035540 (Monique Marie Hedderson), UG3OD035543 (Kelly J Hunt), UG3OD035537 (Sunni L Mumford), UG3OD035529 (Hong-Ngoc Nguyen), UG3OD035542 (Hudson Santos), UG3OD035550 (Rebecca Schmidt), UG3OD035536 (Jonathan Slaughter), UG3OD035544 (Kristina Whitworth). This research was funded by the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program, Office of The Director, National Institutes of Health, under Award Number UG3OD023316 awarded to John Vena and Ronald Wapner; by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Intramural Funding and included American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funding via contract numbers HHSN275200800013C; HHSN275200800002I; HHSN27500006; HHSN275200800003IC; HHSN275200800014C; HHSN275200800012C; HHSN275200800028C; HHSN275201000009C. Additional funding: CTSA grant UL1 TR002373 NIH-ICTR, U19 AI104317/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States; Harvard NIEHS Center Grant P30-ES000002; U19 AI 095227; R01-ES015359, R01-ES01031701; NIH P01ES022841, EPA RD 83543301, NIH P30ES030284.
The sponsor, NIH, participated in the overall design and implementation of the ECHO Program, which was funded as a cooperative agreement between NIH and grant awardees. The sponsor approved the Steering Committee-developed ECHO protocol and its amendments including COVID-19 measures. The sponsor had no access to the central database, which was housed at the ECHO Data Analysis Center. Data management and site monitoring were performed by the ECHO Data Analysis Center and Coordinating Center. All analyses for scientific publication were performed by the study statistician, independently of the sponsor. The lead author wrote all drafts of the manuscript and made revisions based on co-authors and the ECHO Publication Committee (a subcommittee of the ECHO Operations Committee) feedback without input from the sponsor. The study sponsor did not review or approve the manuscript for submission to the journal.
Abbreviations
- ARE
asthma with recurrent exacerbations
- CI
confidence interval
- COI
child opportunity index
- ED
emergency department
- ECHO
Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes
- HB
Hispanic Black
- HW
Hispanic White
- IR
incidence rate
- IRR
incidence rate ratio
- NHB
Non-Hispanic Black
- NHW
Non-Hispanic White
- U.S
United States
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest:
C.A. Camargo, Jr, served on asthma-related Scientific Advisory Boards for AstraZeneca (in 2020) and Sanofi Genzyme (in 2021). J.E. Gern has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca and Meissa Vaccines, Inc, and has stock options in MeissaVaccines, Inc. T. Hartert serves on vaccine Data and SafetyMonitoring Boards and advisory panels for Pfizer and Sanofi (without funding). D.J. Jackson has received funding from GlaxoSmithKline and Regeneron; personal fees for Data and Safety Monitoring Board from Pfizer; and personal fees for consulting from AstraZeneca, Avillion, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, and Regeneron. Consultant, Apogee Therapeutics. A.A. Litonjua was a consultant for Apogee Therapeutics. S. Sathyanarayana serves on the board of the Children’s Environmental Health Network; this is a non-paid position. The rest of the authors declare no relevant conflicts of interest.
NIH Disclaimer:
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References:
- 1.Denlinger LC, Heymann P, Lutter R, Gern JE. Exacerbation-prone asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. Feb 2020;8(2):474–482. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.11.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chung KF, Wenzel SE, Brozek JL, Bush A, Castro M, Sterk PJ, et al. International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma. Eur Respir J. Feb 2014;43(2):343–73. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00202013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Perry R, Braileanu G, Palmer T, Stevens P. The economic burden of pediatric asthma in the United States: Literature review of current evidence. Pharmacoeconomics. Feb 2019;37(2):155–167. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0726-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yaghoubi M, Adibi A, Safari A, FitzGerald JM, Sadatsafavi M. The projected economic and health burden of uncontrolled asthma in the United States. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Nov 1 2019;200(9):1102–1112. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201901-0016OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Suruki RY, Boudiaf N, Ortega HG. Retrospective cohort analysis of healthcare claims in the United States characterising asthma exacerbations in paediatric patients. World Allergy Organ J. 2016;9:18. doi: 10.1186/s40413-016-0109-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Haktanir Abul M, Phipatanakul W. Severe asthma in children: Evaluation and management. Allergol Int. Apr 2019;68(2):150–157. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2018.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Camargo CA Jr., Rachelefsky G, Schatz M. Managing asthma exacerbations in the emergency department: summary of the National Asthma Education And Prevention Program Expert Panel Report 3 guidelines for the management of asthma exacerbations. Proc Am Thorac Soc. Aug 1 2009;6(4):357–66. doi: 10.1513/pats.P09ST2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Miller RL, Schuh H, Chandran A, Aris IM, Bendixsen C, Blossom J, et al. Incidence rates of childhood asthma with recurrent exacerbations in the US Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program. J Allergy Clin Immunol. Jul 2023;152(1):84–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.03.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zanobetti A, Ryan PH, Coull B, Brokamp C, Datta S, Blossom J, et al. Childhood asthma incidence, early and persistent wheeze, and neighborhood socioeconomic eactors in the ECHO/CREW consortium. JAMA Pediatr. Aug 1 2022;176(8):759–767. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.1446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Aris IM, Perng W, Dabelea D, Padula AM, Alshawabkeh A, Velez-Vega CM, et al. Associations of neighborhood opportunity and social vulnerability with trajectories of childhood body mass index and obesity among US children. JAMA Netw Open. Dec 1 2022;5(12):e2247957. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.47957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Aris IM, Perng W, Dabelea D, Padula AM, Alshawabkeh A, Velez-Vega CM, et al. Neighborhood 0pportunity and vulnerability and incident asthma among children. JAMA Pediatr. Oct 1 2023;177(10):1055–1064. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.3133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Acevedo-Garcia D, Noelke C, McArdle N, Sofer N, Hardy EF, Weiner M, et al. Racial and ethnic inequities in children’s neighborhoods: Evidence from the new Child Opportunity Index 2.0. Health Aff (Millwood). Oct 2020;39(10):1693–1701. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00735 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tyris J, Gourishankar A, Kachroo N, Teach SJ, Parikh K. The Child Opportunity Index and asthma morbidity among children younger than 5 years old in Washington, DC. J Allergy Clin Immunol. Jan 2024;153(1):103–110 e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.08.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gillman MW, Blaisdell CJ. Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes, a research program of the National Institutes of Health. Curr Opin Pediatr. Apr 2018;30(2):260–262. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Knapp EA, Kress AM, Parker CB, Page GP, McArthur K, Gachigi KK, et al. The Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO)-Wide Cohort. Am J Epidemiol. Aug 4 2023;192(8):1249–1263. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwad071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fuhlbrigge A, Peden D, Apter AJ, Boushey HA, Camargo CA Jr, Gern J, et al. Asthma outcomes: exacerbations. J Allergy Clin Immunol. Mar 2012;129(3 Suppl):S34–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.12.983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Johnson CC, Chandran A, Havstad S, Li X, McEvoy CT, Ownby DR, et al. US childhood asthma incidence rate patterns from the ECHO consortium to identify high-risk groups for primary prevention. JAMA Pediatr. Sep 1 2021;175(9):919–927. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.0667 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Aris IM, Rifas-Shiman SL, Jimenez MP, Li LJ, Hivert MF, Oken E, et al. Neighborhood Child Opportunity Index and adolescent cardiometabolic risk. Pediatrics. Feb 2021;147(2)doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-018903 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ryan PH, Brokamp C, Blossom J, Lothrop N, Miller RL, Beamer PI, et al. A distributed geospatial approach to describe community characteristics for multisite studies. J Clin Transl Sci. Feb 5 2021;5(1):e86. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Flanagin A, Frey T, Christiansen SL, Committee AMAMoS. Updated guidance on the reporting of race and ethnicity in medical and science journals. JAMA. Aug 17 2021;326(7):621–627. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.13304 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Krieger N The US census and the people’s health: Public health engagement from enslavement and “Indians not taxed” to Census tracts and health equity (1790–2018). Am J Public Health. Aug 2019;109(8):1092–1100. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Katerina Smirnova YZ, Rasha Alsaadawi, Xu Ning, Amii Kress, Jordan Kuiper, Mingyu Zhang, et al. Missing data interpolation in integrative multi-cohort analysis with disparate covariate information. Biostatistics. 2022;0:1–29. doi:doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/samplebibtex [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ekaterina Smirnova YZ, Rasha Alsaadawi, Xu Ning, Amii Kress, Jordan Kuiper, Mingyu Zhang, Kristen Lyall, Sheenas Martenies, Akram Alshawabkeh, Catherine Bulka, Carlos Camargo, Jaeun Choi, Elena Colicino, Anne Dunlop, Michael Elliott, Assiamira Ferrara, Tebeb Gebrestadik, Jiang Gui, Kylie Harrall, Tina Hartert, Barry Lester, Andrew Manigault, Justin Manjourides, Yu Ni, Rosalind Wright, Robert Wright, Katherine Ziegler, Bryan Lau Missing data interpolation in integrative multi-cohort analysis with disparate covariate information. arXiv preprint. 2022; arXiv:2211.00407 [Google Scholar]
- 24.GitHub - yqzhong7/relate: R package ‘relate’ is to identify cohort cluster with disparate covariate information using a machine learning approach. https://github.com/yqzhong7/relate
- 25.Luo J, Kibriya MG, Shah S, Craver A, De La Cruz S, King J, et al. The Impact of Neighborhood Disadvantage on Asthma Prevalence in a Predominantly African-American, Chicago-Based Cohort. Am J Epidemiol. Apr 6 2023;192(4):549–559. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwad015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gjelsvik A, Rogers ML, Garro A, Sullivan A, Koinis-Mitchell D, McQuaid EL, et al. Neighborhood Risk and Hospital Use for Pediatric Asthma, Rhode Island, 2005–2014. Prev Chronic Dis. May 30 2019;16:E68. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ramgopal S, Attridge M, Akande M, Goodman DM, Heneghan JA, Macy ML. Distribution of emergency eepartment encounters and subsequent hospital admissions for children by Child Opportunity Index. Acad Pediatr. Nov-Dec 2022;22(8):1468–1476. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2022.06.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhang AM, Banzon TM, Phipatanakul W. The spectrum of environmental disparities in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. Feb 2024;153(2):398–400. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.09.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cardet JC, Chang KL, Rooks BJ, Carroll JK, Celedon JC, Coyne-Beasley T, et al. Socioeconomic status associates with worse asthma morbidity among Black and Latinx adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol. Oct 2022;150(4):841–849 e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.04.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Martinez A, de la Rosa R, Mujahid M, Thakur N. Structural racism and its pathways to asthma and atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. Nov 2021;148(5):1112–1120. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.09.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lane HM, Morello-Frosch R, Marshall JD, Apte JS. Historical redlining is associated with present-day air pollution disparities in U.S. cities. Environ Sci Technol Lett. Apr 12 2022;9(4):345–350. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c01012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jbaily A, Zhou X, Liu J, Lee TH, Kamareddine L, Verguet S, et al. Air pollution exposure disparities across US population and income groups. Nature. Jan 2022;601(7892):228–233. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04190-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liu J, Clark LP, Bechle MJ, Hajat A, Kim SY, Robinson AL, et al. Disparities in air pollution exposure in the United States by race/ethnicity and income, 1990–2010. Environ Health Perspect. Dec 2021;129(12):127005. doi: 10.1289/EHP8584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Grant T, Croce E, Matsui EC. Asthma and the social determinants of health. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. Jan 2022;128(1):5–11. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.10.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Johnson CC, Havstad SL, Ownby DR, Joseph CLM, Sitarik AR, Myers JB, et al. Pediatric asthma incidence rates in the United States from 1980 to 2017. J Allergy Clin Immunol. Nov 2021;148(5):1270–1280. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.04.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Stern DA, Morgan WJ, Wright AL, Guerra S, Martinez FD. Poor airway function in early infancy and lung function by age 22 years: a non-selective longitudinal cohort study. Lancet. Sep 1 2007;370(9589):758–64. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61379-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Oksel C, Granell R, Haider S, Fontanella S, Simpson A, Turner S, et al. Distinguishing wheezing phenotypes from infancy to adolescence. A pooled analysis of five birth cohorts. Ann Am Thorac Soc. Jul 2019;16(7):868–876. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201811-837OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jakwerth CA, Weckmann M, Illi S, Charles H, Zissler UM, Oelsner M, et al. 17q21 variants disturb mucosal host defense in childhood asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Apr 15 2024;209(8):947–959. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202305-0934OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pate CA, Zahran HS, Qin X, Johnson C, Hummelman E, Malilay J. Asthma Surveillance - United States, 2006–2018. MMWR Surveill Summ. Sep 17 2021;70(5):1–32. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7005a1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lu C, Zhang Y, Li B, Zhao Z, Huang C, Zhang X, et al. Interaction effect of prenatal and postnatal exposure to ambient air pollution and temperature on childhood asthma. Environ Int. Sep 2022;167:107456. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107456 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.de Mendonca Filho EJ, Pokhvisneva I, Maalouf CM, Parent C, Mliner SB, Slopen N, et al. Linking specific biological signatures to different childhood adversities: findings from the HERO project. Pediatr Res. Aug 2023;94(2):564–574. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02415-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Keiding N Perils and potentials of self-selected entry to epidemiological studies and surveys. J R Statist Soc A. 2016;179(2):319–376. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hughes HK, Matsui EC, Tschudy MM, Pollack CE, Keet CA. Pediatric asthma health disparities: Race, hardship, housing, and asthma in a national survey. Acad Pediatr. Mar 2017;17(2):127–134. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.11.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bryant-Stephens TC, Strane D, Robinson EK, Bhambhani S, Kenyon CC. Housing and asthma disparities. J Allergy Clin Immunol. Nov 2021;148(5):1121–1129. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.09.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



