Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1982;324:441–451. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014123

Influences on the expression of acetylcholine receptors on rat nodose neurones in cell culture.

P I Baccaglini, E Cooper
PMCID: PMC1250716  PMID: 7097607

Abstract

1. Nodose neurones dissociated from new-born rats were grown in culture in the absence or presence of cells from neonatal skeletal muscle or heart. 2. In cultures devoid of non-neuronal cells cholinergic interactions between the neurones were common. In the presence of non-neuronal cells such interactions were rare. 3. A decrease in the proportion of neurones responsive to ACh was primarily responsible for the reduced incidence of synaptic interactions. Non-neuronal cells influenced the expression of ACh receptors in developing nodose neurones in culture. 4. Most neurones appeared susceptible to the non-neuronal influence during the first week in culture. 5. Many nodose ganglion neurones, whether grown in the presence or absence of non-neuronal cells, were sensitive to gamma-aminobutyric acid and serotonin but were insensitive to glutamate, glycine and L-epinephrine.

Full text

PDF
442

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ARMETT C. J., RITCHIE J. M. The action of acetylcholine on conduction in mammalian non-myelinated fibres and its prevention by an anticholinesterase. J Physiol. 1960 Jun;152:141–158. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baccaglini P. I., Cooper E. Electrophysiological studies of new-born rat nodose neurones in cell culture. J Physiol. 1982 Mar;324:429–439. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Choi D. W., Fischbach G. D. GABA conductance of chick spinal cord and dorsal root ganglion neurons in cell culture. J Neurophysiol. 1981 Apr;45(4):605–620. doi: 10.1152/jn.1981.45.4.605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DIAMOND J. Observations on the excitation by acetylcholine and by pressure of sensory receptors in the cat's carotid sinus. J Physiol. 1955 Dec 29;130(3):513–532. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. De Groat W. C. GABA-depolarization of a sensory ganglion: antagonism by picrotoxin and bicuculline. Brain Res. 1972 Mar 24;38(2):429–432. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(72)90726-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hawrot E. Cultured sympathetic neurons: effects of cell-derived and synthetic substrata on survival and development. Dev Biol. 1980 Jan;74(1):136–151. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(80)90057-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Higashi H. 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors on visceral primary afferent neurones in the nodose ganglion of the rabbit. Nature. 1977 Jun 2;267(5610):448–450. doi: 10.1038/267448a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Landis S. C. Rat sympathetic neurons and cardiac myocytes developing in microcultures: correlation of the fine structure of endings with neurotransmitter function in single neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Nov;73(11):4220–4224. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.11.4220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Patterson P. H., Chun L. L. The induction of acetylcholine synthesis in primary cultures of dissociated rat sympathetic neurons. I. Effects of conditioned medium. Dev Biol. 1977 Apr;56(2):263–280. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90269-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES