ABSTRACT
Lactation and breastfeeding can present both psychological and physical challenges for breastfeeding mothers. In addition, many nursing mothers will also suffer from breast and nipple dermatoses during this period, compounding these difficulties. Common causes of breast and nipple dermatitis during lactation include eczema, psoriasis, mastitis, mammary Paget's disease, Raynaud's phenomenon, and herpes virus infection, all of which may arise or be exacerbated during breastfeeding. This article summarises the common causes of breast and nipple dermatitis during lactation, as well as their investigation and management. In addition, we review the safety of common dermatological medications in this population, accounting for the unique consideration of the breastfeeding infant.
Keywords: breast feeding, dermatitis, eczema, lactation, mastitis, medication safety, psoriasis
1. Introduction
Breastfeeding is a method of infant nutrition that provides numerous benefits for both newborns and their mothers. Both the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) recommend exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of an infant's life, followed by the introduction of complementary foods in conjunction with breastfeeding for up to two years or beyond. Benefits include the facilitation of growth, development, and excellent long‐term health outcomes for infants, while also nurturing the bond between mother and child.
Lactation can present both psychological and physical challenges for breastfeeding mothers. Breastfeeding demands a significant time commitment, often leading to exhaustion and sleep deprivation, and similarly competes with logistical hurdles such as returning to work. In some mothers, feeding can cause trauma and pain, resulting in feelings of frustration and low self‐esteem.
A substantial number of patients also suffer from dermatoses of their breasts or nipples whilst breastfeeding. Breast and nipple dermatoses can manifest in different forms, some of which specifically arise and some of which are exacerbated during lactation. These conditions may cause discomfort and pain; eventually leading to a cessation of breastfeeding.
Some women may also be lactating for long periods whilst requiring treatment for other dermatological conditions. Doctors should be aware of the safety of potential treatments (topical, physical, and systemic) for the breastfeeding infant of a mother being treated with these modalities, acknowledging that trials often exclude lactating women.
This article presents a scoping review of breast and nipple dermatoses during lactation and breastfeeding, including synthesised guidelines on the medicines used to treat them.
2. Breast Dermatoses in the Lactating Woman
2.1. Inflammatory Dermatoses
2.1.1. Eczema
Eczematous dermatoses of the nipples, including endogenous atopic dermatitis, irritant contact dermatitis, and allergic contact dermatitis, are at risk of development or exacerbation during lactation. Eczema presents as an erythematous eruption of the affected area. In acute cases, this is associated with oozing, crusting, and erosions of the skin, and subacutely, scaling or lichenification is seen. Symptomatically, pain and itch are common features [1, 2, 3]. Isolated eczema of the nipple and areola can occur in all patients suffering from eczema [2], though several additional factors predispose patients to the condition during the lactation period, and ultimately may hinder the breastfeeding experience.
2.1.1.1. Irritant Contact Dermatitis
Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is caused by direct physical or chemical trauma to the affected skin. In relation to the breasts and breastfeeding, the areola is most affected, with the nipple and the skin immediately adjacent typically, though not always, spared, as seen in Figure 1.
FIGURE 1.

Irritant contact dermatitis of the nipple. Image provided by Dr Annabel Stevenson.
The most common trigger is trauma from the feeding newborn. Poor latch from the newborn results in repetitive stretching of desmosomes in the areolar skin. This results in microhaemorrhage and release of histamines and inflammatory cytokines, leading to the development of dermatitis [4]. Trauma from breastfeeding is compounded in cases of infantile congenital abnormalities, such as cleft lip and palate, or the use of an ill‐fitting breast pump. Owing to the changes in shape of the breast and nipples during lactation, frictional trauma from ill‐fitting bras and clothing can also occur.
Mechanical skin damage may be exacerbated by overexposure to moisture and maceration of the nipple–areolar complex [4]. Prolonged and recurrent skin exposure to infant saliva results in skin inflammation and erosion termed moisture‐associated skin damage (MASD). Additional exposure to the acidity and viscosity of saliva and salivary enzymes also contributes to MASD, which clinically presents as irritant contact dermatitis [5]. Low oestrogen levels during lactation may additionally lead to menopause‐like “hot flushes” and xerotic skin, causing increased sweating and subsequent MASD, as is seen in jogger's nipples. Breast milk, itself, may contribute to an increase in moisture, but unlike saliva or other bodily fluids, this contains antibodies, epidermal growth factor, and erythropoietin, and its application has been shown to reduce inflammation in many cases [6]. Occlusion from padded bras and nipple covers, as well as the application of topical medications and emollients, can also contribute to moisture excess [4].
Exploration of personal hygiene practices may reveal factors leading to chemical irritation. Soaps and detergents have been reported amongst the commonest causes of ICD in Australia, and an increase or change in their use may be present post‐partum. Laundry products may additionally be retained in clothing or bras. Whilst there have been no cases specifically reported in a lactating mother, granular parakeratosis may result from the combination of increased friction to the breast region and exposure to personal care products containing benzalkonium chloride. This occurs through disruption of cellular lipid membranes and inactivation of skin enzymes, and frequently affects the inframammary folds [7].
2.1.1.2. Allergic Contact Dermatitis
Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), a type IV hypersensitivity reaction, develops following repeat exposure to an allergen. The risk of developing ACD of the nipple or breast is at its highest during the postnatal period. ACD occurs at the site of allergen contact, and so in comparison to ICD, allergic dermatitis is more likely to affect the nipple itself.
As with ICD, the patient's hygiene practices are an important risk factor. Soaps, detergents, shampoo and conditioner, fabric softeners, and textiles may contain potential allergens, and again the possibility of products being retained in clothing is noted. The fragrances, preservatives and other ingredients used to produce such products make up some of the commonest allergens in Australia, and with changes in behaviour over the lactation period, the nursing mother is at risk of new exposure. For example, a case of ACD from methylisothiazolinone contained in baby wipes has specifically been reported in Australia [8] and contact allergy to propylene glycol used in bra padding [9], and disperse blue 106 fabric dye [10] have also been reported in cases affecting the breasts.
During breastfeeding, the use of nursing adjuncts such as nipple shields, protection covers and shells has become increasingly popular. These products are typically made of silicone, plastic, rubber, or silver. Whilst silicone and plastic are uncommon causes of ACD, contact allergy to silver is consistently reported in the literature [11]. Accelerators (thiurams, carbamates, thiazoles, and thioureas) and antioxidants (mainly p‐phenylenediamine (PPD) derivatives) used in rubber and latex production are also common allergens [12]. Nickel and cobalt, often used as the base of silver‐plated products, including nipple shields, are two of the most frequent causes of ACD, and may also be found in the underwire of bras [13, 14]. In a reported case, one 17‐year‐old girl presented with ACD on her breast and was found to have a contact allergy to the nickel in the mobile phone that she carried in her bra [15]. In breastfeeding infants who are concurrently consuming solid food, especially in cases where the introduction of food coincides with the development of nipple dermatitis, allergy to residual food in the infant's mouth is a theoretical, though unreported, cause. ACD to infant formula has been reported in one case of an adoptive mother using a supplemental nursing system [16].
The topical treatments used to manage breast and nipple discomfort during lactation and breastfeeding are numerous and varied, with many of these a potential cause of ACD. Home remedies might include the application of beeswax [17], chamomile [18], garlic [19] and aloe vera [20], all of which have been reported allergens [2]. Emollients containing vitamins A and E [21], as well as various preservatives or fragrances have equally been implicated. Lanolin, a purified wax composed using the wool of sheep, is frequently used to soothe painful nipples during breastfeeding. Again, this may lead to ACD and should be avoided in patients with a known sheep or wool allergy [22]. Prescribed topical medications equally pose a risk. Topical corticosteroids, antibiotics (e.g., neomycin or bacitracin), and topical anaesthetics (e.g., benzocaine) are commonly reported causes of contact allergy. Miconazole ointment, which is often used during lactation, and Trimovate cream have been reported in cases affecting the nipple and breasts respectively [23, 24]. Patch testing should target not only the active ingredient, but include any excipients, such as in the latter case, where the patient reacted to cetearyl alcohol, sodium metabisulfite and clobetasone butyrate upon patch testing [24].
Allergens reported to have caused breast and nipple ACD are summarised in Table 2.
TABLE 2.
Reported allergens causing allergic contact dermatitis of breast and/or nipples.
| Allergen | Reported source of exposure |
|---|---|
| Nickel sulfate hexahydrate a | Nickel in mobile phone |
| Disperse blue 106 fabric dye (Textile dye mix a ) | Fabric dye used in lining of blue dress |
| Methylisothiazolinone a | Ingredient in baby wipes |
| Propylene glycol a | Component of bra padding |
| Chamomile (Compositae Mix II a ) | Chamomile used as home remedy for topical analgesia |
| Propolis a | Beeswax used as home remedy for topical analgesia |
| Diallyl Disulfide | Garlic poultice used on nipples as home remedy for topical analgesia |
| Aloe Vera | Aloe vera used as home remedy for topical analgesia |
| Lanolin a | Used as home remedy for topical analgesia |
| Miconazole | Ointment used to treat nipple candidiasis |
| Sodium metabisulphite a | Ingredient in Trimovate cream |
Included in Australian Baseline Series (ABS).
2.1.1.3. Atopic Dermatitis
Whilst more common in children, 5%–10% of adult Australians suffer from atopic dermatitis [25]. The nipples are commonly affected (Figure 2), with one study in paediatric patients demonstrating involvement in up to 23% of patients [26]. The condition results from a complex interplay of skin barrier dysfunction, immune dysregulation, and cutaneous microbiome imbalance [25].
FIGURE 2.

Atopic dermatitis of the nipple. Image provided by Dr Annabel Stevenson.
Similar to other eczematous dermatoses, breastfeeding, through mechanical irritation and exposure to moisture and irritant chemicals, can lead to exacerbation of nipple eczema during the post‐partum period [2]. Atopic patients also frequently suffer from allergic contact dermatitis because of their chronic skin breakdown and exposure to antigens [1, 25]. Around half of the women who suffer from breast dermatoses during lactation are believed to be atopic [2, 3].
2.1.2. Psoriasis
Psoriasis of the nipple or breast is uncommon but is an important differential diagnosis. The condition has been described as having a bimodal age of onset, with the first of these (20‐30 years) coinciding with childbearing age. Between 40%–90% of women with psoriasis suffer an exacerbation of their disease during the post‐partum period [27, 28, 29].
Psoriasis of the nipple or breasts presents as erythematous plaques with overlying scale, usually more well‐demarcated than eczema. The “classically” described Koebner Phenomenon is particularly noteworthy in breastfeeding mothers, with latch from the nursing infant causing trauma and potential exacerbations of the disease [1, 28]. The condition itself is not a contraindication to breastfeeding; though the discomfort and exacerbations of disease in this population are often cited as reasons for discontinuing breastfeeding.
2.2. Malignancy
2.2.1. Mammary Paget's Disease
Mammary Page's disease represents 1%–3% of all breast cancers and is an important differential diagnosis for inflammatory breast dermatoses. This rare form of intraductal carcinoma invades the epithelium of the nipple, spreading to the adjacent areola, and presents as scaling, crusting, and erythema of the unilateral breast. Whilst Mammary Page's Disease most commonly affects post‐menopausal women [3, 30], it has been reported in a 32‐year‐old lactating mother who had her symptoms dismissed as lactation‐associated changes for one year before her ultimately fatal diagnosis [31]. Suspicions should be raised in patients with unilateral breast or nipple changes, and those with symptoms persisting longer than three weeks [3, 30].
2.3. Infections
2.3.1. Mastitis
Mastitis, the inflammation of lactiferous ducts, affects somewhere between 3% and 20% of lactating women, and its associated pain is a common reason for early cessation of breastfeeding [32]. Blocked lactiferous ducts result in stasis of breast milk, and clinically, the affected breast is tender to palpation, with variable erythema and engorgement of the affected duct, as seen in Figure 3. It usually presents unilaterally, most often in the first two to three weeks post‐partum and may be associated with fevers and myalgias. The nipple may exhibit a milk bleb (Figure 4), a white spot resulting from propagation of inflammatory cells, which become lodged at the opening of the duct. Secondary infection with Staphylococcus and Streptococcus species may occur in the area of stasis, eventually leading to abscess formation in some cases.
FIGURE 3.

Mastitis. Image provided by Dr Annabel Stevenson.
FIGURE 4.

Milk bleb (7 o'clock on nipple). Image provided by Dr Annabel Stevenson.
Risk factors for milk plugging include poor feeding technique, infrequent or irregular feeding, attempts to rapidly wean from feeding, oversupply of milk, and occlusion from clothing or bras. Discomfort from other breast pathologies, including breast dermatoses, also puts the mother at risk of milk stasis.
2.3.2. Yeast Infection
Yeast infections, most often Candida spp., of the breast and nipples, are commonly diagnosed during lactation. Usually bilateral in distribution, nipple candida is typically associated with a sharp shooting or burning pain, often out of proportion to physical examination findings. As seen in Figure 5, the infection may present with an erythematous, shiny nipple‐areola complex, often extending to the surrounding skin of the breast. Other clues to the diagnosis may include a personal history of candida infection, recent antibiotic use, and the onset of discomfort following previous pain‐free feeding. Concurrent or recent oral or nappy candida infection in the breastfeeding infant should be considered and may be an obvious sign [33, 34]. Unlike eczema, the skin immediately adjacent to the nipple is not spared [3].
FIGURE 5.

Candidiasis of the Nipple. Image provided by Dr Annabel Stevenson.
The diagnosis of candida mastitis is usually made clinically, with several small studies showing that true candida mastitis may not correlate with the presence or absence of Candida growth on swabs [35, 36].
2.3.3. Herpes Simplex Virus
Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) infections most commonly affect the oral and anogenital regions, though herpetic mastitis has been infrequently reported. The condition is typically described as intensely painful or pruritic, with fine vesicles of the nipple‐areolar complex on an erythematous, swollen base, progressing to the development of “punched out” erosion [1, 37]. HSV infection of the breast most often presents unilaterally. Whilst sexual transmission and autoinoculation are possible, transmission from an infant to their breastfeeding mother is the most reported route of HSV infection of the breast [37].
2.3.4. Herpes Zoster Virus
Herpes Zoster (HZV), or Shingles, results from reactivation of Varicella Zoster Virus during periods of immunosuppression. Following a prodrome of pain or itch, HZV presents as pruritic or tender vesicles, which may become haemorrhagic. The rash is circumscribed to a unilateral, dermatomal distribution, which naturally may include the breast or nipple, supplied by the T4 dermatome. In cases where the breast is affected, temporary cessation of breastfeeding is recommended. However, with contralateral or distant disease, cautious continued feeding is possible, ensuring the infant does not come in contact with the affected area [38].
2.4. Vascular Conditions
2.4.1. Raynaud's Phenomenon of the Nipple
Exposure to cold temperatures, especially with sudden changes in temperature, may result in vasospasm of the blood vessels supplying the nipple, termed Raynaud's Phenomenon of the Nipple. This vasospasm results in ischaemia of the nipple and in turn, leads to pain and swelling. Whilst the condition may present in non‐lactating patients, exposure of the nipples during feeding may be the first time a nursing mother experiences the phenomenon [33]. The diagnosis is made clinically, based on nipple pain following exposure to cold, with or without the classic biphasic or triphasic colour changes described with Raynaud's Phenomenon. As with digital Raynaud's Phenomenon, smoking is an important risk factor [39].
Isolated Raynaud's Phenomenon of the digits has been reported in up to 20% of women of childbearing age. Whilst there has been no established correlation between the two conditions, in the largest published case series, 20 of the 22 patients with Raynaud's of the nipples had previously experienced symptoms elsewhere [39]. The published literature fails to comment on whether isolated Raynaud's Phenomenon of the Nipple warrants investigation for underlying connective tissue disease, though a complete review of systems would be prudent to investigate for symptoms of associated connective tissue disease [39, 40].
3. Investigation of Breast Dermatoses in the Lactating Woman
The diagnosis of breast dermatoses is largely based on history and physical examination. The history ought to clarify the timing and pattern of nipple pain and development of the dermatosis and should elucidate any risk factors or causative triggers outlined in Table 1. The treating doctor should focus not only on the health of the affected mother, but also on their breastfeeding infant as well. Physical examination should involve inspection of the affected area, as well as palpation to observe for underlying induration, fluctuance, or mass. The physical examination should equally include observation of breastfeeding or expression technique, examining the breast for resultant shape or colour changes, which may suggest traumatic feeding as a potential trigger.
TABLE 1.
Summary of breast and nipple dermatoses in the lactating woman.
| Name | Risk factors/Triggers | Method of diagnosis | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Irritant contact dermatitis |
Triggers: Trauma (poor latch, ill‐fitting breast pump, frequent cleaning), moisture excess (saliva, sweat, emollients and topical therapy, occlusive clothing, nipple shields), chemical irritation Risk Factors: Congenital abnormalities (tongue tie, cleft lip, and palate) |
Clinical diagnosis: Erythema, itch, pain, burning Acute: Oozing, crusting, erosions Chronic: Scaling, lichenification Areola is most affected (compared to nipple or adjacent skin) |
General:
Topical:
Systemic:
|
| Allergic contact dermatitis |
Triggers: Soaps, detergents, fabric softeners, fragrances, nipple shields/covers (rubber, silver, nickel, cobalt), topical remedies (lanolin, beeswax, chamomile, garlic, aloe vera, vitamin A and E), topical medications (antibiotics, antifungals), infant's oral medications or solid foods Risk Factors: History of atopic dermatitis |
Clinical diagnosis: As for irritant contact dermatitis Nipple more likely to be affected than in irritant contact dermatitis, more likely to be geometric in outline Patch testing: Australian baseline series and cosmetic allergen series; additional testing targeted to history (topical medications, fragrances, textile dyes) – See Table 2 |
|
| Atopic dermatitis |
Triggers: As for irritant contact dermatitis Risk Factors: Personal or family history of atopy (asthma, allergic rhinitis), smoking |
Clinical diagnosis: As for irritant contact dermatitis May have associated patches of eczema in typically atopic areas (cubital and popliteal fossa) |
|
| Psoriasis |
Triggers: Koebnerisation from traumatic feeding or pumping, medications (beta‐blockers, lithium, antimalarials, NSAIDs, tetracyclines) Risk Factors: Personal history (post‐partum flares common), age (common in women of childbearing potential), obesity, hypertension, smoking, stress |
Clinical diagnosis: Salmon‐coloured plaques with overlying scale, usually more well‐demarcated than eczema |
General:
Topical:
Systemic/Physical:
|
| Mammary Paget's disease | Risk Factors: Personal or family history of breast cancer, increased age, obesity, radiation exposure, Caucasian | Punch Biopsy: >/=3 mm biopsy indicated in unilateral lesions unresponsive to treatment |
Physical: Surgical resection in most cases (complete or partial mastectomy) Systemic: Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in selected patients (may necessitate weaning) |
| Mastitis |
Triggers: Milk stasis Risk Factors: Poor feeding technique, irregular feeding, rapidly weaning feeding, occlusion from clothing or bras, pain from other breast pathologies |
Swab culture or breast milk culture: Assess for secondary bacterial infection |
General: Continue regular breast feeding or general expression of breast milk Systemic (severe cases with systemic symptoms): Dicloxacillin or flucloxacillin 500 mg orally 6 hourly for 10 days (5 days may be sufficient in rapidly responsive cases) |
| Yeast Infection |
Triggers: Infant oropharyngeal candidiasis Risk Factors: History of candida infection, recent antibiotic use, concurrent or recent infant nappy candidiasis, moisture excess (saliva, sweat, emollients and topical therapy, occlusive clothing or nipple shields) |
Clinical diagnosis: Erythematous, shiny nipple‐areola complex, pain out of proportion to examination findings Culture swab: Positive culture does not necessarily correlate with symptoms |
General: Thorough cleaning of clothing or equipment in contact with affect nipples or infant mucosa Topical (mother): Miconazole 2% cream twice daily to nipple and areola (wipe from nipple prior to breast feeding, apply immediately after feed) Topical (infant): Miconazole 2% oral gel or nystatin oral suspension 1mL qid orally for 7–14 days Systemic: Oral fluconazole 200 mg once, then 100mg daily for 7–10 days (for resistant cases) |
| Herpes Simplex | Triggers: Transmission from infant to mother most common route of infection | Viral PCR or culture: Swab taken from newly punctured vesicular lesion |
General: Cessation of feeding from affected nipple or breast, pump and discard milk for comfort Systemic: Valaciclovir 500 mg, oral, BD for 5 days |
| Herpes Zoster |
Triggers: Immunosuppression Risk Factors: Past infection with Varicella and/or Herpes Zoster |
Viral PCR or culture: Swab taken from newly punctured vesicular lesion |
General: Cessation of feeding from affected nipple or breast, pump and discard milk for comfort Systemic: Valaciclovir 1 g, oral, TDS for 7 days |
| Raynaud's phenomenon |
Triggers: Cold exposure Risk factors: Smoking, caffeine, alcohol, vasoconstrictive medications |
Clinical Diagnosis: Extreme pain, onset of symptoms with cold exposure, bi‐ or triphasic colour changes, occurrences without breastfeeding |
General: Avoidance of cold exposure, warm compresses, avoidance of caffeine, nicotine and vasoconstrictive medications Systemic: Nifedipine Controlled‐Release 30–60 mg, oral, daily |
In cases of suspected infection, sampling for culture may be indicated. Where the skin is intact, a moist swab should sample the skin of the nipple‐areolar complex in a ten‐point zig‐zag fashion (Figure 6), before being placed in a culture medium. This may be required in suspected cases of yeast infection or mastitis, for example. In cases of suspected mastitis, additional milk culture may be necessary to determine the infecting organism. The nipple should be prepared using saline lavage and alcohol preparation, prior to discarding a few drops. 5–10 mL of milk should then be expressed manually to send for culture. Where there is an open wound, fissure, or vesicle, the moistened swab should be rotated in the affected area or at the site of a deroofed vesicle for five seconds before being sent for culture or PCR testing. Both swab and milk culture collection should occur under appropriately sterile conditions [2, 35, 127].
FIGURE 6.

Culture swab technique. Original figure created by Dr Hamish Moore.
In cases of unilateral nipple dermatoses persisting for longer than three weeks or those not responding to treatment, Paget's disease of the nipple should be considered. Punch biopsy (at least 3mm) is recommended for patients with skin changes concerning for breast malignancy [128, 129]. In cases with an associated breast mass, the need for imaging with mammography or ultrasound, core biopsy, and referral to a breast clinic should be considered. The development of a milk fistula following punch biopsy has not been reported, though there is a theoretical risk. Regardless, lactation is not considered a contraindication to this necessary investigation [130, 131]. Emptying the breast prior to biopsy and applying pressure to the biopsy site when subsequently feeding can reduce the risk [131].
In cases of suspected contact allergy, patch testing should be performed. At present, there is no specific guideline for patch testing patients with breast and nipple dermatoses in Australia. Instead, the Skin Health Institute and the Contact Allergen Bank of Australia (CABA) recommend the use of the Australian Baseline Series (ABS) and the cosmetic allergen series, both of which are considered standard in this population. Based on our findings of reported cases of breast and nipple allergic contact dermatitis, we propose the following targeted “nipple series” (Table 2).
4. Management of Dermatoses in the Lactating Woman
Treatment of dermatoses in a woman who is lactating requires special consideration of the safety of the infant. Infants may be exposed to medications via breastmilk, or in the case of topical medications, through direct contact with the product. Uniquely with breast and nipple dermatoses, topical products are also at risk of ingestion. The next section will examine the known literature surrounding the safety of medications commonly used in dermatology.
4.1. Topical Medications
4.1.1. General Advice
Topical medications are commonly seen in dermatology. Breastfeeding infants may be at undue risk of exposure to their mother's medication through several mechanisms. Firstly, these medications may be absorbed systemically and transferred via the breast milk. Secondly, the infant may come in direct contact with the treated area, exposing their own skin to the treatment and its side effects. Finally, the infant is at risk of ingestion of products applied to the nipple and breast area.
The safety profile of topical medications during breastfeeding is outlined in Table 3. Whilst each medication is unique, when used in the treatment of breast and nipple dermatoses, some general recommendations apply. Patients should apply their medication immediately after each feed, allowing for maximal absorption prior to the next feed. Before feeding again, it is recommended to gently wipe the treated area with a warm towel to reduce infant oral exposure. Avoiding traumatic cleaning and ensuring the breast is dry will reduce exacerbating some dermatoses. Lactating mothers should also seek to use the lowest concentration of medications for the shortest time possible to further reduce exposure.
TABLE 3.
Summary of medication safety during lactation and breastfeeding—topical [27, 28, 29, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47].
| Topical | Mechanism of action | Safety in breastfeeding | Reported risks in infant | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| General use | Use on Nipple/Areola | |||
| Topical steroids | ||||
|
Corticosteroid | Safe | Safe | A case report of a mother using topical isoflupredone acetate (corticosteroid) on the nipple resulted in QT prolongation, hypertension cushingoid appearance and electrolyte abnormalities in her two‐month‐old infant [132] |
|
Corticosteroid (predominantly glucocorticoid) | Safe | Safe | |
|
Glucocorticoid | Safe | Safe | |
|
Glucocorticoid | Safe | Benefit must outweigh risk
|
|
|
Corticosteroid (predominantly glucocorticoid) | Safe | ||
|
Glucocorticoid | Safe | A mother treated with oral prednisolone, cetirizine, topical betamethasone and topical clobetasol reported no effects in her breastfeeding newborn [71] | |
|
Corticosteroid (predominantly glucocorticoid) | Safe | ||
| Calcineurin Inhibitors | ||||
|
Calcineurin inhibitors Disrupt transcription of IL‐2 in T‐lymphocytes |
Safe | Safe (wipe off prior to feeding) | No reports of use during breastfeeding |
| ||||
| Crisabarole | PDE4 Inhibitor | Benefit must outweigh risk
|
No reports of use during breastfeeding | |
| Calcipotriene | Vitamin D Analogue | Safe | Avoid | No reports of use during breastfeeding |
| Diphenylcyclopropenone (DPCP) | Topical immunomodulator reducing autoimmune attack on hair follicles | Avoid | Avoid | No reports of use during breastfeeding |
| Dithranol/Anthralin | Reduced mitotic activity of hyperactive epidermis | Benefit must outweigh risk | Avoid | No reports of use during breastfeeding |
| Retinoids | ||||
|
Binds RAR receptors, decreasing keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation | Avoid | Avoid | No reports of use during breastfeeding |
|
Vitamin A derivative, binds RAR and RXR receptors reducing keratinocyte cohesiveness and follicular occlusion | Safe
|
Avoid | No reports of use during breastfeeding |
|
Binds RAR receptors reducing keratinocyte cohesiveness and follicular occlusion | Safe
|
Avoid | No reports of use during breastfeeding |
| Benzoyl peroxide | Bacteriostatic (against C. acnes) and comedolytic | Benefit must outweigh risk
|
Avoid | No reports of use during breastfeeding |
| Azelaic acid | Inhibits growth of C. acnes and inhibits keratinocyte differentiation and proliferation | Safe
|
Avoid | No reports of use during breastfeeding |
| Salicylic acid | Beta‐hydroxy acid, keratolytic and mild antibacterial and antifungal | Safe
|
Avoid
|
No reports of use during breastfeeding |
| Minoxidil | Increases duration of anagen and enlarges miniaturised hair follicles | Benefit must outweigh risk | Avoid |
A case report of facial hypertrichosis in the breastfed infant of a mother using topical minoxidil [133] A case report of a 7‐year‐old girl who accidentally ingested topical minoxidil developed significant hypotension |
| Coal tar | Poorly understood; suppression of DNA synthesis and thus keratinocyte proliferation | Benefit must outweigh risk
|
Avoid | Single case report, 3‐month‐old and mother using tar on all areas but face and breasts; tar metabolites detectable in urine of infant, despite being undetectable in breastmilk, suggesting infant‐skin contact [134] |
| Antibiotics | ||||
|
Macrolide antibiotic; inhibit bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the 50S ribosomal subunit | Safe | Benefit must outweigh risk
|
No reports of use during breastfeeding |
|
Lincosamide antibiotic; inhibit bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the 50S ribosomal subunit | Safe | Benefit must outweigh risk
|
No reports of use during breastfeeding |
|
Monoxycarbolic acid; inhibits bacterial protein synthesis in gram‐positive and some gram‐negative aerobes | Safe | Safe | A breastfeeding mother was treated with IV teicoplanin, ceftriaxone, topical mupirocin (not on nipples) with no effects in infant [135] |
|
Binds EF‐G, resulting in impaired bacterial protein synthesis | Safe | Safe | 17 patients in one randomised, unblinded study of mothers at risk of mastitis used fusidic acid on their nipples; infant outcomes were not reported [136] |
|
Nitroimidazole antibiotic; inhibits nucleic acid synthesis disrupting microbial cellular DNA | Avoid | Avoid |
No reports of topical use during breastfeeding Reports of candida infection and diarrhoea with systemic use [137, 138, 139, 140] |
| Antifungals | ||||
|
Impair synthesis of ergosterol in fungal cell membranes leading to their breakdown | Safe | Safe | No reports of use during breastfeeding |
|
Safe | Safe | No reports of use during breastfeeding | |
|
Safe | Avoid
|
No reports of topical use in breastfed infants A mother using oral ketoconazole noticed no effects in her breastfed infant [141] |
|
| Antiparasitic | ||||
|
Binds glutamate‐gated chloride ion channels, acting as a GABA‐antagonist, causing parasitic paralysis and death | Safe | Avoid | No reports of topical use during breastfeeding |
| Excipients/Bases | ||||
|
Occlusive effect, minimising transepidermal fluid losses | Safe | Avoid | One study suggests direct application to the nipple may result in ingestion of up to ten times the acceptable daily dose in the breastfed newborn [142] |
| ||||
| Intralesional agents | ||||
|
Sodium channel blocker, thus inhibiting depolarization and impulse conduction in peripheral nerves | Safe | Benefit must outweigh risk | No reports of use during breastfeeding |
|
Glucocorticoid | Safe | Benefit must outweigh risk | A temporary but significant decrease in milk production noted after injection of triamcinolone into breast to treat idiopathic granulomatous mastitis; triamcinolone not detected in breast milk [143] |
|
Blocks release of acetylcholine resulting in paralysis | Benefit must outweigh risk
|
Benefit must outweigh risk
|
In a breastfeeding mother suffering from botulism, no toxin was detectable in the breast milk nor in the infant's serum [144] |
Note: Significance of Green, Yellow, Red indicates as follows: Green = Medication is safe to use during breastfeeding. Yellow = Benefit of use must outweigh risks during breastfeeding. Red = Avoid use during breastfeeding.
4.1.2. Preparation of Medication
With regards to topical medications, an area inconsistently reported on in the literature is the safety of ointments containing mineral oils on the nipples and areolae of breastfeeding mothers. Whilst reporting of medication safety is often focused on the active ingredient, information on the additives of products, which are at risk of ingestion by the breastfeeding infant, is frequently omitted, despite clearly being relevant in this group.
Some guidelines have advocated for the use of ointments over water‐miscible cream or gel products, claiming that because of their occlusive properties, ointments are better absorbed with topical use [2, 3]. Whilst this may be the case, other experts suggest avoiding the use of ointments on the nipples of breastfeeding patients wherever possible [29, 41], after a frequently cited study of breastfeeding subjects suggested that by using paraffin oil on a mother's nipples, an infant could ingest up to ten times the recommended daily dose of mineral hydrocarbons [142]. Notably, no such concern has been demonstrated for microcrystalline waxes, which, owing to their higher molecular weight, are considered safe for ingestion. Lanolin, which is not a hydrocarbon but is rather composed of fatty acid esters, is also not of concern.
Given the lack of definitive data, dermatologists should exercise caution when prescribing mineral oil‐, paraffin‐ and wax‐containing products for use on the breast area of lactating mothers. Whilst prolonged oral ingestion of some ointments may be harmful, with sparing use and judicious cleaning of the nipple prior to breastfeeding, these products are likely to be safe for short‐term treatment. One approach may be to use a high‐potency ointment formulation for a short period, before transitioning to a water‐based product when the disease is better‐controlled.
4.2. Systemic Medications
4.2.1. General Advice
Systemic medications, typically taken orally or subcutaneously, may be transferred to the breastfeeding infant via the breast milk. Many are safe for use during lactation, as summarised in Table 4.
TABLE 4.
Summary of medication safety during lactation and breastfeeding—systemic [27, 28, 29, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47].
| Systemic agents | Mechanism of action | Safety in breastfeeding | Reported risks in infant |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oral antibiotics | |||
|
Tetracycline antibiotic; inhibit bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the 30S ribosomal subunit | Safe for short periods (< 21 days)
|
None reported |
|
Tetracycline antibiotic; inhibit bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the 30S ribosomal subunit | Safe for short periods (7–10 days)
|
Two reported cases of black galactorrhoea with long‐term oral minocycline use [48, 49] |
|
Macrolide antibiotic; inhibit bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the 50S ribosomal subunit | Safe
|
Two studies suggested a possible association between hypertrophic pyloric stenosis and use during breastfeeding [50, 51] Two meta‐analyses failed to demonstrate a causative relationship [52, 53] |
|
Lincosamide antibiotic; inhibit bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the 50S ribosomal subunit | Safe
|
Single case report of newborn developing bloody stools after mother administered IV Clindamycin and Gentamicin [54] |
|
Cephalosporin antibiotic; bind to penicillin‐binding proteins, interfering with bacterial cell wall peptidoglycan synthesis | Safe
|
In 7 mothers taking cefalexin, 2 breastfed infants developed diarrhoea [55] In 11 mothers taking cefalexin, 1 breastfed infant developed diarrhoea [56] In a mother receiving IV cefalothin then oral cefalexin, the breastfed infant developed diarrhoea [57] A 4‐month‐old infant developed toxic epidermal necrolysis follow IV Cefazolin administration; prior sensitisation to cefalexin through breast milk was thought to be a trigger [58] |
|
Penicillin antibiotic; bind to penicillin‐binding proteins, interfering with bacterial cell wall peptidoglycan synthesis | Safe
|
No reports of use during breastfeeding |
|
Bacteriostatic through competitive inhibition of bacterial folate production |
Safe in healthy, full‐term infant Avoid in ill or pre‐term infants, especially those with hyperbilirubinemia or G6PD deficiency |
A systematic review found no adverse effects on the use of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole during breastfeeding, including no neonatal kernicterus [59] In a prospective study of 12 mothers taking trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole during breastfeeding, two mothers reported poor feeding in their newborn [60] |
| Hormonal treatments | |||
|
Suppression of androgens, decreasing sebum production |
Benefits must outweigh risk Avoid for 6 weeks post‐partum due to risk of VTE in mother May reduce milk production |
Multiple case reports and case series of transient gynaecomastia in breastfed infants of mothers taking OCP; resolution of symptoms with cessation of use [61, 62, 63, 64] One case report of an infant developing folate deficiency possibly caused by maternal OCP use [65] At 8 year follow‐up, no difference in growth and development of 48 breastfed children whose mothers started taking OCP at two months post‐partum [66] |
|
Suppression of androgens, decreasing sebum production | Safe | No adverse effects in a case report of a 17‐day‐old infant [67] |
| Retinoids | |||
|
Binds RAR and RXR receptors reducing keratinocyte proliferation | Avoid | No reports of use during breastfeeding |
|
Modulates cell proliferation and differentiation, including decreased sebum production | Avoid | No reports of use during breastfeeding |
| Photosensitising agents | |||
|
Once activated by UV light, bind to DNA and inhibit DNA synthesis | Avoid for 24 h after oral dose | No reports of use during breastfeeding |
|
Photosensitising agent; activated by light to produce reactive singlet oxygen, destroying tumour cells | Avoid
|
No reports of use during breastfeeding |
| Antivirals | |||
|
Guanine analogues Inhibit viral DNA polymerase and DNA synthesis |
Safe | None reported [46, 68] |
|
Safe | None reported [46, 69] | |
|
Benefit must outweigh risk | Secreted at higher concentration than Acyclovir/Valaciclovir and no reports of safe use, so considered second‐line option [46] | |
| Antifungals | |||
|
Impair synthesis of ergosterol in fungal cell membranes leading to their breakdown | Safe | In a study of 96 mothers taking oral fluconazole, 7 breastfed infants developed possible minor side effects (flushed cheeks, GI upset) [70] |
|
|
No reports of use during breastfeeding | |
|
Inhibits squalene epoxidase, thereby inhibiting fungal ergosterol synthesis leading to cell death | Benefit must outweigh risk
|
No reports of use during breastfeeding |
|
Disrupts fungal cell microtubule formation | Avoid
|
No reports of use during breastfeeding |
| Antiparasitic | |||
|
Binds glutamate‐gated chloride ion channels, acting as a GABA‐antagonist, causing parasitic paralysis and death | Safe | No reports of use during breastfeeding |
| Antihistamines | |||
|
Second‐generation antihistamines Bind H1 receptors, thus inhibiting histamine activity |
Safe
|
Multiple case reports and series with no adverse effects on the breastfed infant [55, 71, 72, 73] In one study of 31 women taking cetirizine, 39% noticed minor side effects (fever, rash, sedation, constipation, poor feeding), most of which were attributed to other causes [74] |
|
In one study, three out of 25 women taking fexofenadine reported irritability in their breastfeeding infant [55] | ||
|
In one study, two out of 51 women taking loratadine reported sedation in their breastfeeding infant [75] | ||
|
No reports of use during breastfeeding | ||
|
First‐generation antihistamine | Benefit must outweigh risk
|
No reports of use during breastfeeding |
| Immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory agents | |||
|
Folic acid antagonist with both antineoplastic and immunomodulatory properties |
Antineoplastic doses: Avoid Immunomodulatory doses: Benefit must outweigh risk
|
A mother taking 25mg weekly methotrexate breastfed her 151‐day‐old infant for 9 months with no adverse effects [76] Three breastfeeding mothers inadvertently received toxic doses of methotrexate, with no observable adverse effects in their infants [77] |
|
Metabolised to thioguanine nucleotides which interfere with purine synthesis, impairing lymphocyte proliferation, cellular immunity and antibody responses | Safe
|
Multiple case reports and case series with no reported adverse effects on breastfeeding infants [78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86] One of six infants breastfed by mothers taking azathioprine developed a “low blood count” [87] One of ten infants breastfed by mothers taking azathioprine developed asymptomatic mild neutropenia after 28 days [88] Increased rates of childhood infection requiring hospital admission [89] 21 mothers taking allupurinol and a thiopurine (azathioprine or mercaptopurine) breastfed their infants; two infants died, one of issues related to prematurity and one of SIDS; the authors did not believe this was related to their medication 59 infants exposed to azathioprine during pregnancy and breastfeeding were reported to have higher rates of infection compared to 114 infants who were not [89] |
|
Inhibits inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, selectively suppressing lymphocyte proliferation and antibody formation | Avoid
|
No adverse effects were observed in the children of two breastfeeding women taking mycophenolate [86] Six mothers breastfed seven infants without adverse outcomes whilst taking mycophenolate [84] |
|
PDE‐4 inhibitor, reducing pro‐inflammatory cytokines | Avoid
|
No reports of use during breastfeeding |
|
Tyrosine Kinase 2 inhibitor | Avoid
|
No reports of use during breastfeeding |
|
Calcineurin inhibitor; disrupt transcription of IL‐2 in T‐lymphocytes | Safe
|
Multiple case reports and case series with no reported adverse effects on breastfeeding infants [17, 79, 84, 88, 90, 91, 92] |
|
Systemic corticosteroid (predominantly glucocorticoid) | Safe
|
Multiple case reports and case series with no reported adverse effects on breastfeeding infants [55, 71, 88, 93, 94, 95] |
|
Antibacterial through inhibition of folic acid synthesis Anti‐inflammatory through inhibition of myeloperoxidase in polymorphonucleocytes |
Benefit must outweigh risk
|
The 41‐day‐old infant of a breastfeeding mother taking 50mg dapsone daily developed haemolytic anaemia [96] |
|
Anti‐inflammatory through increasing lysosomal pH Antiproliferative and immunomodulatory through decreasing lymphocyte proliferation and natural killer cell activity |
Safe | Multiple case reports and case series with no reported adverse effects on breastfeeding infants [89, 97, 98, 99, 100] |
|
JAK‐1 inhibitor | Avoid
|
No reports of use during breastfeeding |
|
JAK‐1,2 and 3 inhibitor | Avoid
|
No reports of use during breastfeeding |
|
JAK‐1 and 2 inhibitor | Avoid
|
No reports of use during breastfeeding |
|
Immunoglobulins from human plasma having undergone viral inactivation | Safe
|
In one case report [101], and one infant in a case series of mothers taking IVIg [102], the breastfed infants developed a transient rash In multiple case series, no adverse effects were noted in the breastfed infants [93, 103, 104] |
| Calcium Channel Blockers | |||
|
Calcium channel blocker; act on L‐type calcium channels to block inward current of calcium, resulting in reduced vascular resistance | Safe | None reported [105, 106, 107] |
| Other | |||
|
Increases duration of anagen and enlarges miniaturised hair follicles | Benefit must outweigh risk
|
One case report with no adverse effects in the breastfed infant [108] |
|
Competitively inhibits the binding of androgens at androgen receptors | Avoid | No reports of use during breastfeeding |
| Biologic Agents | |||
|
TNF‐alpha inhibitor | Safe |
Several case series with no adverse effects reported [109, 110, 111] A self‐resolving, mild rash was reported in one infant [112] |
|
TNF‐alpha inhibitor | Safe | Multiple case reports or series with no adverse effects reported [110, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118] |
|
TNF‐alpha inhibitor | Safe |
Multiple case reports and case series with no adverse effects reported One of two twins breastfed by a mother taking Infliximab was hospitalised at 18 months with severe asthmatic bronchitis; at 24 months both twins were developing normally [119] |
|
TNF‐alpha inhibitor | Safe | Several case reports and case series with no adverse effects reported [110, 118, 120, 121, 122] |
|
IL‐12 and IL‐23 inhibitor | Benefits must outweigh risk
|
Multiple case reports and case series with no adverse effects reported |
|
IL‐23p19 inhibitor | Benefits must outweigh risk
|
No reports of use during breastfeeding |
|
IL‐23p19 inhibitor | Benefits must outweigh risk
|
No reports of use during breastfeeding |
|
IL‐23p19 inhibitor | Benefits must outweigh risk
|
No reports of use during breastfeeding |
|
IL‐17A inhibitor | Benefits must outweigh risk
|
No reports of use during breastfeeding |
|
IL‐17A inhibitor | Benefits must outweigh risk
|
No reports of use during breastfeeding |
|
IL‐17A, IL‐17F, IL‐17AF inhibitor | Benefits must outweigh risk
|
No reports of use during breastfeeding |
|
IL‐4 and IL‐13 inhibitor | Benefits must outweigh risk
|
Two case reports and one case series demonstrated no adverse effects on the infant during breastfeeding [123, 124, 125] |
|
IgE inhibitor | Safe | Several case series and one large‐scale pregnancy registry observed no adverse effects in hundreds of breastfed infants [126] |
Note: Significance of Green, Yellow, Red indicates as follows: Green = Medication is safe to use during breastfeeding. Yellow = Benefit of use must outweigh risks during breastfeeding. Red = Avoid use during breastfeeding.
There are numerous factors which may influence the excretion of a medication in the breastmilk. To some extent, most medications diffuse passively into breastmilk. As a result, feeding at the time of peak maternal plasma concentration will result in a larger dose to the infant. This also means that medications highly bound to maternal plasma proteins are less likely to be excreted. The size of the drug molecule plays another important role, with larger molecules, such as the newer biological medications, being less likely to be excreted [27, 28, 29]. Owing to the acidity of breastmilk compared to the serum, alkaline medications diffuse in higher concentration into breastmilk [145].
Additional factors unique to the infant also play an important role. The frequency and volume of breastfeeding will result in a change in the total dose received. The age of the infant is important, as increasing age correlates not only with increased child weight, but also with a significantly improved metabolism. Many of the medication‐related adverse outcomes reported have been seen in newborn or premature infants. The bioavailability of medications also plays a role, with some medications destroyed or poorly absorbed in the infant's GI tract after ingestion [145].
4.2.2. Targeted Immunomodulators and Live Vaccinations in Breastfed Children
A consideration in patients prescribed targeted immunomodulator “biologic” therapy is the administration of vaccinations. Live‐attenuated vaccines are contraindicated in these patients, given the risk of disseminated infection. In general, this recommendation also applies to newborns exposed to biologic medications in utero. Whilst outside of the scope of this paper, most of these medications cross the placenta, with detectable levels of these drugs in a newborn's serum. In a single case report, a child exposed to Infliximab in utero died following administration of the BCG vaccine [146]; and as such, delaying the administration of live vaccines until 12 months of age is recommended. On the Australian immunisation schedule, the rotavirus vaccine is the only recommended live‐attenuated vaccine before 12 months (due at 2 and 4 months of age). The measles‐mumps‐rubella vaccine is due at 12 months and again at 18 months, when varicella is also contained in the live vaccine.
In cases where the infant was not exposed in utero, but where the mother has recommenced biologic treatment whilst breastfeeding, the impact on a child's immunisation schedule is less straightforward. Most biologics are excreted in the breastmilk at insignificant doses, and there is no conclusive evidence demonstrating that this exposure results in immunocompromise. Current guidelines on the use of these medications in the post‐partum period frequently fail to comment on the safety of infant vaccinations, defaulting to recommendations for patients exposed in utero. There are no case reports of the administration of live‐attenuated vaccinations in this population, successful or otherwise.
Ultimately, a nuanced and individualised approach is required. The treating dermatologist and their patient ought to take into consideration the mother's dermatosis, the risk of infection in an unvaccinated newborn, and the known benefits of continuing breastfeeding. Input from a paediatrician and monitoring of newborn drug levels are recommended if the decision is made to proceed with vaccination.
5. Conclusion
Breast and nipple dermatoses are not uncommon during lactation and breastfeeding. Their impact on a breastfeeding mother may significantly hinder the breastfeeding experience, ultimately leading to early cessation of breastfeeding. Dermatologists ought to have a thorough understanding of breast and nipple dermatoses in this population, including the impact of treatment on the nursing infant. Owing to their exclusion from clinical trials, safety data in this population is limited, and so a nuanced, patient‐focused approach is pivotal.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of the Contact Allergen Bank of Australia, who provided information on patch testing in the setting of allergic contact dermatitis of the breast and nipples, and those individuals whose deidentified clinical photographs have been used in this article. Open access publishing facilitated by The University of Adelaide, as part of the Wiley ‐ The University of Adelaide agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
- 1. Barrett M. E., Heller M. M., Fullerton Stone H., and Murase J. E., “Dermatoses of the Breast in Lactation,” Dermatologic Therapy 26, no. 4 (2013): 331–336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Reynaert V., Gutermuth J., and Wollenberg A., “Nipple Eczema: A Systematic Review and Practical Recommendations,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 37, no. 6 (2023): 1149–1159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Barankin B. and Gross M. S., “Nipple and Areolar Eczema in the Breastfeeding Woman,” Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery 8, no. 2 (2004): 126–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Douglas P., “Re‐Thinking Lactation‐Related Nipple Pain and Damage,” Women's Health 18 (2022): 17455057221087865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Gray M., Black J. M., Baharestani M. M., et al., “Moisture‐Associated Skin Damage Overview and Pathophysiology,” Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing 38, no. 3 (2011): 233–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Witkowska‐Zimny M., Kamińska‐El‐Hassan E., and Wróbel E., “Milk Therapy: Unexpected Uses for Human Breast Milk,” Nutrients 11, no. 5 (2019): 944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Dear K., Palmer A., and Nixon R., “Contact Allergy and Allergic Contact Dermatitis From Benzalkonium Chloride in a Tertiary Dermatology Center in Melbourne, Australia,” Contact Dermatitis 85, no. 2 (2021): 146–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Boyapati A., Tam M., Tate B., Lee A., Palmer A., and Nixon R., “Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Methylisothiazolinone: Exposure From Baby Wipes Causing Hand Dermatitis,” Australasian Journal of Dermatology 54, no. 4 (2013): 264–267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Lamb S. R., Ardley H. C., and Wilkinson S. M., “Contact Allergy to Propylene Glycol in Brassiere Padding Inserts,” Contact Dermatitis 48, no. 4 (2003): 224–225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Dawes‐Higgs E. and Freeman S., “Allergic Contact Dermatitis Caused by the Clothing Dye, Disperse Blue 106, an Important Contact Allergen That May Be Frequently Missed,” Australasian Journal of Dermatology 45, no. 1 (2004): 64–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Lopez Rodriguez R. and Goday B. J., “Silver: An Underdiagnosed Allergen?,” Contact Dermatitis 84, no. 6 (2021): 464–466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Mahler V., Allergic Reactions to Rubber Components (Springer International Publishing, 2020), 891–911. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ahlström M. G., Thyssen J. P., Wennervaldt M., Menné T., and Johansen J. D., “Nickel Allergy and Allergic Contact Dermatitis: A Clinical Review of Immunology, Epidemiology, Exposure, and Treatment,” Contact Dermatitis 81, no. 4 (2019): 227–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Kim S. K., Won Y. H., and Kim S. J., “Nipple Eczema: A Diagnostic Challenge of Allergic Contact Dermatitis,” Annals of Dermatology 26, no. 3 (2014): 413–414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Dannepond C. and Armingaud P., “Breast Eczema: Mobile Phones Must Not Be Overlooked,” Annales de Dermatologie et de Vénéréologie 139, no. 2 (2012): 142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Özkaya E., Erdem Y., Yerlioğlu Ak D., and Keskindemirci G., “Allergic Contact Dermatitis From Infant Formula in an Adoptive Mother Using a Supplemental Nursing System: The First Case,” Contact Dermatitis 91, no. 4 (2024): 346–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. García M., del Pozo M. D., Díaz J., Muñoz D., and Fernández de Corrés L., “Allergic Contact Dermatitis From a Beeswax Nipple‐Protective,” Contact Dermatitis 33, no. 6 (1995): 440–441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. McGforge B. C. L. and Steele M. C., “Allergic Contact Dermatitis of the Nipple From ROzMAN Chamomile Ointment,” Contact Dermatitis 24, no. 2 (1991): 139–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Roberge R. J., Leckey R., Spence R., and Krenzelok E. J., “Garlic Burns of the Breast,” American Journal of Emergency Medicine 15, no. 5 (1997): 548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Ferreira M., Teixeira M., Silva E., and Selores M., “Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Aloe Vera,” Contact Dermatitis 57, no. 4 (2007): 278–279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Manzano D., Aguirre A., Gardeazabal J., Eizaguirre X., and Pérez J. L. D., “Allergic Contact Dermatitis From Tocopheryl Acetate (Vitamin E) and Retinol Palmitate (Vitamin A) in a Moisturizing Cream,” Contact Dermatitis 31, no. 5 (1994): 324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Marloes F., Marloes F., Line E. K. O., Jeanne D. J., and Jacob P. T., “Contact Allergy to Lanolin: Temporal Changes in Prevalence and Association With Atopic Dermatitis: Contact Allergy to Lanolin,” Contact Dermatitis 78 (2017): 70–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Cowan T. L., Murrell D. F., and Lara R. A., “Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Miconazole for Nipple Candidiasis,” Contact Dermatitis 87, no. 2 (2022): 201–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Cussans A., Spierings N., Woods A., and Ostlere L., “Topical Medicament Allergy: The Importance of Patch Testing,” British Journal of Medical Practitioners 8, no. 2 (2015): 29. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Goh M. S. Y., Yun J. S. W., and Su J. C., “Management of Atopic Dermatitis: A Narrative Review,” Medical Journal of Australia 216, no. 11 (2022): 587–593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Julián‐Gónzalez R. E., Orozco‐Covarrubias L., Durán‐McKinster C., Palacios‐Lopez C., Ruiz‐Maldonado R., and Sáez‐de‐Ocariz M., “Less Common Clinical Manifestations of Atopic Dermatitis: Prevalence by Age,” Pediatric Dermatology 29, no. 5 (2012): 580–583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Balakirski G., Gerdes S., Beissert S., Ochsendorf F., Kiedrowski R., and Wilsmann‐Theis D., “Therapy of Psoriasis During Pregnancy and Breast‐Feeding,” Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft 20, no. 5 (2022): 653–683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Belinchón I., Velasco M., Ara‐Martín M., et al., “Management of Psoriasis During Preconception, Pregnancy, Postpartum, and Breastfeeding: A Consensus Statement,” Actas Dermo‐Sifiliográficas 112, no. 3 (2021): 225–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Rademaker M., Agnew K., Andrews M., et al., “Psoriasis in Those Planning a Family, Pregnant or Breast‐Feeding,” Australasian Psoriasis Collaboration. Australasian Journal of Dermatology 59, no. 2 (2018): 86–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Gilmore R., Prasath V., and Habibi M., Paget Disease of the Breast in Pregnancy and Lactation. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology (Springer International Publishing, 2018), 133–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Nargotra N. and Kalita D., “Pregnancy Associated Breast Cancer: Awareness Is the Key to Diagnosis—A Case Report,” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 9, no. 11 (2015): ED09–ED11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Pevzner M. and Dahan A., “Mastitis While Breastfeeding: Prevention, the Importance of Proper Treatment, and Potential Complications,” Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 8 (2020): 1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Buck M. L., Amir L. H., Cullinane M., and Donath S. M., “Nipple Pain, Damage, and Vasospasm in the First 8 Weeks Postpartum,” Breastfeeding Medicine 9, no. 2 (2014): 56–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Duncan D., “Candida and Breastfeeding,” British Journal of Midwifery 23, no. 2 (2015): 98–100. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Mitchell K. B., Johnson H. M., Rodríguez J. M., et al., “Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Clinical Protocol #36: The Mastitis Spectrum, Revised 2022,” Breastfeeding Medicine 17, no. 5 (2022): 360–376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Betts R. C., Johnson H. M., Eglash A., and Mitchell K. B., “It's Not Yeast: Retrospective Cohort Study of Lactating Women With Persistent Nipple and Breast Pain,” Breastfeeding Medicine 16, no. 4 (2021): 318–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Toussaint A., Simonson C., and Valla C., “Herpes Mastitis: Diagnosis and Management,” Breast Journal 22, no. 3 (2016): 335–338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Alexandra P., Susana P., Gustavo R., and Hercília G., “How and When Maternal Viral Infections Can Be a Contraindication to Breastfeeding: A Narrative Review,” Journal of Pediatric and Neonatal Individualized Medicine 10, no. 1 (2021): e100130. [Google Scholar]
- 39. Barrett M. E., Heller M. M., Stone H. F., and Murase J. E., “Raynaud Phenomenon of the Nipple in Breastfeeding Mothers: An Underdiagnosed Cause of Nipple Pain,” JAMA Dermatology (Chicago, IL) 149, no. 3 (2013): 300–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Di Como J., Tan S., Weaver M., Edmonson D., and Gass J. S., “Nipple Pain: Raynaud's Beyond Fingers and Toes,” Breast Journal 26, no. 10 (2020): 2045–2047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed®) (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 2006), https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK501922/. [Google Scholar]
- 42.“Australian Medicines Handbook. AMH. Adelaide, S.Aust. Australian Medicines Handbook.”
- 43. Ly S., Kamal K., Manjaly P., Barbieri J. S., and Mostaghimi A., “Treatment of Acne Vulgaris During Pregnancy and Lactation: A Narrative Review,” Dermatology and Therapy 13, no. 1 (2023): 115–130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Briggs G. G. and Freeman R. K., Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation: A Reference Guide to Fetal and Neonatal Risk, 10th ed. (Wolters Kluwer, 2015). [Google Scholar]
- 45. Russell M. D., Dey M., Flint J., et al., “British Society for Rheumatology Guideline on Prescribing Drugs in Pregnancy and Breastfeeding: Immunomodulatory Anti‐Rheumatic Drugs and Corticosteroids,” Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 62, no. 4 (2023): E48–E88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Butler D. C., Heller M. M., and Murase J. E., “Safety of Dermatologic Medications in Pregnancy and Lactation: Part II. Lactation,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 70, no. 3 (2014): 417.e1‐10; quiz 27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Deleuran M., Dézfoulian B., Elberling J., et al., “Systemic Anti‐Inflammatory Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis During Conception, Pregnancy and Breastfeeding: Interdisciplinary Expert Consensus in Northern Europe,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 38, no. 1 (2024): 31–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Basler R. S., “Black Galactorrhea as a Consequence of Minocycline and Phenothiazine Therapy,” Archives of Dermatology (1960) 121, no. 3 (1985): 417–418. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Hunt M. J., Salisbury E. L. C., Grace J., and Armati R., “Black Breast Milk due to Minocycline Therapy,” British Journal of Dermatology (1951) 134, no. 5 (1996): 943–944. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Sørensen H. T., Skriver M. V., Pedersen L., Larsen H., Ebbesen F., and Schønheyder H. C., “Risk of Infantile Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis After Maternal Postnatal Use of Macrolides,” Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 35, no. 2 (2003): 104–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Stang H., “Pyloric Stenosis Associated With Erythromycin Ingested Through Breastmilk,” Minnesota Medicine 69, no. 11 (1986): 669–670, 82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Abdellatif M., Ghozy S., Kamel M. G., et al., “Association Between Exposure to Macrolides and the Development of Infantile Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” European Journal of Pediatrics 178, no. 3 (2019): 301–314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Almaramhy H. H. and Al‐Zalabani A. H., “The Association of Prenatal and Postnatal Macrolide Exposure With Subsequent Development of Infantile Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Italian Journal of Pediatrics 45, no. 1 (2019): 20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Mann C. F., “Clindamycin and Breast‐Feeding,” Pediatrics (Evanston) 66, no. 6 (1980): 1030–1031. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Ito S., Blajchman A., Stephenson M., Eliopoulos C., and Koren G., “Prospective Follow‐Up of Adverse Reactions in Breast‐Fed Infants Exposed to Maternal Medication,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 168, no. 5 (1993): 1393–1399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Benyamini L., Merlob P., Stahl B., et al., “The Safety of Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid and Cefuroxime During Lactation,” Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 27, no. 4 (2005): 499–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Ilett K. F., Hackett L. P., Ingle B., and Bretz P. J., “Transfer of Probenecid and Cephalexin Into Breast Milk,” Annals of Pharmacotherapy 40, no. 5 (2006): 986–989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Chu Y.‐N., Lee M.‐S., Yang S.‐C., Tai H.‐C., Chung W.‐H., and Chiu T.‐M., “Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis in an Infant Induced by Drug Intake Through Breast Milk,” Dermatologica Sinica 37, no. 2 (2019): 86–89. [Google Scholar]
- 59. Forna F., McConnell M., Kitabire F. N., et al., “Systematic Review of the Safety of Trimethoprim‐Sulfamethoxazole for Prophylaxis in HIV‐Infected Pregnant Women: Implications for Resource‐Limited Settings,” AIDS Reviews 8, no. 1 (2006): 24–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Faraoni L., Gallo M., Eleftheriou J., et al., “Prospective Follow‐Up of Adverse Reactions in Breast‐Fed Infants Exposed to Maternal Cabergoline Treatment,” Reproductive Toxicology (Elmsford, NY) 57 (2015): 218. [Google Scholar]
- 61. Curtis E. M., “Oral‐Contraceptive Feminization of a Normal Male Infant: Report of a Case,” Obstetrics and Gynecology (New York 1953) 23, no. 2 (1964): 295–296. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Marriq P. and Oddo G., “Letter: Gynecomastia in the Newborn Induced by Maternal Milk? An Unusual Complication of Oral Contraceptives,” La Nouvelle Presse Médicale 3, no. 41–43 (1974): 2579. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Nilsson S., Nygren K.‐G., and Johansson E. D. B., “Ethinyl Estradiol in Human Milk and Plasma After Oral Administration,” Contraception (Stoneham) 17, no. 2 (1978): 131–139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Madhavapeddi R. and Ramachandran P., “Side Effects of Oral Contraceptive Use in Lactating Women—Enlargement of Breast in a Breast‐Fed Child,” Contraception (Stoneham) 32, no. 5 (1985): 437–443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Mandel H. and Berant M., “Oral Contraceptives and Breastfeeding: Haematological Effects on the Infant,” Archives of Disease in Childhood 60, no. 10 (1985): 971–972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Nilsson S., Mellbin T., Hofvander Y., Sundelin C., Valentin J., and Nygren K. G., “Long‐Term Follow‐Up of Children Breast‐Fed by Mothers Using Oral Contraceptives,” Contraception (Stoneham) 34, no. 5 (1986): 443–457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Phelps D. L. and Karim A., “Spironolactone: Relationship Between Concentrations of Dethioacetylated Metabolite in Human Serum and Milk,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 66, no. 8 (1977): 1203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Don P. C. and Kizner R., “Excretion of Acyclovir in Human Breast Milk,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 25, no. 2 (1991): 342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Drake A. L., Roxby A. C., Ongecha‐Owuor F., et al., “Valacyclovir Suppressive Therapy Reduces Plasma and Breast Milk HIV‐1 RNA Levels During Pregnancy and Postpartum: A Randomized Trial,” Journal of Infectious Diseases 205, no. 3 (2012): 366–375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Moorhead A. M., Amir L. H., O'Brien P. W., and Wong S., “A Prospective Study of Fluconazole Treatment for Breast and Nipple Thrush,” Breastfeeding Review 19, no. 3 (2011): 25–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Westermann L., Hügel R., Meier M., et al., “Glucocorticosteroid‐Resistant Pemphigoid Gestationis: Successful Treatment With Adjuvant Immunoadsorption,” Journal of Dermatology 39, no. 2 (2012): 168–171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Gashlin L. Z., Sullo D., Lawrence R. A., and Rosen‐Carole C., “Treatment of Narcolepsy With Sodium Oxybate While Breastfeeding: A Case Report,” Breastfeeding Medicine 11, no. 5 (2016): 261–263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Wilkerson H., Datta P., Rewers‐Felkins K., Baker T., and Hale T. W., “Maternal Transfer of Cetirizine Into Human Milk,” Journal of Human Lactation 37, no. 1 (2021): 135–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Nordeng H., Wegler C., Lindqvist A., et al., “Transfer of Cetirizine/Levocetirizine Into Human Breast Milk and Estimation of Drug Exposure to Infants Through Breastfeeding: A Human Lactation Study From the ConcePTION Project,” Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology 134, no. 1 (2024): 153–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Messinis I. E., Souvatzoglou A., Fais N., and Lolis D., “Histamine H1 Receptor Participation in the Control of Prolactin Secretion in Postpartum,” Journal of Endocrinological Investigation 8, no. 2 (1985): 143–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Thorne J. C., Nadarajah T., Moretti M., and Ito S., “Methotrexate Use in a Breastfeeding Patient With Rheumatoid Arthritis,” Journal of Rheumatology 41, no. 11 (2014): 2332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.“43rd International Congress of the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists (EAPCCT), 23‐26 May 2023, Palma de Mallorca, Spain,” Clinical Toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.) 61, no. S1 (2023): 1–129.36444937 [Google Scholar]
- 78. Coulam C. B., Moyer T. P., Jiang N. S., and Zincke H., “Breast‐Feeding After Renal Transplantation,” Transplantation Proceedings 14, no. 3 (1982): 605–609. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Nyberg G., Haljamäe U., Frisenette‐Fich C., Wennergren M., and Kjellmer I., “Breast‐Feeding During Treatment With Cyclosporine,” Transplantation 65, no. 2 (1998): 253–255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Munoz‐Flores‐Thiagarajan K. D., Easterling T., Davis C., and Bond E. F., “Breast‐Feeding by a Cyclosporine‐Treated Mother,” Obstetrics & Gynecology 97, no. 5 Pt 2 (2001): 816–818. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Moretti M. E., Verjee Z., Ito S., and Koren G., “Breast‐Feeding During Maternal Use of Azathioprine,” Annals of Pharmacotherapy 40, no. 12 (2006): 2269–2272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Werner M., Björnsson E., Prytz H., et al., “Autoimmune Hepatitis Among Fertile Women: Strategies During Pregnancy and Breastfeeding?,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 42, no. 8 (2007): 986–991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Zelinkova Z., De Boer I. P., Van Dijke M. J., Kuipers E. J., and Van Der Woude C. J., “Azathioprine Treatment During Lactation,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 30, no. 1 (2009): 90–91; author reply 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Constantinescu S., Pai A., Coscia L. A., Davison J. M., Moritz M. J., and Armenti V. T., “Breast‐Feeding After Transplantation,” Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 28, no. 8 (2014): 1163–1173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Klintmalm G. B. and R. T. Gunby, Jr. , “Successful Pregnancy in a Liver Transplant Recipient on Belatacept,” Liver Transplantation 26, no. 9 (2020): 1193–1194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Boyle S., Sung‐Him Mew T., Lust K., McKenzie S., Javorsky G., and Parsonage W., “Pregnancy Following Heart Transplantation: A Single Centre Case Series and Review of the Literature,” Heart, Lung & Circulation 30, no. 1 (2021): 144–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Khare M. M., Lott J., Currie A., and Howarth E., “Is It Safe to Continue Azathioprine in Breast Feeding Mothers?,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 23, no. S1 (2003): S48. [Google Scholar]
- 88. Moretti M. E., Sgro M., Johnson D. W., et al., “Cyclosporine Excretion Into Breast Milk,” Transplantation 75, no. 12 (2003): 2144–2146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Reynolds J. A., Gayed M., Khamashta M. A., et al., “Outcomes of Children Born to Mothers With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Exposed to Hydroxychloroquine or Azathioprine,” Rheumatology (Oxford) 62, no. 3 (2023): 1124–1135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Thiru Y., Bateman D. N., and Coulthard M. G., “Successful Breast Feeding While Mother Was Taking Cyclosporin,” BMJ 315, no. 7106 (1997): 463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Morton A., “Cyclosporine and Lactation,” Nephrology (Carlton) 16, no. 2 (2011): 249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Lahiff C. and Moss A. C., “Cyclosporine in the Management of Severe Ulcerative Colitis While Breast‐Feeding,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 17, no. 7 (2011): E78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Gan D. C., Welsh B., and Webster M., “Successful Treatment of a Severe Persistent Case of Pemphigoid Gestationis With Antepartum and Postpartum Intravenous Immunoglobulin Followed by Azathioprine,” Australasian Journal of Dermatology 53, no. 1 (2012): 66–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Izumi Y., Miyashita T., and Migita K., “Safety of Tacrolimus Treatment During Pregnancy and Lactation in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Report of Two Patients,” Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine 234, no. 1 (2014): 51–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Mizutani S., Okunishi Y., Tamada T., et al., “A Woman With Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Successfully Delivered a Healthy Child With Continuous Administration of Sarilumab Throughout Pregnancy,” Internal Medicine 62, no. 4 (2023): 633–636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Sanders S. W., Zone J. J., Foltz R. L., Tolman K. G., and Rollins D. E., “Hemolytic Anemia Induced by Dapsone Transmitted Through Breast Milk,” Annals of Internal Medicine 96, no. 4 (1982): 465–466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Nation R. L., Hackett L. P., Dusci L. J., and Ilett K. F., “Excretion of Hydroxychloroquine in Human Milk,” British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 17, no. 3 (1984): 368–369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Motta M., Tincani A., Faden D., et al., “Follow‐Up of Infants Exposed to Hydroxychloroquine Given to Mothers During Pregnancy and Lactation,” Journal of Perinatology 25, no. 2 (2005): 86–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Peng W., Liu R., Zhang L., Fu Q., Mei D., and Du X., “Breast Milk Concentration of Hydroxychloroquine in Chinese Lactating Women With Connective Tissue Diseases,” European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 75, no. 11 (2019): 1547–1553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Li R., Zhang C., Wang H., and An Y., “Breastfeeding by a Mother Taking Cyclosporine for Nephrotic Syndrome,” International Breastfeeding Journal 17, no. 1 (2022): 72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Bostan E., Gülseren D., Ersoy Evans S., Elçin G., Karaduman A., and Atakan N., “Efficacious Treatment of Pemphigus Vulgaris by Intravenous Immunoglobulin During Pregnancy and Postpartum Period,” Dermatologic Therapy 33, no. 1 (2020): e13187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Haas J., “High Dose IVIG in the Post Partum Period for Prevention of Exacerbations in MS,” Multiple Sclerosis 6, no. Suppl 2 (2000): S18–S20; discussion S33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Achiron A., Kishner I., Dolev M., et al., “Effect of Intravenous Immunoglobulin Treatment on Pregnancy and Postpartum‐Related Relapses in Multiple Sclerosis,” Journal of Neurology 251, no. 9 (2004): 1133–1137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Winkelmann A., Benecke R., and Zettl U., “Effect of Intravenous Immunoglobulin Treatment on Pregnancy and Postpartum‐Related Relapses in Multiple Sclerosis: A Prospective, Rater‐Blinded Analysis (P06.185),” Neurology 78, no. Meeting Abstracts 1 (2012): P06‐P.185. [Google Scholar]
- 105. Anderson P. O., “Drug Treatment of Raynaud's Phenomenon of the Nipple,” Breastfeeding Medicine 15, no. 11 (2020): 686–688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Penny W. J. and Lewis M. J., “Nifedipine is Excreted in Human Milk,” European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 36, no. 4 (1989): 427–428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Deniz S. and Kural B., “Nipple Vasospasm of Nursing Mothers,” Breastfeeding Medicine 18, no. 6 (2023): 494–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Valdivieso A., Valdés G., Spiro T. E., and Westerman R. L., “Minoxidil in Breast Milk,” Annals of Internal Medicine 102, no. 1 (1985): 135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Keeling S. and Wolbink G. J., “Measuring Multiple Etanercept Levels in the Breast Milk of a Nursing Mother With Rheumatoid Arthritis,” Journal of Rheumatology 37, no. 7 (2010): 1551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Membrive‐Jiménez C., Sánchez‐Piedra C., Martínez‐González O., et al., “Safety and Effectiveness of bDMARDs During Pregnancy in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases: Real‐World Data From the Biobadaser Registry,” Reumatología Clínica (English Edition) 19, no. 9 (2023): 500–506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Dall'ara F., Reggia R., Bazzani C., et al., “FRI0176 Safety of Anti‐TNF Alfa Agents During Pregancy and Breastfeeding: Longterm Follow Up of Exposed Children in a Case‐Series of Mothers With Chronic Arthritides,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 75, no. Suppl 2 (2016): 493. [Google Scholar]
- 112. Bertrand K., Rossi S., Wells A., Best B., and Chambers C. D., “The Concentration of Etanercept in Human Milk and Infant Outcomes,” Journal of Rheumatology 50, no. 5 (2023): 712–714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Vesga L., Terdiman J. P., and Mahadevan U., “Adalimumab Use in Pregnancy,” Gut 54, no. 6 (2005): 890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Mishkin D. S., Van Deinse W., Becker J. M., and Farraye F. A., “Successful Use of Adalimumab (Humira) for Crohn's Disease in Pregnancy,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 12, no. 8 (2006): 827–828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Fritzsche J., Pilch A., Mury D., Schaefer C., and Weber‐Schoendorfer C., “Infliximab and Adalimumab Use During Breastfeeding,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology 46, no. 8 (2012): 718–719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Julsgaard M., Brown S., Gibson P., and Bell S., “Adalimumab Levels in an Infant,” Journal of Crohn's and Colitis 7, no. 7 (2013): 597–598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Lund T. and Thomsen S. F., “Use of TNF‐Inhibitors and Ustekinumab for Psoriasis During Pregnancy: A Patient Series,” Dermatologic Therapy 30, no. 3 (2017): 1–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Matro R., Martin C. F., Wolf D., Shah S. A., and Mahadevan U., “Exposure Concentrations of Infants Breastfed by Women Receiving Biologic Therapies for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases and Effects of Breastfeeding on Infections and Development,” Gastroenterology 155, no. 3 (2018): 696–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Vestergaard T., Kammerlander H., Brock B., and Julsgaard M., “Immunoglobulin and Infliximab Concentrations in Dichorionic Twins Exposed to Infliximab In Utero,” Journal of Crohn's and Colitis 11, no. 9 (2017): 1152–1153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Mahadevan U., Wolf D. C., Dubinsky M., et al., “Placental Transfer of Anti‐Tumor Necrosis Factor Agents in Pregnant Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 11, no. 3 (2013): 286–292; quiz e24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Prieto‐Peña D., Calderón‐Goercke M., Adán A., et al., “Efficacy and Safety of Certolizumab Pegol in Pregnant Women With Uveitis. Recommendations on the Management With Immunosuppressive and Biologic Therapies in Uveitis During Pregnancy,” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology 39, no. 1 (2021): 105–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Lambiase S., Pensa C., Shumak R. G., Bianchi L., and Dattola A., “Certolizumab Pegol in Pregnant and Breastfeeding Psoriatic Patients,” Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology 157, no. 4 (2022): 383–384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Kage P., Simon J. C., and Treudler R., “A Case of Atopic Eczema Treated Safely With Dupilumab During Pregnancy and Lactation,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 34, no. 6 (2020): e256–e257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Escolà H., Figueras‐Nart I., Bonfill‐Orti M., et al., “Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis During Pregnancy and Breastfeeding: Clinical Experience in 13 Patients,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 37, no. 9 (2023): e1156–e1160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Alvarenga J. M., Maria Lé A., and Torres T., “Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis During Pregnancy and Breastfeeding: A Case Report,” Actas Dermo‐Sifiliográficas 115 (2024): 1100–1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Namazy J. A., Blais L., Andrews E. B., et al., “Pregnancy Outcomes in the Omalizumab Pregnancy Registry and a Disease‐Matched Comparator Cohort,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 145, no. 2 (2020): 528–536, 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Berens P., Eglash A., Malloy M., et al., “ABM Clinical Protocol #26: Persistent Pain With Breastfeeding,” Breastfeeding Medicine 11, no. 2 (2016): 46–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.“Clinically Guided Core Biopsy and Cutaneous Punch Biopsy in the Evaluation of Breast Lesions: A Necessary Test or an Obsolete Skill?,” (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 129. Hicks G., Brown S., Pepper T., Sait R., and Barkeji M., “The Role of Nipple Punch Biopsy,” Breast Journal 25, no. 6 (2019): 1328–1329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Larson K. E. and Valente S. A., “Milk Fistula: Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment,” Breast Journal 22, no. 1 (2016): 111–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Alipour S., Local Complications of Breast Surgery During Pregnancy and Lactation. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology (Springer International Publishing, 2020), 101–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. De Stefano P., Bongo I. G., Borgna‐Pignatti C., and Severi F., “Factitious Hypertension With Mineralocorticoid Excess in an Infant,” Helvetica Paediatrica Acta 38, no. 2 (1983): 185–189. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Trüeb R. M. and Caballero‐Uribe N., “Minoxidil‐Induced Hypertrichosis in a Breastfed Infant,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 36, no. 3 (2022): e224–e225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Scheepers P. T. J., Van Houtum J. L. M., Anzion R. B. M., Harder R., Bos R. P., and Van Der Valk P. G. M., “Uptake of Pyrene in a Breast‐Fed Child of a Mother Treated With Coal Tar,” Pediatric Dermatology 26, no. 2 (2009): 184–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Kaplan Y. C., Keskin‐Arslan E., Acar S., and Erol‐Coskun H., “Teicoplanin Use During Breastfeeding,” Breastfeeding Medicine 12 (2017): 124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Livingstone V. and Stringer L. J., “The Treatment of Staphyloccocus Aureus Infected Sore Nipples: A Randomized Comparative Study,” Journal of Human Lactation 15, no. 3 (1999): 241–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Passmore C. M., McElnay J. C., Rainey E. A., and D'Arcy P. F., “Metronidazole Excretion in Human Milk and Its Effect on the Suckling Neonate,” British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 26, no. 1 (1988): 45–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Heisterberg L. and Branebjerg P. E., “Blood and Milk Concentrations of Metronidazole in Mothers and Infants,” Journal of Perinatal Medicine 11, no. 2 (1983): 114–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Clements C. J., “Metronidazole and Breast Feeding,” New Zealand Medical Journal 92, no. 670 (1980): 329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Gray M. S., Kane P. O., and Squires S., “Further Observations on Metronidazole (Flagyl),” British Journal of Venereal Diseases 37, no. 4 (1961): 278–279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Moretti M. E., Ito S., and Koren G., “Disposition of Maternal Ketoconazole in Breast Milk,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 173, no. 5 (1995): 1625–1626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Noti A., Grob K., Biedermann M., Deiss U., and Brüschweiler B. J., “Exposure of Babies to C15–C45 Mineral Paraffins From Human Milk and Breast Salves,” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 38, no. 3 (2003): 317–325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Rosen‐Carole C., Datta P., Palmiter K., Starks K., and Hale T. W., “Transfer of Injected Triamcinolone Into Human Milk of a Lactating Patient Suffering From Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis,” Breastfeeding Medicine 18, no. 1 (2023): 74–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Botulism M. J. and Milk B., “Botulism and Breast Milk,” New England Journal of Medicine 298, no. 6 (1978): 343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Hotham N. and Hotham E., “Drugs in Breastfeeding,” Australian Prescriber 38, no. 5 (2015): 156–159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Cheent K., Nolan J., Shariq S., Kiho L., Pal A., and Arnold J., “Case Report: Fatal Case of Disseminated BCG Infection in an Infant Born to a Mother Taking Infliximab for Crohn's Disease,” Journal of Crohn's & Colitis 4, no. 5 (2010): 603–605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
