Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2025 Nov 26;14:RP105541. doi: 10.7554/eLife.105541

The RAB27A effector SYTL5 regulates mitophagy and mitochondrial metabolism

Ana Lapão 1,2,, Lauren Sophie Johnson 1,2,3,, Laura Trachsel-Moncho 1,2,3, Samuel J Rodgers 2,3, Sakshi Singh 1,2, Matthew YW Ng 1,2, Sigve Nakken 2,4,5, Eeva-Liisa Eskelinen 6, Anne Simonsen 1,2,3,
Editors: Li Yu7, David Ron8
PMCID: PMC12656530  PMID: 41294009

Abstract

SYTL5 is a member of the Synaptotagmin-Like (SYTL) protein family that differs from the Synaptotagmin family by having a unique N-terminal Synaptotagmin homology domain that directly interacts with the small GTPase RAB27A. Several SYTL protein family members have been implicated in plasma membrane transport and exocytosis, but the specific function of SYTL5 remains unknown. We here show that SYTL5 is a RAB27A effector and that both proteins localise to mitochondria and vesicles containing mitochondrial material. Mitochondrial recruitment of SYTL5 depends on its interaction with functional RAB27A. We demonstrate that SYTL5-RAB27A positive vesicles containing mitochondrial material, autophagy proteins and LAMP1 form during hypoxia and that depletion of SYTL5 and RAB27A reduces mitophagy under hypoxia mimicking conditions, indicating a role for these proteins in mitophagy. Indeed, we find that SYTL5 interacts with proteins involved in vesicle-mediated transport and cellular response to stress and that its depletion compromises mitochondrial respiration and increases glucose uptake. Intriguingly, SYTL5 expression is significantly reduced in tumours of the adrenal gland and correlates positively with survival for patients with adrenocortical carcinoma.

Research organism: None

Introduction

The Synaptotagmin-Like (SYTL) protein family consists of 5 members (SYTL1-5), each containing an N-terminal Synaptotagmin homology domain (SHD) and two C-terminal C2 lipid-binding domains. The SHD domains of SYTL1-5 have been found to directly interact with the small GTPase protein RAB27 (Kuroda et al., 2002a; Kuroda et al., 2002b). The C2 domain is generally involved in phospholipid binding and interacts with cellular membranes (Nalefski and Falke, 1996), either in a calcium-dependent or calcium-independent manner (Nalefski and Falke, 1996; Gálvez-Santisteban et al., 2012). Calcium was shown to be required for SYTL3 and SYTL5 phospholipid binding activity (Kuroda et al., 2002a; Fukuda, 2002), whereas SYTL2 binding to phosphatidylserine (PS) was inhibited by calcium (Yu et al., 2007).

The SYTL protein family is generally involved in plasma membrane transport and exocytosis (Kuroda et al., 2002b; Gálvez-Santisteban et al., 2012), mostly through their binding to RAB27 proteins. The main functions of RAB27 are related to vesicle budding, delivery, tethering and fusion with membranes (Fukuda, 2013), and its activity is regulated by a cyclic activation and inactivation state depending on its binding to guanosine-5'-triphosphate (GTP) or guanosine diphosphate (GDP), respectively (Fukuda, 2013). RAB27A and RAB27B are the two RAB27 isoforms found in vertebrates (Fukuda, 2013), and their binding to effector proteins occurs only when they are bound to GTP (Fukuda, 2013). SYTL5 binds to the GTP-bound RAB27A form, indicating its possible role in membrane trafficking events (Kuroda et al., 2002a).

Functional mitochondria are fundamental for normal cellular metabolism. Mitochondria are the primary source of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) obtained through oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and are important for cellular calcium homeostasis, lipid metabolism, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, and detoxification (Montava-Garriga and Ganley, 2020). Mitochondria can integrate and generate signalling cues to adjust their metabolism and biogenesis to maintain cellular homeostasis (Montava-Garriga and Ganley, 2020; Martínez-Reyes and Chandel, 2020). Mitochondrial function and health are tightly regulated by several quality control processes involving targeting of parts of mitochondria to lysosomes for degradation, including macromitophagy (Allen et al., 2013; Lazarou et al., 2015; selective degradation of mitochondria by autophagy), piecemeal mitophagy (Le Guerroué et al., 2017; Abudu et al., 2021), mitochondrial-derived vesicles (MDVs; Neuspiel et al., 2008; Soubannier et al., 2012), and vesicles derived from the inner mitochondrial membrane (VDIMs; Prashar et al., 2024). It has also been found that damaged mitochondria can be directly released to the extracellular space (Choong et al., 2021), either contained within extracellular vesicles (Phinney et al., 2015) or by mitocytosis, where damaged mitochondria are expelled in migrasomes (Jiao et al., 2021).

Exposure of mitochondria to various stressors can affect their function and lead to severe diseases, such as neurodegenerative disorders and cancer (Youle and Narendra, 2011; Ding and Yin, 2012). Cancer cells can trigger a change in mitochondrial metabolism to promote cell proliferation and survival by a process known as the Warburg effect, characterised by a switch from OXPHOS to ATP production through glycolysis even under normoxic conditions (Liberti and Locasale, 2016). Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare type of cancer that develops in the adrenal gland cortex, having a very poor prognosis and limited treatment options (Else et al., 2014). Most patients are diagnosed at advanced cancer stages and present an excess in adrenocortical hormone production (Else et al., 2014). Mitochondria are known to be essential organelles in the synthesis of steroid hormones, including cortisol, since they contain specific enzymes that catalyse steroid synthesis from cholesterol delivered to the mitochondria (Miller, 2013).

Here, we demonstrate that SYTL5 localises to mitochondria in a RAB27A-dependent manner and that both proteins regulate mitophagy and cellular metabolism. Cells lacking SYTL5 undergo a shift from mitochondrial oxygen consumption to glycolysis, which may explain the correlation between low SYTL5 expression and poor survival of ACC patients.

Results

SYTL5 localises to mitochondria and endolysosomal compartments

SYTL5 was identified as a putative candidate in a screen for lipid-binding proteins involved in the regulation of mitophagy (Munson et al., 2021). To characterise the cellular localisation and function of SYTL5, we generated U2OS cells with stable inducible expression of SYTL5-EGFP, as there are no antibodies recognising endogenous SYTL5 and our efforts to tag endogenous SYTL5 using CRISPR/Cas9 were also unsuccessful. Intriguingly, live cell imaging analysis revealed that SYTL5-EGFP co-localised with filamentous structures positive for MitoTracker red (Figure 1A), which labels active mitochondria. Moreover, several SYTL5-EGFP-positive vesicles were observed, including some small and highly mobile SYTL5-EGFP vesicles moving along the mitochondrial network (Figure 1—video 1 and arrows in Figure 1B). SYTL5-EGFP staining at the plasma membrane was also seen, particularly in cells with higher expression levels (Figure 1C), which may suggest a role for SYTL5 in secretion to the plasma membrane.

Figure 1. Lipid binding protein SYTL5 localises to mitochondria and endo-lysosomes.

(A) Live confocal microscopy imaging of U2OS stably expressing SYTL5-EGFP co-stained with 50 nM MitoTracker red. SYTL5-EGFP expression was induced for 24 hr using 100 ng/ml doxycycline. MitoTracker Red was added 30 min before imaging. Scale bars: 10 μm, 2 μm (insets). (B) Time-lapse video frames (Figure 1—video 1) tracking SYTL5 vesicle movement along filaments positive for MitoTracker red (arrows). SYTL5-EGFP expression was induced for 24 hr using 100 ng/ml doxycycline. Scale bars: 3 μm. (C) Live confocal microscopy imaging of U2OS stably expressing SYTL5-EGFP co-stained with 50 nM LysoTracker red. SYTL5-EGFP expression was induced for 24 hr using 100 ng/ml doxycycline. LysoTracker Red was added 30 min before imaging. Scale bars: 10 μm, 2 μm (insets). (D) Confocal imaging of U2OS stably expressing SYTL5-EGFP stained for endogenous LAMP1. Nuclei were stained using Hoechst. Scale bars: 10 μm, 2 μm (insets). (E) Overview of domain structure of SYTL5 full length, ∆SHD and ∆C2AB mutants. (F) 3xFLAG fusion proteins expressed in U2OS cells (SYTL5-EGFP-3xFLAG, SYTL5 (∆SHD)-EGFP-3xFLAG and SYTL5 (∆C2AB)-EGFP-3xFLAG) were immunoprecipitated and added to membranes spotted with lipids found in cell membranes: LPA (lipoprotein A); LPC (lysophosphatidylcholine); PI (phosphatidylinositol); PI(3)P (phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate); PI(4)P (phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate); PI(5)P (phosphatidylinositol 5-phosphate); PE (phosphatidylethanolamine); PC (phosphatidylcholine); S1P (sphingosine-1-phosphate); PI(3,4)P2 (phosphatidylinositol 3,4-bisphosphate); PI(3,5)P2 (phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate); PI(4,5)P2 (phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate); PI(3,4,5)P3 (phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate); PA (phosphatidic acid); PS (phosphatidylserine); TAG (triglyceride); DAG (diglyceride); PG (phosphatidylglycerol); CL (cardiolipin); Cholesterol; SM (sphingomyelin); Sulfatide. (G) Live confocal microscopy imaging of U2OS stably expressing SYTL5 (∆SHD)-EGFP-3xFLAG co-stained with 50 nM MitoTracker red added 30 min before imaging. Scale bars: 10 μm, 2 μm (insets). (H) Live confocal microscopy imaging of U2OS stably expressing SYTL5 (∆C2AB)-EGFP-3xFLAG co-stained with 50 nM MitoTracker red added 30 min before imaging. Scale bars: 10 μm, 2 μm (insets).

Figure 1—source data 1. Original image files for Figure 1A, C, D, G and H.
Figure 1—source data 2. Original uncropped membranes for Figure 1F.
Figure 1—source data 3. Uncropped membranes with the relevant spots clearly labelled for Figure 1F.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Co-localisation of SYTL5 with RAB proteins.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

(A–F) SYTL5-EGFP expression was induced for 24 hr with 100 ng/ml doxycycline in U2OS cells with stable inducible expression of SYTL5-EGFP and constitutive expression of mScarlet-RAB4 (A), mScarlet-RAB11 (B), mScarlet-RAB5 (C), mScarlet-RAB7 (D), mScarlet-RAB9 (E), or mScarlet-RAB6 (F) followed by live confocal microscopy imaging analysis. Scale bars: 10 μm, 2 μm (insets).
Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original image files for Figure 1—figure supplement 1A, B, C, D, E, F.
Figure 1—video 1. Live confocal microscopy imaging tracking SYTL5 vesicle movement along filaments positive for MitoTracker red.
Download video file (7.2MB, mp4)

To determine the identity of the SYTL5-positive vesicles, U2OS SYTL5-EGFP cells were infected with a panel of lentiviral RAB GTPase constructs representing different cellular compartments (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A–F) and analysed by live cell imaging. SYTL5-EGFP-positive structures were observed to co-localise with vesicles positive for RAB4 and RAB11, two GTPases that mainly localise to recycling endosomes (Wandinger-Ness and Zerial, 2014) and to some extent with RAB5, mostly localised to early endosomes (Wandinger-Ness and Zerial, 2014; Figure 1—figure supplement 1A–C). Co-localisation was also observed with RAB7, a marker of late endosomes, lysosomes, and autophagosomes (Wandinger-Ness and Zerial, 2014) and partially with RAB9, which associates with late endosomes and mediates the transport between late endosomes and the trans-Golgi network (Wandinger-Ness and Zerial, 2014; Figure 1—figure supplement 1D–E). SYTL5-EGFP showed little or no co-localisation with RAB6-positive structures, representing Golgi-derived vesicles (Figure 1—figure supplement 1F). In line with an endocytic identity of SYTL5-EGFP-positive vesicles, they were also positive for lysosomal markers, including LysoTracker red, which labels acidic compartments in the cell (Figure 1C), and the lysosomal membrane marker LAMP1 (Figure 1D).

Thus, based on live cell imaging analysis, we conclude that SYTL5 localises to the mitochondrial network and to mitochondria-associated vesicles that partly overlap with endolysosomal compartments.

Mitochondrial localisation of SYTL5 requires both the RAB27-binding SHD domain and the lipid-binding C2 domains

To investigate whether the observed intracellular localisation of SYTL5-EGFP depends on its binding to RAB27 and/or lipids, we generated U2OS cells with stable expression of EGFP-3xFLAG-tagged wild type SYTL5 or SYTL5 lacking either the RAB27-binding SHD domain (SYTL5(∆SHD)) or the two lipid-binding C2 domains (SYTL5(∆C2AB); Figure 1E).

To validate the SYTL5(∆C2AB) mutant and determine the lipid-binding specificity of SYTL5, lysates from these cells were incubated with membranes containing various phosphoinositides and other lipids. Full-length SYTL5 was observed to bind to mono-phosphorylated phosphoinositides (PI(3)P, PI(4)P, PI(5)P), as well as PI(4,5)P2, PI(3,4,5)P3 and to some extent to phosphatidic acid (PA) and cardiolipin (CL) (Figure 1F). As expected, upon removal of the C2 domains, specific binding to all lipid species was lost, while SYTL5 lacking the SHD domain retained the ability to bind to lipids (Figure 1F).

The SYTL5(∆SHD)-EGFP and SYTL5(∆C2AB)-EGFP expressing cell lines were then incubated with MitoTracker red and analysed by live cell imaging. Indeed, the SYTL5 colocalisation to mitochondria was lost, and both SYTL5(∆SHD)-EGFP and SYTL5(∆C2AB)-EGFP were dispersed in the cytosol (Figure 1G–H), indicating that both the RAB27-interacting SHD domain and the lipid binding C2 domains are required for mitochondrial localisation of SYTL5.

Mitochondrial localisation of SYTL5 requires RAB27A GTPase activity

Given that the SHD domain of SYTL5 has been shown to bind RAB27A (Kuroda et al., 2002a) and our observations that the SHD domain is required for mitochondrial localisation of SYTL5, we asked whether RAB27A activity is required for SYTL5 recruitment to mitochondria. U2OS SYTL5-EGFP cells were infected with a mScarlet-RAB27A lentiviral construct to generate a stable cell line. Co-expression of SYTL5-EGFP and mScarlet-RAB27A resulted in a clear co-localisation of both proteins to filaments positive for MitoTracker DeepRed (DR) (Figure 2A). The mitochondrial localisation of SYTL5-EGFP and mScarlet-RAB27A was confirmed by correlative light and EM (CLEM) analysis using the same cell line (Figure 2B, zoom in 1). Intriguingly, the mitochondrial localisation of SYTL5-EGFP was enhanced when co-expressed with mScarlet-RAB27A compared to cells expressing SYTL5-EGFP only (Figure 1A–B), indicating that RAB27A might facilitate mitochondrial recruitment of SYTL5. Indeed, in U2OS cells with stable expression of mScarlet-RAB27A only, RAB27A strongly co-localised with MitoTracker green (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A), demonstrating its mitochondrial targeting. Moreover, SYTL5-EGFP and mScarlet-RAB27A were both detected in the mitochondrial fraction (containing TIM23 and COXIV) of cells expressing SYTL5-EGFP or mScarlet-RAB27A (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B). Importantly, the mitochondrial localisation of SYTL5 and RAB27A is not specific to U2OS cells as HeLa cells with stable expression of SYTL5-EGFP or mScarlet-RAB27A show a similar expression pattern to U2OS cells, as demonstrated by co-localisation of SYTL5-EGFP with MitoTracker Red and plasma membrane staining in cells having higher expression (Figure 2—figure supplement 1C) and of mScarlet-RAB27A with MitoTracker Green (Figure 2—figure supplement 1D). All further experiments were conducted in U2OS cells.

Figure 2. Mitochondrial localisation of SYTL5 requires RAB27A GTPase activity.

(A) SYTL5-EGFP expression was induced for 24 hr with 100 ng/ml doxycycline in U2OS cells with stable inducible expression of SYTL5-EGFP and constitutive expression of mScarlet-RAB27A. Cells were co-stained with MitoTracker DR for 30 min before live imaging. Arrows indicate mitochondrion filaments. Scale bars: 10 μm, 2 μm (insets). (B) CLEM analysis of the cells described in A. Before imaging, cells growing in monolayer were fixed in warm (≈37 °C) 3.7% paraformaldehyde in 0.2 M HEPES (pH 7). After fixation, cells were imaged using a confocal microscope to acquire Z-stacks of optical sections and DIC images to locate the cells of interest. The cells were finally fixed using 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.2 M HEPES (pH 7.4) for 120 min before sample preparation for TEM. Arrows in panel 1 indicate mitochondrion filaments. Scale bars: 15 μm (left), 5 μm (middle) and 2 μm (right). (C) U2OS dKO cells were rescued with mScarlet-RAB27A and co-stained with 50 nM MitoTracker green for 30 min before imaging. Scale bars: 10 μm, 2 μm (insets). (D) U2OS dKO cells were rescued with SYTL5-EGFP and co-stained with 50 nM MitoTracker red for 30 min before imaging. Scale bars: 10 μm, 2 μm (insets). (E) Live confocal microscopy imaging of U2OS dKO cells rescued with SYTL5-EGFP and mScarlet-RAB27A (upper panel); SYTL5-EGFP and mScarlet-RAB27A-T23N (middle panel) or SYTL5-EGFP and mScarlet-RAB27A-Q78L (lower panel). All cells were co-stained with 50 nM MitoTracker DR for 30 min before imaging. Scale bars: 10 μm, 2 μm (insets). (F) Lysates from U2OS cells stably expressing EGFP (control) and U2OS dKO cells expressing SYTL5-EGFP and/or mScarlet-RAB27A (wild-type, T23N, or Q78L mutants) were immunoprecipitated using GFP-Trap beads and analysed by western blot using RAB27A and EGFP antibodies.

Figure 2—source data 1. Original image files for Figure 2A, B, C, D and E.
Figure 2—source data 2. Original uncropped blots for Figure 2F.
Figure 2—source data 3. Uncropped blots with the relevant bands clearly labelled for Figure 2F.

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Mitochondrial localisation of SYTL5 and RAB27A.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

(A) Live confocal microscopy imaging of U2OS constitutively expressing mScarlet-RAB27A co-stained with MitoTracker green added 30 min before imaging. Scale bars: 10 μm, 2 μm (insets). (B) Total cell lysate (TCL), cytosol, and a crude mitochondria fraction from U2OS control cells and cells with stable expression of mScarlet-RAB27A or SYTL5-EGFP were analysed by western blotting for EGFP, RAB27A, tubulin, TIM23, and COXIV. (C) Live confocal microscopy imaging of HeLa constitutively expressing SYTL5-EGFP co-stained with MitoTracker Red added 30 min before imaging. Scale bars: 10 μm, 2 μm (insets). (D) Live confocal microscopy imaging of HeLa constitutively expressing mScarlet-RAB27A co-stained with MitoTracker green added 30 min before imaging. Scale bars: 10 μm, 2 μm (insets).
Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original image files for Figure 2—figure supplement 1A, C, D, C, D.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original uncropped blots for Figure 2—figure supplement 1B.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 3. Uncropped blots with the relevant bands clearly labelled for Figure 2—figure supplement 1B.
Figure 2—figure supplement 2. Generation of RAB27A and SYTL5 knock out cells.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2.

(A) RAB27A KO validation by genotyping. The WT RAB27A gDNA sequence was aligned with the RAB27A KO clone 21(c21) gDNA sequence. CRISPR/Cas9 editing produced an indel (single nucleotide deletion indicated by *) in a genomic location shared between all RAB27A isoforms. gRNA targeting region is underlined in the WT RAB27A gDNA sequence. (B) RAB27A KO validation by western blot. Cell lysates from U2OS control cells and RAB27A KO cells (c21) were compared to cell lysates where RAB27A was depleted for 72 hr using two independent siRNAs and probed with RAB27 and actin antibodies. (C) SYTL5 CRISPR/Cas9 exon deletion was performed using two gRNAs simultaneously. These gRNAs target the 5´UTR or intronic regions of SYTL5 (transcript NM_138780) that are shared by all SYTL5 isoforms. Genomic deletion validation and individual clone genotyping were performed using a primer pair that flanked the region to be edited (about 1307 bp length between these primer binding sites). (D) SYTL5 KO validation was performed with conventional PCR reaction. A PCR product of 1307 bp is expected for wild-type U2OS gDNA, while a PCR product of about 618 bp is expected if a clone has a deletion in the targeted region. This method was used to validate the SYTL5 KO clone 2 and for dKO RAB27A/SYTL5 clone 57. The deleted sequence includes a coding exon from SYTL5, resulting in a non-functional SYTL5 protein.
Figure 2—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Original uncropped blots and gel for Figure 2—figure supplement 2B, D.
Figure 2—figure supplement 2—source data 2. Uncropped blots with the relevant bands clearly labelled for Figure 2—figure supplement 2B, D.

To further characterise mitochondrial recruitment of SYTL5 and RAB27A and elucidate their role at the mitochondrion, we used CRISPR/Cas9 to knock out (KO) RAB27A and SYTL5 in U2OS cells (Figure 2—figure supplement 2A–D). This double-KO (dKO) cell line was further transduced with lentiviral constructs to constitutively express SYTL5-EGFP, mScarlet-RAB27A, or both, and their mitochondrial localisation was analysed by live cell imaging (Figure 2C–E). Intriguingly, mScarlet-RAB27A co-localised extensively with MitoTracker Green and to small vesicles dispersed in the cytoplasm and located at or near mitochondria (Figure 2C), indicating that SYTL5 is not required for RAB27A mitochondrial localisation. In contrast, SYTL5-EGFP was not recruited to mitochondria when expressed alone in dKO cells, although some SYTL5-EGFP vesicles were seen near mitochondrial structures (Figure 2D). Upon co-expression of SYTL5-EGFP and mScarlet-RAB27A in dKO cells, the mitochondrial localisation of SYTL5-EGFP was rescued (Figure 2E), demonstrating that mitochondrial recruitment of SYTL5 is dependent on RAB27A.

Since SYTL5 has previously been described as a RAB27A effector (Kuroda et al., 2002a), we asked whether its mitochondrial recruitment depends on binding to the GTP-bound form of RAB27A. To address this, dKO cells expressing SYTL5-EGFP were rescued with the constitutively active (RAB27A-Q78L) or inactive (RAB27A-T23N) mutant forms of mScarlet-RAB27A. As expected, SYTL5-EGFP interacted specifically with RAB27A wild type (WT) and RAB27A-Q78L, as well as with endogenous RAB27A in control cells, while no interaction was detected with RAB27A-T23N, as assessed by GFP-pulldown (Figure 2F). To our surprise, live cell imaging of the same cells revealed that, in contrast to mScarlet-RAB27A WT, neither the RAB27A Q78L nor the T23N mutant localised to the mitochondrial network when expressed together with SYTL5-EGFP in dKO cells (Figure 2E). Also, SYTL5-EGFP failed to localise to mitochondria in cells expressing RAB27A Q78L, further demonstrating that mitochondrial recruitment of SYTL5 depends on mitochondrial RAB27A localisation (Figure 2E). Taken together, our data indicate that the GTPase activity of RAB27A is required for its mitochondrial localisation, which facilitates further recruitment of SYTL5.

SYTL5 interacts with proteins involved in vesicle-mediated transport and cellular response to stress

As few molecular interactors of SYTL5 are known (Kuroda et al., 2002a), we analysed the SYTL5 interactome by immunoprecipitating SYTL5-EGFP or an EGFP control, followed by mass spectrometry (MS) and protein-hit enrichment analysis. RAB27A was one of the most significant hits found, providing evidence that the IP was successful, together with several proteins known to participate in secretion such as PDCD6IP (Baietti et al., 2012; Figure 3A). In total, 163 proteins were identified as significant SYTL5-EGFP interactors compared to the EGFP control (Figure 3A, Supplementary file 1) and were subjected to Gene Ontology (GO) term enrichment analysis. Considering GO enrichment within the subcellular compartment ontology (GO-CC), we discovered the following compartments as enriched (Figure 3B) (number of hits for each category in parentheses): cytoskeleton (43), intracellular vesicle (38), extracellular vesicle (36), plasma-membrane-bound cell projection (33), endosome (18), and focal adhesion (17). Furthermore, for biological processes, encoded in the GO-BP subontology, we discovered the following categories as enriched (Figure 3A and C): vesicle-mediated transport (38), cellular response to stress (34), response to oxygen-containing compound (31), intracellular protein transport (22), secretion (21), autophagy (13), stress-activated MAPK cascade (10), cellular response to oxidative stress (9), reactive oxygen species metabolic process (7), regulation of mitochondrion organisation (6), endosome organisation (4), and protein insertion into mitochondrial membrane (3). Taken together, the SYTL5 interactome implies a role for SYTL5 in mitochondrial processes and cellular response to stress, in line with its localisation to mitochondria, as well as a possible role in secretion and endocytosis, in line with its localisation to endocytic compartments and the plasma membrane (Figure 1).

Figure 3. SYTL5 interacts with proteins involved in vesicle-mediated transport and cellular response to stress.

Figure 3.

(A) SYTL5 interactome. SYTL5-EGFP expression in U2OS cells was induced for 24 hr using 100 ng/ml doxycycline, followed by immunoprecipitation of SYTL5-EGFP using GFP-Trap beads and identification of co-purified proteins by MS analysis. The list of co-purified proteins was compared with that obtained from cells expressing EGFP, and only significant (p<0.05) SYTL5-EGFP-specific protein hits are highlighted in colour. Protein hits falling into at least one of the biological processes: autophagy, regulation of mitochondrion organisation, protein insertion into mitochondrial membrane, or cellular response to oxidative stress are colour coded according to plot legend. All other significant hits are indicated in blue. Non-significant (p>0.05) hits are indicated in grey. Data are from three biological replicates. (B) GO cellular compartment term enrichment of significant protein hits co-purified with SYTL5-EGFP. Corresponding enrichment false discovery rate (FDR) value is represented inside each bar and bars are ordered from smallest to largest FDR (q-value) from top to bottom. (C) GO biological processes term enrichment of significant protein hits co-purified with SYTL5-EGFP. Corresponding enrichment FDR value is represented inside each bar and bars are ordered from smallest to largest FDR (q-value) from top to bottom. Proteins corresponding to each biological process category are listed in the table to the right.

SYTL5-RAB27A-positive vesicles contain mitochondrial components

Several proteins involved in autophagy were identified as specific SYTL5 interactors, including SQSTM1/p62, ATG4B, TBK1, and ATP6V1A (Figure 3A), and given the mitochondrial localisation of SYTL5, we first investigated a possible role of SYTL5 in mitophagy. To induce mitophagy, dKO cells expressing mScarlet-RAB27A and SYTL5-EGFP were subjected to hypoxia or the drugs DFP (deferiprone, an iron chelator) or DMOG (Dimethyloxalylglycine, a prolyl-4-hydroxylase inhibitor) that mimics hypoxia by activation of HIF1α. We noticed an increase in the number and size of vesicles positive for SYTL5-EGFP and mScarlet-RAB27A that also contained MitoTracker Deep Red (MitoTracker DR) in all conditions, compared to control cells (Figure 4A).

Figure 4. Mitochondrial localisation of SYTL5 and RAB27A is not perturbed by autophagy inhibition or mitophagy stimulation.

(A) SYTL5/RAB27A dKO U2OS cells rescued with SYTL5-EGFP and mScarlet-RAB27A were untreated (upper panel) or treated with 1 mM DFP (2nd panel), hypoxia (1% O2) (3rd panel), or 1  mM DMOG (4th panel) for 24 hr. All cells were stained with 50 nM MitoTracker DR 30 min prior to live confocal microscopy imaging. Scale bars: 10 μm, 2 μm (insets). (B) SYTL5/RAB27A dKO U2OS cells rescued with SYTL5-EGFP and mScarlet-RAB27A were treated or not with 1 mM DFP for 24 hr. Cells were stained with 50 nM MitoTracker DR prior to fixation. Fixed cells were stained with a LAMP1 antibody and imaged by confocal microscopy. Scale bars: 10 μm, 2 μm (insets). Arrowheads point to SYTL5/RAB27A-positive structures. (C) U2OS cells expressing pSu9-Halo-mGFP were transfected with 20 nM control siRNA, SYTL5 siRNA #1 or RAB27A siRNA #1 for 48 hr before 20 min incubation with the TMR-conjugated Halo ligand followed by 24 hr incubation with 1 mM DFP or 1 mM DMOG. Cell lysates were analysed by western blot for the Halo tag. Actin was used as a loading control. (D) Quantification of data in C. Error bars represent the mean with standard deviation between replicates (n=3). Significance was determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. *=p < 0.05, **=p < 0.01, ***=p < 0.001.

Figure 4—source data 1. Original image files for Figure 4A.
Figure 4—source data 2. Original image files for Figure 4B.
Figure 4—source data 3. Original uncropped blots for Figure 2C.
Figure 4—source data 4. Uncropped blots with the relevant bands clearly labelled for Figure 2C and quantification of blots in 2D.

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. SYTL5/RAB27A-positive mitochondrial structures co-localise with autolysosomal markers.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

(A) SYTL5/RAB27A dKO U2OS cells rescued with SYTL5-EGFP and mScarlet-RAB27A were treated with 1 mM DFP for 24 hr. Fixed cells were stained with a LAMP1 antibody in addition to either p62 (upper panel) or LC3 (lower panels) antibodies and imaged by confocal microscopy. Arrowheads point to SYTL5/RAB27A-positive structures. Scale bars: 10 μm, 2 μm (insets). (B) SYTL5/RAB27A dKO U2OS cells rescued with SYTL5-EGFP and mScarlet-RAB27A were treated with 1 mM DFP for 24 hr and 100 nM BafA1 for the final 4 hr. All cells were stained with 50 nM MitoTracker DR 30 min prior to fixing. Fixed cells were stained with either LAMP1 (upper panel), p62 (middle panel), or LC3 (lower panel) antibody and imaged by confocal microscopy. Arrowheads point to SYTL5/RAB27A-positive structures. Scale bars: 10 μm, 2 μm (insets). (C) SYTL5/RAB27A dKO U2OS cells rescued with SYTL5-EGFP and mScarlet-RAB27A were treated with 1 μM MRT68921 for 2 hr (upper panel) or 5 μM Vps34-IN1 for 2 hr (lower panel). All cells were stained with 50 nM MitoTracker DR 30 min prior to live imaging confocal microscopy. Scale bars: 10 μm, 2 μm (insets).
Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original image files for Figure 4—figure supplement 1A.
Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original image files for Figure 4—figure supplement 1B.
Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 3. Original image files for Figure 4—figure supplement 1B, C.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2. SYTL5 and RAB27A are dispensable for macro-mitophagy.

Figure 4—figure supplement 2.

(A) U2OS cells were transfected with 20 nM control siRNA, SYTL5 siRNA #1 or RAB27A siRNA #1 for 48 hr followed by 24 hr incubation with 1 mM DFP or 1 mM DMOG. Cell lysates were analysed by western blot for BNIP3L. Actin was used as a loading control. Error bars represent the mean with standard deviation between replicates (n=3). (B) U2OS cells were transfected with 20 nM control siRNA or SYTL5 siRNA oligos for 72 hr. Transfection efficiency was analysed by qPCR where the relative mRNA expression of SYTL5 was normalised to the expression levels of TBP and siControl. Error bars represent the standard deviation between replicates (n=3). Significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett multiple comparison test, ***=p < 0.001. (C) U2OS cells expressing the mitochondrial matrix reporter NIPSNAP1aa1-53-EGFP-mCherry (Princely Abudu et al., 2019) (referred to as IMLS cells) were transfected with 20 nM control siRNA or SYTL5 siRNA oligos for 48 hr before 24 hr incubation with 1 mM DFP in the absence or presence of 100 nM BafA1 for the last 2 hr. After fixation, cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst and widefield images were obtained using a high-content imaging microscope. The area of red-only puncta per cell (>1000 cells analysed, representing mitochondria delivered to lysosomes as the EGFP signal is quenched in the acidic lysosome) was quantified using a Cell Profiler pipeline. The obtained results were normalised to the control siRNA, and error bars represent the mean with standard deviation between replicates (n=3). Significance was determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison test. (D) U2OS IMLS cells expressing PARKIN were transfected with 20 nM control siRNA or SYTL5 siRNA oligos for 48 hr before a 16 hr incubation with 20 μM CCCP to induce mitophagy, with treatment with 100 nM BafA1 or not for the last 2 hr. The area of red-only puncta per cell (>1000 cells analysed) was quantified using Cell Profiler from widefield images obtained using a high-content imaging microscope. The obtained results were normalised to the control siRNA, and error bars represent the mean with standard deviation between replicates (n=3). Significance was determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. (E) U2OS IMLS cells were transfected with 20 nM control siRNA or RAB27A siRNA oligos for 48 hr before 24 hr incubation with 1 mM DFP in the absence or presence of 100 nM BafA1 for the last 2 hr. After fixation, cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst and widefield images were obtained using a high-content imaging microscope. The area of red-only puncta per cell (>1000 cells analysed) was quantified using a Cell Profiler pipeline. The obtained results were normalised to the siControl, and error bars represent the mean with standard deviation between replicates (n=3). Significance was determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison test. (F) WT (control) or SYTL5 KO U2OS cells were starved in EBSS for 4 hr or incubated with complete medium in the presence or absence of 100 nM BafA1 the last 2 hr. Cell lysates were harvested and analysed by western blot for LC3B and actin proteins. LC3B-II band intensity was quantified relative to actin and normalised to control. Error bars represent the mean with standard deviation between replicates (n=3). Significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison test.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Original uncropped blots for Figure 4—figure supplement 2F.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2—source data 2. Uncropped blots with the relevant bands clearly labelled for Figure 4—figure supplement 2F.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2—source data 3. Values plotted in Figure 4—figure supplement 2A, B, C, D, E, F.

HIF-1α is a transcription factor that is a main driver of the Warburg effect (Soubannier et al., 2012) and an inducer of mitophagy via upregulation of the outer mitochondrial membrane proteins BNIP3 and BNIP3L, which bind to LC3. To identify the nature of the SYTL5/RAB27A/MitoTracker DR-positive vesicular structures that increase with HIF-1α stabilisation, dKO cells expressing mScarlet-RAB27A and SYTL5-EGFP were immunostained with antibodies against various autophagy markers. Intriguingly, while observing strong co-localisation of SYTL5/RAB27A/MitoTracker DR-positive vesicles with LAMP1 (Figure 4B), the same structures did not co-localise with LC3B or the autophagy receptor p62 (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A). However, as both LC3 and p62 are degraded in the lysosome, we added the lysosomal V-ATPase inhibitor Bafilomycin A1 (BafA1) for the last 4 hr of DFP treatment, resulting in the presence of some LC3 and p62 positive SYTL5/RAB27A/MitoTracker DR vesicles (Figure 4—figure supplement 1B). It should be noted that the SYTL5/RAB27A/MitoTracker-positive vesicle structures do not always colocalise with LAMP1, LC3, and p62, and that the phenotype of these cells is varied. The mitochondrial localisation of SYTL5 and RAB27A was not affected in cells treated with the ULK1 inhibitor MRT68291 or with the class III phosphoinositide 3-kinase VPS34 inhibitor IN1 (Figure 4—figure supplement 1C), indicating that SYTL5 and RAB27A are recruited to mitochondria independent of active autophagy. Thus, our data show that SYTL5 and RAB27A-positive vesicles containing mitochondrial material and autophagic proteins form upon HIF-1α-induced mitophagy.

SYTL5 and RAB27A function as positive regulators of selective mitophagy

To investigate whether SYTL5 and RAB27A are required for the turnover of mitochondrial proteins in hypoxic conditions, we took advantage of two mitophagy reporter U2OS cell lines, one expressing the mitochondrial matrix reporter, pSu9-Halo-mGFP (Yim et al., 2022) and one expressing the mitochondrial targeting signal of the matrix protein NIPSNAP1 tagged with EGFP-mCherry (Princely Abudu et al., 2019; hereafter referred to as IMLS cells).

The pSu9-Halo-mGFP cells allow a measure of mitophagy flux via the production of a cleaved Halo Tag band, which is stable in lysosomes when bound to the ligand (HaloTMR). Activation of HIF1α by treatment with DFP or DMOG resulted in the appearance of cleaved HaloTMR (Figure 4C–D), consistent with activation of mitophagy. The use of small interfering RNA (siRNA) to deplete SYTL5, RAB27A or both simultaneously in these cells resulted in a significant reduction in the amount of free HaloTMR (Figure 4C–D), highlighting a reduction in mitophagy. Depletion of SYTL5 and/or RAB27A did not affect the DFP or DMOG-induced HIF1α activation, as analysed by BNIP3L expression levels (Figure 4—figure supplement 2A). Thus, both SYTL5 and RAB27A are required for the lysosomal turnover of mitochondrial components in response to HIF1α activation and not for the HIF1α-mediated induction of mitophagy.

In contrast, we did not observe a significant difference in mitophagy levels in IMLS cells depleted of SYTL5 or RAB27A treated with DFP to induce Parkin-independent mitophagy, or in IMLS cells with stable expression of Parkin treated with the uncoupler carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazone (CCCP) to induce Parkin-dependent mitophagy (Figure 4—figure supplement 2B–E), together indicating that macro-mitophagy proceeds independently of SYTL5 and RAB27A. In line with this, the starvation-induced autophagic flux was not affected in cells lacking SYTL5 (Figure 4—figure supplement 2F).

 Taken together, our results indicate that SYTL5 and RAB27A function to regulate the lysosomal turnover of selected mitochondrial proteins in response to hypoxic conditions.

SYTL5 regulates mitochondrial respiration

Our finding of mitochondrial material within SYTL5-RAB27A-positive structures upon induction of mitochondrial stress through DFP and hypoxia (Figure 4A), together with reduced turnover of the Fo-ATPase subunit 9 upon knockdown of SYTL5 and RAB27A (Figure 4C–D) and the identification of several proteins involved in the cellular response to stress (Figure 3C), including mitochondrial proteins (e.g. DECR1 and TIMM13), in the SYTL5 interactome (Figure 3A), led us to investigate a potential role of SYTL5 and RAB27A in mitochondrial function and bioenergetics.

The cellular oxygen consumption rate (OCR) can be measured with the Seahorse analyser upon sequential addition of different inhibitors (oligomycin, CCCP, antimycin and rotenone) that block the function of specific electron transport chain (ETC) complexes (Hill et al., 2012). SYTL5 KO cells had a significant decrease in both basal and ATP-linked respiration compared to WT U2OS cells (Figure 5A–B), indicating reduced mitochondrial OXPHOS activity. As for RAB27A, both basal respiration and ATP-linked OCR were significantly reduced in cells depleted of RAB27A (RAB27A KO and RAB27A/SYTL5 dKO) relative to the control (Figure 5A–B), indicating an important function of these proteins in regulation of mitochondrial respiration.

Figure 5. SYTL5 and RAB27A regulate mitochondrial bioenergetics.

Figure 5.

(A) Mitochondrial oxygen consumption rate was analysed in U2OS control cells, SYTL5 KO, RAB27A KO, and dKO cells using the Seahorse XF analyser. OCR was measured after sequential addition of oligomycin, CCCP and a combination of rotenone and antimycin-A into the assay medium. Error bars represent the mean with standard deviation between replicates (n=3). (B) The four basal OCR measurements per well (before oligomycin addition) were averaged to obtain the basal OCR value and the non-mitochondrial respiration was subtracted to determine the basal respiration associated with each condition. The ATP production was calculated by subtracting the proton leak from the maximal respiratory capacity. Error bars represent the mean with standard deviation between replicates (n=3). Significance was determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison test, *=p < 0.05, **=p < 0.01. (C) The extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) was analysed in U2OS control cells, SYTL5 KO, RAB27A KO, and dKO cells using the Seahorse XF analyser. ECAR was measured upon addition of glucose, oligomycin, and 2-DG using control and SYTL5-depleted cells. Error bars represent the mean with standard deviation between replicates (n=3). (D) The glycolysis rate of each condition was calculated by subtracting the ECAR value after 2-DG treatment from the ECAR after addition of glucose (Glycolysis = ECAR after addition of glucose − ECAR after 2-DG treatment). Error bars represent the mean with standard deviation between replicates (n=3). Significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparison test, *=p < 0.05. (E) Cell lysates from U2OS control, RAB27A KO, SYTL5 KO, and dKO cells were analysed by western blot for the indicated electron transport chain complex-II, -III, -V, and -V proteins. GAPDH was used as a loading control. (F) Quantification of data in E. Band intensities were quantified relative to GAPDH and normalised to control. Error bars represent the mean with standard deviation between replicates (n=4). Significance was determined by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison test, **=p < 0.01. (G) U2OS cells were transfected with 20 nM control siRNA, SYTL5 siRNA #1, or RAB27A siRNA #1 for 48 hr followed by 24 hr incubation with 1 mM DFP or 1 mM DMOG. Cell lysates were analysed by western blot for COXIV. Actin was used as a loading control. Error bars represent the mean with standard deviation between replicates (n=3).

Figure 5—source data 1. Original uncropped blots for Figure 5E.
Figure 5—source data 2. Uncropped blots with the relevant bands clearly labelled for Figure 5E.
Figure 5—source data 3. Values plotted in Figure 5B, D, F and G.

To test whether the decreased respiration in cells depleted of SYTL5 and/or RAB27A is coupled to a shift to glycolysis, we performed Seahorse analysis of the extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) in cells upon the sequential addition of glucose (increases glycolytic capacity), oligomycin (inhibits mitochondrial ATP production), and 2-DG (a glycolysis inhibitor which causes an abrupt decrease in ECAR). Intriguingly, glycolysis was significantly increased in SYTL5 KO cells as compared to control (Figure 5C–D), indicating a possible metabolic shift to compensate for the decrease in OCR observed when SYTL5 was depleted (Figure 5A–B). In contrast, ECAR was reduced in cells lacking RAB27A compared to the control, which may indicate an impairment in glucose uptake (Figure 5C) and therefore in glycolysis (Figure 5D). After adding oligomycin, the ECAR increased in all cell lines, but in RAB27A KO and dKO cell lines, the increase was reduced when compared to the control cell line (Figure 5C–D).

The clear reduction in mitochondrial respiration observed in cells lacking RAB27A and SYTL5 led us to investigate the abundance of various ETC proteins. Depletion of SYTL5 and/or RAB27A did not affect the overall abundance of ATP5A (complex V), UQCRC2 (complex III), or SDHB (complex II), but we observed a significant increase in the level of MTCO1 (complex IV) in cells lacking RAB27A (Figure 5E–F). There was, however, no significant difference in the level of COXIV, another subunit of the ETC complex IV, upon siRNA-mediated knockdown of SYTL5, RAB27A or both compared to siControl in basal condition or upon induction of mitophagy with DFP or DMOG (Figure 5G).

Taken together, our data show that both RAB27A and SYTL5 are important for normal mitochondrial respiration and ATP production, while SYTL5 seems to regulate a metabolic switch to glycolysis.

Low SYTL5 expression is related to reduced survival for adrenocortical carcinoma patients

Since our data indicate that SYTL5 may be a regulator of the metabolic switch from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis (the Warburg effect; Figure 5A–D) that is frequently associated with cancer cells, we decided to analyse publicly available expression datasets to explore a possible link between SYTL5 and cancer. Using bulk RNA expression data from healthy/normal tissue samples in the GTEx project, we found that SYTL5 is preferentially expressed in adrenal gland and various regions of the brain (Figure 6A). Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare type of aggressive cancer with poor prognosis and limited treatment options that develops in the adrenal cortex (Else et al., 2014). A comparison of gene expression levels (Tang et al., 2017) in normal adrenal gland samples and ACC samples showed that SYTL5 mRNA expression is significantly reduced in tumour samples (Figure 6B). Furthermore, patient survival analysis using data obtained from the TCGA-ACC cohort indicates that low SYTL5 mRNA expression is associated with a significantly reduced survival of ACC patients (Figure 6C), suggesting a possible tumour suppressor function for SYTL5 in ACC cancer progression. RAB27A expression levels were also reduced in tumour tissue compared to normal samples, although to a lesser extent than SYTL5 (Figure 6D), and overall patient survival in ACC patients did not show any relationship with RAB27A expression levels (Figure 6E).

Figure 6. Low SYTL5 expression is related to reduced survival for adrenocortical carcinoma patients.

(A) SYTL5 expression levels in normal/healthy tissues, using data from the GTEx project (v8). Shown are the 10 tissue sites for which SYTL5 is most highly expressed (i.e. based on median expression levels). TPM = transcripts per million. Median is represented by a red solid line and quartiles by red dashed lines. (B) Comparison of SYTL5 gene expression levels in normal adrenal gland samples (GTEx, n=128) and adrenocortical carcinoma samples (The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) ACC cohort, n=77). Median expression is represented by a red solid line and quartiles by red dashed lines. Statistical analysis was performed using the unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction. TPM = transcripts per million. (C) Kaplan-Meier plot for ACC patient survival related to SYTL5 expression levels. The events related to high SYTL5 expression (expression level above median) are indicated in red, and the dotted lines represent 95% confidence interval. Events related to low SYTL5 expression (expression level below median) are indicated in blue, and the dotted lines represent 95% confidence interval. Statistical analysis was performed using the Logrank (Mantel-Cox) test. (D) Comparison of RAB27A gene expression levels in normal adrenal gland samples (GTEx, n=128) and adrenocortical carcinoma samples (The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) ACC cohort, n=77). Median expression is represented by a red solid line and quartiles by red dashed lines. Statistical analysis was performed using the unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction. (E) Kaplan-Meier plot for ACC patient survival related to RAB27A expression levels. The events related to high RAB27A expression (expression level above median) are indicated in red, and the dotted lines represent 95% confidence interval. Events related to low RAB27A expression (expression level below median) are indicated in blue, and the dotted lines represent 95% confidence interval. Statistical analysis was performed using the Logrank (Mantel-Cox) test.

Figure 6—source data 1. Values plotted in Figure 6A, B, C, D and E.

Figure 6.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1. NCl-H295R cells were transfected with 20 nM control siRNA, SYTL5 siRNA or RAB27A siRNA oligos for 72 h.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1.

Cortisol secretion was measured and normalised to siControl. Error bars represent the mean with standard deviation between replicates (n=4).
Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Values plotted in Figure 6—figure supplement 1.

The adrenal gland cortex secretes several steroid hormones, such as mineralocorticoids (e.g. aldosterone), glucocorticoids (e.g. cortisol), and adrenal androgens (DHEA and DHEA-sulphate; Wang and Rainey, 2012), to the bloodstream. ACC tumours are characterised by excess adrenocortical hormone production in nearly 45–70% of patients, with hypercortisolism being the most common (Else et al., 2014). As mitochondria contain enzymes essential for steroid hormone biosynthesis from cholesterol (Miller, 2013), we asked whether SYTL5 may regulate cortisol production. SYTL5 or RAB27A was depleted by siRNA in the ACC cell line H295R, followed by quantification of cortisol secretion using a colourimetric assay. We did not observe a significant change in cortisol secretion upon SYTL5 or RAB27A knockdown (Figure 6—figure supplement 1), indicating that the correlation between low SYTL5 expression levels and ACC patient survival likely is unrelated to effects on cortisol production.

Discussion

SYTL5 has been identified as a RAB27A effector protein with affinity for membranes through its C2 lipid-binding domains (Kuroda et al., 2002a), but nothing is known about a potential role of SYTL5 in regulation of RAB27A-dependent membrane trafficking pathways. Using the osteosarcoma-derived U2OS cell line, here we confirm that SYTL5 interacts with RAB27A and show that it localises to mitochondria and small, highly mobile vesicles interacting with the mitochondrial network, as well as to endolysosomal and endocytic compartments, indicating a role of SYTL5 in cellular membrane trafficking events.

Most interestingly, mitochondrial recruitment of SYTL5 involves coincidence detection, as it requires both its RAB27-binding SHD domain and its lipid-binding C2 domains. Indeed, we demonstrate that SYTL5 is recruited to mitochondria in a RAB27A-dependent manner and that RAB27A itself is localised to mitochondria in a manner dependent on its GTPase activity, as both RAB27A GDP and GTP mutants (T23N and Q78L, respectively) showed a dispersed cytoplasmic localisation. This is in line with a study showing that the GTPase activity of RAB27A is required for its localisation to melanosomes (Ishida et al., 2014). The mechanisms involved in mitochondrial recruitment of RAB27A are not clear. It is, however, interesting to note that other RAB proteins are recruited to the mitochondria by regulation of their GTPase activity. During parkin-mediated mitophagy, RABGEF1 (a guanine nucleotide exchange factor) is recruited through its ubiquitin-binding domain and directs mitochondrial localisation of RAB5, which subsequently leads to recruitment of RAB7 by the MON1/CCZ1 GEF complex (Yamano et al., 2018). Intriguingly, ubiquitination of the RAB27A GTPase activating protein alpha (TBC1D10A) is reduced in the brain of Parkin KO mice compared to controls (Key et al., 2019), suggesting a possible connection of RAB27A with regulatory mechanisms that are linked with mitochondrial damage and dysfunction.

SYTL5 and RAB27A are both members of protein families, suggesting possible functional redundancies from RAB27B or one of the other SYTL isoforms. While RAB27B has a very low expression in U2OS cells, all five SYTLs are expressed. However, when knocking out or knocking down SYTL5 and RAB27A, we observe significant effects that we presume would be negated if their isoforms were providing functional redundancies. Moreover, we did not detect any other SYTL protein or RAB27B in the SYTL5 interactome, confirming that they do not form a complex with SYTL5.

Given the presence of mitochondria-associated small and highly mobile SYTL5/RAB27A-positive vesicles that contain mitochondrial material and stain positive for LAMP1, we speculate that RAB27A and SYTL5 facilitate mitophagy-mediated lysosomal delivery of mitochondria or selected mitochondrial components. Indeed, SYTL5 and RAB27A-positive vesicles containing mitochondrial material were observed in cells upon hypoxia or hypoxia-mimicking (DFP and DMOG) treatments, where some vesicles stained positive for the autophagy markers p62 and LC3B upon co-treatment with the lysosomal V-ATPase inhibitor BafA1. Intriguingly, in cells treated with DFP and DMOG, we observed a significant decrease in lysosomal cleavage of the mitophagy reporter pSu9-Halo-mGFP (Yim et al., 2022) upon depletion of SYTL5 and/or RAB27A. Additionally, when blotting for various endogenous proteins of the electron transport chain complexes, we found that the level of the cytochrome c oxidase (complex IV) subunit MTCO1/COX1 was significantly increased in cells lacking RAB27A. However, neither the basal level of COXIV, another complex IV subunit, nor the lysosomal targeting of a mitochondrial matrix reporter (IMLS) was affected by depletion of SYTL5 and/or RAB27A. Expression of the mitophagy receptor BNIP3L, a HIF-1a target, was not affected by SYTL5 and/or RAB27A depletion. Mitochondrial recruitment of SYTL5 and RAB27A was also independent of the core autophagy machinery components ULK1 and VPS34. Taken together, our data indicate that mitochondrial RAB27A/SYTL5 functions as positive regulators of selective clearance of mitochondrial components in a piece-meal mitophagy-dependent manner.

The role of SYTL5 and RAB27A in the turnover of proteins involved in mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and ATP production is reminiscent of the recently described VDIM (vesicles derived from the inner mitochondrial membrane) pathway (Prashar et al., 2024). VDIMs are formed by IMM herniation through pores in the outer mitochondrial membrane, followed by their engulfment by lysosomes in proximity to mitochondria in a process that is independent of the core autophagy machinery. However, in contrast to our findings, VDIMs lack LC3 and p62, and oxidative stress-induced VDIM formation leads to selective degradation of IMM proteins, including COX4.

Mitochondria are known stress sensors and hubs for cellular adaptation (Montava-Garriga and Ganley, 2020). When analysing the interactome of SYTL5, we found that many candidates were related to the cellular response to stress and oxygen-containing compounds, as well as vesicle-mediated transport and secretion. In line with a role for SYTL5/RAB27A in the regulation of mitochondrial stress, we found that cells lacking SYTL5 and/or RAB27A displayed reduced OXPHOS activity and ATP production. A shift from OXPHOS to anaerobic glycolysis occurs in normal cells during hypoxic conditions and often in cancer cells even under normoxic conditions, commonly referred to as the Warburg effect (Liberti and Locasale, 2016). Intriguingly, while the depletion of SYTL5 triggered a shift to glycolysis as observed by an increase in the extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) due to cellular lactate production, depletion of RAB27A or both RAB27A/SYTL5 had no significant effect, indicating that SYTL5 may function as a negative regulator of RAB27A and subsequently the Warburg effect.

The observed switch from OXPHOS to glycolysis in U2OS cells depleted of SYTL5 prompted us to look at cancer patient databases. We observed, using data from GTEx, that the adrenal gland is among the tissues with highest levels of SYTL5 gene expression, and that its expression is reduced in adrenocortical carcinoma samples (TCGA-ACC) when compared to normal adrenal gland tissue. Moreover, low SYTL5 expression is associated with reduced ACC patient survival. One characteristic of this type of cancer is an increase in steroid hormone production and secretion. Most steroid hormones are produced in mitochondria (Miller, 2013), but we did not observe any changes in the level of cortisol in ACC cells depleted of SYTL5. The mechanisms linking SYTL5 to the Warburg effect and ACC need further investigation, but it is interesting to note that RAB27A expression levels do not correlate with ACC survival.

To summarise, we show that SYTL5 is a RAB27A effector protein being recruited to mitochondria in a RAB27A-dependent manner. Upon hypoxia, RAB27A and SYTL5 promote lysosomal clearance of selected mitochondrial components, and both proteins are needed for mitochondrial respiration. We identify SYTL5 as a negative regulator of the Warburg effect and potentially tumourigenesis.

Materials and methods

Key resources table.

Reagent type (species) or resource Designation Source or reference Identifiers Additional information
Cell line (Homo sapiens) U2OS ATCC HTB-96
Cell line (Homo sapiens) HEK-FT Invitrogen R70007
Cell line (Homo sapiens) NCI-H295R ATCC CRL-2128
Sequence-based reagent siRNA to SYTL5 Thermo Fisher Scientific s41276 Silencer Select
Sequence-based reagent siRNA to SYTL5 Thermo Fisher Scientific s41277 Silencer Select
Sequence-based reagent siRNA to SYTL5 Thermo Fisher Scientific s41275 Silencer Select
Sequence-based reagent siRNA to RAB27A Thermo Fisher Scientific s11695 Silencer Select
Transfected construct (human) siRNA to RAB27A Thermo Fisher Scientific s532296 Silencer Select
Antibody Mouse monoclonal
α-Tubulin
Sigma-Aldrich #T5168 1:20,000
Antibody Mouse monoclonal
β-Actin
Cell signalling technology  #3700 1:5000
Antibody Rabbit monoclonal BNIP3L   Cell signalling technology #12396 1:1000
Antibody Rabbit monoclonal COXIV   Cell signalling technology #4850 1:1000
Antibody Mouse monoclonal EGFP    Clontech #632569 1:1000
Antibody Rabbit polyclonal GFP Abcam; #ab290 1:1000
Antibody Rabbit monoclonal FLAG Tag  Cell signalling technology #14793 1:500
Antibody Rabbit monoclonal GAPDH   Cell signalling technology #5174 1:1000
Antibody Mouse monoclonal Halo Tag   Promega #G9211 1:1000
Antibody Mouse monoclonal LAMP1  Santa Cruz Biotechnology  #sc-20011 1:2000
Antibody Rabbit polyclonal
LC3
MBL PM036 1:500
Antibody Mouse monoclonal OXPHOS   Abcam #ab110413 Cocktail of 5mAbs 1:500
Antibody Guinea pig polyclonal p62  Progen  #GP62-C 1:2000
Antibody Mouse monoclonal RAB27A  Santa Cruz Biotechnology  #sc-74586 1:1000
Antibody Rabbit polyclonal
SYTL5
Sigma-Aldrich  #HPA026074 1:1000
Antibody Mouse monoclonal
TIM23  
BD Biosciences #611223 1:1000
Antibody Mouse monoclonal
TOMM20 
Santa Cruz Biotechnology  #sc-17764 1:1000
Recombinant DNA reagent pcDNA5/FRT/TO_SYTL5-EGFP This paper See methods
Recombinant DNA reagent pLVX-SV40-mScarlet-RAB27A This paper See methods
Recombinant DNA reagent pLVX-SV40-mScarlet-RAB27A (T23N) This paper See methods
Recombinant DNA reagent pLVX-SV40-mScarlet-RAB27A (Q78L) This paper See methods
Recombinant DNA reagent pLVX-CMV-SYTL5-EGFP-3xHA This paper See methods
Recombinant DNA reagent pLVX-CMV-SYTL5-EGFP-3xFLAG This paper See methods
Recombinant DNA reagent pLVX-CMV-SYTL5 (∆C2AB)-EGFP-3xFLAG This paper See methods
Recombinant DNA reagent pLVX-CMV-SYTL5 (∆SHD)-EGFP-3xFLAG This paper See methods
Commercial assay or kit FLAG immuno-precipitation kit Sigma-Aldrich #FLAGIPT-1
Commercial assay or kit Cortisol Immunoassay kit R&D Systems #KGE008B
Chemical compound, drug DFP Sigma-Aldrich #379409
Chemical compound, drug DMOG Sigma-Aldrich #D3695
Chemical compound, drug VPS34IN1 Selleckchem # S7980
Chemical compound, drug MRT68291 Selleckchem #S7949
Chemical compound, drug Oligomycin A SelleckChem #S1478
Chemical compound, drug CCCP Enzo Life Sciences #BML-CM124-0500
Chemical compound, drug Rotenone Sigma-Aldrich #R8875
Chemical compound, drug Antimycin Sigma-Aldrich #A8674
Software, algorithm Prism GraphPad Statistical analysis
Other Hoechst Thermo Fisher Scientific #H1399
Other LysoTracker Red DND-99  Thermo Fisher Scientific  #L7528
Other MitoTracker Deep Red FM  Thermo Fisher Scientific # M22426
Other MitoTracker Green FM Thermo Fisher Scientific #M7514
Other MitoTracker Red CMXRos Thermo Fisher Scientific #M7512

Cell culture, lentivirus production, and stable cell line generation

Human bone osteosarcoma epithelial cells (U2OS FlpIn TRex cell line, kindly provided by Steve Blacklow, Harvard Medical School, US) were grown in complete medium of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM; Lonza #12–604 F and Gibco # 31966047) with 10% v/v foetal bovine serum (FBS; Sigma-Aldrich #F7524), 100 U/ml Penicillin and 100 μg/ml Streptomycin (P/S; Thermo Fisher Scientific #15140122) at 37 °C with 5% CO2.

For lentiviral particle production, HeK-FT cells were co-transfected with 1.6 μg of pLVX lentiviral vector, pCMV-VSV-G and psPAX2 using X-tremeGENE 9 DNA Transfection Reagent (Sigma #XTG9-RO). For virus infection, cells were seeded in complete medium and supplemented with 8 μg/ml polybrene (Santa Cruz Biotechnology #sc-134220). 2 μg/ml Puromycin (Sigma Aldrich #P7255) was added after 24 hr post-infection for selection.

To generate U2OS stably expressing SYTL5-EGFP, U2OS FlpIn TRex cells and U2OS FlpIn TRex_mScarlet-RAB27A were co-transfected with 0.1 μg pcDNA5/FRT/TO_SYTL5-EGFP and 0.9 μg pOG44 Flp recombinase expression vector using Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific #11668019) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To produce stable cell lines expressing pLVX-SV40-mScarlet-RAB27A(T23N/Q78L) and pLVX-CMV-SYTL5-EGFP-3xHA, U2OS dKO cells were infected with lentiviral particles followed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) for double mScarlet/EGFP expressing cells. To generate stable cells expressing pLVX-CMV-SYTL5-EGFP-3xFLAG, pLVX-CMV-SYTL5 (∆C2AB)-EGFP-3xFLAG and pLVX-CMV-SYTL5 (∆SHD)-EGFP-3xFLAG, U2OS FlpIn TRex cells were infected with lentiviral particles. To generate U2OS stably expressing pSu9-Halo-mGFP, U2OS cells were infected with retroviral particles generated using pUMVC (Addgene # 8449) and pMRX-IB-pSu9-HaloTag7-mGFP (Addgene # 184905). Stable cell lines were maintained in complete medium with additional 5 μg/ml blasticidin S (Thermo Fisher Scientific #R21001) or 2 μg/ml puromycin (Sigma-Aldrich #P7255). For starvation experiments, cells were washed with PBS and incubated for 4 hr in Earle’s balanced salt solution (EBSS; Gibco #24010043).

NCI-H295R cells were obtained from ATCC (#CRL-2128) and maintained in DMEM: F12, HEPES medium (Gibco #11330032) supplemented with 2.5% Nu-Serum (Corning #355100), 1% ITS +Premix Universal culture supplement (Corning #354352), and 100 μg/ml P/S (Thermo Fisher Scientific #15140122) at 37 °C with 5% CO2.

All cell lines were tested regularly for mycoplasma, and the result was negative. Authentication was by STR profiling.

Hypoxia and drug treatments

After cells were seeded, they were transferred to an INVIVO2 200 Hypoxic workstation (Ruskinn). Hypoxia treatment was carried out for 24 hr with oxygen concentration set to 1%.

Drugs were added into the cell media. Treatment durations and drug concentrations are indicated in the figure legends. Drugs used were DFP (Sigma-Aldrich #379409), DMOG (Sigma-Aldrich #D3695), VPS34IN1 (Selleckchem # S7980), and MRT68291 (Selleckchem #S7949).

Molecular cloning

SYTL5 was amplified from WT U2OS cDNA (5´-ATGTCTAAGAACTCAGAGTTCATC-3´ and 5´-TTAGAGCCTACATTTTCCCATG-3´) and cloned into Zero Blunt TOPO vector using Zero Blunt TOPO PCR Cloning Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific #450245) according to the manufacturer´s instructions. pcDNA5/FRT/TO_SYTL5-EGFP was generated by Gibson Assembly using the TOPO-SYTL5 vector as a template for SYTL5 and cloned into a pcDNA5/FRT Mammalian Expression Vector (Thermo Fisher Scientific #V601020) or into a pLVX-CMV lentiviral expression vector. Truncated SYTL5 (∆SHD) and SYTL5 (∆C2AB) were generated by Gibson assembly using the pcDNA5/FRT/TO_SYTL5-EGFP construct as a template and cloned into a pLVX-CMV lentiviral expression vector.

RAB27A was amplified from WT U2OS cDNA and cloned into a pLVX-SV40 lentiviral expression vector. RAB27A mutations were performed using the site-directed mutagenesis QuikChange II kit (Agilent #200524) according to the manufacturer’s instructions using the following primer pairs:

Mutation Forward primer Reverse primer
RAB27A_T23N (c68a) atattggtaaagtacactgttcttccctacaccagagtc gactctggtgtagggaagaacagtgtactttaccaatat
RAB27A_Q78L (a233t) tacgaaacctctccagccctgctgtgtcc ggacacagcagggctggagaggtttcgta

CRISPR knockout cell line generation and validation

SYTL5 and RAB27A gene knockouts were performed as previously described by Ran et al., 2013; . Briefly, gRNA target sequences were designed using Wellcome Sanger Institute Genome Editing (WGE) design tool available at https://wge.stemcell.sanger.ac.uk/find_crisprs.

Target gene gRNA sequence Genomic location
RAB27A AGTGGCTCCATCCGGCCCAC chr15:55230454
SYTL5 guide 1 CGACTAATACTTGCCAGAGC chrX:38034292
SYTL5 guide 2 ATACGTAGAACAGCCTCCAC chrX:38033693

DNA oligos were annealed and phosphorylated before cloning into pSpCas9(BB)–2A-Puro (PX459) V2.0 (addgene # 62988). The obtained CRISPR plasmids were transfected into U2OS Flp-In TRex cells using Lipofectamine 2000 according to the manufacturer’s instructions and selection with 2 μg/ml puromycin (Sigma-Aldrich #P7255) was applied for 24 hr. Limiting dilutions were performed using a concentration of 15 cells/ml and seeded in complete medium in a 384-well plate. Single colonies were collected ~10 days after seeding and expanded for a further 3 weeks. For genotyping, gDNA from each single clone line was isolated using QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN #51304) and the targeted genomic region was amplified by PCR using flanking primers (RAB27A: 5´-ATAACCTCTCCCTTGACCTTGTATG-3´ and 5´-TAGATGCCTTTGGGATTTGTACTGA-3´; SYTL5: 5´-CAGGTCCCTTTCTTCTCGCA-3´ and 5´-TCAGTCAGCTGCAAGAGTGG-3´). The PCR product was cloned into the Zero Blunt TOPO vector using Zero Blunt TOPO PCR Cloning Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RAB27A clonal lines were validated by western blot, and SYTL5 deletions were detected by running PCR products in 1% w/v agarose gel (Thermo Fisher Scientific #R2801).

siRNA knockdown by reverse transfection

For siRNA knockdown, cells were incubated with OptiMEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific # 31985047) and Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Thermo Fisher Scientific #13778150) for 5 min at room temperature (RT). Followed by the addition of 20 nM siRNA diluted in OptiMEM and a 15 min incubation at RT. Cells were fixed/harvested after 72 hr of knockdown. The siRNA used for mRNA depletion is the following: siControl: 5´-UAACGACGCGACGACGUAAtt-3´; siSYTL5 #1: 5´-CUCUUAGAAGCAAAACGUAtt-3´; siSYTL5 #2: 5´-CAACAAGCGUAAGACCAAAtt-3´; siSYTL5 #3: 5’-GGUUUGUGCUUCAACCCAAtt-3’; siRAB27A #1: 5´-GGAAGACCAGUGUACUUUAtt-3´ and siRAB27A #2: 5´-CCAGUGUACUUUACCAAUAtt-3´.

RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, and RT-PCR

RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific #15596026) and cDNA was synthesised using SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific #18080085) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. qPCR analysis was performed using KAPA SYBR FAST qPCR Kit (Sigma-Aldrich #KK4601) and relative mRNA expression levels were normalised to the expression levels of TATA-binding protein (TBP) using the comparative ∆Ct method. The primers used were the following:

SYTL5: 5´-GTGACAAAATCGCGCAGCTA-3´, 5´-GGACAACATCAGTGCCGAGA-3´

RAB27A: 5’-GGAGAGGTTTCGTAGCTTAACG-3’, 5’-CCACACAGCACTATATCTGGGT-3’

TBP: 5´-CAGAAAGTTCATCCTCTGGGCT-3´, 5´-TATATTCGGCGTTTCGGGCA-3´

Immunofluorescent staining

Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) (Sigma-Aldrich #158127) in PBS for at least 15 min at 37 °C, quenched for 10 min using 0.05 M NH4Cl in PBS, permeabilised in 0.05% saponin in PBS for 5 min and blocked in 1% BSA in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. Antibody staining was performed in a wet chamber for 1 hr at room temperature, and the antibodies were diluted in PBS containing 0.05% saponin. Nuclei staining was performed using Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Fisher Scientific #H1399) diluted in PBS at 1 µg/ml.

Light microscopy

Cells expressing inducible fluorescent proteins were induced with 100 ng/ml doxycycline (Clontech #631311) for 24 hr. For live cell confocal microscopy, cells were incubated with indicated dyes prior to imaging. Imaging was carried out with either the Andor Dragonfly High Speed Confocal Microscope or the Nikon Crest V3 with a 60 x oil immersion objective (NA 1.4). High-content widefield imaging was conducted with the ImageXpress Micro Confocal (Molecular Devices) microscope with a 20 x objective (NA 0.45). Fixed immunofluorescence confocal imaging was performed using the Andor Dragonfly High Speed Confocal Microscope or Nikon Crest V3, both with a 60 x oil immersion objective (NA 1.4) or Zeiss LSM 800 microscope (Zen Black 524 2012 SP5 FP3, Zeiss) with a 63 x oil immersion objective (NA 1.4).

Correlative light electron microscopy

U2OS cells co-expressing SYTL5-EGFP and mScarlet-RAB27A were seeded in gridded glass-bottom cell culture dishes (MatTek #P35G-1.5–14-CGRD). Cells growing in monolayer were fixed in warm (≈37 °C) 3.7% PFA in 0.2 M HEPES (pH 7) and imaged using the Andor Dragonfly High Speed Confocal Microscope. After imaging, the samples were fixed using 2% v/v glutaraldehyde in 0.2 M HEPES, pH 7.4. After post-fixation in 2% v/v osmium tetraoxide and 3% v/v K4[Fe(CN)6], samples were embedded in Epon and 60 nm thickness sections were cut with a diamond knife. Sections were analysed using a JEM-1400 Plus Transmission Electron Microscope.

Western blot

Cells were harvested in RIPA buffer 50 mM Tris pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl (Merck #1064041000), 0,5% sodium deoxycholate (Sigma-Aldrich #30970), 1% NP-40 (Sigma-Aldrich #I3091), 1 mM EDTA (VWR #20302–293), 0,1% SDS (Sigma-Aldrich #L3771) containing 1 x protease inhibitor (Merck #11697498001) and 1 x phosphatase inhibitor (Merck #4906845001). 20 µg of lysate was loaded on SDS-PAGE gel (BioRad #5671095) and proteins transferred to a PVDF membrane (Merck #IPFL00010) which was blocked using 5 x v/v casein blocking buffer in PBS for 1 hr at room temperature. The obtained membranes were immunoblotted using primary and secondary antibodies with washing steps using PBST (1 x Phosphate-Buffered Saline with 1% Tween20 (Sigma-Aldrich #P1379)). Membranes were analysed using the Odyssey CLx imaging system (Li-cor biosciences), and protein levels were quantified by densitometry with ImageStudio Lite software (Li-cor biosciences).

Macro-mitophagy analysis

siRNA knockdown was conducted as previously described in U2OS-IMLS cells seeded in complete media supplemented with 100 ng/ml doxycycline. Culture media were replaced 24 hr after transfection, and 1 mM DFP (Sigma-Aldrich #379409) treatment was added after 48 hr. For U2OS-IMLS cells expressing PARKIN, 20 μM CCCP (Enzo Life Sciences #BML-CM124-0500) was used for 16 hr and 10 μM Q-VD-OPh (Sigma-Aldrich #SML0063-1MG) pan-caspase inhibitor was included to support cell survival (Lazarou et al., 2015; Caserta et al., 2003). Control wells with 100 nM BafA1 (AH diagnostics #BML-CM110-0100) were dosed 2 hr prior to fixation. After 72 hr, cells were washed with PBS pH 7 and fixed in warm (≈37 °C) 3.7% PFA in 0.2 M HEPES (pH 7) for 15 min at 37 °C. After washing with PBS, cells were incubated with 2 μg/ml Hoechst and widefield images were obtained using a high-content imaging microscope. The area of red-only puncta per cell (which represent mitochondria delivered to lysosomes as the EGFP signal is quenched in the acidic lysosome) was quantified using a Cell Profiler pipeline. The addition of BafA1 was used as a control to confirm that the mCherry-only puncta corresponded to lysosomal structures.

Halo assay for mitophagy flux

siRNA knockdown was conducted as previously described in U2OS cells expressing the pSu9-Halo-mGFP reporter. 48 hr after transfection, culture media was changed to contain 100 nM tetramethylrhodamine (TMR)-conjugated Halo ligand (Promega #G8251). After a 20 min incubation, cells were washed twice with PBS and the media replaced with either media containing no treatment, 1 mM DFP or 1 mM DMOG. 72 hr after transfection, cells were harvested and western blot conducted (as described earlier). Membranes were incubated with the Halo Tag antibody and actin antibody. Membranes were imaged using the Chemidoc MP system (Bio-Rad) and band intensity quantified in Image Lab 6.1 (Bio-Rad). Bands were normalised to actin loading control. The percentage cleaved Halo was calculated by the formula (Free Halo / (Free Halo +Full Length)) x 100.

Oxygen consumption rate measurement by Seahorse XF analyser

U2OS cells were seeded in complete medium at the density of 4x104 cells/well into XF24 cell culture microplates (Agilent #100777–004). The sensor cartridge was hydrated for 24 hr using XF calibrant in a 37 °C non-CO2 incubator. Before analysis, the cell medium was replaced by warm (≈37 °C) DMEM without Sodium Bicarbonate (pH 7.4) and placed for 1 hr in a 37 °C non-CO2 incubator. Each measurement cycle consisted of a mixing time of 3 min and a data acquisition period of 3 min (three data points). OCR results refer to the average rates during each measurement cycle. The final concentration for each mitochondrial inhibitor used in this assay was 1.5 µM Oligomycin A (SelleckChem #S1478), 1 µM CCCP, 0.5 µM Rotenone (Sigma-Aldrich #R8875-1G), and 0.5 µM Antimycin (Sigma-Aldrich #A8674). Four baseline measurements were performed before adding each compound, and three response measurements were taken after each compound was added. Data analysis was performed using Seahorse Analytics software available at https://seahorseanalytics.agilent.com/ and OCR data was normalised to protein concentration in each well.

Extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) measurement by Seahorse XF analyser

U2OS cells were seeded in complete medium at the density of 4x104 cells/well into XF24 cell culture microplates. The sensor cartridge was hydrated for 24 hr using XF calibrant in a 37 °C non-CO2 incubator. Before analysis, cell medium was replaced by warm (≈37 °C) XF DMEM media (Seahorse Bioscience #102353–100) supplemented with 2 mM L-Glutamine (BioNordika #BE17-605E) and pH adjusted to 7.4. The final concentration for each reagent used in this assay was 11 mM Glucose, 1.3 µM Oligomycin A, 0.1 M 2-Deoxy-Glucose (2-DG; Sigma-Aldrich #D8375-1G; TeSlaa and Teitell, 2014). Each measurement cycle consisted of a mixing time of 3 min and data acquisition period of 3 min (four data points). ECAR results refer to the average rates during each measurement cycle. Five baseline measurements were performed before adding each compound, and four response measurements were taken after each compound was added. Data was normalised to protein concentration using Seahorse Analytics software available at https://seahorseanalytics.agilent.com/ and the glycolysis rate was calculated by subtracting the ECAR value after 2-DG treatment from the ECAR value after addition of glucose.

Purification of crude mitochondrial fraction

To purify crude mitochondrial fraction, cells expressing EGFP (control), mScarlet-RAB27A, SYTL5-EGFP and SYTL5(∆C2AB)-EGFP were harvested from one 150 mm (80–90% confluency) dish, washed twice with ice-cold homogenisation buffer (210 mM mannitol (Sigma Aldrich #M4125), 70 mM sucrose (Sigma Aldrich #S0389), 5 mM HEPES pH 7.12 at 25 °C) and harvested in 1 ml homogenisation buffer supplemented (HBS) with 1 mM EGTA (Sigma Aldrich #E3889) and 1 x protease inhibitor. The obtained cell lysate was further mechanically homogenised at 4 °C using a cell homogeniser (Isobiotech) equipped with a 16 µm clearance ball by repeatedly passing the cell lysate for 10 x repeats with the aid of two disposable syringes. The homogenised solution was further spun down at 1500 x g for 3 min at 4 °C to collect the TCL, and the obtained supernatant was collected and spun down at 13,000 x g for 20 min. The obtained supernatant corresponds to the cytosolic fraction, and the pellet was resuspended in 2 ml HBS and spun down at 13,000 x g for 20 min. The obtained pellet corresponds to the enriched mitochondrial fraction and was resuspended in 900 µl HBS. 50 µl of each cellular fraction was resuspended in 30 µl 2 x SDS-sample buffer and boiled at 100 °C for 5 min and further analysed using SDS-PAGE.

GFP-TRAP and FLAG immunoprecipitation

Cells expressing EGFP were harvested from a 100 mm dish (80–90% confluency), washed with ice-cold PBS and scraped using ice-cold isolation buffer (1% NP-40, 2 mM EDTA, 136 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 10% glycerol, 1 x protease inhibitor, and 1 x phosphatase inhibitor). Cell lysate was spun down at 20,000 x g for 10 min and the supernatant was added to 25 µl equilibrated GFP-trap agarose beads (Chromotek #gta-20). Samples were rotated end-over-end for 1 hr at 4 °C. After 4 x washing steps, the beads were collected by centrifugation at 2700 x g for 1 min, resuspended in 30 µl 2 x SDS-sample buffer and boiled at 100 °C for 5 min. The obtained supernatant was analysed by SDS-PAGE.

U2OS cells expressing pLVX-CMV-SYTL5-EGFP-3xFLAG, pLVX-CMV-SYTL5(∆C2AB)-EGFP-3xFLAG and pLVX-CMV-SYTL5(∆SHD)-EGFP-3xFLAG were harvested from a 150 mm dish (80–90% confluency), washed 2 x with cold PBS and scraped using 1 ml of cold lysis buffer 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 5 mM CaCl2 Merck #1023821000, and 1 x protease inhibitor. Cell lysates were spun down at 20,000 x g for 10 min and the resulting supernatants were added to 40 µl of pre-washed anti-FLAG M2-Agarose Affinity Gel (Sigma-Aldrich #FLAGIPT-1). Samples were rotated end-over-end for 2 hr at 4 °C. After 3 x washing steps, the affinity gel was centrifuged at 5000 x g for 30 s and the FLAG fusion proteins eluted using 3 x FLAG peptide according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The eluted FLAG fusion proteins were diluted in 4 ml 1 x TBST supplemented with 3% BSA and 5 mM CaCl2.

In vitro protein-lipid binding assay

Eluted FLAG fusion proteins SYTL5-EGFP-3xFLAG, SYTL5(∆C2AB)-EGFP-3xFLAG and SYTL5(∆SHD)-EGFP-3xFLAG were diluted in 1 x TBST supplemented with 3% BSA and 5 mM CaCl2. PIP strips (Echelon Biosciences #P-6001) and membrane lipid strips (Echelon Biosciences #P-6002) were blocked in 1 x TBST supplemented with 3% BSA for 1 hr at room temperature and incubated with the diluted FLAG fusion protein for 1 hr at 4 °C with gentle agitation. Lipid membranes were washed 3 x with TBST and incubated with FLAG Tag primary antibody for 1 hr at room temperature and detected using SuperSignal West Dura Extended Duration Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific #34076).

LC-MS/MS analysis of SYTL5-EGFP interactome

Cells expressing SYTL5-EGFP or EGFP (control) were harvested using NP-40 lysis buffer 10 mM Tris Cl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5% NP-40, 1 x protease inhibitor. SYTL5-EGFP was immunoprecipitated using GFP-Trap agarose beads according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The obtained beads were washed twice with 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate, reduced, alkylated and further digested by trypsin overnight at 37 °C. Digested peptides were transferred to a new tube, acidified and the peptides were de-salted for MS analysis.

LC-MS/MS analysis was carried out using a nanoElute nanoflow ultrahigh pressure LC system (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) coupled to the timsTOF fleX mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics), using a CaptiveSpray nanoelectrospray ion source (Bruker Daltonics). De-salted peptides were loaded on a capillary C18 column Bruker (15 cm length, 75 μm inner diameter, 1.9 μm particle size, Bruker Daltonics). Peptides were separated at 50 °C using a 30 min gradient at a flow rate of 300 nl/min. The timsTOF fleX was operated in PASEF mode. Mass spectra for MS and MS/MS scans were recorded between m/z 100 and 1700. Ion mobility resolution was set to 0.60–1.60 V·s/cm over a ramp time of 100ms. Data-dependent acquisition was performed using 10 PASEF MS/MS scans per cycle with a near 100% duty cycle. A polygon filter was applied in the m/z and ion mobility space to exclude low m/z, singly charged ions from PASEF precursor selection. An active exclusion time of 0.4 min was applied to precursors that reached 20 000 intensity units. Collisional energy was ramped stepwise as a function of ion mobility.

Raw files from LC-MS/MS analyses were submitted to MaxQuant 1.6.17.0 software for peptide/protein identification. Parameters were set as follows: Carbamidomethyl (C) was set as a fixed modification, N-acetylation and methionine oxidation as variable modifications. First, search the error window of 20 ppm and mains search error of 6 ppm. Trypsin without proline restriction cleavage option was used, with two allowed miscleavages. Minimal unique peptides were set to one, and FDR allowed was 0.01 (1%) for peptide and protein identification. The UniProt human database was used. Generation of reversed sequences was selected to assign FDR rates. Further analysis was performed with Perseus (Tyanova et al., 2016), limma/voom (Ritchie et al., 2015) and Package R (Dessau and Pipper, 2008). Volcano plots were plotted with EnhancedVolcano (Kevin Blighe, 2021). GO analysis was performed with shinyGO (Ge et al., 2020). The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE (Perez-Riverol et al., 2025) partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD069382.

Bulk gene expression analysis - normal and tumour tissue

Bulk gene expression distribution in healthy/normal tissue samples was collected from GTEx v8 (PMID: 26484571). We utilised a combined RNA-seq expression dataset of TCGA and GTEx samples available through the Xena platform to investigate SYTL5 and RAB27A expression in normal and tumour tissue (PMID: 32444850). Here, data from a total of n=77 samples provided normal adrenal gland expression (GTEx), and a total of n=128 samples provided expression in adrenocortical carcinoma samples (TCGA-ACC). Survival data from samples in the TCGA-ACC cohort (one record per patient) was obtained using the TCGABiolinks R package (Colaprico et al., 2016). Survival curve analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0.1 and the Logrank test (Mantel-Cox).

Cortisol assay

To measure cortisol in cell culture supernates, siRNA knockdown by reverse transfection with siSYTL5 and siRAB27A was conducted as described earlier in NCI-H295R cells. Cells were harvested with TNTE Lysis Buffer. Cortisol from lysates was measured using the R&D Systems Cortisol Immunoassay kit (# KGE008B) as described in the protocol provided from the company. Controls were performed using cells treated with 50 µM Forskolin as a positive control to stimulate cortisol secretion (Maglich et al., 2014), or 10 µM mitotane to inhibit cortisol production (Lin et al., 2012).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism (8.0.1, 9.3.1, and 10.2.0 versions) and the tests used are indicated in the respective figure legends. All values come from distinct samples.

****=p < 0.0001, ***=p < 0.001, **=p < 0.01, *=p < 0.05.

Acknowledgements

We thank Jenni Laine and the Electron Microscopy Laboratory, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, for assisting with EM sample preparation and TEM microscopy, Sachin Singh and Tuula Nyman at the OUS Proteomics Core Facility for assisting with mass spectrometry-based proteomic experiments, Ankush Sharma for help with analysis of mass spectrometry data, Anna Lång at ALM Core Facility Gaustad for assisting with widefield microscopy experiments, Santosh Phuyal for experimental assistance and Serhiy Pankiv for providing the lentiviral mScarlet-RAB expression constructs. We also thank Patricia González-Rodríguez for providing us with the U2OS pSu9-HaloTag7-mGFP cells and Viola Nähse for her contributions and advice regarding CRISPR knock-in strategies. This project was funded by the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme (project number 262652) and FRIPRO grant (project number 249753), the Norwegian Cancer Society (project number 190251), Marie Skłodowska-Curie ETN grant under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (Grant Agreement No 765912 DRIVE) and by the University of Oslo Scientia Fellow program through the MSC scheme - Co-funding of Regional, National and International Programmes (COFUND). Mass spectrometry-based proteomic analyses were performed by the Proteomics Core Facility, Department of Immunology, University of Oslo/Oslo University Hospital, which is supported by the Core Facilities program of the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority. This core facility is also a member of the National Network of Advanced Proteomics Infrastructure (NAPI), which is funded by the Research Council of Norway INFRASTRUKTUR-program (project number: 295910).

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Anne Simonsen, Email: anne.simonsen@medisin.uio.no.

Li Yu, Tsinghua University, China.

David Ron, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • Kreftforeningen 190251 to Laura Trachsel-Moncho, Samuel J Rodgers, Anne Simonsen.

  • Norges Forskningsråd 262652 to Sigve Nakken, Anne Simonsen.

  • Norges Forskningsråd 249753 to Lauren Sophie Johnson, Matthew YW Ng, Anne Simonsen.

  • HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions 10.3030/765912 to Ana Lapão.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Project administration.

Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.

Investigation.

Methodology.

Data curation, Formal analysis.

Investigation.

Data curation, Formal analysis.

Investigation.

Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.

Additional files

MDAR checklist
Supplementary file 1. SYTL5-EGFP interactome.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files; source data files have been provided for all figures. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD069382.

The following dataset was generated:

Singh S. 2025. The RAB27A effector SYTL5 regulates mitophagy and mitochondrial metabolism. PRIDE. PXD069382

References

  1. Abudu YP, Shrestha BK, Zhang W, Palara A, Brenne HB, Larsen KB, Wolfson DL, Dumitriu G, Øie CI, Ahluwalia BS, Levy G, Behrends C, Tooze SA, Mouilleron S, Lamark T, Johansen T. SAMM50 acts with p62 in piecemeal basal- and OXPHOS-induced mitophagy of SAM and MICOS components. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2021;220:e202009092. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202009092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen GFG, Toth R, James J, Ganley IG. Loss of iron triggers PINK1/Parkin-independent mitophagy. EMBO Reports. 2013;14:1127–1135. doi: 10.1038/embor.2013.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baietti MF, Zhang Z, Mortier E, Melchior A, Degeest G, Geeraerts A, Ivarsson Y, Depoortere F, Coomans C, Vermeiren E, Zimmermann P, David G. Syndecan-syntenin-ALIX regulates the biogenesis of exosomes. Nature Cell Biology. 2012;14:677–685. doi: 10.1038/ncb2502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Caserta TM, Smith AN, Gultice AD, Reedy MA, Brown TL. Q-VD-OPh, a broad spectrum caspase inhibitor with potent antiapoptotic properties. Apoptosis. 2003;8:345–352. doi: 10.1023/a:1024116916932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Choong C-J, Okuno T, Ikenaka K, Baba K, Hayakawa H, Koike M, Yokota M, Doi J, Kakuda K, Takeuchi T, Kuma A, Nakamura S, Nagai Y, Nagano S, Yoshimori T, Mochizuki H. Alternative mitochondrial quality control mediated by extracellular release. Autophagy. 2021;17:2962–2974. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1848130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Colaprico A, Silva TC, Olsen C, Garofano L, Cava C, Garolini D, Sabedot TS, Malta TM, Pagnotta SM, Castiglioni I, Ceccarelli M, Bontempi G, Noushmehr H. TCGAbiolinks: an R/Bioconductor package for integrative analysis of TCGA data. Nucleic Acids Research. 2016;44:e71. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dessau RB, Pipper CB. ''R"--project for statistical computing. Ugeskrift for Laeger. 2008;170:328–330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ding WX, Yin XM. Mitophagy: mechanisms, pathophysiological roles, and analysis. Biological Chemistry. 2012;393:547–564. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2012-0119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Else T, Kim AC, Sabolch A, Raymond VM, Kandathil A, Caoili EM, Jolly S, Miller BS, Giordano TJ, Hammer GD. Adrenocortical carcinoma. Endocrine Reviews. 2014;35:282–326. doi: 10.1210/er.2013-1029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fukuda M. The C2A domain of synaptotagmin-like protein 3 (Slp3) is an atypical calcium-dependent phospholipid-binding machine: comparison with the C2A domain of synaptotagmin I. The Biochemical Journal. 2002;366:681–687. doi: 10.1042/BJ20020484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fukuda M. Rab27 effectors, pleiotropic regulators in secretory pathways. Traffic. 2013;14:949–963. doi: 10.1111/tra.12083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gálvez-Santisteban M, Rodriguez-Fraticelli AE, Bryant DM, Vergarajauregui S, Yasuda T, Bañón-Rodríguez I, Bernascone I, Datta A, Spivak N, Young K, Slim CL, Brakeman PR, Fukuda M, Mostov KE, Martín-Belmonte F. Synaptotagmin-like proteins control the formation of a single apical membrane domain in epithelial cells. Nature Cell Biology. 2012;14:838–849. doi: 10.1038/ncb2541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ge SX, Jung D, Yao R. ShinyGO: a graphical gene-set enrichment tool for animals and plants. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:2628–2629. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hill BG, Benavides GA, Lancaster JR, Jr, Ballinger S, Dell’Italia L, Jianhua Z, Darley-Usmar VM. Integration of cellular bioenergetics with mitochondrial quality control and autophagy. Biological Chemistry. 2012;393:1485–1512. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2012-0198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ishida M, Arai SP, Ohbayashi N, Fukuda M. The GTPase-deficient Rab27A(Q78L) mutant inhibits melanosome transport in melanocytes through trapping of Rab27A effector protein Slac2-a/melanophilin in their cytosol: development of a novel melanosome-targetinG tag. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2014;289:11059–11067. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.552281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jiao H, Jiang D, Hu X, Du W, Ji L, Yang Y, Li X, Sho T, Wang X, Li Y, Wu Y-T, Wei Y-H, Hu X, Yu L. Mitocytosis, a migrasome-mediated mitochondrial quality-control process. Cell. 2021;184:2896–2910. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kevin Blighe SR. EnhancedVolcano: publication-ready volcano plots with enhanced colouring and labeling. ab0428eGithub. 2021 https://github.com/kevinblighe/EnhancedVolcano
  18. Key J, Mueller AK, Gispert S, Matschke L, Wittig I, Corti O, Münch C, Decher N, Auburger G. Ubiquitylome profiling of Parkin-null brain reveals dysregulation of calcium homeostasis factors ATP1A2, Hippocalcin and GNA11, reflected by altered firing of noradrenergic neurons. Neurobiology of Disease. 2019;127:114–130. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2019.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kuroda TS, Fukuda M, Ariga H, Mikoshiba K. Synaptotagmin-like protein 5: a novel Rab27A effector with C-terminal tandem C2 domains. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2002a;293:899–906. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)00320-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kuroda TS, Fukuda M, Ariga H, Mikoshiba K. The Slp homology domain of synaptotagmin-like proteins 1-4 and Slac2 functions as a novel Rab27A binding domain. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2002b;277:9212–9218. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112414200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lazarou M, Sliter DA, Kane LA, Sarraf SA, Wang C, Burman JL, Sideris DP, Fogel AI, Youle RJ. The ubiquitin kinase PINK1 recruits autophagy receptors to induce mitophagy. Nature. 2015;524:309–314. doi: 10.1038/nature14893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Le Guerroué F, Eck F, Jung J, Starzetz T, Mittelbronn M, Kaulich M, Behrends C. Autophagosomal content profiling reveals an LC3C-dependent piecemeal mitophagy pathway. Molecular Cell. 2017;68:786–796. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Liberti MV, Locasale JW. The Warburg effect: How does it benefit cancer cells? Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 2016;41:211–218. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lin CW, Chang YH, Pu HF. Mitotane exhibits dual effects on steroidogenic enzymes gene transcription under basal and cAMP-stimulating microenvironments in NCI-H295 cells. Toxicology. 2012;298:14–23. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2012.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Maglich JM, Kuhn M, Chapin RE, Pletcher MT. More than just hormones: H295R cells as predictors of reproductive toxicity. Reproductive Toxicology. 2014;45:77–86. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2013.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Martínez-Reyes I, Chandel NS. Mitochondrial TCA cycle metabolites control physiology and disease. Nature Communications. 2020;11:102. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13668-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Miller WL. Steroid hormone synthesis in mitochondria. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 2013;379:62–73. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2013.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Montava-Garriga L, Ganley IG. Outstanding questions in mitophagy: What we do and do not know. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2020;432:206–230. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.06.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Munson MJ, Mathai BJ, Ng MYW, Trachsel-Moncho L, de la Ballina LR, Schultz SW, Aman Y, Lystad AH, Singh S, Singh S, Wesche J, Fang EF, Simonsen A. GAK and PRKCD are positive regulators of PRKN-independent mitophagy. Nature Communications. 2021;12:6101. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26331-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nalefski EA, Falke JJ. The C2 domain calcium-binding motif: structural and functional diversity. Protein Science. 1996;5:2375–2390. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560051201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Neuspiel M, Schauss AC, Braschi E, Zunino R, Rippstein P, Rachubinski RA, Andrade-Navarro MA, McBride HM. Cargo-selected transport from the mitochondria to peroxisomes is mediated by vesicular carriers. Current Biology. 2008;18:102–108. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.12.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Perez-Riverol Y, Bandla C, Kundu DJ, Kamatchinathan S, Bai J, Hewapathirana S, John NS, Prakash A, Walzer M, Wang S, Vizcaíno JA. The PRIDE database at 20 years: 2025 update. Nucleic Acids Research. 2025;53:D543–D553. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Phinney DG, Di Giuseppe M, Njah J, Sala E, Shiva S, St Croix CM, Stolz DB, Watkins SC, Di YP, Leikauf GD, Kolls J, Riches DWH, Deiuliis G, Kaminski N, Boregowda SV, McKenna DH, Ortiz LA. Mesenchymal stem cells use extracellular vesicles to outsource mitophagy and shuttle microRNAs. Nature Communications. 2015;6:8472. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Prashar A, Bussi C, Fearns A, Capurro MI, Gao X, Sesaki H, Gutierrez MG, Jones NL. Lysosomes drive the piecemeal removal of mitochondrial inner membrane. Nature. 2024;632:1110–1117. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07835-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Princely Abudu Y, Pankiv S, Mathai BJ, Håkon Lystad A, Bindesbøll C, Brenne HB, Yoke Wui Ng M, Thiede B, Yamamoto A, Mutugi Nthiga T, Lamark T, Esguerra CV, Johansen T, Simonsen A. NIPSNAP1 and NIPSNAP2 act as “eat me” signals for mitophagy. Developmental Cell. 2019;49:509–525. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ran FA, Hsu PD, Wright J, Agarwala V, Scott DA, Zhang F. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nature Protocols. 2013;8:2281–2308. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W, Smyth GK. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Research. 2015;43:e47. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Soubannier V, McLelland G-L, Zunino R, Braschi E, Rippstein P, Fon EA, McBride HM. A vesicular transport pathway shuttles cargo from mitochondria to lysosomes. Current Biology. 2012;22:135–141. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.11.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Tang Z, Li C, Kang B, Gao G, Li C, Zhang Z. GEPIA: a web server for cancer and normal gene expression profiling and interactive analyses. Nucleic Acids Research. 2017;45:W98–W102. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. TeSlaa T, Teitell MA. Techniques to monitor glycolysis. Methods in Enzymology. 2014;542:91–114. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-416618-9.00005-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Tyanova S, Temu T, Sinitcyn P, Carlson A, Hein MY, Geiger T, Mann M, Cox J. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nature Methods. 2016;13:731–740. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wandinger-Ness A, Zerial M. Rab proteins and the compartmentalization of the endosomal system. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2014;6:a022616. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a022616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang T, Rainey WE. Human adrenocortical carcinoma cell lines. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 2012;351:58–65. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.08.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yamano K, Wang C, Sarraf SA, Münch C, Kikuchi R, Noda NN, Hizukuri Y, Kanemaki MT, Harper W, Tanaka K, Matsuda N, Youle RJ. Endosomal Rab cycles regulate Parkin-mediated mitophagy. eLife. 2018;7:e31326. doi: 10.7554/eLife.31326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yim WW-Y, Yamamoto H, Mizushima N. A pulse-chasable reporter processing assay for mammalian autophagic flux with HaloTag. eLife. 2022;11:e78923. doi: 10.7554/eLife.78923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Youle RJ, Narendra DP. Mechanisms of mitophagy. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 2011;12:9–14. doi: 10.1038/nrm3028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Yu M, Kasai K, Nagashima K, Torii S, Yokota-Hashimoto H, Okamoto K, Takeuchi T, Gomi H, Izumi T. Exophilin4/Slp2-a targets glucagon granules to the plasma membrane through unique Ca2+-inhibitory phospholipid-binding activity of the C2A domain. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 2007;18:688–696. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e06-10-0914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

eLife Assessment

Li Yu 1

This study by Lapao et al. uncovers a novel role for the Rab27A effector SYTL5 in regulating mitochondrial function and mitophagy under hypoxic conditions. Using a range of imaging and functional assays, the authors demonstrate that SYTL5 localizes to mitochondria in a Rab27A-dependent manner and impacts mitochondrial respiration and metabolic reprogramming. While the findings are solid and valuable in the area of cancer biology, further mechanistic clarity and improved imaging would strengthen the conclusions.

Reviewer #1 (Public review):

Anonymous

Summary:

In this study, Ana Lapao et al. investigated the roles of Rab27 effector SYTL5 in cellular membrane trafficking pathways. The authors found that SYTL5 localizes to mitochondria in a Rab27A-dependent manner. They demonstrated that SYTL5-Rab27A positive vesicles containing mitochondrial material are formed under hypoxic conditions, thus they speculate that SYTL5 and Rab27A play roles in mitophagy. They also found that both SYTL5 and Rab27A are important for normal mitochondrial respiration. Cells lacking SYTL5 undergo a shift from mitochondrial oxygen consumption to glycolysis which is a common process known as the Warburg effect in cancer cells. Based on cancer patient database, the author noticed that low SYTL5 expression is related to reduced survival for adrenocortical carcinoma patients, indicating SYTL5 could be a negative regulator of the Warburg effect and potentially tumorigenesis.

Strengths:

The authors take advantages of multiple techniques and novel methods to perform the experiments.

(1) Live-cell imaging revealed that stably inducible expression of SYTL5 co-localized with filamentous structures positive for mitochondria. This result was further confirmed by using correlative light and EM (CLEM) analysis and western blotting from purified mitochondrial fraction.

(2) In order to investigate whether SYTL5 and RAB27A are required for mitophagy in hypoxic conditions, two established mitophagy reporter U2OS cell lines were used to analyze the autophagic flux.

Weaknesses:

This study revealed a potential function of SYTL5 in mitophagy and mitochondrial metabolism. However, the mechanistic evidence that establishes the relationship between SYTL5/Rab27A and mitophagy is insufficient. The involvement of SYTL5 in ACC needs more investigation. Furthermore, images and results supporting the major conclusions need to be improved.

Comments on revisions: The authors did not revise the paper as suggested.

Reviewer #2 (Public review):

Anonymous

Summary:

The authors provide convincing evidence that Rab27 and STYL5 work together to regulate mitochondrial activity and homeostasis.

Strengths:

The development of models which allow the function to be dissected, and the rigous approach and testing of mitochondrial activity.

This work is carefully done, and supports the importance of the roles of Rab27A and STYL5.

Reviewer #3 (Public review):

Anonymous

In the manuscript by Lapao et al., the authors uncover a role for the RAB27A effector protein SYTL5 in regulating mitochondrial function and apparent selective turnover of mitochondrial components. The authors find that SYTL5 localizes to mitochondria in a RAB27A dependent way and that loss of SYTL5 (or RAB27A) impairs lysosomal turnover of MTCO1 (but not a matrix-based reporter/other mitochondrial proteins). The authors go on to show that loss of SYTL5 impacts mitochondrial respiration and ECAR and as such may influence the Warburg effect and tumorigenesis. Of relevance here, the authors go on to show that SYTL5 expression is reduced in adrenocortical carcinomas and this correlates with reduced survival rates.

As previously reviewed, this is a very intriguing body of work and reveals a new role for SYTL5/RAB27A at the mitochondria. Unfortunately, it appears that SYTL5 is challenging protein to detect endogenously and the authors' cell lines "comprise a heterogenous pool with high variability", which means that a lot of my original concerns remain. It is still also not clear if the conventional autophagy machinery is required for this pathway, especially if SYTL5/RAB27A mitochondrial recruitment is upstream of this. Hopefully, in future work, the authors (and/or others) will be able to address this and build on the mechanisms of this interesting and potentially important pathway.

eLife. 2025 Nov 26;14:RP105541. doi: 10.7554/eLife.105541.3.sa4

Author response

Ana Lapão 1, Lauren Sophie Johnson 2, Laura Trachsel-Moncho 3, Samuel J Rodgers 4, Sakshi Singh 5, Matthew YW Ng 6, Sigve Nakken 7, Eeva-Liisa Eskelinen 8, Anne Simonsen 9

The following is the authors’ response to the original reviews.

Reviewer #1 (Public review):

Summary:

In this study, Ana Lapao et al. investigated the roles of Rab27 effector SYTL5 in cellular membrane trafficking pathways. The authors found that SYTL5 localizes to mitochondria in a Rab27A-dependent manner. They demonstrated that SYTL5-Rab27A positive vesicles containing mitochondrial material are formed under hypoxic conditions, thus they speculate that SYTL5 and Rab27A play roles in mitophagy. They also found that both SYTL5 and Rab27A are important for normal mitochondrial respiration. Cells lacking SYTL5 undergo a shift from mitochondrial oxygen consumption to glycolysis which is a common process known as the Warburg effect in cancer cells. Based on the cancer patient database, the author noticed that low SYTL5 expression is related to reduced survival for adrenocortical carcinoma patients, indicating SYTL5 could be a negative regulator of the Warburg effect and potentially tumorigenesis.

Strengths:

The authors take advantage of multiple techniques and novel methods to perform the experiments.

(1) Live-cell imaging revealed that stably inducible expression of SYTL5 co-localized with filamentous structures positive for mitochondria. This result was further confirmed by using correlative light and EM (CLEM) analysis and western blotting from purified mitochondrial fraction.

(2) In order to investigate whether SYTL5 and Rab27A are required for mitophagy in hypoxic conditions, two established mitophagy reporter U2OS cell lines were used to analyze the autophagic flux.

Weaknesses:

This study revealed a potential function of SYTL5 in mitophagy and mitochondrial metabolism. However, the mechanistic evidence that establishes the relationship between SYTL5/Rab27A and mitophagy is insufficient. The involvement of SYTL5 in ACC needs more investigation. Furthermore, images and results supporting the major conclusions need to be improved.

We thank the reviewer for their constructive comments. We agree that a complete understanding of the mechanism by which SYTL5 and Rab27A are recruited to the mitochondria and subsequently involved in mitophagy requires further investigation. Here, we have shown that SYTL5 recruitment to the mitochondria requires both its lipid-binding C2 domains and the Rab27A-binding SHD domain (Figure 1G-H). This implies a coincidence detection mechanism for mitochondrial localisation of SYTL5. Additionally, we find that mitochondrial recruitment of SYTL5 is dependent on the GTPase activity and mitochondrial localisation of Rab27A (Figure 2D-E). We also identified proteins linked to the cellular response to oxidative stress, reactive oxygen species metabolic process, regulation of mitochondrion organisation and protein insertion into mitochondrial membrane to be enriched in the SYTL5 interactome (Figure 3A and C).

However, less details regarding the mitochondrial localisation of Rab27A are understood. To investigate this, we have now performed a mass spectrometry analysis to identify the interactome of Rab27A (see Author response table 1 below,). U2OS cells with stable expression of mScarlet-Rab27A or mScarlet only, were subjected to immunoprecipitation, followed by MS analysis. Of the 32 significant Rab27A-interacting hits (compared to control), two of the hits are located in the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM); ATP synthase F(1) complex subunit alpha (P25705), and mitochondrial very long-chain specific acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (VLCAD)(P49748). However, as these IMM proteins are not likely involved in mitochondrial recruitment of Rab27A, observed under basal conditions, we choose not to include these data in the manuscript.

It is known that other RAB proteins are recruited to the mitochondria. During parkin-mediated mitophagy, RABGEF1 (a guanine nucleotide exchange factor) is recruited through its ubiquitin-binding domain and directs mitochondrial localisation of RAB5, which subsequently leads to recruitment of RAB7 by the MON1/CCZ1 complex[1]. As already mentioned in the discussion (p. 12), ubiquitination of the Rab27A GTPase activating protein alpha (TBC1D10A) is reduced in the brain of Parkin KO mouse compared to controls[35], suggesting a possible connection of Rab27A with regulatory mechanisms that are linked with mitochondrial damage and dysfunction. While this an interesting avenue to explore, in this paper we will not follow up further on the mechanism of mitochondrial recruitment of Rab27A.

Author response table 1. Rab27A interactome.

Proteins co-immunoprecipitated with mScarlet-Rab27A vs mScarlet expressing control. The data show average of three replicates.

Gene ID log FC PValue Protein ID
SYTL1 6.51279398 2.58011E-07 Q8IYJ3
SYTL4 9.462240971 5.37442E-07 Q96C24
RAB27A 9.964034476 0.000225708 P51159
PHKA1 1.901649808 0.00024689 P46020
SYTL5 3.382670586 0.00028503 Q8TDW5
RPN1 1.842817754 0.000618174 P04843
SYTL2 2.787103426 0.000976248 Q9HCH5
SYTL3 1.763916791 0.001231698 Q4VX76
YWHAB 1.324625725 0.001792747 P31946
KPNA4 -2.119041679 0.001819937 000629
KPNA2 -1.316606494 0.002674273 P52292
XPO7 1.881758901 0.00434815 Q9UIA9
H3F3C -1.014289683 0.005676851 Q6NXT2
FTSJ3 -1.536695759 0.013027871 Q8IY81
HSPA5 -0.696530058 0.013830063 P11021
GCN1L1 1.282942068 0.014007173 Q92616
SEC23A -1.154781691 0.014551903 Q15436
YWHAE 1.051069572 0.014721005 P62258
CSE1L 1.573274711 0.015215159 P55060
PRKDC 1.203932332 0.015522477 P78527
HSD17B4 0.622782422 0.018684219 P51659
TUBA1C 0.757418802 0.021056742 Q9BQE3
ATP5A1 1.652450437 0.021124762 P25705
ACADVL 1.487591887 0.023527244 P49748
SYNE1 1.484495661 0.023619887 Q8NF91
TUBA1B 0.869686638 0.026093033 P68363
KHNYN 0.530428593 0.032980211 015037
STIP1 -1.003028534 0.037684326 P31948
RNF213 2.063787445 0.041437396 Q63HN8
MACF1 -0.558906019 0.041690413 Q9UPN3
BANF1 -2.961226325 0.047019044 075531
AGL -1.021197131 0.047045989 P35573

To investigate the role of SYTL5 in the context of ACC, we acquired the NCI-H295R cell line isolated from the adrenal gland of an adrenal cancer patient. The cells were cultured as recommended from ATCC using DMEM/F-12 supplemented with NuSerum and ITS +premix. It is important to note that the H295R cells were adapted to grow as an adherent monolayer from the H295 cell line which grows in suspension. However, there can still be many viable H295R cells in the media.

We attempted to conduct OCR and ECAR measurements using the Seahorse XF upon knockdown of SYTL5 and/or Rab27A in H295R cells. For these assays, it is essential that the cells be seeded in a monolayer at 70-90% confluency with no cell clusters[4]. Poor adhesion of the cells can cause inaccurate measurements by the analyser. Unfortunately, the results between the five replicates we carried out were highly inconsistent, the same knockdown produced trends in opposite directions in different replicates. This is likely due to problems with seeding the cells. Despite our best efforts to optimise seeding number, and pre-coating the plate with poly-D-lysine[5] we observed poor attachment of cells and inability to form a monolayer.

To study the localisation of SYTL5 and Rab27A in an ACC model, we transduced the H295R cells with lentiviral particles to overexpress pLVX-SV40-mScarlet-I-Rab27A and pLVX-CMV-SYTL5-EGFP-3xFLAG. Again, this proved unsuccessful after numerous attempts at optimising transduction.

These issues limited our investigation into the role of SYTL5 in ACC to the cortisol assay (Supplementary Figure 6). For this the H295R cells were an appropriate model as they are able to produce an array of adrenal cortex steroids[6] including cortisol[7]. In this assay, measurements are taken from cell culture supernatants, so the confluency of the cells does not prevent consistent results as the cortisol concentration was normalised to total protein per sample. With this assay we were able to rule out a role for SYTL5 and Rab27A in the secretion of cortisol.

Another consideration when investigating the involvement of SYTL5 in ACC, is that in general ACC cells should have a low expression of SYTL5 as is seen from the patient expression data (Figure 6B).

The reviewer also writes “Furthermore, images and results supporting the major conclusions need to be improved.”. We have tried several times, without success, to generate U2OS cells with CRISPR/Cas9-mediated C-terminal tagging of endogenous SYTL5 with mNeonGreen, using an approach that has been successfully implemented in the lab for other genes. This is likely due to a lack of suitable sgRNAs targeting the C-terminal region of SYTL5, which have a low predicted efficiency score and a large number of predicted off-target sites in the human genome including several other gene exons and introns (see Author response image 2).

We have also included new data (Supplementary Figure 4B) showing that some of the hypoxia-induced SYTL5-Rab27A-positive vesicles stain positive for the autophagy markers p62 and LC3B when inhibiting lysosomal degradation, further strengthening our data that SYTL5 and Rab27A function as positive regulators of mitophagy.

Reviewer #2 (Public review):

Summary:

The authors provide convincing evidence that Rab27 and STYL5 work together to regulate mitochondrial activity and homeostasis.

Strengths:

The development of models that allow the function to be dissected, and the rigorous approach and testing of mitochondrial activity.

Weaknesses:

There may be unknown redundancies in both pathways in which Rab27 and SYTL5 are working which could confound the interpretation of the results.

Suggestions for revision:

Given that Rab27A and SYTL5 are members of protein families it would be important to exclude any possible functional redundancies coming from Rab27B expression or one of the other SYTL family members. For Rab27 this would be straightforward to test in the assays shown in Figure 4 and Supplementary Figure 5. For SYTL5 it might be sufficient to include some discussion about this possibility.

We thank the reviewer for pointing out the potential redundancy issue for Rab27A and SYTL5. There are multiple studies demonstrating the redundancy between Rab27A and Rab27B. For example, in a study of the disease Griscelli syndrome, caused by Rab27A loss of function, expression of either Rab27A or Rab27B rescues the healthy phenotype indicating redundancy[8]. This redundancy however applies to certain function and cell types. In fact, in a study regarding hair growth, knockdown of Rab27B had the opposite effect to knockdown of Rab27A[9].

In this paper, we conducted all assays in U2OS cells, in which the expression of Rab27B is very low. Human Protein Atlas reports expression of 0.5nTPM for Rab27B, compared to 18.4nTPM for Rab27A. We also observed this low level of expression of Rab27B compared to Rab27A by qPCR in U2OS cells. Therefore, there would be very little endogenous Rab27B expression in cells depleted of Rab27A (with siRNA or KO). In line with this, Rab27B peptides were not detected in our SYTL5 interactome MS data (Table 1 in paper). Moreover, as Rab27A depletion inhibits mitochondrial recruitment of SYTL5 and mitophagy, it is not likely that Rab27B provides a functional redundancy. It is possible that Rab27B overexpression could rescue mitochondrial localisation of SYTL5 in Rab27A KO cells, but this was not tested as we do not have any evidence for a role of Rab27B in these cells. Taken together, we believe our data imply that Rab27B is very unlikely to provide any functional redundancy to Rab27A in our experiments.

For the SYTL family, all five members are Rab27 effectors, binding to Rab27 through their SHD domain. Together with Rab27, all SYTL’s have been implicated in exocytosis in different cell types. For example, SYTL1 in exocytosis of azurophilic granules from neutrophils[10], SYTL2 in secretion of glucagon granules from pancreatic α cells[11], SYTL3 in secretion of lytic granules from cytotoxic T lymphocytes[12], SYTL4 in exocytosis of dense hormone containing granules from endocrine cells[13] and SYTL5 in secretion of the RANKL cytokine from osteoblasts[14]. This indicates a potential for redundancy through their binding to Rab27 and function in vesicle secretion/trafficking. However, one study found that different Rab27 effectors have distinct functions at different stages of exocytosis[15].

Very little known about redundancy or hierarchy between these proteins. Differences in function may be due to the variation in gene expression profile across tissues for the different SYTL’s (see Author response image 1 below). SYTL5 is enriched in the brain unlike the others, suggesting possible tissue specific functions. There are also differences in the binding affinities and calcium sensitivities of the C2iA and C2B domains between the SYTL proteins[16].

Author response image 1. GTEx Multi Gene Query for SYTL1-5.

Author response image 1.

All five SYTL’s are expressed in the U2OS cell line with nTPMs according to Human Protein Atlas of SYTL1: 7.5, SYTL2: 13.4, SYTL3:14.2, SYTL4: 8.7, SYTL5: 4.8. In line with this, in the Rab27A interactome, when comparing cells overexpressing mScarlet-Rab27A with control cells, we detected all five SYTL’s as specific Rab27A-interacting proteins (see Author response table 1 above). Whereas, in the SYTL5 interactome we did not detect any other SYTL protein (table 1 in paper), confirming that they do not form a complex with SYTL5.

We have included the following text in the discussion (p. 12): “SYTL5 and Rab27A are both members of protein families, suggesting possible functional redundancies from Rab27B or one of the other SYTL isoforms. While Rab27B has a very low expression in U2OS cells, all five SYTL’s are expressed. However, when knocking out or knocking down SYTL5 and Rab27A we observe significant effects that we presume would be negated if their isoforms were providing functional redundancies. Moreover, we did not detect any other SYTL protein or Rab27B in the SYTL5 interactome, confirming that they do not form a complex with SYTL5.”

Suggestions for Discussion:

Both Rab27A and STYL5 localize to other membranes, including the endolysosomal compartments. How do the authors envisage the mechanism or cellular modifications that allow these proteins, either individually or in complex to function also to regulate mitochondrial funcYon? It would be interesYng to have some views.

We agree that it would be interesting to better understand the mechanism involved in modulation of the localisation and function of SYTL5 and Rab27A at different cellular compartments, including the mitochondria. Here, we have shown that SYTL5 recruitment to the mitochondria involves coincidence detection, as both its lipid-binding C2 domains and the Rab27A-binding SHD domain are required (Figure 1G-H). Both these domains also seem required for localisation of SYTL5 to vesicles, and we can only speculate that binding to different lipids (Figure 1F) may regulate SYTL5 localisation. Additionally, we find that mitochondrial recruitment of SYTL5 is dependent on the GTPase activity and mitochondrial localisation of Rab27A (Figure 2D-E). However, this seems also the case for vesicular recruitment of SYTL5, although a few SYTL5-Rab27A (T23N) positive vesicles were seen (Figure 2E).

To characterise the mechanisms involved in mitochondrial localisation of Rab27A, we have performed mass spectrometry analysis to identify the interactome of Rab27A (see Author response table 1 above). U2OS cells with stable expression of mScarlet-Rab27A or mScarlet only were subjected to immunoprecipitation, followed by MS analysis. Of the 32 significant Rab27A-interacting hits (compared to control), two of the hits localise in the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM); ATP synthase F(1) complex subunit alpha (P25705), and mitochondrial very long-chain specific acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (VLCAD)(P49748). However, as these IMM proteins are not likely involved in mitochondrial recruitment of Rab27A, observed under basal conditions, we chose not to include these data in the manuscript.

It is known that other RAB proteins are recruited to the mitochondria by regulation of their GTPase activity. During parkin-mediated mitophagy, RABGEF1 (a guanine nucleotide exchange factor) is recruited through its ubiquitin-binding domain and directs mitochondrial localisation of RAB5, which subsequently leads to recruitment of RAB7 by the MON1/CCZ1 GEF complex[1]. As already mentioned in the discussion (p.12), ubiquitination of the Rab27A GTPase activating protein alpha (TBC1D10A) is reduced in the brain of Parkin KO mouse compared to controls[35], suggesting a possible connection of Rab27A with regulatory mechanisms that are linked with mitochondrial damage and dysfunction. While this an interesting avenue to explore, it is beyond the scope of this paper.

Our data suggest that SYTL5 functions as a negative regulator of the Warburg effect, the switch from OXPHOS to glycolysis. While both SYTL5 and Rab27A seem required for mitophagy of selective mitochondrial components, and their depletion leading to reduced mitochondrial respiration and ATP production, only depletion of SYTL5 caused a switch to glycolysis. The mechanisms involved are unclear, but we found several proteins linked to the cellular response to oxidative stress, reactive oxygen species metabolic process, regulation of mitochondrion organisation and protein insertion into mitochondrial membrane to be enriched in the SYTL5 interactome (Figure 3A and C).

We have addressed this comment in the discussion on p.12

Reviewer #3 (Public review):

Summary:

In the manuscript by Lapao et al., the authors uncover a role for the Rab27A effector protein SYTL5 in regulating mitochondrial function and turnover. The authors find that SYTL5 localizes to mitochondria in a Rab27A-dependent way and that loss of SYTL5 (or Rab27A) impairs lysosomal turnover of an inner mitochondrial membrane mitophagy reporter but not a matrix-based one. As the authors see no co-localization of GFP/mScarlet tagged versions of SYTL5 or Rab27A with LC3 or p62, they propose that lysosomal turnover is independent of the conventional autophagy machinery. Finally, the authors go on to show that loss of SYTL5 impacts mitochondrial respiration and ECAR and as such may influence the Warburg effect and tumorigenesis. Of relevance here, the authors go on to show that SYTL5 expression is reduced in adrenocortical carcinomas and this correlates with reduced survival rates.

Strengths:

There are clearly interesting and new findings here that will be relevant to those following mitochondrial function, the endocytic pathway, and cancer metabolism.

Weaknesses:

The data feel somewhat preliminary in that the conclusions rely on exogenously expressed proteins and reporters, which do not always align.

As the authors note there are no commercially available antibodies that recognize endogenous SYTL5, hence they have had to stably express GFP-tagged versions. However, it appears that the level of expression dictates co-localization from the examples the authors give (though it is hard to tell as there is a lack of any kind of quantitation for all the fluorescent figures). Therefore, the authors may wish to generate an antibody themselves or tag the endogenous protein using CRISPR.

We agree that the level of SYTL5 expression is likely to affect its localisation. As suggested by the reviewer, we have tried hard, without success, to generated U2OS cells with CRISPR knock-in of a mNeonGreen tag at the C-terminus of endogenous SYTL5, using an approach that has been successfully implemented in the lab for other genes. This is likely due to a lack of suitable sgRNAs targeting the C-terminal region of SYTL5, which have a low predicted efficiency score and a large number of predicted off-target sites in the human genome including several other gene exons and introns (see Author response image 2).

Author response image 2. Overview of sgRNAs targeting the C-terminal region of SYTL5.

Author response image 2.

Although the SYTL5 expression level might affect its cellular localization, we also found the mitochondrial localisation of SYTL5-EGFP to be strongly increased in cells co-expressing mScarletRab27A, supporting our findings of Rab27A-mediated mitochondrial recruitment of SYTL5. We have also included new data (Supplementary Figure 4B) showing that some of the hypoxia-induced SYTL5Rab27A-positive vesicles stain positive for the autophagy markers p62 and LC3B when inhibiting lysosomal degradation, further strengthening our data that SYTL5 and Rab27A function as positive regulators of mitophagy.

In relation to quantitation, the authors found that SYTL5 localizes to multiple compartments or potentially a few compartments that are positive for multiple markers. Some quantitation here would be very useful as it might inform on function.

We find that SYTL5-EGFP localizes to mitochondria, lysosomes and the plasma membrane in U2OS cells with stable expression of SYTL5-EGFP and in SYTL5/Rab27A double knock-out cells rescued with SYTL5EGFP and mScralet-Rab27A. We also see colocalization of SYTL5-EGFP with endogenous p62, LC3 and LAMP1 upon induction of mitophagy. However, as these cell lines comprise a heterogenous pool with high variability we do not believe that quantification of the overexpressing cell lines would provide beneficial information in this scenario. As described above, we have tried several times to generate SYTL5 knock-in cells without success.

The authors find that upon hypoxia/hypoxia-like conditions that punctate structures of SYTL5 and Rab27A form that are positive for Mitotracker, and that a very specific mitophagy assay based on pSu9-Halo system is impaired by siRNA of SYTL5/Rab27A, but another, distinct mitophagy assay (Matrix EGFP-mCherry) shows no change. I think this work would strongly benefit from some measurements with endogenous mitochondrial proteins, both via immunofluorescence and western blot-based flux assays.

In addition to the western blotting for different endogenous ETC proteins showing significantly increased levels of MTCO1 in cells depleted of SYTL5 and/or Rab27A (Figure 5E-F), we have now blotted for the endogenous mitochondrial proteins, COXIV and BNIP3L, in DFP and DMOG conditions upon knockdown of SYTL5 and/or Rab27A (Figure 5G and Supplementary Figure 5A). Although there was a trend towards increased levels, we did not see any significant changes in total COXIV or BNIP3L levels when SYTL5, Rab27A or both are knocked down compared to siControl. Blotting for endogenous mitochondrial proteins is however not the optimum readout for mitophagy. A change in mitochondrial protein level does not necessarily result from mitophagy, as other factors such as mitochondrial biogenesis and changes in translation can also have an effect. Mitophagy is a dynamic process, which is why we utilise assays such as the HaloTag and mCherry-EGFP double tag as these indicate flux in the pathway. Additionally, as mitochondrial proteins have different half-lives, with many long-lived mitochondrial proteins[17], differences in turnover rates of endogenous proteins make the results more difficult to interpret.

A really interesting aspect is the apparent independence of this mitophagy pathway on the conventional autophagy machinery. However, this is only based on a lack of co-localization between p62or LC3 with LAMP1 and GFP/mScarlet tagged SYTL5/Rab27A. However, I would not expect them to greatly colocalize in lysosomes as both the p62 and LC3 will become rapidly degraded, while the eGFP and mScarlet tags are relatively resistant to lysosomal hydrolysis. -/+ a lysosome inhibitor might help here and ideally, the functional mitophagy assays should be repeated in autophagy KOs.

We thank the reviewer for this suggestion. We have now repeated the colocalisation studies in cells treated with DFP with the addition of bafilomycin A1 (BafA1) to inhibit the lysosomal V-ATPase. Indeed, we find that a few of the SYTL5/Rab27A/MitoTracker positive structures also stain positive for p62 and LC3 (Supplementary Figure 4B). As expected, the occurrence of these structures was rare, as BafA1 was only added for the last 4 hrs of the 24 hr DFP treatment. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that there are two different populations of these vesicles.

The link to tumorigenesis and cancer survival is very interesYng but it is not clear if this is due to the mitochondrially-related aspects of SYTL5 and Rab27A. For example, increased ECAR is seen in the SYTL5 KO cells but not in the Rab27A KO cells (Fig.5D), implying that mitochondrial localization of SYTL5 is not required for the ECAR effect. More work to strengthen the link between the two sections in the paper would help with future direcYons and impact with respect to future cancer treatment avenues to explore.

We agree that the role of SYTL5 in ACC requires future investigation. While we observe reduced OXPHOS levels in both SYTL5 and Rab27A KO cells (Figure 5B), glycolysis was only increased in SYTL5 KO cells (Figure 5D). We believe this indicates that Rab27A is being negatively regulated by SYTL5, as ECAR was unchanged in both the Rab27A KO and Rab27A/SYTL5 dKO cells. This suggests that Rab27A is required for the increase in ECAR when SYTL5 is depleted, therefore SYTL5 negatively regulates Rab27A. The mechanism involved is unclear, but we found several proteins linked to the cellular response to oxidative stress, reactive oxygen species metabolic process, regulation of mitochondrion organisation and protein insertion into mitochondrial membrane to be enriched in the SYTL5 interactome (Figure 3A and C).

To investigate the link to cancer further, we tested the effect of knockdown of SYTL5 and/or Rab27A on the levels of mitochondrial ROS. ROS levels were measured by flow cytometry using the MitoSOX Red dye, together with the MitoTracker Green dye to normalise ROS levels to the total mitochondria. Cells were treated with the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC)[18] as a negative control and menadione as a positive control, as menadione induces ROS production via redox cycling[19]. We must consider that there is also a lot of autofluorescence from cells that makes it impossible to get a level of ‘zero ROS’ in this experiment. We did not see a change in ROS with knockdown of SYTL5 and/or Rab27A compared to the NAC treated or siControl samples (see Author response image 3 below). The menadione samples confirm the success of the experiment as ROS accumulated in these cells. Thus, based on this, we do not believe that low SYTL5 expression would affect ROS levels in ACC tumours.

Author response image 3. Mitochondrial ROS production normalised to total mitochondria.

Author response image 3.

As discussed in our response to Reviewer #1, we tried hard to characterise the role of SYTL5 in the context of ACC using the NCI-H295R cell line isolated from the adrenal gland of an adrenal cancer patient. We attempted to conduct OCR and ECAR measurements using the Seahorse XF upon knockdown of SYTL5 and/or Rab27A in H295R cells without success, due to poor attachment of the cells and inability to form a monolayer. We also transduced the H295R cells with lentiviral particles to overexpress pLVX-SV40-mScarlet-I-Rab27A and pLVX-CMV-SYTL5-EGFP-3xFLAG to study the localisation of SYTL5 and Rab27A in an ACC model. Again, this proved unsuccessful after numerous attempts at optimising the transduction. These issues limited our investigation into the role of SYTL5 in ACC to the cortisol assay (Supplementary Figure 6). For this the H295R cells were an appropriate model as they are able to produce an array of adrenal cortex steroids[6] including cortisol[7] In this assay, measurements are taken from cell culture supernatants, so the confluency of the cells does not prevent consistent results as the cortisol concentration was normalised to total protein per sample. With this assay we were able to rule out a role for SYTL5 and Rab27A in the secretion of cortisol.

Another consideration when investigating the involvement of SYTL5 in ACC, is that in general ACC cells should have a low expression of SYTL5 as is seen from the patient expression data (Figure 6B).

Further studies into the link between SYTL5/Rab27A and cancer are beyond the scope of this paper as we are limited to the tools and expertise available in the lab.

References

(1) Yamano, K. et al. Endosomal Rab cycles regulate Parkin-mediated mitophagy. eLife 7 (2018). https://doi.org:10.7554/eLife.31326

(2) Carré, M. et al. Tubulin is an inherent component of mitochondrial membranes that interacts with the voltage-dependent anion channel. The Journal of biological chemistry 277, 33664-33669 (2002). https://doi.org:10.1074/jbc.M203834200

(3) Hoogerheide, D. P. et al. Structural features and lipid binding domain of tubulin on biomimetic mitochondrial membranes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, E3622-E3631 (2017). https://doi.org:10.1073/pnas.1619806114

(4) Plitzko, B. & Loesgen, S. Measurement of Oxygen Consumption Rate (OCR) and Extracellular Acidification Rate (ECAR) in Culture Cells for Assessment of the Energy Metabolism. Bio Protoc 8, e2850 (2018). https://doi.org:10.21769/BioProtoc2850

(5) Yavin, E. & Yavin, Z. Attachment and culture of dissociated cells from rat embryo cerebral hemispheres on polylysine-coated surface. The Journal of cell biology 62, 540-546 (1974). https://doi.org:10.1083/jcb.62.2.540

(6) Wang, T. & Rainey, W. E. Human adrenocortical carcinoma cell lines. Mol Cell Endocrinol 351, 5865 (2012). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.mce.2011.08.041

(7) Rainey, W. E. et al. Regulation of human adrenal carcinoma cell (NCI-H295) production of C19 steroids. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77, 731-737 (1993). https://doi.org:10.1210/jcem.77.3.8396576

(8) Barral, D. C. et al. Functional redundancy of Rab27 proteins and the pathogenesis of Griscelli syndrome. J. Clin. Invest. 110, 247-257 (2002). https://doi.org:10.1172/jci15058

(9) Ku, K. E., Choi, N. & Sung, J. H. Inhibition of Rab27a and Rab27b Has Opposite Effects on the Regulation of Hair Cycle and Hair Growth. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 (2020). https://doi.org:10.3390/ijms21165672

(10) Johnson, J. L., Monfregola, J., Napolitano, G., Kiosses, W. B. & Catz, S. D. Vesicular trafficking through cortical actin during exocytosis is regulated by the Rab27a effector JFC1/Slp1 and the RhoA-GTPase–activating protein Gem-interacting protein. Mol. Biol. Cell 23, 1902-1916 (2012). https://doi.org:10.1091/mbc.e11-12-1001

(11) Yu, M. et al. Exophilin4/Slp2-a targets glucagon granules to the plasma membrane through unique Ca2+-inhibitory phospholipid-binding activity of the C2A domain. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 688696 (2007). https://doi.org:10.1091/mbc.e06-10-0914

(12) Kurowska, M. et al. Terminal transport of lyXc granules to the immune synapse is mediated by the kinesin-1/Slp3/Rab27a complex. Blood 119, 3879-3889 (2012). https://doi.org:10.1182/blood-2011-09-382556

(13) Zhao, S., Torii, S., Yokota-Hashimoto, H., Takeuchi, T. & Izumi, T. Involvement of Rab27b in the regulated secretion of pituitary hormones. Endocrinology 143, 1817-1824 (2002). https://doi.org:10.1210/endo.143.5.8823

(14) Kariya, Y. et al. Rab27a and Rab27b are involved in stimulation-dependent RANKL release from secretory lysosomes in osteoblastic cells. J Bone Miner Res 26, 689-703 (2011). https://doi.org:10.1002/jbmr.268

(15) Zhao, K. et al. Functional hierarchy among different Rab27 effectors involved in secretory granule exocytosis. Elife 12 (2023). https://doi.org:10.7554/eLife.82821

(16) Izumi, T. Physiological roles of Rab27 effectors in regulated exocytosis. Endocr J 54, 649-657 (2007). https://doi.org:10.1507/endocrj.kr-78

(17) Bomba-Warczak, E. & Savas, J. N. Long-lived mitochondrial proteins and why they exist. Trends in cell biology 32, 646-654 (2022). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.tcb.2022.02.001

(18) Curtin, J. F., Donovan, M. & Cotter, T. G. Regulation and measurement of oxidative stress in apoptosis. Journal of Immunological Methods 265, 49-72 (2002). https://doi.org:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1759(02)00070-4

(19) Criddle, D. N. et al. Menadione-induced Reative Oxygen Species Generation via Redox Cycling Promotes Apoptosis of Murine Pancreatic Acinar Cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry 281, 40485-40492 (2006). https://doi.org:https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M607704200

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Singh S. 2025. The RAB27A effector SYTL5 regulates mitophagy and mitochondrial metabolism. PRIDE. PXD069382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 1—source data 1. Original image files for Figure 1A, C, D, G and H.
    Figure 1—source data 2. Original uncropped membranes for Figure 1F.
    Figure 1—source data 3. Uncropped membranes with the relevant spots clearly labelled for Figure 1F.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original image files for Figure 1—figure supplement 1A, B, C, D, E, F.
    Figure 2—source data 1. Original image files for Figure 2A, B, C, D and E.
    Figure 2—source data 2. Original uncropped blots for Figure 2F.
    Figure 2—source data 3. Uncropped blots with the relevant bands clearly labelled for Figure 2F.
    Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original image files for Figure 2—figure supplement 1A, C, D, C, D.
    Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original uncropped blots for Figure 2—figure supplement 1B.
    Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 3. Uncropped blots with the relevant bands clearly labelled for Figure 2—figure supplement 1B.
    Figure 2—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Original uncropped blots and gel for Figure 2—figure supplement 2B, D.
    Figure 2—figure supplement 2—source data 2. Uncropped blots with the relevant bands clearly labelled for Figure 2—figure supplement 2B, D.
    Figure 4—source data 1. Original image files for Figure 4A.
    Figure 4—source data 2. Original image files for Figure 4B.
    Figure 4—source data 3. Original uncropped blots for Figure 2C.
    Figure 4—source data 4. Uncropped blots with the relevant bands clearly labelled for Figure 2C and quantification of blots in 2D.
    Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original image files for Figure 4—figure supplement 1A.
    Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original image files for Figure 4—figure supplement 1B.
    Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 3. Original image files for Figure 4—figure supplement 1B, C.
    Figure 4—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Original uncropped blots for Figure 4—figure supplement 2F.
    Figure 4—figure supplement 2—source data 2. Uncropped blots with the relevant bands clearly labelled for Figure 4—figure supplement 2F.
    Figure 4—figure supplement 2—source data 3. Values plotted in Figure 4—figure supplement 2A, B, C, D, E, F.
    Figure 5—source data 1. Original uncropped blots for Figure 5E.
    Figure 5—source data 2. Uncropped blots with the relevant bands clearly labelled for Figure 5E.
    Figure 5—source data 3. Values plotted in Figure 5B, D, F and G.
    Figure 6—source data 1. Values plotted in Figure 6A, B, C, D and E.
    Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Values plotted in Figure 6—figure supplement 1.
    MDAR checklist
    Supplementary file 1. SYTL5-EGFP interactome.

    Data Availability Statement

    All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files; source data files have been provided for all figures. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD069382.

    The following dataset was generated:

    Singh S. 2025. The RAB27A effector SYTL5 regulates mitophagy and mitochondrial metabolism. PRIDE. PXD069382


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES