Abstract
The long lifespan of humans is often not matched with health span. Thus, there is a need for rejuvenation strategies. Here, we first discuss the evolutionary benefits of the long human lifespan, particularly when coupled with an extended health span. We then highlight the importance of understanding the complexity of aging before interfering with it. This raises the question of the optimal target for rejuvenation. We propose the blood system and hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Their decline is associated with dysfunction and disease in other organs, crystallizing them as a central player in organismal aging. We present rejuvenation strategies targeting the hematopoietic system, especially HSCs, and explore their systemic benefits. Overall, we summarize the potential of the blood system to reverse aging.
Impact statement.
There is a current need to reduce the economic burden caused by aging‐related diseases. In this perspective article, we discuss the evidence that supports that rejuvenating or delaying aging of the blood system has a beneficial and systemic impact on human health.
Keywords: blood system, health span, hematopoietic stem cells, organismal aging, rejuvenation
The aging of HSCs (hematopoietic stem cells) and the blood system leads to the decline of other organs. Rejuvenating aged HSCs improves the function of the blood system, slowing the aging of the heart, kidney, brain, and liver, and the occurrence of age‐related diseases. The blood system is therefore a promising target to improve organismal health during aging.

Abbreviations
aHSC, autologous hematopoietic stem cell
AIDS, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
Aβ, amyloid beta
C. elegans , Caenorhabditis elegans
CAR, chimeric antigen receptor
CNS, central nervous system
CR, calorie restriction
DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid
eccDNA, extrachromosomal circular DNA
HGPS, Hutchinson‐Gilford progeria syndrome
HIV, human immunodeficiency viruses
HP, heterochronic parabiosis
HSC, hematopoietic stem cell
iPSC, induced pluripotent stem cell
MSC, mesenchymal stem cell
mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin
NAD + , nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
NK, natural killer
RBC, red blood cell
ROS, reactive oxygen species
TPE, therapeutic plasma exchange
The quest for longevity is an old tale [1]. Recently, an unmatched interest in anti‐aging and rejuvenation strategies has emerged. From skincare products to anti‐aging food, a flood of new products claims their age‐defying benefits [2]. Longevity and rejuvenation have become a global business market [3], valued at more than $42 billion in 2024 [4]. Current global annual investment in geroscience exceeds $10 billion, combining public, philanthropic, and venture capital sources [5].
Given this interest in rejuvenation, we discuss the importance of understanding aging before reversing it. We then identify the blood system as a key rejuvenation target due to its crucial role in organismal aging.
What is aging?
From the moment we are born, several processes take place over time, including development, adaptation, and functional decline. Aging refers to the latter and is often defined as time‐dependent deterioration of physiological functions [6]. Aging is driven by aging factors or hallmarks, which (i) manifest during aging, (ii) when induced accelerate aging, (iii) and when removed slow down aging [7]. The list included the following: cellular senescence, mitochondrial dysfunction, stem cell exhaustion, telomere attrition, altered intercellular communication, deregulated nutrient sensing, loss of proteostasis, genomic instability, disabled macroautophagy, chronic inflammation, dysbiosis, epigenetic alterations, and other emerging aging factors, such as cellular enlargement [7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. The aging hallmarks provide a starting point to test interventions with rejuvenation potential. However, the aging process remains not fully understood and the number of aging hallmarks is continuously expanding.
Why rejuvenate?
We live longer than ever before [13]. However, health span—the period without chronic diseases and disabilities—does not match the extending lifespan, which increases the incidence of age‐related diseases and the associated socio‐economic burden [14, 15]. Reversing or slowing aging would delay the onset of age‐related diseases like cardiovascular, neurodegenerative, metabolic, and hematological disorders [13, 16, 17, 18, 19]. This approach has been proposed to be economically more beneficial than treating diseases individually [20].
Before reversing aging, it is important to first ask why it exists in humans in the first place. Humans have a comparatively long lifespan of ~80 years with 122 years as the oldest recorded [13, 21]. What are the reasons for this long lifespan? Theodosius Dobzhansky said ‘Nothing makes sense in biology except in the light of evolution’ [22]. Evolutionary aging theories suggest that natural selection acts mostly at younger ages when reproduction is high and mutations are passed onto the next generation. Thus, genes that cause decline at old age are less likely to be eliminated by natural selection [23, 24, 25]. For humans, evolutionary pressure may even continue after the reproductive phase. One observation supporting this is known as the grandmother effect, where the presence of grandmothers is associated with increased survival and reproductive success of their grandchildren [26, 27, 28, 29]. This would provide an explanation of why women live long after their menopause. The grandmother effect is only observed so far in humans, orcas, and elephants [30, 31, 32] and is most likely not the only factor connecting reproductive strategies with lifespan. Interestingly, some gene variant alleles present uniquely in humans have been proposed to protect against cognitive decline at old age. An interpretation is that elderly people carrying these variant alleles maintained their cognitive functions longer, which would similarly allow them to support their reproductive offspring [33]. Thus, improving the health and lifespan of postreproductive individuals in our society is expected to support the fitness of younger ones. Furthermore, in many organisms, the number of cortical neurons correlates with both total lifespan and length of the developmental period [34]. The long lifespan and postnatal development of humans may allow for more developed brains capable of complex social interactions and the creation of advanced tools, which both positively impact lifespan [35]. Together, these observations suggest that the long lifespan of humans evolved to allow complex brain development and the presence of elderly people to ensure the survival of their genes in the younger generations.
Considering the advantages of a long lifespan, why is lifespan limited at all? An interesting discovery was that certain gene manipulations extend lifespan [36, 37], for example the daf‐2 gene in C. elegans [36, 38, 39] and potentially its human homolog [40]. Originally, this raised the question of whether genes exist that limit lifespan, which would imply the existence of selective pressure against increased lifespan. However, daf‐2 has pleiotropic functions; for example, it is important for proper development [41]. Thus, its function in early life likely provides a greater evolutionary benefit than the cost of limiting lifespan later in life (known as antagonistic pleiotropy [42]). Nevertheless, genes that limit lifespan are interesting as targets for treatments aiming to increase lifespan after the reproductive period [43].
One important point is that extending lifespan seems to only benefit an organism if health span is extended at the same time. Indeed, extending lifespan reduces the resistance to natural stresses in several model organisms [44] and increases time spent in a frail state in C. elegans [39] and humans [14, 15, 45]. Health span in humans is restricted by the limited regenerative ability of organs like the heart, spinal cord, and brain [46] and the aging‐dependent decline of regeneration in organs, such as bone marrow, liver, intestine, and skeletal muscle [47, 48, 49]. These observations raise the question of why we did not evolve regenerative potential that persists at old age in all organs. One interpretation is that regeneration increases cancer risk [50, 51], which may shorten lifespan even more than decay from aging. Thus, prolonging health span via increased regeneration requires balancing to prevent tumor formation. Altogether, these observations suggest that there are evolutionary benefits of a healthy and long lifespan in humans.
Compensatory adaptations during old age
Over time, several processes take place, including adaptations to decay from aging [52]. Examples of time‐dependent adaptation were provided by research in Saccaromyces cerevisiae (budding yeast), a powerful model system for eukaryotic aging [53]: Old yeast cells grow and adapt better than younger ones when nutritional conditions change [54, 55]. This rapid adaptation may result from the time‐dependent accumulation of stress protectant molecules and specific extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA), which provides a reservoir of heterogeneous molecular material [56, 57]. eccDNA also exists in human cells, opening the possibility that these adaptive mechanisms are conserved. They are proposed to provide adaptive advantages in the cancer context [56, 58, 59, 60, 61]. Furthermore, low‐level activation of stress responses upon age‐associated damage also improves resistance to external stresses (hormesis) [62, 63]. Importantly, these observations suggest that not everything occurring with old age directly leads to decay but can instead be a compensatory adaptation to temporarily maintain functions.
There are more examples of processes originally thought to exclusively drive aging, which then turned out to (also) support physiological functions:
Amyloid beta (Aβ) plaques accumulate during aging and are consistently observed in postmortem brains with Alzheimer's disease. Hence, Aβ plaques were first considered as a main pathogenic driver of Alzheimer's [64]. Now, models suggest that Aβ plaques may be neuroprotective as they sequester toxic Aβ forms, thereby preventing the formation of amyloid pores [64, 65, 66].
Somatic mutations accumulate during aging and are the root cause of cancer. While they were initially assumed to drive aging, this is now under debate [12, 67, 68]. Most likely, somatic mutations are associated with gradual functional decline and increased vulnerability to disease; however, there are exceptions which restore organ function. For example, the germline variant COL17A1 is associated with skin disease. Somatic mutations in this gene can result in a selection advantage leading to an improvement of symptoms [69]. Similar observations were made for germline mutations of Mendelian hematopoietic diseases [70] and Hutchinson–Gilford progeria [71]. Furthermore, somatic mutations have been reported to confer cancer protection in the epithelium and promote liver regeneration [72, 73]. Exploring the mutational landscape of centenarians—persons ≥100 years—may uncover beneficial somatic mutations for human longevity [74, 75]. Somatic mutations also accumulate in the blood system and are present in around 15% of 70‐year‐olds harboring mutated clones. These mutations initially improve blood‐building capacity; however, ultimately, all clonal expansions in the blood are associated with increased risk of hematological malignancy [76, 77].
Senescent cells are permanently arrested in the cell cycle, accumulate during aging and are a major component of aging dysfunction [78, 79, 80]. Indeed, transplanting senescent cells into mice drives age‐related diseases [81, 82, 83, 84]. However, it has been revealed that senescence also supports physiological functions like tissue remodeling during embryonic development, wound healing, removal of premalignant cells, and hemostasis (the process of bleeding cessation) [85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92]. Indeed, certain senolytics are associated with thrombocytopenia that impairs hemostasis [93, 94, 95]. Thus, it would be optimal to pharmacologically distinguish between pathological and physiological senescence.
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulate over time. However, increasing evidence indicates no direct correlation between ROS accumulation and accelerated aging. The physiological function of ROS production is proposed to contribute to intracellular signaling rather than stochastic macromolecular damage [96]. In agreement with this, ROS generation governs the metabolic benefits of physical exercise in humans via transcriptional reprogramming [97].
Overall, these examples illustrate the importance of first understanding the mechanisms occurring during old age before targeting them. Aspects of aging itself have been proposed to maintain physiological functions. For example, while aging is the most important risk factor for cancer [98, 99], it also has been suggested to be cancer protective [99, 100]. Many cells decline in proliferative potential during aging [101, 102], while cancerous cells are characterized by increased proliferation. Telomere attrition causes cellular aging and is often counteracted by overexpression of telomerase in cancer cells [103]. Expressing oncogenes can induce senescence in cells, while drivers of senescence, such as p21, p16, and p53, are often dysfunctional in tumors [104, 105, 106, 107]. However, the picture is more complex as some senescent cells can exit their cell cycle arrest and drive cancer relapse [108, 109].
Another cancer protective example driven by aging is provided by Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS), which is caused by progerin generation. Individuals affected by the syndrome experience premature aging and display increased levels of DNA damage [110, 111]. However, this increased genetic instability does not correlate with a higher cancer risk [110, 112] due to the protective effect of progerin [113]. Upon aging, progerin also accumulates in normal tissues suggesting that its protective properties may also occur in physiological conditions [114, 115, 116]. Thus, has aging evolved to suppress cancer? This will remain a hard question to disentangle since another interpretation reverses this viewpoint: mechanisms evolved to suppress cancer until they fail due to aging [117]. Regardless, aging and cancer are linked in humans and any attempt to rejuvenate must take care that the intervention does not lead to malignancy. Taken together, not everything that occurs during the later years of an organism can be taken at face value as a direct driver of aging. This highlights the need for caution when aiming to intervene in aging mechanisms to rejuvenate.
What to rejuvenate? The blood system as a star(t) ☆
To effectively rejuvenate, we should consider that aging is a complex process that manifests differently across individuals of the same chronological age. Moreover, in the same individual, aging rates vary across tissues, organs [118, 119] and cell type populations [120, 121, 122], thereby influencing the development of distinct age‐related diseases and associated comorbidities [118, 123]. An optimal target of rejuvenation has therefore the potential to be restored in function and improve the function of other aged organs at the same time. Here, we explore the evidence suggesting that the blood system plays a central role in overall tissue and organ aging and that its rejuvenation therefore improves health span.
Role of hematopoietic cells in organismal aging and age‐related diseases
Hematopoietic cells have numerous roles, including molecular transport throughout the body, immune response, and body homeostasis. With time, these functions decline [124]. Here, we point out how hematopoietic cells relate to organismal aging and age‐related diseases:
Blood system—A declining blood system co‐occurs with additional disease risks:
Patients with age‐related blood disorders display comorbidities that are listed in the top 10 causes of death by the World Health Organization: cardiac, renal, and pulmonary diseases, and solid tumor development [125, 126, 127, 128].
An aging blood system often displays clonal hematopoiesis, wherein a subset of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) clones acquires mutations increasing their proliferation thereby making up a large portion of the hematopoietic compartment. Clonal hematopoiesis is associated with increased risk of blood cancer, coronary heart disease and stroke and is associated with a 35% higher mortality risk [128] possibility via modulation of immune system function.
An aging blood system is accompanied by increased risk of (pre‐)malignant hemopathies [129, 130, 131] and bone marrow fibrosis [132, 133, 134].
Disease risk increases upon T‐cell decline: Increased risk of autoimmune diseases correlates with aging of T cells [135]. In patients with autoimmune disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis, pro‐inflammatory T‐cell expansion drives tissue destruction, and promotes age‐related pathologies like cardiovascular disease [124]. T‐cell destruction upon HIV infection accelerates aging in AIDS patients, which also leads to cardiovascular disease, cancer, frailty, and osteoporosis [136, 137].
The decline of red blood cells (RBC) results in anemia that affects about one‐third of the world population. Even mild anemia is associated with age‐associated diseases, such as cancer and renal insufficiency [138].
Overall, these observations reveal that a declining blood system correlates with dysfunction in other organs.
Immune system—During old age, a drastic drop in the efficiency of the immune cells and an accumulation of pro‐inflammatory cytokines and chemokines result in organismal decline. Indeed, transplanting senescent immune cells causes, (a) senescence in nonlymphoid tissues and solid organs, (b) loss of muscle regeneration, (c) organ damage, especially in the heart, liver, kidneys, and brain, and (d) reduced lifespan in recipient mice [81]. This organismal decline is expressed in various ways:
Infections become more frequent and vaccination responsiveness decreases with age [124, 139].
Systemic inflammation accelerates cellular and organ aging [140, 141]. T‐cell dysfunction increases systemic pro‐inflammatory cytokines, contributing to organ decline and reduced lifespan [81, 90, 124, 142, 143, 144]. For example, the expansion of CD8+ T cells in the spleen, peritoneum, liver, and lung produces the pro‐inflammatory Granzyme K, which has been proposed as a trigger of age‐driven inflammation [143]. Macrophages are also a main source of pro‐inflammatory cytokines and drive inflammation in the kidney and liver [145, 146]. Increased activation of neutrophils increases tissue inflammation, such as periodontitis, and contributes to age‐associated disease onset [147, 148].
Clearance activity of cytotoxic T cells declines during aging, slowing down the removal of premalignant and senescent cells, which facilitates cancer and organismal decline [90, 149, 150]
Organ repair decreases with declining immune function [151, 152]. For instance, lower abundance of neutrophils alters organ repair [153] and delays bone fracture healing [154].
Overall, these findings demonstrate that the hematopoietic system and especially the immune system play a fundamental role in organismal functions beyond the blood system and therefore are likely to be a key aspect of organismal aging [16].
Blood system—A target for organismal rejuvenation
Several strategies have been explored to rejuvenate the blood system, which in turn further demonstrates its influence on the function of other organs:
Heterochronic parabiosis is a procedure that merges the blood systems of old and young mice. It thereby increases rejuvenation markers and processes in many organs of the old animal while the young animal displays increased aging characteristics [155, 156, 157, 158]. The rejuvenation is likely caused by rejuvenating factors from the young circulatory system [159, 160, 161, 162, 163] and the dilution of pro‐aging factors from the aged compartment [164, 165, 166]. Supplying old animals with young blood cells improves senescent cell removal [157, 167, 168], bone repair [169, 170], and the regeneration of the central nervous system (CNS) [158, 160, 161, 171]. This procedure unveils the potential of the blood compartment as a central rejuvenation tool [155].
Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a procedure in which a patient's plasma is removed and replaced with a substitute fluid like saline, albumin, or donor plasma. In old mice, plasma dilution promotes neurogenesis and rejuvenates skeletal muscles and the liver [164, 166]. In humans, TPE reduces the aging‐associated myeloid bias, systemic inflammation, DNA damage, and senescence in peripheral blood mononuclear cells [165]. TPE is currently used as a therapeutic strategy for numerous diseases [172, 173], but its potential to treat age‐related diseases remains to be explored.
RBC peri‐transfusion is the main treatment for anemia or hemoglobinopathies. Several treatments have been developed to rejuvenate RBCs, thereby improving their capacities following hypothermic conservation [174, 175, 176, 177]. In vivo, these rejuvenated RBCs improved the oxygenation and function of the heart, lungs, and kidneys [178]. RBC rejuvenation could therefore be beneficial for aging individuals.
Transplantation of bone marrow cells promotes functional recovery beyond the blood system by contributing to muscle regeneration [179], repair of heart muscle tissue [180], improving postnatal blood vessel formation [181], bone healing [169], and cognitive functions [182]. Notably, transplanting young bone marrow or progenitor‐enriched bone marrow (Lin‐ cells) into old mice significantly increased their lifespan by about 31% or 12%, respectively [183, 184]. The transplantation of cord blood cells, enriched for bone marrow cell types, attenuates the accelerated aging phenotype driven by progeria [185].
Restoring immune cell function
Removing senescent T cells from adipose tissue improves glucose tolerance, insulin resistance, and obesity‐related metabolic disorders in mice [186]. Importantly, the detrimental effects driven by dysfunctional T cells are reversible in the heart, the visceral adipose tissue and other key organs [81, 142, 186, 187]. A promising way to counteract T‐cell‐driven aging is to restore thymus function [188, 189].
Exercise‐induced rejuvenation of neutrophils co‐occurs with reduced disease risk in aged patients with type 2 diabetes predisposition [190].
Heterochronic parabiosis suggests that monocytes of young animals have the potential to regenerate the CNS of old animals by supporting the process of building new myelin sheath [171].
Overall, these findings demonstrate that rejuvenation of hematopoietic cells restores functions beyond the blood system, crystallizing it as an optimal therapeutic target to prevent organismal aging.
Hematopoietic stem cells—A promising rejuvenation target?
Effect of time on HSCs
HSCs are at the top of the hematopoietic hierarchy, giving rise to all hematopoietic cells. During aging their stemness declines, affecting downstream hematopoietic cells like immune cells [191, 192]. To explore the potential to rejuvenate HSCs, we first need to understand the processes of aging and adaptations in HSCs (Fig. 1):
HSCs decline in function with time [191, 193]. This is driven by intrinsic factors, such as enlargement [8], apolarity [194], metabolic changes [121, 195], reduced DNA damage repair [196, 197], low proteostasis [198], low mitochondrial function [199], declining autophagy [200], increased mTOR activity [201], increased inflammasome [202], increased ROS levels [203, 204], senescence [186], stem cell exhaustion [205], epigenetic changes [206, 207, 208, 209], and possibly transposable element expression [209, 210].
While individual HSC function declines, the HSC pool increases in number over time in humans and mice [101, 211]. This expansion may be a compensatory effort to maintain overall productivity of the HSC compartment. However, this process is often associated with clonal hematopoiesis [128, 211, 212], making the blood system more prone to leukemia transformation [212, 213].
Aged HSCs bias toward myeloid lineage production at the expense of lymphoid lineage [214, 215, 216, 217, 218]. This increases inflammation [219] and reduces the adaptive immune response [120, 220, 221], which is associated with decreased cancer immunosurveillance [222].
HSCs are affected by their complex bone marrow microenvironment, which is called the niche [223, 224]. During aging, the niche undergoes alterations, including increased matrix stiffness, vascular remodeling, decreased innervation, increased adiposity, and inflammation, which contribute to the decline of HSC function [225, 226]. Indeed, an old recipient's microenvironment reduces the ability of young HSCs to engraft and produce T cells. Inversely, transplanting old HSCs into young recipients results in more balanced myeloid/lymphoid lineages [227, 228]. However, a young niche is not sufficient to restore the function of old HSCs [229].
Fig. 1.

Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) aging factors and rejuvenation strategies. This diagram represents the factors leading to HSC aging (inner circle), and the rejuvenation tools targeting these aging factors (outer circle). The aging drivers can originate from the HSCs themselves (purple) or the microenvironment (yellow), or a combination of both (purple and yellow). For some factors, no HSC‐specific rejuvenation strategy currently exists and is marked as N/A. See the main text for more details. HP, heterochronic parabiosis.
Interestingly, aging does not uniformly affect the HSC population, creating subsets of differently aged HSCs [120, 121, 122, 211, 230]. Overall, aging and the resulting adaptations progressively impair the ability of HSCs to ensure the functionality of the blood system.
Rejuvenation strategies for HSCs and their effect on organismal functions
Transplanting young HSCs into aged mice significantly extends their health‐ and lifespan [122, 183], which indicates that the rejuvenation of old HSCs could have similar effects. In this part, we present strategies that restore the function of old HSCs [231] and present the effect on organismal functions. These studies analyzed the rejuvenation of HSCs at different levels: (a) HSC cellular characteristics like DNA damage, (b) in vivo HSC function, like engraftment, blood‐building capacity and lineage bias analyzed after transplantation into untreated recipient mice, overcoming pleiotropic effects, and (c) health‐ and lifespan of HSC recipients.
- Rejuvenating old HSCs by restoring intrinsic pathways
- Inhibition of RhoGTPase Cdc42 with CASIN in aged mice partially rejuvenates aged HSCs by restoring their apolarity and improves their capacity to build immunocompetent cells. Remarkably, transplanting these rejuvenated HSCs increases the lifespan of aged immunocompromised recipient mice [192, 234]. Increased activity of Cdc42 is also associated with aging in humans and aged HSCs [235, 236, 237, 238].
- Sirtuins are NAD+‐dependent deacetylases implicated in inflammation, metabolism, and oxidative stress response [240]. Sirtuins were established as promising pro‐longevity genes [241], although this is also disputed [242]. In mouse HSCs, overexpression of SIRT2/3/7 improves blood‐building capacity after transplantation, and SIRT2/7 improves lineage balance [202, 243, 244].
- Mitophagy induction by in vitro or in vivo Urolithin A treatment or the restoration of mitochondrial membrane potential with MitoQ improves the capacity of old HSCs to build blood after transplantation [245, 246]. Old mice supplemented with Urolithin A also show an improvement in their immune response after an acute viral infection.
- Activation of chaperone‐mediated autophagy in vitro or in vivo improves the function of old HSCs [247]. This is evidenced by enhanced long‐term self‐renewal capacity of aged HSCs in vitro, increased GAPDH activity and decreased protein oxidation level.
- Modulating the expression of age‐associated genes, such as p38 MAPK, Satb1, Per2, Phf6, and Rantes/Ccl5, partially rejuvenates old HSCs. These approaches improve HSC commitment toward the lymphoid lineage. In addition, p38 MAPK inhibition and Phf6 deletion improve long‐term blood reconstitution. Of note, Per2−/− aged mice present an improved immune function and lifespan, although this may not be solely caused by rejuvenated HSCs because the gene is deleted in all cell types [227, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253]
- Rejuvenating old HSCs by systemic interventions
- Aged HSCs contribute to the generation of pro‐inflammatory myeloid cells, which infiltrate cardiac tissue after myocardial infarction. Enforcing HSC quiescence with 4‐oxo‐retinoic acid, a vitamin A metabolite, mitigates inflammatory myelopoiesis, thereby improving tissue remodeling and preserving long‐term cardiac function [254, 255].
- In middle‐aged mice, long‐term calorie restriction (CR) shows positive and negative effects [256]: It limits the increase of the HSC pool observed upon aging, and overall improves their self‐renewal and repopulation capacity upon transplantation. However, long‐term CR specifically inhibits the proliferation of lymphoid progenitors, resulting in an impaired immune function. In old mice, life‐long CR resulted in opposite results upon transplantation with either no impact on HSC function [257, 258] or improving the blood‐building capacity and maintaining the lymphoid/myeloid balance [259, 260].
- Strategies that are commonly used to drive rejuvenation in other cell types like TPE and exercise do not seem to rejuvenate old HSCs [257].
- Removing old HSCs
- Clearing senescent cells, either from niche or HSCs themselves, rejuvenates the remaining HSCs in aged mice, and improves their ability to build a new blood system [262].
- Depleting myeloid‐biased HSCs restores balanced differentiation in aged mice [220]. This depletion results in more lymphocyte progenitors and naive T and B cells. It improves adaptive immune responses, while decreasing age‐related markers of immune decline.
- Targeting the niche
- The infusion of young bone marrow‐resident endothelial cells in old mice rejuvenates HSC function and improves their engraftment and blood‐building capacity [263].
- Supplementing old mice with niche‐derived factors like netrin‐1 [264] or with adrenergic agonists to stimulate the sympathetic system [265, 266] rejuvenates their niche, demonstrated by improved bone marrow vascular integrity, mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) number, and lower DNA damage levels. These approaches also improve blood‐building capacity of HSCs.
- Softening the extracellular matrix stiffness rejuvenates old HSCs ex vivo and restores their blood reconstitution capacity, lineage balance, mitochondrial function, cell polarity, and DNA damage level [267]. Importantly, this approach requires the support of bone marrow‐resident MSCs, implying a functional connection between HSCs and MSCs (details below).
- However, a young niche is not sufficient to fully restore the function of old HSCs [229], which implies that both intrinsic and extrinsic aging factors have to be targeted to optimize HSC rejuvenation.
We note that most of these studies were conducted in mice, and for most treatments, it is unclear whether they are also promising for human HSCs. The murine and human blood systems exhibit both similarities and differences when comparing aging hallmarks [268]. For instance, clonal hematopoiesis occurs more frequently in humans than in mice [269]. Thus, there is a need to expand aging research on human HSCs.
Overall, HSC rejuvenation can be achieved by multiple approaches and has far‐reaching effects like protecting immune functions and increasing lifespan. HSCs and their niche are therefore promising targets to improve health span.
Mesenchymal stem cells—Support for blood system rejuvenation
In the bone marrow, HSCs are surrounded by niche cell types, including MSCs [270]. MSCs influence the function of hematopoietic cells [271]. For example, the co‐transplantation of HSCs with MSCs improves HSC engraftment, short and long‐term reconstitution and accelerates lymphocyte recovery [272, 273, 274, 275]. Co‐culturing of HSCs with young MSCs or HSC niche factors enhances the HSC's ability to build a blood system in vivo [276, 277]. In addition, MSCs modulate immune responses by, for example, limiting T‐cell pro‐inflammatory activity [278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290, 291, 292], which can mitigate the graft‐versus‐host disease upon co‐transplantation with HSCs [293, 294, 295]. In turn, HSCs improve the function of damaged MSCs [296]. Hence, these two cell types influence each other's rejuvenation capacity.
Upon aging, senescent MSCs alter immune cells thereby impairing bone and cardiac regeneration and driving organ inflammation [145, 146, 297, 298, 299, 300]. Impaired MSCs also promote tumorigenesis, myeloproliferative diseases and bone marrow fibrosis [133, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305]. Rejuvenating or removing senescent MSCs restores their immunoregulatory activity and improves bone regeneration, angiogenesis and cardioprotection following infarction [297, 300, 306]. The infusion of young MSCs restores immunomodulatory activities and reduces tissue deterioration driven by autoimmune disease [307, 308]. In line with this, several clinical studies use MSCs for skin regeneration and to treat neurodegenerative and ischemic heart diseases [309, 310, 311]. Thus, targeting MSCs is a promising approach for the rejuvenation of immune cells and organs. Interestingly, the organs affected by MSC‐based cell therapies are similar to the ones for HSC‐based therapies (see below), which further strengthens the functional interplay between MSCs and HSCs in rejuvenation potential. Unfortunately, the advantages of MSC‐based therapy in patients with autoimmune disease are inconsistent and often lost in the long term, which implies a short‐term maintenance of MSCs in recipients and the need for repeated infusions [312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324]. However, these findings place MSCs as a promising partner to the hematopoietic system for immune cell and organ rejuvenation.
HSC‐derived (immuno)therapies to counteract aging‐related disease
HSC transplantation is the main stem cell‐based therapy in humans and is used for treating diseases of the blood system, like hematological malignancies and autoimmune diseases [325, 326]. In patients with autoimmune diseases, for example, autologous HSC (aHSC) transplantations reset the T‐cell repertoire, which improves immune cell function and disease outcomes [327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336]. Furthermore, several clinical studies have evaluated the potential of HSC transplants to treat nonhematopoietic diseases:
Solid tumors: HSC transplants can generate an immune response, called graft‐vs‐tumor effect, improving the survival of patients by the elimination of cancerous cells [337, 338, 339].
Angiogenesis and organ arterial blood supply uponischemia: HSC transplants may promote angiogenesis by generating new endothelial cells [340].
Neurological disorders: HSC transplants improve brain repair potential in patients with neurological disorders [341, 342]. Together with HSC gene therapy, HSC transplants are an efficient treatment for patients with cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy and metachromatic leukodystrophy [343, 344, 345, 346, 347].
Skin disorder: HSC transplants improve wound healing and reepithelialization of the skin in epidermolysis bullosa patients and diabetic mice [348, 349].
Systemic sclerosis: HSC transplants decrease all‐cause mortality and improve lung capacity and skin thickness [330].
An interesting question is how aHSC transplants improve nonhematopoietic diseases. One supported model is that they restore a functional immune system, which in turn improves the health of other organs by, for example, removing premalignant and senescent cells as outlined above [81, 90, 124, 142, 144]. Another model proposes that HSCs transdifferentiate into nonhematopoietic cell types [350, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356]. However, HSCs rarely generate nonhematopoietic cell types during physiological conditions in mice [357]. Lastly, hematopoietic cells may also improve cardiac, neuronal and hepatic functions via cell fusion [358]. Altogether, even though the safety of the procedure has to be improved [348, 359, 360], aHSC transplants reveal a new perspective on how to counteract certain aging‐related diseases.
HSCs are also interesting for approaches using engineered chimeric antigen receptors (CARs). CARs enable T and NK cells to recognize specific antigens and to target, for example, cancer cells [361, 362]. This approach is also utilized to target fibrotic and senescent cells, thereby preserving the integrity of cardiac and liver tissue following injury [363, 364, 365]. However, the high costs of CAR T‐cell engineering and their short maintenance in recipients motivate the search for alternatives [361]. HSCs display long‐term self‐renewal capacities and multipotency. Hence, engineering HSCs for immunotherapies allows for long‐lasting and diverse replenishment of chimeric immune cells [366, 367, 368]. For instance, HSC engineering can overcome the resistance of NK cells to viral transduction and generate HSC‐derived invariant NK cells for cancer immunotherapies [362, 369, 370]. The potential of HSCs for immunotherapies is further enhanced by the outcome of clinical studies on hematological and autoimmune disorders; up to 15 years follow‐up on subjects confirmed the long‐term biological safety and efficacy of gene therapy using lentivirally transduced HSCs [368, 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379]. Excitingly, the development of nanoparticles and viral vectors might even enable in vivo editing of HSCs [380, 381, 382, 383, 384, 385, 386]. Altogether, autologous transplantation of rejuvenated and engineered HSCs is a promising tool to slow down age‐related disease occurrence.
Conclusion
The current interest in anti‐aging and rejuvenation strategies motivated us to discuss the importance of understanding lifespan and aging before interfering with them. We find compelling arguments that the long and healthy lifespan of humans provides benefits from enabling complex brain development to building efficient social structures of intergenerational care supporting survival and reproduction.
Aging is a complex process manifesting itself differently across tissues and cell type populations. Importantly, it is still not fully understood. To establish successful rejuvenation strategies, it is essential that we improve our understanding of the holistic picture of all factors driving aging and their interactions.
The blood system, with HSCs at the top of its hierarchy, appears to play a central role in organismal aging. HSC aging is driven by intrinsic mechanisms and the bone marrow microenvironment. It impacts hematopoiesis with consequences within and beyond the blood system, contributing to organismal aging. Thus, restoring a functional blood system by rejuvenating HSCs is expected to also improve the function of other organs thereby reducing the risk of developing a broad range of age‐associated diseases. While HSC rejuvenation is not expected to benefit all organs and tissues, such as the endocrine system, future work will show whether HSC‐derived improvements are enough to counteract overall decline at old age.
Techniques to rejuvenate the blood compartment are expanding and improving. Autologous HSC transplantations in humans further illustrate what organismal rejuvenation strategies can achieve as they are already used to treat hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic diseases. The supplementation of MSCs or other niche factors might enable HSCs to reach their full rejuvenation potential. Overall, our review highlights the power of the hematopoietic compartment to reverse organismal aging.
Acknowledgements
JL was supported by the Research Council of Finland, Vetenskapsrådet, European Research Council Starting Grant and FEBS Excellence Award; JA was supported by Karolinska Institutet KID grant. We are grateful to the members of the Lengefeld Lab, Federico Pietrocola, and Maria Eriksson for discussion and feedback, reviewers for crucial feedback, and baby Hedgi for sleeping during working hours. We apologize to the authors whose studies we missed. Thanks to FEBS Letters for the opportunity to write this review.
Edited by Quan Chen
Contributor Information
Emilie L. Cerezo, Email: emilie.cerezo@helsinki.fi.
Jette Lengefeld, Email: jette.lengefeld@helsinki.fi.
References
- 1. George AR (2003) The Babylonian Gilgamesh Epic: Introduction, Critical Edition and Cuneiform. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. [Google Scholar]
- 2. MacGregor C, Petersen A and Parker C (2018) Promoting a healthier, younger you: the media marketing of anti‐ageing superfoods. J Consumer Culture 21, 164–179. [Google Scholar]
- 3. The Longevity Opportunity.
- 4. Regenerative Medicine Market Size, Share | Global Report, 2032.
- 5. Lederman S (2023) The funding channels of geroscience. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 13, a041210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Moqri M, Herzog C, Poganik JR, Justice J, Belsky DW, Higgins‐Chen A, Moskalev A, Fuellen G, Cohen AA, Bautmans I et al. (2023) Biomarkers of aging for the identification and evaluation of longevity interventions. Cell 186, 3758–3775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Tartiere AG, Freije JMP and López‐Otín C (2024) The hallmarks of aging as a conceptual framework for health and longevity research. Front Aging 5, 1334261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Lengefeld J, Cheng C‐W, Maretich P, Blair M, Hagen H, McReynolds MR, Sullivan E, Majors K, Roberts C, Kang JH et al. (2021) Cell size is a determinant of stem cell potential during aging. Sci Adv 7, eabk0271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Lu YR, Tian X and Sinclair DA (2023) The information theory of aging. Nat Aging 3, 1486–1499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Davies DM, van den Handel K, Bharadwaj S and Lengefeld J (2022) Cellular enlargement – a new hallmark of aging? Front Cell Dev Biol 10, 1036602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. López‐Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M and Kroemer G (2023) Hallmarks of aging: an expanding universe. Cell 186, 243–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Franco I and Eriksson M (2022) Reverting to old theories of ageing with new evidence for the role of somatic mutations. Nat Rev Genet 23, 645–646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Vaupel JW (2010) Biodemography of human ageing. Nature 464, 536–542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Bodnár K and Nerlich C (2022) The Macroeconomic and Fiscal Impact of Population Ageing. European Central Bank (ECB), Frankfurt a. M., Germany. [Google Scholar]
- 15. Garmany A and Terzic A (2024) Global Healthspan‐lifespan gaps among 183 World Health Organization member states. JAMA Netw Open 7, e2450241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Fotopoulou F, Rodríguez‐Correa E, Dussiau C and Milsom MD (2025) Reconsidering the usual suspects in age‐related hematologic disorders: is stem cell dysfunction a root cause of aging? Exp Hematol 143, 104698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Jaul E and Barron J (2017) Age‐related diseases and clinical and public health implications for the 85 years old and pver population. Front Public Health 5, 1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Kenyon CJ (2010) The genetics of ageing. Nature 464, 504–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Guo J, Huang X, Dou L, Yan M, Shen T, Tang W and Li J (2022) Aging and aging‐related diseases: from molecular mechanisms to interventions and treatments. Signal Transduct Target Ther 7, 391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Scott AJ, Ellison M and Sinclair DA (2021) The economic value of targeting aging. Nat Aging 1, 616–623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Dong X, Milholland B and Vijg J (2016) Evidence for a limit to human lifespan. Nature 538, 257–259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Dobzhansky T (1964) Biology, molecular and organismic. Am Zool 4, 443–452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Kirkwood TB (1977) Evolution of ageing. Nature 270, 301–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Williams GC (1957) Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 11, 398–411. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Medawar 1952 Unsolved Problem: Peter Medawar: Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive.
- 26. Hawkes K (2004) The grandmother effect. Nature 428, 128–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Alvarez HP (2000) Grandmother hypothesis and primate life histories. Am J Phys Anthropol 113, 435–450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Hawkes K, O'Connell JF, Jones NG, Alvarez H and Charnov EL (1998) Grandmothering, menopause, and the evolution of human life histories. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95, 1336–1339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Lee RD (2003) Rethinking the evolutionary theory of aging: transfers, not births, shape senescence in social species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100, 9637–9642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Foster EA, Franks DW, Mazzi S, Darden SK, Balcomb KC, Ford JKB and Croft DP (2012) Adaptive prolonged postreproductive life span in killer whales. Science 337, 1313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Grimes C, Brent LJN, Ellis S, Weiss MN, Franks DW, Ellifrit DK and Croft DP (2023) Postreproductive female killer whales reduce socially inflicted injuries in their male offspring. Curr Biol 33, 3250–3256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Lahdenperä M, Mar KU and Lummaa V (2016) Nearby grandmother enhances calf survival and reproduction in Asian elephants. Sci Rep 6, 27213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Schwarz F, Springer SA, Altheide TK, Varki NM, Gagneux P and Varki A (2016) Human‐specific derived alleles of CD33 and other genes protect against postreproductive cognitive decline. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113, 74–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Herculano‐Houzel S (2019) Longevity and sexual maturity vary across species with number of cortical neurons, and humans are no exception. J Comp Neurol 527, 1689–1705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Charness N, Fox MC and Mitchum AL (2011) Life‐span cognition and information technology. In Handbook of Life‐Span Development, pp. 331–361. Springer Publishing Company, New York, NY, USA. [Google Scholar]
- 36. Kenyon C, Chang J, Gensch E, Rudner A and Tabtiang R (1993) A C. Elegans mutant that lives twice as long as wild type. Nature 366, 461–464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Kennedy BK (2008) The genetics of ageing: insight from genome‐wide approaches in invertebrate model organisms. J Intern Med 263, 142–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Statzer C, Reichert P, Dual J and Ewald CY (2022) Longevity interventions temporally scale healthspan in Caenorhabditis elegans . iScience 25, 103983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Bansal A, Zhu LJ, Yen K and Tissenbaum HA (2015) Uncoupling lifespan and healthspan in Caenorhabditis elegans longevity mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112, E277–E286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Ali A, Zhang ZD, Gao T, Aleksic S, Gavathiotis E, Barzilai N and Milman S (2025) Identification of functional rare coding variants in IGF‐1 gene in humans with exceptional longevity. Sci Rep 15, 10199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Kimura KD, Tissenbaum HA, Liu Y and Ruvkun G (1997) Daf‐2, an insulin receptor‐like gene that regulates longevity and diapause in Caenorhabditis elegans . Science 277, 942–946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Long E and Zhang J (2023) Evidence for the role of selection for reproductively advantageous alleles in human aging. Sci Adv 9, eadh4990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Dillin A, Crawford DK and Kenyon C (2002) Timing requirements for insulin/IGF‐1 signaling in C. elegans . Science 298, 830–834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Briga M and Verhulst S (2015) What can long‐lived mutants tell us about mechanisms causing aging and lifespan variation in natural environments? Exp Gerontol 71, 21–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Cohen AA, Beard JR, Ferrucci L, Fülöp T, Gladyshev VN, Moqri M, Olde Rikkert MGM and Picard M (2025) Balancing the promise and risks of geroscience interventions. Nat Aging 5, 4–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Iismaa SE, Kaidonis X, Nicks AM, Bogush N, Kikuchi K, Naqvi N, Harvey RP, Husain A and Graham RM (2018) Comparative regenerative mechanisms across different mammalian tissues. Npj Regen Med 3, 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Cai Y, Xiong M, Xin Z, Liu C, Ren J, Yang X, Lei J, Li W, Liu F, Chu Q et al. (2023) Decoding aging‐dependent regenerative decline across tissues at single‐cell resolution. Cell Stem Cell 30, 1674–1691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Jin J, Wang G‐L, Shi X, Darlington GJ and Timchenko NA (2009) The age‐associated decline of glycogen synthase kinase 3beta plays a critical role in the inhibition of liver regeneration. Mol Cell Biol 29, 3867–3880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Brunet A, Goodell MA and Rando TA (2023) Ageing and rejuvenation of tissue stem cells and their niches. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 24, 45–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Beachy PA, Karhadkar SS and Berman DM (2004) Tissue repair and stem cell renewal in carcinogenesis. Nature 432, 324–331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Barker N, Ridgway RA, van Es JH, van de Wetering M, Begthel H, van den Born M, Danenberg E, Clarke AR, Sansom OJ and Clevers H (2009) Crypt stem cells as the cells‐of‐origin of intestinal cancer. Nature 457, 608–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Ogrodnik M and Gladyshev VN (2023) The meaning of adaptation in aging: insights from cellular senescence, epigenetic clocks and stem cell alterations. Nat Aging 3, 766–775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Denoth Lippuner A, Julou T and Barral Y (2014) Budding yeast as a model organism to study the effects of age. FEMS Microbiol Rev 38, 300–325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Frenk S, Pizza G, Walker RV and Houseley J (2017) Aging yeast gain a competitive advantage on non‐optimal carbon sources. Aging Cell 16, 602–604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Frenk S and Houseley J (2017) Can aging be beneficial? Aging 9, 2016–2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Hull RM and Houseley J (2020) The adaptive potential of circular DNA accumulation in ageing cells. Curr Genet 66, 889–894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Levy SF, Ziv N and Siegal ML (2012) Bet hedging in yeast by heterogeneous, age‐correlated expression of a stress protectant. PLoS Biol 10, e1001325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Sal'nokov KV (1990) Extrachromosomal DNA in mammalian cells. Tsitologiia 32, 1061–1071. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Shmookler Reis RJ, Lumpkin CK, McGill JR, Riabowol KT and Goldstein S (1983) Extrachromosomal circular copies of an “inter‐alu” unstable sequence in human DNA are amplified during in vitro and in vivo ageing. Nature 301, 394–398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Lumpkin CK, McGill JR, Riabowol KT, Moerman EJ, Shmookler Reis RJ and Goldstein S (1985) Extrachromosomal circular DNA and aging cells. Adv Exp Med Biol 190, 479–493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Shmookler Reis, R. J. , Lumpkin, C. K. , McGill, J. R. , Riabowol, K. T. & Goldstein, S. (1983) Genome alteration during in vitro and in vivo aging: amplification of extrachromosomal circular DNA molecules containing a chromosomal sequence of variable repeat frequency. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 47(Pt 2), 1135–1139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Rattan SI (1998) Repeated mild heat shock delays ageing in cultured human skin fibroblasts. Biochem Mol Biol Int 45, 753–759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Calabrese EJ, Osakabe N, Di Paola R, Siracusa R, Fusco R, D'Amico R, Impellizzeri D, Cuzzocrea S, Fritsch T, Abdelhameed AS et al. (2023) Hormesis defines the limits of lifespan. Ageing Res Rev 91, 102074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Zhang Y, Chen H, Li R, Sterling K and Song W (2023) Amyloid β‐based therapy for Alzheimer's disease: challenges, successes and future. Signal Transduct Target Ther 8, 248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Lashuel HA, Hartley D, Petre BM, Walz T and Lansbury PT (2002) Neurodegenerative disease: amyloid pores from pathogenic mutations. Nature 418, 291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Castellani RJ, Lee H, Siedlak SL, Nunomura A, Hayashi T, Nakamura M, Zhu X, Perry G and Smith MA (2009) Reexamining Alzheimer's disease: evidence for a protective role for amyloid‐beta protein precursor and amyloid‐beta. J Alzheimer's Dis 18, 447–452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Chatsirisupachai K and de Magalhães JP (2024) Somatic mutations in human ageing: new insights from DNA sequencing and inherited mutations. Ageing Res Rev 96, 102268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Franco I, Revêchon G and Eriksson M (2022) Challenges of proving a causal role of somatic mutations in the aging process. Aging Cell 21, e13613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Pasmooij AMG, Pas HH, Deviaene FCL, Nijenhuis M and Jonkman MF (2005) Multiple correcting COL17A1 mutations in patients with revertant mosaicism of epidermolysis bullosa. Am J Hum Genet 77, 727–740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Revy P, Kannengiesser C and Fischer A (2019) Somatic genetic rescue in Mendelian haematopoietic diseases. Nat Rev Genet 20, 582–598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Bar DZ, Arlt MF, Brazier JF, Norris WE, Campbell SE, Chines P, Larrieu D, Jackson SP, Collins FS, Glover TW et al. (2017) A novel somatic mutation achieves partial rescue in a child with Hutchinson‐Gilford progeria syndrome. J Med Genet 54, 212–216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Colom B, Herms A, Hall MWJ, Dentro SC, King C, Sood RK, Alcolea MP, Piedrafita G, Fernandez‐Antoran D, Ong SH et al. (2021) Mutant clones in normal epithelium outcompete and eliminate emerging tumours. Nature 598, 510–514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Zhu M, Lu T, Jia Y, Luo X, Gopal P, Li L, Odewole M, Renteria V, Singal AG, Jang Y et al. (2019) Somatic mutations increase hepatic clonal fitness and regeneration in chronic liver disease. Cell 177, 608–621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Zhao X, Liu X, Zhang A, Chen H, Huo Q, Li W, Ye R, Chen Z, Liang L, Liu QA et al. (2018) The correlation of copy number variations with longevity in a genome‐wide association study of Han Chinese. Aging 10, 1206–1222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Wang H‐T, Zhao L, Yang L‐Q, Ge M‐X, Yang X‐L, Gao Z‐L, Cun Y‐P, Xiao F‐H and Kong Q‐P (2024) Scrutiny of genome‐wide somatic mutation profiles in centenarians identifies the key genomic regions for human longevity. Aging Cell 23, e13916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Loh P‐R, Genovese G, Handsaker RE, Finucane HK, Reshef YA, Palamara PF, Birmann BM, Talkowski ME, Bakhoum SF, McCarroll SA et al. (2018) Insights into clonal haematopoiesis from 8,342 mosaic chromosomal alterations. Nature 559, 350–355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Walsh K, Raghavachari N, Kerr C, Bick AG, Cummings SR, Druley T, Dunbar CE, Genovese G, Goodell MA, Jaiswal S et al. (2022) Clonal hematopoiesis analyses in clinical, epidemiologic, and genetic aging studies to unravel underlying mechanisms of age‐related dysfunction in humans. Front Aging 3, 841796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. van Deursen JM (2014) The role of senescent cells in ageing. Nature 509, 439–446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Dimri GP, Lee X, Basile G, Acosta M, Scott G, Roskelley C, Medrano EE, Linskens M, Rubelj I and Pereira‐Smith O (1995) A biomarker that identifies senescent human cells in culture and in aging skin in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92, 9363–9367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Acosta JC, Banito A, Wuestefeld T, Georgilis A, Janich P, Morton JP, Athineos D, Kang T‐W, Lasitschka F, Andrulis M et al. (2013) A complex secretory program orchestrated by the inflammasome controls paracrine senescence. Nat Cell Biol 15, 978–990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Yousefzadeh MJ, Flores RR, Zhu Y, Schmiechen ZC, Brooks RW, Trussoni CE, Cui Y, Angelini L, Lee K‐A, McGowan SJ et al. (2021) An aged immune system drives senescence and ageing of solid organs. Nature 594, 100–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Xu M, Bradley EW, Weivoda MM, Hwang SM, Pirtskhalava T, Decklever T, Curran GL, Ogrodnik M, Jurk D, Johnson KO et al. (2017) Transplanted senescent cells induce an osteoarthritis‐like condition in mice. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 72, 780–785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Lewis‐McDougall FC, Ruchaya PJ, Domenjo‐Vila E, Shin Teoh T, Prata L, Cottle BJ, Clark JE, Punjabi PP, Awad W, Torella D et al. (2019) Aged‐senescent cells contribute to impaired heart regeneration. Aging Cell 18, e12931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Xu M, Pirtskhalava T, Farr JN, Weigand BM, Palmer AK, Weivoda MM, Inman CL, Ogrodnik MB, Hachfeld CM, Fraser DG et al. (2018) Senolytics improve physical function and increase lifespan in old age. Nat Med 24, 1246–1256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Rhinn M, Ritschka B and Keyes WM (2019) Cellular senescence in development, regeneration and disease. Development 146, dev151837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Krizhanovsky V, Yon M, Dickins RA, Hearn S, Simon J, Miething C, Yee H, Zender L and Lowe SW (2008) Senescence of activated stellate cells limits liver fibrosis. Cell 134, 657–667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Jun J‐I and Lau LF (2010) The matricellular protein CCN1 induces fibroblast senescence and restricts fibrosis in cutaneous wound healing. Nat Cell Biol 12, 676–685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Muñoz‐Espín D, Cañamero M, Maraver A, Gómez‐López G, Contreras J, Murillo‐Cuesta S, Rodríguez‐Baeza A, Varela‐Nieto I, Ruberte J, Collado M et al. (2013) Programmed cell senescence during mammalian embryonic development. Cell 155, 1104–1118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Storer M, Mas A, Robert‐Moreno A, Pecoraro M, Ortells MC, Di Giacomo V, Yosef R, Pilpel N, Krizhanovsky V, Sharpe J et al. (2013) Senescence is a developmental mechanism that contributes to embryonic growth and patterning. Cell 155, 1119–1130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Kang T‐W, Yevsa T, Woller N, Hoenicke L, Wuestefeld T, Dauch D, Hohmeyer A, Gereke M, Rudalska R, Potapova A et al. (2011) Senescence surveillance of pre‐malignant hepatocytes limits liver cancer development. Nature 479, 547–551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Venturini W, Olate‐Briones A, Valenzuela C, Méndez D, Fuentes E, Cayo A, Mancilla D, Segovia R, Brown NE and Moore‐Carrasco R (2020) Platelet activation is triggered by factors secreted by senescent endothelial HMEC‐1 cells in vitro. Int J Mol Sci 21, 3287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Wiley CD, Liu S, Limbad C, Zawadzka AM, Beck J, Demaria M, Artwood R, Alimirah F, Lopez‐Dominguez J‐A, Kuehnemann C et al. (2019) SILAC analysis reveals increased secretion of hemostasis‐related factors by senescent cells. Cell Rep 28, 3329–3337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Kaefer A, Yang J, Noertersheuser P, Mensing S, Humerickhouse R, Awni W and Xiong H (2014) Mechanism‐based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic meta‐analysis of navitoclax (ABT‐263) induced thrombocytopenia. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 74, 593–602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Rudin CM, Hann CL, Garon EB, Ribeiro de Oliveira M, Bonomi PD, Camidge DR, Chu Q, Giaccone G, Khaira D, Ramalingam SS et al. (2012) Phase II study of single‐agent navitoclax (ABT‐263) and biomarker correlates in patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 18, 3163–3169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Schoenwaelder SM, Jarman KE, Gardiner EE, Hua M, Qiao J, White MJ, Josefsson EC, Alwis I, Ono A, Willcox A et al. (2011) Bcl‐xL‐inhibitory BH3 mimetics can induce a transient thrombocytopathy that undermines the hemostatic function of platelets. Blood 118, 1663–1674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Stuart JA, Maddalena LA, Merilovich M and Robb EL (2014) A midlife crisis for the mitochondrial free radical theory of aging. Longev Healthspan 3, 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Ristow M, Zarse K, Oberbach A, Klöting N, Birringer M, Kiehntopf M, Stumvoll M, Kahn CR and Blüher M (2009) Antioxidants prevent health‐promoting effects of physical exercise in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106, 8665–8670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Risk Factors: Age – NCI.
- 99. Pedersen JK, Engholm G, Skytthe A, Christensen K and Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare) (2016) Cancer and aging: epidemiology and methodological challenges. Acta Oncol 55(Suppl 1), 7–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Rozhok AI and DeGregori J (2016) The evolution of lifespan and age‐dependent cancer risk. Trends Cancer 2, 552–560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Beerman I, Maloney WJ, Weissmann IL and Rossi DJ (2010) Stem cells and the aging hematopoietic system. Curr Opin Immunol 22, 500–506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Cameron IL (1972) Cell proliferation and renewal in aging mice. J Gerontol 27, 162–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Liu M, Zhang Y, Jian Y, Gu L, Zhang D, Zhou H, Wang Y and Xu Z‐X (2024) The regulations of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) in cancer. Cell Death Dis 15, 90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Shamloo B and Usluer S (2019) p21 in cancer research. Cancers (Basel) 11, 1178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Whibley C, Pharoah PDP and Hollstein M (2009) p53 polymorphisms: cancer implications. Nat Rev Cancer 9, 95–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Serrano M, Lin AW, McCurrach ME, Beach D and Lowe SW (1997) Oncogenic ras provokes premature cell senescence associated with accumulation of p53 and p16INK4a. Cell 88, 593–602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Liggett WH and Sidransky D (1998) Role of the p16 tumor suppressor gene in cancer. J Clin Oncol 16, 1197–1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. O'Sullivan EA, Wallis R, Mossa F and Bishop CL (2024) The paradox of senescent‐marker positive cancer cells: challenges and opportunities. NPJ Aging 10, 41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Song K‐X, Wang J‐X and Huang D (2023) Therapy‐induced senescent tumor cells in cancer relapse. J National Cancer Center 3, 273–278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Gordon LB, Rothman FG, López‐Otín C and Misteli T (2014) Progeria: a paradigm for translational medicine. Cell 156, 400–407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Olive M, Harten I, Mitchell R, Beers JK, Djabali K, Cao K, Erdos MR, Blair C, Funke B, Smoot L et al. (2010) Cardiovascular pathology in Hutchinson‐Gilford progeria: correlation with the vascular pathology of aging. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 30, 2301–2309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Cisneros B, García‐Aguirre I, De Ita M, Arrieta‐Cruz I and Rosas‐Vargas H (2023) Hutchinson‐Gilford progeria syndrome: cellular mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives. Arch Med Res 54, 102837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Fernandez P, Scaffidi P, Markert E, Lee J‐H, Rane S and Misteli T (2014) Transformation resistance in a premature aging disorder identifies a tumor‐protective function of BRD4. Cell Rep 9, 248–260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. McClintock D, Ratner D, Lokuge M, Owens DM, Gordon LB, Collins FS and Djabali K (2007) The mutant form of lamin a that causes Hutchinson‐Gilford progeria is a biomarker of cellular aging in human skin. PLoS One 2, e1269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Rodriguez S, Coppedè F, Sagelius H and Eriksson M (2009) Increased expression of the Hutchinson‐Gilford progeria syndrome truncated lamin a transcript during cell aging. Eur J Hum Genet 17, 928–937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Scaffidi P and Misteli T (2006) Lamin A‐dependent nuclear defects in human aging. Science 312, 1059–1063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Rozhok A and DeGregori J (2019) A generalized theory of age‐dependent carcinogenesis. Elife 8, 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Oh HS‐H, Rutledge J, Nachun D, Pálovics R, Abiose O, Moran‐Losada P, Channappa D, Urey DY, Kim K, Sung YJ et al. (2023) Organ aging signatures in the plasma proteome track health and disease. Nature 624, 164–172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Ding Y, Zuo Y, Zhang B, Fan Y, Xu G, Cheng Z, Ma S, Fang S, Tian A, Gao D et al. (2025) Comprehensive human proteome profiles across a 50‐year lifespan reveal aging trajectories and signatures. Cell 188, 5763–5784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Wahlestedt M, Erlandsson E, Kristiansen T, Lu R, Brakebusch C, Weissman IL, Yuan J, Martin‐Gonzalez J and Bryder D (2017) Clonal reversal of ageing‐associated stem cell lineage bias via a pluripotent intermediate. Nat Commun 8, 14533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Su T‐Y, Hauenstein J, Somuncular E, Dumral Ö, Leonard E, Gustafsson C, Tzortzis E, Forlani A, Johansson A‐S, Qian H et al. (2024) Aging is associated with functional and molecular changes in distinct hematopoietic stem cell subsets. Nat Commun 15, 7966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Wang Y, Zhang W, Zhang C, Van HQT, Seino T and Zhang Y (2025) Reducing functionally defective old HSCs alleviates aging‐related phenotypes in old recipient mice. Cell Res 35, 45–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Tian YE, Cropley V, Maier AB, Lautenschlager NT, Breakspear M and Zalesky A (2023) Heterogeneous aging across multiple organ systems and prediction of chronic disease and mortality. Nat Med 29, 1221–1231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Weyand CM and Goronzy JJ (2016) Aging of the immune system. Mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Ann Am Thorac Soc 13 Suppl 5, S422–S428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Della Porta MG, Malcovati L, Strupp C, Ambaglio I, Kuendgen A, Zipperer E, Travaglino E, Invernizzi R, Pascutto C, Lazzarino M et al. (2011) Risk stratification based on both disease status and extra‐hematologic comorbidities in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Haematologica 96, 441–449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Cook EK, Luo M and Rauh MJ (2020) Clonal hematopoiesis and inflammation: partners in leukemogenesis and comorbidity. Exp Hematol 83, 85–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Gandhi SJ, Hagans I, Nathan K, Hunter K and Roy S (2017) Prevalence, comorbidity and investigation of anemia in the primary care office. J Clin Med Res 9, 970–980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Jaiswal S and Ebert BL (2019) Clonal hematopoiesis in human aging and disease. Science 366, eaan4673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Dang Chi VL, Sibille C, Willard‐Gallo K and Bron D (2019) Aging and Malignant Hemopathies: A Complex Multistep Process. Springer, Cham. [Google Scholar]
- 130. Hao T, Li‐Talley M, Buck A and Chen W (2019) An emerging trend of rapid increase of leukemia but not all cancers in the aging population in the United States. Sci Rep 9, 12070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Han HJ, Choi K and Suh HS (2024) Impact of aging on acute myeloid leukemia epidemiology and survival outcomes: a real‐world, population‐based longitudinal cohort study. PLoS One 19, e0300637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Gleitz HFE, Benabid A and Schneider RK (2021) Still a burning question: the interplay between inflammation and fibrosis in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Curr Opin Hematol 28, 364–371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Ghosh K, Shome DK, Kulkarni B, Ghosh MK and Ghosh K (2023) Fibrosis and bone marrow: understanding causation and pathobiology. J Transl Med 21, 703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Kuter DJ, Bain B, Mufti G, Bagg A and Hasserjian RP (2007) Bone marrow fibrosis: pathophysiology and clinical significance of increased bone marrow stromal fibres. Br J Haematol 139, 351–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Zhao TV, Sato Y, Goronzy JJ and Weyand CM (2022) T‐cell aging‐associated phenotypes in autoimmune disease. Front Aging 3, 867950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Deeks SG (2011) HIV infection, inflammation, immunosenescence, and aging. Annu Rev Med 62, 141–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Breen EC, Sehl ME, Shih R, Langfelder P, Wang R, Horvath S, Bream JH, Duggal P, Martinson J, Wolinsky SM et al. (2022) Accelerated aging with HIV begins at the time of initial HIV infection. iScience 25, 104488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Schippel N and Sharma S (2023) Dynamics of human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell differentiation to the erythroid lineage. Exp Hematol 123, 1–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Jo N, Hidaka Y, Kikuchi O, Fukahori M, Sawada T, Aoki M, Yamamoto M, Nagao M, Morita S, Nakajima TE et al. (2023) Impaired CD4+ T cell response in older adults is associated with reduced immunogenicity and reactogenicity of mRNA COVID‐19 vaccination. Nat Aging 3, 82–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Jurk D, Wilson C, Passos JF, Oakley F, Correia‐Melo C, Greaves L, Saretzki G, Fox C, Lawless C, Anderson R et al. (2014) Chronic inflammation induces telomere dysfunction and accelerates ageing in mice. Nat Commun 2, 4172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Josephson AM, Bradaschia‐Correa V, Lee S, Leclerc K, Patel KS, Muinos Lopez E, Litwa HP, Neibart SS, Kadiyala M, Wong MZ et al. (2019) Age‐related inflammation triggers skeletal stem/progenitor cell dysfunction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116, 6995–7004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Desdín‐Micó G, Soto‐Heredero G, Aranda JF, Oller J, Carrasco E, Gabandé‐Rodríguez E, Blanco EM, Alfranca A, Cussó L, Desco M et al. (2020) T cells with dysfunctional mitochondria induce multimorbidity and premature senescence. Science 368, 1371–1376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Mogilenko DA, Shpynov O, Andhey PS, Arthur L, Swain A, Esaulova E, Brioschi S, Shchukina I, Kerndl M, Bambouskova M et al. (2021) Comprehensive profiling of an aging immune system reveals clonal GZMK+ CD8+ T cells as conserved hallmark of inflammaging. Immunity 54, 99–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Ovadya Y, Landsberger T, Leins H, Vadai E, Gal H, Biran A, Yosef R, Sagiv A, Agrawal A, Shapira A et al. (2018) Impaired immune surveillance accelerates accumulation of senescent cells and aging. Nat Commun 9, 5435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Lefèvre L, Iacovoni JS, Martini H, Bellière J, Maggiorani D, Dutaur M, Marsal DJ, Decaunes P, Pizzinat N, Mialet‐Perez J et al. (2021) Kidney inflammaging is promoted by CCR2+ macrophages and tissue‐derived micro‐environmental factors. Cell Mol Life Sci 78, 3485–3501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Martini H, Iacovoni JS, Maggiorani D, Dutaur M, Marsal DJ, Roncalli J, Itier R, Dambrin C, Pizzinat N, Mialet‐Perez J et al. (2019) Aging induces cardiac mesenchymal stromal cell senescence and promotes endothelial cell fate of the CD90+ subset. Aging Cell 18, e13015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Wang Z, Saxena A, Yan W, Uriarte SM, Siqueira R and Li X (2025) The impact of aging on neutrophil functions and the contribution to periodontitis. Int J Oral Sci 17, 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Van Avondt K, Strecker J‐K, Tulotta C, Minnerup J, Schulz C and Soehnlein O (2023) Neutrophils in aging and aging‐related pathologies. Immunol Rev 314, 357–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Matveeva K, Vasilieva M, Minskaia E, Rybtsov S and Shevyrev D (2024) T‐cell immunity against senescence: potential role and perspectives. Front Immunol 15, 1360109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Rukavina D, Laskarin G, Rubesa G, Strbo N, Bedenicki I, Manestar D, Glavas M, Christmas SE and Podack ER (1998) Age‐related decline of perforin expression in human cytotoxic T lymphocytes and natural killer cells. Blood 92, 2410–2420. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Tobin SW, Alibhai FJ, Weisel RD and Li R‐K (2020) Considering cause and effect of immune cell aging on cardiac repair after myocardial infarction. Cells 9, 1894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Tobin SW, Alibhai FJ, Wlodarek L, Yeganeh A, Millar S, Wu J, Li S‐H, Weisel RD and Li R‐K (2021) Delineating the relationship between immune system aging and myogenesis in muscle repair. Aging Cell 20, e13312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Hazeldine J and Lord JM (2015) Innate immunesenescence: underlying mechanisms and clinical relevance. Biogerontology 16, 187–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Zhang X, Baht GS, Huang R, Chen Y‐H, Molitoris KH, Miller SE and Kraus VB (2022) Rejuvenation of neutrophils and their extracellular vesicles is associated with enhanced aged fracture healing. Aging Cell 21, e13651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Lagunas‐Rangel FA (2024) Aging insights from heterochronic parabiosis models. NPJ Aging 10, 38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Pálovics R, Keller A, Schaum N, Tan W, Fehlmann T, Borja M, Kern F, Bonanno L, Calcuttawala K, Webber J et al. (2022) Molecular hallmarks of heterochronic parabiosis at single‐cell resolution. Nature 603, 309–314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Ma S, Wang S, Ye Y, Ren J, Chen R, Li W, Li J, Zhao L, Zhao Q, Sun G et al. (2022) Heterochronic parabiosis induces stem cell revitalization and systemic rejuvenation across aged tissues. Cell Stem Cell 29, 990–1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Ximerakis M, Holton KM, Giadone RM, Ozek C, Saxena M, Santiago S, Adiconis X, Dionne D, Nguyen L, Shah KM et al. (2023) Heterochronic parabiosis reprograms the mouse brain transcriptome by shifting aging signatures in multiple cell types. Nat Aging 3, 327–345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Chen X, Luo Y, Zhu Q, Zhang J, Huang H, Kan Y, Li D, Xu M, Liu S, Li J et al. (2024) Small extracellular vesicles from young plasma reverse age‐related functional declines by improving mitochondrial energy metabolism. Nat Aging 4, 814–838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160. Katsimpardi L, Litterman NK, Schein PA, Miller CM, Loffredo FS, Wojtkiewicz GR, Chen JW, Lee RT, Wagers AJ and Rubin LL (2014) Vascular and neurogenic rejuvenation of the aging mouse brain by young systemic factors. Science 344, 630–634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161. Castellano JM, Mosher KI, Abbey RJ, McBride AA, James ML, Berdnik D, Shen JC, Zou B, Xie XS, Tingle M et al. (2017) Human umbilical cord plasma proteins revitalize hippocampal function in aged mice. Nature 544, 488–492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162. Ozek C, Krolewski RC, Buchanan SM and Rubin LL (2018) Growth differentiation factor 11 treatment leads to neuronal and vascular improvements in the hippocampus of aged mice. Sci Rep 8, 17293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163. Liu M‐N, Lan Q, Wu H and Qiu C‐W (2024) Rejuvenation of young blood on aging organs: effects, circulating factors, and mechanisms. Heliyon 10, e32652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164. Mehdipour M, Skinner C, Wong N, Lieb M, Liu C, Etienne J, Kato C, Kiprov D, Conboy MJ and Conboy IM (2020) Rejuvenation of three germ layers tissues by exchanging old blood plasma with saline‐albumin. Aging (Albany NY) 12, 8790–8819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165. Kim D, Kiprov DD, Luellen C, Lieb M, Liu C, Watanabe E, Mei X, Cassaleto K, Kramer J, Conboy MJ et al. (2022) Old plasma dilution reduces human biological age: a clinical study. Geroscience 44, 2701–2720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166. Mehdipour M, Mehdipour T, Skinner CM, Wong N, Liu C, Chen C‐C, Jeon OH, Zuo Y, Conboy MJ and Conboy IM (2021) Plasma dilution improves cognition and attenuates neuroinflammation in old mice. Geroscience 43, 1–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167. Yousefzadeh MJ, Wilkinson JE, Hughes B, Gadela N, Ladiges WC, Vo N, Niedernhofer LJ, Huffman DM and Robbins PD (2020) Heterochronic parabiosis regulates the extent of cellular senescence in multiple tissues. Geroscience 42, 951–961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168. Karin O and Alon U (2021) Senescent cell accumulation mechanisms inferred from parabiosis. Geroscience 43, 329–341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169. Baht GS, Silkstone D, Vi L, Nadesan P, Amani Y, Whetstone H, Wei Q and Alman BA (2015) Exposure to a youthful circulaton rejuvenates bone repair through modulation of β‐catenin. Nat Commun 6, 7131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170. Li H, Lu A, Gao X, Tang Y, Ravuri S, Wang B and Huard J (2021) Improved bone quality and bone healing of dystrophic mice by parabiosis. Metabolites 11, 247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171. Ruckh JM, Zhao J‐W, Shadrach JL, van Wijngaarden P, Rao TN, Wagers AJ and Franklin RJM (2012) Rejuvenation of regeneration in the aging central nervous system. Cell Stem Cell 10, 96–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172. Sergent, SR & Ashurst, JV (2025) Plasmapheresis. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173. David S, Russell L, Castro P, van de Louw A, Zafrani L, Pirani T, Nielsen ND, Mariotte E, Ferreyro BL, Kielstein JT et al. (2023) Research priorities for therapeutic plasma exchange in critically ill patients. ICMx 11, 26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174. Inglut C, Kausch K, Gray A and Landrigan M (2016) Rejuvenation of stored red blood cells increases oxygen release capacity. Blood 128, 4808. [Google Scholar]
- 175. Rabcuka J, Smethurst PA, Dammert K, Saker J, Aran G, Walsh GM, Tan JCG, Codinach M, McTaggart K, Marks DC et al. (2025) Assessing the kinetics of oxygen‐unloading from red cells using FlowScore, a flow‐cytometric proxy of the functional quality of blood. EBioMedicine 111, 105498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176. Evans BA, Ansari AK, Srinivasan AJ, Kamyszek RW, Stoner KC, Fuller M, Poisson JL and Welsby IJ (2020) Rejuvenation solution as an adjunct cold storage solution maintains physiological haemoglobin oxygen affinity during early‐storage period of red blood cells. Vox Sang 115, 388–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177. Marin M, Roussel C, Dussiot M, Ndour PA, Hermine O, Colin Y, Gray A, Landrigan M, Le Kim C, Buffet PA et al. (2021) Metabolic rejuvenation upgrades circulatory functions of red blood cells stored under blood bank conditions. Transfusion 61, 903–918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178. Aujla H, Woźniak M, Kumar T, Murphy GJ and REDJUVENATE Investigators (2018) Rejuvenation of Allogenic Red Cells: Benefits and Risks. Vox Sang 113, 509–529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179. Ferrari G, Cusella‐De Angelis G, Coletta M, Paolucci E, Stornaiuolo A, Cossu G and Mavilio F (1998) Muscle regeneration by bone marrow‐derived myogenic progenitors. Science 279, 1528–1530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180. Orlic D, Kajstura J, Chimenti S, Bodine DM, Leri A and Anversa P (2001) Transplanted adult bone marrow cells repair myocardial infarcts in mice. Ann N Y Acad Sci 938, 221–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181. Asahara T, Masuda H, Takahashi T, Kalka C, Pastore C, Silver M, Kearne M, Magner M and Isner JM (1999) Bone marrow origin of endothelial progenitor cells responsible for postnatal vasculogenesis in physiological and pathological neovascularization. Circ Res 85, 221–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182. Das MM, Godoy M, Chen S, Moser VA, Avalos P, Roxas KM, Dang I, Yáñez A, Zhang W, Bresee C et al. (2019) Young bone marrow transplantation preserves learning and memory in old mice. Commun Biol 2, 73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183. Guderyon MJ, Chen C, Bhattacharjee A, Ge G, Fernandez RA, Gelfond JAL, Gorena KM, Cheng CJ, Li Y, Nelson JF et al. (2020) Mobilization‐based transplantation of young‐donor hematopoietic stem cells extends lifespan in mice. Aging Cell 19, e13110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184. Kovina MV, Karnaukhov AV, Krasheninnikov ME, Kovin AL, Gazheev ST, Sergievich LA, Karnaukhova EV, Bogdanenko EV, Balyasin MV, Khodarovich YM et al. (2019) Extension of maximal lifespan and high bone marrow chimerism after nonmyeloablative syngeneic transplantation of bone marrow from young to old mice. Front Genet 10, 310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185. Suh MR, Lim I, Kim J, Yang P‐S, Choung JS, Sim HR, Ha SC and Kim M (2021) Efficacy of cord blood cell therapy for Hutchinson‐Gilford progeria syndrome – a case report. Int J Mol Sci 22, 12316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186. Yoshida S, Nakagami H, Hayashi H, Ikeda Y, Sun J, Tenma A, Tomioka H, Kawano T, Shimamura M, Morishita R et al. (2020) The CD153 vaccine is a senotherapeutic option for preventing the accumulation of senescent T cells in mice. Nat Commun 11, 2482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187. Sugiyama Y, Harada T, Kamei Y, Yasuda T, Mashimo T, Nishikimi A and Maruyama M (2023) A senolytic immunotoxin eliminates p16INK4a‐positive T cells and ameliorates age‐associated phenotypes of CD4+ T cells in a surface marker knock‐in mouse. Exp Gerontol 174, 112130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188. Bredenkamp N, Nowell CS and Blackburn CC (2014) Regeneration of the aged thymus by a single transcription factor. Development 141, 1627–1637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189. Santamaria JC, Chevallier J, Dutour L, Picart A, Kergaravat C, Cieslak A, Amrane M, Vincentelli R, Puthier D, Clave E et al. (2024) RANKL treatment restores thymic function and improves T cell‐mediated immune responses in aged mice. Sci Transl Med 16, eadp3171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190. Bartlett DB, Slentz CA, Willis LH, Hoselton A, Huebner JL, Kraus VB, Moss J, Muehlbauer MJ, Spielmann G, Muoio DM et al. (2020) Rejuvenation of neutrophil functions in association with reduced diabetes risk following ten weeks of low‐volume high intensity interval walking in older adults with prediabetes – a pilot study. Front Immunol 11, 729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191. Kamminga LM, van Os R, Ausema A, Noach EJK, Weersing E, Dontje B, Vellenga E and de Haan G (2005) Impaired hematopoietic stem cell functioning after serial transplantation and during normal aging. Stem Cells 23, 82–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192. Leins H, Mulaw M, Eiwen K, Sakk V, Liang Y, Denkinger M, Geiger H and Schirmbeck R (2018) Aged murine hematopoietic stem cells drive aging‐associated immune remodeling. Blood 132, 565–576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193. Morrison SJ, Wandycz AM, Akashi K, Globerson A and Weissman IL (1996) The aging of hematopoietic stem cells. Nat Med 2, 1011–1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194. Florian MC, Klose M, Sacma M, Jablanovic J, Knudson L, Nattamai KJ, Marka G, Vollmer A, Soller K, Sakk V et al. (2018) Aging alters the epigenetic asymmetry of HSC division. PLoS Biol 16, e2003389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195. Flohr Svendsen A, Yang D, Kim K, Lazare S, Skinder N, Zwart E, Mura‐Meszaros A, Ausema A, von Eyss B, de Haan G et al. (2021) A comprehensive transcriptome signature of murine hematopoietic stem cell aging. Blood 138, 439–451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196. Biechonski S, Olender L, Zipin‐Roitman A, Yassin M, Aqaqe N, Marcu‐Malina V, Rall‐Scharpf M, Trottier M, Meyn MS, Wiesmüller L et al. (2018) Attenuated DNA damage responses and increased apoptosis characterize human hematopoietic stem cells exposed to irradiation. Sci Rep 8, 6071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197. Nijnik A, Woodbine L, Marchetti C, Dawson S, Lambe T, Liu C, Rodrigues NP, Crockford TL, Cabuy E, Vindigni A et al. (2007) DNA repair is limiting for haematopoietic stem cells during ageing. Nature 447, 686–690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198. Chua BA, Lennan CJ, Sunshine MJ, Dreifke D, Chawla A, Bennett EJ and Signer RAJ (2023) Hematopoietic stem cells preferentially traffic misfolded proteins to aggresomes and depend on aggrephagy to maintain protein homeostasis. Cell Stem Cell 30, 460–472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199. Morganti C and Ito K (2021) Mitochondrial contributions to hematopoietic stem cell aging. Int J Mol Sci 22, 11117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200. Ho TT, Warr MR, Adelman ER, Lansinger OM, Flach J, Verovskaya EV, Figueroa ME and Passegué E (2017) Autophagy maintains the metabolism and function of young and old stem cells. Nature 543, 205–210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201. Chen C, Liu Y, Liu Y and Zheng P (2009) mTOR regulation and therapeutic rejuvenation of aging hematopoietic stem cells. Sci Signal 2, ra75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202. Luo H, Mu W‐C, Karki R, Chiang H‐H, Mohrin M, Shin JJ, Ohkubo R, Ito K, Kanneganti T‐D and Chen D (2019) Mitochondrial stress‐initiated aberrant activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome regulates the functional deterioration of hematopoietic stem cell aging. Cell Rep 26, 945–954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203. Naka K, Muraguchi T, Hoshii T and Hirao A (2008) Regulation of reactive oxygen species and genomic stability in hematopoietic stem cells. Antioxid Redox Signal 10, 1883–1894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204. Jang Y‐Y and Sharkis SJ (2007) A low level of reactive oxygen species selects for primitive hematopoietic stem cells that may reside in the low‐oxygenic niche. Blood 110, 3056–3063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205. Rossi DJ, Bryder D, Seita J, Nussenzweig A, Hoeijmakers J and Weissman IL (2007) Deficiencies in DNA damage repair limit the function of haematopoietic stem cells with age. Nature 447, 725–729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206. Beerman I, Bock C, Garrison BS, Smith ZD, Gu H, Meissner A and Rossi DJ (2013) Proliferation‐dependent alterations of the DNA methylation landscape underlie hematopoietic stem cell aging. Cell Stem Cell 12, 413–425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207. Keenan CR, Iannarella N, Naselli G, Bediaga NG, Johanson TM, Harrison LC and Allan RS (2020) Extreme disruption of heterochromatin is required for accelerated hematopoietic aging. Blood 135, 2049–2058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208. Djeghloul D, Kuranda K, Kuzniak I, Barbieri D, Naguibneva I, Choisy C, Bories J‐C, Dosquet C, Pla M, Vanneaux V et al. (2016) Age‐associated decrease of the histone methyltransferase SUV39H1 in HSC perturbs heterochromatin and B lymphoid differentiation. Stem Cell Reports 6, 970–984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209. Sun D, Luo M, Jeong M, Rodriguez B, Xia Z, Hannah R, Wang H, Le T, Faull KF, Chen R et al. (2014) Epigenomic profiling of young and aged HSCs reveals concerted changes during aging that reinforce self‐renewal. Cell Stem Cell 14, 673–688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210. Lemerle E and Trompouki E (2023) Transposable elements in normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Dis Model Mech 16, dmm050170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211. Scherer M, Singh I, Braun MM, Szu‐Tu C, Sanchez Sanchez P, Lindenhofer D, Jakobsen NA, Körber V, Kardorff M, Nitsch L et al. (2025) Clonal tracing with somatic epimutations reveals dynamics of blood ageing. Nature 643, 478–487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212. Bowman RL, Busque L and Levine RL (2018) Clonal hematopoiesis and evolution to hematopoietic malignancies. Cell Stem Cell 22, 157–170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213. Jan M, Snyder TM, Corces‐Zimmerman MR, Vyas P, Weissman IL, Quake SR and Majeti R (2012) Clonal evolution of preleukemic hematopoietic stem cells precedes human acute myeloid leukemia. Sci Transl Med 4, 149ra118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214. Muller‐Sieburg CE, Cho RH, Karlsson L, Huang J‐F and Sieburg HB (2004) Myeloid‐biased hematopoietic stem cells have extensive self‐renewal capacity but generate diminished lymphoid progeny with impaired IL‐7 responsiveness. Blood 103, 4111–4118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215. Kim M, Moon H‐B and Spangrude GJ (2003) Major age‐related changes of mouse hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci 996, 195–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216. Sudo K, Ema H, Morita Y and Nakauchi H (2000) Age‐associated characteristics of murine hematopoietic stem cells. J Exp Med 192, 1273–1280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217. Pang WW, Price EA, Sahoo D, Beerman I, Maloney WJ, Rossi DJ, Schrier SL and Weissman IL (2011) Human bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells are increased in frequency and myeloid‐biased with age. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108, 20012–20017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218. Singh A, Chia JJ, Rao DS and Hoffmann A (2025) Population dynamics modeling reveals that myeloid bias involves both HSC differentiation and progenitor proliferation biases. Blood 145, 1293–1308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219. Beerman I, Bhattacharya D, Zandi S, Sigvardsson M, Weissman IL, Bryder D and Rossi DJ (2010) Functionally distinct hematopoietic stem cells modulate hematopoietic lineage potential during aging by a mechanism of clonal expansion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107, 5465–5470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220. Ross JB, Myers LM, Noh JJ, Collins MM, Carmody AB, Messer RJ, Dhuey E, Hasenkrug KJ and Weissman IL (2024) Depleting myeloid‐biased haematopoietic stem cells rejuvenates aged immunity. Nature 628, 162–170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221. Gekas C and Graf T (2013) CD41 expression marks myeloid‐biased adult hematopoietic stem cells and increases with age. Blood 121, 4463–4472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222. Foster AD, Sivarapatna A and Gress RE (2011) The aging immune system and its relationship with cancer. Aging Health 7, 707–718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223. Zhang P, Zhang C, Li J, Han J, Liu X and Yang H (2019) The physical microenvironment of hematopoietic stem cells and its emerging roles in engineering applications. Stem Cell Res Ther 10, 327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224. Li H, Luo Q, Shan W, Cai S, Tie R, Xu Y, Lin Y, Qian P and Huang H (2021) Biomechanical cues as master regulators of hematopoietic stem cell fate. Cell Mol Life Sci 78, 5881–5902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225. Geiger H, de Haan G and Florian MC (2013) The ageing haematopoietic stem cell compartment. Nat Rev Immunol 13, 376–389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226. Matteini F, Mulaw MA and Florian MC (2021) Aging of the hematopoietic stem cell niche: new tools to answer an old question. Front Immunol 12, 738204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227. Ergen AV, Boles NC and Goodell MA (2012) Rantes/Ccl5 influences hematopoietic stem cell subtypes and causes myeloid skewing. Blood 119, 2500–2509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228. Young K, Eudy E, Bell R, Loberg MA, Stearns T, Sharma D, Velten L, Haas S, Filippi M‐D and Trowbridge JJ (2021) Decline in IGF1 in the bone marrow microenvironment initiates hematopoietic stem cell aging. Cell Stem Cell 28, 1473–1482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229. Kuribayashi W, Oshima M, Itokawa N, Koide S, Nakajima‐Takagi Y, Yamashita M, Yamazaki S, Rahmutulla B, Miura F, Ito T et al. (2021) Limited rejuvenation of aged hematopoietic stem cells in young bone marrow niche. J Exp Med 218, e20192283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230. Saçma M, Pospiech J, Bogeska R, de Back W, Mallm J‐P, Sakk V, Soller K, Marka G, Vollmer A, Karns R et al. (2019) Haematopoietic stem cells in perisinusoidal niches are protected from ageing. Nat Cell Biol 21, 1309–1320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231. Kasbekar M, Mitchell CA, Proven MA and Passegué E (2023) Hematopoietic stem cells through the ages: a lifetime of adaptation to organismal demands. Cell Stem Cell 30, 1403–1420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232. Ehninger D, Neff F and Xie K (2014) Longevity, aging and rapamycin. Cell Mol Life Sci 71, 4325–4346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233. Rohrabaugh SL, Campbell TB, Hangoc G and Broxmeyer HE (2011) Ex vivo rapamycin treatment of human cord blood CD34+ cells enhances their engraftment of NSG mice. Blood Cells Mol Dis 46, 318–320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234. Montserrat‐Vazquez S, Ali NJ, Matteini F, Lozano J, Zhaowei T, Mejia‐Ramirez E, Marka G, Vollmer A, Soller K, Sacma M et al. (2022) Transplanting rejuvenated blood stem cells extends lifespan of aged immunocompromised mice. Npj Regen Med 7, 78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235. Amoah A, Keller A, Emini R, Hoenicka M, Liebold A, Vollmer A, Eiwen K, Soller K, Sakk V, Zheng Y et al. (2022) Aging of human hematopoietic stem cells is linked to changes in Cdc42 activity. Haematologica 107, 393–402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236. Kerber RA, O'Brien E and Cawthon RM (2009) Gene expression profiles associated with aging and mortality in humans. Aging Cell 8, 239–250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237. Florian MC, Dörr K, Niebel A, Daria D, Schrezenmeier H, Rojewski M, Filippi M‐D, Hasenberg A, Gunzer M, Scharffetter‐Kochanek K et al. (2012) Cdc42 activity regulates hematopoietic stem cell aging and rejuvenation. Cell Stem Cell 10, 520–530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238. Florian MC, Nattamai KJ, Dörr K, Marka G, Uberle B, Vas V, Eckl C, Andrä I, Schiemann M, Oostendorp RAJ et al. (2013) A canonical to non‐canonical Wnt signalling switch in haematopoietic stem‐cell ageing. Nature 503, 392–396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239. Wahlestedt M, Norddahl GL, Sten G, Ugale A, Frisk M‐AM, Mattsson R, Deierborg T, Sigvardsson M and Bryder D (2013) An epigenetic component of hematopoietic stem cell aging amenable to reprogramming into a young state. Blood 121, 4257–4264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240. Wu Q‐J, Zhang T‐N, Chen H‐H, Yu X‐F, Lv J‐L, Liu Y‐Y, Liu Y‐S, Zheng G, Zhao J‐Q, Wei Y‐F et al. (2022) The sirtuin family in health and disease. Signal Transduct Target Ther 7, 402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241. Howitz KT, Bitterman KJ, Cohen HY, Lamming DW, Lavu S, Wood JG, Zipkin RE, Chung P, Kisielewski A, Zhang L‐L et al. (2003) Small molecule activators of sirtuins extend Saccharomyces cerevisiae lifespan. Nature 425, 191–196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242. Brenner C (2022) Sirtuins are not conserved longevity genes. Life Metab 1, 122–133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243. Brown K, Xie S, Qiu X, Mohrin M, Shin J, Liu Y, Zhang D, Scadden DT and Chen D (2013) SIRT3 reverses aging‐associated degeneration. Cell Rep 3, 319–327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244. Mohrin M, Shin J, Liu Y, Brown K, Luo H, Xi Y, Haynes CM and Chen D (2015) Stem cell aging. A mitochondrial UPR‐mediated metabolic checkpoint regulates hematopoietic stem cell aging. Science 347, 1374–1377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245. Girotra M, Chiang Y‐H, Charmoy M, Ginefra P, Hope HC, Bataclan C, Yu Y‐R, Schyrr F, Franco F, Geiger H et al. (2023) Induction of mitochondrial recycling reverts age‐associated decline of the hematopoietic and immune systems. Nat Aging 3, 1057–1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246. Mansell E, Sigurdsson V, Deltcheva E, Brown J, James C, Miharada K, Soneji S, Larsson J and Enver T (2021) Mitochondrial potentiation ameliorates age‐related heterogeneity in hematopoietic stem cell function. Cell Stem Cell 28, 241–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247. Dong S, Wang Q, Kao Y‐R, Diaz A, Tasset I, Kaushik S, Thiruthuvanathan V, Zintiridou A, Nieves E, Dzieciatkowska M et al. (2021) Chaperone‐mediated autophagy sustains haematopoietic stem‐cell function. Nature 591, 117–123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248. Wang Y, Kellner J, Liu L and Zhou D (2011) Inhibition of p38 mitogen‐activated protein kinase promotes ex vivo hematopoietic stem cell expansion. Stem Cells Dev 20, 1143–1152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249. Jung H, Kim DO, Byun J‐E, Kim WS, Kim MJ, Song HY, Kim YK, Kang D‐K, Park Y‐J, Kim T‐D et al. (2016) Thioredoxin‐interacting protein regulates haematopoietic stem cell ageing and rejuvenation by inhibiting p38 kinase activity. Nat Commun 7, 13674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250. Ito K, Hirao A, Arai F, Takubo K, Matsuoka S, Miyamoto K, Ohmura M, Naka K, Hosokawa K, Ikeda Y et al. (2006) Reactive oxygen species act through p38 MAPK to limit the lifespan of hematopoietic stem cells. Nat Med 12, 446–451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251. Satoh Y, Yokota T, Sudo T, Kondo M, Lai A, Kincade PW, Kouro T, Iida R, Kokame K, Miyata T et al. (2013) The Satb1 protein directs hematopoietic stem cell differentiation toward lymphoid lineages. Immunity 38, 1105–1115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252. Wang J, Morita Y, Han B, Niemann S, Löffler B and Rudolph KL (2016) Per2 induction limits lymphoid‐biased haematopoietic stem cells and lymphopoiesis in the context of DNA damage and ageing. Nat Cell Biol 18, 480–490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253. Wendorff AA, Aidan Quinn S, Alvarez S, Brown JA, Biswas M, Gunning T, Palomero T and Ferrando AA (2022) Epigenetic reversal of hematopoietic stem cell aging in Phf6‐knockout mice. Nat Aging 2, 1008–1023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254. Rettkowski J, Romero‐Mulero MC, Singh I, Wadle C, Wrobel J, Chiang D, Hoppe N, Mess J, Schönberger K, Lalioti M‐E et al. (2025) Modulation of bone marrow haematopoietic stem cell activity as a therapeutic strategy after myocardial infarction: a preclinical study. Nat Cell Biol 27, 591–604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255. Cabezas‐Wallscheid N, Buettner F, Sommerkamp P, Klimmeck D, Ladel L, Thalheimer FB, Pastor‐Flores D, Roma LP, Renders S, Zeisberger P et al. (2017) Vitamin A‐retinoic acid signaling regulates hematopoietic stem cell dormancy. Cell 169, 807–823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256. Tang D, Tao S, Chen Z, Koliesnik IO, Calmes PG, Hoerr V, Han B, Gebert N, Zörnig M, Löffler B et al. (2016) Dietary restriction improves repopulation but impairs lymphoid differentiation capacity of hematopoietic stem cells in early aging. J Exp Med 213, 535–553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257. Ho TT, Dellorusso PV, Verovskaya EV, Bakker ST, Flach J, Smith LK, Ventura PB, Lansinger OM, Hérault A, Zhang SY et al. (2021) Aged hematopoietic stem cells are refractory to bloodborne systemic rejuvenation interventions. J Exp Med 218, 35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258. Lazare S, Ausema A, Reijne AC, van Dijk G, van Os R and de Haan G (2017) Lifelong dietary intervention does not affect hematopoietic stem cell function. Exp Hematol 53, 26–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259. Ertl RP, Chen J, Astle CM, Duffy TM and Harrison DE (2008) Effects of dietary restriction on hematopoietic stem‐cell aging are genetically regulated. Blood 111, 1709–1716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260. Chen J, Astle CM and Harrison DE (2003) Hematopoietic senescence is postponed and hematopoietic stem cell function is enhanced by dietary restriction. Exp Hematol 31, 1097–1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261. Ambrosi TH, Marecic O, McArdle A, Sinha R, Gulati GS, Tong X, Wang Y, Steininger HM, Hoover MY, Koepke LS et al. (2021) Aged skeletal stem cells generate an inflammatory degenerative niche. Nature 597, 256–262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262. Chang J, Wang Y, Shao L, Laberge R‐M, Demaria M, Campisi J, Janakiraman K, Sharpless NE, Ding S, Feng W et al. (2016) Clearance of senescent cells by ABT263 rejuvenates aged hematopoietic stem cells in mice. Nat Med 22, 78–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263. Poulos MG, Ramalingam P, Gutkin MC, Llanos P, Gilleran K, Rabbany SY and Butler JM (2017) Endothelial transplantation rejuvenates aged hematopoietic stem cell function. J Clin Invest 127, 4163–4178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264. Ramalingam P, Gutkin MC, Poulos MG, Tillery T, Doughty C, Winiarski A, Freire AG, Rafii S, Redmond D and Butler JM (2023) Restoring bone marrow niche function rejuvenates aged hematopoietic stem cells by reactivating the DNA damage response. Nat Commun 14, 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265. Maryanovich M, Zahalka AH, Pierce H, Pinho S, Nakahara F, Asada N, Wei Q, Wang X, Ciero P, Xu J et al. (2018) Adrenergic nerve degeneration in bone marrow drives aging of the hematopoietic stem cell niche. Nat Med 24, 782–791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266. Ho Y‐H, Del Toro R, Rivera‐Torres J, Rak J, Korn C, García‐García A, Macías D, González‐Gómez C, Del Monte A, Wittner M et al. (2019) Remodeling of bone marrow hematopoietic stem cell niches promotes myeloid cell expansion during premature or physiological aging. Cell Stem Cell 25, 407–418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267. Zhang X, Cao D, Xu L, Xu Y, Gao Z, Pan Y, Jiang M, Wei Y, Wang L, Liao Y et al. (2023) Harnessing matrix stiffness to engineer a bone marrow niche for hematopoietic stem cell rejuvenation. Cell Stem Cell 30, 378–395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268. Tharmapalan V and Wagner W (2024) Biomarkers for aging of blood ‐ how transferable are they between mice and humans? Exp Hematol 140, 104600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 269. Kapadia CD, Williams N, Dawson KJ, Watson C, Yousefzadeh MJ, Le D, Nyamondo K, Kodavali S, Cagan A, Waldvogel S et al. (2025) Clonal dynamics and somatic evolution of haematopoiesis in mouse. Nature 641, 681–689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 270. Pinho S and Frenette PS (2019) Haematopoietic stem cell activity and interactions with the niche. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 20, 303–320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 271. Guidi N, Marka G, Sakk V, Zheng Y, Florian MC and Geiger H (2021) An aged bone marrow niche restrains rejuvenated hematopoietic stem cells. Stem Cells 39, 1101–1106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 272. Ball LM, Bernardo ME, Roelofs H, Lankester A, Cometa A, Egeler RM, Locatelli F and Fibbe WE (2007) Cotransplantation of ex vivo expanded mesenchymal stem cells accelerates lymphocyte recovery and may reduce the risk of graft failure in haploidentical hematopoietic stem‐cell transplantation. Blood 110, 2764–2767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 273. Fernández‐García M, Yañez RM, Sánchez‐Domínguez R, Hernando‐Rodriguez M, Peces‐Barba M, Herrera G, O'Connor JE, Segovia JC, Bueren JA and Lamana ML (2015) Mesenchymal stromal cells enhance the engraftment of hematopoietic stem cells in an autologous mouse transplantation model. Stem Cell Res Ther 6, 165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 274. Noort WA, Kruisselbrink AB, in't Anker PS, Kruger M, van Bezooijen RL, de Paus RA, Heemskerk MHM, Löwik CWGM, Falkenburg JH, Willemze R et al. (2002) Mesenchymal stem cells promote engraftment of human umbilical cord blood‐derived CD34(+) cells in NOD/SCID mice. Exp Hematol 30, 870–878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 275. Almeida‐Porada G, Porada CD, Tran N and Zanjani ED (2000) Cotransplantation of human stromal cell progenitors into preimmune fetal sheep results in early appearance of human donor cells in circulation and boosts cell levels in bone marrow at later time points after transplantation. Blood 95, 3620–3627. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 276. Nakahara F, Borger DK, Wei Q, Pinho S, Maryanovich M, Zahalka AH, Suzuki M, Cruz CD, Wang Z, Xu C et al. (2019) Engineering a haematopoietic stem cell niche by revitalizing mesenchymal stromal cells. Nat Cell Biol 21, 560–567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 277. Kulkarni R, Bajaj M, Ghode S, Jalnapurkar S, Limaye L and Kale VP (2018) Intercellular transfer of microvesicles from Young mesenchymal stromal cells rejuvenates aged murine hematopoietic stem cells. Stem Cells 36, 420–433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 278. Davies LC, Heldring N, Kadri N and Le Blanc K (2017) Mesenchymal stromal cell secretion of programmed Death‐1 ligands regulates T cell mediated immunosuppression. Stem Cells 35, 766–776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 279. Plumas J, Chaperot L, Richard MJ, Molens JP, Bensa JC and Favrot MC (2005) Mesenchymal stem cells induce apoptosis of activated T cells. Leukemia 19, 1597–1604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 280. Glennie S, Soeiro I, Dyson PJ, Lam EW‐F and Dazzi F (2005) Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells induce division arrest anergy of activated T cells. Blood 105, 2821–2827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 281. Kim J and Hematti P (2009) Mesenchymal stem cell‐educated macrophages: a novel type of alternatively activated macrophages. Exp Hematol 37, 1445–1453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 282. Corcione A, Benvenuto F, Ferretti E, Giunti D, Cappiello V, Cazzanti F, Risso M, Gualandi F, Mancardi GL, Pistoia V et al. (2006) Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate B‐cell functions. Blood 107, 367–372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 283. Ren G, Zhao X, Zhang L, Zhang J, L'Huillier A, Ling W, Roberts AI, Le AD, Shi S, Shao C et al. (2010) Inflammatory cytokine‐induced intercellular adhesion molecule‐1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule‐1 in mesenchymal stem cells are critical for immunosuppression. J Immunol 184, 2321–2328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 284. Franquesa M, Mensah FK, Huizinga R, Strini T, Boon L, Lombardo E, DelaRosa O, Laman JD, Grinyó JM, Weimar W et al. (2015) Human adipose tissue‐derived mesenchymal stem cells abrogate plasmablast formation and induce regulatory B cells independently of T helper cells. Stem Cells 33, 880–891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 285. Yang ZX, Han Z‐B, Ji YR, Wang YW, Liang L, Chi Y, Yang SG, Li LN, Luo WF, Li JP et al. (2013) CD106 identifies a subpopulation of mesenchymal stem cells with unique immunomodulatory properties. PLoS One 8, e59354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 286. Krampera M, Glennie S, Dyson J, Scott D, Laylor R, Simpson E and Dazzi F (2003) Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells inhibit the response of naive and memory antigen‐specific T cells to their cognate peptide. Blood 101, 3722–3729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 287. Rasmusson I, Ringdén O, Sundberg B and Le Blanc K (2003) Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit the formation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, but not activated cytotoxic T lymphocytes or natural killer cells. Transplantation 76, 1208–1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 288. Di Nicola M, Carlo‐Stella C, Magni M, Milanesi M, Longoni PD, Matteucci P, Grisanti S and Gianni AM (2002) Human bone marrow stromal cells suppress T‐lymphocyte proliferation induced by cellular or nonspecific mitogenic stimuli. Blood 99, 3838–3843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 289. Klyushnenkova E, Mosca JD, Zernetkina V, Majumdar MK, Beggs KJ, Simonetti DW, Deans RJ and McIntosh KR (2005) T cell responses to allogeneic human mesenchymal stem cells: immunogenicity, tolerance, and suppression. J Biomed Sci 12, 47–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 290. Aggarwal S and Pittenger MF (2005) Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate allogeneic immune cell responses. Blood 105, 1815–1822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 291. Le Blanc K and Mougiakakos D (2012) Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells and the innate immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 12, 383–396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 292. Pers Y‐M, Bony C, Duroux‐Richard I, Bernard L, Maumus M, Assou S, Barry F, Jorgensen C and Noël D (2021) miR‐155 contributes to the immunoregulatory function of human mesenchymal stem cells. Front Immunol 12, 624024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 293. Kurtzberg J, Abdel‐Azim H, Carpenter P, Chaudhury S, Horn B, Mahadeo K, Nemecek E, Neudorf S, Prasad V, Prockop S et al. (2020) A phase 3, single‐arm, prospective study of Remestemcel‐L, ex vivo culture‐expanded adult human mesenchymal stromal cells for the treatment of pediatric patients who failed to respond to steroid treatment for acute graft‐versus‐host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 26, 845–854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 294. Burnham AJ, Daley‐Bauer LP and Horwitz EM (2020) Mesenchymal stromal cells in hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood Adv 4, 5877–5887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 295. Li T, Luo C, Zhang J, Wei L, Sun W, Xie Q, Liu Y, Zhao Y, Xu S and Wang L (2021) Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells co‐infusion in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Stem Cell Res Ther 12, 246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 296. Golan K, Singh AK, Kollet O, Bertagna M, Althoff MJ, Khatib‐Massalha E, Petrovich‐Kopitman E, Wellendorf AM, Massalha H, Levin‐Zaidman S et al. (2020) Bone marrow regeneration requires mitochondrial transfer from donor Cx43‐expressing hematopoietic progenitors to stroma. Blood 136, 2607–2619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 297. Kizilay Mancini Ö, Lora M, Shum‐Tim D, Nadeau S, Rodier F and Colmegna I (2017) A proinflammatory Secretome mediates the impaired Immunopotency of human mesenchymal stromal cells in elderly patients with atherosclerosis. Stem Cells Transl Med 6, 1132–1140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 298. Pajarinen J, Lin T, Gibon E, Kohno Y, Maruyama M, Nathan K, Lu L, Yao Z and Goodman SB (2019) Mesenchymal stem cell‐macrophage crosstalk and bone healing. Biomaterials 196, 80–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 299. Sepúlveda JC, Tomé M, Fernández ME, Delgado M, Campisi J, Bernad A and González MA (2014) Cell senescence abrogates the therapeutic potential of human mesenchymal stem cells in the lethal endotoxemia model. Stem Cells 32, 1865–1877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 300. Hong Y, He H, Jiang G, Zhang H, Tao W, Ding Y, Yuan D, Liu J, Fan H, Lin F et al. (2020) miR‐155‐5p inhibition rejuvenates aged mesenchymal stem cells and enhances cardioprotection following infarction. Aging Cell 19, e13128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 301. Santamaría C, Muntión S, Rosón B, Blanco B, López‐Villar O, Carrancio S, Sánchez‐Guijo FM, Díez‐Campelo M, Alvarez‐Fernández S, Sarasquete ME et al. (2012) Impaired expression of DICER, DROSHA, SBDS and some microRNAs in mesenchymal stromal cells from myelodysplastic syndrome patients. Haematologica 97, 1218–1224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 302. Vallabhaneni KC, Penfornis P, Dhule S, Guillonneau F, Adams KV, Mo YY, Xu R, Liu Y, Watabe K, Vemuri MC et al. (2015) Extracellular vesicles from bone marrow mesenchymal stem/stromal cells transport tumor regulatory microRNA, proteins, and metabolites. Oncotarget 6, 4953–4967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 303. Fei C, Zhao Y, Guo J, Gu S, Li X and Chang C (2014) Senescence of bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells is accompanied by activation of p53/p21 pathway in myelodysplastic syndromes. Eur J Haematol 93, 476–486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 304. Muntión S, Ramos TL, Diez‐Campelo M, Rosón B, Sánchez‐Abarca LI, Misiewicz‐Krzeminska I, Preciado S, Sarasquete M‐E, de Las Rivas J, González M et al. (2016) Microvesicles from mesenchymal stromal cells are involved in HPC‐microenvironment crosstalk in myelodysplastic patients. PLoS One 11, e0146722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 305. Forte D, García‐Fernández M, Sánchez‐Aguilera A, Stavropoulou V, Fielding C, Martín‐Pérez D, López JA, Costa ASH, Tronci L, Nikitopoulou E et al. (2020) Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells support acute myeloid leukemia bioenergetics and enhance antioxidant defense and escape from chemotherapy. Cell Metab 32, 829–843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 306. Lei F, Huang Z, Ou Q, Li J, Liu M, Ma L, Tan L, Lin Z and Kou X (2022) Apoptotic vesicles rejuvenate mesenchymal stem cells via Rab7‐mediated autolysosome formation and alleviate bone loss in aging mice. Nano Res 16, 822–833. [Google Scholar]
- 307. Shin T‐H, Kim H‐S, Kang T‐W, Lee B‐C, Lee H‐Y, Kim Y‐J, Shin J‐H, Seo Y, Won Choi S, Lee S et al. (2016) Human umbilical cord blood‐stem cells direct macrophage polarization and block inflammasome activation to alleviate rheumatoid arthritis. Cell Death Dis 7, e2524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 308. Gu Z, Tan W, Ji J, Feng G, Meng Y, Da Z, Guo G, Xia Y, Zhu X, Shi G et al. (2016) Rapamycin reverses the senescent phenotype and improves immunoregulation of mesenchymal stem cells from MRL/lpr mice and systemic lupus erythematosus patients through inhibition of the mTOR signaling pathway. Aging 8, 1102–1114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 309. Staff NP, Jones DT and Singer W (2019) Mesenchymal stromal cell therapies for neurodegenerative diseases. Mayo Clin Proc 94, 892–905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 310. Ha DH, Kim H‐K, Lee J, Kwon HH, Park G‐H, Yang SH, Jung JY, Choi H, Lee JH, Sung S et al. (2020) Mesenchymal stem/stromal cell‐derived exosomes for immunomodulatory therapeutics and skin regeneration. Cells 9, 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 311. Litwinowicz R, Kapelak B, Sadowski J, Kędziora A and Bartus K (2018) The use of stem cells in ischemic heart disease treatment. Kardiochir Torakochirurgia pol 15, 196–199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 312. Riordan NH, Morales I, Fernández G, Allen N, Fearnot NE, Leckrone ME, Markovich DJ, Mansfield D, Avila D, Patel AN et al. (2018) Clinical feasibility of umbilical cord tissue‐derived mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. J Transl Med 16, 57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 313. Kurihara K, Sasaki M, Nagahama H, Obara H, Fukushi R, Hirota R, Yoshimoto M, Teramoto A, Kocsis JD, Yamashita T et al. (2023) Repeated intravenous infusion of mesenchymal stem cells enhances recovery of motor function in a rat model with chronic spinal cord injury. Brain Res 1817, 148484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 314. Yokoyama T, Sasaki M, Nagahama H, Kataoka‐Sasaki Y, Ukai R, Oka S, Kocsis JD and Honmou O (2025) Multiple intravenous infusions versus a single infusion of mesenchymal stem cells in a rat model of cerebral ischemia. J Neurosurg 142, 684–692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 315. Fernández O, Izquierdo G, Fernández V, Leyva L, Reyes V, Guerrero M, León A, Arnaiz C, Navarro G, Páramo MD et al. (2018) Adipose‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (AdMSC) for the treatment of secondary‐progressive multiple sclerosis: a triple blinded, placebo controlled, randomized phase I/II safety and feasibility study. PLoS One 13, e0195891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 316. Lublin FD, Bowen JD, Huddlestone J, Kremenchutzky M, Carpenter A, Corboy JR, Freedman MS, Krupp L, Paulo C, Hariri RJ et al. (2014) Human placenta‐derived cells (PDA‐001) for the treatment of adults with multiple sclerosis: a randomized, placebo‐controlled, multiple‐dose study. Mult Scler Relat Disord 3, 696–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 317. Uccelli A, Laroni A, Brundin L, Clanet M, Fernandez O, Nabavi SM, Muraro PA, Oliveri RS, Radue EW, Sellner J et al. (2019) MEsenchymal StEm cells for multiple sclerosis (MESEMS): a randomized, double blind, cross‐over phase I/II clinical trial with autologous mesenchymal stem cells for the therapy of multiple sclerosis. Trials 20, 263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 318. de Oliveira GLV, de Lima KWA, Colombini AM, Pinheiro DG, Panepucci RA, Palma PVB, Brum DG, Covas DT, Simões BP, de Oliveira MC et al. (2015) Bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells isolated from multiple sclerosis patients have distinct gene expression profile and decreased suppressive function compared with healthy counterparts. Cell Transplant 24, 151–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 319. Petrou P, Kassis I, Levin N, Paul F, Backner Y, Benoliel T, Oertel FC, Scheel M, Hallimi M, Yaghmour N et al. (2020) Beneficial effects of autologous mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in active progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain 143, 3574–3588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 320. Álvaro‐Gracia JM, Jover JA, García‐Vicuña R, Carreño L, Alonso A, Marsal S, Blanco F, Martínez‐Taboada VM, Taylor P, Martín‐Martín C et al. (2017) Intravenous administration of expanded allogeneic adipose‐derived mesenchymal stem cells in refractory rheumatoid arthritis (Cx611): results of a multicentre, dose escalation, randomised, single‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase Ib/IIa clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis 76, 196–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 321. Llufriu S, Sepúlveda M, Blanco Y, Marín P, Moreno B, Berenguer J, Gabilondo I, Martínez‐Heras E, Sola‐Valls N, Arnaiz J‐A et al. (2014) Randomized placebo‐controlled phase II trial of autologous mesenchymal stem cells in multiple sclerosis. PLoS One 9, e113936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 322. Duijvestein M, Vos ACW, Roelofs H, Wildenberg ME, Wendrich BB, Verspaget HW, Kooy‐Winkelaar EMC, Koning F, Zwaginga JJ, Fidder HH et al. (2010) Autologous bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stromal cell treatment for refractory luminal Crohn's disease: results of a phase I study. Gut 59, 1662–1669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 323. Ciccocioppo R, Bernardo ME, Sgarella A, Maccario R, Avanzini MA, Ubezio C, Minelli A, Alvisi C, Vanoli A, Calliada F et al. (2011) Autologous bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stromal cells in the treatment of fistulising Crohn's disease. Gut 60, 788–798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 324. Connick P, Kolappan M, Crawley C, Webber DJ, Patani R, Michell AW, Du M‐Q, Luan S‐L, Altmann DR, Thompson AJ et al. (2012) Autologous mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: an open‐label phase 2a proof‐of‐concept study. Lancet Neurol 11, 150–156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 325. Niederwieser D, Baldomero H, Bazuaye N, Bupp C, Chaudhri N, Corbacioglu S, Elhaddad A, Frutos C, Galeano S, Hamad N et al. (2022) One and a half million hematopoietic stem cell transplants: continuous and differential improvement in worldwide access with the use of non‐identical family donors. Haematologica 107, 1045–1053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 326. Passweg JR, Baldomero H, Atlija M, Kleovoulou I, Witaszek A, Alexander T, Angelucci E, Averbuch D, Bazarbachi A, Ciceri F et al. (2025) The 2023 EBMT report on hematopoietic cell transplantation and cellular therapies. Increased use of allogeneic HCT for myeloid malignancies and of CAR‐T at the expense of autologous HCT. Bone Marrow Transplant 60, 519–528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 327. Cantú‐Rodríguez OG, Lavalle‐González F, Herrera‐Rojas MÁ, Jaime‐Pérez JC, Hawing‐Zárate JÁ, Gutiérrez‐Aguirre CH, Mancias‐Guerra C, González‐Llano O, Zapata‐Garrido A, Villarreal‐Pérez JZ et al. (2016) Long‐term insulin Independence in type 1 diabetes mellitus using a simplified autologous stem cell transplant. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101, 2141–2148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 328. Couri CEB, Oliveira MCB, Stracieri ABPL, Moraes DA, Pieroni F, Barros GMN, Madeira MIA, Malmegrim KCR, Foss‐Freitas MC, Simões BP et al. (2009) C‐peptide levels and insulin independence following autologous nonmyeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus. JAMA 301, 1573–1579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 329. Voltarelli JC, Couri CEB, Stracieri ABPL, Oliveira MC, Moraes DA, Pieroni F, Coutinho M, Malmegrim KCR, Foss‐Freitas MC, Simões BP et al. (2007) Autologous nonmyeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus. JAMA 297, 1568–1576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 330. Shouval R, Furie N, Raanani P, Nagler A and Gafter‐Gvili A (2018) Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for systemic sclerosis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 24, 937–944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 331. Burt RK, Balabanov R, Han X, Burns C, Gastala J, Jovanovic B, Helenowski I, Jitprapaikulsan J, Fryer JP and Pittock SJ (2019) Autologous nonmyeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 93, e1732–e1741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 332. Burt RK, Balabanov R, Tavee J, Han X, Sufit R, Ajroud‐Driss S, Jovanovic B, Quigley K, Arnautovic I, Helenowski I et al. (2020) Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. J Neurol 267, 3378–3391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 333. Muraro, P A , Mariottini, A , Greco, R , Burman, J , Iacobaeus, E , Inglese, M , Snowden, JA , Alexander, T , Amato, MP , Bø, L et al. (2025) Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for treatment of multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder ‐ recommendations from ECTRIMS and the EBMT. Nat Rev Neurol 21, 140–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 334. Burman J, Fransson M, Tötterman TH, Fagius J, Mangsbo SM and Loskog ASI (2013) T‐cell responses after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for aggressive relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis. Immunology 140, 211–219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 335. Burt RK, Balabanov R, Han X, Quigley K, Arnautovic I, Helenowski I, Rose J and Siddique T (2021) Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for stiff‐person Spectrum disorder: a clinical trial. Neurology 96, e817–e830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 336. Muraro PA, Robins H, Malhotra S, Howell M, Phippard D, Desmarais C, de Paula Alves Sousa A, Griffith LM, Lim N, Nash RA et al. (2014) T cell repertoire following autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple sclerosis. J Clin Invest 124, 1168–1172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 337. Lucas KG, Schwartz C and Kaplan J (2008) Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in a patient with relapsed Ewing sarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 51, 142–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 338. Ohta H, Hashii Y, Yoshida H, Kusuki S, Tokimasa S, Yoneda A, Fukuzawa M, Inoue N, Hara J, Kusafuka T et al. (2011) Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation against recurrent rhabdomyosarcoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 33, e35–e38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 339. Childs R and Srinivasan R (2002) Advances in allogeneic stem cell transplantation: directing graft‐versus‐leukemia at solid tumors. Cancer J 8, 2–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 340. Marvasti TB, Alibhai FJ, Weisel RD and Li R‐K (2019) CD34+ stem cells: promising roles in cardiac repair and regeneration. Can J Cardiol 35, 1311–1321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 341. Mehta T, Feroz A, Thakkar U, Vanikar A, Shah V and Trivedi H (2008) Subarachnoid placement of stem cells in neurological disorders. Transplant Proc 40, 1145–1147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 342. Mancías‐Guerra C, Marroquín‐Escamilla AR, González‐Llano O, Villarreal‐Martínez L, Jaime‐Pérez JC, García‐Rodríguez F, Valdés‐Burnes SL, Rodríguez‐Romo LN, Barrera‐Morales DC, Sánchez‐Hernández JJ et al. (2014) Safety and tolerability of intrathecal delivery of autologous bone marrow nucleated cells in children with cerebral palsy: an open‐label phase I trial. Cytotherapy 16, 810–820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 343. Krägeloh‐Mann I, Groeschel S, Kehrer C, Opherk K, Nägele T, Handgretinger R and Müller I (2013) Juvenile metachromatic leukodystrophy 10 years post transplant compared with a non‐transplanted cohort. Bone Marrow Transplant 48, 369–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 344. Eichler F, Duncan C, Musolino PL, Orchard PJ, De Oliveira S, Thrasher AJ, Armant M, Dansereau C, Lund TC, Miller WP et al. (2017) Hematopoietic stem‐cell gene therapy for cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy. N Engl J Med 377, 1630–1638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 345. Sessa M, Lorioli L, Fumagalli F, Acquati S, Redaelli D, Baldoli C, Canale S, Lopez ID, Morena F, Calabria A et al. (2016) Lentiviral haemopoietic stem‐cell gene therapy in early‐onset metachromatic leukodystrophy: an ad‐hoc analysis of a non‐randomised, open‐label, phase 1/2 trial. Lancet 388, 476–487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 346. Cartier N, Hacein‐Bey‐Abina S, Bartholomae CC, Veres G, Schmidt M, Kutschera I, Vidaud M, Abel U, Dal‐Cortivo L, Caccavelli L et al. (2009) Hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy with a lentiviral vector in X‐linked adrenoleukodystrophy. Science 326, 818–823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 347. van Egmond ME, Pouwels PJW, Boelens J‐J, Lindemans CA, Barkhof F, Steenwijk MD, van Hasselt PM, van der Knaap MS and Wolf NI (2013) Improvement of white matter changes on neuroimaging modalities after stem cell transplant in metachromatic leukodystrophy. JAMA Neurol 70, 779–782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 348. Wagner JE, Ishida‐Yamamoto A, McGrath JA, Hordinsky M, Keene DR, Woodley DT, Chen M, Riddle MJ, Osborn MJ, Lund T et al. (2010) Bone marrow transplantation for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. N Engl J Med 363, 629–639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 349. Sivan‐Loukianova E, Awad OA, Stepanovic V, Bickenbach J and Schatteman GC (2003) CD34+ blood cells accelerate vascularization and healing of diabetic mouse skin wounds. J Vasc Res 40, 368–377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 350. Mezey E, Key S, Vogelsang G, Szalayova I, Lange GD and Crain B (2003) Transplanted bone marrow generates new neurons in human brains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100, 1364–1369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 351. Eglitis MA and Mezey E (1997) Hematopoietic cells differentiate into both microglia and macroglia in the brains of adult mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94, 4080–4085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 352. Peichev M, Naiyer AJ, Pereira D, Zhu Z, Lane WJ, Williams M, Oz MC, Hicklin DJ, Witte L, Moore MA et al. (2000) Expression of VEGFR‐2 and AC133 by circulating human CD34(+) cells identifies a population of functional endothelial precursors. Blood 95, 952–958. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 353. Jackson KA, Majka SM, Wang H, Pocius J, Hartley CJ, Majesky MW, Entman ML, Michael LH, Hirschi KK and Goodell MA (2001) Regeneration of ischemic cardiac muscle and vascular endothelium by adult stem cells. J Clin Invest 107, 1395–1402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 354. Lagasse E, Connors H, Al‐Dhalimy M, Reitsma M, Dohse M, Osborne L, Wang X, Finegold M, Weissman IL and Grompe M (2000) Purified hematopoietic stem cells can differentiate into hepatocytes in vivo. Nat Med 6, 1229–1234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 355. Körbling M, Katz RL, Khanna A, Ruifrok AC, Rondon G, Albitar M, Champlin RE and Estrov Z (2002) Hepatocytes and epithelial cells of donor origin in recipients of peripheral‐blood stem cells. N Engl J Med 346, 738–746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 356. Krause DS, Theise ND, Collector MI, Henegariu O, Hwang S, Gardner R, Neutzel S and Sharkis SJ (2001) Multi‐organ, multi‐lineage engraftment by a single bone marrow‐derived stem cell. Cell 105, 369–377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 357. Wagers AJ, Sherwood RI, Christensen JL and Weissman IL (2002) Little evidence for developmental plasticity of adult hematopoietic stem cells. Science 297, 2256–2259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 358. Alvarez‐Dolado M, Pardal R, Garcia‐Verdugo JM, Fike JR, Lee HO, Pfeffer K, Lois C, Morrison SJ and Alvarez‐Buylla A (2003) Fusion of bone‐marrow‐derived cells with Purkinje neurons, cardiomyocytes and hepatocytes. Nature 425, 968–973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 359. Shih C‐S, Hale GA, Gronewold L, Tong X, Laningham FH, Gilger EA, Srivastava DK, Kun LE, Gajjar A and Fouladi M (2008) High‐dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue for children with recurrent malignant brain tumors. Cancer 112, 1345–1353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 360. Swart JF, Delemarre EM, van Wijk F, Boelens J‐J, Kuball J, van Laar JM and Wulffraat NM (2017) Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for autoimmune diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol 13, 244–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 361. Gabandé‐Rodríguez E, Pfeiffer M and Mittelbrunn M (2023) Immuno(T)herapy for age‐related diseases. EMBO Mol Med 15, e16301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 362. Peng L, Sferruzza G, Yang L, Zhou L and Chen S (2024) CAR‐T and CAR‐NK as cellular cancer immunotherapy for solid tumors. Cell Mol Immunol 21, 1089–1108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 363. Rurik JG, Tombácz I, Yadegari A, Méndez Fernández PO, Shewale SV, Li L, Kimura T, Soliman OY, Papp TE, Tam YK et al. (2022) CAR T cells produced in vivo to treat cardiac injury. Science 375, 91–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 364. Amor C, Feucht J, Leibold J, Ho Y‐J, Zhu C, Alonso‐Curbelo D, Mansilla‐Soto J, Boyer JA, Li X, Giavridis T et al. (2020) Senolytic CAR T cells reverse senescence‐associated pathologies. Nature 583, 127–132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 365. Aghajanian H, Kimura T, Rurik JG, Hancock AS, Leibowitz MS, Li L, Scholler J, Monslow J, Lo A, Han W et al. (2019) Targeting cardiac fibrosis with engineered T cells. Nature 573, 430–433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 366. Gschweng E, De Oliveira S and Kohn DB (2014) Hematopoietic stem cells for cancer immunotherapy. Immunol Rev 257, 237–249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 367. Li Y‐R, Dunn ZS, Yu Y, Li M, Wang P and Yang L (2023) Advancing cell‐based cancer immunotherapy through stem cell engineering. Cell Stem Cell 30, 592–610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 368. Calabria A, Spinozzi G, Cesana D, Buscaroli E, Benedicenti F, Pais G, Gazzo F, Scala S, Lidonnici MR, Scaramuzza S et al. (2024) Long‐term lineage commitment in hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy. Nature 636, 162–171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 369. Li Y‐R, Zeng S, Dunn ZS, Zhou Y, Li Z, Yu J, Wang Y‐C, Ku J, Cook N, Kramer A et al. (2022) Off‐the‐shelf third‐party HSC‐engineered iNKT cells for ameliorating GvHD while preserving GvL effect in the treatment of blood cancers. iScience 25, 104859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 370. Li Y‐R, Zhou Y, Kim YJ, Zhu Y, Ma F, Yu J, Wang Y‐C, Chen X, Li Z, Zeng S et al. (2021) Development of allogeneic HSC‐engineered iNKT cells for off‐the‐shelf cancer immunotherapy. Cell Rep Med 2, 100449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 371. Magnani A, Semeraro M, Adam F, Booth C, Dupré L, Morris EC, Gabrion A, Roudaut C, Borgel D, Toubert A et al. (2022) Long‐term safety and efficacy of lentiviral hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell gene therapy for Wiskott‐Aldrich syndrome. Nat Med 28, 71–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 372. Srivastava A, Abraham A, Aboobacker F, Singh G, Geevar T, Kulkarni U, Selvarajan S, Korula A, Dave RG, Shankar M et al. (2025) Lentiviral gene therapy with CD34+ hematopoietic cells for hemophilia a. N Engl J Med 392, 450–457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 373. Esrick EB, Lehmann LE, Biffi A, Achebe M, Brendel C, Ciuculescu MF, Daley H, MacKinnon B, Morris E, Federico A et al. (2021) Post‐transcriptional genetic silencing of BCL11A to treat sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med 384, 205–215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 374. Río P, Navarro S, Wang W, Sánchez‐Domínguez R, Pujol RM, Segovia JC, Bogliolo M, Merino E, Wu N, Salgado R et al. (2019) Successful engraftment of gene‐corrected hematopoietic stem cells in non‐conditioned patients with Fanconi anemia. Nat Med 25, 1396–1401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 375. Locatelli F, Thompson AA, Kwiatkowski JL, Porter JB, Thrasher AJ, Hongeng S, Sauer MG, Thuret I, Lal A, Algeri M et al. (2022) Betibeglogene Autotemcel gene therapy for non‐β0/β0 genotype β‐thalassemia. N Engl J Med 386, 415–427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 376. Marktel S, Scaramuzza S, Cicalese MP, Giglio F, Galimberti S, Lidonnici MR, Calbi V, Assanelli A, Bernardo ME, Rossi C et al. (2019) Intrabone hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy for adult and pediatric patients affected by transfusion‐dependent ß‐thalassemia. Nat Med 25, 234–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 377. Kohn DB, Booth C, Kang EM, Pai S‐Y, Shaw KL, Santilli G, Armant M, Buckland KF, Choi U, De Ravin SS et al. (2020) Lentiviral gene therapy for X‐linked chronic granulomatous disease. Nat Med 26, 200–206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 378. Ferrua F, Cicalese MP, Galimberti S, Giannelli S, Dionisio F, Barzaghi F, Migliavacca M, Bernardo ME, Calbi V, Assanelli AA et al. (2019) Lentiviral haemopoietic stem/progenitor cell gene therapy for treatment of Wiskott‐Aldrich syndrome: interim results of a non‐randomised, open‐label, phase 1/2 clinical study. Lancet Haematol 6, e239–e253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 379. De Ravin SS, Wu X, Moir S, Anaya‐O'Brien S, Kwatemaa N, Littel P, Theobald N, Choi U, Su L, Marquesen M et al. (2016) Lentiviral hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy for X‐linked severe combined immunodeficiency. Sci Transl Med 8, 335ra57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 380. Cruz LJ, Rezaei S, Grosveld F, Philipsen S and Eich C (2022) Nanoparticles targeting hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells: multimodal carriers for the treatment of hematological diseases. Front Genome ed 4, 1030285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 381. Li C, Wang H, Gil S, Germond A, Fountain C, Baldessari A, Kim J, Liu Z, Georgakopoulou A, Radtke S et al. (2022) Safe and efficient in vivo hematopoietic stem cell transduction in nonhuman primates using HDAd5/35++ vectors. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev 24, 127–141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 382. Breda L, Papp TE, Triebwasser MP, Yadegari A, Fedorky MT, Tanaka N, Abdulmalik O, Pavani G, Wang Y, Grupp SA et al. (2023) In vivo hematopoietic stem cell modification by mRNA delivery. Science 381, 436–443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 383. Li C, Georgakopoulou A, Mishra A, Gil S, Hawkins RD, Yannaki E and Lieber A (2021) In vivo HSPC gene therapy with base editors allows for efficient reactivation of fetal γ‐globin in β‐YAC mice. Blood Adv 5, 1122–1135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 384. Li C, Wang H, Georgakopoulou A, Gil S, Yannaki E and Lieber A (2021) In vivo HSC gene therapy using a Bi‐modular HDAd5/35++ vector cures sickle cell disease in a mouse model. Mol Ther 29, 822–837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 385. Wang H, Georgakopoulou A, Zhang W, Kim J, Gil S, Ehrhardt A and Lieber A (2023) HDAd6/35++ – a new helper‐dependent adenovirus vector platform for in vivo transduction of hematopoietic stem cells. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev 29, 213–226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 386. Milani M, Fabiano A, Perez‐Rodriguez M, Hernandez RJ, Zecchillo A, Zonari E, Ottonello S, Basso‐Ricci L, Canepari C, Volpin M et al. (2025) In vivo haemopoietic stem cell gene therapy enabled by postnatal trafficking. Nature 643, 1097–1106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
