Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), driven by the extensive use of antibiotics in human and animal health, poses a significant global threat. In Ghana, the contribution of poultry farming to the high prevalence of AMR remains underexplored. This study investigates the genomic characteristics and prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli in poultry and human populations. A total of 300 cloacal swabs from poultry and 60 stool samples from poultry farm workers in peri-urban Accra were collected from 20 poultry farms and cultured. Bacterial isolates were identified through MALDI-TOF-MS, with ESBL production confirmed using the double disk synergy test. Whole-genome sequencing of 17 multi-drug resistant isolates selected was conducted on the MiSeq Illumina platform to characterize resistance genes, virulence genes, and sequence types. ESBL production was detected in 84.8% (n = 123/145) in isolates from poultry and 67.5% (n = 27/40) in isolates from humans. All isolates were resistant to cefotaxime, with significant resistance to tetracycline and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim also recorded. The blaCTX−M−15 gene was the most prevalent ESBL gene identified, with additional genes including blaCTX−M−27, blaOXA−1, blaOXA−181, blaTEM−1B, and blaDHA−1 also identified. Sequence typing revealed multiple resistance-associated sequence types, notably ST10 and ST155. Plasmid replicon analysis identified IncF, Col, and IncI1 groups, many co-occurring with multiple resistance genes. Virulome profiling revealed the presence of avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC)-associated genes such as iroN, iss, ompT, and hlyF. This study highlights the prevalence and genomic characteristics of ESBL-producing E. coli at the human–poultry interface in Ghana, emphasizing poultry as a potential reservoir for multidrug-resistant bacteria. The findings provide actionable insights for small- to medium-scale poultry farmers, including the importance of prudent antibiotic use, enhanced hygiene, and biosecurity practices, and underscore the need for ongoing genomic surveillance to guide interventions aimed at reducing the spread of antimicrobial resistance in Ghana.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-026-36471-9.
Keywords: Antimicrobial resistance, Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, Whole-genome sequencing, Poultry farming, Escherichia coli, Ghana
Subject terms: Microbiology, Molecular biology
Introduction
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as a significant global public health challenge, with an alarming potential to claim up to 10 million lives annually by 20501. Among the various forms of resistance, Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria, particularly Escherichia coli, have gained prominence due to their association with severe infections and their role in the horizontal transfer of resistance genes. ESBLs are enzymes produced by Gram-negative bacteria, particularly members of the Enterobacteriaceae, that hydrolyze extended-spectrum cephalosporins, as well as monobactams, while remaining inhibited by β-lactamase inhibitors such as clavulanic acid. The ESBL phenotype is most commonly mediated by genes belonging to the blaCTX−M, blaTEM, and blaSHV families, which are frequently plasmid-encoded and often co-located with resistance determinants to other antimicrobial classes, thereby contributing to multidrug resistance2,3.
The increasing prevalence of ESBL-producing E. coli has raised significant concerns in both healthcare and agricultural sectors, particularly in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), where the overuse of antibiotics in human medicine and livestock farming has become widespread4,5. Poultry farming in Ghana is a widely practiced agricultural activity fueled by economic incentives, inadvertently increasing the risks of antibiotic misuse and overuse in these systems6. The emergence of ESBL-producing E. coli in poultry is particularly troubling, given their association with contamination in retail chicken and their potential to facilitate the transmission of resistance genes to human populations7–9. The close proximity of poultry farms to human settlements, often lacking appropriate biosecurity measures, intensifies public health concerns10. Despite the urgency, research exploring the dynamics of AMR dissemination between poultry and humans in Ghana has been limited, and primarily focused on human health11. This creates a critical gap in our understanding of the complex interplay between poultry farming practices, AMR, and potential zoonotic transmission routes. While existing studies on AMR in Ghana have contributed valuable insights, they predominantly rely on phenotypic analyses and do not include poultry farm workers5,12,13, which, although useful for identifying resistance patterns, do not provide a comprehensive understanding of the underlying genetic mechanisms driving resistance. Methods such as whole-genome sequencing and multi-locus sequence typing have been rarely applied, limiting our ability to map the genetic characteristics and potential transmission pathways of ESBL-producing E. coli across poultry and human populations13,14. This gap is concerning, considering the potential risks associated with the spread of resistant strains and their implications for public health. Moreover, the unique environmental and agricultural factors in Ghana, such as economic pressures leading to increased, often unregulated, antibiotic use, further exacerbate the potential spread of AMR. The lack of robust biosecurity measures in poultry farms, combined with the close integration of these farms within human communities, positions them as potential reservoirs for resistant bacteria15–17. Addressing these gaps in knowledge is essential for informing health policy and intervention strategies aimed at curbing the threat of AMR. This study sought to conduct genomic profiling of ESBL-producing E. coli isolated from poultry and poultry farm workers across 20 poultry farms in Accra, Ghana. By leveraging advanced genomic techniques, the study elucidated the genetic diversity, resistance gene profiles, and dissemination of ESBL-producing E. coli. The findings provide insights into the dynamics of AMR in the poultry-human interface, contributing to a broader understanding of its impact on public health.
Materials and methods
Study site and sampling
This cross-sectional study was conducted in peri-urban areas of Accra, Ghana, focusing on small-to-medium-scale poultry farms and their workers to determine the prevalence and genomic characteristics of ESBL-producing E. coli. A total of 360 samples were collected from 20 poultry farms in November 2023, comprising 300 cloacal swabs from chickens and 60 stool samples from poultry farm workers. Each farm housed approximately 900–3000 chickens, and 15 randomly selected chickens were sampled per farm, along with stool samples from three farm workers. Cloacal swabs were obtained from live chickens using sterile swabs pre-moistened with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Oxoid, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK) and transported in a cold box to the laboratory. Stool samples were self-collected by poultry workers in sterile containers, inoculated with PBS, and transported in a cold box to the laboratory within 24 h of collection. Participants were selected based on their willingness to participate and their involvement in poultry farming.
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethical and Protocol Review Committee of the College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana (CHS-Et/M.2-P 4.6/2021–2022). All methods were performed following the relevant guidelines and regulations and in accordance with Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines.
Isolation and identification
Cloacal swabs were incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 24 h, while approximately one gram of each human stool sample was inoculated into buffered peptone water (Oxoid, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK) immediately upon arrival and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Immediately after incubation, a 10 µL loopful of the culture was streaked onto selective MacConkey agar plates (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 4 µg/mL cefotaxime. The inoculated plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h under aerobic conditions. Following overnight incubation, morphologically distinct colonies were observed, and up to five pink to reddish isolated colonies indicative of lactose fermentation from each sample were selected. These colonies were then sub-cultured on Nutrient agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h to obtain pure cultures. The pure cultures were initially screened using conventional biochemical tests (Triple sugar iron, Citrate utilization tests, Urease, and Sulphur Indole motility biochemical tests) and subsequently identified using the Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) analyzer. Isolates identified as E. coli were retained for downstream ESBL confirmation and genomic analyses while non–E. coli Enterobacterales identified were excluded from further analyses. For long-term storage and future analyses, three to five representative colonies of the pure cultures of E. coli were preserved in skim-milk-tryptone-glucose-glycerol broth at − 80 °C.
Phenotypic detection of ESBL-producing E. coli
The phenotypic detection of ESBL production was carried out utilizing the double disk synergy test, following the guidelines established by the WHO18. Mueller-Hinton agar plates (Oxoid, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK) were used as the growth medium. Briefly, an inoculum preparation of a bacterial suspension equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard was done, and the suspension was inoculated onto the agar plates using sterile cotton swabs to ensure uniform growth. After allowing the plates to air-dry for 3–5 min, cefotaxime (30 µg), and ceftazidime (30 µg), were placed approximately 20 mm from the centrally positioned amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (20/10µg) disk using sterile forceps. The plates were incubated for 18 h at 37 °C under aerobic conditions and then examined for synergy effects indicated by increased zones of inhibition surrounding the cephalosporin disks, which confirmed positive ESBL production.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of E. coli isolates was conducted using the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines19. Pure colonies were selected and suspended in sterile saline, and the bacterial concentration was adjusted to a 0.5 McFarland standard using a BD PhoenixSpec™ nephelometer (Beckton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA). The standardized suspension was uniformly spread across Mueller-Hinton agar plates (Oxoid, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK) using sterile cotton swabs to achieve confluent bacterial growth. Commercially available antibiotic disks (Oxoid, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK) were carefully placed on the agar surface. The antibiotics tested included amikacin (30 µg), amoxicillin-clavulanate (20/10 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), cefoxitin (30 µg), piperacillin-tazobactam (100/10 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), and cefotaxime (30 µg). The plates were then incubated at 37 °C under aerobic conditions for 24 h. A quality control strain, E. coli ATCC 25,922, was included in each batch to validate the results and ensure accuracy. The inhibition zone diameters surrounding the antibiotic disks were measured and recorded into WHONET 2024 software for interpretation20.
Whole genome sequencing and bioinformatic analysis
DNA extraction was performed on 17 ESBL-producing E. coli isolates, including 10 obtained from poultry and 7 from poultry farmworkers, selected based on their similar multidrug-resistant patterns. The isolates were cultured on nutrient agar after overnight incubation at 37 °C under aerobic conditions, and DNA was extracted using the QIAamp® DNA mini kit (QIAGEN Inc. GmbH, Holden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The quality and concentration of genomic DNA were assessed using the NanoDrop™ 2000 Spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and Qubit Fluorometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Genomic libraries were generated with the Illumina DNA prep kit, adhering to the manufacturer’s guidelines for the Illumina MiSeq technology. The libraries were pooled and subsequently loaded onto the MiSeq Illumina sequencer (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) to generate 250 bp x 2 paired-end reads for each ESBL-producing E. coli isolate. All raw sequences were submitted to NCBI and assigned a Bioproject accession number, PRJNA1208549.
The raw sequenced reads underwent quality assessment and trimming, using FASTQC v0.12.1 and Trimmomatic v0.3621. Trimmed reads were then de novo assembled using the SPAdes assembler. Multi-locus sequence typing analysis was conducted on the assembled genomes using the MLST 2.0 tool hosted by the Center for Genomic Epidemiology (CGE) (http://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/MLST/) according to the Achtman scheme, which identifies sequence types (STs) based on variations in seven housekeeping genes (adk, fumC, gyrB, icd, mdh, purA, and recA)22. Isolates that could not be assigned ST through conventional MLST were further analyzed using core genome MLST (cgMLST) in EnteroBase to determine their cgSTs. In silico analysis was conducted using the ResFinder tool v4.6.023 hosted on the CGE website at default threshold ID (90%) and minimum length (60%) values to identify acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. Virulome and plasmid analysis were also conducted using the VirulenceFinder 2.0 tool24 and PlasmidFinder 2.125 hosted on the CGE website to identify the virulence-associated genes. The phylogroups classification of the E. coli genomes was then performed using the in silico Clermon-Typing 1.4.1 tool26 at default parameters before whole-genome sequences were uploaded to CSIPhylogeny to analyze the evolutionary relatedness27 among the 17 ESBL-producing E. coli and identify single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), by comparing assembled sequences to the reference genome ASM584v2 (Escherichia coli str. K-12 substr. MG1655). The generated tree was visualized and annotated using Interactive Tree of Life, ITOL v628.
Data analysis
Statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate differences in antibiotic resistance patterns between poultry and human isolates. Fisher’s exact test was applied separately to each antibiotic resistance profile to determine whether resistance frequencies varied significantly between the two sources. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using R v4.4.1 software.
Results
Prevalence of ESBL-Producing E. coli
In this study, we assessed the prevalence of ESBL-producing E. coli within poultry farms and among poultry farm workers. A total of 189 third-generation cephalosporin-resistant bacterial isolates were obtained from 300 cloacal swab samples (n = 149/300) and 60 fecal samples (n = 40/60) collected from poultry workers. The isolated bacteria were predominantly E. coli (n = 185/189, 97.9%), with a smaller number of Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 3/189, 1.6%) and Enterobacter cloacae (n = 1/189, 0.5%). Out of 185 E. coli isolates recovered, 150 were phenotypically confirmed as ESBL producers. Among poultry-derived isolates, 84.8% (n = 123/145) were confirmed as ESBL-producing E. coli. Among isolates recovered from poultry farm workers, 67.5% (n = 27/40) were confirmed as ESBL-producing E. coli. Notably, 16 out of the 20 farms exhibited at least one positive henhouse for ESBL-producing E. coli, while at least one human from 10 farms also tested positive for ESBL-producing E. coli. Farm-level analysis revealed significant variation in ESBL prevalence. At the farm level, the proportion of samples from poultry testing positive for ESBL-producing E. coli ranged from 40% (n = 6/15) to 60% (n = 9/15), while the carriage among humans ranged from 33.3% (n = 1/3) to 66.7% (n = 2/3) per farm (Table S2).
The antibiotic susceptibility testing of the 150 ESBL-producing E. coli isolates showed widespread resistance across multiple antibiotic classes. All ESBL-positive isolates from both poultry (n = 123/123, 100%) and farm workers (n = 27/27, 100%) were resistant to cefotaxime, confirming the characteristic β-lactam resistance conferred by ESBL production. Among the ESBL-producing isolates, resistance to ceftazidime varied between poultry (n = 118/123, 95.9%) and humans (n = 22/27, 81.5%). Similarly, tetracycline resistance was notable in both poultry (n = 121/123, 98.4%) and human (n = 17/27, 63.0%) isolates. Resistance to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim was observed in (n = 112/123, 90.8%) poultry isolates and (n = 19/27, 70.4%) of the human isolates (Table 1).
Table 1.
Antimicrobial resistance profile of ESBL-producing E. coli isolates from poultry (n = 123) and poultry farm workers (n = 27).
| Antibiotics | ESBL-positive isolates | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Poultry | Humans | p-value | |
| (n = 123) | (n = 27) | ||
| Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (30 µg) | 31 (25.6%) | 09 (33.3%) | 0.634 |
| Piperacillin-tazobactam (30 µg) | 43 (34.6%) | 09 (33.3%) | 1 |
| Cefotaxime (30 µg) | 123 (100%) | 27 (100%) | NA |
| Ceftazidime (30 µg) | 118 (95.9%) | 22 (81.4%) | 0.017 |
| Cefoxitin (30 µg) | 43 (34.6%) | 10 (37.0%) | 0.828 |
| Meropenem (10 µg) | 02 (1.6) | 00 (0.0%) | 1 |
| Gentamicin (10 µg) | 31 (25.2%) | 12 (44.4%) | 0.065 |
| Amikacin (30 µg) | 46 (37.2%) | 10 (37.0%) | 0.828 |
| Tetracycline (30 µg) | 121 (98.4%) | 17 (63.0%) | < 0.001 |
| Chloramphenicol (30 µg) | 38 (31.0%) | 11 (40.7%) | 0.821 |
| Ciprofloxacin (5 µg) | 93 (75.6%) | 16 (59.3%) | 0.154 |
| Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (1.25/23.75 µg) | 112 (90.8%) | 19 (70.4%) | 0.002 |
NA: Statistical comparison not applicable because all isolates were 100% resistant. The values represent the number of resistant isolates, with percentages given in parentheses.
Distribution of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes
Genomic analysis of the 17 ESBL-producing E. coli isolates, selected based on their similar multidrug resistance patterns in both poultry and human sources, identified a significant diversity of antimicrobial resistance genes. Notably, a total of 32 acquired antimicrobial resistance genes were identified with blaCTX−M−15 emerging as the most prevalent, present in all 17 isolates (Fig. 1). Several other beta-lactamase genes were detected, including blaCTX−M−27, blaDHA−1, blaTEM−1B, blaTEM−35, blaOXA−1, and blaOXA−181. The blaOXA−181 gene was observed exclusively in isolates that also exhibited resistance to meropenem. Beyond beta-lactam resistance, genes conferring resistance to aminoglycoside (aph(6)-Id, aph(3’)-Ia, aph(3’’)-Ib, ant(3’’)-Ia, aadA2), folate inhibitors (sul1, sul2, dfrA12, dfrA14) and quinolones (aac(6’)-Ib-cr, qnrS1, qepA4) were also observed.
Fig. 1.
Antimicrobial resistance gene distribution.
Distribution of Beta-lactam resistance genes by source
The patterns of beta-lactam resistance genes in the ESBL-producing E. coli isolates from human and poultry sources reveal interesting trends. The gene blaCTX−M−15 was the most commonly identified resistance gene in both groups, with a higher prevalence in poultry samples (n = 10) compared to human isolates (n = 7). In addition to blaCTX−M−15, the gene blaTEM−1B was frequently detected, again showing greater occurrence in poultry (n = 6) than in humans (n = 2). Notably, other beta-lactam resistance genes such as blaOXA−1, blaOXA−181, blaCTX−M−27, and blaTEM−35 were unique to poultry samples, whilst blaDHA−1 (n = 1), was identified only in one isolate from the human samples. (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Distribution of Beta-lactam resistance genes by source.
Virulence factors distribution in poultry and human ESBL-producing E. coli isolates
A virulome analysis conducted using the Virulence Finder tool from CGE identified 25 unique virulence-associated genes (VAGs) across the 17 ESBL-producing E. coli isolates. Among these, the most prevalent VAGs were fimH, present in 88% of the isolates (n = 15/17), followed closely by terC at 82% (n = 14/17), lpfA at 59% (n = 10/17), and gad at 41% (n = 7/17). The identified virulence factors were categorized based on their functional roles, including adhesion molecules, toxin production, iron acquisition systems, immune evasion, and acid resistance (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
Distribution of Virulence genes in the ESBL-producing E. coli isolates.
Phylogenetic analysis of ESBL-producing E. coli isolates
The phylogenetic analysis of the ESBL-producing E. coli isolates among the strains derived from human and poultry sources (Fig. 4) classified the isolates into two major phylogroups, A and B1, with B1 predominantly associated with poultry-derived strains, while A was more evenly distributed between human and poultry isolates. Twelve sequence types (STs) were identified, including ST-224, ST-746, and ST-10, with the identification of two novel sequence types. Two isolates that could not be assigned STs through conventional MLST were further analyzed using cgMLST in EnteroBase, which identified them as cgST 17,714 (1 K S60) and cgST 90,610 (KB1 S70). Thirty different plasmids were observed among the 17 ESBL-producing E. coli isolates sequenced from poultry and human sources. The most prevalent plasmid replicons belonged to Col (ColRNAI, Col440I, ColKP3, ColE10, Col(MG828), Col440II, Col156, Col8282, Col(MG828), Col8282) and Inc (IncY, IncFIB(AP001918), IncFIC(FII), IncFIA, IncX1, IncFIB(pB171), IncFII(p14), IncN, IncHI1A, IncHI1B(R27), IncFIA(HI1), IncHI2A, IncHI2, IncHI1B(CIT), IncX4, IncX3, IncFII(pAMA1167-NDM-5), IncFII(pRSB107), IncFIB(K)_1_Kpn3) groups. The prevalent plasmid types were ColRNAI (n = 13/17), IncY (n = 7/17), IncFIB (AP001918), and Col440I (n = 6/17 each), as shown (Fig. 4). ColRNAI was the most prevalent in poultry (n = 9/17), whilst Col440I and ColRNAI (n = 4/17, each) were prevalent in the isolates from poultry farm workers.
Fig. 4.
A phylogenetic tree generated based on single-nucleotide polymorphisms of the core genes of 17 ESBL-producing E. coli isolates, showing resistance genes and plasmids against sequence types with reference genome E. coli str. K-12 substr. MG1655 as an outgroup.
Discussion
Studies worldwide have shown increasing concerns regarding AMR impacting both human and animal health29,30. This study highlights the genomic diversity of ESBL-producing E. coli from poultry and poultry farm workers in Accra, Ghana.
The detection rates of ESBL-producing E. coli observed suggest potential differences in exposure risks, biosecurity measures, or antibiotic use practices31, which may contribute to variations in colonization patterns between poultry and farm workers. These ESBL-producing E. coli isolates showed significant resistance to multiple antibiotics across different classes such as tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, highlighting their multidrug-resistant nature and a widespread presence of antimicrobial-resistant ESBL-producing E. coli in both animal and human populations on farms. The findings align with previous studies that have similarly linked high rates of ESBL production in E. coli to the development of multidrug resistance in both poultry and human sources32–34, reinforcing the notion that farming practices may be instrumental in shaping the resistance profiles of these pathogens. Notably, the observed resistance pattern was most evident against penicillin, tetracycline, aminoglycosides, and sulfonamides which are antimicrobials frequently employed for therapeutic purposes in both human medicine and the poultry industry in Ghana5,35. The high resistance rates observed in poultry may reflect antibiotic exposure driven by agricultural practices such as the use of antibiotics for growth promotion and disease prevention. This trend raises questions about the efficacy of current antimicrobial stewardship practices, highlighting the urgent need for revised strategies to mitigate the selection and spread of resistance.
Whole genome sequencing revealed blaCTX−M−15 as the most occurring ESBL gene in all the isolates. The predominance of blaCTX−M−15 among the ESBL-producing E. coli isolates in this study aligns with its widespread distribution in both clinical and agricultural settings14,36. CTX-M-15 has been frequently implicated in human infections and has been reported in various geographic regions, particularly in LMICs where the burden of antimicrobial resistance is high37–39. Its presence in Ghanaian hospital settings further supports this trend, as previous studies have consistently identified blaCTX−M−15 as the dominant ESBL gene in clinical isolates40. A study reported that all ESBL-producing E. coli isolates carried a blaCTX−M gene, with blaCTX−M−15 detected in 98% of cases in 2016 at a hospital in Ghana39. Similarly, a more recent study on ESBL-producing E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from pediatric patients found that blaCTX−M was the most prevalent ESBL gene, detected in 92.4% of isolates in a hospital in Ghana41. This trend is not unique to Ghana but is also in other LMICs, where a high prevalence of the blaCTX−M gene has been reported. In Senegal, blaCTX−M−15 has been reported to be the predominant ESBL gene detected in ESBL-producing E. coli isolated from broiler chickens sold in open wet markets42. Similarly, prevalence rates of 83–88% have been reported for the detection of blaCTX−M−15 within hospitals in Ethiopia43,44. The detection of other beta-lactamase genes such as blaCTX−M−27, blaTEM−1B, blaTEM−35, and blaOXA−1, in this study, further underscores the genetic diversity of resistance within these isolates and highlights their functional significance in conferring broad-spectrum β-lactam resistance. Although blaOXA−1 and blaOXA−181 were identified in a few isolates, their presence warrants attention. blaOXA−1 is often associated with resistance to amoxicillin-clavulanate, compromising the effectiveness of β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in treating infections caused by these resistant strains45,46. The blaOXA−181 gene, identified only in isolates that were meropenem resistant, suggests a potential role in conferring meropenem resistance in these specific strains. blaOXA−181 is a carbapenemase-producing gene and has primarily been identified in enterobacteriaceae in hospitals in Ghana44. Although carbapenems are not used in poultry production, the presence of this gene in poultry-associated isolates may reflect horizontal transfer of carbapenemase genes within the farm environment. Detecting these clinically significant resistance genes in poultry highlights the need for close monitoring to control their spread into the broader community. While studies from Africa, including this study, indicate a high predominance of blaCTX−M−15, research conducted in Europe reveals markedly lower rates of this gene in poultry isolates47,48. This disparity emphasizes the regional variations in the prevalence of ESBL genes, which are likely influenced by differing antibiotic usage patterns, agricultural practices, and the robustness of monitoring frameworks47.
A range of resistance determinants to non-beta-lactam antibiotics was also identified. These included genes conferring resistance to quinolones, aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, phenicols, and folate pathway inhibitors. These findings are consistent with those reported in similar studies12,49,50. The presence of such genes underscores a multidrug-resistant profile among the E. coli isolates from both poultry and human sources. This occurrence of resistance determinants to multiple antibiotic classes poses a significant challenge to existing antimicrobial therapies, as it greatly reduces the pool of effective antibiotics. The diversity and prevalence of these resistance genes highlight the adaptability and resilience of the ESBL-producing E. coli isolates. This emphasizes the urgent need for enhanced regional surveillance and strategic antimicrobial stewardship measures to combat the spread of antimicrobial resistance effectively.
The genomic analysis further elucidated the genetic diversity present among the ESBL-producing E. coli isolates, revealing 12 STs that were grouped into two principal commensal phylogenetic groups: B1 and A. Phylogroup B1 was predominantly composed of isolates from poultry, suggesting host adaptation or persistence within the poultry environment. In contrast, phylogroup A included isolates from both poultry and farm workers, indicating potential genetic overlap and exchange across hosts. Within these, only ST10 emerged as a shared sequence type between poultry and human sources, both of which were recovered from the same farm. This co-occurrence points to a possible overlap between hosts within a shared environment, suggesting possible zoonotic potential. Conversely, ST155 and ST4977, found exclusively in poultry isolates, may indicate a possible adaptation to avian hosts. The association of ST10 and ST155 with high virulence and resistance-associated gene counts raises concerns about their pathogenic potential, as their adaptability and prevalence within microbial communities could facilitate the transfer of critical genetic material, complicating efforts to control the spread of antimicrobial resistance. Previous studies have established that these STs are prevalent in both poultry and human populations, with frequent identification in clinical settings13,51,52. These STs harbor a range of virulence factors, such as adhesion factors (fimH), iron acquisition systems (fyuA, iroN, irp2), serum resistance genes (iss), and hemolysins (hlyF), which are commonly found in extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli strains10,53,54. This is consistent with our study, where ST10 and ST155 were predominantly identified with these virulence genes (fig S1). The overlap between these STs in agricultural and healthcare environments points to the risk of cross-species transmission and emphasizes the necessity for monitoring these strains.
Virulome analysis of the ESBL-producing E. coli isolates revealed a complex landscape of virulence factors linked to the pathogen’s adaptability and survival in both host environments. The high occurrence of fimH and lpfA observed in this study highlights their critical roles in E. coli adhesion to host cells. FimH, a key virulence factor mainly associated with Uropathogenic E. coli encodes type 1 fimbriae55 while lpfA, typically linked to Enterotoxigenic E. coli encodes long polar fimbriae56. Both facilitate bacterial attachment to epithelial surfaces, promoting colonization in poultry and humans57,58. Together, these findings highlight the significant role of fimH and lpfA in enhancing the ability of the ESBL-producing E. coli isolates to adhere to host tissues, a key factor in their adaptability, persistence, and pathogenic potential across diverse environments. Notably, none of the isolates carried the set of virulence determinants defining diarrheagenic E. coli (DEC) pathotypes, suggesting that classical DEC lineages were absent in this population59–61. In contrast, several isolates harbored combinations of avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC)-associated genes such as iutA (aerobactin receptor gene), traT (outer membrane protein complement resistance), iss (serum survival protein), hlyE; hlyF (haemolysins), ompT (outer membrane protease), and iroN (salmochelin siderophore receptor)62–64. These findings indicate that while diarrheagenic lineages were not represented, the isolates exhibited virulence characteristics of APEC-like strains. This overlap of virulence determinants in both poultry and human isolates highlights their zoonotic relevance and raises concerns about the potential for extraintestinal pathogenic infections, particularly in agricultural settings where frequent human–animal contact occurs.
The widespread presence of terC among 82% of the isolates suggests that this gene plays a significant role in environmental stress resistance65,66, its contribution to the survival of E. coli in harsh conditions cannot be overlooked. This suggests a potential evolutionary advantage, especially in agricultural settings where selective pressures, such as antimicrobial use, are common. Additional insights were gained from the identification of the gad gene in 41% of the isolates, indicative of an enhanced resilience to acidic environments, an essential trait for pathogens colonizing the gastrointestinal tract at low pH67,68.
The plasmid replicons in this study indicate the potential of these isolates to acquire new genetic material and transfer AMR genes among similar species and other pathogens via plasmid-mediated resistance gene transmission. The frequent use of antibiotics in poultry farming exerts selective pressure, fostering the persistence of resistance genes within poultry-associated bacteria, which can be transferred to human pathogens14,69–72. Notably, resistance genes, such as blaOXA−181, qnrS1, tet(A), and sul2 were detected together with the ColKP3 plasmid replicon (Table S3), suggesting a robust capacity for conferring resistance to third-generation cephalosporins, tetracyclines, and fluoroquinolones, further complicating treatment options. Another notable plasmid group identified in this study is the Inc plasmid replicons with 19 different types observed as shown in Fig. 4. This group of plasmids is often identified in Enterobacteriaceae isolated from humans and animals73–76, where they serve as carriers of genes that code for resistance against beta-lactam antibiotics and other resistance genes that contribute to multidrug resistance mostly in E. coli73–78. This aligns with the findings of this study, as these plasmids were observed to co-occur with resistance genes such as blaTEM−1B, qnrS1, dfrA1, tet(A), ter(C) and aph(3’’)-Ib (Table S3), conferring resistance to beta-lactams, trimethoprim, tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides, further emphasizing their role in the dissemination of MDR traits.
Given the proximity of poultry farms to human communities in peri-urban Ghana, the spread of AMR from animals to humans poses a public health risk, particularly in settings with limited biosecurity measures, as it facilitates the exchange of resistant bacteria between humans and animals and increases the risk of treatment failures in clinical settings. These findings call for targeted interventions, such as regulated antibiotic usage and enhanced biosecurity practices in poultry farms, to mitigate the risk of AMR spread.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in this study was performed using the disc diffusion method, which provides qualitative resistance profiles. Factors such as agar thickness and potential AmpC β-lactamase overproduction may influence resistance interpretation. Future studies incorporating quantitative methods, such as broth microdilution for minimum inhibitory concentration determination, would allow more precise assessment of resistance levels. While this study provides valuable insights into AMR at the human–poultry interface in Ghana, several limitations should be considered. First, the human sample size was relatively small, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Future studies should consider increasing the human sample size and incorporating more diverse populations. Additionally, environmental samples were not included, which could have provided further context on potential reservoirs of resistant strains. Also, expanding the WGS analysis to include a larger and more phenotypically diverse set of isolates would further enhance the robustness and representativeness of the genomic findings. In this study, only 17 ESBL-producing E. coli isolates selected based on similar multidrug-resistant patterns were subjected to WGS; therefore, the genomic results reflect this highly resistant subset and do not fully capture the genetic diversity of the total ESBL-producing E. coli population recovered. Also, including antibiotic usage data could have strengthened the conclusions by linking resistance patterns to specific antimicrobial exposures. Future research should incorporate longitudinal sampling, which would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the selective pressures driving AMR and allow for assessment of transmission dynamics in poultry farming systems.
Conclusions
This study provides insights into the prevalence and genomic characteristics of ESBL-producing E. coli at the human-poultry interface in Ghana, highlighting the significant role of poultry as a potential reservoir for antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. A high detection of ESBL production in E. coli isolates from both poultry and farm workers was observed, underscoring the public health risks associated with antimicrobial resistance at the human–poultry interface in peri-urban Ghana. We report the co-occurrence of the blaCTX−M−15 gene in all sequenced isolates, often with non-beta-lactamase resistance genes such as tetA, sul2, and qnrS1. This suggests an increasing spread of multidrug-resistant E. coli bacteria within the Ghanaian animal farming landscape. Our data further revealed that ST10 and ST155 were the two sequence types that predominantly carried a broad range of virulence factors typically associated with both avian and human infections among the sequenced isolates. Additionally, the co-occurrence of resistance determinants and plasmids suggests a significant potential for horizontal gene transfer, facilitating the spread of multidrug resistance between bacteria. While the genomic analysis was based on a limited set of isolates, the findings remain highly relevant for small- to medium-scale poultry farmers. These farming systems often operate with fewer biosecurity safeguards and limited veterinary oversight, making them particularly vulnerable to resistant bacteria. By providing evidence of shared MDR E. coli patterns between poultry and humans, this study offers actionable knowledge that can inform farmer-level practices, such as prudent antibiotic use, enhanced hygiene, and farmworker training, thereby supporting both poultry health and farmer well-being. These findings underscore the urgency of implementing stricter antibiotic stewardship and biosecurity measures to mitigate the spread of antibiotic resistance. Continuous genomic surveillance is essential to monitor emerging resistance patterns and inform targeted interventions that address the growing threat of AMR within agricultural and healthcare systems.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the poultry farm owners, workers, and the laboratory and technical staff of the Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School.
Author contributions
Conceptualization, ESD, SJ, AA, IJO; methodology, IJO, ESD, GOS, AA, SJ; software, IJO.; validation, IJO, GOS, ESD, SJ, AA; formal analysis, IJO.; investigation, IJO, GOS, ESD, SJ, AA.; resources, ESD.; data curation, IJO, GOS; writing—original draft preparation, IJO, GOS, ESD, SJ, AA; writing—review and editing, IJO, ESD, SJ, AA; visualization, IJO, GOS; supervision, ESD, SJ, AA; project administration, ESD, SJ, AA; funding acquisition, ESD. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health, USA, through the “Application of Data Science to Build Research Capacity in Zoonoses and Food-Borne Infections in West Africa (DS-ZOOFOOD) Training Programme” hosted at the Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School (Grant Number: UE5TW012566). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Data availability
The raw sequencing data are available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive under the BioProject ID PRJNA1208549. All other raw data supporting the reported results can be made available upon request from the corresponding author.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Institutional review board
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethical and Protocol Review Committee of the College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana (CHS-Et/M.2-P 4.6/2021–2022).
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Naghavi, M. et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990–2021: a systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050. Lancet404, 10459, 1199–1226. 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01867-1 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Husna, A. et al. Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases (ESBL): Challenges and Opportunities. Biomedicines. 11 11, 2937, (2023). 10.3390/biomedicines11112937 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 3.Shaikh, S. et al. Antibiotic resistance and extended spectrum beta-lactamases: Types, epidemiology and treatment. Saudi J. Biol. Sci.22, 1, 90–101. 10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.08.002 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nkansa, M., Agbekpornu, H., Kikimoto, B. & Chandler, C. Antibiotic Use among Poultry Farmers in the Dormaa Municipality, Ghana. Report for Fleming Fund Fellowship Programme (London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 2020). 10.17037/PUBS.04658868
- 5.Paintsil, E. K. et al. Antimicrobial usage in commercial and domestic poultry farming in two communities in the Ashanti region of Ghana. Antibiotic S (Basel). 10, 7, (800). 10.3390/antibiotics10070800 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 6.Enyetornye, B., Velayudhan, B. T. & Gottdenker, N. L. The poultry sector of Ghana: regime transitions and its implications for poultry health and management, World’s Poultry Science Journal, Dec. Accessed: Dec. 11, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/ (2024). 10.1080/00439339.2024.2437184
- 7.Aworh, M. K. et al. Characteristics of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from retail meat products in North Carolina. PLoS ONE. 19, 1, (e0294099). 10.1371/journal.pone.0294099 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Cohen Stuart, J. et al. Comparison of ESBL contamination in organic and conventional retail chicken meat. Int. J. Food Microbiol.154, 3, 212–214. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.12.034 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Overdevest, I. et al. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase genes of Escherichia coli in chicken meat and humans, the Netherlands. Emerg. Infect. Dis.17, 7, 1216–1222. 10.3201/eid1707.110209 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Foster-Nyarko, E. et al. Genomic diversity of Escherichia coli isolates from backyard chickens and Guinea fowl in the Gambia. Microb. Genomics. 7 (1). 10.1099/mgen.0.000484 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 11.Asare Yeboah, E. E. et al. Genomic characterization of multi drug resistant ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolates from patients and patient environments in a teaching hospital in Ghana. BMC Microbiol.24, 1, (250). 10.1186/s12866-024-03406-1 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 12.Ayim-Akonor, M. et al. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile and Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Phenotype of E. coli Isolated From Poultry. International Journal of Microbiology. 1, 9468425, 2025, (2025). 10.1155/ijm/9468425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 13.Akenten, C. W. et al. Prevalence, Characterization, and antimicrobial resistance of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli from domestic Free-Range poultry in Agogo, Ghana. Foodborne Pathog. Dis.20, 2, 59–66. 10.1089/fpd.2022.0060 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Falgenhauer, L. et al. Detection and characterization of ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli from humans and poultry in Ghana. Front. Microbiol., 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03358 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 15.Nhung, N. T., Chansiripornchai, N. & Carrique-Mas, J. J. Antimicrobial resistance in bacterial poultry pathogens: A review. Front. Vet. Sci.4, 126 10.3389/fvets.2017.00126 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 16.Alders, R. G. & Pym, R. E. Village poultry: still important to millions, eight thousand years after domestication. World’s Poult. Sci. J.65, 2, 181–190. 10.1017/S0043933909000117 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wong, J. T. et al. Small-scale poultry and food security in resource-poor settings: A review. Global Food Secur.15, 43–52. 10.1016/j.gfs.2017.04.003 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 18.WHO. Integrated Global Surveillance on ESBL-Producing E. Coli Using a One Health Approach: Implementation and Opportunities 1st edn (World Health Organization, 2021).
- 19.Hindler, J. A. & Schuetz, A. N. CLSI and the AST subcommittee during COVID-19, 6, 1, (2021).
- 20.O’Brien, T. F. & Stelling, J. M. WHONET: an information system for monitoring antimicrobial resistance. Emerg. Infect. Dis.1, 2, (66). 10.3201/eid0102.950209 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 21.Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics30, 15, 2114–2120. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Larsen, M. V. et al. Multilocus sequence typing of total-genome-sequenced bacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol.50, 4, 1355–1361. 10.1128/JCM.06094-11 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bortolaia, V. et al. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.75, 12, 3491–3500. 10.1093/jac/dkaa345 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Joensen, K. G. et al. Real-time whole-genome sequencing for routine typing, surveillance, and outbreak detection of verotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J. Clin. Microbiol.52 (5), 1501–1510. 10.1128/JCM.03617-13 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Carattoli, A. et al. In Silico detection and typing of plasmids using plasmidfinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.58, 7, 3895–3903. 10.1128/AAC.02412-14 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Beghain, J., Bridier-Nahmias, A., Le Nagard, H., Denamur, E. & Clermont, O. ClermonTyping: an easy-to-use and accurate in Silico method for Escherichia genus strain phylotyping. Microb. Genom. 4, 7, (e000192). 10.1099/mgen.0.000192 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 27.Solving the Problem of Comparing Whole Bacterial Genomes across Different Sequencing Platforms | PLOS ONE. Accessed: Feb. 15, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0104984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 28.Letunic, I. & Bork, P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res.49, W293–W296. 10.1093/nar/gkab301 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Antimicrobial resistance, WOAH - World Organisation for Animal Health. Accessed: Feb. 15, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.woah.org/en/what-we-do/global-initiatives/antimicrobial-resistance/
- 30.Murray, C. J. L. et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet399, 10325, 629–655. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Aliyu, A. B., Jalila, A., Saleha, A. A. & Zunita, Z. ESBL producing E. coli in chickens and poultry farms environment in Selangor, malaysia: A Cross-Sectional study on their occurrence and associated risk factors with environment and public health importance. Zoonoses Public. Health. 71, 8, 962–971. 10.1111/zph.13179 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Day, M. J. et al. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in human-derived and foodchain-derived samples from England, Wales, and scotland: an epidemiological surveillance and typing study. Lancet. Infect. Dis. 19, 12, 1325–1335. 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30273-7 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Halabi, M. K. et al. Antibiotic resistance pattern of extended spectrum beta lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolated from patients with urinary tract infection in Morocco. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.11 (720701). 10.3389/fcimb.2021.720701 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 34.Ibrahim, D. R. et al. Multidrug-Resistant ESBL-Producing E. coli in Clinical Samples from the UK. Antibiotics, 12,1, 169, (2023). 10.3390/antibiotics12010169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 35.Johnson, S., Bugyei, K., Nortey, P. & Tasiame, W. Antimicrobial drug usage and poultry production: case study in Ghana. Anim. Prod. Sci.59 (1), 177–182. 10.1071/AN16832 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chah, K. F. et al. Detection and molecular characterisation of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing enteric bacteria from pigs and chickens in Nsukka, Nigeria. J. Global Antimicrob. Resist.15, 36–40. 10.1016/j.jgar.2018.06.002 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ghenea, A. E. et al. TEM,CTX-M,SHV genes in ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from clinical samples in a County clinical emergency hospital Romania-Predominance of CTX-M-15. Antibiot. (Basel). 11 (4, 503, ). 10.3390/antibiotics11040503 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 38.Manyahi, J. et al. Detection of CTX-M-15 beta-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae causing hospital- and community-acquired urinary tract infections as early as 2004, in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. BMC Infect. Dis.17, 1, (282). 10.1186/s12879-017-2395-8 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 39.Fam, N. et al. CTX-M-15-Producing Escherichia coli clinical isolates in Cairo (Egypt), including isolates of clonal complex ST10 and clones ST131, ST73, and ST405 in both community and hospital settings. Microb. Drug Resist.17 (1), 67–73. 10.1089/mdr.2010.0063 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Agyekum, A. et al. blaCTX-M-15 carried by IncF-type plasmids is the dominant ESBL gene in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae at a hospital in Ghana. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.84 (4), 328–333. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.12.010 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Akenten, C. W. et al. Carriage of ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli among children in rural ghana: a cross-sectional study. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 12, 60 10.1186/s13756-023-01263-7 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 42.Cissé, A. et al. Prevalence, Antimicrobial Susceptibility, and Resistance Genes of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli from Broilers Sold in Open Markets of Dakar, Senegal. Microorganisms. 12, 11, 2357, (2024). 10.3390/microorganisms12112357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 43.Muhummed, A. et al. Fecal carriage of ESBL-producing E. coli and genetic characterization in rural children and livestock in the Somali region, ethiopia: a one health approach. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 13, 148 10.1186/s13756-024-01502-5 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 44.Sewunet, T. et al. Polyclonal spread of blaCTX-M-15 through high-risk clones of Escherichia coli at a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia. J. Global Antimicrob. Resist.29, 405–412. 10.1016/j.jgar.2021.09.017 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sugumar, M., Kumar, K. M., Manoharan, A., Anbarasu, A. & Ramaiah, S. Detection of OXA-1 β-Lactamase gene of Klebsiella pneumoniae from blood stream infections (BSI) by conventional PCR and In-Silico analysis to understand the mechanism of OXA mediated resistance. PLOS ONE. 9 3, (e91800). 10.1371/journal.pone.0091800 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 46.Siu, L. K. et al. beta-lactamases in Shigella flexneri isolates from Hong Kong and Shanghai and a novel OXA-1-like beta-lactamase, OXA-30. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.44, 8, 2034–2038. 10.1128/AAC.44.8.2034-2038.2000 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mahazu, S. et al. Possible dissemination of Escherichia coli sequence type 410 closely related to B4/H24RxC in Ghana. Front. Microbiol.10.3389/fmicb.2021.770130 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Randall, L. P. et al. Prevalence of Escherichia coli carrying extended-spectrum β-lactamases (CTX-M and TEM-52) from broiler chickens and Turkeys in great Britain between 2006 and 2009. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.66 (1), 86–95. 10.1093/jac/dkq396 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Huijbers, P. M. C. et al. Extended-spectrum and AmpC β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in broilers and people living and/or working on broiler farms: prevalence, risk factors and molecular characteristics. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.69, 10, 2669–2675. 10.1093/jac/dku178 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Muteeb, G., Rehman, M. T., Shahwan, M. & Aatif, M. Origin of antibiotics and antibiotic Resistance, and their impacts on drug development: A narrative review. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 16, 11, (1615). 10.3390/ph16111615 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 51.Pasquali, F. et al. Genetic diversity and antimicrobial resistance of extraintestinal E. coli populations Pre- and Post-Antimicrobial therapy on broilers affected by colisepticemia. Anim. : Open. Access. J. MDPI. 13,16 (2590). 10.3390/ani13162590 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 52.Aworh, M. K., Kwaga, J. K. P., Hendriksen, R. S., Okolocha, E. C. & Thakur, S. Genetic relatedness of multidrug resistant Escherichia coli isolated from humans, chickens and poultry environments. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 10 (1, 58, ). 10.1186/s13756-021-00930-x (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 53.Bergeron, C. R. et al. Chicken as reservoir for extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli in Humans, Canada. Emerg. Infect. Dis.18,3, (415). 10.3201/eid1803.111099 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 54.Manges, A. R. et al. Multilocus sequence typing and virulence gene profiles associated with Escherichia coli from human and animal sources. Foodborne Pathog Dis.12, 4, 302–310. 10.1089/fpd.2014.1860 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Müller, C. M. et al. Type 1 Fimbriae, a colonization factor of uropathogenic Escherichia coli, are controlled by the metabolic sensor CRP-cAMP. PLoS Pathog. 510.1371/journal.ppat.1000303 (2009). 2, e1000303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 56.Sváb, D. et al. The long Polar fimbriae (lpf) Operon and its flanking regions in bovine Escherichia coli O157:H43 and STEC O136:H12 strains. Pathog Dis.6810.1111/2049-632X.12038 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 57.Prorok-Hamon, M. et al. Colonic mucosa-associated diffusely adherent afaC + Escherichia coli expressing LpfA and Pks are increased in inflammatory bowel disease and colon cancer. Gut63 (5, 761). 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304739 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 58.Hojati, Z., Zamanzad, B., Hashemzadeh, M., Molaie, R. & Gholipour, A. The FimH gene in uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from patients with urinary tract infection. Jundishapur J. Microbiol.8, (e17520). 10.5812/jjm.17520 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 59.Gomes, T. A. T. et al. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Braz J. Microbiol.47, 1, 3–30. 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.10.015 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Nataro, J. P. & Kaper, J. B. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.11, 1, 142–201. 10.1128/cmr.11.1.142 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Trabulsi, L. R., Keller, R. & Gomes, T. A. T. 10.321/eid0805.Typical and atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Emerg. Infect. Dis.8, 5, 508–513. 10.3201/eid0805.010385 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kathayat, D., Lokesh, D., Ranjit, S. & Rajashekara, G. Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC): An Overview of Virulence and Pathogenesis Factors, Zoonotic Potential, and Control Strategies. Pathogens10, 4, 467, (2021). 10.3390/pathogens10040467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 63.Thomrongsuwannakij, T., Blackall, P. J., Djordjevic, S. P., Cummins, M. L. & Chansiripornchai, N. A comparison of virulence genes, antimicrobial resistance profiles and genetic diversity of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) isolates from broilers and broiler breeders in Thailand and Australia, Avian Pathology, Sept. Accessed: Oct. 01, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/ (2020). 10.1080/03079457.2020.1764493 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 64.Ewers, C., Janssen, T. & Wieler, L. H. [Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC)]. Berl Munch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. 116, 9–10 (2003). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Zhang, H. et al. Dissecting the metal resistance genes contributed by Virome from mining-affected metal contaminated soils. Front. Environ. Sci.10.3389/fenvs.2023.1182673 (2023).
- 66.Kormutakova, R., Klucar, L. & Turna, J. DNA sequence analysis of the tellurite-resistance determinant from clinical strain of Escherichia coli and identification of essential genes. Biometals13 (2), 135–139. 10.1023/A:1009272122989 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Karatzas, K. A. G., Suur, L. & O’Byrne, C. P. Characterization of the intracellular glutamate decarboxylase system: analysis of its Function, Transcription, and role in the acid resistance of various strains of Listeria monocytogenes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.78,10 (3571). 10.1128/AEM.00227-12 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 68.Yang, H., He, M. & Wu, C. Cross protection of lactic acid bacteria during environmental stresses: stress responses and underlying mechanisms. LWT144 (111203). 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111203 (2021).
- 69.Reig, M. & Toldrá, F. Veterinary drug residues in meat: concerns and rapid methods for detection. Meat Sci.78 (1–2), 60–67. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.029 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Goetting, V., Lee, K. A. & Tell, L. A. Pharmacokinetics of veterinary drugs in laying hens and residues in eggs: a review of the literature. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther.34, 6, 521–556. 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2011.01287.x (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Yang, Q. E. et al. IncF plasmid diversity in multi-drug resistant Escherichia coli strains from animals in China. Front. Microbiol.10.3389/fmicb.2015.00964 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Mathers, A. J., Peirano, G. & Pitout, J. D. D. The role of epidemic resistance plasmids and international high-risk clones in the spread of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.28, 3, 565–591. 10.1128/CMR.00116-14 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Rozwandowicz, M. et al. Plasmids carrying antimicrobial resistance genes in Enterobacteriaceae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.73, 5, 1121–1137. 10.1093/jac/dkx488 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Liao, X. P. et al. Comparison of plasmids coharboring 16S rRNA Methylase and Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase genes among Escherichia coli isolates from pets and poultry. J. Food. Prot.76, 12, 2018–2023. 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-200 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Adelowo, O. O. et al. A survey of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in urban wetlands in Southwestern Nigeria as a step towards generating prevalence maps of antimicrobial resistance. PLoS One. 15, (e0229451). 10.1371/journal.pone.0229451 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 76.Liu, B. T. et al. Dissemination and characterization of plasmids carrying oqxAB-blaCTX-M genes in Escherichia coli isolates from Food-Producing animals. PLOS ONE. 8, (e73947). 10.1371/journal.pone.0073947 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 77.Soncini, J. G. M. et al. Genomic insights of high-risk clones of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolated from community infections and commercial meat in Southern Brazil. Sci. Rep.12 (1, 9354, ). 10.1038/s41598-022-13197-y (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 78.Carattoli, A. Plasmids and the spread of resistance. Int. J. Med. Microbiol.303, 6, 298–304. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.02.001 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The raw sequencing data are available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive under the BioProject ID PRJNA1208549. All other raw data supporting the reported results can be made available upon request from the corresponding author.




