Skip to main content
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences: CMLS logoLink to Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences: CMLS
. 2026 Mar 3;83(1):140. doi: 10.1007/s00018-025-06022-y

Microbes, mood, and metabolism/obesity: Pharmacological insights into the gut-obesity-depression triad

Archana Yadav 1, Girish C Melkani 1,2,
PMCID: PMC12979749  PMID: 41774188

Abstract

The global rise in obesity and depression, two highly prevalent and often comorbid disorders has intensified interest in the gut–brain axis as a shared biological link. Mounting evidence indicates that the gut microbiota profoundly influences both metabolic and neuropsychiatric regulation, positioning it as a promising therapeutic target for these interconnected conditions. This review explores the complex interactions among microbial dysbiosis, host metabolism, and mood regulation, emphasizing pharmacological strategies that harness this triad for treatment. Gut-derived hormones such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and microbiome-produced metabolites, including short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and bile acids, have demonstrated potential to modulate appetite, insulin sensitivity, inflammation, and brain function. GLP-1 receptor agonists like semaglutide originally developed for diabetes and obesity also exhibit antidepressant properties, highlighting their dual therapeutic promise. Emerging microbiome-based interventions, such as precision probiotics, engineered psychobiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), are being investigated to restore microbial balance and improve both metabolic and mood outcomes. Furthermore, combination therapies pairing microbiota-targeted agents with conventional antidepressants or anti-obesity drugs may offer synergistic benefits, enhance efficacy while minimize adverse effects. Despite this promise, significant challenges remain, including ensuring safety, understanding long-term impacts, navigating regulatory hurdles for live biotherapeutics, and addressing ethical concerns about altering the human microbiome. A deeper understanding of the gut–microbiome–brain axis may ultimately enable personalized, microbiota-guided therapies that treat both the physiological and psychological dimensions of obesity and depression, marking a major step toward holistic and precision medicine.

Keywords: Gut-brain axis, Microbiome, Obesity, Depression, Pharmacological interventions, GLP-1 receptor agonists, Psychobiotics, Microbial dysbiosis, Microbiome-targeted therapy

Introduction

Obesity and depression are among the most pressing global health concerns of the 21 st century. The World Health Organization reports that the prevalence of obesity has nearly tripled since 1975, now affecting over 650 million adults worldwide, and that depression remains the leading cause of disability globally [1]. These two conditions frequently co-occur and are linked by a range of shared biological mechanisms, including chronic inflammation, hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis dysregulation, and metabolic impairments [13].

In recent years, attention has turned toward gut microbiome as a potential unifying factor in the pathophysiology of both disorders. The gut microbiome, a complex community of trillions of microorganisms, plays a critical role in host metabolism, immune modulation, and neurochemical signaling [4, 5]. Disruptions in microbiome composition and diversity, commonly referred to as microbial dysbiosis, have been implicated in the development of both obesity and major depressive disorder [68]. In the context of obesity, dysbiosis can enhance the host’s capacity for energy harvest, promote adipogenesis through modulation of short-chain fatty acid production, and trigger low-grade systemic inflammation [1, 9]. Parallel mechanisms have been proposed in depression, wherein gut-derived immune signaling, neurotransmitter precursors, and microbial metabolites influence mood and behavior through the gut–brain axis [10, 11]. Notably, some studies suggest that obesity-related changes in the microbiome may mediate depressive symptoms, further supporting a bidirectional and potentially synergistic relationship [12, 13].

This convergence of evidence highlights the gut microbiota as a promising therapeutic target. Current pharmacological interventions for obesity and depression often yield suboptimal outcomes and are associated with significant side effects [2, 3]. In contrast, microbiome-targeted therapies, including probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics, represent a novel, integrative approach aimed at restoring microbial balance and simultaneously addressing both metabolic and neuropsychiatric dimensions of disease [1, 6]. The objective of this review is to systematically explore the role of the gut microbiome in the etiology and progression of obesity and depression, and to assess the current and emerging pharmacological strategies targeting microbial pathways. By examining the interplay between microbiota composition, host physiology, and mental health, this review aims to inform future directions for personalized, microbiome-informed therapeutics in the treatment of these interlinked conditions.

Importance of pharmacological interventions

Obesity and depression are two of the most prevalent and debilitating health disorders worldwide, both associated with substantial personal, societal, and economic burdens. While they are often treated as separate entities, a growing body of evidence supports a strong bidirectional relationship, with each condition increasing the risk and severity of the other, creating a vicious cycle that complicates treatment outcomes and exacerbates long term health complications. [1, 5]. This interconnection poses significant challenges to existing treatment paradigms, many of which target these disorders in isolation. Current strategies for managing obesity and depression rely heavily on lifestyle modifications (e.g., diet, exercise, behavioral therapy), pharmacotherapy, and in severe cases, surgical interventions or electroconvulsive therapy [2, 3]. Pharmacological options for obesity include agents such as orlistat, liraglutide, and bupropion-naltrexone combinations, which primarily act on appetite regulation or energy expenditure [1]. However, these drugs typically lead to only modest and short-term weight loss, and many are linked to adverse side effects, poor long-term adherence, or minimal metabolic improvement [1].

Similarly, the pharmacological management of depression, dominated by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and other antidepressants, presents significant limitations. These include delayed onset of therapeutic action, variable patient response, cognitive blunting, and undesirable side effects, such as weight gain and sexual dysfunction [6, 8]. These drawbacks are of particular concern given the high rates of treatment-resistant depression and the common co-occurrence of obesity, which may further impair therapeutic outcomes. In this context, there is an urgent need for novel, integrative pharmacological strategies that address the shared pathophysiological underpinnings of both conditions. Recent research has increasingly implicated the gut microbiome, an intricate and dynamic ecosystem of microorganisms inhabiting the gastrointestinal tract, in the modulation of both metabolic and mental health [10, 11]. Changes in the composition and function of gut microbes "known as dysbiosis" have been linked to obesity-related metabolic dysfunction and inflammation, as well as to mood disorders through the gut–brain axis [10, 11].

This emerging evidence positions the gut microbiota as a compelling therapeutic target, offering the potential to develop microbiome-based pharmacological interventions that could simultaneously modulate metabolic homeostasis and neuropsychiatric resilience. Approaches such as probiotics, prebiotics, microbial metabolites (e.g., short-chain fatty acids), and psychobiotics are currently being investigated for their dual benefits in improving both mood and weight outcomes [7, 13]The primary objective of this review is to synthesize current knowledge regarding the role of gut microbial dysbiosis in the pathogenesis of obesity and depression, and to critically evaluate the potential of microbiome-informed pharmacological interventions. By exploring these integrated pathways, this review aims to identify innovative strategies for developing personalized treatments that go beyond symptom management to target the root biological mechanisms linking these two global health crises [14, 15] (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Gut microbiome as a central link between obesity and depression. The schematic illustrates the bidirectional relationship between obesity and depression, highlighting the role of gut microbiota dysbiosis in mediating metabolic and behavioral dysfunctions. Obesity leads to alterations in gut microbiota composition, characterized by reduced microbial diversity and increased inflammation. This dysbiosis results in altered short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production, increased intestinal permeability, and chronic inflammation. These changes influence the brain through mechanisms such as HPA (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal) axis dysregulation, neurotransmitter imbalance, and vagus nerve-mediated mood modulation

The role of microbes in obesity and depression

The influence of the gut microbiome on metabolism and energy balance

The gut microbiome comprises trillions of microorganisms that play a crucial role in digesting food, synthesizing vitamins, and regulating immune functions. Growing evidence indicates that the gut microbiota plays a crucial role in regulating host metabolism and energy balance [1, 12]. Dysbiosis, an imbalance in microbial composition, has been implicated in the development of metabolic disorders, including obesity and depression. Research indicates that individuals with obesity exhibit distinct gut microbiota profiles compared to lean individuals, characterized by reduced microbial diversity and altered abundance of specific bacterial taxa [1, 12]. These microbial alterations can affect energy extraction from the diet, fat storage, and inflammatory pathways, contributing to the pathogenesis of obesity. Similarly, depression has been associated with gut microbiome alterations, with studies reporting decreased microbial diversity and an overrepresentation of pro-inflammatory bacteria in individuals with depression [6, 16]. These microbial changes may influence the gut-brain axis, a bidirectional communication system linking the gut and the brain, thereby affecting mood and behavior.

How microbial composition can affect nutrient absorption, fat storage, and inflammatory pathways

The composition of the gut microbiota can influence nutrient absorption and fat storage through several mechanisms. Certain bacteria possess enzymes capable of breaking down complex carbohydrates into simple sugars, leading to increased energy harvest from the diet and subsequent fat accumulation [1, 12]. Moreover, specific microbial taxa can modulate the expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism, thereby affecting fat storage and distribution. For example, an overabundance of Firmicutes relative to Bacteroidetes has been linked to increased energy harvest and fat deposition [1]. In terms of inflammation, the gut microbiome can influence systemic inflammatory responses through the production of microbial metabolites, such as lipopolysaccharides, which can activate immune pathways [6, 16]. Chronic low-grade inflammation resulting from dysbiosis has been implicated in the development of obesity and depression, highlighting the importance of maintaining a balanced gut microbiota for overall health. In conclusion, the gut microbiome plays a pivotal role in regulating metabolism and energy balance, with significant implications for the development of obesity and depression. Pharmacological interventions aimed at modulating the gut microbiota offer a promising avenue for treating these conditions. However, personalized approaches and further research are essential to optimize the efficacy and safety of such interventions.

Microbial dysbiosis in obesity

Microbial dysbiosis, an imbalance in the composition and function of the gut microbiota, has been increasingly recognized as a critical contributor to the development and progression of obesity. Many studies have shown that obese individuals often display an increased Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratio, a shift that enhances the gut microbes’ ability to extract energy from otherwise indigestible dietary polysaccharides [17, 18]. This results in elevated production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) such as acetate, propionate, and butyrate, which, although beneficial at physiological levels, may in excess promote lipogenesis and fat accumulation in adipose tissues [1719]. Moreover, SCFAs influence host metabolism through G-protein coupled receptors (e.g., GPR41 and GPR43), thereby modulating insulin sensitivity and energy storage pathways [20, 21]. Beyond energy harvesting, gut microbiota plays a central role in regulating host appetite and metabolism by influencing enteroendocrine signaling. Dysbiosis has been shown to disrupt the secretion of key hormones such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and peptide YY (PYY), both of which are essential for promoting satiety, regulating insulin secretion, and maintaining glucose homeostasis [2, 14, 22]. A deficiency in these hormones due to altered microbial signaling can lead to increased appetite, reduced energy expenditure, and further weight gain. In parallel, microbiota-mediated modification of bile acids affects nuclear and membrane-bound receptors like farsenoid X receptor (FXR) and takeda G-protein coupled receptor 5 (TGR5), which not only influence lipid and glucose metabolism but also stimulate GLP-1 production, linking bile acid metabolism directly to energy balance [11, 21]. Additionally, dysbiosis impairs intestinal barrier integrity, increasing gut permeability, a condition often referred to as “leaky gut.” This permits translocation of microbial components such as lipopolysaccharides (LPS) into systemic circulation, triggering metabolic endotoxemia. Chronic exposure to LPS activates inflammatory signaling pathways and cytokine production, which contribute to systemic low-grade inflammation, insulin resistance, and other metabolic disturbances commonly associated with obesity [8, 23, 24]. These mechanistic insights collectively illustrate how gut microbiota imbalances are not merely correlative but functionally involved in obesity pathophysiology, highlighting their potential as therapeutic targets for intervention and prevention strategies.

Microbial dysbiosis in depression: Linkage between gut-brain axis and mental health

Emerging evidence strongly supports the role of gut microbial dysbiosis as a key factor in the etiology of depression, primarily through disruption of the gut-brain axis, a complex bidirectional communication system involving neural, immune, endocrine, and metabolic pathways. One central mechanism by which dysbiosis contributes to depression is through the modulation of neurotransmitter synthesis and signaling. Several gut bacteria, including species of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, can produce or modulate levels of neurotransmitters such as serotonin, dopamine, and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), which are critical for mood regulation [2, 6]. Up to 90% of the body’s serotonin is synthesized in the gut, influenced by microbial metabolism of tryptophan. Dysbiosis, particularly a reduction in beneficial microbes, shifts tryptophan metabolism toward the kynurenine pathway, leading to the production of neurotoxic metabolites (e.g., quinolinic acid) associated with neuroinflammation and depressive symptoms [5, 8, 22]. Another major pathway is immune system activation and inflammation. Dysbiosis often leads to increased intestinal permeability (a “leaky gut”), allowing translocation of microbial products such as LPS into systemic circulation. LPS triggers the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α), which can cross the blood-brain barrier and activate microglia in the central nervous system [14, 24]. Activated microglia promotes neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and neuronal damage, factors that impair synaptic plasticity and neurogenesis in the hippocampus, a brain region central to mood regulation and cognition [13, 25]. Elevated cytokines also disrupt the functioning of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, leading to hypercortisolemia, which exacerbates depressive pathology and further disturbs gut microbial composition in a vicious feedback loop [1, 8]. Furthermore, microbial metabolites such as SCFAs, notably acetate, propionate, and butyrate, play a protective role in maintaining the integrity of the blood-brain barrier and regulating central inflammation [20, 26]. In healthy individuals, SCFAs exert anti-inflammatory and neurotrophic effects by modulating histone acetylation, increasing brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression, and promoting regulatory T-cell development [20, 26]. However, in dysbiosis, the altered production or absence of SCFAs may impair these neuroprotective effects, contributing to depressive behavior. Additionally, the vagus nerve serves as a direct communication route between the gut and brain, transmitting microbial and immune signals from the gastrointestinal tract to brain centers involved in mood regulation. Certain probiotics have been shown to modulate vagal activity, and vagotomy (surgical disruption of the vagus nerve) has been found to abolish the antidepressant-like effects of some microbial strains, underlining the importance of this pathway [11, 27]. Taken together, these mechanistic insights emphasize that microbial dysbiosis can drive depressive pathology through multiple, interconnected pathways, disrupting neurotransmitter balance, increasing systemic and neuroinflammation, compromising neurogenesis, and altering neuroendocrine signaling. This growing body of evidence supports the therapeutic potential of targeting microbiota through psychobiotics, diet, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) as adjunct treatments for depression.

Bidirectional relationship: Exploring the potential bidirectional relationship between obesity and depression about microbial health

The bidirectional association between obesity and depression is increasingly recognized as being intricately mediated by gut microbial dysbiosis, implicating the gut-brain-metabolic axis as a shared pathological conduit. Obesity is frequently characterized by a significant shift in gut microbiota composition, namely, an increased Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratio and reduced microbial diversity, which enhances energy harvest from the diet and promotes adiposity [17, 20, 28]. These microbial alterations also compromise intestinal barrier function, leading to “leaky gut” syndrome. This, in turn, facilitates the translocation of bacterial endotoxins like LPS into systemic circulation, resulting in chronic low-grade inflammation [1, 22, 24]. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α not only interfere with insulin signaling and lipid metabolism but also cross the blood-brain barrier and impair central nervous system functioning. They reduce the availability of BDNF, suppress hippocampal neurogenesis, and disrupt monoaminergic neurotransmission, which are all implicated in the pathophysiology of major depressive [5, 8, 14]. Conversely, individuals suffering from depression are at increased risk for developing obesity due to both behavioral and physiological mechanisms. Depression is associated with altered appetite regulation, decreased physical activity, emotional eating, and disrupted circadian rhythms, all of which contribute to weight gain [2, 11]. At the neuroendocrine level, depressive states often trigger chronic activation of the HPA axis, leading to sustained cortisol elevation. This hypercortisolemia not only promotes central adiposity and insulin resistance but also alters gut permeability and reshapes the microbial community in favor of pathogenic species [1, 8]. Furthermore, depression-linked dysbiosis has been shown to reduce the production of beneficial microbial metabolites such as SCFAs, especially butyrate. SCFAs play a crucial role in regulating glucose and lipid metabolism, maintaining blood-brain barrier integrity, and exerting anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects through histone deacetylase inhibition and increased BDNF expression [6, 26, 29]. A central mediator in this gut-brain-metabolic loop is the vagus nerve, which allows direct bidirectional communication between the gut microbiota and the brain. Certain probiotics that influence vagal tone have shown antidepressant-like effects, and vagotomy has been found to blunt such effects, underscoring the importance of this neural pathway [11, 27]. Notably, obesity-induced gut dysbiosis also results in altered signaling through the vagus nerve, which may contribute to depressive symptoms via disrupted neuroendocrine signaling and impaired satiety feedback [13, 30]. The intertwining of microbial, immune, and neuroendocrine disturbances suggests that obesity and depression do not simply coexist but may perpetuate each other via shared microbial pathways. This model highlights a vicious cycle where obesity-induced inflammation and microbial imbalance contribute to depression, which in turn exacerbates behaviors and neurochemical changes that worsen metabolic health. This cyclical interplay suggests the need for integrated therapeutic strategies that concurrently target gut microbial composition to break the feedback loop. Interventions such as prebiotics, probiotics, dietary fiber, polyphenol-rich diets, and even FMT have shown promise in restoring microbial balance and mitigating symptoms of both metabolic and mood disorders (Fig. 2) [3133].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Interconnected mechanisms linking gut microbial dysbiosis to obesity and depression. Diagram illustrates the complex bidirectional interactions between obesity and depression, mediated through gut microbiota and the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis. Obesity alters gut microbiota composition, leading to increased energy harvest (via Short-chain fatty acids; SCFAs), reduced satiety hormones (Glucagon like peptide-1; GLP-1, peptide YY; PYY), increased gut permeability, elevated lipopolysaccharide (LPS) levels, chronic inflammation, insulin resistance, and disrupted fat metabolism. Concurrently, depression is associated with decreased serotonin and tryptophan metabolism, increased neuroinflammatory markers (Interleukin-6; IL-6, Tumor necrosis factor; TNF-α), elevated cortisol, reduced brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and hippocampal dysfunction. These changes are influenced by reduced microbial diversity, increased Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratio, decreased SCFAs, and elevated LPS. Dysregulated gut microbiota affects the HPA axis and contributes to both metabolic and mood disorders. Probiotic interventions targeting the gut microbiota may offer therapeutic benefits by restoring microbial balance and modulating the gut–brain axis

Current pharmacological interventions

Current treatments for obesity: Pharmacological options and limitations

Pharmacological approaches to obesity have evolved in recent years to target diverse aspects of energy balance, appetite regulation, and metabolism. Current therapeutic options include appetite suppressants (e.g., phentermine, naltrexone-bupropion), lipase inhibitors (e.g., orlistat), GLP-1 receptor agonists (e.g., liraglutide, semaglutide), and metabolic modulators (e.g., metformin in insulin-resistant patients) [3436]. GLP-1 agonists not only enhance insulin sensitivity and promote satiety but also delay gastric emptying, resulting in reduced caloric intake and meaningful weight loss [3638]. GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), GLP-1 secretagogues, and GLP-1 analogues have been shown in numerous studies to alter the gut microbiota in a way that is more metabolically advantageous [3941]. Treatment with liraglutide or semaglutide, for example, has been demonstrated to decrease pro-inflammatory taxa linked to dysbiosis in obesity while increasing the abundance of beneficial bacterial genera such Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Bacteroides fragilis, and Akkermansia muciniphila [3941].

Conversely, through free fatty acid receptor2/3 (FFAR2/3) and TGR5-mediated signaling, gut microbial metabolites, such as SCFAs like butyrate and propionate, as well as secondary bile acids, can promote GLP-1 secretion from enteroendocrine L-cells [4245]. These microbial–host interactions improve insulin sensitivity, lower systemic inflammation, and repair gut barrier function in addition to increasing endogenous GLP-1 secretion [46]. From a medicinal perspective, these results imply that individual differences in gut microbiota could contribute to the diverse metabolic reactions seen with GLP-1-based treatments [47]. The metabolic advantages of GLP-1 therapy may be enhanced by including microbiota-targeted strategies, such as dietary modification, probiotics, or prebiotics. This is an emerging adjunct method for the management of type 2 diabetes and obesity [40, 48]. Meanwhile, combination therapies such as bupropion-naltrexone aim to simultaneously target the reward system and hypothalamic hunger pathways [18, 49]. However, despite their effectiveness in some patients, these medications are not without significant limitations.

A primary concern is adverse effects. Orlistat often causes gastrointestinal distress due to fat malabsorption, while phentermine can lead to insomnia and elevated blood pressure [19, 50]. GLP-1 analogs, although effective, are associated with nausea, vomiting, and high cost, which can reduce long-term adherence [51, 52]. Furthermore, most weight-loss drugs yield modest and often unsustainable weight reduction unless coupled with sustained lifestyle changes [13, 53]. Many patients experience weight regain after discontinuing therapy due to the persistence of obesogenic environmental and behavioral factors [54, 55]. Another limitation is the limited personalization of treatment. Current pharmacological options do not account for patient-specific variables such as gut microbiome composition, genetic predispositions, or neurobehavioral traits, which may impact therapeutic responsiveness [21, 33]. Recent findings suggest that microbiome-related metabolic modulators, such as prebiotics and postbiotics, may offer future therapeutic adjuncts to address individual variability and improve [31, 56].

In summary, while current pharmacologic treatments for obesity have broadened therapeutic strategies by targeting hunger, satiety, and metabolism, they remain limited by side effects, long-term sustainability, and interindividual variability. Integrative approaches involving gut microbiota modulation may represent the next frontier in achieving durable and safe weight management.

Current pharmacological treatments for obesity encompass a range of medications targeting various aspects of appetite regulation, metabolic modulation, and energy balance. These treatments aim to support weight loss and improve associated comorbidities, such as type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases.

Current treatments for depression

Pharmacological interventions for depression predominantly rely on antidepressants, particularly SSRIs, SNRIs, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs). These drugs primarily function by modulating monoaminergic transmission, with SSRIs and SNRIs enhancing serotonin and/or norepinephrine availability in synaptic clefts, which is theorized to alleviate depressive symptoms [12, 35]. Despite their widespread use, these medications are associated with several critical limitations. One of the foremost concerns is the delayed onset of therapeutic effect, often requiring 2–6 weeks to manifest noticeable clinical improvements, which can be particularly detrimental for patients in acute distress or those at risk of suicide [16, 37, 38]. Moreover, adverse effects are common, including sexual dysfunction, gastrointestinal upset, weight gain, insomnia, and emotional blunting, which frequently contribute to poor adherence and early discontinuation [34, 56, 57]. Importantly, a substantial proportion of patients, estimated at 30–50%, either do not respond or achieve only partial remission with first-line antidepressants, highlighting issues of pharmacological inefficacy and treatment resistance [22, 33, 58]. For these individuals, more potent agents like MAOIs are sometimes prescribed, yet these require stringent dietary restrictions and carry higher risks of hypertensive crises and drug interactions, limiting their clinical utility [1, 10]. Additionally, chronic use of antidepressants has raised concerns regarding their long-term impact on neuroplasticity and gut-brain axis dynamics, suggesting that traditional monoaminergic approaches may overlook underlying multifactorial pathophysiology’s of depression [2, 11, 59]. Thus, despite being a mainstay in psychiatric care, current antidepressant regimens remain suboptimal for many, necessitating a paradigm shift toward more personalized, mechanistically targeted therapies. In summary, while SSRIs, SNRIs, and MAOIs play a pivotal role in the management of depression, their limitations, such as delayed onset of action, side effects, and inefficacy in certain patients, underscore the need for ongoing research into more effective and tolerable treatments. Future advancements may include the development of novel antidepressants with faster onset of action, improved side effect profiles, and greater efficacy in treatment-resistant populations (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Schematic overview of the gut–brain axis in obesity and depression. Therapeutic interventions (probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics, Glucagon like peptide; GLP-1 agonists, Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; SSRIs) modulate gut microbiota and produce metabolites (Short-chain fatty acids; SCFAs, bile acids) via metabolic signaling, neurotransmitters (serotonin, dopamine, Gamma-aminobutyric acid; GABA), and cytokines. These signals influence brain function and metabolic outcomes through bidirectional feedback along the gut–brain axis. Integrated or combination therapies may enhance both metabolic and mood-related benefits

SGLT2 inhibitors and depression

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, including empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and canagliflozin, are primarily used for the management of hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia in type 2 diabetes [6062]. However, accumulating evidence suggests that these agents may also exert beneficial effects on mood and cognitive function, indicating a potential role in depression management [6366]. The mechanisms underlying these effects extend beyond glycemic control and include attenuation of systemic inflammation, reduction of oxidative stress, improvement of mitochondrial bioenergetics, and modulation of neurotrophic and neuroendocrine signaling [6366].

Preclinical studies have shown that empagliflozin and dapagliflozin can activate AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) pathways, reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α, and enhance hippocampal neurogenesis, collectively contributing to antidepressant-like effects [66, 67]. In a recent randomized controlled trial, adjunctive therapy with empagliflozin in patients receiving citalopram significantly reduced depressive symptom scores, highlighting the therapeutic promise of SGLT2 inhibitors in mood disorders comorbid with metabolic dysfunction [66]. Moreover, the improvement in metabolic parameters such as insulin sensitivity, lipid profile, and body weight may indirectly enhance psychological well-being and cognitive performance [68]. These findings collectively suggest that SGLT2 inhibitors hold promise as adjunctive agents in the management of depression, particularly in individuals with obesity, diabetes, or metabolic syndrome. Future research should further elucidate their psychotropic mechanisms and long-term safety in psychiatric populations.

Gut-targeted therapies

Emerging research has increasingly highlighted the gut-brain axis as a crucial mediator in the pathophysiology of both depression and obesity, prompting growing interest in gut-targeted therapies such as probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics [1, 2, 69]. These microbiome-based interventions aim to restore healthy microbial balance and improve systemic and neural signaling through modulation of inflammation, neurotransmitter production, and metabolic function [1, 2, 69]. Probiotics, live microorganisms that confer health benefits, have been shown in several clinical trials to reduce depressive symptoms. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by Liu et al. [7072] found that probiotic supplementation significantly improved depressive scores in patients with mild-to-moderate depression, potentially via increased production of GABA and modulation of the HPA axis. Clinical studies have demonstrated that probiotic supplementation can alleviate depressive symptoms in individuals with mild to moderate depression. For instance, a meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials revealed that probiotics significantly improved depressive symptoms compared to placebo, with effects observed across various assessment time points and scales [73]. Similarly, synbiotic supplementation combining Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains with prebiotic fibers showed significant reduction in depressive symptoms and improvements in BDNF levels, as reported by Jin et al. [36] and Markus et al. [33]. Similarly, synbiotics, which combine probiotics and prebiotics, have shown efficacy in reducing depressive symptoms and enhancing brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in certain patient populations [74]. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study indicated that multispecies synbiotic supplementation led to significant reductions in waist circumference and body fat percentage in overweight and obese individuals over a 12-week period [75]. Moreover, an umbrella review of trials’ meta-analyses highlighted that prebiotic, probiotic, and synbiotic supplementation could positively influence body weight, BMI, and waist circumference, though results varied across studies [76]. These findings underscore the potential of gut-targeted therapies in managing both mental health and metabolic disorders.

In the context of obesity, dysbiosis of gut microbiota has been implicated in metabolic endotoxemia, insulin resistance, and chronic low-grade inflammation [26, 77]. Probiotic and synbiotic interventions have shown potential in modulating these pathways. For instance, a double-blind randomized controlled trial by Avila-Nava et al. [78] demonstrated that inulin-type prebiotic supplementation significantly decreased body weight and waist circumference in overweight adults. Similarly, Gawlik-Kotelnicka et al. [27] found that multispecies synbiotics not only improved BMI and fat distribution but also reduced circulating lipopolysaccharide-binding protein levels, a marker of endotoxemia. These metabolic improvements are often paralleled by improvements in mental health, further supporting the bidirectional link between gut health, mood regulation, and weight control [11, 14]. However, despite the promising data, heterogeneity in study designs, microbial strains used, dosages, and population characteristics remain a challenge. As noted by Zhang et al. [79] and Farzi et al. [6], further large-scale, well-controlled studies are needed to identify standardized protocols and clarify the long-term efficacy and safety of gut-based interventions in both psychiatric and metabolic disorders. Until then, these therapies are best considered as adjunctive strategies alongside conventional (Table 1).

Table 1.

Current pharmacological interventions for obesity and depression: Mechanisms, efficacy, and limitations

Category Drug/ approach Mechanisms Clinical benefits Limitations
Category supplements Phentermine, Topiramate CNS appetite regulation Weight loss, improved glycemic control Insomnia, High Bp, limited long-term use
GLP-1 agonists Liraglutide, Semaglutide Insulin secretion, satiely, delayed gastric emptying Weight loss, improved glycemic control Nausea, high cost,GI side effects
Lipase inhibitor Orlistat Inhibit fat absorption Moderate weight loss GI discomfort, adherence issues
Antidepressants SSRIs, SNRIs, MAOIs Serotonin/ norepinephrine reuptake inhibition Mood improvement Sexual dysfunction, delayed response
Gut therapies Probiotics, Synbiotcs Modulate microbiome, reduce inflammation Reduce depressive symptoms, weight control Varying efficacy, dosage inconsistency

Future of pharmacological interventions

Targeting the gut microbiome

The future of pharmacological interventions targeting the gut microbiome holds significant promise for treating obesity and depression, two prevalent and interrelated disorders. Emerging research underscores the pivotal role of the gut-brain axis, a bidirectional communication system linking the gastrointestinal tract and the central nervous system, in influencing mood, behavior, and metabolic functions [80]. This axis mediates the effects of gut microbiota on the brain through various mechanisms, including the modulation of neurotransmitter production, immune responses, and systemic inflammation [81]. Obesity and depression often co-occur, with each condition exacerbating the other. This bidirectional relationship is partly mediated by gut microbiota composition [82]. Dysbiosis, or microbial imbalance, can lead to increased intestinal permeability and systemic inflammation, which are implicated in both obesity and depression. Conversely, depression can alter eating behaviors and physical activity levels, contributing to weight gain. Thus, interventions targeting the gut microbiome may offer a dual benefit in addressing both conditions simultaneously (Fig. 3).

Pharmacological strategies aimed at modulating the gut microbiome are gaining traction. Probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics are being explored for their potential to restore microbial balance and alleviate symptoms of obesity and depression. Probiotics, such as Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Bifidobacterium longum, have shown promise in animal models by enhancing gut barrier function, reducing inflammation, and influencing neurotransmitter levels [83]. Prebiotics like fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) and galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) selectively stimulate beneficial gut bacteria, leading to the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) that can modulate brain function and behavior [84].

Fecal microbiotatransplantation (FMT) is another innovative approach under investigation. This procedure involves transferring stools from a healthy donor to a recipient to restore a balanced gut microbiota [84]. While FMT has demonstrated efficacy in treating gastrointestinal disorders like Clostridium difficile infection, its role in managing depression and obesity is still being evaluated. Some studies suggest that FMT can reduce systemic inflammation and improve mood in individuals with depression, though results are mixed, and further research is needed [83].

The concept of personalized microbiome-based medicine is gaining momentum. Individual variations in gut microbiota composition, genetics, and lifestyle factors necessitate tailored therapeutic approaches. By profiling an individual’s microbiome, clinicians can identify specific microbial imbalances and select appropriate interventions, such as targeted probiotics or dietary modifications, to optimize treatment outcomes [74].

In conclusion, the modulation of the gut microbiome presents a promising frontier in the pharmacological treatment of obesity and depression. While current evidence is promising, further clinical trials are essential to validate the efficacy and safety of microbiome-targeted therapies. As research progresses, personalized approaches to microbiome-based medicine may revolutionize the management of these complex, multifactorial disorders (Table 2) [85].

Table 2.

Summary of studies investigating the effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on obesity and depression

Intervention Outcomes Key findings Study (Author, Year)
Various probiotics strains and combinations Mental healt, gut health, systemic effects Probiotics showed promise across multiple domains including mental health; emphasized standardization and personalization Chao et al,. 2025
Probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics Depression and anxiety scores Probiotics significantly reduced depression, and anxiety; prebiotics had nonsignificant effect Asad et al., 2025
Bifidobacterium longum 1714 Stress, memory, cortisol levels Reduce stress and improved memory performance; lowered cortisol response Patterson et al., 2024
Prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics Depression scores Significant improvement in depressive symptoms with probiotics; prebiotics and synbiotics showed mixed results; stronger effects observed in studies with lower female participation and mild/ moderate depression Zhang et al., 2023
Probiotic mix (Lactobacillus Bifidobacterium) Body weight, depression/ anxiety scores, cognitive function Improved neurobehavioral in symptoms and weight reduction; enhanced gut-brain axis function Cai et al., 2023
Lactobacillus plantarum 299v Depression scores (HAM-D), inflammatory markers Significant reduction in depressive symptoms and IL-6 levels Rudzki et al., 2019
Probiotic capsule (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum) Depression scores (BDI), BMI Decrease depression scores and BMI; improved metabolic parameters Kazemi et al., 2019
Probiotic mix (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Lactobacillus casei) Depression scores (DBI) Significant reduction in depressive symptoms compared to placebo Akksheh et al., 2016

Microbiome modulation and psychobiotics

The burgeoning field of psychobiotics explores the therapeutic potential of specific probiotics in modulating the gut-brain axis to alleviate mental health disorders such as depression and anxiety [86]. Psychobiotics are live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer health benefits to the host by positively influencing the gut microbiota and, consequently, the brain’s function and behavior [87]. The gut-brain axis is a complex communication network linking the gastrointestinal tract and the central nervous system, involving neural, endocrine, and immune pathways [86, 87]. Microbial dysbiosis, an imbalance in gut microbiota composition, has been implicated in the pathophysiology of various psychiatric disorders. Restoring microbial balance through psychobiotics may offer a novel approach to treating these conditions [88].

Several probiotic strains have shown promise in preclinical and clinical studies. For instance, Lactobacillus plantarum PS128 has demonstrated anxiolytic and antidepressant effects in animal models, associated with increased levels of dopamine and serotonin in the brain. Similarly, Lactobacillus helveticus NS8 and Bifidobacterium longum NCC3001 have been reported to reduce anxiety and depression-like behaviors, potentially through modulation of neurotransmitter systems and neuroinflammatory pathways [86, 89].

Clinical trials have also supported the efficacy of psychobiotics. A randomized controlled trial involving patients with major depressive disorder and irritable bowel syndrome found that Bacillus coagulans MTCC 5856 supplementation led to significant improvements in both gastrointestinal and depressive symptoms. Another study reported that Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175 reduced depressive symptoms and modulated the kynurenine/tryptophan ratio, indicating effects on tryptophan metabolism and serotonin synthesis [86].

The mechanisms underlying the effects of psychobiotics are multifaceted. They may influence the gut-brain axis by producing neurotransmitters such as GABA and serotonin, modulating the immune response, and enhancing the integrity of the intestinal barrier [86] For example, Lactobacillus rhamnosus JB-1 has been shown to alter GABA receptor expression in the brain and reduce corticosterone levels, suggesting a role in stress response regulation. Additionally, certain strains can decrease levels of proinflammatory cytokines like IL-6 and TNF-α, which are elevated in depression and anxiety [89].

Despite promising findings, the clinical application of psychobiotics faces challenges. Variability in study designs, probiotic strains used, dosages, and patient populations complicates the interpretation of results. Moreover, the optimal duration of treatment and long-term safety remains fully established. Therefore, while psychobiotics represent a novel and promising avenue for mental health treatment, further rigorous and large-scale clinical trials are necessary to confirm their efficacy and safety profiles.

In conclusion, psychobiotics offer a promising adjunct or alternative to traditional pharmacological treatments for depression and anxiety by targeting the gut-brain axis. Their potential to modulate mood and behavior through microbial interventions opens new therapeutic possibilities in psychiatry. However, comprehensive research is essential to translate these findings into clinical practice effectively.

Pharmacological approaches targeting gut hormones and microbiome-derived metabolites in obesity

Pharmacological strategies targeting gut hormones and microbiome-derived metabolites are emerging as promising approaches for obesity treatment. GLP-1, a gut-derived hormone, plays a pivotal role in regulating appetite, glucose homeostasis, and energy balance. GLP-1 receptor agonists, such as semaglutide, have shown efficacy in promoting weight loss and improving metabolic health by enhancing insulin sensitivity and reducing food intake [48].

The gut microbiome significantly influences GLP-1 secretion and overall metabolic function. SCFAs, particularly butyrate, propionate, and acetate, are produced by gut bacteria during the fermentation of dietary fibers [48]. These SCFAs activate G-protein-coupled receptors on enteroendocrine L-cells, stimulating GLP-1 release and contributing to improved metabolic outcomes [90, 91]. For instance, supplementation with butyrate-producing bacteria like Anaerobutyricum soehngenii has demonstrated potential in enhancing GLP-1 secretion and improving insulin sensitivity [91]. Bile acids, synthesized in the liver and modified by gut microbiota, also play a crucial role in metabolic regulation [92]. They act as signaling molecules through receptors such as TGR5, influencing glucose metabolism, insulin sensitivity, and energy expenditure. Alterations in bile acid composition, resulting from changes in gut microbiota, have been associated with obesity and related metabolic disorders. Modulating bile acid metabolism through dietary interventions or pharmacological agents presents a potential therapeutic avenue for obesity management.

Furthermore, dietary compounds like curcumin have been shown to influence gut microbiota composition and enhance the production of beneficial bile acids. In high-fat diet-induced obese mice, curcumin treatment led to an increase in secondary bile acids, including deoxycholic acid and lithocholic acid, which activate TGR5 receptors and promote thermogenesis, thereby ameliorating obesity [93]. In summary, integrating pharmacological agents that modulate gut hormones and microbiome-derived metabolites offers a multifaceted approach to obesity treatment. By targeting GLP-1 pathways, enhancing SCFA production, and influencing bile acid signaling, these strategies aim to restore metabolic balance and promote sustainable weight loss. Continued research into the intricate interactions between the gut microbiome and host metabolism will be essential in developing personalized and effective therapies for obesity management.

Combination therapies

Combination therapies that integrate microbiome-targeted interventions with traditional antidepressants or weight loss medications represent a promising frontier in treating both obesity and depression. This dual approach leverages the intricate relationship between the gut microbiota, metabolic processes, and mental health, aiming to achieve synergistic effects that enhance therapeutic outcomes. The gut microbiome plays a pivotal role in regulating metabolic functions and influencing brain activity through the gut-brain axis. Alterations in microbial composition have been linked to obesity and depression, suggesting that modulating the microbiome could offer therapeutic benefits. For instance, studies have shown that weight loss medications like semaglutide and liraglutide not only aid in reducing body weight but also induce significant changes in gut microbiota, enhancing bacterial diversity and influencing metabolic pathways [83]. These medications’ effects on the microbiome may contribute to their efficacy in managing both metabolic and psychiatric disorders.

Traditional antidepressants, such as selective SSRIs and SNRIs, have also been observed to impact gut microbiota composition. For example, fluoxetine and escitalopram have been shown to reduce the richness of microbial communities, particularly affecting species associated with body mass regulation [84]. These alterations suggest that antidepressants’ effects on the microbiome could influence their therapeutic outcomes and potential side effects.

Combining microbiome-targeted therapies with traditional medications holds the potential for enhanced efficacy. Probiotics and synbiotics, which combine prebiotics and probiotics, have demonstrated benefits in improving depressive symptoms and metabolic health. For instance, a synbiotic supplement containing Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and inulin improved depressive symptoms in overweight or obese adults [74, 94]. These adjunctive therapies may potentiate the effects of primary treatments, leading to improved outcomes (Fig. 3).

Furthermore, pharmacologically induced weight loss has been associated with distinct changes in the gut microbiome [95]. A study involving obese rats treated with sibutramine revealed alterations in microbial taxa and genes related to inflammation, indicating that weight loss interventions can modulate the microbiome in ways that may support both metabolic and mental health [95]. The integration of microbiome-targeted therapies with traditional medications offers a multifaceted approach to treating obesity and depression. By addressing the underlying microbial imbalances and enhancing the efficacy of existing treatments, combination therapies may provide a more comprehensive and effective strategy for managing these interconnected conditions. However, further research is necessary to optimize these combinations, determine the most effective formulations, and understand the long-term impacts on both metabolic and mental health.

In conclusion, the exploration of combined pharmacological therapies that incorporate microbiome-targeted interventions with traditional weight loss and antidepressant medications represents a promising avenue for treating obesity and depression. This integrated approach has the potential to offer synergistic effects, improving therapeutic outcomes and providing a more holistic treatment strategy for patients.

Psychotropic drugs, obesity, and antidepressant effects of anti-obesity therapies

Psychotropic medications, particularly antidepressants and antipsychotics, are strongly associated with metabolic side effects, including weight gain, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia [96, 97]. Agents such as mirtazapine, paroxetine, amitriptyline, clozapine, and olanzapine are well-documented to induce significant weight gain through mechanisms involving increased appetite, altered leptin and ghrelin signaling, and modulation of hypothalamic pathways regulating energy balance [98100]. Long-term exposure to these medications can exacerbate obesity and related cardiometabolic complications, which in turn may worsen depressive outcomes and reduce treatment adherence [98100]. Conversely, certain antidepressants such as bupropion, a norepinephrine–dopamine reuptake inhibitor, have been associated with modest weight loss and improved metabolic profiles, suggesting potential utility in patients with comorbid depression and obesity [101, 102].

Emerging evidence also indicates that some anti-obesity drugs may exert beneficial effects on mood and depression. For example, GLP-1 receptor agonists (e.g., liraglutide, semaglutide) have demonstrated not only potent weight-reducing and glycemic effects but also neuroprotective and antidepressant-like properties in both preclinical and clinical studies [74, 103, 104]. These effects are believed to occur via central GLP-1 receptor activation, reduction in neuroinflammation, improved insulin sensitivity in the brain, and enhanced hippocampal neurogenesis [74, 103, 104]. Similarly, the combination therapy of bupropion/naltrexone, originally developed for obesity management, has shown improvements in mood and reduction in depressive symptoms due to bupropion’s dopaminergic and noradrenergic actions [105107].

These findings underscore a complex bidirectional relationship between mood-regulating and metabolic therapies. Psychotropic medications can worsen obesity, while certain anti-obesity drugs can improve depressive symptoms. Therefore, therapeutic decision-making should consider the dual impact of pharmacological agents on both mood and metabolic health, especially in patients presenting with comorbid depression and obesity. Future treatment strategies may benefit from personalized regimens that balance psychotropic efficacy with metabolic safety and explore the mood-enhancing potential of metabolic drugs such as GLP-1 receptor agonists and combination therapies (Fig. 3).

Challenges and considerations

The burgeoning field of microbiome-targeted therapies offers promising avenues for treating complex conditions like obesity and depression. However, the integration of these therapies into clinical practice is fraught with multifaceted challenges encompassing safety and efficacy concerns, regulatory complexities, and ethical dilemmas.

Safety and Efficacy Concerns

A primary concern in microbiome-based treatments is the variability in individual responses due to the unique composition of each person’s gut microbiota. This inter-individual variability complicates the standardization of treatments and the prediction of therapeutic outcomes. For instance, a specific probiotic strain may be highly effective for one individual but ineffective for another, underscoring the necessity for personalized approaches in microbiome modulation [108]. Additionally, the long-term safety of microbiome-targeted therapies remains uncertain. While short-term studies have shown promising results, there is a paucity of data on the sustained effects of these interventions. The potential for adverse outcomes, such as dysbiosis, a condition characterized by an imbalance in the gut microbiota, raises significant safety concerns. This imbalance can lead to further health complications, highlighting the need for rigorous and prolonged clinical evaluations [108].

Regulatory Hurdles

The regulatory landscape for microbiome-based therapies is complex and inconsistent across different regions. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has classified products containing live microorganisms as biologics, necessitating extensive safety and efficacy testing before approval [109]. Conversely, in the European Union, there is no centralized classification system for such treatments, leading to varied regulatory approaches among member states. This lack of harmonization not only delays the development and approval of microbiome-based therapies but also creates uncertainty for developers and investors. The absence of clear regulatory pathways can impede innovation and hinder the timely introduction of potentially beneficial treatments to the market. Moreover, the FDA’s recent restructuring, which included significant staff reductions, has further exacerbated delays in drug development and approval processes, affecting the advancement of microbiome therapeutics.

Ethical Considerations

Manipulating the gut microbiota for therapeutic purposes raises profound ethical questions. One major concern is the autonomy of individuals in making decisions about their microbiome. There is a risk that interventions could affect not only the individual but also others nearby, potentially infringing on personal autonomy and consent [109]. Furthermore, the use of FMT and other microbiome-based therapies involves the collection and utilization of biological materials, which necessitates stringent ethical guidelines to ensure donor consent, privacy, and the safe handling of biological samples. The potential for unintended social and cultural implications, such as the stigmatization of donors or recipients, underscores the need for comprehensive ethical frameworks to govern these practices [109]. While microbiome-targeted therapies hold significant promise for treating obesity and depression, their integration into clinical practice is hindered by safety and efficacy concerns, regulatory challenges, and ethical dilemmas. Addressing these issues requires a concerted effort from researchers, clinicians, regulators, and ethicists to develop personalized treatment protocols, establish clear and consistent regulatory guidelines, and create robust ethical frameworks. Only through such collaborative endeavors can the full potential of microbiome-based therapies be realized in a manner that is safe, effective, and ethically sound.

Future directions

The gut microbiome represents a rapidly evolving frontier in the treatment of complex and comorbid disorders such as obesity and depression. Given the substantial body of evidence linking microbial dysbiosis to metabolic and neuropsychiatric dysfunctions, continued research into the gut microbiota’s composition, function, and therapeutic modulation is both necessary and promising [1, 2, 26]. Future studies should prioritize high-resolution microbiome mapping, longitudinal cohort analyses, and mechanistic studies to elucidate causal relationships between specific microbial strains, their metabolites, and host physiological outcomes. An exciting future avenue lies in the advancement of personalized pharmacological strategies that leverage individual microbiome profiles to optimize treatment outcomes. With progress in metagenomic sequencing, metabolomics, and AI-driven modeling, tailored interventions such as precision probiotics, microbiome-modulating drugs, or synbiotic combinations could be designed to restore microbial balance in a patient-specific manner [37, 38]. For instance, microbial signatures associated with resistance or responsiveness to antidepressants or anti-obesity agents could guide more effective and individualized treatment pathways [11, 110].

Furthermore, integrating microbiome-targeted therapies into existing treatment frameworks, especially in combination with traditional medications, could produce synergistic effects, minimize side effects and enhance therapeutic efficacy [22, 36]. Future drug development may also involve engineering microbial strains to deliver therapeutic compounds directly within the gut environment or manipulating microbial metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids or bile acids to modulate host metabolism and mood regulation [7, 19]. Another critical direction includes addressing current limitations and ensuring safe implementation. This involves improving regulatory frameworks for microbiome-based therapies, developing robust biomarkers of microbial function, and conducting large-scale, randomized clinical trials to validate efficacy across diverse populations [31] Ethical considerations, such as data privacy in microbiome profiling, consent in (FMT, and equitable access to these novel therapies, must also be foregrounded in future research agendas [8, 14].

More recently, Time-restricted feeding (TRF), a dietary strategy aligning food intake with circadian rhythms, has emerged as a potent intervention to combat obesity and related metabolic disorders through microbiome regulation [111114]. Increasing evidence highlights that the gut microbiome plays a central role in mediating TRF’s metabolic benefits. TRF promotes diurnal oscillations in microbial composition and function, enhances microbial diversity, and increases production of short-chain fatty acids and bile acid derivatives that regulate host energy metabolism and inflammatory tone [112114]. Recent studies using Drosophila models of obesity and metabolic dysfunction have elucidated mechanistic underpinnings of these interactions [111, 115]. Livelo et al. [111] provided compelling evidence that TRF remodels the gut microbiome, enhancing beneficial taxa such as Acetobacter pasteurianus while reducing harmful species like Staphylococcus aureus, and that these microbial shifts are causally linked to improved muscle and metabolic physiology [111]. Collectively, these studies support a model wherein TRF exerts its anti-obesity effects through coordinated circadian, metabolic, and microbiome-driven mechanisms that optimize organismal energy homeostasis.

In summary, the future of gut microbiome research holds great promise for transforming the treatment landscape of obesity and depression. By bridging microbial science with precision medicine, we are moving closer to a paradigm where personalized, microbiome-based pharmacology can revolutionize the treatment of multifaceted disorders, thereby enhancing both clinical outcomes and patient quality of life.

Conclusion

The intricate relationship between the gut microbiome, obesity, and depression underscores a pivotal area in pharmacological research. Emerging evidence highlights that gut microbial imbalances, termed dysbiosis, are implicated in the pathogenesis of both obesity and depression. This dysbiosis can lead to systemic inflammation, altered metabolic functions, and disruptions in the gut-brain axis, thereby influencing mood and energy balance. Pharmacological interventions targeting the microbiome, including probiotics, prebiotics, Synbiotics, and FMT, have shown promise in modulating these conditions [116]. For instance, FMT has demonstrated potential in ameliorating depressive symptoms, as evidenced by case reports of individuals experiencing significant mood improvements following the procedure. Similarly, probiotic supplementation has been associated with reductions in depressive symptoms in certain populations, although results have been variable and often study-dependent [117].

The impact of microbiome-based interventions extends beyond individual symptom management. By addressing the underlying microbial imbalances, these therapies offer a holistic approach to treating comorbid obesity and depression, potentially reducing the need for multiple medications and minimizing side effects. This integrated treatment strategy could lead to improved patient outcomes and a better quality of life. From a public health perspective, the widespread implementation of microbiome-targeted therapies could alleviate the burden of obesity and depression, two prevalent conditions with significant societal and economic costs. By focusing on the gut microbiome, these interventions may offer a sustainable and effective means of managing these interconnected disorders.

In conclusion, the gut microbiome represents a promising frontier in the treatment of obesity and depression. While challenges remain in standardizing treatments and understanding long-term effects, the potential benefits of microbiome-based therapies are substantial. Continued research and clinical trials are essential to fully harness the therapeutic potential of the microbiome, paving the way for more effective and integrated treatment approaches in the future.

Authors contribution

Under the GCM guidelines, AY outlined the review and wrote the draft of the review. GCM edited and revised the review.

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers AG065992, RF1NS133378, and P30AG050886.

Data availability

Not applicable.

Declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors have agreed to the manuscript’s content.

Competing interest

Not applicable.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Bruce-Keller AJ et al (2015) Obese-type gut microbiota induce neurobehavioral changes in the absence of obesity. Biol Psychiatry 77(7):607–615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Castanon N, Luheshi G, Laye S (2015) Role of neuroinflammation in the emotional and cognitive alterations displayed by animal models of obesity. Front Neurosci 9:229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Russo R et al (2018) Gut-brain axis: role of lipids in the regulation of inflammation, pain and CNS diseases. Curr Med Chem 25(32):3930–3952 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Groer MW et al (2015) The very low birth weight infant microbiome and childhood health. Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today: Reviews 105(4):252–264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Morkl S et al (2017) Gut microbiota and body composition in anorexia nervosa inpatients in comparison to athletes, overweight, obese, and normal weight controls. Int J Eat Disord 50(12):1421–1431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Farzi A et al (2019) Diabesity and mood disorders: multiple links through the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Mol Aspects Med 66:80–93 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gonzalez-Correa CA et al (2017) The colon revisited or the key to wellness, health and disease. Med Hypotheses 108:133–143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Obrenovich M et al (2016) The co-metabolism within the gut-brain metabolic interaction: potential targets for drug treatment and design. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 15(2):127–134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Scalera A, Di Minno MN, Tarantino G (2013) What does irritable bowel syndrome share with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease? World J Gastroenterol 19(33):5402–20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 10.Boem F, Amedei A (2019) Healthy axis: towards an integrated view of the gut-brain health. World J Gastroenterol 25(29):3838–3841 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Moya-Perez A et al (2017) Bifidobacterium CECT 7765 modulates early stress-induced immune, neuroendocrine and behavioral alterations in mice. Brain Behav Immun 65:43–56 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bell V et al (2018) One health, fermented foods, and gut microbiota. Foods. 10.3390/foods7120195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bruce-Keller AJ, Salbaum JM, Berthoud HR (2018) Harnessing gut microbes for mental health: getting from here to there. Biol Psychiatry 83(3):214–223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Wilson SJ, Madison A (2019) Marriage and gut (microbiome) feelings: tracing novel dyadic pathways to accelerated aging. Psychosom Med 81(8):704–710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Niccolai E et al (2019) The gut(-)brain axis in the neuropsychological disease model of obesity: a classical movie revised by the emerging director “Microbiome.” Nutrients. 10.3390/nu11010156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fitzgerald E, Murphy S, Martinson HA (2019) Alpha-synuclein pathology and the role of the microbiota in parkinson’s disease. Front Neurosci 13:369 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Afzaal M et al (2022) Human gut microbiota in health and disease: unveiling the relationship. Front Microbiol 13:999001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Alam MJ et al (2022) Human microbiome and cardiovascular diseases. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 192(1):231–279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bardanzellu F et al (2021) The clinical impact of maternal weight on offspring health: lights and shadows in breast milk metabolome. Expert Rev Proteomics 18(7):571–606 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Feng X et al (2017) Exercise prevents enhanced postoperative neuroinflammation and cognitive decline and rectifies the gut microbiome in a rat model of metabolic syndrome. Front Immunol 8:1768 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Guzzardi MA, Rosa FL, Iozzo P (2023) Trust the gut: outcomes of gut microbiota transplant in metabolic and cognitive disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 149:105143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bruce-Keller AJ et al (2017) Maternal obese-type gut microbiota differentially impact cognition, anxiety and compulsive behavior in male and female offspring in mice. PLoS One 12(4):e0175577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Burke MV, Small DM (2015) Physiological mechanisms by which non-nutritive sweeteners May impact body weight and metabolism. Physiol Behav 152Pt B:381–388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Daulatzai MA (2015) Non-celiac gluten sensitivity triggers gut dysbiosis, neuroinflammation, gut-brain axis dysfunction, and vulnerability for dementia. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 14(1):110–131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Crespo MT et al (2025) Circadian disruption of feeding-fasting rhythm and its consequences for metabolic, immune, cancer, and cognitive processes. Biomed J. 10.1016/j.bj.2025.100827 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Guzzardi MA et al (2022) Maternal pre-pregnancy overweight and neonatal gut bacterial colonization are associated with cognitive development and gut microbiota composition in pre-school-age offspring. Brain Behav Immun 100:311–320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gawlik-Kotelnicka O, Strzelecki D (2021) Probiotics as a treatment for “Metabolic depression”? A rationale for future studies. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 10.3390/ph14040384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sanchez-Tapia M et al (2017) Nopal (Opuntia ficus indica) protects from metabolic endotoxemia by modifying gut microbiota in obese rats fed high fat/sucrose diet. Sci Rep 7(1):4716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Feng J et al (2024) Effects of semaglutide on gut microbiota, cognitive function and inflammation in obese mice. PeerJ 12:e17891 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Barone M et al (2022) Multi-omics gut microbiome signatures in obese women: role of diet and uncontrolled eating behavior. BMC Med 20(1):500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dinleyici EC (2025) Breastfeeding and health benefits for the mother-infant dyad: a perspective on human milk microbiota. Ann Nutr Metab. 10.1159/000541711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Madhogaria B, Bhowmik P, Kundu A (2022) Correlation between human gut microbiome and diseases. Infect Med (Beijing) 1(3):180–191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Markus V et al (2023) Conversations in the gut: the role of quorum sensing in normobiosis. Int J Mol Sci. 10.3390/ijms24043722 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Barber TM et al (2023) The effects of the Mediterranean diet on health and gut microbiota. Nutrients. 10.3390/nu15092150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Beretta S et al (2023) The importance of the intestinal microbiota in humans and dogs in the neonatal period. Anim Reprod 20(3):e20230082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jin K et al (2024) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) improves cognitive impairment and intestinal microecological dysfunction induced by high-fat diet in rats. Research 7:p0384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kendig MD et al (2023) The benefits of switching to a healthy diet on metabolic, cognitive, and gut microbiome parameters are preserved in adult rat offspring of mothers fed a high-fat, high-sugar diet. Mol Nutr Food Res 67(1):e2200318 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kendig MD et al (2023) Obesogenic diet cycling produces graded effects on cognition and microbiota composition in rats. Mol Nutr Food Res 67(12):e2200809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Al Qassab M et al (2025) The expanding role of GLP-1 receptor agonists: advancing clinical outcomes in metabolic and mental health. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 10.3390/cimb47040285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gofron KK, Wasilewski A, Malgorzewicz S (2025) Effects of GLP-1 analogues and agonists on the gut microbiota: a systematic review. Nutrients 17(8):1039. 10.3390/nu17081303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 41.Zheng Z et al (2024) Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor: mechanisms and advances in therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther 9(1):234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Greiner TU, Backhed F (2016) Microbial regulation of GLP-1 and L-cell biology. Mol Metab 5(9):753–758 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jyoti, Dey P (2025) Mechanisms and implications of the gut microbial modulation of intestinal metabolic processes. NPJ Metab Health Dis 3(1):24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kuhre RE et al (2018) Bile acids are important direct and indirect regulators of the secretion of appetite- and metabolism-regulating hormones from the gut and pancreas. Mol Metab 11:84–95 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tolhurst G et al (2012) Short-chain fatty acids stimulate glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion via the G-protein-coupled receptor FFAR2. Diabetes 61(2):364–371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Trapanese V et al (2025) Bidirectional interactions between the gut microbiota and incretin-based therapies. Life. 10.3390/life15060843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tsai CY et al (2021) Gut microbial signatures for glycemic responses of GLP-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetic patients: A pilot study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 12:814770 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Singh K et al (2024) Rebalancing the gut: Glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists as a strategy for obesity and metabolic health. Cureus 16(7):e64738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Cabrera C, Vicens P, Torrente M (2021) Modifiable risk factors for dementia: the role of gut microbiota. Curr Alzheimer Res 18(13):993–1009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hussein HM et al (2022) Vitamin D mitigates diabetes-associated metabolic and cognitive dysfunction by modulating gut microbiota and colonic cannabinoid receptor 1. Eur J Pharm Sci 170:106105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Fumagalli A et al (2025) Archaea methanogens are associated with cognitive performance through the shaping of gut microbiota, butyrate and histidine metabolism. Gut Microbes 17(1):2455506 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Tsan L et al (2022) Early-life low-calorie sweetener consumption disrupts glucose regulation, sugar-motivated behavior, and memory function in rats. JCI Insight. 10.1172/jci.insight.157714 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhang SQ et al (2022) Chlorogenic acid ameliorates High-Fat and High-Fructose Diet-Induced cognitive impairment via mediating the Microbiota-Gut-Brain axis. J Agric Food Chem 70(8):2600–2615 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chaput JP et al (2020) Sleep duration and health in adults: an overview of systematic reviews. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 45(10):S218–S231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kaakoush NO, Morris MJ (2017) More flavor for flavonoid-based interventions? Trends Mol Med 23(4):293–295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Farre N, Farre R, Gozal D (2018) Sleep apnea morbidity: a consequence of microbial-immune cross-talk? Chest 154(4):754–759 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Godfrey KM et al (2017) Influence of maternal obesity on the long-term health of offspring. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 5(1):53–64 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Liptak R, Gromova B, Gardlik R (2021) Fecal microbiota transplantation as a tool for therapeutic modulation of Non-gastrointestinal disorders. Front Med (Lausanne) 8:665520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Guo Y et al (2024) Diurnal expression of Dgat2 induced by time-restricted feeding maintains cardiac health in the drosophila model of circadian disruption. Aging Cell 23(7):e14169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Heerspink HJ et al (2016) Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in the treatment of diabetes mellitus: cardiovascular and kidney effects, potential mechanisms, and clinical applications. Circulation 134(10):752–772 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Hsia DS, Grove O, Cefalu WT (2017) An update on sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 24(1):73–79 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Padda IS, Mahtani AU, Parmar M (2025) Sodium-Glucose Transport 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors, in StatPearls. : Treasure Island (FL) [PubMed]
  • 63.Khedr LH et al (2023) Canagliflozin attenuates chronic unpredictable mild stress induced neuroinflammation via modulating AMPK/mTOR autophagic signaling. Neuropharmacology 223:109293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Liu Y et al (2025) Dapagliflozin alleviated seizures and cognition impairment in pilocarpine induced status epilepticus via suppressing microglia-mediated neuroinflammation and oxidative stress. Int Immunopharmacol 148:114117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Mei J et al (2024) SGLT2 inhibitors: a novel therapy for cognitive impairment via multifaceted effects on the nervous system. Transl Neurodegener 13(1):41 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zandifar A et al (2024) Efficacy of empagliflozin as adjunctive therapy to Citalopram in major depressive disorder: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. BMC Psychiatry 24(1):163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.El-Safty H et al (2022) Dapagliflozin diminishes memory and cognition impairment in streptozotocin induced diabetes through its effect on Wnt/beta-Catenin and CREB pathway. Brain Res Bull 181:109–120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Mohseni M et al (2023) Improved physical and mental health after a combined lifestyle intervention with cognitive behavioural therapy for obesity. Int J Endocrinol Metab 21(1):e129906 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gareau MG (2016) Cognitive function and the microbiome. Int Rev Neurobiol 131:227–246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Liu CY et al (2024) Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 1008 promotes reproductive function and cognitive activity in aged male mice with high-fat-diet-induced obesity by altering metabolic parameters and alleviating testicular oxidative damage, inflammation and apoptosis. Antioxidants. 10.3390/antiox13121498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 71.Liu T et al (2024) <Text>Isomalto-Oligosaccharide potentiates alleviating effects of intermittent fasting on Obesity-Related cognitive impairment during weight loss and the rebound weight gain</Text>. J Agric Food Chem 72(43):23875–23892 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Liu YE et al (2024) <Text>Stress-induced obesity in mice causes cognitive decline associated with inhibition of hippocampal neurogenesis and dysfunctional gut microbiota</Text>. Front Microbiol 15:1381423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Zhang Q et al (2023) <Text>Effect of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics on depression: results from a meta-analysis</Text>. BMC Psychiatry 23(1):477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Liu L et al (2023) <Text>Gut microbiota and its metabolites in depression: from pathogenesis to treatment</Text>. EBioMedicine 90:104527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Oraphruek P et al (2023) Effect of a multispecies synbiotic supplementation on body composition, antioxidant status, and gut microbiomes in overweight and obese subjects: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Nutrients. 10.3390/nu15081863 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Rasaei N et al (2024) <Text>The effects of prebiotic, probiotic or synbiotic supplementation on overweight/obesity indicators: an umbrella review of the trials’ meta-analyses</Text>. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 15:1277921 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Chunchai T et al (2018) <Text>Decreased microglial activation through gut-brain axis by prebiotics, probiotics, or synbiotics effectively restored cognitive function in obese-insulin resistant rats</Text>. J Neuroinflammation 15(1):11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Avila-Nava A et al (2017) Food combination based on a pre-hispanic Mexican diet decreases metabolic and cognitive abnormalities and gut microbiota dysbiosis caused by a sucrose-enriched high-fat diet in rats. Mol Nutr Food Res. 10.1002/mnfr.201501023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Zhang X et al (2023) Brain-gut microbiome profile of neuroticism predicts food addiction in obesity: a transdiagnostic approach. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 125:110768 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Mehta I et al (2025) Gut microbiota and mental health: a comprehensive review of gut-brain interactions in mood disorders. Cureus 17(3):e81447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Mayer EA, Nance K, Chen S (2022) The gut-brain axis. Annu Rev Med 73:439–453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Sochacka K, Kotowska A, Lachowicz-Wisniewska S (2024) The role of gut Microbiota, Nutrition, and physical activity in depression and Obesity-Interdependent Mechanisms/Co-Occurrence. Nutrients 16(7):1039. 10.3390/nu16071039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 83.Halabitska I et al (2024) The interplay of gut microbiota, obesity, and depression: insights and interventions. Cell Mol Life Sci 81(1):443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Donoso F et al (2023) Inflammation, lifestyle factors, and the microbiome-gut-brain axis: relevance to depression and antidepressant action. Clin Pharmacol Ther 113(2):246–259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Solas M et al (2017) Inflammation and gut-brain axis link obesity to cognitive dysfunction: plausible pharmacological interventions. Curr Opin Pharmacol 37:87–92 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Kimse L et al (2024) A narrative review of psychobiotics: probiotics that influence the Gut-Brain axis. Med (Kaunas) 60(4):601. 10.3390/medicina60040601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 87.Bermudez-Humaran LG et al (2019) From probiotics to psychobiotics: live beneficial bacteria which act on the brain-gut axis. Nutrients. 10.3390/nu11040890 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Borrego-Ruiz A, Borrego JJ (2024) An updated overview on the relationship between human gut microbiome dysbiosis and psychiatric and psychological disorders. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 128:110861 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Cheng LH et al (2019) Psychobiotics in mental health, neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental disorders. J Food Drug Anal 27(3):632–648 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Ispas S et al (2023) Metabolic disorders, the microbiome as an endocrine organ, and their relations with obesity: a literature review. J Pers Med. 10.3390/jpm13111602 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Bui TPN (2024) The human microbiome as a therapeutic target for metabolic diseases. Nutrients. 10.3390/nu16142322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Li R et al (2021) Gut microbiome and bile acids in obesity-related diseases. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 35(3):101493 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Feng W et al (2022) Dietary compounds in modulation of gut microbiota-derived metabolites. Front Nutr 9:939571 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Luqman A et al (2024) Mood and microbes: a comprehensive review of intestinal microbiota’s impact on depression. Front Psychiatry 15:1295766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Raineri S et al (2022) Pharmacologically induced weight loss is associated with distinct gut microbiome changes in obese rats. BMC Microbiol 22(1):91 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Mazereel V et al (2020) Impact of psychotropic medication effects on obesity and the metabolic syndrome in people with serious mental illness. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 11:573479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Sepulveda-Lizcano L et al (2023) Metabolic adverse effects of psychotropic drug therapy: a systematic review. Eur J Invest Health Psychol Educ 13(8):1505–1520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Garakani A et al (2020) Pharmacotherapy of anxiety disorders: current and emerging treatment options. Front Psychiatry 11:595584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Mukherjee S et al (2021) Understanding the effects of antipsychotics on appetite control. Front Nutr 8:815456 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Whitney Z et al (2015) Treatment of clozapine-associated weight gain: a systematic review. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 71(4):389–401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Clark A et al (2023) Bupropion mediated effects on depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and smoking cessation. Health Psychol Res 11:81043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Stahl SM et al (2004) A review of the neuropharmacology of bupropion, a dual norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake inhibitor. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry 6(4):159–166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Kokkorakis M et al (2025) Emerging pharmacotherapies for obesity: a systematic review. Pharmacol Rev 77(1):100002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Popoviciu MS et al (2023) Emerging role of GLP-1 agonists in obesity: a comprehensive review of randomised controlled trials. Int J Mol Sci. 10.3390/ijms241310449 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Alim Ur Rahman H et al (2025) The weight reducing effects of naltrexone-bupropion among obese psychiatric and non-psychiatric patients: a systematic review. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 10.1007/s00213-025-06873-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Christou GA, Kiortsis DN (2015) The efficacy and safety of the naltrexone/bupropion combination for the treatment of obesity: an update. Horm (Athens) 14(3):370–375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Liu Y et al (2024) The effects of bupropion alone and combined with Naltrexone on weight loss: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetol Metab Syndr 16(1):93 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Reddy N et al (2024) Harnessing the power of the gut microbiome: a review of supplementation therapies for metabolic syndrome. Cureus 16(9):e69682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Chuong KH et al (2017) Navigating social and ethical challenges of biobanking for human microbiome research. BMC Med Ethics 18(1):1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Zhang P et al (2023) Characteristics of the gut microbiota in bipolar depressive disorder patients with distinct weight. CNS Neurosci Ther 29(1):74–83 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Livelo C et al (2025) Time-restricted feeding mediated modulation of microbiota leads to changes in muscle physiology in drosophila obesity models. Aging Cell 24(2):e14382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Zeb F et al (2023) Gut microbiota and time-restricted feeding/eating: a targeted biomarker and approach in precision nutrition. Nutrients. 10.3390/nu15020259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Zeb F et al (2020) Effect of time-restricted feeding on metabolic risk and circadian rhythm associated with gut microbiome in healthy males. Br J Nutr 123(11):1216–1226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Zarrinpar A et al (2014) Diet and feeding pattern affect the diurnal dynamics of the gut microbiome. Cell Metab 20(6):1006–1017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Livelo C et al (2023) Time-restricted feeding promotes muscle function through purine cycle and AMPK signaling in drosophila obesity models. Nat Commun 14(1):949 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Dhanasekaran D, Venkatesan M, Sabarathinam S (2025) Efficacy of microbiome-targeted interventions in obesity management- a comprehensive systematic review. Diabetes Metab Syndr 19(2):103208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Chen L et al (2024) The effect of probiotics on obesity with comorbid depression: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 85(9):1–21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences: CMLS are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES