Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1999 Feb;76(2):618–630. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77230-9

Exploration of the structural features defining the conduction properties of a synthetic ion channel.

G R Dieckmann 1, J D Lear 1, Q Zhong 1, M L Klein 1, W F DeGrado 1, K A Sharp 1
PMCID: PMC1300068  PMID: 9929468

Abstract

The finite-difference Poisson-Boltzmann methodology was applied to a series of parallel, alpha-helical bundle models of the designed ion channel peptide Ac-(LSSLLSL)3-CONH2. This method is able to fully describe the current-voltage curves for this channel and quantitatively explains their cation selectivity and rectification. We examined a series of energy-minimized models representing different aggregation states, side-chain rotamers, and helical rotations, as well as an ensemble of structures from a molecular dynamics trajectory. Potential energies were computed for single, permeating K+ and Cl- ions at a series of positions along a central pathway through the models. A variable-electric-field Nernst-Planck electrodiffusion model was used, with two adjustable parameters representing the diffusion coefficients of K+ and Cl- to scale the individual ion current magnitudes. The ability of a given DelPhi potential profile to fit the experimental data depended strongly on the magnitude of the desolvation of the permeating ion. Below a pore radius of 3.8 A, the predicted profiles showed large energy barriers, and the experimental data could be fit only with unrealistically high values for the K+ and Cl- diffusion coefficients. For pore radii above 3.8 A, the desolvation energies were 2kT or less. The electrostatic calculations were sensitive to positioning of the Ser side chains, with the best fits associated with maximum exposure of the Ser side-chain hydroxyls to the pore. The backbone component was shown to be the major source of asymmetry in the DelPhi potential profiles. Only two of the energy-minimized structures were able to explain the experimental data, whereas an average of the dynamics structures gave excellent agreement with experimental results. Thus this method provides a promising approach to prediction of current-voltage curves from three-dimensional structures of ion channel proteins.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (275.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barlow D. J., Thornton J. M. Helix geometry in proteins. J Mol Biol. 1988 Jun 5;201(3):601–619. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90641-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Betz S. F., DeGrado W. F. Controlling topology and native-like behavior of de novo-designed peptides: design and characterization of antiparallel four-stranded coiled coils. Biochemistry. 1996 May 28;35(21):6955–6962. doi: 10.1021/bi960095a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bormann J., Hamill O. P., Sakmann B. Mechanism of anion permeation through channels gated by glycine and gamma-aminobutyric acid in mouse cultured spinal neurones. J Physiol. 1987 Apr;385:243–286. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen D. P., Barcilon V., Eisenberg R. S. Constant fields and constant gradients in open ionic channels. Biophys J. 1992 May;61(5):1372–1393. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81944-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen D., Lear J., Eisenberg B. Permeation through an open channel: Poisson-Nernst-Planck theory of a synthetic ionic channel. Biophys J. 1997 Jan;72(1):97–116. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78650-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cohen B. N., Labarca C., Davidson N., Lester H. A. Mutations in M2 alter the selectivity of the mouse nicotinic acetylcholine receptor for organic and alkali metal cations. J Gen Physiol. 1992 Sep;100(3):373–400. doi: 10.1085/jgp.100.3.373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dauber-Osguthorpe P., Roberts V. A., Osguthorpe D. J., Wolff J., Genest M., Hagler A. T. Structure and energetics of ligand binding to proteins: Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase-trimethoprim, a drug-receptor system. Proteins. 1988;4(1):31–47. doi: 10.1002/prot.340040106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dieckmann G. R., DeGrado W. F. Modeling transmembrane helical oligomers. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1997 Aug;7(4):486–494. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(97)80111-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Doyle D. A., Morais Cabral J., Pfuetzner R. A., Kuo A., Gulbis J. M., Cohen S. L., Chait B. T., MacKinnon R. The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of K+ conduction and selectivity. Science. 1998 Apr 3;280(5360):69–77. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5360.69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dunbrack R. L., Jr, Cohen F. E. Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences. Protein Sci. 1997 Aug;6(8):1661–1681. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560060807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dunbrack R. L., Jr, Karplus M. Conformational analysis of the backbone-dependent rotamer preferences of protein sidechains. Nat Struct Biol. 1994 May;1(5):334–340. doi: 10.1038/nsb0594-334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dunker A. K., Zaleske D. J. Stereochemical considerations for constructing alpha-helical protein bundles with particular application to membrane proteins. Biochem J. 1977 Apr 1;163(1):45–57. doi: 10.1042/bj1630045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dwyer T. M., Adams D. J., Hille B. The permeability of the endplate channel to organic cations in frog muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1980 May;75(5):469–492. doi: 10.1085/jgp.75.5.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fatima-Shad K., Barry P. H. Anion permeation in GABA- and glycine-gated channels of mammalian cultured hippocampal neurons. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Jul 22;253(1336):69–75. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hao Y., Pear M. R., Busath D. D. Molecular dynamics study of free energy profiles for organic cations in gramicidin A channels. Biophys J. 1997 Oct;73(4):1699–1716. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78202-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Imoto K. Ion channels: molecular basis of ion selectivity. FEBS Lett. 1993 Jun 28;325(1-2):100–103. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(93)81422-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Karle I. L., Balaram P. Structural characteristics of alpha-helical peptide molecules containing Aib residues. Biochemistry. 1990 Jul 24;29(29):6747–6756. doi: 10.1021/bi00481a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kienker P. K., DeGrado W. F., Lear J. D. A helical-dipole model describes the single-channel current rectification of an uncharged peptide ion channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 May 24;91(11):4859–4863. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.11.4859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kienker P. K., Lear J. D. Charge selectivity of the designed uncharged peptide ion channel Ac-(LSSLLSL)3-CONH2. Biophys J. 1995 Apr;68(4):1347–1358. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80307-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kohn W. D., Mant C. T., Hodges R. S. Alpha-helical protein assembly motifs. J Biol Chem. 1997 Jan 31;272(5):2583–2586. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.5.2583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lear J. D., Wasserman Z. R., DeGrado W. F. Synthetic amphiphilic peptide models for protein ion channels. Science. 1988 May 27;240(4856):1177–1181. doi: 10.1126/science.2453923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. McGregor M. J., Islam S. A., Sternberg M. J. Analysis of the relationship between side-chain conformation and secondary structure in globular proteins. J Mol Biol. 1987 Nov 20;198(2):295–310. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90314-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nicholls A., Sharp K. A., Honig B. Protein folding and association: insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons. Proteins. 1991;11(4):281–296. doi: 10.1002/prot.340110407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. PAULING L., COREY R. B., BRANSON H. R. The structure of proteins; two hydrogen-bonded helical configurations of the polypeptide chain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1951 Apr;37(4):205–211. doi: 10.1073/pnas.37.4.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Parsegian A. Energy of an ion crossing a low dielectric membrane: solutions to four relevant electrostatic problems. Nature. 1969 Mar 1;221(5183):844–846. doi: 10.1038/221844a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Parsegian V. A. Ion-membrane interactions as structural forces. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975 Dec 30;264:161–171. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb31481.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pinto L. H., Dieckmann G. R., Gandhi C. S., Papworth C. G., Braman J., Shaughnessy M. A., Lear J. D., Lamb R. A., DeGrado W. F. A functionally defined model for the M2 proton channel of influenza A virus suggests a mechanism for its ion selectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Oct 14;94(21):11301–11306. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.21.11301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Roux B., Karplus M. Molecular dynamics simulations of the gramicidin channel. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1994;23:731–761. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.23.060194.003503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sansom M. S., Kerr I. D., Smith G. R., Son H. S. The influenza A virus M2 channel: a molecular modeling and simulation study. Virology. 1997 Jun 23;233(1):163–173. doi: 10.1006/viro.1997.8578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sansom M. S., Smith G. R., Adcock C., Biggin P. C. The dielectric properties of water within model transbilayer pores. Biophys J. 1997 Nov;73(5):2404–2415. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78269-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sather W. A., Yang J., Tsien R. W. Structural basis of ion channel permeation and selectivity. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1994 Jun;4(3):313–323. doi: 10.1016/0959-4388(94)90091-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sharp K. A., Friedman R. A., Misra V., Hecht J., Honig B. Salt effects on polyelectrolyte-ligand binding: comparison of Poisson-Boltzmann, and limiting law/counterion binding models. Biopolymers. 1995 Aug;36(2):245–262. doi: 10.1002/bip.360360211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sharp K. A., Honig B. Electrostatic interactions in macromolecules: theory and applications. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1990;19:301–332. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.19.060190.001505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Shen L., Bruccoleri R. E., Krystek S., Novotny J. Factors influencing accuracy of computer-built models: a study based on leucine zipper GCN4 structure. Biophys J. 1996 Mar;70(3):1096–1104. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79675-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sitkoff D., Lockhart D. J., Sharp K. A., Honig B. Calculation of electrostatic effects at the amino terminus of an alpha helix. Biophys J. 1994 Dec;67(6):2251–2260. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80709-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Smart O. S., Neduvelil J. G., Wang X., Wallace B. A., Sansom M. S. HOLE: a program for the analysis of the pore dimensions of ion channel structural models. J Mol Graph. 1996 Dec;14(6):354-60, 376. doi: 10.1016/s0263-7855(97)00009-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Smith G. R., Sansom M. S. Molecular dynamics study of water and Na+ ions in models of the pore region of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Biophys J. 1997 Sep;73(3):1364–1381. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78169-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Weiss M. S., Kreusch A., Schiltz E., Nestel U., Welte W., Weckesser J., Schulz G. E. The structure of porin from Rhodobacter capsulatus at 1.8 A resolution. FEBS Lett. 1991 Mar 25;280(2):379–382. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(91)80336-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Weiss M. S., Schulz G. E. Structure of porin refined at 1.8 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1992 Sep 20;227(2):493–509. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90903-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Woolfson D. N., Alber T. Predicting oligomerization states of coiled coils. Protein Sci. 1995 Aug;4(8):1596–1607. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560040818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Woolley G. A., Biggin P. C., Schultz A., Lien L., Jaikaran D. C., Breed J., Crowhurst K., Sansom M. S. Intrinsic rectification of ion flux in alamethicin channels: studies with an alamethicin dimer. Biophys J. 1997 Aug;73(2):770–778. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78109-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Yool A. J., Schwarz T. L. Alteration of ionic selectivity of a K+ channel by mutation of the H5 region. Nature. 1991 Feb 21;349(6311):700–704. doi: 10.1038/349700a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhong Q., Moore P. B., Newns D. M., Klein M. L. Molecular dynamics study of the LS3 voltage-gated ion channel. FEBS Lett. 1998 May 8;427(2):267–270. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)00304-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES