Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2002 Oct;83(4):1784–1796. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73944-1

Differential segregation in a cell-cell contact interface: the dynamics of the immunological synapse.

Nigel John Burroughs 1, Christoph Wülfing 1
PMCID: PMC1302272  PMID: 12324401

Abstract

Receptor-ligand couples in the cell-cell contact interface between a T cell and an antigen-presenting cell form distinct geometric patterns and undergo spatial rearrangement within the contact interface. Spatial segregation of the antigen and adhesion receptors occurs within seconds of contact, central aggregation of the antigen receptor then occurring over 1-5 min. This structure, called the immunological synapse, is becoming a paradigm for localized signaling. However, the mechanisms driving its formation, in particular spatial segregation, are currently not understood. With a reaction diffusion model incorporating thermodynamics, elasticity, and reaction kinetics, we examine the hypothesis that differing bond lengths (extracellular domain size) is the driving force behind molecular segregation. We derive two key conditions necessary for segregation: a thermodynamic criterion on the effective bond elasticity and a requirement for the seeding/nucleation of domains. Domains have a minimum length scale and will only spontaneously coalesce/aggregate if the contact area is small or the membrane relaxation distance large. Otherwise, differential attachment of receptors to the cytoskeleton is required for central aggregation. Our analysis indicates that differential bond lengths have a significant effect on synapse dynamics, i.e., there is a significant contribution to the free energy of the interaction, suggesting that segregation by differential bond length is important in cell-cell contact interfaces and the immunological synapse.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (497.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alon R., Chen S., Puri K. D., Finger E. B., Springer T. A. The kinetics of L-selectin tethers and the mechanics of selectin-mediated rolling. J Cell Biol. 1997 Sep 8;138(5):1169–1180. doi: 10.1083/jcb.138.5.1169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anton van der Merwe P., Davis S. J., Shaw A. S., Dustin M. L. Cytoskeletal polarization and redistribution of cell-surface molecules during T cell antigen recognition. Semin Immunol. 2000 Feb;12(1):5–21. doi: 10.1006/smim.2000.0203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bell G. I., Dembo M., Bongrand P. Cell adhesion. Competition between nonspecific repulsion and specific bonding. Biophys J. 1984 Jun;45(6):1051–1064. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84252-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bell G. I. Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. Science. 1978 May 12;200(4342):618–627. doi: 10.1126/science.347575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bromley S. K., Burack W. R., Johnson K. G., Somersalo K., Sims T. N., Sumen C., Davis M. M., Shaw A. S., Allen P. M., Dustin M. L. The immunological synapse. Annu Rev Immunol. 2001;19:375–396. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown D. A., London E. Functions of lipid rafts in biological membranes. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1998;14:111–136. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.14.1.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carlin L. M., Eleme K., McCann F. E., Davis D. M. Intercellular transfer and supramolecular organization of human leukocyte antigen C at inhibitory natural killer cell immune synapses. J Exp Med. 2001 Nov 19;194(10):1507–1517. doi: 10.1084/jem.194.10.1507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dai J., Sheetz M. P. Membrane tether formation from blebbing cells. Biophys J. 1999 Dec;77(6):3363–3370. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77168-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Davis S. J., van der Merwe P. A. The structure and ligand interactions of CD2: implications for T-cell function. Immunol Today. 1996 Apr;17(4):177–187. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(96)80617-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dembo M., Torney D. C., Saxman K., Hammer D. The reaction-limited kinetics of membrane-to-surface adhesion and detachment. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1988 Jun 22;234(1274):55–83. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1988.0038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Donnadieu E., Revy P., Trautmann A. Imaging T-cell antigen recognition and comparing immunological and neuronal synapses. Immunology. 2001 Aug;103(4):417–425. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2001.01268.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dustin M. L., Cooper J. A. The immunological synapse and the actin cytoskeleton: molecular hardware for T cell signaling. Nat Immunol. 2000 Jul;1(1):23–29. doi: 10.1038/76877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dustin M. L., Ferguson L. M., Chan P. Y., Springer T. A., Golan D. E. Visualization of CD2 interaction with LFA-3 and determination of the two-dimensional dissociation constant for adhesion receptors in a contact area. J Cell Biol. 1996 Feb;132(3):465–474. doi: 10.1083/jcb.132.3.465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dustin M. L., Olszowy M. W., Holdorf A. D., Li J., Bromley S., Desai N., Widder P., Rosenberger F., van der Merwe P. A., Allen P. M. A novel adaptor protein orchestrates receptor patterning and cytoskeletal polarity in T-cell contacts. Cell. 1998 Sep 4;94(5):667–677. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81608-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Evans E. A. Detailed mechanics of membrane-membrane adhesion and separation. I. Continuum of molecular cross-bridges. Biophys J. 1985 Jul;48(1):175–183. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(85)83770-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Favier B., Burroughs N. J., Wedderburn L., Valitutti S. TCR dynamics on the surface of living T cells. Int Immunol. 2001 Dec;13(12):1525–1532. doi: 10.1093/intimm/13.12.1525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Forscher P., Lin C. H., Thompson C. Novel form of growth cone motility involving site-directed actin filament assembly. Nature. 1992 Jun 11;357(6378):515–518. doi: 10.1038/357515a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fritz J., Katopodis A. G., Kolbinger F., Anselmetti D. Force-mediated kinetics of single P-selectin/ligand complexes observed by atomic force microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Oct 13;95(21):12283–12288. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.21.12283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Grakoui A., Bromley S. K., Sumen C., Davis M. M., Shaw A. S., Allen P. M., Dustin M. L. The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science. 1999 Jul 9;285(5425):221–227. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5425.221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hahn W. C., Rosenstein Y., Calvo V., Burakoff S. J., Bierer B. E. A distinct cytoplasmic domain of CD2 regulates ligand avidity and T-cell responsiveness to antigen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Aug 1;89(15):7179–7183. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.15.7179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Janes P. W., Ley S. C., Magee A. I. Aggregation of lipid rafts accompanies signaling via the T cell antigen receptor. J Cell Biol. 1999 Oct 18;147(2):447–461. doi: 10.1083/jcb.147.2.447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Johnson K. G., Bromley S. K., Dustin M. L., Thomas M. L. A supramolecular basis for CD45 tyrosine phosphatase regulation in sustained T cell activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Aug 29;97(18):10138–10143. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.18.10138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Krummel M. F., Sjaastad M. D., Wülfing C., Davis M. M. Differential clustering of CD4 and CD3zeta during T cell recognition. Science. 2000 Aug 25;289(5483):1349–1352. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5483.1349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Le Grimellec C., Lesniewska E., Giocondi M. C., Finot E., Vié V., Goudonnet J. P. Imaging of the surface of living cells by low-force contact-mode atomic force microscopy. Biophys J. 1998 Aug;75(2):695–703. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77559-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Leupin O., Zaru R., Laroche T., Müller S., Valitutti S. Exclusion of CD45 from the T-cell receptor signaling area in antigen-stimulated T lymphocytes. Curr Biol. 2000 Mar 9;10(5):277–280. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00362-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lollo B. A., Chan K. W., Hanson E. M., Moy V. T., Brian A. A. Direct evidence for two affinity states for lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 on activated T cells. J Biol Chem. 1993 Oct 15;268(29):21693–21700. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lyons D. S., Lieberman S. A., Hampl J., Boniface J. J., Chien Y., Berg L. J., Davis M. M. A TCR binds to antagonist ligands with lower affinities and faster dissociation rates than to agonists. Immunity. 1996 Jul;5(1):53–61. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80309-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. McNeill H. Sticking together and sorting things out: adhesion as a force in development. Nat Rev Genet. 2000 Nov;1(2):100–108. doi: 10.1038/35038540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Monks C. R., Freiberg B. A., Kupfer H., Sciaky N., Kupfer A. Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells. Nature. 1998 Sep 3;395(6697):82–86. doi: 10.1038/25764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Moy V. T., Florin E. L., Gaub H. E. Intermolecular forces and energies between ligands and receptors. Science. 1994 Oct 14;266(5183):257–259. doi: 10.1126/science.7939660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Needham D., Hochmuth R. M. A sensitive measure of surface stress in the resting neutrophil. Biophys J. 1992 Jun;61(6):1664–1670. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81970-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Orsello C. E., Lauffenburger D. A., Hammer D. A. Molecular properties in cell adhesion: a physical and engineering perspective. Trends Biotechnol. 2001 Aug;19(8):310–316. doi: 10.1016/s0167-7799(01)01692-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pierres A., Benoliel A. M., Bongrand P., van der Merwe P. A. Determination of the lifetime and force dependence of interactions of single bonds between surface-attached CD2 and CD48 adhesion molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Dec 24;93(26):15114–15118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.26.15114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Qi S. Y., Groves J. T., Chakraborty A. K. Synaptic pattern formation during cellular recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 22;98(12):6548–6553. doi: 10.1073/pnas.111536798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Raucher D., Sheetz M. P. Membrane expansion increases endocytosis rate during mitosis. J Cell Biol. 1999 Feb 8;144(3):497–506. doi: 10.1083/jcb.144.3.497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Raucher D., Stauffer T., Chen W., Shen K., Guo S., York J. D., Sheetz M. P., Meyer T. Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate functions as a second messenger that regulates cytoskeleton-plasma membrane adhesion. Cell. 2000 Jan 21;100(2):221–228. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81560-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rotsch C., Braet F., Wisse E., Radmacher M. AFM imaging and elasticity measurements on living rat liver macrophages. Cell Biol Int. 1997 Nov;21(11):685–696. doi: 10.1006/cbir.1997.0213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rudd P. M., Elliott T., Cresswell P., Wilson I. A., Dwek R. A. Glycosylation and the immune system. Science. 2001 Mar 23;291(5512):2370–2376. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5512.2370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ryan T. A., Myers J., Holowka D., Baird B., Webb W. W. Molecular crowding on the cell surface. Science. 1988 Jan 1;239(4835):61–64. doi: 10.1126/science.2962287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Schreiner G. F., Unanue E. R. Capping and the lymphocyte: models for membrane reorganization. J Immunol. 1977 Nov;119(5):1549–1551. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Shao J. Y., Ting-Beall H. P., Hochmuth R. M. Static and dynamic lengths of neutrophil microvilli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jun 9;95(12):6797–6802. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.12.6797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Simons K., Ikonen E. Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature. 1997 Jun 5;387(6633):569–572. doi: 10.1038/42408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Strey H., Peterson M., Sackmann E. Measurement of erythrocyte membrane elasticity by flicker eigenmode decomposition. Biophys J. 1995 Aug;69(2):478–488. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)79921-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Viola A., Lanzavecchia A. T-cell activation and the dynamic world of rafts. APMIS. 1999 Jul;107(7):615–623. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1999.tb01450.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wild M. K., Cambiaggi A., Brown M. H., Davies E. A., Ohno H., Saito T., van der Merwe P. A. Dependence of T cell antigen recognition on the dimensions of an accessory receptor-ligand complex. J Exp Med. 1999 Jul 5;190(1):31–41. doi: 10.1084/jem.190.1.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wülfing C., Davis M. M. A receptor/cytoskeletal movement triggered by costimulation during T cell activation. Science. 1998 Dec 18;282(5397):2266–2269. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5397.2266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wülfing C., Sjaastad M. D., Davis M. M. Visualizing the dynamics of T cell activation: intracellular adhesion molecule 1 migrates rapidly to the T cell/B cell interface and acts to sustain calcium levels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 May 26;95(11):6302–6307. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.11.6302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wülfing Christoph, Sumen Cenk, Sjaastad Michael D., Wu Lawren C., Dustin Michael L., Davis Mark M. Costimulation and endogenous MHC ligands contribute to T cell recognition. Nat Immunol. 2001 Dec 3;3(1):42–47. doi: 10.1038/ni741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES