Skip to main content
IMA Fungus logoLink to IMA Fungus
. 2026 Apr 24;17:e177246. doi: 10.3897/imafungus.17.177246

Novel species and new host records of Apiospora and Nigrospora (Amphisphaeriales, Apiosporaceae) from Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, China

Xing-Chang Wang 1, Rui-Nan Zhang 1, Chada Norphanphoun 1, Si-Bo Wang 1, Meng-Ting Zou 1, Shi-Qi Guo 1, Jing-E Sun 1, Jia-Ping Wang 1, Nalin N Wijayawardene 2,3,4,5, Kevin D Hyde 6,7, Yong Wang 1,, Feng-Quan Liu 1,
PMCID: PMC13135200  PMID: 42079566

Abstract

The family Apiosporaceae is a cosmopolitan family of fungi that occurs as endophytes, pathogens, and saprobes. Due to the morphological similarity of species within this family, both morphological and phylogenetic analyses are required to determine their taxonomic status. In this study, eleven specimens were collected from Yunnan and Guizhou provinces in China. Morphological and phylogenetic analyses based on ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2 sequence data were performed to identify Apiospora (A.) and Nigrospora (N.) isolates. Five new species are described: A. huaxiensissp. nov., A. nanmingensissp. nov., A. qingzhenensissp. nov., A. tongrenensissp. nov., and Nigrospora neosaccharicolasp. nov. Six new host record species are reported: A. locuta-pollinis, A. setariae, N. chinensis, N. endophytica, N. osmanthi, and N. sphaerica. Furthermore, A. mediterraneasyn. nov. is synonymized under A. hispanica, and A. euphorbiaesyn. nov., A. magnisporasyn. nov., and A. malaysianasyn. nov. are reduced to synonyms of A. vietnamensis based on morphological comparison and phylogenetic analysis. In addition, Apiospora sinensis is reinstated, with Arthrinium sinense (Ar. sinense) syn. nov. treated as its synonym. Statistical analysis of host preferences indicates that Poaceae is the dominant host family. Analysis of their regional distributions showed that Apiospora is more prevalent in Europe, while Nigrospora is more widespread in Asia. This study refines the taxonomy and expands the phylogenetic understanding of Apiosporaceae in China.

Key words: Arthrinium-like, Ascomycota , multilocus analysis, phylogeny, Sordariomycetes , taxonomy

Introduction

The family Apiosporaceae was established by Hyde et al. (1998) to accommodate Apiospora Sacc., together with Appendicospora K.D. Hyde, Dictyoarthrinium S. Hughes, Endocalyx Berk. & Broome, Scyphospora L.A. Kantsch., and Spegazzinia Sacc., based on distinctive morphological characteristics, particularly the characters of multilocular ascomata and Arthrinium-like basauxic conidiogenous cell (Senanayake et al. 2015; Li et al. 2023; Liu et al. 2024b). Phylogenetic analyses of LSU and SSU sequence data subsequently placed the family within Xylariales (Smith 2003), a position later confirmed by Crous and Groenewald (2013), who demonstrated that Apiosporaceae and Amphisphaeriaceae form sister clades. Wijayawardene et al. (2020) subsequently reassigned Apiosporaceae to Amphisphaeriales (Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes) (Hyde et al. 2024b), where it is currently classified. Over time, molecular data have refined the generic boundaries within the family. Tanaka et al. (2015) transferred Spegazzinia to Didymosphaeriaceae based on multigene phylogenetic evidence, while Wang et al. (2017) included Nigrospora Zimm. within Apiosporaceae. Samarakoon et al. (2020) further transferred Dictyoarthrinium to Didymosphaeriaceae based on its close relationship with Spegazzinia in both morphology and molecular phylogeny. Konta et al. (2021) placed Endocalyx in Cainiaceae, and Samarakoon et al. (2022) established Appendicosporaceae to accommodate Appendicospora as an independent lineage. As a result of these revisions, Apiosporaceae is now circumscribed to three well-established genera, Apiospora, Arthrinium Kunze, and Nigrospora (Wang et al. 2017; Pintos and Alvarado 2021; Hyde et al. 2024b; Mukhopadhyay et al. 2025). These genera are morphologically and phylogenetically related but differ in their diagnostic reproductive characteristics. Apiospora is the sexually typified genus, producing multilocular ascomata beneath stromata and exhibiting Arthrinium-like basauxic conidiogenesis, whereas Arthrinium was for a period considered the asexual morph linked to Apiospora (Kirk et al. 2008). The genus Apiospora, once treated as a synonym of Arthrinium, is now recognized as an independent lineage within Apiosporaceae based on multilocus phylogenetic evidence (Pintos and Alvarado 2021; Han et al. 2024; Liu et al. 2024b; Yan and Zhang 2024; Chang et al. 2025; Yu et al. 2025). For decades, both names were used interchangeably until multilocus phylogenetic analyses demonstrated that Apiosporasensu stricto and Arthriniumsensu stricto represent two distinct but closely related lineages within Apiosporaceae (Pintos and Alvarado 2021). Although both genera share morphological similarities, they differ in host range, distribution, and conidial morphology; Apiospora conidia are generally rounded in face view and lenticular in side view, while those of Arthrinium are more variable, including angular, curved, fusiform, globose, and polygonal forms (Zeng et al. 2022). Species of Apiospora have been found worldwide, ranging from tropical and subtropical regions to Mediterranean, temperate, and cold climates, while Arthrinium s.str. is quite rarely reported in tropical and subtropical habitats (Pintos and Alvarado 2021; Liu et al. 2023a). Additionally, Apiospora has a broader host range, whereas Arthrinium s.str. specimens are exclusively associated with plants from the Cyperaceae and Juncaceae (Pintos and Alvarado 2021). Nigrospora forms the third major lineage, phylogenetically allied to the ApiosporaArthrinium clade, and is characterized by spherical to subspherical conidiogenous cells producing black, globose to subglobose conidia (Zhang et al. 2024a; Zou et al. 2024). Nigrospora is another important genus comprising endophytic, saprobic, and pathogenic species that can cause diseases in economically significant plants (Zou et al. 2024). Despite their morphological distinctness, extensive convergence in conidial size, shape, and development has historically obscured genus boundaries, underscoring the necessity of molecular approaches for accurate identification and phylogenetic resolution within the family (Wang et al. 2017; Pintos and Alvarado 2021; de Queiroz Brito et al. 2023).

Members of Apiosporaceae are ecologically versatile, functioning as endophytes, saprobes, and plant pathogens on numerous hosts worldwide (Liao et al. 2023; Liu et al. 2023a). Several species are of agricultural and ecological importance, including A. arundinis, associated with root rot of Pseudostellaria heterophylla (Xiao et al. 2024), and N. aurantiaca, causing leaf spots on Myrica rubra, Pandanus amaryllifolius, and Castanea mollissima (Luo et al. 2020; Khoo et al. 2022; Fu et al. 2025). Moreover, most species in this family can produce secondary metabolites, demonstrating strong biological activity (Xu et al. 2022; Overgaard et al. 2023). Their ecological versatility, morphological plasticity, and close evolutionary relationships make Apiosporaceae one of the most taxonomically complex and diverse families within Amphisphaeriales (Liao et al. 2023; Liu et al. 2023a).

The Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau harbors numerous potential Apiospora species due to its suitable climate, demonstrating strong ecological adaptability of this genus (Zeng et al. 2022; Zhang et al. 2023; Han et al. 2024; Guo et al. 2025; Yu et al. 2025). Despite significant taxonomic progress, the diversity and distribution of Apiosporaceae in China remain insufficiently explored, particularly in ecologically rich provinces such as Yunnan and Guizhou. To address this gap, diseased leaves and decaying stems were collected from Southwestern China, from which 35 strains were isolated. These isolates were identified and characterized through detailed morphological observations and multilocus phylogenetic analyses based on ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2 sequence data. Additionally, we statistically analyzed the species distribution and host range of Apiospora and Nigrospora and selected the most suitable culture medium for morphological observation by testing multiple media. The objectives of this study were to clarify the taxonomy of these fungi, describe their morphological diversity, and elucidate their phylogenetic relationships and ecological associations within these diverse ecosystems. Comprehensive descriptions, illustrations, and phylogenetic placements of the newly identified taxa are provided herein.

Materials and methods

Specimen collection and isolation

Samples were collected from different hosts, including Poaceae (bamboo), Zea mays L. (maize), and Juglans regia L. (walnut), in various localities across Southwestern China during 2023–2024. All sample collections were placed in sterile paper bags and brought back to the Plant Pathology Laboratory at Guizhou University for fungal observation and isolation. The collected materials were first examined under a stereomicroscope to observe conidiomata and conidia. Fungi were isolated using two complementary techniques depending on the specimen condition: 1) spore suspension isolation was carried out for the species exhibiting conidiomata; 2) tissue isolation was used for samples without conidiomata but exhibiting disease symptoms, both following the protocol of Senanayake et al. (2020). Subsequently, culture plates containing spore suspensions or sterilized leaf fragments were incubated at 25 °C for 24 h. A single germinated spore or hyphal tip was then transferred to potato dextrose agar (PDA) and incubated at 25 °C for approximately 10 days to obtain pure cultures. Pure cultures were transferred to fresh PDA plates for morphological observation and DNA extraction. The fungal cultures were stored in sterile water and 30% glycerol in a refrigerator at 4 °C. The specimens were dried and stored in the Herbarium of the Department of Plant Pathology, Agricultural College, Guizhou University, Guizhou, China (HGUP). The cultures were deposited in the Culture Collection at the Department of Plant Pathology, Agricultural College, Guizhou University, Guizhou, China (GUCC). Registration ID numbers were obtained from MycoBank (www.mycobank.org) for the novel species in this study.

Morphological observation

Morphological features of the fungal isolates were examined from cultures grown on PDA, water agar (WA), synthetic low-nutrient agar (SNA), oatmeal agar (OA), cornmeal agar (CMA), and malt extract agar (MEA) for 7–14 days at 25 °C under alternating light and dark conditions. Colony characteristics, including color, texture, growth rate, and pigmentation were recorded after 7 and 14 days of incubation. After 14 days, conidia formed on the culture medium were examined and documented. The colony color recognition was performed using the color charts of Rayner (1970). Microscopic structures were observed and photographed using a Zeiss Scope 5 compound microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany) with an attached camera, Axioscope 5 (AxioCam 208 color). The dimensions of the different spore structures were measured using ZEN 3.0 (blue edition) software (Jena, Germany). At least 30 measurements were taken for each significant morphological structure (e.g., conidia, conidiogenous cells, asci, and ascospores) to determine size ranges and mean values. Illustrations were prepared using Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Adobe Systems Inc., USA) to assemble images and adjust brightness and contrast without altering the original structure or color.

DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from 7–10–day-old pure cultures grown on PDA using a BIOMIGA Fungal Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Biomiga#GD2416, San Diego, California, USA) according to the manufacturer’S protocol. The extracted DNA was stored at – 20 °C until further use. Four loci were amplified for phylogenetic analyses: the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, the large subunit ribosomal RNA gene (LSU), the translation elongation factor 1-α (tef1-α), and the beta tubulin (tub2) gene. The primer pairs and amplification conditions are summarized in Suppl. material 3: table SS1. The following primer pairs were used: ITS5/ITS4 for ITS (White et al. 1990), LR0R/LR5 for LSU (Vilgalys and Hester 1990), EF1-728F/EF2 for tef1-α (Carbone and Kohn 1999), and Bt2a /T1/Bt2b for tub2 (Glass and Donaldson 1995). Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were performed in a total volume of 25 µL, containing 12.5 µL of 2 × T5 Super PCR Mix (Tsingke Biotech Co., China), 1 µL of each primer (10 µM), 1 µL of DNA template, and 9.5 µL of sterile distilled water. PCR amplifications were carried out in a thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, USA) under the conditions listed in Suppl. material 3: table SS1. The PCR products were visualized on 1% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide, and successful amplicons were purified and sequenced by Sangon Biotech in Chengdu, China. Forward and reverse sequence reads were assembled and edited using Geneious Prime v2023.2.2 (Biomatters Ltd., New Zealand). Consensus sequences were deposited in GenBank, and accession numbers are provided in Table 1.

Table 1.

GenBank accession numbers of the phylogenetic analysis in this study. (Species marked in red are new species discovered in this study, while those marked in blue are species for which new host records were identified in this study or species for which the taxonomic name has changed). “T” indicates the type strain.

Taxa Strain Numbers GenBank Accession Numbers Citation
ITS LSU tub2 tef1–α
Apiospora acutiapica KUMCC 20-0210T MT946343 MT946339 MT947366 MT947360 Senanayake et al. 2020
A. acutiapica KUMCC 20-0209T MT946342 MT946338 MT947365 MT947359 Senanayake et al. 2020
A. adinandrae SAUCC 1282B-1T OR739431 OR739572 OR757128 OR753448 Liu et al. 2024b
A. adinandrae SAUCC 1282B-2 OR739432 OR739573 OR757129 OR753449 Liu et al. 2024b
A. agari KUC21333T MH498520 MH498478 MH544663 Kwon et al. 2021
A. agari KUC21361 MH498519 MH498477 MN868914 Kwon et al. 2021
A. agari KUC21364 MH498516 MH498474 MN868917 Kwon et al. 2021
A. ananasi MFLU 23-0236T OR438409 OR438876 OR538086 OR500338 Tian et al. 2024
A. ananasi MFLU 23-0101 OR438410 OR438877 OR538085 OR500339 Tian et al. 2024
A. anshunensis GMB6208T PQ874006 PQ860451 PQ863977 PQ826947 Habib et al. 2025
A. anshunensis GMB6207 PQ874005 PQ860450 PQ863976 PQ826946 Habib et al. 2025
A. aquatica S-642T MK828608 MK835806 Luo et al. 2019
A. aquatica HKAS:131571 PQ845702 PQ819653 Shen et al. 2025
A. aquatica KUNCC:23-16117 PQ845759 PV536212 Shen et al. 2025
A. arctoscopi KUC21331T MH498529 MH498487 MN868918 Kwon et al. 2021
A. arctoscopi KUC21344 MH498528 MH498486 MN868919 Kwon et al. 2021
A. arctoscopi KUC21345 MH498527 MH498485 MN868920 Kwon et al. 2021
A. arecacearum KUNCC 23-15554T PP584683 PP584780 PP982282 PP933191 Dissanayake et al. 2024
A. arecacearum HKAS 133085 PP584685 PP584782 PP982284 Dissanayake et al. 2024
A. arecacearum KUNCC 23-15555 PP584684 PP584781 PP982283 PP933192 Dissanayake et al. 2024
A. armeniaca SAUCC DL1831T OQ592540 OQ615269 OQ613285 OQ613313 Ai et al. 2024
A. armeniaca SAUCC DL1844 OQ592539 OQ615268 OQ613284 OQ613312 Ai et al. 2024
A. arundinis CBS 449.92 KF144887 KF144931 KF144977 KF145019 Crous and Groenewald 2013
A. aseptata KUNCC 23-14169T OR590341 OR590335 OR634943 OR634949 Zhang et al. 2023
A. aurea CBS 244.83T AB220251 KF144935 KF144981 KF145023 Crous and Groenewald 2013
A. babylonica SAUCC DL1841T OQ592538 OQ615267 OQ613283 OQ613311 Ai et al. 2024
A. babylonica SAUCC DL1864 OQ592537 OQ615266 OQ613282 OQ613310 Ai et al. 2024
A. balearica CBS 145129T MK014869 MK014836 MK017975 MK017946 Pintos et al. 2019
A. bambusicaulis GUCC17.41-T PP959151 PP959161 PP998084 PP998074 Yu et al. 2025
A. bambusicaulis GUCC17.42 PP959152 PP959162 PP998085 PP998075 Yu et al. 2025
A. bambusicola MFLUCC 20-0144T MW173030 MW173087 MW183262 Tang et al. 2020
A. bambusigena SAUCC 2446-2T PP702396 PP711785 PP716801 PP716797 Li et al. 2024
A. bambusigena SAUCC 2446-6 PP702397 PP711786 PP716802 PP716798 Li et al. 2024
A. bambusilentiginis GUCC18.51-T PP959155 PP959165 PP998088 PP998078 Yu et al. 2025
A. bambusilentiginis GUCC18.52 PP959156 PP959166 PP998089 PP998079 Yu et al. 2025
A. bambusiparasitica RCEF20000 OR687309 PQ530552 OR712912 PQ538537 Chang et al. 2025
A. bambusiparasitica RCEF20003T OR687306 PQ530551 OR712906 OR712911 Chang et al. 2025
A. bambusirimae GUCC12.51-T PP959153 PP959163 PP998086 PP998076 Yu et al. 2025
A. bambusirimae GUCC12.52 PP959154 PP959164 PP998087 PP998077 Yu et al. 2025
A. bawanglingensis SAUCC BW0444T OR739429 OR739570 OR757126 OR753446 Liu et al. 2024b
A. bawanglingensis SAUCC BW04441 OQ592551 OQ615280 OQ613302 OQ613324 Liu et al. 2024b
A. biserialis CGMCC 3.20135T MW481708 MW478885 MW522955 MW522938 Feng et al. 2021
A. biserialis GZCC20-0099 MW481709 MW478886 MW522956 MW522939 Feng et al. 2021
A. biserialis GZCC20-0100 MW481710 MW478887 MW522957 MW522940 Feng et al. 2021
A. camelliae-sinensis LC 5007T KY494704 KY494780 KY705173 KY705103 Wang et al. 2018
A. camelliae-sinensis LC 8181 KY494761 KY494837 KY705229 KY705157 Wang et al. 2018
A. cannae ZHKUCC 22-0127T OR164901 OR164948 OR166321 OR166285 Senanayake et al. 2023
A. cannae ZHKUCC 22-0139 OR164902 OR164949 OR166322 OR166286 Senanayake et al. 2023
A. chiangraiense MFLUCC 21-0053T MZ542520 MZ542524 MZ546409 Tian et al. 2021
A. chiangraiense KUNCC 24-17543 PP584687 PP584784 PP933194 Dissanayake et al. 2024
A. chromolaenae MFLUCC 17-1505T MT214342 MT214436 MT235802 Mapook et al. 2020
A. cordylines GUCC 10026 MT040105 MT040147 MT040126 Chen et al. 2021
A. cordylines GUCC 10027T MT040106 MT040148 MT040127 Chen et al. 2021
A. coryli CFCC 58978T OR125564 OR133586 OR139978 OR139974 Li et al. 2023
A. coryli CFCC 58979 OR125565 OR133587 OR139979 OR139975 Li et al. 2023
A. cyclobalanopsidis CGMCC 3.20136T MW481713 MW478892 MW522962 MW522945 Feng et al. 2021
A. cyclobalanopsidis GZCC20-0103 MW481714 MW478893 MW522963 MW522946 Feng et al. 2021
A. cylindrica CC.BYG98.1T PP407917 PP407730 Direct Submission
A. dehongensis GMBCC1011T PQ111494 PQ111483 PQ463974 PQ464025 Han et al. 2024
A. dehongensis GMBCC1012 PQ111495 PQ111484 PQ463975 PQ464026 Han et al. 2024
A. dematiacea KUNCC 23-14202T NR_190281 OR590339 OR634948 OR634953 Zhang et al. 2023
A. dendrobii MFLUCC 14-0152T NR_189847 MZ463192 Ma et al. 2022
A. descalsii CBS 145130T MK014870 MK014837 MK017976 MK017947 Pintos et al. 2019
A. dichotomanthi LC 4950T KY494697 KY494773 KY705167 KY705096 Wang et al. 2018
A. dichotomanthi LC8175 KY494755 KY494831 KY705223 KY705151 Wang et al. 2018
A. dichotomanthi LC8176 KY494756 KY494832 KY705224 KY705152 Wang et al. 2018
A. dicranopteridis KUNCC 23-14171T NR_190280 OR590336 OR634944 OR634950 Zhang et al. 2023
A. dicranopteridis KUNCC 23-14177 OR590343 OR590337 OR634945 OR634951 Zhang et al. 2023
A. dongyingensis SAUCC 0302T OP563375 OP572424 OP573270 OP573264 Liu et al. 2023a
A. dongyingensis SAUCC 0303 OP563374 OP572423 OP573269 OP573263 Liu et al. 2023a
A. elliptica ZHKUCC 22-0131T OR164905 OR164952 OR166323 OR166284 Senanayake et al. 2023
A. elliptica ZHKUCC 22-0140 OR164906 OR164953 OR166324 Senanayake et al. 2023
A. endophytica ZHKUCC 23-0006T OQ587996 OQ587984 OQ586075 OQ586062 Liao et al. 2023
A. endophytica ZHKUCC 23-0007 OQ587997 OQ587985 OQ586076 OQ586063 Liao et al. 2023
A. esporlensis CBS 145136T MK014878 MK014845 MK017983 MK017954 Pintos et al. 2019
A. fermenti KUC21289T MF615226 MF615213 MF615231 MH544667 Kwon et al. 2021
A. fermenti KUC21288 MF615230 MF615217 MF615235 MH544668 Kwon et al. 2021
A. fujianensis CGMCC3.25647T PP159026 PP159034 PP488470 PP488454 Zhao et al. 2024
A. fujianensis CGMCC3.25648 PP159027 PP159035 PP488471 PP488455 Zhao et al. 2024
A. fuzhouensis CGMCC3.25649T PP159028 PP159036 PP488468 PP488456 Zhao et al. 2024
A. fuzhouensis CGMCC3.25650 PP159029 PP159037 PP488469 PP488457 Zhao et al. 2024
A. gaoyouensis CFCC 52301T MH197124 MH236789 MH236793 Jiang et al. 2018
A. gaoyouensis CFCC 52302 MH197125 MH236790 MH236794 Jiang et al. 2018
A. garethjonesii KUMCC 16-0202T KY356086 KY356091 Dai et al. 2016
A. garethjonesii SICAUCC 22-0027 ON228603 ON228659 ON237651 Direct Submission
A. garethjonesii SICAUCC 22-0028 ON228606 ON228662 ON237654 Direct Submission
A. gelatinosa KHAS 11962T MW481706 MW478888 MW522958 MW522941 Feng et al. 2021
A. globosa KUNCC 23-14210T NR_190282 OR590340 OR634954 Zhang et al. 2023
A. globosa GMBCC1021 PQ111502 PQ111491 PQ464027 Han et al. 2024
A. gongcheniae YNE00465T PP033259 PP033102 PP034691 PP034683 Yan and Zhang 2024
A. gongcheniae YNE00565 PP033260 PP033103 PP034692 PP034684 Yan and Zhang 2024
A. guangdongensis ZHKUCC 23-0004T OQ587994 OQ587982 OQ586073 OQ586060 Liao et al. 2023
A. guangdongensis ZHKUCC 23-0005 OQ587995 OQ587983 OQ586074 OQ586061 Liao et al. 2023
A. guiyangensis HKAS 102403T MW240647 MW240577 MW775604 MW759535 Samarakoon et al. 2022
A. guiyangensis HKAS:125898 OQ029540 OQ029613 OQ186446 OQ186444 Direct Submission
A. guizhouensis LC 5322T KY494709 KY494785 KY705178 KY705108 Wang et al. 2018
A. guizhouensis LC 5318 KY494708 KY494784 KY705177 KY705107 Wang et al. 2018
A. hainanensis SAUCC 1681T OP563373 OP572422 OP573268 OP573262 Liu et al. 2023a
A. hainanensis SAUCC 1682 OP563372 OP572421 OP573267 OP573261 Liu et al. 2023a
A. hispanica IMI 326877T AB220242 AB220336 AB220289 Direct Submission, Wang et al. 2018
A. hispanica (= A. mediterranea) IMI 326875T AB220243 AB220337 AB220290 Direct Submission, Wang et al. 2018
A. hongheensis ZHKUCC 23-0792T OR936320 OR936322 PP778365 PP778354 Manawasinghe et al. 2025
A. hongheensis ZHKUCC 23-0793 OR936321 OR936323 PP778366 PP778355 Manawasinghe et al. 2025
A. huaxiensis sp. nov. GUCC 25-0068T PV948976 PV940519 PV954844 PX625453 This study
A. huaxiensis sp. nov. GUCC 25-0069 PV948977 PV940520 PV954845 PX625454 This study
A. huaxiensis sp. nov. GUCC 25-0070 PV948978 PV940521 PV954846 PX625455 This study
A. hydei CBS 114990T KF144890 KF144936 KF144982 KF145024 Crous and Groenewald 2013
A. hydei GZCC 20–0113 MW481721 MW478900 MW522953 Feng et al. 2021
A. hyphopodii MFLUCC 15-0003T KR069110 Senanayake et al. 2015
A. hyphopodii SICAUCC 22-0034 ON228605 ON228661 ON237653 Direct Submission
A. hysterina ICPM 6889T MK014874 MK014841 MK017980 MK017951 Pintos et al. 2019
A. hysterina KUC21437 ON764018 ON787757 ON806632 ON806622 Kwon et al. 2022
A. hysterina KUC21438 ON764019 ON787758 ON806633 ON806623 Kwon et al. 2022
A. iberica CBS 145137T MK014879 MK014846 MK017984 MK017955 Pintos et al. 2019
A. intestini CBS 135835T KR011352 KR149063 KR011350 KR011351 Crous et al. 2015
A. italica CBS 145138T MK014880 MK014847 MK017985 MK017956 Pintos et al. 2019
A. italica AP29118 MK014881 MK014848 MK017986 MK017957 Pintos et al. 2019
A. jatrophae AMH-9557T JQ246355 Sharma et al. 2014
A. jiangxiensis LC 4494 KY494690 KY494766 KY705160 KY705089 Wang et al. 2018
A. jiangxiensis LC 4577T KY494693 KY494769 KY705163 KY705092 Wang et al. 2018
A. jinanensis SAUCC DL1981T OQ592544 OQ615273 OQ613289 OQ613317 Ai et al. 2024
A. jinanensis SAUCC DL2000 OQ592543 OQ615272 OQ613288 OQ613316 Ai et al. 2024
A. jinghongensis GMB-W1013T PQ140160 PQ140163 PQ463971 PQ464022 Han et al. 2024
A. jinghongensis GMB-W1014 PQ140161 PQ140164 PQ463972 PQ464023 Han et al. 2024
A. kogelbergensis CBS 113333T KF144892 KF144938 KF144984 KF145026 Crous and Groenewald 2013
A. koreana KUC21332T MH498524 MH498482 MH544664 Kwon et al. 2021
A. koreana KUNCC23-15553 PP584690 PP584787 PP982289 PP933195 Dissanayake et al. 2024
A. lageniformis KUC21686T ON764022 ON787761 ON806636 ON806626 Kwon et al. 2022
A. lageniformis KUC21687 ON764023 ON787762 ON806637 ON806627 Kwon et al. 2022
A. lageniformis KUC21685 ON764021 ON787760 ON806635 ON806625 Kwon et al. 2022
A. locuta-pollinis LC 11683T MF939595 MF939622 MF939616 Zhao et al. 2018
A. locuta-pollinis SAUCC 3808 OQ592563 OQ615292 OQ613308 OQ613336 Direct Submission
A. locuta-pollinis SAUCC 3807 OQ592564 OQ615293 OQ613309 OQ613337 Direct Submission
A. locuta-pollinis GUCC 25-0071 PV948987 PV940530 PV954855 PX625458 This study
A. locuta-pollinis GUCC 25-0072 PV948988 PV940531 PV954856 PX625459 This study
A. longistroma MFLUCC_11-0481T KU940141 KU863129 Dai et al. 2017
A. longistroma MFLUCC_11-0479 KU940142 KU863130 Dai et al. 2017
A. lophatheri CFCC 58975T OR125566 OR133588 OR139980 OR139970 Li et al. 2023
A. lophatheri CFCC 58976 OR125567 OR133589 OR139981 OR139971 Li et al. 2023
A. machili SAUCC 1175A-4_T OR739433 OR739574 OR757130 OR753450 Liu et al. 2024b
A. machili SAUCC 1175 OQ592560 OQ615289 OQ613307 OQ613333 Liu et al. 2024b
A. marianiae CBS 148710T NR_183001 NG_149092 Pintos and Alvarado 2022
A. marianiae AP18219 ON692406 ON692422 ON677186 ON677180 Pintos and Alvarado 2022
A. marianiae AP301119 ON692407 ON692423 ON677187 ON677181 Pintos and Alvarado 2022
A. marii CBS 497.90T AB220252 KF144947 KF144993 KF145035 Crous and Groenewald 2013
A. marii CPC 18904 KF144902 KF144949 KF144994 KF145036 Crous and Groenewald 2013
A. marii CBS 200.57 KF144900 KF144946 KF144992 KF145034 Crous and Groenewald 2013
A. marina KUC21328T MH498538 MH498496 MH544669 Kwon et al. 2022
A. marina KUC21353 MH498537 MH498495 MN868923 Kwon et al. 2022
A. menglaensis KUNCC 24-17546T PP584693 PP584790 PP982292 PP933198 Dissanayake et al. 2024
A. menglaensis KUNCC 24-17547 PP584694 PP584791 PP982293 PP933199 Dissanayake et al. 2024
A. minutispora 17E-042T LC517882 LC518888 LC518889 Das et al. 2020
A. mori MFLUCC 20-0181T MW114313 MW114393 Tennakoon et al. 2021
A. mori NCYUCC 19-0340 MW114314 MW114394 Tennakoon et al. 2021
A. mukdahanensis MFLUCC 22-0056T OP377735 OP377742 OP381089 Monkai et al. 2022
A. multiloculata MFLUCC 21-0023T OL873137 OL873138 Bhunjun et al. 2022
A. mytilomorpha DAOM 214595T KY494685 Wang et al. 2018
A. nanmingensis sp. nov. GUCC 25-0087T PV948979 PV940522 PV954847 PX625456 This study
A. nanmingensis sp. nov. GUCC 25-0088 PV948980 PV940523 PV954848 PX625457 This study
A. neobambusae LC 7106T KY494718 KY494794 KY705186 KY806204 Wang et al. 2018
A. neobambusae LC 7124 KY494727 KY494803 KY705195 KY806206 Wang et al. 2018
A. neochinensis CFCC 53036T MK819291 MK818547 MK818545 Jiang et al. 2020
A. neochinensis CFCC 53037 MK819292 MK818548 MK818546 Jiang et al. 2020
A. neogarethjonesii KUMCC 18-0192T MK070897 MK070898 Hyde et al. 2020
A. neogongcheniae YNE01248T PP033263 PP033106 PP034695 PP034687 Yan and Zhang 2024
A. neosubglobosa KUMCC 16-0203T KY356090 KY356095 Dai et al. 2016
A. neosubglobosa JHB006 KY356089 KY356094 Dai et al. 2016
A. neosubglobosa GZAAS 20–0099 MW481705 MW478901 MW522969 MW522954 Feng et al. 2021
A. obovata LC 4940T KY494696 KY494772 KY705166 KY705095 Wang et al. 2018
A. obovata LC 8177 KY494757 KY494833 KY705225 KY705153 Wang et al. 2018
A. oenotherae CFCC 58972T OR125568 OR133590 OR139982 OR139972 Li et al. 2023
A. olivata ZY22.052 T OR680531 OR680598 OR843234 OR858925 Zhang et al. 2024b
A. olivata ZY22.053 OR680532 OR680599 OR843235 OR858926 Zhang et al. 2024b
A. ovata CBS 115042T KF144903 KF144950 KF144995 KF145037 Crous and Groenewald 2013
A. pallidespora ZHKUCC 22-0129T OR164903 OR164950 Senanayake et al. 2023
A. paragongcheniae YNE00992T PP033261 PP033104 PP034693 PP034685 Yan and Zhang 2024
A. paragongcheniae YNE01259 PP033262 PP033105 PP034694 PP034686 Yan and Zhang 2024
A. paraphaeosperma MFLUCC 13-0644T KX822128 KX822124 Hyde et al. 2016
A. phragmitis CPC 18900T KF144909 KF144956 KF145001 KF145043 Crous and Groenewald 2013
A. phragmitis CBS 145145 MK014889 MK014856 MK017994 MK017965 Pintos et al. 2019
A. phyllostachydis MFLUCC 18-1101T MK351842 MH368077 MK291949 MK340918 Yang et al. 2019
A. phyllostachydis GZCC:20-0111 MW481717 MW522965 MW522949 Feng et al. 2021
A. phyllostachydis GZCC:20-0112 MW481718 MW522966 MW522950 Feng et al. 2021
A. piptatheri CBS 145149T MK014893 MK014860 MK017969 Pintos et al. 2019
A. piptatheri KUC21279 MF615229 MF615234 MH544671 Kwon et al. 2022
A. piptatheri KUC21220 KT207736 KT207636 MH544672 Kwon et al. 2022
A. pseudohyphopodii KUC21680T ON764026 ON787765 ON806640 ON806630 Kwon et al. 2022
A. pseudohyphopodii KUC21684 ON764027 ON787766 ON806641 ON806631 Kwon et al. 2022
A. pseudoparenchymatica LC 7234T KY494743 KY494819 KY705211 KY705139 Wang et al. 2018
A. pseudoparenchymatica LC8173 KY494753 KY494829 KY705221 KY705149 Wang et al. 2018
A. pseudoparenchymatica GZCC 20–0117 MW481719 MW478898 MW522967 MW522951 Feng et al. 2021
A. pseudorasikravindrae KUMCC 20-0208T MT946344 MT947367 MT947361 Senanayake et al. 2020
A. pseudorasikravindrae KUMCC 20–0211 MT946345 MT947368 MT947362 Senanayake et al. 2020
A. pseudosinensis CPC 21546T KF144910 KF144957 KF145044 Crous and Groenewald 2013
A. pseudosinensis SAUCC 0221 OP563377 OP572426 OP573272 OP573266 Liu et al. 2023a
A. pseudosinensis SAUCC 0222 OP563376 OP572425 OP573271 OP573265 Liu et al. 2023a
A. pseudospegazzinii CBS 102052T KF144911 KF144958 KF145002 KF145045 Crous and Groenewald 2013
A. pterosperma CPC 20193T KF144913 KF144960 KF145004 KF145046 Crous and Groenewald 2013
A. pusillisperma KUC21321T MH498533 MH498491 MN868930 Kwon et al. 2022
A. pusillisperma KUC21357 MH498532 MH498490 MN868931 Kwon et al. 2022
A. qiannanensis RCEF7610 PQ526600 PQ530550 PQ538539 PQ538535 Chang et al. 2025
A. qiannanensis RCEF7611T PQ526599 PQ530549 PQ538538 PQ538536 Chang et al. 2025
A. qingzhenensis sp. nov. GUCC 25-0077T PV948972 PV940515 PV954840 PX625449 This study
A. qingzhenensis sp. nov. GUCC 25-0078 PV948973 PV940516 PV954841 PX625450 This study
A. qingzhenensis sp. nov. GUCC 25-0079 PV948974 PV940517 PV954842 PX625451 This study
A. qingzhenensis sp. nov. GUCC 25-0080 PV948975 PV940518 PV954843 PX625452 This study
A. qinlingensis CFCC 52303T MH197120 MH236791 MH236795 Jiang et al. 2018
A. rasikravindrae NFCCI 2144T JF326454 Singh et al. 2012
A. rasikravindrae KUC21327 MH498541 MH498499 MH544670 Kwon et al. 2021
A. rasikravindrae KUC21351 MH498540 MH498498 MN868932 Wang et al. 2018
A. rasikravindrae LC5449 KY494713 KY705182 KY705112 Wang et al. 2018
A. rasikravindrae LC7115 KY494721 KY705189 KY705118 Wang et al. 2018
A. sacchari CBS 372.67 KF144918 KF144964 KF145007 KF145049 Crous and Groenewald 2013
A. sacchari CBS 30149 KF144917 KF144963 KF145006 KF145048 Crous and Groenewald 2013
A. saccharicola CBS 191.73 KF144920 KF144966 KF145009 KF145051 Crous and Groenewald 2013
A. saccharicola CBS 463.83 KF144921 KF144968 KF145011 KF145053 Crous and Groenewald 2013
A. sargassi KUC21228T KT207746 KT207644 MH544677 Kwon et al. 2022
A. sargassi KUC21232 KT207750 KT207700 KT207648 MH544676 Kwon et al. 2022
A. sasae CBS 146808T MW883402 MW883797 MW890120 MW890104 Crous et al. 2021
A. sasae 23P495 PV384448 PV384449 PV460718 PV460719 Kim et al. 2025
A. senecionis HKAS 127245T PP584697 PP584794 PP993513 Dissanayake et al. 2024
A. senecionis KUNCC 23-15557 PP584698 PP584795 PP993514 Dissanayake et al. 2024
A. septata CGMCC 3.20134T MW481711 MW478890 MW522960 MW522943 Feng et al. 2021
A. septata GZCC20-0109 MW481712 MW478891 MW522961 MW522944 Feng et al. 2021
A. serenensis IMI 326869T AB220250 AB220344 AB220297 Direct Submission, Wang et al. 2018
A. serenensis ATCC 76309 AB220240 AB220334 AB220287 Direct Submission, Wang et al. 2018
A. setariae beilin024 MT492005 MT497467 MW118457 Jiang and Tian 2021
A. setariae CFCC 54041T MT492004 MT497466 MW118456 Jiang and Tian 2021
A. setariae GUCC 25-0081 PV948989 PV940532 PV954857 PX625460 This study
A. setariae GUCC 25-0082 PV948990 PV940533 PV954858 PX625461 This study
A. setostroma KUMCC 19-0217T MN528012 MN528011 MN527357 Jiang et al. 2019
A. shangrilaensis GMBCC1019T PQ111492 PQ111481 PQ164976 PQ164974 Han et al. 2024
A. shangrilaensis GMBCC1020 PQ111493 PQ111482 PQ164977 PQ164975 Han et al. 2024
A. sichuanensis HKAS 107008T MW240648 MW240578 MW775605 MW759536 Samarakoon et al. 2022
A. sichuanensis AP151120 ON692419 ON692426 ON677190 ON677184 Pintos and Alvarado 2022
A. sichuanensis AP121220 ON692420 ON692427 ON677191 ON677185 Pintos and Alvarado 2022
A. sinense (= Arthrinium sinense) HKUCC 3143 AY083831 Direct Submission, Réblová et al. 2016
A. sorghi URM 93000T MK371706 MK348526 Yuan et al. 2020
A. sphaeroidea CC.YQ02.3T PP407911 PP407724 PP496600 Direct Submission
A. sphaerosperma CBS114315 KF144905 KF144952 KF144997 KF145039 Crous and Groenewald 2013
A. sphaerosperma CBS114317 KF144906 KF144953 KF144998 KF145040 Crous and Groenewald 2013
A. sphaerosperma CBS114318 KF144907 KF144954 KF144999 KF145041 Crous and Groenewald 2013
A. sphaerosperma CBS114314 KF144904 KF144951 KF144996 KF145038 Crous and Groenewald 2013
A. stipae CBS 146804T MW883403 MW883798 MW890121 MW890082 Crous et al. 2021
A. subglobosa MFLUCC 11-0397T KR069112 KR069113 Senanayake et al. 2015
A. subglobosa GMB-W1024 PQ140162 PQ140165 PQ463973 PQ464024 Han et al. 2024
A. subrosea LC 7291 KY494751 KY494827 KY705219 KY705147 Wang et al. 2018
A. subrosea LC 7292T KY494752 KY494828 KY705220 KY705148 Wang et al. 2018
A. taeanensis KUC21322T MH498515 MH498473 MH544662 Kwon et al. 2022
A. taeanensis KUC21359 MH498513 MH498471 MN868935 Kwon et al. 2022
A. thailandica MFLUCC 15-0202T KU940145 KU863133 Dai et al. 2017
A. tongrenensis sp. nov. GUCC 25-0083T PV948993 PV940536 PV954861 PX625462 This study
A. tongrenensis sp. nov. GUCC 25-0084 PV948994 PV940537 PV954862 PX625463 This study
A. trachycarpi KUNCC23-15558T PP584701 PP584798 PP982298 PP933204 Dissanayake et al. 2024
A. trachycarpi KUNCC23-15559 PP584702 PP584799 PP982299 PP933205 Dissanayake et al. 2024
A. tropica MFLUCC 21-0056T OK491657 OK491653 OK560922 Phukhamsakda et al. 2022
A. ulmicola CFCC 57941 PP965512 PP957891 Yin and Jiang 2024
A. ulmicola CFCC 57942 PP965513 PP957892 Yin and Jiang 2024
A. vietnamensis IMI 99670T KX986096 KX986111 KY019466 Wang et al. 2017
A. vietnamensis (= A. malaysiana) CBS 102053T KF144896 KF144942 KF144988 KF145030 Crous and Groenewald 2013
A. vietnamensis (= A. magnispora) ZHKUCC 22-0001 OM728647 OM486971 OM543544 OM543543 Zhao et al. 2023
A. Vietnamensis (= A. euphorbiae) IMI 285638b AB220241 AB220335 AB220288 Direct Submission, Tian et al. 2021
A. vietnamensis KUMCC 21-0428 ON426826 OP363254 OR025928 OR025967 Liu et al. 2023b
A. vietnamensis KUMCC 21-0429 ON426827 OP363255 OR025929 OR025968 Liu et al. 2023b
A. vietnamensis (=A. malaysiana) CBS 251.29 KF144897 KF144943 KF144989 KF145031 Crous and Groenewald 2013
A. wurfbainiae ZHKUCC 23-0008T OQ587998 OQ587986 OQ586077 OQ586064 Liao et al. 2023
A. wurfbainiae ZHKUCC 23-0009 OQ587999 OQ587987 OQ586078 OQ586065 Liao et al. 2023
A. xenocordella CBS 478.86T KF144925 KF144970 KF145013 KF145055 Crous and Groenewald 2013
A. xenocordella CBS 595.66 KF144926 KF144971 Crous and Groenewald 2013
A. xiangxiense RCEF20001T OR687308 PQ530553 OR712910 OR712909 Chang et al. 2025
A. xiangxiense RCEF20002 OR687307 PQ530548 OR712908 OR712907 Chang et al. 2025
A. yunnana MFLUCC 15-1002T KU940147 KU863135 Dai et al. 2017
A. yunnana DDQ 00281 KU940148 KU863136 Dai et al. 2017
A. yunnanensis ZHKUCC 23-0014T OQ588004 OQ587992 OQ586083 OQ586070 Liao et al. 2023
A. yunnanensis ZHKUCC 23-0015 OQ588005 OQ587993 OQ586084 OQ586071 Liao et al. 2023
A. zhaotongensis GMBCC1015T PQ111500 PQ111489 PQ463980 PQ464016 Han et al. 2024
A. zhaotongensis GMBCC1016 PQ111501 PQ111490 PQ463981 PQ464017 Han et al. 2024
A. zhenxiongensis GMBCC1017T PQ111498 PQ111487 PQ463978 PQ464018 Han et al. 2024
A. zhenxiongensis GMBCC1018 PQ111499 PQ111488 PQ463979 PQ464019 Han et al. 2024
A. xishuangbannaensis KUMCC 21-0695T ON426832 OP363248 OR025930 OR025969 Liu et al. 2023b
A. xishuangbannaensis KUMCC 21-0696 ON426833 OP363249 OR025931 OR025970 Liu et al. 2023b
Arthrinium austriacum GZU 345004 MW208928 Pintos and Alvarado 2021
Ar. caricicola AP23518 MK014871 MK014838 MK017977 MK017948 Pintos et al. 2019
Ar. crenatum AG19066T MW208931 MW208861 MW221923 MW221917 Pintos and Alvarado 2021
Ar. curvatum AG191036 MW208935 MW208862 MW221924 Pintos and Alvarado 2021
Ar. japonicum IFO 30500 AB220262 AB220356 AB220309 Direct Submission
Ar. morthieri GZU 345043 MW208938 MW208864 MW221926 MW221920 Pintos and Alvarado 2021
Ar. puccinioides AP26418 MK014894 MK014861 MK017998 MK017970 Pintos et al. 2019
Ar. sporophleoides GZU 345102 MW208944 MW208866 MW221927 Pintos and Alvarado 2021
Neoarthrinium lithocarpicola CFCC 54456 ON427580 ON427582 ON456914 Jiang et al. 2022
Neo. lithocarpicola CFCC 55883 ON427581 ON427583 ON456915 Jiang et al. 2022
Nigrospora anhuiensis QY-2 OP677969 PP103614 PP103590 Liu et al. 2024c
N. aurantiaca LC7034 KX986093 KY019598 KY019394 Wang et al. 2017
N. aurantiaca CGMCC 3.18130T KX986064 KY019465 KY019295 Wang et al. 2017
N. bambusae CGMCC 3.18327T KY385307 KY385319 KY385313 Wang et al. 2017
N. bambusae LC7245 KY385305 KY385321 KY385315 Wang et al. 2017
N. brasiliensis CMM 1217 KY569630 MK720817 MK753272 Crous et al. 2019
N. brasiliensis CMM 1214T KY569629 MK720816 MK753271 Crous et al. 2019
N. camelliae-sinensis CGMCC 3.18125T KX985986 KY019460 KY019293 Wang et al. 2017
N. chinensis CGMCC 3.18127T KX986023 KY019462 KY019422 Wang et al. 2017
N. chinensis LC6851 KX986049 KY019579 KY019450 Wang et al. 2017
N. chinensis GUCC 25-0120 PX460746 PX512433 PX512413 This study
N. chinensis GUCC 25-0121 PX460747 PX512434 PX512414 This study
N. cooperae BRIP 72440aT NR_185745 OP039540 OP039539 Tan et al. 2022
N. cooperae BRIP 72531c OP035049 OP039542 OP039541 Tan et al. 2022
N. coryli W18T PP218065 PP320372 PP461302 Wang et al. 2024
N. covidalis LC158337 OK335210 OK431480 OK431486 Chen et al. 2022
N. covidalis CGMCC 3.20538T OK335209 OK431479 OK431485 Chen et al. 2022
N. endophytica URM8462=A.R.M. 973T OM265233 OP572420 OP572416 de Queiroz Brito et al. 2023
N. endophytica URM8712=A.R.M. 687 OM265226 OP572418 OP572415 de Queiroz Brito et al. 2023
N. endophytica GUCC 25-0122 PX460760 PX512447 PX512427 This study
N. endophytica GUCC 25-0123 PX460761 PX512448 PX512428 This study
N. falsivesicularis LC13553 MN215779 MN329943 MN264018 Raza et al. 2019
N. falsivesicularis CGMCC 3.19678T MN215778 MN329942 MN264017 Raza et al. 2019
N. ficuum ZHKUCC 22-0125 OR164910 Senanayake et al. 2023
N. ficuum ZHKUCC 22-0143 OR164911 Senanayake et al. 2023
N. globosa LC12440T MK329121 MK336134 MK336056 Chen et al. 2022
N. globosa LC12441 MK329122 MK336135 MK336057 Chen et al. 2022
N. globospora LC15839 OK335212 OK431482 OK431488 Chen et al. 2022
N. globospora CGMCC 3.20539T OK335211 OK431481 OK431487 Chen et al. 2022
N. gorlenkoana CBS 480.73T KX986048 KY019456 KY019420 Wang et al. 2017
N. guangdongense ZHKUCC 24-0545 PV523285 PV536733 PV536735 Hongsanan et al. 2025
N. guangdongense ZHKUCC 24-0546 PV523286 PV536734 PV536736 Hongsanan et al. 2025
N. guangdongensis CFCC:53917T MT017509 MT024495 MT024493 Tian et al. 2020
N. guilinensis CGMCC 3.18124T KX985983 KY019459 KY019292 Wang et al. 2017
N. guilinensis LC7301 KX986063 KY019608 KY019404 Wang et al. 2017
N. hainanensis CGMCC 3.18129T KX986091 KY019464 KY019415 Wang et al. 2017
N. hainanensis URM8714=A.R.M.967 OM265228 OM793057 OM642834 de Queiroz Brito et al. 2023
N. hainanensis URM8715=A.R.M.968 OM265229 OM793058 OM642835 de Queiroz Brito et al. 2023
N. hainanensis URM8717=A.R.M.972 OM265232 OP572419 OM642837 de Queiroz Brito et al. 2023
N. hainanensis URM8719=A.R.M.976 OM265236 OM793060 OP572417 de Queiroz Brito et al. 2023
N. humicola CFCC 56884T ON555686 ON557392 ON557394 Zhang et al. 2024a
N. humicola CFCC 56885 ON555687 ON557393 ON557395 Zhang et al. 2024a
N. lacticolonia CGMCC 3.18123T KX985978 KY019458 KY019291 Wang et al. 2017
N. lacticolonia URM8713=A.R.M. 921 OM265227 OM642838 OM642833 de Queiroz Brito et al. 2023
N. macarangae MFLUCC_19-0141 MW114318 Tennakoon et al. 2021
N. macarangae NCYUCC 19-0177 MW114319 Tennakoon et al. 2021
N. macarangae NCYUCC 19-0312 MW114320 Tennakoon et al. 2021
N. magnoliae MFLUCC 19–0112T MW285092 MW438334 Tennakoon et al. 2021
N. manihoticola URM8461=A.R.M. 645T OM265224 OM869479 OM914791 de Queiroz Brito et al. 2023
N. marylouisemclawsiae BRIP 74865b PP125567 PP209362 PP209361 Direct Submission
N. mercuriadeae BRIP 75764a NR_198785 PP712794 PP712793 Direct Submission
N. musae CBS 319.34T KX986076 KY019455 KY019419 Wang et al. 2017
N. musae LC6385 KX986042 KY019567 KY019371 Wang et al. 2017
N. neosaccharicola sp. nov. GUCC 25-0124T PX460756 PX512443 PX512423 This study
N. neosaccharicola sp. nov. GUCC 25-0125 PX460757 PX512444 PX512424 This study
N. neosaccharicola sp. nov. GUCC 25-0126 PX460758 PX512445 PX512425 This study
N. neosaccharicola sp. nov. GUCC 25-0127 PX460759 PX512446 PX512426 This study
N. neosaccharicola sp. nov. GUCC 25-0128 PX460764 PX512451 PX512431 This study
N. neosaccharicola sp. nov. GUCC 25-0129 PX460765 PX512452 PX512432 This study
N. oryzae LC2724 KX985959 KY019486 KY019312 Wang et al. 2017
N. oryzae LC4265 KX985994 KY019518 KY019335 Wang et al. 2017
N. osmanthi CGMCC 3.18126T KX986010 KY019461 KY019421 Wang et al. 2017
N. osmanthi LC4487 KX986017 KY019540 KY019438 Wang et al. 2017
N. osmanthi GUCC 25-0130 PX460752 PX512439 PX512419 This study
N. osmanthi GUCC 25-0131 PX460753 PX512440 PX512420 This study
N. osmanthi GUCC 25-0132 PX460754 PX512441 PX512421 This study
N. osmanthi GUCC 25-0133 PX460755 PX512442 PX512422 This study
N. pernambucoensis URM8711=A.R.M.651 OM265225 OM869480 OM914792 de Queiroz Brito et al. 2023
N. pernambucoensis URM8463=A.R.M. 974T OM265234 OM869481 OM914793 de Queiroz Brito et al. 2023
N. philosophiae-doctoris CGMCC 3.20540T OK335214 OK431484 OK431490 Chen et al. 2022
N. pubeiensis KUNCC 23-16745 PQ553686 PQ613608 PQ613603 Zhang et al. 2025
N. pyriformis CGMCC 3.18122T KX985940 KY019457 KY019290 Wang et al. 2017
N. pyriformis URM8716=A.R.M.970 OM265231 OM642839 OM513904 de Queiroz Brito et al. 2023
N. rubi LC2698T KX985948 KY019475 KY019302 Wang et al. 2017
N. saccharicola LC12057 MN215789 MN329952 MN264028 Raza et al. 2019
N. saccharicola CGMCC 3.19362T MN215788 MN329951 MN264027 Raza et al. 2019
N. sacchari-ofcinarum CGMCC 3.19335T MN215791 MN329954 MN264030 Raza et al. 2019
N. sacchari-ofcinarum LC13531 MN215792 MN329955 MN264031 Raza et al. 2019
N. singularis CGMCC 3.19334T MN215793 MN329956 MN264032 Raza et al. 2019
N. singularis LC12068 MN215794 MN329957 MN264033 Raza et al. 2019
N. sphaerica LC 7294 KX985932 KY019602 KY019397 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 2705 KX985952 KY019479 KY019305 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 2958 KX985966 KY019493 KY019319 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 3420 KX985980 KY019506 KY019325 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 3477 KX985982 KY019508 KY019326 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 4174 KX985989 KY019513 KY019330 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 4241 KX985990 KY019514 KY019331 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 4263 KX985992 KY019516 KY019333 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 4264 KX985993 KY019517 KY019334 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 4274 KX985996 KY019520 KY019337 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 4278 KX985998 KY019522 KY019339 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 4291 KX986000 KY019524 KY019341 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 4293 KX986001 KY019525 KY019342 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 4303 KX986004 KY019528 KY019345 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 4307 KX986005 KY019529 KY019346 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 4372 KX986012 KY019535 KY019351 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 4447 KX986014 KY019537 KY019352 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 5932 KX986035 KY019557 KY019362 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 5944 KX986036 KY019558 KY019363 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 5966 KX986039 KY019561 KY019365 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 6294 KX986044 KY019565 KY019369 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 6969 KX986077 KY019584 KY019386 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 6996 KX986085 KY019592 KY019390 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 7295 KX985933 KY019603 KY019398 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 7296 KX985934 KY019604 KY019399 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 7298 KX985937 KY019606 KY019401 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 7303 KX986065 KY019609 KY019405 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC 7304 KX986066 KY019610 KY019406 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC2839 KX985964 KY019491 KY019317 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC2840 KX985965 KY019492 KY019318 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC5901 KX986034 KY019556 KY019361 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica LC7312 KX985935 KY019618 KY019414 Wang et al. 2017
N. sphaerica GUCC 25-0134 PX460748 PX512435 PX512415 This study
N. sphaerica GUCC 25-0135 PX460749 PX512436 PX512416 This study
N. sphaerica GUCC 25-0136 PX460750 PX512437 PX512417 This study
N. sphaerica GUCC 25-0137 PX460751 PX512438 PX512418 This study
N. sphaerica GUCC 25-0138 PX460762 PX512449 PX512429 This study
N. sphaerica GUCC 25-0139 PX460763 PX512450 PX512430 This study
N. stoneae BRIP 75022a OR608744 OR604067 OR604065 Direct Submission
N. tomentosae ZHKUCC 22-0339 PP759659 PP763296 PP763294 Manawasinghe et al. 2025
N. vesicularifera CGMCC 3.19333T MN215812 MN329975 MN264051 Raza et al. 2019
N. vesicularifera URM8718=A.R.M.975 OM265235 OM642840 OM513905 de Queiroz Brito et al. 2023
N. vesicularis LC0322 KX985939 KY019467 KY019296 Wang et al. 2017
N. vesicularis CGMCC 3.18128T KX986088 KY019463 KY019294 Wang et al. 2017
N. weininensis GUCC23-0144T PP729081 PP737836 PP731561 Liu et al. 2024a
N. yunnanensis GUCC24-0008T PP915796 PP947937 PP947933 Zou et al. 2024
N. zimmermanii CBS 290.62T KY385309 KY385317 KY385311 Wang et al. 2017
N. zimmermanii CBS 984.69 KY385310 KY385322 KY385316 Wang et al. 2017

Phylogenetic analyses

All sequences generated in this study were initially compared against the NCBI nucleotide database using the BLAST tool (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) to determine closely related taxa. Representative reference sequences of related genera and species were selected for subsequent phylogenetic analyses based on BLAST results and recent taxonomic publications (Liu et al. 2024a; Yan and Zhang 2024; Zou et al. 2024; Chang et al. 2025; Yu et al. 2025). GenBank accession numbers of all sequences used in this study are listed in Table 1. Raw sequence chromatograms were trimmed and edited using the Trim Ends function in Geneious Prime v2023.2.2 (Biomatters Ltd., New Zealand), and individual loci were assembled into consensus sequences. Each locus was aligned using MAFFT v7.520 (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/) with default settings (Katoh et al. 2019). The resulting alignments were manually checked and trimmed using TrimAl v1.3 (Capella-Gutiérrez et al. 2009) to remove ambiguously aligned regions. Concatenated datasets were generated with PhyloSuite v1.2.3 (Zhang et al. 2020).

Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using both Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) algorithms. The best-fit substitution model for each gene partition was determined using ModelFinder implemented in IQ-TREE v2.2.0 and is summarized in Suppl. material 3: table S2. ML analyses were performed with 1,000 ultrafast bootstrap replications to assess branch support. Bayesian analyses were carried out in MrBayes v3.2.7a, running two parallel analyses of four Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) chains for 5,000,000 generations, sampling every 1,000 generations, and discarding the first 25% of trees as burn-in. Phylogenetic trees were visualized in FigTree v1.4.0 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree) and annotated in Adobe Illustrator 2023 (Adobe Systems Inc., USA) for final presentation.

Host and geographical distribution of Nigrospora and Apiospora

To assess the host associations and geographic distribution of Apiospora and Nigrospora, species occurrence records for both genera were retrieved from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) database (GBIF.org, accessed 19 January 2026; Occurrence Downloads: https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.dx2b4u and https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.4ng2ze). The downloaded datasets were curated and standardized, and the following fields were extracted for analysis: GBIF ID, habitat, associated taxa (host), host family, country of collection, and accepted scientific name (Suppl. material 3: tables S3, S4). Records lacking information on habitat or associated taxa (host) were excluded from further analyses.

In total, 2,354 occurrence records for Apiospora and 1,785 for Nigrospora were obtained. Of these, 2,231 Apiospora records and 1,759 Nigrospora records contained country-level collection data and were retained for geographic analyses. Subsequent data processing, statistical analyses, and graphical visualization were conducted using R software.

Results

Phylogenetic analyses

For family Apiosporaceae (Fig. 1), a concatenated alignment comprising ITS (1–615), LSU (616–1361), tef1-α (1362–2368), and tub2 (2369–2613) loci was analyzed, including 194 strains with Neoarthrinium lithocarpicola (CFCC 54456 and CFCC 55883) designated as outgroup taxa. Eleven strains in this research were incorporated into the dataset. The ML topology served as the reference, with Bayesian posterior probabilities mapped onto corresponding branches. Both topologies were identical, and the best-scoring RAxML tree with a final ML optimization likelihood value of – 38398.438 is presented. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.232, C = 0.258, G = 0.256, T = 0.254; substitution rates AC = 1.17641, AG = 2.69166, AT = 1.17641, CG = 1.0, CT = 4.67220, GT = 1.0. The phylogenetic tree clearly demonstrates that the three genera Apiospora, Nigrospora, and Arthrinium within Apiosporaceae form distinct and well-separated clades.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Phylogenetic tree constructed using Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses based on the multilocus alignment (ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2) for Apiosporaceae. The outgroup is Neoarthrinium lithocarpicola (CFCC 54456 and CFCC 55883). Maximum likelihood bootstrap proportions ≥ 70% (left) and Bayesian inference posterior probability ≥ 0.8 (right) are indicated at nodes (ML/BI). The type strains are followed by “T” and bold. New species in this study are red, and new records and merged species are blue.

Phylogenetic analyses further revealed several instances of minimal or no genetic divergence among certain taxa; A. hispanica (IMI 326877) and A. mediterranea (IMI 326875) clustered together without detectable genetic distance. Similarly, A. vietnamensis (IMI 99670, KUMCC 21-0428, KUMCC 21-0429), A. malaysiana (CBS 102053, CBS 251.29), A. magnispora (ZHKUCC 22-0001T), and A. euphorbiae (IMI 285638b) formed a closely related cluster with little genetic divergence (ML/BI = 96/0.63). Apiospora jinanensis (SAUCC DL1981) and A. thailandica (MFLUCC 15-0202) grouped together with no genetic distance, as did A. sorghi (URM 93000) and A. taeanensis (KUC21322). Notably, Ar. sinense (HKUCC 3143) clusters within the Apiospora clade, suggesting potential taxonomic implications that may warrant further investigation.

The two phylogenetic trees of Apiospora and Nigrospora were conducted separately for each genus to more precisely determine their interrelationships. For Apiospora (Fig. 2), a concatenated alignment comprising ITS (1–466), LSU (467–1220), tef1-α (1221–1935), and tub2 (1936–2303) loci was analyzed, including 282 strains with Ne. lithocarpicola (CFCC 54456 and CFCC 55883) designated as outgroup taxa. The ML topology served as the reference, with Bayesian posterior probabilities mapped onto corresponding branches. Both topologies were identical, and the best-scoring RAxML tree with a final ML optimization likelihood value of – 29198.663 is presented. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.237, C = 0.250, G = 0.254, T = 0.259; substitution rates AC = 1.29435, AG = 3.16215, AT = 1.03614, CG = 0.85141, CT = 4.90526, GT = 1.0. Sequences from 15 isolates obtained in this study were incorporated into the dataset, forming six well-supported lineages within Apiospora, representing four new species (A. huaxiensis sp. nov., A. nanmingensis sp. nov., A. qingzhenensis sp. nov., and A. tongrenensis sp. nov.) and two known species (A. locuta-pollinis and A. setariae). Apiospora huaxiensis (GUCC 25-0068, GUCC 25-0069, and GUCC 25-0070) formed a sister clade with A. bambusirimae (GUCC12.51 and GUCC12.52) with high support (ML/BI = 100/1). Apiospora nanmingensis (GUCC 25-0087 and GUCC 25-0088), formed a sister clade with A. hysterina and A. sasae, with high support (ML/BI = 100/1). Apiospora qingzhenensis (GUCC 25-0077, GUCC 25-0078, GUCC 25-0079, GUCC 25-0080), formed a single clade with high support (ML/BI = 100/1). Apiospora tongrenensis (GUCC 25-0083 and GUCC 25-0084) formed a sister clade with A. saccharicola, with high support(ML/BI = 99/1). Apiospora locuta-pollinis and A. setariae each clustered separately from other strains of the species with high support values (ML/BI = 100/0.96 and ML/BI = 100/1). Arthrinium sinense (HKUCC 3143) clusters within the clade of A. bambusilentiginis, A. guizhouensis, A. armeniaca, A. elliptica, A. cannae, and A. sacchari with high support (ML/BI = 86/-). Apiospora hispanica (IMI 326877) and A. mediterranea (IMI 326875) clustered together on the phylogenetic tree with no genetic distance with a high support value (ML/BI = 100/0.93), which is consistent with the previous studies in Tian et al. (2021), Monkai et al. (2022), and Liao et al. (2023). Apiospora vietnamensis (IMI 99670, KUMCC 21-0428, KUMCC 21-0429), A. malaysiana (CBS 102053, CBS 251.29), A. magnispora (ZHKUCC 22-0001), and A. euphorbiae (IMI 285638b) clustered together with minimal genetic distance with a high support value (ML/BI = 100/1).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Phylogenetic tree constructed using Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses based on the multilocus alignment (ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2) for Apiospora. The outgroup is Neoarthrinium lithocarpicola (CFCC 54456 and CFCC 55883). Maximum likelihood bootstrap proportions ≥ 70% (left) and Bayesian inference posterior probability ≥ 0.8 (right) are indicated at nodes (ML/BI). The type strains are followed by “T” and bold. New species in this study are red, and new records and merged species are blue.

For Nigrospora (Fig. 3), phylogenetic relationships were inferred from a combined dataset of ITS (1–522), tef1-α (523–961), and tub2 (962–1752) loci, comprising 132 strains with A. pseudoparenchymatica (LC 7234) and A. malaysiana (CBS 102053) as outgroup taxa. The ML topology was used as the reference, with Bayesian posterior probabilities mapped onto corresponding branches, and the best-scoring RAxML tree with a final ML optimization likelihood value of – 17739.687 is presented. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.215, C = 0.306, G = 0.243, T = 0.237; substitution rates AC = 1.0, AG = 3.25843, AT = 1.0, CG = 1.0, CT = 4.42079, GT = 1.0. Twenty newly obtained isolates clustered into five well-supported lineages, representing one novel species (N. neosaccharicola sp. nov.) and four known species (N. chinensis, N. endophytica, N. osmanthi, and N. sphaerica). Nigrospora neosaccharicola (GUCC 25-0124, GUCC 25-0125, GUCC 25-0126, GUCC 25-0127, GUCC 25-0128, and GUCC 25-0129) formed a sister clade with N. saccharicola (CGMCC 3.19362 and LC 4241) with a high support value (ML/BI = 100/1). GUCC 25-0130, GUCC 25-0131, GUCC 25-0132, and GUCC 25-0133 clustered to the N. osmanthi clade with high support values (ML/BI = 100/1). GUCC 25-0122 and GUCC 25-0123 clustered to N. endophytica with high support values (ML/BI = 96/-). GUCC 25-0120 and GUCC 25-0121 clustered to N. chinensis with high support values (ML/BI = 100/1). GUCC 25-0134, GUCC 25-0135, GUCC 25-0136, GUCC 25-0137, GUCC 25-0138, and GUCC 25-0139 clustered to N. sphaerica with high support values (ML/BI = 100/1).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Phylogenetic tree constructed using Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses based on the multilocus alignment (ITS, tef1-α, and tub2) for Nigrospora. The outgroups are A. pseudoparenchymatica (LC 7234T) and A. malaysiana (CBS 102053). Maximum likelihood bootstrap proportions ≥ 70% (left) and Bayesian inference posterior probability ≥ 0.8 (right) are indicated at nodes (ML/BI). The type strains are followed by “T” and bold. New species discovered in this study are red, and new records are blue.

Host and geographical distribution of Apiospora and Nigrospora

According to GBIF data, based on host association, Poaceae represents the dominant host family for both genera (Fig. 4). For Apiospora, 1,710 records (72.64% of all host-associated records) were linked to Poaceae, with bamboo accounting for the largest proportion (868 records, 36.87% of all host-associated records). Additional host families with notable representation include Fabaceae, Cyperaceae, and Pinaceae. In contrast, 42 records were associated with non-plant substrates or atypical hosts, such as soil, animals, humans, and other fungi. Similarly, Nigrospora species were predominantly associated with Poaceae, comprising 697 records (39.05% of host-associated records). Additional host families with notable representation include Fabaceae, Rosaceae, and Asteraceae (Fig. 4). Regarding geographical distribution, Apiospora species are most frequently recorded in Europe, followed by Asia and North America (Fig. 5). In contrast, Nigrospora species are most widely reported from Asia, with Africa representing the second most recorded region (Fig. 5). At the country level, the highest numbers of Apiospora records originate from the USA, UK, and China (Fig. 6). For Nigrospora, the top three countries are China, India, and the USA (Fig. 6).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Host-substratum diversity of Apiospora (A) and Nigrospora (B) species according to GBIF.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Apiospora (A) and Nigrospora (B) species distribution by continent according to GBIF.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Distribution of Apiospora (A) and Nigrospora (B) species by countries according to GBIF.

Taxonomy

Apiosporaceae K.D. Hyde, et al. 1998.

Apiospora Sacc., Atti Soc. Veneto-Trent. Sci. Nat., Padova, Sér. 4 4: 85. 1875.

Apiospora hispanica

(Larrondo & Calvo) Pintos & P. Alvarado, Fungal Systematics and Evolution 7: 205. 2021.

B8C1FFC2-09C4-5AAD-9B92-CFAD670D68F8

837674

Basionym.

Arthrinium hispanicum Larrondo & Calvo, Mycologia 84(3): 476. 1992.

Synonyms.

Arthrinium mediterranei Larrondo & Calvo, Mycologia 84(3): 476. 1992.

Apiospora mediterranea (Larrondo & Calvo) Pintos & P. Alvarado, Fungal Systematics and Evolution 7: 206. 2021. syn. nov.

Substrate and distribution.

Beach sand and air, Spain (Larrondo and Calvo 1992).

Notes.

Arthrinium hispanicum was originally described by Larrondo and Calvo (1992) from maritime sand in Spain, while Ar. mediterranei was isolated from the air in the same region (Larrondo and Calvo 1992). The two taxa were morphologically distinguished primarily by conidial dimensions (7.5–8.5 × 6.2–7.6 µm vs. 9–9.5 × 7.5–9 µm, respectively). Pintos and Alvarado (2021) later clarified the relationship between Apiospora and Arthrinium, transferring both Ar. hispanicum and Ar. mediterranei to Apiospora based on multilocus phylogenetic analyses. However, they did not explicitly evaluate whether the two taxa represent a single species. Our phylogenetic analyses reveal that strains of A. hispanica (IMI 326877) and A. mediterranea (IMI 326875) form a single clade without genetic distinction. Comparative analyses of ITS, LSU, and tub2 sequences showed no nucleotide differences between the two species. Based on the congruence of morphological features and the molecular divergence, we accept A. hispanica as the correct name and regard A. mediterranea syn. nov. as its synonym.

Apiospora huaxiensis

J. E. Sun, X. C. Wang, K.D. Hyde & Yong Wang bis sp. nov.

1BB615FD-02B8-5B35-8A55-B8EBD48E2250

860108

Fig. 7

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Apiospora huaxiensis (GUCC 25-0068). A, B Appearance of the fungus on spot leaves of bamboo; C–H Upper view and reverse view of culture on PDA, MEA, CMA, SNA, WA, and OA after 7 days. (I) Close up of PDA culture with conidia; J, K Conidia with conidiogenous cells. (L) Conidia. (M) Conidia with germ slit. Scale bars: 100 μm (B); 10 μm (J–M).

Etymology.

The species name refers to the collected location, Huaxi District, Guizhou Province.

Holotype.

China • Guizhou Province, Guiyang City, Huaxi District, Huaxi Park, on the leaf spots of bamboo, 23 November 2023. X.C. Wang, HGUP 25-0006 (holotype); ex-type GUCC 25-0068.

Description.

Associated with the leaf spots of bamboo. Lesions are black and brown spots with yellow halos on leaves, subglobose and ellipsoidal in shape, measuring 250–700 μm in diam. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph: on PDA, Hyphae 2.4–4.1 μm wide, branched, septate, hyaline to pale green. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 3.6–6.5 × 2.3–5.8 μm (x̄ =5.2 × 3.2 μm, n=30), cylindrical or round, monoblastic, pale green. Conidia 13.8–17.6 × 11.3–16.4 μm (x̄ =15.8 × 13.7 μm, n=30), globose to ellipsoidal granules, pale green to dark brown, with longitudinal germ-slit.

Culture characteristics.

After 7 days at 25°C, on PDA, colonies reach 70–74 mm in diam., with irregular margins, flat, cottony, dense aerial mycelia, pale red coloration, and a red reverse; they produce scarlet pigment. On MEA, colonies reach 88–90 mm diam., with regular margins, flat, dense, floccose, surface pale salmon and reverse salmon. On CMA, colonies reach 85–87 mm diam., cottony, flat, dense, irregular margins with aerial mycelia, surface straw, and reverse pale luteous. On SNA, colonies reach 55–59 mm diam., flat, spreading, with sparse aerial mycelia and regular margin, surface and reverse white. On WA, colonies reach 22–26 mm diam., flat, aerial mycelia scant, surface and reverse white. On OA, colonies reach 72–74 mm diam., flat, cottony, with regular floccose margin, surface pale ochreous and reverse umber middle area and pale-yellow outer area. Sporulation was abundant only on PDA after 14 days.

Material examined.

China • Guizhou Province, Guiyang City, Huaxi District, Huaxi Park, on the leaf spots of bamboo, 23 November 2023, X.C. Wang, HGUP 25-0006 (holotype); GUCC 25-0068 (ex-type), GUCC 25-0069 and GUCC 25-0070.

Notes.

Apiospora huaxiensis (GUCC 25-0068, GUCC 25-0069, and GUCC 25-0070) formed a sister clade to A. bambusirimae (GUCC 12.51) with strong statistical support (100% ML/1.0 BI) (Fig. 2). Morphologically, the conidia of A. huaxiensis are smaller than those of A. bambusirimae (x̄ = 15.8 × 13.7 μm vs. x̄ = 20.5 × 13 μm; Yu et al. 2025). In culture, A. huaxiensis produced reddish pigment on PDA after 3 days, whereas A. bambusirimae did not on the same cultivation conditions (Yu et al. 2025). Moreover, pairwise sequence comparisons between the two species revealed nucleotide differences of 2.34% in ITS (11/469 bp, including six gaps) and 2.65% in tef1-α (12/453 bp, including nine gaps).

Apiospora locuta-pollinis

(F. Liu & L. Cai) Pintos & P. Alvarado, Fungal Systematics and Evolution 7: 206. 2021.

0A314D1F-8365-5336-894A-8283350FD193

837763

Fig. 8

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Apiospora locuta-pollinis (GUCC 25-0071). A Appearance of the fungus on leaves of maize; B–G Upper view and reverse view of culture on PDA, MEA, CMA, SNA, WA, and OA after 7 days; H, O Close up of WA; H and SNA; O cultures with conidia; I–M Conidia with conidiogenous cells on WA; N coiled hyphae on WA; P–U Conidia with conidiogenous cells on SNA. Scale bars: 100 μm (H, O); 10 μm (I–N, P–U).

Basionym.

Arthrinium locutum-pollinis F. Liu & L. Cai [as ‘locuta-pollinis’], in Zhao, Zhang et al., Mycosphere 9(6): 1094. 2018.

Synonym.

Arthrinium pseudomarii T.Z. Chen, Yong Wang bis & K.D. Hyde, in Chen, Zhang et al., Mycotaxon 136(1): 191. 2021.

Substrate and distribution.

On hive-stored pollen, Hubei Province, China (Zhao et al. 2018); Aristolochia debilis, China (Chen et al. 2021); Bamboo, China (Monkai et al. 2022); Musa sp., Thailand (Samarakoon et al. 2024); grass, China (Gao et al. 2025).

Description.

Associated with the leaf spots of maize. Lesions are yellow spots with pale brown halos on leaves, subglobose and spindle-shaped in shape, measuring 300–1000 μm in diam. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph: on WA, Hyphae 2.1–4.1 μm wide, occasionally coiled, septate, branched hyphae, hyaline. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 3.9–5.1 × 1.9–3.2 μm (x̄ = 4.2 × 2.1 μm, n = 30), subglobose to ampulliform, mostly polyblastic, hyaline to pale green. Conidia 4.2–10.1 × 3.9–8.7 μm (x̄ = 7.7 × 5.9 μm, n = 30), globose to subglobose, smooth-walled, pale green when immature, brown when mature. On SNA, Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 3.5–8.2 × 2.1–4.2 μm (x̄ = 4.9× 2.7 μm, n = 30), subglobose to ampulliform, mostly polyblastic, pale green. Conidia 4.8–13.9 × 3.7–7.6 μm (x̄ = 8.2× 6.2 μm, n = 30), globose, subcylindrical to ovate, smooth, brown.

Culture characteristics.

After 7 days at 25°C, on PDA, colonies reach 88–90 mm in diam., flat, cottony, with regular margins; surface pale straw, reverse salmon. On MEA, colonies reach 70–74 mm diam., flat, with regular margins, surface, and reverse white. On CMA, colonies reaching 56–58 mm in diam., flat, with regular margins, surface, and reverse white. On SNA, colonies reach 77–79 mm in diam., flat, spreading, with scant aerial mycelia, and a regular margin, surface, and reverse that are white. On WA, colonies reach 42–45 mm diam., flat, spreading, with irregular margins, aerial mycelia scant, surface and reverse white. On OA, colonies reach 81–84 mm diam., circular, flat, cottony, with regular margin, surface white and reverse pale saffron. Sporulation was abundant on WA and SNA after 14 days.

Material examined.

• Guizhou Province, Liupanshui City, leaf spot on Zea mays, 16 September 2024, X.C. Wang, HGUP 25-0058; GUCC 25-0071; • ibid. GUCC 25-0072.

Notes.

GUCC 25-0071 and GUCC 25-0072 clustered with A. locuta-pollinis (LC 11683). Morphologically, the new collections also closely resemble A. locuta-pollinis (LC 11683), with globose to subglobose conidia (x̄ = 7.7 × 5.9 μm vs. x̄ = 7.1 × 6.4 μm) and subglobose to ampulliform conidiogenous cells (x̄ = 4.2 × 2.1 μm vs. x̄ = 4.9 × 3.8 μm) (Zhao et al. 2018). Nucleotide comparison with LC 11683 revealed that only tef1-α exhibited two nucleotide differences (2/430). Therefore, strains GUCC 25-0071 and GUCC 25-0072 are identified as A. locuta-pollinis. This is the first report of A. locuta-pollinis isolated from maize.

Apiospora nanmingensis

X. C. Wang, S. Q. Guo, K.D. Hyde & Yong Wang bis sp. nov.

E3288603-4944-526E-8BF5-08EDF78B43F7

861263

Fig. 9

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Apiospora nanmingensis (GUCC 25-0087). A Appearance of the fungus on stem of bamboo; B Conidiomata on host; C–H Upper view and reverse view of culture on PDA, MEA, CMA, SNA, WA, and OA after 7 days; I Close up of SNA culture with conidia; J–Q Conidia with conidiogenous cells on SNA; R Conidia. Scale bars: 100 μm (B, I); 10 μm (J–R).

Etymology.

This species was named according to the location where the fungus was first collected, Nanming District, Guiyang City, Guizhou Province.

Holotype.

China • Guizhou Province, Guiyang City, Nanming District, Guiyang Forest Park, on the stem of bamboo, 1 April 2024. X.C. Wang, HGUP 25-0053 (holotype); ex-type GUCC 25-0087.

Description.

Isolated from decaying stems of bamboo. On the host, Conidiomata punctiform, brown, 150–400 µm × 125–200 µm (n = 30). Conidia 9.2 × 15.2–7.4 × 13.2 μm (x̄ = 13.2 × 11.4 μm, n=30), globose to subglobose, brown. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph: on SNA, Hyphae1.5–3.8 µm wide, branched, septate, smooth, hyaline. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 3.9–11.3 × 2.5–3.9 μm (x̄ = 6.8 × 3.1 μm, n=30), cylindrical to globose, monoblastic to mostly polyblastic, aggregated, hyaline to pale green. Conidia 7.6–10.4 × 6.9–10.1 μm (x̄ = 8.9 × 7.5 μm, n=30), globose, subglobose to lenticular, with longitudinal germ slit, pale green to brown.

Culture characteristics.

Colonies for 7 days at 25°C: On PDA, colonies reach 88–90 mm diam., flat, spreading, with irregular margins, dense aerial mycelia, surface white and reverse pale salmon center and white margin. On MEA, colonies reach 57–60 mm diam., flat, floccose, cottony, with regular margins, surface and reverse white. On CMA, colonies reach 77–80 mm diam., flat, with regular margins, spreading, with moderate aerial mycelia, surface and reverse pale salmon. On SNA, colonies reach 87–90 mm diam., flat, aerial mycelia scant, with regular margins, surface and reverse white. On WA, colonies reach 63–65 mm diam., flat, aerial mycelia scant, with regular margins, surface and reverse white. On OA, colonies reach 70–72 mm diam., cottony, with dense aerial mycelia, regular margins, surface white and reverse pale straw. Sporulation was abundant only on SNA after 14 days.

Material examined.

China • Guizhou Province, Guiyang City, Nanming District, Guiyang Forest Park, on the stem of bamboo, 1 April 2024. X.C. Wang, HGUP 25-0053 (holotype); GUCC 25-0087 (ex-type), GUCC 25-0088.

Notes.

Based on the phylogenetic analyses, the two strains obtained in this study, GUCC 25-0087 and GUCC 25-0088, formed a distinct, well-supported lineage (100% ML/1.0 BI) with A. hysterina, A. sasae, and A. yunnana (Fig. 2). Morphologically, our strains can be readily distinguished from these closely related taxa by their smaller conidia, which measure 7.6–10.4 × 6.9–10.1 µm (vs. 15–18 × 14–16.5 µm in A. hysterina; Kwon et al. 2022; Saccardo 1893;17–18 × 16–17 µm in A. sasae; Crous et al. 2021; and 17.5–26.5 × 15.5–25 µm in A. yunnana; Dai et al. 2017). The conidiogenous cells are likewise smaller than those of A. yunnana (3.9–11.3 × 2.5–3.9 µm vs. 16.5–50 × 2–4 µm). Interestingly, in this clade, the shape and size of the conidia of A. hysterina, A. sasae, and A. yunnana are relatively similar, whereas the conidia of A. nanmingensis that we identified differ significantly in shape and size from those of the other species, whether observed on the host or on culture media. Apiospora species are variable in morphological characteristics depending on growth conditions, and molecular and phylogenetic analysis are the key to recognize species in this genus. Pairwise sequence comparisons revealed that strains GUCC 25-0087 and GUCC 25-0088 differ from A. hysterina (ICPM 6889) by 2.72% in ITS (14/441 bp, including two gaps), 1.86% in tef1-α (8/430 bp, four gaps), and 1.19% in tub2 (9/758 bp, one gap). Comparisons with A. sasae (CBS 146808) showed divergences of 2.02% in ITS (10/496 bp, three gaps) and 1.55% in tub2 (12/773 bp). Comparisons with A. yunnana (MFLUCC 15-1002) showed divergences of 4.77% in ITS (26/545 bp, seven gaps) and 0.34% in LSU (3/875 bp, one gap).

Apiospora qingzhenensis

X.C. Wang, K.D. Hyde & Yong Wang bis sp. nov.

5122DDF4-296D-5F00-971D-5CA83CCB81FC

860112

Fig. 10

Figure 10.

Figure 10.

Apiospora qingzhenensis (GUCC 25-0077). A, B Appearance of the fungus on leaf spots of bamboo; C–H Upper view and reverse view of culture on PDA, MEA, CMA, SNA, WA, and OA after 7 days; I, O Close up of WA; I and SNA; O cultures with conidia; J–M Conidia with conidiogenous cells on WA; N Conidia on WA; P, Q Conidia with conidiogenous cells on SNA; R Conidia and sterile cell on SNA; S Conidia on SNA. Scale bars: 100 μm (B, I, O); 10 μm (J–N, P–S).

Etymology.

The name refers to Qingzhen City in Guizhou Province, where the fungus was collected.

Holotype.

China • Guizhou Province, Qingzhen City, on the leaves of bamboo with spots, 18 January 2024, X.C. Wang, HGUP 25-0008 (holotype); ex-type GUCC 25-0077.

Description.

Associated with bamboo leaf spots. Lesions are black spots on leaves, subglobose in shape, measuring 250–620 μm in diam. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph: On WA, Hyphae 2.1–5.9 μm in diam, branched, septate, hyaline. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 4.1–6.3 × 2.1–5.7 μm (x̄ = 5.7 × 3.6 μm, n=30), cylindrical, mostly polyblastic, aggregated, hyaline or pale green. Conidia 7.1–17.5 × 6.0–11.4 μm (x̄ = 10.7 × 8.7 μm, n=30), globose, subglobose to ovate with a straight germ-slit along spore length, green to dark brown. On SNA, Conidiogenous cells 5.2–8.3 × 2.7–6.1 μm (x̄ = 6.1 × 3.9 μm, n=30), cylindrical, mostly polyblastic, aggregated, hyaline or pale green. Conidia 6.5–14.3 × 6.0–12.4 μm (x̄ = 11.8 × 9.3 μm, n=30), globose to subglobose, pale green for immature and dark brown for mature. Sterile cells extremely rare, pale brown, rolled up, irregularly lobed.

Culture characteristics.

Colonies for 7 days at 25°C: On PDA, colonies reach 90 mm diam., flat, spreading, cottony, dense aerial mycelia, with regular margins, surface, and reverse pale flesh. On MEA, colonies reach 77–80 mm diam., flat, with moderate aerial mycelia, irregular margins, surface white, and reverse center pale salmon, with margin white. On CMA, colonies reach mm 71–74 diam., flat, spreading, with moderate aerial mycelia, regular margins, surface and reverse pale salmon. On SNA, colonies reach 90 mm diam., flat, aerial mycelia scant, with regular margins, surface and reverse pale white. On WA, colonies reach 53–57 mm diam., flat, aerial mycelia scant, regular margins filamentous, surface and reverse white. On OA, colonies reach 81–84 mm diam., floccose, flat, spreading, with dense aerial mycelia, regular margins, surface white and reverse pale salmon. Sporulation was abundant on WA and SNA after 14 days.

Material examined.

China • Guizhou Province, Qingzhen City, on the leaves of bamboo with spots, 18 January 2024, X.C. Wang, HGUP 25-0008 (holotype); GUCC 25-0077 (ex-type), GUCC 25-0078, GUCC 25-0079, and GUCC 25-0080.

Notes.

Based on phylogenetic analyses (Fig. 2), four strains (GUCC 25-0077, GUCC 25-0078, GUCC 25-0079, and GUCC 25-0080) formed a distinct and well-supported clade within Apiosporasensu stricto. The closest related species are A. zhaotongensis, A. zhenxiongensis, and A. bambusiparasitica. Since A. zhaotongensis and A. zhenxiongensis have been reported only from their sexual morphs (Han et al. 2024), morphological comparisons were made solely with A. bambusiparasitica. Morphologically, the new species differs from A. bambusiparasitica by having smaller conidiogenous cells (4.1–6.3 × 2.1–5.7 μm vs. 7–17 × 2.0–4.5 μm) and slightly larger conidia (x̄ = 10.7 × 8.7 μm vs. x̄ = 9.2 ± 0.9 × 8.1 ± 1.1 μm; Chang et al. 2025). Occasionally, pale brown, elongated sterile cells can be observed in our species. Furthermore, pairwise sequence comparisons across four gene regions revealed clear nucleotide differences between the new species and its closest relatives. The new strains differ from A. zhaotongensis (GMBCC 1015) by 4.34% in tub2 (21/484 bp, including seven gaps) and 5.66% in tef1-α (25/442 bp, including five gaps); from A. zhenxiongensis (GMBCC 1017) by 5.15% in tub2 (25/485 bp, including eight gaps) and 5.67% in tef1-α (25/441 bp, including five gaps); and from A. bambusiparasitica (RCEF 20003) by 4.72% in tub2 (23/487 bp, including ten gaps) and 6.39% in tef1-α (28/438 bp, including six gaps).

Apiospora setariae

(C.M. Tian & N. Jiang) X.G. Tian & Tibpromma, Life 11(no. 1071): 19. 2021.

2046CA96-5EC6-59E2-AF86-9CF13455A6F2

558561

Fig. 11

Figure 11.

Figure 11.

Apiospora setariae (GUCC 25-0081). A Appearance of the fungus on stem of bamboo stems; B Stromata on bamboo stems; C–H Upper view and reverse view of culture on PDA, MEA, CMA, SNA, WA, and OA after 7 days; I Transverse sections of the stromata; J, K Peridium; L Asci; M–P Ascospores. Scale bar: 100 μm (B, I); 20 μm (J–L); 10 μm (M–P).

Basionym.

Arthrinium setariae C.M. Tian & N. Jiang, in Jiang & Tian, Phytotaxa 484(2): 153. 2020.

Substrate and distribution.

Setaria viridis, China (Jiang and Tian 2021).

Description.

Associated with decaying stems of bamboo. Sexual morph: Stromata 400–1250 × 270–495 μm (n = 30), solitary to gregarious, partially immersed to erumpent, fusiform, raised on the host surface, with a slit-like opening, multi-loculate. Ascomata 70–240 μm (n = 30) diam., uniseriate or irregularly arranged beneath stromata, globose to subglobose. Peridium 5–20 μm (n = 30) thick, composed of 3–5 layers of brown to hyaline cells arranged in textura angularis. Hamathecium not observed. Asci 67.1–91.6 × 10.1–20.4 μm (x̄ = 79.9 × 15 μm, n = 30), 8-spored, broadly cylindrical, with an indistinct pedicel. Ascospores 22.9–29.4 × 6.9–10.9 μm (x̄ = 25.9 × 9 μm, n = 30), broadly ellipsoidal, composed of a large upper cell and a small lower cell, hyaline to pale green, smooth-walled. Asexual morph: refer to (Jiang and Tian 2021).

Culture characteristics—Colonies for 7 days at 25°C: On PDA, colonies reaching 88–90 mm diam., flat, spreading, dense aerial mycelia, with regular margins, surface and reverse scarlet, produce scarlet pigment. On MEA, colonies reach 55–58 mm diam., flat, spreading, with irregular margins, surface and reverse center scarlet and margin white, produce reddish pigment. On CMA, colonies reach 31–33 mm diam., flat, aerial mycelia scant, regular margins, surface and reverse white. On SNA, colonies reach 41–43 mm diam., flat, aerial mycelia scant, regular margins, surface and reverse white. On WA, colonies reach 30–32 mm diam., flat, aerial mycelia scant, regular margins, surface and reverse white. On OA, colonies reach 44–47 mm diam., flat, cottony, dense aerial mycelia, with regular margins, surface white and reverse salmon. Sporulation was absent on any medium after 14 days.

Material examined.

China • Guizhou Province, Guiyang City, Huaxi District, Huaxi Park, on the decaying bamboo stems, 17 April 2024, X.C. Wang, HGUP 25-0059; GUCC 25-0081 and GUCC 25-0082.

Notes.

In phylogenetic analyses, the newly generated strains in this study, GUCC 25-0081 and GUCC 25-0082, clustered with A. setariae (strains CFCC 54041 and beilin024) with ML/BI = 100/1 (Fig. 2). Morphologically, our new collections are very similar to A. setariae in the asci size (67.1–91.6 × 10.1–20.4 μm vs. 60–95 × 15–21 μm) and ascospores (22.9–29.4 × 6.9–10.9 μm vs. 18–23 × 8–11 μm, Jiang and Tian 2021). Therefore, both collections are identified as A. setariae. Previously, A. setariae was reported only from decaying culms of Setaria viridis (Jiang and Tian 2021). The comparison of nucleotide differences between strain GUCC 25-0081 and the type strain of A. setariae (CFCC 54041T) revealed clear sequence divergence: 0.69% in ITS (4/583 bp, including one gap), 0.41% in tub2 (3/730 bp, including one gap), and 0.46% in tef1-α (2/439 bp, no gaps). In this study, the species was isolated from bamboo stems, representing a new host record for A. setariae.

Apiospora sinense

K.D. Hyde, J. Fröhl. & Joanne E. Taylor, Sydowia 50(1): 27. 1998 syn. nov.

12F85AAE-322C-5344-9B79-DFBFD131F025

816836

Synonym.

Arthrinium sinense (K.D. Hyde, J. Fröhl. & Joanne E. Taylor) Crous & J.Z. Groenew., in Réblová et al., IMA Fungus 7(1): 140. 2016.

Substrate and distribution.

On dead petiole of Trachycarpus fortunei, Hubei Province, China (Hyde 1998).

Morphological description.

refer to Hyde et al. (1998).

Notes.

Apiospora sinensis was described initially from dead petiole of Trachycarpus fortunei by Hyde et al. (1998). Due to uncertainty regarding the taxonomic boundaries between Apiospora and Arthrinium, Crous and Groenewald in 2016 subsequently transferred this species to Arthrinium based on phylogenetic analysis (Réblová et al. 2016). Pintos and Alvarado (2021) clarified the generic delimitation between Apiospora and Arthrinium, and reassigned most species previously placed in Arthrinium to Apiospora. Currently, only LSU sequence data (AY083831) is available for this species in GenBank. In our phylogenetic analyses, Ar. sinensis (HKUCC 3143) clustered within Apiosporasensu stricto and formed an independent branch distinct from other taxa. Compared to the reported morphology of this species, its asexual form, the conidia, exhibit the following characteristics: 9–12 × 6–8 μm, mainly rounded in face view, mainly lenticular, brown, with an equatorial germ slit, smooth (Hyde et al. 1998), which shares the same conidial characteristics as those reported for Apiospora (Pintos and Alvarado 2021). Therefore, Ar. sinense is reinstated in Apiospora to accommodate this taxon.

Apiospora tongrenensis

S.Q. Guo, X.C. Wang, K.D. Hyde & Yong Wang bis sp. nov.

4FF98D5A-A06B-55AB-BA61-F8085117334B

860113

Fig. 12

Figure 12.

Figure 12.

Apiospora tongrenensis (GUCC 25-0083). A Collecting location; B Appearance of the fungus on spot leaves of bamboo; C–H Upper view and reverse view of culture on PDA, MEA, CMA, SNA, WA, and OA after 7 days; I Close up of SNA culture with conidia. (J, L, O–Q) Conidia with conidiogenous cells on SNA. (K, M, N) Elongated conidia (sterile cells) with conidiogenous cells on SNA; R Conidia; S Elongated conidia (sterile cells). Scale bars: 100 μm (B); 10 μm (J–S).

Etymology.

Named according to Tongren, Guizhou Province, China, where the species was collected.

Holotype.

China • Guizhou Province, Tongren City, Foding Mountain, leaf spots on bamboo, 10 July 2024, S.Q. Guo, HGUP 25-0009 (holotype), ex-type living culture GUCC 25-0083.

Description.

Associated with leaf spots on bamboo. Lesions as pale-yellow spots on leaves, subglobose and ellipsoidal in shape, measuring 500–2000 × 240–1200 μm. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph: On SNA, Hyphae 1.9–3.6 μm wide, branched, coiled hyphae, septate, hyaline to pale green. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 6–18.4 × 3.1–6.6 μm (x̄ = 12.4 × 4.2 μm, n=30), cylindrical, aggregated, monoblastic to polyblastic, smooth, hyaline or brown. Conidia immature pale green, mature brownish, smooth-walled, globose or subglobose, 10–14.9 × 8.5–11.4 μm (x̄ = 13 × 9.7 μm, n=30), sometimes with longitudinal germ slit. Elongated conidia (sterile cells) pale brown, elongate, 17.6–32.5 × 4.5–8.8 μm (x̄ = 22.3 × 6.9 μm, n=30).

Culture characteristics.

Colonies after 7 days at 25°C: On PDA, colonies reach 90 mm diam., flat, spreading, dense aerial mycelia, with regular margins, surface white and reverse pale salmon. On MEA, colonies reach 80–82 mm diam., flat, cottony, dense aerial mycelia, with regular margins, surface white and reverse pale salmon. On CMA, colonies reach 77–80 mm diam., flat, spreading, with regular margins, surface white, and reverse pale salmon. On SNA, colonies reach 83–85 mm diam., flat, aerial mycelia scant, regular margins filamentous, surface and reverse white. On WA, colonies reach 47–50 mm diam., flat, center dense aerial mycelia, and margin scant, surface and reverse white. On OA, colonies reach 64–67 mm diam., flat, cottony, dense aerial mycelia, with regular margins, surface white and reverse salmon. Sporulation was abundant only on SNA after 14 days.

Material examined.

China • Guizhou Province, Tongren City, Foding Mountain, leaf spots on bamboo, 10 July 2024, S.Q. Guo, HGUP 25-0009 (holotype); GUCC 25-0083 (ex-type), GUCC 25-0083 and GUCC 25-0084.

Notes.

Phylogenetic analyses (Fig. 2) revealed that the new species, A. tongrenensis (GUCC 25-0083 and GUCC 25-0084) formed a distinct and well-supported branch with A. saccharicola (99% ML/1.0 BI). Morphologically, the two species are clearly different, with A. tongrenensis possessing larger conidiogenous cells (6–18.4 × 3.1–6.6 μm vs. 5–12 × 2.5–4 μm; Crous and Groenewald 2013). The conidia of A. tongrenensis are also larger than those of A. saccharicola (Crous and Groenewald 2013). Pairwise sequence comparisons between A. tongrenensis (GUCC 25-0083) and A. saccharicola (CBS 191.73) revealed nucleotide differences of 1% in ITS (6/600, no gaps), 0.82% in LSU (10/1225, no gaps), 3.47% in tub2 (28/806, including six gaps), and 0.92% in tef1-α (4/435 bp, no gaps).

Apiospora vietnamensis

(Hol.-Jech.) Pintos & P. Alvarado, Fungal Syst. Evol. 7: 207. 2021.

7D2B2152-B4C6-57DE-87D3-4FC1C946A6D4

837737

Basionym.

Nigrospora vietnamensis Hol.-Jech., Česká Mykol. 17(1): 19. 1963.

Synonyms.

Arthrinium euphorbiae M.B. Ellis, Mycol. Pap. 103: 6. 1965.

Arthrinium malaysianum Crous, in Crous & Groenewald, IMA Fungus 4(1): 144. 2013. syn. nov.

Arthrinium vietnamense (Hol.-Jech.) Mei Wang & L. Cai [as ‘vietnamensis’], in Wang, Liu, et al., Persoonia 39: 139. 2017. syn. nov.

Apiospora euphorbiae (M.B. Ellis) X.G. Tian & Tibpromma, in Tian, Karunarathna, et al., Life 11(no. 1071): 17. 2021. syn. nov.

Apiospora malaysiana (Crous) Pintos & P. Alvarado, Fungal Syst. Evol. 7: 206. 2021. syn. nov.

Apiospora magnispora H.J. Zhao, Manawas. & W. Dong, in Zhao, Dong, et al., Curr. Res. Envir. & App. Myc. 13(1): 9. 2023. syn. nov.

Substrate and distribution.

On decayed fruit of Citrus sinensis, Czech Republic (Holubová-Jechová 1963); On dead stems of Euphorbia, Zambia (Ellis 1965); Macaranga hullettii, Malaysia (Crous and Groenewald 2013); Cinnamomum camphora (Crous and Groenewald 2013); Ficus septica, Taiwan (China) (Tennakoon et al. 2021); Bambusa textilis, China (Zhao et al. 2023); Bats, China (Liu et al. 2023b). Other distributions such as Vietnam, Indonesia, Brazil, Portugal, India, United Kingdom, and The United Republic of Tanzania record in GBIF.

Notes.

The species A. vietnamensis was originally described as N. vietnamensis from decayed fruit of Citrus sinensis (Jechová 1963) and later transferred to Arthrinium by Wang et al. (2017) before being reclassified under Apiospora based on DNA sequence data (Pintos and Alvarado 2021). Our phylogenetic analyses indicate that A. vietnamensis, A. euphorbiae, A. malaysiana, and A. magnispora form a single clade without evident genetic divergence (Fig. 2). Pairwise sequence comparisons further reveal negligible nucleotide differences among the type strains of these species. Morphologically, A. euphorbiae (Ellis 1965; Tian et al. 2021), A. malaysiana (Crous & Groenewald, 2013), and A. vietnamensis (Wang et al. 2017) share nearly identical conidial dimensions (4–5.5 × 3–4 µm, 5–6 × 3–4 µm, and 5–6 × 3–4 µm, respectively). In contrast, A. magnispora produces distinctly larger conidia (20–35 × 15–25 µm; Zhao et al. 2023), which may represent host-associated morphological plasticity rather than a taxonomically meaningful difference. Pairwise sequence comparisons revealed that type strain IMI 99670T of A. vietnamensis differs from A. malaysiana (CBS 102053T) by 0.18% in ITS (1/570 bp, no gaps), 0.12% in LSU (1/812 bp, one gap), and no differences in tub2. Comparisons with A. euphorbiae (IMI 285638b) showed divergences of 0.18% in ITS (1/520 bp, no gaps), 0.31% in LSU (1/318 bp), and no difference in tub2. Comparisons with A. magnispora (ZHKUCC 22-0001T) showed divergences of 0.18% in ITS (1/570 bp, no gaps), 0.12% in LSU (1/812 bp, one gap), and no differences in tub2. Given the absence of genetic differentiation and the strong morphological congruence among these taxa, we consider A. euphorbiae, A. malaysiana, and A. magnispora to be conspecific with A. vietnamensis, and thus propose them as its synonyms.

Nigrospora Zimm., Centbl. Bakt. ParasitKde, Abt. II 8: 220 (1902).

Nigrospora chinensis

Mei Wang & L. Cai, in Wang, Liu, et al., Persoonia 39: 129. 2017.

57ED8FD0-92F9-58B0-86A4-EB51185AA911

820732

Fig. 13

Figure 13.

Figure 13.

Nigrospora chinensis (GUCC 25-0120) A Appearance of the fungus on leaves of Juglans regia; B–G Upper view and reverse view of culture on PDA, MEA, CMA, SNA, WA, and OA after 7 days; H Close up of SNA culture with conidia; I–P Conidia with conidiogenous cells on SNA. Scale bars: 100 μm (H); 10 μm (I–P).

Substrate and distribution.

Found mostly in China on Zanthoxylum bungeanum (Cheng et al. 2025); dragon fruit (Guo et al. 2024); Camellia oleifera (Qin et al. 2021); rice, (Liu et al. 2024c); Camellia sinensis, Musa paradisiaca, Lindera aggregate, Aucuba japonica, Machilus duthiei, Osmanthus sp., Quercus sp., Smilax ocreata, (Wang et al. 2017). And on Eleiodoxa conferta, Thailand (Karimi et al. 2025).

Description.

Associated with leaf spots on Juglans regia. Circular or irregular lesions, ranging from yellowish-brown to dark brown, primarily concentrated along the leaf margins. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph: On SNA, Hyphae 2.5–5.1 µm wide, hyphae, branched, septate, hyaline to pale green, smooth. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 5.4–9.5 × 4.8–6.1 µm (x̄ = 7.4 × 5.3 μm, n=30), ampulliform to subglobose, monoblastic, hyaline. Conidia 10.3–13.5 × 8.5–12.8 µm (x̄ = 11.9 × 10.3 μm, n=30), globose to subglobose, solitary, aseptate, black, smooth-walled, rarely longitudinal germ-slit.

Culture characteristics.

Colonies after 7 days at 25 °C: On PDA, colonies reach mm 90 diam., flat, spreading, with regular margins, surface white and reverse pale salmon. On MEA, colonies reach 88–90 mm diam., flat, spreading, with regular margins, surface and reverse white. On CMA, colonies reach 70–72 mm diam., floccose, spreading, with regular margins, surface and reverse white. On SNA, colonies reach 85–87 mm diam., flat, spreading, with regular margins, surface and reverse white. On WA, colonies reach 53–57 mm diam., flat, spreading, with erose margin, surface and reverse white. On OA, colonies reach 90 mm diam., flat, cottony, with regular margins, surface pale mouse grey and reverse pale salmon. Sporulation was abundant only on SNA after 14 days.

Material examined.

China • Guizhou Province, Tongren City, Dejiang County, on the diseased leaves of Juglans regia with spots, 5 May 2024, M.T. Zou, HGUP 25-0060; living cultures GUCC 25-0120 and GUCC 25-0121.

Notes.

Our phylogenetic analysis revealed that the two strains GUCC 25-0120 and GUCC 25-0121 clustered together with N. chinensis, showing no significant genetic distance and high support rates (100% ML/1.0 BI; Fig. 3). Morphological comparison indicated that the characteristics of our strains are consistent with those reported for N. chinensis with the size of conidia and conidiogenous cells (Wang et al. 2017). This species is reported for the first time on the leaves of Juglans regia.

Nigrospora endophytica

A.C.Q. Brito & A.R. Machado, in Brito, Mello, et al., Mycological Progress 22(6, no. 37): 5. 2023.

B5809F7E-410E-5E2B-933D-EE12653B7682

845749

Fig. 14

Figure 14.

Figure 14.

Nigrospora endophytica (GUCC 25-0122) A Appearance of the fungus on leaves of Juglans regia; B–G Upper view and reverse view of culture on PDA, MEA, CMA, SNA, WA, and OA after 7 days; H Close up of SNA culture with conidia; I–L Conidia with conidiogenous cells on SNA. Scale bars: 100 μm (H); 10 μm (I–L).

Substrate and distribution.

Manihot esculenta, Brazil (de Queiroz Brito et al. 2023).

Description.

Associated with leaf spots on Juglans regia. Circular or irregular lesions, ranging from yellowish-brown to dark brown. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph: On SNA, Hyphae 1.5–4 µm wide, hyphae, ranched, sometimes coiled, septate, hyaline or pale green to dark brown. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 7.4–9.1 × 4.9–7.8 µm (x̄ = 8.2 × 6.2 μm, n=30), ampulliform to subglobose, solitary, monoblastic, pale green. Conidia 11.1–16.3 × 7.4–13.4 µm (x̄ = 13.6 × 10.9 μm, n=30), subglobose, solitary, aseptate, pale brown to black, smooth.

Culture characteristics.

Colonies for 7 days at 25 °C: On PDA, colonies reach 90 mm diam., flat, spreading, with regular margins, surface center fuscous black and margin white, reverse center black and margin pale salmon. On MEA, colonies reach 90 mm diam., flat, spreading, with regular margins, surface center and reverse vinaceous grey and margin greyish lilac. On CMA, colonies reach 90 mm diam., flat spreading, with regular margins, surface, and reverse greyish lilac. On SNA, colonies reaching 90 mm diam., flat, aerial mycelia scant, regular margins filamentous, surface and reverse pale vinaceous grey. On WA, colonies reach 40–42 mm diam., flat, aerial mycelia scant, with erose margin, surface and reverse greyish. On OA, colonies reach 90 mm diam., flat, spreading, with regular margins, surface greyish lilac and reverse center black and margin pale grey. Sporulation was abundant only on SNA after 14 days.

Material examined.

China • Yunnan Province, Lincang City, on the diseased leaves of Juglans regia with spots, 21 June 2024, M.T. Zou, HGUP 25-0061; GUCC 25-0122 and GUCC 25-0123.

Notes.

Our phylogenetic analysis indicated that strains GUCC 25-0122 and GUCC 25-0123 clustered together with N. endophytica (strains A.R.M 973 and A.R.M 687) with statistical support (96% ML/0.69 BI) (Fig. 3). Comparison of nucleotide differences between GUCC 25-0122 and N. endophytica (A.R.M 973) revealed minor variations: 0.83% in ITS (4/481bp, including one gap), 1.05% in tef1-α (5/478 bp, including one gap), and 0.05% in tub2 (2/405 bp, without gaps). Although slight sequence differences were observed, the morphological characteristics of our strains are closely similar to those of N. endophytica (de Queiroz Brito et al. 2023). Therefore, strains GUCC 25-0122 and GUCC 25-0123 are identified as N. endophytica. Previously, N. endophytica was reported only as an endophyte from the stem tissue of Manihot esculenta (de Queiroz Brito et al. 2023). This study represents the first record of this species from J. regia leaves, indicating a new host association.

Nigrospora neosaccharicola

M. T. Zou, X. C. Wang, K.D. Hyde & Yong Wang bis sp. nov.

41880857-C8AB-5139-A19A-60DB52983537

860114

Fig. 15

Figure 15.

Figure 15.

Nigrospora neosaccharicola (GUCC 25-0124) A Appearance of the fungus on leaves of Juglans regia; B–G Upper view and reverse view of culture on PDA, MEA, CMA, SNA, WA, and OA after 7 days; H Close up of SNA culture with conidia; I–M Conidia with conidiogenous cells on SNA. Scale bars: 100 μm (H); 10 μm (I–M).

Etymology.

The species was named based on morphological similarity to Nigrospora saccharicola.

Holotype.

China • Yunnan Province, Chuxiong City, on the diseased leaves of Juglans regia with spots, 26 March 2024, M.T. Zou, HGUP 25-0010 (holotype), ex-type GUCC 25-0124.

Description.

Associated with leaf spots on Juglans regia. Leaves lose their green coloration, developing nearly circular lesions that appear yellowish-brown with a surrounding yellow halo. In later stages, the center of the lesions turns pale yellow. Small spots merge into larger ones, eventually causing leaf death. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph: On SNA, Hyphae 3.2–5.8 µm wide, branched, septate, hyaline to dark brown, smooth. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 4.5–10.7 × 5.4–8.9 µm (x̄ = 7.4 × 6.7 μm, n=30), subglobose to pot-shaped, aseptate, pale brown. Conidia 11.4–16.7 × 8.1–13.4 µm (x̄ = 13.7 × 10.6 μm, n=30), globose to subglobose, solitary, aseptate, brown to black, smooth-walled.

Culture characteristics.

Colonies after 7 days at 25 °C: On PDA, colonies reach 90 mm diam., flat, dense aerial mycelia, with regular margins, surface pale olivaceous gray, reverse center black, and margin pale flesh. On MEA, colonies reach 90 mm in diam., flat, spreading, and dense, with regular margins; surface dark mouse grey and reverse umber. On CMA, colonies reach 90 mm diam., flat, spreading, with regular margins, surface, and reverse center grey and margin greyish lilac. On SNA, colonies reach 90 mm diam., flat, aerial mycelia scant, regular margins filamentous, surface and reverse pale vinaceous grey. On WA, colonies reach 77–79 mm diam., flat, aerial mycelia scant, with erose margin, surface and reverse greyish. On OA, colonies reach 90 mm diam., cottony, dense aerial mycelia, with regular margins, surface mouse grey, reverse center dark mouse grey, and margin saffron. Sporulation was abundant only on SNA after 14 days.

Material examined.

China • Yunnan Province, Chuxiong City, on the diseased leaves of Juglans regia with spots, 26 March 2024, M.T. Zou, HGUP 25-0010 (holotype), GUCC 25-0124, (ex-type), GUCC 25-0125, GUCC 25-0126, GUCC 25-0127, GUCC 25-0128 and GUCC 25-0129.

Notes.

In the phylogenetic analyses (Fig. 3), six strains (GUCC 25-0124, GUCC 25-0125, GUCC 25-0126, GUCC 25-0127, GUCC 25-0128, and GUCC 25-0129) formed a sister clade to N. saccharicola (type strain CGMCC 3.19362) with strong statistical support (100% ML/1.0 BI). The comparison of nucleotide differences between strain GUCC 25-0124 and the type strain of N. saccharicola revealed clear sequence divergence: 0.31% in ITS (1/324 bp, no gaps), 3.32% in tub2 (12/361 bp, including seven gaps), and 5.58% in tef1-α (24/430 bp, including three gaps). Morphologically, our isolates differ slightly from N. saccharicola in both conidial and conidiogenous cell dimensions. Nigrospora neosaccharicola produces smaller conidia (mean = 13.7 × 10.6 μm vs. 15.24 × 11.69 μm) and narrower conidiogenous cells (mean = 7.4 × 6.7 μm vs. 8.65 × 6.8 μm) (Raza et al. 2019). Furthermore, sterile (elongated) cells, which are present in N. saccharicola, were not observed in our isolates. While N. saccharicola was originally described from Saccharum officinarum (Raza et al. 2019), our isolates were obtained from leaves of Juglans regia.

Nigrospora osmanthi

Mei Wang & L. Cai, Persoonia 39: 135 (2017).

A2EDC710-48D0-56E4-A238-21197035B59E

820736

Fig. 16

Figure 16.

Figure 16.

Nigrospora osmanthi (GUCC 25-0130). A Appearance of the fungus on leaves of Juglans regia; B–G Upper view and reverse view of culture on PDA, MEA, CMA, SNA, WA, and OA after 7 days; H Close up of SNA culture with conidia; I–M Conidia with conidiogenous cells on SNA; N Coiled hyphae on SNA. Scale bars: 100 μm (H); 10 μm (I–N).

Substrate and distribution.

Ficus pandurata, China (Liu et al. 2019); Hedera nepalensis, China (Wang et al. 2017); Water Lettuce, China (Lin et al. 2023); Stenotaphrum secundatum China (Mei et al. 2019); Orthosiphon stamineus, Malaysia (Ismail et al. 2022); Artemisia argyi, China (Yang et al. 2025); Cirsium setosum, Phyllostachys nigra, Phragmites australis, Rosa chinensis, China (Hao et al. 2020). Other distributions such as Colombia, Croatia, Iran, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, and United States recorded in GBIF.

Description.

Associated with leaf spots of Juglans regia. Circular or irregular lesions, ranging from yellowish-brown to dark brown with yellow halos. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph: On SNA, Hyphae 3.5–7 µm wide, branched, septate, hyaline to dark brown, smooth. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 5.8–8.7 × 4.1–6.6 µm (x̄ = 7.0 × 5.2 μm, n=30), subglobose, monoblastic, pale green to brown. Conidia 10.2–12.3 × 8.3–10.9 µm (x̄ = 11.4 × 9.5 μm, n=30), globose to subglobose, aseptate, solitary, brown to black, smooth, shiny.

Culture characteristics.

Colonies after 7 days at 25 °C: On PDA, colonies reach 90 mm diam., flat, spreading, dense aerial mycelia, with regular margins, surface and reverse white. On MEA, colonies reach 90 mm diam., flat, spreading, dense aerial mycelia, regular margins, surface and reverse pale vinaceous grey. On CMA, colonies reach 90 mm diam., flat, spreading, regular margins, surface and reverse pale vinaceous grey. On SNA, colonies reach 88–90 mm diam., flat, spreading, aerial mycelia scant, regular margins filamentous, surface and reverse pale vinaceous grey. On WA, colonies reach 52–55 mm diam., flat, spreading, with erose and irregular margin, surface and reverse pale vinaceous grey. On OA, colonies reach 90 mm diam., flat, spreading, dense aerial mycelia, with regular margins, surface mouse grey and reverse center dark mouse grey and margin saffron. Sporulation was abundant only on SNA after 14 days.

Material examined.

China • Yunnan Province, Chuxiong City, on the diseased leaves of Juglans regia with spots, 23 March 2024, M.T. Zou, HGUP 25-0062; GUCC 25-0130, GUCC 25-0131, GUCC 25-0132 and GUCC 25-0133.

Notes.

Nigrospora osmanthi was first observed on Osmanthus sp. in Jiangxi Province, China (Wang et al. 2017). In this study, four strains (GUCC 25-0130, GUCC 25-0131, GUCC 25-0132, and GUCC 25-0133) were isolated from leaf spots of J. regia. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that these two strains clustered with the type strain of N. osmanthi (CGMCC 3.18126) and strain LC4467, showing no significant genetic divergence. Morphologically, our isolates exhibited characteristics consistent with those described for N. osmanthi (Wang et al. 2017). Based on the combined morphological and phylogenetic evidence, the four strains are identified as N. osmanthi. This represents the first record of N. osmanthi from J. regia. However, further pathogenicity tests are required to confirm the pathogenic causes of leaf spot symptoms.

Nigrospora sphaerica

(Sacc.) E.W. Mason, Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 12(2-3): 158 (1927).

8708EAD7-9D28-5539-BE6C-8941DF9AD3F8

254776

Fig. 17

Figure 17.

Figure 17.

Nigrospora sphaerica (GUCC 25-0134). A Appearance of the fungus on leaves of Juglans regia; B–G Upper view and reverse view of culture on PDA, MEA, CMA, SNA, WA, and OA after 7 days; H Close up of SNA culture with conidia; I–M Conidia with conidiogenous cells on SNA. Scale bars: 100 μm (H); 10 μm (I–M).

Substrate and distribution.

Pathogens with a wide host range, primarily causing leaf spot or leaf blight.

Description.

Associated with leaf spots of Juglans regia. Lesions irregular in shape and dark brown in color. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph: On SNA, Hyphae 2.5–5 µm in diam., branched, septate, contracted at septum, hyaline to dark brown, smooth. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 6.0–10.5 × 5.0–8.1 µm (x̄ = 7.8 × 6.6 μm, n=30), subglobose, monoblastic, pale brown. Conidia 11.8–15.8 × 9.9–13.7 µm (x̄ = 14.1 × 11.6 μm, n=30), globose to subglobose, solitary, aseptate, black, smooth.

Culture characteristics.

Colonies after 7 days at 25 °C: On PDA, colonies reach 90 mm diam., flat, spreading, with regular margins, surface white and reverse salmon. On MEA, colonies reach 27–30 mm diam., flat, aerial mycelia scant, regular margins filamentous, surface and reverse white. On CMA, colonies reach 56–60 mm diam., cottony, dense aerial mycelia, with regular margins, surface white and reverse pale salmon. On SNA, colonies reach 20–22 mm diam., flat, aerial mycelia scant, regular margins filamentous, surface and reverse white. On WA, colonies reach 20–22 mm diam., flat, aerial mycelia scant, regular margins filamentous, surface and reverse white. On OA, colonies reach 73–75 mm diam., flat, spreading, dense aerial mycelia, with regular margins, surface greyish lilac and reverse center black and margin pale salmon. Sporulation was abundant only on SNA after 14 days.

Material examined.

China • Yunnan Province, Lincang City, on the diseased leaves of Juglans regia with spots, 7 May 2024, M.T. Zou, HGUP 25-0063; GUCC 25-0134, GUCC 25-0135, GUCC 25-0136, GUCC 25-0137, GUCC 25-0138 and GUCC 25-0139.

Notes.

In the phylogenetic analyses (Fig. 3), the six strains obtained in this study (GUCC 25-0134, GUCC 25-0135, GUCC 25-0136, GUCC 25-0137, GUCC 25-0138, and GUCC 25-0139) clustered with the N. sphaerica species clade with strong statistical support (100% ML/1.0 BI). Morphologically, our isolates closely resemble N. sphaerica in their overall diagnostic characteristics. The conidia of our strains are comparable in shape but slightly smaller (14.1 × 11.6 µm) than those reported for N. sphaerica (18.22 × 18.22 µm), while the conidiogenous cells also show similar dimensions (7.8 × 6.6 µm vs. 7.97 × 7.97 µm; Wang et al. 2017; Hyde et al. 2024a). This study represents the first record of N. sphaerica isolated from leaves of J. regia.

Discussion

The family Apiosporaceae is widely distributed across terrestrial ecosystems and exhibits broad ecological adaptability, with members recorded from tropical, subtropical, temperate, and boreal regions and colonizing diverse hosts with no clear host specificity (Jiang et al. 2019; Phukhamsakda et al. 2022). The Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau in Southwest China represents a well-known biodiversity hotspot where numerous novel fungi have been discovered in recent years (Wijayawardene et al. 2021), including members of Apiosporaceae, such as A. aseptata, A. dematiacea, A. dicranopteridis, A. globosa (Zhang et al. 2023), A. olivata (Zhang et al. 2024b), and N. weininensis (Liu et al. 2024a). In this study, all specimens were collected from Guizhou and Yunnan provinces, further confirming that the plateau remains an important reservoir of Apiosporaceae diversity.

The multilocus phylogenetic analysis using ITS, LSU, tef1-α, and tub2 sequences confirms the novelty of these taxa. Four single-gene phylogenetic trees were constructed to evaluate variation in the ITS and protein-coding genes (tef1-α and tub2). In the ITS phylogeny (Suppl. material 1: fig. S1), several Apiospora species exhibited low genetic divergence, whereas this phenomenon is less frequent in tub2 and tef1-α phylogenies (Suppl. material 1: figs S3, S4). These results indicate that tub2 and tef1-α provide higher resolution for species delimitation than ITS, consistent with Monkai et al. (2022). Similarly, in a study of Hypoxylaceae, another family within the Xylariomycetidae to which Apiospora belongs, Stadler et al. (2020) demonstrated that ITS alone is insufficient for delimiting taxa, as ITS and other rDNA markers exhibit polymorphism both between and within species. Therefore, species identification in Apiospora should rely on multigene phylogenetic frameworks, with a particular emphasis on tub2 and tef1-α genes, while ITS is primarily suitable for genus-level identification.

Multigene phylogenetic analyses demonstrate that A. mediterranea and A. hispanica are conspecific, forming a single clade with no genetic divergence and showing minimal morphological differentiation (Monkai et al. 2022; Liao et al. 2023). Similarly, A. euphorbiae, A. magnispora, and A. malaysiana should be treated as synonyms of A. vietnamensis, as they cluster together with negligible nucleotide differences and minimal morphological variation. Phylogenetic analyses in Nigrospora revealed that N. sphaerica is divided into two lineages, one of which includes only strains LC2839 and LC2840. The type strain lacks molecular data, and the sequences provided by Wang et al. (2017) indicate that LC2840 forms a separate branch from the main N. sphaerica clade. Comparative sequence analyses reveal differences of 1.94% in tub2 (8/412 bp, five gaps) and 2.55% in tef1-α (12/470 bp, no gap) between LC2840 and LC7295. BLAST analyses further indicate that these strains share <99% identity with known Nigrospora sequences. Therefore, resequencing of LC2840 and LC2839 is recommended to determine whether these strains represent a distinct taxon or belong to N. sphaericasensu stricto.

To investigate spore production in Apiospora and Nigrospora, six commonly used media (PDA, SNA, WA, OA, CMA, and MEA) were evaluated, and conidia production was examined after 14 days. Apiospora produced conidia readily on WA and SNA, consistent with the report by Zhang et al. (2023). Strains of A. setariae failed to produce conidia on any medium, even after 30 days. For Nigrospora, conidia production occurred only on SNA medium after 14 days, though at low levels. In addition, these observations suggest that certain cultural characteristics may serve as diagnostic features for species identification. For example, A. huaxiensis and A. setariae produce red pigments on PDA. Similar pigment production has been reported in A. dehongensis (Han et al. 2024). Therefore, red pigment production on PDA may represent a useful taxonomic character.

The four new species of Apiospora were isolated from symptomatic bamboo leaves or stems, supporting a strong association with Poaceae, particularly bamboo hosts (Han et al. 2024; Liu et al. 2024b). Two additional taxa, A. locuta-pollinis and A. setariae were recorded from new host species. Strains of A. locuta-pollinis, previously reported in hive-stored pollen (Zhao et al. 2018), Aristolochia debilis (Chen et al. 2021), bamboo (Monkai et al. 2022), Musa sp. (Samarakoon et al. 2024), and grass (Gao et al. 2025), were isolated from maize leaves. Moreover, A. setariae, previously known from dead culms of Setaria viridis (Jiang and Tian 2021), is recorded here for the first time from bamboo. All Nigrospora isolates in this research were obtained from walnut. To date, only one species, N. yunnanensis, has been reported from walnut (Zou et al. 2024). Analyses of host preferences and species distributions of Apiospora and Nigrospora indicate that for Apiospora, the primary host family is Poaceae, with bamboo species constituting the largest proportion, consistent with Monkai et al. (2022). For the species distributions of this genus, Monkai et al. (2022) identified China as the country with the highest number of recorded species for this genus. Our findings, however, indicate that the United States has the highest number of recorded species, followed by the United Kingdom and China. This discrepancy likely reflects differences between databases, as GBIF was used, whereas Monkai et al. (2022) used USDA data, which contain fewer records and are primarily disease-related. For Nigrospora, GBIF data indicate that Poaceae is the most common host family, followed by Fabaceae and Cyperaceae. In terms of geographic distribution, China has the highest number of hosts records, followed by India and the United States.

Overall, this study significantly expands current knowledge of Apiosporaceae diversity in Southwest China, clarifies several taxonomic relationships within Apiospora and Nigrospora, and highlights the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau as a rich reservoir of new taxa. The discovery of five new species and six new host species records highlights the ecological adaptability of Apiosporaceae and underscores the importance of integrating morphology, molecular data, and host associations for accurate species identification and improved understanding of their taxonomy and evolution.

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Apiospora hispanica
XML Treatment for Apiospora huaxiensis
XML Treatment for Apiospora locuta-pollinis
XML Treatment for Apiospora nanmingensis
XML Treatment for Apiospora qingzhenensis
XML Treatment for Apiospora setariae
XML Treatment for Apiospora sinense
XML Treatment for Apiospora tongrenensis
XML Treatment for Apiospora vietnamensis
XML Treatment for Nigrospora chinensis
XML Treatment for Nigrospora endophytica
XML Treatment for Nigrospora neosaccharicola
XML Treatment for Nigrospora osmanthi
XML Treatment for Nigrospora sphaerica

Citation

Wang X-C, Zhang R-N, Norphanphoun C, Wang S-B, Zou M-T, Guo S-Q, Sun J-E, Wang J-P, Wijayawardene NN, Hyde KD, Wang Y, Liu F-Q (2026) Novel species and new host records of Apiospora and Nigrospora (Amphisphaeriales, Apiosporaceae) from Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, China. IMA Fungus 17: e177246. https://doi.org/10.3897/imafungus.17.177246

Funding Statement

This research is supported by the following projects: National Key Research and Development Program of China (No.2024YFE0214300), the Guizhou Plant Bacteria and Biological Control Science and Technology Innovation Talent Team Development (Qian Ke He Talent-BQW[2025]003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31972222), the Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities of China (111 Program, D20023), and the Distinguished Scientist Fellowship Program (DSFP), King Saud University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Footnotes

Xing-Chang Wang and Rui-Nan Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Contributor Information

Yong Wang, Email: yongwangbis@aliyun.com.

Feng-Quan Liu, Email: fqliu20011@sina.com.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) use

The authors accept full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, including the disclosure of any use of AI.

No AI tools were used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Adherence to national and international regulations

All the fungal strains used in this study have been legally obtained, respecting the Convention on Biological Diversity (Rio Convention).

Funding

This research is supported by the following projects: National Key Research and Development Program of China (No.2024YFE0214300), the Guizhou Plant Bacteria and Biological Control Science and Technology Innovation Talent Team Development (Qian Ke He Talent-BQW[2025]003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31972222), the Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities of China (111 Program, D20023), and the Distinguished Scientist Fellowship Program (DSFP), King Saud University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Xing-Chang Wang, Yong Wang; Data curation: Meng-Ting Zou, Shi-Qi Guo, Jia-Ping Wang; Formal analysis: Xing-Chang Wang, Rui-Nan Zhang, Shi-Qi Guo, Chada Norphanphoun, Yong Wang; Funding acquisition: Feng-Quan Liu, Yong Wang, Kevin D. Hyde; Investigation: Xing-Chang Wang, Meng-Ting Zou, Shi-Qi Guo, Si-Bo Wang; Project administration: Yong Wang, Feng-Quan Liu; Resources: Yong Wang, Feng-Quan Liu; Supervision: Yong Wang, Feng-Quan Liu; Validation: Xing-Chang Wang, Si-Bo Wang, Jing-E Sun; Visualization: Xing-Chang Wang, Jing-E Sun, Si-Bo Wang, Yong Wang; Writing – original draft: Xing-Chang Wang, Chada Norphanphoun, Shi-Qi Guo; Writing – review & editing: Yong Wang, Kevin D. Hyde, Nalin N. Wijayawardene, Feng-Quan Liu

All authors have edited the manuscript and approved to publish the research findings. This research has not been published and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.

Author ORCIDs

Xing-Chang Wang https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4913-5316

Rui-Nan Zhang https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6010-9570

Chada Norphanphoun https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5756-7206

Si-Bo Wang https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0060-3247

Meng-Ting Zou https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5564-4131

Shi-Qi Guo https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4997-2276

Jing-E Sun https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5226-5743

Jia-Ping Wang https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7558-4760

Nalin N. Wijayawardene https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0522-5498

Kevin D. Hyde https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2191-0762

Yong Wang https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3831-2117

Feng-Quan Liu https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9325-1500

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article or in the supplementary materials. All sequences during this study have been submitted to GenBank.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1

Single gene trees for Apiospora and Nigrospora

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(S) are credited.

Xing-Chang Wang, Rui-Nan Zhang, Chada Norphanphoun, Si-Bo Wang, Meng-Ting Zou, Shi-Qi Guo, Jing-E Sun, Jia-Ping Wang, Nalin N. Wijayawardene, Kevin D. Hyde, Yong Wang, Feng-Quan Liu

Data type

zip

Explanation note

fig. S1. Phylogenetic trees constructed using Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses based on ITS for Apiospora. fig. S2. Phylogenetic trees constructed using Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses based on LSU for Apiospora. fig. S3. Phylogenetic trees constructed using Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses based on tef1-α for Apiospora. fig. S4. Phylogenetic trees constructed using Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses based on tub2 for Apiospora. fig. S5. Phylogenetic trees constructed using Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses based on ITS for Nigrospora. fig. S6. Phylogenetic trees constructed using Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses based on tef1-α for Nigrospora. fig. S7. Phylogenetic trees constructed using Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses based on tub2 for Nigrospora.

Supplementary material 2

Suppl. data 1-7: the sequences after mafft for Apiospora and Nigrospora

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(S) are credited.

Xing-Chang Wang, Rui-Nan Zhang, Chada Norphanphoun, Si-Bo Wang, Meng-Ting Zou, Shi-Qi Guo, Jing-E Sun, Jia-Ping Wang, Nalin N. Wijayawardene, Kevin D. Hyde, Yong Wang, Feng-Quan Liu

Data type

zip

Explanation note

suppl. data 1. The ITS sequences for Apiospora after Mafft. suppl. data 2. The LSU sequences for Apiospora after Mafft. suppl. data 3. The tef1-α sequences for Apiospora after Mafft. suppl. data 4. The tub2 sequences for Apiospora after Mafft. suppl. data 5. The ITS sequences for Nigrospora after Mafft. suppl. data 6. The tef1-α sequences for Nigrospora after Mafft. suppl. data 7. The tub2 sequences for Nigrospora after Mafft.

Supplementary material 3

Primer pairs and amplification procedures used in this study, the best models of BI and ML used for each gene in the phylogenetic tree, and the records of Apiospora and Nigrospora in the GBIF database

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(S) are credited.

Xing-Chang Wang, Rui-Nan Zhang, Chada Norphanphoun, Si-Bo Wang, Meng-Ting Zou, Shi-Qi Guo, Jing-E Sun, Jia-Ping Wang, Nalin N. Wijayawardene, Kevin D. Hyde, Yong Wang, Feng-Quan Liu

Data type

xlsx

Explanation note

table SS1. Primer pairs and amplification procedures used in this study. table S2. The best models of BI and ML used for each gene in the phylogenetic tree. table S3. Records of Apiospora in GBIF. table S4. Records of Nigrospora in GBIF.

References

  1. Ai C, Dong Z, Yun J et al. (2024) Phylogeny, Taxonomy and Morphological Characteristics of Apiospora (Amphisphaeriales, Apiosporaceae). Microorganisms 12(7): 1372. 10.3390/microorganisms12071372 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  2. Bhunjun CS, Niskanen T, Suwannarach N et al. (2022) The numbers of fungi: are the most speciose genera truly diverse? Fungal Diversity 114: 387–462. 10.1007/s13225-022-00501-4 [DOI]
  3. Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T (2009) trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25: 1972–1973. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  4. Carbone I, Kohn L (1999) A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in Filamentous Ascomycetes. Mycologia 91(3): 553–556. 10.1080/00275514.1999.12061051 [DOI]
  5. Chang X, Wang Y, Xu T et al. (2025) Three new species of Apiospora (Apiosporaceae, Amphisphaeriales) associated with diseased bamboo in China. MycoKeys 116: 205–226. 10.3897/mycokeys.116.142263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  6. Chen Q, Bakhshi M, Balci Y et al. (2022) Genera of phytopathogenic fungi: GOPHY 4. Studies in Mycology 101: 417–564. 10.3114/sim.2022.101.06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Chen TZ, Zhang Y, Ming XB et al. (2021) Morphological and phylogenetic resolution of Arthrinium from medicinal plants in Yunnan, including A. cordylines and A. pseudomarii spp. nov. Mycotaxon 136: 183–199. 10.5248/136.183 [DOI]
  8. Cheng KX, Zeng Y, Yu KM et al. (2025) First report of leaf spot on Zanthoxylum bungeanum caused by Nigrospora chinensis in China. Plant Disease 109: 722–722. 10.1094/pdis-11-24-2380-pdn [DOI]
  9. Crous PW, Carnegie AJ, Wingfield MJ et al. (2019) Fungal Planet description sheets: 868-950. Persoonia 42: 291–473. 10.3767/persoonia.2019.42.11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  10. Crous PW, Groenewald JZ (2013) A phylogenetic re-evaluation of Arthrinium. IMA Fungus 4: 133–154. 10.5598/imafungus.2013.04.01.13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  11. Crous PW, Hernández-Restrepo M, Schumacher RK et al. (2021) New and Interesting Fungi. 4. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 7: 255–343. 10.3114/fuse.2021.07.13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  12. Crous PW, Wingfield MJ, Le Roux JJ et al. (2015) Fungal Planet description sheets: 371-399. Persoonia 35: 264–327. 10.3767/003158515x690269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  13. Dai DQ, Jiang HB, Tang LZ et al. (2016) Two new species of Arthrinium (Apiosporaceae, Xylariales) associated with bamboo from Yunnan, China. Mycosphere 7: 1332–1345. 10.5943/mycosphere/7/9/7 [DOI]
  14. Dai DQ, Phookamsak R, Wijayawardene NN et al. (2017) Bambusicolous fungi. Fungal Diversity 82: 1–105. 10.1007/s13225-016-0367-8 [DOI]
  15. Das K, Lee SY, Choi HW et al. (2020) Taxonomy of Arthrinium minutisporum sp. nov., Pezicula neosporulosa, and Acrocalymma pterocarpi: New records from soil in Korea. Mycobiology 48: 450–463. 10.1080/12298093.2020.1830741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  16. de Queiroz Brito AC, de Mello JF, de Almeida Souza AE et al. (2023) Richness of Nigrospora spp. (Apiosporaceae) in Manihot esculenta in Brazil and the description of three new species. Mycological Progress 22: 37. 10.1007/s11557-023-01887-4 [DOI]
  17. Dissanayake L, Samarakoon MC, Maharachchikumbura S et al. (2024) Exploring the taxonomy and phylogeny of Sordariomycetes taxa emphasizing Xylariomycetidae in Southwestern China. Mycosphere 15: 1675–1793. 10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/15 [DOI]
  18. Ellis MB (1965) Dematiaceous hyphomycetes. VI. Mycological Papers 103: 1–46. 10.1079/9780851986180.0000 [DOI]
  19. Feng Y, Liu J-K, Lin C-G et al. (2021) Additions to the genus Arthrinium (Apiosporaceae) from bamboos in China. Frontiers in Microbiology 12: 661281. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.661281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  20. Fu S-M, Muhae Ud Din G, Wang Y et al. (2025) Nigrospora aurantiaca causing leaf spot disease in Bayberry in Guizhou, China. Plant Disease 109(6): 1376. 10.1094/pdis-09-24-1971-pdn [DOI]
  21. Glass NL, Donaldson GC (1995) Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61: 1323–1330. 10.1128/aem.61.4.1323-1330.1995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  22. Gao Y, Wanasinghe D, Liu L et al. (2025) Microfungi associated with grassland ecosystems in Yunnan, Southwest China. Mycosphere 16: 3281–3499. 10.5943/mycosphere/16/1/25 [DOI]
  23. Guo Q, Zeng Y, Jiang YL (2024) First report of Nigrospora chinensis causing dragon fruit (Selenicereus monacanthus) stem spot in China. Plant Disease 108(7): 2229. 10.1094/pdis-02-24-0485-pdn [DOI]
  24. Guo S-Q, Norphanphoun C, Hyde KD et al. (2025) Three novel species and a new record of Pleosporales (Didymellaceae, Roussoellaceae) from China. MycoKeys 113: 295–320. 10.3897/mycokeys.113.139934 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  25. Habib K, Li WH, Ren YL et al. (2025) Exploration of ascomycetous fungi revealing novel taxa in Southwestern China. Mycosphere 16: 1412–1529. 10.5943/mycosphere/16/1/9 [DOI]
  26. Han LS, Liu C, Dai DQ et al. (2024) Five new species, two new sexual morph reports, and one new geographical record of Apiospora (Amphisphaeriales, Sordariomycetes) isolated from bamboo in Yunnan, China. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 14: 1476066. 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1476066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  27. Hao YY, Aluthmuhandiram JVS, Chethana KWT et al. (2020) Nigrospora species associated with various hosts from shandong peninsula, China. Mycobiology 48: 169–183. 10.1080/12298093.2020.1761747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  28. Holubová-Jechová, V. 1963. New species of the genus Nigrospora causing rots of Southern fruits [Nigrospora maydis (Garov.) Jechová and N. vietnamensis Jechová]. Česká Mykologie 17(1): 12–20.
  29. Hongsanan S, Khuna S, Manawasinghe IS et al. (2025) Mycosphere Notes 521-571: A special edition of fungal biodiversity to celebrate Kevin D. Hyde’s 70th birthday and his exceptional contributions to Mycology. Mycosphere 16: 2002–2180. 10.5943/mycosphere/16/2/1 [DOI]
  30. Hyde KD, Hongsanan S, Jeewon R et al. (2016) Fungal diversity notes 367–490: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 80: 1–270. 10.1007/s13225-016-0373-x [DOI]
  31. Hyde KD, Norphanphoun C, Maharachchikumbura SSN et al. (2020) Refined families of Sordariomycetes. Mycosphere 11: 305–1059. 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/7 [DOI]
  32. Hyde KD, Wijesinghe SN, Afshari N et al. (2024a) Mycosphere Notes 469-520. Mycosphere 15: 1294–1454. 10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/11 [DOI]
  33. Hyde KD, Noorabadi MT, Thiyagaraja et al. (2024b) The 2024 Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa. Mycosphere 15: 5146–6239. 10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/25 [DOI]
  34. Hyde KD, Frohlich J, Taylor JE (1998) Fungi from palms. XXXVI. Reflections on unitunicate ascomycetes with apiospores. Sydowia 50(1): 21–80. 10.5962/p.415967 [DOI]
  35. Ismail SI, Norzaki NAM, Ya’acob ME et al. (2022) First report of Nigrospora osmanthi causing leaf blight on Orthosiphon stamineus in Malaysia. Plant Disease 106(2): 770. https://doi.org10.1094/pdis-12-20-2668-pdn
  36. Jiang HB, Hyde KD, Doilom M et al. (2019) Arthrinium setostromum (Apiosporaceae, Xylariales), a novel species associated with dead bamboo from Yunnan, China. Asian Journal of Mycology 2: 254–268. 10.5943/ajom/2/1/16 [DOI]
  37. Jiang N, Li J, Tian CM (2018) Arthrinium species associated with bamboo and reed plants in China. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 2: 1–9. 10.3114/fuse.2018.02.01 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  38. Jiang N, Liang YM, Tian CM (2020) A novel bambusicolous fungus from China, Arthrinium chinense (Xylariales). Sydowia 72: 77–83. 10.12905/0380.sydowia72-2020-0077 [DOI]
  39. Jiang N, Tian C (2021) The holomorph of Arthrinium setariae sp. nov. (Apiosporaceae, Xylariales) from China. Phytotaxa 483: 149–159. 10.11646/phytotaxa.483.2.7 [DOI]
  40. Jiang N, Voglmayr H, Ma C-Y et al. (2022) A new arthrinium-like genus of Amphisphaeriales in China. MycoKeys 92: 27–43. 10.3897/mycokeys.92.86521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  41. Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD (2019) MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Briefings in Bioinformatics 20: 1160–1166. 10.1093/bib/bbx108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  42. Karimi O, Hyde KD, Asghari R et al. (2025) Peat swamp Ascomycota associated with palms (Arecaceae) from Narathiwat, Thailand. mycosphere 16: 2456–2575. 10.5943/mycosphere/16/1/14 [DOI]
  43. Khoo YW, Tan HT, Khaw YS et al. (2022) First report of Nigrospora aurantiaca causing leaf spot on Pandanus amaryllifolius in Malaysia. Journal of Plant Pathology 104: 1205–1206. 10.1007/s42161-022-01175-2 [DOI]
  44. Kim T-H, Cha J-E, Kim Y-J et al. (2025) New records of endophytic Xylariales from Korea: Hypoxylon vinosopulvinatum and Apiospora sasae. The Korean Journal of Mycology 53(2): 127–134. 10.4489/kjm.2025.53.2.8 [DOI]
  45. Kirk PM, Cannon PF, Minter DW et al. (2008) Dictionary of the Fungi. 10th edn, Wallingford, CABI, 22. http://www.slideshare.net/fitolima/dictionary-of-fungi-kirk-et-al-2008-10a-edicao
  46. Konta S, Hyde KD, Eungwanichayapant PD et al. (2021) Multigene phylogeny reveals Haploanthostomella elaeidis gen. et sp. nov. and familial replacement of Endocalyx (Xylariales, Sordariomycetes, Ascomycota). Life 11: 486. 10.3390/life11060486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  47. Kwon SL, Cho M, Lee YM et al. (2022) Diversity of the bambusicolous fungus Apiospora in Korea: Discovery of new Apiospora species. Mycobiology 50: 302–316. 10.1080/12298093.2022.2133808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  48. Kwon SL, Park MS, Jang S et al. (2021) The genus Arthrinium (Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Apiosporaceae) from marine habitats from Korea, with eight new species. IMA Fungus 12: 13. 10.1186/s43008-021-00065-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  49. Larrondo JV, Calvo MA (1992) New contributions to the study of the genus Arthrinium. Mycologia 84: 475–478. 10.1080/00275514.1992.12026164 [DOI]
  50. Li D, Zhang M, Zhang J et al. (2024) Three new microfungi (Ascomycota) species from southern China. MycoKeys 111: 87–110. 10.3897/mycokeys.111.136483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  51. Li S, Peng C, Yuan R et al. (2023) Morphological and phylogenetic analyses reveal three new species of Apiospora in China. MycoKeys 99: 297–317. 10.3897/mycokeys.99.108384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  52. Liao C, Senanayake IC, Dong W et al. (2023) Taxonomic and phylogenetic updates on Apiospora: Introducing four new species from Wurfbainia villosa and grasses in China. Journal of Fungi 9: 1087. 10.3390/jof9111087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  53. Lin ZY, Wang B, Zhang BZ et al. (2023) Occurrence of Nigrospora osmanthi causing leaf blight on water lettuce in China. Plant Disease 107: 2517. 10.1094/pdis-01-22-0146-pdn [DOI]
  54. Liu J, Yang L, Miao P et al. (2019) First report of leaf blight on Ficus pandurata caused by Nigrospora osmanthi in China. Plant Disease 103: 2685. 10.1094/pdis-04-19-0705-pdn [DOI]
  55. Liu MR, Liu YF, Zhang XY et al. (2024a) Nigrospora weininensis sp. nov., a new potent nematicidal fungus isolated from Globodera rostochiensis in Guizhou, China. Phytotaxa 675: 135–146. 10.11646/phytotaxa.675.2.4 [DOI]
  56. Liu R, Li D, Zhang Z et al. (2023a) Morphological and phylogenetic analyses reveal two new species and a new record of Apiospora (Amphisphaeriales, Apiosporaceae) in China. MycoKeys 95: 27–45. 10.3897/mycokeys.95.96400 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  57. Liu X-F, Tibpromma S, Hughes A et al. (2023b) Culturable mycota on bats in central and southern Yunnan Province, China. Mycosphere 14: 497–662. 10.5943/mycosphere/14/1/7 [DOI]
  58. Liu X, Zhang Z, Wang S et al. (2024b) Three new species of Apiospora (Amphisphaeriales, Apiosporaceae) on Indocalamus longiauritus, Adinandra glischroloma and Machilus nanmu from Hainan and Fujian, China. Journal of Fungi 10: 74. 10.3390/jof10010074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  59. Liu Y, An JH, Safdar A et al. (2024c) Identification and characterization of Nigrospora species and a novel species, Nigrospora anhuiensis, causing black leaf spot on rice and wild rice in the Anhui Province of China. Journal of Fungi 10(2): 156. 10.3390/jof10020156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  60. Luo FY, Li WJ, Zhu TH et al. (2020) First report of Nigrospora aurantiaca causing leaf spot disease of Castanea mollissima in China. Plant Disease 104: 2730–2731. 10.1094/pdis-12-19-2608-pdn [DOI]
  61. Luo Z-L, Hyde KD, Liu J-K et al. (2019) Freshwater Sordariomycetes. Fungal Diversity 99: 451–660. 10.1007/s13225-019-00438-1 [DOI]
  62. Ma X, Chomnunti P, Doilom M et al. (2022) Multigene phylogeny reveals endophytic Xylariales novelties from Dendrobium Species from southwestern China and northern Thailand. Journal of Fungi 8: 248. 10.3390/jof8030248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  63. Manawasinghe IS, Hyde KD, Wanasinghe DN et al. (2025) Fungal diversity notes 1818–1918: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungi. Fungal Diversity 130: 1–261. 10.1007/s13225-024-00541-y [DOI]
  64. Mei SS, Wang ZY, Zhang J et al. (2019) First report of leaf blight on Stenotaphrum secundatum caused by Nigrospora osmanthi in China. Plant Disease 103: 1783. 10.1094/pdis-02-19-0270-pdn [DOI]
  65. Mapook A, Hyde KD, McKenzie EHC et al. (2020) Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungi associated with the invasive weed Chromolaena odorata (Siam weed). Fungal Diversity 101: 1–175. 10.1007/s13225-020-00444-8 [DOI]
  66. Monkai J, Phookamsak R, Tennakoon DS et al. (2022) Insight into the taxonomic resolution of Apiospora: Introducing novel species and records from bamboo in China and Thailand. Diversity 14: 918. 10.3390/d14110918 [DOI]
  67. Mukhopadhyay S, Phukhamsakda C, Bhunjun CS et al. (2025) Exploring fungi on mangrove associates: novel family Neoarthriniaceae and two novel species in Neoarthrinium and Oncopodiella. Mycological Progress 24: 18. 10.1007/s11557-025-02035-w [DOI]
  68. Overgaard ML, Aalborg T, Zeuner EJ et al. (2023) Quick guide to secondary metabolites from Apiospora and Arthrinium. Fungal Biology Reviews 43: 100288. 10.1016/j.fbr.2022.10.001 [DOI]
  69. Phukhamsakda C, Nilsson RH, Bhunjun CS et al. (2022) The numbers of fungi: contributions from traditional taxonomic studies and challenges of metabarcoding. Fungal Diversity 114: 327–386. 10.1007/s13225-022-00502-3 [DOI]
  70. Pintos Á, Alvarado P (2021) Phylogenetic delimitation of Apiospora and Arthrinium. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 7: 197–221. 10.3114/fuse.2021.07.10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  71. Pintos Á, Alvarado P (2022) New studies on Apiospora (Amphisphaeriales, Apiosporaceae): epitypification of Sphaeria apiospora, proposal of Ap. marianiae sp. nov. and description of the asexual morph of Ap. sichuanensis. MycoKeys 92: 63–78. 10.3897/mycokeys.92.87593 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  72. Pintos Á, Alvarado P, Planas J et al. (2019) Six new species of Arthrinium from Europe and notes about A. caricicola and other species found in Carex spp. hosts. MycoKeys 49: 15–48. 10.3897/mycokeys.49.32115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  73. Qin S, Chen X, Zhou X et al. (2021) First report of Camellia oleifera leaf blight caused by Nigrospora chinensis. Journal of Plant Pathology 103: 711–712. 10.1007/s42161-021-00793-6 [DOI]
  74. Raza M, Zhang Z-F, Hyde KD et al. (2019) Culturable plant pathogenic fungi associated with sugarcane in southern China. Fungal Diversity 99: 1–104. 10.1007/s13225-019-00434-5 [DOI]
  75. Réblová M, Miller AN, Rossman AY et al. (2016) Recommendations for competing sexual-asexually typified generic names in Sordariomycetes (except Diaporthales, Hypocreales, and Magnaporthales). IMA Fungus 7: 131–153. 10.5598/imafungus.2016.07.01.08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  76. Rayner RW (1970) A Mycological Colour Chart. CMI and British Mycological Society, Kew.
  77. Saccardo PA (1893) Florula mycologica Lusitanica sistens contributionem decimam ad eandem floram nec non conspectus fungorum omnium in Lusitania hucusque observatorum. Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana 11: 9–70.
  78. Samarakoon BC, Wanasinghe DN, Samarakoon MC et al. (2020) Multi-gene phylogenetic evidence suggests Dictyoarthrinium belongs in Didymosphaeriaceae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes) and Dictyoarthrinium musae sp. nov. on Musa from Thailand. MycoKeys 71: 101–118. 10.3897/mycokeys.71.55493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  79. Samarakoon MC, Hyde KD, Maharachchikumbura SSN et al. (2022) Taxonomy, phylogeny, molecular dating and ancestral state reconstruction of Xylariomycetidae (Sordariomycetes). Fungal Diversity 112: 1–88. 10.1007/s13225-021-00495-5 [DOI]
  80. Senanayake IC, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Hyde KD et al. (2015) Towards unraveling relationships in Xylariomycetidae (Sordariomycetes). Fungal Diversity 73: 73–144. 10.1007/s13225-015-0340-y [DOI]
  81. Senanayake IC, Rathnayaka A, Sandamali D et al. (2020) Morphological approaches in studying fungi: collection, examination, isolation, sporulation and preservation. Mycosphere 11: 2678–2754. 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/20 [DOI]
  82. Senanayake IC, Rossi W, Leonardi M et al. (2023) Fungal diversity notes 1611–1716: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on fungal genera and species emphasis in south China. Fungal Diversity 122: 161–403. 10.1007/s13225-023-00523-6 [DOI]
  83. Sharma R, Kulkarni G, Sonawane MS et al. (2014) A new endophytic species of Arthrinium (Apiosporaceae) from Jatropha podagrica. Mycoscience 55: 118–123. 10.1016/j.myc.2013.06.004 [DOI]
  84. Shen H-W, Bao D-F, Luan S et al. (2025) Taxonomy and phylogeny of lignicolous freshwater fungi from plateau lakes in Yunnan Province, China. Fungal Diversity 134: 635–899. 10.1007/s13225-025-00564-z [DOI]
  85. Singh SM, Yadav LS, Singh PN et al. (2012) Arthrinium rasikravindrii sp. nov. from Svalbard, Norway. Mycotaxon 122: 449–460. 10.5248/122.449 [DOI]
  86. Smith G (2003) A molecular systematic study of the Xylariales (Ascomycota). Open Dissertation Press. 10.5353/th_b3011084 [DOI]
  87. Stadler M, Lambert C, Wibberg D et al. (2020) Intragenomic polymorphisms in the ITS region of high-quality genomes of the Hypoxylaceae (Xylariales, Ascomycota). Mycological Progress 19: 235–245. 10.1007/s11557-019-01552-9 [DOI]
  88. Tanaka K, Hirayama K, Yonezawa H et al. (2015) Revision of the Massarineae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes). Studies in Mycology 82: 75–136. 10.1016/j.simyco.2015.10.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  89. Tan YP, Bishop-Hurley SL, Shivas RG et al. (2022) Fungal Planet description sheets: 1436–1477. Persoonia 49: 261–350. 10.3767/persoonia.2022.49.08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  90. Tang X, Goonasekara ID, Jayawardena RS et al. (2020) Arthrinium bambusicola (Fungi, Sordariomycetes), a new species from Schizostachyum brachycladum in northern Thailand. Biodiversity Data Journal 8: e58755. 10.3897/BDJ.8.e58755 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  91. Tennakoon DS, Kuo C-H, Maharachchikumbura SSN et al. (2021) Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to Celtis formosana, Ficus ampelas, F. septica, Macaranga tanarius and Morus australis leaf litter inhabiting microfungi. Fungal Diversity 108: 1–215. 10.1007/s13225-021-00474-w [DOI]
  92. Tian L-Y, Zhang Y-F, Lian T et al. (2020) Nigrospora guangdongensis sp. nov. from the needle of Cunninghamia lanceolata in China. Phytotaxa 449: 181–187. 10.11646/phytotaxa.449.2.6 [DOI]
  93. Tian X, Bao D-F, Karunarathna S et al. (2024) Taxonomy and phylogeny of ascomycetes associated with selected economically important monocotyledons in China and Thailand. Mycosphere 15: 1–274. 10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/1 [DOI]
  94. Tian X, Karunarathna SC, Mapook A et al. (2021) One new species and two new host records of Apiospora from bamboo and maize in northern Thailand with thirteen new combinations. Life 11: 1071. 10.3390/life11101071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  95. Vilgalys R, Hester M (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172: 4238–4246. 10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  96. Wang J, Liu Z-X, Yu WEI et al. (2024) A new species of Nigrospora (Apiosporaceae) in Corylus heterophylla in China. Turkish Journal of Botany 48: 274–282. 10.55730/1300-008X.2815 [DOI]
  97. Wang M, Liu F, Crous PW et al. (2017) Phylogenetic reassessment of Nigrospora: Ubiquitous endophytes, plant and human pathogens. Persoonia 39: 118–142. 10.3767/persoonia.2017.39.06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  98. Wang M, Tan XM, Liu F et al. (2018) Eight new Arthrinium species from China. MycoKeys: 1–24. 10.3897/mycokeys.34.24221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  99. White T, Bruns T, Lee S et al. (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protocols, 315–322. 10.1016/b978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1 [DOI]
  100. Wijayawardene NN, Dissanayake LS, Dai DQ et al. (2021) Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau: a mycological hotspot. Phytotaxa 523: 1–31. 10.11646/phytotaxa.523.1.1 [DOI]
  101. Wijayawardene NN, Hyde KD, Al-Ani LKT et al. (2020) Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa. Mycosphere 11: 1060–1456. 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/8 [DOI]
  102. Xiao RF, Cheng X, Chen YP et al. (2024) First report of Apiospora arundinis causing wet root rot of Pseudostellaria heterophylla in China. Plant Disease 108: 788. 10.1094/pdis-05-23-0911-pdn [DOI]
  103. Xu T, Song Z, Hou Y et al. (2022) Secondary metabolites of the genus Nigrospora from terrestrial and marine habitats: Chemical diversity and biological activity. Fitoterapia 161: 105254. 10.1016/j.fitote.2022.105254 [DOI] [PubMed]
  104. Yan XN, Zhang CL (2024) Three new endophytic Apiospora species (Apiosporaceae, Amphisphaeriales) from China. MycoKeys 105: 295–316. 10.3897/mycokeys.105.122583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  105. Yang C-L, Xu X-L, Dong W et al. (2019) Introducing Arthrinium phyllostachium sp. nov. (Apiosporaceae, Xylariales) on Phyllostachys heteroclada from Sichuan Province, China. Phytotaxa 406: 91–110. 10.11646/phytotaxa.406.2.2 [DOI]
  106. Yang K, Yang X, Li M et al. (2025) Occurrence of Nigrospora osmanthi causing leaf spot on Artemisia argyi in China. Crop Protection 191: 107142. 10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107142 [DOI]
  107. Yin X, Jiang N (2024) A novel species of Apiospora from Ulmus pumila in China. Phytotaxa 669: 36–46. 10.11646/phytotaxa.669.1.4 [DOI]
  108. Yu K, Zhang H, Cheng K et al. (2025) Three new species of Apiospora (Amphisphaeriales, Apiosporaceae) in China. MycoKeys 112: 233–252. 10.3897/mycokeys.112.135493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  109. Yuan H-S, Lu X, Dai Y-C et al. (2020) Fungal diversity notes 1277–1386: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 104: 1–266. 10.1007/s13225-020-00461-7 [DOI]
  110. Zeng Q, Lv Y-C, Xu X-L et al. (2022) Morpho-Molecular characterization of microfungi associated with Phyllostachys (Poaceae) in Sichuan, China. Journal of Fungi 8: 702. 10.3390/jof8070702 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  111. Zhang D, Gao FL, Jakovlic I et al. (2020) PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Molecular Ecology Resources 20: 348–355. 10.1111/1755-0998.13096 [DOI] [PubMed]
  112. Zhang J-Y, Chen M-L, Boonmee S et al. (2023) Four new endophytic Apiospora species isolated from three Dicranopteris species in Guizhou, China. Journal of Fungi 9: 1096. 10.3390/jof9111096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  113. Zhang S, Li J, Jiang H et al. (2025) The polyphasic approach reveals two new species and two new records of Nigrospora (Apiosporaceae, Amphisphaeriales) associated with Aquilaria sinensis from China. MycoKeys 121: 1–20. 10.3897/mycokeys.121.154055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  114. Zhang Y-Y, Zhang T, Li H-Y et al. (2024a) Nigrospora humicola (Apiosporaceae, Amphisphaeriales), a new fungus from soil in China. Diversity 16: 118. 10.3390/d16020118 [DOI]
  115. Zhang ZY, Pan H, Tao G et al. (2024b) Culturable mycobiota from Guizhou Wildlife Park in China. Mycosphere 15: 654–763. 10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/5 [DOI]
  116. Zhao HJ, Dong W, Shu YX et al. (2023) Bambusicolous fungi in Guangdong, China: establishing Apiospora magnispora sp. nov. (Apiosporaceae, Amphisphaeriales) based on morphological and molecular evidence. Current Research in Environmental & Applied Mycology (Journal of Fungal Biology) 13(1): 1–15. 10.5943/cream/13/1/1 [DOI]
  117. Zhao YZ, Zhang ZF, Cai L et al. (2018) Four new filamentous fungal species from newly-collected and hive-stored bee pollen. Mycosphere 9: 1089–1116. 10.5943/mycosphere/9/6/3 [DOI]
  118. Zhao Z, Mu T, Keyhani NO et al. (2024) Diversity and new species of Ascomycota from bamboo in China. Journal of Fungi 10: 454. 10.3390/jof10070454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  119. Zou M, Al-Otibi F, Hyde KD et al. (2024) New Helminthosporium (Massarinaceae, Dothideomycetes) and Nigrospora (Incertae sedis, Sordariomycetes) species associated with walnut (Juglans regia L.) in China. MycoKeys 109: 265–284. 10.3897/mycokeys.109.133431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Apiospora hispanica
XML Treatment for Apiospora huaxiensis
XML Treatment for Apiospora locuta-pollinis
XML Treatment for Apiospora nanmingensis
XML Treatment for Apiospora qingzhenensis
XML Treatment for Apiospora setariae
XML Treatment for Apiospora sinense
XML Treatment for Apiospora tongrenensis
XML Treatment for Apiospora vietnamensis
XML Treatment for Nigrospora chinensis
XML Treatment for Nigrospora endophytica
XML Treatment for Nigrospora neosaccharicola
XML Treatment for Nigrospora osmanthi
XML Treatment for Nigrospora sphaerica
Supplementary material 1

Single gene trees for Apiospora and Nigrospora

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(S) are credited.

Xing-Chang Wang, Rui-Nan Zhang, Chada Norphanphoun, Si-Bo Wang, Meng-Ting Zou, Shi-Qi Guo, Jing-E Sun, Jia-Ping Wang, Nalin N. Wijayawardene, Kevin D. Hyde, Yong Wang, Feng-Quan Liu

Data type

zip

Explanation note

fig. S1. Phylogenetic trees constructed using Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses based on ITS for Apiospora. fig. S2. Phylogenetic trees constructed using Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses based on LSU for Apiospora. fig. S3. Phylogenetic trees constructed using Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses based on tef1-α for Apiospora. fig. S4. Phylogenetic trees constructed using Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses based on tub2 for Apiospora. fig. S5. Phylogenetic trees constructed using Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses based on ITS for Nigrospora. fig. S6. Phylogenetic trees constructed using Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses based on tef1-α for Nigrospora. fig. S7. Phylogenetic trees constructed using Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses based on tub2 for Nigrospora.

Supplementary material 2

Suppl. data 1-7: the sequences after mafft for Apiospora and Nigrospora

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(S) are credited.

Xing-Chang Wang, Rui-Nan Zhang, Chada Norphanphoun, Si-Bo Wang, Meng-Ting Zou, Shi-Qi Guo, Jing-E Sun, Jia-Ping Wang, Nalin N. Wijayawardene, Kevin D. Hyde, Yong Wang, Feng-Quan Liu

Data type

zip

Explanation note

suppl. data 1. The ITS sequences for Apiospora after Mafft. suppl. data 2. The LSU sequences for Apiospora after Mafft. suppl. data 3. The tef1-α sequences for Apiospora after Mafft. suppl. data 4. The tub2 sequences for Apiospora after Mafft. suppl. data 5. The ITS sequences for Nigrospora after Mafft. suppl. data 6. The tef1-α sequences for Nigrospora after Mafft. suppl. data 7. The tub2 sequences for Nigrospora after Mafft.

Supplementary material 3

Primer pairs and amplification procedures used in this study, the best models of BI and ML used for each gene in the phylogenetic tree, and the records of Apiospora and Nigrospora in the GBIF database

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(S) are credited.

Xing-Chang Wang, Rui-Nan Zhang, Chada Norphanphoun, Si-Bo Wang, Meng-Ting Zou, Shi-Qi Guo, Jing-E Sun, Jia-Ping Wang, Nalin N. Wijayawardene, Kevin D. Hyde, Yong Wang, Feng-Quan Liu

Data type

xlsx

Explanation note

table SS1. Primer pairs and amplification procedures used in this study. table S2. The best models of BI and ML used for each gene in the phylogenetic tree. table S3. Records of Apiospora in GBIF. table S4. Records of Nigrospora in GBIF.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article or in the supplementary materials. All sequences during this study have been submitted to GenBank.


Articles from IMA Fungus are provided here courtesy of The International Mycological Association

RESOURCES