Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2026 Apr 23;12(5):2567–2589. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6c00137

Chitosan-Based Nanoparticles for Nose-to-Brain Drug Delivery: A Real Path toward Effective CNS Therapy?

Lorena R Riani †,, Gustavo F B Seno , Dominique M Silva , Cibele R Toledo , Mayara R B Paiva , Júlia S Santos §, Rodrigo L Fabri †,, Frederico Pittella †,, Guilherme D Tavares †,‡,*
PMCID: PMC13169366  PMID: 42024000

Abstract

Treating central nervous system (CNS) disorders remains a major clinical challenge. The blood–brain barrier (BBB), systemic toxicity, and first-pass metabolism are key obstacles. These factors limit the effective drug delivery to the brain. Intranasal administration has emerged as a noninvasive strategy to bypass the BBB. This approach enables direct drug delivery to the brain through the olfactory and trigeminal nerve pathways, commonly referred to as nose-to-brain (N2B) delivery. In this context, chitosan (CS), a biocompatible and mucoadhesive polysaccharide with permeation-enhancing properties, has gained significant interest as a functional material for nanoparticle (NP) engineering. CS-based or CS-coated NP can prolong the residence time on the nasal mucosa and facilitate drug transport to the CNS. This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent advances in CS-based NP for N2B drug delivery across a range of CNS disorders, including neurodegenerative, neuropsychiatric, neoplastic, and infectious conditions. Particular attention is given to formulation strategies, mechanistic insights, and preclinical outcomes. Recent patent applications are surveyed to underscore the translational potential and commercial interest in this technology. Collectively, CS-based NPs effectively address major therapeutic barriers, establishing a transformative and innovative platform in CNS drug delivery.

Keywords: CNS disorders, intranasal delivery, nose-to-brain, nanoparticles, chitosan


graphic file with name ab6c00137_0010.jpg


graphic file with name ab6c00137_0008.jpg

1. Introduction

Central nervous system (CNS) disorders constitute one of the leading causes of disability and mortality worldwide. Neurological conditions currently affect an estimated 3.40 billion people, representing 43.1% of the global population. Over the past three decades, both mortality and overall health burden have increased by 39% with this burden projected to increase significantly in the coming decades. ,

This trend is intimately linked to the progressive aging of the global population, which is accompanied by a marked increase in the incidence of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s, as well as neuropsychiatric disorders including depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder (BD). In parallel, the management of CNS tumors and infections continues to pose substantial clinical challenges. , Collectively, these conditions underscore the need for effective therapeutic strategies targeting the CNS. Despite extensive investment in drug development, most therapeutic agents exhibit limited clinical efficacy due to their inability to adequately cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB), an evolutionarily conserved structure that restricts the passage of xenobiotics into the brain parenchyma. As a result, many CNS drugs suffer from poor bioavailability, high systemic toxicity, short half-life, and frequent off-target effects, necessitating high doses and frequent administration schedules. ,

Alternative delivery approaches that can bypass or overcome the BBB have become a focus of scientific research, such as noninvasive delivery strategies. Among them, the intranasal route has emerged as a particularly promising approach for direct drug delivery to the brain, leveraging the anatomical and physiological connectivity of the nasal cavity with the CNS via the olfactory and trigeminal pathways. This approach, often referred to as nose-to-brain (N2B) delivery, enables rapid onset of action, reduces systemic exposure, and enhances therapeutic targeting. Notably, the clinical feasibility of this route is supported by the approval of several intranasal formulations currently on the market for migraine (e.g., zolmitriptan, Sumatriptan), opioid overdose (e.g., naloxone), epilepsy (e.g., diazepam, midazolam), and depression (e.g., esketamine).

Importantly, the intranasal route still presents several challenges that may limit its efficiency. Rapid mucociliary clearance in the nasal cavity, combined with enzymatic degradation within the nasal mucosa, significantly reduces the drug residence time and hinders absorption. Importantly, although the intranasal route offers a promising noninvasive pathway for N2B delivery, it still presents several physiological and formulation-related challenges that may limit its efficiency. Rapid mucociliary clearance in the nasal cavity, together with enzymatic degradation within the nasal mucosa, can significantly reduce drug residence time and hinder absorption. In addition, particle size plays a critical role in determining nasal deposition, mucosal penetration, and subsequent transport to the brain, with optimal sizes typically in the 100–200 nm range, whereas suboptimal sizes may lead to rapid clearance or limited permeation.

Furthermore, the physicochemical stability of formulations, including resistance to aggregation, degradation, and premature drug release, is essential to ensure consistent performance and therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, the rational design of N2B delivery systems must carefully consider these factors to optimize drug transport across the nasal mucosa and improve brain targeting.

Building upon the foundation of N2B drug delivery, nanotechnology has been increasingly explored as a means to enhance its efficiency and overcome formulation-related barriers. ,, Nanoparticles (NP) can improve drug solubility, protect labile molecules from enzymatic degradation, and facilitate controlled release, while also enabling surface functionalization for targeted delivery. Among the various nanocarrier systems investigated, chitosan (CS)-based nanoparticles have garnered particular attention due to the favorable physicochemical and biological properties of this natural cationic polysaccharide. CS exhibits excellent mucoadhesiveness, biodegradability, biocompatibility, and the ability to transiently open tight junctions in the nasal epithelium, thereby enhancing paracellular transport of the therapeutic agent. Furthermore, CS can serve both as a matrix material and as a surface coating for hybrid nanostructures, extending its utility across a wide range of nanotechnological platforms.

This review presents a comprehensive and critical analysis of the recent advances in the development of CS-based NPs for N2B delivery. We discuss their formulation strategies, mechanisms of action, and preclinical outcomes in diverse CNS pathologies, including neurodegenerative, neuropsychiatric, oncologic, and infectious diseases. We also integrate insights from recent patent filings, underscoring the translational potential and innovation landscape of these systems.

2. Central Nervous System Disorders

Disorders affecting the CNS represent a complex and heterogeneous group of conditions with profound implications for public health, quality of life, and healthcare systems worldwide. These include neurodegenerative diseases, neuropsychiatric disorders, brain tumors, and CNS infectionseach with distinct etiologies, pathophysiologies, and clinical trajectories. Collectively, CNS disorders rank among the leading causes of disability and death, and their incidence continues to rise, driven largely by global population aging and the increasing prevalence of mental and neurological conditions.

Despite this diversity, many CNS disorders share common hallmarks, such as progressive neuronal dysfunction, cognitive and behavioral impairments, and chronic disease progression. These features are often accompanied by complex symptom clusters, frequent comorbidities, and a high social and economic burden. Moreover, the clinical management of CNS disorders remains highly challenging due to diagnostic complexity, limited therapeutic efficacy, and, particularly, constraints in drug delivery. Most treatments rely on invasive administration routes, such as intravenous or intrathecal delivery, which are associated with increased risks and low patient acceptance. Additionally, even when oral administration is feasible, systemic side effects frequently occur, highlighting the need for new approaches to CNS-targeted drug delivery.

Figure summarizes the key aspects of CNS disorders and provides a framework for the subsequent discussion. In the following subsections, we outline major CNS disorders that have been the focus of translational research in drug delivery, including neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric conditions, primary brain tumors, and CNS infections. Particular attention is given to their epidemiological relevance, clinical impact, and current therapeutic limitations, which collectively underscore the urgent need for more effective treatment strategies.

1.

1

Schematic representation of key aspects of CNS disorders. Created using https://www.canva.com.

2.1. Neurodegenerative Diseases

Neurodegenerative diseases are among the most therapeutically intractable disorders of the CNS. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD) are the two most prevalent forms, both characterized by progressive neuronal dysfunction and death, leading to irreversible cognitive, behavioral, and motor decline. , AD currently affects approximately 51.6 million individuals worldwide, with projections reaching 132 million by the mid-21st century, alongside a 146.2% increase in mortality over the past decade. Similarly, the prevalence of PD has increased markedly, rising by approximately 156% between 1990 and 2019 and is projected to reach 22 million cases by 2050.

Despite decades of research and partial elucidation of pathological hallmarkssuch as amyloid-β plaques, hyperphosphorylated tau tangles in AD, and dopaminergic neurodegeneration in PDclinically meaningful interventions remain limited. , In AD, available pharmacological treatments offer only modest symptomatic relief without halting the disease progression. Most are administered systemically, including cholinesterase inhibitors (e.g., donepezil, rivastigmine) and N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists (e.g., memantine), which suffer from poor CNS penetration and frequent peripheral side effects. Recent advances in monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid-β, such as lecanemab and donanemab, have shown limited efficacy and raised concerns regarding brain edema and infusion-related complications. Importantly, these biologics require intravenous delivery and long-term administration protocols, further complicating patient adherence.

Similarly, PD management remains largely symptomatic. Levodopa remains the mainstay therapy, often combined with catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors or dopamine agonists to prolong its effect. However, these agents do not modify disease progression and exhibit limited BBB permeability. Moreover, chronic use is associated with debilitating motor fluctuations and dyskinesias.

Overall, the lack of targeted CNS-penetrant therapies underscores a critical need for innovative drug delivery strategies capable of overcoming the BBB and providing sustained therapeutic action within the brain parenchyma.

2.2. Neuropsychiatric Disorders

While neurodegenerative diseases are characterized by progressive neuronal dysfunction, neuropsychiatric disorders represent a distinct class of CNS conditions involving functional and neurochemical dysregulation. These disorders encompass a diverse spectrum of mental health conditions marked by intricate disturbances in mood, cognition, perception, and behavior, typically arising from dysregulation of CNS circuits. Among the most prevalent and debilitating disorders are major depressive disorder (MDD), anxiety disorders, BD, and schizophrenia (SCZ), each of which will be briefly examined in this review.

2.2.1. Depression

MDD, commonly referred to as depression, is one of the most prevalent and disabling neuropsychiatric disorders, currently affecting more than 280 million people worldwide. , Clinically, it manifests as persistent low mood, anhedonia (loss of interest or pleasure), fatigue, cognitive impairment, and pervasive feelings of guilt or worthlessness, often accompanied by disturbances in sleep and appetite. In severe cases, MDD can culminate in suicidal ideation or behavior. ,

MDD is a heterogeneous, multifactorial condition, whose pathophysiology remains only partially understood. The long-standing and most widely accepted monoamine hypothesis posits that depressive symptoms arise from deficits in key neurotransmittersparticularly serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine. , More recent evidence, however, implicates a broader array of mechanisms, including dysregulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis; diminished neurotrophic support, exemplified by reduced brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels; chronic neuroinflammation marked by elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α); hippocampal atrophy; and disturbances of circadian rhythmicity. , In addition, both genetic susceptibility and environmental stressors are recognized as critical determinants of disease onset and progression.

Despite significant advances in pharmacological interventions, MDD remains difficult to manage in a substantial proportion of patients. Conventional treatments primarily target monoaminergic pathways through agents such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs). However, nearly 50% of patients fail to achieve a satisfactory response to first-line therapy, and approximately 30% meet criteria for treatment-resistant depression. In addition to pharmacodynamic limitations, restricted drug delivery to the CNS, limited brain bioavailability, and interindividual variability in drug distribution further compromise therapeutic outcomes. Persistent residual symptoms, high relapse rates, and profound impairment in daily functioning underscore the urgent need for more effective and mechanistically targeted therapeutic strategies, including advanced drug delivery approaches.

2.2.2. Anxiety

Anxiety disorders represent one of the most prevalent categories of mental health conditions, affecting individuals of all ages worldwide. According to the World Health Organization, an estimated 359 million people worldwide, including approximately 58 million children and adolescents, currently live with an anxiety disorder. Their typically early onset, chronic course, high rates of comorbidity, and profound impact on daily functioning place anxiety disorders among the leading causes of health-related disability, accounting for approximately 3.3% of the global disease burden.

Clinically, anxiety disorders comprise a broad spectrum of conditions, including generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, separation anxiety disorder, specific phobias, agoraphobia, post-traumatic stress disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Although each exhibits distinct symptom profiles and age-related patterns of onset, these disorders often share overlapping neurobiological mechanisms and frequently co-occur.

These disorders are typically marked by excessive and persistent fear, worry, or nervousness that can profoundly disrupt daily functioning, academic performance, occupational productivity, and interpersonal relationships. , Beyond emotional distress, affected individuals often experience physical manifestations, such as tachycardia, hyperventilation, diaphoresis, gastrointestinal discomfort, and tremors. Importantly, anxiety disorders have also been associated with elevated cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, underscoring their considerable clinical and public health significance.

The pathophysiology of anxiety is complex and has been incompletely elucidated. Neurobiological models implicate dysregulation of neural circuits governing fear processing and threat detection, particularly within the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex, as a central mechanism. At the molecular level, reduced γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)–mediated inhibitory signaling contributes to heightened neuronal excitability and arousal. Moreover, alterations in serotonergic, noradrenergic, glutamatergic, endocannabinoid, and neuropeptidergic pathways have been linked to the development and persistence of anxiety symptoms.

Pharmacological management of anxiety disorders has traditionally relied on benzodiazepines, which act on GABA-A receptors to produce rapid anxiolytic and sedative effects. However, concerns regarding dependence, tolerance, and cognitive adverse effects have prompted a therapeutic shift toward SSRIs, SNRIs, and nonbenzodiazepine anxiolytics such as buspirone, which are now widely regarded as first-line treatments.

Despite these options, many patients fail to achieve full symptom remission: clinical trials report response rates of only 40–70%, with sustained remission occurring in merely 20–47% of the cases. Treatment-resistant anxiety remains a significant challenge, particularly among individuals with comorbid depressiona highly prevalent combination associated with greater symptom severity and poorer clinical outcomes. These limitations underscore the urgent need for more effective, accessible, and personalized therapeutic strategies.

2.2.3. Bipolar Disorder

BD is a prevalent, heritable, and severely disabling psychiatric condition associated with a considerable economic burden. It is characterized by marked mood fluctuations, with alternating episodes of mania or hypomania and depression. , BD is classified into two main subtypes: Bipolar I Disorder (BD I), which involves full manic episodes often accompanied by elevated mood, agitation, and increased energy, and Bipolar II Disorder (BD II), in which hypomanic episodes alternate with major depressive episodes. , The global prevalence of BD is estimated to range from 1% to 5%, depending on the diagnostic subtype. While the incidence of BD I is similar in males and females, BD II appears to be more common in women. The disorder typically emerges in late adolescence or early adulthood, most often between the ages of 18 and 22. , A major clinical concern in BD is its high rate of psychiatric comorbidities, including anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, personality disorders, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). ,

Although the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying BD are not yet fully understood, accumulating evidence implicates a complex interplay of genetic predispositions, environmental influences, neurodevelopmental dysregulation, neuroinflammatory processes, mitochondrial dysfunction, and disruptions in sleep and circadian rhythms. Pharmacological agents targeting various neurotransmitter systemsdopaminergic, serotonergic, glutamatergic, and GABAergichave shown efficacy in both acute symptom management and long-term mood stabilization.

The principal aim of pharmacological treatment in BD is the stabilization of mood to prevent the recurrence of acute episodes of mania, hypomania, and depression. , Treatment regimens are typically individualized based on the patient’s symptom profile. Lithium, long considered the gold standard mood stabilizer, remains widely used and FDA-approved. Anticonvulsants such as carbamazepine and valproic acid, are particularly effective for manic and hypomanic episodes. Atypical antipsychotics, including haloperidol, olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone, are frequently utilized in the management of acute mood episodes. For depressive episodes, SSRIs and other antidepressants are often prescribed. Maintenance therapy commonly involves combination strategies, integrating agents such as lamotrigine, quetiapine, or olanzapine alongside lithium. Despite their clinical efficacy, these pharmacotherapies are associated with a range of adverse effects, including sedation, extrapyramidal symptoms, tremors, anxiety, metabolic disturbances, and weight gain, that may impair treatment adherence and necessitate close clinical monitoring. ,

2.2.4. Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a chronic and severely disabling psychiatric disorder affecting approximately 24 million individuals worldwide and ranking among the top ten causes of disability, owing to its broad range of functional impairments. , Clinically, the disorder presents a spectrum of symptoms that are categorized as either positive or negative. Positive symptoms include hallucinations, delusions, and episodes of agitation or aggression. In contrast, negative symptoms encompass emotional withdrawal, social isolation, diminished spontaneity, and cognitive impairments.

Although the precise etiology of schizophrenia remains unclear, current hypotheses suggest that its pathophysiology involves the dysregulation of several neurotransmitter systems. These include increased dopaminergic and serotonergic (5-HT) activity, alongside decreased glutamatergic activityparticularly via N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors and impaired gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) neurotransmission. Historically, schizophrenia was primarily linked to dopaminergic dysfunction, leading to the development of first-generation (typical) antipsychotics, such as chlorpromazine and haloperidol, which primarily target D2/D3 receptors. Second-generation (atypical) antipsychotics, including clozapine, risperidone, and quetiapine, exhibit broader receptor activity profiles.

Despite their clinical utility, antipsychotic medications are associated with significant adverse effects, such as weight gain, extrapyramidal symptoms, hyperglycemia, sedation, and postural hypotension, that frequently compromise patient adherence to treatment. , Furthermore, these drugs face pharmacokinetic limitations, including poor oral bioavailability, low aqueous solubility, and extensive first-pass metabolism. Treatment with antipsychotics often follows a cyclic pattern of remission and relapse. With each relapse, the duration required for symptom remission typically increases and therapeutic responsiveness diminishes. Consequently, early and effective intervention is critical to minimizing relapses and halting disease progression.

2.3. Brain Tumors

In contrast to neuropsychiatric disorders, which primarily involve functional and neurochemical alterations, brain tumors are characterized by uncontrolled cellular proliferation, resulting in abnormal masses that disrupt normal neurological function. Without timely diagnosis and intervention, these neoplasms can cause profound neurological deficits and may ultimately lead to death. Histopathologically, brain tumors are classified into four grades based on their cellular characteristics and growth dynamics. Grades I and II are generally categorized as low-grade or slow-growing tumors, such as pilocytic astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma, and are typically associated with a more favorable prognosis. Conversely, grades III and IV represent high-grade or malignant tumors, including anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma multiforme, which display marked aggressiveness, rapid progression, and dismal clinical outcomes.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common malignant subtype of gliomas and a primary intracranial neoplasm originating from glial cells. It is associated with an extremely poor prognosis, with approximately 30% of patients surviving up to one year and fewer than 5% beyond five years. Despite significant advances in research and therapeutic strategies, GBM remains associated with exceptionally high mortality rates and lacks effective treatment options capable of achieving a cure or substantially extending patient survival.

GBM is marked by pronounced intratumoral heterogeneity, low immunogenicity, the presence of the BBB, and a marked resistance to conventional therapies. First-line treatment consists of maximal safe surgical resection followed by concomitant radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy with Temozolomide (TMZ). One of the main obstacles to the development of effective therapeutic strategies is the BBB, whose selective permeability greatly restricts drug penetration into the tumor microenvironment. GBM cells further complicate this scenario by overexpressing vascular endothelial growth factor, which drives the formation of abnormal, highly permeable, and structurally deficient blood vessels. This vascular dysfunction disrupts tight junctions and compromises BBB integrity, paradoxically increasing permeability while hindering effective and uniform drug distribution.

Nanotechnology and related drug-delivery technologies are being extensively explored to optimize drug bioavailability within the CNS before the initiation of therapeutic protocols for tumor treatment. Employing alternative routes of administration offers a promising strategy to bypass the BBB, thereby enabling more efficient and targeted delivery of therapeutics to the brain.

2.4. Brain Infections

In addition to noninfectious conditions, infectious diseases of CNS represent a clinically significant and heterogeneous group of disorders, often associated with high morbidity and mortality and further complicated by challenges in effective drug delivery. These infections are caused by a diverse range of pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites, which further complicate therapeutic management. CNS-infiltrating pathogens exhibit tropism for specific brain cells including neurons and glial cells. Notably, viruses such as rabies virus, Zika virus, tick-borne encephalitis virus, and herpes viruses demonstrate a particular affinity for neurons. These infections frequently result in profound disruptions of CNS homeostasis, leading to severe neurological conditions such as encephalitis or meningitis, which may culminate in significant morbidity, long-term disability, or death. Other pathogens are more prone to invade the CNS under conditions of compromised physiological barriers or immune function, including immunodeficiency, systemic inflammation, BBB disruption, traumatic injury, neurosurgical interventions, or concurrent infections. Examples of such opportunistic pathogens include fungal species such as Candida spp., Cryptococcus spp., and members of the order Mucorales, the protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii, and bacterial species such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Mycoplasma spp.

The treatment of brain infections remains a formidable clinical challenge. Although several pharmacological agents are currently available, their therapeutic effectiveness is often compromised by the restricted permeability of the BBB, which prevents most conventional drugs from achieving therapeutic concentrations within the CNS. As a result, only a limited number of therapeutic options exist for CNS and brain infections, and those currently in clinical use frequently exhibit suboptimal efficacy in pathogen eradication. To address these limitations, recent research has focused on the development of innovative therapeutic approaches, particularly nanotechnology-based formulations and advanced drug delivery systems designed to enhance BBB penetration and improve drug bioavailability at the target site.

3. Nose-to-Brain Delivery

Delivery of drugs to the CNS poses multiple challenges. Many compounds that are effective against diseases of this system cannot cross the BBB, frequently displaying low solubility and poor central bioavailability. The BBB separates the cerebral capillary blood from the brain’s interstitial fluid through a structure formed by endothelial cells, astrocytes, and pericytes. Under physiological conditions, only lipophilic and low-molecular-weight substances can passively diffuse across the BBB. However, this transport is limited by the physicochemical properties of the drug, and often requires specific mechanisms such as paracellular transport, ion channels, ligand-specific receptors or carriers, and energy-dependent transport systems.

Several strategies have been employed for the treatment of CNS diseases, including intrathecal and intracerebroventricular injections, as well as conventional routes such as oral and intravenous administration. While invasive routes can achieve higher CNS drug concentrations, they are associated with procedural complexity, increased risks, and restriction to hospital settings. In contrast, conventional delivery routes are limited by the BBB, resulting in poor CNS bioavailability and limited brain targeting. Consequently, high systemic doses are often required, increasing the risk of peripheral toxicity, systemic side effects, gastrointestinal disturbances, and extensive hepatic metabolism. ,

In this context, N2B delivery has emerged as a promising strategy for directly transporting drugs to the brain through the olfactory and trigeminal nerve pathways, thereby bypassing the BBB, minimizing systemic side effects, and enabling targeted delivery to the CNS. The human nasal cavity has an approximate surface area of 160 cm2, and drug transport occurs across both the respiratory and olfactory epithelia, with the olfactory region serving as the primary pathway. , The respiratory region, which constitutes the largest portion of the nasal cavity, is lined with a ciliated respiratory epithelium and functions primarily as a protective surface. It is innervated by branches of the trigeminal nerve. In contrast, the olfactory region, which represents about 10% of the nasal cavity surface area, is located in the upper part of the cavity and is innervated by fine fibers originating from the olfactory nerve. Both regions, as well as their respective neural connections, are depicted in Figure .

2.

2

Schematic illustration of the nose-to-brain delivery pathway via the olfactory and trigeminal nerves. Created using https://www.biorender.com/.

Drug transport along these pathways can occur through the olfactory epithelium either by rapid extracellular movement via perineural and perivascular spaces or by slower intra-axonal transport along olfactory neurons, ultimately reaching the olfactory bulb and higher brain regions. Olfactory nerve fibers cross the cribriform plate of the ethmoid bone and project to the olfactory bulb within the CNS. In contrast, the trigeminal nerve pathway involves the ophthalmic and maxillary branches, which extend to both the olfactory and respiratory epithelia. Drugs may travel along these nerves primarily through perineural routes and, to a lesser extent, by intra-axonal transport, reaching the CNS at the level of the pons and terminating in the spinal trigeminal nucleus within the brainstem. Notably, the transit time along the trigeminal nerve has been reported to exceed that of the olfactory route by more than 10 h.

Compared with other administration routes, such as parenteral and intrathecal, the intranasal route is considered noninvasive, easy to self-administer, and painless. Nevertheless, several formulation parameters must be carefully evaluated during the development of the nasal dosage forms. Among these, pH is particularly important and should be maintained between 4.5 and 6.5 to prevent irritation of the nasal mucosa, inhibit the growth of pathogenic microorganisms, and preserve normal ciliary function. Another critical parameter to consider is the volume of administration, as excessive volumes can cause mucosal irritation and may result in anterior leakage from the nostrils or posterior drainage into the pharynx, leading to patient discomfort. The optimal volume for intranasal administration typically ranges from 0.05 to 0.15 mL, with a recommended maximum of 0.20 mL. To enhance therapeutic efficacy, particularly through the olfactory and trigeminal pathways, specialized nasal drug-delivery devices have been developed, including droppers, syringes, pressurized metered-dose inhalers, breath-powered bidirectional nasal devices, and pressurized olfactory delivery systems.

To date, several intranasal drug delivery formulations have been approved for clinical use, and there is growing interest in repurposing and developing N2B delivery systems to enhance therapeutic outcomes in CNS disorders. These products target a range of clinical conditions, including multifactorial disorders that involve both the peripheral and central nervous systems, such as migraine, opioid overdose, and dry eye disease, as well as neurological and psychiatric conditions that are primarily associated with CNS dysfunction, such as epilepsy and depression. The approved intranasal formulations currently available on the market are summarized in Table .

1. FDA-Approved Nose-to-Brain Formulations .

active ingredient therapy approval time/Country device
Nicotine Smoking cessation 1996/USA Reusable spray device
Sumatriptan Migraine 1997/UK Disposable prefilled nasal spray device
Dihydroergotamine mesylate Migraine 1997/Canada Nasal spray device
Zolmitriptan Migraine 2003/USA Disposable prefilled nasal spray device
Nalocone hydrochloride Opioid overdose 2015/Ireland Disposable prefilled nasal spray device
Sumatriptan Migraine 2016/UK Xsail system
Sumatritpan Migraine 2019/USA Disposable prefilled nasal spray device
Midazolam Epilepsy 2019/Belgium Disposable prefilled nasal spray device
Esketamine hydrochloride Depression 2019/USA Disposable prefilled nasal spray device
Diazepam Epilepsy 2020/USA Disposable prefilled nasal spray device
Dihydroergotamine mesylate Migraine 2021/USA POD system
Nalozone hydrochloride Opioid overdose 2021/USA Disposable prefilled nasal spray device
Varenicline Dry Eye Disease 2021/USA Reusable nasal spray device
Zavegepant Migraine 2023/USA Disposable prefilled nasal spray device
Naloxone hydrochloride Opioid overdose 2023/USA Disposable prefilled nasal spray device
a

Adapted with permission from [Ge et al.] Copyright [2024] MDPI.

In addition to currently approved therapies, several clinical studies investigating N2B delivery have been completed or are ongoing, highlighting the translational potential of this approach. A completed clinical trial evaluating intranasal Sumatriptan administered via a dedicated delivery device demonstrated a faster onset of action compared to oral administration, with significant reductions in migraine pain intensity and migraine-related disability observed as early as 10 min postdose. , Additionally, a completed study assessing intranasal reduced glutathione (GSH) showed that this approach effectively increases brain GSH levels, with elevated concentrations persisting for at least 1 h in patients with PD. ,

Intranasal insulin has also been explored in clinical trials, demonstrating safety and clinically relevant improvements in cognitive and functional performance in patients with PD following daily administration over 4 weeks. , Furthermore, a completed study investigated its effects over a 12 week treatment period, revealing its ability to modulate cognitive outcomes, as well as blood and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and amyloid-β deposition in patients with AD. , In addition to these findings, an ongoing clinical trial is recruiting participants to evaluate the effects of intranasal oxytocin on stress, anxiety, and depression in caregivers of individuals with dementia.

However, nasal drug delivery also faces anatomical and physiological challenges, such as interindividual variations in nasal cavity structure, significant differences between human and animal models (making this difficult to extrapolate preclinical studies to clinical) and the influence of mucociliary clearance. This last one is an interaction between the cilia and mucus layers, which helps inhaled toxic substances to adhere and transport toward the nasopharynx and gastrointestinal tract. The average clearance rate is approximately 6 mm/min and this rapid turnover can significantly impact drug bioavailability in nose-to-brain delivery, as the formulation must remain in contact with nasal epithelium long enough to penetrate the mucus and adhere to the local nasal epithelium before being washed away.

To address the inherent limitations of N2B drug delivery, various nanoparticulate systems have been developed to enhance drug stability within the nasal cavity, facilitate trans-epithelial transport, and improve drug targeting to the CNS. Nanoparticles with sizes ranging from 100 to 200 nm are considered optimal for N2B delivery, since this size range facilitates cellular uptake and enhances the ability of the particles to penetrate the nasal mucus, enabling drug transport through the olfactory and trigeminal nerves to the brain. ,, In addition, nanoparticles can assist in the precise control of drug release kinetics, which may help maintain therapeutic concentrations in the brain, potentially enhance treatment efficacy, and reduce dosing frequency. Moreover, their biocompatibility and low toxicity can help minimize potential adverse effects on both nasal and cerebral tissues.

Building on these advantages, several preclinical studies have demonstrated the translational potential of nanoparticle-based systems for N2B delivery. For instance, intranasal lipid nanocapsules loaded with nimodipine achieved brain drug levels comparable to those obtained by intravenous administration while significantly reducing systemic exposurean important advantage given the cardiovascular side effects associated with intravenous delivery. This reduced peripheral distribution, combined with sustained brain availability, highlights the potential of nanocarriers to improve safety and therapeutic efficacy. Similarly, in an induced rat model of parkinsonism, carbenoxolone-loaded CS-coated solid lipid nanoparticles showed superior neuroprotective effects compared to a drug suspension, preserving neuronal architecture and attenuating oxidative stress and apoptosis.

Importantly, this translational potential is further supported by ongoing clinical investigations, including a phase II trial evaluating an intranasal nanoparticle formulation (APH-1105) in patients with mild to moderate AD, reinforcing the clinical relevance of nanotechnology-based N2B strategies.

A wide variety of nanocarrier platformsincluding liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, solid lipid nanoparticles, and dendrimersprovide versatile strategies for drug encapsulation and enable the tailoring of delivery profiles. Among these, CS-based nanoparticles stand out as a particularly promising system owing to their strong mucoadhesive properties, which are discussed in the following section.

4. Chitosan-Based Nanoparticles for N2B Delivery

Chitosan (CS) is a linear cationic polysaccharide composed of β-(1 → 4)-linked d-glucosamine and N-acetyl-d-glucosamine units, obtained through the partial or complete deacetylation of chitin, a naturally abundant biopolymer primarily found in crustacean shells and fungal cell walls. , Each repeating unit of CS contains two hydroxyl groups and one amino group, as illustrated in Figure . CS is classified as a weak base, remaining insoluble in water and most organic solvents. However, it becomes soluble in dilute acidic environments (pH < 6.5), where protonation of the amino groups (R–NH2 → R–NH3 +) confers a positive charge and enhances solubility. Under neutral or alkaline conditions, deprotonation occurs, resulting in precipitation driven by charge loss and strengthened intermolecular interactions. ,

3.

3

Schematic representation of chitin deacetylation leading to the formation of CS. Created using ChemDraw Professional 15.0.

Beyond its structural characteristics, CS possesses a set of properties that make it an attractive candidate for biomedical and pharmaceutical applications. These include excellent biocompatibility, biodegradability, and low toxicity, together with a wide spectrum of biological activities such as antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, and antioxidant effects. Owing to its cationic nature, CS readily engages in electrostatic interactions with negatively charged biological membranes and mucosal surfaces, thereby prolonging residence time and improving drug absorption and bioavailability. , Such mucoadhesive properties are particularly advantageous for N2B delivery, where mucociliary clearance constitutes a major barrier. In addition, CS can transiently modulate epithelial tight junctions through interactions with proteins such as occludin and zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1), thereby enhancing paracellular drug transport across the nasal epithelium. , Taken together, these features highlight the potential of CS as a foundational material for developing advanced drug delivery systems, particularly nanoengineered platforms tailored to overcome the barriers inherent to N2B administration.

Beyond these biological and physicochemical attributes, the versatility of CS also arises from its functionalizable backbone, which enables chemical modifications to improve solubility, enhance drug loading within nanoparticulate systems, and increase targeting specificity. ,, In this context, several studies have investigated CS derivatives bearing chemical modifications that expand their functional versatility. Examples include quaternary ammonium palmitoyl glycol chitosan (GCPQ) (Figure A), which enhances drug transport across the gastrointestinal epithelium, BBB, and cornea; carboxymethyl chitosan (CMCh); and N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan (N,O-CMCS) (Figure B), which improves aqueous solubility, mucoadhesion, and biocompatibility, thereby facilitating nanoparticle stability and effective permeation through the nasal mucosa. , Taken together, these features position CS as a promising polymeric platform for engineering advanced nanosystems designed to overcome the barriers of N2B administration.

4.

4

Schematic representation of CS derivatives. (A) quaternary ammonium palmitoyl glycol chitosan (GCPQ); (B) N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan (N,O-CMCS). Created using ChemDraw Professional 15.0.

CS-based nanoparticles can be produced using several established techniques, including ionic gelation, reverse micelles (microemulsion), emulsification, coacervation, nanoprecipitation, and spray-drying. The choice of method depends on factors such as the physicochemical properties of the encapsulated drug, desired particle size, formulation safety, and scalability. , Among these approaches, ionic gelation remains the most widely employed owing to its simplicity, aqueous processing, and avoidance of toxic cross-linkers or solvents, making it a cost-effective, scalable, and environmentally sustainable method. ,,,

In addition to functioning as a matrix material, CS can also be employed as a surface coating for a wide range of nanostructures, including polymeric nanoparticles, solid lipid nanoparticles, ,, and liposomes. , The CS coating can be applied either during nanoparticle formation or postassembly by introducing a CS solution under controlled mixing conditions. The coating process primarily occurs through polymer chain entanglement and/or electrostatic interactions between the positively charged amino groups of CS and the negatively charged functional groups present on the surface of lipid or polymeric nanoparticles. This approach confers several advantageous properties to the delivery system, including enhanced mucoadhesiveness, improved permeability, greater colloidal stability, and augmented biological activity, thereby reinforcing the role of CS as a versatile component in nanoparticle engineering.

In the specific context of N2B administration, CS-based nanotechnology has gained increasing attention as a versatile strategy for CNS drug delivery. Formulations employing CS-based or CS-coated nanoparticles are being explored across a wide range of indicationsincluding neurodegenerative, , neuropsychiatric, oncological, and infectious CNS disordersunderscoring their translational potential as alternatives or complements to conventional therapies.

The physicochemical characteristics of CS-based nanoparticles, such as particle size and surface charge, are critical for efficient N2B delivery. Smaller nanoparticles favor direct brain uptake through the nasal route, while sizes within 100–200 nm are generally considered optimal; however, larger CS-based systems (>200 nm) have also shown effective brain transport. , A zeta potential exceeding ±20 mV is essential to ensuring sufficient electrostatic repulsion between particles, thus preventing aggregation and enhancing colloidal stability. Moreover, the typically high and positive surface charge of CS nanoparticles promotes adhesion to the negatively charged nasal mucosa, increasing residence time and facilitating cellular transport. , Altogether, these parameters strongly influence the therapeutic performance of CS nanocarriers during intranasal administration. In addition to these physicochemical characteristics, the interaction of CS nanoparticles with nasal epithelial cells plays a crucial role in determining their internalization pathways.

Although the underlying mechanisms are not yet fully elucidated, several studies suggest that CS nanoparticles enhance paracellular transport by transiently modulating tight junction integrity through electrostatic interactions with negatively charged junctional proteins, including claudins, occludin, and ZO-1, thereby facilitating drug permeation without compromising epithelial integrity. Cellular uptake of these nanoparticles occurs primarily via clathrin- and caveolae-mediated endocytosis, while macropinocytosis contributes as a secondary internalization pathway. , Formulation parameters play a critical role in delivery efficiency as controlled increases in viscosity can enhance deposition in the olfactory region, thereby improving brain targeting. Moreover, stimuli-responsive systems enable site-specific drug release within diseased brain regions, via intraneuronal transport along axons or extraneuronal diffusion through perineural pathways. ,

This section provides a comprehensive and critical review of the current literature on CS-NP for N2B delivery with emphasis on their capacity to enhance drug bioavailability, improve therapeutic outcomes, and address unmet needs in CNS treatment.

4.1. Therapeutic Applications and Current Evidence

Several drugs have been encapsulated in CS-based nanoparticles to enhance their pharmacological efficacy in the treatment of CNS disorders, as summarized in Table . These formulations have been developed using different strategies, including CS-coated nanoparticles, ,,,,− CS-based polymeric nanoparticles, polymer blends incorporating CS, ,,, and hybrid systems. ,,,,− In addition, modified preparation approaches employing cyclodextrins as cross-linking agents have also been reported.

2. CS-Based Nanoparticles for Nose-to-Brain Delivery in CNS Disorders .

neurodegenerative disorders – Alzheimer’s disease (AD)
drug carrier limitations main results ref
Narigenin CS-NP Low aqueous solubility, low bioavailability Memory improvement, higher levels of endogenous antioxidants, higher neuronal density
Sinapic Acid CS-coated-NLC Low aqueous solubility and low permeability through BBB Improved nasal permeation, increased half-life, and brain concentration after intranasal administration
Rivastigmine CS-NP Short half-life, lower bioavailability, and lower brain concentration after oral administration Downregulation of caspase-3 and lower expression of Tau after intranasal administration
Donezepil CS-NP Low ability to cross BBB Higher brain concentration after intranasal administration
Quercetin CS-coated fullerene conjugate Low bioavailability, solubility, and rapid metabolism Improvement of mucoadhesion and of nasal permeation in
17β-estradiol CS-coated-NLC Peripheral side effects and risk of breast cancer Improvement of learning ability and long-term memory
Vinpocentine In situ gel based on CS-NP Low oral bioavailability Improved nose-to brain distribution higher brain concentration after nasal administration
Lutein CS-NP Low solubility, lower bioavailability Cellular uptake by the caveolae-mediated endocytosis, clathrin-mediated pathway, and micropinocytosis. Higher penetration into BBB model, higher brain distribution
Berberin CS-coated-NLC Poor systemic bioavailability, limited CNS penetration Improved nasal permeation and brain concentration, Highest nose-to brain-distribution
Resveratrol SPIONs-loaded CS coated bilosomes Poor bioavailability, low aqueous solubility, photodegradation, and extensive metabolization Improved in cognitive and memory functions
Insulin CS-coated-SLN Impaired transport across BBB Higher nasal permeability to coated-SLN
Ferulic Acid CS-coated-SLN Poor aqueous solubility, low permeability across lipophilic barriers, and extensive first-pass metabolism Improved drug permeation through nasal mucosa, higher brain distribution, improvement in cognitive ability
Meloxicam (MEL) CS-coated-SLN Lipophilicity, low brain bioavailability Improved mucoadhesion and nasal permeation to CS coated NP regarding uncoated, higher permeation to MEL-SLN than MEL-PLGA NP
Galantamine CS-NP Adverse effects related to oral administration Reduction of amyloid-β deposition, suppression of Notch signaling an, improvement of brain delivery and of half-life time, higher nose-to-brain transport
Curcumin Core–shell NP based on CS shell and PLGA as the core Low solubility, low bioavailability, and extensive first-pass metabolism Improved nasal mucosa permeation, cellular uptake by calveolae-mediated endocytosis, higher in vitro BBB permeation and brain distribution, Cellular uptake by caveolae-mediated endocytosis, clathrin-mediated pathway and micropinocytosis
Huperzine A PLGA NP with surface modification by Lf-conjugated TMC Lack of brain selectivity, serious gastrointestinal side effects Higher adsorption to mucin regarding PLGA-NP and TMC-NP, higher brain fluorescence and higher targeting-efficiency to memory-related areas
BACE1 siRNA CS-coated-SLN Short half-life Improved permeation into caco-2 cells
Neurodegenerative disordersParkinson’s disease (PD)
drug carrier limitations main results ref
Carbenoxolone CS-coated-SLN Poor aqueous solubility, steroid-like structure Improvement in motor functions, coordination, higher levels of dopamine in brain
Rotigotine Lecithin-CS-NP Poor oral bioavailability, low aqueous solubility, and extensive first-pass metabolism Higher nasal permeation and nasal mucociliary transport, higher brain concentration
Levodopa GCPQ-NP Low oral bioavailability, limited brain uptake, peripheral side effects, and poor brain bioavailability Higher dopamine levels in the brain after nasal administration
Dopamine N,O-CMCS-NP Poor solubility and/or unstable the gastrointestinal fluids Higher Olfactory Ensheathing Cells uptake due to mucin-N,O-CMCS-NP complex
Piribedil Thermoresponsive gels containing Lecithin-CS-NP Low oral bioavailability, gastrointestinal side-effects Increased of the relative bioavailability of PBD in brain of rats, higher nose-to brain distribution, and higher targeting efficiency
Ropinirole hydrochloride PLGA/CS-NP Low half-life time, extensive hepatic first-pass metabolism, low bioavailability Higher nasal mucosa permeation to rospirenone-PLGA/CS-NPs than rospirenone loaded-PLGA/NP
Rotigotine CS-NP Low aqueous solubility, extensive first-pass metabolism, and low bioavailability Reduced catalepsy, akinesia and total immobility time enhanced nose-to-brain transport, higher brain drug targeting efficiency
Narigenin CS-NP Gastrointestinal degradation, inefficient permeability, low aqueous solubility, low bioavailability Higher permeation through nasal mucosa, reduced oxygen reactive species due to narigenin-antioxidant effect uptake
Pramipexol CS-NP Low brain bioavailability Reduction of catalepsy score, improvement in cerebral dopamine, glutathione, and catalase levels
Rasagiline CS-coated PLGA NP Inability to reach high concentration in brain tissue and low oral bioavailability Higher nasal mucosa permeation and enhanced brain-to-nose distribution
Rasagiline CS-glutamate NP Short half-life and low oral bioavailability due to hepatic first pass effect, gastrointestinal adverse effects Higher nasal mucosa permeation, higher brain concentration, enhanced nose-to brain distribution, higher drug targeting efficiency
Dopamine Glycol-CS/sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin NP Inability to overcome the BBB, extensive metabolism by liver when orally administered Repeated intranasal administration improved dopamine levels in the right nostril of rats
Rotigotine Lecithin-CS-NP Poor oral bioavailability, low aqueous solubility, and extensive first-pass metabolism Higher nasal permeation and nasal mucociliary transport, higher brain concentration
neuropsychiatric disordersanxiety
drug carrier limitations main results ref
Buspirone CS-coated-NLC Low oral bioavailability Higher brain drug targeting efficiency, highernose-to-brain transport
Riluzole Transferin/CS-NP Low oral bioavailability Enhanced brain uptake, higher brain concentration after intranasal administration, better anxiety effect, increase in glutathione levels, reduction of malondialdehyde levels
Buspirone hydrochloride ThiolatedCS-NP Low oral bioavailability Higher brain concentrations after intravenous and intranasal administration, improved nasal mucosa adhesion, higher nose-to-brain transport, lower anxiety effecti.n. administration of TCS resulted in higher brain concentrations than BUH solution administered either i.v. or i.n.
neuropsychiatric disordersbipolar disorder
 
drug carrier limitations main results ref
Lithium Hydrogel based on functionalized oxidized starch NP Low therapeutic index Reduction of hyperlocomotion and lower plasma concentrations after intranasal administration
neuropsychiatric disordersdepression
drug carrier limitations main results ref
Paroxetine hydrochloride CS-coated-PLGA-NP Low bioavailability Higher brain concentration after nasal administration, reduced depression effects
Mirtazapine CS-grafted cationic leciplexes Low bioavailability Reduction of depression, higher brain concentration higher brain relative bioavailability after nasal administration
Imipramine hydrochloride CS-NP embedded in in situ thermoresponsive gel Low bioavailability and gastrointestinal side-effects Improved nasal mucosa permeation regarding nongel CS-NP
Duloxetine hydrochloride CS-grafted-PLGA/PVA-NP Low bioavailability Lower depression effects, higher brain relative bioavailability after nasal administration
Desvenlafaxin succinate PLGA/CS NP Inability to reach brain after oral administration Enhanced nose-to-brain transport, Reduced depression symptoms
Selegiline hydrochloride CS-NP Low bioavailability Higher brain concentration, reduced oxidative stress, reduction of immobility
Neuropsychiatric disordersSchizophrenia
drug carrier limitations main results ref
Lurasidone hydrochloride Transferrin conjugated CS-NP Short-half-life, low oral bioavailability, high drug dosing, and drug-related toxicity Improvement in locomotion, reduced catalepsy, activity; higher brain targeting-efficiency, higher nose-to-brain transport
Ziprazidone Hydrochloride Transferrin conjugated CS-NP Low bioavailability, poor solubility, and extensive first-pass metabolism Higher nasal permeation reaching deeper mucosa layers, absence of harmful effects on nasal mucosa
Quetiapine Poloxamer-CS Limited bioavailability, hematological side effects Higher cell uptake, higher nasal mucosa permeation
Lurasidone hydrochloride CS-NP Low bioavailability Reduction of catalepsy and higher locomotion, higher brain concentration after nasal administration
Peptide drug Hydrogel based on starch NP/O-carboxymethyl CS Highly degraded by digestive enzyme by oral administration Reduction of schizophrenia negative symptoms
Asenapine maleate CS-coated-mucoadhesive nanoemulsion Biopharmaceutics Classification System class II Improved brain concentration after intranasal administration, reduction of extrapyramidal effects
Risperidone CS-NP High hydrophobicity, extensive hepatic metabolism, and varied bioavailability Higher plasma half-life after nasal administration, improvement in antipsychotic effect
Risperidone CS-coated-lipid nanoparticle Low aqueous solubility, low bioavailability, and high protein binding Reduction of catalepsy and increased locomotion, higher brain targeting-efficiency
Olanzapine CS-coated niosomes Low aqueous solubility, low bioavailability Higher nasal permeation and brain concentration after intranasal administration
Asenapine maleate Glycol chitosan (GC)- coated-NLC Low bioavailability, embryonary, and reproductive adverse effects Higher mucoadhesion in nasal mucosa, higher brain absolute bioavailability, higher brain targeting-efficiency, no teratogenic effect
Olanzapine CS-NP Low bioavailability, Extensive first pass metabolism Lower cytotoxicity than olanzapine solution, absence of harmful effects to nasal mucosa
Brain tumors
drug carrier limitations main results ref
Gemcitabine CS-coated-PLGA-NP Side effects, extensive metabolization Improved mucoadhesion, higher ability to inhibit cell survival
Isovanillin CS-NP Chemical instability Improved nasal permeability and higher cytotoxicity, highest brain concentration after nasal administration
Simvastatin CS-coated-loaded lipid-core nanocapsules Limited ability to cross BBB Decreased tumor size, higher cytotoxicity, and higher brain concentration after intranasal administration
Alpha-cyano-4- hydroxycinnamic acid and cetuximab PLGA/CS NP Chemical instability Higher nasal permeation and tumor size reduction
Alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid CS-loaded PLGA/OCS NP Extensive first-pass metabolism Improvement of cytotoxic and antiangiogenic effects
Kaempferol CS-coated-nanoemulsions Prone to oxidation Higher mucoadhesion, decreased viability of glioma cells
Anti GaL-1 siRNA CS-NP Low short-life Reduction of GaL expression, distribution from nose-to-brain, ability to cross BBB model
brain infections
drug carrier limitations main results ref
Efavirenz CS-g-hydroxypropyl β-cyclodextrin nanoparticles Biopharmaceutics Classification System class II Higher permeability in nasal mucosa, Higher nose-to-brain distribution regarding efavirenz solution
Artemether and lumefantrine Trimethyl CS coating of lipidic nanocarriers Poor aqueous solubility of drugs Higher nasal mucosa permeability and antiplasmodial effect
Isoniazid and rifampicin Spray-dried CS-NP Poor ability to cross BBB Bactericidal effect in mice, higher brain distribution to spray-dried rifampicin loaded, sustained release of spray-dried isoniazid-loaded CS NP
a

BBB: blood–brain barrier; CMCh: carboxymethyl chitosan; CS: Chitosan; GCPQ: N-palmitoyl-N-monomethyl-N,N-dimethyl-N,N,N-trimethyl-6-O-glycolchitosan; Lf: lactoferrin; N,O-CMCS: N,O-Carboxymethylchitosan-amide conjugate; NLC: nanostructured lipid carrier; NP: nanoparticles; OCS: oligomeric chitosan; PLGA: poly­(lactic-co-glycolic) acid; PVA: poly­(vinyl alcohol); SLN: Solid lipid nanoparticle; SPIONs: superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles; RGV: rabbit virus glycoprotein; SiRNA: small interfering RNA; TMC: N-trimethylated chitosan.

Most reported applications focus on Parkinson’s and AD, reflecting the limitations of current pharmacological treatments, as previously discussed. In PD, the majority of drugs incorporated into nanoparticles correspond to those already marketed in conventional, non-nanotechnological formulations. ,,,,,, Enhanced nasal mucosal permeation has been demonstrated for several systems, including rotigotine-loaded lecithin–CS nanoparticles, narigenin-loaded CS nanoparticles, rasagiline-loaded CS-coated PLGA nanoparticles, rasagiline-loaded CS glutamate nanoparticles, and ropinirole-loaded PLGA/CS nanoparticles. These formulations consistently achieved higher brain concentrations after nasal administration in in vivo studies compared with their conventional counterparts, underscoring the translational potential of CS-based nanocarriers in Parkinson’s therapy (Figure ). ,

5.

5

Brain and plasma pharmacokinetic profiles of rotigotine (RTG) following intranasal delivery in male Wister rats (9–10 weeks, 250–260 g). RTG was administered as a suspension and formulated in lecithin–chitosan nanoparticles (RTG-LCNP) at a dose of 2 mg/kg. (a) RTG-LCNP produced markedly higher RTG concentrations in the brain compared with the suspension, indicating superior brain exposure. (b) Corresponding RTG plasma levels. The enhanced brain-to-plasma ratio (a vs b) confirms efficient N2B delivery via the RTG-LCNP formulation. The ^ symbol denotes time points at which RTG concentrations were not detected. Reproduced under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attributions (CC BY) license from Saha et al.]. Copyright [2023], MDPI.

In addition, nanotechnological formulations have demonstrated multiple therapeutic advantages in PD. These include in vivo improvements in motor function, ,, increased rats brain dopamine levels, typically reduced in patients with the disorder, , and attenuation of oxidative stress through enhanced endogenous antioxidant activity demonstrated in animal studies, which is critical for neuroprotection and slowing disease progression. , CS nanoparticles have also been shown to increase nasal mucociliary transport, thereby prolonging residence time in the nasal cavity of wistar rats, while complex formation between CS and mucin may further facilitate the uptake of N,O-carboxymethyl CS nanoparticles in vitro by olfactory ensheathing cells. Moreover, piribedil-loaded lecithin–CS nanoparticles exhibited increased relative bioavailability in male wistar rats, along with enhanced N2B transport ,, and improved drug-targeting efficiency when compared with conventional, non-nanotechnological formulations. ,

Similarly to nanoparticles developed for PD, CS-based nanoparticles for AD have been shown to enhance nasal mucosal permeation in in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo studies, ,− primarily through improved mucoadhesion ,,, thereby enabling higher drug concentrations to reach the brain. ,,, These pharmacokinetic improvements translated into measurable therapeutic outcomes, including reduced memory impairment in rats ,,, and enhanced long-term memory performance. , Consistent with these effects, treated animals also exhibited higher neuronal density, typically diminished in AD.

Furthermore, intranasal administration of CS-based nanoparticles has been shown to improve both N2B distribution and brain-targeting efficiency, , while also prolonging cerebral half-life compared with oral administration or conventional drug formulations. , For example, the brain half-life of galantamine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor clinically used for symptomatic treatment of AD, encapsulated in CS nanoparticles was more than doubled relative to oral administration or intranasal delivery of galantamine solution in a rat model. Similarly, sinapic acid, a neuroprotective compound involved in synaptic plasticity, loaded into CS nanoparticles achieved a 1.5-fold increase in brain half-life after intranasal administration compared with plain sinapic acid administered orally in BALB/c mice and also demonstrated enhanced neuronal cellular uptake (Figure ).

6.

6

In vitro Cell Uptake in Neuro-2a cells. Representative fluorescence micrographs of cells exposed to blank formulation (BL), free coumarin-6 solution (C6), C6-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (C6-NLCs), and chitosan-coated C6-NLCs (CH-C6-NLCs) after (A) 30 min and (B) 2 h of incubation (magnification: 10×; scale bar: 500 μm). Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3). Statistical comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (*P < 0.05; ****P < 0.0001). CH-C6-NLCs exhibited markedly enhanced and time-dependent cellular internalization, which is consistent with strengthened electrostatic interactions between the positively charged CH coating and the negatively charged neuronal membrane. Reproduced with permission from [Prabakaran et al.]. Copyright [2025] Elsevier.

Among the molecular targets implicated in AD progression are BACE1, which drives amyloid-β plaque formation; Notch, whose upregulation is associated with neuroinflammation; and Tau and caspase-3, both linked to neuronal loss and disease progression. ,, In this context, nanoparticle-based strategies have been investigated to modulate the expression of these targets, either through the encapsulation of siRNA or by delivery of therapeutic small molecules via CS nanocarriers. For instance, BACE1 siRNA was encapsulated in CS-coated solid lipid nanoparticles for N2B administration. Intranasal delivery of galantamine-loaded CS nanoparticles was reported to downregulate Notch expression, thereby attenuating the neuroinflammation associated with its upregulation. Similarly, rivastigmine-loaded CS nanoparticles administered intranasally decreased Tau and caspase-3 expression. In addition, encapsulation of antioxidant small molecules such as narigenin and curcumin reduced oxidative stress in vivo, supporting the notion that antioxidants may serve as complementary strategies to mitigate neuronal damage in AD. ,

Beyond neurodegenerative disorders, CS-based N2B nanocarrier systems have also been investigated in the context of neuropsychiatric conditions, including BD and anxiety. Although lithium remains the gold standard for BD therapy, fluctuations in its plasma concentration are closely associated with adverse effects. In this regard, intranasal administration of lithium via a sprayable in situ-forming hydrogel composed of chelating oxidized starch nanoparticles and carboxymethyl chitosan was shown to reduce systemic exposure while maintaining therapeutic brain levels, resulting in decreased hyperlocomotion and improved tolerability. As for anxiety treatment, N2B distribution and brain-targeting efficiency were enhanced with buspirone-loaded CS nanoparticles and buspirone-loaded thiolated CS nanoparticles compared with buspirone solution. , Thiolated CS nanoparticles and transferrin-functionalized nanoparticles provided further anxiolytic benefits through improved mucoadhesion and facilitated brain delivery. ,

The application of CS nanoparticles via the N2B route has also shown considerable promise for brain tumor therapy. Studies have encapsulated therapeutic agents within CS-coated nanoparticles to circumvent first-pass metabolism, demonstrating enhanced mucoadhesion and greater drug accumulation in brain tissue of wistar rats. CS has been specifically selected for its ability to adhere to the nasal mucosa owing to its positive surface charge, which prolongs residence time and enhances drug uptake, resulting in significant cytotoxicity against glioblastoma cells or measurable tumor regression.

Moreover, synthesis protocols have been increasingly refined to yield nanoparticles with precise control over drug release kinetics and selective activation at the target site, ultimately enhancing therapeutic outcomes. Notably, this design strategy has also been associated with improved antiangiogenic effects, , highlighting its relevance for tumor microenvironment modulation. From a translational perspective, CS-based nanocarriers exhibit high nasal permeability and efficient transport to the brain parenchyma, enabling selective accumulation within tumor regions and reinforcing their potential as effective platforms for nose-to-brain drug delivery. ,

Beyond their capacity to enhance brain delivery, CS-based nanoparticles have also emerged as promising platforms for drug repurposing strategies. In particular, simvastatin-loaded CS nanoparticles exhibited notable efficacy against glioblastoma by mitigating hallmark pathological alterations, such as intratumoral hemorrhage, as illustrated in Figure .

7.

7

Therapeutic efficacy of chitosan-coated simvastatin-loaded lipid-core nanocapsules (LNCSVT-chit) in a rat glioblastoma model. Male Wistar rats inoculated with C6 glioma cells were intranasally treated once daily for 14 days with vehicle (0.9% NaClcontrol), blank LNCchit, free simvastatin (SVT, 60 μg/day), or LNCSVT-chit, 60 μg/day. (A) Schematic representation of the intranasal dosing protocol. (B) Representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained brain sections showing glioma after 14 days of treatment. Scale bars = 1 mm. (C) Tumor volume on day 19 (mean ± SD, n = 6). LNCSVT-chit treatment resulted in a pronounced reduction in tumor size, whereas free SVT did not significantly affect tumor growth. ***p < 0.001 vs control; ###p < 0.001 vs SVT. Reproduced with permission from [Bruinsmann et al.]. Copyright [2022] Elsevier.

In the context of infectious diseases, various therapeutic agentsincluding antivirals, antibacterials, and antiparasiticshave been encapsulated into CS-based nanoparticles for the treatment of neuroAIDS, cerebral tuberculosis, and cerebral malaria, respectively. For instance, CS-coated lipid nanoparticles coloaded with artemether and lumefantrine, a combination of first-line antimalarial drugs, enhanced cerebral drug distribution through improved nasal permeation, resulting in a marked antiplasmodial effect with 95% chemosuppression following intranasal administration. Similarly, efavirenz, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor used in HIV therapy, when loaded into CS-g-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin nanoparticles, exhibited superior nasal permeation due to the increased solubility conferred by β-cyclodextrin grafting, thereby promoting higher N2B delivery. In addition, spray-dried CS nanoparticles encapsulating rifampicin and isoniazid, both first-line antitubercular drugs, achieved greater area under the curve and prolonged time to maximum concentration compared with oral administration, leading to improved brain distribution and sustained drug release. These pharmacokinetic improvements were directly associated with stronger mycobactericidal effects in murine models of cerebral tuberculosis.

Given the growing body of evidence supporting the efficacy of CS-based NP for N2B delivery, their safety profile must be carefully evaluated. Direct brain deposition via olfactory pathways introduces specific neurotoxicity risks, including microglial activation, neuroinflammation, and potential interference with neuronal signaling. Chronic intranasal administration may also impair olfactory function, increasing the risk of hyposmia or anosmia, highlighting the need for rigorous safety assessment in the development of N2B nanocarriers. Despite these limitations, this route reduces systemic exposure, potentially lowering off-target toxicity and improving therapeutic outcomes.

Although long-term exposure data remain limited, current evidence suggests a favorable safety profile for intranasal CS-NP. CS-coated formulations consistently have shown lower cytotoxicity than uncoated systems and CS oligosaccharides have been reported to protect against neuronal damage. Furthermore, CS-coated NP formulation have been deemed safe for nasal epithelial cell lines (RPMI-2650) and histomorphological analyses in male Wistar rats have already demonstrated preserved nasal mucosal integrity, with no signs of cellular damage or necrosis following intranasal administration. Despite these promising findings, few systems have progressed to advanced clinical evaluation, highlighting a key translational bottleneck.

5. Patent Review

Over the past decade, a substantial number of patents have been filed on CS-based nanoparticles specifically designed for N2B delivery. For this review, patents were retrieved from three major databases: Espacenet, the World Intellectual Property Organization, and Google Patents. The search strategy combined the keywords “nose-to-brain delivery,” “chitosan nanoparticles,” and either “central nervous system” or “brain.” All of the retrieved entries were individually screened to confirm their relevance to the scope of this review. Table summarizes the identified patents, highlighting key aspects such as formulation characteristics, functional role of CS, active pharmaceutical ingredients, therapeutic indications, and country of origin.

3. Patents Related to the Development of CS-Based NP for N2B Delivery in the Treatment of CNS Disorders .

patent Number patent name Year/Country formulation drug application ref
WO2016101081A1 NP based on CS for the transport of peptides with activity in the CNS 2016/Chile CS-basedNP loaded with peptides Peptides with activities in the CNS Treatment of CNS disorders
WO2015063510A1 Delivery of drugs 2016/England NP consist of an amphiphilic carbohydrate compound (CS and CS-derivatives), a hydrophilic drug (peptide), and one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients Endogenous opioid peptides: leucine-5-enkephalin (LENK) and methionine-5-enkephalin (MENK) Treatment of brain disorders
US20180177744A1 Method of treating pain and depression using a hybrid mixture of S-ketamine and R-ketamine 2018/USA CS-based NP loaded with racemic ketamine Racemic mixture of R- ketamine (10–30%) and S-ketamine (70–90%) Treatment of depression and pain
US10799601B2 Method of making peptide-tagged PEGylated CS nanoparticles 2020/Canada The NP design entails the chemical modification of a cationic cross-linkable polymer (CS) with a hydrophilic linear polymer (e.g., polyethylene glycol) and a targeting/penetrating peptide for delivering anionic agents Anionic agents (e.g., RNA, DNA, siRNA, shRNA, miRNA, oDNA, and anticancer drugs Prevention, treatment, and/or alleviation of symptoms associated with neurodegenerative disease or brain cancer
WO2017089392A1 Treatment of central nervous tumors 2021/Belgium CS-NP loaded with siRNA targeting Galectin-1 siRNA targeting Galectin 1 Treatment of central nervous tumors
BR1020210211458A2 CsS-coated poly(e-caprolactone) NP loaded with sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim, for i.n. administration, for the treatment of cerebral toxoplasmosis: obtaining process, pharmaceutical composition, and application 2023/Brazil CsS-coated loaded with sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim Sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim Treatment of cerebral toxoplasmosis
CN118021764A Nanopharmony drug delivery system for active targeting treatment of cognitive dysfunction through nose and brain, and preparation method and application thereof 2024/China CS-based NPs surface-functionalized with TAT polypeptide and lactoferrin for the delivery of the CCR5 peptide antagonist DAPTA CCR5 peptide antagonist-DAPTA Treatment of cognitive dysfunction
US20240344068Al Dual function hybrid NP and methods of using the same to treat diseases and disorders 2024/USA Dual-function hybrid NP consist of CS and siRNA core, surrounded by an outer liposomal layer containing phospholipids and cannabidiol siRNA and cannabidiol Treatment of neurological diseases and disorders
a

CS: chitosan; NP: nanoparticles; CNS: central nervous system.

Overall, the patent landscape reveals a rapidly expanding but still fragmented field. Although numerous filings underscore the versatility of CS-based NP as coatings, carriers, or functionalized platforms for N2B delivery, several patents exhibit overlapping claims and incremental modifications, which may limit their differentiation in terms of technological advancement. Most inventions remain anchored in preclinical concepts, with few addressing essential aspects for clinical translation such as reproducible large-scale manufacturing, regulatory compliance, and long-term safety. This gap suggests that while CS nanocarriers are consistently recognized as promising tools for CNS therapy, their patentability often reflects incremental advances rather than disruptive breakthroughs. Future progress hinges on integrating truly disruptive innovations, such as multifunctional systems, improved standardization of CS derivatives, and harmonized regulatory frameworks to effectively bridge the divide between experimental concepts and clinically viable CNS therapies.

6. Conclusion and Future Directions

CS-based NP has emerged as one of the most robust and adaptable platforms for N2B drug delivery. A growing body of preclinical evidence supports their capacity to navigate key physiological barriers driven by strong mucoadhesion, transient modulation of tight junctions, and access to the brain via the olfactory and trigeminal pathways. Collectively, these features have translated into encouraging outcomes across a wide range of CNS disorders including neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric diseases, brain tumors, and infectious conditions, underscoring both the versatility and biological relevance of CS-based systems.

The studies discussed herein demonstrate that CS-based NP enhances N2B drug delivery by improving permeation, mucoadhesion, and residence time in the nasal mucosa, thereby increasing targeting efficiency and brain exposure. These systems facilitate transport to the brain parenchyma, enhance neuronal uptake, and enable sustained drug release, resulting in a prolonged cerebral half-life while reducing systemic exposure. Collectively, these effects have been associated with improved pharmacological outcomes, supporting their potential as versatile and effective platforms for the treatment of CNS disorders. Despite this promise, however, clinical translation remains limited by unresolved challenges related to manufacturing scalability, long-term safety, and regulatory alignment, highlighting the need for continued innovation and coordinated multidisciplinary efforts.

One of the most persistent bottlenecks lies in the lack of scalable, reproducible, and clinically compliant production strategies. Widely used fabrication methods, such as ionic gelation, remain largely restricted to small-batch laboratory settings. In this context, microfluidic technologies offer an attractive bridge between bench-scale innovation and industrial manufacturing, enabling continuous production with precise control over the particle size and surface properties. Nevertheless, their implementation at a scale introduces new hurdles, including device fouling, microfabrication costs, and stringent Good Manufacturing Practice requirements. Addressing these challenges will require robust process control, validation strategies, and early regulatory engagement.

Translational hurdles are further compounded by anatomical and physiological differences between commonly used rodent models and the human nasal cavity, particularly with respect to epithelial organization, surface area, and mucus composition. Although advances in in vitro and ex vivo nasal models have improved our mechanistic understanding, their predictive power remains limited. The adoption of more physiologically relevant platforms, such as organ-on-a-chip systems and large-animal models including sheep or nonhuman primates, will be essential to strengthen translational relevance and better anticipate human outcomes.

At the formulation level, the performance of CS-based NP is highly sensitive to parameters such as the polymer molecular weight, degree of deacetylation, particle size, and surface charge. A deeper, mechanistic understanding of how these variables influence interactions with nasal mucus, epithelial barriers, and neuronal pathways is still lacking. Emerging tools in high-resolution imaging, computational modeling, and single-cell transcriptomics offer new opportunities to elucidate these complex interactions. In parallel, machine learning and AI-driven approaches may accelerate rational formulation design by identifying optimal parameter spaces from increasingly large and heterogeneous data sets.

While the chemical versatility of CS enables surface modification and ligand-mediated targeting, important questions remain regarding the long-term safety and immunogenicity of modified systems, particularly under chronic dosing conditions. In addition, the inherent variability of natural polymers raises concerns about batch-to-batch consistency, reinforcing the need for rigorous quality control and validated analytical frameworks. Furthermore, extended repeat-dose toxicity studies are essential to facilitate regulatory approval and clinical translation. The development of regulatory pathways specifically tailored to N2B nanomedicines, building on emerging guidance from agencies such as the FDA and EMA, will be critical to derisk clinical development and ensure patient safety.

Beyond conventional drug delivery, the full potential of CS-based NP remains largely untapped in areas such as gene therapy, modulation of neuroinflammation, and theranostic applications. Future efforts should prioritize multifunctional platforms capable of integrating therapeutic delivery, targeting, and real-time monitoring within a single system. Advances in engineering strategies that combine precise nanoparticle design with scalable manufacturing will be pivotal in translating these concepts from a proof-of-concept to clinical reality.

Ultimately, progress in N2B drug delivery will depend on a deeper convergence of materials science, neuroscience, and clinical pharmacology. Designing more sophisticated carriers alone would not be sufficient. A patient-centered perspective, accounting for interindividual variability in disease biology, nasal anatomy, and treatment adherence, must guide future development. In this broader context, CS-based NP represent more than delivery vehicles; they offer a transformative platform with the potential to reshape therapeutic paradigms across neurological, oncological, and psychiatric disorders. Realizing this potential will require sustained innovation, seamless integration between preclinical and clinical research, scalable, and standardized manufacturing strategies and a firm commitment to personalized medicine.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). L. R. Riani acknowledges the scholarship granted by PROQUALI UFJF. All figures were created with BioRender.com, Canva.com and ChemDraw.

Glossary

Abbreviations

AD

Alzheimer’s disease

ADHD

attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

BBB

blood–brain barrier

BD

bipolar disorder

BDNF

brain-derived neurotrophic factor

CMCh

carboxymethyl chitosan

CNS

central nervous system

COMT

catechol-O-methyltransferase

CS

chitosan

EMA

European medicines agency

FDA

Food and Drug Administration

GABA

gamma-aminobutyric acid

GBM

glioblastoma multiforme

GCPQ

palmitoyl glycol chitosan

IL-6

interleukin-6

MAOIs

monoamine oxidase inhibitors

MDD

major depressive disorder

N

O-CMCS, N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan

N2B

nose to brain

NLC

nanostructured lipid carrier

NMDA

N-methyl-d-aspartate

NP

nanoparticles

OCS

oligomeric chitosan

PD

Parkinson’s disease

PLGA

poly­(lactic-co-glycolic) acid

PVA

poly­(vinyl alcohol)

SCZ

schizophrenia

SLN

solid lipid nanoparticle

SNRIs

serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors

SPIONs

superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles

SSRIs

selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

TMC

N-trimethylated chitosan

TMZ

Temozolomide

TNF-α

tumor necrosis factor-alpha

VEGF

vascular endothelial growth factor

WHO

World Health Organization

WIPO

World Intellectual Property Organization

The manuscript was written through the contributions of all authors. L.R.R. designed the review protocol, conducted the literature search, extracted data, performed data curation, and wrote the article. G.F.B.S., D.M.S., C.R.T., M.R.B.P., and J.S.S. conducted the literature search, extracted data, and wrote the article. R.L.F. and F.P. critically revised the manuscript. G.D.T. designed the review protocol, supervised the project, and critically revised the manuscript. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.

The Article Processing Charge for the publication of this research was funded by the Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES), Brazil (ROR identifier: 00x0ma614). For open access purposes, the authors have assigned the Creative Commons CC BY license to any accepted version of the article.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Feigin V. L., Vos T., Nichols E., Owolabi M. O., Carroll W. M., Dichgans M., Deuschl G., Parmar P., Brainin M., Murray C.. The Global Burden of Neurological Disorders: Translating Evidence into Policy. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(3):255–265. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30411-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Steinmetz J. D., Seeher K. M., Schiess N., Nichols E., Cao B., Servili C., Cavallera V., Cousin E., Hagins H., Moberg M. E.. et al. Global, Regional, and National Burden of Disorders Affecting the Nervous System, 1990–2021: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Neurol. 2024;23(4):344–381. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00038-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jessen F., Amariglio R. E., Buckley R. F., van der Flier W. M., Han Y., Molinuevo J. L., Rabin L., Rentz D. M., Rodriguez-Gomez O., Saykin A. J., Sikkes S. A. M., Smart C. M., Wolfsgruber S., Wagner M.. The Characterisation of Subjective Cognitive Decline. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(3):271–278. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30368-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bicker J., Alves G., Fonseca C., Falcão A., Fortuna A.. Repairing Blood-CNS Barriers: Future Therapeutic Approaches for Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Pharmacol. Res. 2020;162:105226. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gajurel B. P., Giri S., Rayamajhi S., Khanal N., Bishowkarma S., Mishra A., Karn R., Rajbhandari R., Ojha R.. Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristics of Central Nervous System Infections in a Tertiary Center: A Retrospective Study. Health Sci. Rep. 2023;6(2):e1099. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhou J., Gu L., Du F., Li C., Zhang F., Zhang X., Pang J., Xie B., Wang X., Peng J., Jiang Y.. The Global, Regional, and National Brain and CNS Cancers Burden and Trends from 1990 to 2021. Sci. Rep. 2025;15(1):19228. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04636-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wu D., Chen Q., Chen X., Han F., Chen Z., Wang Y.. The Blood-Brain Barrier: Structure, Regulation, and Drug Delivery. Signal Transduction Targeted Ther. 2023;8:217. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01481-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu J., Wang T., Dong J., Lu Y.. The Blood-Brain Barriers: Novel Nanocarriers for Central Nervous System Diseases. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2025;23(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12951-025-03247-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kakinen A., Jiang Y., Davis T. P., Teesalu T., Saarma M.. Brain Targeting Nanomedicines: Pitfalls and Promise. Int. J. Nanomed. 2024;19:4857–4875. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S454553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pandit R., Chen L., Götz J.. The Blood-Brain Barrier: Physiology and Strategies for Drug Delivery. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2020;165:1. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2019.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sunena, Kumar S., Sulekha, Tomar D., Kumar D., Kishore V.. Applications of Polymeric Nanoparticle in Nose to Brain Drug Delivery. Res. J. Pharm. Technol. 2023;16(12):6087–6094. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00988. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Madden S., Carrazana E., Rabinowicz A. L.. Optimizing Absorption for Intranasal Delivery of Drugs Targeting the Central Nervous System Using Alkylsaccharide Permeation Enhancers. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(8):2119. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15082119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ge Y., Xu X., Cao M., Liu B., Wang Y., Liao P., Wang J., Chen Y., Yuan H., Chen G.. Nasal Drug Delivery and Nose-to-Brain Delivery Technology Development Status and Trend Analysis: Based on Questionnaire Survey and Patent Analysis. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16(7):929. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16070929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Djupesland P. G.. Nasal Drug Delivery Devices: Characteristics and Performance in a Clinical Perspective-a Review. Drug Delivery Transl. Res. 2013;3(1):42–62. doi: 10.1007/s13346-012-0108-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nematalla H. A., Elharoun M., Bargash S. N., Abd-Alhaseeb M. M., Sharafeldin H. A., Zewail M., Abbas H., Elsheikh M. A.. Novel Nose-to-Brain Delivery of Carbenoxolone via Mucoadhesive Solid Lipid Nanoparticles for Parkinson’s Symptoms Management: In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation in a Rotenone-Induced Rat Model. Int. J. Pharm. 2025;670:125197. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.125197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chakraborty S., Karmakar V., Chatterjee K., Chatterjee A., Dwivedi M., Gorain B.. Chitosan Nanoparticle-Mediated Nose-to-Brain Delivery of Naringenin: Attenuating Memory Decline in Experimental Animals via Behavioural Assessment and Modulation of Biochemical Parameters. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025;286:138336. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.138336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nayak U., Halagali P., Panchal K. N., Tippavajhala V. K., Mudgal J., Radhakrishnan R., Manikkath J.. Nanoparticles in CNS Therapeutics: Pioneering Drug Delivery Advancements. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2025;31(6):443–460. doi: 10.2174/0113816128328722240828184410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nguyen T. T., Dung Nguyen T. T., Vo T. K., Tran N. M. A., Nguyen M. K., Van Vo T., Van Vo G.. Nanotechnology-Based Drug Delivery for Central Nervous System Disorders. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021;143:112117. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee D., Minko T.. Nanotherapeutics for Nose-to-Brain Drug Delivery: An Approach to Bypass the Blood Brain Barrier. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(12):2049. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13122049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Silva A. C., Costa M. P., Zacaron T. M., Ferreira K. C. B., Braz W. R., Fabri R. L., Frézard F. J. G., Pittella F., Tavares G. D.. The Role of Inhaled Chitosan-Based Nanoparticles in Lung Cancer Therapy. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16(8):969. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16080969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zacaron T. M., Silva M. L. S. e., Costa M. P., Silva D. M. e., Silva A. C., Apolônio A. C. M., Fabri R. L., Pittella F., Rocha H. V. A., Tavares G. D.. Advancements in Chitosan-Based Nanoparticles for Pulmonary Drug Delivery. Polymers. 2023;15(18):3849. doi: 10.3390/polym15183849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Toader C., Dumitru A. V., Eva L., Serban M., Covache-Busuioc R. A., Ciurea A. V.. Nanoparticle Strategies for Treating CNS Disorders: A Comprehensive Review of Drug Delivery and Theranostic Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024;25(24):13302. doi: 10.3390/ijms252413302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Borumandnia N., Majd H. A., Doosti H., Olazadeh K.. The Trend Analysis of Neurological Disorders as Major Causes of Death and Disability According to Human Development, 1990–2019. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022;29(10):14348. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16604-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dugger B. N., Dickson D. W.. Pathology of Neurodegenerative Diseases. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 2017;9(7):a028035. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a028035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Terstappen G. C., Meyer A. H., Bell R. D., Zhang W.. Strategies for Delivering Therapeutics across the Blood-Brain Barrier. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery. 2021;20(5):362–383. doi: 10.1038/s41573-021-00139-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lanni I., Chiacchierini G., Papagno C., Santangelo V., Campolongo P.. Treating Alzheimer’s Disease with Brain Stimulation: From Preclinical Models to Non-Invasive Stimulation in Humans. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2024;165:105831. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Peng S., Liu P., Wang X., Li K.. Global, Regional and National Burden of Parkinson’s Disease in People over 55 Years of Age: A Systematic Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study, 1991–2021. BMC Neurol. 2025;25(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04191-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Cao J., Li B., Li X.. Identification of Alzheimer’s Disease Brain Networks Based on EEG Phase Synchronization. Biomed. Eng. Online. 2025;24(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12938-025-01361-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schaffner S. L., Tosefsky K. N., Inskter A. M., Appel-Cresswell S., Schulze-Hentrich J. M.. Sex and Gender Differences in the Molecular Etiology of Parkinson’s Disease: Considerations for Study Design and Data Analysis. Biol. Sex Differ. 2025;16(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13293-025-00692-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Singh S., Singh R. K.. Recent Advancements in the Understanding of the Alterations in Mitochondrial Biogenesis in Alzheimer’s Disease. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2025;52(1):173. doi: 10.1007/s11033-025-10297-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Xu Q.-H., Wang Y.-L., Wang C., Jiang S. S., Zhang B.-R., Tian J.. Exploring the Active Ingredients and Potential Mechanisms of Pingchan Granules in Parkinson’s Disease Treatment through Network Pharmacology and Transcriptomics. Sci. Rep. 2025;15(1):7847. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91344-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Akel H., Ismail R., Katona G., Sabir F., Ambrus R., Csóka I.. A Comparison Study of Lipid and Polymeric Nanoparticles in the Nasal Delivery of Meloxicam: Formulation, Characterization, and in Vitro Evaluation. Int. J. Pharm. 2021;604:120724. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. How is Alzheimer’s Disease Treated?; National Institute on Aging. https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/alzheimers-treatment/how-alzheimers-disease-treated (accessed 2025–06–01). [Google Scholar]
  34. Sherif S., Sameh A., Salah S. M., Omar A., Elhaes H., Ibrahim A., Refaat A., Ibrahim M. A.. DFT and QSAR Study of Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) as Inhibitors for Parkinson’s Disease Treatment. Opt. Quant. Electron. 2024;56(4):633. doi: 10.1007/s11082-023-06125-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pourhamzeh M., Moravej F. G., Arabi M., Shahriari E., Mehrabi S., Ward R., Ahadi R., Joghataei M. T.. The Roles of Serotonin in Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2022;42(6):1671–1692. doi: 10.1007/s10571-021-01064-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Vitorino C., Silva S., Bicker J., Falcão A., Fortuna A.. Antidepressants and Nose-to-Brain Delivery: Drivers, Restraints, Opportunities and Challenges. Drug Discovery Today. 2019;24(9):1911–1923. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2019.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Akbar K., Rehman M. U., Shah F. A., Younas S., Al-Otaibi J. S., Khan H.. Paroxetine Loaded Nanostructured Lipid Carriers Based In-Situ Gel for Brain Delivery via Nasal Route for Enhanced Anti-Depressant Effect: In Vitro Prospect and In Vivo Efficacy. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2024;25(8):248. doi: 10.1208/s12249-024-02954-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Alsaidan O. A., Elkomy M. H., Zaki R. M., Tulbah A. S., Yusif R. M., Eid H. M.. Brain Targeting of Venlafaxine via Intranasal Transbilosomes Thermogel for Improved Management of Depressive Disorder. J. Pharm. Sci. 2024;113(11):3304. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2024.08.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Anxiety Disorders; World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/anxiety-disorders (accessed 2025–09–10). [Google Scholar]
  40. Shadrina M., Bondarenko E. A., Slominsky P. A.. Genetics Factors in Major Depression Disease. Front. Psychiatr. 2018;9:334. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Penninx B. W., Pine D. S., Holmes E. A., Reif A.. Anxiety Disorders. Lancet. 2021;397:914–927. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00359-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Alberto M., Paiva-Santos A. C., Veiga F., Pires P. C.. Lipid and Polymeric Nanoparticles: Successful Strategies for Nose-to-Brain Drug Delivery in the Treatment of Depression and Anxiety Disorders. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(12):2742. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14122742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Awad R., Avital A., Sosnik A.. Polymeric Nanocarriers for Nose-to-Brain Drug Delivery in Neurodegenerative Diseases and Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Acta Pharm. Sin. B. 2023;13(5):1866. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zorkina Y., Abramova O., Ushakova V., Morozova A., Zubkov E., Valikhov M., Melnikov P., Majouga A., Chekhonin V.. Nano Carrier Drug Delivery Systems for the Treatment of Neuropsychiatric Disorders: Advantages and Limitations. Molecules. 2020;25(22):5294. doi: 10.3390/molecules25225294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang Q., Wang C., Deng Q., Zhan L., Tang Y., Li H., Antwi C. O., Xiang A., Lv Y., Jia X., Ren J.. Alterations of Regional Spontaneous Brain Activities in Anxiety Disorders: A Meta-Analysis. J. Affective Disord. 2022;296:233–240. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.09.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kenwood M. M., Kalin N. H., Barbas H.. The Prefrontal Cortex, Pathological Anxiety, and Anxiety Disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022;47(1):260–275. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01109-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Melaragno A. J.. Pharmacotherapy for Anxiety Disorders: From First-Line Options to Treatment Resistance. Focus. 2021;19(2):145–160. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20200048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ashok A. H., Marques T. R., Jauhar S., Nour M. M., Goodwin G. M., Young A. H., Howes O. D.. The Dopamine Hypothesis of Bipolar Affective Disorder: The State of the Art and Implications for Treatment. Mol. Psychiatry. 2017;22(5):666–679. doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Marzani G., Neff A. P.. Bipolar Disorders: Evaluation and Treatment. Am. Fam. Physician. 2021;103(4):227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. O’Connell K. S., Adolfsson R., Andlauer T. F. M., Bauer M., Baune B., Biernacka J. M., Carpiniello B., Cichon S., Craddock N., Cuellar-Barboza A. B., Dannlowski U., Degenhardt F., Dikeos D., Ferentinos P., Forstner A. J., Frye M. A., Fullerton J. M., Grigoroiu-Serbanescu M., Guzman-Parra J., Jones L., Jonsson L., Kircher T., Kogevinas M., Landén M., Lissowska J., Lochner C., Manchia M., Mayoral F., McElroy S. L., McGregor N. W., Meyer-Lindenberg A., Mitchell P. B., Müller-Myhsok B., Nöthen M. M., Patrinos G. P., Pawlak J. M., Reif A., Rietschel M., Schofield P. R., Schulze T. G., Serretti A., Smoller J. W., Squassina A., Stein D. J., Streit F., Świątkowska B., Tondo L., Vieta E., Waldman I. D., Dale A. M., Andreassen O. A.. New Genomics Discoveries across the Bipolar Disorder Spectrum Implicate Neurobiological and Developmental Pathways. Biol. Psychiatry. 2025;98:302. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.05.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Preda, A. Psychiatry.orgWhat are Bipolar Disorders?. American Psychiatric Association. https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/bipolar-disorders/what-are-bipolar-disorders (accessed 2025–06–22). [Google Scholar]
  52. Carvalho A. F., Firth J., Vieta E.. Bipolar Disorder. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;383(1):58–66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1906193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Pereira A. C., Oliveira J., Silva S., Madeira N., Pereira C. M. F., Cruz M. T.. Inflammation in Bipolar Disorder (BD): Identification of New Therapeutic Targets. Pharmacol. Res. 2021;163:105325. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Xiao K., Sayed H., Xing J., Zhang X. Y., Ai J., Teopiz K. M., Ho R., Rhee T. G., Lo H. K. Y., Guillen-Burgos H. F., Vinberg M., McIntyre R. S.. The Prevalence, Clinical Impact, and Therapeutic Considerations of Trauma in Adults with Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review. J. Affect. Disord. 2025;388:119507. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.119507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Scott M. R., McClung C. A.. Bipolar Disorder. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2023;83:102801. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2023.102801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Bozzatello P., Novelli R., Schisano R., Brasso C., Rocca P., Bellino S.. New Agents in the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders: What Innovations and in What Areas of Psychopathology? Pharmaceuticals. 2025;18(5):665. doi: 10.3390/ph18050665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Scaini G., Valvassori S. S., Diaz A. P., Lima C. N., Benevenuto D., Fries G. R., Quevedo J.. Neurobiology of Bipolar Disorders: A Review of Genetic Components, Signaling Pathways, Biochemical Changes, and Neuroimaging Findings. Braz. J. Psychiatry. 2020;42(5):536–551. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2019-0732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Ventriglio A., Ricci F., Giallanella D., Gaggiano C., Torales J., Castaldelli-Maia J. M., Smith A., Liebrenz M., Caycho-Rodríguez T., Bellomo A.. Psychosocial Interventions in Bipolar Disorders: A Guidelines’ Review. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatr. 2025;71(7):1204. doi: 10.1177/00207640251333296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Owen M. J., Sawa A., Mortensen P. B.. Schizophrenia. Lancet. 2016;388:86–97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01121-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Schizophrenia; World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/schizophrenia (accessed 2025–06–28). [Google Scholar]
  61. Kassar O., Shaheen O., Selim A., Soliman M., Taman L., Elshahat A., Abouelmagd M. E.. Efficacy and Safety of Ondansetron in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry. 2025;96:37–46. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2025.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Fišar Z.. Biological Hypotheses, Risk Factors, and Biomarkers of Schizophrenia. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry. 2023;120:110626. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2022.110626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Krejčí V., Murínová I., Slanař O., Šíma M.. Evidence for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Atypical Antipsychotics. Prague Med. Rep. 2024;125(2):101–129. doi: 10.14712/23362936.2024.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Yang A. C., Tsai S. J.. New Targets for Schizophrenia Treatment beyond the Dopamine Hypothesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18(8):1689. doi: 10.3390/ijms18081689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Gadhave D., Quadros M., Ugale A. R., Goyal M., Gupta V.. A Nanoemulgel for Nose-to-Brain Delivery of Quetiapine - QbD-Enabled Formulation Development & in-Vitro Characterization. Int. J. Pharm. 2023;648:123566. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Khallaf R. A., Aboud H. M., Sayed O. M.. Surface Modified Niosomes of Olanzapine for Brain Targeting via Nasal Route; Preparation, Optimization, and in Vivo Evaluation. J. Liposome Res. 2020;30(2):163–173. doi: 10.1080/08982104.2019.1610435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Qureshi M., Aqil M., Imam S. S., Ahad A., Sultana Y.. Formulation and Evaluation of Neuroactive Drug Loaded Chitosan Nanoparticle for Nose to Brain Delivery: In-Vitro Characterization and In-Vivo Behavior Study. Curr. Drug Delivery. 2018;16(2):123–135. doi: 10.2174/1567201815666181011121750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Kibriya H., Amin R., Kim J., Nawaz M., Gantassi R.. A Novel Approach for Brain Tumor Classification Using an Ensemble of Deep and Hand-Crafted Features. Sensors. 2023;23(10):4693. doi: 10.3390/s23104693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Amin J., Sharif M., Haldorai A., Yasmin M., Nayak R. S.. Brain Tumor Detection and Classification Using Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Survey. Complex Intell. Syst. 2022;8(4):3161–3183. doi: 10.1007/s40747-021-00563-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Sun S., Shyr Z., McDaniel K., Fang Y., Tao D., Chen C. Z., Zheng W., Zhu Q.. Reversal Gene Expression Assessment for Drug Repurposing, a Case Study of Glioblastoma. J. Transl. Med. 2025;23(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-06046-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Zheng X., Tang Q., Ren L., Liu J., Li W., Fu W., Wang J., Du G.. A Narrative Review of Research Progress on Drug Therapies for Glioblastoma Multiforme. Ann. Transl. Med. 2021;9(11):943. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-8017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Liang Z. Z. S. C. C., Zhao S., Liu Y., Cheng C.. The Promise of Mitochondria in the Treatment of Glioblastoma: A Brief Review. Discover Oncol. 2025;16:142. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-01891-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Anwer M. S., Abdel-Rasol M. A., El-Sayed W. M.. Emerging Therapeutic Srategies in Glioblastoma: Drug Repurposing, Mechanisms of Resistance, Precision Medicine, and Technological Innovations. Clin. Exp. Med. 2025;25:117. doi: 10.1007/s10238-025-01631-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Ferreira N. N., Granja S., Boni F. I., Prezotti F. G., Ferreira L. M. B., Cury B. S. F., Reis R. M., Baltazar F., Gremião M. P. D.. Modulating Chitosan-PLGA Nanoparticle Properties to Design a Co-Delivery Platform for Glioblastoma Therapy Intended for Nose-to-Brain Route. Drug Delivery Transl. Res. 2020;10(6):1729–1747. doi: 10.1007/s13346-020-00824-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Fymat A. L.. Pathogens in the Brain and Neurodegenerative Diseases. J. Neurol. Psychol. Res. 2023;5(1):1. [Google Scholar]
  76. Levine K. S., Leonard H. L., Blauwendraat C., Iwaki H., Johnson N., Bandres-Ciga S., Ferrucci L., Faghri F., Singleton A. B., Nalls M. A.. Virus Exposure and Neurodegenerative Disease Risk across National Biobanks. Neuron. 2023;111(7):1086–1093. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.12.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Rezaei S. J., Mateen F. J.. Encephalitis and Meningitis in Western Africa: A Scoping Review of Pathogens. Trop. Med. Int. Health. 2021;26(4):388–396. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Kettunen P., Koistinaho J., Rolova T.. Contribution of CNS and Extra-CNS Infections to Neurodegeneration: A Narrative Review. J. Neuroinflammation. 2024;21:152. doi: 10.1186/s12974-024-03139-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Lashkari A., Ranjbar R.. Nanoparticles and Nanoformulated Drugs as Promising Delivery System in Treatment of Microbial-Induced CNS Infection: A Systematic Review of Literature. J. NeuroVirol. 2021;27(4):542–549. doi: 10.1007/s13365-021-00994-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Susa F., Arpicco S., Pirri C. F., Limongi T.. An Overview on the Physiopathology of the Blood-Brain Barrier and the Lipid-Based Nanocarriers for Central Nervous System Delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16:849. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16070849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Ibrahim M., Basalious E., El-Nabarawi M., Makhlouf A.. Lipid Nanocapsules: A Novel Strategy for Brain Targeting via Nasal Administration. J. Res. Pharm. 2024;28(2):545–559. doi: 10.29228/jrp.717. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  82. Patharapankal E. J., Ajiboye A. L., Mattern C., Trivedi V.. Nose-to-Brain (N2B) Delivery: An Alternative Route for the Delivery of Biologics in the Management and Treatment of Central Nervous System Disorders. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16:66. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16010066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Agrawal M., Saraf S., Saraf S., Antimisiaris S. G., Chougule M. B., Shoyele S. A., Alexander A.. Nose-to-Brain Drug Delivery: An Update on Clinical Challenges and Progress towards Approval of Anti-Alzheimer Drugs. J. Controlled Release. 2018;281:139–177. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Daku A. B., Mohd-Rosdan B. S., Mohtar N., Nurull A. A.. Advances in Polysaccharide-Based Formulations for Intranasal Drug Delivery: A Review. J. Drug Delivery Sci. Technol. 2024;101:106266. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2024.106266. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  85. Zhang Y., Liu M., Wang Y., Hu D., Wu S., Zhao B., Zhou B., Yang L.. Nasal Nanotherapeutics for Central Nervous System Disorders: Bridging the Translational Gap in Central Nervous System Drug Delivery. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2025;1003:177958. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2025.177958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Drath I., Richter F., Feja M.. Nose-to-Brain Drug Delivery: From Bench to Bedside. Transl. Neurodegener. 2025;14:1–22. doi: 10.1186/s40035-025-00481-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Trevino J. T., Quispe R. C., Khan F., Novak V.. Non-Invasive Strategies for Nose-to-Brain Drug Delivery. J. Clin. Trials. 2020;10(7):439. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Huang Q., Chen X., Yu S., Gong G., Shu H.. Research Progress in Brain-Targeted Nasal Drug Delivery. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2024;15:1341295. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1341295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Cassano R., Servidio C., Trombino S.. Biomaterials for Drugs Nose-Brain Transport: A New Therapeutic Approach for Neurological Diseases. Materials. 2021;14(7):1802. doi: 10.3390/ma14071802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Gänger S., Schindowski K.. Tailoring Formulations for Intranasal Nose-to-Brain Delivery: A Review on Architecture, Physico-Chemical Characteristics and Mucociliary Clearance of the Nasal Olfactory Mucosa. Pharmaceutics. 2018;10(3):116. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics10030116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Kisku A., Nishad A., Agrawal S., Paliwal R., Datusalia A. K., Gupta G., Singh S. K., Dua K., Sulakhiya K.. Recent Developments in Intranasal Drug Delivery of Nanomedicines for the Treatment of Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Front. Med. 2024;11:1463976. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1463976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Yenigun V. B., Yenigun A., Sagiroglu A. A., Kocyigit A., Ozturan O.. Formulation of Nasal Analgesic Sprays with Diclofenac Sodium, Ibuprofen, Paracetamol, and Evaluation of in Vitro Toxicity. Sci. Prog. 2024;107(4):368504241304200. doi: 10.1177/00368504241304200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Xu J., Tao J., Wang J.. Design and Application in Delivery System of Intranasal Antidepressants. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020;8:626882. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.626882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Controlled, Cross-Over Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of 20 mg Sumatriptan Powder Delivered Intranasally With the Bi-directional Device Compared With 100 mg Sumatriptan Tablets in Adults With Acute Migraine With or Without Aura. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01667679. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01667679 (accessed 03 19, 2026).
  95. Lipton R. B., McGinley J. S., Shulman K. J., Wirth R. J., Buse D. C.. Faster Improvement in Migraine Pain Intensity and Migraine-Related Disability at Early Time Points with AVP-825 (Sumatriptan Nasal Powder Delivery System) versus Oral Sumatriptan: A Comparative Randomized Clinical Trial Across Multiple Attacks from the COMPASS Study. Headache. 2017;57(10):1570–1582. doi: 10.1111/head.13165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Central Nervous System Uptake of Intranasal Glutathione in Parkinson’s Disease. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02324426. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02324426 (accessed 03 19, 2026).
  97. Mischley L. K., Conley K. E., Shankland E. G., Kavanagh T. J., Rosenfeld M. E., Duda J. E., White C. C., Wilbur T. K., De La Torre P. U., Padowski J. M.. Central Nervous System Uptake of Intranasal Glutathione in Parkinson’s Disease. npj Parkinson’s Dis. 2016;2(1):16002. doi: 10.1038/npjparkd.2016.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. A Double-blinded Placebo-controlled Single-center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Intranasal Insulin 40 International Units Day as Treatment for Subjects With Parkinson Disease and Multiple System Atrophy. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02064166. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02064166 (accessed 03 19, 2026).
  99. Novak P., Maldonado D. A. P., Novak V.. Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of Intranasal Insulin for Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson Disease and Multiple System Atrophy: A Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0214364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Therapeutic Effects of Intranasally-Administered Insulin in Adults With Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (aMCI) or Mild Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01767909. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01767909 (accessed 03 19, 2026).
  101. Craft S., Raman R., Chow T. W., Rafii M. S., Sun C. K., Rissman R. A., Donohue M. C., Brewer J. B., Jenkins C., Harless K., Gessert D., Aisen P. S.. Safety, Efficacy, and Feasibility of Intranasal Insulin for the Treatment of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer Disease Dementia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(9):1099–1109. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Intranasal Oxytocin Intervention for Caregivers to Persons With Dementia. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06364228. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06364228 (accessed 03 19, 2026).
  103. Khatri D. K., Preeti K., Tonape S., Bhattacharjee S., Patel M., Shah S., Singh P. K., Srivastava S., Gugulothu D., Vora L., Singh S. B.. Nanotechnological Advances for Nose to Brain Delivery of Therapeutics to Improve the Parkinson Therapy. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2023;21(3):493–516. doi: 10.2174/1570159X20666220507022701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Ramalho M. J., Serra E. ´., Lima J., Loureiro J. A., Pereira M. C.. Chitosan-PLGA Mucoadhesive Nanoparticles for Gemcitabine Repurposing for Glioblastoma Therapy. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2024;200:114326. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2024.114326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Bruinsmann F. A., de Cristo Soares Alves A., de Fraga Dias A., Lopes Silva L. F., Visioli F., Raffin Pohlmann A., Figueiró F., Sonvico F., Stanisçuaski Guterres S.. Nose-to-Brain Delivery of Simvastatin Mediated by Chitosan-Coated Lipid-Core Nanocapsules Allows for the Treatment of Glioblastoma in Vivo. Int. J. Pharm. 2022;616:121563. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Prabakaran A., Rakshit D., Patel I., Susanna K. J., Mishra A., Radhakrishnanand P., Sarma P., Alexander A.. Chitosan-Coated Nanostructured Lipid Carriers for Intranasal Delivery of Sinapic Acid in Aβ1–42 Induced C57BL/6 Mice for Alzheimer’s Disease Treatment. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025;305:141136. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.141136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Mohsen K., Azzazy H. M. E., Allam N. K., Basalious E. B.. Intranasal Lipid Nanocapsules for Systemic Delivery of Nimodipine into the Brain: In Vitro Optimization and in Vivo Pharmacokinetic Study. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020;116:111236. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy Assessment of Intranasal Nanoparticles of APH-1105, A Novel Alpha Secretase Modulator For Mild to Moderate Cognitive Impairment Due to Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03806478. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03806478 (accessed 03 19, 2026).
  109. Gandhi S., Shastri D. H., Shah J., Nair A. B., Jacob S.. Nasal Delivery to the Brain: Harnessing Nanoparticles for Effective Drug Transport. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16(4):481. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16040481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Vahab S. A., Anjali K. I., Sabitha M., Kumar V. S.. Exploring Chitosan Nanoparticles for Enhanced Therapy in Neurological Disorders: A Comprehensive Review. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025;398(3):2151. doi: 10.1007/s00210-024-03507-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Eissa M. A., Hashim Y. Z. H. Y., Badawi N. M.. Unlocking the Potential of Chitosan-Based Polymeric Nanoparticles for the Treatment of Neurological Disorders. Nanomed. J. 2024;11(2):107–118. doi: 10.22038/NMJ.2024.74564.1812. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  112. Avelelas F., Horta A., Pinto L. F. V., Cotrim Marques S., Marques Nunes P., Pedrosa R., Leandro S. M.. Antifungal and Antioxidant Properties of Chitosan Polymers Obtained from Nontraditional Polybius Henslowii Sources. Mar. Drugs. 2019;17(4):239. doi: 10.3390/md17040239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Ivanova D. G., Yaneva Z. L.. Antioxidant Properties and Redox-Modulating Activity of Chitosan and Its Derivatives: Biomaterials with Application in Cancer Therapy. BioRes. Open Access. 2020;9(1):64–72. doi: 10.1089/biores.2019.0028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Satitsri S., Muanprasat C.. Chitin and Chitosan Derivatives as Biomaterial Resources for Biological and Biomedical Applications. Molecules. 2020;25(24):5961. doi: 10.3390/molecules25245961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Ke C. L., Deng F. S., Chuang C. Y., Lin C. H.. Antimicrobial Actions and Applications of Chitosan. Polymers. 2021;13(6):904. doi: 10.3390/polym13060904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Harugade A., Sherje A. P., Pethe A.. Chitosan: A Review on Properties, Biological Activities and Recent Progress in Biomedical Applications. React. Funct. Polym. 2023;191:105634. doi: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2023.105634. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  117. Alghareeb S., Ekenna I., Asare-Addo K., Conway B. R., Adebisi A. O.. Chitosan Nanoparticles for Nasal Drug Delivery. J. Drug Delivery Sci. Technol. 2025;105:106623. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2025.106623. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  118. Lalatsa A., Garrett N. L., Ferrarelli T., Moger J., Schätzlein A. G., Uchegbu I. F.. Delivery of Peptides to the Blood and Brain after Oral Uptake of Quaternary Ammonium Palmitoyl Glycol Chitosan Nanoparticles. Mol. Pharmaceutics. 2012;9(6):1764–1774. doi: 10.1021/mp300068j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Tavares G. D., Gonçalves J. E., Monteiro L. M., Löbenberg R., Storpirtis S., Bou-Chacra N. A., Consiglieri V. O.. N,N,N-Trimethylchitosan-Poly (n-Butylcyanoacrylate) Core-Shell Nanoparticles as a Potential Oral Delivery System for Acyclovir. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2020;196:111336. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Dimiou S., Lopes R. M., Kubajewska I., Mellor R. D., Schlosser C. S., Shet M. S., Huang H., Akcan O., Whiteside G. T., Schätzlein A. G., Uchegbu I. F.. Particulate Levodopa Nose-to-Brain Delivery Targets Dopamine to the Brain with No Plasma Exposure. Int. J. Pharm. 2022;618:121658. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Lofts A., Abu-Hijleh F., Rigg N., Winterhelt E., Kostashuk M., Monterio A., Tavakolian M., Rivera N. P., Frey B. N., Mishra R. K., Hoare T.. Nose-to-Brain Delivery of Lithium via a Sprayable in Situ-Forming Hydrogel Composed of Chelating Starch Nanoparticles. J. Controlled Release. 2025;378:831–846. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.12.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Inamdar N., Mourya V. K., Tiwari A.. Carboxymethyl Chitosan and Its Applications. Adv. Mater. Lett. 2010;1:11–33. doi: 10.5185/amlett.2010.3108. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  123. Trapani A., Cometa S., De Giglio E., Corbo F., Cassano R., Di Gioia M. L., Trombino S., Hossain M. N., Di Gioia S., Trapani G., Conese M.. Novel Nanoparticles Based on N,O-Carboxymethyl Chitosan-Dopamine Amide Conjugate for Nose-to-Brain Delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(1):147. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14010147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Nabi B., Rehman S., Fazil M., Khan S., Baboota S., Ali J.. Riluzole-Loaded Nanoparticles to Alleviate the Symptoms of Neurological Disorders by Attenuating Oxidative Stress. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2020;46(3):471–483. doi: 10.1080/03639045.2020.1730396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Salem H. F., Ali A. A., Rabea Y. K., Abo El-Ela F. I., Khallaf R. A.. Optimization and Appraisal of Chitosan-Grafted PLGA Nanoparticles for Boosting Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Effect of Duloxetine HCl Using Box-Benkhen Design. J. Pharm. Sci. 2023;112(2):544–561. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2022.08.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Piazzini V., Landucci E., D’Ambrosio M., Tiozzo Fasiolo L., Cinci L., Colombo G., Pellegrini-Giampietro D. E., Bilia A. R., Luceri C., Bergonzi M. C.. Chitosan Coated Human Serum Albumin Nanoparticles: A Promising Strategy for Nose-to-Brain Drug Delivery. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019;129:267–280. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Spindler L. M., Feuerhake A., Ladel S., Günday C., Flamm J., Günday-Türeli N., Türeli E., Tovar G. E. M., Schindowski K., Gruber-Traub C.. Nano-in-Micro-Particles Consisting of PLGA Nanoparticles Embedded in Chitosan Microparticles via Spray-Drying Enhances Their Uptake in the Olfactory Mucosa. Front. Pharmacol. 2021;12:732954. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.732954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Jadhav K., Jhilta A., Singh R., Ray E., Kumar V., Yadav A. B., Singh A. K., Verma R. K.. Effective Cerebral Tuberculosis Treatment via Nose-to-Brain Transport of Anti-TB Drugs Using Mucoadhesive Nano-Aggregates. Nanoscale. 2024;16:16485. doi: 10.1039/D4NR02621G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Yanat M., Schroën K.. Preparation Methods and Applications of Chitosan Nanoparticles; with an Outlook toward Reinforcement of Biodegradable Packaging. React. Funct. Polym. 2021;161:104849. doi: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2021.104849. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  130. Gagliardi M., Chiarugi S., De Cesari C., Di Gregorio G., Diodati A., Baroncelli L., Cecchini M., Tonazzini I.. Crosslinked Chitosan Nanoparticles with Muco-Adhesive Potential for Intranasal Delivery Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24(7):6590. doi: 10.3390/ijms24076590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Calvo P., Remuñán-López C., Vila-Jato J. L., Alonso M. J.. Novel Hydrophilic Chitosan-Polyethylene Oxide Nanoparticles as Protein Carriers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1997;63(1):125–132. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19970103)63:1<125::aid-app13>3.0.co;2-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  132. Sharma S., Gauba P., Tyagi A., Dang S.. Chitosan-Modified Polymeric Nanoparticles for the Nose-to-Brain Drug Delivery of Paroxetine: An in Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation. Nanoscale. 2025;17(3):1687–1702. doi: 10.1039/D4NR04250F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Rassu G., Soddu E., Posadino A. M., Pintus G., Sarmento B., Giunchedi P., Gavini E.. Nose-to-Brain Delivery of BACE1 SiRNA Loaded in Solid Lipid Nanoparticles for Alzheimer’s Therapy. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2017;152:296–301. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.01.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Noorulla K. M., Yasir M., Muzaffar F., S R., Ghoneim M. M., Almurshedi A. S., Tura A. J., Alshehri S., Gebissa T., Mekit S., Ahmed M. M., Zafar A.. Intranasal Delivery of Chitosan Decorated Nanostructured Lipid Carriers of Buspirone for Brain Targeting: Formulation Development, Optimization and In-Vivo Preclinical Evaluation. J. Drug Delivery Sci. Technol. 2022;67:102939. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102939. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  135. Gebremeskal Y. H., Nadtochii L. A., Eremeeva N. B., Soliman T. N., Al-Harbye N. F., Liu X., Boulkrane M. S., Baranenko D. A., El-Messery T. M.. Chitosan-Coated Liposomes of Chia Seed (Salvia Hispanica L.) Phenolic Extract: Maximising Bioaccessibility and Shelf-Life Stability in Functional Yoghurt. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2025;18:9854. doi: 10.1007/s11947-025-04007-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  136. Bayati P., Karami M. A., Toolabi M., Ahmadi Z., Radmehr S., Safdarian M.. Chitosan-Coated Liposomes for Sustained Levetiracetam Delivery: In-Silico and in-Vitro Evaluation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025;328:147682. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.147682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Ferreira N. N., de Oliveira Junior E., Granja S., Boni F. I., Ferreira L. M. B., Cury B. S. F., Santos L. C. R., Reis R. M., Lima E. M., Baltazar F., Gremião M. P. D.. Nose-to-Brain Co-Delivery of Drugs for Glioblastoma Treatment Using Nanostructured System. Int. J. Pharm. 2021;603:120714. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Uppuluri C. T., Ravi P. R., Dalvi A. V.. Design and Evaluation of Thermo-Responsive Nasal in Situ Gelling System Dispersed with Piribedil Loaded Lecithin-Chitosan Hybrid Nanoparticles for Improved Brain Availability. Neuropharmacology. 2021;201:108832. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2021.108832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Raj R., Wairkar S., Sridhar V., Gaud R.. Pramipexole Dihydrochloride Loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles for Nose to Brain Delivery: Development, Characterization and in Vivo Anti-Parkinson Activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018;109:27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.12.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Malaiya A., Kenwat R., Mamgain A., Paliwal S. R., Sulakhiya K., Maiti S., Paliwal R.. QbD-Based Optimization and Evaluation of Chitosan-Adorned Nanostructured Lipid Carriers for Nose-to-Brain Delivery of 17β-Estradiol in Rat Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Drug Delivery Sci. Technol. 2024;96:105716. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2024.105716. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  141. Dhas N., Mehta T.. Intranasal Delivery of Chitosan Decorated PLGA Core/Shell Nanoparticles Containing Flavonoid to Reduce Oxidative Stress in the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Drug Delivery Sci. Technol. 2021;61:102242. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2020.102242. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  142. Dhas N., Garkal A., Kudarha R., Hebbar S., Mutalik S., Mehta T.. Carotenoid Containing Cationic Nanoparticles for Effective Therapy for Suppressing Oxidative Stress: An Intranasal Approach. OpenNano. 2023;13:100172. doi: 10.1016/j.onano.2023.100172. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  143. Borbolla-Jiménez F. V., Gutiérrez-Ruiz S. C., Hernández-Parra H., Peña-Corona S. I., Tamez A. A., Rivas-Amores R. D., Magaña J. J., Leyva-Gomez G.. Nanoparticles Navigating the Intranasal Route: Innovative Approaches in Neurodegenerative Diseases. J. Nanotechnol. 2025;2025:7697122. doi: 10.1155/jnt/7697122. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  144. Morim E., Sarmento B., Pacheco C.. Nanocarrier-Based Intranasal Drug Delivery for Enhanced Neurological Disorders Treatment. Drug Delivery Transl. Res. 2025;16:761–779. doi: 10.1007/s13346-025-02019-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Bari N. K., Fazil M., Hassan M. Q., Haider M. R., Gaba B., Narang J. K., Baboota S., Ali J.. Brain Delivery of Buspirone Hydrochloride Chitosan Nanoparticles for the Treatment of General Anxiety Disorder. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015;81:49–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.07.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Colombo M., Figueiró F., de Fraga Dias A., Teixeira H. F., Battastini A. M. O., Koester L. S.. Kaempferol-Loaded Mucoadhesive Nanoemulsion for Intranasal Administration Reduces Glioma Growth in Vitro. Int. J. Pharm. 2018;543(1–2):214–223. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.03.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Tong G. F., Qin N., Sun L. W.. Development and Evaluation of Desvenlafaxine Loaded PLGA-Chitosan Nanoparticles for Brain Delivery. Saudi Pharm. J. 2017;25(6):844–851. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2016.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Bhattamisra S. K., Shak A. T., Xi L. W., Safian N. H., Choudhury H., Lim W. M., Shahzad N., Alhakamy N. A., Anwer M. K., Radhakrishnan A. K., Md S.. Nose to Brain Delivery of Rotigotine Loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles in Human SH-SY5Y Neuroblastoma Cells and Animal Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Int. J. Pharm. 2020;579:119148. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. El-Ganainy S. O., Gowayed M. A., Agami M., Mohamed P., Belal M., Farid R. M., Hanafy A. S.. Galantamine Nanoparticles Outperform Oral Galantamine in an Alzheimer’s Rat Model: Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics. Nanomedicine. 2021;16(15):1281–1296. doi: 10.2217/nnm-2021-0051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Md S., Alhakamy N. A., Aldawsari H. M., Asfour H. Z.. Neuroprotective and Antioxidant Effect of Naringenin-Loaded Nanoparticles for Nose-to-Brain Delivery. Brain Sci. 2019;9(10):275. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9100275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Van Woensel M., Wauthoz N., Rosière R., Mathieu V., Kiss R., Lefranc F., Steelant B., Dilissen E., Van Gool S. W., Mathivet T., Gerhardt H., Amighi K., De Vleeschouwer S.. Development of SiRNA-Loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles Targeting Galectin-1 for the Treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme via Intranasal Administration. J. Controlled Release. 2016;227:71–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.02.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Chatzitaki A. T., Jesus S., Karavasili C., Andreadis D., Fatouros D. G., Borges O.. Chitosan-Coated PLGA Nanoparticles for the Nasal Delivery of Ropinirole Hydrochloride: In Vitro and Ex Vivo Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety. Int. J. Pharm. 2020;589:119776. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Saha P., Singh P., Kathuria H., Chitkara D., Pandey M.. Self-Assembled Lecithin-Chitosan Nanoparticles Improved Rotigotine Nose-to-Brain Delivery and Brain Targeting Efficiency. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(3):851. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15030851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Abbas H., Refai H., El Sayed N., Rashed L. A., Mousa M. R., Zewail M.. Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Loaded Chitosan Coated Bilosomes for Magnetic Nose to Brain Targeting of Resveratrol. Int. J. Pharm. 2021;610:121244. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.121244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Singh D., Rashid M., Hallan S. S., Mehra N. K., Prakash A., Mishra N.. Pharmacological Evaluation of Nasal Delivery of Selegiline Hydrochloride-Loaded Thiolated Chitosan Nanoparticles for the Treatment of Depression. Artif. Cells, Nanomed., Biotechnol. 2016;44(3):865–877. doi: 10.3109/21691401.2014.998824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Di Gioia S., Trapani A., Mandracchia D., De Giglio E., Cometa S., Mangini V., Arnesano F., Belgiovine G., Castellani S., Pace L., Lavecchia M. A., Trapani G., Conese M., Puglisi G., Cassano T.. Intranasal Delivery of Dopamine to the Striatum Using Glycol Chitosan/Sulfobutylether-β-Cyclodextrin Based Nanoparticles. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2015;94(1):180–193. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Ahmad N.. Rasagiline-Encapsulated Chitosan-Coated PLGA Nanoparticles Targeted to the Brain in the Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2017;40(13):677–690. doi: 10.1080/10826076.2017.1343735. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  158. Mittal D., Md S., Hasan Q., Fazil M., Ali A., Baboota S., Ali J.. Brain Targeted Nanoparticulate Drug Delivery System of Rasagiline via Intranasal Route. Drug Delivery. 2016;23(1):130–139. doi: 10.3109/10717544.2014.907372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Saini S., Sharma T., Jain A., Kaur H., Katare O. P., Singh B.. Systematically Designed Chitosan-Coated Solid Lipid Nanoparticles of Ferulic Acid for Effective Management of Alzheimer’s Disease: A Preclinical Evidence. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2021;205:111838. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Garg Y., Kumar M., Sharma G., Katare O. P., Chopra S., Bhatia A.. Systematic Designing and Optimization of Polymeric Nanoparticles Using Central Composite Design: A Novel Approach for Nose-to-Brain Delivery of Donepezil Hydrochloride. J. Cluster Sci. 2024;35(4):1007–1019. doi: 10.1007/s10876-023-02528-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  161. Akel H., Csóka I., Ambrus R., Bocsik A., Gróf I., Mészáros M., Szecskó A., Kozma G., Veszelka S., Deli M. A., Kónya Z., Katona G.. In Vitro Comparative Study of Solid Lipid and Plga Nanoparticles Designed to Facilitate Nose-to-Brain Delivery of Insulin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22(24):13258. doi: 10.3390/ijms222413258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Meng Q., Wang A., Hua H., Jiang Y., Wang Y., Mu H., Wu Z., Sun K.. Intranasal Delivery of Huperzine A to the Brain Using Lactoferrin-Conjugated N-Trimethylated Chitosan Surface-Modified PLGA Nanoparticles for Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018;13:705–718. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S151474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Palai A. K., Kumar A., Mazahir F., Sharma A., Yadav A. K.. Synthesis and Characterization of Fullerene-Based Nanocarrier for Targeted Delivery of Quercetin to the Brain. Ther. Delivery. 2024;15(7):545. doi: 10.1080/20415990.2024.2365620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Hard S. A. A. A., Shivakumar H. N., Redhwan M. A. M.. Development and Optimization of In-Situ Gel Containing Chitosan Nanoparticles for Possible Nose-to-Brain Delivery of Vinpocetine. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023;253:127217. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. El-Enin H. A. A., Elkomy M. H., Naguib I. A., Ahmed M. F., Alsaidan O. A., Alsalahat I., Ghoneim M. M.. Lipid Nanocarriers Overlaid with Chitosan for Brain Delivery of Berberine via the Nasal Route. Pharmaceuticals. 2022;15(3):281. doi: 10.3390/ph15030281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Prabakaran A., Rakshit D., Patel I., Susanna K. J., Mishra A., Radhakrishnanand P., Sarma P., Alexander A.. Enhanced Cognitive Function in Mice through Intranasal Delivery of Sinapic Acid via Chitosan-Coated Solid Lipid Nanoparticles. Int. J. Pharm. 2025;675:125565. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.125565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. ElMosbah D. E., Khattab M. S., Ibrahim M. A., El-Asssal M. I., Miniawy H. M. F. E.. Preclinical Efficacy of Oral and Nasal Rivastigmine-Loaded Chitosan Nano-Particles on AlCl3-Induced Alzheimer’s-like Disease in Rats. Inflammopharmacology. 2024;32:3943. doi: 10.1007/s10787-024-01541-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. El-Kawy O. A., Shweeta H. A., Attallah K. M.. Radioiodination, Nasal Nanoformulation and Preliminary Evaluation of Isovanillin: A New Potential Brain Cancer-Targeting Agent. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2022;189:110464. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Belgamwar A., Khan S., Yeole P.. Intranasal Chitosan-g-HPβCD Nanoparticles of Efavirenz for the CNS Targeting. Artif. Cells, Nanomed., Biotechnol. 2018;46(2):374–386. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2017.1313266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Kaur R., Gorki V., Singh G., Kaur R., Katare O. P., Nirmalan N., Singh B.. Intranasal Delivery of Polymer-Anchored Lipid Nanoconstructs of Artemether-Lumefantrine in Plasmodium Berghei ANKA Murine Model. J. Drug Delivery Sci. Technol. 2021;61:102114. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2020.102114. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  171. El Sisi A. M., Eissa E. M., Hassan A. H. E., Bekhet M. A., El-Ela F. I. A., Roh E. J., Kharshoum R. M., Ali A. A.. Nose-to-Brain Delivery of Chitosan-Grafted Leciplexes for Promoting the Bioavailability and Antidepressant Efficacy of Mirtazapine: In Vitro Assessment and Animal Studies. Pharmaceuticals. 2025;18(1):46. doi: 10.3390/ph18010046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Adwan S., Obeidi T., Al-Akayleh F.. Chitosan Nanoparticles Embedded in In Situ Gel for Nasal Delivery of Imipramine Hydrochloride: Short-Term Stage Development and Controlled Release Evaluation. Polymers. 2024;16(21):3062. doi: 10.3390/polym16213062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Annu, Sartaj A., Qamar Z., Aldosari E., Baboota S., Ali J.. Intranasal Delivery of Transferrin Conjugated Chitosan Nanoparticles to the Brain: A Comparative Analysis of Conjugated and Un-Conjugated Nanoparticles in Vivo. J. Drug Delivery Sci. Technol. 2025;104:106550. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2024.106550. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  174. Ponduri T. K., Guntupalli C., Jedanathan B., Malothu N.. Impact of Ligand Conjugation of Physicochemical Attributes of Polymeric Nanoparticles of Atypical Antipsychotic Drug for Nose-to-Brain Delivery. Int. J. Appl. Pharm. 2024;16(6):38. [Google Scholar]
  175. Annu, Baboota S., Ali J.. In Vitro Appraisals and Ex Vivo Permeation Prospect of Chitosan Nanoparticles Designed for Schizophrenia to Intensify Nasal Delivery. Polym. Bull. 2022;79(4):2263–2285. doi: 10.1007/s00289-021-03598-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  176. Majcher M. J., Babar A., Lofts A., Leung A., Li X., Abu-Hijleh F., Smeets N. M. B., Mishra R. K., Hoare T.. In Situ-Gelling Starch Nanoparticle (SNP)/O-Carboxymethyl Chitosan (CMCh) Nanoparticle Network Hydrogels for the Intranasal Delivery of an Antipsychotic Peptide. J. Controlled Release. 2021;330:738–752. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.12.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Kumbhar S. A., Kokare C. R., Shrivastava B., Gorain B., Choudhury H.. Preparation, Characterization, and Optimization of Asenapine Maleate Mucoadhesive Nanoemulsion Using Box-Behnken Design: In Vitro and in Vivo Studies for Brain Targeting. Int. J. Pharm. 2020;586:119499. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Rukmangathen R., Yallamalli I. M., Yalavarthi P. R.. Formulation and Biopharmaceutical Evaluation of Risperidone-Loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles for Intranasal Delivery. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2019;45(8):1342–1350. doi: 10.1080/03639045.2019.1619759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Singh S. K., Hidau M. K., Gautam S., Gupta K., Singh K. P., Singh S. K., Singh S.. Glycol Chitosan Functionalized Asenapine Nanostructured Lipid Carriers for Targeted Brain Delivery: Pharmacokinetic and Teratogenic Assessment. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018;108:1092–1100. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Ruby J. J., Pandey V. P.. Formulation and Evaluation of Olanzapine Loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles for Nose to Brain Targeting an in Vitro and Ex Vivo Toxicity Study. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2016;6(9):034–040. doi: 10.7324/JAPS.2016.60905. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  181. Ponduri T. K., Rao G. S. N. K.. Targeting the Brain through the Nose: Advances in Polymeric Nanoparticle Delivery for Schizophrenia. Neuropeptides. 2026;116:102585. doi: 10.1016/j.npep.2026.102585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Elmowafy M., Alruwaili N. K., Shalaby K., Alharbi K. S., Altowayan W. M., Ahmad N., Zafar A., Elkomy M.. Long-Acting Paliperidone Parenteral Formulations Based on Polycaprolactone Nanoparticles; the Influence of Stabilizer and Chitosan on in Vitro Release, Protein Adsorption, and Cytotoxicity. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(2):160. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12020160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Hao C., Wang W., Wang S., Zhang L., Guo Y.. An Overview of the Protective Effects of Chitosan and Acetylated Chitosan Oligosaccharides against Neuronal Disorders. Mar. Drugs. 2017;15(89):89. doi: 10.3390/md15040089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Gadhave D. G., Quadros M., Ugale A. R., Goyal M., Ayehunie S., Gupta V.. Mucoadhesive Chitosan-Poly (Lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid) Nanoparticles for Intranasal Delivery of Quetiapine - Development & Characterization in Physiologically Relevant 3D Tissue Models. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024;267:131491. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.131491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Ponduri T. K., Guntupalli C., Jeganathan B., Malothu N., Kowtharapu S.. Transferrin-Conjugated Chitosan Nanoparticles for Direct Nose-to-Brain Delivery of Ziprasidone: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation. Mol. Pharmaceutics. 2025;22(11):6941–6955. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5c00863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Von Plessing, R. ; Guillermo, C. . Nanoparticles Based on Chitosan for the Transport of Peptides with Activity in the Central Nervous System. WO 2016101081 A1, June 30, 2016.
  187. Uchegbu, I. ; Schatzlein, A. ; Godfrey, L. ; Lalatsa, K. ; Iannitelli, A. . Delivery of Drugs. U.S. Patent 20,160,279,189 A1, September 29, 2016.
  188. Jay, G. Method of Treating Pain and Depression Using a Hybrid Mixture of S-Ketamine and R-Ketamine. U.S. Patent 20,180,177,744 A1, June 28, 2018.
  189. Prakash, S. ; Malhotra, M. . Tunable dipole moment for formation measurements. U.S. Patent 10788,601 B2, October 13, 2020.
  190. Vleeschouwer, S. D. ; Woensel, M. V. ; Amighi, K. ; Wauthoz, N. ; Rosiere, R. . Treatment of Central Nervous Tumours, May 18, 2021.
  191. da Silva, G. R. ; Costa, H. d. P. . CTS-Coated Poly­(e-Caprolactone) NPs Loaded with Sulfamethoxazole and Trimethoprim, for i.n. Administration, for the Treatment of Cerebral Toxoplasmosis: Obtaining Process, Pharmaceutical Composition and Application. BR 102021021145 A2, May 9, 2023.
  192. Nanopharmony Drug Delivery System for Active Targeting Treatment of Cognitive Dysfunction through Nose and Brain, and Preparation Method and Application Thereof. CN 118021764 A, May 14, 2024.
  193. Fihurka, O. ; Saya, V. ; Sanchez-Ramos, J. . Dual Function Hybrid Nanoparticles and Methods of Using Thesame to Treat Diseases and Disorders. U.S. Patent 20,240,344,068 A1, October 17, 2024.

Articles from ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES