Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2026 May 13;26(20):6525–6531. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c05598

Large Enhancement of Spin-Flip Scattering Efficiency at Y3Fe5O12/Pt Interfaces Due to Vertical Confinement

Haripriya Madathil †, Pranav Pradeep †, Paul Noël ‡, Saül Vélez †,§,*
PMCID: PMC13220310  PMID: 42125957

Abstract

Magnons, the quanta of spin angular momentum, can be excited in magnetic insulators by spin-flip scattering processes induced by currents applied to a heavy-metal overlayer. The efficiency of generating nonequilibrium magnons is characterized by the interface spin current j s , whose magnitude is considered to depend on the thermal magnon population. Here, we investigate nonlinear magnetoresistance phenomena in Pt arising from current-driven nonequilibrium magnons in Y3Fe5O12 (YIG). Remarkably, we find that spin-flip scattering processes are dominated by subthermal magnons at room temperature, resulting in a large modulation of j s with the magnetic field and YIG thickness. Concretely, reducing the YIG thickness from 100 to 10 nm increases j s by a factor ∼20, while increasing the magnetic field exponentially suppresses the magnon generation efficiency. These findings challenge the current understanding on j s and indicate that electrically driven magnonic effects such as damping compensation and magnon condensation can be largely boosted through device miniaturization.

Keywords: magnons, spin-flip scattering, harmonic transport, nonlinear magnetoresistance, spin Hall magnetoresistance


graphic file with name nl5c05598_0007.jpg


graphic file with name nl5c05598_0006.jpg


Magnetic insulators (MIs) interfaced with heavy metals (HMs) are an ideal platform for realizing magnonic devices operated by charge currents. − Diffusive magnons, parametrized by the magnon chemical potential, are created in such heterostructures by interfacial spin-flip scattering processes. Most experiments to date have been devoted to investigating the transport characteristics of diffusive magnons by employing nonlocal lateral structures, − whereas less attention has been given to exploring the MI/HM interface spin conductance and emerging phenomena at the metal side. ,

Variations in the magnon population lead to changes in the magnetization. Thereby, any magnetoresistance that depends on the magnetization is expected to be modulated when magnons are created or annihilated by spin currents. Recently, Noël et al. showed that the creation/annihilation of magnons in Pt/Y3Fe5O12 (YIG) results in a nonlinear magnetoresistive response in Pt. However, the physical mechanisms governing the amplitude of this effect remain poorly understood.

In this work, we investigate nonlinear magnetoresistance arising from magnon creation/annihilation in YIG/Pt of varying YIG thickness and demonstrate that the effect is dominated by subthermal magnons at room temperature. As a result, the interface spin current j s is largely modulated by the magnetic field and YIG thickness. Remarkably, reducing the YIG thickness from 100 to 10 nm enhances the magnon modulation efficiency by a factor of ∼20, which we attribute to the vertical confinement of the subthermal magnon modes. These results evidence the potential to realize spin–orbit torque nano-oscillators, two-dimensional magnonic circuits, and explore magnon Bose–Einstein condensate physics at the nanoscale.

Nonlinear Magnetoresistance Due to Magnon Creation/Annihilation

In Pt/YIG, the relevant magnetoresistance is the spin Hall magnetoresistance (SMR), which stems from the interaction of spin currents in Pt with magnetic moments in YIG. , While the amplitude of the SMR depends on specific parameters of the materials defining the interface, the Hall response in ferro/ferrimagnets with in-plane magnetization M = (M x , M y ) scale as Δρ xy ,SMR(ϕ) ∝ M x M y = M 2 cos ϕ sin ϕ, , where ϕ denotes the angle between M and the current I. Meanwhile, the magnetization of YIG is modulated by the creation/annihilation of magnons according to M(I) = M s + ΔM(I) sin ϕ, where M s is the static magnetization and ΔM(I) the amplitude of the modulation induced by I. sin ϕ describes the angular dependence of the spin-flip efficiency, which is maxima when M is collinear to the spin accumulation in Pt, i.e., for ϕ = 90 and 270°. Note that the sign of ΔM(I) sin ϕ reflects whether magnons are created (negative) or annihilated (positive), which inverts when the current polarity changes or ϕ rotates by 180°. To leading order, the modulation of SMR due to magnon creation/annihilation reads as

Δρxy,SMR(ϕ)∝Ms2cos⁡ϕsinϕ+2MsΔM(I)cos⁡ϕsin2⁡ϕ=Rxy,SMR1ωcos⁡ϕsin⁡ϕ+Rxy,SMR2ωcos⁡ϕsin2⁡ϕ 1

where R xy,SMR is the usual SMR, whereas R xy,SMR is the nonlinear term associated with magnon creation/annihilation processes and manifests in the second harmonic. As we will see below, this term is linear with I but becomes nonlinear when approaching the damping compensation point. In YIG/Pt, the amplitude of the magnetization variation can be evaluated by

ΔMMs=Rxy,SMR2ω/2Rxy,SMR1ω 2

In YIG/Pt, the second-harmonic Hall response R xy (ϕ) includes field-like (FL) spin–orbit torque R FL and spin Seebeck effect (SSE) R SSE contributions, whereas the antidamping torque is negligible due to its weak anomalous Hall effect. Including the nonlinear SMR (second term in eq ), the angular dependence of R xy in YIG/Pt reads as

Rxy2ω(ϕ)=(Rxy,SMR2ω−Rxy,FL2ω+Rxy,SSE2ω)cos⁡ϕ+(2Rxy,FL2ω−Rxy,SMR2ω)cos3⁡ϕ 3

Modeling ΔM/M s from Spin-Flip Scattering at the YIG/Pt Interface

ΔM is directly proportional to changes in the magnon spectral density n. The latter is modified by spin-flip scattering processes according to , ∂n∂t=∂n∂trel+∂n∂tsc , where ∂n∂trel=−n−n0τ is the magnon relaxation term in the relaxation time approximation and ∂n∂tsc=ε(μs−μm)n is the effect of the interfacial spin current. n 0 is the magnon spectral density at equilibrium, τ is the relaxation time, μs and μm are the current-driven nonequilibrium spin accumulation and magnon chemical potential at the Pt and YIG sides, respectively, and ε is a proportionality factor that depends on the real part of the spin mixing conductance g r and the magnetization and thickness t of the magnetic film, following ε ∝ g r/M s t. Both μs and μm, to leading order and for moderate magnon excitations, are linear with the current. Hence, the chemical potential difference at the interface is described by μs – μm = βI, with β a factor that depends on Pt.

The stationary solution is n(ω,I)=n01−I/Ic , where I c = 1/εβτ is the critical current for damping compensation. The variation of the magnon spectral density Δn by an alternating current (ac) is given by 2Δn = n(ω,I) – n(ω,–I) = 2n 0 I/Ic1−(I/Ic)2 . By considering τ ∝ α–1, with α the Gilbert damping, μs ∝ I, and that n 0 relates to the interface spin conductance g s ∝ g r as n 0 ∝ g s M s/g r, we find that ,

ΔMMs∝jsintμstαMsI[1−(I/Ic)2] 4

where j s = g s(μs – μm) is the spin current across the YIG/Pt interface.

Experiment

Harmonic Hall measurements in YIG/Pt were performed in Hall bar-shaped devices (Figure a) consisting of epitaxial YIG films of different thicknesses interfaced with a 4-nm-thick Pt overlayer (see Methods). The magnetic, crystallographic, topographic, and interface properties of the films were investigated, and the films were found to have state-of-the-art characteristics , (Sections S1–S4). The static, dynamic, and thermoelectric responses of the films to an ac current are extracted from first- and second-harmonic hall voltage analysis, including the nonlinear magnetoresistance originated from magnon creation/annihilation [eqs –] (see Methods). For simplicity, here we focus on the Hall response R xy (ϕ), although magnon effects also exhibit a longitudinal counterpart. ,

1.

1

(a) Optical image of a Hall bar device (w = 10 μm and L = 100 μm) showing the coordinate system, rotation angle, and wiring. R xy is obtained from the 2ω voltage response as V xy /I. (b and c) R xy (ϕ) for YIG (10 nm)/Pt and YIG (100 nm)/Pt at 10 mT (black dots) and 400 mT (blue squares), respectively, for I = 4 mA. The FL, 2ωSMR, and SSE (dotted, dashed, and solid lines, respectively) represent the R xy,FL , R xy,SMR , and R xy,SSE contributions to R xy at 10 mT evaluated from fitting the data to eq . The SSE contribution overlaps with R xy (400 mT), showing that at large fields the signal is dominated by the SSE.

Results and Discussion

We find that magnon creation/annihilation effects are strongly dependent on the magnetic field and YIG thickness. Figure b,c show that at large fields both R xy,FL and R xy,SMR become negligible, only prevailing the spin thermoelectric contribution R xy,SSE (red line). The suppression of R xy,FL with the field agrees with the 1/B dependence of the torques (blue triangles, Figure a), but the suppression of R xy,SMR (Figure b) is surprising because no modulation is expected for thermal magnons. That is because the Zeeman energy μ0 HM for a magnetic field μ0 HM = 400 mT is orders of magnitude smaller than the thermal energy k B T, resulting in a negligible modulation of the thermal magnon modes. In contrast, for magnon energies in the range of μ0 HM, noticeable changes are expected with the field. Therefore, the suppression of R xy,SMR (B) indicates that the dominant magnon modes responsible for interface spin-flip scattering processes are deep subthermal, i.e., magnons in the gigahertz regime with an associated temperature T eff in the Kelvin regime.

2.

2

(a) Field dependence of the amplitude of the different contributions to R xy (ϕ) in YIG (10 nm)/Pt. Blue and purple lines show the fit to B –γ with γ = 1.00 and 0.83, respectively. Inset: Amplitude of the first (black dots) and second (red dots) terms in eq . (b) ΔM/M s vs B in YIG (10 nm)/Pt at different currents computed from R xy,SMR using eq . The solid lines show the fit to B –γ.

In thin films and for small magnetic fields, R xy is pronounced and dominates R xy,SMR (ϕ) (Figures b and a). In contrast, in 100-nm-thick YIG, R xy,SMR is negligibly small even for small magnetic fields (Figure c), recovering the bulk-like behavior for R xy dominated by R xy,SSE and R xy,FL in YIG/Pt. The strong suppression of R xy,SMR in 100-nm YIG (∼2 orders of magnitude compared to 10 nm) indicates that the efficiency to modulate nonequilibrium magnons by spin currents is strongly influenced by additional effects beyond thickness changes (eq ). We will address this question in what follows.

An important step to analyze ΔMMs is to identify R xy,SMR from R xy (ϕ). This is done by performing R xy (ϕ) measurements at different magnetic fields. Because R xy,FL /R xy,SMR ∝ 1/B and R xy,SSE (B) exhibits a weak field dependence, we first estimate R xy,FL (B) by fitting the cos ϕ + cos3 ϕ terms in R xy (ϕ), normalized by R xy,SMR [i.e., (R xy,SSE + R xy,FL )/R xy,SMR ; eq ], to a 1/B function for B → 0. This allows us to disentangle the different contributions to R xy (ϕ) and extract R xy,SMR (B) and R xy,SSE (B) without requiring saturation values at large fields. See Section S5 for a detailed description of the fitting procedure along with additional R xy (ϕ) data. The results for YIG (10 nm)/Pt are presented in Figure a.

The analysis of R xy,FL confirms that the FL torque in YIG/Pt is dominated by the Oersted field B Oe. In 10-nm YIG, we obtain B FL + B Oe = 0.224 ± 0.003 mT for I = 4 mA (blue line Figure a), which is consistent with BOe=Iμ02w=0.25±0.03 mT. Similar B FL + B Oe values were obtained in all samples, corroborating the negligible interface contribution to torques, B FL, in YIG/Pt (Table S3).

R xy,SSE (B) (green dots, Figure a) evolves with the field as R xy,SMR (B), indicating that both magnitudes correlate with M(B) (Section S6). This shows that the SSE in thin films is approximately constant once the magnetization is saturated, consistent with previous results. As expected, we also found that the SSE amplitude increases linearly with the current and decreases with the YIG thickness (Figure S5). Finally, we found that R xy,SMR follows a power-law dependence on the magnetic field, B –γ , with γ ranging from 0.70 at 1 mA to 0.83 at 4 mA for 10-nm YIG (Figure a,b). This analysis shows that the different contributions to R xy can be disentangled, allowing for quantification of the magnon creation/annihilation processes. Furthermore, the nonlinear SMR was also evaluated from R xy (ϕ), yielding consistent results (Section S7).

The variation of the magnetization ΔM/M s in thin films exhibits a nonlinear response with the current and varies with the magnetic field (Figure ). The current dependence is consistent with eq , which is valid when the channel width w is much larger than the magnon diffusion length λm. This scenario applies to our samples because λm ∼ 1.3 μm for 100-nm YIG and gradually decreases in thinner films, making it possible to reach damping compensation in a continuous magnetic film.

3.

3

(a) Current dependence of ΔM/M s in YIG (10 nm)/Pt at different magnetic fields. Solid lines show the fits to eq . (b) Field dependence of I c extracted from panel a. Open dots show estimates of I c for magnetic fields where ΔM/M s does not show evident nonlinear behavior. Error bars represent the uncertainty associated with the fits.

The critical current for damping compensation increases as the magnetic field increases (Figure b). Up to ∼40 mT, I c can be reliably estimated, following a linear increase with the field. At larger fields, however, ΔMMs(I) becomes flatter (Figure a), making the estimation of I c inaccurate (open dots, Figure b). The strong field dependence of I c supports the idea that the magnons contributing to ΔM must be deep subthermal. Indeed, the increase of I c with the field is consistent with the expected increase of Gilbert damping for low-frequency magnons. The absence of an upturn of I c at small fields indicates that crystal inhomogeneities are remarkably small, in agreement with X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements (Section S2). The dominant role of subthermal magnons to long-range diffusive transport, current-induced condensation effects, and SSE phenomena are well-known. ,− Our results indicate that subthermal magnons also play a key role in determining the spin-flip scattering efficiency at interfaces.

ΔM exhibits an exponential dependence on magnetic field B –γ, with γ strongly influenced by the YIG thickness and current (Figure ). The suppression is large in thin films and increases with the current, reaching γ values ∼1 in 10-nm YIG. In contrast, for small drives and thick layers, γ drops to ∼0.1. A similar exponential behavior has also been observed for the unidirectional SMR originated from spin-flip scattering processes, with the exponent following the same trend with I and t as we observe for γ­(I,t) (Figure c). The results were attributed to changes in the magnon stiffness D, as is expected to decrease with reducing thickness or increasing current. D can affect ΔM through τ­(B), yielding ΔM ∝ 1/(1 + ξB) for low-frequency magnons, with ξ a parameter that depends on D (Section S8). However, such a field dependence produces poor fits to the experimental data, indicating that D is not the dominant parameter that controls ΔM(B).

4.

4

(a and b) Magnetic field dependence of ΔM/M s evaluated from R xy (ϕ) for different currents (t = 10 nm) and YIG thicknesses (I = 4 mA). The solid lines are fits to B –γ. Inset in panel b: Zoom in the small ΔM/M s amplitude range. Data for 15, 30, 50, and 100 nm are scaled to account for changes in the interface quality relative to 10-nm YIG (Section S4). (c) γ values extracted from data fits at different currents and thicknesses.

The exponential dependence of ΔM(B) can be explained by the field dependence of the spin conductance g s(B). Because ΔMMs∝jsint=gs(μs−μm) (eq ), and μs – μm should remain constant or increase with B (at leading order, only μm is modulated with field, with an expected decrease correlated with ΔMMs ), the suppression of g s must be the dominant mechanism behind the observed ΔMMs(B) (Figure ). At k = 0, g s is connected to the magnetization via g s ∝ ⟨M ⊥ 2⟩, i.e., the average of the quadratic magnetic components perpendicular to the magnetization. In essence, this term captures the degree of magnetic disorder (magnon occupation). For instance, ⟨M ⊥ 2⟩, and thus g s, increases with the current (i.e., temperature), as observed in experiments , (Figure a,c and Section S9). Interestingly, ⟨M ⊥ 2⟩(B) can be qualitatively estimated from R xy,SMR (B). Considering R xy,SMR (B) = R xy,SMR – ΔR xy,SMR (B), with R xy,SMR denoting the asymptotic resistivity value at large fields, the second term captures the degree of disorder with ΔR xy,SMR (B) ∝ ⟨M ⊥ 2⟩(B) ∝ g s(B). The analysis reveals an exponential decay of ΔR xy,SMR (B) of the form B –η, with η values exhibiting a consistent trend with the thickness and current, as observed for γ (Figure S8 and Tables S4 and S5). This suggests that the suppression of ΔM is dominated by modulation of the interface spin conductance with the field, further highlighting the key role of subthermal magnons in spin-flip scattering processes. We note that τ­(B) and μm(B) may also contribute to ΔM(B)/M s (eq ), which can explain the quantitative discrepancy between γ and η. The demonstrated modulation of g s with B is also expected to influence other spin-driven magnon effects, such as the amplitude of magnon signals in nonlocal devices due to their g s 2 dependence. This effect is expected to be significant (negligible) for thin (thick) magnetic layers and large (small) drives, where large (small) γ factors are expected (Figure c), in agreement with the observations. ,,

Finally, we analyze the role of the YIG thickness on the amplitude of ΔM/M s. Figure a shows the current dependence of ΔM/M s at 10 mT, where a very strong thickness dependence is inferred. Notably, in contrast to the 10-nm sample, I c cannot be experimentally reached for 15-nm YIG. Moreover, for t ≥ 30 nm, ΔM/M s is orders of magnitude smaller than that for 10-nm YIG and exhibits a nearly linear dependence with I, indicating that IIc≪1 . A current dependence and an amplitude for ΔM/M s similar to those of our YIG (10 nm)/Pt were also observed in PLD-grown YIG (6.2 nm)/Pt. Using eq , in the linear regime ( IIc≪1 ),

ΔM1/Ms1ΔM2/Ms2=α2t2α1t1Ms2Ms1js1intjs2int≈Ms2Ms1js1intjs2int 5

where the numbers denote the samples and α2t2α1t1∼1 due to the dominant 1/t dependence of α for the thicknesses explored (Section S10). Therefore, the large differences observed in Figure a are essentially associated with the difference in the interface spin current js1intjs2int modulated by Ms2Ms1 and the nonlinearity of ΔM(I) as I → I c. The latter is estimated from fitting of the data to eq (solid lines Figure a).

5.

5

Current dependence of ΔM/M s for different YIG thicknesses. The amplitudes for t = 15, 30, 50, and 100 nm are scaled according to variations in the interface quality relative to 10-nm YIG, which is evaluated from R xy,SMR (Section S4). Solid lines present the fits to eq . (b) Estimates of j s1 /j s2 (eq ), taking 100-nm YIG as in ref .

Figure b presents the enhancement of the interface spin current when reducing the YIG thickness. In bulk materials, js1intjs2int∼1 , indicating that the enhancement of j s arises from vertical confinement. This cannot be attributed to the reduction of T c in films. Assuming a (T/Tc)3/2 dependence on g s, we expect gs1gs2∼1.58 for 10-nm YIG compared to 100 nm, which is about a factor of 13 smaller than js1intjs2int at 10 mT (Figure b and Section S11). Moreover, increasing B leads to the reduction of js1intjs2int→1 , indicating that the suppression of low-frequency magnons results in the homogenization of the response across all thicknesses as expected.

Both the discretization of the magnon bands and changes in μs – μm with t may contribute to j s (t). Because ΔMMs is increasing as the YIG thickness decreases (Figure a), μs – μm must decrease, resulting in gs1gs2≳js1intjs2int . This highlights the dominant role of g s(t) on the interfacial spin current transmission. Our findings demonstrate that the spin transmission across interfaces is enhanced with decreasing film thickness, thereby enhancing magnon transport signals and facilitating damping compensation.

For subthermal magnons with energy k B T eff, the number of occupied magnon bands is given by N=1+int(tπkBTeffℏγmD) , where γm is the gyromagnetic ratio and D = 5 × 10–17 Tm2 for YIG. We speculate that the increase of j s (t) upon reducing the thickness (Figure b) is due to the vertical confinement of the subthermal magnon modes, leading to the occupation of only a few or a single magnon band (Section S12). In fact, the 3D → 2D transition is expected to occur at a length scale λTeff=4πℏγmDkBTeff . For instance, for magnons with T eff ∼ 10 K (1 K), λTeff is ∼10 nm (100 nm), suggesting that the observed steep increase of js1intjs2int in thin films (Figure b) is due to the dominant role of deep subthermal magnons on g s.

The key role of low-frequency magnons on the amplitude of the SSE is well-established. ,, However, modulation of the interfacial spin transmission efficiency reported here exhibits clear differences from the SSE. First, the SSE is driven by a temperature gradient and involves magnons across the full spectrum, , while spin-flip scattering is driven by the spin Hall effect (SHE), having different associated energies. As a result, we find that j s (B) ∝ g s(B) due to modulation of the low-frequency magnons, leading to a strong suppression of ΔM/M s with the field. In contrast, the SSE remains nearly field independent, consistent with its thermal origin. Second, the SSE decreases with reduced YIG thickness due to the suppression of low-frequency magnons , (Figure S5a). This behavior is in striking contrast to the observed enhancement of magnon creation/annihilation processes upon a reduction in the YIG thickness, highlighting the fundamentally different physics governing spin-flip scattering processes driven by spins or temperature.

The model proposed here is valid for ferro/ferrimagnets where g s ≪ g r and hence magnon excitations are weak compared to M s, leading to SMR ∝ M s 2. , This occurs at most experimental conditions like the ones studied here, but in the vicinity of phase transitions or compensation points, strong nonlinear magnon phenomena emerge, leading to enhanced scattering processes or the loss of the collinear order in ferrimagnets. These scenarios are not captured by our model and deserve a dedicated independent study. In addition, the methodology presented here, if adapted to materials with negligible or absent net magnetic moment such as antiferromagnets, could be used to investigate magnon excitations in emerging materials such as canted antiferromagnets and altermagnets.

Conclusions

We analyzed changes in the magnetization driven by spin-flip scattering at YIG/Pt interfaces and found that the amplitude of the effect is dramatically enhanced in thin films. The phenomenon is explained via the strong thickness and field dependence of the interfacial spin-current transmission efficiency, which to date has been considered to depend on thermal magnons for energies larger than the Zeeman energy. , We attribute this finding to the unexpected dominant role of deep subthermal magnons in spin-flip scattering processes. Our work shows that magnon transport, auto-oscillation, and magnon condensation effects driven by the SHE can be dramatically enhanced by geometrical confinement.

Methods

Samples Preparation

Epitaxial YIG films of thicknesses t = 100, 50, 30, 15, and 10 nm were grown via sputtering deposition onto (111)-oriented Gd3Ga5O12 substrates from a stochiometric Y3Fe5O12 target in a system with a base pressure of <1 × 10–5 Pa. The substrate temperature was maintained at 800 °C and the Ar pressure to 1.3 Pa during growth. After deposition, the samples were annealed for 30 min at the deposition temperature and finally cooled back to room temperature in vacuum. A 4-nm-thick polycrystalline Pt layer was subsequently sputtered at room temperature at 0.4 Pa Ar atmosphere. Pt Hall bars were patterned using optical lithography and Ar plasma etching, leaving the YIG films unetched.

Experiment

Harmonic transport measurements were performed in a magnetotransport setup capable of applying a 2T magnetic field and rotating the sample by 360°. An ac current I of frequency ω = 10 Hz was applied, and both the longitudinal and transverse responses were captured in a 205 kHz acquisition card. The harmonic components to the transport were obtained by demodulating the voltage at frequency ω. In all measurements, the magnetic field applied was much larger than the in-plane anisotropy field of YIG, , resulting in a collinear alignment of M with B. Therefore, ϕ in eqs and is directly determined by B (Figure a).

Error Analysis

The error bars associated with the data points in Figures – are displayed or are smaller than the size of the dots. Error bars are calculated from the uncertainty of the angular-, current-, and magnetic field-dependent fits of the linear and nonlinear magnetoresistance measurements to eqs – and error propagation.

Supplementary Material

nl5c05598_si_001.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge insightful discussions with A. Kamra and R. Schlitz. This work was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (Grants PID2021-122980OA-C53 and PID2024-157112OB-C54) and by the Comunidad de Madrid through the Atracción de Talento program (Grant 2020-T1/IND-20041) and Project Mag4TIC (TEC-2024/TEC-380). H.M. acknowledges support from the FPI-UAM Ph.D. scholarship program.

The data that support the findings of this work are available at https://doi.org/10.21950/1RVPMU.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c05598.

  • SQUID magnetometry, XRD and AFM characterization of the films, analysis of the YIG/Pt interface quality g r, details on the analysis of R xy (ϕ) and R xy (ϕ) and additional magnetoresistance data, analysis and discussion of R xy,FL (ϕ) and R xy,SSE (ϕ), analysis of R xx,SMR (ϕ), discussion on the role of stiffness on ΔM(B), field dependence of R xy (ϕ), Gilbert damping of YIG­(t)/Pt films, characterization of Joule heating and discussion on j s , magnon band occupation with t and T eff, and refs – (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Chumak A. V., Vasyuchka V. I., Serga A. A., Hillebrands B.. Magnon Spintronics. Nat. Phys. 2015;11:453–461. doi: 10.1038/nphys3347. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Demidov V. E., Urazhdin S., de Loubens G., Klein O., Cros V., Anane A., Demokritov S. O.. Magnetization Oscillations and Waves Driven by Pure Spin Currents. Phys. Rep. 2017;673:1–31. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2017.01.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Althammer M.. Pure Spin Currents in Magnetically Ordered Insulator/Normal Metal Heterostructures. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 2018;51(31):313001. doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/aaca89. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cornelissen L. J., Peters K. J. H., Bauer G. E. W., Duine R. A., Van Wees B. J.. Magnon Spin Transport Driven by the Magnon Chemical Potential in a Magnetic Insulator. Phys. Rev. B. 2016;94(1):014412. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.014412. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kajiwara Y., Harii K., Takahashi S., Ohe J., Uchida K., Mizuguchi M., Umezawa H., Kawai H., Ando K., Takanashi K., Maekawa S., Saitoh E.. Transmission of Electrical Signals by Spin-Wave Interconversion in a Magnetic Insulator. Nature. 2010;464(7286):262–266. doi: 10.1038/nature08876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cornelissen L. J., Liu J., Duine R. A., Youssef J. B., van Wees B. J.. Long-Distance Transport of Magnon Spin Information in a Magnetic Insulator at Room Temperature. Nat. Phys. 2015;11:1022–1026. doi: 10.1038/nphys3465. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lebrun R., Ross A., Bender S. A., Qaiumzadeh A., Baldrati L., Cramer J., Brataas A., Duine R. A., Kläui M.. Tunable Long-Distance Spin Transport in a Crystalline Antiferromagnetic Iron Oxide. Nature. 2018;561(7722):222–225. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0490-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cornelissen L. J., Oyanagi K., Kikkawa T., Qiu Z., Kuschel T., Bauer G. E. W., Van Wees B. J., Saitoh E.. Nonlocal Magnon-Polaron Transport in Yttrium Iron Garnet. Phys. Rev. B. 2017;96(10):104441. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.104441. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wimmer T., Kamra A., Gückelhorn J., Opel M., Geprägs S., Gross R., Huebl H., Althammer M.. Observation of Antiferromagnetic Magnon Pseudospin Dynamics and the Hanle Effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020;125(24):247204. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.247204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schlitz R., Vélez S., Kamra A., Lambert C.-H., Lammel M., Goennenwein S. T. B., Gambardella P.. Control of Nonlocal Magnon Spin Transport via Magnon Drift Currents. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021;126(25):257201. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.257201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wei X. Y., Santos O. A., Lusero C. H. S., Bauer G. E. W., Ben Youssef J., van Wees B. J.. Giant Magnon Spin Conductivity in Ultrathin Yttrium Iron Garnet Films. Nat. Mater. 2022;21(12):1352–1356. doi: 10.1038/s41563-022-01369-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu G., Wang X. G., Luan Z. Z., Zhou L. F., Xia S. Y., Yang B., Tian Y. Z., Guo G. H., Du J., Wu D.. Magnonic Unidirectional Spin Hall Magnetoresistance in a Heavy-Metal-Ferromagnetic-Insulator Bilayer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021;127(20):207206. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.207206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Noël P., Schlitz R., Karadza E., Lambert C.-H., Nessi L., Binda F., Gambardella P.. Nonlinear Longitudinal and Transverse Magnetoresistances Due to Magnon Creation-Annihilation Processes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2025;134:146701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.146701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nakayama H., Althammer M., Chen Y.-T., Uchida K., Kajiwara Y., Kikuchi D., Ohtani T., Geprägs S., Opel M., Takahashi S., Gross R., Bauer G. E. W., Goennenwein S. T. B., Saitoh E.. Spin Hall Magnetoresistance Induced by a Non-Equilibrium Proximity Effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013;110(May):206601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.206601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vélez S., Golovach V. N., Gomez-Perez J. M., Chuvilin A., Bui C. T., Rivadulla F., Hueso L. E., Bergeret F. S., Casanova F.. Spin Hall Magnetoresistance in a Low-Dimensional Heisenberg Ferromagnet. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;100(18):180401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.180401. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhang X.-P., Bergeret F. S., Golovach V. N.. Theory of Spin Hall Magnetoresistance from a Microscopic Perspective. Nano Lett. 2019;19(9):6330–6337. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Uchida K., Qiu Z., Kikkawa T., Iguchi R., Saitoh E.. Spin Hall Magnetoresistance at High Temperatures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015;106:052405. doi: 10.1063/1.4907546. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim J.-V., Tiberkevich V., Slavin A. N.. Generation Linewidth of an Auto-Oscillator with a Nonlinear Frequency Shift: Spin-Torque Nano-Oscillator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008;100(1):017207. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.017207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Borisenko I. V., Demidov V. E., Urazhdin S., Rinkevich A. B., Demokritov S. O.. Relation between Unidirectional Spin Hall Magnetoresistance and Spin Current-Driven Magnon Generation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018;113(6):062403. doi: 10.1063/1.5044737. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kohno R., An K., Clot E., Naletov V. V., Thiery N., Vila L., Schlitz R., Beaulieu N., Ben Youssef J., Anane A., Cros V., Merbouche H., Hauet T., Demidov V. E., Demokritov S. O., De Loubens G., Klein O.. Nonlocal Magnon Transconductance in Extended Magnetic Insulating Films. I. Spin Diode Effect. Phys. Rev. B. 2023;108(14):144410. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.144410. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mendil J., Trassin M., Bu Q., Schaab J., Baumgartner M., Murer C., Dao P. T., Vijayakumar J., Bracher D., Bouillet C., Vaz C. A. F., Fiebig M., Gambardella P.. Magnetic Properties and Domain Structure of Ultrathin Yttrium Iron Garnet/Pt Bilayers. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2019;3(3):034403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.034403. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mitra A., Cespedes O., Ramasse Q., Ali M., Marmion S., Ward M., Brydson R. M. D., Kinane C. J., Cooper J. F. K., Langridge S., Hickey B. J.. Interfacial Origin of the Magnetisation Suppression of Thin Film Yttrium Iron Garnet. Sci. Rep. 2017;7(1):11774. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10281-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Noël P., Karadža E., Schlitz R., Welter P., Lambert C.-H., Nessi L., Binda F., Degen C. L., Gambardella P.. Estimation of Spin-Orbit Torques in the Presence of Current-Induced Magnon Creation and Annihilation. Phys. Rev. B. 2025;111(14):144409. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.111.144409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Manchon A., Miron I. M., Jungwirth T., Sinova J., Zelezny J., Thiaville A., Garello K., Gambardella P.. Current-Induced Spin-Orbit Torques in Ferromagnetic and Antiferromagnetic Systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2019;91:035004. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.91.035004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mendil J., Trassin M., Bu Q., Fiebig M., Gambardella P.. Current-Induced Switching of YIG/Pt Bilayers with in-Plane Magnetization Due to Oersted Fields. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2019;114(17):172404. doi: 10.1063/1.5090205. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ritzmann U., Hinzke D., Kehlberger A., Guo E. J., Kläui M., Nowak U.. Magnetic Field Control of the Spin Seebeck Effect. Phys. Rev. B. 2015;92(17):174411. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.174411. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Collet M., De Milly X., D’Allivy Kelly O., Naletov V. V., Bernard R., Bortolotti P., Ben Youssef J., Demidov V. E., Demokritov S. O., Prieto J. L., Muñoz M., Cros V., Anane A., De Loubens G., Klein O.. Generation of Coherent Spin-Wave Modes in Yttrium Iron Garnet Microdiscs by Spin-Orbit Torque. Nat. Commun. 2016;7(1):10377. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gao J., Lambert C. H., Schlitz R., Fiebig M., Gambardella P., Vélez S.. Magnon Transport and Thermoelectric Effects in Ultrathin Tm3Fe5O12/Pt Nonlocal Devices. Phys. Rev. Res. 2022;4(4):043214. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.043214. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Cornelissen L. J., van Wees B. J.. Magnetic Field Dependence of the Magnon Spin Diffusion Length in the Magnetic Insulator Yttrium Iron Garnet. Phys. Rev. B. 2016;93:020403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.020403. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gomez-Perez J. M., Vélez S., Hueso L. E., Casanova F.. Differences in the Magnon Diffusion Length for Electrically and Thermally Driven Magnon Currents in Y3Fe5O12. Phys. Rev. B. 2020;101(18):184420. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.184420. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Thiery N., Draveny A., Naletov V. V., Vila L., Attané J. P., Beigné C., De Loubens G., Viret M., Beaulieu N., Ben Youssef J., Demidov V. E., Demokritov S. O., Slavin A. N., Tiberkevich V. S., Anane A., Bortolotti P., Cros V., Klein O.. Nonlinear Spin Conductance of Yttrium Iron Garnet Thin Films Driven by Large Spin-Orbit Torque. Phys. Rev. B. 2018;97(6):060409. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.060409. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wimmer T., Althammer M., Liensberger L., Vlietstra N., Geprägs S., Weiler M., Gross R., Huebl H.. Spin Transport in a Magnetic Insulator with Zero Effective Damping. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019;123(25):257201. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.257201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Divinskiy B., Merbouche H., Demidov V. E., Nikolaev K. O., Soumah L., Gouere D., Lebrun R., Cros V., Youssef J. B., Bortolotti P., Anane A., Demokritov S. O.. Evidence for Spin Current Driven Bose–Einstein Condensation of Magnons. Nat. Commun. 2021;12(1):6541. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26790-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kehlberger A., Ritzmann U., Hinzke D., Guo E. J., Cramer J., Jakob G., Onbasli M. C., Kim D. H., Ross C. A., Jungfleisch M. B., Hillebrands B., Nowak U., Kläui M.. Length Scale of the Spin Seebeck Effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015;115(9):096602. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.096602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kikkawa T., Uchida K.-I., Daimon S., Qiu Z., Shiomi Y., Saitoh E.. Critical Suppression of Spin Seebeck Effect by Magnetic Fields. Phys. Rev. B. 2015;92(6):064413. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.064413. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Avci C. O., Mendil J., Beach G. S. D., Gambardella P.. Origins of the Unidirectional Spin Hall Magnetoresistance in Metallic Bilayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018;121(8):087207. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.087207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Goennenwein S. T. B., Schlitz R., Pernpeintner M., Ganzhorn K., Althammer M., Gross R., Huebl H.. Non-Local Magnetoresistance in YIG/Pt Nanostructures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015;107:172405. doi: 10.1063/1.4935074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Jungfleisch M. B., Chumak A. V., Kehlberger A., Lauer V., Kim D. H., Onbasli M. C., Ross C. A., Kläui M., Hillebrands B.. Thickness and Power Dependence of the Spin-Pumping Effect in Y3Fe5 O12 /Pt Heterostructures Measured by the Inverse Spin Hall Effect. Phys. Rev. B. 2015;91(13):134407. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.134407. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Klingler S., Chumak A., Mewes T., Khodadadi B., Mewes C., Dubs C., Surzhenko O., Hillebrands B., Conca A.. Measurements of the Exchange Stiffness of YIG Films Using Broadband Ferromagnetic Resonance Techniques. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 2015;48(1):015001. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/48/1/015001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Barker J., Bauer G. E. W.. Thermal Spin Dynamics of Yttrium Iron Garnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016;117(21):217201. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.217201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. An K., Kohno R., Thiery N., Reitz D., Vila L., Naletov V. V., Beaulieu N., Ben Youssef J., De Loubens G., Tserkovnyak Y., Klein O.. Short-Range Thermal Magnon Diffusion in Magnetic Garnet. Phys. Rev. B. 2021;103(17):174432. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.174432. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Shao Q., Tang C., Yu G., Navabi A., Wu H., He C., Li J., Upadhyaya P., Zhang P., Razavi S. A., He Q. L., Liu Y., Yang P., Kim S. K., Zheng C., Liu Y., Pan L., Lake R. K., Han X., Tserkovnyak Y., Shi J., Wang K. L.. Role of Dimensional Crossover on Spin-Orbit Torque Efficiency in Magnetic Insulator Thin Films. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:3612. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06059-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Cooper J. F. K., Kinane C. J., Langridge S., Ali M., Hickey B. J., Niizeki T., Uchida K., Saitoh E., Ambaye H., Glavic A.. Unexpected Structural and Magnetic Depth Dependence of YIG Thin Films. Phys. Rev. B. 2017;96(10):104404. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.104404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Vélez S., Schaab J., Wörnle M. S. S., Müller M., Gradauskaite E., Welter P., Gutgsell C., Nistor C., Degen C. L. L., Trassin M., Fiebig M., Gambardella P.. High-Speed Domain Wall Racetracks in a Magnetic Insulator. Nat. Commun. 2019;10(1):4750. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12676-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Uchida K., Kikkawa T., Miura A., Shiomi J., Saitoh E.. Quantitative Temperature Dependence of Longitudinal Spin Seebeck Effect at High Temperatures. Phys. Rev. X. 2014;4(4):041023. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.4.041023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Vaz C. A. F., Bland J. A. C., Lauhoff G.. Magnetism in Ultrathin Film Structures. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2008;71:056501. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/71/5/056501. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Althammer M., Meyer S., Nakayama H., Schreier M., Altmannshofer S., Weiler M., Huebl H., Geprägs S., Opel M., Gross R., Meier D., Klewe C., Kuschel T., Schmalhorst J.-M., Reiss G., Shen L., Gupta A., Chen Y.-T., Bauer G. E. W., Saitoh E., Goennenwein S. T. B.. Quantitative Study of the Spin Hall Magnetoresistance in Ferromagnetic Insulator/Normal Metal Hybrids. Phys. Rev. B. 2013;87(22):224401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.224401. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Xiao J., Bauer G. E. W., Uchida K.-I., Saitoh E., Maekawa S.. Theory of Magnon-Driven Spin Seebeck Effect. Phys. Rev. B. 2010;81:214418. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.214418. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Weiler M., Althammer M., Schreier M., Lotze J., Pernpeintner M., Meyer S., Huebl H., Gross R., Kamra A., Xiao J., Chen Y.-T., Jiao H., Bauer G. E. W., Goennenwein S. T. B.. Experimental Test of the Spin Mixing Interface Conductivity Concept. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013;111(1):176601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.176601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Mahmoud A., Ciubotaru F., Vanderveken F., Chumak A. V., Hamdioui S., Adelmann C., Cotofana S.. Introduction to Spin Wave Computing. J. Appl. Phys. 2020;128(16):161101. doi: 10.1063/5.0019328. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Gückelhorn J., Wimmer T., Müller M., Geprägs S., Hübl H., Gross R., Althammer M.. Magnon Transport in Y3Fe5O12/Pt Nanostructures with Reduced Effective Magnetization. Phys. Rev. B. 2021;104:L180410. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.L180410. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Oyanagi K., Gomez-Perez J. M., Zhang X.-P., Kikkawa T., Chen Y., Sagasta E., Chuvilin A., Hueso L. E., Golovach V. N., Bergeret F. S., Casanova F., Saitoh E.. Paramagnetic Spin Hall Magnetoresistance. Phys. Rev. B. 2021;104(13):134428. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.134428. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Haertinger M., Back C. H., Lotze J., Weiler M., Geprägs S., Huebl H., Goennenwein S. T. B., Woltersdorf G.. Spin Pumping in YIG/Pt Bilayers as a Function of Layer Thickness. Phys. Rev. B. 2015;92(5):054437. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.054437. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Klingler S., Chumak A., Mewes T., Khodadadi B., Mewes C., Dubs C., Surzhenko O., Hillebrands B., Conca A.. Measurements of the Exchange Stiffness of YIG Films Using Broadband Ferromagnetic Resonance Techniques. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 2015;48(1):015001. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/48/1/015001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

nl5c05598_si_001.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this work are available at https://doi.org/10.21950/1RVPMU.


Articles from Nano Letters are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES