1. Introduction
Diabetes mellitus is characterized by progressive pancreatic β‐cell dysfunction, chronic low‐grade inflammation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial impairment, and systemic metabolic dysregulation [1, 2, 3]. Although currently available therapies effectively improve glycemic control, they fail to adequately preserve endogenous β‐cell mass and prevent long‐term disease progression [4]. Increasing evidence suggests that targeting immune metabolic signaling pathways may provide disease‐modifying therapeutic benefits by simultaneously modulating inflammatory responses and cellular metabolic homeostasis [5, 6].
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib has emerged as a promising therapeutic target for anti‐leukemic activity [7]. Beyond its direct effects on pancreatic β‐cells, imatinib also exerts broad immune metabolic actions that target several key pathogenic mechanisms underlying diabetes [8]. Studies have demonstrated that imatinib improves peripheral insulin sensitivity, suppresses pro‐inflammatory cytokine production, and attenuates chronic inflammatory signaling pathways that contribute to insulin resistance and β‐cell dysfunction [9, 10]. Inhibition of c‐Abl, PDGFR, and related tyrosine kinases reduces inflammatory stress, fibrosis, and tissue remodeling in metabolic organs, thereby improving systemic glucose homeostasis [11, 12].
Recent evidence indicates that imatinib induces a mild inhibition of mitochondrial respiration, leading to activation of AMP‐activated protein kinase (AMPK), a master regulator of metabolic homeostasis. AMPK activation subsequently suppresses thioredoxin‐interacting protein (TXNIP), reduces oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum stress, enhances autophagic responses, and protects β‐cells from apoptosis. In both experimental models and human islets, these effects preserve β‐cell viability and functional capacity under diabetogenic conditions [13].
2. Major Pleiotropic Actions of Imatinib in Diabetes
Imatinib exerts pleiotropic protective effects on pancreatic β‐cells through coordinated regulation of inflammatory, stress‐response, and metabolic signaling pathways [14, 15]. Imatinib suppresses M1 macrophage polarization, pro‐inflammatory cytokine production (TNF‐α, IFN‐γ, and IL‐1β), and Th1/Th17‐mediated immune responses while promoting an anti‐inflammatory M2 macrophage phenotype, thereby reducing local and systemic inflammation and reduce β‐cell death [16, 17]. At the cellular level, inhibition of c‐Abl signaling attenuates endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and suppresses PERK, IRE1α, and ATF6 activation, preventing CHOP‐mediated apoptosis. Concurrently, imatinib disrupts the c‐Abl–SHIP2 interaction, enhancing PI3K/Akt signaling, β‐catenin accumulation, and ERK1/2 activation, which collectively support β‐cell survival, proliferation, and regeneration [18, 19, 20]. Imatinib also induces mild mitochondrial stress, resulting in reduced ATP/AMP ratio and activation of AMP‐activated protein kinase (AMPK). Activated AMPK suppresses mTORC1 signaling and TXNIP expression [21], promotes autophagy and mitochondrial quality control, reduces reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation and NLRP3 inflammasome activation, and limits mitochondrial dysfunction [13, 22, 23]. Furthermore, imatinib enhances insulin biosynthesis and glucose sensing through upregulation of NKx2.2 and GLUT2 expression [24]. Collectively, these immune metabolic effects preserve β‐cell mass, maintain insulin secretory capacity, and improve glucose homeostasis in diabetes as shown in Figure 1.
FIGURE 1.

Proposed immune metabolic mechanisms of imatinib‐mediated β‐cell protection in diabetes. Imatinib inhibits c‐Abl signaling, attenuates ER stress and inflammation, activates PI3K/Akt and AMPK pathways, suppresses mTOR/TXNIP signaling, enhances autophagy and mitochondrial function, and promotes insulin biosynthesis, collectively improving β‐cell survival and function.
3. Concluding Remarks & Editorial Take‐Home Message
Imatinib has shown pleiotropic actions by targeting inflammatory signaling, mitochondrial dysfunction, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and β‐cell survival pathways. Through coordinated regulation of c‐Abl, AMPK/mTOR/TXNIP, PI3K/Akt, and immune‐mediated mechanisms, imatinib represents a compelling example of how therapeutic repurposing can uncover novel disease‐modifying strategies. While further clinical validation is required, the success of imatinib highlights the potential of immune metabolic interventions to preserve endogenous β‐cell mass, delay diabetes progression, and redefine future precision therapies for diabetes.
Author Contributions
S.K. and R.K. contributed to conceptualization, original writing and editing of the manuscript, and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
The authors have nothing to report.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge all the search engines like PubMed, Google, Google Scholar and referenced research articles used for the preparation of this manuscript.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
References
- 1. Galicia‐Garcia U., Benito‐Vicente A., Jebari S., et al., “Pathophysiology of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 17 (2020): 6275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Zhao L., Yuan J., Yang Q., et al., “Diabetes and Its Complications: Molecular Mechanisms, Prevention and Treatment,” Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 11, no. 1 (2026): 22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Oguntibeju O. O., “Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Oxidative Stress and Inflammation: Examining the Links,” International Journal of Physiology, Pathophysiology and Pharmacology 11, no. 3 (2019): 45. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Wajchenberg B. L., “β‐Cell Failure in Diabetes and Preservation by Clinical Treatment,” Endocrine Reviews 28, no. 2 (2007): 187–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Hu T., Liu C. H., Lei M., et al., “Metabolic Regulation of the Immune System in Health and Diseases: Mechanisms and Interventions,” Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 9, no. 1 (2024): 268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Wang C., Zhang W., Shu Y., et al., “Metabolic Control of Immunity and Inflammation: Mitochondrial Dynamics, Pharmacological Targets, and Therapeutic Opportunities,” Pharmacological Research 227 (2026): 108194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Iqbal N. and Iqbal N., “Imatinib: A Breakthrough of Targeted Therapy in Cancer,” Chemotherapy Research and Practice 2014 (2014): 357027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Welsh N., “Are Off‐Target Effects of Imatinib the Key to Improving Beta‐Cell Function in Diabetes?,” Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences 127 (2022): 10–48101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Duijvelaar E., Pan X., Bogaard H. J., Eringa E. C., and Aman J., “Imatinib Treatment Improves Hyperglycaemic Dysregulation in Severe COVID‐19: A Secondary Analysis of Blood Biomarkers in a Randomised Controlled Trial,” Critical Care 28, no. 1 (2024): 65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. AlAsfoor S., Rohm T. V., Bosch A. J., et al., “Imatinib Reduces Non‐Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Obese Mice by Targeting Inflammatory and Lipogenic Pathways in Macrophages and Liver,” Scientific Reports 8, no. 1 (2018): 15331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Xia C. Q., Zhang P., Li S., et al., “C‐Abl Inhibitor Imatinib Enhances Insulin Production by β Cells: C‐Abl Negatively Regulates Insulin Production via Interfering With the Expression of NKx2. 2 and GLUT‐2,” PLoS One 9, no. 5 (2014): e97694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Pichavaram P., Shawky N. M., Hartney T. J., Jun J. Y., and Segar L., “Imatinib Improves Insulin Resistance and Inhibits Injury‐Induced Neointimal Hyperplasia in High Fat Diet‐Fed Mice,” European Journal of Pharmacology 890 (2021): 173666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Elksnis A., Schiffer T. A., Palm F., et al., “Imatinib Protects Against Human Beta‐Cell Death via Inhibition of Mitochondrial Respiration and Activation of AMPK,” Clinical Science 135, no. 19 (2021): 2243–2263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Han M. S., Chung K. W., Cheon H. G., et al., “Imatinib Mesylate Reduces Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Induces Remission of Diabetes in Db/Db Mice,” Diabetes 58, no. 2 (2009): 329–336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Kosheleva L., Koshelev D., Lagunas‐Rangel F. A., Levit S., Rabinovitch A., and Schiöth H. B., “Disease‐Modifying Pharmacological Treatments of Type 1 Diabetes: Molecular Mechanisms, Target Checkpoints, and Possible Combinatorial Treatments,” Pharmacological Reviews 77, no. 2 (2025): 100044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Zhang Z., Huang Q., Zhao D., Lian F., Li X., and Qi W., “The Impact of Oxidative Stress‐Induced Mitochondrial Dysfunction on Diabetic Microvascular Complications,” Frontiers in Endocrinology 14 (2023): 1112363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Gitelman S. E., Bundy B. N., Ferrannini E., et al., “Imatinib Therapy for Patients With Recent‐Onset Type 1 Diabetes: A Multicentre, Randomised, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled, Phase 2 Trial,” Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology 9, no. 8 (2021): 502–514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Li J., Dang Y., Gao J., Li Y., Zou J., and Shen L., “PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway Is Activated After Imatinib Secondary Resistance in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs),” Medical Oncology 32, no. 4 (2015): 111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Mokhtari D., Al‐Amin A., Turpaev K., et al., “Imatinib Mesilate‐Induced Phosphatidylinositol 3‐Kinase Signalling and Improved Survival in Insulin‐Producing Cells: Role of Src Homology 2‐Containing Inositol 5′‐Phosphatase Interaction With c‐Abl,” Diabetologia 56, no. 6 (2013): 1327–1338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Ni Y. G., Wang N., Cao D. J., et al., “FoxO Transcription Factors Activate Akt and Attenuate Insulin Signaling in Heart by Inhibiting Protein Phosphatases,” National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, no. 51 (2007): 20517–20522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Qayyum N., Haseeb M., Kim M. S., and Choi S., “Role of Thioredoxin‐Interacting Protein in Diseases and Its Therapeutic Outlook,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 5 (2021): 2754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Manojlovic M., Zafirovic S., Naglic D. T., et al., “Mitochondrial Dysfunction, Reactive Oxygen Species, and Diabetes Mellitus—A Triangular Relationship: A Review,” Biomolecules and Biomedicine 26, no. 4 (2025): 547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Berbudi A., Khairani S., and Tjahjadi A. I., “Interplay Between Insulin Resistance and Immune Dysregulation in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Implications for Therapeutic Interventions,” ImmunoTargets and Therapy 14 (2025): 359–382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Brawerman G. and Thompson P. J., “Beta Cell Therapies for Preventing Type 1 Diabetes: From Bench to Bedside,” Biomolecules 10, no. 12 (2020): 1681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
