Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1970 Nov;14(3 Pt 2 Suppl):373–409. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-s373

Inhibition and the stimulus control of operant behavior1

Eliot Hearst, Serena Besley, G William Farthing
PMCID: PMC1333688  PMID: 16811482

Abstract

A variety of methods, definitions, and theoretical notions that have been used in the study of inhibitory stimulus control were reviewed and evaluated. Preliminary data from several new operant methods were also described. It was proposed that future workers distinguish clearly between two forms of inhibitory control: (a) the learned power of a specific stimulus to reduce behavior, and (b) a dimensional effect, in which responding increases as values progressively more distant from the value of that specific stimulus along some dimension are presented (generalization gradient). Conclusions from several important recent studies were shown to be strongly dependent on the individual experimenter's criterion for deciding when a stimulus is inhibitory. The concept of inhibition seems a very valuable one for the field of operant behavior, and it deserves more attention than it has received in the past.

Full text

PDF
400

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BLOUGH D. S., MILLWARD R. B. LEARNING: OPERANT CONDITIONING AND VERBAL LEARNING. Annu Rev Psychol. 1965;16:63–94. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.16.020165.000431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BOWER G., GRUSEC T. EFFECT OF PRIOR PAVLOVIAN DISCRIMINATION TRAINING UPON LEARNING AN OPERANT DISCRIMINATION. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Nov;7:401–404. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beale I. L., Corballis M. C. Beak shift: an explanation for interocular mirror-image reversal in pigeons. Nature. 1968 Oct 5;220(5162):82–83. doi: 10.1038/220082a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bloomfield T. M. Discrimination learning in animals: an analysis through side-effects. Nature. 1968 Mar 9;217(5132):929–930. doi: 10.1038/217929a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blough D. S. Generalization gradient shape and summation in steady-state tests. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jan;12(1):91–104. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown P. L., Jenkins H. M. Conditioned inhibition and excitation in operant discrimination learning. J Exp Psychol. 1967 Oct;75(2):255–266. doi: 10.1037/h0024985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bull J. A., 3rd, Overmier J. B. Additive and subtractive properties of excitation and inhibition. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1968 Oct;66(2):511–514. doi: 10.1037/h0026362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. CARLTON P. L. Cholinergic mechanisms in the control of behavior by the brain. Psychol Rev. 1963 Jan;70:19–39. doi: 10.1037/h0045063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Carlton P. L., Vogel J. R. Habituation and conditioning. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1967 Apr;63(2):348–351. doi: 10.1037/h0024372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Catania A. C. Concurrent performances: inhibition of one response by reinforcement of another. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Sep;12(5):731–744. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. D'AMATO M. R., JAGODA H. Analysis of the role of overlearning in discrimination reversal. J Exp Psychol. 1961 Jan;61:45–50. doi: 10.1037/h0047757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. D'AMATO M. R., JAGODA H. Overlearning and position reversal. J Exp Psychol. 1962 Aug;64:117–122. doi: 10.1037/h0040578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Desiderato O. Generalization of excitation and inhibition in control of avoidance responding by Pavlovian CSs in dogs. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1969 Aug;68(4):611–616. doi: 10.1037/h0027678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Deutsch J. A., Terrace H. S. Discrimination learning and inhibition. Science. 1967 May 19;156(3777):988–989. doi: 10.1126/science.156.3777.988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Deutsch J. A., Terrace H. S. Discrimination learning and inhibition. Science. 1967 May 19;156(3777):988–989. doi: 10.1126/science.156.3777.988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Douglas R. J. The hippocampus and behavior. Psychol Bull. 1967 Jun;67(6):416–422. doi: 10.1037/h0024599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Farthing G. W., Hearst E. Generalization gradients of inhibition after different amounts of training. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):743–752. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. GLEITMAN H., NACHMIAS J., NEISSER U. The S-R reinforcement theory of extinction. Psychol Rev. 1954 Jan;61(1):23–33. doi: 10.1037/h0062623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. GRAY J. A. STIMULUS INTENSITY DYNAMISM. Psychol Bull. 1965 Mar;63:180–196. doi: 10.1037/h0021700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. GUTTMAN N., KALISH H. I. Discriminability and stimulus generalization. J Exp Psychol. 1956 Jan;51(1):79–88. doi: 10.1037/h0046219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Grusec T. The peak shift in stimulus generalization: equivalent effects of errors and noncontingent shock. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3):239–249. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. HANSON H. M. Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization. J Exp Psychol. 1959 Nov;58:321–334. doi: 10.1037/h0042606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. HONIG W. K. Prediction of preference, transposition, and transposition-reversal from the generalization gradient. J Exp Psychol. 1962 Sep;64:239–248. doi: 10.1037/h0048290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. HONIG W. K., THOMAS D. R., GUTTM AN N. Differential effects of continuous extinction and discrimination training on the generalization gradient. J Exp Psychol. 1959 Aug;58:145–152. doi: 10.1037/h0048484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hammond L. J. Retardation of fear acquisition by a previously inhibitory CS. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1968 Dec;66(3):756–759. doi: 10.1037/h0026546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hearst E. Discrimination learning as the summation of excitation and inhibition. Science. 1968 Dec 13;162(3859):1303–1306. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Honig W. K. The role of discrimination training in the generalization of punishment. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Jul;9(4):377–384. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. JENKINS H. M., HARRISON R. H. Generalization gradients of inhibition following auditory discrimination learning. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:435–441. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. JENSEN A. R. On the reformulation of inhibition in Hull's system. Psychol Bull. 1961 Jul;58:274–298. doi: 10.1037/h0043984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. KALISH H. I., HABER A. Generalization. I. Generalization gradients from single and multiple stimulus points. II. Generalization of inhibition. J Exp Psychol. 1963 Feb;65:176–181. doi: 10.1037/h0046826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. KIEFFER J. D. DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE RATES CORRELATED WITH THE PRESENCE OF "NEUTRAL" STIMULI. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 Jul;8:227–229. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. KLING J. W. Generalization of extinction of an instrumental response to stimuli varying in the size dimension. J Exp Psychol. 1952 Nov;44(5):339–346. doi: 10.1037/h0060959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kimble D. P. Hippocampus and internal inhibition. Psychol Bull. 1968 Nov;70(5):285–295. doi: 10.1037/h0026470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. LOGAN F. A. A note on stimulus intensity dynamism. V. Psychol Rev. 1954 Jan;61(1):77–80. doi: 10.1037/h0057534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lubow R. E. Latent inhibition: effects of frequency of nonreinforced preexposure of the CS. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1965 Dec;60(3):454–457. doi: 10.1037/h0022576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lyons J. Stimulus generalization as a function of discrimination learning with and without errors. Science. 1969 Jan 31;163(3866):490–491. doi: 10.1126/science.163.3866.490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. MACKINTOSH N. J. SELECTIVE ATTENTION IN ANIMAL DISCRIMINATION LEARNING. Psychol Bull. 1965 Aug;64:124–150. doi: 10.1037/h0022347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. MORSE W. H., SKINNER B. F. A second type of superstition in the pigeon. Am J Psychol. 1957 Jun;70(2):308–311. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mandler J. M. Overtraining and the use of positive and negative stimuli in reversal and transfer. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1968 Aug;66(1):110–115. doi: 10.1037/h0025980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Migler B., Millenson J. R. Analysis of response rates during stimulus generalization. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jan;12(1):81–87. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. NEWMAN F. L., BARON M. R. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION ALONG THE DIMENSION OF ANGULARITY: A COMPARISON OF TRAINING PROCEDURES. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1965 Aug;60:59–63. doi: 10.1037/h0022334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Nevin J. A. Differential reinforcement and stimulus control of not responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):715–726. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Nevin J. A., Shettleworth S. J. An analysis of contrast effects in multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Jul;9(4):305–315. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Newman F. L., Benefield R. L. Stimulus control, cue utilization, and attention: effects of discrimination training. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1968 Aug;66(1):101–104. doi: 10.1037/h0025988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. PERKINS C. C., Jr The relation between conditioned stimulus intensity and response strength. J Exp Psychol. 1953 Oct;46(4):225–231. doi: 10.1037/h0063567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  47. RESCORLA R. A., LOLORDO V. M. INHIBITION OF AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1965 Jun;59:406–412. doi: 10.1037/h0022060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. REYNOLDS G. S. Contrast, generalization, and the process of discrimination. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Oct;4:289–294. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. REYNOLDS G. S. OPERANT EXTINCTION NEAR ZERO. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Mar;7:173–176. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Rescorla R. A. Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures. Psychol Rev. 1967 Jan;74(1):71–80. doi: 10.1037/h0024109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Rescorla R. A., Solomon R. L. Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning. Psychol Rev. 1967 May;74(3):151–182. doi: 10.1037/h0024475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Rilling M., Askew H. R., Ahlskog J. E., Kramer T. J. Aversive properties of the negative stimulus in a successive discrimination. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):917–932. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Switalski R. W., Lyons J., Thomas D. R. Effects of interdimensional training on stimulus generalization. J Exp Psychol. 1966 Nov;72(5):661–666. doi: 10.1037/h0023795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Terrace H. S. Discrimination learning and inhibition. Science. 1966 Dec 30;154(3757):1677–1680. doi: 10.1126/science.154.3757.1677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Terrace H. S. Discrimination learning, the peak shift, and behavioral contrast. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):727–741. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Touchette P. E. Tilted lines as complex stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Mar;12(2):211–214. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Trapold M. A., Lawton G. W., Dick R. A., Gross D. M. Transfer of training from differential classical to differential instrumental conditioning. J Exp Psychol. 1968 Apr;76(4):568–573. doi: 10.1037/h0025709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Vetter G. H., Hearst E. Generalization and discrimination of shape orientation in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):753–765. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wagner A. R., Logan F. A., Haberlandt K., Price T. Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning. J Exp Psychol. 1968 Feb;76(2):171–180. doi: 10.1037/h0025414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Weisman R. G., Palmer J. A. Factors influencing inhibitory stimulus control: discrimination training and prior non-differential reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Mar;12(2):229–237. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Weisman R. G. Some determinants of inhibitory stimulus control. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 May;12(3):443–450. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Weiss S. J. Free-operant compounding of variable-interval and low-rate discriminative stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Nov;10(6):535–540. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES