Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2026 Jun 24;126(14):8034–8088. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6c00095

Semiartificial CO2 Fixation Using Metal-Dependent Formate Dehydrogenase

Yongpeng Liu †, Beverly Q L Low †, William E Robinson ‡, Rita R Manuel §, Ana Rita Oliveira §, Inês A C Pereira §, Erwin Reisner †,*
PMCID: PMC13397495  PMID: 42339808

Abstract

Semiartificial photosynthesis exploits synergies between synthetic light absorbers and biological catalysts, offering a promising strategy for solar chemistry. Unlike conventional synthetic catalysts for carbon dioxide (CO2) fixation, biological systems employ enzymes, most notably formate dehydrogenases (Fdhs), to catalyze the interconversion between CO2, protons and electrons into formate, a central hub molecule in energy and carbon metabolism. This review focuses on the deployment of metal-dependent Fdhs in semiartificial photosynthesis, with an emphasis on molybdenum- and tungsten-dependent enzymes directly wired to electrodes and synthetic light absorbers. We first examine the structural, mechanistic, and redox properties of relevant Fdhs in vivo and in vitro, highlighting reaction pathways and inherent challenges. Subsequent sections discuss the central role of biotic–abiotic interfaces in constructing functional biohybrid systems, highlighting how advanced interfacial characterization techniques inform enzyme loading, charge carrier dynamics, and reaction intermediates. We then summarize progress and challenges in (photo)­electrochemical and photochemical systems leveraging Fdhs unique properties as a model catalyst for CO2-to-formate conversion. This review aims to clarify the current state of the semiartificial photosynthesis field employing metal-dependent Fdhs in vitro, and guide future research at the interface of enzymology, photo­(electro)­chemistry, and materials science.


graphic file with name cr6c00095_0037.jpg


graphic file with name cr6c00095_0036.jpg

1. Introduction

The anthropogenic greenhouse-gas emissions resulting from fossil fuel combustion are raising the atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration to increasingly high levels, presenting one of the most pressing global challenges of our time. − While mitigation of CO2 emissions remains important, − the valorization of CO2 to value-added chemicals and fuels through catalytic processes offers a complementary route toward a circular chemical industry. − This approach repositions CO2 from a waste into a valuable carbon feedstock, reducing atmospheric greenhouse levels while providing sustainable alternatives to petrochemical building blocks. In particular, the two-electron CO2 reduction product, formate, is a versatile hub molecule, being stable in aqueous solution, readily separable, and usable as a carbon and energy source, a liquid-hydrogen carrier, a metabolite, or an intermediate for downstream chemistry. −

However, the valorization of CO2 is hindered by its thermodynamic stability and sluggish kinetics, as synthetic electrocatalysts typically require high overpotentials and often exhibit poor selectivity for formate, thereby wasting energy and producing mixed gaseous and liquid products. − These inherent limitations of artificial approaches motivate the exploration of alternative catalytic platforms capable of selective and efficient operation under ambient conditions.

Natural CO2 fixation, including geochemical processes, inorganic pathways, and photosynthesis, is essential for nearly all forms of life. − A notable feature of natural photosynthesis is the use of enzymes, such as ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO, the most studied carboxylase), − carbon monoxide dehydrogenase, − and formate dehydrogenase (Fdh), − which catalyze reactions with high efficiency, defined as the rapid conversion of substrates to products with minimal energy input, and with high selectivity under ambient conditions. Understanding how nature achieves these transformations provides inspiration for designing semiartificial or fully artificial systems that combine the robustness and scalability of synthetic materials with the precision and efficiency of enzymatic catalysis. − Thus, biological carbon fixation not only sustains ecosystems but also provides a blueprint for sustainable technologies to recycle CO2.

Fdhs are a family of enzymes that catalyze the reversible interconversion between CO2, protons (H+), electrons (e–), and formate (HCOO–) at neutral pH (Figure a, eq ). ,−

CO2+H++2e−↔HCOO− 1
E=E°′−RT2F×ln(1+Kox1/[H+](1+Kox2/[H+])1+Kred1/[H+]×1[H+]2) 2

1.

1

(a) Pourbaix diagram for the interconversion among formic acid, formate, CO2, carbonate, bicarbonate, and carbonic acid at 25 °C. The pH-dependent reduction potentials (blue solid line) were calculated using the Nernst equation (eq ) using the following parameters: pK red1 = 3.75, pK ox1 = 6.39, pK ox2 = 10.32, and formal potential (E°) of −0.075 V. − (b) A simplified general representation of the Mo or W active site in a metal-dependent Fdh. (c) Schematic of mediated and direct electron transfer pathways from an electrode or a light absorber to the Mo or W active site through four Fe–S clusters for CO2 reduction to formate.

Metal-dependent Fdhs (see Section for classification) contain a molybdenum (Mo) or tungsten (W) active site that is hexacoordinated by four sulfur atoms from two molybdopterin guanine dinucleotide (MGD) pyranopterins, one terminal sulfur ligand, and either a cysteine (Cys) or selenocysteine (Sec) to complete the primary coordination sphere (Figure b). − This metal active site underpins their unique catalytic properties (see Section for details), including electrocatalytic reversibility, which is the ability to operate at the thermodynamic potential and thus drive both forward and backward reactions at a marginal overpotential under mild conditions (see Section for electrochemistry). This unique molecular architecture also enables Fdhs to operate at a level of efficiency and rate of catalysis (turnover frequency, TOF) that has not yet been matched by synthetic catalysts.

In a metal-dependent Fdh, multiple iron–sulfur (Fe–S) clusters connect the deeply buried active site to the enzyme surface (Figure c), providing a natural ‘wire’ that enables efficient electron transfer pathways to physiological redox partners (see Section for details). ,− Using the CO2 reduction reaction as an illustration, electrons are either transferred directly through physical contact at the interface (direct electron transfer, DET) or shuttled via a small molecular redox-active mediator (mediated electron transfer, MET) from a source (e.g., an electrode or light absorber) to the distal Fe–S cluster of Fdh (Figure c). Subsequently, the electrons are relayed through the Fe–S clusters to the Mo or W active site for CO2 reduction to formate. This structural feature enables certain metal-dependent Fdhs to be directly interfaced with electrodes and light absorbers to achieve DET in a semiartificial assembly. , In contrast to metal-independent Fdhs (see Section for classification), metal-dependent Fdhs display substantially higher catalytic activities, particularly for CO2 reduction. Despite these advantages, several challenges persist, including oxygen sensitivity, difficulties and high cost in expression and purification, higher catalytic turnover rates for formate oxidation than for CO2 reduction, inhibition of cofactors, and the large carbon footprint in producing enzymes − compared to synthetic catalysts.

The concept of semiartificial photosynthesis, which integrates the selectivity of enzymes with synthetic light absorbers, has emerged as a promising strategy for solar energy conversion and storage. − By bypassing natural redox partners (see Section for details), this approach enables renewable electrons to be directly delivered to biological catalysts, resulting in highly efficient and selective catalytic transformations. Semiartificial systems have been successfully demonstrated with a range of enzymes, including hydrogenases for proton reduction to hydrogen, − nitrogenases for dinitrogen (N2) reduction to ammonia (NH3), − carbon monoxide dehydrogenases for CO2 reduction to carbon monoxide (CO), − as well as Photosystem I for light harvesting − and Photosystem II for water oxidation to molecular oxygen (O2). − The implementation of Fdh in semiartificial photosynthesis offers a promising route for solar-driven CO2 reduction to formate and constitutes the focus of this review. Complementary reviews covering semiartificial photosynthesis, − ,− as well as the use of Fdh in catalytic CO2 fixation, − ,,− are available elsewhere.

In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview and critical perspective on metal-dependent Fdhs and their applications in semiartificial CO2 fixation with a focus on establishing DET. We first examine the mechanism, structures, and purification of the major classes of Fdhs and their variants, with particular attention to their behavior in vivo and in vitro. We then discuss the central role of interfacial engineering at the biotic–abiotic interfaces for constructing functional biohybrid systems, highlighting how advanced interfacial characterization techniques can provide essential insights into enzyme loading, desorption, reaction intermediates, and charge transfer and recombination processes. This is followed by a summary of the historical development and recent progress in photo­(electro)­catalytic systems for semiartificial CO2 reduction, with emphasis on establishing DET to Fdhs in electrochemical, photoelectrochemical, and photocatalytic applications. Finally, we identify knowledge gaps, outline future directions, and evaluate the prospects of semiartificial CO2 fixation with metal-dependent Fdhs as a sustainable route for CO2 valorization beyond formate.

2. Fdh in Vivo

This section focuses on the roles and applications of Fdhs in vivo, providing an overview of the known types of Fdh. It introduces the classification of Fdhs, with particular emphasis on metal-dependent enzymes, especially W-dependent Fdhs that have been widely used in semiartificial photosynthesis, and discusses their structural features and evolutionary origins. The section also examines the metabolic pathways in which metal-dependent Fdhs operate in vivo, highlighting their catalytic chemistry and ability to catalyze CO2 reduction and formate oxidation reversibly. Finally, the distribution of these enzymes across diverse organisms is outlined.

2.1. Metal-Independent Fdhs

Fdhs are found across a wide range of organisms and can be divided into two main groups. The first group, metal-independent Fdhs, occurs in diverse organisms including aerobic bacteria, yeasts, and plants. These enzymes are O2 tolerant and belong to the D-specific dehydrogenases of the 2-oxyacid family (also known as d-isomer specific 2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenases). − Structurally, metal-independent Fdhs are composed of two subunits containing two independent active sites and do not require a metal center or a prosthetic group (i.e., a nonamino acid molecule, either organic or inorganic, that binds tightly to a protein and is required for its biological function). The primary in vivo role of metal-independent Fdhs is the oxidation of formate to CO2 coupled to the regeneration of the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) cofactor by reducing its oxidized form, although some metal-independent Fdhs can also catalyze CO2 reduction to formate under specific conditions (see Section for metabolic pathways). The NAD cofactor consists of two nucleotides, one containing an adenine base and the other a nicotinamide base, joined together through their phosphate groups (see Section for details). This cofactor exists in every living cell and is essential for cellular metabolism, energy production, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) repair, cell signaling, and functions by accepting/donating electrons in metabolic reactions, while shuttling between its oxidized (NAD+) and reduced (NADH) forms. , The catalytic turnover rates for formate oxidation in metal-independent Fdhs typically range from 1 to 7 s–1, which are considerably lower than those of metal-dependent Fdhs (from several tens to several thousands of s–1, see Section for details), and they exhibit very low activity for CO2 reduction (<1 s–1). CO2 reduction by these enzymes is only feasible at very high concentrations of NADH, as this reaction is thermodynamically unfavorable under physiological conditions (pH 7, 298 K), the formal potentials (E°’) for the NAD+/NADH and CO2/formate redox couples are −0.32 V , and −0.389 V vs the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE), respectively. −

In metal-independent Fdhs, formate oxidation proceeds via direct hydride transfer from formate to the C4 carbon of the nicotinamide moiety of NAD+. The most extensively studied example is the Fdh from Candida boidinii (CbFdh, Figure ), which is commercially available. − These enzymes have been widely applied for NADH regeneration, including at industrial scale. − Comprehensive reviews of metal-independent Fdhs are available elsewhere. − Given their low CO2 reduction activity and the unknown ability to establish DET, they are not discussed further in this review.

2.

2

Structure of CbFdh (PDB: 5DN9).

2.2. Metal-Dependent Fdhs

The second group, metal-dependent Fdhs, belongs to the dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) reductase family of Mo and W enzymes. − This enzyme family is found exclusively in prokaryotes and contains a wide range of redox enzymes, ,, including Mo- and W-dependent Fdhs, DMSO reductases, nitrate reductases, and other enzymes. Based on their metal cofactor, metal-dependent Fdhs can be classified into two categories, namely Mo-dependent and W-dependent Fdhs. Notably, W-dependent Fdhs generally exhibit higher CO2 reduction rates than their Mo-dependent counterparts, , consistent with the more favorable redox properties of W compared to Mo for CO2 reduction (see Section for redox states).

Although the active site architecture is highly conserved across metal-dependent Fdhs, these enzymes display considerable diversity in their quaternary structures, including variations in subunit number and the composition of redox-active cofactors. Some metal-dependent Fdhs can also use NAD+ as an electron acceptor. Examples include Fdhs isolated from Rhodobacter capsulatus (R. capsulatus) and Cupriavidus necator (C. necator), , which contain a dedicated subunit responsible for NAD+ reduction (see Section for structures).

2.3. Metabolic Pathways and Natural Redox Partners

Fdhs can occur either as soluble enzymes located in the periplasm or cytoplasm, or as membrane-bound complexes (Figure ). ,,− Soluble proteins are freely dispersed in the aqueous cellular environment, whereas membrane-bound proteins are embedded in or tightly associated with cell membranes. The inner membrane forms a selective barrier that encloses the cytoplasm and contains the cell’s primary metabolic and genetic machinery, while the periplasm is an aqueous compartment located between the inner and outer membranes that provides a specialized space for processes such as nutrient transformation and protein folding.

3.

3

Schematic illustration showing cellular locations of Fdhs.

The unique ability of Fdhs to efficiently catalyze both formate oxidation and CO2 reduction enables their involvement in a wide range of metabolic pathways, including fermentation (Figure a), formate respiration (Figure b), methanogenesis (Figure c), acetogenesis (Figure d), and NAD+ reduction (Figure e). Fermentation is an anaerobic metabolic process in which microorganisms break down organic substrates to generate energy, producing simpler molecules such as formate. , Formate respiration is a metabolic pathway in which formate is oxidized as an electron donor to drive energy conservation (conserve the energy of nutrient molecules) via an electron transport chain. , Methanogenesis is an anaerobic metabolism used by methanogens in which CO2, formate, or simple carbon compounds are reduced to methane (CH4) as the final product. , Acetogenesis is an anaerobic process for energy conservation and carbon fixation in which acetogens reduce CO2 to acetate. , NAD+ reduction is the process by which the oxidized NAD cofactor gains electrons to form NAD+, allowing cells to store and transfer reducing power for metabolic and biosynthetic reactions. , Fdhs that primarily catalyze CO2 reduction are typically cytoplasmic enzymes found in methanogens, acetogens, and some fermentative organisms. , In contrast, Fdhs that function mainly in formate oxidation show more diverse cellular localization and can be found in either the cytoplasm or the periplasm. ,

4.

4

Schematic illustrations of the main metabolic pathways involving Fdhs. Acetyl-CoA: Acetyl-coenzyme A; CoA: coenzyme A; PFL: pyruvate formate lyase; FHL: formate hydrogenlyase; Fd: ferredoxin; MK: menaquinone; MKH2: menaquinol; Cyt: cytochrome (TpIc 3); Qrc: quinone reductase complex; HDR: heterodisulfide reductase; Formyl-THF: tetrahydrofolate.

During fermentation, anaerobic or facultatively anaerobic bacteria, such as Escherichia coli (E. coli) produce formate as a major waste product from pyruvate cleavage (Figure a, left panel). This process is catalyzed by pyruvate formate lyase (PFL, also known as formate C-acetyltransferase), which reversibly converts pyruvate into formate and acetyl coenzyme A (Acetyl-CoA), a central metabolic intermediate consisting of a two-carbon acetyl group linked to coenzyme A. To prevent the toxic accumulation of formic acid, which would acidify the cytoplasm and collapse the proton motive force, the soluble Fdh associates with a hydrogenase to form the membrane-bound formate hydrogenlyase (FHL) complex (see Section for structures). − This complex converts formate into CO2 and H2, effectively transforming an acidic liquid metabolite into neutral gases that readily diffuse out of the cell (Figure a, middle panel), thereby helping to maintain intracellular pH during rapid fermentative growth. Periplasmic Fdhs can also catalyze CO2 reduction to formate, which serves as an electron shuttle in syntrophic interspecies electron transfer (IET), , a cooperative microbial process in which different organisms exchange electrons to break down complex substrates. In this process, CO2 reduction is coupled to NADH or ferredoxin oxidation, and the resulting formate is exported across the outer membrane to initiate IET (Figure a, right panel).

In the presence of alternative electron acceptors such as nitrate or sulfate, many prokaryotes use formate as an electron donor for anaerobic respiration. In this process, formate is oxidized by Fdh at the periplasmic or cytoplasmic side of the membrane, releasing CO2 and two electrons. These electrons are transferred through internal Fe–S clusters to reduce menaquinone (MK) to menaquinol (MKH2) within the lipid bilayer (Figure b, left panel). , MK and MKH2 are the oxidized and reduced forms of vitamin K2 and act as key membrane-bound electron carriers in bacteria and archaea, shuttling electrons during energy metabolism. In some organisms, such as sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), electron transfer from Fdh to MK is mediated by the quinone reductase complex (Qrc): ,,, electrons released from formate oxidation are first accepted by a soluble periplasmic cytochrome, the type I tetraheme cytochrome c 3 (TpIc 3), passed from this to the Qrc membrane complex, and then transferred to MK (Figure b, right panel). The resulting MKH2 diffuses within the membrane to deliver electrons to downstream terminal reductases or intermediate complexes. Together, the Qrc complex, the MK/MKH2 cycle and downstream complexes, form an electrogenic redox loop that links formate oxidation to the generation of a proton motive force and, ultimately, the synthesis of adenosine triphosphate (ATP). A cytochrome is a heme-containing protein that transfers electrons by reversibly changing the oxidation state of its Fe atom. Hemes are Fe-containing cofactors in which an Fe atom is coordinated by a tetrapyrrole ring, enabling electron transfer and, in some cases, small-molecule binding. ATP is the universal energy currency of the cell, storing and supplying energy to drive biochemical reactions such as metabolism, transport, and biosynthesis.

In methanogens, Fdh works in generating reducing equivalents and CO2 for the methanogenic pathway and is typically located in the cytoplasm (Figure c). Fdh oxidizes formate to CO2 and transfers the released electrons to low-potential electron carriers, most commonly reducing coenzyme F420 to F420H2, and in some organisms also delivering electrons to the heterodisulfide reductase (HDR) complex. − Coenzyme F420 is a specialized flavin derivative, named for its absorption maximum at 420 nm. HDR catalyzes the reduction of the heterodisulfide CoM–S–S-CoB back to its thiol forms, which is an essential step for sustaining CH4 production. This heterodisulfide is formed in the final step of methanogenesis and consists of coenzyme M (2-sulfanyl­ethanesulfonate, CoM-SH) and coenzyme B (7-mercaptoheptanoylthreoninephosphate, CoB-SH) linked by a disulfide bond. The reduced cofactors generated by Fdh activity, including F420H2 and reduced HDR, then contribute to the supply of electrons for the multistep reduction of CO2 to CH4. This tight coupling between Fdh, coenzyme F420, and HDR enables methanogens to conserve energy efficiently and sustain growth even under extremely low-energy environmental conditions.

In acetogens, Fdh acts as the primary entry point for inorganic carbon into the Wood–Ljungdahl pathway (WLP), operating in the cytoplasm as a CO2 reductase (Figure d). , The WLP (also known as the reductive acetyl-CoA pathway) is a central anaerobic pathway for carbon fixation that converts CO2 into organic carbon, − ultimately producing acetate in a process known as acetogenesis. The pathway proceeds through two parallel branches: in the methyl branch, CO2 is first reduced to formate by Fdh and then sequentially reduced to a methyl group bound to tetrahydrofolate (Formyl-THF); in the carbonyl branch, a second CO2 molecule is reduced to CO by carbon monoxide dehydrogenase. These two units are condensed by Acetyl-CoA synthase to form Acetyl-CoA, which is subsequently converted to acetate with associated ATP formation via substrate-level phosphorylation, where a phosphate group is directly transferred from a high-energy intermediate to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) without the need for a membrane-bound electron transport chain. Through catalyzing the initial CO2-to-formate step, Fdh directly links inorganic carbon fixation to cellular energy conservation and biomass formation.

In many bacteria, cytoplasmic NAD+-dependent Fdhs play a central role in cellular redox metabolism by oxidizing formate to CO2 while simultaneously reducing NAD+ to NADH (Figure e). , The NADH generated provides essential reducing power for carbon fixation, fermentation, and biosynthetic pathways, and helps maintain redox balance under anaerobic or microaerobic conditions. Through this activity, Fdh directly links formate metabolism to the universal NAD+/NADH pool that underpins energy conservation and cell growth. In many organisms, this NAD+-reducing function also supports survival under nutrient- or energy-limited conditions by ensuring a continuous supply of NADH when alternative electron donors or respiratory pathways are restricted.

Owing to their metabolic versatility in vivo, Fdhs can interact with a wide range of natural redox partners to mediate electron transfer under different physiological conditions. These partners include soluble cofactors such as NAD+ (Figure a), coenzyme F420 (Figure b), cytochrome c (Figure c), and ferredoxins (Figure d), ,, which accept electrons during formate oxidation and channel them into biosynthetic pathways or methanogenesis. ,− Membrane-associated redox carriers like quinones (e.g., MK, Figure e) , and cytochrome b (Figure f) also act as electron acceptors, thereby coupling Fdh activity to energy conservation through proton or sodium ion gradients. In addition, multiheme cytochrome c can serve as electron acceptor for periplasmic Fdhs, for example, the TpIc 3, which transfers electrons onward to the MK pool via the Qrc complex. , In some systems, such cytochromes are integral components of the Fdh enzyme itself, forming dedicated electron-transfer subunits, as exemplified by the FdhABC3 complex. ,

5.

5

Chemical structures of natural redox partners for Fdh, (a) NAD+/NADH, (b) F420/F420H2, (c) cytochrome c (PDB: 1CGO) with its heme c center, (d) ferredoxin (PDB: 2ZVS) with its [4Fe–4S] clusters, (e) MK/MKH2, and (f) cytochrome b (PDB: 1CYO) with its Heme b center.

Hydrogenases are also natural redox partners of Fdh in pathways that directly link formate and hydrogen metabolism, forming tightly coupled enzyme assemblies such as hydrogen-dependent CO2 reductases (HDCRs, Figure a) and the FHL complex (Figure b). HDCRs catalyze the reversible interconversion of H2, CO2, and formate, enabling cells to store reducing equivalents in the form of formate or release them as H2. ,, In contrast, the FHL system plays a key role in maintaining redox balance and pH homeostasis during E. coli fermentation by coupling cytoplasmic formate oxidation to proton reduction, as explained above. Together, HDCR and FHL illustrate how the Fdh and hydrogenase partnerships can provide metabolic flexibility by dynamically interconverting formate, CO2, and H2 in response to cellular demands. Main cellular locations of Fdhs and respective natural redox partners are listed in Table .

6.

6

Schematic of the primary in vivo role of (a) hydrogen-dependent CO2 reductase (HDCR) and (b) formate hydrogenlyase (FHL) complex, , highlighting the interconversion of formate/CO2 coupled with H+/H2.

1. Main Cellular Locations of Fdhs and Respective Natural Redox Partners.

Location Redox Partners ref.
Cytoplasmic NAD+ , , , −
Ferredoxin, F420
Cytoplasmic (HDCR) Hydrogenase ,
Inner membrane (FHL) Hydrogenase ,
Inner membrane Menaquinone ,
Periplasmic Multiheme cytochrome c (independent or subunit) , , ,

2.4. Protein Structures and Model Fdhs

Metal-dependent Fdhs exhibit a wide range of structural organizations, spanning from simple single subunit enzymes to large multi subunit complexes. ,,− The number and diversity of cofactors present in Fdhs also vary considerably and, in addition to the catalytic Mo or W center (see Section for catalytic mechanism), may include different types of Fe–S clusters, hemes, flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD), or flavin mononucleotide (FMN). ,,, Fe–S clusters are small assemblies of Fe and S atoms embedded within proteins that function as electron carriers. Hemes are cofactors in which an Fe atom is coordinated by a tetrapyrrole ring, as explained in Section . FAD is an organic cofactor capable of accepting and donating either one or two electrons, while FMN is a smaller flavin cofactor that, like FAD, participates in electron transfer by cycling between oxidized and reduced states in redox enzymes. , The key characteristics of some metal-dependent Fdhs are summarized in Table .

2. Main Characteristics of Model Fdhs and Respective Cellular Locations.

Organism Composition Cofactor Location ref.
E. coli Fdh-H Sec-Mo Cytoplasm , ,
α
Fdh-N Sec-Mo Membrane
αβγ
Fdh-O Sec-Mo Membrane ,
αβγ
D. desulfuricans FdhABC3 Sec-Mo Periplasm
αβγ
M. gigas FdhAB Sec-W Periplasm ,
αβ
N. vulgaris Hildenborough FdhAB Sec-W Periplasm
αβ
FdhABC3 Sec-Mo Periplasm ,
αβγ
FdhM Sec-W Membrane ,
αβ
Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 FdhAB Cys-W Membrane
αβ
S. fumaroxidans Fdh1 Sec-W Periplasm ,
αβγ
Fdh2 Sec-W Periplasm
αβ
C. necator FdsDABG Cys-Mo Cytoplasm ,
αβγδ
NAD+-dependent
R. capsulatus FdsABGD Cys-Mo Cytoplasm ,
αβγδ
NAD+-dependent
B. subtilis ForC4E4 Cys-Mo Cytoplasm
A. woodii αβ Sec-Mo Cytoplasm (part of HDCR)
T. kivui αβ Cys-W Cytoplasm (part of HDCR)

2.4.1. E. coli Fdhs

The model organism E. coli produces three distinct Fdhs, they are Fdh-H (H for hydrogenase-linked), Fdh-N (N for nitrate-inducible), and Fdh-O (O for oxygen-tolerant), named according to their physiological roles. All three enzymes are Mo-dependent and contain Sec coordinated to their active sites, but they differ significantly in their cellular localization, subunit composition, and expression conditions, reflecting their distinct physiological functions for different environmental conditions and metabolic strategies.

Fdh-H is encoded by the fdhF gene and is therefore also referred to as FdhF. In vivo, Fdh-H can associate with the FHL complex (see Section for physiological functions). For clarity, this review consistently uses the designation Fdh-H to refer to the isolated enzyme and FdhF when referring to the subunit of FHL. Fdh-H also occurs as a soluble, cytoplasmic enzyme dissociated from FHL, and represents one of the simplest and best-studied metal-dependent Fdhs, ,, consisting solely of a FdhF (α) catalytic subunit that contains one [4Fe–4S] cluster and a Mo cofactor. The structure of the E. coli Fdh-H in its isolated form is shown in Figure a.

7.

7

Structures of (a) Fdh-H (PDB: 1FDI), (b) Fdh-N (PDB: 1KQF), and (c) FHL (PDB: 7Z0T) from E. coli. Key components are highlighted on the right, including the Fdh Sec-Mo active site, the [NiFe] hydrogenase active site, the [4Fe–4S] cluster, heme b, and cardiolipin (1,3-bis­(sn-3′-phosphatidyl)-sn-glycerol).

The structure of the complete FHL complex was recently resolved by cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM), revealing an L-shaped structure with a soluble arm for catalyzing redox reactions and a membrane arm for pumping protons. This is a characteristic structure of the complex I superfamily, a group of evolutionarily related membrane-bound redox enzymes that functions as redox-driven ion pumps. , FHL is a heptameric (seven subunits) complex composed of FdhF and six additional subunits (HycB, HycC, HycD, HycE, HycF, and HycG), collectively denoted as FdhF-HycBCDEFG (Figure b). The hexameric (six subunits) HycBCDEFG is encoded by the hyc genes and fulfills the hydrogenase and membrane-coupling functions of the system. In brief, HycE is a [NiFe] hydrogenase that accepts electrons from FdhF, transferred through HycB and HycF, to reduce protons to H2, while HycD connects the soluble and membrane arms of the complex. FdhF interacts with the HycB subunit through hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonding, and with HycF primarily through electrostatic interactions, enabling efficient electron transfer within the FHL complex.

Fdh-N, encoded by the fdnGHI genes, is the major respiratory Fdh expressed by E. coli under anaerobic conditions in the presence of nitrate. , This membrane-bound enzyme complex is oriented toward the periplasm and serves as the primary electron-donating component of the formate-nitrate respiratory chain, , coupling formate oxidation to nitrate reduction catalyzed by nitrate reductase, a molybdoenzyme that reduces nitrate to nitrite. , Electron transfer through this pathway is linked to proton translocation across the membrane by a redox-loop mechanism, generating a proton motive force that drives ATP synthesis and enables energy conservation in the absence of oxygen. , The crystal structure of Fdh-N reveals a trimeric (three subunits) complex composed of FdnG, FdnH, and FdnI subunits organized in an (αβγ)3 configuration (Figure c). The catalytic FdnG (α) subunit closely resembles Fdh-H and contains a Mo cofactor coordinated by two MGDs, a Sec residue, and a terminal sulfur ligand, along with one [4Fe–4S] cluster. The FdnH (β) and FdnI (γ) subunits function in electron transfer to MK: the FdnH subunit contains four [4Fe–4S] clusters, while the FdnI subunit contains two heme b groups and a MK-binding site that mediates electron transfer to the quinone pool.

Fdh-O is a membrane-associated Fdh that faces the periplasm and is structurally very similar to Fdh-N, sharing a high degree of amino acid sequence identity. ,, Unlike Fdh-N, Fdh-O is expressed under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. ,, Its structure is predicted to be trimeric (three subunits), but has not yet been experimentally resolved, and it remains the least studied of the three E. coli Fdhs. Available evidence suggests that Fdh-O is coexpressed with a different nitrate reductase and participates in a formate-nitrate respiratory pathway active during the transition from aerobic respiration to anaerobic fermentation. ,, This positioning is thought to enable rapid metabolic adaptation when oxygen becomes limiting, allowing cells to quickly redirect electron flow from oxygen to alternative electron acceptors.

2.4.2. Nitratidesulfovibrio Fdhs

Nitratidesulfovibrio is a relatively newly defined genus of Gram-negative SRB created by reclassifying several species from the broader Desulfovibrio genus. − These organisms are well-known for expressing high levels of diverse Fdhs and hydrogenases. ,, Three species are widely used as sources for Fdh expression: Nitratidesulfovibrio vulgaris (N. vulgaris, formerly Desulfovibrio vulgaris (D. vulgaris)), Megadesulfovibrio gigas (M. gigas, formerly Desulfovibrio gigas (D. gigas)), and Desulfovibrio desulfuricans (D. desulfuricans). Originally isolated in Hildenborough, Kent, United Kingdom, N. vulgaris Hildenborough (NvH, formerly D. vulgaris Hildenborough (DvH)) is a strain of N. vulgaris widely used as a model organism for studying anaerobic metabolism, energy conservation, and stress responses in SRB. The most extensively studied Fdhs from SRB are soluble, periplasmic enzymes rather than membrane-bound complexes, and they typically associate with a TpIc 3 to oxidize formate as an electron donor to the respiratory chain (see Section for physiological functions). ,,,

NvH expresses three distinct Fdhs: two soluble periplasmic enzymes, FdhAB and FdhABC3, and one enzyme that is likely membrane-associated, FdhM. ,,, Among these, FdhAB is the simplest, consisting of two subunits (Figure a): a catalytic subunit (FdhA or α) and an electron-transfer subunit (FdhB or β). , FdhA contains a W cofactor coordinated by a Sec residue with a histidine (His) and an arginine (Arg) in the second coordination sphere, two MGDs, a terminal sulfur ligand, and one [4Fe–4S] cluster, whereas FdhB contains three [4Fe–4S] clusters that provide efficient electron transfer to the enzyme surface. The presence of both W and Sec is associated with exceptionally high CO2 reduction turnover numbers. Remarkably, despite being a W-dependent enzyme, FdhAB displays significant oxygen tolerance and can be purified and handled in air. This unusual property arises from an allosteric disulfide bridge that stabilizes an O2-protected resting state (see Section ). Deletion mutant studies have shown that FdhAB is the primary enzyme responsible for CO2 reduction under syntrophic and fermentative growth conditions. ,

8.

8

Structures of (a) NvFdhAB (PDB: 6SDV) and (b) MgFdhAB (PDB: 1H0H). Key components are highlighted on the bottom, including the Fdh Sec-W active site and the [4Fe–4S] cluster.

The second enzyme, FdhABC3, has catalytic (α) and electron-transfer (β) subunits that are closely related to those of FdhAB, but it is Mo-dependent and includes a third subunit: a tetraheme cytochrome c that facilitates electron transfer. The structure of FdhABC3 has not been experimentally resolved. FdhAB and FdhABC3 are the two main Fdhs expressed by NvH, and their production is tightly regulated by the availability of Mo and W. Under Mo-rich conditions, FdhABC3 is the dominant enzyme, whereas in the presence of W, FdhABC3 is downregulated and FdhAB becomes the primary Fdh expressed. An FdhABC3 has also been identified and characterized in D. desulfuricans. ,,

The third enzyme, FdhM, is a Sec-W enzyme that is likely membrane-associated and oriented toward the periplasm. It is expressed at low levels and is weakly induced by W, and its gene cluster also encodes a multiheme cytochrome c, a cytochrome c oxidase, and an unidentified membrane protein (i.e., no assigned function). Cytochrome c oxidase catalyzes the reduction of O2 to water while simultaneously pumping protons to drive ATP synthesis. The two FdhM subunits, the catalytic (α) and electron-transfer (β) subunits, can be purified individually, showing activity toward formate oxidation under aerobic conditions. However, this activity is approximately 1 order of magnitude lower than that of FdhAB, and no CO2 reduction activity has been detected, suggesting that FdhM fulfills a physiological role distinct from those of FdhAB and FdhABC3. The structure of FdhM has not been experimentally resolved.

M. gigas expresses two Fdhs. The first is a soluble periplasmic enzyme MgFdhAB composed of two subunits (Figure b) and homologous to NvFdhAB, since it is the same enzyme in a closely related organism. Its structure, solved in 2002, was the first structure reported for a W-dependent enzyme from a mesophilic organism. This structure revealed a Sec-W active site, with one [4Fe–4S] cluster in the catalytic (FdhA or α) subunit and three [4Fe–4S] clusters in the electron transfer (FdhB or β) subunit. The second Fdh has not yet been biochemically characterized, but sequence analysis suggests it is a close homologue of the first enzyme, also comprising two similar subunits, with a Cys residue replacing Sec as the metal-coordinating ligand.

2.4.3. Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 Fdhs

A W-containing Fdh from Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 (SoFdhAB) was identified via AI-assisted enzyme mining and exhibits both oxygen tolerance (see Section for details) and intrinsic DET capability (see Section for details). The enzyme was expressed in a dimeric (two subunits) architecture composed of a catalytic subunit (FdhA or α) and an electron transfer subunit (FdhB or β). FdhA contains a Cys-W cofactor with a terminal sulfur ligand, together with one [4Fe–4S] cluster. FdhB accommodates four [4Fe–4S] clusters, forming an extended electron transfer chain (Figure ). Compared to the homologous dimeric (two subunits) enzyme NvFdhAB (see Section for details), SoFdhA and SoFdhB share modest sequence identities with NvFdhA (30.5%) and NvFdhB (22.5%). Notably, SoFdhAB represents the first Fdh reported to combine complete oxygen tolerance with DET.

9.

9

Structure of SoFdhAB (PDB: 9VAP). Key components are highlighted on the bottom, including the Fdh Cys-W active site and the [4Fe–4S] cluster.

2.4.4. Cytoplasmic NAD+-Dependent Fdhs

A distinct group of metal-dependent cytoplasmic Fdhs use NAD+ as their physiological electron acceptor. These enzymes are found in several bacteria and operate in diverse metabolic contexts, where they contribute to NADH generation for cellular redox balance and energy metabolism. They are typically dimeric (two subunits) or multimeric complexes containing multiple Fe–S clusters and a dedicated NAD+-reducing subunit that binds an FMN or FAD cofactor. Three representative systems have been studied in detail: MeFDH1 from Methylorubrum extorquens (M. extorquens) AM1, FdsDABG from C. necator, and FdsABGD from R. capsulatus.

M. extorquens AM1 is a pink Gram-negative bacterium widely used as the primary model organism for studying methylotrophy, the metabolic ability to grow aerobically on one-carbon (C1) compounds such as methanol and methylamine, with formate acting as a central metabolic intermediate and, in some conditions, a carbon and energy source. In this organism, MeFDH1 catalyzes the oxidation of formate produced during the metabolism of reduced C1 compounds such as CH4, methanol, or methylamine. This enzyme is dimeric (two subunits), composed of a catalytic (Fdh1A or α) subunit and a dedicated NAD+-reducing (Fdh1B or β) subunit (Figure a). The catalytic subunit contains a Cys-vW cofactor, three [4Fe–4S] clusters, and one [2Fe–2S] cluster, while the NAD+-reducing subunit binds one FMN cofactor, one [4Fe–4S] cluster, and one [2Fe–2S] cluster to facilitate electron transfer to NAD+. The structure of MeFDH1 has been resolved by cryo-EM. ,

10.

10

Structures of (a) MeFdh1 (PDB: 7XQW) and (b) RcFdh dimer (PDB: 6TGA). Key components are highlighted on the right, including Cys-W active site for MeFdh1, Cye-Mo active site for RcFdh, the [4Fe–4S] and [2Fe–2S] clusters, and FMN.

C. necator is a Gram-negative, aerobic, H2-oxidizing bacterium that is widely used as a model organism for studying the biosynthesis of biodegradable plastics, particularly polyhydroxy­alkanoates (PHAs). This organism expresses a tetrameric (four subunits), NAD+-dependent Fdh known as FdsDABG (CnFdh), where the designation Fds reflects that the enzyme is encoded by the fds gene, with the letter ‘s’ indicating its soluble nature. ,,, The redox potentials of these subunits have been characterized recently.

R. capsulatus is a purple nonsulfur, Gram-negative bacterium noted for its remarkable metabolic versatility and ability to grow under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. It is widely used as a model organism for studying photosynthesis, nitrogen fixation, and cellular electron-transfer processes. , R. capsulatus expresses a similar tetrameric (four subunits), NAD+-dependent Fdh termed FdsABGD (RcFdh), which is homologous to the C. necator enzyme CnFdh. , Structural studies by cryo-EM revealed that the catalytic FdsA subunit contains a Cys-coordinated Mo cofactor and one [2Fe–2S] cluster, along with four additional [4Fe–4S] clusters involved in intramolecular electron transfer. The FdsB subunit harbors one [4Fe–4S] cluster and an FMN cofactor that mediates NAD+ reduction, while the FdsG subunit contains one [2Fe–2S] cluster. The FdsD subunit does not bind cofactors but caps the Mo-containing domain of FdsA, contributing to structural stability and enzyme assembly (Figure b). Electron transfer has been shown to occur within each FdsABGD tetramer rather than between tetramers.

Both Fdhs from C. necator and R. capsulatus are tailored for formate oxidation under physiological conditions, but they have also been shown to catalyze CO2 reduction when supplied with high concentrations of NADH, enabling in vitro NADH recycling. ,, However, this reverse reaction proceeds at only moderate rates, as it is thermodynamically unfavorable and strongly limited by product inhibition, particularly by formate and NAD+ accumulation. These constraints indicate that CO2 reduction is unlikely to represent a significant physiological function for these enzymes, but rather reflects their intrinsic catalytic reversibility under artificially driven reducing conditions.

2.4.5. Bacillus subtilis Fdhs

The observation that the Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis) presents formate oxidation activity when grown aerobically, led to the identification of two noncanonical Fdhs, ForCE1 and ForCE2. These BsFdhs catalyze formate oxidation and are composed of two subunits: the catalytic subunit ForC and the essential partner subunit ForE. The structure of the asymmetric dimer unit of a complete ForCE hetero-octamer (eight subunits) is shown in Figure . The ForC subunit functions as the formate oxidoreductase and contains a Cys-Mo, together with four [4Fe–4S] clusters and one [2Fe–2S] cluster. Its amino acid sequence shows high homology to the catalytic subunit FdsA from R. capsulatus and C. necator (see Section for details). In contrast, the ForE subunit does not directly participate in catalysis but is essential for enzyme function. It forms a tight complex with ForC and plays a structural and functional role in mediating electron transfer from formate oxidation to the membrane quinone pool. In particular, ForE contributes to the stabilization of quinone binding and to the overall structural integrity of the complex, as the catalytic activity of ForC is significantly diminished in the absence of ForE. Structural insights from cryo-EM and modeling suggest that the interface between ForC and ForE contains small cavities that are occupied by glycerophospholipid molecules. These lipids are proposed to seal the intersubunit interface and may facilitate transient association of the complex with the cytoplasmic membrane. ,

11.

11

Structure of the asymmetric dimer unit of ForCE1 from B. subtilis (PDB: 8RQZ). Key components are highlighted on the bottom, including the Fdh Cys-Mo active site, the [4Fe–4S] cluster, and the [2Fe–2S] cluster.

2.4.6. Hydrogen Dependent CO2 Reductases (HDCRs)

A type of Fdh has recently been characterized as part of HDCR, a multienzyme complex in which a hydrogenase is directly coupled to an Fdh to catalyze the reduction of CO2 to formate driven by H2 oxidation (see Section for physiological functions). To date, only two HDCRs have been studied in detail, both from acetogenic bacteria in which the enzyme plays a central role in CO2 fixation: Acetobacterium woodii (A. woodii) and Thermoanaerobacter kivui (T. kivui). ,

The HDCR from A. woodii (AwHDCR) was the first to be characterized. It is a tetrameric (four subunits) complex comprising a FdhF subunit featuring a Sec-Mo cofactor, a HydA2 subunit with an [FeFe] hydrogenase, and two electron transfer subunits HycB2 and HycB3. AwHDCR contains a total of 11 [4Fe–4S] clusters, with one located in the FdhF subunit, two in the HydA2 subunit, and four in each of the two electron transfer subunits HycB2 and HycB3, forming an extended intramolecular electron transfer pathway. The thermophilic HDCR from T. kivui (TkHDCR) has a similar tetrameric (four subunits) structure containing FdhF, HydA2, HycB3 and HycB4 (Figure ), but it differs from AwHDCR in two key aspects. First, the FdhF subunit contains a Cys-coordinated W cofactor instead of Mo, and second, the HydA2 subunit harbors three [4Fe–4S] clusters, resulting in a total of 12 [4Fe–4S] clusters in TkHDCR. , Recently, the structure of TkHDCR was resolved by cryo-EM, revealing that the complex assembles into long filaments in vivo, a supramolecular organization that enhances electron transfer efficiency and overall catalytic activity. Notably, in addition to H2-driven CO2 reduction, both HDCRs can perform H2 production from formate oxidation, and the Fdh and hydrogenase can also accept electrons from reduced ferredoxin to support CO2 or proton reduction.

12.

12

Structure of the asymmetric unit of TkHDCR (PDB: 7QV7). Note that the W cofactor in FdhF is not resolved due to the resolution limit of the cryo-EM structure. Key components are highlighted on the bottom, including the [4Fe–4S] cluster, and the H-cluster.

2.4.7. Formylmethanofuran Dehydrogenases (FMFdhs)

A formylmethanofuran dehydrogenase (FMFdh) is a Mo- or W-containing enzyme from methanogenic archaea that catalyzes the reduction of CO2 to formate and its subsequent condensation with methanofuran to form formylmethanofuran, using ferredoxin as the physiological electron donor. ,, The crystal structure of FMFdh from Methanothermobacter wolfeii (FwdABCDFG) was resolved in two forms, as a dimer (two subunits) and as a tetramer (four subunits) of the FwdABCDFG hexamer (six subunits), revealing that catalysis is initiated by CO2 reduction to formate at an Fdh-like subunit (Figure ). This complex contains twenty-four subunits with a total of forty-six [4Fe–4S] clusters that electronically couple the two catalytic modules: FwdB, a Cys-W Fdh subunit responsible for CO2 reduction, and FwdA, an amidohydrolase subunit harboring a binuclear Zn2+ center that catalyzes the condensation of formate with the methanofuran cofactor. Note that the metal cofactor is not resolved in Figure due to the resolution limit of the cryo-EM structure, and it was modeled by comparing to the structure of MgFdhAB. Remarkably, the W active site in FwdB is connected to the solvent by a narrow 40 Å long tunnel that permits access of CO2 but excludes formate to enforce directional catalysis. The formate generated at this site is then channeled to the FwdA active site through a separate 43 Å long hydrophilic tunnel linking the two catalytic centers. The remaining subunits play predominantly structural and electron transfer roles: FwdF contains eight [4Fe–4S] clusters and FwdG contains two [4Fe–4S] clusters to mediate long-range electron transfer, while FwdC forms a central scaffold that interfaces with FwdB, FwdA, and FwdF, stabilizing the overall architecture of the complex.

13.

13

Structure of dimer form of the FwdABCDFG hexamer in FMFdh (PDB: 5T61). Key components are highlighted on the bottom, including the Fdh Cys-W active site, the [4Fe–4S] cluster, and MFN (N-[4,5,7-tricarboxyheptanoyl]-l-gamma-glutamyl-N-{2-[4-({5-[(formylamino)­methyl]-3-furyl}­methoxy)­phenyl]­ethyl}-d-glutamine).

2.5. Protein Evolution

Fdhs are considered among the most ancient enzymes within the DMSO reductase superfamily and are thought to have been vertically inherited from the last universal common ancestor (LUCA), the most recent organism from which all known life on Earth descended, which marks the branching point for Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya. , Fdhs featuring Sec as a metal-coordinating ligand ,, are the most common selenoproteins in the genomes of Sec-utilizing bacteria and archaea. The presence of both periplasmic and cytoplasmic Fdhs across the bacterial and archaeal domains suggests that LUCA already possessed distinct Fdhs adapted for periplasmic formate oxidation and cytoplasmic CO2 reduction prior to the divergence of these domains.

Fdhs can be broadly divided into two major phylogenetic groups that correlate with their cellular localization, quaternary structure, and physiological roles. The first group comprises cytoplasmic Fdhs, including Fdh-H, methanogenic Fdhs that oxidize formate to CO2 during methanogenesis, acetogenic Fdhs that catalyze CO2 reduction to formate as the first step of acetogenesis, and multimeric NAD+-dependent Fdhs with complex architectures, such as those from R. capsulatus or C. necator. ,,, These enzymes are typically soluble, often multisubunit complexes, and are closely integrated into central redox metabolism through various natural redox partners. The second phylogenetic group consists of periplasmic or periplasmic-facing membrane Fdhs, , exemplified by the Mo-dependent Fdh-N and Fdh-O from E. coli. These enzymes are usually trimeric (three subunits), comprising a catalytic subunit, an electron transfer subunit, and an integral membrane subunit that mediates electron transfer to the quinone pool. This group also includes periplasmic Fdhs from SRB, such as the dimeric (two subunits) FdhAB from NvH ,, and related organisms, , as well as trimeric (three subunits) enzymes like FdhABC3 from D. desulfuricans and NvH, which contain an additional tetraheme cytochrome c subunit. ,, In these SRB, the Fdhs lack an integral membrane subunit and instead transfer electrons to the respiratory chain via the TpIc 3 and the Qrc complex. ,

The evolution of metal-dependent Fdhs is closely linked to the bioavailability of metal elements in the environment. Although Mo and W have similar average abundances in the Earth’s crust (1.2 mg kg–1 for Mo and 1.25 mg kg–1 for W), their concentrations in seawater differ markedly, at approximately 0.01 mg L–1 for Mo ions and 0.0001 mg L–1 for W ions. − Importantly, elemental abundance does not directly translate into biological availability, which is strongly influenced by environmental conditions and has likely shaped the evolution of this enzyme family.

The rise of atmospheric oxygen and the associated oxidation of Mo to the highly soluble molybdate ion may have favored the incorporation of Mo over the more ancient W in the active sites of some enzymes. , Consistent with this view, Mo-dependent Fdhs are found in both anaerobic and aerobic prokaryotes, as well as in facultative anaerobes, ,, whereas W-dependent Fdhs are predominantly restricted to obligate anaerobes. ,, A notable exception is the aerobic methylotrophic Methylobacterium extorquens, in which the presence of a W-dependent Fdh is likely the result of horizontal gene transfer, a process by which an organism acquires genetic material directly from another organism rather than inheriting it from a parent, thereby enabling the rapid acquisition of new traits such as antibiotic resistance.

In addition, W is strictly essential for some hyperthermophilic organisms, possibly reflecting its higher bioavailability in ancient anoxic environments, such as sulfide-rich waters where early life may have emerged. Under these conditions, W sulfides are significantly more soluble than Mo sulfides, rendering Mo comparatively poorly bioavailable. Finally, the expression of Fdhs in several organisms is differentially regulated by the presence of Mo or W ions, highlighting the continued influence of metal availability on Fdh biology. ,

3. Catalytic Mechanisms of Fdhs

It is generally assumed that the interconversion of CO2 and formate proceeds through a reversible catalytic mechanism. Under this framework, mechanistic insights gained from formate oxidation are directly relevant to understanding CO2 reduction, and vice versa. Although Fdhs display notable diversity at their active sites including variations in the Mo or W center, Sec or Cys ligand, and surrounding amino acid residues, it is widely accepted that these enzymes operate via fundamentally similar catalytic mechanisms, despite exhibiting different catalytic efficiencies for formate oxidation and CO2 reduction, defined by the ratio between turnover number and the Michaelis constant (see Section for Fdh catalysis). Accordingly, differences in activity among Fdhs are best viewed as tuning of overall catalytic activity rather than reflecting distinct mechanistic pathways. Several mechanistic hypotheses have been proposed and comprehensively reviewed elsewhere. ,, In this section, we highlight key structural features of Fdh active sites, summarize proposed catalytic intermediates, and discuss experimental evidence that informs current understanding of active site structure and reactivity.

3.1. CO2 and Formate as the Substrates

Experimental evidence indicates that Fdh catalyzes the interconversion between CO2 and formate, rather than involving bicarbonate (HCO3 ) as a direct substrate or product (Figure ). Early studies on Fdh from Clostridium pasteurianum showed that incorporation of 14C into formate occurs more rapidly when 14CO2 is supplied than when than when H14CO3 is used. When carbonic anhydrase, a zinc-containing enzyme that catalyzes the interconversion of CO2 and water with bicarbonate and protons, is added to the assay, the uptake rates from 14CO2 and H14CO3 become identical. Electrochemical measurements further support this conclusion, demonstrating an immediate catalytic response upon addition of CO2, whereas bicarbonate addition produces a delayed increase in the reduction rate as reflected by the electrocatalytic current (see Section ). ,, Together, these observations indicate that Fdhs do not directly react with HCO3 , and instead catalyze CO2 reduction.

14.

14

Schematic illustration of how Fdhs reduce CO2 to formate, and oxidize formate to CO2, while CO2 equilibrates between the aqueous/gaseous phases, carbonic acid, bicarbonate, and carbonate.

In the oxidative direction, it has been established that Fdhs use formate as the sole substrate (Figure ). First, mass spectrometric analysis of the headspace during formate oxidation by Fdh-H shows that no oxygen atoms from the water solvent are incorporated into the CO2 product. Specifically, oxidation of 13C-labeled formate for 10 s in 18O-labeled water at pH 6.5 yields exclusively 16O-containing CO2. At higher pH values and with longer reaction times, increased incorporation of 18O into CO2 is observed, but this incorporation can be explained by the background hydration equilibrium between CO2 and HCO3 . More recent studies reported that RcFdh accelerates solvent oxygen incorporation into CO2, but this process is slow, and similar incorporation was also observed with catalytically inactive CnFdh. These findings indicate that the observed oxygen exchange arises from a slow postcatalytic equilibration between CO2 and HCO3 (Figure ), rather than from an oxygen atom transfer mechanism at the Mo active site. Collectively, these data support the conclusion that the sole product of formate oxidation by Fdh is CO2, which retains both oxygen atoms originally present in the formate molecule.

3.2. Structure of Metal Active Sites

As shown in the Fdh crystal structures in Section , the Mo or W metal at the active site is coordinated by MGDs, a terminal sulfur ligand, and either a Cys or Sec in the primary coordination sphere (Figure b and Figure ). W and Mo are both group 6 transition metals with high versatility and biological availability, and as 4d and 5d transition metals they exhibit similar ionic radii, coordination chemistries, and redox properties. , Under physiological conditions, both W and Mo can access the IV, V, and VI oxidation states.

15.

15

(a) Chemical structure and (b) 3D model of the metal active site in the first coordination sphere of metal-dependent Fdhs consisting of a metal center (Mo or W) bound to 2 molybdopterin guanine dinucleotides (MGDs) as well as a cysteine residue (Mo or W coordination by S) or selenocysteine residue (Mo or W coordination by Se).

In general, W-dependent enzymes show higher activity in low potential redox reactions, such as CO2 reduction, reflecting the lower redox potential of the W­(VI)/W­(V) and W­(V)/W­(IV) transitions compared with Mo. For example, in Rhodobacter capsulatus DMSO reductases, Mo could be substituted for W, and these transitions were 220 and 334 mV lower, respectively, than those of the Mo-enzymes. W-enzymes in general (e.g., aldehyde oxidoreductases, acetylene hydratases, class II benzoyl-CoA reductases, Fdhs, and FMFdhs) catalyze very low potential redox reactions (E0′ < −420 mV vs SHE). , W tends to introduce a reductive bias, whereas Mo favors oxidative reactions. ,,

It is generally assumed that Mo- and W-dependent enzymes operate by cycling the metal center through the IV, V, and VI oxidation states during catalysis. Accordingly, Fdhs are proposed to cycle these redox states during both CO2 reduction, which initiates from the IV state, and formate oxidation, which initiates from the VI state. Although the VI and IV states are required to accomplish the two-electron redox reaction of formate and CO2 interconversion, only the V state in Fdhs is directly observable by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. ,,,,,, This observation suggests that regeneration of the active site proceeds through a one-electron pathway. Such a mechanism is consistent with the fact that the associated Fe–S clusters transfer electrons one at a time and that the Mo­(V) or W­(V) state is generated upon reduction of the enzyme by formate or other physiological electron donors. Kinetic models incorporating stepwise single-electron regeneration of the active site have successfully reproduced key features of Fdh catalytic behavior. ,

An important feature of Mo- and W-dependent Fdhs is the presence of either Sec or Cys as a protein ligand coordinating the metal center (Figure ). The group 16 elements, selenium and sulfur, share similar physicochemical properties, including electronegativity and accessible oxidation states. However, Sec is more acidic and exhibits higher nucleophilicity than Cys. The presence of Sec in redox enzymes is commonly associated with enhanced catalytic activity and increased resistance to oxidative inactivation. ,− In addition to the Sec or Cys ligand, the first coordination sphere of the metal contains five sulfur ligands, four derived from the two MGDs and one terminal sulfur ligand (Figure ). It is firmly established that this terminal sulfur ligand is a sulfur atom in both Mo- and W-dependent Fdhs, as well as in FMFdhs. , This sulfur atom is essential for catalytic activity and is introduced by a dedicated chaperone protein. − Chaperone proteins assist in the correct folding, assembly, and transport of other proteins within a cell, while also preventing misfolding and aggregation, without becoming a permanent part of the final functional structure.

The MGD ligands in the active site of Fdhs are not thought to participate directly in substrate binding. However, they likely play a role in mediating electron exchange with the metal center throughout the catalytic cycle. Multiple EPR studies of the Mo­(V) state have reported signals with g values near 2.094, close to that of a free electron. ,,,,, These observations suggest delocalization of an electron onto the pterin ligands, consistent with their redox sensitivity and with the known electrochemical behavior of synthetic Mo-dithiolene complexes. The MGD ligands are therefore considered redox noninnocent and are proposed to interconvert between dihydro and tetrahydro states through a coupled two-electron, two-proton process. −

The metal active site of Fdhs is surrounded by conserved His and Arg residues in the second coordination sphere, which are thought to contribute to proton transfer and substrate binding. For example, crystallographic studies of NvFdhAB show redox dependent rearrangements of the protein backbone and side chains, ,, most notably involving His residue, suggesting a role in binding substrates or inhibitors. This is supported by the pH dependence of azide binding to the Mo­(VI) state, which indicates involvement of a residue with a pK a around 6.5, consistent with His. In RcFdh, mutation of a conserved His (H387M) lowers affinity for azide and cyanate by about an order of magnitude, further implicating His in ligand binding. These redox linked conformational changes, including His side chain reorientation, likely underlie reductive activation of Fdhs, ,,,,, rather than dissociation of the Sec or Cys ligand. ,, Conserved Arg residues are also present in all Fdh active sites, including metal independent enzymes, and are likewise proposed to participate in proton transfer and substrate binding. ,,,

3.3. Consensus Mechanism for Fdh Catalysis

In the CO2 reduction direction, Fdhs are widely thought to operate via formal hydride transfer rather than proton transfer (Figure ). Protonation of CO2 is thermodynamically unfavorable because the effective pKa of the carbon atom is extremely low, making involvement of biological acids unrealistic, even within a protein environment. ,, Instead, the reduced active site, commonly presented in the protonated form as Mo­(IV)-SH or W­(IV)-SH, acts as a hydride donor to CO2, reducing it to formate in the second coordination sphere without direct substrate binding to the metal. This hydride transfer mechanism is consistent with formate formation in both metal-dependent and metal-independent Fdhs. ,

16.

16

Consensus mechanism for Fdh catalysis showing CO2, formate, His, and Arg in the second coordination sphere. ,

In the reverse reaction, formate oxidation likewise proceeds through hydride transfer (Figure ). Formate binds in the second coordination sphere and donates a hydride to the terminal sulfur ligand in the metal active site, Mo­(VI)S or W­(VI)S. ,, EPR studies show strong coupling between the Cα hydrogen of formate and the metal center, indicating close proximity of the transferred hydrogen to the first coordination sphere via the terminal sulfur ligand. ,, Multiple spectroscopic and kinetic studies support Mo-SH or W-SH as a key intermediate in both reaction directions, analogous to hydride transfer intermediates proposed for other Mo-dependent enzymes such as xanthine oxidases.

Nevertheless, several mechanisms have been previously proposed for Fdh catalysis. ,,,,,, A central question has been whether the Sec or Cys ligand dissociates from the metal center during turnover or remains bound throughout the catalytic cycle, in both the CO2 reduction and formate oxidation directions. Current evidence supports a mechanism in which the Sec or Cys ligand remains coordinated to the metal, and CO2 is reduced to formate in the second coordination sphere, without direct binding of the substrate to the metal center (Figure ). ,,,,,,,− ,

Multiple lines of evidence support continued coordination of the Sec or Cys ligand to the metal center throughout Fdh catalysis. Early crystallographic analysis of oxidized Fdh-H showed Sec coordinated to Mo, a feature later confirmed in structures of several other Fdhs, including Fdh-N, NvFdhAB, ,− and MgFdhAB. Importantly, the original Fdh-H structure is essentially unchanged from its reduced form, indicating stable metal coordination during turnover. This conclusion is reinforced by numerous recent structures of NvFdhAB, including reduced-state and time-resolved crystallographic studies, which consistently show Sec remaining bound to the metal during reduction and support a second coordination sphere catalytic mechanism. ,,,,,

Spectroscopic and electrochemical data further corroborate this view. EPR studies of Fdh-H , and NvFdhAB detected strong 77Se coupling to the Mo­(V) or W­(V) state, providing strong evidence that the Sec ligand remains coordinated to the metal during catalysis. Consistent with these findings, X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) of oxidized and dithionite-reduced forms of Fdh-H shows that both states have very similar metal coordination environments. Comparable results for oxidized and reduced D. desulfuricans Fdh (DdFdh) and RcFdh also indicate little change in coordination environment around Mo upon dithionite reduction. Electrochemical studies across multiple Fdhs likewise support formate binding outside the first coordination sphere. In contrast, crystallographic observations of Sec dissociation in NvFdhAB arise only under oxidative damage conditions, where O2 or peroxide replaces Sec at the metal center, leading to irreversible enzyme inactivation. These inactive species indicate that Sec dissociation reflects oxidative damage rather than a physiologically relevant catalytic state.

3.4. Inhibition of the Fdh Metal Active Site

The Fdh metal active site can bind a range of small molecules, ,,,, mainly anionic ions, such as azide, ,,,, nitrite, , nitrate, , cyanide ,, and derivatives such as cyanate and thiocyanate, which are isoelectronic and isostructural with CO2 or formate. These species act as inhibitors and have been widely used as probes of Fdh catalytic function. Most inhibitors display competitive inhibition with respect to formate oxidation, with inhibitory strength correlating with their electron-donating ability (azide > cyanate > thiocyanate > nitrite > nitrate). In contrast, CO2 reduction generally shows apparently noncompetitive inhibition, except for nitrite. For all inhibitors, the degree of inhibition depends on their redox potentials, indicating that inhibitor binding at the Fdh active site is redox dependent.

Metal-independent Fdhs are also inhibited by small molecules such as azide and iodoacetamide, , indicating that inhibitor binding in metal-dependent Fdhs need not involve direct coordination to the Mo center, although similar substrate scopes likely lead to comparable small-ion affinities. Consistent with this view, IR and DFT studies suggest that azide and cyanate bind in the second coordination sphere of RcFdh rather than directly to the Mo metal center. In addition, crystallographic analysis of the dithionite-reduced U192C mutant of NvFdhAB has been interpreted as showing a sulfur dioxide (SO2) molecule bound at a Cys-associated active site. In this structure, SO2 is stabilized by hydrogen bonding to an active site Arg residue and may weakly interact with the Cys sulfur (Figure ).

17.

17

SO2 binding to the W­(IV) active site, based on reported crystal structure modeling and analogous calculated intermediates. ,

Iodoacetamide tagging experiments have been reported for many Fdh types and typically monitor enzyme inactivation during formate oxidation. ,,, Early studies on Fdh-H showed that iodoacetamide inactivation is more common at higher pH, with the Cys variant requiring higher pH than the native Sec enzyme. A similar increase in iodoacetamide sensitivity with pH has been observed for Cys-containing RcFdh. Inactivation at pH 6 requires the presence of formate for both Sec and Cys variants, and nitrate promotes inactivation over a pH range of 6 to 10. In RcFdh, the H387M mutant exhibits faster iodoacetamide inactivation than the wild type, consistent with loss of a His residue that elevates the pKa of the neighboring Cys, thereby increasing its nucleophilicity.

These trends led to the proposal that iodoacetamide inactivation arises from alkylation of the Sec or Cys ligands in the first coordination sphere, with the lower pK a of Sec enabling formation of Se– at lower pH than S–. However, mass spectrometric analysis of iodoacetamide-treated NvFdhAB revealed alkylation of multiple Cys residues, including those coordinating Fe–S clusters and surface Cys, while Sec remained unmodified. Moreover, iodoacetamide alkylation can occur without loss of metal coordination. Collectively, these results indicate that iodoacetamide labeling is unselective and therefore an unreliable probe for assessing the specific role of the active site Sec or Cys residue.

4. Fdh in Vitro

This section focuses on the in vitro applications of Fdhs, with particular emphasis on properties relevant to biotechnological deployment. We cover strategies for enzyme isolation and purification, robustness and scalability under operational conditions, and distinctive catalytic features that differentiate Fdhs from other CO2-converting enzymes. The discussion also addresses oxygen tolerance and stability outside the cellular environment, as well as how in vitro studies have enabled detailed mechanistic insights into catalytic activity.

4.1. Isolation and Purification

The first step of in vitro application of Fdhs is the isolation of the target enzyme from a mixture of other enzymes and components in the source organism. These separation and purification procedures must not only retain the biological activity and chemical integrity of the enzyme, but also effectively remove contaminants (e.g., other proteins, nucleic acids, viruses, cell culture media) as well as other isoforms (i.e., closely related versions of the same protein). Enzymes can either be isolated in the native form directly from the natural source organism (native purification) or expressed in the recombinant form, where genetic engineering is used to produce the target enzyme in a host cell (e.g., bacteria or yeast).

The native purification of Fdh was first reported for the cytoplasmic Fdh-H from E. coli. Two column chromatographic steps were employed, the first of which leveraged on the hydrophobic character of Fdh-H to adhere the enzymes to a phenyl Sepharose column, whereas the second step utilized hydroxylapatite to separate Fdh-H from bulk contaminants. The nearly homogeneously purified Fdh-H had a light, yellow-brown color and was determined by electrophoresis to have a molecular weight of 80 kDa. Adapting from these procedures, the same enzyme was also purified using a Q-Sepharose column (anion-exchange column) in the second step with an additional third step involving a gel filtration column based on size exclusion chromatography.

While native purification preserves the original structure of the natural enzyme without surface modification, such enzyme production can be complex and time-consuming, as well as limited in supply and scalability. Alternatively, enzymes expressed in the recombinant form can be purified by affinity purification, which is faster, and achieves higher yield and activity of the isolated enzymes. Recombinant expression involves introducing a cloned gene encoding the target enzyme into a host organism for enzyme production, where the host organism can either be identical or relative to the native source organism, known as homologous or heterologous expression, respectively. Furthermore, recombinant expression allows target enzymes to be modified with specific affinity tags such as Histidine tag (His-tag) or streptavidin tag (Strep-tag) to enhance selective binding to Ni2+ or biotin, respectively. These tags are short protein sequences or peptides that have highly specific binding partners. Affinity purification (or affinity chromatography) can then be used, leveraging on these specific binding interactions to isolate the target enzyme in a facile, one-step procedure with very high purity. ,

The first heterologous expression of a metal containing Fdh was executed for RcFdh. The His-tagged RcFdh was expressed in E. coli and purified with a Ni2+–nitrilotriacetic acid resin and size exclusion chromatography, resulting in the isolation of enzyme in high purity (90–95%). Strep-tagged CnFdh expressed in E. coli was similarly purified with a Strep column, followed by an ion exchange and ammonium sulfate precipitation to obtain the active enzyme. It should be noted that the expression of W-dependent enzymes in E. coli has been reported, which is considered an important challenge in the field.

Homologous expression of Strep-tagged NvFdhAB, , and FdhM from the same organism, also yielded high purity enzymes in a one-step affinity purification. Remarkably, the recombinant NvFdhAB could be purified and handled under aerobic conditions with nitrate and glycerol as stabilizing agents, wherein the nitrate acts as an inhibitor that protects the enzyme likely by preventing the loss of the labile sulfido group. ,

Recombinant expression systems are also advantageous in that protein variants can be generated to investigate several features, including the catalytic mechanism. The first variant produced was the Sec-to-Cys variant of the Cys-FhL from E. coli which significantly affected formate oxidation activity, as well as the CO2 reducing activity. The same mutation in the NvFdhAB enzyme confirmed the strong impact on activity, and revealed that the Sec residue is also important to increase O2 tolerance and may function in H+ transfer to/from the active site. O2 tolerance of NvFdhAB was also further investigated with the mutation of a surface disulfide bond which revealed the presence of a redox switch mechanism for protection against transient O2 exposure (see Section ). , Meanwhile, variants of active site residues of the RcFdh confirmed the important role of the conserved His and Arg residues in catalysis.

4.2. Fdh Catalysis in Vitro

The catalytic activity of Fdh toward CO2 reduction or formate oxidation can be quantified in a solution assay by measuring the initial reaction velocity (ν0) at different substrate (CO2 or formate) concentrations, in the presence of electron donors or acceptors, respectively. Typically, a redox mediator such as methyl viologen or benzyl viologen with a characteristic absorption maximum is employed. By monitoring the change in absorbance at the characteristic wavelength of the redox mediator upon charge transfer, ν0 for CO2 reduction or formate oxidation can be found (Figure ). Thereafter, by employing the Michaelis–Menten model (eq ), where V max is the maximum reactions rate reached at a saturated substrate concentration and [S] is the substrate concentration, key kinetic parameters such as the Michaelis constant (K M), turnover number (k cat, it can also be denoted as TON but is typically represented as k cat in enzyme catalysis) and the catalytic efficiency (k cat/K M) can be found. The definition of these properties and their derivation is detailed in other reviews. ,

v0=Vmax[S]KM+[S] 3

The kinetic properties of the best characterized metal-dependent Fdhs, for which both formate oxidation and CO2 reduction are reported, are summarized in Table .

18.

18

Brief concept diagram of solution assay measurements for quantifying Fdh activity toward formate oxidation and CO2 reduction via the use of a redox mediator with a characteristic absorption maximum.

3. Kinetic Properties of Some Metal Dependent Fdhs for Both Formate Oxidation and CO2 Reduction .

    k cat (s–1)
K M (μM)
k cat/K M (s–1 mM–1)
 
Organism Enzyme e– acceptor/donor Formate Oxidation CO2 Reduction e– acceptor/donor Formate CO2 Formate Oxidation CO2Reduction ref
E. coli Fdh-H BV2+/MV+ 160 <1 graphite-epoxy electrode 800 2500 200 <1 ,
N. vulgaris Hildenborough FdhAB BV2+/MV+ 1310 345 BV2+/MV+ 17 324 77,515 1 090
S. fumaroxidans Fdh1 BV2+/MV+ 1900 2460 BV2+/MV+ 40 47,500 ,
MV2+/MV+ 3380 280
Fdh2 BV2+/MV+ 5600 185 BV2+/MV+ 10 560,000
C. necator FdsDABG NAD+/NADH 200 11 NAD+/NADH 310 2700 648 4 ,
R. capsulatus FdsDABG NAD+/NADH 37 2 NAD+/NADH 280 132
A. woodii FdhF MV2+/MV+ 1690 372 MV2+/MV+ 1000 37,000 1690 10
T. kivui FdhF MV2+/MV+ 1355 HDCR complex: MV2+/MV+ 550 2464
3228 (70 °C)
2660 (60 °C)
515 (30 °C)
a

Not reported.

In general, the activity for formate oxidation is higher than for CO2 reduction, with two notable known exceptions. For the S. fumaroxidans Sec-W-Fdh1, the k cat toward CO2 reduction measured using dithionite-reduced methyl viologen as electron donor was ∼2460 s–1 at pH 7.3, higher than that for formate oxidation (∼1900 s–1 at pH 8) measured using benzyl viologen as electron acceptor. However, a later study reported a lower turnover rate toward CO2 reduction (282 s–1 at pH 7.5) than toward formate oxidation activity (3380 s–1 at pH 8) for the same enzyme. Despite the high catalytic activity, this enzyme is extremely susceptible to O2 damage.

The second exception is the fastest enzyme in CO2 reduction reported so far, the TkHDCR, which has a k cat of 515 s–1 at 30 °C, but higher at 70 °C (3228 s–1) as expected for a thermophilic enzyme. , However, the TkHDCR enzyme is also very sensitive to O2, requiring strictly anaerobic conditions and the presence of dithiothreitol (DTT) in the activity assays. In contrast, the NvFdhAB is an interesting enzyme for practical applications, since it couples one of the highest CO2 reduction rates under mild conditions (315 s–1) with the ability to be handled aerobically. Furthermore, a homologous recombinant expression system is in place that facilitates its production and purification.

Note that Fdh catalysis involves both chemical steps at the active site and subsequent intraprotein electron transfer steps, and the relative rates of these processes strongly influence the observed enzyme behavior. Activity-based electrochemistry, solution assays, and presteady state kinetics have shown that electron transfer can be rate limiting during formate oxidation by Fdh-H. When interfacial electron transfer is slow, key catalytic parameters can be masked, leading to apparent values of V max, K M, and kinetic isotope effects (KIEs) that do not directly reflect the intrinsic catalytic rates at the active site. For example, solution assays of formate oxidation using benzyl viologen as the electron acceptor yielded a KIE on V max (Vmax /Vmax ) of approximately 1, whereas electrochemical measurements (see Section ) gave a value of 2.44 at 0 V vs SHE, and presteady state stopped-flow experiments reported a KIE of about 3.2. The apparent K M values for formate were also isotope dependent and method dependent, being much lower in solution assays (a K M of 58 μM and a K M of 158 μM) than in electrochemical measurements (a K M of 790 μM).

These seemingly contradictory results can be reconciled using a unified kinetic scheme that contains separate steps for substrate binding, chemical reduction/oxidation, and the electron/proton transfer required to regenerate the active site (Figure ). By fitting this model, with partially shared parameters, simultaneously to solution assay, electrochemical, and stopped-flow data, it was shown that the different experimental methods probe different rate-limiting steps. As a result, variations in electron transfer rates, rather than changes in the intrinsic active-site chemistry, account for the observed differences in V max, K M, and KIE across techniques.

19.

19

A kinetic scheme for Fdhs which incorporates substrate binding, active site turnover, and electron transfer from the active site to regenerate it. This scheme is agnostic to the precise mechanism of the interconversion between CO2 and formate at the active site. PCET: Proton Coupled Electron Transfer.

4.3. Oxygen Tolerance

Metal-dependent Fdhs display high turnover rates for CO2 reduction with little energy loss, but most face challenges of oxygen sensitivity, which is more acute for the most active enzymes, containing W and Sec. ,, In fact, the majority of both Mo- or W-dependent Fdhs are quickly inhibited by O2 and need to be handled anaerobically. Examples are Fdh-H from E. coli, and Fdh1 and Fdh2 from S. fumaroxidans, which lose activity irreversibly after short durations of oxygen exposure. , The Mo-containing NAD+-dependent enzymes from R. capsulatus and from C. necator , are considered oxygen-tolerant enzymes and their NAD+-mediated formate oxidation activity can be measured aerobically, although the activity declines gradually especially if a stabilizing agent (e.g., nitrate) is not present. As the presence and binding of formate results in oxygen sensitivity of Fdh, stabilizing agents that competitively inhibit the binding of formate can enable Fdh to be handled or stored aerobically.

The FdhM enzyme from NvH has been purified aerobically in the absence of any stabilizing agent. This enzyme is also capable of aerobic formate oxidation with high-potential electron acceptors or with O2 itself, which is reduced to H2O2 without apparently affecting the active site, but is not reported to reduce CO2. For all Fdhs, CO2 reduction in the presence of O2 is difficult due to the low reduction potentials involved in the reaction, since the reductants used can react directly with O2.

While most Fdhs require anoxic conditions and a reductive activation step for catalysis, some Fdhs can be purified and handled aerobically. A striking example is the NvFdhAB, which would be expected to be extremely O2-sensitive, similar to other tungstoenzymes and W-complexes mimicking their active site, ,, but it can be purified and handled aerobically. , The mechanism behind this was recently described and involves an allosteric disulfide bond at the enzyme surface that controls the activity and O2 stability of the enzyme (Figure ). When the disulfide bond is present (resting state) the enzyme displays negligible activity and presents a very high K M for formate (2.5 mM) that precludes its reduction in vivo, and keeps it stable to O2. Upon reduction of the disulfide bond the enzyme is converted to the fully active conformation, which involves structural changes that propagate from the surface to the active site. In this state, the enzyme is more sensitive to O2 and can be readily reduced by physiological formate concentrations (K M for formate 17 μM) to the O2-sensitive W­(IV)-SH state. This mechanism allows protection of FdhAB when NvH is transiently exposed to O2, as it happens in its natural habitats.

20.

20

Schematic highlighting the different physiological states in the NvFdhAB cycle and how the reductive activation of the disulfide bond affects the activation and oxygen sensitivity of the enzyme.

Another Fdh that displayed remarkable oxygen tolerance is the SoFdhAB which, unlike NvFdhAB, maintains its activity before and after treatment with the reducing agent, DTT. Cryo-EM analysis of SoFdhAB revealed a different substrate channel from NvFdhAB, wherein the exit of the gas substrate tunnel was controlled by the residues H653 and V666. More crucially, the bulky residue Y776 which blocks the tunnel and another residue T927 on the opposite side of the channel, play a vital role in oxygen protection, evidenced by the difference in activities for the constructed SoFdhAB-Y776A/T927A variants under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. NAD-dependent Fdh from Clostridium carboxidivorans (CcFdh) was also highlighted for its ability to reduce CO2 to formate under aerobic conditions. Coupled with the ability to use NAD­(P)H as an electron source, ccFDH was found to be suitable for supporting CO2 fixation via the Calvin–Benson–Bassham (CBB) cycle in oxygenic phototrophs.

Several possible mechanisms have been identified in the oxidative inactivation of Fdhs. The most general one involves the loss of the essential sulfur ligand, which can occur faster in the reduced W­(IV)-SH or Mo­(IV)-SH state than in the oxidized W­(VI) or Mo­(VI) state and at higher pHs, , involving exchange with hydroxide. In the absence of a stabilizing agent, the reduced CnFdh was inactivated within minutes of O2 exposure. Upon contact with O2, the reduced enzyme was shown to produce superoxide that reacts with the terminal sulfur ligand to form sulfite leading to enzyme inactivation, which could have been prevented by the presence of superoxide dismutase and catalase. This process also explains why inhibitors like nitrate can stabilize the enzyme by sterically preventing access to the terminal sulfur ligand. Partial loss of this ligand was also observed in the aerobically obtained structure of the active C872A variant of NvFdhAB.

However, an additional mechanism for oxidative inactivation was recently described for this enzyme. Although NvFdhAB could perform formate oxidation with O2 as electron acceptor and does not suffer oxidative damage for short periods of O2 contact (<12 min), structural studies revealed that upon prolonged O2 exposure in the presence of either substrate (formate or CO2), dissociation of the Sec ligand occurs, which is displaced by a dioxygen or peroxide molecule, leading to irreversible inactivation. Remarkably, this was also observed for the enzyme in the presence of CO2, where the metal is not reduced. Although a small loss of the terminal sulfur ligand was also observed, addition of superoxide dismutase and catalase did not offer significant protection, indicating that the main mechanism involved in inactivation was the displacement of the Sec ligand from W coordination. These results suggest that binding of either substrate induces a conformational state that is more susceptible to O2 attack and Sec displacement, and suggest that previous reports of Sec dissociation in Fdh-H and Cys dissociation in R. capsulatus Fdh, accompanied with oxygen ligation, are probably associated with inactivated forms.

5. Characterizations at the Fdh–Abiotic Interface

Characterizing Fdh–abiotic interactions is crucial to achieve and optimize DET through controlling enzyme orientation, surface modifications, and overall system efficiency. − This section introduces a complementary set of interfacial characterization techniques and analysis that enable real-time monitoring of Fdh adsorption and desorption, structural integrity, as well as substrate/inhibitor binding. These techniques provide invaluable fundamental insights into Fdh photo­(electro)­catalysis, facilitating the rational design and development of efficient and robust semiartificial photosynthesis. The electrochemistry section focuses on the use of Fdh as a model electrocatalyst for the electrochemical interconversion of CO2 and formate. This will cover the unique advantages of metal-dependent Fdh compared to synthetic electrocatalysts in terms of overpotential, reversibility, and tunability. It will also highlight the key applications of Fdh for CO2 reduction in electrocatalysis to produce chemicals and for formate oxidation in biofuel cells to generate electricity.

5.1. Fdh Electrochemistry

Metal-dependent Fdhs, featuring Mo or W cofactors, contain Fe–S clusters that efficiently shuttle electrons across the insulating protein scaffold to the buried metal active site (Figure a). These Fdhs can also be adsorbed onto an electrode to accept or donate electrons via DET, enabling the activity of these enzymes to be probed directly with electrochemical techniques such as protein film voltammetry (PFV) or more generally, protein film electrochemistry (PFE). ,−

21.

21

(a) Structure of W-dependent NvFdhAB (PDB: 6SDV) adsorbed onto an electrode, highlighting the reversible electron transfer to and from the W-active site through the [Fe–S] clusters. (b) Cyclic voltammograms of ideal irreversible and reversible electrochemical reactions. Numerical data adapted from ref with permission from National Academy of Sciences, copyright 2011. (c) Protein film voltammetry of Fdh from S. fumaroxidans adsorbed onto polished pyrolytic graphite edge electrode in 10 mM CO2 and 10 mM sodium formate (pH 6.4) showcasing the interconversion of CO2 and formate at the reduction potential (black dashed line). The background current is represented by the dashed line. The conditions employed were 100 mV s–1 scan rate, 37 °C and 1000 rpm electrode rotation. Numerical data adapted from ref with permission. Copyright 2008 National Academy of Sciences.

Electrochemical reversibility refers to when the kinetics of interfacial electron transfer is sufficiently fast to maintain Nernstian equilibrium at an electrode surface, wherein a small amount of additional energy input beyond the thermodynamic requirements, known as overpotential, produces a significant catalytic current that reflects the shifting Nernstian equilibrium. ,− In an ideal scenario (Figure b), a reversible reaction gives rise to a single sigmoidal curve (blue) that intercepts through zero current at the equilibrium potential (E0’) and reaches a limiting current independent of applied potential in both directions. The magnitude of the equivalent oxidation and reduction currents at E0’ is known as the exchange current, which is high in reversible systems. Meanwhile, irreversible systems display low exchange currents and have negligible response to potential changes near E0’. A significant overpotential is required before current increases, reflected in the two waves (red) increasing exponentially with potential, each in one direction. Consequently, a significant overpotential is required to match the current produced in the reversible system, which results in a loss in energy and selectivity.

In the case of an enzyme-modified electrode, electrochemical reversibility is better described with electrocatalytic exchange currents, which encompasses the interfacial electron transfer as well as the enzyme’s turnover and intramolecular electron transfer, each having the ability to limit electrocatalysis. In this regard, metal-dependent Fdhs are reversible electrocatalysts that showcases high electrocatalytic exchange currents and correspondingly, very minimal overpotential requirement in either direction. Metal-dependent Fdhs are capable of performing the reversible interconversion of CO2 and formate and hence, are suitable model electrocatalysts for probing CO2 reduction or formate oxidation reactions.

A polished pyrolytic graphite edge (PGE) electrode adsorbed with W-dependent Fdh from Syntrophobacter fumaroxidans demonstrated an onset potential for CO2 reduction and formate oxidation at approximately −0.4 V vs SHE (Figure c), close to the thermodynamic potential of −0.36 V vs SHE (pH 6.5). Notably, the PFV showcased a sigmoidal onset reflecting the high electrocatalytic exchange currents characteristic to a reversible system. This onset is followed by a linear relationship as the overpotential is increased which highlights that even at the highest driving force applied, the rate of IET is still slower than the rapid active-site turnover, hence the limiting factor to electrocatalysis.

A subsequent study also demonstrated the reversible interconversion of CO2 and formate using Mo-containing Fdh-H from E. coli adsorbed onto a graphite-epoxy rotating disk and similarly concluded that the electrocatalytic rate of the enzyme is limited by interfacial electron transfer. Nonetheless, the catalysis remained reversible across a variety of conditions (pH, applied E vs SHE), following the Pourbaix diagram in Figure a. Controlled potential electrolysis with the Fdh-H adsorbed on the electrode at applied potentials of −0.5 and −0.6 V vs SHE (pH 6.9) resulted in the quantitative conversion of CO2 to the single product formate with a Faradaic efficiency (FE) of 102 ± 2%.

The reversible nature and CO2 reduction activity of W-dependent NvFdhAB was also established, demonstrating the interfacial electron transfer from a metal oxide-based cathode to the Fe–S clusters of Fdh and an onset potential (−0.36 V vs SHE, pH 6.5) close to the thermodynamic potential. The Fdh cathode achieved a current density of −240 μΑ cm–2 at −0.6 V vs SHE and a FE of around 78% toward formate production.

Similar DET-type bioelectrocatalysis was achieved with the engineered TkHDCR. The study delved into the heterologous expression of TkHDCR in E. coli and subsequently the truncation of TkHDCR to obtain Fdh variants displaying catalytic activity toward both the reduction of CO2 and formate oxidation. Formate oxidation through a DET mechanism was also studied with the immobilization of BsFdh on PGE rotating-disc electrodes. A model that describes the cycling of the enzyme’s active site between three redox states (IV, V, and VI) was fitted to baseline-subtracted voltammograms, enabling deeper understanding of how substrate binding and deprotonation are coupled to electron-transfer steps during catalytic formate oxidation.

Benefitting from the electrochemical reversibility of metal-dependent Fdh, these enzymes have been employed for formate oxidation in biofuel cells, , as well as in CO2 reduction for the sustainable production of formate. With the early reports of high turnover numbers (112 s–1) attained and the low overpotential (∼50 mV) required for CO2 reduction, metal-dependent Fdh serve as a model electrocatalyst with catalytic performance superior to state-of-the-art synthetic molecular catalysts (e.g., Fe-porphyrins) or heterogeneous metal catalysts (e.g., Au, Pb, Bi and Sn), hence paving the rational design of synthetic CO2 reduction electrocatalysts. ,,− Moreover, the high catalytic activity of metal-dependent Fdhs and their ability to perform DET spurred the development of electrodes over the years (Figure ), to achieve stable immobilization of enzymes, to increase enzyme loading and to improve the interfacial electron transfer between electrodes and Fdh.

22.

22

Electrode materials for Fdh integration. (a) CNT-NHMe2 + modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE) for adsorption of Fdh via electrostatic interactions. (b) Viologen-modified polymer matrix on carbon cloth-based gas diffusion layer for wiring Fdh. (c) Polyaniline (PANi) hydrogel conjugated with ClFdh on a GCE. (d) Schematics and corresponding SEM images of mesoporous ITO particles sintered on ITO-coated glass and carbon felt. The SEM image of ITO|ITO-coated glass is reproduced from ref . Copyright 2019 the Authors, published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, under CC BY. The SEM image of ITO|carbon felt is reproduced from ref . Copyright 2025 the Authors, published by American Chemical Society, under CC BY. (e) Schematic of the procedures involved in fabricating IO-ITO electrodes using polystyrene (PS) beads to provide a templated structure for the pores along with the SEM images of the electrodes with different pore sizes (750 nm and 3 μm) made with commercial polydispersed ITO nanoparticles (Sigma-Aldrich, ITO-SA) or synthesized monodispersed ITO nanoparticles with average sizes of 10 nm (ITO-10), 20 nm (ITO-20) and 40 nm (ITO-40). The schematic is reproduced from ref . Copyright 2020 the Authors, published by National Academy of Sciences, under CC BY. The SEM image of IO-ITO are reproduced from ref . Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society, under CC BY.

The reversibility and electrochemical CO2 reduction ability of Fdh was first characterized using enzyme-adsorbed graphite electrodes, e.g. PGE electrode, which showcased the fast and selective performance of Fdh. ,, Thereafter, studies probed the interfacial association between Fdh and the electrode using electrodes with various functionalization and morphologies, investigating the immobilization of Fdh in the correct electroactive orientation. Beyond that, to achieve high loadings of Fdh and therefore higher current densities, greater formate concentrations and extended stability, 3D-structured porous electrodes such as conjugated polymer matrices and porous metal oxide electrodes were developed. The key performance metrics of notable works on Fdh-immobilized electrodes are listed and compared in Table .

4. Comparison of Key Performance Metrics across Reported Fdh-Immobilized Electrodes for CO2 Reduction in 3-Electrode Configuration .

Year Electrode Electrode type Electron transfer type Electrode area (cm2) Organism Enzyme(loading) –J (mA cm2) E app (VSHE) FE (%) Stability (h) (post J%) Electrolyte ref
2008 PGE Stationary DET 3.94 S. fumaroxidans Fdh1 (5 μg) 0.008 –0.81 97.3 1 (N/A) MES (0.1 M), NaCl (1 M), NaHCO3 (20 mM), pH 6.5
2014 Graphite-epoxy Stationary DET 5.3 E. coli Fdh-H (1 mg mL–1) 0.4 –0.60 101.7 1 (2.5%) MES (0.1 M), Na2CO3 (20 mM), pH 6.9
2019 PANi Hydrogel DET 1 C. ljungdahlii Fdh (NA) 0.5 –0.40 92.7 12 (40%) NaHCO3 (50 mM), Na3PO4 (0.1 M), pH 6.5
2019 ITO|mesoTiO2 Stationary DET 0.25 NvH FdhAB (43 pmol) 0.1 –0.60 92 2 (88%) NaHCO3 (0.1 M), KCl (50 mM), pH 6.5
2020 Carbon cloth/redox polymer Gas diffusion MET 0.636 NvH FdhAB (95.4 μg) 0.533 –0.59 3.7 45 (80%) Phosphate buffer (50 mM), pH 6
2021 Functionalized LDG Stationary DET 0.07 NvH FdhAB (162 pmol) 0.16 –0.60 >99 1.5 (34%) Sodium citrate (0.1 M), NaHCO3 (50 mM), pH 6
2021 FTO|IO-TiO2 Stationary DET 0.19 NvH FdhAB (104 pmol) 4.75 –0.80 96 10 (80%) MOPS (0.1 M), NaHCO3 (1 mM), CsCl (50 mM), pH 4.6
2022 Functionalized CNT Stationary DET 0.071 NvH FdhAB (40 pmol) 0.25 –0.60 >90 2 (40%) NaHCO3 (0.1 M), KCl (50 mM), pH 6.7
2022 ITO|mesoITO Stationary DET 0.19 NvH FdhAB (50 pmol) 0.24 N/A 95 2 (100%) KHCO3 (0.1 M), KCl (50 mM), pH 6.67
2022 FTO|IO-TiO2 Stationary DET 0.19 NvH FdhAB (104 pmol) 3.6 –0.80 96 10 (72%) MOPS (0.1 M), NaHCO3 (1 mM), KCl (50 mM), pH 4.6
2023 ITO|mesoITO Stationary DET 0.19 NvH FdhAB (40 pmol) 0.244 –0.60 96 N/A MOPS (0.1 M), KCl (50 mM), pH 7
2023 PGE Rotating disk (3000 rpm) DET 0.06 C. ljungdahlii Fdh (180 nmol) 0.125 –0.60 99.3 2 (>100%) HEPES (0.1 M), NaCl (0.1 M), NaHCO3 (0.1 M), pH 7
2025 Ti foil|IO-TiO2 Stationary DET 0.19 NvH FdhAB (100 pmol) 1.2 –0.78 95 10 (90%) NaHCO3 (50 mM), KCl (50 mM), pH 6.45
2024 CNT|CP Stationary DET 1 Tk FdhF_HycB3Δ159–184 (95 μg) 0.27 –0.50 99.1 14 (14.8%) HEPES/NaOH (0.1 M), NaCl (0.1 M), pH 7
2025 PGE Stationary DET 0.1237 Dd Fdh (30 pmol) 1.68 –0.46 N/A N/A Acetate/phosphate buffer (0.1 M), NaCl (0.1 M), pH 7
2025 CF|TiO2 Stationary DET 0.25 NvH FdhAB (100 pmol) 0.11 –0.59 >99 1 (>99%) NaHCO3 (0.1 M), KCl (50 mM), pH 6.7
2026 Functionalized CNT Stationary DET 1 S. oneidensis SoFdhAB (150 μg) –2.9 –0.6 93.1 64 (50%) HEPES/NaOH (0.1 M) NaCl (0.1 M), pH 7
a

FE: Faradaic efficiency, ITO: indium tin oxide, FTO: fluorine-doped tin oxide, CP: carbon paper.

b

Galvanostatic measurements.

c

Co-immobilized with carbonic anhydrase.

d

10% CO2 instead of saturated CO2.

e

Measured at 4 h.

f

Electrolyte was occasionally refreshed.

Although adsorption of Fdh through drop-casting is often sufficient to enable enzymatic CO2 electroreduction, the orientation of Fdh on the electrode surface is crucial for effective DET. The direct electrocatalysis of CO2 by DdFdh on PGE was found to produce a significantly lower current compared to when a mediator (e.g., methyl viologen) was used to shuttle electrons between DdFdh and the PGE, i.e. mediated electron transfer (MET). This was likely due to the limited number of electroactive DdFDH properly oriented on the electrode surface for effective DET, which highlights how desirable enzyme orientation is in the DET regime.

The low potential mediator, methyl viologen (E0′ = −0.45 V vs SHE), also enabled the reversible interconversion of HCOO– and CO2 by Mo-containing Fdh (FdsDABG) from C. necator, consistent with the low MoV/IV redox potential (E0′ = −0.47 V vs NHE, pH 7.5). Meanwhile, other artificial mediators with higher potentials such as methylene blue (E0′ = +0.015 V vs NHE, pH 7) and phenazinum (E0′ = +0.085 V vs NHE, pH 7) were more effective as electron acceptors for FdsDABG in formate oxidation. ,

Although effective DET demands specific oriented enzyme immobilization, DET circumvents the disadvantages of MET such as the mass-transport limited kinetics (slow diffusing mediators), the possibility of short-circuit (back) reactions, energy loss, the debilitating costs of mediators and their potential toxicity to microorganisms. ,, Therefore, this spurred the development and engineering of electrodes that can immobilize large numbers of Fdh in an electroactive configuration, thereby achieving effective CO2 reduction via DET.

In some enzymes, such as the NvFdhAB, the protein surface around the distal Fe–S cluster which is responsible for exchanging electrons with the electrode (Figure c and Figure e) is negatively charged. Thus, tuning the surface functionalization and electrostatics of the electrode surface is an effective tool to control enzyme immobilization and orientation for DET. Carbon nanotube (CNT) electrodes functionalized with positive (−NHMe2 +) and negative (−COO–) functional groups were employed for NvFdhAB immobilization (Figure a), where reversible electrochemical CO2 reduction and high catalytic currents were observed for the CNT–NHMe2 + electrodes, whereas negligible catalytic current was measured for CNT–COO– electrodes. This contrast showcases that the oriented binding of NvFdhAB via the negatively charged distal Fe–S cluster is essential for effective DET and hence the importance of surface charges for enzymatic CO2 reduction.

Likewise, low-density graphite (LDG) electrodes functionalized with aminophenyl groups electrostatically oriented the negatively charged acceptor binding site (i.e., the distal Fe–S cluster) of NvFdhAB to the electrode surface, allowing NvFdhAB to be subsequently covalently anchored in an electroactive orientation desirable for DET. As such, the covalently bound NvFdhAB electrode resulted in high electrocatalytic current by DET for both formate oxidation (−700 μΑ cm–2) and CO2 reduction (−200 μΑ cm–2), obtaining ∼100% FE toward formate during chronoamperometric measurements at −0.6 V vs SHE (pH 6).

Using TkHDCR as a template for AI-assisted mining, an oxygentolerant enzyme, SoFdhAB, was employed for DET electrocatalytic performance. The constructed SoFdhAB/carbon nanotube/glassy carbon electrode (SoFdhAB/CNT/GC) demonstrated the reversible interconversion of CO2 and formate with an onset for CO2 at −420 mV vs SHE at pH 7. Notably, the interfacial electron transfer efficiency achieved was >0.9 for CO2 reduction at −550 mV vs SHE (pH 6.2) and higher current densities were achieved in the amino-modified and pyrene methylamine-doped CNT electrodes. This was attributed to the hydrogen bond and π-π interactions, respectively, between SoFdhAB and the electrodes, which work synergistically to drive the oriented immobilization of SoFdhAB. Most remarkably, excellent oxygen tolerance was demonstrated when a current density of 1.6 mA cm–2 was achieved during CO2 reduction in gas mixtures containing 20% O2, albeit the FE decreased.

While functionalized-2D electrodes (e.g., PGE, LDG) have achieved effective immobilization for CO2 reduction by DET, the amount of enzyme that can be effectively immobilized with the correct orientation is restricted to a monolayer and consequently, the current densities and overall performance of the bioelectrocatalytic system is limited. ,

To address this limitation, bespoke 3D electrodes such as polymer matrices and porous metal oxides have been developed for Fdh attachment. ,, One example is the viologen-modified polymer matrix (Figure b). This heterogenized MET approach involves the wiring of NvFdhAB to carbon cloth-based gas diffusion layers via an organic low-potential viologen polymer matrix. However, the stability of such mediator-modified polymer electrode is limited due to the narrow range of operating potentials suitable for the mediator and energy (potential)-losses associated with MET. The FE measured toward formate was also observed to be lower than unity. On the contrary, conjugating W-dependent Fdh from Clostridium ljungdahlii (ClFdh) to a conductive polyaniline (PANi) hydrogel (Figure c) achieved DET CO2 reduction to formate with a FE of 93%. ClFdh was previously identified among 20 screened Fdhs to have the highest CO2 reduction activity with a k cat/K M value of 183 mM–1 s–1, and an optimum pH and temperature of 8.6 and 45 °C, respectively. The quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics-based computation study conducted for the ClFdh-conjugated PANi hydrogel suggested a possible electron transfer pathway from the benzenoid amines in the PANi hydrogel to the Arg36 surface residue, the [4Fe–4S] cluster and finally to the W metal center.

Another type of 3D electrode is the porous metal oxide electrode, which allows for high enzyme loading, stable enzyme binding, and efficient DET to the active site of Fdh (Figure d). , The strong and active enzyme attachment is attributed to the high affinity between the glutamic and aspartic acid residues on the protein surface to metal oxides, which has been originally reported for [NiFeSe]-hydrogenase from Desulfomicrobium baculatum and TiO2. ,− This established binding hence forms the basis for the further development of metal oxide electrodes for immobilizing enzymes, such as Fdh for CO2 reduction. The two types of metal oxides commonly used for Fdh immobilization are indium tin oxide (ITO) and TiO2. ITO is a conductive material (degenerate semiconductor) but is unstable at more reducing potentials (<−0.6 V vs SHE, pH 6.7) and is hence more suited for probing the reversible nature of Fdh at mild potentials. Meanwhile, TiO2 is a semiconductor insulating at mild potentials but stable and conducting at more reducing potentials (<−0.6 V vs SHE, pH 6.7), which makes it suitable for application in CO2 reduction devices.

The use of metal oxides was investigated for PFV by immobilizing NvFdhAB on mesoporous ITO (Fdh|mesoITO) and TiO2 (Fdh|mesoTiO2) electrodes with a film thickness of ∼2.5 μm. The particle sizes of the mesoporous ITO and TiO2 were <50 nm and ∼21 nm, respectively. After demonstrating the reversible interconversion of CO2 and formate using the Fdh|mesoITO electrode, an Fdh|mesoTiO2 electrode was employed for CO2 reduction, achieving a current density of −100 μA cm–2 at −0.6 V vs SHE (pH 6.5). The interaction of NvFdhAB with TiO2 was also probed using a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) cell (see Section ), which suggested contributions from chemisorption beyond pure electrostatic interaction. Hence, strong attachment between the enzyme and TiO2 is established for efficient electron transfer and thereby, CO2 reduction catalysis. The saturated enzyme loading on TiO2 was shown to be approximately 3.5 pmol cm–2.

Progressing from flat and mesoporous electrodes, metal oxide electrodes with a hierarchical macroporous inverse opal (IO) architecture (Figure e) were also developed, significantly improving enzyme adsorption and the penetration of substrates and products. These IO structures are highly ordered, 3D nanoporous materials suitable for high loading of enzymes. The endowment of a mesoporous frame further increases the effective surface area for enzyme interactions and enables stable enzyme immobilization. Furthermore, the tunability of the dimensions of macro/meso pores and film thickness render these hierarchical electrodes versatile for enzyme integration. Pore sizes of 750 nm are typically used for enzyme immobilization, but for larger microbiological components such as bacteria, 10 μm pore sizes are typically used. Following the first report of ITO electrode with IO architecture and mesoporous skeleton, similar electrodes were employed for the immobilization of Fdh as (photo)­electrodes for CO2 reduction. , IO-TiO2 electrodes adsorbed with NvFdhAB (IO-TiO2|Fdh) attained a remarkably high current density of (−4.75 mA cm–2 at −0.53 V vs RHE) with the use of CO2-saturated CsCl electrolyte (pH 4.6). After 10 h of controlled potential electrolysis, a FE of 96% toward formate, a turnover number (TON) of 1.5 × 106, and TOF of 42 s–1 were achieved. The IO-TiO2|Fdh electrode was also combined with a perovskite to assemble a photoelectrode (see Section ).

5.2. Understanding the Local Environments in Fdh Electrocatalysis

The use of porous 3D electrodes results in the nanoconfinement of enzymes, which over the course of catalysis, establishes local chemical environments at the electrode surface (pH, substrate and product concentration) distinct from the bulk solution. ,, As enzyme activity is highly sensitive to the precise conditions of these local chemical environments, in depth understanding and careful tuning of the local environment is essential to achieve optimal performance of the enzyme-immobilized porous electrodes. While direct measurement of these local environments is either challenging or currently not possible, the use of finite element modeling (FEM) is a powerful technique for analyzing and simulating these systems to gain insights inaccessible by experimental methods. Briefly, FEM models are built using fundamental physical equations and known enzyme-activity dependencies, and is then validated with experimental results before applying the model to simulate new case scenarios.

For example, a 2D axisymmetric tertiary current distribution model was developed to represent an Fdh-immobilized mesoITO film on FTO-coated glass electrode (Figure a). Using analytical expressions such as the Nernst–Planck equation, Michaelis–Menten kinetics and mass transport model, the dependence of enzyme catalytic current on applied potential, pH and substrate concentrations were calculated over a range of conditions. Upon validating the model, i.e. predicted currents matched well with experimental values, the model was employed to simulate changes in local pH and other species concentrations.

23.

23

Tuning of local electrode environment for enhanced catalytic performance. (a) Illustration of the different parameters considered in developing the finite element model (FEM), such as enzyme activity dependence, enzyme–electrode kinetics, geometry parameters, solution properties, and potential distributions. Reproduced from ref . Copyright 2022 the Authors, published by PNAS, under CC BY. (b) Schematic of coimmobilized carbonic anhydrase (CA, PDB: 1V9E) with NvFdhAB (PDB: 6SDV), depicting the nanoconfinement of both enzymes. The SEM image of a mesoporous ITO electrode is reproduced from ref . Copyright 2022 the Authors and Springer Nature Limited. (c) FEM simulation results for the average pH and CO2 concentration within the mesoporous electrode at steady state. Solid lines and dashed lines represent results with and without CA respectively. Solution conditions: orange, CO2-purged 0.1 M KHCO3+0.05 M KCl (pH 6.67); blue, CO2-purged 0.05 M KHCO3+0.05 M MES+0.05 M KCl (pH 6.45). Numerical data adapted from ref . Copyright 2022 the Authors and Springer Nature Limited.

Local pH is an important parameter of the local environment that affects the activity of NvFdhAB as seen in previously reported pH-activity solution assays, revealing the optimal pH of NvFdhAB to be 7.1. Given the net consumption of protons during CO2 electroreduction to formate by Fdh, the local pH at the electrode surface is expected to increase during the electroreduction of CO2. Employing the model built, the local pH in NvFdhAB-immobilized mesoITO electrodes was found to increase by around 2 pH units, resulting in a drastic decrease in activity (∼5 times lower). The local pH was better maintained when the buffer capacity was increased with the addition of zwitterionic Good’s buffers or by adding carbonic anhydrase (CA) to accelerate the conversion of CO2 to H+ and HCO3 . Furthermore, instead of selecting the bulk pH for optimal enzyme activity, a lower bulk pH should be selected to cater for subsequent local pH changes, which then leads to the optimum pH for enzyme activity within the local environment. Apart from tuning the buffer components in the electrolyte, a less dense porous electrode structure (e.g., hierarchical IO electrodes) was also shown to benefit mass transport and alleviate unfavorable local environments.

Good’s buffers are prevalently used for enzymatic electrocatalysis due to the several advantages they possess, namely, (i) consisting of fast-buffering species, (ii) having good buffer capacity at the local pH optimum, (iii) not prone to coordinate with the metals in the enzymes, and (iv) physically and chemically inert (i.e., noninteracting) toward the reference electrode. − However, the presence of Good’s buffers has shown to inhibit enzyme activity, , actively contribute to catalytic mechanism as a proton donor, , and act as noninnocent electrolytes which can be oxidized at mild potentials in the presence of an anode or photoelectrochemical setups (e.g., in a one-compartment cell). The extra components introduced with the use of additional buffers also complicate product separation or downstream use of products after catalysis.

Instead of utilizing additional buffers (e.g., Good’s buffer), the effects of local pH changes can also be mitigated by increasing the kinetics of CO2 hydration such that CO2/HCO3 can act as an active buffer for the local environment. This has been explored by the coimmobilization of CA and NvFdhAB on planar ITO (Figure b). By building a FEM model that comprises electrode and diffusion layer geometry, enzyme and solution kinetics as well as enzyme activity factors and mass transport, the role of CA in changing the local pH and local concentration of CO2 and proton donors was understood. Upon CA coimmobilization, enhanced hydration of CO2 (i.e., equilibrium shifts toward to HCO3 and H+) in response to proton consumption during catalysis maintains the optimal local pH (Figure c), resulting in increased NvFdhAB activity and formate production. Notably, the lowered CO2 concentration arising from the shift in the equilibrium has little effect on NvFdhAB activity due to the high affinity of NvFdhAB for CO2 (Michaelis–Menten constant, K M = 0.420 mM). For comparison, the coimmobilization of CA worsens the performance of heterogeneous Au catalyst wherein the increased concentration of H+ leads to greater hydrogen evolution which is compounded by the reduced concentration of CO2 that adversely affects the rate of CO2 reduction.

The advantages of coimmobilizing CA for enzymatic catalysis have been confirmed by recent works, highlighting how CA tunes the local chemical equilibrium, enhances (photo)­electrochemical performance, and replaces the use of Good’s buffers to enable the deployment of integrated devices in one-compartment systems. ,

Apart from mitigating local pH changes, CA was also employed to accelerate the interconversion between CO2 and HCO3 to conclusively prove that CO2 is indiscriminately the substrate for the reductive reaction of Fdh, rather than HCO3 . This was carried out in a PFE system with Fdh immobilized on a rotating disc electrode and the evolution of catalytic current with time was observed upon injections of CO2 or HCO3 in the presence or absence of CA in solution. In the absence of CA, the current increases slowly upon injection of carbonate, corresponding to the slow transformation of bicarbonate into CO2, while when CO2 was injected, a rapid current increase is observed suggesting the CO2 is the actual substrate of the enzyme. In the presence of CA, whether CO2 or HCO3 was injected, CA quickly shifts the equilibrium away or toward CO2 respectively, resulting in comparable current traces.

CA has also been employed to increase local CO2 concentration for utilization. By biomimicking a carboxysome, CA was utilized to accelerate the conversion of HCO3 to CO2 with the aim of raising local CO2 levels in a nanoconfined electrode to enable CO2 electrolysis in dilute CO2 streams. However, the fast hydration kinetics of CA coimmobilization does not improve formate production under conditions of low CO2 concentration. While the current densities with and without CA were comparable, the employed FEM model revealed that CO2 now acts as both the substrate and buffer, and local CO2 concentration becomes critical toward Fdh activity. As a result, the decrease in local pH to maintain optimal local pH is counteracted by the additional lowering of local CO2 concentration, overall inhibiting enzymatic activity under dilute CO2 conditions. To address this issue, CA was used together with kinetically fast Good’s buffer (e.g., MOPS) to counterbalance the local increase in pH. In this case, CA coimmobilization promotes the conversion of HCO3 and H+ to CO2, which leads to the replenishment of CO2 that depleted during electrolysis, resulting in a significant improvement in CO2 reduction activity under the conditions of dilute CO2 concentrations down to atmospheric concentrations. By mitigating local pH increases and enabling the utilization of dilute CO2 concentrations, these studies pave the development of Fdh systems toward longer term operational stability and applicability.

5.3. Quartz Crystal Microbalance and ECQCM

Quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) is a highly sensitive technique used to measure changes in mass per unit area by detecting variations in the frequency of a quartz crystal oscillator. It operates using the piezoelectric effect, where an alternating voltage causes the quartz crystal to oscillate at its resonant frequency. − When a biomolecule, such as Fdh, adsorbs onto the surface of the crystal, the added mass causes a decrease in the resonant frequency. This frequency shift (Δf) is directly proportional to the mass change on the surface of the quartz crystal oscillator, defined by the Sauerbrey equation (eq ). −

Δf=−2f02ApqμqΔm 4

where f 0 is the resonant frequency of the quartz crystal oscillator, A is the piezoelectrically active crystal area, Δm is the change in mass, p q is the density of quartz, and μ q is the shear modulus of quartz. QCM is capable of detecting mass changes in the range of nanogram to microgram per square centimeter. This sensitivity makes it an invaluable tool for studying surface interactions between Fdh and electrodes, enabling precise analysis of adsorption processes (Figure ).

24.

24

(a) Schematic illustration of a metal oxide-functionalized quartz chip. (b) An idealized schematic QCM profile for monitoring enzyme adsorption and desorption. (c) A representative experimental QCM profile of Fdh immobilization on a SrTiO3-functionalized quartz chip. Numerical data adapted from ref . Copyright 2024 the Authors, published by American Chemical Society, under CC BY.

In addition to detecting mass changes, QCM with dissipation monitoring (QCM-D) provides insights into the viscoelastic properties of the adsorbed layer by analyzing the dissipation factor, which reflects energy loss during oscillation. − This feature is particularly valuable for studying soft or viscous layers such as polymers or biological molecules. ,, By integrating data on mass and dissipation, QCM-D enables detailed assessment of Fdh adsorption, desorption, assembly, and orientation. Moreover, the quartz crystal oscillator can be functionalized with a thin layer of electrode material, , such as self-assembled monolayers or metal oxides, allowing it to function as a working electrode in an electrochemical cell. This technique, known as electrochemical QCM (EQCM), − is a powerful tool for real-time monitoring of mass changes associated with Fdh–electrode interactions during electrochemical reactions.

The first application of QCM in Fdh research was for the construction of a mediated enzyme film formate biosensor, where EQCM was employed to monitor the deposition of constituent layers. This biosensor composed of a layer of polypyrrole film embedded with Fdh from Candida boidinii and NAD+, as well as a Prussian blue (PB) film which acts as the mediator. Through monitoring the simultaneous current and frequency changes via EQCM, two distinct electrodeposition mechanisms with PB deposited above or below the polypyrrole film were studied. The layered structure with PB under the polypyrrole film was found to be superior, achieving very stable current and frequency responses during deposition. The bilayer structure served as a formate biosensor where the Fdh in the polypyrrole film oxidizes formate to CO2 and reduces NAD+ to NADH, and subsequently the underlying PB film regenerates NAD+ from NADH, mediating the electron transfer to the electrode which is recorded as a current signal.

In contrast to MET systems, direct interfacing of Fdh with an electrode offers a straightforward DET configuration, achievable through rational interfacial modifications such as covalent bonding and electrostatic interactions. The covalent immobilization of NvFdhAB on chemically modified gold and graphite electrodes for bioelectrocatalytic CO2-to-formate conversion has been investigated using QCM-D. This process involves forming a self-assembled monolayer of 4-aminothiophenol on a gold-coated quartz crystal surface, where the positively charged amino groups link with the negatively charged carboxyl groups of NvFdhAB, achieving an enzyme coverage of 8.6 ± 0.2 pmol cm–2. The resulting compact Fdh layer on the electrode surface exhibits a current density of −200 μA cm–2 at −0.66 V vs SHE (pH 6), with nearly 100% FE in a three-electrode configuration.

Fdh–electrode interactions have been further investigated using EQCM on five different thiol-based self-assembled monolayers on gold electrodes, confirming that the synergy between electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonding enhances the electrocatalytic activity of NvFdhAB. Interfacing NvFdhAB with 2-dimethylammoniumethanethiol, which possesses both a positive charge (pK a = 7.6) and hydrogen bonding capabilities, results in the highest current density of 21 μA cm–2 at +0.5 V vs RHE for formate oxidation. When the enzyme is correctly oriented electrostatically, the addition of viologen-based redox mediators shows no increase in current density, indicating nearly quantitative binding of the enzymes in the correct orientation for DET, as evidenced by a near-unity DET/MET current density ratio.

A more complex system that combines porosity and electrostatics is demonstrated by functionalizing a quartz crystal chip with CNTs featuring either positive (tertiary amine) or negative (carboxylic) surface groups. Despite similar NvFdhAB loadings on both positive CNTs (7.7 ± 0.47 pmol cm–2) and negative CNTs (6.6 ± 0.63 pmol cm–2) after 2 h, the immobilized Fdh on carboxylic CNTs shows no DET currents. In contrast, tertiary amine CNTs support NvFdhAB for the reversible electrocatalytic interconversion of CO2 and formate, achieving >90% FE with a current density of −247 μA cm–2 at −0.6 V vs SHE for CO2 reduction and +246 μA cm–2 at +0.1 V vs SHE for formate oxidation.

In addition to carbonaceous materials, metal oxides have shown significant promise for binding Fdh in its electroactive orientations. The interaction of NvFdhAB with TiO2 for electrocatalysis and photocatalysis has been investigated using QCM analysis, revealing a loading of 3.5 pmol cm–2 on a planar TiO2-coated quartz chip after 2 h. The strong binding between NvFdhAB and TiO2 is demonstrated by a series of washing experiments: after rinsing the QCM cell with an enzyme-free solution for 1 h, 94% of the preloaded NvFdhAB remains adsorbed. Even with KCl concentrations increased to 0.5–3.0 M, only 30–40% of NvFdhAB desorbed from the TiO2 surface, indicating strong chemisorption, likely involving amino acids such as aspartic and glutamic acid.

QCM studies can also guide the loading of NvFdhAB on porous ITO electrodes, revealing a saturated surface coverage of 4.2 pmol cm–2 on a planar ITO-coated quartz chip. A mesoporous ITO electrode, with a geometric surface area of 0.19 cm2 and an absolute surface area of 139 cm2, can accommodate a theoretical maximum of 530 pmol NvFdhAB. Co-immobilization of NvFdhAB and carbonic anhydrase on an ITO-coated QCM chip demonstrates stable enzyme coloading of up to 4.5 pmol cm–2 over 2 h. Likewise, QCM analysis of NvFdhAB interactions with SrTiO3:La,Rh shows a two-stage adsorption process: a rapid initial adsorption over 13 min followed by a slower approach to saturation at 3.8 pmol cm–2. This process is a standard kinetic behavior governed by surface availability, molecular diffusion, and structural reorganization. The strong binding at the SrTiO3:La,Rh|Fdh interface is evidenced by a subsequent 1 h washing section, during which only 18% of NvFdhAB is is desorbed (Figure c).

5.4. Infrared Spectroscopy

Infrared (IR) spectroscopy is a widely utilized analytical technique in enzyme studies, offering detailed insights into enzyme structure, function, and dynamics. − By measuring the absorption of IR light by molecular bonds, IR spectroscopy provides a molecular fingerprint that reflects the specific vibrational modes of various functional groups present in Fdh. ,, Fourier-transform IR (FTIR) spectroscopy allows for the collection of high-resolution spectra over a wide range of wavenumbers in real-time. − This is beneficial for monitoring dynamic processes in Fdh at a molecular level, such as conformational changes that occur upon enzyme immobilization. ,, FTIR can track these changes by observing shifts in specific IR bands, offering insights into the structural dynamics of Fdh under various conditions. It is particularly useful for studying metal cofactors, Fdh–substrate binding, Fdh–electrode interactions, and changes in secondary structure. ,−

By monitoring the vibrational modes of specific bonds within the active site, IR spectroscopy provides valuable insights into substrate and inhibitor binding, complex formation, and the mechanisms of catalysis and inhibition. Notably, azide, an inhibitor of Fdh, also serves as an effective IR probe, enabling vibrational spectroscopic investigations of Fdh dynamics on the femtosecond time scale. ,− Changes in the IR spectra can reveal the formation or breaking of chemical bonds during reactions, offering direct evidence of intermediate states and the overall catalytic or inhibitory pathways. For instance, a recent IR spectroscopy study on Mo-dependent Fdh from RcFdh identified distinct competitive and noncompetitive binding sites within the enzyme’s secondary coordination sphere, using azide and cyanate as model inhibitors. Site-directed mutagenesis revealed the involvement of key amino acids near the bis-MGD cofactor in these binding interactions, particularly Arg587 and His387. This study suggests that these inhibitors can serve as models for understanding substrate binding in Fdh, potentially stabilizing formate/CO2 during catalysis and protecting the enzyme from oxidative damage.

IR spectroscopy is also useful for examining the secondary structure of enzymes (Figure ). Techniques such as attenuated total reflectance FTIR (ATR-FTIR) can provide information about the structural motifs by analyzing the IR absorption of amide I band and amide II band. , The amide I band, which occurs in the range of 1700–1600 cm–1, arises primarily from the CO stretching vibrations of the peptide bonds. This band is highly sensitive to the secondary structure of the protein, such as α-helices and β-sheets. The amide II band, found in the range of 1600–1500 cm–1, results primarily from N–H bending and C–N stretching vibrations in the peptide bonds. In Fdh research, the analysis of amide I and II bands using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy is essential for understanding the structural integrity and dynamics of Fdh. Changes in these bands can indicate conformational changes in the enzyme that are associated with substrate binding, catalysis, or inhibition. By functionalizing the ATR-FTIR prism with electrode materials, this technique can offer valuable insights into the immobilization and infiltration process of Fdh on the electrode surface in real time.

25.

25

(a) Schematic illustration of a functionalized IR prism. (b) An idealized schematic IR spectrum for studying the secondary and tertiary structures of enzymes. (c) A representative experimental IR spectrum of Fdh immobilization on a CNT-functionalized IR prism. Numerical data adapted from ref . Copyright 2022 the Authors, published by American Chemical Society, under CC BY.

For example, the NvFdhAB adsorption on TiO2 surface was studied using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy on a 100 nm planar or a 400 nm mesoporous TiO2 layer-coated Si prism. After adding NvFdhAB, characteristic amide I (1650 cm–1) and II (1545 cm–1) bands were detected, indicating the enzyme backbone’s structure. The adsorption process was monitored in situ for 2 h, showing minimal changes in the amide bands, suggesting a largely retained NvFdhAB structure on TiO2 surfaces. Amide band intensities increased over time, and most NvFdhAB remained adsorbed even with increased ionic strength, indicating strong associations between NvFdhAB and TiO2 beyond purely electrostatic interactions.

To confirm NvFdhAB’s structural integrity upon adsorption on carbonaceous electrodes, ATR-IR spectroscopy was conducted using Si prisms coated with positively or negatively charged CNT films. The thin CNT membrane (∼76 nm) allowed immediate detection of NvFdhAB upon adsorption. Amide I and II bands at 1647 and 1541 cm–1 confirmed NvFdhAB adsorption on both CNT films with different charges. By plotting the amide bands intensities overtime, the adsorption kinetics showed most loading occurred within the first 20 min, with retained secondary structure evident from consistent amide band shapes. Comparatively, a control with denatured NvFdhAB showed significant amide I band broadening due to loss of the secondary structure.

5.5. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is a transfer-function measurement used to measure the impedance of an electrochemical system over a range of frequencies. − By applying a small alternating current (AC) voltage perturbation (typically sinusoidal modulation) to a working electrode, EIS records the resulting current response. Based on the Ohm’s law, the impedance (Z(ω)) is calculated as the ratio of the complex voltage (Ṽ(ω)) to the current (Ĩ(ω)): −

Z(ω)=Ṽ(ω)Ĩ(ω)=|Z|(cos⁡φ(ω)+isin⁡φ(ω))=Zr+iZi

where ω is the angular frequency, |Z| is the magnitude of impedance, φ is the phase angle shift between the input voltage and the output current, i is the imaginary number, and Z r and Z i are the real and imaginary part of the impedance, respectively.

EIS data are typically presented in the forms of Nyquist plot or Bode plot (Figure ). − The Nyquist plot displays Z r on the x-axis and Z i on the y-axis. Each point on the plot corresponds to the impedance value at a specific frequency, with the highest frequencies typically near the origin and lower frequencies further along the curve. Note that Nyquist plots should have equally scaled x-axis and y-axis to allow the assessment of circularity. , The Bode plot is classified as the magnitude (|Z|) plot or the phase angle (φ) plot, both of which represent impedance as a function of frequency. The x-axis, typically displayed on a logarithmic scale, represents the frequency, while the y-axis shows |Z| in the Bode magnitude plot and φ in the Bode phase plot.

26.

26

(a) Schematic illustration of a 3-electrode EIS setup consisting of an IO-TiO2|Fdh (PDB: 6SDV) working electrode (WE), a Pt counter electrode (RE), and a Ag/AgCl reference electrode (RE). (b) An idealized schematic impedance response in Nyquist plot. (c) A representative experimental Nyquist plot and corresponding equivalent circuit to quantitatively evaluate charge transfer and recombination at interfaces. Conditions: 500 kHz to 0.1 Hz and a 25 mV sinusoidal amplitude, −0.2 V vs RHE. Numerical data adapted from ref . Copyright 2025 the Authors, published by Elsevier Inc., under CC BY.

EIS data can be interpreted using both qualitative and quantitative methods. , Qualitative interpretation involves analyzing the shape and features of Nyquist plots to understand the overall behavior of the system. In a Nyquist plot, each semicircle typically corresponds to a distinct electrochemical process, such as charge transfer at the enzyme–electrode interface, − electrical double layer behavior, − or electrode resistance. − The diameter of each semicircle is indicative of the resistance associated with that process, making it a widely used approach for estimating charge transfer resistance (R ct ). The high-frequency intercept (HFI) is the point where the impedance response intersects the real axis in the high-frequency region (MHz–kHz) of a Nyquist plot. − It typically represents the series resistance (R S ), which includes contributions from cables and electrolyte resistance. In contrast, the low-frequency region (Hz–mHz) of the Nyquist plot is dominated by mass transport and slower kinetic processes. − A characteristic feature in this region is a straight line with a slope close to 45-degree, which is indicative of a diffusion-controlled process known as Warburg impedance. −

Qualitative EIS analysis investigated Fdh bioelectrocatalysis on a CNT-modified graphite electrode with a polyethylenimine (PEI) protective layer, achieving a current density of up to 0.23 mA cm–2 and stability for 11 h. Subsequent EIS measurements revealed the role of each modification layer in influencing the R ct , which is estimated from the semicircle diameter in a Nyquist plot. The deposition of CNTs on the graphite electrode reduced R ct from 24 Ω to 10 Ω, indicating enhanced conductivity. Modification of the electrode with nitrophenyl (NP) functional groups using 2 mM diazonium salt increased R ct to 26 Ω. Following the reduction of these groups to positively charged aminophenyl functional groups, R ct decreased to 9 Ω. However, using a higher concentration of diazonium salt (20 mM) significantly increased R ct to 330 Ω, suggesting the formation of insulating nitroaryl multilayers. The immobilization of Fdh led to a slight increase in R ct due to the insulating nature of peptide chains, while the final addition of a PEI protective layer reduced R ct .

Quantitative interpretation of complex impedance data relies on equivalent circuit fitting, which models the electrochemical system as a combination of electrical components such as resistors, capacitors, inductors, and Warburg elements. ,,− , By fitting the experimental impedance data to this model, various electrochemical processes including charge transfer, diffusion, recombination, and charge storage at the electrical double layer can be quantitatively described in terms of resistance and capacitance. − To account for nonideal capacitive behavior, often caused by surface roughness or frequency-dependent dielectric constants, − a constant phase element (CPE) is frequently employed in equivalent circuit fitting to interchange with a capacitor. − Selecting an appropriate equivalent circuit model requires a thorough understanding of the electrochemical system and should accurately represent all the expected electrochemical processes during bioelectrocatalysis. The model must be carefully chosen to avoid overfitting, which, despite potentially yielding a better perceived fitting result, can lead to results that lack physical meaning. , The Randles circuit comprising R S , R ct , and double-layer capacitance (C dl ), with a Warburg element (Z W ) included if diffusion processes are significant, is the most commonly used model for describing bioelectrocatalytic systems.

Quantitative EIS analysis of Fdh electrochemistry was performed to elucidate charge carrier behavior on an Fdh-immobilized IO-TiO2 electrode (Figure ). The analysis employed three distinct equivalent circuits that consists of electrical components such as a R S to describe cell resistance; a C dl in parallel with a series combination of a R ct and a Z W to elucidate the electrical double layer; and an RC circuit (R e , C e ) to depict electron transfer in the Faradaic process. These circuits were used to fit impedance data for the bare IO-TiO2 electrode, the IO-TiO2|Fdh electrode before the onset potential, and the IO-TiO2|Fdh electrode after the onset potential, respectively. The results showed that R e on the IO-TiO2|Fdh electrodes decreased with increasing cathodic potential due to insulating nature of TiO2 and further decreased in the presence of carbonic anhydrase. Additionally, C dl of IO-TiO2|Fdh electrodes increased as the potential shifted toward more cathodic values, suggesting an increased local HCOO– ion concentration due to the bioelectrocatalytic CO2 reduction to formate. The presence of CA, which consumes CO2 and water to maintain the local proton concentration during formate production, effectively stabilized the C dl from +0.2 to −0.4 V vs RHE, indicating its role in maintaining the local environment of an electrochemical system for CO2 reduction.

6. Deployment of Fdh Systems in CO2 Electrolysis Devices

While electrodes (Section ), using PFE using a well-controlled three-electrode configuration serves as a useful characterization technique for studying and optimizing Fdh-immobilized electrodes, the established understanding and insights also provide a foundation for the application and further development of Fdh systems in larger scale or device-type CO2 electrolysis.

CO2 electrolyzers are an essential pivot for advancing the use of electrocatalysts (e.g., heterogeneous catalysts, small molecule catalysts) toward greater technological relevance. Some parallels can be drawn between the architecture of a typical CO2 electrolyzer and the structure of Fdh (Figure ), for example, the flow and housing plates that holds the gas diffusion electrodes (GDE) and polymer electrolyte membrane are analogous to the outer protein scaffold, [4Fe–4S] clusters and ion transport channels, while the hydrophobic gas diffusion layers of the GDE is akin to the hydrophobic channels in enzymes, and finally, the catalyst and other additives deposited on the are similar to the enzymatic active site and secondary coordination sphere.

27.

27

Analogous comparison between (a) the schematic of a CO2 electrolyzer with the identified key components and (b) the schematic of W-Fdh immobilized on an electrode, emphasizing the substrate, product and ion channels as well as electron transport relays. The parallel roles are highlighted by the same color coding (e.g., the gray catalyst in (a) is analogous to the gray W active site in (b)). In (b), the bicolored ion channel (yellow and salmon) depicts its bifunctional correspondence to the ion exchange membrane (yellow) and ionomer layer (salmon) in (a). Adapted from ref . Copyright 2023 the Authors, published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, under CC BY.

This section describes notable works that progressed Fdh systems from fundamental studies to scale-up application, by achieving CO2 electrolysis in a two-electrode electrolysis configuration, long-term formate production, or the transition to flow systems.

Leveraging on the reversibility of NvFdhAB and hydrogenase, an in vitro enzymatic-metal oxide system was developed to mimic the biological FHL complex (Figure , Figure a). This semiartificial system which links the two reversible redox enzymes (H2ase and Fdh) on a pair of IO-ITO electrodes is capable of performing the interconversion of H+/CO2 and H2/formate. By wiring the enzymes in a two-electrode configuration in the presence of all substrates and products, a marginal positive or negative voltage was sufficient to drive the reaction in either direction, demonstrating the reversible unbiased electrocatalysis. Upon applying a voltage of 0.2 V (in the presence of formate) or −0.2 V (in the presence of H2), H2 or formate could be generated with a FE of 79% and 81%, respectively. This reversibility and interconversion were also achieved with Fdh and H2ase coassembled on ITO nanoparticles without external electrochemical wiring. This concept of a semiartificial FHL system that couples the two half-reactions provides a roadmap for on demand H2 storage and release.

28.

28

(a) Representation of semiartificial FHL complex mimic consisting of Fdh (PDB: 6SDV) and hydrogenase (H2ase, PDB: 5JSK) immobilized on IO-ITO electrodes for the reversible interconversion of formate to H2 and CO2. (b) Schematic of the mediated-enzymatic CO2 reduction to HCOOH by MeFdh1 as well as a photographic image of the overall flow system featuring the MeFdh1-immobilized packed bed column and anion-exchange resin (AIEX) column for in situ formate separation. Reproduced from ref with permission. Copyright 2024 the Authors, published by Elsevier Ltd., under CC BY. (c) Schematic and images of an enzymatic flow electrolyzer highlighting the cathode consisting of Fdh immobilized onto TiO2 coated carbon felt (Fdh|TiO2|CF) and the Ni foam anode for paired CO2 and ethylene glycol (EG) electrolysis to formate. Adapted from ref . Copyright 2025 the Authors, published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, under CC BY.

Expanding upon the developments in electrode engineering to optimize the performance of CO2 reduction by Fdh, recent works have started to explore systems where Fdh can be employed for long-term operation with the aim of continuous formate production. One example is the MET-based flow reactor system established using Fdh1 from M. extorquens AM1 (MeFdh1). Reduced ethyl viologen (EV·+) was continuously supplied as the electron mediator through electrochemical regeneration and flowed to MeFdh1 immobilized on Ni2+–nitrilotriacetic acid agarose (Figure b). As compared to using unbound MeFdh1, the immobilization of MeFdh1 alleviates the denaturation of enzymes by the shear stress of CO2 bubbling. The resulting MeFdh1-packed plug flow reactor obtained an optimal formate production at near-unity FE for over 200 h, with a final formate concentration of >1.7 M. Despite the remarkable performance obtained, the use of freely diffusing mediators can result in crossovers and back reactions which may present issues in the development of paired electrolysis devices (i.e., CO2 reduction with an anodic reaction in 2-electrode configuration).

Similarly, in earlier work, the developed gas-diffusion-type biocathode modified with [W]-Fdh from M. extorquens AM1 attained a high current density toward CO2 reduction but required freely diffusible viologen-based mediators, rendering the cathode challenging for device fabrication.

To circumvent the use of freely diffusing redox mediators, a redox-polymer/enzyme-modified gas diffusion electrode was fabricated. The constructed polymer matrix not only allows large amount of enzymes to be loaded but also effectively wired to accept electrons from the carbon cloth electrode substrate. Furthermore, the gas diffusion layers enable the use of gaseous CO2 as substrate, hence eliminating mass transport limitations. Despite attaining a stable current for 45 h, FE of formate was far less (∼3.7%) than expected and and only the qualitative formation of formate was reliably observed.

While the above-mentioned works have demonstrated how Fdh can be utilized for long-term operation or integrated in gas-diffusion-electrodes, the scope of the applications is still restricted to half-cell electrolysis reaction in in three-electrode configurations. To address this limitation, a DET-based flow enzymatic electrolyzer was developed, which pairs CO2 reduction by Fdh to waste (plastic and biomass) oxidation for paired formate production (Figure c). Utilizing a cathode composed of NvFdhAB-immobilized on TiO2-sintered carbon felt and a commercial nickel foam as anode, the device completely eliminates the use of mediators and achieves near-unity FE toward formate for both half reactions (i.e., cell FE of ∼200%). Leveraging on the low overpotential requirement of NvFdhAB, the enzymatic electrolyzer could be operated at low full-cell voltage (−1.5 V) to produce formate continuously for over 122 h.

The deployment of Fdh in these flow or device systems has marked significant progress from the characterization of Fdh-electrode interface to the application of these enzymes for fuel production. This extends the role of Fdh from a model electrocatalyst that paves the design of synthetic CO2 reduction electrocatalysts, that may become an electrocatalyst that can be integrated for CO2 electrolysis for long-term fuel production.

7. Fdh Photoelectrochemistry

This section will focus on the use of Fdhs as model cocatalysts for photoelectrochemical CO2 reduction to formate. This will cover immobilized and homogeneous Fdh on various photoelectrodes for light-driven CO2 fixation.

7.1. Overall Design of a Photoelectrochemical Cell

A photoelectrochemical (PEC) cell directly couples light absorption with chemical transformations, enabling solar-driven energy conversion and storage. − Its core components typically include a semiconducting photoelectrode that harvests photons, a cocatalyst to facilitate the desired interfacial catalytic redox reaction, and an electrolyte containing the relevant substrates. To investigate fundamental processes, a conventional three-electrode configuration is often employed, comprising the illuminated photoelectrode as the working electrode, a reference electrode to control the potential, and a dark counter electrode to complete the circuit. This arrangement is particularly suited for probing half-reactions at either a photoanode or a photocathode under controlled bias conditions. For the demonstration of overall solar-to-chemical conversion, particularly under bias-free operation, more integrated device architectures and components are required. In such cases, Fdh-based photoelectrochemistry can be implemented in a conventional two-compartment cell using different designs. These include: (i) a single light absorber system employing either a photocathode or a photoanode, (ii) a dual light absorber configuration, in which a photoanode and photocathode are coupled in a tandem arrangement to complement light absorption, and (iii) an integrated semiartificial leaf, which is a fully assembled wireless standalone device. Despite significant advancements in synthetic cocatalysts for electrochemical CO2 reduction, their application in PEC systems is often limited due to potential-dependent selectivity, high overpotentials, high cost, and fabrication challenges (e.g., high temperatures). − In contrast, the biocatalyst Fdh offers several advantages, including near-zero overpotential, exceptional selectivity with near unity FE independent of potential, simple processability (e.g., drop-casting), and optimal performance under mild conditions. These attributes make Fdh an ideal model cocatalyst for CO2 reduction in photoelectrochemical devices.

7.2. Redox Mediated-Photoelectrochemistry

The first photoelectrochemical CO2 fixation with Fdh was reported in 1984, using a p-type indium phosphide (p-InP) photocathode in the presence of a MV redox mediator (Figure a, Table ). Thanks to the suitable conduction band position and excellent semiconducting properties of p-InP, a photocurrent density of 9 mA cm–2 was achieved at −0.06 vs SHE under 50–60 mW cm–2 illumination from a 150 W tungsten-halogen lamp under ambient conditions. This setup produced 0.6 mM formate with a FE of 80–93%. The use of 23 nmol Fdh led to a high TON of 21000. In 2016, integration of Thiobacillus sp. Fdh (TsFdh) with a hydrogen-terminated silicon nanowire photocathode for solar-driven formate synthesis from CO2 and water was demonstrated. The photocathode efficiently delivered hydrides to an Rh-based organometallic electron mediator, enabling regeneration of the NADH cofactor that activates TsFdh, achieving a FE of 16% at an applied bias of 1.8 V. By further coupling the photocathode with a cobalt phosphate-coated triple-junction silicon photoanode, solar-to-chemical conversion under natural sunlight using a solar-tracking system was demonstrated. However, like other MET systems employing soluble redox mediators, this configuration faced challenges in product separation and the toxicity of MV. To this end, a compactly integrated bioelectrode was developed in 2016 for light-driven CO2 reduction. In this system, Fdh from Candida boidinii and NADH were coimmobilized within a polydopamine thin film on a GCE. The immobilized NADH cofactor acted as an electron mediator, addressing issues of MV toxicity and product separation. Pairing this biocathode with a CoPi|BiVO4 photoanode achieved unassisted solar formate production with simultaneous OER, maintaining a stable unbiased photocurrent density >0.1 μA cm–2 for 24 h. This system generated 16 μM formate with a near unity FE of 99.18 ± 6.77% in a two-electrode configuration.

29.

29

Development of Fdh-based semiartificial photocathodes for light-driven CO2 fixation with focus on DET to Fdh: (a) p-InP|MV (1984), (b) CFO|TiO2 (2020), (c) Si|TiO2 (2021), (d) PVK|TiO2 (2021), , (e) ITO|PSI (PDB: 1JB0, 2023), (f) OPV|TiO2 (2025). ,, The first Fdh-based photoelectrochemistry using p-InP|MV for MET is listed for comparison. (g) Front and (h) back photographic images of (f) an OPV|TiO2 photocathode with immobilized Fdh under operation. Reproduced from ref . Copyright 2025 the Authors, published by Elsevier Inc., under CC BY. Numerical data can be found in Table .

5. Summary of Fdh-Based Photocathodes for CO2 Reduction to Formate.

Year Photocathode Organism Enzyme (loading) Onset (VRHE) –J (mA cm–2) at E (VRHE) Stability (h) at E (VRHE) (post J%) FE (%) Electrolyte Irradiance (mW cm–2) Wavelength (nm) ref
1984 p-InP|MV Pseudomonas oxalaticus Fdh (23 nmol) 0.7 0.6 at 0.45 2 at 0.45 (N/A) 80–93 Phosphate (0.5 M), NaHCO3 (0.5 M), MV (2 mM), pH 6.8 50–60 <900
2020 FTO|CFO|TiO2 Clostridium ljungdahlii Fdh (1 U) 0.9 1.2 at 0.2 6 at 0.39 (N/A) 13.5 Phosphate (0.1 M), HCO3 (50 mM), pH 6.5 100 >420
2021 p-Si|TiO2 NvH FdhAB (160 pmol) N/A 0.07 at – 0.1 12 at −0.1 (67%) 99 ± 12 KHCO3 (0.5 M), pH 7.3 100 >400
2021 PVK|TiO2 NvH FdhAB (104 pmol) 1.1 3.7 at 0.35 10 at 0.4 (55%) 80 ± 10 MOPS (0.1 M), CsCl (50 mM), NaHCO3 (1 mM), pH 4.6 100 AM1.5G
2023 ITO|PSI Methylobacterium extorquens AM1Fdh (704 pmol) 0.65 0.007 at 0.35 22 at 0.35 (10%) 15 KHCO3 (50 mM) 100 400–800
2025 OPV|TiO2 NvH FdhAB (100 pmol) 1.0 5.7 at −0.1 10 at 0.6 (52%) 98 ± 2 NaHCO3 (50 mM), KCl (50 mM), pH 6.45 100 AM1.5G
2025 OPV|TiO2 NvH FdhAB (125 pmol) 1.0 6 at 0 12 at 0.8 (80%) 54 MOPS (0.1 M), NAD+ (1 mM), acetophenone (50 mM), pH 6 100 AM1.5G
2025 OPV|TiO2 NvH FdhAB (500 pmol) 1.0 10 at 0 10 at 0.6 (73%) 90 ± 6 NaHCO3 (50 mM), KCl (50 mM), pH 6.45 100 AM1.5G

7.3. Establishing DET in PEC

Drawing upon the advances in interfacial and materials engineering for Fdh electrochemistry, including strategies such as electrostatic interactions, chemisorption, and covalent binding, substantial efforts have been devoted to establishing DET between photoelectrodes and Fdh to enable the assembly of bias-free solar devices. To this end, the predominant approach has involved the utilization of porous materials, which provide an enlarged surface area for enzyme immobilization and catalysis to produce considerable amount of formate. In 2018, a notable advancement involved the development of a PEC tandem device, pairing Photosystem II immobilized on a dpp (phosphonated diketopyrrolopyrroles) dyesensitized IO-TiO2 photoanode with a NvFdhAB-immobilized IO-TiO2 dark biocathode for CO2 photoreduction paired with water oxidation to O2 (Figure a, Table ). This device required only a small applied bias of 0.3 V to drive the overall reaction. Under visible-light irradiation for 1 h, a half-lifetime of approximately 8 min was observed, attributed to the photodegradation of Photosystem II. Despite this limitation in stability, the system achieved formate production of 0.185 ± 0.017 μmol cm–2 with a FE of 70 ± 6%. In addition to photosystem II, the use of photosystem I was reported as a biological light absorber to activate Fdh from Methylobacterium extorquens. In this system, photosystem I and Fdh were sequentially assembled on an IO-ITO electrode (Figure e), enabling direct transfer of photogenerated electrons to Fdh for CO2-to-formate conversion. Remarkably, the setup achieved an operational stability of 22 h and with a FE of ∼15%.

30.

30

Development of Fdh-based semiartificial tandem devices featuring single dark electrode for light-driven CO2 fixation: (a) PSII-dpp|TiO2||TiO2 (PDB: 3WU2, 2018), (b) TiN||BiVO4|FeOOH||PVK (2019), (c) STEMPO/DPP-CA|TiO2||ITO (2022), (d) TiO2|PVK||Cu27Pd73 (2023), (e) ITO||BiVO4||TEG (2024), (f) ITO||CNX–ITO (2025). (g) Photo of (e) the BiVO4–TEG device. Reproduced from ref . Copyright 2024 the Authors, published by Elsevier Inc., under CC BY. (h) Photo of (f) the 3 configurations of CNX–ITO devices. Reproduced from ref . Copyright 2025 the Authors, published by American Chemical Society, under CC BY. Numerical data can be found in Table .

6. Summary of Fdh-Based PEC Tandem Devices Featuring Single Light Absorbers for Unbiased Reactions.

Year Photocathode||Anode Organism Enzyme (loading) Onset (V) –J at 0 V (mA cm–2) Stability (h) at 0 V (post J%) FE (%) STF (%) Electrolyte Irradiance (mW cm–2) Wavelength (nm) ref
2023 TiO2|PVK||Cu27Pd73 NvH FdhAB (100 pmol) –0.6 1 10 (95%) 96 ± 4 N/A MOPS (0.5 M), pH 6.4 100 AM1.5G
Year Cathode||Photoanode||Booster Organism Enzyme (loading) Onset (V) –J at 0 V (mA cm–2) Stability (h) at 0 V (post J%) FE (%) STF (%) Electrolyte Irradiance (mW cm–2) Wavelength (nm) ref
2018 TiO2||TiO2|dpp-PSII NvH FdhAB (34 pmol) 0 0.092 (0.3 V) 1 (0.3 V, 8%) 70 ± 6 N/A NaHCO3 (0.1 M), KCl (50 mM), pH 6.5 100 AM1.5G
2019 TiN||BiVO4|FeOOH||PVK Clostridium ljungdahlii Fdh (0.5 U) N/A 0.12 8 (79%) 83.1 0.08 NaPi (0.1 M), HCO3 (50 mM), pH 6.5 100 >420
2022 ITO||TiO2| STEMPO/DPP-CA NvH FdhAB (52 pmol) –0.2 0.03 6 (99%) 74 ± 17 N/A NaHCO3 (50 mM), pH 6.4 100 >420
2024 ITO||BiVO4||TEG NvH FdhAB (400 pmol) N/A 0.08 10 (21%) 97 ± 5 0.032 NaHCO3 (67 mM), pH 7 300 AM1.5G
2025 ITO||CNX–ITO NvH FdhAB (100 pmol) –0.2 0.075 10 (67%) 94 ± 3 N/A NaHCO3 (0.1 mM), KCl (50 mM), pH 6.7 100 AM1.5G

A dark biocathode was developed in 2019 using a 3D titanium nitride (TiN) nanoshell electrode, which offers attractive conductivity, porosity, and stability (Figure b). When ClFdh was immobilized, a high current density of nearly 1 mA cm–2 with a FE of 94% was achieved. This biocathode was integrated into a PEC tandem device comprising a perovskite photovoltaic and a FeOOH|BiVO4 photoanode, enabling unassisted solar formate production at an average rate of 0.78 μmol h–1 with a FE of 77%. However, incorporating an additional photovoltaic element into a metal oxide photoanode markedly increases the overall system complexity, thereby underscoring the need for an integrated PEC cell design. To address this limitation, an integrated photocathode was fabricated by loading 160 pmol Fdh onto mesoporous TiO2-coated silicon (Figure c), delivering a photocurrent density of 0.07 mA cm–2 and a FE of 99 ± 12% over 12 h.

The first Fdh-based PEC tandem cell featuring dual light absorbers was developed in 2020, consisting of a CuFeO2|CuO|TiO2|ClFdh photocathode (Figure b) and a FeOOH|BiVO4 photoanode (Figure a, Table ). In a two-electrode configuration, this bioelectrocatalytic cell reduced CO2 to formate using water as the electron donor, delivering an unbiased photocurrent density of 0.15 mA cm–2 with no significant degradation for 12 h. The formate production rate was 0.10 μmol h–1 cm–2, with a FE of 34% and a solar-to-formate conversion efficiency (STF) of 0.01%. Additionally, a monolithic FeOOH|BiVO4||CFO|TiO2|Fdh device was fabricated, representing a wireless semiartificial leaf (Figure a). Under simulated AM 1.5G illumination, it operated continuously for 24 h, producing 3.1 μmol of formate with an O2 evolution rate of 1.57 μmol h–1 cm–2. However, the limited Fdh loading was identified as one of the performance bottlenecks, which could be addressed by employing hierarchically structured scaffolds.

31.

31

Development of Fdh-based semiartificial tandem devices featuring dual light absorbers for light-driven CO2 fixation: (a) FeOOH|BiVO4||CFO|TiO2 (2020), (b) TiCo|BiVO4||PVK|TiO2 (2021), (c) TiO2|OPV||Fe2O3|Ni­(OH) x (2025), (d) TiO2|OPV||BiVO4|TiCo (2025). (e) Photo of (c) the OPV–BVO tandem. Adapted from ref . Copyright 2025 the Authors, published by Elsevier Inc., under CC BY. (f) Photo of (d) the OPV–hematite tandem. Reproduced from ref . Copyright 2025 the Authors, published by the Royal Society of Chemistry, under CC BY. Numerical data can be found in Table .

7. Summary of Fdh-Based PEC Tandem Featuring Dual Light Absorbers for Unbiased Reactions.

Year Photocathode||Photoanode Organism Enzyme (loading) Onset (V) –J at 0 V (mA cm–2) Stability (h) at 0 V (post J%) FE (%) STF (%) Electrolyte Irradiance (mW cm–2) Wavelength (nm) ref
2020 TiO2|CFO||BiVO4|FeOOH Clostridium ljungdahlii Fdh (1 U) N/A 0.15 12 (87%) 33.5 0.008 Phosphate (0.1 M), HCO3 (50 mM), pH 6.5 100 >420
2021 TiO2|PVK||BiVO4|TiCo NvH FdhAB (104 pmol) –0.5 0.8 10 (75%) 83 ± 5 0.8 MOPS (86 mM), NaHCO3 (50 mM), CsCl (50 mM), pH 6.4 100 AM1.5G
2025 TiO2|OPV||BiVO4|TiCo NvH FdhAB (500 pmol) –0.8 0.55 10 (73%) 98 ± 8 0.6 ± 0.1 NaHCO3 (50 mM), KCl (50 mM), pH 6.45 100 AM1.5G
2025 TiO2|OPV||Fe2O3|Ni(OH) x NvH FdhAB (500 pmol) –0.3 1.1 10 (62%) 97 N/A NaHCO3 (50 mM), KCl (50 mM), pH 6.45 100 AM1.5G

Combining semiconducting photoelectrodes with Fdhs immobilized on hierarchically structured IO-TiO2 scaffolds represents a state-of-the-art DET configuration that balances high enzyme loading with efficient charge transfer. For example, a STF efficiency of 0.8% was achieved using a combination of an encapsulated perovskite photocathode (Figure d) and a BiVO4 photoanode (Figure b). In a three-electrode configuration, the perovskite photocathode was functionalized with a thick layer of IO-TiO2 scaffold to host NvFdhAB, resulting in a high photocurrent density of 4 mA cm–2 at 0.4 V vs RHE. The unassisted TiCo|BiVO4|perovskite|IO-TiO2|Fdh semiartificial leaf produced 70 ± 20 mmol cm–2 of formate with a FE of 83 ± 5% and a TOF of 4 s–1 during 10 h of operation, using only sunlight, CO2, and water as inputs (Figure b). The large photovoltage generated by the perovskite|IO-TiO2|Fdh photocathode enables the construction of an unassisted PEC tandem cell when paired with a Cu27Pd73 dark anode (Figure d). Under a two-electrode configuration, the system exhibited an onset potential of – 0.6 V and a photocurrent density of 1 mA cm–2 at 0 V applied bias to facilitate CO2 reduction coupled with the simultaneous oxidative valorization of pretreated PET plastic, maintaining stable operation for 10 h.

The IO-TiO2|Fdh scaffold has also been integrated with organic photovoltaic (OPV) photocathodes in bias-free devices (Figure f–h). To avoid the use of noninnocent additives such as Good’s buffers, 100 pmol CA was coimmobilized with 500 pmol Fdh to mitigate the steep pH gradient generated during CO2 conversion and thereby stabilize the local environment. This system delivered a photocurrent density approaching 10 mA cm–2 with near-unity selectivity for formate production in a three-electrode configuration (Figure c,e). Furthermore, coupling the semiartificial OPV photocathode with a nanostructured hematite photoanode modified with a Ni-based catalyst enabled unbiased PEC comproportionation of CO2 and pretreated PET plastic into formate over 10 h (Figure d,f).

In addition to biological and semiconducting light absorbers, co-catalysts and dye molecules such as STEMPO, DPP, and RuP have been integrated into mesoporous TiO2 to construct dye-sensitized photoanodes (Figure a,c). When coupled with an Fdh-loaded mesoporous ITO dark cathode, this system enabled unbiased solar CO2 reduction to formate coupled with selective alcohol oxidation, achieving a bias-free photocurrent density of up to 30 μA cm–2 over 6 h and a TONFdh of 4,532 ± 945. The coupling of CO2 reduction with selective alcohol oxidation has recently been extended to a carbon nitride (CNX)|ITO photoanode. When paired with an Fdh|mesoITO dark cathode, the system achieved a bias-free photocurrent density of 65 ± 15 μA cm–2 over 10 h, producing 10.6 ± 0.1 μmol cm–2 of formate with a FE of 94 ± 3% (Figure f,h).

Recently, a thermoelectric generator (TEG) was paired with a BiVO4 photoanode integrated with a NvFdhAB loaded mesoITO biocathode (Figure e,g), aiming to harness the full solar spectrum and manage waste heat. The BiVO4 photoanode absorbed UV–visible light while the TEG utilized the IR range, enabling complementary light management. This integrated device achieved a photocurrent density up to 0.47 ± 0.05 mA cm–2 for CO2 photoreduction, producing 42 ± 8 mmol of formate after 10 h of continuous operation.

With the aim of extending semiartificial CO2 fixation on Fdh beyond formate, OPV|IO-TiO2|Fdh devices have been coupled with both biological and synthetic catalysts to enable CO2-mediated enantioselective organic synthesis, as well as using an engineered E. coli for biomass production (Figure ). A triple-enzyme cascade on an ITO-coated carbon felt electrode was demonstrated, where formate produced from CO2 reduction by NvFdhAB was directly utilized by Candida boidinii Fdh for NADH regeneration. The regenerated cofactor was then used by an alcohol dehydrogenase to reduce acetophenone to chiral 1-phenylethanol, achieving an enantiomeric excess of 93% and a conversion yield of 38%.

32.

32

Semiartificial cascade for CO2-mediated enantioselective organic synthesis of chiral 1-phenylethanol from acetophenone using either (i) a synthetic Noyori-Ikariya catalyst or (ii) biological catalysts containing Candida boidinii fdh (PDB: 5DN9) and alcohol dehydrogenase (PDB: 1ZK4). CO2 photoreduction was achieved using NvFdhAB (PDB: 6SDV). (iii) Semiartificial photosynthesis of biomass using formate from CO2 reduction and an engineered E. coli.

In a complementary approach, renewable formate generated from Fdh-catalyzed CO2 reduction was used to drive the asymmetric hydrogenation of acetophenone with a synthetic Noyori-Ikariya catalyst, obtaining a high yield of 78% and excellent enantioselectivity of 94% for (R)-1-phenylethanol. A semiartificial leaf with an engineered E. coli has been established for solar-driven CO2-to-biomass conversion, where adapted E. coli was shown to efficiently utilize formate as an energy source for growth, demonstrating electrode–microbe compatibility and biomass production. This integrated two-stage design mimics natural photosynthesis, with abiotic light-driven formate generation and biotic carbon fixation, presenting a formate bioeconomy approach for coupling renewable energy with microbial production. These examples illustrate the potential of integrating Fdh-based CO2 reduction with downstream synthetic, enzymatic, and microbial transformations to produce high-value, complex chemicals in a sustainable and selective manner.

Four decades after the first MV-mediated semiartificial CO2 fixation using Fdh, research has clearly shifted toward DET. This strategy offers distinct advantages in device integration and minimizing enzyme demand. While early DET systems delivered photocurrent densities below 1 mA cm–2, within just five years the state-of-the-art DET photocathodes now achieve ∼10 mA cm–2 with nearly 100% FE, requiring 2 orders of magnitude less Fdh than MET-based photocathodes.

8. Fdh Photochemistry

This section will focus on the use of Fdh as a model cocatalyst for photochemical CO2 reduction to formate. This will cover Fdh in solution, suspension, and sheets for CO2 reduction, coupling Fdh with organic and inorganic light absorbers. This will also highlight strategies for binding Fdh with light absorbers.

8.1. Light Absorbers

Integrating Fdh with photocatalysts represents an innovative semiartificial approach that combines the high selectivity of enzymes with energy-efficient, light-driven reactions. ,, These biohybrid assemblies show significant potential for harnessing sunlight to convert CO2 into formate under mild conditions, using simple components and device configuration. A typical semiartificial photocatalytic system consists of a light absorber, biocatalyst, substrate, buffer solution, and electron donor. Upon light irradiation, light absorbers such as semiconductors or dyes convert absorbed photons into photoexcited electrons that are localized in the conduction band or LUMO, respectively. − The energy levels of conduction band or LUMO must be higher than the redox potential of the target reaction, such as the interconversion between CO2 and formate, to thermodynamically allow electron transfer and enable the reaction bidirectionally with the Fdh (Figure ). Substrates like CO2 or formate are introduced into the solution by purging or dissolving prior to photocatalysis. Electron donors are usually sacrificial reagents, though replacing them with value-added reactions (e.g., waste valorization) or oxygen evolution reaction is highly desirable. − The pH of the solution is maintained in the neutral range (pH 6–8) using the Good’s buffer or an inorganic buffer to ensure high enzyme activity. Recent studies have revealed that Good’s buffer can also act as an electron donor in photocatalytic reactions, thereby complicating the oxidation pathway. To address this issue, efforts have been directed toward employing CA and/or inorganic buffers to enable cleaner solar-driven chemistry (see Section ).

33.

33

Energy band positions of light absorbers for construing a Fdh biohybrid. Data source: RuP, DPP, carbon dot (CD), CNX, , NU1006, TiO2, SrTiO3, CdS, ZnIn2S4. The redox potential for CO2/HCOO– catalyzed by Fdh is displayed as reference. The energy band positions and redox potential are converted to RHE.

8.2. Photocatalysis Using Electron Mediators

Photochemical activation of Fdh via DET has been an important challenge in the field, early studies have predominantly focused on developing mediated photocatalytic systems that employ soluble redox mediators, e.g. using Fdh from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. − In 2002, photocatalytic CO2-to-formate conversion using this Fdh was reported in a MV-mediated system with zinc tetrakis­(4-methylpyridyl) porphyrin (ZnTMPyP) as the light absorber and triethanolamine (TEOA) as the sacrificial electron donor. This system produced 0.1 mM formate after 4 h of visible-light irradiation, corresponding to a 10.4% yield for CO2 to formate conversion. The same system has been further optimized and characterized in 2004, producing 62 μM after 3 h in the presence of 30 μM MV. In 2006, a similar MV-mediated system was constructed using chlorophyll-a as a photosensitizer and NADPH as an electron donor, generating 0.056 mM formate after 4 h of irradiation. To replace the NADH cofactor, a series of artificial cofactors were synthesized in 2017 to evaluate how ionic groups in viologen derivatives influence Fdh catalytic activity. Among them, the reduced form 1,1′-diaminoethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium salt exhibited the highest catalytic efficiency, reaching 0.25 μM–1 min–1.

In 2012, a rhodium complex was employed to mediate electron transfer from a graphene-based photocatalyst for the photochemical regeneration of NADH from NAD+. Using TEOA as a sacrificial electron donor, visible-light-driven CO2 reduction produced 111 μmol of formic acid within 2 h. Thus, recent efforts to eliminate soluble mediators have led to the development of an integrated mediated system in 2020. In this approach, the electron mediator Cp*Rh­(2,2′-bipyridyl-5,5′-dicarboxylic acid)Cl was anchored onto a metal–organic framework (MOF) NU-1006, with Fdh immobilized within the MOF pores. This semiartificial system achieved a turnover frequency of 865 h–1 over 24 h in the presence of NADH as an electron donor. However, the use of diffusional electron mediators is costly due to the increased system complexity, and they cannot be easily separated from the formate product in the liquid form. Additionally, the most widely used MV compounds are toxic, presenting significant drawbacks for practical applications.

8.3. Interfacial Engineering for Direct Electron Transfer

Establishing DET between the light absorber and Fdh presents a promising component and energy efficient strategy for photocatalytic CO2 reduction to formate due to system simplicity. The first such configuration was reported in 2019, employing a ruthenium tris-2,2’-bipyridine dye-sensitized TiO2 colloidal system (Figure a, Table ). This approach benefited from the unique advantages of metal oxides, for example, low cost, scalability, and the ability to bind enzymes in their electroactive orientations. Comprehensive QCM and ATR-IR studies demonstrated the strong and stable binding affinity between NvH Fdh and TiO2. As a result, a benchmark TOF of 11 ± 1 s–1 was achieved using TEOA as a sacrificial electron donor, without the need for an electron mediator using Ru-dye sensitized TiO2. This work shows the importance of metal oxide as a scaffold in effectively immobilizing enzymes and establishing efficient DET with directly wired Fdh, paving the way for developing more controlled immobilization of enzymes and more efficient semiartificial photosynthetic systems. The active TiO2|Fdh interface enabled the development of floating semiconductor–enzyme photoreforming catalysts (Figure b). By immobilizing TiO2 onto silica-based hollow glass microspheres, the resulting floating photocatalyst allows vertical solar illumination and facilitates product separation. This composite supports simultaneous solar-driven CO2 reduction coupled to pretreated cellulose oxidation for 24 h, producing up to 1.16 ± 0.04 mmol g–1 of formate as the sole product through a comproportionation reaction.

34.

34

Interfacing Fdhs (PDB: 6SDV) with light absorbers for semiartificial photocatalysis. Representative metal oxides systems: (a) Ru|TiO2 (2019), (b) floating SiO2|TiO2 (2023), (c) Z-scheme BiVO4||SrTiO3 (2024), (d) CNX|ITO (2025). Representative electrostatic association systems: (e) carbon dot (2022), (f) Ru-micelle (2025). Representative metal sulfide system: (g) ZnIn2S4 (2025). The electron donors are triethanolamine (TEOA), 4-methylbenzyl alcohol (MBA), dithiothreitol (DTT), and ascorbate acid (AA). Numerical data can be found in Table .

8. Summary of Fdh-Based Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction Systems.

Year Photocatalysis Organism Enzyme (loading) TOF (h–1) Stability (h) Electrolyte Irradiance (mW cm–2) Wavelength (nm) ref
2019 RuP|TiO2 NvH FdhAB (12 pmol) 40,000 24 NaHCO3 (0.1 M), TEOA (0.1 M), pH 6.5 100 AM1.5G (UV-filtered)
2019 DPP|TiO2 NvH FdhAB (12 pmol) 18,000 24 NaHCO3 (0.1 M), TEOA (0.1 M), pH 6.5 100 AM1.5G (UV-filtered)
2022 a-CD NvH FdhAB (40 pmol) 2,100 24 NaHCO3 (0.1 M), DTT (10 mM), pH 6.7 100 AM1.5G
2024 BiVO4-SrTiO3 NvH FdhAB (50 pmol) 1,274 10 NaHCO3 (0.1 M), Co(bpy)3 (0.5 mM), pH 6.7 100 AM1.5G
2025 Ru-micelle NvH FdhAB (20 pmol) 333 24 NaHCO3 (0.1 M), NaHAsc (0.1 M), pH 6.7 100 AM1.5G
2025 ZnIn2S4 NvH FdhAB (50 pmol) 375 8 NaHCO3 (0.1 M), PP-ol (1 mg/mL), pH 6.7 100 AM1.5G
2025 CN X –ITO NvH FdhAB (40 pmol) 35,000 10 NaHCO3 (0.1 M), KCl (50 mM), MBA (7.5 mM), pH 6.7 100 AM1.5G
2026 CPE-FBI hydrogel NvH FdhAB (50 pmol) 2,000 48 NaHCO3 (0.1 M), NaHAsc (0.1 M), pH 6.7 100 AM1.5G
2026 pBP-DB+ NvH FdhAB (50 pmol) 27,488 48 NaHCO3 (0.1 M), MBA (50 mM), pH 6.7 100 AM1.5G

Inspired by the metal oxide–Fdh interactions, the first colloidal Z-scheme system for semiartificial photosynthesis was developed by combining SrTiO3:La,Rh, BiVO4:Mo, and a [Co­(bpy)3]­SO4 complex (Figure c). The spatial separation of oxidation and reduction semiconductors enabled the use of water as an electron donor, achieving overall water splitting and eliminating the need for a sacrificial electron donor. The assembled Fdh|SrTiO3:La,Rh|[Co­(bpy)3]3+/2+|BiVO4:Mo|RuO2 system continuously generated formate, while simultaneously producing molecular oxygen with the input of only sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide. This system yielded 319 ± 27 μmol formate g–1 with a TON of 12740 over 10 h. QCM analysis revealed that the strong immobilization of Fdh on SrTiO3:La,Rh was key to enabling efficient and stable DET.

Beyond adopting the semiconducting properties of metal oxides, conductive oxides also serve as efficient electron relay materials, enabling enzymes to be loaded in their electroactive orientations. In this context, ITO was employed to bridge CNX and Fdh (Figure d), facilitating the construction of colloidal photocatalysts, photosheets, and PEC devices. Among the tested oxides such as SiO2, TiO2, and ZrO2, ITO proved to be the most effective oxide support, with an optimal composition of 75% ITO in CNX. When 40 pmol Fdh was immobilized onto 4 mg of the CNX–ITO composite to form a colloidal photocatalyst, a formate areal activity of 0.70 ± 0.06 μmol cm–2 was achieved over 10 h.

Besides metal oxides, the emerging metal sulfide semiconductor ZnIn2S4 (ZIS) has demonstrated the ability to directly transfer photogenerated electrons to Fdh for solar-driven CO2 reduction (Figure g), achieving a formate TON of 2,200 after 4 h, corresponding to an overall quantum yield of 0.1%. This reductive process was coupled with the selective oxidation of a lignin model compound PP-ol to PP-one, achieving a high conversion yield of approximately 80% after 24 h. The interactions between ZIS and Fdh were further investigated using QCM and PEIS. Fdh adsorption on a ZIS-coated quartz chip occurred rapidly, reaching saturation within 6 min at a surface coverage of 6.8 pmol cm–2. The binding was also strong, as evidenced by only 18% Fdh desorption during subsequent buffer washing process. Equivalent circuit fitting of the Nyquist plots revealed a decrease in R ct from 160 kΩ to 76 kΩ, confirming the catalytic contribution of Fdh for CO2 reduction.

Given that the protein surrounding the distal Fe–S cluster of Fdh consists of negatively charged amino acids, such as aspartic and glutamic acids, functionalizing a light absorber with positively charged terminals is a promising strategy for establishing DET via electrostatic interactions. This strategy enables the mimicry of the positively charged natural redox partner cytochrome c 3 through the use of functionalized light absorbers. The first mediator-free, homogeneous photocatalytic system for CO2 reduction to formate using Fdh was developed on amorphous carbon dots (a-CDs, Figure e). By chemically modifying a-CDs with positively charged amine groups, efficient DET was achieved with a TOF of 3,500 h–1. The electrostatic binding was systematically characterized using QCM, ATR-IR, and electrochemical techniques, highlighting the critical role of surface charge in semiartificial photosynthesis. Additionally, the rational selection of a sacrificial electron donor is crucial for optimizing performance. For instance, the use of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), a commonly used sacrificial electron donor, can shield the surface charge of a-CDs thereby disrupting electrostatic interactions. In contrast, the use of neutral DTT doubled the photocatalytic performance compared to EDTA.

Inspired by the natural enzyme-membrane interface, a biohybrid assembly was developed using supramolecular surfactants as light absorbers for CO2-to-formate conversion. The Ru-based photosensitizer self-assembled into micellar structures, with positively charged Ru head groups that electrostatically associated with the protein surface near the distal Fe–S cluster of Fdh (Figure f) thereby facilitating efficient DET in the presence of sodium ascorbate as the sacrificial electron donor. This biomimetic enzyme–micelle assembly achieved a TON of 8,000 over 24 h. The strong association between the Ru micelles and Fdh was confirmed by nanosecond time-resolved absorption and emission spectroscopy, which indicated structural changes in the micellar assemblies.

Similar electrostatic strategies have been used in interfacing NvFdhAB with positively charged organic semiconductors such as CPE-FBI hydrogel and pBP-DB+ photosheet, , achieving a TON (48 h) of 2,000 and 27,488, respectively. Time-resolved absorption spectroscopy revealed the reaction kinetics of the biohybrid assemblies.

9. Scale-Up Applications of Fdhs

Challenging the common assumption that enzymes are fragile, limited in stability for real-world practicality, this section highlights the scale-up potential of metal-dependent Fdh and their proof-of-principle-use in prototype devices.

NvFdhAB was integrated with a CN x –ITO composite photocatalyst sheet of 50 cm2 geometrical surface area for CO2 reduction to formate coupled with 4-methylbenzyl alcohol oxidation to the corresponding aldehyde (Figure f). The CN x –ITO|Fdh photocatalyst sheet was contained in an airtight and transparent photoreactor and submerged in CO2-saturated solution, enabling outdoor operation under natural sunlight (Figure a). This work highlighted the facile fabrication of such photocatalyst sheets and demonstrated the high areal and specific activity toward formate and aldehyde production. The construction of this semiartificial photoreactor device and its operation for over 3 days showcases the possibility for deploying enzymes under real-world conditions for solar fuel production.

35.

35

(a) Images depicting the 50 cm2 CNx–ITO|Fdh photocatalyst sheet (deposited on FTO substrate) which was housed in a Perspex (poly­(methyl methacrylate)) photoreactor for outdoor experiments under natural sunlight. Reproduced from ref . Copyright 2025 the Authors, published by American Chemical Society, under CC BY. (b) Images of COF|CN x |Fdh photopanel architecture and the outdoor experiment utilizing an individual 3 × 3 cm2 photopanel in a 3D-printed reactor. Photographs taken by Dr Suvendu Karak. (c) Schematic of the scaled-up enCOH using the 10-L enzyme-immobilized reactor with a continuous feed of LDG for formate production. Reproduced from ref . Copyright 2024 the Authors and Springer Nature Limited, under CC BY.

An azo-functionalized β-ketoenamine-based covalent organic framework (COF) integrated with functionalized CN x in a composite (COF|CN x ) provides a versatile photosheet scaffold. The system integrates NvFdhAB for CO2-to-formate generation coupling with the oxidative valorization of ethylene glycol derived from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) waste. The use of spatially defined, pixelated photopanels enables independent tuning of enzymatic reactions, thereby overcoming intrinsic kinetic mismatches between biocatalysts and allowing control over product distributions. These systems have been validated under real-world conditions, including rooftop operation using scalable photopanels (active area of 9 cm2) for the selective generation of formate and glycolaldehyde. The combination of modularity, scalability and compatibility with waste-derived feedstocks highlights the potential of such platforms for decentralized solar-driven refineries. Biocompatible and metal-free photosensitizers such as conjugated polyelectrolytes have also been developed as photocatalytic biohybrid sheets through self-assembly with NvFdhAB, which achieved a TOF of h–1 during the stable operation over 48 h.

Apart from solar devices, the MeFdh1 enzyme was employed in tandem with a CO dehydrogenase (ChCOdh2) for enzymatic CO hydration (enCOH) in a 10-L-scale reactor, converting industrial gas emissions into formate (Figure c). The enCOH involved the conversion of CO into CO2 by ChCOdh2 and subsequently into formate by MeFdh1, mediated by the EVox/EVred redox partner. Notably, the scaled up 10-l reactor immobilized with both enzymes was operated at mild conditions (room temperature and neutral pH) and could utilize a live feed of Linz–Donawitz gas (LDG) directly without pretreatment. This work hence featured the real-world applicability of Fdh and presented enCOH as a promising avenue for valorizing industrial flue gas.

10. Concluding Remarks and Future Perspectives

The growing urgency to mitigate anthropogenic CO2 emissions and develop sustainable energy solutions has driven extensive research into catalytic CO2 fixation. Metal-dependent Fdhs, particularly those containing Mo or W cofactors, have emerged as promising CO2 reduction model catalysts for sustainable formate production. The direct integration of Fdhs into semiartificial photosynthetic platforms provides a versatile and inspirational framework for harnessing renewable electrons for CO2 conversion. Such biohybrid systems not only offer a pathway to sustainable chemical synthesis and solar energy conversion, but also exemplify how insights from natural enzymology can inspire the rational design of next-generation synthetic catalysts for CO2 fixation.

Despite these advances, several challenges remain in the deployment of Fdh-based systems. The oxygen sensitivity of many metal-dependent Fdhs limits their operational stability, and difficulties and cost in enzyme expression, purification, and functional immobilization continue to hinder scalability. Electron-transfer bottlenecks at the abiotic–biotic interface, kinetic imbalances between CO2 reduction and formate oxidation, as well as mass transport limitations further constrain overall performance. Additionally, the full potential of Fdh in semiartificial systems is yet to be realized due to limited understanding of interfacial phenomena, including enzyme orientation, reaction intermediates, and the mechanisms governing charge transfer and recombination. Addressing these fundamental and engineering challenges will be critical for improving efficiency, scalability, and durability in semiartificial CO2 fixation systems.

Looking forward, several avenues hold promises for advancing Fdh-based semiartificial CO2 fixation. First, protein engineering via directed evolution could generate Fdh variants with enhanced oxygen tolerance, higher stability, and improved CO2 reduction activity. − Rational modification of the enzyme cofactor may also improve catalytic rates, improve bias favored CO2 reduction, and reduce inhibition. Second, advances in materials science, including high-performance light absorbers, combined with interfacial engineering strategies to improve charge transfer and reduce surface recombination, can enable more efficient integration of Fdhs with photoelectrodes, − molecular photosensitizers, − and nanostructured scaffolds. − In particular, the development of hierarchically structured porous supports that maximize enzyme loading at their electroactive orientation is expected to improve overall system performance. ,, Third, in situ and operando characterization techniques, including spectroelectrochemistry, − infrared, − Raman, − and X-ray spectroscopy, − and advanced optical microscopy, − will be instrumental in uncovering the mechanistic details of Fdh–material interactions and the charge carrier dynamics at the abiotic–biotic interface. Such insights can guide the rational design of more robust, efficient, and scalable biohybrid systems.

Reducing the reliance on redox mediators, sacrificial electron donors, and noninnocent buffers in semiartificial systems is a crucial step toward the practical application of Fdh-based biohybrids. This approach not only simplifies system design but also enables cleaner chemical production. Establishing DET between synthetic and Fdh materials eliminates the need for toxic or costly mediators and minimizes photovoltage loss between the mediator and the Fdh active site. − It also opens avenues for interfacial engineering through electrostatic association, covalent binding, and nanoconfinement. Although most studies on Fdh photocatalysis have relied on sacrificial electron donors that generate mixed, low-value oxidation products, recent advances have demonstrated the use of photogenerated holes in productive oxidation reactions such as water oxidation, , organic transformations, , and biomass valorizations. , These efforts highlight the potential for fully exploiting photogenerated electron–hole pairs, thereby enhancing solar-to-chemical conversion efficiencies beyond systems limited to reductive processes. Good’s buffers are widely used in biological applications owing to their suitable pH range, high solubility, optical transparency, and inertness to enzymatic reactions. − However, these organic zwitterionic compounds are readily oxidized, ,, restricting their compatibility with demanding oxidation reactions in photocatalysis and reducing oxidation FEs in photoelectrochemical systems. The search for alternatives to such noninnocent buffers has therefore gained increasing attention, leading to the recent development of semiartificial platforms for CO2-mediated asymmetric synthesis.

Expanding the scope of Fdh-based CO2 conversion beyond formate through domino chemistry presents exciting opportunities for producing higher-value multicarbon products. Coupling Fdh-catalyzed formate production with downstream microbial, enzymatic, or chemical cascades could establish integrated or consecutive CO2 valorization pathways, bridging solar energy conversion with sustainable chemical synthesis. ,,,, Integration with solar-driven or electrochemical systems also enables on-demand and decentralized CO2 fixation. Future efforts can be put into optimizing enzymatic activity while maintaining long-term operational stability and enabling large-scale, continuous formate production in flow systems for downstream applications. Furthermore, the real-world applicability of Fdh can be further established with the use of industrial flue gas, i.e., improving the performance of Fdh under low CO2 concentrations present with trace amounts of O2.

Thus, semiartificial photosynthesis using metal-dependent Fdhs represents a unique and powerful approach for sustainable CO2 fixation. While challenges remain, advances in protein/materials engineering and operando characterization provide clear pathways for overcoming these barriers. Continued interdisciplinary research will be essential for realizing the full potential of Fdh-based semiartificial CO2 fixation. These efforts hold promise of transforming CO2 from a persistent greenhouse gas into a sustainable carbon feedstock for energy storage and chemical synthesis, contributing both to climate mitigation and the development of a circular economy.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for support by the Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellowship (ECF-2024-230 to Y.L.), the Isaac Newton Trust (23.23(g) and 24.08(s) to Y.L.), the Swiss National Science Foundation Postdoc.Mobility (P500PN_202908 to Y.L.), the Singapore Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR) PhD studentship (to B.Q.L.L.), The Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (The Netherlands) and the National Growth Fund program Big Chemistry (1420578 to W.E.R), the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (PTDC/BII-BBF/2050/2020 to I.A.C.P.), MOSTMICROITQB unit (UIDB/04612/2020 and UIDP/04612/2020), the LS4FUTURE Associated Laboratory (LA/P/0087/2020 to I.A.C.P.), and PhD fellowships (SFRH/BD/116515/2016 and COVID/BD/151766/2021 to A.R.O., and 2020.07897.BD to R.R.M.), the UK Research & Innovation ERC Advanced Grant (EP/X030563/1 to E.R.), the UK Department for Science, Innovation & Technology and the Royal Academy of Engineering Chair in Emerging Technologies programme (CIET-2324-83 to E.R.). We thank Dr. Samuel J. Cobb (The University of Manchester, UK) for his initial help and discussions as well as Prof. Judy Hirst (MRC Mitochondrial Biology Unit of the University of Cambridge, UK) for past collaborations enabling some of the work discussed in this review. We thank Soleh Anderlini and Dr. Glenn Quek (University of Cambridge, UK) for reviewing this manuscript.

Biographies

Yongpeng Liu is an incoming Assistant Professor at the University of Macau (2026). He obtained his PhD degree from École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) in 2021 under the supervision of Prof. Kevin Sivula and Prof. Néstor Guijarro. Following this, he joined Prof. Ross Milton’s group at the University of Geneva as a 3-month BNF Visiting Research Fellow. In 2022, he joined Prof. Erwin Reisner’s group at the University of Cambridge as a Swiss National Science Foundation Postdoc.Mobility Fellow, an Isaac Newton Trust Early Career Fellow, and a Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellow. He obtained his Master’s and Bachelor’s degree from the University of Glasgow (2016) and Huazhong University of Science and Technology (2015), respectively. He has research interests in photo­(electro)­catalysis, bioelectrocatalysis, semiartificial photosynthesis, and spectroelectrochemistry.

Beverly Q. L. Low received her B. Eng in Materials Science and Engineering from the National University of Singapore (NUS) in 2023. Currently, she is a third-year PhD student in the Department of Chemistry at the University of Cambridge under the supervision of Prof. Erwin Reisner, where she develops bioelectrodes with enzymes and microbes for the semibiological valorization of carbon dioxide and waste.

William E. Robinson is currently Group Leader at Radboud University Nijmegen and the Big Chemistry Consortium, The Netherlands. He received his PhD from the University of Cambridge with Prof. Erwin Reisner as part of the Doctoral Training Centre for Nanotechnology. Later, he joined the group of Prof. Wilhelm T. S. Huck at Radboud University Nijmegen working on understanding the self-organization of systems of chemical reactions. His current research focuses on the exploring interface of chemistry, AI and automation with application to designing and understanding the physical properties of complex formulations.

Rita Rebelo Manuel earned a BSc in Molecular and Cellular Biology in 2017 from NOVA School of Science and Technology, and a MSc in Biotechnology for Sustainability in 2019 from ITQB NOVA. For her MSc thesis she worked at the University of Delft on the production of high-value products, as part of the IronPlugNPlay Consortium. In 2020 she joined Inês Cardoso Pereira’s lab where she worked on the catalytic mechanism of a tungsten-dependent Formate Dehydrogenase, earning her PhD in December 2025.

Ana Rita Oliveira received her BSc in Biochemistry in 2012 and her MSc in Applied Biochemistry in 2015 from the Universidade do Minho, Portugal. She then joined Inês Cardoso Pereira’s Laboratory at ITQB NOVA, where she worked on the production and characterization of the W/Sec-dependent FdhAB from Nitratidesulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough. Her studies helped to uncover how this model CO2 reductase is activated and tolerates oxygen, leading to her PhD in Molecular Biosciences in 2022. Later, she joined the Stratingh Institute for Chemistry at the University of Groningen, The Netherlands. There, she focused on engineering improved biocatalysts and advancing enzyme-evolution strategies by leveraging genetic code expansion to couple enzymatic activity with bacterial fitness.

Inês Cardoso Pereira received her first degree in Applied Chemistry from NOVA University Lisbon. She then got a D.Phil. degree from the University of Oxford, working with Prof. Jack E. Baldwin on nonheme iron oxygenases involved in the biosynthesis of cephalosporins. She returned to Portugal to do a postdoc with Profs. Antonio V. Xavier and Miguel Teixeira working on several metalloproteins from anaerobes at the Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica at NOVA University Lisbon (ITQB NOVA), where she later started her own group. At ITQB NOVA she held the positions of Assistant Professor, Principal Researcher and Full Professor since 2020. Her lab is interested in the microbial physiology of anaerobes and in investigating and exploring biological systems, like redox enzymes and microbes, for sustainable production of biofuels.

Erwin Reisner received his PhD degree from the University of Vienna (with Prof. Bernhard K. Keppler), and postdoctoral training at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (with Prof. Stephen J. Lippard) and the University of Oxford (with Prof. Fraser A. Armstrong) in biological inorganic chemistry, before moving to the University of Cambridge where he is currently the Professor of Energy and Sustainability and Royal Academy of Engineering Chair in Emerging Technologies. His laboratory explores the interface of chemical biology, synthetic chemistry, materials science and engineering relevant to the development of solar-driven processes for the sustainable synthesis of fuels and chemicals.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Published as part of Chemical Reviews special issue “Semi-artificial Photosynthesis”.

References

  1. Friedlingstein P., Le Quéré C., O’Sullivan M., Hauck J., Landschützer P., Luijkx I. T., Li H., van der Woude A., Schwingshackl C., Pongratz J., Regnier P., Andrew R. M., Bakker D. C. E., Canadell J. G., Ciais P., Gasser T., Jones M. W., Lan X., Morgan E., Olsen A., Peters G. P., Peters W., Sitch S., Tian H.. Emerging Climate Impact on Carbon Sinks in a Consolidated Carbon Budget. Nature. 2026;649:98–103. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09802-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Deng Z., Zhu B., Davis S. J., Ciais P., Guan D., Gong P., Liu Z.. Global Carbon Emissions and Decarbonization in 2024. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2025;6(4):231–233. doi: 10.1038/s43017-025-00658-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Liu Z., Deng Z., Davis S. J., Ciais P.. Global Carbon Emissions in 2023. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2024;5(4):253–254. doi: 10.1038/s43017-024-00532-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sanz-Pérez E. S., Murdock C. R., Didas S. A., Jones C. W.. Direct Capture of CO2 from Ambient Air. Chem. Rev. 2016;116(19):11840–11876. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pall P., Aina T., Stone D. A., Stott P. A., Nozawa T., Hilberts A. G. J., Lohmann D., Allen M. R.. Anthropogenic Greenhouse Gas Contribution to Flood Risk in England and Wales in Autumn 2000. Nature. 2011;470(7334):382–385. doi: 10.1038/nature09762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hubbert M. K.. Energy from Fossil Fuels. Science. 1949;109(2823):103–109. doi: 10.1126/science.109.2823.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Siegelman R. L., Kim E. J., Long J. R.. Porous Materials for Carbon Dioxide Separations. Nat. Mater. 2021;20(8):1060–1072. doi: 10.1038/s41563-021-01054-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Paustian K., Cole C. V., Sauerbeck D., Sampson N.. CO2 Mitigation by Agriculture: An Overview. Clim. Change. 1998;40(1):135–162. doi: 10.1023/A:1005347017157. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ho S.-H., Chen C.-Y., Lee D.-J., Chang J.-S.. Perspectives on Microalgal CO2-Emission Mitigation Systems  A Review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011;29(2):189–198. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ou Y., Roney C., Alsalam J., Calvin K., Creason J., Edmonds J., Fawcett A. A., Kyle P., Narayan K., O’Rourke P., Patel P., Ragnauth S., Smith S. J., McJeon H.. Deep Mitigation of CO2 and Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases toward 1.5 and 2 °C Futures. Nat. Commun. 2021;12(1):6245. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26509-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rahimi M., Khurram A., Hatton T. A., Gallant B.. Electrochemical Carbon Capture Processes for Mitigation of CO2 Emissions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022;51(20):8676–8695. doi: 10.1039/D2CS00443G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fang S., Rahaman M., Bharti J., Reisner E., Robert M., Ozin G. A., Hu Y. H.. Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Nat. Rev. Methods Primer. 2023;3(1):61. doi: 10.1038/s43586-023-00243-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Navarro-Jaén S., Virginie M., Bonin J., Robert M., Wojcieszak R., Khodakov A. Y.. Highlights and Challenges in the Selective Reduction of Carbon Dioxide to Methanol. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2021;5(8):564–579. doi: 10.1038/s41570-021-00289-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ross M. B., De Luna P., Li Y., Dinh C.-T., Kim D., Yang P., Sargent E. H.. Designing Materials for Electrochemical Carbon Dioxide Recycling. Nat. Catal. 2019;2(8):648–658. doi: 10.1038/s41929-019-0306-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jouny M., Hutchings G. S., Jiao F.. Carbon Monoxide Electroreduction as an Emerging Platform for Carbon Utilization. Nat. Catal. 2019;2(12):1062–1070. doi: 10.1038/s41929-019-0388-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Artz J., Müller T. E., Thenert K., Kleinekorte J., Meys R., Sternberg A., Bardow A., Leitner W.. Sustainable Conversion of Carbon Dioxide: An Integrated Review of Catalysis and Life Cycle Assessment. Chem. Rev. 2018;118(2):434–504. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee J., Kim S. M., Jeon B. W., Hwang H. W., Poloniataki E. G., Kang J., Lee S., Ra H. W., Na J., Na J.-G., Lee J., Kim Y. H.. Molar-Scale Formate Production via Enzymatic Hydration of Industrial off-Gases. Nat. Chem. Eng. 2024;1(5):354–364. doi: 10.1038/s44286-024-00063-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Yishai O., Lindner S. N., Gonzalez de la Cruz J., Tenenboim H., Bar-Even A.. The Formate Bio-Economy. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2016;35:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim Y. J., Lee H. S., Kim E. S., Bae S. S., Lim J. K., Matsumi R., Lebedinsky A. V., Sokolova T. G., Kozhevnikova D. A., Cha S.-S., Kim S.-J., Kwon K. K., Imanaka T., Atomi H., Bonch-Osmolovskaya E. A., Lee J.-H., Kang S. G.. Formate-Driven Growth Coupled with H2 Production. Nature. 2010;467(7313):352–355. doi: 10.1038/nature09375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Saha P., Amanullah S., Dey A.. Selectivity in Electrochemical CO2 Reduction. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022;55(2):134–144. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dattila F., Seemakurthi R. R., Zhou Y., López N.. Modeling Operando Electrochemical CO2 Reduction. Chem. Rev. 2022;122(12):11085–11130. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nitopi S., Bertheussen E., Scott S. B., Liu X., Engstfeld A. K., Horch S., Seger B., Stephens I. E. L., Chan K., Hahn C., Nørskov J. K., Jaramillo T. F., Chorkendorff I.. Progress and Perspectives of Electrochemical CO2 Reduction on Copper in Aqueous Electrolyte. Chem. Rev. 2019;119(12):7610–7672. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Xu S., Carter E. A.. Theoretical Insights into Heterogeneous (Photo)­Electrochemical CO2 Reduction. Chem. Rev. 2019;119(11):6631–6669. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Xia M., Pan L., Liu Y., Gao J., Li J., Mensi M., Sivula K., Zakeeruddin S. M., Ren D., Grätzel M.. Efficient Cu2O Photocathodes for Aqueous Photoelectrochemical CO2 Reduction to Formate and Syngas. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023;145(51):27939–27949. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c06146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Guan X., Xie Y., Liu C.. Performance Evaluation and Multidisciplinary Analysis of Catalytic Fixation Reactions by Material-Microbe Hybrids. Nat. Catal. 2024;7(5):475–482. doi: 10.1038/s41929-024-01151-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Bierbaumer S., Nattermann M., Schulz L., Zschoche R., Erb T. J., Winkler C. K., Tinzl M., Glueck S. M.. Enzymatic Conversion of CO2: From Natural to Artificial Utilization. Chem. Rev. 2023;123:5702. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Shafaat H. S., Yang J. Y.. Uniting Biological and Chemical Strategies for Selective CO2 Reduction. Nat. Catal. 2021;4(11):928–933. doi: 10.1038/s41929-021-00683-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Appel A. M., Bercaw J. E., Bocarsly A. B., Dobbek H., DuBois D. L., Dupuis M., Ferry J. G., Fujita E., Hille R., Kenis P. J. A., Kerfeld C. A., Morris R. H., Peden C. H. F., Portis A. R., Ragsdale S. W., Rauchfuss T. B., Reek J. N. H., Seefeldt L. C., Thauer R. K., Waldrop G. L.. Frontiers, Opportunities, and Challenges in Biochemical and Chemical Catalysis of CO2 Fixation. Chem. Rev. 2013;113(8):6621–6658. doi: 10.1021/cr300463y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Prywes N., Phillips N. R., Oltrogge L. M., Lindner S., Taylor-Kearney L. J., Tsai Y.-C. C., de Pins B., Cowan A. E., Chang H. A., Wang R. Z., Hall L. N., Bellieny-Rabelo D., Nisonoff H. M., Weissman R. F., Flamholz A. I., Ding D., Bhatt A. Y., Mueller-Cajar O., Shih P. M., Milo R., Savage D. F.. A Map of the Rubisco Biochemical Landscape. Nature. 2025;638(8051):823–828. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08455-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gionfriddo M., Birch R., Rhodes T., Buck S., Skinner T., Andersson I., Whitney S.. Laboratory Evolution of Rubisco Solubility and Catalytic Switches to Enhance Plant Productivity. Nat. Plants. 2025;11(9):1939–1950. doi: 10.1038/s41477-025-02093-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Keys A. J.. Rubisco: Its Role in Photorespiration. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 1986;313(1162):325–336. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1986.0040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Can M., Armstrong F. A., Ragsdale S. W.. Structure, Function, and Mechanism of the Nickel Metalloenzymes, CO Dehydrogenase, and Acetyl-CoA Synthase. Chem. Rev. 2014;114(8):4149–4174. doi: 10.1021/cr400461p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ragsdale S. W., Kumar M.. Nickel-Containing Carbon Monoxide Dehydrogenase/Acetyl-CoA Synthase. Chem. Rev. 1996;96(7):2515–2540. doi: 10.1021/cr950058+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hu Z., Spangler N. J., Anderson M. E., Xia J., Ludden P. W., Lindahl P. A., Münck E.. Nature of the C-Cluster in Ni-Containing Carbon Monoxide Dehydrogenases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996;118(4):830–845. doi: 10.1021/ja9528386. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ferry J. G.. Formate Dehydrogenase. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1990;87(3–4):377–382. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1990.tb04940.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Maia L. B., Moura J. J. G., Moura I.. Molybdenum and Tungsten-Dependent Formate Dehydrogenases. JBIC J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2015;20(2):287–309. doi: 10.1007/s00775-014-1218-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tishkov V. I., Popov V. O.. Catalytic Mechanism and Application of Formate Dehydrogenase. Biochem. Mosc. 2004;69(11):1252–1267. doi: 10.1007/PL00021765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Li Y., Gomez-Mingot M., Fogeron T., Fontecave M.. Carbon Dioxide Reduction: A Bioinspired Catalysis Approach. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021;54(23):4250–4261. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Intasian P., Prakinee K., Phintha A., Trisrivirat D., Weeranoppanant N., Wongnate T., Chaiyen P.. Enzymes, In Vivo Biocatalysis, and Metabolic Engineering for Enabling a Circular Economy and Sustainability. Chem. Rev. 2021;121(17):10367–10451. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Proppe A. H., Li Y. C., Aspuru-Guzik A., Berlinguette C. P., Chang C. J., Cogdell R., Doyle A. G., Flick J., Gabor N. M., van Grondelle R., Hammes-Schiffer S., Jaffer S. A., Kelley S. O., Leclerc M., Leo K., Mallouk T. E., Narang P., Schlau-Cohen G. S., Scholes G. D., Vojvodic A., Yam V. W.-W., Yang J. Y., Sargent E. H.. Bioinspiration in Light Harvesting and Catalysis. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020;5(11):828–846. doi: 10.1038/s41578-020-0222-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Artero V.. Bioinspired Catalytic Materials for Energy-Relevant Conversions. Nat. Energy. 2017;2(9):17131. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2017.131. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang A., Zhuang X., Liu J., Huang J., Lin L., Tang Y., Zhao S., Li R., Wang B., Fang B., Hong W.. Catalytic Cycle of Formate Dehydrogenase Captured by Single-Molecule Conductance. Nat. Catal. 2023;6(3):266–275. doi: 10.1038/s41929-023-00928-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Calzadiaz-Ramirez L., Meyer A. S.. Formate Dehydrogenases for CO2 Utilization. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2022;73:95–100. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2021.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Jayathilake B. S., Bhattacharya S., Vaidehi N., Narayanan S. R.. Efficient and Selective Electrochemically Driven Enzyme-Catalyzed Reduction of Carbon Dioxide to Formate Using Formate Dehydrogenase and an Artificial Cofactor. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019;52(3):676–685. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Palmer D. A., Van Eldik R.. The Chemistry of Metal Carbonato and Carbon Dioxide Complexes. Chem. Rev. 1983;83(6):651–731. doi: 10.1021/cr00058a004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. DuBois, D. L. Electrochemical Reactions of Carbon Dioxide. In Encyclopedia of Electrochemistry; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2007. 10.1002/9783527610426.bard070602. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Inzelt, G. Standard, Formal, and Other Characteristic Potentials of Selected Electrode Reactions. In Encyclopedia of Electrochemistry; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2007. 10.1002/9783527610426.bard070002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Hori, Y. CO2-Reduction, Catalyzed by Metal Electrodes. In Handbook of Fuel Cells; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2010. 10.1002/9780470974001.f207055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Bassegoda A., Madden C., Wakerley D. W., Reisner E., Hirst J.. Reversible Interconversion of CO2 and Formate by a Molybdenum-Containing Formate Dehydrogenase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136(44):15473–15476. doi: 10.1021/ja508647u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Boyington J. C., Gladyshev V. N., Khangulov S. V., Stadtman T. C., Sun P. D.. Crystal Structure of Formate Dehydrogenase H: Catalysis Involving Mo, Molybdopterin, Selenocysteine, and an Fe4S4 Cluster. Science. 1997;275(5304):1305–1308. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5304.1305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Oliveira A. R., Mota C., Mourato C., Domingos R. M., Santos M. F. A., Gesto D., Guigliarelli B., Santos-Silva T., Romão M. J., Cardoso Pereira I. A.. Toward the Mechanistic Understanding of Enzymatic CO2 Reduction. ACS Catal. 2020;10(6):3844–3856. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c00086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Conrads T., Hemann C., George G. N., Pickering I. J., Prince R. C., Hille R.. The Active Site of Arsenite Oxidase from Alcaligenes Faecalis . J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124(38):11276–11277. doi: 10.1021/ja027684q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Li H.-K., Temple C., Rajagopalan K. V., Schindelin H.. The 1.3 Å Crystal Structure of Rhodobacter Sphaeroides Dimethyl Sulfoxide Reductase Reveals Two Distinct Molybdenum Coordination Environments. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122(32):7673–7680. doi: 10.1021/ja000643e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Hartmann T., Schrapers P., Utesch T., Nimtz M., Rippers Y., Dau H., Mroginski M. A., Haumann M., Leimkühler S.. The Molybdenum Active Site of Formate Dehydrogenase Is Capable of Catalyzing C-H Bond Cleavage and Oxygen Atom Transfer Reactions. Biochemistry. 2016;55(16):2381–2389. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Cobb S. J., Rodríguez-Jiménez S., Reisner E.. Connecting Biological and Synthetic Approaches for Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2024;63(8):e202310547. doi: 10.1002/anie.202310547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Esakova O. A., Booker S. J.. Iron-Sulfur Cluster with Double Duty. Nat. Catal. 2025;8(8):758–759. doi: 10.1038/s41929-025-01386-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Honarmand Ebrahimi K., Ciofi-Baffoni S., Hagedoorn P.-L., Nicolet Y., Le Brun N. E., Hagen W. R., Armstrong F. A.. Iron-Sulfur Clusters as Inhibitors and Catalysts of Viral Replication. Nat. Chem. 2022;14(3):253–266. doi: 10.1038/s41557-021-00882-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Beinert H., Holm R. H., Münck E.. Iron-Sulfur Clusters: Nature’s Modular, Multipurpose Structures. Science. 1997;277(5326):653–659. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5326.653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Fourmond V., Di Giuliantonio A., Malagnini M., Opdam L., Ostermann N., Webb S., Milton R. D., Leger C.. Direct Electrochemistry of Enzymes That Use and Produce Solar Fuels: Hydrogenase, Formate Dehydrogenase, CO-Dehydrogenase and Nitrogenase. Chem. Rev. 2026;126:6550–6679. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c01110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Kalimuthu P., Hakopian S., Niks D., Hille R., Bernhardt P. V.. The Reversible Electrochemical Interconversion of Formate and CO2 by Formate Dehydrogenase from Cupriavidus Necator . J. Phys. Chem. B. 2023;127(39):8382–8392. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c04652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Reda T., Plugge C. M., Abram N. J., Hirst J.. Reversible Interconversion of Carbon Dioxide and Formate by an Electroactive Enzyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008;105(31):10654–10658. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801290105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Hobusch M., Kırtel O., Meramo S., Sukumara S., Hededam Welner D.. A Life Cycle Assessment of Early-Stage Enzyme Manufacturing Simulations from Sustainable Feedstocks. Bioresour. Technol. 2024;400:130653. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2024.130653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Lee K., Evans J. P., Satagopan S., Sun Y., Parquette J. R., Sundaresan V. B., Tabita F. R., Bakshi B. R.. Carbon Footprint of Biomimetic Carbon Fixation by Immobilizing Nature’s CO2-Sequestering Enzyme and Regenerating Its Energy Carrier. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020;8(45):16833–16841. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c05498. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Nachtergaele P., Kocak O., Escobar Y. R., Motte J., Gabriels D., Mottet L., Dewulf J.. Does Enzymatic Catalysis Lead to More Sustainable Chemicals Production? A Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Isopropyl Palmitate. Green Chem. 2024;26(23):11662–11672. doi: 10.1039/D4GC04514A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Xiao K., Liang J., Wang X., Hou T., Ren X., Yin P., Ma Z., Zeng C., Gao X., Yu T., Si T., Wang B., Zhong C., Jiang Z., Lee C.-S., Yu J. C.-m., Wong P. K.. Panoramic Insights into Semi-Artificial Photosynthesis: Origin, Development, and Future Perspective. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022;15(2):529–549. doi: 10.1039/D1EE03094A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Fang X., Kalathil S., Reisner E.. Semi-Biological Approaches to Solar-to-Chemical Conversion. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020;49(14):4926–4952. doi: 10.1039/C9CS00496C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Zhang J. Z., Reisner E.. Advancing Photosystem II Photoelectrochemistry for Semi-Artificial Photosynthesis. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2020;4(1):6–21. doi: 10.1038/s41570-019-0149-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Kornienko N., Zhang J. Z., Sakimoto K. K., Yang P., Reisner E.. Interfacing Nature’s Catalytic Machinery with Synthetic Materials for Semi-Artificial Photosynthesis. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018;13(10):890–899. doi: 10.1038/s41565-018-0251-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Reisner E., Powell D. J., Cavazza C., Fontecilla-Camps J. C., Armstrong F. A.. Visible Light-Driven H2 Production by Hydrogenases Attached to Dye-Sensitized TiO2 Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131(51):18457–18466. doi: 10.1021/ja907923r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Brown K. A., Dayal S., Ai X., Rumbles G., King P. W.. Controlled Assembly of Hydrogenase-CdTe Nanocrystal Hybrids for Solar Hydrogen Production. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132(28):9672–9680. doi: 10.1021/ja101031r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Caputo C. A., Gross M. A., Lau V. W., Cavazza C., Lotsch B. V., Reisner E.. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production Using Polymeric Carbon Nitride with a Hydrogenase and a Bioinspired Synthetic Ni Catalyst. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014;53(43):11538–11542. doi: 10.1002/anie.201406811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Pavliuk M. V., Lorenzi M., Morado D. R., Gedda L., Wrede S., Mejias S. H., Liu A., Senger M., Glover S., Edwards K., Berggren G., Tian H.. Polymer Dots as Photoactive Membrane Vesicles for [FeFe]-Hydrogenase Self-Assembly and Solar-Driven Hydrogen Evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144(30):13600–13611. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c03882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Liu Y., Pulignani C., Webb S., Cobb S. J., Rodríguez-Jiménez S., Kim D., Milton R. D., Reisner E.. Electrostatic [FeFe]-Hydrogenase-Carbon Nitride Assemblies for Efficient Solar Hydrogen Production. Chem. Sci. 2024;15(16):6088–6094. doi: 10.1039/D4SC00640B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Shi Mi., Liu Y., Mohamad Annuar A. B., Webb S., Milton R. D., Li R., Li C., Reisner E.. Interfacing Broad-Spectrum Semiconductors with Hydrogenases for Semi-Artificial Solar Reforming of Cellulose. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2026;148:18608. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6c03439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Brown K. A., Harris D. F., Wilker M. B., Rasmussen A., Khadka N., Hamby H., Keable S., Dukovic G., Peters J. W., Seefeldt L. C., King P. W.. Light-Driven Dinitrogen Reduction Catalyzed by a CdS:Nitrogenase MoFe Protein Biohybrid. Science. 2016;352(6284):448–450. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Brown K. A., Ruzicka J., Kallas H., Chica B., Mulder D. W., Peters J. W., Seefeldt L. C., Dukovic G., King P. W.. Excitation-Rate Determines Product Stoichiometry in Photochemical Ammonia Production by CdS Quantum Dot-Nitrogenase MoFe Protein Complexes. ACS Catal. 2020;10(19):11147–11152. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c02933. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  77. Chica B., Ruzicka J., Kallas H., Mulder D. W., Brown K. A., Peters J. W., Seefeldt L. C., Dukovic G., King P. W.. Defining Intermediates of Nitrogenase MoFe Protein during N2 Reduction under Photochemical Electron Delivery from CdS Quantum Dots. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142(33):14324–14330. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c06343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Woolerton T. W., Sheard S., Reisner E., Pierce E., Ragsdale S. W., Armstrong F. A.. Efficient and Clean Photoreduction of CO2 to CO by Enzyme-Modified TiO2 Nanoparticles Using Visible Light. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132(7):2132–2133. doi: 10.1021/ja910091z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Woolerton T. W., Sheard S., Pierce E., Ragsdale S. W., Armstrong F. A.. CO2 Photoreduction at Enzyme-Modified Metal Oxide Nanoparticles. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011;4(7):2393–2399. doi: 10.1039/c0ee00780c. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  80. Zhang L., Can M., Ragsdale S. W., Armstrong F. A.. Fast and Selective Photoreduction of CO2 to CO Catalyzed by a Complex of Carbon Monoxide Dehydrogenase, TiO2, and Ag Nanoclusters. ACS Catal. 2018;8(4):2789–2795. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b04308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Pavliuk M. V., Böhm M., Wilhelmsen J., Hardt S., Land H., Tian H.. Photobiocatalytic CO2 Reduction into CO by Organic Nanorod-Carbon Monoxide Dehydrogenase Assemblies: Surfactant Matters. Chem. Sci. 2024;15(40):16789–16795. doi: 10.1039/D4SC03154G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Greenbaum E.. Platinized Chloroplasts: A Novel Photocatalytic Material. Science. 1985;230(4732):1373–1375. doi: 10.1126/science.230.4732.1373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Grimme R. A., Lubner C. E., Bryant D. A., Golbeck J. H.. Photosystem I/Molecular Wire/Metal Nanoparticle Bioconjugates for the Photocatalytic Production of H2 . J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130(20):6308–6309. doi: 10.1021/ja800923y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Robinson M. T., Simons C. E., Cliffel D. E., Jennings G. K.. Photocatalytic Photosystem I/PEDOT Composite Films Prepared by Vapor-Phase Polymerization. Nanoscale. 2017;9(18):6158–6166. doi: 10.1039/C7NR01158J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Gisriel C. J., Malavath T., Qiu T., Menzel J. P., Batista V. S., Brudvig G. W., Utschig L. M.. Structure of a Biohybrid Photosystem I-Platinum Nanoparticle Solar Fuel Catalyst. Nat. Commun. 2024;15(1):9519. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53476-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Izzo M., Jacquet M., Góral T., Strawski M., Fujiwara T., Miyagishima S., Kargul J.. Cryo-EM of Rationally Designed Photosystem I Nanoassembly on Graphene Validates Orientation-Driven Enhancement of Photocatalytic Performance. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2026;36:e10926. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202510926. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  87. Kato M., Cardona T., Rutherford A. W., Reisner E.. Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation with Photosystem II Integrated in a Mesoporous Indium-Tin Oxide Electrode. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134(20):8332–8335. doi: 10.1021/ja301488d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Kato M., Cardona T., Rutherford A. W., Reisner E.. Covalent Immobilization of Oriented Photosystem II on a Nanostructured Electrode for Solar Water Oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135(29):10610–10613. doi: 10.1021/ja404699h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Mersch D., Lee C.-Y., Zhang J. Z., Brinkert K., Fontecilla-Camps J. C., Rutherford A. W., Reisner E.. Wiring of Photosystem II to Hydrogenase for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137(26):8541–8549. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b03737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Zhang J. Z., Sokol K. P., Paul N., Romero E., van Grondelle R., Reisner E.. Competing Charge Transfer Pathways at the Photosystem II-Electrode Interface. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2016;12(12):1046–1052. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Zhang J. Z., Bombelli P., Sokol K. P., Fantuzzi A., Rutherford A. W., Howe C. J., Reisner E.. Photoelectrochemistry of Photosystem II in Vitro vs in Vivo . J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140(1):6–9. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b08563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Sokol K. P., Robinson W. E., Warnan J., Kornienko N., Nowaczyk M. M., Ruff A., Zhang J. Z., Reisner E.. Bias-Free Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting with Photosystem II on a Dye-Sensitized Photoanode Wired to Hydrogenase. Nat. Energy. 2018;3(11):944–951. doi: 10.1038/s41560-018-0232-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  93. Fang X., Sokol K. P., Heidary N., Kandiel T. A., Zhang J. Z., Reisner E.. Structure-Activity Relationships of Hierarchical Three-Dimensional Electrodes with Photosystem II for Semiartificial Photosynthesis. Nano Lett. 2019;19(3):1844–1850. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Baikie T. K., Wey L. T., Lawrence J. M., Medipally H., Reisner E., Nowaczyk M. M., Friend R. H., Howe C. J., Schnedermann C., Rao A., Zhang J. Z.. Photosynthesis Re-Wired on the Pico-Second Timescale. Nature. 2023;615(7954):836–840. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05763-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Cai B., Pavliuk M. V., Berggren G., Tian H.. Bio-Hybrid Photoelectrochemical Catalysis for Solar Fuels and Chemicals Conversion. Nat. Commun. 2025;16(1):9131. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-64931-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Zhi T., Fu T., Zhan H., Zhou R., Yang M., Gao C., Wang P., Zhan S., Zhou Q.. Photosynthetic Biohybrid Systems: A Promising Approach for Energy and Environmental Applications. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025;59(31):16090–16111. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5c04721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Ye J., Gu W., Hu J., Chen L., Yang C., Gao J., Zhou S.. Toward Next-Generation Semiartificial Photosynthesis: Multidisciplinary Engineering of Biohybrid Systems. Chem. Rev. 2025;125:12198. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c00658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Stripp S. T., Duffus B. R., Fourmond V., Léger C., Leimkühler S., Hirota S., Hu Y., Jasniewski A., Ogata H., Ribbe M. W.. Second and Outer Coordination Sphere Effects in Nitrogenase, Hydrogenase, Formate Dehydrogenase, and CO Dehydrogenase. Chem. Rev. 2022;122(14):11900–11973. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Rouf S., Greish Y. E., Van der Bruggen B., Al Zuhair S.. CO2 Hydrogenation to Formate by Immobilized Formate Dehydrogenase: Challenges and Opportunities. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2025;142:1067–1074. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.12.492. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  100. Zheng Y., Qi C., Qiao Y., Liu K., Wang Y., Jiang W., Jiang Y., Xin F., Guo F., Zhang W., Jiang M.. From Formate Oxidation to CO2 Reduction: The Role of Formate Dehydrogenase in Sustainable Carbon Utilization. Biotechnol. Adv. 2025;82:108600. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2025.108600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Moon M., Park G. W., Lee J., Lee J.-S., Min K.. Recent Progress in Formate Dehydrogenase (FDH) as a Non-Photosynthetic CO2 Utilizing Enzyme: A Short Review. J. CO2 Util. 2020;42:101353. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2020.101353. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  102. Amao Y.. Formate Dehydrogenase for CO2 Utilization and Its Application. J. CO2 Util. 2018;26:623–641. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2018.06.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  103. Popov V. O., Lamzin V. S.. NAD+-Dependent Formate Dehydrogenase. Biochem. J. 1994;301(3):625–643. doi: 10.1042/bj3010625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Kato N.. [71] Formate Dehydrogenase from Methylotrophic Yeasts. Methods Enzymol. 1990;188:459–462. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(90)88073-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Vinals C., Depiereux E., Feytmans E.. Prediction of Structurally Conserved Regions of D-Specific Hydroxy Acid Dehydrogenases by Multiple Alignment with Formate Dehydrogenase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1993;192(1):182–188. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1993.1398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Dong G., Ryde U.. Reaction Mechanism of Formate Dehydrogenase Studied by Computational Methods. JBIC J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2018;23(8):1243–1254. doi: 10.1007/s00775-018-1608-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Nielsen C. F., Lange L., Meyer A. S.. Classification and Enzyme Kinetics of Formate Dehydrogenases for Biomanufacturing via CO2 Utilization. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019;37(7):107408. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Xie N., Zhang L., Gao W., Huang C., Huber P. E., Zhou X., Li C., Shen G., Zou B.. NAD+ Metabolism: Pathophysiologic Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020;5(1):227. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-00311-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Lin H.. Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide: Beyond a Redox Coenzyme. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007;5(16):2541–2554. doi: 10.1039/b706887e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Wilson D. F., Erecińska M., Dutton P. L.. Thermodynamic Relationships in Mitochondrial Oxidative Phosphorylation. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 1974;3:203–230. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.03.060174.001223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Matsui T., Kitagawa Y., Okumura M., Shigeta Y.. Accurate Standard Hydrogen Electrode Potential and Applications to the Redox Potentials of Vitamin C and NAD/NADH. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2015;119(2):369–376. doi: 10.1021/jp508308y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Rusching U., Müller U., Willnow P., Höpner T.. CO2 Reduction to Formate by NADH Catalysed by Formate Dehydrogenase from Pseudomonas Oxalaticus . Eur. J. Biochem. 1976;70(2):325–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1976.tb11021.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Thauer R. K., Jungermann K., Decker K.. Energy Conservation in Chemotrophic Anaerobic Bacteria. Bacteriol. Rev. 1977;41(1):100–180. doi: 10.1128/br.41.1.100-180.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Villa R., Nieto S., Donaire A., Lozano P.. Direct Biocatalytic Processes for CO2 Capture as a Green Tool to Produce Value-Added Chemicals. Molecules. 2023;28(14):5520. doi: 10.3390/molecules28145520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Schütte H., Flossdorf J., Sahm H., Kula M.-R.. Purification and Properties of Formaldehyde Dehydrogenase and Formate Dehydrogenase from Candida Boidinii . Eur. J. Biochem. 1976;62(1):151–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1976.tb10108.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Labrou N. E., Rigden D. J.. Active-Site Characterization of Candida Boidinii Formate Dehydrogenase. Biochem. J. 2001;354(2):455–463. doi: 10.1042/bj3540455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Guo Q., Gakhar L., Wickersham K., Francis K., Vardi-Kilshtain A., Major D. T., Cheatum C. M., Kohen A.. Structural and Kinetic Studies of Formate Dehydrogenase from Candida Boidinii . Biochemistry. 2016;55(19):2760–2771. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Peters J., Zelinski T., Minuth T., Kula M.-R.. Synthetic Applications of the Carbonyl Reductases Isolated from Candida Parapsilosis and Rhodococcus Erythropolis . Tetrahedron Asymmetry. 1993;4(7):1683–1692. doi: 10.1016/S0957-4166(00)80376-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  119. Stillger T., Bönitz M., Villela Filho M., Liese A.. Überwindung von Thermodynamischen Limitierungen in Substratgekoppelten Cofaktorregenerierungsverfahren. Chem. Ing. Technol. 2002;74(7):1035–1039. doi: 10.1002/1522-2640(200207)74:7<1035::AID-CITE1035>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  120. Tishkov V. I., Popov V. O.. Protein Engineering of Formate Dehydrogenase. Biomol. Eng. 2006;23(2):89–110. doi: 10.1016/j.bioeng.2006.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Lee Y. S., Gerulskis R., Minteer S. D.. Advances in Electrochemical Cofactor Regeneration: Enzymatic and Non-Enzymatic Approaches. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2022;73:14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2021.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Maier A., Mguni L. M., Ngo A. C. R., Tischler D.. Formate Dehydrogenase: Recent Developments for NADH and NADPH Recycling in Biocatalysis. ChemCatChem. 2024;16(21):e202401021. doi: 10.1002/cctc.202401021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  123. Alpdaǧtaş S., Turunen O., Valjakka J., Binay B.. The Challenges of Using NAD+-Dependent Formate Dehydrogenases for CO2 Conversion. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2022;42(6):953–972. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2021.1981820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Fröhlich P., Albert K., Bertau M.. Formate Dehydrogenase - a Biocatalyst with Novel Applications in Organic Chemistry. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011;9(22):7941–7950. doi: 10.1039/c1ob06064c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Hille R.. Molybdenum and Tungsten in Biology. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2002;27(7):360–367. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0004(02)02107-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Grimaldi S., Schoepp-Cothenet B., Ceccaldi P., Guigliarelli B., Magalon A.. The Prokaryotic Mo/W-BisPGD Enzymes Family: A Catalytic Workhorse in Bioenergetic. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA - Bioenerg. 2013;1827(8):1048–1085. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Wells M., Kim M., Akob D. M., Basu P., Stolz J. F.. Impact of the Dimethyl Sulfoxide Reductase Superfamily on the Evolution of Biogeochemical Cycles. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023;11(2):e04145-2. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04145-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. de Bok F. A. M., Hagedoorn P.-L., Silva P. J., Hagen W. R., Schiltz E., Fritsche K., Stams A. J. M.. Two W-Containing Formate Dehydrogenases (CO2-Reductases) Involved in Syntrophic Propionate Oxidation by Syntrophobacter Fumaroxidans . Eur. J. Biochem. 2003;270(11):2476–2485. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03619.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Hartmann T., Leimkühler S.. The Oxygen-Tolerant and NAD+-Dependent Formate Dehydrogenase from Rhodobacter Capsulatus Is Able to Catalyze the Reduction of CO2 to Formate. FEBS J. 2013;280(23):6083–6096. doi: 10.1111/febs.12528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Niks D., Duvvuru J., Escalona M., Hille R.. Spectroscopic and Kinetic Properties of the Molybdenum-Containing, NAD+-Dependent Formate Dehydrogenase from Ralstonia Eutropha . J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291(3):1162–1174. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.688457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Schuchmann K., Müller V.. Direct and Reversible Hydrogenation of CO2 to Formate by a Bacterial Carbon Dioxide Reductase. Science. 2013;342(6164):1382–1385. doi: 10.1126/science.1244758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Jormakka M., Törnroth S., Byrne B., Iwata S.. Molecular Basis of Proton Motive Force Generation: Structure of Formate Dehydrogenase-N. Science. 2002;295(5561):1863–1868. doi: 10.1126/science.1068186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Costa C., Teixeira M., LeGall J., Moura J. J. G., Moura I.. Formate Dehydrogenase from Desulfovibrio Desulfuricans ATCC 27774: Isolation and Spectroscopic Characterization of the Active Sites (Heme, Iron-Sulfur Centers and Molybdenum) JBIC J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 1997;2(2):198–208. doi: 10.1007/s007750050125. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  134. Buswell A. M., Sollo F. W. Jr. The Mechanism of the Methane Fermentation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1948;70(5):1778–1780. doi: 10.1021/ja01185a034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Carpenter S., Beck J.. Fermentation Chemistry: A Study Abroad Course. J. Chem. Educ. 2020;97(3):873–877. doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00740. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  136. Hughes E. R., Winter M. G., Duerkop B. A., Spiga L., Carvalho T. F. de, Zhu W., Gillis C. C., Büttner L., Smoot M. P., Behrendt C. L., Cherry S., Santos R. L., Hooper L. V., Winter S. E.. Microbial Respiration and Formate Oxidation as Metabolic Signatures of Inflammation-Associated Dysbiosis. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;21(2):208–219. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Igamberdiev A. U., Bykova N. V., Kleczkowski L. A.. Origins and Metabolism of Formate in Higher Plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 1999;37(7):503–513. doi: 10.1016/S0981-9428(00)80102-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  138. Lyu Z., Shao N., Akinyemi T., Whitman W. B.. Methanogenesis. Curr. Biol. 2018;28(13):R727–R732. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Zeikus J. G.. The Biology of Methanogenic Bacteria. Bacteriol. Rev. 1977;41(2):514–541. doi: 10.1128/br.41.2.514-541.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Ragsdale S. W.. Enzymology of the Wood-Ljungdahl Pathway of Acetogenesis. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 2008;1125(1):129–136. doi: 10.1196/annals.1419.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Ragsdale S. W., Pierce E.. Acetogenesis and the Wood-Ljungdahl Pathway of CO2 Fixation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA - Proteins Proteomics. 2008;1784(12):1873–1898. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2008.08.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Verdin E.. NAD+ in Aging, Metabolism, and Neurodegeneration. Science. 2015;350(6265):1208–1213. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Migaud M. E., Ziegler M., Baur J. A.. Regulation of and Challenges in Targeting NAD+ Metabolism. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2024;25(10):822–840. doi: 10.1038/s41580-024-00752-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Pereira I. A. C., Ramos A. R., Grein F., Marques M. C., Da Silva S. M., Venceslau S. S.. A Comparative Genomic Analysis of Energy Metabolism in Sulfate Reducing Bacteria and Archaea. Front. Microbiol. 2011;2:1–22. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Stams A. J. M., Plugge C. M.. Electron Transfer in Syntrophic Communities of Anaerobic Bacteria and Archaea. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009;7(8):568–577. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Ward, B. Bacterial Energy Metabolism. Molecular Medical Microbiology; Academic Press, 2015; pp 201–233. 10.1016/B978-0-12-397169-2.00011-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  147. Himo F., Eriksson L. A.. Catalytic Mechanism of Pyruvate Formate-Lyase (PFL). A Theoretical Study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998;120(44):11449–11455. doi: 10.1021/ja9820947. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  148. Pietrocola F., Galluzzi L., Bravo-San Pedro J. M., Madeo F., Kroemer G.. Acetyl Coenzyme A: A Central Metabolite and Second Messenger. Cell Metab. 2015;21(6):805–821. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. McDowall J. S., Murphy B. J., Haumann M., Palmer T., Armstrong F. A., Sargent F.. Bacterial Formate Hydrogenlyase Complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014;111(38):E3948-E3956. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1407927111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Steinhilper R., Höff G., Heider J., Murphy B. J.. Structure of the Membrane-Bound Formate Hydrogenlyase Complex from Escherichia Coli . Nat. Commun. 2022;13(1):5395. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32831-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Sokol K. P., Robinson W. E., Oliveira A. R., Zacarias S., Lee C.-Y., Madden C., Bassegoda A., Hirst J., Pereira I. A. C., Reisner E.. Reversible and Selective Interconversion of Hydrogen and Carbon Dioxide into Formate by a Semiartificial Formate Hydrogenlyase Mimic. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141(44):17498–17502. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b09575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. da Silva S. M., Voordouw J., Leitão C., Martins M., Voordouw G., Pereira I. A. C.. Function of Formate Dehydrogenases in Desulfovibrio Vulgaris Hildenborough Energy Metabolism. Microbiology. 2013;159(8):1760–1769. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.067868-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Jormakka M., Byrne B., Iwata S.. Protonmotive Force Generation by a Redox Loop Mechanism. FEBS Lett. 2003;545(1):25–30. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)00389-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Bentley R., Meganathan R.. Biosynthesis of Vitamin K (Menaquinone) in Bacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 1982;46(3):241–280. doi: 10.1128/mr.46.3.241-280.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. da Silva S. M., Pacheco I., Pereira I. A. C.. Electron Transfer between Periplasmic Formate Dehydrogenase and Cytochromes c in Desulfovibrio Desulfuricans ATCC 27774. JBIC J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2012;17(5):831–838. doi: 10.1007/s00775-012-0900-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Venceslau S. S., Lino R. R., Pereira I. A. C.. The Qrc Membrane Complex, Related to the Alternative Complex III, Is a Menaquinone Reductase Involved in Sulfate Respiration. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285(30):22774–22783. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.124305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Bertini I., Cavallaro G., Rosato A.. Cytochrome c: Occurrence and Functions. Chem. Rev. 2006;106(1):90–115. doi: 10.1021/cr050241v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Poulos T. L.. Heme Enzyme Structure and Function. Chem. Rev. 2014;114(7):3919–3962. doi: 10.1021/cr400415k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Baddiley J., Michelson A. M., Todd A. R.. Synthesis of Adenosine Triphosphate. Nature. 1948;161(4098):761–762. doi: 10.1038/161761a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Wood G. E., Haydock A. K., Leigh J. A.. Function and Regulation of the Formate Dehydrogenase Genes of the Methanogenic Archaeon Methanococcus Maripaludis . J. Bacteriol. 2003;185(8):2548–2554. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.8.2548-2554.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Thauer R. K., Kaster A.-K., Seedorf H., Buckel W., Hedderich R.. Methanogenic Archaea: Ecologically Relevant Differences in Energy Conservation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008;6(8):579–591. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Costa K. C., Wong P. M., Wang T., Lie T. J., Dodsworth J. A., Swanson I., Burn J. A., Hackett M., Leigh J. A.. Protein Complexing in a Methanogen Suggests Electron Bifurcation and Electron Delivery from Formate to Heterodisulfide Reductase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010;107(24):11050–11055. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003653107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Watanabe T., Pfeil-Gardiner O., Kahnt J., Koch J., Shima S., Murphy B. J.. Three-Megadalton Complex of Methanogenic Electron-Bifurcating and CO2-Fixing Enzymes. Science. 2021;373(6559):1151–1156. doi: 10.1126/science.abg5550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Greening C., Ahmed F. H., Mohamed A. E., Lee B. M., Pandey G., Warden A. C., Scott C., Oakeshott J. G., Taylor M. C., Jackson C. J.. Physiology, Biochemistry, and Applications of F420- and Fo-Dependent Redox Reactions. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2016;80(2):451–493. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00070-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Wagner T., Koch J., Ermler U., Shima S.. Methanogenic Heterodisulfide Reductase (HdrABC-MvhAGD) Uses Two Noncubane [4Fe-4S] Clusters for Reduction. Science. 2017;357(6352):699–703. doi: 10.1126/science.aan0425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Balch W. E., Wolfe R. S.. Specificity and Biological Distribution of Coenzyme M (2-Mercaptoethanesulfonic Acid) J. Bacteriol. 1979;137(1):256–263. doi: 10.1128/jb.137.1.256-263.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Noll K. M., Rinehart K. L., Tanner R. S., Wolfe R. S.. Structure of Component B (7-Mercaptoheptanoylthreonine Phosphate) of the Methylcoenzyme M Methylreductase System of Methanobacterium Thermoautotrophicum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1986;83(12):4238–4242. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.12.4238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Schuchmann K., Müller V.. Autotrophy at the Thermodynamic Limit of Life: A Model for Energy Conservation in Acetogenic Bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2014;12(12):809–821. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Debabov V. G.. Acetogens: Biochemistry, Bioenergetics, Genetics, and Biotechnological Potential. Microbiology. 2021;90(3):273–297. doi: 10.1134/S0026261721030024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  170. Ljungdahl L. G., Wood H. G.. Total Synthesis of Acetate from CO2 by Heterotrophic Bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1969;23(1):515–538. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.23.100169.002503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Ljungdhal L. G.. The Autotrophic Pathway of Acetate Synthesis in Acetogenic Bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1986;40(1):415–450. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.40.100186.002215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Ljungdahl L. G.. A Life with Acetogens, Thermophiles, and Cellulolytic Anaerobes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2009;63(1):1–25. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.091208.073617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Abdul Halim M. F., Fonseca D. R., Niehaus T. D., Costa K. C.. Functionally Redundant Formate Dehydrogenases Enable Formate-Dependent Growth in Methanococcus Maripaludis . J. Biol. Chem. 2024;300(1):105550. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Laukel M., Chistoserdova L., Lidstrom M. E., Vorholt J. A.. The Tungsten-Containing Formate Dehydrogenase from Methylobacterium Extorquens AM1: Purification and Properties. Eur. J. Biochem. 2003;270(2):325–333. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03391.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Yu X., Niks D., Mulchandani A., Hille R.. Efficient Reduction of CO2 by the Molybdenum-Containing Formate Dehydrogenase from Cupriavidus Necator (Ralstonia Eutropha) J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292(41):16872–16879. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.785576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Hille R., Hall J., Basu P.. The Mononuclear Molybdenum Enzymes. Chem. Rev. 2014;114(7):3963–4038. doi: 10.1021/cr400443z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Duarte A. G., Catarino T., White G. F., Lousa D., Neukirchen S., Soares C. M., Sousa F. L., Clarke T. A., Pereira I. A. C.. An Electrogenic Redox Loop in Sulfate Reduction Reveals a Likely Widespread Mechanism of Energy Conservation. Nat. Commun. 2018;9(1):5448. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07839-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Sebban C., Blanchard L., Bruschi M., Guerlesquin F.. Purification and Characterization of the Formate Dehydrogenase from Desulfovibrio Vulgaris Hildenborough. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1995;133(1–2):143–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1995.tb07875.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Dobbs A. J., Anderson B. F., Faber H. R., Baker E. N.. Three-Dimensional Structure of Cytochrome c’ from Two Alcaligenes Species and the Implications for Four-Helix Bundle Structures. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 1996;52(2):356–368. doi: 10.1107/S0907444995008328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Saridakis E., Giastas P., Efthymiou G., Thoma V., Moulis J.-M., Kyritsis P., Mavridis I. M.. Insight into the Protein and Solvent Contributions to the Reduction Potentials of [4Fe-4S]2+/+ Clusters: Crystal Structures of the Allochromatium Vinosum Ferredoxin Variants C57A and V13G and the Homologous Escherichia Coli Ferredoxin. JBIC J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2009;14(5):783–799. doi: 10.1007/s00775-009-0492-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Durley R. C. E., Mathews F. S.. Refinement and Structural Analysis of Bovine Cytochrome b5 at 1.5 Å Resolution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 1996;52(1):65–76. doi: 10.1107/S0907444995007827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Schwarz F. M., Schuchmann K., Müller V.. Hydrogenation of CO2 at Ambient Pressure Catalyzed by a Highly Active Thermostable Biocatalyst. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 2018;11(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s13068-018-1236-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Radon C., Mittelstädt G., Duffus B. R., Bürger J., Hartmann T., Mielke T., Teutloff C., Leimkühler S., Wendler P.. Cryo-EM Structures Reveal Intricate Fe-S Cluster Arrangement and Charging in Rhodobacter Capsulatus Formate Dehydrogenase. Nat. Commun. 2020;11(1):1912. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15614-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Holm R. H., Lo W.. Structural Conversions of Synthetic and Protein-Bound Iron-Sulfur Clusters. Chem. Rev. 2016;116(22):13685–13713. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Bruice T. C.. Mechanisms of Flavin Catalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 1980;13(8):256–262. doi: 10.1021/ar50152a002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  186. Walsh C.. Flavin Coenzymes: At the Crossroads of Biological Redox Chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 1980;13(5):148–155. doi: 10.1021/ar50149a004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  187. Axley M. J., Grahame D. A., Stadtman T. C.. Escherichia Coli Formate-Hydrogen Lyase. Purification and Properties of the Selenium-Dependent Formate Dehydrogenase Component. J. Biol. Chem. 1990;265(30):18213–18218. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)44740-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Pommier J., Mandrand M. A., Holt S. E., Boxer D. H., Giordano G.. A Second Phenazine Methosulphate-Linked Formate Dehydrogenase Isoenzyme in Escherichia Coli . Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA - Biomembr. 1992;1107(2):305–313. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(92)90417-K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Sawers G., Heider J., Zehelein E., Böck A.. Expression and Operon Structure of the Sel Genes of Escherichia Coli and Identification of a Third Selenium-Containing Formate Dehydrogenase Isoenzyme. J. Bacteriol. 1991;173(16):4983–4993. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.16.4983-4993.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Raaijmakers H., Macieira S., Dias J. M., Teixeira S., Bursakov S., Huber R., Moura J. J. G., Moura I., Romão M. J.. Gene Sequence and the 1.8 Å Crystal Structure of the Tungsten-Containing Formate Dehydrogenase from Desulfovibrio Gigas . Structure. 2002;10(9):1261–1272. doi: 10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00826-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Almendra M. J., Brondino C. D., Gavel O., Pereira A. S., Tavares P., Bursakov S., Duarte R., Caldeira J., Moura J. J. G., Moura I.. Purification and Characterization of a Tungsten-Containing Formate Dehydrogenase from Desulfovibrio Gigas . Biochemistry. 1999;38(49):16366–16372. doi: 10.1021/bi990069n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. da Silva S. M., Pimentel C., Valente F. M. A., Rodrigues-Pousada C., Pereira I. A. C.. Tungsten and Molybdenum Regulation of Formate Dehydrogenase Expression in Desulfovibrio Vulgaris Hildenborough. J. Bacteriol. 2011;193(12):2909–2916. doi: 10.1128/JB.00042-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Graham J. E., Niks D., Zane G. M., Gui Q., Hom K., Hille R., Wall J. D., Raman C. S.. How a Formate Dehydrogenase Responds to Oxygen: Unexpected O2 Insensitivity of an Enzyme Harboring Tungstopterin, Selenocysteine, and [4Fe-4S] Clusters. ACS Catal. 2022;12(16):10449–10471. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.2c00316. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  194. Liu W., Zhang P., Wang X., Zhang K., Yang W., Cui H., Liu J., Sun J., You C., Cui H., Zhu Z., Zhang L.. An Interfacial-Intramolecular Electron Highway for Accelerated Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction by an O2-Tolerant Formate Dehydrogenase. Nat. Commun. 2026;17(1):3370. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-69827-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  195. Broc M., Cherrier M. V., Uzel A., Arias-Cartin R., Arnoux P., Brasseur G., Seduk F., Guigliarelli B., Legrand P., Pierrel F., Schoehn G., Maté M. J., Martin L., Grimaldi S., Nicolet Y., Magalon A., Walburger A.. A Scaffold for Quinone Channeling between Membrane and Soluble Bacterial Oxidoreductases. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2025;32(11):2196–2202. doi: 10.1038/s41594-025-01607-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  196. Birkmann A., Bock A.. Characterization of a Cis Regulatory DNA Element Necessary for Formate Induction of the Formate Dehydrogenase Gene (fdhF) of Escherichia Coli . Mol. Microbiol. 1989;3(2):187–195. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1989.tb01807.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. Hirst J.. Mitochondrial Complex I. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2013;82(1):551–575. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-070511-103700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  198. Lenaz G., Fato R., Genova M. L., Bergamini C., Bianchi C., Biondi A.. Mitochondrial Complex I: Structural and Functional Aspects. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA - Bioenerg. 2006;1757(9):1406–1420. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  199. Hakobyan M., Sargsyan H., Bagramyan K.. Proton Translocation Coupled to Formate Oxidation in Anaerobically Grown Fermenting Escherichia Coli . Biophys. Chem. 2005;115(1):55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2005.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  200. Punginelli C., Ize B., Stanley N. R., Stewart V., Sawers G., Berks B. C., Palmer T.. mRNA Secondary Structure Modulates Translation of Tat-Dependent Formate Dehydrogenase N. J. Bacteriol. 2004;186(18):6311–6315. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.18.6311-6315.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  201. Simon J., Klotz M. G.. Diversity and Evolution of Bioenergetic Systems Involved in Microbial Nitrogen Compound Transformations. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA - Bioenerg. 2013;1827(2):114–135. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  202. Graham A., Tucker A. D., Smith N. H.. The Formate-Nitrate Respiratory Chain of E. Coli: Localisation of Proteins by Immunoadsorption Studies. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1981;11(2):141–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1981.tb06952.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  203. Berg B. L., Stewart V.. Structural Genes for Nitrate-Inducible Formate Dehydrogenase in Escherichia Coli K-12. Genetics. 1990;125(4):691–702. doi: 10.1093/genetics/125.4.691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Campbell W. H.. NITRATE REDUCTASE STRUCTURE, FUNCTION AND REGULATION: Bridging the Gap between Biochemistry and Physiology. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 1999;50(1):277–303. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  205. Sparacino-Watkins C., Stolz J. F., Basu P.. Nitrate and Periplasmic Nitrate Reductases. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014;43(2):676–706. doi: 10.1039/C3CS60249D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  206. Abaibou H., Pommier J., Benoit S., Giordano G., Mandrand-Berthelot M. A.. Expression and Characterization of the Escherichia Coli Fdo Locus and a Possible Physiological Role for Aerobic Formate Dehydrogenase. J. Bacteriol. 1995;177(24):7141–7149. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.24.7141-7149.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  207. Heidelberg J. F., Seshadri R., Haveman S. A., Hemme C. L., Paulsen I. T., Kolonay J. F., Eisen J. A., Ward N., Methe B., Brinkac L. M., Daugherty S. C., Deboy R. T., Dodson R. J., Durkin A. S., Madupu R., Nelson W. C., Sullivan S. A., Fouts D., Haft D. H., Selengut J., Peterson J. D., Davidsen T. M., Zafar N., Zhou L., Radune D., Dimitrov G., Hance M., Tran K., Khouri H., Gill J., Utterback T. R., Feldblyum T. V., Wall J. D., Voordouw G., Fraser C. M.. The Genome Sequence of the Anaerobic, Sulfate-Reducing Bacterium Desulfovibrio Vulgaris Hildenborough. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004;22(5):554–559. doi: 10.1038/nbt959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  208. Waite D. W., Chuvochina M., Pelikan C., Parks D. H., Yilmaz P., Wagner M., Loy A., Naganuma T., Nakai R., Whitman W. B., Hahn M. W., Kuever J., Hugenholtz P.. Proposal to Reclassify the Proteobacterial Classes Deltaproteobacteria and Oligoflexia, and the Phylum Thermodesulfobacteria into Four Phyla Reflecting Major Functional Capabilities. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020;70(11):5972–6016. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  209. Park M.-J., Kim Y. J., Park M., Yu J., Namirimu T., Roh Y.-R., Kwon K. K.. Establishment of Genome Based Criteria for Classification of the Family Desulfovibrionaceae and Proposal of Two Novel Genera, Alkalidesulfovibrio Gen. Nov. and Salidesulfovibrio Gen. Nov. Front. Microbiol. 2022;13:738205. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.738205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  210. Morais-Silva F. O., Rezende A. M., Pimentel C., Santos C. I., Clemente C., Varela-Raposo A., Resende D. M., da Silva S. M., de Oliveira L. M., Matos M., Costa D. A., Flores O., Ruiz J. C., Rodrigues-Pousada C.. Genome Sequence of the Model Sulfate Reducer Desulfovibrio Gigas: A Comparative Analysis within the Desulfovibrio Genus . MicrobiologyOpen. 2014;3(4):513–530. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  211. Rabus, R. ; Venceslau, S. S. ; Wöhlbrand, L. ; Voordouw, G. ; Wall, J. D. ; Pereira, I. A. C. . Chapter Two - A Post-Genomic View of the Ecophysiology, Catabolism and Biotechnological Relevance of Sulphate-Reducing Prokaryotes. In Advances in Microbial Physiology; Poole, R. K. , Ed.; Academic Press, 2015; Vol. 66, pp 55–321. 10.1016/bs.ampbs.2015.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  212. Mukhopadhyay A., He Z., Alm E. J., Arkin A. P., Baidoo E. E., Borglin S. C., Chen W., Hazen T. C., He Q., Holman H.-Y., Huang K., Huang R., Joyner D. C., Katz N., Keller M., Oeller P., Redding A., Sun J., Wall J., Wei J., Yang Z., Yen H.-C., Zhou J., Keasling J. D.. Salt Stress in Desulfovibrio Vulgaris Hildenborough: An Integrated Genomics Approach. J. Bacteriol. 2006;188(11):4068–4078. doi: 10.1128/JB.01921-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  213. Pereira P. M., He Q., Valente F. M. A., Xavier A. V., Zhou J., Pereira I. A. C., Louro R. O.. Energy Metabolism in Desulfovibrio Vulgaris Hildenborough: Insights from Transcriptome Analysis. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2008;93(4):347–362. doi: 10.1007/s10482-007-9212-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  214. Oliveira A. R., Mota C., Vilela-Alves G., Manuel R. R., Pedrosa N., Fourmond V., Klymanska K., Léger C., Guigliarelli B., Romão M. J., Cardoso Pereira I. A.. An Allosteric Redox Switch Involved in Oxygen Protection in a CO2 Reductase. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2024;20(1):111–119. doi: 10.1038/s41589-023-01484-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  215. Martins M., Mourato C., Pereira I. A. C.. Desulfovibrio Vulgaris Growth Coupled to Formate-Driven H2 Production. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015;49(24):14655–14662. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  216. Maia L. B., Fonseca L., Moura I., Moura J. J. G.. Reduction of Carbon Dioxide by a Molybdenum-Containing Formate Dehydrogenase: A Kinetic and Mechanistic Study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138(28):8834–8846. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b03941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  217. Rivas M. G., González P. J., Brondino C. D., Moura J. J. G., Moura I.. EPR Characterization of the Molybdenum­(V) Forms of Formate Dehydrogenase from Desulfovibrio Desulfuricans ATCC 27774 upon Formate Reduction. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2007;101(11):1617–1622. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2007.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  218. Yoshikawa S., Shimada A.. Reaction Mechanism of Cytochrome c Oxidase. Chem. Rev. 2015;115(4):1936–1989. doi: 10.1021/cr500266a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  219. Park J., Heo Y., Jeon B. W., Jung M., Kim Y. H., Lee H. H., Roh S.-H.. Structure of Recombinant Formate Dehydrogenase from Methylobacterium Extorquens (MeFDH1) Sci. Rep. 2024;14(1):3819. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54205-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  220. Yoshikawa T., Makino F., Miyata T., Suzuki Y., Tanaka H., Namba K., Kano K., Sowa K., Kitazumi Y., Shirai O.. Multiple Electron Transfer Pathways of Tungsten-Containing Formate Dehydrogenase in Direct Electron Transfer-Type Bioelectrocatalysis. Chem. Commun. 2022;58(45):6478–6481. doi: 10.1039/D2CC01541B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  221. Morlino M. S., Serna García R., Savio F., Zampieri G., Morosinotto T., Treu L., Campanaro S.. Cupriavidus Necator as a Platform for Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production: An Overview of Strains, Metabolism, and Modeling Approaches. Biotechnol. Adv. 2023;69:108264. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2023.108264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  222. Jahn M., Crang N., Janasch M., Hober A., Forsström B., Kimler K., Mattausch A., Chen Q., Asplund-Samuelsson J., Hudson E. P.. Protein Allocation and Utilization in the Versatile Chemolithoautotroph Cupriavidus Necator . eLife. 2021;10:e69019. doi: 10.7554/eLife.69019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  223. Oh J.-I., Bowien B.. Structural Analysis of the Fds Operon Encoding the NAD+-Linked Formate Dehydrogenase of Ralstonia Eutropha . J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273(41):26349–26360. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.41.26349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  224. Harmer J. R., Hakopian S., Niks D., Hille R., Bernhardt P. V.. Redox Characterization of the Complex Molybdenum Enzyme Formate Dehydrogenase from Cupriavidus Necator . J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023;145(47):25850–25863. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c10199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  225. Bauer C., Buggy J., Mosley C.. Control of Photosystem Genes in Rhodobacter Capsulatus . Trends Genet. 1993;9(2):56–60. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(93)90188-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  226. IMHOFF J. F., TRÜPER H. G., PFENNIG N.. Rearrangement of the Species and Genera of the Phototrophic “Purple Nonsulfur Bacteria.”. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1984;34(3):340–343. doi: 10.1099/00207713-34-3-340. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  227. Duffus B. R., Gauglitz M., Teutloff C., Leimkühler S.. Redox Potentials Elucidate the Electron Transfer Pathway of NAD+-Dependent Formate Dehydrogenases. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2024;253:112487. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2024.112487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  228. Yu X., Niks D., Ge X., Liu H., Hille R., Mulchandani A.. Synthesis of Formate from CO2 Gas Catalyzed by an O2-Tolerant NAD-Dependent Formate Dehydrogenase and Glucose Dehydrogenase. Biochemistry. 2019;58(14):1861–1868. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b01301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  229. Arias-Cartín R., Uzel A., Seduk F., Gerbaud G., Pierrel F., Broc M., Lebrun R., Guigliarelli B., Magalon A., Grimaldi S., Walburger A.. Identification and Characterization of a Noncanonical Menaquinone-Linked Formate Dehydrogenase. J. Biol. Chem. 2022;298(2):101384. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  230. Dietrich H. M., Righetto R. D., Kumar A., Wietrzynski W., Trischler R., Schuller S. K., Wagner J., Schwarz F. M., Engel B. D., Müller V., Schuller J. M.. Membrane-Anchored HDCR Nanowires Drive Hydrogen-Powered CO2 Fixation. Nature. 2022;607(7920):823–830. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04971-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  231. Dietrich H. M., Müller V.. Ferredoxin as a Physiological Electron Donor for Carbon Dioxide Fixation to Formate in a Bacterial Carbon Dioxide Reductase. ACS Catal. 2023;13(18):12374–12382. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.3c02753. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  232. Wagner T., Ermler U., Shima S.. The Methanogenic CO2 Reducing-and-Fixing Enzyme Is Bifunctional and Contains 46 [4Fe-4S] Clusters. Science. 2016;354(6308):114–117. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf9284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  233. Bertram P. A., Karrasch M., Schmitz R. A., Böcher R., Albracht S. P. J., Thauer R. K.. Formylmethanofuran Dehydrogenases from Methanogenic Archaea Substrate Specificity, EPR Properties and Reversible Inactivation by Cyanide of the Molybdenum or Tungsten Iron-Sulfur Proteins. Eur. J. Biochem. 1994;220(2):477–484. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb18646.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  234. Moody E. R. R., Álvarez-Carretero S., Mahendrarajah T. A., Clark J. W., Betts H. C., Dombrowski N., Szánthó L. L., Boyle R. A., Daines S., Chen X., Lane N., Yang Z., Shields G. A., Szöllösi G. J., Spang A., Pisani D., Williams T. A., Lenton T. M., Donoghue P. C. J.. The Nature of the Last Universal Common Ancestor and Its Impact on the Early Earth System. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2024;8(9):1654–1666. doi: 10.1038/s41559-024-02461-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  235. Koonin E. V.. Comparative Genomics, Minimal Gene-Sets and the Last Universal Common Ancestor. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2003;1(2):127–136. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  236. Wells M., Kanmanii N. J., Al Zadjali A. M., Janecka J. E., Basu P., Oremland R. S., Stolz J. F.. Methane, Arsenic, Selenium and the Origins of the DMSO Reductase Family. Sci. Rep. 2020;10(1):10946. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67892-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  237. Weiss M. C., Sousa F. L., Mrnjavac N., Neukirchen S., Roettger M., Nelson-Sathi S., Martin W. F.. The Physiology and Habitat of the Last Universal Common Ancestor. Nat. Microbiol. 2016;1(9):16116. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  238. Peng T., Lin J., Xu Y.-Z., Zhang Y.. Comparative Genomics Reveals New Evolutionary and Ecological Patterns of Selenium Utilization in Bacteria. ISME J. 2016;10(8):2048–2059. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  239. Oliveira A. R., Mota C., Klymanska K., Biaso F., Romão M. J., Guigliarelli B., Pereira I. C.. Spectroscopic and Structural Characterization of Reduced Desulfovibrio Vulgaris Hildenborough W-FdhAB Reveals Stable Metal Coordination during Catalysis. ACS Chem. Biol. 2022;17(7):1901–1909. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.2c00336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  240. Carmichael, R. S. Practical Handbook of Physical Properties of Rocks and Minerals; CRC Press: Boca Raton, 1989. 10.1201/9780203710968. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  241. Bodek, I. Environmental Inorganic Chemistry: Properties, Processes, and Estimation Methods; Franklin Book Company, Incorporated, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  242. Ronov, A. B. ; Yaroshevsky, A. A. . Chemical Composition of the Earth’s Crust. In The Earth’s Crust and Upper Mantle; American Geophysical Union (AGU), 1969; pp 37–57. 10.1029/GM013p0037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  243. Andreesen J. R., Makdessi K.. Tungsten, the Surprisingly Positively Acting Heavy Metal Element for Prokaryotes. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 2008;1125(1):215–229. doi: 10.1196/annals.1419.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  244. Alissandratos A., Kim H.-K., Matthews H., Hennessy J. E., Philbrook A., Easton C. J.. Clostridium Carboxidivorans Strain P7T Recombinant Formate Dehydrogenase Catalyzes Reduction of CO2 to Formate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013;79(2):741–744. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02886-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  245. Soucy S. M., Huang J., Gogarten J. P.. Horizontal Gene Transfer: Building the Web of Life. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2015;16(8):472–482. doi: 10.1038/nrg3962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  246. Johnson M. K., Rees D. C., Adams M. W. W.. Tungstoenzymes. Chem. Rev. 1996;96(7):2817–2840. doi: 10.1021/cr950063d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  247. Mota C. S., Valette O., González P. J., Brondino C. D., Moura J. J. G., Moura I., Dolla A., Rivas M. G.. Effects of Molybdate and Tungstate on Expression Levels and Biochemical Characteristics of Formate Dehydrogenases Produced by Desulfovibrio Alaskensis NCIMB 13491. J. Bacteriol. 2011;193(12):2917–2923. doi: 10.1128/JB.01531-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  248. Maia L. B., Moura I., Moura J. J. G.. Molybdenum and Tungsten-Containing Formate Dehydrogenases: Aiming to Inspire a Catalyst for Carbon Dioxide Utilization. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2017;455:350–363. doi: 10.1016/j.ica.2016.07.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  249. Niks D., Hille R.. Molybdenum- and Tungsten-Containing Formate Dehydrogenases and Formylmethanofuran Dehydrogenases: Structure, Mechanism, and Cofactor Insertion. Protein Sci. 2019;28(1):111–122. doi: 10.1002/pro.3498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  250. Meneghello M., Oliveira A. R., Jacq-Bailly A., Pereira I. A. C., Léger C., Fourmond V.. Formate Dehydrogenases Reduce CO2 Rather than HCO3 –: An Electrochemical Demonstration. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021;60(18):9964–9967. doi: 10.1002/anie.202101167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  251. Thauer R. K., Käufer B., Fuchs G.. The Active Species of ‘CO2’ Utilized by Reduced Ferredoxin: CO2 Oxidoreductase from Clostridium Pasteurianum . Eur. J. Biochem. 1975;55(1):111–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1975.tb02143.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  252. Robinson W. E., Bassegoda A., Reisner E., Hirst J.. Oxidation-State-Dependent Binding Properties of the Active Site in a Mo-Containing Formate Dehydrogenase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139(29):9927–9936. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b03958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  253. Robinson W. E., Bassegoda A., Blaza J. N., Reisner E., Hirst J.. Understanding How the Rate of C-H Bond Cleavage Affects Formate Oxidation Catalysis by a Mo-Dependent Formate Dehydrogenase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142(28):12226–12236. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c03574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  254. Khangulov S. V., Gladyshev V. N., Dismukes G. C., Stadtman T. C.. Selenium-Containing Formate Dehydrogenase H from Escherichia Coli: A Molybdopterin Enzyme That Catalyzes Formate Oxidation without Oxygen Transfer. Biochemistry. 1998;37(10):3518–3528. doi: 10.1021/bi972177k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  255. Kumar H., Khosraneh M., Bandaru S. S. M., Schulzke C., Leimkühler S.. The Mechanism of Metal-Containing Formate Dehydrogenases Revisited: The Formation of Bicarbonate as Product Intermediate Provides Evidence for an Oxygen Atom Transfer Mechanism. Molecules. 2023;28(4):1537. doi: 10.3390/molecules28041537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  256. Niks D., Hakopian S., Canchola A., Lin Y.-H., Hille R.. Mechanism of Action of Formate Dehydrogenases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024;146(42):28601–28604. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c07376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  257. Kirk, M. L. ; Kc, K. . Molybdenum and Tungsten Cofactors and the Reactions They Catalyze. In Transition Metals and Sulfur - A Strong Relationship for Life; Sosa Torres, M. , Kroneck, P. , Eds.; De Gruyter, 2020; pp 313–342. [Google Scholar]
  258. Hagedoorn P.-L., Hagen W. R., Stewart L. J., Docrat A., Bailey S., Garner C. D.. Redox Characteristics of the Tungsten DMSO Reductase of Rhodobacter Capsulatus . FEBS Lett. 2003;555(3):606–610. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)01359-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  259. Seelmann C. S., Willistein M., Heider J., Boll M.. Tungstoenzymes: Occurrence, Catalytic Diversity and Cofactor Synthesis. Inorganics. 2020;8(8):44. doi: 10.3390/inorganics8080044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  260. Gladyshev V. N., Khangulov S. V., Axley M. J., Stadtman T. C.. Coordination of Selenium to Molybdenum in Formate Dehydrogenase H from Escherichia Coli . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994;91(16):7708–7711. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.16.7708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  261. Brondino C. D., Passeggi M. C. G., Caldeira J., Almendra M. J., Feio M. J., Moura J. J. G., Moura I.. Incorporation of Either Molybdenum or Tungsten into Formate Dehydrogenase from Desulfovibrio Alaskensis NCIMB 13491; EPR Assignment of the Proximal Iron-Sulfur Cluster to the Pterin Cofactor in Formate Dehydrogenases from Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria. JBIC J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2004;9(2):145–151. doi: 10.1007/s00775-003-0506-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  262. Reich H. J., Hondal R. J.. Why Nature Chose Selenium. ACS Chem. Biol. 2016;11(4):821–841. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.6b00031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  263. Arnér E. S. J.. SelenoproteinsWhat Unique Properties Can Arise with Selenocysteine in Place of Cysteine? Exp. Cell Res. 2010;316(8):1296–1303. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.02.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  264. Marques M. C., Tapia C., Gutiérrez-Sanz O., Ramos A. R., Keller K. L., Wall J. D., De Lacey A. L., Matias P. M., Pereira I. A. C.. The Direct Role of Selenocysteine in [NiFeSe] Hydrogenase Maturation and Catalysis. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2017;13(5):544–550. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  265. Axley M. J., Böck A., Stadtman T. C.. Catalytic Properties of an Escherichia Coli Formate Dehydrogenase Mutant in Which Sulfur Replaces Selenium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1991;88(19):8450–8454. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.19.8450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  266. Wombwell C., Caputo C. A., Reisner E.. [NiFeSe]-Hydrogenase Chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015;48(11):2858–2865. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  267. Raaijmakers H. C. A., Romão M. J.. Formate-Reduced E. Coli Formate Dehydrogenase H: The Reinterpretation of the Crystal Structure Suggests a New Reaction Mechanism. JBIC J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2006;11(7):849–854. doi: 10.1007/s00775-006-0129-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  268. Arnoux P., Ruppelt C., Oudouhou F., Lavergne J., Siponen M. I., Toci R., Mendel R. R., Bittner F., Pignol D., Magalon A., Walburger A.. Sulphur Shuttling across a Chaperone during Molybdenum Cofactor Maturation. Nat. Commun. 2015;6(1):6148. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  269. Schrapers P., Hartmann T., Kositzki R., Dau H., Reschke S., Schulzke C., Leimkühler S., Haumann M.. Sulfido and Cysteine Ligation Changes at the Molybdenum Cofactor during Substrate Conversion by Formate Dehydrogenase (FDH) from Rhodobacter Capsulatus . Inorg. Chem. 2015;54(7):3260–3271. doi: 10.1021/ic502880y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  270. Thomé R., Gust A., Toci R., Mendel R., Bittner F., Magalon A., Walburger A.. A Sulfurtransferase Is Essential for Activity of Formate Dehydrogenases in Escherichia Coli . J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287(7):4671–4678. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.327122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  271. Gladyshev V. N., Boyington J. C., Khangulov S. V., Grahame D. A., Stadtman T. C., Sun P. D.. Characterization of Crystalline Formate Dehydrogenase H from Escherichia Coli . J. Biol. Chem. 1996;271(14):8095–8100. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.14.8095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  272. Lim B. S., Donahue J. P., Holm R. H.. Synthesis and Structures of Bis­(Dithiolene)Molybdenum Complexes Related to the Active Sites of the DMSO Reductase Enzyme Family. Inorg. Chem. 2000;39(2):263–273. doi: 10.1021/ic9908672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  273. Yan Y., Keating C., Chandrasekaran P., Jayarathne U., Mague J. T., DeBeer S., Lancaster K. M., Sproules S., Rubtsov I. V., Donahue J. P.. Ancillary Ligand Effects upon Dithiolene Redox Noninnocence in Tungsten Bis­(Dithiolene) Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2013;52(11):6743–6751. doi: 10.1021/ic4009174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  274. Matz K. G., Mtei R. P., Leung B., Burgmayer S. J. N., Kirk M. L.. Noninnocent Dithiolene Ligands: A New Oxomolybdenum Complex Possessing a Donor-Acceptor Dithiolene Ligand. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132(23):7830–7831. doi: 10.1021/ja100220x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  275. Matz K. G., Mtei R. P., Rothstein R., Kirk M. L., Burgmayer S. J. N.. Study of Molybdenum­(4+) Quinoxalyldithiolenes as Models for the Noninnocent Pyranopterin in the Molybdenum Cofactor. Inorg. Chem. 2011;50(20):9804–9815. doi: 10.1021/ic200783a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  276. Adamson H., Simonov A. N., Kierzek M., Rothery R. A., Weiner J. H., Bond A. M., Parkin A.. Electrochemical Evidence That Pyranopterin Redox Chemistry Controls the Catalysis of YedY, a Mononuclear Mo Enzyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015;112(47):14506–14511. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1516869112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  277. Rothery R. A., Stein B., Solomonson M., Kirk M. L., Weiner J. H.. Pyranopterin Conformation Defines the Function of Molybdenum and Tungsten Enzymes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012;109(37):14773–14778. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200671109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  278. Basu P., Burgmayer S. J. N.. Pterin Chemistry and Its Relationship to the Molybdenum Cofactor. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011;255(9):1016–1038. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  279. Raghavan R., Dryhurst G.. Redox Chemistry of Reduced Pterin Species. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 1981;129(1):189–212. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0728(81)80014-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  280. Vilela-Alves G., Manuel R. R., Oliveira A. R., Pereira I. C., Romão M. J., Mota C.. Tracking W-Formate Dehydrogenase Structural Changes During Catalysis and Enzyme Reoxidation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24(1):476. doi: 10.3390/ijms24010476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  281. Vilela-Alves G., Manuel R. R., Viegas A., Carpentier P., Biaso F., Guigliarelli B., Pereira I. A. C., Romão M. J., Mota C.. Substrate-Dependent Oxidative Inactivation of a W-Dependent Formate Dehydrogenase Involving Selenocysteine Displacement. Chem. Sci. 2024;15(32):13090–13101. doi: 10.1039/D4SC02394C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  282. Vilela-Alves G., Rebelo Manuel R., Pedrosa N., Cardoso Pereira I. A., Romão M. J., Mota C.. Structural and Biochemical Characterization of the M405S Variant of Desulfovibrio Vulgaris Formate Dehydrogenase. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. F Struct. Biol. Commun. 2024;80(5):98–106. doi: 10.1107/S2053230X24003911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  283. Laun K., Duffus B. R., Wahlefeld S., Katz S., Belger D., Hildebrandt P., Mroginski M. A., Leimkühler S., Zebger I.. Infrared Spectroscopy Elucidates the Inhibitor Binding Sites in a Metal-Dependent Formate Dehydrogenase. Chem. - Eur. J. 2022;28(54):e202201091. doi: 10.1002/chem.202201091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  284. Oliveira A. R., Vilela-Alves G., Mota C., Léger C., Fourmond V., Biaso F., Guigliarelli B., Romão M. J., Pereira I. A. C.. The Role of Selenocysteine in Catalysis and Oxygen Tolerance of a W-Dependent Formate Dehydrogenase. ACS Catal. 2025;15(15):12627–12639. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5c02382. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  285. Cerqueira N. M. F. S. A., Fernandes P. A., Gonzalez P. J., Moura J. J. G., Ramos M. J.. The Sulfur Shift: An Activation Mechanism for Periplasmic Nitrate Reductase and Formate Dehydrogenase. Inorg. Chem. 2013;52(19):10766–10772. doi: 10.1021/ic3028034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  286. Mota C. S., Rivas M. G., Brondino C. D., Moura I., Moura J. J. G., González P. J., Cerqueira N. M. F. S. A.. The Mechanism of Formate Oxidation by Metal-Dependent Formate Dehydrogenases. JBIC J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2011;16(8):1255–1268. doi: 10.1007/s00775-011-0813-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  287. Siegbahn P. E. M.. Energetics for CO2 Reduction by Molybdenum-Containing Formate Dehydrogenase. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2022;126(8):1728–1733. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c00151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  288. Duffus B. R., Schrapers P., Schuth N., Mebs S., Dau H., Leimkühler S., Haumann M.. Anion Binding and Oxidative Modification at the Molybdenum Cofactor of Formate Dehydrogenase from Rhodobacter Capsulatus Studied by X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy. Inorg. Chem. 2020;59(1):214–225. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b01613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  289. Yang J. Y., Kerr T. A., Wang X. S., Barlow J. M.. Reducing CO2 to HCO2 – at Mild Potentials: Lessons from Formate Dehydrogenase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142(46):19438–19445. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c07965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  290. George G. N., Colangelo C. M., Dong J., Scott R. A., Khangulov S. V., Gladyshev V. N., Stadtman T. C.. X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy of the Molybdenum Site of Escherichia Coli Formate Dehydrogenase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998;120(6):1267–1273. doi: 10.1021/ja973004l. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  291. George G. N., Costa C., Moura J. J. G., Moura I.. Observation of Ligand-Based Redox Chemistry at the Active Site of a Molybdenum Enzyme. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121(11):2625–2626. doi: 10.1021/ja9841761. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  292. Meneghello M., Uzel A., Broc M., Manuel R. R., Magalon A., Léger C., Pereira I. A. C., Walburger A., Fourmond V.. Electrochemical Kinetics Support a Second Coordination Sphere Mechanism in Metal-Based Formate Dehydrogenase. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023;62(6):e202212224. doi: 10.1002/anie.202212224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  293. Jollie D. R., Lipscomb J. D.. Formate Dehydrogenase from Methylosinus Trichosporium OB3b. Purification and Spectroscopic Characterization of the Cofactors. J. Biol. Chem. 1991;266(32):21853–21863. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)54716-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  294. Schauer N. L., Ferry J. G.. Properties of Formate Dehydrogenase in Methanobacterium Formicicum . J. Bacteriol. 1982;150(1):1–7. doi: 10.1128/jb.150.1.1-7.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  295. Lamzin V. S., Dauter Z., Popov V. O., Harutyunyan E. H., Wilson K. S.. High Resolution Structures of Holo and Apo Formate Dehydrogenase. J. Mol. Biol. 1994;236(3):759–785. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  296. Egorov A. M., Avilova T. V., Dikov M. M., Popov V. O., Rodionov Y. V., Berezin I. V.. NAD-Dependent Formate Dehydrogenase from Methylotrophic Bacterium, Strain 1. Eur. J. Biochem. 1979;99(3):569–576. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1979.tb13289.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  297. Huber R. E., Criddle R. S.. Comparison of the Chemical Properties of Selenocysteine and Selenocystine with Their Sulfur Analogs. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1967;122(1):164–173. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(67)90136-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  298. Smee J. J., Goodman D. C., Reibenspies J. H., Darensbourg M. Y.. Models for Terminal Ni­(S-Cysteine) Modification in [NiFe]­Hydrogenases by Iodoacetamide and Iodoacetate. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 1999;1999(3):539–546. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0682(199903)1999:3<539::AID-EJIC539>3.0.CO;2-Y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  299. Labrou, N. E. Protein Purification Technologies. In Protein Downstream Processing: Design, Development, and Application of High and Low-Resolution Methods; Labrou, N. E. , Ed.; Springer US: New York, NY, 2021; pp 3–10. 10.1007/978-1-0716-0775-6_1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  300. Kimple M. E., Brill A. L., Pasker R. L.. Overview of Affinity Tags for Protein Purification. Curr. Protoc. Protein Sci. 2013;73:1.9.9.1–9.9.23. doi: 10.1002/0471140864.ps0909s73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  301. Urh M., Simpson D., Zhao K.. Chapter 26 Affinity Chromatography: General Methods. Methods Enzymol. 2009;463:417–438. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(09)63026-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  302. Leonhardt F., Gennari A., Paludo G. B., Schmitz C., da Silveira F. X., Moura D. C. D. A., Renard G., Volpato G., Volken de Souza C. F.. A Systematic Review about Affinity Tags for One-Step Purification and Immobilization of Recombinant Proteins: Integrated Bioprocesses Aiming Both Economic and Environmental Sustainability. 3 Biotech. 2023;13(6):186. doi: 10.1007/s13205-023-03616-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  303. Pina A. S., Lowe C. R., Roque A. C. A.. Challenges and Opportunities in the Purification of Recombinant Tagged Proteins. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014;32(2):366–381. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  304. Hakopian S., Niks D., Hille R.. The Air-Inactivation of Formate Dehydrogenase FdsDABG from Cupriavidus Necator . J. Inorg. Biochem. 2022;231:111788. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2022.111788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  305. Kuk S. K., Gopinath K., Singh R. K., Kim T.-D., Lee Y., Choi W. S., Lee J.-K., Park C. B.. NADH-Free Electroenzymatic Reduction of CO2 by Conductive Hydrogel-Conjugated Formate Dehydrogenase. ACS Catal. 2019;9(6):5584–5589. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b00127. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  306. Mota, C. de S. Characterization of Molybdenum and Tungsten Formate Dehydrogenases from Sulfate Reducing Bacteria, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10362/6688 (accessed 2026-04-08). [Google Scholar]
  307. Li F., Scheller S., Lienemann M.. Comparative Analysis of CO2 Reduction by Soluble Escherichia Coli Formate Dehydrogenase H and Its Selenocysteine-to-Cysteine Substitution Variant. J. CO2 Util. 2023;77:102608. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2023.102608. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  308. Johnson K. A., Goody R. S.. The Original Michaelis Constant: Translation of the 1913 Michaelis-Menten Paper. Biochemistry. 2011;50(39):8264–8269. doi: 10.1021/bi201284u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  309. Johnson K. A.. A Century of Enzyme Kinetic Analysis, 1913 to 2013. FEBS Lett. 2013;587(17):2753–2766. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.07.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  310. Jain S., Dietrich H. M., Müller V., Basen M.. Formate Is Required for Growth of the Thermophilic Acetogenic Bacterium Thermoanaerobacter Kivui Lacking Hydrogen-Dependent Carbon Dioxide Reductase (HDCR) Front. Microbiol. 2020;11:59. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  311. Niks, D. ; Hille, R. . Reductive Activation of CO2 by Formate Dehydrogenases. In Methods in Enzymology; Armstrong, F. , Ed.; Enzymes of Energy Technology; Academic Press, 2018; Vol. 613, pp 277–295. 10.1016/bs.mie.2018.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  312. Brouwer E.-M., Medipally H. K. R., Schwab S., Song S., Nowaczyk M. M., Hagemann M.. Characterization of the Oxygen-Tolerant Formate Dehydrogenase from Clostridium Carboxidivorans . Front. Microbiol. 2025;15:1527626. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1527626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  313. Kornienko N., Ly K. H., Robinson W. E., Heidary N., Zhang J. Z., Reisner E.. Advancing Techniques for Investigating the Enzyme-Electrode Interface. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019;52(5):1439–1448. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  314. Zhang W., Xiong C., Chen P., Fu B., Mao X.. Elucidating Energy Conversion Pathways at Biotic/Abiotic Interfaces in Microbe-Semiconductor Hybrids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147(24):20171–20188. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c02838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  315. Song W., Liu Y., Wu Y., Wang C., Liu Z., Liu Y., Zhang X., Cao L., Li B., Song B., Cao B., Yao Y., Mao X., He Q., Zou Z., Liu B.. Single-Atom Bridges across Biotic-Abiotic Interfaces Facilitate Direct Electron Transfer for Solar-to-Chemical Conversion. Nat. Commun. 2025;16(1):6708. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-62062-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  316. Léger C., Elliott S. J., Hoke K. R., Jeuken L. J. C., Jones A. K., Armstrong F. A.. Enzyme Electrokinetics: Using Protein Film Voltammetry To Investigate Redox Enzymes and Their Mechanisms. Biochemistry. 2003;42(29):8653–8662. doi: 10.1021/bi034789c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  317. Cadoux C., Milton R. D.. Recent Enzymatic Electrochemistry for Reductive Reactions. ChemElectroChem. 2020;7(9):1974–1986. doi: 10.1002/celc.202000282. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  318. Armstrong F. A., Hirst J.. Reversibility and Efficiency in Electrocatalytic Energy Conversion and Lessons from Enzymes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011;108(34):14049–14054. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103697108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  319. Castañeda-Losada L., Richter M., Léger C., Fourmond V., Plumere N.. Electroenzymatic CO2 Fixation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2026 doi: 10.1002/anie.202522125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  320. Klingler R. J., Kochi J. K.. Electron-Transfer Kinetics from Cyclic Voltammetry. Quantitative Description of Electrochemical Reversibility. J. Phys. Chem. 1981;85(12):1731–1741. doi: 10.1021/j150612a028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  321. Elgrishi N., Rountree K. J., McCarthy B. D., Rountree E. S., Eisenhart T. T., Dempsey J. L.. A Practical Beginner’s Guide to Cyclic Voltammetry. J. Chem. Educ. 2018;95(2):197–206. doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00361. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  322. Espinoza E. M., Clark J. A., Soliman J., Derr J. B., Morales M., Vullev V. I.. Practical Aspects of Cyclic Voltammetry: How to Estimate Reduction Potentials When Irreversibility Prevails. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019;166(5):H3175. doi: 10.1149/2.0241905jes. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  323. Bard, A. J. ; Faulkner, L. R. . Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  324. Miller M., Robinson W. E., Oliveira A. R., Heidary N., Kornienko N., Warnan J., Pereira I. A. C., Reisner E.. Interfacing Formate Dehydrogenase with Metal Oxides for the Reversible Electrocatalysis and Solar-Driven Reduction of Carbon Dioxide. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019;58(14):4601–4605. doi: 10.1002/anie.201814419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  325. Sokol K. P., Robinson W. E., Oliveira A. R., Warnan J., Nowaczyk M. M., Ruff A., Pereira I. A. C., Reisner E.. Photoreduction of CO2 with a Formate Dehydrogenase Driven by Photosystem II Using a Semi-Artificial Z-Scheme Architecture. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140(48):16418–16422. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b10247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  326. Liu W., Zhang K., Liu J., Wang Y., Zhang M., Cui H., Sun J., Zhang L.. Bioelectrocatalytic Carbon Dioxide Reduction by an Engineered Formate Dehydrogenase from Thermoanaerobacter Kivui . Nat. Commun. 2024;15(1):9962. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53946-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  327. Sahin S., Cai R., Milton R. D., Abdellaoui S., Macazo F. C., Minteer S. D.. Molybdenum-Dependent Formate Dehydrogenase for Formate Bioelectrocatalysis in a Formate/O2 Enzymatic Fuel Cell. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018;165(3):H109. doi: 10.1149/2.0431803jes. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  328. Sakai K., Kitazumi Y., Shirai O., Takagi K., Kano K.. High-Power Formate/Dioxygen Biofuel Cell Based on Mediated Electron Transfer Type Bioelectrocatalysis. ACS Catal. 2017;7(9):5668–5673. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b01918. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  329. Fogeron T., Todorova T. K., Porcher J.-P., Gomez-Mingot M., Chamoreau L.-M., Mellot-Draznieks C., Li Y., Fontecave M.. A Bioinspired Nickel­(Bis-Dithiolene) Complex as a Homogeneous Catalyst for Carbon Dioxide Electroreduction. ACS Catal. 2018;8(3):2030–2038. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b03383. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  330. Nichols E. M., Derrick J. S., Nistanaki S. K., Smith P. T., Chang C. J.. Positional Effects of Second-Sphere Amide Pendants on Electrochemical CO2 Reduction Catalyzed by Iron Porphyrins. Chem. Sci. 2018;9(11):2952–2960. doi: 10.1039/C7SC04682K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  331. Azcarate I., Costentin C., Robert M., Savéant J.-M.. Through-Space Charge Interaction Substituent Effects in Molecular Catalysis Leading to the Design of the Most Efficient Catalyst of CO2-to-CO Electrochemical Conversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138(51):16639–16644. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b07014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  332. Mezzavilla S., Horch S., Stephens I. E. L., Seger B., Chorkendorff I.. Structure Sensitivity in the Electrocatalytic Reduction of CO2 with Gold Catalysts. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019;58(12):3774–3778. doi: 10.1002/anie.201811422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  333. Li W., Gao Y., Sun X., Wan L., Ji H., Luo H., Tian Y., Song H., Wu G., Zhang L.. Direct Detection of a Single [4Fe-4S] Cluster in a Tungsten-Containing Enzyme: Electrochemical Conversion of CO2 into Formate by Formate Dehydrogenase. Carbon Energy. 2023;5(5):e304. doi: 10.1002/cey2.304. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  334. Paul N., Moura I., Maia L. B., Cordas C. M., Moura J. J. G.. Electroenzymatic CO2 Reduction Using Formate Dehydrogenase: Direct and Mediated Catalysis. ChemElectroChem. 2025;12(15):e202500100. doi: 10.1002/celc.202500100. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  335. Szczesny J., Ruff A., Oliveira A. R., Pita M., Pereira I. A. C., De Lacey A. L., Schuhmann W.. Electroenzymatic CO2 Fixation Using Redox Polymer/Enzyme-Modified Gas Diffusion Electrodes. ACS Energy Lett. 2020;5(1):321–327. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02436. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  336. Alvarez-Malmagro J., Oliveira A. R., Gutiérrez-Sánchez C., Villajos B., Pereira I. A. C., Vélez M., Pita M., De Lacey A. L.. Bioelectrocatalytic Activity of W-Formate Dehydrogenase Covalently Immobilized on Functionalized Gold and Graphite Electrodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2021;13(10):11891–11900. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c21932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  337. Edwardes Moore E., Andrei V., Oliveira A. R., Coito A. M., Pereira I. A. C., Reisner E.. A Semi-Artificial Photoelectrochemical Tandem Leaf with a CO2-to-Formate Efficiency Approaching 1% Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021;60(50):26303–26307. doi: 10.1002/anie.202110867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  338. Badiani V. M., Casadevall C., Miller M., Cobb S. J., Manuel R. R., Pereira I. A. C., Reisner E.. Engineering Electro- and Photocatalytic Carbon Materials for CO2 Reduction by Formate Dehydrogenase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144(31):14207–14216. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c04529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  339. Cobb S. J., Badiani V. M., Dharani A. M., Wagner A., Zacarias S., Oliveira A. R., Pereira I. A. C., Reisner E.. Fast CO2 Hydration Kinetics Impair Heterogeneous but Improve Enzymatic CO2 Reduction Catalysis. Nat. Chem. 2022;14(4):417–424. doi: 10.1038/s41557-021-00880-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  340. Edwardes Moore E., Cobb S. J., Coito A. M., Oliveira A. R., Pereira I. A. C., Reisner E.. Understanding the Local Chemical Environment of Bioelectrocatalysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2022;119(4):e2114097119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2114097119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  341. Cobb S. J., Dharani A. M., Oliveira A. R., Pereira I. A. C., Reisner E.. Carboxysome-Inspired Electrocatalysis Using Enzymes for the Reduction of CO2 at Low Concentrations. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023;62(26):e202218782. doi: 10.1002/anie.202218782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  342. Yeung C. W. S., Liu Y., Vahey D. M., Cobb S. J., Andrei V., Coito A. M., Manuel R. R., Pereira I. A. C., Reisner E.. Semi-Artificial Leaf Interfacing Organic Semiconductors and Enzymes for Solar Chemical Synthesis. Joule. 2025;9(11):102165. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2025.102165. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  343. Low B. Q. L., Rodríguez-Jiménez S., Rogolino A., Cobb S. J., Han C., Martins G., Pereira I. A. C., Reisner E.. Enzymatic Flow Electrolyzer for CO2 and Waste Comproportionation to Formate and Its Use in Photocatalytic Alkene Hydrocarboxylation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2025;64(46):e202515810. doi: 10.1002/anie.202515810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  344. Kim J., Lee S. H., Tieves F., Choi D. S., Hollmann F., Paul C. E., Park C. B.. Biocatalytic C = C Bond Reduction through Carbon Nanodot-Sensitized Regeneration of NADH Analogues. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018;57(42):13825–13828. doi: 10.1002/anie.201804409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  345. Rowe S. F., Le Gall G., Ainsworth E. V., Davies J. A., Lockwood C. W. J., Shi L., Elliston A., Roberts I. N., Waldron K. W., Richardson D. J., Clarke T. A., Jeuken L. J. C., Reisner E., Butt J. N.. Light-Driven H2 Evolution and CC or CO Bond Hydrogenation by Shewanella Oneidensis: A Versatile Strategy for Photocatalysis by Nonphotosynthetic Microorganisms. ACS Catal. 2017;7(11):7558–7566. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b02736. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  346. Singh R. K., Singh R., Sivakumar D., Kondaveeti S., Kim T., Li J., Sung B. H., Cho B.-K., Kim D. R., Kim S. C., Kalia V. C., Zhang Y.-H. P. J., Zhao H., Kang Y. C., Lee J.-K.. Insights into Cell-Free Conversion of CO2 to Chemicals by a Multienzyme Cascade Reaction. ACS Catal. 2018;8(12):11085–11093. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b02646. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  347. Liu Y., Webb S., Moreno-García P., Kulkarni A., Maroni P., Broekmann P., Milton R. D.. Facile Functionalization of Carbon Electrodes for Efficient Electroenzymatic Hydrogen Production. JACS Au. 2023;3(1):124–130. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.2c00551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  348. Reisner E., Fontecilla-Camps J. C., Armstrong F. A.. Catalytic Electrochemistry of a [NiFeSe]-Hydrogenase on TiO2 and Demonstration of Its Suitability for Visible-Light Driven H2 Production. Chem. Commun. 2009;(5):550–552. doi: 10.1039/B817371K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  349. Reisner E.. Solar Hydrogen Evolution with Hydrogenases: From Natural to Hybrid Systems. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011;2011(7):1005–1016. doi: 10.1002/ejic.201000986. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  350. Pászti Z., Keszthelyi T., Hakkel O., Guczi L.. Adsorption of Amino Acids on Hydrophilic Surfaces. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 2008;20(22):224014. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/20/22/224014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  351. Rosser T. E., Reisner E.. Understanding Immobilized Molecular Catalysts for Fuel-Forming Reactions through UV/Vis Spectroelectrochemistry. ACS Catal. 2017;7(5):3131–3141. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b00326. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  352. Muresan N. M., Willkomm J., Mersch D., Vaynzof Y., Reisner E.. Immobilization of a Molecular Cobaloxime Catalyst for Hydrogen Evolution on a Mesoporous Metal Oxide Electrode. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012;51(51):12749–12753. doi: 10.1002/anie.201207448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  353. Bouwens T., Cobb S. J., Yeung C. W. S., Liu Y., Martins G., Pereira I. A. C., Reisner E.. Semiartificial Photoelectrochemistry for CO2-Mediated Enantioselective Organic Synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147(16):13114–13119. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c02250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  354. Fang X., Kalathil S., Divitini G., Wang Q., Reisner E.. A Three-Dimensional Hybrid Electrode with Electroactive Microbes for Efficient Electrogenesis and Chemical Synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2020;117(9):5074–5080. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1913463117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  355. Wagner A., Sahm C. D., Reisner E.. Towards Molecular Understanding of Local Chemical Environment Effects in Electro- and Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Nat. Catal. 2020;3(10):775–786. doi: 10.1038/s41929-020-00512-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  356. Dalle K. E., Warnan J., Leung J. J., Reuillard B., Karmel I. S., Reisner E.. Electro- and Solar-Driven Fuel Synthesis with First Row Transition Metal Complexes. Chem. Rev. 2019;119(4):2752–2875. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  357. Good N. E., Winget G. D., Winter W., Connolly T. N., Izawa S., Singh R. M. M.. Hydrogen Ion Buffers for Biological Research*. Biochemistry. 1966;5(2):467–477. doi: 10.1021/bi00866a011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  358. Good N. E., Izawa S.. [3] Hydrogen Ion Buffers. Methods Enzymol. 1972;24:53–68. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(72)24054-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  359. Grady J. K., Chasteen N. D., Harris D. C.. Radicals from “Good’s” Buffers. Anal. Biochem. 1988;173(1):111–115. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(88)90167-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  360. Ferreira C. M. H., Pinto I. S. S., Soares E. V., Soares H. M. V. M.. (Un)­Suitability of the Use of pH Buffers in Biological, Biochemical and Environmental Studies and Their Interaction with Metal Ions - a Review. RSC Adv. 2015;5(39):30989–31003. doi: 10.1039/C4RA15453C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  361. Baker C. J., Mock N. M., Roberts D. P., Deahl K. L., Hapeman C. J., Schmidt W. F., Kochansky J.. Interference by Mes [2-(4-Morpholino)­Ethanesulfonic Acid] and Related Buffers with Phenolic Oxidation by Peroxidase. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2007;43(9):1322–1327. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  362. Steiner H., Jonsson B.-H., Lindskog S.. The Catalytic Mechanism of Carbonic Anhydrase. Eur. J. Biochem. 1975;59(1):253–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1975.tb02449.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  363. Le J. M., Alachouzos G., Chino M., Frontier A. J., Lombardi A., Bren K. L.. Tuning Mechanism through Buffer Dependence of Hydrogen Evolution Catalyzed by a Cobalt Mini-Enzyme. Biochemistry. 2020;59(12):1289–1297. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  364. Saito R., Sato T., Ikai A., Tanaka N.. Structure of Bovine Carbonic Anhydrase II at 1.95 Å Resolution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2004;60(4):792–795. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904003166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  365. Liu Y., Yeung C. W. S., Reisner E.. Photoelectrochemical Comproportionation of Pre-Treated PET Plastics and CO2 to Formate. Energy Environ. Sci. 2025;18(14):7023–7033. doi: 10.1039/D5EE00689A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  366. Addo P. K., Arechederra R. L., Waheed A., Shoemaker J. D., Sly W. S., Minteer S. D.. Methanol Production via Bioelectrocatalytic Reduction of Carbon Dioxide: Role of Carbonic Anhydrase in Improving Electrode Performance. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2011;14(4):e9. doi: 10.1149/1.3537463. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  367. King W. H.. Piezoelectric Sorption Detector. Anal. Chem. 1964;36(9):1735–1739. doi: 10.1021/ac60215a012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  368. Bruckenstein S., Shay M.. Experimental Aspects of Use of the Quartz Crystal Microbalance in Solution. Electrochim. Acta. 1985;30(10):1295–1300. doi: 10.1016/0013-4686(85)85005-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  369. O’Sullivan C. K., Guilbault G. G.. Commercial Quartz Crystal Microbalances - Theory and Applications. Biosens. Bioelectron. 1999;14(8):663–670. doi: 10.1016/S0956-5663(99)00040-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  370. Sauerbrey G.. Verwendung von Schwingquarzen zur Wägung dünner Schichten und zur Mikrowägung. Z. Für Phys. 1959;155(2):206–222. doi: 10.1007/BF01337937. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  371. Kankare J.. Sauerbrey Equation of Quartz Crystal Microbalance in Liquid Medium. Langmuir. 2002;18(18):7092–7094. doi: 10.1021/la025911w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  372. Vogt B. D., Lin E. K., Wu W., White C. C.. Effect of Film Thickness on the Validity of the Sauerbrey Equation for Hydrated Polyelectrolyte Films. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2004;108(34):12685–12690. doi: 10.1021/jp0481005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  373. Liu Y., Bin Mohamad Annuar A., Rodríguez-Jiménez S., Yeung C. W. S., Wang Q., Coito A. M., Manuel R. R., Pereira I. A. C., Reisner E.. Solar Fuel Synthesis Using a Semiartificial Colloidal Z-Scheme. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024;146(43):29865–29876. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c11827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  374. Johannsmann D., Reviakine I., Richter R. P.. Dissipation in Films of Adsorbed Nanospheres Studied by Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM) Anal. Chem. 2009;81(19):8167–8176. doi: 10.1021/ac901381z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  375. Easley A. D., Ma T., Eneh C. I., Yun J., Thakur R. M., Lutkenhaus J. L.. A Practical Guide to Quartz Crystal Microbalance with Dissipation Monitoring of Thin Polymer Films. J. Polym. Sci. 2022;60(7):1090–1107. doi: 10.1002/pol.20210324. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  376. Johannsmann D., Reviakine I.. Quartz Crystal Microbalance with Dissipation Monitoring for Studying Soft Matter at Interfaces. Nat. Rev. Methods Primer. 2024;4(1):1–21. doi: 10.1038/s43586-024-00340-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  377. Rodahl M., Höök F., Fredriksson C., Keller C. A., Krozer A., Brzezinski P., Voinova M., Kasemo B.. Simultaneous Frequency and Dissipation Factor QCM Measurements of Biomolecular Adsorption and Cell Adhesion. Faraday Discuss. 1997;107:229–246. doi: 10.1039/a703137h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  378. Dixon M. C.. Quartz Crystal Microbalance with Dissipation Monitoring: Enabling Real-Time Characterization of Biological Materials and Their Interactions. J. Biomol. Technol. JBT. 2008;19(3):151–158. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  379. Roush J. A., Thacker D. L., Anderson M. R.. Application of the Quartz Crystal Microbalance to Characterize the Interaction of Solutes with Modified Interfaces. Langmuir. 1994;10(6):1642–1646. doi: 10.1021/la00018a003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  380. Cheng C. I., Chang Y.-P., Chu Y.-H.. Biomolecular Interactions and Tools for Their Recognition: Focus on the Quartz Crystal Microbalance and Its Diverse Surface Chemistries and Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012;41(5):1947–1971. doi: 10.1039/C1CS15168A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  381. Deakin M. R., Buttry D. A.. Electrochemical Applications of the Quartz Crystal Microbalance. Anal. Chem. 1989;61(20):1147A–1154A. doi: 10.1021/ac00195a001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  382. Shpigel N., Levi M. D., Sigalov S., Daikhin L., Aurbach D.. In Situ Real-Time Mechanical and Morphological Characterization of Electrodes for Electrochemical Energy Storage and Conversion by Electrochemical Quartz Crystal Microbalance with Dissipation Monitoring. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018;51(1):69–79. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  383. Ji Y., Yin Z.-W., Yang Z., Deng Y.-P., Chen H., Lin C., Yang L., Yang K., Zhang M., Xiao Q., Li J.-T., Chen Z., Sun S.-G., Pan F.. From Bulk to Interface: Electrochemical Phenomena and Mechanism Studies in Batteries via Electrochemical Quartz Crystal Microbalance. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021;50(19):10743–10763. doi: 10.1039/D1CS00629K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  384. Zhao H., Yuan Y., Adeloju S., Wallace G. G.. Study on the Formation of the Prussian Blue Films on the Polypyrrole Surface as a Potential Mediator System for Biosensing Applications. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2002;472(1):113–121. doi: 10.1016/S0003-2670(02)00937-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  385. Badiani V. M., Cobb S. J., Wagner A., Oliveira A. R., Zacarias S., Pereira I. A. C., Reisner E.. Elucidating Film Loss and the Role of Hydrogen Bonding of Adsorbed Redox Enzymes by Electrochemical Quartz Crystal Microbalance Analysis. ACS Catal. 2022;12(3):1886–1897. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c04317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  386. Parker, F. Applications of Infrared Spectroscopy in Biochemistry, Biology, and Medicine; Springer US, 1971. [Google Scholar]
  387. Susi H., Byler D. M.. [13] Resolution-Enhanced Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy of Enzymes. Methods Enzymol. 1986;130:290–311. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(86)30015-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  388. Siebert F.. [20] Infrared Spectroscopy Applied to Biochemical and Biological Problems. Methods Enzymol. 1995;246:501–526. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(95)46022-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  389. Wahr J. A., Tremper K. K., Samra S., Delpy D. T.. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: Theory and Applications. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 1996;10(3):406–418. doi: 10.1016/S1053-0770(96)80107-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  390. Vimont A., Thibault-Starzyk F., Daturi M.. Analysing and Understanding the Active Site by IR Spectroscopy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010;39(12):4928–4950. doi: 10.1039/b919543m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  391. Wharton C. W.. Infrared Spectroscopy of Enzyme Reaction Intermediates. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2000;17(5):447–453. doi: 10.1039/b002066o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  392. Griffiths P. R.. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometry. Science. 1983;222(4621):297–302. doi: 10.1126/science.6623077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  393. Movasaghi Z., Rehman S., Rehman U. I.. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy of Biological Tissues. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 2008;43(2):134–179. doi: 10.1080/05704920701829043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  394. Baker M. J., Trevisan J., Bassan P., Bhargava R., Butler H. J., Dorling K. M., Fielden P. R., Fogarty S. W., Fullwood N. J., Heys K. A., Hughes C., Lasch P., Martin-Hirsch P. L., Obinaju B., Sockalingum G. D., Sulé-Suso J., Strong R. J., Walsh M. J., Wood B. R., Gardner P., Martin F. L.. Using Fourier Transform IR Spectroscopy to Analyze Biological Materials. Nat. Protoc. 2014;9(8):1771–1791. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  395. Ranasinghe C., Pagano P., Sapienza P. J., Lee A. L., Kohen A., Cheatum C. M.. Isotopic Labeling of Formate Dehydrogenase Perturbs the Protein Dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2019;123(49):10403–10409. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b08426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  396. Waffo A. F. T., Wu-Lu M., Katz S., Frielingsdorf S., Duffus B. R., Liedtke J., Leimkühler S., Lenz O., Laun K., Mroginski M. A., Zebger I.. Coupling of the Catalytic Reactions of Formate Dehydrogenase and Hydrogenase in Solution: Insights from in Situ IR Spectroscopy and Computations. ChemCatChem. 2025;17(1):e202400794. doi: 10.1002/cctc.202400794. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  397. Antoniou D., Schwartz S. D.. Role of Protein Motions in Catalysis by Formate Dehydrogenase. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2020;124(43):9483–9489. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c05725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  398. Kuwabata S., Tsuda R., Yoneyama H.. Electrochemical Conversion of Carbon Dioxide to Methanol with the Assistance of Formate Dehydrogenase and Methanol Dehydrogenase as Biocatalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994;116(12):5437–5443. doi: 10.1021/ja00091a056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  399. Böcker U., Wubshet S. G., Lindberg D., Afseth N. K.. Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy for Characterization of Protein Chain Reductions in Enzymatic Reactions. Analyst. 2017;142(15):2812–2818. doi: 10.1039/C7AN00488E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  400. Su Z., Elmahdy R., Biernat J. F., Chen A., Lipkowski J.. Electrocatalysis of CO2 Reduction by Immobilized Formate Dehydrogenase without a Metal Redox Center. Langmuir. 2024;40(31):16249–16257. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c01444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  401. Dutta S., Li Y.-L., Rock W., Houtman J. C. D., Kohen A., Cheatum C. M.. 3-Picolyl Azide Adenine Dinucleotide as a Probe of Femtosecond to Picosecond Enzyme Dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2012;116(1):542–548. doi: 10.1021/jp208677u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  402. Ohyama T., Yamazaki I.. Formate Dehydrogenase: Subunit and Mechanism of Inhibition by Cyanide and Azide. J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 1975;77(4):845–852. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a130792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  403. Bandaria J. N., Dutta S., Nydegger M. W., Rock W., Kohen A., Cheatum C. M.. Characterizing the Dynamics of Functionally Relevant Complexes of Formate Dehydrogenase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010;107(42):17974–17979. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912190107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  404. Ji Y., Yang X., Ji Z., Zhu L., Ma N., Chen D., Jia X., Tang J., Cao Y.. DFT-Calculated IR Spectrum Amide I, II, and III Band Contributions of N-Methylacetamide Fine Components. ACS Omega. 2020;5(15):8572–8578. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b04421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  405. Ganim Z., Chung H. S., Smith A. W., DeFlores L. P., Jones K. C., Tokmakoff A.. Amide I Two-Dimensional Infrared Spectroscopy of Proteins. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008;41(3):432–441. doi: 10.1021/ar700188n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  406. Lasia, A. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy and Its Applications. In Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry; Conway, B. E. , Bockris, J. O. , White, R. E. , Eds.; Springer US: Boston, MA, 2002; pp 143–248. 10.1007/0-306-46916-2_2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  407. Park S.-M., Yoo J.-S.. Peer Reviewed: Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy for Better Electrochemical Measurements. Anal. Chem. 2003;75(21):455 A–461 A. doi: 10.1021/ac0313973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  408. Macdonald D. D.. Reflections on the History of Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy. Electrochim. Acta. 2006;51(8):1376–1388. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.02.107. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  409. Lazanas A. Ch., Prodromidis M. I.. Electrochemical Impedance SpectroscopyA Tutorial. ACS Meas. Sci. Au. 2023;3(3):162–193. doi: 10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.2c00070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  410. Macdonald, D. D. Transient Techniques in Electrochemistry; Springer US: Boston, MA, 1977. 10.1007/978-1-4613-4145-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  411. Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry; Bockris, J. O. , Conway, B. E. , White, R. E. , Eds.; Springer US: Boston, MA, 1982. 10.1007/978-1-4615-7458-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  412. Wang S., Zhang J., Gharbi O., Vivier V., Gao M., Orazem M. E.. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy. Nat. Rev. Methods Primer. 2021;1(1):1–21. doi: 10.1038/s43586-021-00039-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  413. Chang B.-Y., Park S.-M.. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2010;3:207–229. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anchem.012809.102211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  414. Walter G. W.. A Review of Impedance Plot Methods Used for Corrosion Performance Analysis of Painted Metals. Corros. Sci. 1986;26(9):681–703. doi: 10.1016/0010-938X(86)90033-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  415. Orazem M. E., Pébère N., Tribollet B.. Enhanced Graphical Representation of Electrochemical Impedance Data. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2006;153(4):B129. doi: 10.1149/1.2168377. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  416. Mei B.-A., Munteshari O., Lau J., Dunn B., Pilon L.. Physical Interpretations of Nyquist Plots for EDLC Electrodes and Devices. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2018;122(1):194–206. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10582. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  417. Huang J., Li Z., Liaw B. Y., Zhang J.. Graphical Analysis of Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy Data in Bode and Nyquist Representations. J. Power Sources. 2016;309:82–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.01.073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  418. Lisdat F., Schäfer D.. The Use of Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy for Biosensing. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2008;391(5):1555–1567. doi: 10.1007/s00216-008-1970-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  419. Pandey K., Islam S. T. A., Happe T., Armstrong F. A.. Frequency and Potential Dependence of Reversible Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Interconversion by [FeFe]-Hydrogenases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2017;114(15):3843–3848. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1619961114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  420. Kharitonov A. B., Alfonta L., Katz E., Willner I.. Probing of Bioaffinity Interactions at Interfaces Using Impedance Spectroscopy and Chronopotentiometry. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2000;487(2):133–141. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0728(00)00178-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  421. Fera M.-C., Manuel R. R., Pereira I. A. C., Abad J. M., De Lacey A. L., Pita M.. Carbon Nanotubes - PEI - Formate Dehydrogenase Nano-Biointerface for the Specific Bioelectrochemical Reduction of CO2 to Formate. Carbon. 2023;209:118013. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2023.118013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  422. Schalenbach M., Durmus Y. E., Tempel H., Kungl H., Eichel R.-A.. Double Layer Capacitances Analysed with Impedance Spectroscopy and Cyclic Voltammetry: Validity and Limits of the Constant Phase Element Parameterization. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021;23(37):21097–21105. doi: 10.1039/D1CP03381F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  423. Liu Y., Xia M., Yao L., Mensi M., Ren D., Grätzel M., Sivula K., Guijarro N.. Spectroelectrochemical and Chemical Evidence of Surface Passivation at Zinc Ferrite (ZnFe2O4) Photoanodes for Solar Water Oxidation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021;31(16):2010081. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202010081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  424. Wang H., Pilon L.. Intrinsic Limitations of Impedance Measurements in Determining Electric Double Layer Capacitances. Electrochim. Acta. 2012;63:55–63. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.12.051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  425. Geddes L. A., Da Costa C. P., Wise G.. The Impedance of Stainless-Steel Electrodes. Med. Biol. Eng. 1971;9(5):511–521. doi: 10.1007/BF02474708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  426. Liu Y., Le Formal F., Boudoire F., Guijarro N.. Hematite Photoanodes for Solar Water Splitting: A Detailed Spectroelectrochemical Analysis on the pH-Dependent Performance. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019;2(9):6825–6833. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.9b01261. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  427. Lasia A.. Impedance of Porous Electrodes. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2025;54:101764. doi: 10.1016/j.coelec.2025.101764. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  428. Macdonald J. R.. Impedance Spectroscopy. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 1992;20(3):289–305. doi: 10.1007/BF02368532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  429. Abasi S., Aggas J. R., Garayar-Leyva G. G., Walther B. K., Guiseppi-Elie A.. Bioelectrical Impedance Spectroscopy for Monitoring Mammalian Cells and Tissues under Different Frequency Domains: A Review. ACS Meas. Sci. Au. 2022;2(6):495–516. doi: 10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.2c00033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  430. Liu Y., Guijarro N., Sivula K.. Understanding Surface Recombination Processes Using Intensity-Modulated Photovoltage Spectroscopy on Hematite Photoanodes for Solar Water Splitting. Helv. Chim. Acta. 2020;103(6):e2000064. doi: 10.1002/hlca.202000064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  431. Ackmann J. J.. Complex Bioelectric Impedance Measurement System for the Frequency Range from 5 Hz to 1 MHz. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 1993;21(2):135–146. doi: 10.1007/BF02367609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  432. Bisquert J.. Hysteresis, Impedance, and Transients Effects in Halide Perovskite Solar Cells and Memory Devices Analysis by Neuron-Style Models. Adv. Energy Mater. 2024;14(26):2400442. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202400442. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  433. Wieczorek A., Liu Y., Cho H.-H., Sivula K.. Assessing the Charge Carrier Dynamics at Hybrid Interfaces of Organic Photoanodes for Solar Fuels. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2024;15(24):6347–6354. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c01170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  434. Warburg E.. Ueber Die Spitzenentladung. Ann. Phys. 1899;303(1):69–83. doi: 10.1002/andp.18993030104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  435. Taylor S. R., Gileadi E.. Physical Interpretation of the Warburg Impedance. Corrosion. 1995;51(9):664–671. doi: 10.5006/1.3293628. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  436. Huang J.. Diffusion Impedance of Electroactive Materials, Electrolytic Solutions and Porous Electrodes: Warburg Impedance and Beyond. Electrochim. Acta. 2018;281:170–188. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.05.136. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  437. Ragoisha G. A., Bondarenko A. S.. Potentiodynamic Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy. Electrochim. Acta. 2005;50(7):1553–1563. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.10.055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  438. Xing C., Liu Y., Zhang Y., Wang X., Guardia P., Yao L., Han X., Zhang T., Arbiol J., Soler L., Chen Y., Sivula K., Guijarro N., Cabot A., Llorca J.. A Direct Z-Scheme for the Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production from a Water Ethanol Mixture on CoTiO3/TiO2 Heterostructures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2021;13:449. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c17004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  439. Pulignani C., Bin Mohamad Annuar A., Cobb S. J., Rahaman M., Liu Y., Han C., Rogolino A., Bhattacharjee S., Reisner E.. Stabilizing Carbon Nitride Photoanodes for Unassisted Alcohol Reforming Coupled to CO2 Reduction under Concentrated Sunlight. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2026;148(12):12839–12848. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c20624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  440. Polo A., Boudoire F., Lhermitte C. R., Liu Y., Guijarro N., Dozzi M. V., Selli E., Sivula K.. Key Factors Boosting the Performance of Planar ZnFe2O4 Photoanodes for Solar Water Oxidation. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2021;9(48):27736–27747. doi: 10.1039/D1TA07499G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  441. McCann J. F., Badwal S. P. S.. Equivalent Circuit Analysis of the Impedance Response of Semiconductor/Electrolyte/Counterelectrode Cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1982;129(3):551. doi: 10.1149/1.2123907. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  442. Harrington D. A., van den Driessche P.. Mechanism and Equivalent Circuits in Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy. Electrochim. Acta. 2011;56(23):8005–8013. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.01.067. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  443. Liu Y., Bouri M., Yao L., Xia M., Mensi M., Grätzel M., Sivula K., Aschauer U., Guijarro N.. Identifying Reactive Sites and Surface Traps in Chalcopyrite Photocathodes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021;60(44):23651–23655. doi: 10.1002/anie.202108994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  444. Maxwell, J. C. A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism; Clarendon Press: 1873. [Google Scholar]
  445. Wagner K. W.. Zur Theorie Der Unvollkommenen Dielektrika. Ann. Phys. 1913;345(5):817–855. doi: 10.1002/andp.19133450502. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  446. Liu Y., Le Formal F., Boudoire F., Yao L., Sivula K., Guijarro N.. Insights into the Interfacial Carrier Behaviour of Copper Ferrite (CuFe2O4) Photoanodes for Solar Water Oxidation. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2019;7(4):1669–1677. doi: 10.1039/C8TA11160J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  447. Lasia A.. The Origin of the Constant Phase Element. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2022;13(2):580–589. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  448. Bisquert J., Balaguera E. H.. Brief Guide to Transformation of Constant Phase Element Impedance to Equivalent Capacitor or Inductor. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2025;16(23):5779–5783. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c01131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  449. Boudoire F., Liu Y., Le Formal F., Guijarro N., Lhermitte C. R., Sivula K.. Spray Synthesis of CuFeO2 Photocathodes and In-Operando Assessment of Charge Carrier Recombination. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2021;125(20):10883–10890. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c02282. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  450. Li X., Ahmadi M., Collins L., Kalinin S. V.. Deconvolving Distribution of Relaxation Times, Resistances and Inductance from Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy via Statistical Model Selection: Exploiting Structural-Sparsity Regularization and Data-Driven Parameter Tuning. Electrochim. Acta. 2019;313:570–583. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.05.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  451. Liu Y., Quinonero J., Yao L., Da Costa X., Mensi M., Gomez R., Sivula K., Guijarro N.. Defect Engineered Nanostructured LaFeO3 Photoanodes for Improved Activity in Solar Water Oxidation. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2021;9(5):2888–2898. doi: 10.1039/D0TA11541J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  452. Randles J. E. B.. Kinetics of Rapid Electrode Reactions. Discuss. Faraday Soc. 1947;1:11–19. doi: 10.1039/df9470100011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  453. Jeon B. W., Phan U. T., Heo Y., Lee H. H., Ryu J., Kim Y. H.. Enzymatic Conversion of CO2 to Formate: The Potential of Tungsten-Containing Formate Dehydrogenase in Flow Reactor System. J. CO2 Util. 2024;82:102754. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2024.102754. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  454. Sakai K., Kitazumi Y., Shirai O., Takagi K., Kano K.. Efficient Bioelectrocatalytic CO2 Reduction on Gas-Diffusion-Type Biocathode with Tungsten-Containing Formate Dehydrogenase. Electrochem. Commun. 2016;73:85–88. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2016.11.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  455. Bard A. J.. Photoelectrochemistry. Science. 1980;207(4427):139–144. doi: 10.1126/science.207.4427.139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  456. Peter L. M.. Dynamic Aspects of Semiconductor Photoelectrochemistry. Chem. Rev. 1990;90(5):753–769. doi: 10.1021/cr00103a005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  457. Grätzel M.. Photoelectrochemical Cells. Nature. 2001;414(6861):338–344. doi: 10.1038/35104607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  458. Barham J. P., König B.. Synthetic Photoelectrochemistry. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020;59(29):11732–11747. doi: 10.1002/anie.201913767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  459. Yao L., Liu Y., Cho H.-H., Xia M., Sekar A., Darwich B. P., Wells R. A., Yum J.-H., Ren D., Grätzel M., Guijarro N., Sivula K.. A Hybrid Bulk-Heterojunction Photoanode for Direct Solar-to-Chemical Conversion. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021;14(5):3141–3151. doi: 10.1039/D1EE00152C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  460. Cho H.-H., Yao L., Yum J.-H., Liu Y., Boudoire F., Wells R. A., Guijarro N., Sekar A., Sivula K.. A Semiconducting Polymer Bulk Heterojunction Photoanode for Solar Water Oxidation. Nat. Catal. 2021;4(5):431–438. doi: 10.1038/s41929-021-00617-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  461. Sekar A., Moreno-Naranjo J. M., Liu Y., Yum J.-H., Darwich B. P., Cho H.-H., Guijarro N., Yao L., Sivula K.. Bulk Heterojunction Organic Semiconductor Photoanodes: Tuning Energy Levels to Optimize Electron Injection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2022;14(6):8191–8198. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c21440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  462. Yao L., Guijarro N., Boudoire F., Liu Y., Rahmanudin A., Wells R. A., Sekar A., Cho H.-H., Yum J.-H., Le Formal F., Sivula K.. Establishing Stability in Organic Semiconductor Photocathodes for Solar Hydrogen Production. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142(17):7795–7802. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c00126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  463. Parkinson B.. On the Efficiency and Stability of Photoelectrochemical Devices. Acc. Chem. Res. 1984;17(12):431–437. doi: 10.1021/ar00108a004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  464. Fountaine K. T., Lewerenz H. J., Atwater H. A.. Efficiency Limits for Photoelectrochemical Water-Splitting. Nat. Commun. 2016;7(1):13706. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  465. Liu Y., Xia M., Ren D., Nussbaum S., Yum J.-H., Grätzel M., Guijarro N., Sivula K.. Photoelectrochemical CO2 Reduction at a Direct CuInGaS2/Electrolyte Junction. ACS Energy Lett. 2023;8(4):1645–1651. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c00022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  466. Dussouillez M., Moon S.-J., Mensi M., Wolff C. M., Liu Y., Yum J.-H., Kamino B. A., Walter A., Sahli F., Lauber L., Christmann G., Sivula K., Jeangros Q., Ballif C., Nicolay S., Paracchino A.. Understanding and Mitigating the Degradation of Perovskite Solar Cells Based on a Nickel Oxide Hole Transport Material during Damp Heat Testing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2023;15(23):27941–27951. doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c02709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  467. Rahmanudin A., Yao L., Sekar A., Cho H.-H., Liu Y., Lhermitte C. R., Sivula K.. Fully Conjugated Donor-Acceptor Block Copolymers for Organic Photovoltaics via Heck-Mizoroki Coupling. ACS Macro Lett. 2019;8(2):134–139. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  468. Parkinson B. A., Weaver P. F.. Photoelectrochemical Pumping of Enzymatic CO2 Reduction. Nature. 1984;309(5964):148–149. doi: 10.1038/309148a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  469. Son E. J., Ko J. W., Kuk S. K., Choe H., Lee S., Kim J. H., Nam D. H., Ryu G. M., Kim Y. H., Park C. B.. Sunlight-Assisted, Biocatalytic Formate Synthesis from CO2 and Water Using Silicon-Based Photoelectrochemical Cells. Chem. Commun. 2016;52(62):9723–9726. doi: 10.1039/C6CC04661D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  470. Lee S. Y., Lim S. Y., Seo D., Lee J.-Y., Chung T. D.. Light-Driven Highly Selective Conversion of CO2 to Formate by Electrosynthesized Enzyme/Cofactor Thin Film Electrode. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016;6(11):1502207. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201502207. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  471. Morlock S., Schenderlein M., Kano K., Zouni A., Lisdat F.. Coupling of Formate Dehydrogenase to Inverse-Opal ITO-PSI Electrodes for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Biosens. Bioelectron. X. 2023;14:100359. doi: 10.1016/j.biosx.2023.100359. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  472. Umena Y., Kawakami K., Shen J.-R., Kamiya N.. Crystal Structure of Oxygen-Evolving Photosystem II at a Resolution of 1.9 Å. Nature. 2011;473(7345):55–60. doi: 10.1038/nature09913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  473. Kuk S. K., Ham Y., Gopinath K., Boonmongkolras P., Lee Y., Lee Y. W., Kondaveeti S., Ahn C., Shin B., Lee J.-K., Jeon S., Park C. B.. Continuous 3D Titanium Nitride Nanoshell Structure for Solar-Driven Unbiased Biocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019;9(25):1900029. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201900029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  474. Antón-García D., Edwardes Moore E., Bajada M. A., Eisenschmidt A., Oliveira A. R., Pereira I. A. C., Warnan J., Reisner E.. Photoelectrochemical Hybrid Cell for Unbiased CO2 Reduction Coupled to Alcohol Oxidation. Nat. Synth. 2022;1(1):77–86. doi: 10.1038/s44160-021-00003-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  475. Bhattacharjee S., Rahaman M., Andrei V., Miller M., Rodríguez-Jiménez S., Lam E., Pornrungroj C., Reisner E.. Photoelectrochemical CO2-to-Fuel Conversion with Simultaneous Plastic Reforming. Nat. Synth. 2023;2(2):182–192. doi: 10.1038/s44160-022-00196-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  476. Cobb S. J., Pornrungroj C., Andrei V., Badiani V. M., Su L., Manuel R. R., Pereira I. A. C., Reisner E.. A Photoelectrochemical-Thermoelectric Device for Semi-Artificial CO2 Fixation Employing Full Solar Spectrum Utilization. Device. 2024;2(11):100505. doi: 10.1016/j.device.2024.100505. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  477. Rahaman M., Pulignani C., Miller M., Bhattacharjee S., Bin Mohamad Annuar A., Manuel R. R., Pereira I. A. C., Reisner E.. Solar-Driven Paired CO2 Reduction-Alcohol Oxidation Using Semiartificial Suspension, Photocatalyst Sheet, and Photoelectrochemical Devices. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147(10):8168–8177. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c10519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  478. Kuk S. K., Jang J., Kim J., Lee Y., Kim Y. S., Koo B., Lee Y. W., Ko J. W., Shin B., Lee J.-K., Park C. B.. CO2-Reductive, Copper Oxide-Based Photobiocathode for Z-Scheme Semi-Artificial Leaf Structure. ChemSusChem. 2020;13(11):2940–2944. doi: 10.1002/cssc.202000459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  479. Roy S., Miller M., Warnan J., Leung J. J., Sahm C. D., Reisner E.. Electrocatalytic and Solar-Driven Reduction of Aqueous CO2 with Molecular Cobalt Phthalocyanine-Metal Oxide Hybrid Materials. ACS Catal. 2021;11(3):1868–1876. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c04744. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  480. Jordan P., Fromme P., Witt H. T., Klukas O., Saenger W., Krauß N.. Three-Dimensional Structure of Cyanobacterial Photosystem I at 2.5 Å Resolution. Nature. 2001;411(6840):909–917. doi: 10.1038/35082000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  481. Su, L. ; Yeung, C. W. S. ; Milshtein, E. ; Low, B. Q. L. ; Liu, Y. ; Milo, R. ; Reisner, E. . Towards Solar-Powered Growth of Autotrophic Escherichia Coli Using Photoelectrochemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. Revis. 2026. 10.1021/jacs.6c03677 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  482. Liu Y., Rodríguez-Jiménez S., Song H., Pannwitz A., Kim D., Coito A. M., Manuel R. R., Webb S., Su L., Bonke S. A., Milton R. D., Pereira I. A. C., Bonnet S., Hammarström L., Reisner E.. Bio-Inspired Self-Assembly of Enzyme-Micelle Systems for Semi-Artificial Photosynthesis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2025;64(18):e202424222. doi: 10.1002/anie.202424222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  483. Chen L., Liu Y., Mitra S., Kim D., Huang Z., Vahey D. M., Bin Mohamad Annuar A., Reisner E.. Solar Lignin Reforming with Tunable Selectivity Using a Hybrid Photocatalyst in Aqueous Solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147(47):43509–43516. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c11981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  484. Quek G., Low B. Q. L., Anderlini S., Chua X. W., Short M. I. M., Kim D., Stranks S. D., Reisner E.. Organic Semiconducting Hydrogel with Integrated Microbes and Enzymes for Selective Solar CO2 Conversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2026;148:16019. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6c00205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  485. Quek, G. ; Chua, X. W. ; Liu, Y. ; Han, C. ; Martins, G. ; Pereira, I. A. C. ; Stranks, S. D. ; Reisner, E. . Molecular Engineering of Conjugated Polyelectrolyte-Enzyme Biohybrid Sheets for Solar-Driven CO2 Conversion. ChemRxiv, 2026. [Google Scholar]
  486. Xu Y., Schoonen M. A. A.. The Absolute Energy Positions of Conduction and Valence Bands of Selected Semiconducting Minerals. Am. Mineral. 2000;85(3–4):543–556. doi: 10.2138/am-2000-0416. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  487. Costa J. C. S., Taveira R. J. S., Lima C. F. R. A. C., Mendes A., Santos L. M. N. B. F.. Optical Band Gaps of Organic Semiconductor Materials. Opt. Mater. 2016;58:51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.optmat.2016.03.041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  488. Sivula K., Van De Krol R.. Semiconducting Materials for Photoelectrochemical Energy Conversion. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016;1(2):15010. doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2015.10. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  489. Schneider J., Bahnemann D. W.. Undesired Role of Sacrificial Reagents in Photocatalysis. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013;4(20):3479–3483. doi: 10.1021/jz4018199. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  490. Mifsud M., Gargiulo S., Iborra S., Arends I. W. C. E., Hollmann F., Corma A.. Photobiocatalytic Chemistry of Oxidoreductases Using Water as the Electron Donor. Nat. Commun. 2014;5(1):3145. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  491. Yoshino S., Takayama T., Yamaguchi Y., Iwase A., Kudo A.. CO2 Reduction Using Water as an Electron Donor over Heterogeneous Photocatalysts Aiming at Artificial Photosynthesis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022;55(7):966–977. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  492. Costantino F., Kamat P. V.. Do Sacrificial Donors Donate H2 in Photocatalysis? ACS Energy Lett. 2022;7(1):242–246. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c02487. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  493. Warnan J., Willkomm J., Ng J. N., Godin R., Prantl S., Durrant J. R., Reisner E.. Solar H2 Evolution in Water with Modified Diketopyrrolopyrrole Dyes Immobilised on Molecular Co and Ni Catalyst-TiO2 Hybrids. Chem. Sci. 2017;8(4):3070–3079. doi: 10.1039/C6SC05219C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  494. Zhang J., Chen X., Takanabe K., Maeda K., Domen K., Epping J. D., Fu X., Antonietti M., Wang X.. Synthesis of a Carbon Nitride Structure for Visible-Light Catalysis by Copolymerization. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010;49(2):441–444. doi: 10.1002/anie.200903886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  495. Karak S., Liu Y., Annuar A. B. M., Reisner E.. Covalent Organic Framework and Carbon Nitride Composite for Scalable Solar Reforming. Adv. Mater. 2026;38:e13457. doi: 10.1002/adma.202513457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  496. Chen Y., Li P., Zhou J., Buru C. T., Đorđević L., Li P., Zhang X., Cetin M. M., Stoddart J. F., Stupp S. I., Wasielewski M. R., Farha O. K.. Integration of Enzymes and Photosensitizers in a Hierarchical Mesoporous Metal-Organic Framework for Light-Driven CO2 Reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142(4):1768–1773. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b12828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  497. Beranek R.. (Photo)­Electrochemical Methods for the Determination of the Band Edge Positions of TiO2-Based Nanomaterials. Adv. Phys. Chem. 2011;2011:786759. doi: 10.1155/2011/786759. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  498. Kuehnel M. F., Orchard K. L., Dalle K. E., Reisner E.. Selective Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction in Water through Anchoring of a Molecular Ni Catalyst on CdS Nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139(21):7217–7223. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b00369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  499. Miyatani R., Amao Y.. Bio-CO2 Fixation with Formate Dehydrogenase from Saccharomyces Cerevisiae and Water-Soluble Zinc Porphyrin by Visible Light. Biotechnol. Lett. 2002;24(22):1931–1934. doi: 10.1023/A:1020912527723. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  500. Miyatani R., Amao Y.. Photochemical Synthesis of Formic Acid from CO2 with Formate Dehydrogenase and Water-Soluble Zinc Porphyrin. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2004;27(2):121–125. doi: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2003.11.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  501. Tsujisho I., Toyoda M., Amao Y.. Photochemical and Enzymatic Synthesis of Formic Acid from CO2 with Chlorophyll and Dehydrogenase System. Catal. Commun. 2006;7(3):173–176. doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2005.10.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  502. Ikeyama S., Amao Y.. An Artificial Co-Enzyme Based on the Viologen Skeleton for Highly Efficient CO2 Reduction to Formic Acid with Formate Dehydrogenase. ChemCatChem. 2017;9(5):833–838. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201601188. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  503. Yadav R. K., Baeg J.-O., Oh G. H., Park N.-J., Kong K., Kim J., Hwang D. W., Biswas S. K.. A Photocatalyst-Enzyme Coupled Artificial Photosynthesis System for Solar Energy in Production of Formic Acid from CO2 . J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134(28):11455–11461. doi: 10.1021/ja3009902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  504. Lam E., Miller M., Linley S., Manuel R. R., Pereira I. A. C., Reisner E.. Comproportionation of CO2 and Cellulose to Formate Using a Floating Semiconductor-Enzyme Photoreforming Catalyst. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023;62(20):e202215894. doi: 10.1002/anie.202215894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  505. Karak, S. ; Liu, Y. ; Gostimskaya, I. ; Anderlini, S. ; Han, C. ; Martins, G. ; Pereira, I. A. C. ; Guo, C. ; Reisner, E. . Chemoenzymatic Domino Photoreforming for the Upcycling of Polyesters and CO2 . Submitted 2026. [Google Scholar]
  506. Kwarteng P. K., Liu Y., Han C., Bonke S. A., Vahey D. M., Pulignani C., Reisner E.. Solar Reforming of Plastics Using Acid-Catalyzed Depolymerization. Joule. 2026:102347. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2026.102347. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  507. Wang Y., Xue P., Cao M., Yu T., Lane S. T., Zhao H.. Directed Evolution: Methodologies and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2021;121(20):12384–12444. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  508. Yang Y., Arnold F. H.. Navigating the Unnatural Reaction Space: Directed Evolution of Heme Proteins for Selective Carbene and Nitrene Transfer. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021;54(5):1209–1225. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  509. Yang J., Li F.-Z., Arnold F. H.. Opportunities and Challenges for Machine Learning-Assisted Enzyme Engineering. ACS Cent. Sci. 2024;10(2):226–241. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.3c01275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  510. Li Z., Luo W., Zhang M., Feng J., Zou Z.. Photoelectrochemical Cells for Solar Hydrogen Production: Current State of Promising Photoelectrodes, Methods to Improve Their Properties, and Outlook. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013;6(2):347–370. doi: 10.1039/C2EE22618A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  511. Zheng J., Zhou H., Zou Y., Wang R., Lyu Y., Jiang S. P., Wang S.. Efficiency and Stability of Narrow-Gap Semiconductor-Based Photoelectrodes. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019;12(8):2345–2374. doi: 10.1039/C9EE00524B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  512. Thangamuthu M., Ruan Q., Ohemeng P. O., Luo B., Jing D., Godin R., Tang J.. Polymer Photoelectrodes for Solar Fuel Production: Progress and Challenges. Chem. Rev. 2022;122(13):11778–11829. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  513. Esswein A. J., Nocera D. G.. Hydrogen Production by Molecular Photocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 2007;107(10):4022–4047. doi: 10.1021/cr050193e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  514. Berardi S., Drouet S., Francàs L., Gimbert-Suriñach C., Guttentag M., Richmond C., Stoll T., Llobet A.. Molecular Artificial Photosynthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014;43(22):7501–7519. doi: 10.1039/C3CS60405E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  515. Guo Q., Ma Z., Zhou C., Ren Z., Yang X.. Single Molecule Photocatalysis on TiO2 Surfaces. Chem. Rev. 2019;119(20):11020–11041. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  516. Stanley P. M., Haimerl J., Shustova N. B., Fischer R. A., Warnan J.. Merging Molecular Catalysts and Metal-Organic Frameworks for Photocatalytic Fuel Production. Nat. Chem. 2022;14(12):1342–1356. doi: 10.1038/s41557-022-01093-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  517. Osterloh F. E.. Inorganic Nanostructures for Photoelectrochemical and Photocatalytic Water Splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013;42(6):2294–2320. doi: 10.1039/C2CS35266D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  518. Xu C., Ravi Anusuyadevi P., Aymonier C., Luque R., Marre S.. Nanostructured Materials for Photocatalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019;48(14):3868–3902. doi: 10.1039/C9CS00102F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  519. Wang S., Liu G., Wang L.. Crystal Facet Engineering of Photoelectrodes for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Chem. Rev. 2019;119(8):5192–5247. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  520. Sokol K. P., Mersch D., Hartmann V., Zhang J. Z., Nowaczyk M. M., Rögner M., Ruff A., Schuhmann W., Plumeré N., Reisner E.. Rational Wiring of Photosystem II to Hierarchical Indium Tin Oxide Electrodes Using Redox Polymers. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016;9(12):3698–3709. doi: 10.1039/C6EE01363E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  521. Nam D. H., Zhang J. Z., Andrei V., Kornienko N., Heidary N., Wagner A., Nakanishi K., Sokol K. P., Slater B., Zebger I., Hofmann S., Fontecilla-Camps J. C., Park C. B., Reisner E.. Solar Water Splitting with a Hydrogenase Integrated in Photoelectrochemical Tandem Cells. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018;57(33):10595–10599. doi: 10.1002/anie.201805027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  522. Stankovich M. T.. An Anaerobic Spectroelectrochemical Cell for Studying the Spectral and Redox Properties of Flavoproteins. Anal. Biochem. 1980;109(2):295–308. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(80)90652-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  523. Comtat M., Durliat H.. Some Examples of the Use of Thin Layer Spectroelectrochemistry in the Study of Electron Transfer between Metals and Enzymes. Biosens. Bioelectron. 1994;9(9):663–668. doi: 10.1016/0956-5663(94)80063-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  524. Best S. P.. Spectroelectrochemistry of Hydrogenase Enzymes and Related Compounds. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2005;249(15):1536–1554. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.01.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  525. Bedendi G., De Moura Torquato L. D., Webb S., Cadoux C., Kulkarni A., Sahin S., Maroni P., Milton R. D., Grattieri M.. Enzymatic and Microbial Electrochemistry: Approaches and Methods. ACS Meas. Sci. Au. 2022;2(6):517–541. doi: 10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.2c00042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  526. Wharton C. W.. Infra-Red and Raman Spectroscopic Studies of Enzyme Structure and Function. Biochem. J. 1986;233(1):25–36. doi: 10.1042/bj2330025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  527. Barth A.. Infrared Spectroscopy of Proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA - Bioenerg. 2007;1767(9):1073–1101. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2007.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  528. Zheng C., Ji Z., Mathews I. I., Boxer S. G.. Enhanced Active-Site Electric Field Accelerates Enzyme Catalysis. Nat. Chem. 2023;15(12):1715–1721. doi: 10.1038/s41557-023-01287-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  529. Carey P. R., Storer A. C.. Molecular Details of Enzyme-Substrate Transients by Resonance Raman Spectroscopy. Acc. Chem. Res. 1983;16(12):455–460. doi: 10.1021/ar00096a005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  530. Carey P. R., Tonge P. J.. Chemistry of Enzyme-Substrate Complexes Revealed by Resonance Raman Spectroscopy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1990;19(3):293–316. doi: 10.1039/CS9901900293. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  531. Carey P. R., Tonge P. J.. Unlocking the Secrets of Enzyme Power Using Raman Spectroscopy. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995;28(1):8–13. doi: 10.1021/ar00049a002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  532. Larmour I. A., Faulds K., Graham D.. The Past, Present and Future of Enzyme Measurements Using Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Chem. Sci. 2010;1(2):151–160. doi: 10.1039/c0sc00226g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  533. Colombo R. N. P., Sedenho G. C., Neckel I. T., Crespilho F. N.. Enzymatic X-Ray Absorption Spectroelectrochemistry. Nat. Protoc. 2025:1–38. doi: 10.1038/s41596-025-01254-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  534. Cza̧stka K., Oughli A. A., Rüdiger O., DeBeer S.. Enzymatic X-Ray Absorption Spectroelectrochemistry. Faraday Discuss. 2022;234:214–231. doi: 10.1039/D1FD00079A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  535. Blow D. M., Steitz T. A.. X-Ray Diffraction Studies of Enzymes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1970;39(1):63–100. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.39.070170.000431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  536. Dale W. M.. The Effect of X-Rays on Enzymes. Biochem. J. 1940;34(10–11):1367–1373. doi: 10.1042/bj0341367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  537. Ha T., Ting A. Y., Liang J., Caldwell W. B., Deniz A. A., Chemla D. S., Schultz P. G., Weiss S.. Single-Molecule Fluorescence Spectroscopy of Enzyme Conformational Dynamics and Cleavage Mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999;96(3):893–898. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.3.893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  538. Zarzar L. D., Kalow J. A., He X., Walish J. J., Swager T. M.. Optical Visualization and Quantification of Enzyme Activity Using Dynamic Droplet Lenses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2017;114(15):3821–3825. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1618807114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  539. Günther J.-P., Börsch M., Fischer P.. Diffusion Measurements of Swimming Enzymes with Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018;51(9):1911–1920. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  540. Kubota R., Tanaka W., Hamachi I.. Microscopic Imaging Techniques for Molecular Assemblies: Electron, Atomic Force, and Confocal Microscopies. Chem. Rev. 2021;121(22):14281–14347. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  541. Lee S. H., Choi D. S., Kuk S. K., Park C. B.. Photobiocatalysis: Activating Redox Enzymes by Direct or Indirect Transfer of Photoinduced Electrons. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018;57(27):7958–7985. doi: 10.1002/anie.201710070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  542. Ghindilis A. L., Atanasov P., Wilkins E.. Enzyme-Catalyzed Direct Electron Transfer: Fundamentals and Analytical Applications. Electroanalysis. 1997;9(9):661–674. doi: 10.1002/elan.1140090902. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  543. Frew J. E., Hill H. A. O.. Direct and Indirect Electron Transfer between Electrodes and Redox Proteins. Eur. J. Biochem. 1988;172(2):261–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988.tb13882.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  544. Armstrong F. A., Cheng B., Herold R. A., Megarity C. F., Siritanaratkul B.. From Protein Film Electrochemistry to Nanoconfined Enzyme Cascades and the Electrochemical Leaf. Chem. Rev. 2023;123(9):5421–5458. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Chemical Reviews are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES