Abstract
Corizus hyoscyami (Heteroptera: Rhopalidae) is a widely distributed and highly polyphagous insect, making it a relevant species for understanding the evolution of herbivory and host adaptation in true bugs. However, the genome of Corizus hyoscyami has not yet been sequenced, limiting investigations into its biological characteristics. In this study, a high-quality chromosome-level genome assembly was generated by integrating MGI DNBSEQ-T7 short-read, PacBio Sequel II long-read, and Hi-C scaffolding technologies. The assembly was assessed to be 97.6% complete by BUSCO. The final genome was assembled into a size of 1.47 Gb, with a contig N50 of 1.61 Mb and a scaffold N50 of 198.34 Mb. The GC content was determined to be 34%, and 94.90% of the sequences were anchored onto 6 chromosome-level scaffolds, representing the major chromosomal elements of the genome. Repetitive sequences accounted for 69.79% of the genome, and 18,540 protein-coding genes were annotated. This genome assembly is expected to facilitate research on adaptive evolution in Heteroptera.
Subject terms: Entomology, Comparative genomics
Background & Summary
Corizus hyoscyami (Linnaeus, 1758) (Heteroptera: Rhopalidae), commonly known as the cinnamon bug or the black and red squash bug, is a widely distributed scentless plant bug. As a mesophilous species, it predominantly inhabits open areas with moderate humidity across the Palearctic region. Its distribution spans from Western Europe and North Africa, extending eastwards across the Middle East, Central Asia, and Siberia to Mongolia and Northern China1. Within these regions, it frequently occurs in meadows, forest clearings, and grasslands2. C. hyoscyami exhibits high polyphagy with a broad host range. During spring, both adults and nymphs primarily consume floral tissues of willow and young shoots of deciduous and coniferous trees including birch and pine. As the season progresses, feeding shifts to herbaceous plants such as sow-thistle, chamomile, and Euphorbia. Major host species include Hyoscyamus niger, Tabacum, Ononis spinosa, and Erodium. Additionally, it is recognized as a significant pest damaging fruits, vegetables, maize, and leguminous crops3–5. The species is bivoltine, completing two generations per year, and overwinters in the adult stage6,7. Adults remain active throughout the year, with new generations emerging between August and September. Owing to its ecological adaptability and broad dietary range, C. hyoscyami often becomes a widespread and dominant species in suitable habitats8.
Despite its ecological and agricultural importance, molecular research on C. hyoscyami remains limited. Although chromosome-level genomes have been successfully deciphered for an increasing number of heteropteran species, such as the predatory stink bugs Eocanthecona furcellata9 and Arma custos10, the Chinese water scorpion Ranatra chinensis11, the jiuxiang bug Aspongopus chinensis12, and the assassin bug Rhynocoris fuscipes13, genomic information for the vast majority of insect species remains unknown. Most existing studies have focused on morphological descriptions and field observations, leaving significant knowledge gaps in understanding its genomic architecture, evolutionary history, and molecular mechanisms underlying host adaptation and ecological resilience. As a polyphagous insect exhibiting seasonal host-switching behavior, C. hyoscyami serves as an ideal model for investigating plant-insect coevolution, adaptive radiation, and the genetic basis of dietary breadth. However, the absence of a high-quality reference genome has impeded in-depth exploration of these scientific questions.
To address this gap, we employed an integrated sequencing strategy combining PacBio long-read sequencing, MGI DNBSEQ short-read sequencing, and Hi-C-based chromatin conformation capture to successfully assemble a chromosome-level genome for C. hyoscyami. This genomic resource will not only provide a fundamental basis for research on the evolution of herbivory and pest management strategies but also significantly advance our understanding of insect adaptive responses to environmental variations.
Methods
Sample preparation and genome sequencing
Adult specimens of C. hyoscyami were collected from Zepu County, Kashgar, Xinjiang, China (38.2504°N, 77.3175°E). Specimens used for sequencing were identified based on the morphological characters described in Göllner-Scheiding (1980)14 and Moulet (1995)15. To provide molecular evidence for species identification and establish a definitive molecular marker for this reference genome, genomic DNA was extracted from a single adult specimen, from which a 621 bp fragment of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene was amplified and Sanger-sequenced. To obtain sufficient high-quality DNA, genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from a pool of three female adult specimens using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method and purified with the Grandomics Genomic Kit (Grandomics, Wuhan, China). The extracted DNA was subsequently utilized for both Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) high-fidelity (HiFi) sequencing and genome survey sequencing. For HiFi sequencing, a SMRTbell library was prepared with the SMRTbell prep kit 3.0 (PacBio, Menlo Park, CA, USA). The PacBio Revio platform generated 46.64 Gb of HiFi data through circular consensus sequencing (CCS), which were subsequently used for de novo genome assembly (Table 1).
Table 1.
Sequencing data and assembly strategy for the Corizus hyoscyami genome.
| PacBio | Survey | Hi-C | RNA-seq | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clean data (Gb) | 46.64 | 49.22 | 161.94 | 8.04 |
| Coverage (X) | 31.64 | 66.78 | 109.86 | 5.46 |
| GC content (%) | 33.56 | 35.35 | 37.27 | 38.75 |
For genome survey analysis, the same gDNA batch was processed into a short-read library using the MGIEasy Universal DNA Library Prep Kit V1.0 (MGI, Shenzhen, China). Sequencing on the DNBSEQ-T7RS platform (MGI, Shenzhen, China) in paired-end 150-base pair (bp) mode generated 51.39 Gb of raw data, with 49.22 Gb of clean data retained after Fastp version 0.23.416 processing (Table 1). The mitochondrial genome of C. hyoscyami was obtained through de novo assembly of clean short-reads from the genome survey data using IDBA-UD version 1.1.317 with a k-mer range of 41 to 141 bp. To evaluate assembly accuracy, clean reads were mapped back onto the obtained mitogenomic contig using Geneious Prime 2023.2.118. The resulting assembly was subsequently annotated using the MITOZ pipeline version 3.619 under the invertebrate mitochondrial genetic code, which identified a complete set of 37 standard mitochondrial genes. Finally, the full-length COI gene sequence was extracted and compared with the Sanger-sequenced fragment obtained from the single specimen, exhibiting 98.9% identity.
For high-throughput chromatin conformation capture (Hi-C) and ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequencing, a single adult specimen was utilized to ensure genomic consistency. The head of this individual was used for Hi-C library preparation, while the remaining body was used for total RNA extraction. Chromosome-level scaffolding was achieved through Hi-C library preparation by digesting nuclei with the DpnII restriction enzyme. The Hi-C protocol involved biotin labeling, blunt-end ligation, and DNA fragmentation to 300–600 bp fragments. The final libraries were sequenced on the DNBSEQ-T7RS platform (MGI, Shenzhen, China), generating 161.94 Gb of Hi-C reads (Table 1).
For genome annotation, transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed. Total RNA was extracted from the body of the aforementioned individual using TRIzol reagent (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China). A non-strand-specific RNA-seq library was prepared using the MGIEasy RNA Library Prep Kit V3.1 (MGI, Shenzhen, China) and sequenced on the DNBSEQ-T7RS platform (MGI, Shenzhen, China) in paired-end 150-bp mode, generating approximately 8.04 Gb of high-quality short-read data (Table 1).
Genome size estimation
Genomic characteristics including genome size, duplication, and heterozygosity were estimated through K-mer analysis using 49.22 Gb clean MGI DNBSEQ short reads (Table 1). The k-mer frequency distribution was analyzed with JELLYFISH version 2.2.1020 (k = 17), followed by genome profiling in GenomeScope version 2.021 under default parameters. This analysis revealed a genome size of 1.56 Gb with 0.884% heterozygosity (Table 2).
Table 2.
Features of the Corizus hyoscyami genome assembly.
| Genomic features | Statistics |
|---|---|
| Assembly level | Chromosome -level |
| Heterozygosity (%) | 0.884 |
| Survey | 1,563,998,627 |
| Genome size (bp) | 1,475,691,838 |
| Contig N50 (bp) | 1,609,326 |
| Scaffold N50 (bp) | 198,335,333 |
| Number of pseudochromosomes | 6 |
| BUSCO (%) | 97.6 |
| GC content (%) | 34 |
| Protein-coding genes | 18,540 |
| Repetitive elements (%) | 69.86 |
Note: The 6 pseudochromosomes represent the five major autosomes and the X chromosome, consistent with the major elements of the known C. hyoscyami karyotype (n = 7, 5 A + m + X).
Genome assembly and Hi-C scaffolding
The C. hyoscyami genome was assembled using PacBio long-read sequencing data with WTDBG2 version 2.522. Purge_Dups version 1.2.523 was used to remove haplotypic duplications, producing a contig-level genome assembly of 1.47 Gb with 34% GC content and a contig N50 of 1.60 Mb (Table 2). For chromosome-level scaffolding, high-quality Hi-C reads were aligned to the contig assembly using the end-to-end alignment algorithm implemented in BWA-MEM version 0.7.1824. Scaffolds were assembled into pseudochromosomes using Juicer version 1.625 and 3D-DNA version 18041926 with parameter -r 2. The chromosome-level assembly was manually reviewed and adjusted using Juicebox (https://github.com/aidenlab/juicebox/wiki/Download), resulting in 6 well-anchored pseudochromosomes representing the major putative chromosomal elements (the five autosomes and the X chromosome), with a scaffold N50 of 198.34 Mb (Fig. 1). The comprehensive genome architecture, including the distribution of gene density and repeat content across these pseudochromosomes, is summarized in a circular representation (Fig. 2). Although previous cytogenetic studies of C. hyoscyami reported a karyotype of n = 7 (5 A + m + X)27,28, the m-chromosome was likely not clustered into a separate pseudochromosome due to its significantly small size and highly repetitive nature, which often results in insufficient Hi-C contact signals. Consequently, the sequences belonging to the m-chromosome are presumed to be distributed among the remaining unanchored scaffolds. Further analysis revealed that these unplaced scaffolds (comprising approximately 5.10% of the total assembly) were characterized by an exceptionally high repeat content (90.51%) and a significantly higher proportion of tandem repeats (9.49%) compared to the anchored chromosomes (2.00%). This high repetitive density likely caused substantial mapping ambiguity during Hi-C scaffolding, preventing their confident positioning. To ensure genomic transparency and data integrity, all assembled sequences, including these unplaced scaffolds, have been included in the public data release via Figshare29. The completeness of the final assembly was assessed using BUSCO version 5.7.130 with the insecta_odb10 database, showing 97.6% completeness, confirming the high quality of the genome assembly (Table 2). In addition, the obtained genome assembly does not include telomeric sequences.
Fig. 1.
Genome-wide contact matrix of Corizus hyoscyami generated using Hi-C data.
Fig. 2.
Circular representation of the Corizus hyoscyami chromosome-level genome. Tracks represent the distribution of (a) pseudochromosomes karyotypes, (b) gene density, (c) GC content, (d) DNA transposon density, (e) LTR retrotransposon content, (f) transposable element density, and (g) tandem repeat content. Densities were calculated in 200 kb windows.
Repeat sequences annotation
Repetitive sequences were identified through a combined approach utilizing both de novo prediction and homology-based searches. A custom repeat library was generated using RepeatModeler version 2.0.531 and subsequently integrated with RepBase (20170127 edition)32. Genome-wide repeat annotation was performed using RepeatMasker version 4.1.733 and RepeatProteinMask version 4.1.733 against this composite library. Specialized analyses were conducted for specific repeat classes: LTR retrotransposons were detected using LTR_FINDER version 1.0734 with verification by LTR_retriever version 2.935, while tandem repeats were annotated with Tandem Repeats Finder version 4.09.136 (parameters: 2 7 7 80 10 50 500). The genome assembly contained 1.03 Gb (69.79%) of repetitive sequences, which fell into one major category (Table 3). Retrotransposons represented the largest proportion (49.82%), consisting of LTR retrotransposon (43.80%) and non-LTR Retrotransposon (6.02%). Among retrotransposons, we identified long terminal repeat (LTR) elements, short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs), and long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs). The LTR elements were further categorized into Copia, Gypsy, and other unclassified LTR families (Table 3).
Table 3.
The statistics of repeat contents in the genomes of Corizus hyoscyami.
| Repeat type | Length (bp) | Content (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Retrotransposon | 735,263,299 | 49.82 |
| LTR-Retrotransposon | 646,417,197 | 43.80 |
| LTR/Copia | 2,135,014 | 0.14 |
| LTR/Gypsy | 612,172,658 | 41.48 |
| LTR-other | 32,109,525 | 2.18 |
| Non-LTR Retrotransposon | 88,846,102 | 6.02 |
| SINE | 193,014 | 0.01 |
| LINE | 88,653,088 | 6.01 |
| DNA Transposon | 39,696,110 | 2.69 |
| Terminal inverted repeat | 31,250,556 | 2.12 |
| EnSpm/CACTA | 1,879,872 | 0.13 |
| Harbinger | 449,919 | 0.03 |
| MuDR | 2,844,844 | 0.19 |
| Tcl/Mariner | 22,810,676 | 1.55 |
| hAT | 3,271,510 | 0.22 |
| Non-terminal inverted repeat | 8,402,272 | 0.57 |
| Helitron | 2,008,516 | 0.14 |
| DNA-other | 6,298,008 | 0.43 |
| Tandem repeat | 24,965,997 | 1.69 |
| Unclassified | 199,611,958 | 13.53 |
| Total content | 1,029,816,544 | 69.79 |
Protein-coding gene prediction and functional annotation
Protein-coding genes (PCGs) were predicted using a combination of ab initio, transcriptomic, and homology-based approaches. RNA-seq reads were mapped to the genome assembly using HISAT version 2.2.137, with subsequent transcript assembly performed by StringTie version 2.4.038. For homology-based prediction, protein sequences from multiple insect species were aligned to the genome using Exonerate version 2.4.039. Subsequently, predictions were performed using protein sequences from ten reference species: Drosophila melanogaster (GCF_000001215.4)40, Apis mellifera (GCA_003254395.2)41, Bombyx mori (GCA_030269925.2)42, Tribolium castaneum (GCA_031307605.1)43, Gerris buenoi (GCA_001010745.2)44, Acyrthosiphon pisum (GCA_005508785.2)45, Cimex lectularius (GCA_049903775.1)46, Rhodnius prolixus (GCA_049639745.1)47, Apolygus lucorum (GCA_009739505.2)48, and Orius laevigatus (GCA_018703685.1)49. Ab initio prediction was conducted with AUGUSTUS version 3.5.050, incorporating RNA-seq evidence converted to hints files using bam2hints. The final gene set was generated through evidence integration with MAKER version 3.01.0351. A total of 18,540 protein-coding genes were predicted in the C. hyoscyami genome, with average lengths of 11,303.10 bp for genes, 1,284.53 bp for coding sequences (CDS), and 428.18 amino acids for proteins (Table 4). Gene function annotation was performed using an integrated analysis pipeline with eggNOG-mapper version 2.0.152, InterProScan version 5.053, BLAST version 2.16.054, and HMMER version 3.455. These tools were used to analyze sequences against multiple databases including GO, COG, KEGG, nr, Swiss-Prot, and Pfam. A comprehensive functional annotation pipeline successfully annotated 17,051 genes (91.97%) with putative functions (Table 5).
Table 4.
The statistics of gene count, mRNA count, CDS count, exon count and intron count in the genomes of Corizus hyoscyami.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| gene count | 18,540 |
| gene max | 286,885 |
| gene min | 153 |
| gene Median/AVG | 5,693.5/11,303.10 |
| mRNA count | 20,971 |
| mRNA max | 21,490 |
| mRNA min | 153 |
| mRNA Median/AVG | 1,068/1,497.67 |
| mRNA count Median/AVG | 1/1.13 |
| CDS count | 20,971 |
| CDS max | 20,676 |
| CDS min | 150 |
| CDS Median/AVG | 942/1,284.53 |
| protein Median/AVG | 314/428.18 |
| exon Median/AVG | 174/329.66 |
| exon count Median/AVG | 3/4.54 |
| utr3 Median/AVG | 220/687.44 |
| utr5 Median/AVG | 97/137.16 |
| intron Median/AVG | 1,879/2761.31 |
| intron count Median/AVG | 2/3.54 |
Table 5.
The statistics of annotation in the genomes of Corizus hyoscyami.
| Database | Annotated number | Percent (%) |
|---|---|---|
| NR | 16,711 | 90.13 |
| Swiss-Prot | 13,113 | 70.73 |
| GO | 5,225 | 28.18 |
| KEGG | 8,614 | 46.46 |
| COG | 14,204 | 76.61 |
| Eggnog | 14,204 | 76.61 |
| Pfam | 12,882 | 69.48 |
| Total | 17,051 | 91.97 |
Data Records
The raw sequence data generated in this study have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject PRJNA1328843. Specifically, the RNA-seq data (SRR3541001656), genomic MGI DNBSEQ short-read data (SRR3541001757), Hi-C sequencing data (SRR3541001858), and PacBio HiFi sequencing data (SRR3541001959) are publicly accessible.
The chromosome-level genome assembly and functional annotation (GFF) of Corizus hyoscyami have been uploaded to GenBank in NCBI under accession number GCA_059059285.160. These records, along with the mitochondrial genome and COI gene sequences (including both the 621 bp Sanger-verified fragment and the assembly-derived full-length sequence) are also publicly available in the Figshare database (10.6084/m9.figshare.32593206)29. All data records are publicly accessible and resolve to live records.
Technical Validation
The genome assembly was 1.47 Gb in size with a scaffold N50 of 198.34 Mb. The assembly size showed consistency with estimates from K-mer analysis. For accuracy assessment, we mapped MGI DNBSEQ short reads to the C. hyoscyami genome using BWA-MEM version 0.7.1824, with 98.85% of reads successfully mapping. Genome completeness was evaluated using BUSCO version 5.7.130 with the insecta_odb10 database, showing 97.6% completeness. From 1,334 orthologs analyzed, 1,316 were complete single-copy genes.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the grants from the Xinjiang Major Science and Technology Project (2023A02009), “Tianshan Talent” Leading Talents in Science and Technology Innovation (TSYCLJ0016, 2024TSYCLJ0040), “Tianchi Talents” Young Doctoral Program of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Wheat Industry Technology System (XJARS-01), Scientific Research Project of Universities in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (XIEDU2025P067), Key Project of Doctoral Research Startup Fund of Xinjiang Normal University (XJNUZBS2405).
Author contributions
J.S. and Y.X. conceived the project. Y.Z., Z.C. and Z.H. collected insect samples and performed photography. Y.X. and L.M. extracted genomic DNA and performed data analysis. Y.X. wrote the manuscript. R.J., Y.S., G.L. and H.G. discussed the results and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version.
Data availability
The raw sequencing data are deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under BioProject PRJNA1328843. The genome assembly and annotations are available at GenBank under accession number GCA_059059285.160. All other associated data files, including the mitochondrial genome and COI sequences, are available via Figshare at 10.6084/m9.figshare.3259320629.
Code availability
All analyses were performed using established bioinformatics tools following the developers’ standard protocols. Software versions and parameters are fully documented in the Methods section. No custom code was generated for this study.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Kerzhner, I.M. and Josifov, M., Catalogue of the Heteroptera of the Palaearctic region, in Cimicomorpha II, ed. by Aukema B and Rieger C. The Netherlands Entomological Society, Amsterdam (1999).
- 2.Schwoerbel, W. Beobachtungen und Untersuchungen zur Biologie einiger einheimischer Wanzen. Zool. Jb. Syst.84, 329–354 (1956). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Esenbekova, P. A., Temreshev, I. I., Kenzhegaliev, A. M., Tursynkulov, A. M. & Dosmukhambetov, T. M. True bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera)–Alfalfa pests (Barley, Triticale, Wheat) of «Bayserke-Agro» Llp. Ser. Agrar. Nauk2, 21–30 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hradil, K., Kment, P. & Roháčová, M. New records of Liorhyssus hyalinus (Heteroptera: Rhopalidae) in the Czech Republic, with a review of its worldwide distribution and biology. Acta Mus. Moraviae, Sci. Biol.92, 53–107 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sadullaevich, B. A. & Mirganievna, M. M. Fauna and plant nutrition of bed-bugs belonging to the family of Mirid (Miridae) found in cotton, alfalfa, vegetable agrocenoses and natural ecosystems of the Amudarya and Khodjayli districts of the Republic of Karakalpakstan. Eur. J. Agric. Rural Educ.3, 69–74 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Putshkov, V. Poluzhestokrylye semeystva Rhopalidae (Heteroptera) fauny SSSR. [True bugs of the family Rhopalidae (Heteroptera) of the USSR fauna]. Opred. Po Faune SSSR146 (1986).
- 7.Vilimova, J. & Rohanova, M. The external morphology of eggs of three Rhopalidae species (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) with a review of the eggs of this family. Acta Ent. Mus. Nat. Pra.50, 75–95 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wheeler, A. G. Jr. & Krimmel, B. A. Mirid (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) specialists of sticky plants: adaptations, interactions, and ecological implications. Annu. Rev. Entomol.60, 393–414 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Guan, D. et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly and annotation of the predatory stink bug Eocanthecona furcellata. Sci. Data12, 1920 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang, Y. et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly of the predatory stink bug Arma custos. Sci. Data11, 417 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Liu, X. et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly of Chinese water scorpion Ranatra chinensis (Heteroptera: Nepidae). Sci. Data11, 1016 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jiang, T. et al. Chromosomal-level genome assembly of a true bug, Aspongopus chinensis Dallas, 1851 (Hemiptera: Dinidoridae). Genome Biol. Evol.13, evab232 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ma, L. et al. Comparative genomic analyses on assassin bug Rhynocoris fuscipes (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) reveal genetic bases governing the diet-shift. iScience27, 110411 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Göllner-Scheiding, U. Einige Bemerkungen zu den Gattungen Corizus Fallén, 1814, und Xenogenus Berg, 1883 (Heteroptera, Rhopalidae). Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin56, 111–121 (1980). [Google Scholar]
- 15.Moulet, P. Hémiptères Coreoidea (Coreidae, Rhopalidae, Alydidae), Pyrrhocoridae, Stenocephalidae euro-méditerranéens. Faune de France81, 1–336 (1995). i-iv. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & Gu, J. Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics34, i884–i890 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Peng, Y., Leung, H., Yiu, S. & Chin, F. IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics28, 1420–1428 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kearse, M. et al. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics28, 1647–1649 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Meng, G., Li, Y., Yang, C. & Liu, S. MitoZ: a toolkit for animal mitochondrial genome assembly, annotation and visualization. Nucleic Acids Res47, e63 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Marçais, G. & Kingsford, C. A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k-mers. Bioinformatics27, 764–770 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Vurture, G. W. et al. GenomeScope: fast reference-free genome profiling from short reads. Bioinformatics33, 2202–2204 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ruan, J. & Li, H. Fast and accurate long-read assembly with wtdbg2. Nat. Methods17, 155–158 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Guan, D. et al. Identifying and removing haplotypic duplication in primary genome assemblies. Bioinformatics36, 2896–2898 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics25, 1754–1760 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Durand, N. C. et al. Juicer provides a one-click system for analyzing loop-resolution Hi-C experiments. Cell Syst.3, 95–98 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dudchenko, O. et al. De novo assembly of the Aedes aegypti genome using Hi-C yields chromosome-length scaffolds. Science356, 92–95 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Golub, N. V., Anokhin, B. A., Grozeva, S. & Kuznetsova, V. G. Comparative chromosomal mapping of the 18S rDNA loci in true bugs: the first data for 13 genera of the infraorders Cimicomorpha and Pentatomomorpha (Hemiptera, Heteroptera). Genes (Basel)16, 1516 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kuznetsova, V., Golub, N., Anokhin, B., Stoianova, D. & Lukhtanov, V. Diversity of telomeric sequences in true bugs (Heteroptera): new data on the infraorders Pentatomomorpha and Cimicomorpha. Cytogenet. Genome Res165, 192–205 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Xu, Y. et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly of Corizus hyoscyami (Linnaeus, 1758) (Heteroptera: Rhopalidae). figshare. Dataset, 10.6084/m9.figshare.32593206 (2026). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30.Simão, F. A., Waterhouse, R. M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E. V. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics31, 3210–3212 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Flynn, J. M. et al. RepeatModeler2 for automated genomic discovery of transposable element families. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA117, 9451–9457 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jurka, J. et al. Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenetic and Genome Res.110, 462–467 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chen, N. Using RepeatMasker to identify repetitive elements in genomic sequences. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics5, 4–10 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ou, S. & Jiang, N. LTR_FINDER_parallel: parallelization of LTR_FINDER enabling rapid identification of long terminal repeat retrotransposons. Mob. DNA10, 48 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ou, S. & Jiang, N. LTR_retriever: a highly accurate and sensitive program for identification of long terminal repeat retrotransposons. Plant Physiol.176, 1410–1422 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Benson, G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res.27, 573–580 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kim, D., Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods12, 357–360 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pertea, M., Kim, D., Pertea, G. M., Leek, J. T. & Salzberg, S. L. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nat. Protoc.11, 1650–1667 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Slater, G. S. & Birney, E. Automated generation of heuristics for biological sequence comparison. BMC Bioinformatics6, 31 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hoskins, R. A. et al. The Release 6 reference sequence of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Genome Res.25, 445–458 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wallberg, A. et al. A hybrid de novo genome assembly of the honeybee, Apis mellifera, with chromosome-length scaffolds. BMC Genomics20, 275 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lee, J., Fujimoto, T., Sahara, K., Toyoda, A. & Shimada, T. Comprehensive genome annotation of Bombyx mori p50ma strain, a newly developed standard strain. Sci. Data12, 359 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Herndon, N. et al. Enhanced genome assembly and a new official gene set for Tribolium castaneum. BMC Genomics21, 47 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Armisén, D. et al. The genome of the water strider Gerris buenoi reveals expansions of gene repertoires associated with adaptations to life on the water. BMC Genomics19, 832 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mathers, T. C. et al. Chromosome-scale genome assemblies of Aphids Reveal extensively rearranged autosomes and Long-term conservation of the X Chromosome. Mol. Biol. Evol.38, 856–875 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Miles, L. S. et al. A chromosome-level reference genome for the common bed bug, Cimex lectularius, with identification of sex chromosomes. J. Hered.116, 382–388 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mesquita, R. D. et al. Genome of Rhodnius prolixus, an insect vector of Chagas disease, reveals unique adaptations to hematophagy and parasite infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA112, 14936–14941 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Liu, Y. et al. Apolygus lucorum genome provides insights into omnivorousness and mesophyll feeding. Mol. Ecol. Resour.21, 287–300 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bailey, E. et al. A scaffold-level genome assembly of a minute pirate bug, Orius laevigatus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), and a comparative analysis of insecticide resistance-related gene families with hemipteran crop pests. BMC genomics23, 45 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Stanke, M. et al. AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res.34, W435–W439 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Cantarel, B. L. et al. MAKER: an easy-to-use annotation pipeline designed for emerging model organism genomes. Genome Res.18, 188–196 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Huerta-Cepas, J. et al. Fast Genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-mapper. Mol. Biol. Evol.34, 2115–2122 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Jones, P. et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics30, 1236–1240 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.McGinnis, S. & Madden, T. L. BLAST: at the core of a powerful and diverse set of sequence analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res.32, W20–W25 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Potter, S. C. et al. HMMER web server: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res.46, W200–W204 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.NCBI Sequence Read Archivehttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR35410016 (2026).
- 57.NCBI Sequence Read Archivehttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR35410017 (2026).
- 58.NCBI Sequence Read Archivehttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR35410018 (2026).
- 59.NCBI Sequence Read Archivehttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR35410019 (2026).
- 60.NCBI GenBankhttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.gca:GCA_059059285.1 (2026).
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Citations
- NCBI Sequence Read Archivehttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR35410016 (2026).
- NCBI Sequence Read Archivehttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR35410017 (2026).
- NCBI Sequence Read Archivehttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR35410018 (2026).
- NCBI Sequence Read Archivehttps://identifiers.org/ncbi/insdc.sra:SRR35410019 (2026).
Data Availability Statement
The raw sequencing data are deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under BioProject PRJNA1328843. The genome assembly and annotations are available at GenBank under accession number GCA_059059285.160. All other associated data files, including the mitochondrial genome and COI sequences, are available via Figshare at 10.6084/m9.figshare.3259320629.
All analyses were performed using established bioinformatics tools following the developers’ standard protocols. Software versions and parameters are fully documented in the Methods section. No custom code was generated for this study.


