Abstract
An itch, or pruritus, is a sensation that induces the need to scratch. Chronic pruritus, which is prevalent in 8–25% of the population, arises from diverse etiologies among which are several skin diseases. Itch originates from a complex interaction between the skin’s surface, chemical mediators, and the nervous system, driven by an overactive immune system. A comprehensive review of itching is hereby provided, covering its initial steps, mediators, relationship with the spine, ion channels, topical and systemic treatments, and the effects of magnesium and antioxidants. Ion channels present in keratinocytes, immune cells and sensory neurons play a critical role to preserve skin homeostasis. The dysregulation of ionic channels such as calcium, potassium, sodium, or chloride contributes to the production of inflammation, as well as skin barrier problems, and keratinocyte dysfunction that are key elements in the pathophysiology of itch. There is cross-talk between the three elements that intensify itching. Furthermore, the signals reaching the brain induce scratching, creating a vicious cycle between itching and scratching that further exacerbates itching. In this review, we have examined the important role of ion channels in itch. New medications and clinical trials based on ion channels as therapeutic targets are required to provide tools for the treatment of chronic itch. Magnesium efficiently inhibits itch by modulating voltage- and ligand-gated ion channels. Antioxidants prevent itch by blocking the unwarranted amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and dysregulating the innate immune signaling pathways. The strategy combining both magnesium and antioxidants constitutes an important advancement towards new approaches for the treatment of itching with very limited side effects. A number of clinical trials are needed to confirm the usefulness of ion channel-targeted antioxidant and anti-itch strategies to enhance the comprehensiveness and foresight of the conclusions.
Keywords: cross-talk, magnesium, reactive oxygen species, ROS, scratch, spine
Introduction
An itch, or pruritus, is an impression that induces the necessity to scratch. Itch has been classified, depending on its duration, as acute (lasting <6 weeks) or chronic (>6 weeks). In several studies in Europe, the incidence of chronic pruritus ranges from 8% to 25%.1–4 In the United States, itch annually accounts for more than 7 million ambulatory consultations.5 Patients with chronic pruritus have diminished quality of life due to sleep problems,6 temperament disorders,1 and a negative psychosocial impact.7,8 Chronic itch is strongly associated with aging, especially in people older than 85 years.9 Itch in older patients may be associated with multiple factors. An important factor is the progressive loss of skin barrier function associated with aging.10 In addition, itch in the elderly may be produced by a general immuno-senescence described as a modification to a T helper cell type 2-mediated cytokine reply.11 In relation to the cause of itch, sex variances exist. While itch in men is associated with comorbid systemic diseases,12 in women it is more frequently associated with psychosomatic characteristics, neuropathic signals, and secondary scratch injuries.13 In addition, 18−20% of pregnant women suffer from pruritic disorders during pregnancy.14 Itch is not only associated with dermatological diseases; it is also a common symptom arising in the background of different systemic diseases, and neuropathic and psychogenic diseases. Furthermore, there is a genetic predisposition to itch.15 The International Forum for Study of Itch differentiates four clinical groups without considering their underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms.16 Group 1 (dermatologic itch), associated with skin diseases such as inflammatory, allergic, or infectious diseases and insect bites; Group 2 (systemic itch), associated with extracutaneous diseases such as from blood, kidney, liver, or other organs or drugs; Group 3 (neuropathic itch), secondary to neurologic diseases;17 and Group 4 (psychogenic itch), which is ascribed to psychiatric disorders.18 Also is common the pruritus of miscellaneous origin.19 The present review is focused on dermatitis-related itch (ie, Group 1), but does not exclude that many of the mechanisms described herein may also be present in the other types of itch. The molecular and cellular ways causing the itch feeling in the skin have been assessed, with special emphasis on the role of ion channels.
Emerging evidence highlights the direct role of Staphylococcus aureus in triggering itch in atopic dermatitis (AD). Beyond its well-known ability to exacerbate inflammation through superantigens and barrier disruption, S. aureus can directly activate pruriceptive sensory neurons, driving itch and scratch-induced skin injury. Recent findings demonstrate that the S. aureus serine protease V8 breaks proteinase-activated receptor 1 (PAR-1) on sensory neurons, leading to heightened pruritus. Notably, inhibition of PAR-1 significantly decreases itch and skin injury caused by S. aureus contact. Additionally, skin pH performs a critical role in controlling S. aureus colonization and epidermal barrier function.20 The higher pH observed in AD promotes bacterial over-growth and alters epidermal protease activity, which in turn affects the processing of pruritogenic mediators.
The itching process is started by signals from the environment under a certain genetic background that affect specific areas of the skin, in a process involving the immune system. All these circumstances produce a series of signals that activate, through ion channels, the afferent nerve fibers in the spinal circuit and brain, thus relaying the feeling of itch and inducing scratching.
First Steps of Itch
Itching includes an interaction between genetic predilection, immune system dysfunction, and environmental triggers.19 The immune mechanisms in itching are comparable to those in normal skin but with highly augmented activation.21 In the beginning of itching, several mechanisms interact in the form of cross-talk, promoting each other. For example, keratinocytes release antimicrobial peptides, which activate plasmacytoid dendritic cells to secrete interferon-α, which in turn initiates both innate and adaptive immune responses22 (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
The itching begins with the arrival of pruritogens that interfere with the skin. When these substances reach the epidermis, they interact with the afferent nerve endings. Nerve activity drives immune system cells (CD4 T lymphocytes, mast cells, etc.) to release mediators such as cytokines, neuropeptides, etc, which activate sensory neurons. This produces a series of nerve impulses that travel first through the dorsal root and then up the spinal cord to the brain. There, the thalamus assists in the interpretation of the itching sensation.
The main job of the sensation of itch is the removal of environmental insults from the skin (eg, allergens, pruritogens or irritants), which is followed by the motor response of scratching.23 This response damages the epidermal barrier, inducing several communications between the skin, the nervous system and the immune system that eventually result in the induction of itch and pain. Transmission of itch from the skin to the spinal cord requires multidirectional connections between the nervous and the immune systems.23
Cutaneous nerve fibers called pruriceptors, which are either exogenous or endogenous, activate whichever the histaminergic or the non-histaminergic itch pathways.24 The activators are produced by keratinocytes and immune cells such as granulocytes, mast cells, and T lymphocytes reaching the skin through blood. After activation of the skin nerves, the pruritus sign is at that time transmitted along neural pathways to the spinal cord and then to the brain, which answers by inducing scratching.22
The nerve endings that initiate the sensation of pain are called nociceptors and are classified into three groups: Aβ, Aδ, and C. A synaptic contact with nociceptors has been found in keratinocytes.25 Aβ are myelinated fibers, situated in the dermis, that act as mechanoreceptors focused in the stretch, hair movement or perception of pressure. In the epidermis, Aδ and C fibers are characterized into two biophysically different major afferent groups, unmyelinated C-fibers and lightly myelinated Aδ. C fibers are around 0.2–1.5 µm in diameter and have a transmission velocity of fewer than 2 m/s, while Aδ fibers are 2–5 µm in diameter and have a conduction speed of up to 8 m/s. These two types of fibers are thermoreceptors and nociceptors,26 as well as efficient pruriceptors recognizing exogenous and endogenous pruritogens.
In the skin, cross-talk between nociceptors and keratinocytes results in increased inflammation and itching. The neurons secrete calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and neuropeptides such as substance P (SP)27 that induce the proliferation of keratinocytes. In turn, these cells release neurotrophic components such as glial cell line–derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), nerve growth factor (NGF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF),28 and cytokines.29 There are two groups of biochemical receptors participating in pruritus: the main and most frequent group is related to a G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR), and the other group is made by the Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling pathway (ie, cytokine/chemokine receptors). Both receptors communicate the pruritogenic signal by activation of channels (see below). In sensory neurons, the activation of these channels induces an action potential, and then sends the pruritogenic signal primary to the spinal cord and afterward to the brain, producing the sensation of itching. In the dorsal root ganglia (DRG), reside the cell bodies of these nerves with axons that innervate the skin and dendrites that synapse in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. There is a complex connection between these nerve fibers and the skin microenvironment, because nerve communication is controlled by skin pH, temperature, and pain. The binding of exogenous and endogenous pruritogens to their receptors induces the onset of itching in these sensory nerves.30
Itch Mediators
Pruritus has intricate interactions amongst the immune and nervous systems. For pruritus there are two ways: histamine-dependent and histamine-independent. Caused by mast cell degranulation, histamine-dependent itching is typically related to allergic and urticaria responses. Interleukin (IL)-31 and proteases are involved in histamine-independent itching, associated with diseases like atopic dermatitis and chronic kidney disease.31 Itch begins when cutaneous receptors are activated. There are two types of receptors: those associated with the G protein (GPCRs) and those related to the transient receptor potential channels (TRP).
The connections between skin and nerve endings are produced by mediators. Histamine is mostly produced by mast cells and basophils,32 but sporadically by keratinocytes.33 Itch-sensory nerve fibers near mast cells attach to a diversity of itch-inducing molecules or pruritogens through receptors that are also expressed in immune cells such as basophils, eosinophils, and mast cells34 and keratinocytes.35 Activation of histamine receptors induces the liberation of neuropeptides (mainly CGRP and SP) and the stimulation of neurogenic inflammation.36 This is another example of cross-talk between nerve endings and keratinocytes.
Neuropeptides are based on short chains of amino acids, with several working as neurotransmitters. Neuropeptide signaling plays an important role in pruritus. The release of SP occurs mostly by dermal sensory nerve endings and other cells, including keratinocytes.37 SP has a higher specificity for the neurokinin receptor NK1, which is present in multiple cells, including sensory nerve endings, keratinocytes, immune cells, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts. The binding of SP to the MrgprX2 receptor in mast cells induces degranulation and the liberation of histamine and tryptase.38 In addition, some degranulation products induce the release of SP by sensory nerve endings, thus intensifying itch.32 In patients with AD, CGRP has been found to increase IL-13 production.39 A neuropeptide called brain-derived natriuretic peptide (BNP), involved in pruritus, has recently been identified. BNP is expressed by pruriceptors, and higher BNP levels have been found in the skin of AD patients. The production and relief of BNP are induced by IL-31.40 The neuropeptide Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is produced by the spinal cord and several cells, such as keratinocytes, sensory neurons, and endothelial cells. Expression of ET-1 is increased and is related to that of IL-25 in the skin of patients with AD. In keratinocytes there is another cross-talk, where IL-25 increases ET-1 expression and, in turn, ET-1 induces IL-25 expression41 (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Three-way cross-talk between the skin, the nervous system and the immune system. Neuronal ion channels and protein-coupled receptors are activated by damaging stimuli and inflammatory mediators. This induces neuronal depolarization, increase excitability, and detach of neuropeptides such as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), substance P (SP), and nerve growth factor (NGF). These neuropeptides control tissue cell functions and immune system, induce the synthesis of cytokines, degranulation of mast cells, and additionally catches immune cells, such as macrophages, dendritic cells, basophils, eosinophils, and T cells and keratinocytes. Neuronal cytokine receptors activate anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-4, IL-13, IL-31), increasing neuronal excitability and discharge neuropeptides, making a feed‑forward loop for neuroinflammation. In addition, signals such as Ca2+ and pSTAT3 induce nerve activation that, by inducing itching, leads the patient to scratch, inducing another cross-talk. CGRP, calcitonin gene-related peptide; SP, substance P; and nerve growth factor (NGF).
Endogenous opioids constitute an exclusive family of neuropeptides, with the most important members being β-endorphin and dynorphin A. These compounds have opposite effects on pruritus: while the former promotes itch, the latter inhibits it.42
Neurotrophins constitute a family of specialized proteins that act as growth factors to promote the development, survival, function, and plasticity of neurons. The main neurotrophins include Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) and Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF). NGF levels are increased in diseases associated with itch, such as psoriasis or AD.43 In AD, BDNF levels are increased in serum and eosinophils.44
Interleukins are a group of related proteins produced by hematopoietic cells, including eosinophils, basophils, T helper 2 (TH2) cells and mast cells, whose function is to regulate immune responses. In vitro studies using primary keratinocytes showed that IL-4 and IL-13 induces the reduction of the expression of proteins involved in the epidermal barrier.45 The IL-4/IL-13 axis induces the fabrication of thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), IL-25, and IL-33 in keratinocytes, thus contributing to the malicious encircle of neurogenic inflammation.46 In AD, a strong correlation has been found between skin inflammation and IL-13 gene expression that is mediated by the IL-4Ra/IL-13Ra1 axis. Simultaneously, this axis induces negative feedback that downregulates extracellular IL-13.47 IL-31 and IL-33 form an IL-31/IL-33 axis that interacts synergistically. Upon keratinocyte activation by allergens or pathogens, IL-33 is produced that initiates nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) signaling and induces IL-31 gene expression, regulating the production of cytokines such as IL-31 and IL-17A, and inducing mast cell degranulation. IL-33 also enhances IL-4 expression and promotes IL-31 transcription.48 Symptom severity has been associated with high serum and tissue levels of both cytokines, thus sustaining the biological importance of this axis.49 IL-31 is a pruritogenic cytokine with a heterodimeric receptor, IL-31 receptor A (IL31RA)/oncostatin M receptor, that is expressed by keratinocytes, innate immune cells, eosinophils, T cells, and cutaneous nerve endings.50 IL-31 contributes to the malicious circle of neurogenic inflammation through its effects on keratinocytes.51 IL-33 triggers skin barrier dysfunction by downregulating the expression of filaggrin, claudin-1, keratin 1, and keratin 10, thus contributing to neurogenic inflammation.52
Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) is a cytokine whose function is to drive TH2 immune responses, promoting dendritic cell, T cell, and mast cell activation. TSLP acts as an “alarmin” signaling.53 TSLP is only present in pathological conditions such as the wounded skin of sick patients, in several cell types such as keratinocytes, epithelial cells, dendritic cells, mast cells, and fibroblasts.54 Activation of TSLP induces the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13. In patients with AD, the severity of the disease (measured by SCORAD index) is correlated with the overexpression of TSLP.55
Itch and Vertebral Spine
Once the afferent nerve fibers have been activated, communications are transmitted from the peripheral afferents to their cell bodies in the dorsal root or the trigeminal ganglia, and then to second-order neurons in the spinal cord. Then, in the interpretation of the messages that encode itch, the thalamus is assisted.56 Itch can be caused by neural alterations, either through an increase in activation systems or a decrease in regulation systems.23 Classically, the association between cutaneous regions and itch has been linked to the nerves that regulate regions known as dermatomal localizations, but larger regions may also be involved. Scalp dysesthesia has been associated with an itchy sensation of the scalp and can be caused by degenerative alterations at C2–C7.57,58 Brachioradial pruritus is usually located in the proximal upper extremities and shoulders laterally to the C3–C7 dermatomes, and is frequently linked with deteriorating fluctuations in the cervical spine.59,60 Notalgia paresthetica is localized in the area medial to the scapula on the mid-to-upper back, and it is related to the spinal nerves that ascend from T2-T6.61,62 Finally, anogenital pruritus is related to degenerative modifications of the lower spine at L4-S2.63 Recently, a good association has been found between the complete spinal biomechanical modifications and the state of the skin, measured using the Eczema Area and Severity (EASI) test, and the CGRP levels. The EASI values were associated with the different sections of the spine, ie, the cervical, the sagittal balance, the thoracic, and the lumbar spine.64 The importance of the spinal biomechanical alterations in itching was demonstrated since the EASI levels of patients in the control group were reduced after using the compound cream for 2 weeks, but after 3 months they returned to original values and the dermatitis symptoms flared up again. In contrast, in patients given the chiropractic treatment both the EASI and the CGRP levels remained low after 3 months.64 In conclusion, itch is strongly related to spinal biomechanical alterations.
Role of Ion Channels in Itch
Ion channels can be split into two distinctive groups: histamine-dependent and histamine-independent. Histamine-associated itch is primarily included in several patients with urticaria and drug reactions, and plays a minor role in patients with AD and other conditions. This restraint is due to the relative lack of effect of antihistamines on itch. This suggests that histamine-independent channels are the primary handler of itch in the periphery.23
Ion channels were initially recognized for their function in thermos-sensation and nociception (information about noxious stimuli). However, these sensors have appeared as critical causes of itch. Ion channels are made of glycoproteins and are essential in the activity of all cells. They change chemical signals, temperature variations, and mechanical powers into calcium-mediated indicator transduction pathways. These channels conduct ions and can be selectively permeable to one or more of them.
Neuropeptides activate or modulate ion channels, primarily indirectly through metabotropic receptors, G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Unlike fast-acting classical neurotransmitters, neuropeptides modify the activity of calcium or potassium channels through slower signaling cascades, regulating neuronal excitability in the long term. The activation of histamine receptors leads to neuropeptide release (mostly CGRP and SP) from TRPV1 activation, membrane depolarization, and following stimulation of an action potential by voltage-gated ion channels producing neurogenic inflammation.36
The activation of nerve fibers and skin cells such as keratinocytes and immune cells is mediated by ion channels. These channels control a number of processes, including apoptosis, differentiation, proliferation, and immune responses.22 Dysregulated channel activity has been found to lead to an uncontrolled calcium influx that triggers a cascade of signals that, in turn, reprograms the functional activity of crucial immune cells and controls pain and itch through neuroimmune cross-talk.65 Ion channels are important elements in the pathophysiology of itch.66 These channels have been related to processes such as immune-related inflammation, skin barrier alterations and keratinocyte malfunctions.66 Ion channels also work as transducers and signal amplifiers on cutaneous sensory neurons, converting chemical, mechanical, or thermal stimuli into electrical signals (ie, action potentials) that travel to the brain to create the sensation of itch.
The ion channels primarily involved in itch are described herein. Precise ion channels have been identified to be related to psoriasis. Cation channels are critical for intracellular signaling, skin barrier function and immune cell activation. Calcium channels touch the activation of immune cells and keratinocyte differentiation.22 Potassium and chloride channels regulate processes that are altered in itching, such as ion homeostasis and cellular activation.22,66 These ion channels, especially those in the Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) family, are triggered by various pruritogens (itch-inducing substances) and act as the final common pathway for transmitting itch signals, regardless of whether the pathway is histaminergic (histamine-dependent) or non-histaminergic.
The sensitization to pruritus is an interesting phenomenon. Unrelated to the initial cause, there is an augmented receptiveness of peripheral and central pruriceptive neurons to their afferent input in the framework of chronic itch.19
Histaminergic Channels
Calcium channels are critical for numerous cellular functions, including apoptosis, cellular proliferation and differentiation, as well as immune responses. They influence the activation of immune cells and keratinocyte differentiation.22
TRP channels (Transient Receptor Potential channels) are a family of ion channels that control inflammatory reactions and cell growth.66 The TRP family has been related to different features of itch pathogenesis, including keratinocyte spread to immune function. The most important channels in relation to itch are TRPA1, TRPV1 (Transient Receptor Potential Cation Channel Subfamily V Member 1), TRPV3, TRPV4, TRPM4 (Transient Receptor Potential Cation Channel Subfamily M Member 4) and TRPM8.67 The involvement of TRP channels playing a central role in psoriatic pruritus has been demonstrated in recent studies. In murine models, blocking TRP channels such as TRPV1 and TRPA1 can improve pruritus and other self-protective actions without necessarily dropping inflammation.68 In conclusion, TRP channels are important players in psoriasis pathogenesis, preserving skin homeostasis by managing Na+, Ca2+, and Mg2+, mainly through keratinocytes.69 When the TRPV channel action is not regulated, the calcium flux becomes altered, inducing a cascade of signals that alter the functional activity of critical immune cells, modulating pain and itch signals through a neuroimmune crosstalk. Through these cascades, inflammatory responses become amplified, autoimmune conditions are increased, inflammatory cytokine release is enhanced, and pain/itch control signaling is meadiated via neuroimmune crosstalk.65
TRPA1 is often co-expressed with TRPV1 and has been associated with both histaminergic and non-histaminergic itch. This channel is triggered by oxidative stress and environmental irritants.70 TRPA1 is mainly expressed in sensory neurons, keratinocytes, neutrophils, vascular endothelial cells, and other inflammatory cells.71 It is upregulated in human psoriatic skin lesions, therefore indicating a potential role in the inflammatory process, and has emerged as a significant regulator of neurogenic inflammation.71 In summary, in keratinocytes TRPA1 stimulation plays an important task in regulating procedures connected to skin barrier function, differentiation, proliferation, and inflammation.
TRPV1 is preferentially expressed in keratinocytes and sensory neurons. The activation of TRPV1 results in an influx of calcium ions into cells, playing an essential role in moderating cellular differentiation, proliferation, and inflammation. In addition, calcium influx is necessary for various signaling pathways implicated in skin homeostasis, disease etiology and pathogenesis. TRPV1 releases pro-inflammatory cytokines, intensifying the inflammatory cascade.72 Nerve growth factor (NGF) induces stimulation of TRPV1 in psoriasis, releasing substance P, a neuropeptide implicated in neurogenic inflammation that induces neurogenic pruritus through a difficult neuro-immune feedback loop.73 In preclinical models, inhibition of TRPV1 reduces inflammation and improves skin lesions.74 In addition, in animal models of psoriatic conditions, TRPV1 plays an important role in preserving the regulation of epidermal proliferation and skin barrier function.74 In conclusion, TRPV1 is involved in multiple aspects of itch pathogenesis such as skin barrier dysfunction, inflammation, and immune cell regulation.22
TRPV3 is generally expressed in keratinocytes of the basal layer and on hair follicles, suggesting a role in epidermal and follicular functions that regulate cell differentiation, proliferation, and barrier formation.75 TRPV3 can possibly contribute to several skin pathologies. Both mice and humans with gain-of-function mutations have severe itching, hyperkeratosis, augmented inflammatory cytokines in serum (IL-1α, IL-6, IL-17), elevated total IgE levels and high levels of TSLP. This lymphopoietin induces the activation of the IL-23/IL-17 axis, which is critical in the induction of psoriasis.76 In addition, the stimulation of TRPV3 induces the secretion of ATP and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), which directly activate C-fibers, inducing pain and itch sensations; this may explain the finding of persistent pruritus in patients with psoriasis.76 In conclusion, TRPV3 is involved in inflammatory signaling, keratinocyte function, and itch sensation.
TRPV4 is highly expressed in keratinocytes. Skin samples from people with psoriasis show high TRPV4 expression.77 This channel plays a critical role in reacting to mechanical and osmotic stress. In psoriasis, TRPV4 stimulates disease expansion by intensifying ATP release and neuropeptide excretion, and by activating the IL-23/Th17 pathway. In response to histaminergic pruritogens, keratinocytes depend on TRPV4 for calcium influx, inducing the phosphorylation of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase (ERK).78 In a psoriasis-like mouse model, TRPV4 knockout or pharmacological antagonism decreases immune cell infiltration, epidermal thickening, and skin inflammation.21
TRPM4 is a nonselective calcium-activated cation channel that regulates membrane potential and cellular signaling by linking intracellular calcium with transmembrane electrical signaling.79 TRPM4 is expressed in macrophages, T cells, and keratinocytes. In psoriatic skin, when the TRPM4 channel is not regulated, it becomes associated with abnormal calcium signaling. This results in higher production of cytokines such as IL -17 and IL-22, which are needed for disease development. Additionally, TRPM4 controls the activation of T cells and their transfer to irritated skin, thereby increasing local inflammation.80 In conclusion, TRPM4 affects various aspects of keratinocyte proliferation, immune cell function, and inflammatory signaling.
TRPM8 is triggered by cold and cooling composites such as menthol. In relation to psoriasis, TRPM8 has anti-inflammatory and anti-pruritic effects.81 In a mouse psoriasis model, thymol improved psoriasis-like skin lesions, reduced the heightened itch, and decreased the infiltration of dermal neutrophils, dendritic cells, and Th17 cells that are at the origin of psoriasis. Moreover, thymol overturned the increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines both in serum (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, IL-17A, and IFN-γ) and in the skin (TNF-α, IL-22, IL-23, IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-17C, IL-6, IL-1β, and IFN-γ).82 These interesting results indicate that TRPM8 stimulation plays a main role in itching. In 30 patients with prurigo nodularis, treatment with a TRPM8 agonist (topical Cryosim-1) reduced itch significantly, ameliorated sleep disorder, and achieved higher patient satisfaction compared to placebo. Treated patients showed no adverse effects from Cryosim-1. In addition, TRPM8 agonists decreased skin and serum levels of cytokines, including IL-22, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17, and IFN-γ.83 The mechanism by which TRPM8 agonists inhibit itching seems to be multifaceted. The TRPM8 agonists block both histaminergic and non-histaminergic itch pathways. Furthermore, TRPM8 has been found to be specific, since the effect of agonists requires functional TRPM8 channels or integral TRPM8-expressing afferent neurons.81 This channel is another example of the existence of balances, some enhancing itching and others inhibiting it.
Piezo 1 and 2
Itch is a feeling in the skin that induces the need to scratch. Recently, our knowledge of the immune and nervous systems that produce the feeling of itching has increased enormously. It has recently been found that depending on the type of stimulus used to provoke the sensation of itching, the itch pathway used is different. In most cases, chemical intermediaries of itching, for example histamine, are inoculated in the skin, activating receptors of sensory neurons. In patients with chronic itching, light mechanical stimulation is used to induce itching. Using mouse models, research demonstrated that the neuronal trails used by chemical itch inductors and the ones that respond to mechanical stimulation are different. Different groups of sensitive neurons, spinal interneurons, and transmitting neurons were discovered in the two pathways, demonstrating that the itch transmission depends on the activators.84 The procedure by which mechanical stimuli are transformed into electrochemical signs is called mechanotransduction, and it is critical for biological activities such as neuronal cell development, pain sensation, and red blood cell volume regulation. In 2010, Piezo1 and Piezo2 channels, a novel family of mechanically triggered cation channels in eukaryotes, were described.85 Piezo1 is preferentially expressed in the dorsal root ganglion neurons co-expressing the Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) nociceptor marker. In animal models of inflammatory pain, genetic elimination of Piezo1 diminished intermediately-adapting mechanically activated currents, and reduced tactile pain sensitivity. Knockdown Piezo1 also altered, below inflammatory stress, the excitability of the neurons expressing TRPV1. Therefore, Piezo1 emerges as a key mediator in the transmission of mechanical and inflammatory pain.86 Recently, Piezo1 and Piezo2 were found to be present totally in the axon of a subpopulation of human digital Meissner corpuscles; these are specialized nerve endings in the skin that are accountable for detecting delicate touch and low-frequency vibrations.87 Interestingly, Piezo1 plays key roles in bone mass control and mechanotransduction. Studies have emphasized Piezo2 as a supplementary companion of Piezo1 in the control and conservation of skeletal growth and homeostasis.88 Remarkably, it has recently been described that the intensity of intrinsic dermatitis is connected to that of spinal biomechanical modifications.64 In reply to powers generated by the tissue or externally to the cell, Piezo1, which is present in the plasma membrane, opens its cation-permeable porous to permit Ca2+ to arrive the cytosol. This Piezo1-mediated calcium influx directs various Ca2+-dependent downstream signaling pathways and administers housekeeping cellular procedures. Therefore, the cellular job of Piezo1 depends on two important items: its expression and setting on various cell types. Also Ca2+ depends on penetrability and the kinetics of inactivation that determine the largeness and period of the change of cytosolic Ca.2+89 Mechanical energy is transmitted from the Piezo channels to the spinal interneurons and spinal projection cells, relaying this data to the brain.64
Potassium Channels
Potassium (K⁺) is necessary for various biological processes, such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, and activation of the immune system. Its dysregulation has been linked to the pathogenesis of itching and psoriasis.90 Potassium channels, particularly Kv1.3, show important functions in the regulation of itch and psoriasis by moderating ‑ cell function, keratinocyte behavior, and inflammatory processes.
Kv1.3, voltage-gated potassium channel, is expressed preferentially in stimulated T cells and is necessary for the immigration and stimulus of T cells, predominantly Th17 cells, which are important elements to psoriatic inflammation. In psoriatic lesions, expression of Kv1.3 is increased in effector memory T cells, helping to increase their activation and persistence in the skin.91 In vitro experiments in psoriatic lesions showed that the Kv1.3 inhibitor PAP-1 dose-dependently blocked IL-2 and IFN-γ production and suppressed T cell proliferation.92
Chloride Channels
Chloride (Cl−) ion channels are implicated in preserving cell volume regulation, ion homeostasis, and signal transduction. These channels are present in several cell types, including immune cells and keratinocytes, and they participate in several physiological and pathological processes. The dysregulation of these channels can contribute to the characteristic features of itch and psoriasis, such as keratinocyte hyperproliferation, impaired barrier function, chronic inflammation and immune cell signaling.66
Anoctamin 1 (ANO1/TMEM16A) is an important channel mediating nociception and itch. ANO1 is activated by intracellular Ca2+ and depolarization. It is highly expressed in smooth muscle, epithelial cells, interstitial cells of Cajal and sensory neurons (nociceptors). Nerve injury induces upregulation of ANO1 expression in Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG) neurons.93 In neuropathic pain models such as spinal nerve ligation, spinal nerve injury, and chronic contraction injury, ANO1 expression is increased with the development of pain.94 ANO1 increase is associated with an increment of injury-related issues such as inducing transcription factor 3 (ATF-3), caspase-3, protease-activated receptor (PAR2), and neurokinin-1 receptors.95 In animal models, ANO1 regulates cell proliferation and differentiation of keratinocytes.96 Finally, ANO1 has been associated with the control of inflammatory responses in epithelial cells, implying that the lack of regulation could aggravate the inflammatory environment in psoriatic lesions.
Sodium Channels
Sodium (Na⁺) channels are critical controllers of action potential and excitability. They are essential for preserving cellular homeostasis and help signal transduction. In the skin, these channels influence in keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation, as well as the immune cell function. The alteration of sodium channels has been involved in the pathophysiology of psoriasis.97
Nav Channels
Voltage-gated ion channels (VGIC) are a superfamily accountable for generating and transmitting action potentials. The foundational members of the VGIC superfamily are the voltage-gated sodium (Nav) channels that in humans are divided into nine subtypes (Nav1.1-Nav1.9); each is specifically expressed in different tissues and cell types.98 The structure of these channels comprises an α subunit with four homologous repeats I–IV, each with six transmembrane parts (S1-S6). Sections S1 to S4 fold to a voltage-sensing domain, whereas S5 and S6 enclose the pore domain through which sodium ions pass.99 Interestingly, Nav1.7, Nav1.8, and Nav1.9 are often called peripheral Nav channels because their expression occurs mainly in peripheral sensory neurons, such as the dorsal root ganglion neurons.100 These channels relay sensory information from the periphery to the spine. Nav1.8 is different from many other sodium channels for its unique activation and inactivation characteristics. In relation to other Nav subtypes, activation happens at higher depolarized membrane potentials and has longer deactivation kinetics.101 These characteristics permit continued energetic activity even when other subtypes have become inactivated. The speed with which it recovers from inactivation allows for high-frequency repetitive firing. This gives it a mechanism that links hyperexcitability and pain.102 Salvatierra et al described a mutation in NaV1.9 (heterozygous de novo p.L811P gain-of-function) associated with incapacitating itch and different pain perception.103 Using mouse models, these authors found that NaV1.9–/– mice showed, in response to pruritogens, a significantly reduced scratching conduct, while NaV1.9L799P/WT mutation mainly increased itch. In KO mice of NaV1.7, NaV1.8 and NaV1.9, Kremer et al demonstrated that beside the proposed general role of NaV17 and NaV1.9 in itch signaling, NaV1.8 sustained prolonged itching.103 Nav1.8 alter the redox balance by reducing superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2) activity, thus preventing its deacetylation and mitochondrial localization, and thereafter inducing ROS deposition in keratinocytes.104 In turn, elevated ROS levels activate pro-inflammatory signaling pathways, provoking the increase of inflammatory mediators such as IL-1β and IL-6.104
Non-Histaminergic Channels
This group includes the channels involved in itching that are resistant to antihistamines. They also differ from histaminergic channels because there are mechanosensitive C-fibers responsive to cowhage (Mucuna pruriens), a plant known as a non-histaminergic pruritogen.105 The active component of cowhage stimulates mas-related G protein-coupled receptors (Mrgprs). When injected into the skin, cowhage causes intense itching without triggering the histamine response typically associated with allergic reactions.
Mas-Related G-Protein-Coupled Receptor (GPCR) Member X2 (MRGPRX2)
The current attention on Mrgprx2 is due to its function in drug-induced hypersensitivity and its participation as a non-IgE receptor on mast cells.106 This class A GPCR consists of 330 amino acids with a classic seven‑transmembrane α-helices structure.101 The extracellular N-terminal of MRGPRX2 is critical for ligand binding, while the intracellular C‑terminal interrelates with heterotrimeric G proteins.107 The expression of MRGPRX2 is mostly on mast cells and dorsal root ganglia, but is also present on other cells such as basophils, eosinophils and keratinocytes.107 Interestingly, MRGPRX2 has shown affinity for many ligands, either endogenous and exogenous, such as cortistatin‑14, substance P, pro-adrenomedullin N-terminal peptide 12, vasoactive peptide, human cathelicidins LL‑37, human β-defensins 2, cathepsin S and eosinophil cationic protein.106 Therefore, this receptor can play an important role in different situations. These diverse ligands signal through Gαi and Gαq and β-arrestins pathways. These ligands induce mast cell degranulation through various pathways, rapidly releasing several stored bioactive mediators, such as histamine and tryptase. Later, de novo produced mediators such as prostaglandins and leukotrienes are liberated into the close milieu.107 At the same time, a group of cytokines and interleukins are produced and released, contributing to the late phase and often continuing the chronic inflammatory response. Mast cell mediators have pro-inflammatory and immunomodulatory activity and are associated with several symptoms in chronic skin inflammatory conditions. Interestingly, MRGPRX2 mRNA induction is associated with itchy skin in patients with chronic spontaneous urticarial108 and its activation produces an augmented skin reaction in such patients.109 The suppression of MRGPRX2 by Celastrol (which reduces calcium ion influx) inhibits mast cell degranulation in atopic dermatitis.110 These data strongly support an association between MRGPRX2 and itching in humans.
Proteinase-Activated Receptors (PARs)
PARs are a subfamily of GPCRs with four members, PAR1-PAR4. They play important functions in thrombosis, wound healing, hemostasis, embryonic development, cancer progression, and inflammation.111 PARs activation requires the cleavage of the extracellular domain by a protease. This mechanism allows the exposure of a new amino terminus and act as a ligand to activate PARs.112 Activating and deactivating proteases control the PARs activity. The source of proteases can be from external sources such as fungi, mites, bacteria, cockroaches, and plants, or endogenous sources such as keratinocytes, mast cells, macrophages, dendritic cells, B cells, T cells, and neutrophils113 in the skin, the functions of PARs include skin barrier homeostasis, inflammation, as well as itch and pain.114
Between the four members of the PAR family, PAR2 has an important role in the skin inflammatory response, inducing Th2 inflammation, obstructing skin barrier reparation, and disturbing the keratinocytes differentiation. In dermatological diseases, inflammation is the greatest predominant pathological development and the role of PAR2 in inflammation is well recognized. PAR2 is crucial for controlling skin homeostasis, immune and inflammatory responses, and tumor surveillance. It also contributes to the spread of itch and pain feelings in the skin. PAR2 plays a critical function in the mechanisms that induce inflammatory skin diseases such as acne vulgaris, rosacea, psoriasis, and AD.115
PAR2 molecule is a transmembrane protein with 397 amino acids that is divided into an extracellular region (N-terminus and extracellular loops), a transmembrane region (seven transmembrane helices), and an intracellular (intracellular loops and C-terminus) region. PAR2 is expressed on several types of cells, including epithelial, smooth muscle, and endothelial cells.116 After PAR2 activation, the transduction signaling occurs across classical G proteins dependent pathway, activating phospholipase C (PLC) and producing diacylglycerol (DAG) and inositol triphosphate (IP3). It also activates the enrollment of Ca2+ and the stimulation of protein kinase C (PKC). Consequently, a frequent method to identify PAR2 stimulation is to quantify intracellular Ca2+ flux.117 The next step in this pathway is the phosphorylation of IKKα and IKKβ. This leads to the stimulation and movement of NF-ĸB to the nucleus. Activation of NF-κB and the inflammatory mediator intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) could be a pro-inflammatory axis triggered by PAR2 signaling.116 On keratinocytes, activation of PAR2 induces the release of leukotriene B4 (LTB4), causing itch by the high-affinity receptor BLT1-expressing neurons.118 In addition, thymic stromal lymphopoietin is released; this pruritogenic cytokine activates TRPA1-expressing sensitive neurons.119 PAR2 is expressed on several cells, including eosinophils, monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, neutrophils, T cells and mast cells, in the dermis and in the granular layer of the epidermis.120
Glutamate Receptors
In the CNS, glutamate is the main excitative neurotransmitter that binds to some receptors, such as the AMPA, NMDA, and kainate receptors, respectively called after the molecules that selectively bind to them. These receptors frequently work in complex networks in concert with each other. The N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor is mainly located in the CNS and is crucial in synaptic malleability and central felling of pain and itch. This receptor is additionally expressed in peripheral sensory neurons in the dermal–epidermal junction. Under inflammatory conditions, other cells of non-neuronal origin such as macrophages may also add to the local glutamate pool. The NMDA receptor plays a role as a ligand-gated channel permitting the passage of cations such as Na+, K+ and Ca.2+121
Itch Treatment
Given its prevalence, the treatment of itch is an important healthcare problem, and several therapeutic products are currently available.122
Topical Treatments
Emollient creams hydrate, soften and soothe dry skin by forming a protective lipid film over the stratum corneum, which acts as a barrier to seal in moisture and reduce transepidermal water loss. These creams fill the gaps between skin cells with oils, improving skin barrier function and preventing the entry of irritants.123
Corticosteroids act primarily by binding to intracellular glucocorticoid receptors, which then translocate to the nucleus to control gene expression (genomic mechanism) or directly alter cell signaling (non-genomic mechanism). Corticosteroids reduce inflammation by inhibiting pro-inflammatory cytokines and increasing anti-inflammatory proteins, while also inhibiting immune cell migration and function.124
Calcineurin inhibitors such as tacrolimus and pimecrolimus block T cell activation by decreasing the production of IL-2.125 These molecules have a very similar structure, although pimecrolimus penetrates the skin less than tacrolimus.
Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitors
The JAK-STAT pathway includes a family of four JAK kinases and seven Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STATs). A signaling cascade starts after binding of a ligand to its receptor that triggers JAK activation. Receptor phosphorylation causes the formation of dimeric STATs that control the transcription of target genes. This pathway is present in many different cell types, including immune cells, keratinocytes, and peripheral sensory neurons, and it promotes both JAK and STAT activity in inflammation and itching. The JAK-STAT pathway is involved in the induction of IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-22, IL-31, and TSLP, all of which contribute to the induction of itch. JAK inhibitors are among the most active systemic treatments for itch. However, these inhibitors are associated with a high frequency of adverse effects such as severe infections, important cardiovascular events, lymphoma, and thrombosis. Oral JAK inhibitors target different JAKs; the JAK1/2 is Ruxolitinib and there is a pan-JAK inhibitor (ie, one that inhibits all four JAK isoforms) with the name Delgocitinib. Topical JAK inhibitors have very positive effects on the skin, reducing the severity of skin rashes and decreasing itching.126
Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors
In patients suffering from itch, elevated phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) activity has been detected in mononuclear cells. While preserving skin integrity, PDE4 inhibitors are anti-inflammatory drugs that control inflammatory responses. PDE4 inhibitors are an effective alternative for AD treatment because, contrary to corticosteroids, they help avoid skin atrophy and the subsequent decline of the epithelial barrier. Crisaborole is a boron-based benzoxaborole that binds to a single metal site, whereas Roflumilast acts with roughly 300–1000 times higher potency by deeply engaging PDE4’s catalytic metal, glutamine, and a water residue. By blocking phosphodiesterase, Roflumilast stops the failure of cAMP and diminishes overall inflammation.127
Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) selective agonists decrease the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including Tapinarof.128
GABAergic drugs such as Gabapentin and Pregabalin are used in neuropathic pain and chronic itch conditions. These drugs reduce itch through the modulation of neurotransmitters by binding in the CNS to voltage-gated calcium channels. The blockage of these ion channels reduces calcium influx to nerve terminals and by this way excitatory neurotransmitters of itch such as glutamate and substance P were inhibited.129 The use of gabapentin is associated with several infrequent side effects, fluctuating from neurological appearances such as myoclonus and ataxia to modifications of behavior including child violence and suicidal ideas. Furthermore, respiratory problems, questions connected to pregnancy, sleep troubles, and infrequent difficulties such as encephalopathy and myopathy have been reported.130
Systemic Treatments
Phototherapy is an operative treatment for several kinds of pruritus. While the precise devices by which phototherapy decreases itch differ across pruritic circumstances, its effects may result from immune suppression and/or neural modulation.131 Also, nerve fiber density and nerve growth factor may decrease, as well as the activation of peripheral nerves. However, the availability of ultraviolet (UV) phototherapy is limited, as it requires two to three treatments per week during 10 to 14 weeks.132
Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) have evolved rapidly over the last years, with the mAb market being conquered by entirely human molecules, introducing bispecific molecules, and entering into competition from biosimilars.133 At present, mAb are intended to focus on specific immune pathways involved in disease pathogenesis. The Th2 response and its associated cytokines (IL-4, IL-13, and IL-31) contribute to the persistence of pruritus in AD. They disrupt skin barrier function, epidermal differentiation, and immune system regulation, while promoting an increased density of sensory nerve fibers and neurosensitization. Specifically, IL-31 is key in both acute and chronic pruritus. Treating inflammation and restoring the skin barrier is crucial for alleviating pruritus. Dupilumab inhibits binding to the IL-4Rα subunit, and therefore inhibits IL-4 and IL-13 signaling. This makes the subsequent reduction of the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, and the obstruction of the inflammatory response associated with TH2 cells.134 Tralokinumab is an antibody with strong affinity to IL-13 that reduces inflammation because it avoids binding to specific receptors.135 Lebrikizumab is a mAb with strong affinity and selectivity for soluble IL-13; by this way the development of the IL-4Rα–IL-13Rα1 heterodimer compound is prevented. Lebrikizumab does not inhibit IL-13 binding to IL-13Rα2 (a decoy receptor); therefore, IL-13 can be internalized. IL-13 is a crucial cytokine because serum levels are directly associated with itching severity.136 Tralokinumab and lebrikizumab showed no important secondary effects, and both showed similar efficiency in moderate to severe AD. Nemolizumab is an anti-IL-31 receptor α-chain (IL-31RA) mAb with high effectiveness in reducing pruritus. Adverse effects include aggravation of AD, nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infections, raised creatine kinase, peripheral edema and severe asthma aggravation.137
JAK inhibitors block the cascade of signals between the binding of a cytokine to its receptor and the transcription of target genes implicated in inflammatory pathways.138 These inhibitors are very active for itching associated with AD, but they carry a high risk of adverse effects. Upadacitinib and Abrocitinib are reversible and selective inhibitors of JAK1 and Baricitinib shows a high affinity for JAK1 and JAK2. Upadacitinib shows the maximum efficiency among the JAK inhibitors, but is the one with the maximum toxicity. The effectiveness of Abrocitinib is nearly similar to that of Upadacitinib, and it rapidly inhibits itching but also with very high toxicity. Despite inducing dual JAK1/JAK2 inhibition, Baricitinib has lower overall effectiveness compared to the other two inhibitors.
Kappa Opioids
There are two types of opioid receptors with opposing effects on itch production. On one hand, we have κ-opioid receptors (KORs) that inhibit itching, and on the other hand, μ-opioid receptors (MORs) that increase itch. These receptors react with different ligands. The inhibitory interneurons in the spinal cord Bhlhb5-positive release dynorphin that binds to KORs on the Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor (GRPR)-positive neurons. This results in the suppression of chemical itch. Under chronic itch situations, differences in the equilibrium between MORs, which are activators of itch, and KORs, which are contrary inhibitors of itch, in the opioid system are linked to neural sensitization. One therapeutic approach to itching is the use of agonists of KOR through Nalfurafine and Difelikefalin. Another approach is to use a KOR agonist with a MOR antagonist such as the combination of Nalbuphine and Butorphano. The objective is to reduce itch feeling to the CNS by correcting the inequality.139 However, side effects of KOR agonists consist of psychotomimesis, dysphoria, and sedation, and as a result of these effects, clinical trials have been interrupted.140 These side effects delay the progress of KOR agonists for medical use, except Nalfurafine in Japan and Korea and, more recently, Difelikefalin in the United States.
Antimetabolites Methotrexate (MTX) is an antifolate metabolite that blocks nucleic acids as well as the synthesis of purine and exerts its effects by multiple mechanisms that suppress inflammatory and immune responses.141 MTX inhibits inflammation in immune cells through the control of cell-specific signaling pathways. This makes MTX a drug of choice for treating an extensive number of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases.142 Originated from 6-mercaptopurine, Azathioprine is a synthetic purine analog. Through the disruption of purine metabolism, it blocks nucleic acid synthesis, thus affecting cell reproduction, as well as the immune response by blocking the functional activity of T and B cells. This results in the reduction of inflammatory activities.143 Cyclosporine, through its union with cyclophilin, inhibits calcineurin. This union forms a complex that blocks calcineurin activity, an enzyme that dephosphorylates NFAT, which regulates cytokine transcription and inhibits IL-2 expression. Cyclosporine has shown effectiveness in the treatment of itching. However, a large number of adverse effects have been reported, including increased susceptibility to infection, hypertension, headache, tremors, paresthesia, nephrotoxicity, gingival hyperplasia, hirsutism, hypertriglyceridemia, and gastrointestinal symptoms.144 Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) disrupts purine biosynthesis by obstructing inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), an enzyme that converts inosine monophosphate to xanthosine monophosphate, a crucial stage in purine synthesis. This selectively inhibits B- and T‑cell proliferation because the de novo synthesis pathway to create guanosine nucleotides is blocked.145 The greatest side effects are nausea, vomiting, and abdominal cramping. Long‑term treatment has been associated with an increased risk of herpes infections.
GABAergic Drugs
Gabapentin and Pregabalin are medications used for the treatment of neuropathic pain and several chronic itch disorders. In the cerebral cortex, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the major repressive neurotransmitter, preserving the repressive tone that counterbalances neuronal irritation. The disruption of this balance leads to the appearance of seizures. GABA is made in the terminals of GABAergic axons and released in the synapse. Here it acts on two receptors: GABAA, controlling chloride access into the cell, and GABAB, which have several roles, increasing potassium conductance, reducing calcium access, and blocking the presynaptic release of other transmitters. Gabapentin and Pregabalin reduce itch through the modulation of neurotransmitters, decreasing central neural sensitization. In the CNS, at nerve terminals, the drugs reduce calcium influx through inactivation of voltage-gated calcium channels. Similarly, these drugs intensify GABA inhibitory neurotransmission in the CNS. In addition, by increasing spinal cord GABA from primary afferent neurons, they reduce the release of SP and CGRP, which are important itch mediators.146 The safety and efficacy of Gabapentinoids have been evaluated by pooling data from 50 studies with 12,398 participants. Most adverse events concerned the nervous system (7 effects) or psychiatric (3 effects) illnesses. With Pregabalin there were more unfavorable results than with Gabapentin.147
NMDA Receptor Targets
Topical administration of the NMDA-receptor antagonist Ketamine has proven to be effective in chronic itch through reducing peripheral nerve sensitivity. In retrospective studies, after using topical ketamine in individuals with different pathological itches, 55–63% of patients had relief of itch.121 Only 0–16.7% of patients reported side effects, which frequently involved local reactions such as a burning feeling and redness. Intravenous or inhaled ketamine has central effects that differ from the topical formulation. Due to the multiple effects of NMDA acting in the CNS, it has been suggested that these ketamine preparations may decrease central itch neural sensitization by reducing neural plasticity; however, before making this conclusion, extra investigation is required in this area.148
Topical Treatment with Magnesium for Itching
Magnesium is a mineral nutrient essential for human health and welfare. Magnesium is involved in several structural and metabolic functions, and it is also essential in electrophysiological functions. Magnesium ion (Mg2+) is an electrolyte that exists in all body fluids, particularly with intracellular distribution. In nerve cells, Mg2+ is distributed in many cellular structures such as the cell nucleus, cytoplasm, mitochondria, and endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Mitochondria store the highest concentration of Mg2+ in the cell because they function as the location of cellular respiration and also the place of major synthesis of adenosine triphosphate (ATP). In eukaryotic cells, because of the mitochondrial Mg2+ dynamics, there are specific Mg2+-sensitive channels that facilitate Mg2+ permeation through the inner mitochondrial membrane.149 Other transporters and exchangers are relevant for maintaining cellular Mg2+ homeostasis150 on the cell membrane and organelle membranes. Intracellular Mg2+ (Mg2+i) is key for cell energy metabolism by adjusting oxidative phosphorylation by Mg2+ in the mitochondrial matrix, resulting in the enhancement of mitochondrial ATP synthesis.151 Mg2+ ions are also necessary for neuronal health and activity. These ions are disseminated through the cell and cross various compartments. Magnesium is necessary for several nerve cell functions, such as cell cycle control, enzyme stimulation, protein synthesis, genome stabilization, control of biochemical and signaling pathways, energy metabolism, and variation of membrane ion transport mechanisms.152 The extra‑ or intracellular stimuli produce variations in cytosolic Mg2+ levels. From the cellular stocks or entering from the extracellular liquid, Mg2+i can be quickly rallied, acting as a signal transducer and cellular supervisor that controls the action of various target cell molecules.153
Ion channels are membrane proteins that, depending on the channel, discern the movement of ions across the cell membrane. The action of these channels depends on ligand binding, voltage changes, or intracellular signaling molecules. In the presence of aqueous solutions as well as body fluids, Mg2+ ions exert a pull-on dipole of water molecules. Under this condition, as Mg2+(aq), they show a large ionic radius that binds to the ion-specific sites (such as Ca2+, K+, or Na+) of ion channels, inhibiting its passage through the ion channel. Because the pores of the ion channels are very narrow and the hydration double layer of Mg2+ (aq) is difficult to remove, it prevents the passage of Mg2+ ions through the ion channels. In this way, Mg2+ ions become a good inhibitor of activity in different ion channels. After the Mg2+ ions bind inside the channel pore, it turn out to be impossible for competing cations to remove them, completely blocking the channel and preventing the passage of other cations154 (Figure 3).
Figure 3.
Inhibition of ion channels by magnesium. Ion channels are like “gates” in the cell membrane that permit the passage of ions (such as sodium, potassium, or calcium). Under physiological conditions, Ca2+ passes through the ion channel (Figure on the left). If there is a large amount of Mg2+ in the medium, it competes with Ca2+, inhibiting its passage through the ion channel (central figure). Furthermore, Mg2+ can bind two H2O molecules, forming a large particle that blocks the passage of Ca2+ through the ion channel (Figure on the right).
Another way of channel inhibition by Mg2+ is the competition with Ca2+i. This competition is more obvious in the presence of millimolar [Ca2+]i. Therefore, Mg2+ not only blocks channels by taking their high-affinity Ca2+-binding sites, but also by binding to low-affinity metal-binding ones155 (Figure 3). Through other mechanisms, Mg2+ influences the function of ion channels. Mg2+ produces electrostatic exchanges with the pores or gated areas of the channel, allosteric variation of the channel’s configuration, or variations in surface charge that modify the recognition of the membrane potential.152 Magnesium has a critical function operating in physiological and pathophysiological circumstances; this interesting molecule becomes very attractive as a therapeutic instrument in basic science as well as in practical medicine.
The pathophysiology of pruritus begins with the excitation of cutaneous sensory neurons by pruritogens, mainly via activation of GPCRs expressed on peripheral nerve terminals. This induces an inflammatory reaction. During this process, large quantities of ROS are produced initially by neutrophils and subsequently by macrophages. ROS removes infectious agents, but it can also cause tissue damage and is part of the inflammatory spectrum.156 In addition, some channels such as TRPV4 promote Ca2⁺ overload, amplify ROS production, impair antioxidant defenses, and trigger inflammatory signaling157 when they become activated under ischemic stress. Finally, the immune system releases cytokines such as IL-4, IL-13, and IL-31, which can act as pruritogens. Skin inflammation damages the skin barrier, thus continuing a loop of pruritus and inflammation. By controlling inflammatory pathways, calming immune responses, and reinstating skin homeostasis, natural anti-pruritic agents break this loop.158 For a long time, it has been recognized that plant extracts have beneficial effects as anti-oxidants on itch (Figure 4).
Figure 4.
Inhibition of ion channels by anti-oxidants. Activation of keratinocytes and immune cells produce ROS and cytokines that help Ca2+ to cross the ionic channel (Figure on the left). In the presence of anti-oxidants, inflammation and ROS are inhibited, and then the passage of Ca2+ through the ion channel is inhibited (Figure at the right).
In studies conducted on humans, magnesium has demonstrated its effect through its anti-inflammatory properties. The transdermal administration of magnesium oil ameliorates the quality of life of subjects with fibromyalgia by reducing pain, fatigue, depression, and sleep disorders.159 The induction of magnesium wound healing was due to its antioxidant effects.160 On the skin, magnesium acts as a ROS scavenger, increasing the number of fibroblasts, blood vessels and the amount of collagen.161 In the immune response, magnesium induces the polarization of macrophages, causing them to switch from a pro-inflammatory (M1) to an anti-inflammatory (M2) phenotype.162 Also, it has been found that magnesium accelerates skin barrier recovery, a major objective in AD treatment.163 Bathing in a magnesium-rich Dead Sea salt solution improves skin barrier function and hydration, and reduces inflammation in atopic dry skin.164
Topical Treatment with Antioxidants for Itching
Flavonoids, such as Diosmin, Quercetin, and 6-methoxyflavanone, are compounds with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. These compounds block free radicals and ROS, reduce oxidative stress, and in the periphery, they reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines.165 Additionally, in mouse model studies, flavonoids were described to block X2MRGPRX2 through activation of mast cells. MRGPRX2 shows a critical role in many chronic itch situations as well as in AD, urticaria, and chronic prurigo.166 Altogether, by reducing oxidative stress and subsequent inflammation, they decrease peripheral and possibly central itch sensitization.
Resveratrol and curcumin are both current ordinary constituents normally used as dietary supplements.167 Due to its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and neuroprotective effects, Resveratrol has been shown to improve neuropathic pain. Several reports describe that resveratrol controls pain pathways by impeding pro-inflammatory cytokines and controlling neuroinflammation. In animal models, resveratrol decreased pain sensitivity and ameliorated motor function, probably by cooperating with pathways such as NF-κB and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), which are intricate in inflammation and oxidative stress.168,169 The effects of resveratrol on neuroinflammation and oxidative stress are probably critical in stopping neuronal injury and decreasing pain.
Curcumin is a polyphenol compound derived from traditional Chinese medicine. The active compound Curcuma longa (turmeric) is a well-documented anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anti‑apoptotic agent with neuroprotective properties in in vitro and in vivo studies.170,171 By blocking NLRP3 inflammasome activation, curcumin controls both central and peripheral inflammation, both elements are critical in itching.169 Finally, by activating signaling pathways such as AMPK and sirtuins, curcumin similarly promotes neuronal survival.172 In both pharmacological assays and in vivo experiments, curcumin has been shown to be innocuous without secondary effects.173,174
Papaya or Pawpaw (Carica papaya L.) is a plant from the Caricaceae family. The immature fruit is used for diuresis, as an aborticide agent, as a galactogogue, and as a mild laxative. Various parts of the plant are used in the treatment of several diseases. Uses of C. papaya that are technically authenticated comprise the wound‑healing effects of the leaves.175 Using rats as an experimental model, the anti-inflammatory result of an ethanolic extract of Carica papaya leaves has been described. The extract decreased carrageenan-induced paw edema, and also persistent edema induced using the formaldehyde arthritis model.176 In lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated human macrophages, the methanol extract of Papaya leaves decreased the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL -1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α.177 By using organic solvents, the ethyl acetate fraction of Papaya leaf juice presented the best anti-inflammatory activity. In a macrophage cell line activated with LPS, this preparation inhibited the expression of nitric oxide (NO) and pro-inflammatory enzymes, such as inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase (COX-2), and cytokines (IL-1β and IL-6). The results also showed that its anti-inflammatory mechanisms were mediated by the MAPK signaling pathway.178 In adults, papaya leaf ingestion for short-term use is commonly safe. However, it should be used with caution during pregnancy and in people with liver impairment.179
Rosemary
Carnosic acid (CA), a Rosmarinus officinalis L. phenolic diterpene, has been shown to have antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties.180,181 In mice, the bioactive compound inhibited phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)-induced ear inflammation. In mouse skin, this compound decreased the expression of IL-1β and TNF-α and COX-2. In PMA-treated ears, histopathological examination revealed a decrease in leukocyte penetration and epidermal ulceration.180 From keratinocytes activated with sodium lauryl sulfate and retinoic acid, CA obtained from new Rosemary leaves powerfully repressed the production of IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-1. In addition, from an activated macrophage cell line, CA inhibited the production of NO, TNF-α, and prostaglandin E 2 (PGE 2). CA also inhibited the nuclear translocation of nuclear factor (NF)-κB.178,181 The only adverse reaction described was an increase in blood pressure in patients with primary hypotension.182 Therefore, in this population of patients, rosemary should be consumed with caution.
Ferulic acid is a natural compound with antipruritic effects. In Wistar rats, oral administration of Ferulic acid inhibited carrageenan‑induced edema, augmented dye escape made by acetic acid, and formation of granuloma made by cotton pellet.183 In another study using mouse ear edema induced by tetradecanoylphorbol acetate (TPA), topical administration of Ferulic acid reduced inflammation by 71.02% compared to controls, thereby confirming its anti-inflammatory activity.184 The antipruritic activity of Ferulic acid was measured in another study that assessed the incidence of scratching. Oral administration of Ferulic acid to mice 24 hours before challenge with a histamine-releasing agent injected subcutaneously to provoke scratching behavior resulted in a significant inhibition (to 25%) of scratching behavior compared to control levels.185 At present, Ferulic acid is widely used in dermatology. Eighteen human studies have evaluated Ferulic acid in various cutaneous conditions, demonstrating effectiveness in improving skin erythema, pigmentation, hydration, elasticity, and texture. Ferulic acid was also effective both alone and in combination with other active ingredients in subjects with and without dermatologic diagnoses. In addition, consumption in adults is safe with no adverse effects.186
Green tea beverages prepared from tea leaves are not just part of the rich cultural heritage but also provide health benefits. The main component is (−)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), with an exclusive chemical structure and strong biological activities. Its specific stereo-chemical configuration allows it to interrelate with biological targets such as enzyme dynamic sites or cell membrane receptors to control cellular physiological works.187 These features result in several biological actions (including antimicrobial effects, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties), and also improve gut microbiota. In mouse models of acute and chronic itch, behavior tests defined the effects of EGCG. Acute itch was induced by compound 48/80 and chloroquine; green tea polyphenon 60 or EGCG administered either local or systemic ameliorated the itch significantly. In vitro assays using a dorsal root ganglion-derived cell line showed that compound 48/80 induced intracellular ROS that was significantly reduced by adding EGCG. Using mice as an animal model, EGCG reduced imiquimod-provoked chronic psoriatic itch conduct and skin epidermal hyperplasia. These results demonstrated that EGCG is a promising approach for anti-itch therapy.188 Using mice as an animal model, EGCG reduced L-arginine-induced acute pancreatitis and the consequent pulmonary injury. EGCG inhibited oxidative stress and eliminated NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome stimulation in the lung.189 A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of Polyphenon E, a standardized, highly concentrated green tea leaf extract (Camellia sinensis) primarily containing catechins like EGCG, 15% and 10% in the treatment of warts. Concerning the primary result, both Polyphenon E 15% and 10% significantly increased the probability of complete elimination of the initial lesions and new verrucae related to controls. No substantial heterogeneity was detected. The most frequent local skin signs/symptoms were erythema and itching. Regarding safety and tolerability, local skin signs and symptoms were usually uncommon. Recurrence rates were very low.190
Melatonin is a natural hormone made by the brain’s pineal gland in response to darkness that regulates the body’s sleep-wake cycle (circadian rhythm). Melatonin is also produced in the nerves and peripheral organs, as well as in human skin. It also has quite a lot of other properties, including control of immune and endocrine roles and antioxidant capacities such as scavenging free radicals and activation of antioxidant enzymes. Melatonin blocks tyrosinase activity and cell growth over inhibition of DNA synthesis.191 Melatonin may enhance wound healing using several mechanisms: (1) strong antioxidant activity, (2) anti-inflammatory activities, (3) infection regulator, (4) control of vascular reactivity and angiogenesis, (5) painkiller (pain-relieving) properties, and (6) anti-pruritic (anti-itch) results.192 In children with AD, melatonin reduced sleep‑onset latency and ameliorated disease severity with an important difference in SCORAD scores. No adverse events were reported, confirming its tolerability.193 Compared with placebo, melatonin supplementation given to 40 adult patients with mild to moderate AD improved disease gravity based on body surface area (BSA) and SCORAD scores (p<0.001), as well as sleep quality, and quality of life, without any reported adverse effects.194
Niacinamide (nicotinamide) is the water-soluble amide isotype of vitamin B3. Often given as a food supplement, it is now being used in the treatment of skin diseases. Since the body does not store niacinamide naturally, it has to be obtained from external sources. Niacinamide has anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antipruritic properties, and it is used in numerous dermatological products. Its effects are based on the inhibition of poly-ADP-ribose-polymerase (PARP)-1 and many molecules involved in the cell signaling cascade, including intercellular adhesion molecule-1, major histocompatibility complex II, IL-1, IL-12, TNF-α and macrophage migration inhibitory factor-1. In blistering disorders, the capacity of nicotinamide to block pro‑inflammatory cytokine pathways has been considered the primary mechanism for its beneficial effects.195 The activity of Niacinamide in eliminating pruritus is thought to be complex and is due to numerous mechanisms. It can stabilize mast cells and thus reduce histamine release, improve the manufacture of cutaneous ceramides, deficits of which enhance dry skin and pruritus, and it inhibits the increased activity of T helper-1. Topical Nicotinamide has also been shown to be helpful in treating AD since it reduces transepidermal water loss (TEWL), probably through ceramide production.196 A recent study, in patients with mild AD showed significant improvement using the Niacinamide body creams in relation to the clinical symptoms, the skin barrier function and the quality of life. No adverse reactions were detected at the end of the study.197
Conclusion and Outlook
Itching involves at least a three-way relationship between the skin, the nervous system and the immune system. Throughout this review, the cross-talk between these different elements has been highlighted several times. For example, stimuli that activate ion channels in nerve endings induce the secretion of neuropeptides that activate eosinophils, mast cells, macrophages, etc, which in turn release inflammatory mediators, thus increasing the excitability potential in sensory neurons.198 Neuropeptides contribute to neurogenic inflammation and further intensify the itch reaction. These neurotransmitters, in turn, act on inflammatory cells, generating a neuro-inflammatory cross-talk that promotes a positive feedback loop (itch–scratch cycle). Patients experience increased responses to minor pruritic stimuli, and the sensation persists even after the stimulus has disappeared. This sensation is known as neuro-sensitization and can happen at either the central or the peripheral levels. Furthermore, a brain reward system is activated through scratching, involving the dopaminergic system, which explains why scratching provides pleasure and reinforces the addictive itch–scratch cycle.199 Chronic itch includes cross-talk among multiple cellular nets, such as the stromal, immune and sensory nervous systems. The cells of these groups can individually induce itch feeling, and their activation by recurrent scraping can produce a malicious itch–scratch cycle that is a trademark of chronic skin diseases and prurigo nodularis.169 Of note, all the systems involved in itching induce mechanisms or release molecules that increase the severity of symptoms. There are no “brakes”, as occurs, for example, in the immune system, where under normal conditions there is a balance between activation and deactivation.200 Therefore, the objective of the treatment should be to eliminate the cross-talks, thereby breaking the self-stimulation dynamics.
In this review, emphasis has been placed on itching to analyze both the roles of ion channels and the immune system. Topical and systemic treatments of itch have been described. Perhaps the major difference between both types of treatments is the severity of side effects. For example, it is difficult to think that monoclonal antibodies that inhibit important molecules of the immune system would not weaken the patient against infections or other problems. However, natural products administered topically do not have harmful effects. This review has described how magnesium can block the ion channels causing itching and how antioxidants can block inflammation by inhibiting the production of ROS and the immune system. Recently, itching in patients with AD using topical mineral salts, including magnesium and antioxidants, has been described with spectacular results and no side effects.201 These observations can potentially be the turning point in the treatment of itching. However, a greater number of clinical trials are needed to confirm the usefulness of ion channel-targeted antioxidant and anti-itch strategies to enhance the comprehensiveness and foresight of the conclusions. These trials should validate the use of these therapeutic tools in the various pathological conditions associated with itching, as well as in different geographical or genetic areas.
Funding Statement
There is no funding to report.
Abbreviations
AD, atopic dermatitis; AhR, Aryl hydrocarbon receptor; ANO1/TMEM16A, Anoctamin 1; ATF-3, activating transcription factor 3; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; BNP, brain-derived natriuretic peptide; CA, Carnosic acid; CGRP, calcitonin gene-related peptide; DAG, diacylglycerol; DRG, Dorsal Root Ganglion; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; ERK, Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase; ET-1, Endothelin-1; GABA, Gamma-aminobutyric acid; GDNF, glial cell line–derived neurotrophic factor; GPCR, G protein–coupled receptor; GRPR, Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1; IFN-γ, interferon γ; IL-, interleukin-; IMPDH, inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase; IP3, inositol triphosphate; JAK, Janus kinase; KORs, κ-opioid receptors; LTB4, leukotriene B4; mAb, Monoclonal antibodies; MMF, Mycophenolate mofetil; MORs, μ-opioid receptors; MRGPCR, Mas-related G-protein-coupled receptor; MRGPRX2, Mas-related G‑protein-coupled receptor member X2; MTX, Methotrexate; Nav, voltage-gated sodium; NF-κB, Nuclear Factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; NGF, nerve growth factor; NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate; Nrf2, Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2; PAR-1, proteinase-activated receptor 1; PAR-2, proteinase-activated receptor 2, caspase-3; PARP, poly-ADP-ribose-polymerase; PDE4, phosphodiesterase-4; PGE2, prostaglandin E2; PLC, phospholipase C; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SOD2, superoxide dismutase 2; SP, substance P; STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription; TH2, T helper 2; TNF-α, Tumor Necrosis Factor-α; TPA, tetradecanoylphorbol acetate; TRP, transient receptor potential channels; TRPV1, Transient Receptor Potential Cation Channel Subfamily V Member 1; TRPM4, Transient Receptor Potential Cation Channel Subfamily M Member 4; TRPV1, Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 1; TSLP, thymic stromal lymphopoietin; UV, ultraviolet.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Disclosure
Dr. Ignacio Umbert is the owner of the patent number EP4335431B1. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
References
- 1.Dalgard FJ, Svensson Å, Halvorsen JA, et al. Itch and mental health in dermatological patients across Europe: a cross-sectional study in 13 countries. J Invest Dermatol. 2020;140:568–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.05.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Stander S, Schäfer I, Phan NQ, et al. Prevalence of chronic pruritus in Germany: results of a cross-sectional study in a sample working population of 11,730. Dermatology. 2010;221:229–235. doi: 10.1159/000319862 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Matterne U, Apfelbacher C, Loerbroks A, et al. Prevalence, correlates and characteristics of chronic pruritus: a population-based cross-sectional study. Acta Derm Venereol. 2011;91:674–679. doi: 10.2340/00015555-1159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Matterne U, Apfelbacher CJ, Vogelgsang L, Loerbroks A, Weisshaar E. Incidence and determinants of chronic pruritus: a population-based cohort study. Acta Derm Venereol. 2013;93:532–537. doi: 10.2340/00015555-1572 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shive M, Linos E, Berger T, Wehner M, Chren MM. Itch as a patient-reported symptom in ambulatory care visits in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;69:550–556. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.05.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jensen P, Zachariae C, Skov L, Zachariae R. Sleep disturbance in psoriasis: a case-controlled study. Br J Dermatol. 2018;179:1376–1384. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16702 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dalgard F, Svensson A, Holm JO, Sundby J. Self-reported skin morbidity among adults: associations with quality of life and general health in a Norwegian survey. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2004;9:120–125. doi: 10.1046/j.1087-0024.2003.09111.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yamamoto Y, Yamazaki S, Hayashino Y, et al. Association between frequency of pruritic symptoms and perceived psychological stress: a Japanese population-based study. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145:1384–1388. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yalcin B, Tamer E, Toy GG, et al. The prevalence of skin diseases in the elderly: analysis of 4099 geriatric patients. Int J Dermatol. 2006;45:672–676. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2005.02607.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Namer B. Age related changes in human C-fiber function. Neurosci Lett. 2010;470:185–187. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.07.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dehner C, Chen L, Kim B, Rosman IS. Chronic itch of unknown origin is associated with an enhanced Th2 skin immune profile. Am J Dermatopathol. 2021;43:773–775. doi: 10.1097/DAD.0000000000001902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stander S, Stumpf A, Osada N, et al. Gender differences in chronic pruritus: women present different morbidity, more scratch lesions and higher burden. Br J Dermatol. 2013;168:1273–1280. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schmid Y, Navarini A, Thomas Z-RM, et al. Sex differences in the pharmacology of itch therapies-a narrative review. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2019;46:122–142. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2019.05.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lambert J. Itch in pregnancy management. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2016;50:164–172. doi: 10.1159/000446087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Roh YS, Choi J, Sutaria N, Kwatra SG. Itch: epidemiology, clinical presentation, and diagnostic workup. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.07.076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stander S, Weisshaar E, Mettang T, et al. Clinical classification of itch: a position paper of the international forum for the study of itch. Acta Derm Venereol. 2007;87:291–294. doi: 10.2340/00015555-0305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Misery L, Brenaut E, Le Garrec R, et al. Neuropathic pruritus. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10:408–416. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.99 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Misery L, Dutray S, Chastaing M, et al. Psychogenic itch. Transl Psychiatry. 2018;8(52). doi: 10.1038/s41398-018-0097-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Misery L, Pierre O, Le Gall-Ianotto C, et al. Basic mechanisms of itch. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023;152:11–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Deng L, Costa F, Blake KJ, et al. S. aureus drives itch and scratch-induced skin damage through a V8 protease-PAR1 axis. Cell. 2023;186:5375–5393e5325. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.10.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Moore C. The role of TRPV4 channels in cutaneous epithelia. Curr Top Membr. 2022;89:139–154. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctm.2022.06.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Uchida H, Wu X, Zhou Y, et al. Role of ion channels in immune regulation of psoriasis. Curr Opin Immunol. 2026;98:102688. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2025.102688 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cevikbas F, Lerner EA. Physiology and Pathophysiology of Itch. Physiol Rev. 2020;100:945–982. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00017.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ikoma A, Steinhoff M, Stander S, Yosipovitch G, Schmelz M. The neurobiology of itch. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:535–547. doi: 10.1038/nrn1950 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Talagas M, Lebonvallet N, Leschiera R, et al. Keratinocytes communicate with sensory neurons via synaptic-like contacts. Ann Neurol. 2020;88:1205–1219. doi: 10.1002/ana.25912 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.LaMotte RH, Dong X, Ringkamp M. Sensory neurons and circuits mediating itch. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014;15:19–31. doi: 10.1038/nrn3641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Roggenkamp D, Köpnick S, Stäb F, et al. Epidermal nerve fibers modulate keratinocyte growth via neuropeptide signaling in an innervated skin model. J Invest Dermatol. 2013;133:1620–1628. doi: 10.1038/jid.2012.464 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ulmann L, Rodeau J-L, Danoux L, et al. Trophic effects of keratinocytes on the axonal development of sensory neurons in a coculture model. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;26:113–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05649.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Misery L. Skin, immunity and the nervous system. Br J Dermatol. 1997;137:843–850. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1997.tb01542.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sutaria N, Adawi W, Goldberg R, et al. Itch: pathogenesis and treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86:17–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.07.078 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yang TB, Kim BS. Pruritus in allergy and immunology. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;144:353–360. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.06.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hashimoto T, Rosen JD, Sanders KM, Yosipovitch G. Possible roles of basophils in chronic itch. Exp Dermatol. 2019;28:1373–1379. doi: 10.1111/exd.13705 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gutowska-Owsiak D, Greenwald L, Watson C, et al. The histamine-synthesizing enzyme histidine decarboxylase is upregulated by keratinocytes in atopic skin. Br J Dermatol. 2014;171:771–778. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nakashima C, Ishida Y, Kitoh A, Otsuka A, Kabashima K. Interaction of peripheral nerves and mast cells, eosinophils, and basophils in the development of pruritus. Exp Dermatol. 2019;28:1405–1411. doi: 10.1111/exd.14014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Giustizieri ML, Albanesi C, Fluhr J, et al. H1 histamine receptor mediates inflammatory responses in human keratinocytes. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;114:1176–1182. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.07.054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gouin O, L’Herondelle K, Lebonvallet N, et al. TRPV1 and TRPA1 in cutaneous neurogenic and chronic inflammation: pro-inflammatory response induced by their activation and their sensitization. Protein Cell. 2017;8:644–661. doi: 10.1007/s13238-017-0395-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bocciarelli C, Cordel N, Leschiera R, et al. New human in vitro co-culture model of keratinocytes and sensory neurons like cells releasing substance P with an evaluation of the expression of ZIKV entry receptors: a potent opportunity to test Zika virus entry and to study Zika virus’ infection in neurons? Exp Dermatol. 2023;32:1563–1568. doi: 10.1111/exd.14870 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Varricchi G, Pecoraro A, Loffredo S, et al. Heterogeneity of human mast cells with respect to MRGPRX2 receptor expression and function. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019;13:299. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Antunez C, Torres MJ, López S, et al. Calcitonin gene-related peptide modulates interleukin-13 in circulating cutaneous lymphocyte-associated antigen-positive T cells in patients with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2009;161:547–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09318.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Meng QT, Liu X-Y, Liu X-T, et al. BNP facilitates NMB-encoded histaminergic itch via NPRC-NMBR crosstalk. Elife. 2021;10. doi: 10.7554/eLife.71689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Aktar MK, Kido-Nakahara M, Furue M, Nakahara T. Mutual upregulation of endothelin-1 and IL-25 in atopic dermatitis. Allergy. 2015;70:846–854. doi: 10.1111/all.12633 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kim BS, Inan S, Ständer S, et al. Role of kappa-opioid and mu-opioid receptors in pruritus: peripheral and central itch circuits. Exp Dermatol. 2022;31:1900–1907. doi: 10.1111/exd.14669 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Deng J, Parthasarathy V, Marani M, et al. Extracellular matrix and dermal nerve growth factor dysregulation in prurigo nodularis compared to atopic dermatitis. Front Med. 2022;9:1022889. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1022889 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Guseva D, Rüdrich U, Kotnik N, et al. Neuronal branching of sensory neurons is associated with BDNF-positive eosinophils in atopic dermatitis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2020;50:577–584. doi: 10.1111/cea.13560 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kim BE, Leung DY, Boguniewicz M, Howell MD. Loricrin and involucrin expression is down-regulated by Th2 cytokines through STAT-6. Clin Immunol. 2008;126:332–337. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2007.11.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tsoi LC, Rodriguez E, Degenhardt F, et al. Atopic dermatitis is an IL-13-dominant disease with greater molecular heterogeneity compared to psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol. 2019;139:1480–1489. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.12.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Furue M, Ulzii D, Nakahara T, et al. Implications of IL-13Ralpha2 in atopic skin inflammation. Allergol Int. 2020;69:412–416. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2020.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bonzano L, Borgia F, Casella R, et al. Microbiota and IL-33/31 axis linkage: implications and therapeutic perspectives in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. Biomolecules. 2023;13(7):1100. doi: 10.3390/biom13071100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Huang IH, Chung WH, Wu PC, Chen CB. JAK-STAT signaling pathway in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis: an updated review. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1068260. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1068260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Datsi A, Steinhoff M, Ahmad F, Alam M, Buddenkotte J. Interleukin-31: the “itchy” cytokine in inflammation and therapy. Allergy. 2021;76:2982–2997. doi: 10.1111/all.14791 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gouin O, Lebonvallet N, L’Herondelle K, et al. Self-maintenance of neurogenic inflammation contributes to a vicious cycle in skin. Exp Dermatol. 2015;24:723–726. doi: 10.1111/exd.12798 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Seltmann J, Roesner LM, von Hesler FW, Wittmann M, Werfel T. IL-33 impacts on the skin barrier by downregulating the expression of filaggrin. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135:1659–1661e1654. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.01.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wang SH, Zuo YG. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin in cutaneous immune-mediated diseases. Front Immunol. 2021;12:698522. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.698522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Soumelis V, Reche PA, Kanzler H, et al. Human epithelial cells trigger dendritic cell mediated allergic inflammation by producing TSLP. Nat Immunol. 2002;3:673–680. doi: 10.1038/ni805 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Sano Y, Masuda K, Tamagawa-Mineoka R, et al. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin expression is increased in the horny layer of patients with atopic dermatitis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2013;171:330–337. doi: 10.1111/cei.12021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Steinhoff M, Schmelz M, Szabo IL, Oaklander AL. Clinical presentation, management, and pathophysiology of neuropathic itch. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17:709–720. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30217-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Thornsberry LA, English JC. Scalp dysesthesia related to cervical spine disease. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149:200–203. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.914 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lee JJ, Morillo-Hernandez C, Agarwal V, Standaert CJ, English JC. Cervical spine imaging and treatment outcomes in scalp dysesthesia: a retrospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023;88:655–656. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.08.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Weinberg BD, Amans M, Deviren S, Berger T, Shah V. Brachioradial pruritus treated with computed tomography-guided cervical nerve root block: a case series. JAAD Case Rep. 2018;4:640–644. doi: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2018.03.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Marziniak M, Phan NQ, Raap U, et al. Brachioradial pruritus as a result of cervical spine pathology: the results of a magnetic resonance tomography study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65:756–762. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.07.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Huesmann T, Cunha P, Osada N, et al. Notalgia paraesthetica: a descriptive two-cohort study of 65 patients from Brazil and Germany. Acta Derm Venereol. 2012;92:535–540. doi: 10.2340/00015555-1344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Savk O, Savk E. Investigation of spinal pathology in notalgia paresthetica. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;52:1085–1087. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.01.138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Cohen AD, Vander T, Medvendovsky E, et al. Neuropathic scrotal pruritus: anogenital pruritus is a symptom of lumbosacral radiculopathy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;52:61–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2004.04.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Khorsandi D, Ccoicca M, Ruiz A, Olaru A, Umbert I. Biomechanical alterations of the spine correlated with the severity of dermatitis and calcitonin gene-related peptide levels. Res Arch. 2025;13. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Xiao Y, Xin Y, Shen K, Yang M, Wu H. The roles of transient receptor potential vanilloid in autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun Rev. 2025;24:103872. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2025.103872 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kim H, Choi MR, Jeon SH, Jang Y, Yang YD. Pathophysiological roles of ion channels in epidermal cells, immune cells, and sensory neurons in psoriasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25. doi: 10.3390/ijms25052756 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ozcan SS, Gurel G, Cakir M. Gene expression profiles of transient receptor potential (TRP) channels in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of psoriasis patients. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2021;40:1234–1240. doi: 10.1177/0960327121991911 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kodji X, Arkless KL, Kee Z, et al. Sensory nerves mediate spontaneous behaviors in addition to inflammation in a murine model of psoriasis. FASEB J. 2019;33:1578–1594. doi: 10.1096/fj.201800395RR [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Caterina MJ, Pang Z. TRP channels in skin biology and pathophysiology. Pharmaceuticals. 2016;9:77. doi: 10.3390/ph9040077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Follansbee T, Zhou Y, Wu X, et al. Signs of chronic itch in the mouse imiquimod model of psoriasiform dermatitis: sex differences and roles of TRPV1 and TRPA1. Itch. 2019;4:e25–e25. doi: 10.1097/itx.0000000000000025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Zhou Y, Han D, Follansbee T, et al. Transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) positively regulates imiquimod-induced, psoriasiform dermal inflammation in mice. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23:4819–4828. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Xiao T, Sun M, Zhao C, Kang J. TRPV1: a promising therapeutic target for skin aging and inflammatory skin diseases. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1037925. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1037925 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Shang L, Zhao S, Shi H, et al. Nerve growth factor mediates activation of transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 in neurogenic pruritus of psoriasis. Int Immunopharmacol. 2023;118:110063. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zhou Y, Follansbee T, Wu X, et al. TRPV1 mediates inflammation and hyperplasia in imiquimod (IMQ)-induced psoriasiform dermatitis (PsD) in mice. J Dermatol Sci. 2018;92:264–271. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2018.11.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Guo Y, Song Y, Liu W, et al. Novel insights into the role of keratinocytes-expressed TRPV3 in the skin. Biomolecules. 2023;13:513. doi: 10.3390/biom13030513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Um JY, Kim HB, Kim JC, et al. TRPV3 and itch: the role of TRPV3 in chronic pruritus according to clinical and experimental evidence. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:14962. doi: 10.3390/ijms232314962 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Amalia SN, Baral H, Fujiwara C, et al. TRPV4 regulates the development of psoriasis by controlling adenosine triphosphate expression in keratinocytes and the neuroimmune system. J Invest Dermatol. 2023;143:2356–2365e2355. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2023.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Chen Y, Fang Q, Wang Z, et al. Transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 ion channel functions as a pruriceptor in epidermal keratinocytes to evoke histaminergic itch. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:10252–10262. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.716464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Parenti A, De Logu F, Geppetti P, Benemei S. What is the evidence for the role of TRP channels in inflammatory and immune cells? Br J Pharmacol. 2016;173:953–969. doi: 10.1111/bph.13392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Yan J, Ye F, Ju Y, et al. Cimifugin relieves pruritus in psoriasis by inhibiting TRPV4. Cell Calcium. 2021;97:102429. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2021.102429 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Palkar R, Ongun S, Catich E, et al. Cooling relief of acute and chronic itch requires TRPM8 channels and neurons. J Invest Dermatol. 2018;138(6):1391–1399. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.12.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Wang W, Wang H, Zhao Z, et al. Thymol activates TRPM8-mediated Ca(2+) influx for its antipruritic effects and alleviates inflammatory response in Imiquimod-induced mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2020;407:115247. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2020.115247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Choi ME, Lee JH, Jung CJ, et al. A randomized, double-blinded, vehicle-controlled clinical trial of topical cryosim-1, a synthetic TRPM8 agonist, in prurigo nodularis. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024;23:931–937. doi: 10.1111/jocd.16079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Follansbee T, Dong X. A tactile twist: decoding the phenomena of mechanical itch and alloknesis. Front Mol Neurosci. 2023;16:1278151. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2023.1278151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Coste B, Mathur J, Schmidt M, et al. Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels. Science. 2010;330:55–60. doi: 10.1126/science.1193270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Lee PR, Ha T, Choi HS, Lee SE, Kim C, Hong GS. Piezo1 mediates mechanical signals in TRPV1-positive nociceptors in mice. Acta Physiol. 2024;240:e14236. doi: 10.1111/apha.14236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Garcia-Mesa Y, Cuendias P, Alonso-Guervós M, et al. Immunohistochemical detection of PIEZO1 and PIEZO2 in human digital Meissner s corpuscles. Ann Anat. 2024;252:152200. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2023.152200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Qin L, He T, Chen S, et al. Roles of mechanosensitive channel Piezo1/2 proteins in skeleton and other tissues. Bone Res. 2021;9(44). doi: 10.1038/s41413-021-00168-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Xiao B. Mechanisms of mechanotransduction and physiological roles of PIEZO channels. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2024;25:886–903. doi: 10.1038/s41580-024-00773-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Tang M, Wu G, Wang Z, et al. Voltage-gated potassium channels involved in regulation of physiological function in MrgprA3-specific itch neurons. Brain Res. 2016;1636:161–171. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.02.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Tarcha EJ, Olsen CM, Probst P, et al. Safety and pharmacodynamics of dalazatide, a Kv1.3 channel inhibitor, in the treatment of plaque psoriasis: a randomized phase 1b trial. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0180762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180762 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Kundu-Raychaudhuri S, Chen YJ, Wulff H, Raychaudhuri SP. Kv1.3 in psoriatic disease: PAP-1, a small molecule inhibitor of Kv1.3 is effective in the SCID mouse psoriasis--xenograft model. J Autoimmun. 2014;55:63–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2014.07.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Kim H, Shim WS, Oh U. Anoctamin 1, a multi-modal player in pain and itch. Cell Calcium. 2024;123:102924. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2024.102924 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Chen Q, Kong L, Xu Z, et al. The role of TMEM16A/ERK/NK-1 signaling in dorsal root ganglia neurons in the development of neuropathic pain induced by Spared Nerve Injury (SNI). Mol Neurobiol. 2021;58:5772–5789. doi: 10.1007/s12035-021-02520-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Pineda-Farias JB, Barragan-Iglesias P, Loeza-Alcocer E, et al. Role of anoctamin-1 and bestrophin-1 in spinal nerve ligation-induced neuropathic pain in rats. Mol Pain. 2015;11(41). doi: 10.1186/s12990-015-0042-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Choi MR, Kim HD, Cho S, et al. Anoctamin1 Induces Hyperproliferation of HaCaT Keratinocytes and Triggers Imiquimod-Induced Psoriasis-Like Skin Injury in Mice. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22. doi: 10.3390/ijms22137145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Winge MCG, Nasrallah M, Jackrazi LV, et al. Repurposing an epithelial sodium channel inhibitor as a therapy for murine and human skin inflammation. Sci Transl Med. 2024;16(777):eade5915. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.ade5915 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Wang H, Huang J, Zang J, Jin X, Yan N. Drug discovery targeting Na(v)1.8: structural insights and therapeutic potential. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2024;83:102538. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2024.102538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Li Z, Wu Q, Yan N. A structural atlas of druggable sites on Na(v) channels. Channels. 2024;18:2287832. doi: 10.1080/19336950.2023.2287832 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Dib-Hajj SD, Tyrrell L, Black JA, Waxman SG. NaN, a novel voltage-gated Na channel, is expressed preferentially in peripheral sensory neurons and down-regulated after axotomy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:8963–8968. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.15.8963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Cao C, Kang HJ, Singh I, et al. Structure, function and pharmacology of human itch GPCRs. Nature. 2021;600:170–175. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04126-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Renganathan M, Cummins TR, Waxman SG. Contribution of Na(v)1.8 sodium channels to action potential electrogenesis in DRG neurons. J Neurophysiol. 2001;86:629–640. doi: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.2.629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Salvatierra J, Diaz-Bustamante M, Meixiong J, et al. A disease mutation reveals a role for NaV1.9 in acute itch. J Clin Invest. 2018;128:5434–5447. doi: 10.1172/JCI122481 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Zhang Y, Li Y, Zhou L, et al. Nav1.8 in keratinocytes contributes to ROS-mediated inflammation in inflammatory skin diseases. Redox Biol. 2022;55:102427. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Johanek LM, Meyer RA, Friedman RM, et al. A role for polymodal C-fiber afferents in nonhistaminergic itch. J Neurosci. 2008;28:7659–7669. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1760-08.2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Kumar M, Choi YG, Wong T, Li PH, Chow BKC. Beyond the classic players: mas-related G protein-coupled receptor member X2 role in pruritus and skin diseases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2025;39:476–486. doi: 10.1111/jdv.20249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Kumar M, Duraisamy K, Chow BK. Unlocking the non-IgE-mediated pseudo-allergic reaction puzzle with mas-related G-protein coupled receptor member X2 (MRGPRX2). Cells. 2021;10:1033. doi: 10.3390/cells10051033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Cao TBT, Cha HY, Yang EM, Ye YM. Elevated MRGPRX2 levels related to disease severity in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2021;13:498–506. doi: 10.4168/aair.2021.13.3.498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Shtessel M, Limjunyawong N, Oliver ET, et al. MRGPRX2 activation causes increased skin reactivity in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria. J Invest Dermatol. 2021;141:678–681e672. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2020.06.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Yao C, Ye W, Chen M. Inhibition of mast cell degranulation in atopic dermatitis by celastrol through suppressing MRGPRX2. Dis Markers. 2023;2023:9049256. doi: 10.1155/2023/9049256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Gieseler F, Ungefroren H, Settmacher U, Hollenberg MD, Kaufmann R. Proteinase-activated receptors (PARs) - focus on receptor-receptor-interactions and their physiological and pathophysiological impact. Cell Commun Signal. 2013;11(86). doi: 10.1186/1478-811X-11-86 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Adams MN, Ramachandran R, Yau M-K, et al. Structure, function and pathophysiology of protease activated receptors. Pharmacol Ther. 2011;130:248–282. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2011.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Akiyama T, Lerner EA, Carstens E. Protease-activated receptors and itch. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2015;226:219–235. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-44605-8_13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Lee SE, Jeong SK, Lee SH. Protease and protease-activated receptor-2 signaling in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. Yonsei Med J. 2010;51:808–822. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2010.51.6.808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Fan M, Fan X, Lai Y, et al. Protease-activated receptor 2 in inflammatory skin disease: current evidence and future perspectives. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1448952. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1448952 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Rothmeier AS, Ruf W. Protease-activated receptor 2 signaling in inflammation. Semin Immunopathol. 2012;34:133–149. doi: 10.1007/s00281-011-0289-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Majewski MW, Gandhi DM, Rosas R, et al. Design and evaluation of heterobivalent PAR1-PAR2 ligands as antagonists of calcium mobilization. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2019;10:121–126. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.8b00538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Andoh T, Kuraishi Y. Expression of BLT1 leukotriene B4 receptor on the dorsal root ganglion neurons in mice. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2005;137:263–266. doi: 10.1016/j.molbrainres.2005.02.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Wilson SR, Thé L, Batia L, et al. The epithelial cell-derived atopic dermatitis cytokine TSLP activates neurons to induce itch. Cell. 2013;155:285–295. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Rattenholl A, Steinhoff M. Proteinase-activated receptor-2 in the skin: receptor expression, activation and function during health and disease. Drug News Perspect. 2008;21:369–381. doi: 10.1358/dnp.2008.21.7.1255294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Tanaka R, Lo Vecchio S, Aliotta GE, Arendt-Nielsen L. The role of peripheral n-methyl-D-asparate (NMDA) receptors in itch and pain: a narrative review. Eur J Pain. 2025;29:e70082. doi: 10.1002/ejp.70082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Mohino-Farre N, Silvestre-Salvador JF. Practical approach to pruritus in patients with atopic dermatitis. Dermatitis. 2026;17103568261421364. doi: 10.1177/17103568261421364 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Nedorost S. A sticky mess-Are moisturizers overused in dermatitis care? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024;91:1171–1176. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.07.1485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Yu SH, Drucker AM, Lebwohl M, Silverberg JI. A systematic review of the safety and efficacy of systemic corticosteroids in atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78:733–740e711. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.09.074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Gutfreund K, Bienias W, Szewczyk A, Kaszuba A. Topical calcineurin inhibitors in dermatology. Part I: properties, method and effectiveness of drug use. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2013;30:165–169. doi: 10.5114/pdia.2013.35619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Bao L, Zhang H, Chan LS. The involvement of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway in chronic inflammatory skin disease atopic dermatitis. JAKSTAT. 2013;2:e24137. doi: 10.4161/jkst.24137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Martin-Santiago A, Puig S, Arumi D, Rebollo Laserna FJ. Safety profile and tolerability of topical phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2022;96:100679. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2022.100679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Smith SH, Jayawickreme C, Rickard DJ, et al. Tapinarof is a natural AhR agonist that resolves skin inflammation in mice and humans. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137:2110–2119. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Matsuda KM, Sharma D, Schonfeld AR, Kwatra SG. Gabapentin and pregabalin for the treatment of chronic pruritus. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;75:619–625e616. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.02.1237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Nwankwo A, Koyyalagunta D, Huh B, D’Souza RS, Javed S. A comprehensive review of the typical and atypical side effects of gabapentin. Pain Pract. 2024;24:1051–1058. doi: 10.1111/papr.13400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Zhong CS, Elmariah SB. Phototherapy for Itch. Dermatol Clin. 2020;38:145–155. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2019.08.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Davis DMR, Drucker AM, Alikhan A, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis in adults with phototherapy and systemic therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024;90:e43–e56. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.08.102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Aboul-Ella H, Gohar A, Ali AA, et al. Monoclonal antibodies: from magic bullet to precision weapon. Mol Biomed. 2024;5(47). doi: 10.1186/s43556-024-00210-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Olbrich H, Sadik CD, Ludwig RJ, Thaci D, Boch K. Dupilumab in inflammatory skin diseases: a systematic review. Biomolecules. 2023;13:634. doi: 10.3390/biom13040634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Wollenberg A, Blauvelt A, Guttman‐Yassky E, et al. Tralokinumab for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results from two 52-week, randomized, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled Phase III trials (ECZTRA 1 and ECZTRA 2). Br J Dermatol. 2021;184:437–449. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Lin J, Luo M, Zhuo Q, et al. Efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1429709. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1429709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Labib A, Vander Does A, Yosipovitch G. Nemolizumab for atopic dermatitis. Drugs Today. 2022;58:159–173. doi: 10.1358/dot.2022.58.4.3378056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Mohamed MF, Bhatnagar S, Parmentier JM, Nakasato P, Wung P. Upadacitinib: mechanism of action, clinical, and translational science. Clin Transl Sci. 2024;17:e13688. doi: 10.1111/cts.13688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Mahmoud O, Oladipo O, Mahmoud RH, Yosipovitch G. Itch: from the skin to the brain - peripheral and central neural sensitization in chronic itch. Front Mol Neurosci. 2023;16:1272230. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2023.1272230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Pande AC, Pyke RE, Greiner M, et al. Analgesic efficacy of enadoline versus placebo or morphine in postsurgical pain. Clin Neuropharmacol. 1996;19:451–456. doi: 10.1097/00002826-199619050-00009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Todberg T, Loft N, Møller DL, et al. Impact of methotrexate and Adalimumab on immune function of patients with psoriasis. Dermatol Ther. 2022;35:e15284. doi: 10.1111/dth.15284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Cronstein BN, Aune TM. Methotrexate and its mechanisms of action in inflammatory arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020;16:145–154. doi: 10.1038/s41584-020-0373-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Chavez-Alvarez S, Herz-Ruelas M, Villarreal-Martinez A, et al. Azathioprine: its uses in dermatology. An Bras Dermatol. 2020;95:731–736. doi: 10.1016/j.abd.2020.05.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Narla S, Silverberg JI, Simpson EL. Management of inadequate response and adverse effects to dupilumab in atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86:628–636. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.06.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Zwerner J, Fiorentino D. Mycophenolate mofetil. Dermatol Ther. 2007;20:229–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8019.2007.00136.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Fehrenbacher JC, Taylor CP, Vasko MR. Pregabalin and gabapentin reduce release of substance P and CGRP from rat spinal tissues only after inflammation or activation of protein kinase C. Pain. 2003;105:133–141. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00173-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Meaadi J, Obara I, Eldabe S, Nazar H. The safety and efficacy of gabapentinoids in the management of neuropathic pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Int J Clin Pharm. 2023;45:556–565. doi: 10.1007/s11096-022-01528-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Coscarella G, Edwards E, Yosipovitch G. Basic mechanisms of itch and advances in clinical management. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2026;136:131–140. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2025.09.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Li M, Li Y, Lu Y, et al. Molecular basis of Mg(2+) permeation through the human mitochondrial Mrs2 channel. Nat Commun. 2023;14:4713. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40516-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Liu M, Dudley SC Jr. Magnesium homeostasis and magnesium transporters in human health. Nutrients. 2025;17. doi: 10.3390/nu17050920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Pilchova I, Klacanova K, Tatarkova Z, Kaplan P, Racay P. The involvement of Mg(2+) in regulation of cellular and mitochondrial functions. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:6797460. doi: 10.1155/2017/6797460 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Spasic S, Biorac M, Jovanovic N, et al. Magnesium ions as modulators of voltage-gated and ligand-gated ion channels in central neurons. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26:12152. doi: 10.3390/ijms262412152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.newton AC, Bootman MD, Scott JD. Second messengers. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2016;8:a005926. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a005926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Politi HC, Preston RR. Is it time to rethink the role of Mg2+ in membrane excitability? Neuroreport. 2003;14:659–668. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200304150-00001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Shi J, Cui J. Intracellular Mg(2+) enhances the function of BK-type Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channels. J Gen Physiol. 2001;118:589–606. doi: 10.1085/jgp.118.5.589 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Herb M, Schramm M. Functions of ROS in macrophages and antimicrobial immunity. Antioxidants. 2021;10. doi: 10.3390/antiox10020313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Dong Q, Wang Z, Wu Q, Du Y. Inhibition of transient receptor potential vanilloid 4: a promising novel strategy for myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury treatment. Biomed Pharmacother. 2025;193:118765. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2025.118765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Subedi L, Lee SE, Madiha S, et al. Phytochemicals against TNFalpha-mediated neuroinflammatory diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:764. doi: 10.3390/ijms21030764 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Engen DJ, McAllister SJ, Whipple MO, et al. Effects of transdermal magnesium chloride on quality of life for patients with fibromyalgia: a feasibility study. J Integr Med. 2015;13:306–313. doi: 10.1016/S2095-4964(15)60195-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Liu M, Zhang W, Chen Z, et al. Mechanisms of magnesium oxide-incorporated electrospun membrane modulating inflammation and accelerating wound healing. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2023;111:132–151. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.37453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Zhang Z, Huang C, Guan S, et al. Hybrid gelatin-ascorbyl phosphate scaffolds accelerate diabetic wound healing via ROS scavenging, angiogenesis and collagen remodeling. Biomater Adv. 2024;158:213779. doi: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2024.213779 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Bessa-Goncalves M, Ribeiro-Machado C, Costa M, et al. Magnesium incorporation in fibrinogen scaffolds promotes macrophage polarization towards M2 phenotype. Acta Biomater. 2023;155:667–683. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.10.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Denda M, Katagiri C, Hirao T, Maruyama N, Takahashi M. Some magnesium salts and a mixture of magnesium and calcium salts accelerate skin barrier recovery. Arch Dermatol Res. 1999;291:560–563. doi: 10.1007/s004030050454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Proksch E, Nissen HP, Bremgartner M, Urquhart C. Bathing in a magnesium-rich Dead Sea salt solution improves skin barrier function, enhances skin hydration, and reduces inflammation in atopic dry skin. Int J Dermatol. 2005;44:151–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2005.02079.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Lee DH, Park JK, Choi J, Jang H, Seol JW. Anti-inflammatory effects of natural flavonoid diosmetin in IL-4 and LPS-induced macrophage activation and atopic dermatitis model. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020;89:107046. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.107046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Zhang Y, Huang Y, Dang B, et al. Fisetin alleviates chronic urticaria by inhibiting mast cell activation via MRGPRX2. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2023;75:1310–1321. doi: 10.1093/jpp/rgad056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Cione E, La Torre C, Cannataro R, et al. Quercetin, epigallocatechin gallate, curcumin, and resveratrol: from dietary sources to human MicroRNA modulation. Molecules. 2019;25:63. doi: 10.3390/molecules25010063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Tao L, Ding Q, Gao C, Sun X. Resveratrol attenuates neuropathic pain through balancing pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines release in mice. Int Immunopharmacol. 2016;34:165–172. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2016.02.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Zhang MW, Sun X, Xu Y-W, et al. Curcumin relieves oxaliplatin-induced neuropathic pain via reducing inflammation and activating antioxidant response. Cell Biol Int. 2024;48:872–882. doi: 10.1002/cbin.12153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Zhu X, Xu X, Du C, et al. An examination of the protective effects and molecular mechanisms of curcumin, a polyphenol curcuminoid in diabetic nephropathy. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;153:113438. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113438 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Tham CL, Liew CY, Lam KW, et al. A synthetic curcuminoid derivative inhibits nitric oxide and proinflammatory cytokine synthesis. Eur J Pharmacol. 2010;628:247–254. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.11.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Sadek MA, Rabie MA, El Sayed NS, Sayed HM, Kandil EA. Neuroprotective effect of curcumin against experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis-induced cognitive and physical impairments in mice: an insight into the role of the AMPK/SIRT1 pathway. Inflammopharmacology. 2024;32:1499–1518. doi: 10.1007/s10787-023-01399-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Burns J, Joseph PD, Rose KJ, Ryan MM, Ouvrier RA. Effect of oral curcumin on Dejerine-Sottas disease. Pediatr Neurol. 2009;41:305–308. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2009.04.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Soleimani V, Sahebkar A, Hosseinzadeh H. Turmeric (Curcuma longa) and its major constituent (curcumin) as nontoxic and safe substances: review. Phytother Res. 2018;32:985–995. doi: 10.1002/ptr.6054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Mikhal’chik EV, Ivanova AV, Anurov MV, et al. Wound-healing effect of papaya-based preparation in experimental thermal trauma. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2004;137:560–562. doi: 10.1023/b:bebm.0000042711.31775.f7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Owoyele BV, Adebukola OM, Funmilayo AA, Soladoye AO. Anti-inflammatory activities of ethanolic extract of Carica papaya leaves. Inflammopharmacology. 2008;16:168–173. doi: 10.1007/s10787-008-7008-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Salim E, Kumolosasi E, Jantan I. Inhibitory effect of selected medicinal plants on the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J Nat Med. 2014;68:647–653. doi: 10.1007/s11418-014-0841-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Cao Y, Lai K-M, Fu K-C, et al. Dual functionality of papaya leaf extracts: anti-coronavirus activity and anti-inflammation mechanism. Foods. 2024;13:3274. doi: 10.3390/foods13203274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Lim XY, Chan JSW, Japri N, Lee JC, Tan TYC. Carica papaya L. Leaf: a systematic scoping review on biological safety and herb-drug interactions. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021;2021:5511221. doi: 10.1155/2021/5511221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Mengoni ES, Vichera G, Rigano LA, et al. Suppression of COX-2, IL-1beta and TNF-alpha expression and leukocyte infiltration in inflamed skin by bioactive compounds from Rosmarinus officinalis L. Fitoterapia. 2011;82:414–421. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2010.11.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Oh J, Yu T, Choi SJ, et al. Syk/Src pathway-targeted inhibition of skin inflammatory responses by carnosic acid. Mediators Inflamm. 2012;2012:781375. doi: 10.1155/2012/781375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Fernandez LF, Palomino OM, Frutos G. Effectiveness of Rosmarinus officinalis essential oil as antihypotensive agent in primary hypotensive patients and its influence on health-related quality of life. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014;151:509–516. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2013.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Ozaki Y. Antiinflammatory effect of tetramethylpyrazine and ferulic acid. Chem Pharm Bull. 1992;40:954–956. doi: 10.1248/cpb.40.954 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Fernandez MA, Saenz MT, Garcia MD. Anti-inflammatory activity in rats and mice of phenolic acids isolated from Scrophularia frutescens. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1998;50:1183–1186. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1998.tb03332.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Oku H, Kato T, Ishiguro K. Antipruritic effects of 1,4-naphthoquinones and related compounds. Biol Pharm Bull. 2002;25:137–139. doi: 10.1248/bpb.25.137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Roux J, Horton L, Babadjouni A, Kincaid CM, Mesinkovska NA. Ferulic acid use for skin applications: a systematic review. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2025;18:38–42. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Ai Z, Liu S, Qu F, et al. Effect of stereochemical configuration on the transport and metabolism of catechins from green tea across Caco-2 monolayers. Molecules. 2019;24:1185. doi: 10.3390/molecules24061185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Guo R, Zhou F-M, Su C-J, et al. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate attenuates acute and chronic psoriatic itch in mice: involvement of antioxidant, anti-inflammatory effects and suppression of ERK and Akt signaling pathways. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;496:1062–1068. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.01.122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Luo ZL, Sun HY, Wu XB, Cheng L, Ren JD. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate attenuates acute pancreatitis induced lung injury by targeting mitochondrial reactive oxygen species triggered NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Food Funct. 2021;12:5658–5667. doi: 10.1039/d1fo01154e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Tzellos TG, Sardeli C, Lallas A, et al. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of green tea catechins in the treatment of external anogenital warts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011;25:345–353. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03796.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Kim TK, Lin Z, Tidwell WJ, Li W, Slominski AT. Melatonin and its metabolites accumulate in the human epidermis in vivo and inhibit proliferation and tyrosinase activity in epidermal melanocytes in vitro. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2015;404:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2014.07.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Sohn EH, Kim SN, Lee SR. Melatonin’s Impact on Wound Healing. Antioxidants. 2024;13:1197. doi: 10.3390/antiox13101197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Alghamdi F, Alzahrani DY, Alharthy RF, et al. Effectiveness of melatonin supplementation for improving sleep quality and disease severity in children with atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med. 2025;12:1718859. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1718859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Heidari Z, Gharibi G, Alaeen H, et al. Melatonin supplementation in adult patients with atopic dermatitis: a randomized clinical trial. J Pineal Res. 2026;78:e70130. doi: 10.1111/jpi.70130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Forbat E, Al-Niaimi F, Ali FR. Use of nicotinamide in dermatology. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2017;42:137–144. doi: 10.1111/ced.13021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Soma Y, Kashima M, Imaizumi A, et al. Moisturizing effects of topical nicotinamide on atopic dry skin. Int J Dermatol. 2005;44:197–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02375.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Zhu JR, Wang J, Wang SS. A single-center, randomized, controlled study on the efficacy of niacinamide-containing body emollients combined with cleansing gel in the treatment of mild atopic dermatitis. Skin Res Technol. 2023;29:e13475. doi: 10.1111/srt.13475 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Kabata H, Artis D. Neuro-immune crosstalk and allergic inflammation. J Clin Invest. 2019;129:1475–1482. doi: 10.1172/JCI124609 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Mack MR, Kim BS. The itch-scratch cycle: a neuroimmune perspective. Trends Immunol. 2018;39:980–991. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2018.10.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Valledor AF, Comalada M, Santamaria-Babi LF, Lloberas J, Celada A. Macrophage proinflammatory activation and deactivation: a question of balance. Adv Immunol. 2010;108:1–20. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-380995-7.00001-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Yori F, Sarmiento C, Gimeno Beltran J, Umbert I. The combination of mineral salts and natural antioxidants agents is highly effective in atopic dermatitis. Clin Cosmet Invest Dermatol. 2025;18:3695–3711. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S562171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




