Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1984 Jan;41(1):101–107. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-101

The assumptions underlying the generalized matching law

Drazen Prelec
PMCID: PMC1347959  PMID: 16812355

Abstract

Allen (1981) derived the power-function generalization of the matching law from a functional equation involving relative response rates on three concurrently available schedules of reinforcement. This paper defines the conditions (relative homogeneity and independence) under which a more general class of behavioral laws reduces to the power law. The proof also removes two deficiencies of Allen's result (discussed by Houston, 1982), which are, first, that his derivation produces a power law without a bias coefficient, and second, that it holds only for experiments with three or more concurrent schedules.

Keywords: generalized matching, power law, functional equation

Full text

PDF
102

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen C. M. Comment on Houston's arguments. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jul;38(1):113–114. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen C. M. On the exponent in the "generalized" matching equation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Jan;35(1):125–127. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baum W. M. Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Sep;32(2):269–281. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baum W. M. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231–242. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HERRNSTEIN R. J. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:267–272. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Herrnstein R. J. On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243–266. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Houston A. I. The case against Allen's generalization of the matching law. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jul;38(1):109–111. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Staddon J. E. Spaced responding and choice: a preliminary analysis. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):669–682. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES