Abstract
Glutaric acidemia type 1 (GA I) is caused by deficient activity of glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase, leading to predominant accumulation of glutaric acid (GA) in the brain. GA I patients present progressive neurological deterioration whose pathophysiology is only partially elucidated. We investigated whether intracerebral GA administration, alone or combined with quinolinic acid (QA), a pro-inflammatory intermediate of the kynurenine pathway, could alter the expression of genes associated with inflammatory signaling, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and neurotrophic support in cerebral cortex of wild-type (WT) and Gcdh−/− mice. We also tested the effects of L-carnitine (Carn) on these parameters. GA alone increased mRNA levels of the genes encoding NF-κB (NFKB1), COX-2 (PTGS2), iNOS (NOS2), and TLR2 (TLR2) in both genotypes, while reducing those of IL-10 (IL10) and VEGF-A (VEGFA) only in Gcdh−/− mice. Combined QA + GA treatment produced a larger response, including increased TNF-α (TNF), IL-1β (IL1B), IL-6 (IL6), NLRP3 (NLRP3), CHOP (DDIT3) and PERK (EIF2AK3) mRNA levels in the Gcdh−/− mice, besides reducing IκBα (NFKBIA), IL-10 (IL10) and BDNF (BDNF) expression in both genotypes, and VEGF-A (VEGFA) in the Gcdh−/− mice. We also found that lysine (Lys) and QA treatment elevated TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 protein levels in Gcdh−/− mice. Carn prevented or attenuated most transcriptional alterations induced by QA + GA and reduced cytokine protein elevations elicited by Lys + QA administration. These findings indicate that Carn modulates acute molecular responses related to inflammation, ER stress, and neurotrophic factors in the cerebral cortex of the GAI mouse model.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11011-026-01973-y.
Keywords: Glutaric acid, Gcdh−/− mice, Cerebral cortex, Quinolinic acid, Inflammatory response, Neurotrophins
Introduction
Glutaric acidemia type I (GA I, OMIM #231,670) is a severe inherited neurometabolic disorder caused by deficiency of glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase (GCDH, EC 1.3.99.7) activity, leading to predominant accumulation of glutaric (GA) in the brain and biological fluids and secondary to carnitine deficiency (Scriver et al. 2001; Boy et al. 2023). Its worldwide incidence is 30,000–100,000 children, which makes it one of the more common inherited metabolic disorders (Lindner et al. 2006; Strauss et al. 2020).
Untreated infantile-onset GA I patients usually present with acute encephalopathic crises mostly triggered by intercurrent infectious illness, fasting, or other physiological stressors associated with inflammatory processes. Acute striatal deterioration occurs most commonly between ages three months and three years and are usually triggered by a febrile illness, such as infectious, associated with catabolism (Kölker et al. 2006). Neurological deterioration accompanied by insidious striatum and cortical abnormalities without a well-defined triggering event also occur in these patients (Boy et al. 2019). Late-onset GA I (symptoms only occur after six years of life) manifest with nonspecific neurologic signs associated with progressive brain abnormalities beginning at the age of six years (Boy et al. 2019). These chronic presentations characterized by insidious progressive striatum and cortical abnormalities and atrophy are associated with demyelination of the central nervous system (Neumaier-Probst et al. 2004; Funk 2005; Strauss et al. 2007; Harting et al. 2009; Garbade et al. 2014).
Long-term therapy is based on low-lysine diet and carnitine supplementation to accelerate the detoxification of the glutaryl-CoA derivatives GA and 3-hydroxyglutaric acid (3-OHGA), whereas aggressive emergency treatment during metabolic crises aims to rapidly avert catabolism and minimize CNS exposure to the toxicity of the accumulating organic acids (Boy et al. 2013, 2023).
Although yet poorly known, the pathogenesis of the brain damage in GA I seems to be related to the high brain levels of the major organic acids accumulating in GA I, namely GA and 3-OHGA. In this particular it has been shown that these endogenous metabolites disturb redox and energy homeostasis besides inducing excitotoxicity in rat brain (Porciúncula et al. 2004; Magni et al. 2009; Olivera-Bravo et al. 2011; Jafari et al. 2011; Wajner 2019; Amaral et al. 2019; Wajner et al. 2019; Seminotti et al. 2020, 2022; Castro et al. 2024).
A genetic knockout mice model of GA I was developed with complete loss of GCDH activity (Gcdh−/−) (Koeller et al. 2002), and later improved by a high protein or Lys chow resulting in higher brain GA and 3-OHGA concentrations that provoked neuronal loss, myelin disruption (spongiform leukoencephalopathy), and gliosis, mostly in the deep cortex and striatum (Zinnanti et al. 2006, 2007). Disruption of energy and redox homeostasis, apart from altered glutamatergic and GABAergic systems have been shown in the brain of Gcdh−/− mice exposed to a short-term or long-term Lys overload (Kölker et al. 2002; Seminotti et al. 2012, 2013, 2014; Amaral et al. 2012a, b, 2015; Lagranha et al. 2014; Busanello et al. 2014; Rodrigues et al. 2015; Vendramin Pasquetti et al. 2017). Behavioral alterations have been also found in adult Gcdh−/− animals reflecting a permanent brain damage (Busanello et al. 2013). Furthermore, Gcdh−/− mice receiving an acute intracerebral injection of GA on postnatal day 1 presented disturbed neuromotor delay, reflected in abnormal gait, response to negative geotaxis, cliff aversion, righting reflex, and muscle tone, as well as long-standing short- and long-term memory impairment (Castro et al. 2024).
Although the severity of the clinical phenotype of GA I patients depends on the frequency of encephalopathic crises during infancy and childhood, which are mostly triggered by infectious/inflammatory processes and lead to striatum necrosis, practically nothing is known on the impact of these acute inflammatory processes on the cortical alterations observed in GA I. Noteworthy, free carnitine depletion are also observed in these patients as a consequence of the combination of carnitine with glutaric acid producing glutarylcarnitine, and is thought to contribute to hypotonia and other symptoms (Christensen et al. 2004; Strauss et al. 2020; Märtner et al. 2021).
Furthermore, it is stressed that during episodes of metabolic decompensation triggered by infections or immunization the kynurenine pathway (KP) is activated by inflammatory cytokines, leading to overproduction of kynurenic acid, kynurenine, and particularly quinolinic acid (QA). When in excess, these compounds may be toxic to the central nervous system through different pathomechanisms (Lugo-Huitrón et al. 2013), such as activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDAr), which secondarily leads to excessive free radical production and bioenergetics dysfunction (Ribeiro et al. 2006; La Cruz et al. 2012). In what concerns to GA I, it was previously postulated that QA is involved in the neuropathology of this disease (Varadkar and Surtees 2004), but so far, very little has been explored in this particular. However, it was previously reported that intracerebral injection of QA elicits an inflammatory response and induces oxidative stress and bioenergetics dysfunction in brain of young adult Gcdh−/− mice (Seminotti et al. 2016; Amaral et al. 2018).
Noteworthy, recent studies using human GCDH-deficient neuronal cells and gene therapy-based animal models have expanded the understanding of GA I pathophysiology and reinforced the contribution of the accumulated metabolites to cellular and neurological injury (Mateu-Bosch et al. 2024; Segur-Bailach et al. 2025; Saad et al. 2026). In parallel, advances in kynurenine pathway research have highlighted QA as an important mediator linking immune activation to excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation (Pocivavsek et al. 2024). Previous studies on GA I pathogenesis have predominantly examined the separate effects of accumulated GA or QA (Seminotti et al. 2016; Amaral et al. 2018; Castro et al. 2024). However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous in vivo study has comprehensively characterized the molecular responses to GA alone or in combination with QA in the cerebral cortex of neonatal Gcdh−/− mice. Therefore, we examined the effects of these acute treatments on neuroinflammatory signaling, endoplasmic reticulum stress-related pathways, and neurotrophic factors. Another important objective of the present work was to test whether carnitine, which was recently shown to have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, could avert the deleterious effects of these treatments.
Material and methods
Chemicals
All chemicals were of analytical grade and purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA) unless otherwise stated. Solutions were prepared on the day of the experiments and the pH was adjusted to 7.2–7.4. Lysine (Sigma-Aldrich #L5501), L-carnitine (Sigma-Aldrich #C0283), glutaric acid (Sigma-Aldrich #G3407) and quinolinic acid (Sigma-Aldrich #Q1375) were diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
Animals
Wild-type (WT) and Gcdh−/− littermates, both of C129SvEv background, were generated from heterozygotes and maintained at CREAL Animal House of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil. The animals were maintained on a 12:12 h light/dark cycle (lights on 07:00–19:00 h) in air-conditioned constant temperature (22 ± 1 °C) colony room, with free access to water and a normal protein (20%) commercial pellet chow (SUPRA, Porto Alegre, Brazil).
Ethical approval and animal welfare
This study was performed in strict accordance with the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care, National Institute of Health of United States of America, NIH, publication no. 85–23, revised in 2011, the International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Animals. All experimental procedures were also approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (CEUA-UFRGS; protocol no. 46065). All efforts were made to minimize suffering, discomfort, stress, and the number of animals necessary to produce reliable scientific data.
Lysine (Lys), L-carnitine (Carn), glutaric acid (GA) and quinolinic acid (QA) administration
Six-day-old (PND6) WT and Gcdh−/− mice were used in the experiments for the determination of mRNA expression of the inflammatory biomarkers and the protein content of pro-inflammatory cytokines For the measurement of gene expression, mice were randomly separated, marked, weighed and divided into eight groups: WT mice: 1) PBS + PBS + PBS; 2) PBS + PBS + GA; 3) PBS + QA + GA; 4) Carn + QA + GA; Gcdh−/− mice: 5) PBS + PBS + PBS; 6) PBS + PBS + GA; 7) PBS + QA + GA; 8) Carn + QA + GA.
The animals of groups 4 and 8 received an intraperitoneal (ip) injection of Carn (100 mg/kg) one hour before intracerebroventricular (icv) administration of QA or GA, while mice of groups 1–3 and 5–7 received PBS (vehicle) instead. Mice of groups 3, 4, 7 and 8 received an icv injection of QA (5.6 nmol/g) on PND6, and the remaining groups received PBS. On PND7, the animals of groups 2–4 and 6–8 received an icv injection of GA (1 μmol/g), while the other groups received vehicle. On PND8, all animals were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane, euthanized and the cerebral cortex was dissected, identified, and prepared according to each technique. Figure 1A illustrates the injection protocol.
Fig. 1.

Schematic timelines of the experimental designs, showing animal treatments and mRNA (RT-qPCR) (Fig. 1 A) and protein (multiplex kit) (Fig. 1B) levels measured on postnatal day 8 (PND8). Male and female wild-type (WT) mice and GCDH gene knockout mice (Gcdh−/−) were used in the experiments. PND: postnatal day; GA: glutaric acid; QA: quinolinic acid; RT-qPCR: quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
Furthermore, the protein content of pro-inflammatory cytokines was determined using an alternative protocol involving the ip administration of Lys (4 μmol/g), which is mainly converted to GA in the brain, instead of GA. For this study, WT and Gcdh−/− were also divided into eight groups: 1) PBS + PBS + PBS; 2) PBS + Lys + PBS; 3) PBS + Lys + QA; 4) Carn + Lys + QA; Gcdh−/− mice: 5) PBS + PBS + PBS; 6) PBS + Lys + PBS; 7) PBS + Lys + QA; 8) Carn + Lys + QA. Apart from ip Lys injection, the protocol was identical to that using GA administration (Fig. 1B).
Quantitative RT-PCR
Quantitative RT-PCR was used to determine relative mRNA levels. Total RNA was extracted from cerebral cortex samples using TRI Reagent® (Sigma-Aldrich, #T9424, USA). RNA concentration and purity were assessed using a NanoDrop™ spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) based on absorbance at 260 nm and the A260/A280 ratio, respectively. Two micrograms of total RNA were reverse-transcribed using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #4,368,814). Cerebral cortex samples from wild-type (WT) and Gcdh−/− mice were collected at PND8, 24 h after the GA or vehicle injection. Relative transcript levels were determined for genes encoding proteins associated with inflammatory signaling: PTGS2 (COX-2; Mm00478374_m1), NOS2 (iNOS; Mm00440502_m1), NFKB1 (NF-κB; Mm00476361_m1), NFKBIA (IκBα; Mm00477798_m1), NLRP3 (NLRP3; Mm00840904_m1), and TLR2 (TLR2; Mm00442346_m1); pro-inflammatory cytokines: IL6 (IL-6; Mm00446190_m1), IL1B (IL-1β; Mm00434228_m1), and TNF (TNF-α; Mm00443258_m1); the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL10 (IL-10; Mm01288386_m1); endoplasmic reticulum stress-related proteins: DDIT3 (CHOP; Mm01135937_g1) and EIF2AK3 (PERK; Mm00438700_m1); and neurotrophic and vascular factors: VEGFA (VEGF-A; Mm00437306_m1), BDNF (BDNF; Mm04230607_s1), and NTRK2 (TrkB; Mm00435422_m1). ACTB (β-actin; Mm02619580_g1) was used as the reference gene for normalization. All TaqMan™ Gene Expression Assays were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Relative mRNA levels were calculated using the 2^ − ΔΔCt method (Livak and Schmittgen 2001).
Cytokine determination
The protein content of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α was determined in cerebral cortex from WT and Gcdh−/− mice euthanized on PND8, 24 h after injections of Lys and QA. Cytokine measurements were performed simultaneously using a ProcartaPlex™ Mouse Simplex panel (#PPX-MXKA6U3, Invitrogen), with assays conducted in duplicate according to the manufacturer’s protocol for sample dilution and concentration, in addition to a standard curve. Results are expressed in ρg/mL.
Statistical analysis
The obtained data underwent a normality test using the Shapiro–Wilk method. The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation and analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by the post hoc Tukey’s multiple range test when F was significant. Differences between groups were rated significant at P < 0.05. All analyses were carried out using GraphPad Prism software (version 10.1.2).
Results
L-carnitine modulates gene expression alterations of key neuroinflammatory signaling pathways induced in vivo by glutaric acid and quinolinic acid in cerebral cortex of GCDH deficient mice
Initially, we evaluated the effects of glutaric acid (GA), administered alone or in combination with quinolinic acid (QA), on key components of the inflammatory signaling in the cerebral cortex of wild-type (WT) and GCDH-deficient (Gcdh−/−) mice. GA administration significantly upregulated the mRNA expression of NF-κB (Fig. 2A) (Treatment P < 0.001; Interaction P = 0.2487; Genotype P = 0.055), COX-2 (Fig. 2C) (Treatment P < 0.0001; Interaction P = 0.771; Genotype P = 0.2759), iNOS (Fig. 2D) (Treatment P < 0.0001; Interaction P < 0.0001; Genotype P < 0.05), and TLR2 (Fig. 2E) (Treatment P < 0.0001; Interaction P < 0,05; Genotype P < 0.001) in both genotypes, while no significant changes were observed in IκBα (Fig. 2B) and NLRP3 (Fig. 2F) expression. Notably, co-administration of GA and QA potentiated the pro-inflammatory effects induced by GA alone, indicating that QA expanded selected components of the inflammatory response induced by GA alone. This potentiation was particularly evident in Gcdh−/− animals, which exhibited an exacerbated increase in the expression of NF-κB (A), COX-2 (C), iNOS (D), TLR2 (E), and NLRP3 (F). In addition, genotype-dependent differences were observed, as Gcdh−/− mice displayed baseline alterations in inflammatory markers, including IκBα (Fig. 2B), iNOS (Fig. 2D), and TLR2 (Fig. 2E). Of note, IκBα (Fig. 2B) expression was significantly reduced in Gcdh−/− animals compared to WT, suggesting a predisposition to enhanced NF-κB pathway activation in the Gcdh−/− animals. Importantly, Carn treatment exerted a robust anti-inflammatory effect in animals subjected to combined GA and QA administration, effectively reversing the observed molecular alterations and restoring all evaluated parameters to levels comparable to those of the control group. Carn treatment significantly increased IκBα (Fig. 2B) expression, supporting a potential mechanism involving negative regulation of NF-κB signaling.
Fig. 2.

Alterations of mRNA gene expression of the neuroinflammatory signaling pathways NF-κB (A), IκBα (B), COX-2 (C), iNOS (D), TLR2 (E) and NLRP3 (F), caused by icv injections of QA and GA in the cerebral cortex of WT and Gcdh−/− mice on PND8. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), with n = 3–5 animals per group. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s post hoc test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, differences from PBS + PBS + PBS; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001, differences from PBS + PBS + GA; $$$P < 0.001 differences from PBS + QA + GA; @P < 0.05, @@@P < 0.001 differences from genotype)
L-carnitine modulates the increased pro-inflammatory cytokines and the reduced IL-10 mRNA expression induced in vivo by glutaric acid and quinolinic acid in cerebral cortex of GCDH deficient mice
Subsequently, we evaluated whether the alterations in inflammatory signaling pathways could modulate the gene expression of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in the cerebral cortex. As shown in Fig. 3, administration of glutaric acid (GA) alone did not induce significant changes in the mRNA expression of TNF-α (3A) (Treatment P < 0.0001; Interaction P = 0.2680; Genotype P < 0.01), IL-1β (3B) (Treatment P < 0.0001; Interaction P < 0.05; Genotype P = 0.2842), or IL-6 (3C) (Treatment P < 0.0001; Interaction P = 0.0808; Genotype P < 0.01) in mice of both genotypes, but significantly reduced the mRNA levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 (3D) (Treatment P < 0.0001; Interaction P = 0.9557; Genotype P = 0.8545) in Gcdh−/− animals. Furthermore, co-administration of GA and QA resulted in a significant increase in TNF-α (A), IL-1β (B), and IL-6 (C) expression in Gcdh−/− mice, whereas in WT animals, a significant increase was observed only for IL-1β expression (B). Additionally, GA plus QA co-treatment led to a marked reduction in IL-10 (D) expression in both genotypes. Finally, and importantly, Carn exerted a protective effect by preventing the increase in the cytokines TNF-α (A), IL-1β (B), and IL-6 (C) in both WT and Gcdh−/− mice, supporting a modulatory role of this compound in the inflammatory response triggered by these metabolites.
Fig. 3.

Changes of the mRNA expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α (A), IL-1β (B), and IL-6 (C) and the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 (D) following QA and GA icv injections in the cerebral cortex of WT and Gcdh−/− mice on PND 8. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), with n = 3–5 animals per group. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s post hoc test (**P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, differences from PBS + PBS + PBS; ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001, differences from PBS + PBS + GA; $$P < 0.01, $$$P < 0.001 differences from PBS + QA + GA; @@P < 0.01, differences from genotype)
L-carnitine normalizes the increased protein levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines caused in vivo by lysine and quinolinic acid in cerebral cortex of GCDH deficient mice
Next, we measured the protein levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 in the cerebral cortex of WT and Gcdh−/− after acute co-administration of QA and lysine (Lys), which is metabolized to GA in the CNS of Gcdh−/− animals. We found that Lys combined with QA treatment significantly enhanced the protein levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α (Treatment P < 0.0001; Interaction P = 0.1350; Genotype P < 0.05) (Fig. 4A), IL-1β (Treatment P < 0.0001; Interaction P < 0.05; Genotype P = 0.0626) (Fig. 4B), and IL-6 (Treatment P < 0.0001; Interaction P < 0.0001; Genotype P = 0.2843) (Fig. 4C). Furthermore, Lys administration alone did not alter the levels of any of the cytokines analyzed in both genotypes. In contrast and consistent with the mRNA expression data obtained in the GA plus QA model, the combined administration of Lys and QA resulted in a marked increase of all pro-inflammatory cytokines in the Gcdh−/− animals. However, co-administration of QA and Lys caused a minimal effect in WT mice, with only a slight increase observed for TNF-α. Taken together, these findings indicate a genotype-dependent enhancement of the inflammatory response. Noteworthy, treatment with Carn significantly prevented the increase of all cytokines evaluated, highlighting its anti-inflammatory effect and protective role against the deleterious consequences of Lys and QA co-administration.
Fig. 4.

Changes of cortical protein levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α (A), IL-1β (B), and IL-6 (C) following QA (icv) and Lys (ip) injections in WT and Gcdh−/− mice on PND 8. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), with n = 4–5 animals per group. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s post hoc test (*P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 differences from PBS + PBS + PBS; ###P < 0.001, differences from PBS + Lys + PBS; $P < 0.05; $$P < 0.01, $$$P < 0.001 differences from PBS + Lys + QA; @P < 0.05 differences from genotype)
L-carnitine mitigates endoplasmic reticulum stress induced in vivo by glutaric acid and quinolinic acid in cerebral cortex of GCDH deficient mice
Given that inflammatory signaling is a well-established trigger of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, we next examined whether the neuroinflammatory alterations induced by GA and QA were associated with activation of ER stress pathways in the cerebral cortex. Co-administration of GA and QA markedly increased CHOP (Treatment P < 0.0001; Interaction P < 0.0001; Genotype P < 0.0001) (Fig. 5A) and PERK (Treatment P < 0.0001; Interaction P < 0.001; Genotype P < 0.05) (Fig. 5B) mRNA levels in Gcdh−/− animals, indicating an activation of the ER stress response. Finally, treatment with Carn effectively prevented the GA + QA-induced upregulation of CHOP and PERK, restoring their expression to levels comparable to controls, suggesting a protective role of Carn against ER stress activation.
Fig. 5.

mRNA expression of CHOP (A) and PERK (B) following QA and GA icv injections in cerebral cortex of WT and Gcdh−/− mice on PND8. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), with n = 4–5 animals per group. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s post hoc test (***P < 0.001, differences from PBS + PBS + PBS; #P < 0.05, ###P < 0.001, differences from PBS + PBS + GA; $$$P < 0.001 differences from PBS + QA + GA; ++P < 0.01 differences from Carn + QA + GA; @P < 0.05, @@@P < 0.001 differences from genotype)
L-carnitine restores the reductions in BDNF and VEGF mRNA expression induced in vivo by glutaric acid and quinolinic acid in cerebral cortex of GCDH deficient mice
We next assessed the effects of icv administration of GA and QA on the mRNA expression of the neurotrophic factors BDNF and VEGF, as well as on the BDNF receptor TRKB. As shown in Fig. 6, GA alone selectively reduced VEGF mRNA levels (Treatment P < 0.0001; Interaction P < 0.0001; Genotype P < 0.05) (Fig. 6C), without affecting BDNF (Treatment P < 0.0001; Interaction P < 0.001; Genotype P < 0.0001) (Fig. 6A) or TRKB (Treatment P = 0,3657; Interaction P = 0,1611; Genotype P = 0.4275) (Fig. 6B) expression in Gcdh−/− mice. In contrast, co-administration of GA and QA induced a marked reduction in BDNF mRNA levels in both genotypes, with a more pronounced effect observed in Gcdh−/− animals. Notably, VEGF expression was decreased only in Gcdh−/− mice under these conditions, indicating a genotype-dependent vulnerability. TRKB mRNA levels remained unchanged across all experimental groups. Finally, treatment with Carn effectively reversed the alterations induced by GA plus QA co-administration, restoring both BDNF and VEGF expression to levels comparable to controls.
Fig. 6.

Alterations of mRNA of neurotrophic factors BDNF (A), VEGF (C), and TRKB (B) a receptor of BDNF following QA and GA icv injections in cerebral cortex of neonatal WT and Gcdh−/− mice. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), with n = 4–5 animals per group. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s post hoc test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, differences from PBS + PBS + PBS; ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001, differences from PBS + PBS + GA; $P < 0.05, $$$P < 0.001 differences from PBS + QA + GA; @P < 0.05, @@@P < 0.001 differences from genotype)
Discussion
Systemic infections can worsen neurological manifestations of inborn errors of metabolism of intoxication, like the organic acidemias, by triggering encephalopathy that can be life-threatening. By causing fever and inflammation, infections accelerate protein breakdown inducing a catabolic state and acute metabolic decompensation resulting in accumulation of toxic metabolites that cause further biochemical perturbations, cellular and brain damage.
Regarding glutaric aciduria type I (GA-I), infections are the most common cause that trigger metabolic crises ultimately leading to irreversible striatal damage in children between 6 and 36 months of age, and this seems to be correlated to the predominant accumulation of glutaric acid and 3-hydroxyglutaric acid in the brain (Goodman et al. 1977a; Kölker et al. 2006; Wajner 2019). Aggressive management with prompt identification and treatment of infections is therefore critical to prevent severe decompensation and acute striatum degeneration in this disease (Goodman et al. 1977b; Kölker et al. 2006; Harting et al. 2009; Boy et al. 2013). Furthermore, rapid diagnosis through newborn screening and early treatment onset based on low protein/lysine diet allied to carnitine supplementation significantly ameliorates and reduces the severity of these crises, highligthing the importance of reducing the tissue levels of the accumulating metabolites (Kölker et al. 2011; Heringer et al. 2016; Strauss et al. 2020).
On the other hand, little is known about the influence of infectious episodes on the extrastriatal findings like the cortical abnormalities and atrophy in GA I. In this particular, frontotemporal hypoplasia and subependymal nodules are routinely found in MRI of late-onset GA I patients, who do not have an apparent susceptibility for striatal injury despite lack of treatment. These patients with no history of infections-associated crises are characteristically diagnosed over 6 years of age. Cerebral abnormalities at this age are well developed and thought to be due to sustained cumulative neurotoxicity of the accumulating metabolites, particularly GA (Boy et al. 2017, 2018; Wajner 2019). It is stressed that to the best of our knowledge practically nothing has been yet reported on the role of infectious processes on the brain alterations in these patients. Therefore, the present study was designed to investigate the role of an acute overload of GA under an increased inflammatory response triggered by icv injection of QA on neuroinflammatory signaling pathways, endoplasmic reticulum stress, as well as the levels of neurotrophins in cerebral cortex of neonatal Gcdh−/− mice to clarify whether cortical lesions could be accelerated by infectious episodes. We also evaluated the beneficial effects of carnitine, which was recently reported to have potent anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, to test whether this compound could ameliorate the deleterious effects of GA and QA treatments.
Previous studies demonstrated that brain accumulation of GA promotes neuronal damage secondary to oxidative stress and excitotoxicity, culminating in glial activation (Olivera-Bravo et al. 2015; Amaral et al. 2018; Pierozan et al. 2018; Castro et al. 2024). However, the neurotoxic mechanisms triggered by the intracerebral accumulation of GA, especially those related to the inflammatory response, are still poorly understood.
In this work we investigated the influence of GA icv administration alone or combined with QA to WT and Gcdh−/− mice on a range of important neuroinflammatory parameters. Our results showed that GA alone altered the expression of selected genes of inflammatory signaling pathways, increasing the mRNA levels of genes encoding NF-κB, COX-2, iNOS, and TLR2 in both genotypes. Combined QA + GA treatment produced a more intense molecular response, including increased TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, NLRP3, CHOP and PERK mRNA levels in the Gcdh−/− mice, as well as reduced IκBα, IL-10, BDNF in both genotypes, and VEGF-A expression predominantly in the Gcdh−/− mice. Therefore, the inflammatory transcriptional changes observed in this study cannot be attributed solely to the inflammatory stimulus mediated by QA. Overall, these marker-specific profiles indicate that QA selectively amplified downstream inflammatory responses to GA, particularly in the GCDH-deficient brain, rather than producing a uniform additive effect across all evaluated genes. TLR2 recognizes damage-associated molecular patterns and promotes NF-κB-dependent inflammatory signaling (Piccinini and Midwood 2010; Kawai and Akira 2010). The concomitant increases in TLR2 and IκBα expression after GA administration indicate early transcriptional engagement of this inflammatory network. In addition, Gcdh−/− mice exhibited reduced basal IκBα expression, while QA + GA reduced IκBα expression in WT mice. Because IκBα negatively regulates NF-κB signaling, this expression profile is compatible with reduced transcriptional restraint of the inflammatory response. Increased expression of COX-2 and iNOS, which encode important downstream inflammatory enzymes, further supports the induction of a coordinated pro-inflammatory molecular program. The increase in NLRP3 observed after QA + GA exposure, predominantly in Gcdh−/− mice, also indicates transcriptional priming of the NLRP3 inflammasome and suggests that GCDH deficiency increases susceptibility to the combined challenge (Swanson et al. 2019).
The cytokine profile further demonstrates that the combined QA + GA exposure expanded the response induced by GA. GA alone did not significantly alter TNF-⍺, IL-1β, or IL-6 expression but reduced the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in Gcdh−/− mice. In contrast, QA + GA treatment increased TNF-⍺, IL-1β, or IL-6 expression in Gcdh−/− mice, whereas IL-1β was also increased in WT animals. The maintenance of reduced IL-10 expression in the mutant animals, together with the induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines, indicates an imbalance between pro- and anti-inflammatory transcriptional responses. The more extensive response in Gcdh−/− mice highlights the vulnerability imposed by GCDH deficiency and suggests that the accumulation of GA sensitizes the cerebral cortex to additional inflammatory-associated stimuli.
Complementary protein-level evidence was obtained using the Lys + QA experimental approach. Lys alone did not significantly alter cortical TNF-α, IL-1β, or IL-6 concentrations, whereas Lys + QA increased all three cytokines, predominantly in Gcdh−/− mice. Because lysine is a major precursor of GA formation, these results provide complementary support for the interaction between GA brain increased levels and an inflammatory-associated challenge. Therefore, the present cytokine protein findings are in agreement with those of mRNA levels, implying that the results on the present investigation on gene expression are probably translated into protein levels.
Another novel finding of the present work was the observation that Carn attenuated or normalized most of the molecular alterations induced by the combined administration of QA and GA. In this protocol, Carn modulated the mRNA expression of key inflammatory mediators, including TLR2, NF-κB, IκBα, COX-2, iNOS, and NLRP3, as well as the pro-inflammatory cytokine genes TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6. Consistent with these transcriptional effects, Carn also attenuated or normalized the protein levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in the complementary Lys + QA protocol. The consistency of its effects across inflammatory signaling genes, cytokine transcripts, and cytokine proteins strongly supports a broad modulatory action of Carn on the inflammatory response. These findings agree with recent studies demonstrating antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of Carn and its derivatives in experimental models of neurotoxicity and neuroinflammation (Zanelli et al. 2005; Ferreira and McKenna 2017; Kazak and Yarim 2017; Bigio et al. 2024). In the context of GA I, the present results suggest that the benefits of Carn may extend beyond the formation and elimination of glutarylcarnitine to include modulation of molecular responses elicited by inflammatory stress.
Combined QA + GA exposure also increased CHOP and PERK mRNA expression in Gcdh−/− mice, indicating induction of an ER stress-related transcriptional response. PERK is a major sensor of disturbed ER homeostasis, whereas CHOP is associated with maladaptive responses to persistent ER stress (Hetz and Saxena 2017; Hetz et al. 2020). The parallel induction of inflammatory and ER stress-related genes is consistent with the close interaction between these processes, since inflammatory and metabolic stressors associated with redox imbalance, can disrupt ER proteostasis and activate the unfolded protein response (Hotamisligil 2010). Carn prevented or attenuated the increases in CHOP and PERK, suggesting that its modulatory effects also encompass molecular responses associated with ER homeostasis.
The inflammatory and ER stress-related disturbances were accompanied by altered expression of genes associated with neurotrophic and vascular support. In this scenario, QA + GA treatment reduced BDNF expression in both genotypes, with a greater effect in Gcdh−/− mice, while VEGF-A was reduced only in the knockout animals and TRKB remained unchanged. BDNF is an important regulator of neuronal survival and synaptic plasticity, whereas VEGF-A exerts both vascular and neurotrophic actions. Pro-inflammatory cytokines can interfere with transcriptional pathways regulating these factors, providing a biologically plausible connection between the inflammatory response and their reduced expression (Barrientos et al. 2004; Patterson 2015; Zhang et al. 2016). Carn also modulated the reductions in BDNF and VEGF-A, indicating preservation of molecular components associated with neurotrophic and vascular support. These findings agree with the evidence that Carn derivatives can preserve BDNF-related responses and neuroplasticity-associated pathways in other experimental conditions (Kazak and Yarim 2017).
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first in vivo study to investigate the molecular responses elicited by GA alone and by the combined administration of GA and QA in the cerebral cortex of neonatal Gcdh−/− mice, while concurrently examining innate immune signaling involving TLR2, NF-κB, and NLRP3, endoplasmic reticulum stress-related responses, neurotrophic and angiogenic support involving BDNF and VEGF-A and finally the modulatory neuroprotective effects of L-carnitine. This integrated approach provides a comprehensive overview of the molecular responses that may occur during infection-triggered inflammatory and metabolic stress in GA I.
The present study provides new evidence that GA alone induces an inflammatory-associated transcriptional response in the cerebral cortex, that QA expands selected components of this response, particularly in Gcdh−/− mice, and that Carn attenuates molecular alterations associated with inflammation, ER stress, and neurotrophic support. These findings should nevertheless be interpreted within the scope of the experimental design. The acute intracerebroventricular approach enabled a controlled assessment of the direct cerebral responses to GA and QA, although it does not fully reproduce the gradual endogenous accumulation of metabolites or the systemic inflammatory and catabolic components of metabolic decompensation in patients with GA I. Similarly, the absence of a QA-only group limits the assessment of its independent effects and prevents a formal determination of synergism, but the comparison between GA and QA + GA allowed the identification of molecular responses selectively potentiated by the combined challenge. The transcriptional analysis provided a comprehensive and biologically coherent profile of the pathways affected, complemented by cytokine protein measurements in the protocol using Lys + QA treatment. Further studies incorporating additional protein and pathway-activation analyses, histological and behavioral outcomes, glial responses, and mitochondrial function will help establishing the cellular and functional consequences of these molecular alterations and clarify the mechanisms underlying Carn protection. Evaluation of additional Carn doses and treatment periods will also be valuable to extend the present proof-of-concept findings.
Taken together, our findings demonstrate that GA alone induces the expression of some inflammatory-associated genes and that QA + GA combined treatment expands this response, producing more extensive alterations in biomarkers of inflammatory and related ER stress, besides altering neurotrophic molecular pathways, particularly in Gcdh−/− mice. Carn markedly attenuated these transcriptional changes and reduced cytokine protein elevations in the complementary Lys + QA protocol. These results support the involvement of inflammatory-associated molecular mechanisms in cortical vulnerability in GA I and identify Carn as an important modulator of the cerebral response to combined metabolic and inflammatory challenges.
The pathophysiologic relevance of the data here disclosed are still uncertain. However, in case our present findings can be extrapolated to the human condition, it is conceivable that acute episodes of encephalopathy triggered by infections may be associated with the cortical abnormalities and atrophy observed by cerebral MRI in GA I patients. Thus, preventing these metabolic crises and a prompt treatment based on more aggressive measures during acute episodes of decompensation including higher doses of Carn may ameliorate the cortical alterations occurring in this disease.
We should emphasize that one limitation of this study was that we did not measure glutaric acid concentrations in the brain of animals injected with this organic acid. Instead, we based the dose administered to the animals on previous studies of our and other labs (Lima et al. 1998; de Mello et al. 2001; Külkens et al. 2005; Castro et al. 2024). Another limitation of the present work was that the translated protein levels were only measured for pro-inflammatory cytokines.
Figure 7 depicts a schematic representation of the deleterious effects of GA alone and GA + QA treatments on inflammatory response and signaling pathways, ER stress and neurotrophins levels, as potential pathomechanism involved in cerebral cortex damage in Gcdh−/− mice. The figure also shows the neuroprotective role of L-carnitine.
Fig. 7.

Schematic summary of the statistically significant molecular alterations observed following combined quinolinic acid (QA) and glutaric acid (GA) treatment in the cerebral cortex of wild-type (WT) and GCDH-deficient (Gcdh −/−) mice. Upward and downward arrows indicate increased and decreased expression, respectively. The diagram also illustrates the modulatory effects of L-carnitine, which attenuated or normalized most of the alterations associated with inflammatory signaling, cytokine expression, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and neurotrophic support
Supplementary Information
Authors’ contributions
M.W. conceived and designed the study; M.W. and E.T.C. generated and analyzed the majority of the experimental data; Â.Z. and E.T.C. conducted animal handling, metabolite inoculation, and sample collection; A.U.M. processed brain samples and prepared immunofluorescence slides, which were analyzed by R.T.R and E.T.C; R.T.R, Â.Z. and E.T.C. conducted the RT-PCR experiments; C.A.N., A.U.A., C.R. V., A.V.S.C, and G.L. contributed to the formal analysis and critical review of the data related to RT-PCR, immunofluorescence, and neuropathology; E.T.C. wrote the first draft of the manuscript as part of her PhD thesi; M.W. and R.T.R performed the final formal analysis, acquired funding, administered the project, and critically reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors contributed to data interpretation, critically revised the manuscript, and approved the final version.
Funding
The Article Processing Charge (APC) for the publication of this research was funded by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) (ROR identifier: 00x0ma614). This work was supported by grants from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS) [grant number #24/2551–0001239-7], Fundo de Incentivo a Pesquisa do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (FIPE-20230483), and Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Saúde Cerebral (INCT-SC) [grant number #406020/2022–1].
Data availability
All data supporting the results of this study are available in the article, and any additional data will be made available upon request.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- Amaral AU, Cecatto C, Seminotti B et al (2012a) Marked reduction of Na+, K+-ATPase and creatine kinase activities induced by acute lysine administration in glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficient mice. Mol Genet Metab 107:81–86. 10.1016/j.ymgme.2012.04.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amaral AU, Seminotti B, Cecatto C et al (2012b) Reduction of Na+, K+-ATPase activity and expression in cerebral cortex of glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficient mice: a possible mechanism for brain injury in glutaric aciduria type I. Mol Genet Metab 107:375–382. 10.1016/j.ymgme.2012.08.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amaral AU, Cecatto C, Seminotti B et al (2015) Experimental evidence that bioenergetics disruption is not mainly involved in the brain injury of glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficient mice submitted to lysine overload. Brain Res 1620:116–129. 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amaral AU, Seminotti B, da Silva JC et al (2018) Induction of neuroinflammatory response and histopathological alterations caused by quinolinic acid administration in the striatum of glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficient mice. Neurotox Res 33:593–606. 10.1007/s12640-017-9848-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amaral AU, Seminotti B, da Silva JC et al (2019) Acute lysine overload provokes marked striatum injury involving oxidative stress signaling pathways in glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficient mice. Neurochem Int 129:104467. 10.1016/j.neuint.2019.104467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barrientos RM, Sprunger DB, Campeau S et al (2004) BDNF mRNA expression in rat hippocampus following contextual learning is blocked by intrahippocampal IL-1beta administration. J Neuroimmunol 155:119–126. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2004.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bigio B, Azam S, Mathé AA, Nasca C (2024) The neuropsychopharmacology of acetyl-L-carnitine (LAC): basic, translational and therapeutic implications. Discov Ment Health 4:2. 10.1007/s44192-023-00056-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boy N, Haege G, Heringer J et al (2013) Low lysine diet in glutaric aciduria type I–effect on anthropometric and biochemical follow-up parameters. J Inherit Metab Dis 36:525–533. 10.1007/s10545-012-9517-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boy N, Mühlhausen C, Maier EM et al (2017) Proposed recommendations for diagnosing and managing individuals with glutaric aciduria type I: second revision. J Inherit Metab Dis 40:75–101. 10.1007/s10545-016-9999-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boy N, Mengler K, Thimm E et al (2018) Newborn screening: a disease-changing intervention for glutaric aciduria type 1. Ann Neurol 83:970–979. 10.1002/ana.25233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boy N, Garbade SF, Heringer J et al (2019) Patterns, evolution, and severity of striatal injury in insidious- vs acute-onset glutaric aciduria type 1. J Inherit Metab Dis 42:117–127. 10.1002/jimd.12033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boy N, Mühlhausen C, Maier EM et al (2023) Recommendations for diagnosing and managing individuals with glutaric aciduria type 1: third revision. J Inherit Metab Dis 46:482–519. 10.1002/jimd.12566 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Busanello ENB, Pettenuzzo L, Botton PH et al (2013) Neurodevelopmental and cognitive behavior of glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficient knockout mice. Life Sci 92:137–142. 10.1016/j.lfs.2012.11.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Busanello ENB, Fernandes CG, Martell RV et al (2014) Disturbance of the glutamatergic system by glutaric acid in striatum and cerebral cortex of glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase-deficient knockout mice: possible implications for the neuropathology of glutaric acidemia type I. J Neurol Sci 346:260–267. 10.1016/J.JNS.2014.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Castro ET, Ribeiro RT, Carvalho AVS et al (2024) Impairment of neuromotor development and cognition associated with histopathological and neurochemical abnormalities in the cerebral cortex and striatum of glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficient mice. Neurochem Int 181:105898. 10.1016/J.NEUINT.2024.105898 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Christensen E, Ribes A, Merinero B, Zschocke J (2004) Correlation of genotype and phenotype in glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency. J Inherit Metab Dis 27:861–868. 10.1023/B:BOLI.0000045770.93429.3c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- La Cruz VP-D, Carrillo-Mora P, Santamaría A (2012) Quinolinic Acid, an Endogenous Molecule Combining Excitotoxicity, Oxidative Stress and Other Toxic Mechanisms. Int J Tryptophan Res 5:1–8. 10.4137/IJTR.S8158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferreira GC, McKenna MC (2017) L-Carnitine and acetyl-L-carnitine roles and neuroprotection in developing brain. Neurochem Res 42:1661–1675. 10.1007/s11064-017-2288-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Funk CBR (2005) Neuropathological, biochemical and molecular findings in a glutaric acidemia type 1 cohort. Brain 128:711–722. 10.1093/brain/awh401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garbade SF, Greenberg CR, Demirkol M et al (2014) Unravelling the complex MRI pattern in glutaric aciduria type I using statistical models-a cohort study in 180 patients. J Inherit Metab Dis 37:763–773. 10.1007/s10545-014-9676-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goodman SI, Helland P, Stokke O et al (1977a) Organic acid profiles of human tissue biopsies by capillary gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 142:497–503. 10.1016/S0021-9673(01)92062-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goodman SI, Norenberg MD, Shikes RH et al (1977b) Glutaric aciduria: biochemical and morphologic considerations. J Pediatr 90:746–750. 10.1016/S0022-3476(77)81240-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harting I, Neumaier-Probst E, Seitz A et al (2009) Dynamic changes of striatal and extrastriatal abnormalities in glutaric aciduria type I. Brain 132:1764–1782. 10.1093/brain/awp112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heringer J, Valayannopoulos V, Lund AM et al (2016) Impact of age at onset and newborn screening on outcome in organic acidurias. J Inherit Metab Dis 39:341–353. 10.1007/s10545-015-9907-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hetz C, Saxena S (2017) ER stress and the unfolded protein response in neurodegeneration. Nat Rev Neurol 13:477–491. 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.99 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hetz C, Zhang K, Kaufman RJ (2020) Mechanisms, regulation and functions of the unfolded protein response. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 21:421–438. 10.1038/s41580-020-0250-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hotamisligil GS (2010) Endoplasmic reticulum stress and the inflammatory basis of metabolic disease. Cell 140:900–917. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jafari P, Braissant O, Bonafé L, Ballhausen D (2011) The unsolved puzzle of neuropathogenesis in glutaric aciduria type I. Mol Genet Metab 104:425–437. 10.1016/J.YMGME.2011.08.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kawai T, Akira S (2010) The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: update on Toll-like receptors. Nat Immunol 11:373–384. 10.1038/ni.1863 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kazak F, Yarim GF (2017) Neuroprotective effects of acetyl- L -carnitine on lipopolysaccharide-induced neuroinflammation in mice: involvement of brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Neurosci Lett 658:32–36. 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.07.059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koeller DM, Woontner M, Crnic LS et al (2002) Biochemical, pathologic and behavioral analysis of a mouse model of glutaric acidemia type I. Hum Mol Genet 11:347–357. 10.1093/hmg/11.4.347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kölker S, Köhr G, Ahlemeyer B et al (2002) Ca(2+) and Na(+) dependence of 3-hydroxyglutarate-induced excitotoxicity in primary neuronal cultures from chick embryo telencephalons. Pediatr Res 52:199–206. 10.1203/00006450-200208000-00011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kölker S, Sauer SW, Okun JG et al (2006) Lysine intake and neurotoxicity in glutaric aciduria type I: towards a rationale for therapy? Brain 129:e54. 10.1093/brain/awl137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kölker S, Christensen E, Leonard JV et al (2011) Diagnosis and management of glutaric aciduria type I--revised recommendations. J Inherit Metab Dis 34:677–694. 10.1007/s10545-011-9289-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Külkens S, Harting I, Sauer S et al (2005) Late-onset neurologic disease in glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency. Neurology 64:2142–2144. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000167428.12417.B2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lagranha VL, Matte U, de Carvalho TG et al (2014) Increased glutamate receptor and transporter expression in the cerebral cortex and striatum of Gcdh-/- mice: possible implications for the neuropathology of glutaric acidemia type I. PLoS ONE 9:e90477. 10.1371/journal.pone.0090477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lima TT, Begnini J, de Bastiani J et al (1998) Pharmacological evidence for GABAergic and glutamatergic involvement in the convulsant and behavioral effects of glutaric acid. Brain Res 802:55–60. 10.1016/s0006-8993(98)00563-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lindner M, Ho S, Fang-Hoffmann J et al (2006) Neonatal screening for glutaric aciduria type I: strategies to proceed. J Inherit Metab Dis 29:378–382. 10.1007/s10545-006-0284-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25:402–408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lugo-Huitrón R, Ugalde Muñiz P, Pineda B et al (2013) Quinolinic acid: an endogenous neurotoxin with multiple targets. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 10.1155/2013/104024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Magni DV, Furian AF, Oliveira MS et al (2009) Kinetic characterization of L-[(3)H]glutamate uptake inhibition and increase oxidative damage induced by glutaric acid in striatal synaptosomes of rats. Int J Dev Neurosci 27:65–72. 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2008.09.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Märtner EMC, Thimm E, Guder P et al (2021) The biochemical subtype is a predictor for cognitive function in glutaric aciduria type 1: a national prospective follow-up study. Sci Rep 11:19300. 10.1038/s41598-021-98809-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mateu-Bosch A, Segur-Bailach E, Muñoz-Moreno E et al (2024) Systemic delivery of AAV-GCDH ameliorates HLD-induced phenotype in a glutaric aciduria type I mouse model. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev 32:101276. 10.1016/j.omtm.2024.101276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Mello CF, Kölker S, Ahlemeyer B et al (2001) Intrastriatal administration of 3-hydroxyglutaric acid induces convulsions and striatal lesions in rats. Brain Res 916:70–75. 10.1016/s0006-8993(01)02865-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neumaier-Probst E, Harting I, Seitz A et al (2004) Neuroradiological findings in glutaric aciduria type I (glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency). J Inherit Metab Dis 27:869–876. 10.1023/B:BOLI.0000045771.66300.2a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olivera-Bravo S, Fernández A, Sarlabós MN et al (2011) Neonatal astrocyte damage is sufficient to trigger progressive striatal degeneration in a rat model of glutaric acidemia-I. PLoS ONE 6:e20831. 10.1371/journal.pone.0020831 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olivera-Bravo S, Ribeiro CAJ, Isasi E et al (2015) Striatal neuronal death mediated by astrocytes from the Gcdh-/- mouse model of glutaric acidemia type I. Hum Mol Genet 24:4504–4515. 10.1093/hmg/ddv175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patterson SL (2015) Immune dysregulation and cognitive vulnerability in the aging brain: interactions of microglia, IL-1β, BDNF and synaptic plasticity. Neuropharmacology 96:11–18. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.12.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Piccinini AM, Midwood KS (2010) DAMPening inflammation by modulating TLR signalling. Mediators Inflamm. 10.1155/2010/672395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pierozan P, Colín-González AL, Biasibetti H et al (2018) Toxic synergism between quinolinic acid and glutaric acid in neuronal cells is mediated by oxidative stress: insights to a new toxic model. Mol Neurobiol 55:5362–5376. 10.1007/s12035-017-0761-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pocivavsek A, Schwarcz R, Erhardt S (2024) Neuroactive kynurenines as pharmacological targets: new experimental tools and exciting therapeutic opportunities. Pharmacol Rev 76:978–1008. 10.1124/pharmrev.124.000239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Porciúncula LO, Emanuelli T, Tavares RG et al (2004) Glutaric acid stimulates glutamate binding and astrocytic uptake and inhibits vesicular glutamate uptake in forebrain from young rats. Neurochem Int 45:1075–1086. 10.1016/J.NEUINT.2004.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ribeiro CAJ, Grando V, Dutra Filho CS et al (2006) Evidence that quinolinic acid severely impairs energy metabolism through activation of NMDA receptors in striatum from developing rats. J Neurochem 99:1531–1542. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04199.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodrigues MDN, Seminotti B, Amaral AU et al (2015) Experimental evidence that overexpression of NR2B glutamate receptor subunit is associated with brain vacuolation in adult glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficient mice: a potential role for glutamatergic-induced excitotoxicity in GA I neuropathology. J Neurol Sci 359:133–140. 10.1016/J.JNS.2015.10.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saad C, Jung-Klawitter S, Dimitrov B et al (2026) Aminoadipate-semialdehyde synthase, a potential target for substrate reduction therapy in glutaric aciduria type 1. Sci Rep 16:10995. 10.1038/s41598-026-44377-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D (2001) The metabolic and molecular bases of inherited disease. McGraw-Hill, New York [Google Scholar]
- Segur-Bailach E, Mateu-Bosch A, Bofill-De Ros X et al (2025) Therapeutic AASS inhibition by AAV-miRNA rescues glutaric aciduria type I severe phenotype in mice. Mol Ther 33:4820–4833. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.07.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seminotti B, da Rosa MS, Fernandes CG et al (2012) Induction of oxidative stress in brain of glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficient mice by acute lysine administration. Mol Genet Metab 106:31–38. 10.1016/j.ymgme.2012.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seminotti B, Amaral AU, da Rosa MS et al (2013) Disruption of brain redox homeostasis in glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficient mice treated with high dietary lysine supplementation. Mol Genet Metab 108:30–39. 10.1016/j.ymgme.2012.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seminotti B, Ribeiro RT, Amaral AU et al (2014) Acute lysine overload provokes protein oxidative damage and reduction of antioxidant defenses in the brain of infant glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficient mice: a role for oxidative stress in GA I neuropathology. J Neurol Sci 344:105–113. 10.1016/j.jns.2014.06.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seminotti B, Amaral AU, Ribeiro RT et al (2016) Oxidative stress, disrupted energy metabolism, and altered signaling pathways in glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase knockout mice: potential implications of quinolinic acid toxicity in the neuropathology of glutaric acidemia type I. Mol Neurobiol 53:6459–6475. 10.1007/s12035-015-9548-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seminotti B, Amaral U, Grings M et al (2020) Lipopolysaccharide-elicited systemic inflammation induces selective vulnerability of cerebral cortex and striatum of developing glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficient (Gcdh−/−) mice to oxidative stress. Neurotox Res 38:1024–1036. 10.1007/s12640-020-00291-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seminotti B, Brondani M, Ribeiro RT et al (2022) Disturbance of mitochondrial dynamics, endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria crosstalk, redox homeostasis, and inflammatory response in the brain of glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase-deficient mice: neuroprotective effects of bezafibrate. Mol Neurobiol 59:4839–4853. 10.1007/s12035-022-02887-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strauss KA, Lazovic J, Wintermark M, Morton DH (2007) Multimodal imaging of striatal degeneration in Amish patients with glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency. Brain 130:1905–1920. 10.1093/brain/awm058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strauss KA, Williams KB, Carson VJ et al (2020) Glutaric acidemia type 1: treatment and outcome of 168 patients over three decades. Mol Genet Metab 131:325–340. 10.1016/j.ymgme.2020.09.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swanson KV, Deng M, Ting JP-Y (2019) The NLRP3 inflammasome: molecular activation and regulation to therapeutics. Nat Rev Immunol 19:477–489. 10.1038/s41577-019-0165-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Varadkar S, Surtees R (2004) Glutaric aciduria type I and kynurenine pathway metabolites: a modified hypothesis. J Inherit Metab Dis 27:835–842. 10.1023/B:BOLI.0000045767.42193.97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vendramin Pasquetti M, Meier ıL, Loureiro S et al (2017) Impairment of GABAergic system contributes to epileptogenesis in glutaric acidemia type I. Epilepsia 58:1771–1781. 10.1111/epi.13862 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wajner M (2019) Neurological manifestations of organic acidurias. Nat Rev Neurol 15:253–271. 10.1038/s41582-019-0161-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wajner M, Amaral AU, Leipnitz G, Seminotti B (2019) Pathogenesis of brain damage in glutaric acidemia type I: lessons from the genetic mice model. Int J Dev Neurosci 78:215–221. 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2019.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zanelli SA, Solenski NJ, Rosenthal RE, Fiskum G (2005) Mechanisms of ischemic neuroprotection by acetyl-L-carnitine. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1053:153–161. 10.1196/annals.1344.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J, Yao W, Hashimoto K (2016) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)-TrkB signaling in inflammation-related depression and potential therapeutic targets. Curr Neuropharmacol 14:721–731. 10.2174/1570159X14666160119094646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zinnanti WJ, Lazovic J, Wolpert EB et al (2006) A diet-induced mouse model for glutaric aciduria type I. Brain 129:899–910. 10.1093/brain/awl009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zinnanti WJ, Lazovic J, Housman C et al (2007) Mechanism of age-dependent susceptibility and novel treatment strategy in glutaric acidemia type I. J Clin Invest 117:3258–3270. 10.1172/JCI31617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data supporting the results of this study are available in the article, and any additional data will be made available upon request.
