Abstract
A principal means of transmitting intracellular calcium (Ca2+) waves at junctions between astrocytes involves the release of the chemical transmitter adenosine triphosphate (ATP). A model of this process is presented in which activation of purinergic P2Y receptors by ATP triggers the release of ATP, in an autocrine manner, as well as concomitantly increasing intracellular Ca2+. The dependence of the temporal characteristics of the Ca2+ wave are shown to critically depend on the dissociation constant (KR) for ATP binding to the P2Y receptor type. Incorporating this model astrocyte into networks of these cells successfully accounts for many of the properties of propagating Ca2+ waves, such as the dependence of velocity on the type of P2Y receptor and the time-lag of the Ca2+ wave behind the ATP wave. In addition, the conditions under which Ca2+ waves may jump from one set of astrocytes across an astrocyte-free lane to another set of astrocytes are quantitatively accounted for by the model. The properties of purinergic transmission at astrocyte junctions may determine many of the characteristics of Ca2+ propagation in networks of these cells.
INTRODUCTION
Purinergic receptors on astrocytes implicated in Ca2+ elevation
Application of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to astrocytes for periods of several hundred seconds gives rise to a transient increase in Ca2+ concentration—hereafter denoted by [Ca2+]—which then relaxes to a maintained plateau (1–3, but see Koizumi et al. (4)). The sustained response is due to an influx of calcium ions through P2X7 receptors (1,5). The transient response is most likely mediated by P2Y1 and P2Y2 receptors (henceforth P2Y1 R and P2Y2 R), involving an increase in inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) to release calcium from endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stores (4) through G-protein coupling to phospholipase C (PLC) (3,6). The P2Y2 R agonist uridine 5′-triphosphate (UTP) produces Ca2+ in astrocytes through an increase in IP3 turnover (7) with subsequent release of calcium from thapsigargin-sensitive calcium stores (8) as well as release of ATP (9); however, the mechanism by which ATP is released is as yet unknown. Direct evidence for the existence of functional P2Y1 R and P2Y2 R on astrocytes has been obtained by injecting astrocyte mRNA into oocytes and showing subsequently that these give Ca2+ upon application of the P2Y1 R agonist 2-methylthio ATP and the P2Y2 R agonist UTP (10); see also Zhu and Kimelberg (11). The dominant metabotropic P2YR appears to be P2Y1 R, according to a combined Western blot pharmacological approach (12).
Involvement of P2Y receptors in junctional transmission of Ca2+ between astrocytes
Hassinger et al. (13) have shown that scraping away cells to form a cell-free lane in two-dimensional astrocyte cultures does not interrupt the Ca2+ initiated on one side of the lane from propagating to the other side for lane widths <∼120 μm, although the delay time for the Ca2+ propagating across the lane is longer the wider the lane. These observations show that transmission of Ca2+ may involve the release of a chemical substance from the astrocytes. It is very likely that the principal substance that mediates this Ca2+ transmission is ATP. Simultaneous imaging of ATP and Ca2+ waves in two-dimensional cortical astrocyte cultures have been obtained after these were initiated by mechanical stimulation of an astrocyte (14). Both waves possess a duration of ∼10s at half-height and both were blocked by the purinergic receptor antagonist suramin. P2YRs, specifically P2Y1 Rs and P2Y2 Rs, dominate in the action of the astrocyte transmitter ATP in propagating Ca2+ waves (see, for example, Gallagher and Salter (15) and Salter and Hicks (16)). In spinal cord astrocytes, specific P2Y1 R antagonists, such as adenosine-3′-phospho-5′-phosphosulfate, block transmission (17); see also Fam et al. (18). A fivefold greater concentration of the P2Y2 R agonist UTP is required to give a [Ca2+] comparable to that obtained using the specific P2Y1 R agonist 2-MeS adenosine diphosphate (henceforth, ADP) (18), although ATP itself is equipotent at P2Y1 Rs and P2Y2 Rs (19). Gallagher and Salter (15) have shown that transmission of Ca2+ occurs in two-dimensional cultures of human astrocytoma cells heterologously expressing either P2Y1 Rs or P2Y2 Rs, with transmission through the latter faster than through the former. They take this to be due to the fact that P2Y1 Rs take longer than P2Y2 Rs to generate Ca2+ when stimulated with ATP. Since ADP acting on P2Y1 Rs generates Ca2+ much faster than ATP, therefore apyrase, by metabolizing ATP to ADP, accelerates Ca2+ release in astrocytes that only express P2Y1 Rs but blocks release in astrocytes that only express P2Y2 Rs (15). Although glutamate receptors exist on astrocytes, the release of glutamate onto these is not primarily involved in the transmission of Ca2+ waves, but rather that of Na+ waves (20).
Mechanism of release of ATP from astrocytes during junctional transmission of Ca2+
It is well established that ATP-stimulated release of glutamate from astrocytes involves a calcium-triggered exocytosis of glutamate-containing vesicles (21–24). However, the mechanism of release of ATP from astrocytes has yet to be clearly established. Mechanical stimulation gives rise to an increase in [Ca2+], which, if buffered with BAPTA, has been claimed either to block (25,26) or not to block (14) ATP release. However, depletion of intracellular calcium stores with thapsigargin fails to block ATP release (14). Most importantly, ATP waves propagate ahead of calcium waves from the point of stimulation in a two-dimensional astrocyte culture (14) and in the retina (27). Thus, the cumulative evidence is against a Ca2+-dependent exocytosis of ATP. Alternative pathways for ATP release from astrocytes that are not dependent on calcium-triggered exocytosis are possible. ATP release is partially blocked by antagonists to ATP-binding-cassette proteins such as glibenclamide (28,9) and there is evidence that elevation of protein kinase C (PKC) enhances a glibenclamide-sensitive chloride efflux from astrocytes through ATP-binding cassette proteins, raising the possibility that PKC stimulation elevates ATP release (28).
Modeling the process of astrocyte junctional transmission of Ca2+
Previous models of Ca2+ wave propagation in networks of glial cells have assumed that the passive diffusion of IP3 through gap junctions is the underlying mechanism (29,30). An elevated concentration of IP3 in a single cell acts on receptors on the ER causing the release of Ca2+ into the cytosol, which then activates PLC to produce more IP3. This IP3 diffuses to neighboring cells, where the regenerative process is repeated. In contrast, the present model is based solely on purinergic transmission, where the underlying mechanism is the diffusion of ATP in the extracellular space. This ATP binds to P2Y receptors on the astrocyte surface, thus initiating a G-protein cascade that leads to the production of IP3 and the consequent release of Ca2+ from internal stores. This increase in [IP3] is also assumed to lead to release of ATP into the extracellular space, where it acts back on the initiating cell and also diffuses to neighboring cells, thus propagating an ATP wave and a Ca2+ wave. We consider both one-dimensional and two-dimensional networks of these astrocytes and show that the model accounts for most observations on astrocytic transmission and provides a coherent theoretical framework for further experimental research on this subject.
METHODS
Overview
The single-cell model follows that of Lemon et al. (31) with some changes. Simplifications have been made: some processes included in that model are not relevant to astrocytes; others are second-order effects and can be omitted with little change to the final results. The main additions that must be made concern the release of ATP into the extracellular space and the diffusion of IP3 inside the cell and ATP outside the cell. Fig. 1 A is a schematic diagram showing the main processes that will be used in our model of a single cell; Table 1 gives the parameter values used in the calculations.
TABLE 1.
Symbol | Definition | Value | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
P2Y Receptor regulation | |||
KR | Dissociation constant for ligand binding to P2YRs | Various | See text |
G-protein cascade | |||
kdeg | IP3 degradation rate | 1.25 s−1 | (31) |
ka | G-protein activation rate | 0.017 s−1 | (31) |
kd | G-protein deactivation rate | 0.15 s−1 | (31) |
r*h | IP3 production rate | 2 × 10−14μmol μm−2 s−1 | Fit to experiment |
DIP | IP3 diffusion coefficient | 280 μm2 s−1 | (30) |
ATP production | |||
VATP | ATP production rate | 2 × 10−11μmol μm−2 s−1 | Fit to experiment |
Krel | Kinetic parameter | 10 μM | Fit to experiment |
[IP3]min | Threshold concentration | 0.012 μM | Fit to experiment |
kloss | Depletion rate parameter | 30 s−1 | Fit to experiment |
DATP | ATP diffusion coefficient | 300 μm2 s−1 | (67) |
Jmax | Maximum channel current | 2880 μM s−1 | (36) |
KI | IP3 channel kinetic parameter | 0.03 μM | (36) |
Kact | IP3 channel kinetic parameter | 0.17 μM | (36) |
kon | IP3 channel kinetic parameter | 8.0 μM s−1 | (36) |
Kinh | IP3 channel kinetic parameter | 0.1 μM | (36) |
[] | Ca2+ concentration in ER | 400 μM | (36) |
Vmax | Maximum pumping rate into ER | 5.85 μM s−1 | (36) |
Kp | Pump dissociation constant | 0.24 μM | (36) |
β | Endogenous buffer parameter | 0.0244 | (36) |
Initial values | |||
[IP3]0 | Initial IP3 concentration | 0.01 μM | (31) |
[Ca2+]0 | Initial Ca2+ concentration | 0.05 μM | (36) |
Receptors
A basic model is used in which receptors do not desensitize—they are neither phosphorylated nor internalized and recycled. Thus the reaction is
(1) |
where L is ligand and R receptor. The quantity we want is the ratio of bound to total receptors, ρ = [LR]/[RT], where [RT] = [R] + [LR] is the total number of receptors. Under the assumption of fast binding kinetics, Eq. 1 can be assumed to be in equilibrium, leading to
(2) |
where [L] = [ATP] is the extracellular ATP concentration and is the dissociation constant. Although KR is defined in relation to the binding of ATP to P2Y receptors, and as such should have a value of the order of 10 μM (32), it can be interpreted more broadly in the context of the model. The crucial quantity is ρ, since this governs the production of active G-protein (see Eq. 3 below), and thus ρ can be interpreted more generally as being a measure of additional aspects of the model such as the density of P2Y receptors and the strength of the coupling of the bound receptors to G-protein activation. To save introducing additional parameters, these aspects have been incorporated in the single quantity KR, which then becomes an effective, rather than an actual, dissociation constant.
G-protein cascade
The equation describing G-protein activation is Lemon et al. (31), their Eq. 16:
(3) |
where [G] is the amount of activated G-protein, [GT] is the total G-protein, ρ is the fraction of bound receptors as given by Eq. 2, δ is the ratio of the activities of the unbound and bound receptors (and thus allows for background activity even in the absence of ligand binding, i.e., unbound receptors can activate a small amount of G-protein), and ka and kd are the G-protein activation and deactivation rate parameters, respectively. Eq. 3 is represented by the kinetic scheme
(4) |
where Gin is inactive G-protein, so [Gin] = [GT] − [G]. Again assuming fast kinetics, we obtain
(5) |
where G* = [G]/[GT] and KG = kd/ka.
IP3 production and diffusion
IP3 production and degradation is governed by Lemon et al. (31), their Eq. 19:
(6) |
where rh = α([Ca2+]/(Kc + [Ca2+]))[G] and the last term accounts for the degradation of IP3 inside the cell. The Ca2+-dependence of rh allows for the catalytic effect of Ca2+ on IP3 production (it binds to a catalytic site on PLC), but for simplicity this secondary effect is not included in the astrocyte model, so Kc = 0 giving rh = α[G]. Also, there is assumed to be no depletion of PIP2, so [PIP2]= [(PIP2)T] and Eq. 6 simplifies to
(7) |
where G* is given by Eq. 5, and r*h is a constant, independent of [Ca2+].
In the above equations [IP3] is taken to be spatially homogeneous, but now diffusion must be included. IP3 is produced at the cell wall, it then diffuses into the cytosol and is degraded everywhere, including at the cell wall. Thus [IP3] is now spatially inhomogeneous, [IP3] = [IP3](r, t), and satisfies
(8) |
where DIP is the diffusion coefficient for IP3 and the term r*hG* is applied only at the cell wall.
ATP production and diffusion
As stated in the Introduction (see also Discussion), the mechanism by which ATP is released by astrocytes has not been established, although there is evidence that IP3 is probably involved. We have chosen to use IP3 as the agent triggering release, but this is not crucial to the model. The release can be linked to the concentration of active G-protein, with essentially the same results. In an even simpler model, ATP release can be taken to depend directly on ATP concentration, with no intermediate steps.
ATP is assumed to be released into the extracellular space at the cell boundary at rate
(9) |
provided [IP3] is greater than [IP3]min; otherwise it is not released. The threshold value [IP3]min is necessary to prevent very small levels of [ATP] from being amplified and thus leading to a propagating wave. VATP and Krel are constants and χ(t) is a parameter that accounts for depletion of ATP stores inside the cell; it has initial value 1 and decreases according to
(10) |
where kloss is a constant. This depletion is included to terminate ATP release from each cell and thus lead to the correct waveforms for [ATP] and [Ca2+]. Some evidence for a depletable ATP store is provided by the observation that there is no ATP release by the third impulse during repetitive stimulation of astrocytes (14). Evidence against such depletion could come from experiments in which astrocytes are exposed to glutamate, leading to the production of IP3 and hence depletion of ATP stores, but an intercellular wave is still supported (33). However, it may be that only the initial response to glutamate releases significant quantities of IP3: see especially Fig. 2 A in Kim et al. (34), which shows an initial Ca2+ spike followed by much lower oscillations. These oscillations might be supported by a concentration of IP3 that is below threshold in our model, or they might be the result of Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release from IP3-insensitive stores (see Discussion in Charles et al. (33) and the theoretical analysis of Keizer and Levine (35)). Thus, the ATP stores may only be partially depleted by glutamate and also could have time for some refilling. An alternative way of terminating the action of ATP would be to assume that the P2Y receptors desensitize at a sufficient fast rate. Desensitization has been included in the P2Y receptor model in Lemon et al. (31), but the parameter values listed there give a timecourse that is too slow.
ATP diffuses in the extracellular space and is thus spatially inhomogeneous, [ATP] = [ATP](r, t), and satisfies
(11) |
where DATP is the diffusion coefficient for ATP and the depletion term is applied only at the cell wall and only when [IP3] > [IP3]min. The last term allows for the breakdown of ATP by an ectonucleotidase. It was found that the inclusion of this term makes no essential difference to the output of the model (see Results) and so it has been omitted in the main calculations reported here.
Ca2+ release from internal stores
The steps leading from IP3 production to Ca2+ release from the ER via IP3 Rs have been modeled in Lemon et al. (31), but here we follow a similar scheme due to Fink et al. (36). Both schemes are based on the original models of De Young and Keizer (37), and Li and Rinzel (38).
The Ca2+ dynamics are governed by
(12) |
where [Ca2+] is the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration, JIP3, Jpump, and Jleak are the rates of Ca2+ concentration change due to release through IP3 R channels, pump uptake into the ER, and leak from the ER, respectively, and β is a factor describing Ca2+ buffering. The diffusion of Ca2+ has been neglected, since it is much slower that that of IP3. The IP3-induced current is
(13) |
where Jmax is the maximum rate, KI is the dissociation constant for IP3 binding to an IP3 R, Kact is the dissociation constant for Ca2+ binding to an activation site on an IP3 R, [Ca2+]ER is the Ca2+ concentration in the ER (taken to be constant), and h satisfies
(14) |
where kon is the rate of Ca2+ binding to the inhibitory site on the IP3 R and Kinh is the corresponding dissociation constant.
The ATPase Ca2+ pump is described by
(15) |
where Vmax is the maximum pumping rate and Kp is the dissociation constant. The leak is described by
(16) |
where the constant PL is determined by steady-state flux balance (see Initialization, below). The buffering is described by the steady-state approximation
(17) |
where [B]end and Kend are the concentration and dissociation constants of the endogenous buffer, respectively.
Geometry
Each astrocyte is represented by a cube of side 25 μm (Fig. 1 C). These cubes are arranged in two-dimensional arrays, on the x,y plane. The minimum spacing between cubes is 25 μm, but this can be altered to investigate the maximum distance over which astrocytes can communicate. A single lane of four cubes with minimum spacing is illustrated in Fig. 1 B. In many calculations, lanes of 19 astrocytes were used in various configurations to investigate communication between lanes. With this simplified geometry we are not attempting to model the spatial complexity of a real astrocyte; rather this is an effective astrocyte in which the processes emanating from a real astrocyte are lumped into a compact space, taken to be cubical for reasons of computational simplicity. Real astrocytes also tend to be space-filling, with their arborizations touching but not overlapping (39); the intercellular gaps in our model reflect the fact that the specific geometry of the astrocytes has not been incorporated.
Initialization
In the absence of ATP there is still background IP3 and Ca2+ resulting from the activation of a small amount of G-protein by unbound receptors (see Eq. 5; in this case, ρ = 0 but δ ≠ 0). If diffusion of IP3 is neglected, then initial homogeneous concentrations of IP3 and Ca2+, [IP3]0, and [Ca2+]0 respectively, can be set. However, this cannot be used as the background state when diffusion is included, since the production of IP3 at the cell wall and its subsequent diffusion into the interior of the cell violate this homogeneous state and lead to instabilities. Rather, these initial homogeneous concentrations are used to set the activity ratio δ (using Eqs. 5 and 7) as
(18) |
and the Ca2+ leak rate, PL, by setting JIP3 − Jpump − Jleak = 0. Then the IP3 equation, Eq. 8, is run, as described in the following section, until a steady-state solution is obtained that is close to the homogeneous one, but of course not identical since it is inhomogeneous. The Ca2+ equation, Eq. 12, is now solved to find the corresponding equilibrium Ca2+ concentration, which will also be inhomogeneous (even though Ca2+ does not diffuse), because of the inhomogeneous distribution of IP3.
Method of solution
Each cell is represented by a rectangular Cartesian grid with spacing 5 μm (Fig. 1 C), and thus contains 27 interior grid points and 98 surface grid points. The space between the cells is similarly represented by a rectangular grid with the same spacing of 5 μm. The grid extends to ±49 points in the z direction, which is essentially infinite. The lanes of 19 astrocytes use ±99 grid points and thus the grid ends in a space between cells. The boundary conditions are ATP sinks at all boundaries. The ER is present at all 125 grid points of each cell and Ca2+ production and IP3 degradation also occurs at each of these points. On the other hand, IP3 production occurs only at the 98 surface points, as does ATP binding to P2YRs and the production of ATP.
The background distributions of IP3 and Ca2+ are calculated as described in Initialization, above. In doing these calculations, fluxes need to be converted to concentration changes. A flux of f μmol μm−2 s−1 through an area a μm2 into a volume v μm3 leads to a concentration change of 1015 (f a/v) μM s−1, so the appropriate conversion factor to be applied to r*h and VATP is 0.2 × 1015 μm−1. The ATP wave is initiated by setting a step concentration (typically 10 μM) of ATP in the layer surrounding the central cell.
The equations for the diffusion of IP3, Eq. 8, and of ATP, Eq. 11, are solved using a “leap-frog” method (see the Appendix in Henery (40); in the present case, only the straightforward extension of the one-dimensional case is required since there are only single equations, and not coupled equations). The other differential equations for ATP store depletion, Eq. 10, Ca2+, Eq. 12, and h, Eq. 14, are solved using a standard Runge-Kutta method.
RESULTS
P2Y1 and P2Y2 receptor generation of Ca2+ in a single astrocyte
According to the model in Fig. 1 A, exposure of a single astrocyte to ATP leads to both an increase in [Ca2+] as well as the release of ATP, which increases [ATP] and then acts on P2YRs of the cell in an autocrine manner. Fig. 2 shows that exposure of an astrocyte to an initiating pulse of ATP (Fig. 2 A) leads to a fast increase in [IP3] (Fig. 2 B). Given that the release of ATP is directly coupled to IP3 (see Eq. 9), the ATP autocrine mechanism gives rise to a relatively sustained increase in [ATP], which is terminated and drops back to basal levels as a consequence of depletion of the store of releasable ATP in the astrocyte (Fig. 2 C). Calcium is released from the ER by IP3, so that there is a concomitant increase in [Ca2+] accompanying, but lagging that of [IP3] (Fig. 2 D).
The results of a sustained application of ATP to a single astrocyte are given in Fig. 3. The quantitative relation between peak [Ca2+] and [ATP] is shown in Fig. 3 A, with the curves giving higher peak Ca2+ as KR decreases. Fig. 3 B shows that the rate of rise of [Ca2+], after application of a fixed concentration (5 μM) of ATP, increases with a decrease in KR. This rate of rise also increases with an increase in [ATP] (Fig. 3 C). Fig. 3 D plots the half-rise times for [Ca2+] as a function of [ATP]. Shown also are the experimental values of Gallagher and Salter (15) for astrocytes in which ATP or ADP acts exclusively on P2Y1 Rs (diamonds) or ATP acts exclusively on P2Y2 Rs (circles). It will be noted that the theoretical curves give a best fit to the experimental data for the P2Y2 Rs if KR ∼5–15 μM, but that the data for the P2Y1 Rs is fitted if KR ∼25–50 μM. Thus ATP acting on P2Y2 Rs gives a faster rising [Ca2+] than when it acts on P2Y1 Rs, even though both receptors have the same sensitivity to ATP.
P2Y1 and P2Y2 receptor generation of Ca2+ and release of ATP from astrocytes
Consider a network consisting of a lane of astrocytes, each astrocyte making junctions with one another (Fig. 1 B), using the transmitter ATP acting on P2YRs at the junctions. Initiation of the transmission of ATP and of Ca2+ waves along the network begins at a cell when the [ATP] immediately surrounding the cell is impulsively raised to 10 μM. A [Ca2+] transient is thus initiated in the cell, and the cell also releases ATP, which then acts back in an autocrine manner to release further ATP after this initial application. This released ATP, together with some of that applied, diffuses to the next cell to generate Ca2+ and also to trigger the regenerative release of ATP once more through the action of P2YRs. In this manner, the Ca2+ and ATP waves are transmitted along the astrocyte network.
Fig. 4 shows the quantitative relationships between [ATP] (a), [IP3] (b), the size of the ATP store in the astrocyte (c), and [Ca2+] (d). Some data relating to Fig. 4 is summarized in Table 2. Fig. 4, A and B, is for lanes of astrocytes one cell wide and 19 cells long with KR = 25 μM in Fig. 4 A and KR = 15 μM in Fig. 4 B. The changes in [IP3] in each cell are similar to those in [ATP], and they both lead the [Ca2+] changes. This happens because the increase in [Ca2+] arises only after IP3 has acted on the calcium store through the mechanism described by Eq. 12, whereas IP3 causes the immediate release of ATP from stores inside the cell, according to Eq. 9. The release of ATP, involving in part an autocrine mechanism, is terminated by depletion of the ATP store (Fig. 4, Ac and Bc). Comparison between the results for KR = 25 μM (as for P2Y1 R, Fig. 4 A) and KR = 15 μM (as for P2Y2 R, Fig. 4 B), shows that in the latter case the duration of [Ca2+] at 70% height is less, as is that of [ATP] (Table 2). This leads to a faster speed for both the ATP and Ca2+ waves (19 μm s−1 compared with 11 μm s−1 for the higher KR). Gallagher and Salter (15) observed propagation exclusively through P2Y1 R at 6 μm s−1 (see their Fig. 4 e) and through P2Y2 R at 18 μm s−1 (see their Fig. 4 e). The velocities for Ca2+ for different values of KR are summarized in Fig. 5 (open bars). For the wave decreases rapidly in amplitude and does not propagate beyond the first few astrocytes from the point of stimulation. This is in marked contrast to the behavior for KR < 33 μM, in which case the wave propagates indefinitely with almost constant amplitude. For and an initial impulsive application of 10 μM ATP, the value of ρ (Eq. 2) is too small for the G-protein cascade to produce sufficient IP3 to sustain the regenerative release of ATP. The decrease in duration of ATP and Ca2+ waves at the lower KR is due to the faster depletion of the ATP stores by the action of IP3 (compare Fig. 4 Ac with Fig. 4 Bc). Note also the larger amplitude of [ATP] and therefore of [Ca2+] for the receptors with the smaller KR (compare Fig. 4, A and B).
TABLE 2.
A number of calculations were also done with the inclusion of ATP breakdown, as given by the last term in Eq. 11. There was some diminution in amplitude and some decrease in velocity of the Ca2+ wave, but the overall results were very similar to those without this term. For example, for the parameter choice Vdeg = 1 μM s−1, Kdeg = 5 μM, both the amplitude and velocity declined by <10%.
Consideration next was made of lanes of astrocytes which were three cells wide rather than just one cell. In this case, junctional transmission occurred first at the site of initiation to the immediately surrounding four astrocytes before propagating along this wider lane. Fig. 4, C and D, gives the results for cells possessing receptors with KR = 25 μM and 15 μM, respectively. In Fig. 4, comparison of C with A shows the effects of increasing the width of the network. For a given KR value, there is a substantial increase in peak [ATP] (from ∼2 μM to ∼4 μM) with concomitant increase in peak [Ca2+] from ∼0.2 μM to over 0.3 μM. Although the ATP store is depleted at a faster rate in the larger network (in Fig. 4, compare Cc with Ac), the time courses of both [ATP] and [Ca2+] are not much different in the two cases (in Fig. 4, compare Aa and Ad with Ca and Cd). This occurs because the pooling of ATP in the extracellular space, by the additional astrocytes in the larger network, offsets the loss due to store depletion. The result is to increase the amplitudes of ATP and Ca2+ waves with some increase in their speed (Table 2; see also Fig. 5, solid bars).
The transmission of the Ca2+ wave along the length of an astrocyte network consisting of a lane of cells using receptors with KR = 25 μM is shown diagrammatically in Fig. 6. At 7.5 s the Ca2+ transient is near its peak value at the site of initiation in the middle of the lane (compare Fig. 6 (t = 7.5 s) with Fig. 4 Aa). Thereafter the wave is transmitted with little change in peak amplitude or speed along the network from the site of initiation (Fig. 6).
The question arises as to whether changing the size of the initiating [ATP] affects the size and propagation of Ca2+ in the remaining astrocytes along a lane of cells. Doubling the initiating [ATP] from 10 μM (Fig. 7 A) to 20 μM (Fig. 7 B) makes little difference to either the peak amplitude of [Ca2+] at the site of initiation and in the immediately adjacent cells or the speed of propagation in this vicinity or beyond the initiating region.
It has been reported that the addition of exogenous ATP can modify the propagation of Ca2+ in astrocytes in vivo, by increasing the distance over which the Ca2+ wave propagates (Sul et al. (62); see their Fig. 8). Although there is no reason why Ca2+ does not propagate over any distance in our model (provided KR is not too large), it was of interest to observe if raising the ambient level of [ATP] affects the characteristics of propagation. Fig. 8 shows that the effects of increasing the ambient [ATP] from 0.03 μM to 0.07 μM are to marginally increase the speed of propagation (in Fig. 8, compare Aa with Ba) without changing the peak amplitude of the Ca2+ wave (in Fig. 8, compare Ab with Bb). Increasing the ambient [ATP] further, for example to 0.1 μM, leads to spontaneous production of ATP and Ca2+ in all cells.
P2Y1 and P2Y2 receptor generation of Ca2+ and release of ATP for a two-dimensional astrocyte network
Nearly all experimental work on astrocytes in vitro employs two-dimensional arrays of these cells (see Introduction). A study has therefore been made of transmission of ATP and Ca2+ waves in a two-dimensional plane of astrocytes compared with the one-dimensional lanes of astrocytes. Propagation of the Ca2+ wave in the two-dimensional network is illustrated diagrammatically in Fig. 9 A. This shows the wave-front moving out in the plane from its site of initiation in the center. There is an increase in the rates of rise and peak amplitude of [ATP] and [Ca2+] between the one-dimensional case (a lane one cell wide, Fig. 4 A) and the two-dimensional case in which each cell has four nearest neighbors with centers 50 μm apart (Fig. 9 B). The rate of decline of the ATP store is greater in the two-dimensional case (compare Fig. 4 Ac with Fig. 9 Bc), but the rate of decline of [ATP], [IP3], and hence [Ca2+], is slower in the two-dimensional case because of the higher pooling of ATP (compare Fig. 4 A with Fig. 9 B). The duration of [Ca2+] at half-peak is >30 s (after the wave-front has moved away from the site of initiation; see Fig. 9 Bd), which is similar to that observed by Wang et al. (14) (see their Fig. 4 C). The [ATP] wave has a shorter duration than the Ca2+ wave (Fig. 9, Ba and Bd), as is also observed ((14), their Fig. 4 B).
Experiments have been performed on Ca2+ propagation in which two-dimensional cultures of astrocytes are manipulated in such a way as to produce an astrocyte-free lane surrounded by astrocytes (see, for example, Fig. 1 B in Hassinger et al. (13)). Propagation of the Ca2+ wave is at ∼10 μm s−1 in the absence of the lane (see Fig. 2 A in Hassinger et al. (13)). Successively wider lanes delay the propagation across the lane by successively longer times, consistent with the time taken for diffusion of ATP across the lane to initiate a Ca2+ wave in astrocytes on the opposite side of the lane from the side of the mechanically initiated Ca2+ wave. An 80-μm lane gave a delay of 18 s (see Fig. 2 B in Hassinger et al. (13)). Our model of Ca2+ transmission reproduces many of these features of Ca2+ propagation across cell-free lanes. Fig. 10 shows the effects of initiating Ca2+ transmission in lanes of cells that are either one cell wide (Fig. 10 A) or three cells wide (Fig. 10 B), when there are parallel lanes of cells on each side of the central lane containing the initiating cell, but the lanes are separated by a 75-μm-wide gap. At t = 22.5 s (for KR = 25 μM), there is clear indication that the Ca2+ has jumped to the adjacent lanes in both cases.
The present model gave a delay of 12 s for a 75-μm lane and 22 s for a 125-μm-wide lane (see Fig. 11 B), with a propagation speed of 16 μm s−1 in the absence of lanes (Fig. 11 A), if KR = 25 μM. In the case where KR = 15 μM, the model gave a delay of 8 s for a 75-μm-wide lane (Fig. 11 B) with a propagation speed of 25 μm s−1 in the absence of lanes (Fig. 11 A). For KR = 25 μM, a jump of 175 μM can occur after ∼40 s (Fig. 11 B).
DISCUSSION
ATP versus gap-junction transmission
There are considerable contradictions in the literature concerning the question of whether transmission between astrocytes is chemical, involving the release of ATP, or involves gap junctions (for some reviews of the earlier literature, see Charles (41) and Giaume and Venance (42)). For example, blocking gap junctions between astrocytes in the striatum with 18-α-glycyrrhetinic acid is reported to block Ca2+ propagation (43–46); blocking these junctions with heptanol blocks 85% of propagation between spinal cord astrocytes (47) and 75% of propagation between cortical astrocytes (48,49). On the other hand, it has been shown that Ca2+ propagation is considerably antagonized by purinergic receptor blockade between cortical astrocytes (50) and completely antagonized by such blockade of spinal cord astrocytes (17,15). Some of these apparent contradictions may be attributed to the gap-junction blockers acting to antagonize ATP release (51) and/or to the linkage between purinergic receptor (P2YR) expression and that of connexins (47). Whether endogenous endonucleotidases of astrocytes play a role in limiting access of ATP to P2Y1 Rs and P2Y2 Rs is controversial, as some say that it does (52) and others that it does not (15). We have not included any gap-junction transmission mechanism in our model of astrocyte junctions, although this might be necessary in the future when better agreement is reached on the relative contributions of gap junctions and ATP to the Ca2+ transmission process.
ATP release mechanisms
As pointed out in the Introduction, the mechanism by which ATP is released by astrocytes has not yet been elucidated as there are contradictory observations on this point. ATP release, due to mechanical or chemical stimulation, has been reported as either unaffected by the blocking of Ca2+ with thapsigargin or BAPTA/AM chelators (14,53), or affected by such blocking (26,25). A calcium-independent release of ATP may occur via anion transporters (28,9). Connexin hemichannels that are permselective for ATP release (54) have also been implicated in ATP release from astrocytes (55), as well as from endothelial cells (56), so that a product of G-protein signaling could be envisaged as opening such channels. However, it has been claimed that connexin blockers, such as oleamide, fail to block transmission between astrocytes (57), whereas the connexin hemichannel activator quinine evokes ATP release (58). These uncertainties point to a lack of specificity of these agents and suggest that a knockout of specific connexin genes is needed to establish the role of these in astrocyte transmission (59). We have therefore opted at this stage for a Ca2+-independent release of ATP from astrocytes in our model. This is supported by the observation that the ATP wave appears to precede the Ca2+ wave in a number of experimental situations (27,14).
Modeling transmission of the Ca2+ wave
Transmission at junctions between astrocytes has previously been modeled only in terms of gap junctions mediating transmission (30). It is assumed in these models that there is direct diffusion of inositol trisphosphate (IP3) between apposing astrocytes at the junctions, with IP3 generated by a Ca2+-sensitive PLC process in addition to the PLC generation of IP3 after G-protein receptor activation. Given the considerable recent evidence that the major component of junctional transmission involves the release of ATP, at least for astrocytes originating from certain parts of the central nervous system, we have developed a model of this process of transmission.
Modeling conduction of the Ca2+ wave
Single astrocytes, when exposed to a ligand such as noradrenaline, release calcium from different endoplasmic reticula in such a way that the process can be modeled as a series of Ca2+-coupled oscillators, each of these being equivalent to one ER (60). An individual ER or oscillator is activated by IP3 generated throughout at the astrocyte plasmalemma by the action of the ligand on G-protein coupled receptors found over the surface of the plasmalemmal membrane. In the present model, IP3 is also generated throughout the plasmalemma membrane of the astrocyte, but in this case the generation is due to the action of ATP and not noradrenaline. However, this IP3 then diffuses through the astrocyte to act on ER found at each of the 125 grid points in the numerical representation of the astrocyte and to release Ca2+ at each of them. We have not apportioned specialized ER at the grid points, possessing relative high densities of IP3 receptors, which participate in a calcium-coupled oscillator system as is the case in the model of Roth et al. (60). The incorporation of such specialized ER does not assist in illuminating the ATP transmission mechanisms that are the point of interest or the present work.
Spatial and temporal characteristics of Ca2+ wave propagation and transmission in astrocyte networks
In the presence of neurons, astrocytes propagate a Ca2+ wave from a point of mechanical stimulation for a distance of 150−250 μm (61,62) and from a point of potassium stimulation for ∼1000 μm (63), there being indications of a diminution in amplitude and speed over the first 150 μm (for a review see Giaume and Venance (42)). In the absence of neurons, Ca2+ waves propagate for at least 200 μm from a point of stimulation (see, for example, Takano et al. (64)). However, it is not known if the Ca2+ wave propagates in an all-or-none fashion over long distances (>200 μm) when only glial cells are present, although it has been argued that propagation is limited to an approximate distance of 60 astrocytes (42). There is no restriction on the distance of propagation of the Ca2+ wave in the present model, which is regenerative due to the mechanism of ATP-induced ATP release. However, increasing the dissociation constant (KR) of receptors slows the velocity of propagation of the Ca2+ wave from its site of initiation, and if KR is increased to 35 μM in a single lane of astrocytes, propagation ceases at 100 μm from the site of initiation (see Fig. 5). As pointed out in Receptors, above, KR is an effective dissociation constant and may take values greater than the actual dissociation constant for ATP acting on P2Y receptors. Ectonucleotidases may act to metabolize released ATP (65). As described in Results, above, introduction of such enzymes into our model merely uniformly decreases the amplitude and velocity of the Ca2+ wave from its point of origin, without affecting the propagation distance. It remains to be seen whether Ca2+ is observed to propagate for distances of >1000 μm in continuous astrocyte networks confined to discrete lanes in the absence of neurons, such as those modeled in Fig. 6 A.
The speed of propagation of the Ca2+ wave is critically dependent on the dissociation constant, KR, of the receptors (see Table 2 and Fig. 5). Gallagher and Salter (15) obtained velocities of 8 μm s−1 and 16 μm s−1 for propagation of the Ca2+ wave through the release of ATP at astrocyte junctions using P2Y1 and P2Y2 receptors, respectively. This range of velocities is approximately that observed in cultured astrocytes from a variety of sources (see Table 1 in Giaume and Venance (42)). According to the present model, there is a slight decrease in the speed of propagation of the Ca2+ wave over the first three or so astrocytes from the site of initiation (∼150 μm), but there is no diminution in the peak amplitude of Ca2+ (see Figs. 7 and 8). It has been suggested that the relatively high velocities and amplitudes of Ca2+ waves in the vicinity of mechanical stimulation arise as a consequence of a combination of gap junction communication and chemical transmission at the astrocyte junctions at the site of mechanical stimulation (41,64). We have not yet included gap junctions in our model to test this idea; however, it seems implausible that adding a slow process (gap junction communication) to a faster process (extracellular transmission) will result in an overall increase in speed. A further point concerns the common experimental procedure in which Ca2+ release is initiated by mechanical stimulation of an astrocyte. If this only increases [IP3] in the stimulated cell, as has been suggested (66,14), then our method of initiation using a sudden increase in [ATP] surrounding the cell would be equivalent (see Eq. 9). It is interesting in this regard that doubling the step increase in extracellular ATP makes very little difference to the speed or peak amplitudes of the Ca2+ wave (see Fig. 7).
Critical tests of the purinergic junction model of astrocyte transmission
As mentioned in the Introduction, Hassinger et al. (13) examined in some detail the extent to which Ca2+ waves could jump cell free gaps of different widths. They found that there was a delay in propagation of the Ca2+ wave across lanes which increased with gap width until this reached ∼150 μm, when such propagation failed. For a 80-μm-wide cell-free lane the delay was 18 s, whereas our model of this process gave for a 125-μm-wide cell-free lane a delay of 14 s for astrocytes with KR = 15 μM. More recent research has used micropatterned arrays of astrocytes in which lanes of cells ∼110-μm-wide alternate with cell-free lanes ∼40-μm-wide, with mechanical initiation of Ca2+ occurring in just one lane (64). These authors obtained a delay of ∼10 s for the Ca2+ wave to traverse the cell-free lane. This may be compared with a delay of 8 s, which our model gives for a cell-free lane of width 75 μm for astrocytes with a KR = 30 μM. The velocities in the experimental studies were 8–20 μm s−1, which are those found in the modeling study for P2Y receptors with KR values of ∼35−25 μM, respectively. These quantitative comparisons between experimental and modeling results suggest that the model can account for these observations on micropatterned arrays of astrocytes.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Greg Lemon for his input in formulating the present model.
This work was supported by Australian Research Council grant No. DP0345968.
References
- 1.Nobile, M., I. Monaldi, S. Alloisio, C. Cugnoli, and S. Ferroni. 2003. ATP-induced, sustained calcium signalling in cultured rat cortical astrocytes: evidence for a non-capacitative, P2X7-like-mediated calcium entry. FEBS Lett. 538:71–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Neary, J. T., R. Laskey, C. van Breemen, J. Blicharska, L. O. Norenberg, and M. D. Norenberg. 1991. ATP-evoked calcium signal stimulates protein phosphorylation/dephosphorylation in astrocytes. Brain Res. 566:89–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shiga, H., T. Tojima, and E. Ito. 2001. Ca2+ signaling regulated by an ATP-dependent autocrine mechanism in astrocytes. Neuroreport. 12:2619–2622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Koizumi, S., Y. Saito, K. Nakazawa, K. Nakajima, J. I. Sawada, S. Kohsaka, P. Illes, and K. Inoue. 2002. Spatial and temporal aspects of Ca2+ signaling mediated by P2Y receptors in cultured rat hippocampal astrocytes. Life Sci. 72:431–442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ballerini, P., M. P. Rathbone, P. Di Iorio, A. Renzetti, P. Giuliani, I. D'Alimonte, O. Trubiani, F. Caciagli, and R. Ciccarelli. 1996. Rat astroglial P2Z (P2X7) receptors regulate intracellular calcium and purine release. Neuroreport. 7:2533–2537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Idestrup, C. P., and M. W. Salter. 1998. P2Y and P2U receptors differentially release intracellular Ca2+ via the phospholipase C/inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate pathway in astrocytes from the dorsal spinal cord. Neuroscience. 86:913–923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bruner, G., and S. Murphy. 1993. Purinergic P2Y receptors on astrocytes are directly coupled to phospholipase A2. Glia. 7:219–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Centemeri, C., C. Bolego, M. P. Abbracchio, F. Cattabeni, L. Puglisi, G. Burnstock, and S. Nicosia. 1997. Characterization of the Ca2+ responses evoked by ATP and other nucleotides in mammalian brain astrocytes. Br. J. Pharmacol. 121:1700–1706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Abdipranoto, A., G. J. Liu, E. L. Werry, and M. R. Bennett. 2003. Mechanisms of secretion of ATP from cortical astrocytes triggered by uridine triphosphate. Neuroreport. 14:2177–2181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.King, B. F., J. T. Neary, Q. Zhu, S. Wang, M. D. Norenberg, and G. Burnstock. 1996. P2 purinoceptors in rat cortical astrocytes: expression, calcium-imaging and signalling studies. Neuroscience. 74:1187–1196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhu, Y., and H. K. Kimelberg. 2001. Developmental expression of metabotropic P2Y1 and P2Y2 receptors in freshly isolated astrocytes from rat hippocampus. J. Neurochem. 77:530–541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fumagalli, M., R. Brambilla, N. D'Ambrosi, C. Volonte, M. Matteoli, C. Verderio, and M. P. Abbracchio. 2003. Nucleotide-mediated calcium signaling in rat cortical astrocytes: role of P2X and P2Y receptors. Glia. 43:218–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hassinger, T. D., P. B. Guthrie, P. B. Atkinson, M. V. Bennett, and S. B. Kater. 1996. An extracellular signaling component in propagation of astrocytic calcium waves. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:13268–13273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wang, Z., P. G. Haydon, and E. S. Yeung. 2000. Direct observation of calcium-independent intercellular ATP signaling in astrocytes. Anal. Chem. 72:2001–2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gallagher, C. J., and M. W. Salter. 2003. Differential properties of astrocyte calcium waves mediated by P2Y1 and P2Y2 receptors. J. Neurosci. 23:6728–6739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Salter, M. W., and J. L. Hicks. 1994. ATP-evoked increases in intracellular calcium in neurons and glia from the dorsal spinal cord. J. Neurosci. 14:1563–1575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fam, S. R., C. J. Gallagher, and M. W. Salter. 2000. P2Y1 purinoceptor-mediated Ca2+ signaling and Ca2+ wave propagation in dorsal spinal cord astrocytes. J. Neurosci. 20:2800–2808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fam, S. R., C. J. Gallagher, L. V. Kalia, and M. W. Salter. 2003. Differential frequency dependence of P2Y1- and P2Y2-mediated Ca2+ signaling in astrocytes. J. Neurosci. 23:4437–4444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ralevic, V., and G. Burnstock. 1998. Receptors for purines and pyrimidines. Pharmacol. Rev. 50:413–492. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bernardinelli, Y., P. J. Magistretti, and J. Y. Chatton. 2004. Astrocytes generate Na+-mediated metabolic waves. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:14937–14942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pasti, L., M. Zonta, T. Pozzan, S. Vicini, and G. Carmignoto. 2001. Cytosolic calcium oscillations in astrocytes may regulate exocytotic release of glutamate. J. Neurosci. 21:477–484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bezzi, P., V. Gundersen, J. L. Galbete, G. Seifert, C. Steinhauser, E. Pilati, and A. Volterra. 2004. Astrocytes contain a vesicular compartment that is competent for regulated exocytosis of glutamate. Nat. Neurosci. 7:613–620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhang, Q., M. Fukuda, E. Van Bockstaele, O. Pascual, and P. G. Haydon. 2004. Synaptotagmin IV regulates glial glutamate release. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101:9441–9446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhang, Q., T. Pangrsic, M. Kreft, M. Krzan, N. Li, J. Y. Sul, M. Halassa, E. Van Bockstaele, R. Zorec, and P. G. Haydon. 2004. Fusion-related release of glutamate from astrocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 279:12724–12733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cotrina, M. L., J. H. Lin, A. Alves-Rodrigues, S. Liu, J. Li, H. Azmi-Ghadimi, J. Kang, C. C. Naus, and M. Nedergaard. 1998. Connexins regulate calcium signaling by controlling ATP release. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:15735–15740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Coco, S., F. Calegari, E. Pravettoni, D. Pozzi, E. Taverna, P. Rosa, M. Matteoli, and C. Verderio. 2003. Storage and release of ATP from astrocytes in culture. J. Biol. Chem. 278:1354–1362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Newman, E. A. 2001. Propagation of intercellular calcium waves in retinal astrocytes and Müller cells. J. Neurosci. 21:2215–2223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ballerini, P., P. Di Iorio, R. Ciccarelli, E. Nargi, I. D'Alimonte, U. Traversa, M. P. Rathbone, and F. Caciagli. 2002. Glial cells express multiple ATP binding cassette proteins which are involved in ATP release. Neuroreport. 13:1789–1792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sneyd, J., M. Wilkins, A. Strahonja, and M. J. Sanderson. 1998. Calcium waves and oscillations driven by an intercellular gradient of inositol (1,4,5)-trisphosphate. Biophys. Chem. 72:101–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Höfer, T., L. Venance, and C. Giaume. 2002. Control and plasticity of intercellular calcium waves in astrocytes: a modeling approach. J. Neurosci. 22:4850–4859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lemon, G., W. G. Gibson, and M. R. Bennett. 2003. Metabotropic receptor activation, desensitization and sequestration-I: modelling calcium and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate dynamics following receptor activation. J. Theor. Biol. 223:93–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wu, D., and N. Mori. 1999. Extracellular ATP-induced inward current in isolated epithelial cells of the endolymphatic sac. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1419:33–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Charles, A. C., J. E. Merrill, E. R. Dirksen, and M. J. Sanderson. 1991. Intercellular signaling in glial cells: calcium waves and oscillations in response to mechanical stimulation and glutamate. Neuron. 6:983–992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kim, W. T., M. G. Rioult, and A. H. Cornell-Bell. 1994. Glutamate-induced calcium signaling in astrocytes. Glia. 11:173–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Keizer, J., and L. Levine. 1996. Ryanodine receptor adaptation and Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release-dependent Ca2+ oscillations. Biophys. J. 71:3477–3487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fink, C. F., B. Slepchenko, and L. M. Loew. 1999. Determination of time-dependent inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate concentrations during calcium release in a smooth muscle cell. Biophys. J. 77:617–628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.De Young, G. W., and J. Keizer. 1992. A single-pool inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-receptor-based model for agonist-stimulated oscillations in Ca2+ concentration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 89:9895–9899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Li, Y.-X., and J. Rinzel. 1994. Equations for InsP3 receptor-mediated (Ca2+) oscillations derived from a detailed kinetic model: a Hodgkin-Huxley like formalism. J. Theor. Biol. 166:461–473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bushong, E. A., M. E. Martone, Y. Z. Jones, and M. H. Ellisman. 2002. Protoplasmic astrocytes in CA1 stratum radiatum occupy separate anatomical domains. J. Neurosci. 22:183–192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Henery, R., W. G. Gibson, and M. R. Bennett. 1997. Quantal currents and potential in the three-dimensional anisotropic bidomain model of smooth muscle. Bull. Math. Biol. 59:1047–1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Charles, A. 1998. Intercellular calcium waves in glia. Glia. 24:39–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Giaume, C., and L. Venance. 1998. Intercellular calcium signaling and gap junctional communication in astrocytes. Glia. 24:50–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Venance, L., J. Cordier, M. Monge, B. Zalc, J. Glowinski, and C. Giaume. 1995. Homotypic and heterotypic coupling mediated by gap junctions during glial cell differentiation in vitro. Eur. J. Neurosci. 7:451–461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Venance, L., D. Piomelli, J. Glowinski, and C. Giaume. 1995. Inhibition by anandamide of gap junctions and intercellular calcium signalling in striatal astrocytes. Nature. 376:590–594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Venance, L., N. Stella, J. Glowinski, and C. Giaume. 1997. Mechanism involved in initiation and propagation of receptor-induced intercellular calcium signalling in cultured rat astrocytes. J. Neurosci. 17:1981–1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Venance, L., J. Premont, J. Glowinski, and C. Giaume. 1998. Gap junctional communication and pharmacological heterogeneity in astrocytes cultured from the rat striatum. J. Physiol. 510:429–440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Scemes, E., S. O. Suadicani, and D. C. Spray. 2000. Intercellular communication in spinal cord astrocytes: fine-tuning between gap junctions and P2 nucleotide receptors in calcium wave propagation. J. Neurosci. 20:1435–1445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Frisch, C., M. Theis, M. A. De Souza Silva, E. Dere, G. Sohl, B. Teubner, K. Namestkova, K. Willecke, and J. P. Huston. 2003. Mice with astrocyte-directed inactivation of connexin43 exhibit increased exploratory behaviour, impaired motor capacities, and changes in brain acetylcholine levels. Eur. J. Neurosci. 18:2313–2318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Suadicani, S. O., M. H. De Pina-Benabou, M. Urban-Maldonado, D. C. Spray, and E. Scemes. 2003. Acute downregulation of Cx43 alters P2Y receptor expression levels in mouse spinal cord astrocytes. Glia. 42:160–171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Cotrina, M. L., J. H. Lin, and M. Nedergaard. 1998. Cytoskeletal assembly and ATP release regulate astrocytic calcium signaling. J. Neurosci. 18:8794–8804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Bennett, M. R., L. Farnell, W. G. Gibson, Y. Q. Lin, and D. H. Blair. 2001. Quantal and non-quantal current and potential fields around individual sympathetic varicosities on release of ATP. Biophys. J. 80:1311–1328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Joseph, S. M., M. R. Buchakjian, and G. R. Dubyak. 2003. Colocalization of ATP release sites and ecto-ATPase activity at the extracellular surface of human astrocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 278:23331–23342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Anderson, C. M., J. P. Bergher, and R. A. Swanson. 2004. ATP-induced ATP release from astrocytes. J. Neurochem. 88:246–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Goldberg, G. S., A. P. Moreno, and P. D. Lampe. 2002. Gap junctions between cells expressing connexin 43 or 32 show inverse permselectivity to adenosine and ATP. J. Biol. Chem. 277:36725–36730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Cotrina, M. L., J. H. Lin, J. C. López-Garcia, C. C. Naus, and M. Nedergaard. 2000. ATP-mediated glia signalling. J. Neurosci. 20:2835–2844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gomes, P., S. R. Srinivas, W. Van Dressche, J. Vereecke, and B. Himpens. 2005. ATP release through connexin hemichannels in corneal endothelial cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 46:1208–1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Guan, X., B. F. Cravatt, G. R. Ehring, J. E. Hall, D. L. Boger, R. A. Lerner, and N. B. Gilula. 1997. The sleep-inducing lipid oleamide deconvolutes gap junction communication and calcium wave transmission in glial cells. J. Cell Biol. 139:1785–1792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Stout, C. E., J. L. Costantin, C. C. Naus, and A. C. Charles. 2002. Intercellular calcium signaling in astrocytes via ATP release through connexin hemichannels. J. Biol. Chem. 277:10482–10488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Theis, M., D. Speidel, and K. Willecke. 2004. Astrocyte cultures from conditional connexin43-deficient mice. Glia. 46:130–141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Roth, B. J., S. V. Yagodin, L. Holtzclaw, and J. T. Russell. 1995. A mathematical model of agonist-induced propagation of calcium waves in astrocytes. Cell Calcium. 17:53–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Muyderman, H., M. Nilsson, F. Blomstrand, S. Khatibi, T. Olsson, E. Hansson, and L. Ronnback. 1998. Modulation of mechanically induced calcium waves in hippocampal astroglial cells. Inhibitory effects of α1-adrenergic stimulation. Brain Res. 793:127–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sul, J.-Y., G. Oorosz, R. S. Givens, and P. G. Haydon. 2004. Astrocyte connectivity in the hippocampus. Neuron Glia Biol. 1:3–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Peters, O., C. G. Schipke, Y. Hashimoto, and H. Kettenmann. 2003. Different mechanisms promote astrocyte Ca2+ waves and spreading depression in the mouse neocortex. J. Neurosci. 23:9888–9896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Takano, H., J. Y. Sul, M. L. Mazzanti, R. T. Doyle, P. G. Haydon, and M. D. Porter. 2002. Micropatterned substrates: approach to probing intercellular communication pathways. Anal. Chem. 74:4640–4646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Zimmermann, H., N. Braun, B. Kegel, and P. Heine. 1998. New insights into molecular structure and function of ectonucleotidases in the nervous system. Neurochem. Int. 32:421–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Niggel, J., W. Sigurdson, and F. Sachs. 2000. Mechanically induced calcium movements in astrocytes, bovine aortic endothelial cells and C6 glioma cells. Membr. Biol. 174:121–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Bennett, M. R., L. Farnell, W. G. Gibson, and S. Karunanithi. 1995. Quantal transmission at purinergic junctions: stochastic interaction between ATP and its receptors. Biophys. J. 68:925–935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]