Abstract
Widespread dysbiosis in neurological disorders highlights the critical role of the microbiota–gut–brain axis (MGBA) and the therapeutic potential of probiotics in modulating the central nervous system (CNS). Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, a key butyrate-producing commensal bacterium in the human gut, has attracted broad attention as a candidate next-generation probiotic (NGP). This review aims to describe and discuss the mechanisms of action of F. prausnitzii and its potential in the prevention and management of neurological disorders. Multiple human observational cohort studies indicate that the relative abundance of F. prausnitzii—or the genus Faecalibacterium—is negatively correlated with disease severity in conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), stroke, and multiple sclerosis (MS); however, the directionality of this association remains discordant in neurodevelopmental conditions such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD). To date, interventional evidence is predominantly derived from rodent models, in which oral gavage of specific F. prausnitzii strains or synbiotic formulations has been reported to alleviate cognitive deficits, motor dysfunction, anxiety-like behaviors, and pathological protein deposition. Mechanistically, these neuroprotective effects involve diverse F. prausnitzii-derived neuroactive metabolites—including the microbial anti-inflammatory molecule (MAM), extracellular vesicles (EVs), and phenolic derivatives—as well as indirect pathways mediated by butyrate through histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition and intestinal barrier fortification. Given the current lack of clinical intervention trials directly administering live F. prausnitzii in human neurological populations, future research requires rigorously designed, strain-specific randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to establish its clinical safety, colonization efficiency, and therapeutic efficacy.
Keywords: Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, gut microbiota, host health, neurological diseases, probiotics
1. Introduction
Neurological disorders represent a major global public health challenge. According to the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 study, an umbrella of 37 conditions affecting the nervous system—predominantly driven by highly prevalent disorders such as tension-type headaches, migraine, and stroke, alongside progressive neurodegenerative pathologies—collectively ranks as the leading cause of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) globally, affecting an estimated 3.40 billion individuals(G.B.D.N.S.D. Collaborators, 2024). With an aging global population, the prevalence of neurodegenerative diseases and associated functional impairments is expected to rise further, placing a severe strain on healthcare systems worldwide (Cao et al., 2025). Conventional central nervous system (CNS) pharmacotherapies face significant bottlenecks, including poor blood–brain barrier (BBB) penetration, systemic toxicity, and adverse effects from long-term use. Consequently, there is an urgent need for novel intervention strategies that combine biocompatibility with multi-target regulatory capacity (Persson et al., 2026; Li et al., 2024).
The discovery of the microbiota–gut–brain axis (MGBA) has provided a fresh perspective for neuroscience research (Zhang et al., 2025). Characteristic alterations in microbial profiles and gut dysbiosis are widely observed in patients with neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders (Hawkins et al., 2025; Warren et al., 2026). Dysbiosis profoundly alters CNS homeostasis by triggering systemic inflammation, modulating neurotransmitter synthesis, and impairing intestinal barrier permeability (Khan et al., 2025). Restoring gut microbiome homeostasis to modulate host neurochemical processes has therefore become a pivotal strategy for developing alternative therapeutics (Schneider et al., 2024). Currently, interventions such as fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), prebiotics, and probiotic supplementation are attracting broad academic attention (Sun et al., 2020; Rungsri et al., 2017; Kim et al., 2024; Angelucci et al., 2019). Given the lack of established clinical protocols for many major neurological diseases, elucidating the underlying mechanisms and developing emerging therapeutic strategies have become imperative in contemporary neuroscience (Zhou et al., 2023).
Within the complex gut ecosystem, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (F. prausnitzii) is recognized as one of the most vital commensal species for human health and serves as a key biomarker of intestinal homeostasis (Effendi et al., 2022). As a representative butyrate-producing bacterium of the phylum Firmicutes, F. prausnitzii plays a crucial role in maintaining intestinal barrier integrity and modulating systemic immune homeostasis (Lopez-Siles et al., 2017; Avram-Hananel et al., 2010). Reduced abundance of F. prausnitzii has been implicated in the pathogenesis of various inflammatory, metabolic, and autoimmune diseases (He et al., 2020; Fujimura et al., 2016; Song et al., 2016; Eppinga et al., 2016). Due to its robust anti-inflammatory properties, F. prausnitzii has been proposed as a promising next-generation probiotic (NGP) candidate, although its relevance to neurological disorders requires further clinical validation (Al-Fakhrany and Elekhnawy, 2024). However, research on F. prausnitzii has largely focused on intestinal inflammation, and its progress in neurological diseases has not been comprehensively reviewed. To our knowledge, this is the first review to specifically and comprehensively examine the role of F. prausnitzii in neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. By integrating human observational evidence, strain-specific preclinical findings, and potential mechanisms along the MGBA, we further distinguish species-linked effects from shared microbial metabolic pathways and associative findings from causal evidence.
1.1. Literature search strategy
As a narrative review, we performed a structured literature search in PubMed and Web of Science from database inception to September 2026. Search terms combined “Faecalibacterium prausnitzii” or “Faecalibacterium” with terms related to the MGBA and the neurological or neuropsychiatric disorders covered in this review. Original human and preclinical studies reporting F. prausnitzii or Faecalibacterium abundance, mechanistic pathways, or intervention-related outcomes were prioritized, whereas studies without relevant neurological outcomes or separable F. prausnitzii/Faecalibacterium information were excluded.
2. Characteristics of F. prausnitzii
F. prausnitzii, formerly known as Fusobacterium prausnitzii, is a rod-shaped, non-spore-forming, non-motile, Gram-positive obligate anaerobe belonging to the phylum Firmicutes (Louis and Flint, 2009). Typically lacking plasmids, F. prausnitzii possesses a circular chromosome of approximately 2.93–3.32 Mb, predicted to encode roughly 3,000 proteins, with a relatively low guanine-cytosine content of 47–57% (Foditsch et al., 2014; Lopez-Siles et al., 2012). F. prausnitzii exhibits mesophilic growth and extreme oxygen sensitivity, requiring stringent conditions for in vitro culture. These characteristics reflect its specialized adaptation to the anaerobic niche of the gut (Louis and Flint, 2009; Duncan et al., 2002). This bacterium is a dominant member of Clostridium cluster IV in the human colon and represents the second most abundant species identified in human fecal samples (Duncan and Flint, 2008). In healthy adult gut microbiota, F. prausnitzii typically accounts for over 5% of total bacteria, reaching up to 15% in some individuals (Castillo et al., 2007; Oikonomou et al., 2013; Martin et al., 2017). It is also widely distributed across the gastrointestinal tracts of various mammals, including pigs and cattle. The high abundance and broad distribution of F. prausnitzii highlight its role as a core member of the gut microbiota with profound impacts on host physiology and health (Effendi et al., 2022; Zheng et al., 2025).
As sequencing technologies have evolved from 16S rRNA analysis to whole-genome sequencing, F. prausnitzii has demonstrated remarkable intra-species diversity (Miquel et al., 2013). Historically, this species was classified into two main phylogroups: Phylogroup I (represented by ATCC 27768) and Phylogroup II (represented by A2-165) (Lopez-Siles et al., 2012). Recent genomic studies have revealed additional phylogenetic clades with distinct metabolic features. Among these, Clade A, represented by the UT1 strain, shows a high prevalence in global populations despite being long overlooked (Geng et al., 2025). Genomic annotation reveals that UT1 harbors a unique set of carbohydrate-active enzymes, including glycoside hydrolases, polysaccharide lyases, and carbohydrate esterases (Geng et al., 2025). Compared with the classic strain A2-165, UT1 demonstrates superior ecological remodeling capacity in modulating the intestinal microenvironment. Oral administration of UT1 significantly enriches intestinal Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium populations (Geng et al., 2025). This inter-species facilitation enhances the stability of the gut metabolic network. Such microbiome remodeling may indirectly influence host metabolic and immune signaling; however, whether these strain-specific ecological effects translate into altered brain function remains to be established (Socala et al., 2021).
3. Potential mechanisms linking F. prausnitzii to neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders
F. prausnitzii is recognized as a promising next-generation probiotic (NGP) because of its roles in immune regulation, gut homeostasis, and systemic metabolism (Effendi et al., 2022). However, direct evidence linking F. prausnitzii to neurological disorders remains limited, and most human studies report associations between its abundance and disease-related features rather than establishing causality. Several potential mechanisms have nevertheless been proposed, including the production of neuroactive metabolites, preservation of intestinal barrier integrity, and modulation of host immune responses (Figure 1). Importantly, species-linked effects should be distinguished from shared microbial metabolic pathways. F. prausnitzii-derived factors such as the microbial anti-inflammatory molecule (MAM), extracellular vesicles (EVs), and phenolic derivatives provide relatively species-linked evidence, whereas butyrate-mediated effects are less specific because butyrate is produced by multiple anaerobic bacteria. Therefore, butyrate/SCFA signaling, broader microbiome shifts, and multistrain interventions should be interpreted as indirect or non-specific evidence rather than effects unique to F. prausnitzii.
Figure 1.

Multifaceted mechanisms by which F. prausnitzii protects the central nervous system via the microbiota–gut–brain axis. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii exerts neuroprotective effects through multiple mechanisms: (1) producing neuroactive metabolites such as butyrate, (2) secreting microbial anti-inflammatory molecule (MAM), (3) restoring intestinal barrier structure and function, and (4) modulating host immune-inflammatory responses. BBB, Blood–brain barrier; HDAC, Histone deacetylase; NF-κB, Nuclear factor-kappa B; ZO-1, Zonula occludens-1; MAM, Microbial anti-inflammatory molecule; MUC2, Mucin 2; EVs, Extracellular vesicles; ZO1, Zonula occludens-1 gene; OCLN, Occludin gene; Th17, T helper 17; Treg, Regulatory T; IL-17, Interleukin-17; IL-10, Interleukin-10; DP8α, Double-positive CD4 + CD8α+; DC, Dendritic cell.
3.1. Neuroactive metabolites
The biological effects of F. prausnitzii are largely driven by its diverse metabolic output. Multiple studies indicate that colonization by F. prausnitzii significantly reshapes host metabolic profiles, enriching key pathways such as synaptic vesicle cycling and neuroactive ligand–receptor interactions. These findings support several candidate metabolic pathways through which F. prausnitzii may influence host physiology. However, for most metabolites, direct transport from F. prausnitzii in the gut to the CNS and subsequent species-specific effects on neurological outcomes have not been established. Therefore, these pathways should primarily be considered biologically plausible mechanisms rather than direct evidence of CNS delivery.
3.1.1. Short-chain fatty acids: butyrate
The SCFA butyrate is a primary metabolic product of F. prausnitzii (Zhang et al., 2025). Within the intestinal niche, F. prausnitzii displays strong ecological cross-feeding, efficiently converting acetate produced by primary degraders such as Bifidobacterium into butyrate (Louis and Flint, 2009; Moens et al., 2016; Rios-Covian et al., 2015). Butyrate provides approximately 70% of the energy consumed by colonocytes and efficiently crosses the blood–brain barrier (BBB) to enter the CNS (Gasaly et al., 2021; Silveira et al., 2023). Subsequently, butyrate stimulates the AKT/AMPK signaling pathway to upregulate tight junction proteins, reinforcing both intestinal and BBB integrity. This protective mechanism effectively prevents pro-inflammatory cytokines and cytotoxic metabolites from penetrating the central nervous system (Silveira et al., 2023; Peng et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2012; Canani et al., 2011). Upon crossing the BBB, butyrate exerts epigenetic regulation through its potent histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitory activity. By inducing histone acetylation, butyrate restores impaired neuronal gene transcription, promotes neurogenesis, and enhances synaptic plasticity (Xu et al., 2026; Jaworska et al., 2019; Yoo et al., 2011). In an APP/PS1-21 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), butyrate restored hippocampal histone acetylation levels and effectively alleviated cognitive deficits (Govindarajan et al., 2011). In Parkinson’s disease (PD) models, it significantly elevated histone H3 acetylation in striatal tissues, protecting dopaminergic neurons and preventing toxin-induced motor impairments (Sharma et al., 2015). This multi-target transcriptional regulation endows butyrate with unique advantages in intervening in complex neuropathological processes. Butyrate also demonstrates marked immunomodulatory potential in neuroinflammation. Multiple studies have shown that it suppresses NF-κB signaling activation, thereby downregulating pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-18, IL-6, and TNF-α (Dang et al., 2021; Sun et al., 2025; Vinolo et al., 2011). Additionally, it promotes microglial maturation and morphological transitions in the brain, maintaining cellular homeostasis and strengthening central immune defense (Wang et al., 2018). Furthermore, butyrate regulates apoptotic balance by increasing the Bcl-2/Bax expression ratio, thereby inhibiting neuronal apoptosis and delaying neurodegenerative progression (Sun et al., 2015; Bayazid et al., 2021). Butyrate indirectly modulates brain function via enteroendocrine pathways. It stimulates intestinal L-cells to secrete glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and peptide YY (PYY), which transmit metabolic signals to the CNS (Khan et al., 2025; Hirdaramani et al., 2026). In summary, butyrate represents one plausible mediator linking F. prausnitzii to the MGBA, with established roles in maintaining gut barrier integrity and colonocyte energy supply and potential effects on CNS function through epigenetic, immunomodulatory, and neuroendocrine pathways. Nevertheless, because these effects are not specific to F. prausnitzii, direct species- and strain-specific intervention studies are required to determine the extent to which F. prausnitzii-derived butyrate contributes to neurological outcomes.
3.1.2. Microbial anti-inflammatory molecule
F. prausnitzii secretes a unique 15 kDa protein that assembles into an ordered lattice structure on the bacterial surface. Known as the MAM, it is one of the most abundant proteins in the bacterial envelope (Auger et al., 2022; Breyner et al., 2017; Quevrain et al., 2016). Its primary function is to suppress NF-κB signaling in host intestinal epithelial cells, thereby reducing pro-inflammatory cytokine production and directly attenuating local inflammation (Breyner et al., 2017). In addition, MAM plays a vital role in maintaining intestinal barrier integrity (Xu et al., 2020). It potentially interacts with tight junction proteins in the intestinal epithelium to reinforce barrier function (Xu et al., 2020). In a diabetic mouse model, Xu et al. observed reduced F. prausnitzii abundance. Supplementation with recombinant MAM protein significantly restored intestinal barrier function and upregulated ZO-1 expression. Co-immunoprecipitation further revealed potential interactions between MAM and key tight junction proteins, including ZO-1 (Xu et al., 2020). Through these dual mechanisms, MAM plays a crucial role in maintaining local intestinal immune homeostasis.
3.1.3. Phenolic compounds: salicylic acid and shikimic acid
During metabolism, F. prausnitzii synthesizes anti-inflammatory phenolic compounds via the shikimate pathway, primarily producing shikimic acid and salicylic acid (Miquel et al., 2015). In a mouse model of acute colitis, Miquel et al. demonstrated that F. prausnitzii colonization significantly increased colon and serum levels of shikimic acid and salicylic acid. This increase was accompanied by reduced serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1α, IL-2, and IL-5 (Miquel et al., 2015). Shikimic acid regulates microglial activation, effectively suppressing lipopolysaccharide-induced overproduction of pro-inflammatory mediators and reactive oxygen species in BV-2 cells (Bao et al., 2023). Mechanistic studies further confirm that shikimic acid exerts antioxidant and neuroprotective effects by activating the AKT/Nrf2 pathway while concurrently inhibiting the NF-κB pathway (Bao et al., 2023). In a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease, shikimic acid was also shown to attenuate neurological damage and behavioral deficits (Bao et al., 2023). Meanwhile, salicylic acid may exert direct neuromodulatory effects by regulating the central GABAergic system (Motaghi et al., 2022). Motaghi et al. demonstrated that salicylic acid significantly upregulates GAD1 expression in the rat ventral hippocampus, exhibiting distinct anxiolytic, sedative, and hypnotic efficacy (Motaghi et al., 2022). However, evidence regarding the specific metabolic pathways producing these phenolic compounds in F. prausnitzii and their functions within the MGBA remains limited, requiring further validation.
3.2. Restoration of intestinal barrier function
Dysfunction of the intestinal mucosal barrier is deeply involved in the pathological progression of various neurological disorders, such as AD and PD (Fabi, 2024; Di Vincenzo et al., 2024). As a critical interface between gastrointestinal microbiota and host tissues, the intestinal mucosal barrier plays a central regulatory role in maintaining host-commensal homeostasis (Di Vincenzo et al., 2024; Mou et al., 2022; Parker et al., 2020). Preserving intestinal epithelial barrier integrity is essential for host health and neuroimmune homeostasis, constituting the primary defense against pathogen invasion and environmental stress (Turner, 2009; Okumura and Takeda, 2017). F. prausnitzii protects the intestinal barrier through multifaceted mechanisms (Zhang et al., 2021; Ferreira-Halder et al., 2017; Carlsson et al., 2013). It upregulates the expression of occludin and zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) via direct and indirect pathways, strengthening the tight junction scaffold between intestinal epithelial cells and directly modulating mucosal permeability (Xu et al., 2020; Moosavi et al., 2020). For example, its secreted MAM efficiently blocks nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling activation. This protects the intestinal mucosa from immune-mediated structural damage and promotes barrier repair (Breyner et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2020). Additionally, F. prausnitzii-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) act as long-range communication tools. They cross the mucus layer to directly target intestinal epithelial cells, upregulating the mRNA expression levels of tight junction genes ZO1 and OCLN (Moosavi et al., 2020). This paracrine mechanism enables F. prausnitzii to deliver barrier-enhancing effects without requiring direct contact between live anaerobes and the oxygenated epithelial interface (Pan et al., 2025). Furthermore, the mucus layer composed of mucin 2 (MUC2), secreted by goblet cells, forms the initial barrier protecting the colon from toxins and pathogenic microbes (Liu et al., 2023; Liu Y. et al., 2020). F. prausnitzii exerts a marked regulatory effect on maintaining mucus layer homeostasis (Wang et al., 2024). In a sleep-deprivation mouse model, F. prausnitzii colonization effectively restored colonic goblet cell counts and rescued MUC2 expression (Wang et al., 2024). Simultaneously, the F. prausnitzii metabolite butyrate reinforces the intestinal barrier through dual mechanisms. On one hand, butyrate antagonizes foodborne toxin-induced barrier dysfunction by upregulating tight junction proteins and absorptive cell functional proteins. On the other hand, acting as a signaling molecule, butyrate induces monocyte differentiation into macrophages and promotes the secretion of endogenous antimicrobial proteins like calprotectin, further strengthening the luminal antimicrobial environment (Alberge et al., 2024; Schulthess et al., 2019). Collectively, these findings support a barrier-protective role for F. prausnitzii and several of its products in intestinal models. Whether these intestinal effects are sufficient to modify neurological outcomes through the MGBA requires direct experimental validation.
3.3. Immunomodulation
Dysfunction of immune cells and inflammatory mediators is central to the progression of neurological diseases (O’Riordan et al., 2025). Imbalanced peripheral T-cell differentiation provides a major immunological foundation for central nervous system (CNS) inflammatory pathology (Bhutta et al., 2024). F. prausnitzii modulates the differentiation and phenotype of T cells, B lymphocytes, and dendritic cells (DCs). By influencing the Th17/Treg balance and cytokine-mediated peripheral–central humoral immune crosstalk, it restores immune homeostasis and attenuates central neurodegenerative and inflammatory lesions (Miquel et al., 2013; Bhutta et al., 2024; Han et al., 2025). Studies show that F. prausnitzii culture supernatant and its metabolites regulate T-cell subset balance and re-establish immune tolerance (Qiu et al., 2013). F. prausnitzii supplementation significantly decreases IL-17-producing Th17 cells in the spleen and increases regulatory T cell (Treg) populations in mesenteric lymph nodes. This suppresses neuroinflammation and alleviates motor deficits (Warren et al., 2026; Song et al., 2016). F. prausnitzii also specifically induces a unique regulatory T-cell population in humans: double-positive CD4 + CD8α + (DP8α) T cells. Abundant in the colonic lamina propria, these cells express specific transcription factors and possess both immunosuppressive and cytotoxic functions. Their depletion correlates with disease activity in systemic autoimmune conditions (Louis and Flint, 2009; Foditsch et al., 2014). Furthermore, F. prausnitzii reshapes DCs to express high levels of tolerogenic molecules such as IL-10 and IL-27. These DCs suppress pro-inflammatory cytokine production and induce IL-10-secreting anti-inflammatory T cells, forming a defense line that prevents aberrant immune responses from spreading to the CNS (Angelucci et al., 2019; Duncan and Flint, 2008).
F. prausnitzii systematically regulates the inflammatory cytokine network, blocking peripheral-to-central inflammatory cascades (Hao et al., 2019; Moon et al., 2023). In a rat model of anxiety and depression, F. prausnitzii intervention blocked the abnormal release of corticosterone and C-reactive protein (CRP), prevented rising plasma IL-6 levels, and promoted anti-inflammatory IL-10 release (Hao et al., 2019). In a rheumatoid arthritis model, this bacterium reduced local joint expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-17 (Moon et al., 2023). These results demonstrate that F. prausnitzii protects neuronal function by inhibiting pro-inflammatory factors and promoting anti-inflammatory factor secretion, thereby blocking systemic inflammation from activating the BBB and microglia. Additionally, F. prausnitzii modulates humoral immunity and host-microbiota–IgA interactions (Gupta et al., 2025). In patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), intestinal F. prausnitzii specifically coated by secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) is significantly decreased. This reduction weakens peripheral immune tolerance, allowing systemic inflammatory antibodies to cross the BBB (Gupta et al., 2025). In summary, F. prausnitzii achieves multidimensional immunomodulation via the MGBA through mechanisms such as balancing T-cell subsets and regulating cytokine networks to intervene in neurological disorders.
4. F. prausnitzii in neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders
A growing body of human and preclinical evidence has linked alterations in F. prausnitzii or the genus Faecalibacterium to neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. However, the strength and nature of this evidence vary substantially across conditions. Human evidence across disorders is heterogeneous in cohort size, age, disease stage, lifestyle, medication use, comorbidities, geographic background, and microbiome profiling methods, limiting cross-study comparability and causal inference. Most human studies are observational; therefore, changes in F. prausnitzii abundance should be interpreted as associations rather than evidence of causality. Moreover, animal models cannot fully reproduce the complexity of human exposures and clinical heterogeneity, and preclinical efficacy should therefore not be directly extrapolated to clinical benefit. Table 1 summarizes human studies, Table 2 summarizes relevant preclinical evidence, and Figure 2 provides an overview of the reported disease-specific associations and proposed mechanisms.
Table 1.
Summary of human clinical studies evaluating F. prausnitzii and Faecalibacterium in neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders.
| Disease | Study design | Population | Detection method | Sample size | Main findings regarding F. prausnitzii/Faecalibacterium | Taxonomic level | Key limitations | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preclinical AD | Cross-sectional study | Australian | Shotgun metagenomics | 19 Aβ High participants and 68 Aβ Low participants | Decreased | Species (F. prausnitzii) | Small sample; Cross-sectional | Dissanayaka et al. (2025) |
| AD | Case–control | Iranian | Real-time PCR | 25 AD patients and 20 healthy controls | Decreased | Species (F. prausnitzii) | Small sample; Confounding factors | Ahmadi et al. (2026) |
| PD | Case–control | Iranian | Real-time PCR | 25 PD patients and 20 healthy controls | Decreased | Species (F. prausnitzii) | Small sample; Confounding factors | Ahmadi et al. (2026) |
| AD | Case–control | Chinese | Metagenomic sequencing | 8 AD patients and 8 normal cognition controls | Decreased | Species (F. prausnitzii) | Very small sample; Limited generalizability | Lin et al. (2025) |
| PD | Case–control | Chinese | 16S rRNA sequencing | 24 PD patients and 14 healthy controls | Decreased | Species (F. prausnitzii) | Small sample; Limited resolution | Li et al. (2017) |
| AD | Case–control | Japanese | Fecal microbiome analysis | 15 MCI, 7 AD patients, and 21 healthy controls | Decreased | Species (F. prausnitzii) | Small sample; Confounding factors | Ueda et al. (2021) |
| PD | Case–control | Indian | 16S rRNA sequencing | 16 PD patients and 16 healthy controls | Decreased | Species (F. prausnitzii) | Small sample; No functional validation | Jacob et al. (2026) |
| PD | Case–control | Irish | Metagenomics | 435 PD patients and 219 healthy controls | Decreased | Species (F. prausnitzii) | Confounding factors; Attribution unclear | Hensen and Thiele (2025) |
| PD | Case–control | Chinese | 16S rDNA gene sequencing | 64 PDP patients, 36 non-PD patients with pain (nPDP), and 50 healthy controls | Decreased | Species (F. prausnitzii) | Cross-sectional; Confounding factors | Yang et al. (2025) |
| PD & IBD | Case–control | American | Metagenomics | 54 PD patients, 26 IBD patients, and 16 healthy controls | Decreased | Species (F. prausnitzii) | Attribution unclear; Confounding factors | Krueger et al. (2025) |
| PD | Case–control | Japanese | Shotgun metagenomics | 94 PD patients and 73 healthy controls | Decreased | Species (F. prausnitzii) | No functional validation; Confounding factors | Nishiwaki et al. (2024) |
| ALS | Case–control | Chinese | High-throughput sequencing | 6 ALS patients and 5 healthy controls | Decreased | Species (F. prausnitzii) | Very small sample; Limited generalizability | Fang et al. (2016) |
| ALS | Case–control | Chinese | 16S rDNA gene sequencing (nasal microbiota) | 66 ALS patients and 40 healthy controls | Decreased | Genus (Faecalibacterium) | Genus-level analysis; Attribution unclear | Liu et al. (2024) |
| MS | Cohort | American | 16S rRNA gene sequencing | 43 MS patients and 42 healthy controls | Decreased | Species (F. prausnitzii) | Confounding factors; Attribution unclear | Gupta et al. (2025) |
| MS | Case–control | International Multiple Sclerosis Microbiome Study | 16S rRNA/Shotgun sequencing | 576 MS patients and 1,152 healthy controls | Decreased | Species (F. prausnitzii) | Geographic heterogeneity; Confounding factors | iMSMS Consortium (2022) |
| MS | Case–control | Danish | Shotgun metagenomics | 148 MS and 148 healthy controls | Decreased | Species (F. prausnitzii) | Confounding factors; No causal inference | Thirion et al. (2023) |
| MS | Cohort | Romania | 16S rRNA gene sequencing | 39 MS patients and 21 healthy controls | Decreased | Species (F. prausnitzii) | Small sample; Limited generalizability | Paraschiv et al. (2024) |
| MS | Cohort | German | 16S rRNA gene sequencing | 25 MS patients and 14 healthy controls | Decreased | Species (F. prausnitzii) | Small sample; Observational | Swidsinski et al. (2017) |
| Stroke | Case–control | Chinese | 16S rDNA V3-V4 sequencing | 59 Stroke patients and 31 healthy controls | Decreased | Species (F. prausnitzii) | Cross-sectional; Confounding factors | Luo et al. (2024) |
| ADHD | Case–control | Chinese | Shotgun metagenomics | 94 ADHD patients and 94 age- and gender-matched controls | Decreased | Genus (Faecalibacterium) | Genus-level analysis; Confounding factors | Wang et al. (2025) |
| ADHD | Case–control | Chinese | High-throughput pyrosequencing | 51 ADHD patients and 32 healthy controls | Decreased | Genus (Faecalibacterium) | Small sample; Limited resolution | Jiang et al. (2018) |
| ADHD | Case–control | Chinese | Shotgun metagenomics | 17 ADHD patients and 17 healthy controls | Decreased | Species (F. prausnitzii) | Small sample; Observational | Wan et al. (2020) |
| ASD | Case–control | American | 16S rRNA gene sequencing | 21 ASD children and 23 neurotypical controls | Decreased | Species (F. prausnitzii) | Small sample; Confounding factors | Kang et al. (2018) |
| ASD | Case–control | Uruguayan | 16S rRNA gene sequencing | 30 ASD children and 28 typical development controls | Decreased | Species (F. prausnitzii) | Small sample; Cross-sectional | Mendive Dubourdieu and Guerendiain (2023) |
| ASD | Cohort | Chinese | 16S rRNA gene sequencing | 58 ASD children and 30 typical development controls | Increased | Species (F. prausnitzii) | Conflicting findings; Geographic heterogeneity | Huang et al. (2025) |
| ASD | Case–control | Italian | 16S rRNA gene sequencing | 11 ASD children and 14 typical development controls | Increased | Species (F. prausnitzii) | Very small sample; Limited generalizability | Coretti et al. (2018) |
Aβ, Amyloid-beta; AD, Alzheimer’s Disease; ADHD, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder; AIS, Acute Ischemic Stroke; ALS, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis; ASD, Autism Spectrum Disorder; F. prausnitzii, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii; IBD, Inflammatory Bowel Disease; MCI, Mild Cognitive Impairment; MS, Multiple Sclerosis; nPDP, non-Parkinson’s Disease with Pain; PCR, Polymerase Chain Reaction; PD, Parkinson’s Disease; PDP, Parkinson’s Disease with Pain; rDNA, ribosomal Deoxyribonucleic Acid; rRNA,
Table 2.
Summary of preclinical studies linking F. prausnitzii or the genus Faecalibacterium to neurological outcomes.
| Disease | Animal model | Intervention/strain | Detection methods | Major findings | Evidence interpretation | Key limitations | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AD | Aβ25–35-induced AD mice (ddY mice) | Live Fp360; pasteurized Fp14; live Fp14; Fp14 supernatant | Behavioral tests; molecular assays; microbiome sequencing | Improved memory function; reduced oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction; effects differed by strain and viability | Direct strain-specific evidence | Animal model; no human validation | Ueda et al. (2021) |
| AD | APP/PS1 transgenic mice | Tibetan fermented milk supplementation | Behavioral tests; molecular assays; microbiome sequencing | Improved cognition; reduced Aβ accumulation and neurodegeneration; increased Faecalibacterium abundance | Indirect microbiota evidence | Multicomponent intervention; attribution unclear | Liu et al. (2020a) |
| AD | APP/PS1 transgenic mice (young vs. middle-aged) | Voluntary wheel running | Behavioral tests; molecular assays; metabolomics; microbiome sequencing | Improved cognition and reduced neuroinflammation only in young mice; age-dependent microbiome changes | Indirect microbiota evidence | No direct F. prausnitzii administration; attribution unclear | Wang et al. (2021) |
| PD | α-synuclein-overexpressing (Thy1-ASO) mice | Oral F. prausnitzii or microbial consortium | Microbiome analysis; motor/GI assessment; immune assays; α-synuclein analysis | Improved motor and gastrointestinal deficits; reduced brain α-synuclein aggregation; enhanced anti-inflammatory responses | Direct strain-specific evidence | Animal model; limited clinical translation | Moiseyenko et al. (2026) |
| PD | PC12/Caco-2 gut–brain axis co-culture model | F. prausnitzii + L. plantarum + Herba Patriniae extract | Metabolite analysis; inflammatory assays; mitochondrial assays; barrier integrity assays | Reduced oxidative stress and inflammation; increased butyrate; improved mitochondrial and barrier function | Multicomponent mechanistic evidence | Multicomponent intervention; attribution unclear | Wu et al. (2026) |
| PD | AAV-α-synuclein rat model | Voluntary exercise | Histology; neurochemistry; microbiome and bile acid analysis | Altered gut microbiota and bile acid metabolism; reduced intestinal Faecalibacterium abundance | Indirect microbiota evidence | No direct bacterial intervention; causality unclear | Leclair-Visonneau et al. (2020) |
| Ischemic stroke | MCAO mouse model | Synbiotic formulation containing F. prausnitzii-related intervention | Behavioral tests; histology; molecular assays; 16S sequencing | Reduced neurological deficits, infarct volume, inflammation, and neuronal death; increased F. prausnitzii abundance | Multistrain/microbiota intervention evidence | Attribution unclear; species-specific effect uncertain | Kim et al. (2024) |
| Ischemic stroke | Aged MCAO mice | Young FMT or SCFA-producing bacterial consortium (B. longum, C. symbiosum, F. prausnitzii, L. fermentum) | Behavioral tests; inflammation assays; microbiome sequencing; metabolomics; SCFA measurement | Improved post-stroke recovery; increased SCFA levels; reduced inflammatory responses | Multistrain microbiota evidence | Multispecies intervention; F. prausnitzii-specific contribution unclear | Lee et al. (2020) |
AAV, adeno-associated virus; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; Aβ, amyloid-beta; APP/PS1, amyloid precursor protein/presenilin-1; B. longum, Bifidobacterium longum; C. symbiosum, Clostridium symbiosum; Caco-2, human colorectal adenocarcinoma cells; ENS, enteric nervous system; F. prausnitzii, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii; FMT, fecal microbiota transplantation; Fp14, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii strain 14; Fp360, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii strain 360; GI, gastrointestinal; GBA, gut–brain axis; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; GSK3β, glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta; HP, Herba Patriniae; i.c.v., intracerebroventricular; i.g., intragastric; L. fermentum, Limosilactobacillus fermentum; L. plantarum, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum; MCAO, middle cerebral artery occlusion; PD, Parkinson’s disease; PA, passive avoidance; PC12, rat pheochromocytoma cells; SCFA, short-chain fatty acid; TMAO, trimethylamine N-oxide; ZO-1, zonula occludens-1.
Figure 2.

Reported associations, preclinical effects, and proposed roles of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii across neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. Aβ, amyloid-beta; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; ADHD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; ASD, autism spectrum disorder; EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; IL-17, interleukin-17; miR-3120-3p, microRNA-3120-3p; MS, multiple sclerosis; PD, Parkinson’s disease; SCFAs, short-chain fatty acids; Treg, regulatory T cells; γδT, gamma delta T cells.
4.1. F. prausnitzii and Alzheimer’s disease
4.1.1. Human evidence
AD is a neurodegenerative condition with both familial and sporadic forms. It is biologically characterized by amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles, typically presenting as amnestic cognitive impairment (Knopman et al., 2021). Multiple studies have reported associations between altered F. prausnitzii abundance and AD-related clinical or biological features. The abundance of this bacterium declines significantly with worsening cognitive impairment (Dissanayaka et al., 2025; Ahmadi et al., 2026; Lin et al., 2025; Li et al., 2017). Even in cognitively unimpaired individuals, its abundance correlates with cerebral Aβ deposition (Dissanayaka et al., 2025). In a cross-sectional study, gut F. prausnitzii abundance correlated positively with Japanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-J) scores. Patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) exhibited a significant reduction in gut F. prausnitzii compared with healthy controls (Ueda et al., 2021). A study in older adults in China noted that gut Faecalibacterium abundance in MCI patients was approximately 30% lower than in healthy controls, displaying a positive correlation with cognitive scores (Zhang et al., 2021). Multi-omics analysis confirmed that beneficial bacteria, represented by F. prausnitzii, were markedly depleted in AD patients. This depletion correlated with elevated intestinal inflammatory markers, specifically calprotectin and zonulin (Ahmadi et al., 2026). Cai et al. also revealed complex signaling between F. prausnitzii and host miRNAs, finding that F. prausnitzii abundance was closely linked to plasma exosomal miR-3120-3p levels in AD patients (Lin et al., 2025). Based on these associations, clinical interventions have aimed to improve cognition by increasing F. prausnitzii abundance. A 12-week yoga intervention increased F. prausnitzii abundance and improved cognitive scores in AD patients (Tiwari et al., 2026). Additionally, probiotic supplementation to elevate F. prausnitzii levels strengthened intestinal barrier function and modulated the tryptophan metabolic axis in AD patients. This suggests that the bacterium may attenuate AD progression by regulating systemic immune activation and metabolic balance (Leblhuber et al., 2018). Together, these findings suggest that reduced F. prausnitzii abundance is linked to AD-related cognitive impairment, although whether this alteration contributes to disease progression or represents a consequence of disease remains unclear.
4.1.2. Preclinical evidence
Preclinical intervention studies provide more direct evidence for the potential neuroprotective effects of F. prausnitzii in experimental AD models. Takuji et al. isolated multiple F. prausnitzii strains from healthy human feces and evaluated their effects in an Aβ-induced AD mouse model (Ueda et al., 2021). The interventions showed clear strain-specific differences: pasteurized F. prausnitzii 14 (Fp14) significantly improved cognition, whereas its live form showed little effect (Ueda et al., 2021); conversely, F. prausnitzii 360 (Fp360) required live administration to mitigate spatial and long-term memory deficits (Ueda et al., 2021). These contrasting responses indicate that the neurological effects of F. prausnitzii are strain- and viability-dependent, and that species-level abundance alone may not predict the functional or therapeutic effects of individual strains. In APP/PS1 transgenic mice, Tibetan fermented milk supplementation increased the relative abundance of Faecalibacterium, improved spatial learning and object recognition, and reduced Aβ deposition in the cortex and hippocampus (Liu J. et al., 2020). In the same model, voluntary wheel running showed age-dependent effects: when initiated at 9 weeks of age, it attenuated tau phosphorylation and neuroinflammation, enhanced synaptic plasticity-related proteins, and improved learning and memory, whereas initiation at 24 weeks of age failed to improve cognition and was accompanied by a reduction in Faecalibacterium abundance (Wang et al., 2021). Collectively, direct strain-administration studies support strain- and viability-dependent effects, whereas fermented milk and exercise studies provide more indirect evidence because they modify the broader gut microbiota. Thus, the specific causal contribution of F. prausnitzii to AD remains to be established through further species-specific and clinical validation.
4.2. F. prausnitzii and Parkinson’s disease
4.2.1. Human evidence
PD is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized pathologically by loss of substantia nigra neurons and α-synuclein aggregation. Clinically, it presents with rigidity, resting tremor, and gait impairment (Morris et al., 2024). Clinical studies demonstrate that the abundance of F. prausnitzii and its metabolites are significantly reduced in PD patients, correlating closely with disease severity (Ahmadi et al., 2026; Jacob et al., 2026; Hensen and Thiele, 2025; Yang et al., 2025; Krueger et al., 2025; Nishiwaki et al., 2024). A study in an Indian cohort found that despite distinct geographical and dietary backgrounds, F. prausnitzii abundance and network centrality served as key markers distinguishing PD patients from healthy controls (Jacob et al., 2026). Another study utilizing constraint-based metabolic modeling across 435 PD patients and 219 healthy individuals showed that reduced relative abundance of F. prausnitzii was closely linked to impaired host capacity to synthesize butyrate, myristate, and pantothenate (Hensen and Thiele, 2025). Combined 16S rDNA sequencing and LC–MS analysis revealed distinct gut microbial signatures in PD patients with pain, centered on F. prausnitzii abundance fluctuations. A strong negative correlation was observed between F. prausnitzii abundance and plasma lysophosphatidic acid (LysoPA) levels (Yang et al., 2025). These results suggest F. prausnitzii contributes to PD pathogenesis by influencing metabolic outputs. Conversely, increasing F. prausnitzii abundance through diet or probiotics alleviates PD symptoms. For instance, the Mediterranean diet specifically increases F. prausnitzii and its metabolite butyrate. These metabolites participate in synaptic plasticity and inflammatory regulation, underpinning improvements in memory, attention, and executive functions (Ibeas-Perez et al., 2026). Pellecchia et al. administered a 12-week synbiotic treatment to PD patients, observing a significant increase in gut F. prausnitzii abundance. This microbial shift was closely associated with relief of non-motor symptoms, including depression, anxiety, and autonomic dysfunction (Andreozzi et al., 2024). These clinical findings support an association between F. prausnitzii abundance and PD-related features; however, current evidence is insufficient to establish a protective role or clinical biomarker utility.
4.2.2. Preclinical evidence
Preclinical models provide more direct evidence for potential protective effects of F. prausnitzii in PD. Anastasiya et al. demonstrated that supplementing F. prausnitzii in α-synuclein-overexpressing Thy1-ASO mice significantly corrected gut dysbiosis, exerted anti-inflammatory effects, protected the gastrointestinal tract, and improved motor deficits. Crucially, it downregulated pathological α-synuclein aggregation in the brain (Moiseyenko et al., 2026). Wu et al. used an F. prausnitzii-containing synbiotic formulation to target the 5-HTP–TMAO metabolic axis. This formulation exerted direct neuroprotective effects by raising butyrate levels, inhibiting trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) production, and correcting abnormal 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) uptake (Wu et al., 2026). In rats with adeno-associated virus (AAV)-induced α-synuclein overexpression in the substantia nigra, researchers observed a significant reduction in intestinal Faecalibacterium levels, mirroring the gut dysbiosis phenotype observed in PD patients (Leclair-Visonneau et al., 2020). Collectively, these studies support a potential therapeutic role for direct F. prausnitzii administration in selected PD models, while evidence from synbiotic formulations and disease-associated microbiome changes remains indirect.
4.3. F. prausnitzii and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
4.3.1. Human evidence
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive, painless muscle weakness caused by motor neuron loss in the brain, brainstem, and spinal cord (Leclair-Visonneau et al., 2020). Multiple clinical studies report marked gut dysbiosis in ALS patients, with reduced F. prausnitzii abundance as a consistently recurring feature that correlates with disease progression and severity (Fang et al., 2016; Gerhardt and Mohajeri, 2018). Although heterogeneity exists across cohorts due to diet, lifestyle, and disease subtypes, this link has been validated across several studies (Fang et al., 2016; Gerhardt and Mohajeri, 2018). Notably, the role of F. prausnitzii in ALS may extend beyond the gastrointestinal tract. A study examining the nasal microbiome of ALS patients revealed that nasal Faecalibacterium abundance correlated positively with revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) scores (Liu et al., 2024). However, given that Faecalibacterium is an extremely oxygen-sensitive obligate anaerobe, its detection in the nasal mucosa may reflect microbial translocation or systemic immune alterations rather than active respiratory colonization, warranting cautious interpretation. A recent case report showed that two advanced ALS patients with respiratory failure experienced significant improvements in respiratory function, muscle strength, and motor capability following FMT. This was accompanied by increased intestinal F. prausnitzii abundance and elevated levels of arginine biosynthesis metabolites, suggesting that F. prausnitzii may contribute to reversing respiratory failure through metabolic regulation (Yan et al., 2024). However, in a larger randomized controlled trial (RCT) by Feng et al., FMT reshaped gut microbiota structure but failed to achieve statistically significant slowing of ALSFRS-R score decline (Feng et al., 2024). Discrepancies between these studies may stem from differences in sample size and patient inclusion criteria. These findings imply that boosting beneficial bacteria like F. prausnitzii may primarily alleviate comorbid symptoms—such as respiratory dysfunction, constipation, and psychological distress—rather than fundamentally reversing neurodegeneration.
4.4. F. prausnitzii and multiple sclerosis
4.4.1. Human evidence
MS is an autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system. Its primary pathological hallmark is autoreactive T cell targeting of myelin antigens, resulting in demyelination and neurological disability (Dendrou et al., 2015). Depletion of F. prausnitzii represents a central feature of MS-associated gut dysbiosis (Gupta et al., 2025; iMSMS Consortium, 2022; Thirion et al., 2023; Paraschiv et al., 2024; Mokhtarzade et al., 2022; Mokhtarzade et al., 2021; Swidsinski et al., 2017). In an International MS Microbiome Study comprising 576 MS patients and 1,152 healthy controls, untreated MS patients exhibited a marked decline in F. prausnitzii abundance. This reduction was more pronounced in progressive MS than in relapsing–remitting MS, indicating that loss of this bacterium correlates closely with disease progression and severity (iMSMS Consortium, 2022). Although MS patients reported higher diet quality scores (including greater intake of fruits and vegetables that foster bacterial growth), low F. prausnitzii levels persisted. This discrepancy suggests that the depletion is driven by the MS disease state rather than environmental dietary confounders (iMSMS Consortium, 2022). Similarly, metagenomic sequencing by Thirion et al. in a Danish cohort of 148 MS patients and 148 matched healthy controls revealed significantly higher F. prausnitzii abundance during non-active disease phases (Thirion et al., 2023). In a 2-month prospective longitudinal study, Paraschiv et al. confirmed reduced gut F. prausnitzii in MS patients (Paraschiv et al., 2024). Although disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) and IgY supplementation altered other beneficial taxa, they failed to reverse the reduction in F. prausnitzii, reinforcing its deficit as a stable hallmark of MS-related dysbiosis (Paraschiv et al., 2024). Regarding lifestyle interventions, Mokhtarzade et al. showed that lifelong exercise helps maintain levels of probiotics such as F. prausnitzii, which confers clinical protection for brain parenchymal volume in MS patients (Mokhtarzade et al., 2022). However, another study by the same group revealed that a short-term home-based exercise program significantly improved anxiety and depression in MS patients without altering F. prausnitzii abundance. This suggests the bacterium responds to long-term lifestyle habits rather than short-term exercise (Mokhtarzade et al., 2021). Furthermore, Swidsinski et al. identified F. prausnitzii as one of the most severely depleted bacteria in MS patients, yet a 6-month ketogenic diet effectively restored its levels to baseline or higher (Swidsinski et al., 2017). These findings underscore the importance of F. prausnitzii in MS pathophysiology. Nevertheless, current evidence derives mainly from clinical cross-sectional and longitudinal observations. Functional validation in animal models is necessary to clarify its causal role and specific immunomodulatory pathways in MS.
4.5. F. prausnitzii and stroke
4.5.1. Human evidence
Stroke is a leading cause of mortality and disability worldwide, presenting a major public health challenge. Clinically, stroke is categorized as ischemic stroke, caused by vascular occlusion, or hemorrhagic stroke, caused by vascular rupture (Hankey, 2014). Emerging evidence indicates that stroke impairs intestinal function, increases gut permeability, activates intestinal immune cells, and drives gut microbiota translocation (Stanley et al., 2018). A positive feedback loop is increasingly recognized: post-stroke brain changes trigger gut dysbiosis and inflammation, which subsequently exacerbate central neuroinflammation and stroke progression (Benakis et al., 2016). In a case–control study of 59 patients with acute ischemic stroke and 31 age-matched healthy controls, Luo et al. found that F. prausnitzii abundance correlated negatively with stroke severity, adverse prognostic indicators, and inflammatory markers, suggesting that F. prausnitzii warrants further investigation as a candidate microbial biomarker of acute ischemic stroke severity and prognosis (Luo et al., 2024).
4.5.2. Preclinical evidence
In animal models, modulating the gut microbiome via FMT or probiotic supplementation before or during stroke significantly alters recovery outcomes (Rahman et al., 2024; Lee et al., 2020). Lee et al. observed that transplanting healthy human feces into middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) mice markedly improved stroke outcomes (Lee et al., 2020). Further investigations confirmed that transplanting specific SCFA-producing strains, particularly F. prausnitzii, elevated SCFA levels in host gut, blood, and brain tissues, thereby attenuating neurological deficits and inflammatory responses. These findings suggest that F. prausnitzii promotes stroke recovery by elevating SCFA concentrations along the gut–blood–brain axis (Lee et al., 2020). Additionally, Rahman et al. demonstrated in an MCAO rat model that a multi-strain synbiotic intervention significantly alleviated post-stroke neuroinflammation and restored intestinal barrier function, accompanied by a marked recovery in intestinal F. prausnitzii abundance (Rahman et al., 2024). Overall, human and animal studies implicate SCFA-producing gut microbiota, including F. prausnitzii, in post-stroke inflammatory and metabolic responses. However, current evidence does not establish F. prausnitzii as an independent regulator of stroke recovery.
4.6. F. prausnitzii and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
4.6.1. Human evidence
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by persistent, pervasive inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity inconsistent with developmental level, leading to functional impairment (Koirala et al., 2024). Its etiology involves genetic, environmental, and physiological factors. The neurodevelopmental biology of ADHD remains unclear, and reliable diagnostic biomarkers are lacking, leaving diagnosis reliant on behavioral evaluations (Koirala et al., 2024). Evidence links gut microbial profiles with ADHD symptom severity, suggesting that microbes influence neurotransmitter function via metabolites like SCFAs; however, causality and specific mechanisms remain unclarified (Wang et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2025; Ast et al., 2025; Bundgaard-Nielsen et al., 2023). Wang et al. used 16S rRNA sequencing to show that children with ADHD had significantly higher gut microbial diversity (Shannon and Chao indices) than controls (Wang et al., 2020). In a study by Jiang et al., high-throughput pyrosequencing of fecal samples from 51 children with ADHD and 32 healthy controls revealed a significant reduction in relative Faecalibacterium abundance in the ADHD group (Jiang et al., 2018). Further analysis demonstrated that Faecalibacterium abundance correlated negatively with parent-reported ADHD symptom severity, highlighting its potential as a microbial biomarker (Jiang et al., 2018). Utilizing metagenomic sequencing, Wan et al. confirmed a marked decrease in F. prausnitzii in ADHD patients, revealing significant microbial differences in dopamine and 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) metabolic pathways (Wan et al., 2020). Although reduced F. prausnitzii is consistently observed in clinical studies, the precise mechanisms by which it influences neurodevelopment remain to be elucidated. Moreover, preclinical intervention studies that directly establish a causal role for F. prausnitzii in ADHD are still lacking. Nevertheless, targeted microbiota-based interventions may offer novel perspectives for the clinical diagnosis and personalized treatment of ADHD.
4.7. F. prausnitzii and autism spectrum disorder
4.7.1. Human evidence
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a highly heterogeneous and etiologically complex neurodevelopmental condition characterized by impaired social interaction and communication alongside repetitive, stereotyped behaviors (Fattorusso et al., 2019). Epidemiological data show that children with ASD experience a significantly higher rate of gastrointestinal issues than neurotypical peers, with approximately 40% presenting with overt dysfunction such as constipation, diarrhea, and abdominal pain (Wang et al., 2011; Fulceri et al., 2016). Recent studies suggest that these gastrointestinal disturbances and central nervous system symptoms may stem from an inflammatory state induced by gut dysbiosis, pointing to gut–brain interactions as a pivotal player in ASD pathogenesis (Wang et al., 2011; Fulceri et al., 2016; Navarro et al., 2016). Fluctuations in F. prausnitzii in ASD have attracted considerable attention, though findings vary geographically (Kang et al., 2018; Mendive Dubourdieu and Guerendiain, 2023; Huang et al., 2025). In a US study of 21 children with ASD, Kang et al. reported lower gut microbial diversity and significantly reduced F. prausnitzii abundance compared to neurotypical controls (Kang et al., 2018). Similarly, a study evaluating ASD children with different nutritional statuses found that those with overweight or obesity had significantly lower F. prausnitzii abundance than BMI-matched healthy controls (Mendive Dubourdieu and Guerendiain, 2023). Conversely, a cohort study in Guangxi, China, demonstrated a marked enrichment of F. prausnitzii in children with ASD, with taxonomic changes correlating positively with arginine/proline metabolic pathways (Huang et al., 2025). Coretti et al. similarly observed elevated F. prausnitzii levels in young children (aged 2–4 years) with ASD in Naples, linking high abundance to increased fecal butyrate concentrations and enriched metabolic pathways (Coretti et al., 2018). The direction of the association between F. prausnitzii abundance and ASD remains unresolved, likely due to cohort heterogeneity in age, diet, nutritional status, geography, sample size, and microbiome profiling methods, including differences in sequencing platforms and taxonomic resolution (Huang et al., 2025). Dietary interventions and microbial modulation provide fresh possibilities for ASD management (Raghavan et al., 2023; Grimaldi et al., 2017; Grimaldi et al., 2018). Raghavan et al. showed that administering β-1,3/1,6-glucan to ASD patients effectively increased gut probiotics like F. prausnitzii, improving behavior and sleep quality (Raghavan et al., 2023). Grimaldi et al. used an in vitro gut model to evaluate fecal fermentation responses to bimuno-galactooligosaccharide (B-GOS) prebiotics in ASD and non-ASD children. B-GOS intervention significantly elevated F. prausnitzii abundance and altered fecal ethanol and lactate levels (Grimaldi et al., 2017). In a subsequent clinical study of 30 children with ASD, Grimaldi et al. evaluated an exclusion diet (such as gluten-free or casein-free)(Grimaldi et al., 2018). Children adhering to the diet showed reduced abdominal pain and bowel dysfunction scores, alongside increased gut F. prausnitzii abundance (Grimaldi et al., 2018). Together, these studies indicate that shifts in F. prausnitzii abundance correlate with symptom relief in ASD. Given the inconsistent direction of association across cohorts, the utility of F. prausnitzii as an ASD biomarker remains uncertain, and larger multicenter longitudinal studies with standardized microbiome profiling are needed to clarify its relationship with ASD phenotypes.
5. Future perspectives and concluding remarks
Gut dysbiosis is closely linked to the pathogenesis and progression of various CNS disorders. Clinically, reduced abundance of F. prausnitzii has emerged as a hallmark intestinal alteration across several neurological conditions, including AD, PD, ALS, and MS. In animal models, F. prausnitzii exerts multifaceted protective effects in the bidirectional regulation of the MGBA. It maintains gastrointestinal mucosal barrier integrity, reduces mucosal permeability, and downregulates peripheral pro-inflammatory cytokines, thereby preventing inflammatory cascades from spreading to the central nervous system. These two evidence streams should be interpreted separately, because associations observed in humans do not establish that depletion of F. prausnitzii contributes causally to disease development or progression. Collectively, these findings support F. prausnitzii as a potentially relevant microbial component of the MGBA, although its causal contribution and therapeutic significance in humans remain to be established.
The strength and type of evidence differ markedly across disorders. AD and PD include both human association studies and preclinical intervention evidence; MS is supported by relatively large human cohorts but lacks comparable species-specific intervention data; stroke evidence remains limited and partly derives from FMT or SCFA-producing bacterial consortia; ALS and ADHD are mainly supported by observational evidence; and findings in ASD remain directionally inconsistent. Importantly, clinical intervention studies directly evaluating oral F. prausnitzii formulations in patients with neurological disorders are still lacking. Human studies therefore mainly support associations, while improvements observed after exercise, dietary interventions, prebiotics, synbiotics, or FMT cannot be attributed specifically to F. prausnitzii, because these interventions simultaneously affect the broader gut microbiota and host physiology. Moreover, beneficial clinical outcomes may occur without a parallel increase in F. prausnitzii, indicating that changes in its abundance should not be regarded as a universal surrogate of therapeutic response. In contrast, direct administration or colonization with specific F. prausnitzii strains in animal models provides more direct evidence for strain- and model-dependent neuroprotective effects. In AD models, it improves spatial and long-term memory while reducing Aβ deposition and abnormal tau phosphorylation. In PD models, it elevates striatal histone acetylation levels, protects dopaminergic neurons, and downregulates pathological α-synuclein aggregation in the brain. In MCAO models, it effectively raises central SCFA concentrations and alleviates neurological deficits.
Mechanistically, current in vitro and in vivo studies highlight several key pathways, although the specificity of this evidence varies. Findings involving MAM, EVs, or direct F. prausnitzii administration provide relatively species-linked evidence, whereas many observations involving butyrate, SCFA signaling, HDAC inhibition, and downstream inflammatory pathways represent biologically plausible but indirect support. First, F. prausnitzii utilizes acetate to produce its core metabolite, butyrate. Butyrate reinforces tight junctions via the AKT/AMPK pathway and exerts HDAC inhibitory activity to restore impaired neuronal gene transcription, promoting neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity. Second, F. prausnitzii secretes MAM and EVs to block NF-κB activation in host epithelial cells. It also restores colonic goblet cell counts and MUC2 expression, thereby reinforcing the mucus barrier. Third, through the synthesis of phenolic compounds, it activates the AKT/Nrf2 signaling pathway to suppress microglial overactivation and oxidative stress. Finally, F. prausnitzii re-establishes immune tolerance by modulating the Th17/Treg balance and inducing double-positive CD4+CD8α+ T cells. It upregulates tolerogenic molecules (IL-10 and IL-27) and systematically downregulates pro-inflammatory markers, including IL-6, IL-17, TNF-α, CRP, and TMAO, while promoting anti-inflammatory IL-10 release.
Several barriers must be addressed before the clinical translation of F. prausnitzii. Its marked strain specificity and extreme oxygen sensitivity raise important challenges related to strain selection, formulation, storage stability, viable dose, delivery, colonization, and patient-level safety. Future studies should prioritize strain-specific characterization and mechanistic validation, together with longitudinal human cohorts using standardized microbiome profiling and adequate control of major confounders. Integrating biochemical metabolite profiling, dietary tracking, and multi-omics approaches may further clarify how F. prausnitzii interacts with host metabolic, immune, and neurobiological pathways over time. Ultimately, large-scale, multicenter randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are required to establish its safety, feasibility, colonization efficiency, and therapeutic efficacy in neurological populations. Overall, F. prausnitzii represents a biologically plausible and translationally interesting candidate within the MGBA, but its clinical therapeutic value remains to be established.
Acknowledgments
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study received funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 82160437 and 82472604), Ganpo Talent Program (No. S2024GDKX2714).
Footnotes
Edited by: Sidharth Prasad Mishra, University of South Florida, United States
Reviewed by: Francisco Jose Roig, Universidad San Jorge, Spain
Gopinath Ramalingam, Government Theni Medical College, India
Author contributions
YL: Writing – original draft. GY: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. LS: Methodology, Writing – original draft. HW: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. QZ: Visualization, Writing – original draft. PY: Investigation, Writing – original draft. CJ: Investigation, Writing – original draft. YB: Writing – review & editing. ZF: Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- Ahmadi S., Hasani A., Yasdchi M., Hasani A., Poortahmasbe V., Sedaghat F. R., et al. (2026). Altered gut microbiota, SCFAs, and barrier integrity markers in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease patients. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 79. doi: 10.1093/lambio/ovag010, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alberge J., Mussard E., Al-Ayoubi C., Lencina C., Marrauld C., Cauquil L., et al. (2024). Butyrate reduces epithelial barrier dysfunction induced by the foodborne mycotoxin deoxynivalenol in cell monolayers derived from pig jejunum organoids. Gut Microbes 16:2430424. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2024.2430424, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Al-Fakhrany O. M., Elekhnawy E. (2024). Next-generation probiotics: the upcoming biotherapeutics. Mol. Biol. Rep. 51:505. doi: 10.1007/s11033-024-09398-5, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Andreozzi V., Cuoco S., Balestrieri M., Fierro F., Ferrara N., Erro R., et al. (2024). Synbiotic supplementation may globally improve non-motor symptoms in patients with stable Parkinson's disease: results from an open label single-arm study. Sci. Rep. 14:23095. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74400-w, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Angelucci F., Cechova K., Amlerova J., Hort J. (2019). Antibiotics, gut microbiota, and Alzheimer's disease. J. Neuroinflammation 16:108. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1494-4, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ast H. K., Hammer M., Zhang S., Bruton A., Hatsu I. E., Leung B., et al. (2025). Gut microbiome changes with micronutrient supplementation in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the MADDY study. Gut Microbes 17:2463570. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2025.2463570, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Auger S., Kropp C., Borras-Nogues E., Chanput W., Andre-Leroux G., Gitton-Quent O., et al. (2022). Intraspecific diversity of microbial anti-inflammatory molecule (MAM) from Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23:1705. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031705, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Avram-Hananel L., Stock J., Parlesak A., Bode C., Schwartz B. (2010). E durans strain M4-5 isolated from human colonic flora attenuates intestinal inflammation. Dis. Colon Rectum 53, 1676–1686. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181f4b148, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bao X., Zheng Z., Lv J., Bao J., Chang S., Jiang X., et al. (2023). Shikimic acid (SA) inhibits neuro-inflammation and exerts neuroprotective effects in an LPS-induced in vitro and in vivo model. Front. Pharmacol. 14:1265571. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1265571, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bayazid A. B., Jang Y. A., Kim Y. M., Kim J. G., Lim B. O. (2021). Neuroprotective effects of sodium butyrate through suppressing Neuroinflammation and modulating antioxidant enzymes. Neurochem. Res. 46, 2348–2358. doi: 10.1007/s11064-021-03369-z, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Benakis C., Brea D., Caballero S., Faraco G., Moore J., Murphy M., et al. (2016). Commensal microbiota affects ischemic stroke outcome by regulating intestinal gammadelta T cells. Nat. Med. 22, 516–523. doi: 10.1038/nm.4068, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bhutta N. K., Xu X., Jian C., Wang Y., Liu Y., Sun J., et al. (2024). Gut microbiota mediated T cells regulation and autoimmune diseases. Front. Microbiol. 15:1477187. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1477187, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Breyner N. M., Michon C., de Sousa C. S., Vilas Boas P. B., Chain F., Azevedo V. A., et al. (2017). Microbial anti-inflammatory molecule (MAM) from Faecalibacterium prausnitzii shows a protective effect on DNBS and DSS-induced colitis model in mice through inhibition of NF-kappaB pathway. Front. Microbiol. 8:114. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bundgaard-Nielsen C., Lauritsen M. B., Knudsen J. K., Rold L. S., Larsen M. H., Hindersson P., et al. (2023). Children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder share distinct microbiota compositions. Gut Microbes 15:2211923. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2023.2211923, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Canani R. B., Costanzo M. D., Leone L., Pedata M., Meli R., Calignano A. (2011). Potential beneficial effects of butyrate in intestinal and extraintestinal diseases. World J. Gastroenterol. 17, 1519–1528. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i12.1519, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cao Y., Xu Y., Cao M., Chen N., Zeng Q., Lai M. K. P., et al. (2025). Fluid-based biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases. Ageing Res. Rev. 108:102739. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2025.102739, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carlsson A. H., Yakymenko O., Olivier I., Hakansson F., Postma E., Keita A. V., et al. (2013). Faecalibacterium prausnitzii supernatant improves intestinal barrier function in mice DSS colitis. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 48, 1136–1144. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2013.828773, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Castillo M., Skene G., Roca M., Anguita M., Badiola I., Duncan S. H., et al. (2007). Application of 16S rRNA gene-targetted fluorescence in situ hybridization and restriction fragment length polymorphism to study porcine microbiota along the gastrointestinal tract in response to different sources of dietary fibre. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 59, 138–146. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00204.x, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coretti L., Paparo L., Riccio M. P., Amato F., Cuomo M., Natale A., et al. (2018). Gut microbiota features in young children with autism spectrum disorders. Front. Microbiol. 9:3146. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03146, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dang G., Wu W., Zhang H., Everaert N. (2021). A new paradigm for a new simple chemical: butyrate & immune regulation. Food Funct. 12, 12181–12193. doi: 10.1039/D1FO02116H [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dendrou C. A., Fugger L., Friese M. A. (2015). Immunopathology of multiple sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15, 545–558. doi: 10.1038/nri3871, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Di Vincenzo F., Del Gaudio A., Petito V., Lopetuso L. R., Scaldaferri F. (2024). Gut microbiota, intestinal permeability, and systemic inflammation: a narrative review. Intern. Emerg. Med. 19, 275–293. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03374-w, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dissanayaka D. M. S., Jayasinghe T. N., Sohrabi H. R., Rainey-Smith S. R., Taddei K., Masters C. L., et al. (2025). Gut microbial composition and short-chain fatty acid metabolism in cognitively unimpaired adults stratified by amyloid-beta status. Biomolecules 16, 1–18. doi: 10.3390/biom16010018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duncan S. H., Flint H. J. (2008). Proposal of a neotype strain (A1-86) for Eubacterium rectale. Request for an opinion. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 58, 1735–1736. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.2008/004580-0, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duncan S. H., Hold G. L., Harmsen H. J. M., Stewart C. S., Flint H. J. (2002). Growth requirements and fermentation products of fusobacterium prausnitzii, and a proposal to reclassify it as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii gen. Nov., comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52, 2141–2146. doi: 10.1099/00207713-52-6-2141, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Effendi R., Anshory M., Kalim H., Dwiyana R. F., Suwarsa O., Pardo L. M., et al. (2022). Akkermansia muciniphila and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in immune-related diseases. Microorganisms 10:2382. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10122382, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eppinga H., Sperna Weiland C. J., Thio H. B., van der Woude C. J., Nijsten T. E., Peppelenbosch M. P., et al. (2016). Similar depletion of protective Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in psoriasis and inflammatory bowel disease, but not in hidradenitis suppurativa. J. Crohns Colitis 10, 1067–1075. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw070, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fabi J. P. (2024). The connection between gut microbiota and its metabolites with neurodegenerative diseases in humans. Metab. Brain Dis. 39, 967–984. doi: 10.1007/s11011-024-01369-w, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fang X., Wang X., Yang S., Meng F., Wang X., Wei H., et al. (2016). Evaluation of the microbial diversity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using high-throughput sequencing. Front. Microbiol. 7:1479. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01479, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fattorusso A., Di Genova L., Dell'Isola G. B., Mencaroni E., Esposito S. (2019). Autism spectrum disorders and the gut microbiota. Nutrients 11:523. doi: 10.3390/nu11030521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feng R., Zhu Q., Wang A., Wang H., Wang J., Chen P., et al. (2024). Effect of fecal microbiota transplantation on patients with sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BMC Med. 22:566. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03781-6, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferreira-Halder C. V., Faria A. V. S., Andrade S. S. (2017). Action and function of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in health and disease. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 31, 643–648. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2017.09.011, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foditsch C., Santos T. M., Teixeira A. G., Pereira R. V., Dias J. M., Gaeta N., et al. (2014). Isolation and characterization of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii from calves and piglets. PLoS One 9:e116465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116465, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fujimura K. E., Sitarik A. R., Havstad S., Lin D. L., Levan S., Fadrosh D., et al. (2016). Neonatal gut microbiota associates with childhood multisensitized atopy and T cell differentiation. Nat. Med. 22, 1187–1191. doi: 10.1038/nm.4176, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fulceri F., Morelli M., Santocchi E., Cena H., Del Bianco T., Narzisi A., et al. (2016). Gastrointestinal symptoms and behavioral problems in preschoolers with autism Spectrum disorder. Dig. Liver Dis. 48, 248–254. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2015.11.026, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- G.B.D.N.S.D. Collaborators (2024). Global, regional, and national burden of disorders affecting the nervous system, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021. Lancet Neurol. 23, 344–381. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00038-3, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gasaly N., Hermoso M. A., Gotteland M. (2021). Butyrate and the fine-tuning of colonic homeostasis: implication for inflammatory bowel diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22:3061. doi: 10.3390/ijms22063061, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geng P., Zhao N., Zhou Y., Harris R. S., Ge Y. (2025). Faecalibacterium prausnitzii regulates carbohydrate metabolic functions of the gut microbiome in C57BL/6 mice. Gut Microbes 17:2455503. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2025.2455503, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gerhardt S., Mohajeri M. H. (2018). Changes of colonic bacterial composition in Parkinson's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. Nutrients 10:708. doi: 10.3390/nu10060708, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Govindarajan N., Agis-Balboa R. C., Walter J., Sananbenesi F., Fischer A. (2011). Sodium butyrate improves memory function in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model when administered at an advanced stage of disease progression. J. Alzheimer's Dis 26, 187–197. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-110080, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grimaldi R., Cela D., Swann J. R., Vulevic J., Gibson G. R., Tzortzis G., et al. (2017). In vitro fermentation of B-GOS: impact on faecal bacterial populations and metabolic activity in autistic and non-autistic children. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 93:fiw233. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiw233, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grimaldi R., Gibson G. R., Vulevic J., Giallourou N., Castro-Mejia J. L., Hansen L. H., et al. (2018). A prebiotic intervention study in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Microbiome 6:133. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0523-3, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gupta V. K., Janda G. S., Pump H. K., Lele N., Cruz I., Cohen I., et al. (2025). Alterations in gut microbiome-host relationships after immune perturbation in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 12:e200355. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000200355, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Han E. J., Ahn J. S., Chae Y. J., Chung H. J. (2025). Immunomodulatory roles of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Akkermansia muciniphila in autoimmune diseases: mechanistic insights and therapeutic potential. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 68:77. doi: 10.1007/s12016-025-09093-8, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hankey G. J. (2014). Secondary stroke prevention. Lancet Neurol. 13, 178–194. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70255-2, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hao Z., Wang W., Guo R., Liu H. (2019). Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (ATCC 27766) has preventive and therapeutic effects on chronic unpredictable mild stress-induced depression-like and anxiety-like behavior in rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology 104, 132–142. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.02.025, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hawkins B., Montgomery M., Bokota G., Santoyo M., Giron E., Eltokhi A. (2025). Gut microbiota dysbiosis at the interface of neuropsychiatric disorders and their dermatological comorbidities. Gut Microbes 17:2574934. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2025.2574934, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He J., Chan T., Hong X., Zheng F., Zhu C., Yin L., et al. (2020). Microbiome and metabolome analyses reveal the disruption of lipid metabolism in systemic lupus erythematosus. Front. Immunol. 11:1703. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01703, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hensen T., Thiele I. (2025). Metabolic modeling links gut microbiota to metabolic markers of Parkinson's disease. Gut Microbes 17:2554195. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2025.2554195, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hirdaramani A., Cheng C. W., Hanyaloglu A. C., Frost G. (2026). A selective and augmentable butyrate-FFAR2 signal circuitry programs the cellular identity of enteroendocrine L-cells. Commun. Biol. 9:606. doi: 10.1038/s42003-026-09830-5, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang Z., Wei A., Yuan H., Huang S., Chen X., Han Y., et al. (2025). Gut microbiota and urine metabolomics signature in autism spectrum disorder children from southern China. BMC Pediatr. 25:621. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05922-z, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ibeas-Perez M. V., Agui-Ruiz B., Arias-Sanchez S., Martin-Monzon I. (2026). Mediterranean diet and gut microbiota: impact on memory and other cognitive functions: a systematic review. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 19:1749308. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2026.1749308, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- iMSMS Consortium (2022). Gut microbiome of multiple sclerosis patients and paired household healthy controls reveal associations with disease risk and course. Cell 185, 3467–3486 e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.08.021, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jacob A. A., Rout S., Dash R., Venugopal G., Punde A. R., John J. K., et al. (2026). Gut microbiome differences in Parkinson's disease patients in Central Kerala population. Neurodegener Dis Manag 16, 299–309. doi: 10.1080/17582024.2025.2574204, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jaworska J., Zalewska T., Sypecka J., Ziemka-Nalecz M. (2019). Effect of the HDAC inhibitor, sodium butyrate, on neurogenesis in a rat model of neonatal hypoxia-ischemia: potential mechanism of action. Mol. Neurobiol. 56, 6341–6370. doi: 10.1007/s12035-019-1518-1, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang H. Y., Zhou Y. Y., Zhou G. L., Li Y. C., Yuan J., Li X. H., et al. (2018). Gut microbiota profiles in treatment-naive children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Behav. Brain Res. 347, 408–413. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.03.036, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kang D. W., Ilhan Z. E., Isern N. G., Hoyt D. W., Howsmon D. P., Shaffer M., et al. (2018). Differences in fecal microbial metabolites and microbiota of children with autism spectrum disorders. Anaerobe 49, 121–131. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.12.007, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khan M. T., Zohair M., Khan A., Kashif A., Mumtaz S., Muskan F. (2025). From gut to brain: the roles of intestinal microbiota, immune system, and hormones in intestinal physiology and gut-brain-axis. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 607:112599. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2025.112599, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim J. S., Park H., Lee J. H., Shin J., Cha B., Kwon K. S., et al. (2024). Effect of altered gene expression in lipid metabolism on cognitive improvement in patients with Alzheimer's dementia following fecal microbiota transplantation: a preliminary study. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 17:17562864231218181. doi: 10.1177/17562864231218181, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knopman D. S., Amieva H., Petersen R. C., Chetelat G., Holtzman D. M., Hyman B. T., et al. (2021). Alzheimer disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 7:33. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00269-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koirala S., Grimsrud G., Mooney M. A., Larsen B., Feczko E., Elison J. T., et al. (2024). Neurobiology of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: historical challenges and emerging frontiers. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 25, 759–775. doi: 10.1038/s41583-024-00869-z, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krueger M. E., Boles J. S., Simon Z. D., Alvarez S. D., McFarland N. R., Okun M. S., et al. (2025). Comparative analysis of Parkinson's and inflammatory bowel disease gut microbiomes reveals shared butyrate-producing bacteria depletion. NPJ Parkinsons Dis 11:50. doi: 10.1038/s41531-025-00894-4, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leblhuber F., Steiner K., Schuetz B., Fuchs D., Gostner J. M. (2018). Probiotic supplementation in patients with Alzheimer's dementia - an explorative intervention study. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 15, 1106–1113. doi: 10.2174/1389200219666180813144834, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leclair-Visonneau L., Neunlist M., Derkinderen P., Lebouvier T. (2020). The gut in Parkinson's disease: bottom-up, top-down, or neither? Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 32:e13777. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13777, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee J., d'Aigle J., Atadja L., Quaicoe V., Honarpisheh P., Ganesh B. P., et al. (2020). Gut microbiota-derived short-Chain fatty acids promote Poststroke recovery in aged mice. Circ. Res. 127, 453–465. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.316448, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li W., Wu X., Hu X., Wang T., Liang S., Duan Y., et al. (2017). Structural changes of gut microbiota in Parkinson's disease and its correlation with clinical features. Sci. China Life Sci. 60, 1223–1233. doi: 10.1007/s11427-016-9001-4, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li H., Yuan Y., Xie Q., Dong Z. (2024). Exosomes: potential targets for the diagnosis and treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders. J. Transl. Med. 22:115. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-04893-6, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin K., Lin W., Guo Z., Chen C., Chen L., Cai X. (2025). Plasma exosomal miRNA expression and gut microbiota dysbiosis are associated with cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease. Front. Neurosci. 19:1545690. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1545690, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu K., Guo Q., Ding Y., Luo L., Huang J., Zhang Q. (2024). Alterations in nasal microbiota of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Chin. Med. J. 137, 162–171. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002701, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu J., Yu C., Li R., Liu K., Jin G., Ge R., et al. (2020). High-altitude Tibetan fermented milk ameliorated cognitive dysfunction by modified gut microbiota in Alzheimer's disease transgenic mice. Food Funct. 11, 5308–5319. doi: 10.1039/C9FO03007G, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y., Yu X., Zhao J., Zhang H., Zhai Q., Chen W. (2020). The role of MUC2 mucin in intestinal homeostasis and the impact of dietary components on MUC2 expression. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 164, 884–891. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.191, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y., Yu Z., Zhu L., Ma S., Luo Y., Liang H., et al. (2023). Orchestration of MUC2 - the key regulatory target of gut barrier and homeostasis: a review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 236:123862. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123862, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lopez-Siles M., Duncan S. H., Garcia-Gil L. J., Martinez-Medina M. (2017). Faecalibacterium prausnitzii: from microbiology to diagnostics and prognostics. ISME J. 11, 841–852. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.176, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lopez-Siles M., Khan T. M., Duncan S. H., Harmsen H. J., Garcia-Gil L. J., Flint H. J. (2012). Cultured representatives of two major phylogroups of human colonic Faecalibacterium prausnitzii can utilize pectin, uronic acids, and host-derived substrates for growth. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 420–428. doi: 10.1128/AEM.06858-11, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Louis P., Flint H. J. (2009). Diversity, metabolism and microbial ecology of butyrate-producing bacteria from the human large intestine. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 294, 1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01514.x, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo Y., Chang G., Yu G., Lin Y., Zhang Q., Wang Z., et al. (2024). Unveiling the negative association of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii with ischemic stroke severity, impaired prognosis and pro-inflammatory markers. Heliyon 10:e26651. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26651, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin R., Miquel S., Benevides L., Bridonneau C., Robert V., Hudault S., et al. (2017). Functional characterization of novel Faecalibacterium prausnitzii strains isolated from healthy volunteers: a step forward in the use of F. prausnitzii as a next-generation probiotic. Front. Microbiol. 8:1226. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01226, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mendive Dubourdieu P., Guerendiain M. (2023). Understanding the link between gut microbiota, dietary intake, and nutritional status in children with autism and typical development. Front. Nutr. 10:1202948. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1202948, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miquel S., Leclerc M., Martin R., Chain F., Lenoir M., Raguideau S., et al. (2015). Identification of metabolic signatures linked to anti-inflammatory effects of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. MBio 6, e00300–15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00300-15, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miquel S., Martin R., Rossi O., Bermudez-Humaran L. G., Chatel J. M., Sokol H., et al. (2013). Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and human intestinal health. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 16, 255–261. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2013.06.003, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moens F., Weckx S., De Vuyst L. (2016). Bifidobacterial inulin-type fructan degradation capacity determines cross-feeding interactions between bifidobacteria and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 231, 76–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.05.015, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moiseyenko A., Antonello G., Schonhoff A. M., Boktor J. C., Long K., Dirks B., et al. (2026). Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, depleted in the Parkinson's disease microbiome, improves motor deficits in alpha-synuclein overexpressing mice. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 12:94. doi: 10.1038/s41531-026-01287-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mokhtarzade M., Molanouri Shamsi M., Abolhasani M., Bakhshi B., Sahraian M. A., Hamzeh Shalamzari M., et al. (2022). Lifetime physical activity is associated with gut bacteria and brain health in people with multiple sclerosis: focus on physical activity intensity. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 59:103639. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103639, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mokhtarzade M., Molanouri Shamsi M., Abolhasani M., Bakhshi B., Sahraian M. A., Quinn L. S., et al. (2021). Home-based exercise training influences gut bacterial levels in multiple sclerosis. Complement. Ther. Clin. Pract. 45:101463. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2021.101463, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moon J., Lee A. R., Kim H., Jhun J., Lee S. Y., Choi J. W., et al. (2023). Faecalibacterium prausnitzii alleviates inflammatory arthritis and regulates IL-17 production, short chain fatty acids, and the intestinal microbial flora in experimental mouse model for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 25:130. doi: 10.1186/s13075-023-03118-3, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moosavi S. M., Akhavan Sepahi A., Mousavi S. F., Vaziri F., Siadat S. D. (2020). The effect of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and its extracellular vesicles on the permeability of intestinal epithelial cells and expression of PPARs and ANGPTL4 in the Caco-2 cell culture model. J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. 19, 1061–1069. doi: 10.1007/s40200-020-00605-1, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morris H. R., Spillantini M. G., Sue C. M., Williams-Gray C. H. (2024). The pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease. Lancet 403, 293–304. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01478-2, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Motaghi S., Moghaddam Dizaj Herik H., Sepehri G., Abbasnejad M., Esmaeli-Mahani S. (2022). The anxiolytic effect of salicylic acid is mediated via the GABAergic system in the fear potentiated plus maze behavior in rats. Mol. Biol. Rep. 49, 1133–1139. doi: 10.1007/s11033-021-06939-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mou Y., Du Y., Zhou L., Yue J., Hu X., Liu Y., et al. (2022). Gut microbiota interact with the brain through systemic chronic inflammation: implications on Neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration, and aging. Front. Immunol. 13:796288. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.796288, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Navarro F., Liu Y., Rhoads J. M. (2016). Can probiotics benefit children with autism spectrum disorders? World J. Gastroenterol. 22, 10093–10102. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i46.10093, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nishiwaki H., Ueyama J., Ito M., Hamaguchi T., Takimoto K., Maeda T., et al. (2024). Meta-analysis of shotgun sequencing of gut microbiota in Parkinson's disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis 10:106. doi: 10.1038/s41531-024-00724-z, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O’Riordan K. J., Moloney G. M., Keane L., Clarke G., Cryan J. F. (2025). The gut microbiota-immune-brain axis: therapeutic implications. Cell Rep. Med. 6:101982. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.101982 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oikonomou G., Teixeira A. G., Foditsch C., Bicalho M. L., Machado V. S., Bicalho R. C. (2013). Fecal microbial diversity in pre-weaned dairy calves as described by pyrosequencing of metagenomic 16S rDNA. Associations of Faecalibacterium species with health and growth. PLoS One 8:e63157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063157, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Okumura R., Takeda K. (2017). Roles of intestinal epithelial cells in the maintenance of gut homeostasis. Exp. Mol. Med. 49:e338. doi: 10.1038/emm.2017.20, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pan Y., Zhao X., Chen Q., Zhao T., Ma Y., Wu H., et al. (2025). Faecalibacterium prausnitzii extracellular vesicles regulating macrophage differentiation via homologous recombination repair in colitis model. Microbiol. Res. 298:128217. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2025.128217, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paraschiv A. C., Vacaras V., Nistor C., Vacaras C., Strilciuc S., Muresanu D. F. (2024). The effect of multiple sclerosis therapy on gut microbiota dysbiosis: a longitudinal prospective study. Microb Cell 11, 106–115. doi: 10.15698/mic2024.04.819, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parker A., Fonseca S., Carding S. R. (2020). Gut microbes and metabolites as modulators of blood-brain barrier integrity and brain health. Gut Microbes 11, 135–157. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2019.1638722, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peng L., Li Z. R., Green R. S., Holzman I. R., Lin J. (2009). Butyrate enhances the intestinal barrier by facilitating tight junction assembly via activation of AMP-activated protein kinase in Caco-2 cell monolayers. J. Nutr. 139, 1619–1625. doi: 10.3945/jn.109.104638, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Persson N. D. A., Lohela T. J., Anttila J. E., Makela J., Rosenholm M., Peltoniemi M., et al. (2026). General anesthesia and systemic Hyperosmolality modulate lumbar intrathecal drug distribution in female rats. Anesthesiology 144, 390–401. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005794, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qiu X., Zhang M., Yang X., Hong N., Yu C. (2013). Faecalibacterium prausnitzii upregulates regulatory T cells and anti-inflammatory cytokines in treating TNBS-induced colitis. J. Crohns Colitis 7, e558–e568. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.04.002, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Quevrain E., Maubert M. A., Sokol H., Devreese B., Seksik P. (2016). The presence of the anti-inflammatory protein MAM, from Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, in the intestinal ecosystem. Gut 65, 882.1–882.882. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raghavan K., Dedeepiya V. D., Yamamoto N., Ikewaki N., Sonoda T., Iwasaki M., et al. (2023). Benefits of gut microbiota reconstitution by Beta 1,3-1,6 glucans in subjects with autism Spectrum disorder and other neurodegenerative diseases. J. Alzheimer's Dis 94, S241–S252. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220388, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rahman Z., Bhale N. A., Dikundwar A. G., Dandekar M. P. (2024). Multistrain probiotics with Fructooligosaccharides improve middle cerebral artery occlusion-driven neurological deficits by revamping microbiota-gut-brain Axis. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 16, 1251–1269. doi: 10.1007/s12602-023-10109-y, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rios-Covian D., Gueimonde M., Duncan S. H., Flint H. J., de los Reyes-Gavilan C. G. (2015). Enhanced butyrate formation by cross-feeding between Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Bifidobacterium adolescentis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 362:fnv176. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnv176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rungsri P., Akkarachaneeyakorn N., Wongsuwanlert M., Piwat S., Nantarakchaikul P., Teanpaisan R. (2017). Effect of fermented milk containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus SD11 on oral microbiota of healthy volunteers: a randomized clinical trial. J. Dairy Sci. 100, 7780–7787. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-12961, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schneider E., O'Riordan K. J., Clarke G., Cryan J. F. (2024). Feeding gut microbes to nourish the brain: unravelling the diet-microbiota-gut-brain axis. Nat. Metab. 6, 1454–1478. doi: 10.1038/s42255-024-01108-6, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schulthess J., Pandey S., Capitani M., Rue-Albrecht K. C., Arnold I., Franchini F., et al. (2019). The short Chain fatty acid butyrate imprints an antimicrobial program in macrophages. Immunity 50, 432–445.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.12.018, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sharma S., Taliyan R., Singh S. (2015). Beneficial effects of sodium butyrate in 6-OHDA induced neurotoxicity and behavioral abnormalities: modulation of histone deacetylase activity. Behav. Brain Res. 291, 306–314. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.05.052, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Silveira A. K., Gomes H. M., Frohlich N. T., Possa L., Santos L., Kessler F., et al. (2023). Sodium butyrate protects against intestinal oxidative damage and neuroinflammation in the prefrontal cortex of ulcerative colitis mice model. Immunol. Investig. 52, 796–814. doi: 10.1080/08820139.2023.2244967, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Socala K., Doboszewska U., Szopa A., Serefko A., Wlodarczyk M., Zielinska A., et al. (2021). The role of microbiota-gut-brain axis in neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders. Pharmacol. Res. 172:105840. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105840 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song H., Yoo Y., Hwang J., Na Y. C., Kim H. S. (2016). Faecalibacterium prausnitzii subspecies-level dysbiosis in the human gut microbiome underlying atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 137, 852–860. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.08.021, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stanley D., Moore R. J., Wong C. H. Y. (2018). An insight into intestinal mucosal microbiota disruption after stroke. Sci. Rep. 8:568. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18904-8, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun J., Lu L., Lian Y., Xu S., Zhu Y., Wu Y., et al. (2025). Sodium butyrate attenuates microglia-mediated neuroinflammation by modulating the TLR4/MyD88/NF-kappaB pathway and microbiome-gut-brain axis in cardiac arrest mice. Mol. Brain 18:13. doi: 10.1186/s13041-025-01179-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun J., Wang F., Li H., Zhang H., Jin J., Chen W., et al. (2015). Neuroprotective effect of sodium butyrate against cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice. Biomed. Res. Int.:395895. doi: 10.1155/2015/395895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun J., Xu J., Yang B., Chen K., Kong Y., Fang N., et al. (2020). Effect of Clostridium butyricum against microglia-mediated neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease via regulating gut microbiota and metabolites butyrate. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 64:e1900636. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201900636 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swidsinski A., Dorffel Y., Loening-Baucke V., Gille C., Goktas O., Reisshauer A., et al. (2017). Reduced mass and diversity of the colonic microbiome in patients with multiple sclerosis and their improvement with ketogenic diet. Front. Microbiol. 8:1141. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01141, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thirion F., Sellebjerg F., Fan Y., Lyu L., Hansen T. H., Pons N., et al. (2023). The gut microbiota in multiple sclerosis varies with disease activity. Genome Med. 15:1. doi: 10.1186/s13073-022-01148-1, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tiwari P., Gupta A., Kaushik M., Dwivedi R., Tripathi M., Dada R. (2026). Association of yoga with cognitive and gut microbiome changes in Alzheimer's disease: an exploratory case-control study. J. Alzheimer's Dis 110, 562–575. doi: 10.1177/13872877261415612, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turner J. R. (2009). Intestinal mucosal barrier function in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9, 799–809. doi: 10.1038/nri2653, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ueda A., Shinkai S., Shiroma H., Taniguchi Y., Tsuchida S., Kariya T., et al. (2021). Identification of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii strains for gut microbiome-based intervention in Alzheimer's-type dementia. Cell Rep Med 2:100398. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100398, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vinolo M. A., Rodrigues H. G., Nachbar R. T., Curi R. (2011). Regulation of inflammation by short chain fatty acids. Nutrients 3, 858–876. doi: 10.3390/nu3100858, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wan L., Ge W. R., Zhang S., Sun Y. L., Wang B., Yang G. (2020). Case-control study of the effects of gut microbiota composition on neurotransmitter metabolic pathways in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Front. Neurosci. 14:127. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00127, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang X., Li Y., Wang X., Wang R., Hao Y., Ren F., et al. (2024). Faecalibacterium prausnitzii supplementation prevents intestinal barrier injury and gut microflora dysbiosis induced by sleep deprivation. Nutrients 16:1100. doi: 10.3390/nu16081100, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang L. W., Tancredi D. J., Thomas D. W. (2011). The prevalence of gastrointestinal problems in children across the United States with autism spectrum disorders from families with multiple affected members. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 32, 351–360. doi: 10.1097/dbp.0b013e31821bd06a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang X., Wang N., Gao T., Zhang Y., Fu Z., Zhao Y., et al. (2025). Symptom-specific gut microbial and metabolic profiles in ADHD reveal SCFA deficiency as a key pathogenic mechanism. Gut Microbes 17:2537755. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2025.2537755, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang H. B., Wang P. Y., Wang X., Wan Y. L., Liu Y. C. (2012). Butyrate enhances intestinal epithelial barrier function via up-regulation of tight junction protein Claudin-1 transcription. Dig. Dis. Sci. 57, 3126–3135. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2259-4, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang L. J., Yang C. Y., Chou W. J., Lee M. J., Chou M. C., Kuo H. C., et al. (2020). Gut microbiota and dietary patterns in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 29, 287–297. doi: 10.1007/s00787-019-01352-2, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Q., Yang Q., Liu X. (2023). The microbiota-gut-brain axis and neurodevelopmental disorders. Protein Cell 14, 762–775. doi: 10.1093/procel/pwad026, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang P., Zhang Y., Gong Y., Yang R., Chen Z., Hu W., et al. (2018). Sodium butyrate triggers a functional elongation of microglial process via Akt-small RhoGTPase activation and HDACs inhibition. Neurobiol. Dis. 111, 12–25. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2017.12.006, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang G., Zhou H. H., Luo L., Qin L. Q., Yin J., Yu Z., et al. (2021). Voluntary wheel running is capable of improving cognitive function only in the young but not the middle-aged male APPSwe/PS1De9 mice. Neurochem. Int. 145:105010. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2021.105010, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Warren A., Wynia Z., Corr P. G., Devin M. F., Celikkol Z., Gordon L., et al. (2026). The microbiota-gut-brain axis in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: a scoping review of human studies. Alzheimers Dement. 22:e71023. doi: 10.1002/alz.71023, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu X., Zhang T., Feng J., Park S. (2026). Herba Patriniae with probiotics targets Escherichia fergusonii and the 5-hydroxytryptophan-trimethylamine N-oxide axis in Parkinson's disease. Phytomedicine 150:157758. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2025.157758, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu X., Cheng Y., Liu X., Ding W., Zhu Z., Wu L., et al. (2026). Microbial SCFAs as epigenetic mediators: fine-tuning the gut-brain axis in neurodegenerative disorders. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 10:100574. doi: 10.1016/j.crmicr.2026.100574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu J., Liang R., Zhang W., Tian K., Li J., Chen X., et al. (2020). Faecalibacterium prausnitzii-derived microbial anti-inflammatory molecule regulates intestinal integrity in diabetes mellitus mice via modulating tight junction protein expression. J. Diabetes 12, 224–236. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12986, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yan J., Chen H., Zhang Y., Peng L., Wang Z., Lan X., et al. (2024). Fecal microbiota transplantation significantly improved respiratory failure of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Gut Microbes 16:2353396. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2024.2353396, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang B., Jiang T., Li Y., Liu Y., Lin Z., Fang Y., et al. (2025). Changes in gut microbiota and plasma metabolites in Parkinson's disease patients with pain as analyzed by 16S rDNA sequencing and LC-MS. Brain Res. 1866:149948. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2025.149948, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yoo D. Y., Kim W., Nam S. M., Kim D. W., Chung J. Y., Choi S. Y., et al. (2011). Synergistic effects of sodium butyrate, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, on increase of neurogenesis induced by pyridoxine and increase of neural proliferation in the mouse dentate gyrus. Neurochem. Res. 36, 1850–1857. doi: 10.1007/s11064-011-0503-5, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang F., Ding K., Zhang L. M., Liu D. Y., Dong X., Wang M. N., et al. (2025). The role of the gut microbiota in neuropsychiatric disorders and therapy. Ageing Res. Rev. 112:102894. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2025.102894, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J., Huang Y. J., Yoon J. Y., Kemmitt J., Wright C., Schneider K., et al. (2021). Primary human colonic mucosal barrier crosstalk with super oxygen-sensitive Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in continuous culture. Med 2, 74–98.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2020.07.001, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang X., Wang Y., Liu W., Wang T., Wang L., Hao L., et al. (2021). Diet quality, gut microbiota, and microRNAs associated with mild cognitive impairment in middle-aged and elderly Chinese population. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 114, 429–440. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab078, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y., Wei Y., Han X., Shi L., Yu H., Ji X., et al. (2025). Faecalibacterium prausnitzii prevents age-related heart failure by suppressing ferroptosis in cardiomyocytes through butyrate-mediated LCN2 regulation. Gut Microbes 17:2505119. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2025.2505119, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng T., Meng C., Lv Z., Wu C., Zhou X., Mao W. (2025). The critical role of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in cardiovascular diseases. Rev. Cardiovasc. Med. 26:26740. doi: 10.31083/RCM26740, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou J. Q., Zeng L. H., Li C. T., He D. H., Zhao H. D., Xu Y. N., et al. (2023). Brain organoids are new tool for drug screening of neurological diseases. Neural Regen. Res. 18, 1884–1889. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.367983, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
