Skip to main content
PMC home page
Immunology logoLink to Immunology
. 1990 Jan;69(1):78–84.

Allograft rejection in athymic nude rats by transferred T-cell subsets. I. The response of naive CD4+ and CD8+ thoracic duct lymphocytes to complete allogeneic incompatibilities.

E H Whitby 1, S M Sparshott 1, E B Bell 1
PMCID: PMC1385723  PMID: 2138126

Abstract

PVG.rnu/rnu nude rats were pre-grafted with two allogeneic skin grafts, AO(RTlu) and BN(RTln), 6-14 days in advance of cell transfer. Cellular requirements for rejection were established by transferring graded numbers of B cell-depleted (Ig-) thoracic duct lymphocytes (TDL) or purified W3/25+ (CD4+) or OX8+ (CD8+) TDL subsets. Allografts were rejected by 10(5) to 5 x 10(6) Ig- TDL in a dose-dependent fashion. A similar dose-response relationship was found by transferring 5 x 10(5) to 5 x 10(6) Ig- OX8- TDL (purified by depletion of B cells and OX8+ cells). Larger numbers of Ig- OX8- TDL (10-30 x 10(6)) did not significantly accelerate rejection. W3/25+ TDL alone (10(5)), highly purified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), were sufficient to induce allograft rejection in this athymic nude rat model. In contrast, 10 times more FACS purified OX8+ TDL (10(6)) were unable to initiate skin graft rejection despite the complete class I and class II MHC incompatibilities. Furthermore, the addition of 10(6) OX8+ cells did not accelerate or retard the rejection induced by 10(5) W3/25+ cells alone. Pre-grafted nude recipients, irradiated (500 R) 2 hr before W3/25+ TDL injection, in order to eliminate putative nude T cells, rejected allografts on the same day as unirradiated controls. We conclude that when confronted with complete MHC disparities, CD4+ T cells are necessary and sufficient to induce skin allograft rejection whereas CD8+ T cells do not appear to contribute.

Full text

PDF
84

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ager A., Fajumi J., Sparshott S. M., Ford W. L., Butcher G. W. Major histocompatibility complex control of NK-related allogeneic lymphocyte cytotoxicity in rats. The contributions of strong and medial transplantation antigens. Transplantation. 1988 Nov;46(5):762–767. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198811000-00025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell E. B., Sparshott S. M., Drayson M. T., Ford W. L. The stable and permanent expansion of functional T lymphocytes in athymic nude rats after a single injection of mature T cells. J Immunol. 1987 Sep 1;139(5):1379–1384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bell E. B., Sparshott S. M., Drayson M. T., Hunt S. V. The origin of T cells in permanently reconstituted old athymic nude rats. Analysis using chromosome or allotype markers. Immunology. 1989 Dec;68(4):547–556. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bolton E. M., Gracie J. A., Briggs J. D., Kampinga J., Bradley J. A. Cellular requirements for renal allograft rejection in the athymic nude rat. J Exp Med. 1989 Jun 1;169(6):1931–1946. doi: 10.1084/jem.169.6.1931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Born W., Wekerle H. Lympho-stromal interactions in the thymus: medullary thymocytes react with I-A determinants on autochthonous thymic stimulator cells. Eur J Immunol. 1982 Jan;12(1):51–59. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830120111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cobbold S. P., Jayasuriya A., Nash A., Prospero T. D., Waldmann H. Therapy with monoclonal antibodies by elimination of T-cell subsets in vivo. Nature. 1984 Dec 6;312(5994):548–551. doi: 10.1038/312548a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cobbold S., Waldmann H. Skin allograft rejection by L3/T4+ and Lyt-2+ T cell subsets. Transplantation. 1986 May;41(5):634–639. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198605000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Drayson M. T., Sparshott S. M., Bell E. B. Fidelity of the repertoire in T cell reconstituted athymic nude rats. Preservation of a deficit in alloresponsiveness over one year. J Exp Med. 1989 Sep 1;170(3):691–702. doi: 10.1084/jem.170.3.691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. EVERETT N. B., CAFFREY R. W., RIEKE W. O. RADIOAUTOGRAPHIC STUDIES OF THE EFFECT OF IRRADIATION ON THE LONG-LIVED LYMPHOCYTE OF THE RAT. Radiat Res. 1964 Mar;21:383–393. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fossum S., Ager A., Rolstad B. Specific inhibition of natural killer (NK) activity against different alloantigens. Immunogenetics. 1987;26(6):329–338. doi: 10.1007/BF00343700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fossum S., Smith M. E., Bell E. B., Ford W. L. The architecture of rat lymph nodes. III. The lymph nodes and lymph-borne cells of the congenitally athymic nude rat (rnu). Scand J Immunol. 1980;12(5):421–432. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1980.tb00086.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gillis S., Union N. A., Baker P. E., Smith K. A. The in vitro generation and sustained culture of nude mouse cytolytic T-lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1979 Jun 1;149(6):1460–1476. doi: 10.1084/jem.149.6.1460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hall B. M., Dorsch S., Roser B. The cellular basis of allograft rejection in vivo. I. The cellular requirements for first-set rejection of heart grafts. J Exp Med. 1978 Oct 1;148(4):878–889. doi: 10.1084/jem.148.4.878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hall B. M., Dorsch S., Roser B. The cellular basis of allograft rejection in vivo. II. The nature of memory cells mediating second set heart graft rejection. J Exp Med. 1978 Oct 1;148(4):890–902. doi: 10.1084/jem.148.4.890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hall B. M., de Saxe I., Dorsch S. E. The cellular basis of allograft rejection in vivo. III. Restoration of first-set rejection of heart grafts by T helper cells in irradiated rats. Transplantation. 1983 Dec;36(6):700–705. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198336060-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hünig T., Bevan M. J. Specificity of cytotoxic T cells from athymic mice. J Exp Med. 1980 Sep 1;152(3):688–702. doi: 10.1084/jem.152.3.688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kindred B. Nude mice in immunology. Prog Allergy. 1979;26:137–238. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kishihara K., Yoshikai Y., Matsuzaki G., Mak T. W., Nomoto K. Functional alpha and beta T cell chain receptor messages can be detected in old but not in young athymic mice. Eur J Immunol. 1987 Apr;17(4):477–482. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830170407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kung J. T. Impaired clonal expansion in athymic nude CD8+CD4- T cells. J Immunol. 1988 Jun 1;140(11):3727–3735. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kung J. T., Thomas C. A., 3rd Athymic nude CD4+8- T cells produce IL-2 but fail to proliferate in response to mitogenic stimuli. J Immunol. 1988 Dec 1;141(11):3691–3696. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lawetzky A., Hünig T. Analysis of CD3 and antigen receptor expression on T cell subpopulations of aged athymic mice. Eur J Immunol. 1988 Mar;18(3):409–416. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830180314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. LeFrancois L., Bevan M. J. A reexamination of the role of LYT-2-positive T cells in murine skin graft rejection. J Exp Med. 1984 Jan 1;159(1):57–67. doi: 10.1084/jem.159.1.57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Leo O., Foo M., Forman J., Shivakumar S., Rabinowitz R., Bluestone J. A. Selective expression of the Ly-6C.2 epitope on Lyt-2+ T cells that can develop in the absence of thymic influence. J Immunol. 1988 Jul 1;141(1):37–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Loveland B. E., Hogarth P. M., Ceredig R., McKenzie I. F. Cells mediating graft rejection in the mouse. I. Lyt-1 cells mediate skin graft rejection. J Exp Med. 1981 May 1;153(5):1044–1057. doi: 10.1084/jem.153.5.1044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lowry R. P., Gurley K. E., Forbes R. D. Immune mechanisms in organ allograft rejection. I. Delayed-type hypersensitivity and lymphocytotoxicity in heart graft rejection. Transplantation. 1983 Oct;36(4):391–401. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198310000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. MacDonald H. R., Lees R. K., Bron C., Sordat B., Miescher G. T cell antigen receptor expression in athymic (nu/nu) mice. Evidence for an oligoclonal beta chain repertoire. J Exp Med. 1987 Jul 1;166(1):195–209. doi: 10.1084/jem.166.1.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. MacDonald H. R., Lees R. K., Sordat B., Zaech P., Maryanski J. L., Bron C. Age-associated increase in expression of the T cell surface markers Thy-1, Lyt-1, and Lyt-2 in congenitally athymic (nu/nu) mice: analysis by flow microfluorometry. J Immunol. 1981 Mar;126(3):865–870. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mason D. W., Dallman M. J., Arthur R. P., Morris P. J. Mechanisms of allograft rejection: the roles of cytotoxic T-cells and delayed-type hypersensitivity. Immunol Rev. 1984;77:167–184. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1984.tb00721.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mason D. W., Morris P. J. Effector mechanisms in allograft rejection. Annu Rev Immunol. 1986;4:119–145. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.04.040186.001003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mason D. W., Simmonds S. J. The autonomy of CD8+ T cells in vitro and in vivo. Immunology. 1988 Oct;65(2):249–257. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rolstad B., Fossum S., Bazin H., Kimber I., Marshall J., Sparshott S. M., Ford W. L. The rapid rejection of allogeneic lymphocytes by a non-adaptive, cell-mediated mechanism (NK activity). Immunology. 1985 Jan;54(1):127–138. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rosenberg A. S., Mizuochi T., Sharrow S. O., Singer A. Phenotype, specificity, and function of T cell subsets and T cell interactions involved in skin allograft rejection. J Exp Med. 1987 May 1;165(5):1296–1315. doi: 10.1084/jem.165.5.1296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rosenberg A. S., Mizuochi T., Singer A. Analysis of T-cell subsets in rejection of Kb mutant skin allografts differing at class I MHC. 1986 Aug 28-Sep 3Nature. 322(6082):829–831. doi: 10.1038/322829a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sprent J., Schaefer M., Lo D., Korngold R. Properties of purified T cell subsets. II. In vivo responses to class I vs. class II H-2 differences. J Exp Med. 1986 Apr 1;163(4):998–1011. doi: 10.1084/jem.163.4.998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Steinmuller D. Which T cells mediate allograft rejection? Transplantation. 1985 Sep;40(3):229–233. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198509000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Vaessen L. M., Broekhuizen R., Rozing J., Vos J. G., Schuurman H. J. T-cell development during ageing in congenitally athymic (nude) rats. Scand J Immunol. 1986 Aug;24(2):223–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1986.tb02089.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Van Vliet E., Jenkinson E. J., Kingston R., Owen J. J., Van Ewijk W. Stromal cell types in the developing thymus of the normal and nude mouse embryo. Eur J Immunol. 1985 Jul;15(7):675–681. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830150707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ward J. M., Argilan F., Reynolds C. W. Immunoperoxidase localization of large granular lymphocytes in normal tissues and lesions of athymic nude rats. J Immunol. 1983 Jul;131(1):132–139. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wortis H. H., Nehlsen S., Owen J. J. Abnormal development of the thymus in "nude" mice. J Exp Med. 1971 Sep 1;134(3 Pt 1):681–692. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.3.681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES