Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1999 Feb;151(2):885–894. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.2.885

Multiple-trait mapping of quantitative trait loci after selective genotyping using logistic regression.

J M Henshall 1, M E Goddard 1
PMCID: PMC1460505  PMID: 9927477

Abstract

Experiments to map QTL usually measure several traits, and not uncommonly genotype only those animals that are extreme for some trait(s). Analysis of selectively genotyped, multiple-trait data presents special problems, and most simple methods lead to biased estimates of the QTL effects. The use of logistic regression to estimate QTL effects is described, where the genotype is treated as the dependent variable and the phenotype as the independent variable. In this way selection on phenotype does not bias the results. If normally distributed errors are assumed, the logistic-regression analysis is almost equivalent to a maximum-likelihood analysis, but can be carried out with standard statistical packages. Analysis of a simulated half-sib experiment shows that logistic regression can estimate the effect and position of a QTL without bias and confirms the increased power achieved by multiple-trait analysis.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (147.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Churchill G. A., Doerge R. W. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):963–971. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Haley C. S., Knott S. A. A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity (Edinb) 1992 Oct;69(4):315–324. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1992.131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jansen R. C., Johnson D. L., Van Arendonk J. A. A mixture model approach to the mapping of quantitative trait loci in complex populations with an application to multiple cattle families. Genetics. 1998 Jan;148(1):391–399. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.1.391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jiang C., Zeng Z. B. Multiple trait analysis of genetic mapping for quantitative trait loci. Genetics. 1995 Jul;140(3):1111–1127. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.3.1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Korol A. B., Ronin Y. I., Kirzhner V. M. Interval mapping of quantitative trait loci employing correlated trait complexes. Genetics. 1995 Jul;140(3):1137–1147. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.3.1137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lander E. S., Botstein D. Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics. 1989 Jan;121(1):185–199. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.1.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Stuber C. W., Moll R. H., Goodman M. M., Schaffer H. E., Weir B. S. Allozyme Frequency Changes Associated with Selection for Increased Grain Yield in Maize (ZEA MAYS L.). Genetics. 1980 May;95(1):225–236. doi: 10.1093/genetics/95.1.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Weller J. I., Kashi Y., Soller M. Power of daughter and granddaughter designs for determining linkage between marker loci and quantitative trait loci in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 1990 Sep;73(9):2525–2537. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78938-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Zeng Z. B. Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics. 1994 Apr;136(4):1457–1468. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.4.1457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES