Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1999 Aug;152(4):1449–1457. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.4.1449

Genetic analysis of the bacteriophage T4-encoded cochaperonin Gp31.

A Richardson 1, C Georgopoulos 1
PMCID: PMC1460690  PMID: 10430575

Abstract

Previous genetic and biochemical analyses have established that the bacteriophage T4-encoded Gp31 is a cochaperonin that interacts with Escherichia coli's GroEL to ensure the timely and accurate folding of Gp23, the bacteriophage-encoded major capsid protein. The heptameric Gp31 cochaperonin, like the E. coli GroES cochaperonin, interacts with GroEL primarily through its unstructured mobile loop segment. Upon binding to GroEL, the mobile loop adopts a structured, beta-hairpin turn. In this article, we present extensive genetic data that strongly substantiate and extend these biochemical studies. These studies begin with the isolation of mutations in gene 31 based on the ability to plaque on groEL44 mutant bacteria, whose mutant product interacts weakly with Gp31. Our genetic system is unique because it also allows for the direct selection of revertants of such gene 31 mutations, based on their ability to plaque on groEL515 mutant bacteria. Interestingly, all of these revertants are pseudorevertants because the original 31 mutation is maintained. In addition, we show that the classical tsA70 mutation in gene 31 changes a conserved hydrophobic residue in the mobile loop to a hydrophilic one. Pseudorevertants of tsA70, which enable growth at the restrictive temperatures, acquire the same mutation previously shown to allow plaque formation on groEL44 mutant bacteria. Our genetic analyses highlight the crucial importance of all three highly conserved hydrophobic residues of the mobile loop of Gp31 in the productive interaction with GroEL.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (207.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andreadis J. D., Black L. W. Substrate mutations that bypass a specific Cpn10 chaperonin requirement for protein folding. J Biol Chem. 1998 Dec 18;273(51):34075–34086. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.51.34075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Coppo A., Manzi A., Pulitzer J. F., Takahashi H. Abortive bacteriophage T4 head assembly in mutants of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1973 May 5;76(1):61–87. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90081-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ewalt K. L., Hendrick J. P., Houry W. A., Hartl F. U. In vivo observation of polypeptide flux through the bacterial chaperonin system. Cell. 1997 Aug 8;90(3):491–500. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80509-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fayet O., Ziegelhoffer T., Georgopoulos C. The groES and groEL heat shock gene products of Escherichia coli are essential for bacterial growth at all temperatures. J Bacteriol. 1989 Mar;171(3):1379–1385. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.3.1379-1385.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Georgopoulos C. P. Bacterial mutants in which the gene N function of bacteriophage lambda is blocked have an altered RNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Dec;68(12):2977–2981. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.12.2977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Georgopoulos C. P., Hendrix R. W., Casjens S. R., Kaiser A. D. Host participation in bacteriophage lambda head assembly. J Mol Biol. 1973 May 5;76(1):45–60. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90080-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Georgopoulos C. P., Hendrix R. W., Kaiser A. D., Wood W. B. Role of the host cell in bacteriophage morphogenesis: effects of a bacterial mutation on T4 head assembly. Nat New Biol. 1972 Sep 13;239(89):38–41. doi: 10.1038/newbio239038a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hanahan D. Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J Mol Biol. 1983 Jun 5;166(4):557–580. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80284-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Horwich A. L., Low K. B., Fenton W. A., Hirshfield I. N., Furtak K. Folding in vivo of bacterial cytoplasmic proteins: role of GroEL. Cell. 1993 Sep 10;74(5):909–917. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90470-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hunt J. F., Weaver A. J., Landry S. J., Gierasch L., Deisenhofer J. The crystal structure of the GroES co-chaperonin at 2.8 A resolution. Nature. 1996 Jan 4;379(6560):37–45. doi: 10.1038/379037a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hunt J. F., van der Vies S. M., Henry L., Deisenhofer J. Structural adaptations in the specialized bacteriophage T4 co-chaperonin Gp31 expand the size of the Anfinsen cage. Cell. 1997 Jul 25;90(2):361–371. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80343-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kandror O., Sherman M., Rhode M., Goldberg A. L. Trigger factor is involved in GroEL-dependent protein degradation in Escherichia coli and promotes binding of GroEL to unfolded proteins. EMBO J. 1995 Dec 1;14(23):6021–6027. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00290.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Keppel F., Lipinska B., Ang D., Georgopoulos C. Mutational analysis of the phage T4 morphogenetic 31 gene, whose product interacts with the Escherichia coli GroEL protein. Gene. 1990 Jan 31;86(1):19–25. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90109-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Koonin E. V., van der Vies S. M. Conserved sequence motifs in bacterial and bacteriophage chaperonins. Trends Biochem Sci. 1995 Jan;20(1):14–15. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)88941-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kunkel T. A., Bebenek K., McClary J. Efficient site-directed mutagenesis using uracil-containing DNA. Methods Enzymol. 1991;204:125–139. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)04008-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Laemmli U. K., Beguin F., Gujer-Kellenberger G. A factor preventing the major head protein of bacteriophage T4 from random aggregation. J Mol Biol. 1970 Jan 14;47(1):69–85. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90402-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Landry S. J., Taher A., Georgopoulos C., van der Vies S. M. Interplay of structure and disorder in cochaperonin mobile loops. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Oct 15;93(21):11622–11627. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.21.11622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Landry S. J., Zeilstra-Ryalls J., Fayet O., Georgopoulos C., Gierasch L. M. Characterization of a functionally important mobile domain of GroES. Nature. 1993 Jul 15;364(6434):255–258. doi: 10.1038/364255a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mayer M. P. A new set of useful cloning and expression vectors derived from pBlueScript. Gene. 1995 Sep 22;163(1):41–46. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00389-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Netzer W. J., Hartl F. U. Protein folding in the cytosol: chaperonin-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Trends Biochem Sci. 1998 Feb;23(2):68–73. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(97)01171-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Repoila F., Tétart F., Bouet J. Y., Krisch H. M. Genomic polymorphism in the T-even bacteriophages. EMBO J. 1994 Sep 1;13(17):4181–4192. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06736.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Revel H. R., Stitt B. L., Lielausis I., Wood W. B. Role of the host cell in bacteriophage T4 development. I. Characterization of host mutants that block T4 head assembly. J Virol. 1980 Jan;33(1):366–376. doi: 10.1128/jvi.33.1.366-376.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Richardson A., Landry S. J., Georgopoulos C. The ins and outs of a molecular chaperone machine. Trends Biochem Sci. 1998 Apr;23(4):138–143. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(98)01193-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Richardson A., van der Vies S. M., Keppel F., Taher A., Landry S. J., Georgopoulos C. Compensatory changes in GroEL/Gp31 affinity as a mechanism for allele-specific genetic interaction. J Biol Chem. 1999 Jan 1;274(1):52–58. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.1.52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shinedling S., Singer B. S., Gayle M., Pribnow D., Jarvis E., Edgar B., Gold L. Sequences and studies of bacteriophage T4 rII mutants. J Mol Biol. 1987 Jun 5;195(3):471–480. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90176-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sigler P. B., Xu Z., Rye H. S., Burston S. G., Fenton W. A., Horwich A. L. Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding. Annu Rev Biochem. 1998;67:581–608. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Spee J. H., de Vos W. M., Kuipers O. P. Efficient random mutagenesis method with adjustable mutation frequency by use of PCR and dITP. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Feb 11;21(3):777–778. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.3.777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sternberg N. Properties of a mutant of Escherichia coli defective in bacteriophage lambda head formation (groE). II. The propagation of phage lambda. J Mol Biol. 1973 May 5;76(1):25–44. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90079-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Takano T., Kakefuda T. Involvement of a bacterial factor in morphogenesis of bacteriophage capsid. Nat New Biol. 1972 Sep 13;239(89):34–37. doi: 10.1038/newbio239034a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tilly K., Murialdo H., Georgopoulos C. Identification of a second Escherichia coli groE gene whose product is necessary for bacteriophage morphogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Mar;78(3):1629–1633. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.3.1629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Xu Z., Horwich A. L., Sigler P. B. The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex. Nature. 1997 Aug 21;388(6644):741–750. doi: 10.1038/41944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zeilstra-Ryalls J., Fayet O., Baird L., Georgopoulos C. Sequence analysis and phenotypic characterization of groEL mutations that block lambda and T4 bacteriophage growth. J Bacteriol. 1993 Feb;175(4):1134–1143. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.4.1134-1143.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zeilstra-Ryalls J., Fayet O., Georgopoulos C. The universally conserved GroE (Hsp60) chaperonins. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1991;45:301–325. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.45.100191.001505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhou Y. H., Zhang X. P., Ebright R. H. Random mutagenesis of gene-sized DNA molecules by use of PCR with Taq DNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Nov 11;19(21):6052–6052. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.21.6052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. van der Vies S. M., Gatenby A. A., Georgopoulos C. Bacteriophage T4 encodes a co-chaperonin that can substitute for Escherichia coli GroES in protein folding. Nature. 1994 Apr 14;368(6472):654–656. doi: 10.1038/368654a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES