Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2000 Mar;154(3):1379–1387. doi: 10.1093/genetics/154.3.1379

The degeneration of asexual haploid populations and the speed of Muller's ratchet.

I Gordo 1, B Charlesworth 1
PMCID: PMC1460994  PMID: 10757777

Abstract

The accumulation of deleterious mutations due to the process known as Muller's ratchet can lead to the degeneration of nonrecombining populations. We present an analytical approximation for the rate at which this process is expected to occur in a haploid population. The approximation is based on a diffusion equation and is valid when N exp(-u/s) >> 1, where N is the population size, u is the rate at which deleterious mutations occur, and s is the effect of each mutation on fitness. Simulation results are presented to show that the approximation estimates the rate of the process better than previous approximations for values of mutation rates and selection coefficients that are compatible with the biological data. Under certain conditions, the ratchet can turn at a biologically significant rate when the deterministic equilibrium number of individuals free of mutations is substantially >100. The relevance of this process for the degeneration of Y or neo-Y chromosomes is discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (179.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Butcher D. Muller's ratchet, epistasis and mutation effects. Genetics. 1995 Sep;141(1):431–437. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.1.431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Charlesworth B., Charlesworth D. Rapid fixation of deleterious alleles can be caused by Muller's ratchet. Genet Res. 1997 Aug;70(1):63–73. doi: 10.1017/s0016672397002899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Charlesworth B. The evolution of chromosomal sex determination and dosage compensation. Curr Biol. 1996 Feb 1;6(2):149–162. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00448-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Drake J. W., Charlesworth B., Charlesworth D., Crow J. F. Rates of spontaneous mutation. Genetics. 1998 Apr;148(4):1667–1686. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.4.1667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Felsenstein J. The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics. 1974 Oct;78(2):737–756. doi: 10.1093/genetics/78.2.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fry J. D., Keightley P. D., Heinsohn S. L., Nuzhdin S. V. New estimates of the rates and effects of mildly deleterious mutation in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jan 19;96(2):574–579. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.2.574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gessler D. D. The constraints of finite size in asexual populations and the rate of the ratchet. Genet Res. 1995 Dec;66(3):241–253. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300034686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gessler D. D., Xu S. On the evolution of recombination and meiosis. Genet Res. 1999 Apr;73(2):119–131. doi: 10.1017/s001667239800367x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Haigh J. The accumulation of deleterious genes in a population--Muller's Ratchet. Theor Popul Biol. 1978 Oct;14(2):251–267. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(78)90027-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Keightley P. D. Nature of deleterious mutation load in Drosophila. Genetics. 1996 Dec;144(4):1993–1999. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.4.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kimura M., Maruyama T. The mutational load with epistatic gene interactions in fitness. Genetics. 1966 Dec;54(6):1337–1351. doi: 10.1093/genetics/54.6.1337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kondrashov A. S. Muller's ratchet under epistatic selection. Genetics. 1994 Apr;136(4):1469–1473. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.4.1469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lahn B. T., Page D. C. Four evolutionary strata on the human X chromosome. Science. 1999 Oct 29;286(5441):964–967. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5441.964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lynch M., Bürger R., Butcher D., Gabriel W. The mutational meltdown in asexual populations. J Hered. 1993 Sep-Oct;84(5):339–344. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Orr H. A., Kim Y. An adaptive hypothesis for the evolution of the Y chromosome. Genetics. 1998 Dec;150(4):1693–1698. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.4.1693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pamilo P., Nei M., Li W. H. Accumulation of mutations in sexual and asexual populations. Genet Res. 1987 Apr;49(2):135–146. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300026938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Prügel-Bennett A. Modelling evolving populations. J Theor Biol. 1997 Mar 7;185(1):81–95. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1996.0295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rice W. R. Degeneration of a nonrecombining chromosome. Science. 1994 Jan 14;263(5144):230–232. doi: 10.1126/science.8284674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Steinemann M., Steinemann S. Enigma of Y chromosome degeneration: neo-Y and neo-X chromosomes of Drosophila miranda a model for sex chromosome evolution. Genetica. 1998;102-103(1-6):409–420. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Steinemann M., Steinemann S., Lottspeich F. How Y chromosomes become genetically inert. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jun 15;90(12):5737–5741. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.12.5737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Steinemann S., Steinemann M. The Amylase gene cluster on the evolving sex chromosomes of Drosophila miranda. Genetics. 1999 Jan;151(1):151–161. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.1.151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stephan W., Chao L., Smale J. G. The advance of Muller's ratchet in a haploid asexual population: approximate solutions based on diffusion theory. Genet Res. 1993 Jun;61(3):225–231. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300031384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES