Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2000 Jun;155(2):909–919. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.2.909

Genetic drift in an infinite population. The pseudohitchhiking model.

J H Gillespie 1
PMCID: PMC1461093  PMID: 10835409

Abstract

Selected substitutions at one locus can induce stochastic dynamics that resemble genetic drift at a closely linked neutral locus. The pseudohitchhiking model is a one-locus model that approximates these effects and can be used to describe the major consequences of linked selection. As the changes in neutral allele frequencies when hitchhiking are rapid, diffusion theory is not appropriate for studying neutral dynamics. A stationary distribution and some results on substitution processes are presented that use the theory of continuous-time Markov processes with discontinuous sample paths. The coalescent of the pseudohitchhiking model is shown to have a random number of branches at each node, which leads to a frequency spectrum that is different from that of the equilibrium neutral model. If genetic draft, the name given to these induced stochastic effects, is a more important stochastic force than genetic drift, then a number of paradoxes that have plagued population genetics disappear.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (149.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aguade M., Miyashita N., Langley C. H. Reduced variation in the yellow-achaete-scute region in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1989 Jul;122(3):607–615. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.3.607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster. Nature. 1992 Apr 9;356(6369):519–520. doi: 10.1038/356519a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berry A. J., Ajioka J. W., Kreitman M. Lack of polymorphism on the Drosophila fourth chromosome resulting from selection. Genetics. 1991 Dec;129(4):1111–1117. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.4.1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Braverman J. M., Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L., Langley C. H., Stephan W. The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms. Genetics. 1995 Jun;140(2):783–796. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.2.783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T., Charlesworth D. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics. 1993 Aug;134(4):1289–1303. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.4.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Charlesworth B. The effect of background selection against deleterious mutations on weakly selected, linked variants. Genet Res. 1994 Jun;63(3):213–227. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300032365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gillespie J. H. Junk ain't what junk does: neutral alleles in a selected context. Gene. 1997 Dec 31;205(1-2):291–299. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00470-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gillespie J. H. Substitution processes in molecular evolution. I. Uniform and clustered substitutions in a haploid model. Genetics. 1993 Jul;134(3):971–981. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.3.971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gillespie J. H. The role of population size in molecular evolution. Theor Popul Biol. 1999 Apr;55(2):145–156. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1998.1391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaplan N. L., Hudson R. R., Langley C. H. The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):887–899. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kimura M., Ohta T. Protein polymorphism as a phase of molecular evolution. Nature. 1971 Feb 12;229(5285):467–469. doi: 10.1038/229467a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lewontin R C, Dunn L C. The Evolutionary Dynamics of a Polymorphism in the House Mouse. Genetics. 1960 Jun;45(6):705–722. doi: 10.1093/genetics/45.6.705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Miyashita N. T. Molecular and phenotypic variation of the Zw locus region in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1990 Jun;125(2):407–419. doi: 10.1093/genetics/125.2.407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ohta T., Tachida H. Theoretical study of near neutrality. I. Heterozygosity and rate of mutant substitution. Genetics. 1990 Sep;126(1):219–229. doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.1.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Smith J. M., Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):585–595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Takahata N., Ishii K., Matsuda H. Effect of temporal fluctuation of selection coefficient on gene frequency in a population. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Nov;72(11):4541–4545. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.11.4541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. WRIGHT S. Classification of the factors of evolution. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1955;20:16–24D. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1955.020.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Watterson G. A. On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1975 Apr;7(2):256–276. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES