Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2000 Aug;155(4):1577–1591. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.4.1577

Checkpoint proteins influence telomeric silencing and length maintenance in budding yeast.

M P Longhese 1, V Paciotti 1, H Neecke 1, G Lucchini 1
PMCID: PMC1461196  PMID: 10924458

Abstract

A complex network of surveillance mechanisms, called checkpoints, interrupts cell cycle progression when damage to the genome is detected or when cells fail to complete DNA replication, thus ensuring genetic integrity. In budding yeast, components of the DNA damage checkpoint regulatory network include the RAD9, RAD17, RAD24, MEC3, DDC1, RAD53, and MEC1 genes that are proposed to be involved in different aspects of DNA metabolism. We provide evidence that some DNA damage checkpoint components play a role in maintaining telomere integrity. In fact, rad53 mutants specifically enhance repression of telomere-proximal transcription via the Sir-mediated pathway, suggesting that Rad53 might be required for proper chromatin structure at telomeres. Moreover, Rad53, Mec1, Ddc1, and Rad17 are necessary for telomere length maintenance, since mutations in all of these genes cause a decrease in telomere size. The telomeric shortening in rad53 and mec1 mutants is further enhanced in the absence of SIR genes, suggesting that Rad53/Mec1 and Sir proteins contribute to chromosome end protection by different pathways. The finding that telomere shortening, but not increased telomeric repression of gene expression in rad53 mutants, can be suppressed by increasing dNTP synthetic capacity in these strains suggests that transcriptional silencing and telomere integrity involve separable functions of Rad53.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (516.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aparicio O. M., Billington B. L., Gottschling D. E. Modifiers of position effect are shared between telomeric and silent mating-type loci in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1991 Sep 20;66(6):1279–1287. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90049-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Araki H., Leem S. H., Phongdara A., Sugino A. Dpb11, which interacts with DNA polymerase II(epsilon) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, has a dual role in S-phase progression and at a cell cycle checkpoint. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Dec 5;92(25):11791–11795. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.25.11791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Axelrod A., Rine J. A role for CDC7 in repression of transcription at the silent mating-type locus HMR in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Feb;11(2):1080–1091. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.2.1080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bentley N. J., Holtzman D. A., Flaggs G., Keegan K. S., DeMaggio A., Ford J. C., Hoekstra M., Carr A. M. The Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad3 checkpoint gene. EMBO J. 1996 Dec 2;15(23):6641–6651. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boulton S. J., Jackson S. P. Components of the Ku-dependent non-homologous end-joining pathway are involved in telomeric length maintenance and telomeric silencing. EMBO J. 1998 Mar 16;17(6):1819–1828. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.6.1819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Corda Y., Schramke V., Longhese M. P., Smokvina T., Paciotti V., Brevet V., Gilson E., Géli V. Interaction between Set1p and checkpoint protein Mec3p in DNA repair and telomere functions. Nat Genet. 1999 Feb;21(2):204–208. doi: 10.1038/5991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Craven R. J., Petes T. D. Involvement of the checkpoint protein Mec1p in silencing of gene expression at telomeres in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 2000 Apr;20(7):2378–2384. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.7.2378-2384.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dahlen M., Olsson T., Kanter-Smoler G., Ramne A., Sunnerhagen P. Regulation of telomere length by checkpoint genes in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Biol Cell. 1998 Mar;9(3):611–621. doi: 10.1091/mbc.9.3.611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Desany B. A., Alcasabas A. A., Bachant J. B., Elledge S. J. Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes Dev. 1998 Sep 15;12(18):2956–2970. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.18.2956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ehrenhofer-Murray A. E., Kamakaka R. T., Rine J. A role for the replication proteins PCNA, RF-C, polymerase epsilon and Cdc45 in transcriptional silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1999 Nov;153(3):1171–1182. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.3.1171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Emili A. MEC1-dependent phosphorylation of Rad9p in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell. 1998 Aug;2(2):183–189. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80128-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gietz R. D., Sugino A. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene. 1988 Dec 30;74(2):527–534. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90185-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gottschling D. E., Aparicio O. M., Billington B. L., Zakian V. A. Position effect at S. cerevisiae telomeres: reversible repression of Pol II transcription. Cell. 1990 Nov 16;63(4):751–762. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90141-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gottschling D. E. Telomere-proximal DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is refractory to methyltransferase activity in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 May 1;89(9):4062–4065. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.9.4062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Greenwell P. W., Kronmal S. L., Porter S. E., Gassenhuber J., Obermaier B., Petes T. D. TEL1, a gene involved in controlling telomere length in S. cerevisiae, is homologous to the human ataxia telangiectasia gene. Cell. 1995 Sep 8;82(5):823–829. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90479-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hartwell L. H., Weinert T. A. Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science. 1989 Nov 3;246(4930):629–634. doi: 10.1126/science.2683079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Huang H., Kahana A., Gottschling D. E., Prakash L., Liebman S. W. The ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Rad6 (Ubc2) is required for silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Nov;17(11):6693–6699. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.11.6693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ivy J. M., Klar A. J., Hicks J. B. Cloning and characterization of four SIR genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Feb;6(2):688–702. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.2.688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jeggo P. A., Taccioli G. E., Jackson S. P. Menage à trois: double strand break repair, V(D)J recombination and DNA-PK. Bioessays. 1995 Nov;17(11):949–957. doi: 10.1002/bies.950171108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kayne P. S., Kim U. J., Han M., Mullen J. R., Yoshizaki F., Grunstein M. Extremely conserved histone H4 N terminus is dispensable for growth but essential for repressing the silent mating loci in yeast. Cell. 1988 Oct 7;55(1):27–39. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90006-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kondo T., Matsumoto K., Sugimoto K. Role of a complex containing Rad17, Mec3, and Ddc1 in the yeast DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Feb;19(2):1136–1143. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.2.1136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kyrion G., Boakye K. A., Lustig A. J. C-terminal truncation of RAP1 results in the deregulation of telomere size, stability, and function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Nov;12(11):5159–5173. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.11.5159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kyrion G., Liu K., Liu C., Lustig A. J. RAP1 and telomere structure regulate telomere position effects in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 1993 Jul;7(7A):1146–1159. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.7a.1146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Laman H., Balderes D., Shore D. Disturbance of normal cell cycle progression enhances the establishment of transcriptional silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Jul;15(7):3608–3617. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.7.3608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Laroche T., Martin S. G., Gotta M., Gorham H. C., Pryde F. E., Louis E. J., Gasser S. M. Mutation of yeast Ku genes disrupts the subnuclear organization of telomeres. Curr Biol. 1998 May 21;8(11):653–656. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70252-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Longhese M. P., Foiani M., Muzi-Falconi M., Lucchini G., Plevani P. DNA damage checkpoint in budding yeast. EMBO J. 1998 Oct 1;17(19):5525–5528. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.19.5525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Longhese M. P., Fraschini R., Plevani P., Lucchini G. Yeast pip3/mec3 mutants fail to delay entry into S phase and to slow DNA replication in response to DNA damage, and they define a functional link between Mec3 and DNA primase. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Jul;16(7):3235–3244. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.7.3235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Longhese M. P., Paciotti V., Fraschini R., Zaccarini R., Plevani P., Lucchini G. The novel DNA damage checkpoint protein ddc1p is phosphorylated periodically during the cell cycle and in response to DNA damage in budding yeast. EMBO J. 1997 Sep 1;16(17):5216–5226. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.17.5216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Loo S., Rine J. Silencing and heritable domains of gene expression. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1995;11:519–548. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.11.110195.002511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Matsuura A., Naito T., Ishikawa F. Genetic control of telomere integrity in Schizosaccharomyces pombe: rad3(+) and tel1(+) are parts of two regulatory networks independent of the downstream protein kinases chk1(+) and cds1(+). Genetics. 1999 Aug;152(4):1501–1512. doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.4.1501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mills K. D., Sinclair D. A., Guarente L. MEC1-dependent redistribution of the Sir3 silencing protein from telomeres to DNA double-strand breaks. Cell. 1999 May 28;97(5):609–620. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80772-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Morrow D. M., Tagle D. A., Shiloh Y., Collins F. S., Hieter P. TEL1, an S. cerevisiae homolog of the human gene mutated in ataxia telangiectasia, is functionally related to the yeast checkpoint gene MEC1. Cell. 1995 Sep 8;82(5):831–840. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90480-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Naito T., Matsuura A., Ishikawa F. Circular chromosome formation in a fission yeast mutant defective in two ATM homologues. Nat Genet. 1998 Oct;20(2):203–206. doi: 10.1038/2517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Navas T. A., Zhou Z., Elledge S. J. DNA polymerase epsilon links the DNA replication machinery to the S phase checkpoint. Cell. 1995 Jan 13;80(1):29–39. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90448-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Noskov V. N., Araki H., Sugino A. The RFC2 gene, encoding the third-largest subunit of the replication factor C complex, is required for an S-phase checkpoint in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1998 Aug;18(8):4914–4923. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.8.4914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nugent C. I., Lundblad V. The telomerase reverse transcriptase: components and regulation. Genes Dev. 1998 Apr 15;12(8):1073–1085. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.8.1073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Paciotti V., Lucchini G., Plevani P., Longhese M. P. Mec1p is essential for phosphorylation of the yeast DNA damage checkpoint protein Ddc1p, which physically interacts with Mec3p. EMBO J. 1998 Jul 15;17(14):4199–4209. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.14.4199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Palladino F., Laroche T., Gilson E., Axelrod A., Pillus L., Gasser S. M. SIR3 and SIR4 proteins are required for the positioning and integrity of yeast telomeres. Cell. 1993 Nov 5;75(3):543–555. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90388-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Paulovich A. G., Toczyski D. P., Hartwell L. H. When checkpoints fail. Cell. 1997 Feb 7;88(3):315–321. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81870-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pellicioli A., Lucca C., Liberi G., Marini F., Lopes M., Plevani P., Romano A., Di Fiore P. P., Foiani M. Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymerase. EMBO J. 1999 Nov 15;18(22):6561–6572. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.22.6561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ritchie K. B., Mallory J. C., Petes T. D. Interactions of TLC1 (which encodes the RNA subunit of telomerase), TEL1, and MEC1 in regulating telomere length in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Sep;19(9):6065–6075. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.9.6065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sanchez Y., Desany B. A., Jones W. J., Liu Q., Wang B., Elledge S. J. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science. 1996 Jan 19;271(5247):357–360. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5247.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Savitsky K., Bar-Shira A., Gilad S., Rotman G., Ziv Y., Vanagaite L., Tagle D. A., Smith S., Uziel T., Sfez S. A single ataxia telangiectasia gene with a product similar to PI-3 kinase. Science. 1995 Jun 23;268(5218):1749–1753. doi: 10.1126/science.7792600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Singer M. S., Kahana A., Wolf A. J., Meisinger L. L., Peterson S. E., Goggin C., Mahowald M., Gottschling D. E. Identification of high-copy disruptors of telomeric silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1998 Oct;150(2):613–632. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.2.613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sugimoto K., Ando S., Shimomura T., Matsumoto K. Rfc5, a replication factor C component, is required for regulation of Rad53 protein kinase in the yeast checkpoint pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Oct;17(10):5905–5914. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.10.5905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sugimoto K., Shimomura T., Hashimoto K., Araki H., Sugino A., Matsumoto K. Rfc5, a small subunit of replication factor C complex, couples DNA replication and mitosis in budding yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jul 9;93(14):7048–7052. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.14.7048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sun Z., Hsiao J., Fay D. S., Stern D. F. Rad53 FHA domain associated with phosphorylated Rad9 in the DNA damage checkpoint. Science. 1998 Jul 10;281(5374):272–274. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5374.272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tsukamoto Y., Kato J., Ikeda H. Silencing factors participate in DNA repair and recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 1997 Aug 28;388(6645):900–903. doi: 10.1038/42288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Vialard J. E., Gilbert C. S., Green C. M., Lowndes N. F. The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage. EMBO J. 1998 Oct 1;17(19):5679–5688. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.19.5679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wach A., Brachat A., Pöhlmann R., Philippsen P. New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1994 Dec;10(13):1793–1808. doi: 10.1002/yea.320101310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Weinert T. DNA damage and checkpoint pathways: molecular anatomy and interactions with repair. Cell. 1998 Sep 4;94(5):555–558. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81597-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wellinger R. J., Ethier K., Labrecque P., Zakian V. A. Evidence for a new step in telomere maintenance. Cell. 1996 May 3;85(3):423–433. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81120-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zakian V. A. Telomeres: beginning to understand the end. Science. 1995 Dec 8;270(5242):1601–1607. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5242.1601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhao X., Muller E. G., Rothstein R. A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Mol Cell. 1998 Sep;2(3):329–340. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80277-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Zheng P., Fay D. S., Burton J., Xiao H., Pinkham J. L., Stern D. F. SPK1 is an essential S-phase-specific gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that encodes a nuclear serine/threonine/tyrosine kinase. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Sep;13(9):5829–5842. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.9.5829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES